ReportWire

Tag: human evolution

  • Timeline of Human Evolution Now in Question Thanks to Unearthed Skull Found in China

    [ad_1]

    NEED TO KNOW

    • Researchers believe a skull unearthed in 1990 suggests the emergence of the human species occurred 400,000 years earlier than previously believed

    • The fossil was discovered in China’s Hubei Province

    • Scientists digitally reconstructed the fossilized skull, which is between 940,000 and 1.1 million years old, to aid their research

    A human skull found in 1990 is now changing scientists’ understanding of human evolution.

    In a study published in the journal Science on Sept. 25, researchers determined that an ancient skull unearthed in China’s Hubei Province over 30 years ago may push back knowledge of the emergence of the human species by 400,000 years.

    When discovered, the skull — called Yunxian 2 — was crushed and deformed as a result of the fossilization process, making it difficult for researchers to understand its significance.

    “We decided to study this fossil again because it has reliable geological dating and is one of the few million-year-old human fossils,” the study’s first author, Xiaobo Feng, a professor at Shanxi University in China, told CNN in a statement. “A fossil of this age is critical for rebuilding our family tree.”

    Paleoanthropologist Xijun Ni of Fudan University and the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, digitally reconstructed the fossil and determined that the skull, which is between 940,000 and over a million years old, seems to be the oldest-known member of the evolutionary lineage that includes the Denisovans.

    The Denisovans are an extinct subspecies of archaic humans, which were discovered in 2010 after researchers found a fossilized finger in the Denisova Cave in Siberia. They are believed to have lived across much of Asia.

    As a result, the timeline for Homo sapiens and Homo neanderthalensis — archaic humans who disappeared from Europe and Central Asia around 40,000 years ago and are known to have lived alongside the Denisovans — has also been shifted.

    Culture Club/Getty

    Prehistoric man, human evolution

    While it was initially believed that the three species began to diverge from a common ancestor around 700,000 to 500,00 years ago, the new study indicates that common ancestry could actually date back as far as 1.32 million years.

    Never miss a story — sign up for PEOPLE’s free daily newsletter to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.

    “This changes a lot of thinking because it suggests that by one million years ago, our ancestors had already split into distinct groups, pointing to a much earlier and more complex human evolutionary split than previously believed,” coauthor Chris Stringer explained to CNN.

    Read the original article on People

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Human evolution may explain high autism rates

    [ad_1]

    Scientists have uncovered new evidence suggesting that autism may have it roots in how the human brain has evolved.

    “Our results suggest that some of the same genetic changes that make the human brain unique also made humans more neurodiverse,” said the study’s lead author, Alexander L. Starr in a statement.

    In the United States, around one in 31 children—about 3.2 percent—has been diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

    Autism spectrum disorder is a complex developmental condition affecting roughly one in 100 children worldwide, according to The World Health Organization.

    It involves persistent challenges with social communication, restricted interests and repetitive behavior.

    Unlike other neurological conditions seen in animals, autism and schizophrenia appear to be largely unique to humans, likely because they involve traits such as speech production and comprehension that are either exclusive to or far more advanced in people than in other primates.

    A stock image of 3D medical background with male head with brain and DNA strands.

    kirstypargeter/iStock / Getty Images Plus

    The Human Brain and Genetic Change

    Recent advances in single-cell RNA sequencing have allowed scientists to identify an extraordinary diversity of brain cell types.

    Alongside this, large-scale genetic studies have revealed sweeping changes in the human brain that are not seen in other mammals.

    These genomic elements evolved rapidly in Homo sapiens despite remaining relatively stable throughout the rest of mammalian history.

    By analyzing brain samples across different species, researchers found that the most common type of outer-layer neurons—known as L2/3 IT neurons—underwent especially fast evolution in humans compared to other apes.

    Strikingly, this rapid shift coincided with major alterations in genes linked to autism—likely shaped by natural selection factors unique to the human species.

    Why Did These Changes Occur?

    Although the findings strongly point to evolutionary pressure acting on autism-associated genes, the evolutionary benefit to human ancestors remains uncertain.

    The team behind the research noted that many of these genes are tied to developmental delay, which may have played a role in the slower pace of postnatal brain growth in humans compared to chimpanzees.

    The unique human ability for speech and language—often impacted by autism and schizophrenia—may also be connected.

    One possibility is that the evolution of autism-related genes slowed early brain development or expanded language capacity, extending the time window for learning and complex thought in childhood.

    This extended development may have offered an evolutionary advantage by fostering more advanced reasoning skills.

    Do you have a tip on a science story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about autism? Let us know via science@newsweek.com.

    Reference

    Starr, A. L., & Fraser, H. B. (2025). A general principle of neuronal evolution reveals a human-accelerated neuron type potentially underlying the high prevalence of autism in humans. Molecular Biology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaf177

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Unbelievable facts

    Unbelievable facts

    [ad_1]

    The period from the end of the Stone Age to today accounts for only about 0.7% of all human history,…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Just How Sweaty Can Humans Get?

    Just How Sweaty Can Humans Get?

    [ad_1]

    This summer, I, like so many other Americans, have forgotten what it means to be dry. The heat has grown so punishing, and the humidity so intense, that every movement sends my body into revolt. When I stand, I sweat. When I sit, I sweat. When I slice into a particularly dense head of cabbage, I sweat.

    The way things are going, infinite moistness may be something many of us will have to get used to. This past July was the world’s hottest month in recorded history; off the coast of Florida, ocean temperatures hit triple digits, while in Arizona, the asphalt caused third-degree burns. As human-driven climate change continues to remodel the globe, heat waves are hitting harder, longer, and more frequently. The consequences of this crisis will, on a macroscopic scale, upend where and how humans can survive. It will also, in an everyday sense, make our lives very, very sweaty.

    For most Americans, that’s probably unwelcome news. Our culture doesn’t exactly love sweat. Heavy perspirers are shunned on subways; BO is a hallmark of pubescent shame. History is splattered with examples of people trying to cloak sweat in perfumes, wash it away by bathing, or soak it up with wads of cotton or rubber crammed into their shirts, dresses, and hats. People without medical reason to do so have opted to paralyze their sweat-triggering nerves with Botox. Even Bruce Lee had the sweat glands in his armpits surgically removed, reportedly to avoid on-screen stains, several months before his death, in 1973.

    But our scorn of sweat is entirely undeserved. Perspiration is vital to life. It cools our bodies and hydrates our skin; it manages our microbiome and emits chemical cues. Sweat is also a fundamental part of what makes people people. Without it, we wouldn’t be able to run long distances in high heat; we wouldn’t be able to power our big brains and bodies; we wouldn’t have colonized so much of the Earth. We may even have sweat to thank (or blame) for our skin’s nakedness, says Yana Kamberov, a sweat researcher at the University of Pennsylvania. Her team’s recent data, not yet published, suggest that as human skin evolved to produce more and more sweat glands, fur-making hair follicles disappeared to make room. Sweat is one of the “key milestones” in human evolution, argues Andrew Best, a biological anthropologist at the Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts—on par with big brains, walking upright, and the expression of culture through language and art.

    Humans aren’t the only animals that sweat. Many mammals—among them, dogs, cats, and rats—perspire through the footpads on their paws; chimpanzees, macaques, and other primates are covered in sweat glands. Even horses and camels slick their skin in the heat. But only our bodies are studded with this many millions of teeny, tubular sweat glands—about 10 times the number found on other primates’ skin—that funnel water from our blood to pores that can squeeze out upwards of three, four, even five liters of sweat an hour when we need them to.

    Our dampness isn’t cost free. Sweat is siphoned from the liquid components of blood—lose too much, and the risks of heat stroke and death shoot way up. Our lack of fur also makes us more vulnerable to bites and burns. That humans sweat anyway, then, Best told me, is a testament to perspiration’s cooling punch—it’s so much more efficient than merely panting or hiding from the heat. “If your objective is to be able to sustain a high metabolic rate in warm conditions, sweating is absolutely the best,” he said.

    And yet, in modern times, many of us just can’t seem to accept the realities of sweat. Americans are, for whatever reason, particularly preoccupied with quashing perspiration; in many other countries, “body odor is just normal,” says Angela Lamb, a dermatologist at Mount Sinai’s Icahn School of Medicine. But the bemoaning of BO has cultural roots that long predate the United States. “I’ve read discussions well back into antiquity where there are discussions about people whose armpits stink,” says Cari Casteel, a historian at the University of Buffalo. By the start of the 20th century, Americans had been primed by the recent popularization of germ theory to fear dirtiness—the perfect moment for marketers to “put the fear in women, and then men, that sweat was going to kibosh your plans for romance or a job,” says Sarah Everts, the author of The Joy of Sweat. These days, deodorants command an $8 billion market in the United States.

    Our aversion to sweat doesn’t make much evolutionary sense. Unlike other excretions that elicit near-universal disgust, sweat doesn’t routinely transmit disease or pose other harm. But it does evoke physical labor and emotional stress—neither of which polite society is typically keen to see. And for some, maybe it signifies “losing control of your body in a particular way,” says Tina Lasisi, a biological anthropologist at the University of Michigan. Unlike urine or tears, sweat is the product of a body function that we can’t train ourselves to suppress or delay.

    We also hate sweat because we think it smells bad. But it doesn’t, really. Nearly all of the sweat glands on human bodies are of the so-called eccrine variety, and produce slightly salty water with virtually no scent. A few spots, such as the armpits and groin, are freckled with apocrine glands that produce a waxy, fatty substance laced with pheromones—but even that has no inherent odor. The bacteria on our skin eat it, and their waste generates a stench, leaving sweat as the scapegoat. Our species’ approach to perspiration may even make us “less stinky than we could be,” Best told me. The expansion of eccrine glands across the body might not have only made our skin barer; it’s also thought to have evicted a whole legion of BO-producing apocrine glands.

    As global temperatures climb, for many people—especially in parts of the world that lack access to air-conditioning—sweat will be an inevitability. “I suspect everyone is going to be quite drippy,” Kamberov told me. Exactly how slick each of us will be, though, is anyone’s guess. Experts have evidence that men sweat more than women, and that perspiration potential declines with age. But by and large, they can’t say with certainty why some people are inherently sweatier than others, and how much of it is inborn. Decades ago, a Japanese researcher hypothesized that perspiration potential might be calibrated in the first two or three years of life: Kids born into tropical climates, his analyses suggested, might activate more of their sweat glands than children in temperate regions. But Best’s recent attempts to replicate those findings have so far come up empty.

    Perspiration does seem to be malleable within a lifetime. A couple of weeks into a new, intense exercise regimen, for instance, people will start to sweat more and earlier. Over longer periods of time, the body can also learn to tolerate high temperatures, and sweat less copiously but more efficiently. We sense these changes subtly as the seasons shift, says Laure Rittié, a physiologist at Glaxo-Smith Kline, who has studied sweat. It’s part of the reason a 75-degree day might feel toastier—and perhaps sweatier—in the spring than in the fall.

    But we can’t simply sweat our way out of our climatic bind. There’s a ceiling to the temperatures we can tolerate; the body can leach only so much liquid out at once. Sweat’s cooling power also tends to falter in humid conditions, when liquid can’t evaporate as easily off of skin. Nor can researchers predict whether future generations might evolve to perspire much more than we do now. We no longer live under the intense conditions that pressured our ancestors to sprout more sweat glands—changes that also took place over many millions of years. It’s even possible that we’re fast approaching the maximal moistness a primate body can produce. “We don’t have a great idea about the outer limits of that plasticity,” Jason Kamilar, a biological anthropologist at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, told me.

    For now, people who are already on the sweatier side may find themselves better equipped to deal with a warming world, Rittié told me. At long last: Blessed are the moist, for they shall inherit the Earth.

    [ad_2]

    Katherine J. Wu

    Source link