ReportWire

Tag: Housing

  • Rams Foundation Helps Family Rebuild After Altadena Fires

    This is bigger than football, and no matter what, we’re all on the same team

    The amazing residents living here in Los Angeles and the surrounding cities all over Southern California are some of the strongest and most resilient people on Earth. Whether it’s intensely passionate political protests or the second-biggest wildfire catastrophe in California’s history, it’s never a matter of “if” they will recover, but “when” they recover.

    Want proof? Look no further than the Donny-Ashley family, a beautiful blended family that sadly lost their home earlier this year during the dreadful Eaton fires that raged in the Altadena area. And like many other unfortunate victims of the terrible fires that ran rampant across Southern California, the Donny-Ashley family was left scrambling about how to proceed after their lives changed forever in the blink of an eye. 

    “For my husband and I, it felt a lot like losing a loved one. You go through a wave of emotions, like sadness, denial and anxiety,” says Quinn Mitchell-Ashley, a third-generation Altadena/Pasadena native, and loving wife to husband Donny Ashley. Quinn and Donny had just begun to truly settle into their warm Altadena home, along with their wonderful children—Kristina, age 19, Dimitri, age 14, Kenneth, age 11 and Diem, age 1, before disaster struck. 

    Credit: Los Angeles Rams

    Immediately, it was a tough uphill battle for the Donny-Ashley family, with no roof over their heads, and no direction to lean towards; but of course, their first priority was to find proper shelter for the kids. “Thankfully, the perks of being a blended family allowed for our children to have a sense of normalcy with our co-parents,” says Quinn, before continuing on, “There was also the additional struggle of maintaining our clientele and income—as entrepreneurs, losing our home affected our businesses tremendously.”

    Eventually, word of the Donny-Ashley family caught wind to Aurianne Tuttle, a hardworking agent for the nonprofit organization, The Change Reaction, that specializes in aiding struggling Angelenos during dire times of need. Aurianne is no stranger to the supportive role, thanks to the massively positive impact made by her own nonprofit operating in the Watts Area, ROC ERA. Once Aurianne connected with the family and heard their story, she felt obliged to do everything in her power to assist them, including partnering with the LA Rams’ charitable initiative, Rams Foundation. 

    Credit: Los Angeles Rams

    “Aware we were one family of hundreds that needed help, we were grateful for even being considered. After four months, we received a request to be interviewed as wildfire survivors, which we now know was only a ploy to surprise us with a new home for a year!” said Quinn.

    Molly Higgins, Executive Vice President (EVP) of Community Impact and Engagement for the LA Rams, was eager to assist after being absolutely blown away by the family’s selflessness upon initially meeting them. “You’ve lost your home, and yet you’re here to learn about ways to help your community. You know, so cool and inspiring,” Molly recalls before continuing, “They were just so grateful to be alive and said that they were just so appreciative of the community and the way that community rallied around them in such a time of loss.”

    Through the generous efforts of the Rams Foundation, the Donny-Ashleys, and one other family, were given a rental home chosen through Zillow’s handy rental platform, with one year’s rent completely covered, and the houses fully furnished thanks to a thoughtful $15,000 donation from Bob’s Furniture. Additionally, five LAUSD employees whose homes were affected by the fires would receive rental assistance.

    Credit: Los Angeles Rams

    “It was a moment that I’ll never forget and probably one of the most, you know, emotional moments and my 24 years with the Rams, and I’ve had a lot of emotional moments along the way, but just to be able to give that family a fresh start and such a beautiful family at that, and just their gratitude and appreciation it was just incredible,” stated Molly.

    It’s hard not to root for the Donny-Ashley family. Having overcome so much trial and tribulation, Quinn, Donny, and the children know that second chances rarely come around. But thanks to all the remarkable efforts and contributions of Aurianne Tuttle, the Rams Foundation, and their partners, Zillow and Bob’s Furniture, the Donny-Ashley family hold that second chance in their palms. And while they’re extremely grateful for their new housing, Quinn and the rest of the family know that home isn’t just about the walls around you or the roof over your head—as Quinn says passionately, “Home to us has and always will be family… regardless of relation, status or time!”

    Credit: Los Angeles Rams

    Vahe Baghdoyan

    Source link

  • HOA Homefront: Why boards must amend certain CC&Rs and bylaws

    Ordinarily, CC&Rs and bylaws can only be amended by a vote of the HOA membership. However, there are some narrow circumstances under the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act in which boards are empowered by statute to make certain limited amendments to CC&Rs or bylaws without a membership vote.

    Illegal discriminatory language

    Unfortunately, many HOAs have governing documents containing illegal discrimination.

    Provisions discriminating against race, or sex, children (except senior communities, which can ban children), or other classes listed in Government Code 12955 must be removed by boards pursuant to Civil Code 4225.

    Older CC&Rs sometimes still contain racial restrictions, and some association documents from as recently as the 1970’s or 80’s will occasionally have illegal restrictions against children.

    This removal of discriminatory language is not optional because Civil Code Section 4255(b) makes it mandatory.

    If a homeowner brings such illegal language to the board’s attention and the board does not remove the discriminatory language, the state Civil Rights Department (formerly the Department of Fair Employment and Housing), city, county, or any person may under Civil Code Section 4225(d) sue the HOA to compel such amendments.

    Developer construction and marketing provisions

    Many governing documents (typically CC&Rs) contain language protecting the developer’s ability to complete the construction and to market the remaining unsold homes in the project.

    Such provisions often provide for builder access to the site, and authorize a sales office in common area, for example.

    After developer construction and marketing has concluded, Civil Code Section 4230 allows boards to remove such provisions from the governing documents. However, a very confusing subpart “d” to the statute seems to still require a membership vote, with any owners owning more than two units excluded from the definition of “quorum” for this specific vote.

    Outdated statute references

    In 2014, the Davis-Stirling Act was relocated, reorganized and amended in many ways, so pre-2014 CC&Rs and bylaws contain outdated and incorrect Civil Code references.

    Civil Code Section 4235 allows boards to amend and update the statute references in the CC&Rs and bylaws to match the new statute numbers.

    Illegal rental restrictions

    Civil Code Section 4741, effective in 2021, bans “unreasonable” restrictions against rentals and directs HOAs to remove such restrictions from their governing documents.

    To facilitate that, subpart “f” of the statute allowed a small six-month window – from Jan. 1, 2022 through July 1, 2022 – to amend CC&Rs to remove “unreasonable” rental restrictions. Now that this window has long ago closed, removal of illegal rental restrictions will require a membership vote.

    Boards should always seek assistance from qualified legal counsel before considering amendments by the board to the HOA CC&Rs or Bylaws. Your legal counsel can help ensure that the amendment qualifies for one of the three available exceptions to the membership vote requirement, and can help draft the amendment.

    Also remember that any of these amendments must be approved in an open board meeting with the normal Open Meeting Act agenda announcement to the members. CC&R amendments, once approved, must be “recorded,” meaning filed with the County Registrar-Recorder. Bylaw amendments need not be recorded but should be sent to the members as soon as possible after approval.

    CC&Rs address the property and bylaws address how the HOA governs. The official website for California laws is leginfo.legislature.ca.gov.

    Richardson, Esq. is a fellow of the College of Community Association Lawyers and partner of Richardson Ober LLP, a California law firm known for community association advice. Submit column questions to kelly@roattorneys.com

    Originally Published:

    Kelly G. Richardson

    Source link

  • New housing on the way as Citrus County continues to see population growth

    CRYSTAL RIVER, Fla. — New housing is on its way throughout Citrus County.

    At least 10 major housing developments are currently in the works, with subdivisions, apartments and residential phases planned for areas like Homosassa, Lecanto and Crystal River. The tourist destination is becoming a place to call home.


    What You Need To Know

    • New housing is being planned for areas throughout Citrus County
    • At least 10 major housing developments are currently in the works, with subdivisions, apartments and residential phases planned for areas like Homosassa, Lecanto and Crystal River
    • One of those areas is off of Gulf to Lake Highway


    Josh and Ashlyn Reynolds have already seen growth over time.

    Together, they are the proud owners of Baymens, located in downtown Crystal River. Though their store may only be three months old, their roots to the area go much deeper.

    “It is definitely growing here, but it’s still home,” said Josh.

    Josh has called the area home his whole life, seeing firsthand the amount of growth Crystal River and Citrus County have seen throughout the years. And he may witness more to come, with housing developments planned for the near future.

    “It’s good to see a lot more people in the area, especially for small businesses like this,” he said. “We are having a lot more foot traffic, as well as the kayak company. We do have more people wanting to go on the water. It’s beautiful out there.”

    Subdivisions and apartments are planned in areas like one off of Gulf to Lake Highway.

    “You’ve seen a lot of interest from area developers that have come in and gotten their subdivisions platted,” said Josh Wooten, CEO of the Citrus County Chamber of Commerce.

    According to the Citrus County Chamber of Commerce, in recent years, Crystal River has seen steady growth in population. What is known as the “Manatee Capital of the World” is becoming an area to call home.

    “I think it started post-COVID of people looking for refuge in Florida,” Wooten said. “And then that, coupled with the opening of the Suncoast Parkway, the State Road 44, now County Road 486. We’ve definitely noticed an influx of new residents.”

    It’s something the Josh and Ashlyn Reynolds realized before opening up shop.

    “It’s been a good thing, but it’s bittersweet,” Josh said. “You have more people, which means you have more eyes on the community and more people that want to come back and travelers. But also you just have to balance it with is it damaging our ecosystem, or is it damaging our small-town vibe.”

    Calvin Lewis

    Source link

  • Do you pay GST/HST when you build or renovate a house? – MoneySense

    There are some unique considerations when you build or substantially renovate a home that are important for anyone considering it. And there may even be rebates available that can put money back into your pocket.

    Is it a substantial renovation?

    The concept of a so-called substantial renovation is important for residential real estate and sales tax implications. The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) considers a home to be substantially renovated if 90% or more of the building that existed prior to the work started was renovated to some degree. This percentage is based on the interior area of the building. 

    The CRA gives several examples of substantial renovations:

    • A house has 10 rooms. Eight of the rooms are completely gutted and rebuilt. Of the remaining two rooms, the flooring in Bedroom A is replaced and the flooring and one wall are replaced in Bedroom B. Including these two bedrooms, over 90% of the total wall and floor space in the house is removed or replaced.
    • A 5,000-square-foot house is undergoing renovations. In one room measuring 250 square feet, there are no renovations. In another room measuring 200 square feet, the renovations carried out do not meet the “removed or replaced” test. The remaining 4,550 square feet of the house do, however, meet this test.
    • Douglas J.’s house consists of a living room, kitchen, family room, four bedrooms, and an unfinished basement. The renovation work on this house consisted of replacing the drywall throughout the house, installing laminate flooring in the kitchen and bathroom, laying new carpet over the old tile flooring in the other rooms, and replacing the kitchen counters and cabinets.

    It matters how you use the property

    The good news is that if you build or substantially renovate a home that is your primary place of residence, there are generally no sales tax implications beyond the tax you will pay for materials and labour. However, if your construction or renovation is done with the intention to earn a profit, things can change—and there may be additional sales tax payable. 

    The CRA focuses on whether the transaction is entered into in the course of a so-called adventure or concern in the nature of trade. When the builder or renovator’s intention is to earn a profit—even if they are not a home builder—the CRA may treat them as a “builder” for sales tax purposes. 

    In this case, the subsequent sale may, in fact, be subject to GST/HST to be remitted from the sale proceeds. Taxpayers should also be cautious about moving into the house for a short period of time after construction and then selling it. The CRA could still contend that the primary intention was to build, sell, and earn a profit rather than treating the property as their principal residence. This may have sales tax consequences, as well as income tax implications for the profit that may not be protected using the principal residence exemption. 

    An important consideration if a sale is subject to GST/HST is that a buyer will not pay more for the property. As an example: if you are hoping to sell a home with comparable properties selling for $1,000,000 in Ontario where the HST rate is 13%, a buyer will only pay you $1,000,000—not $1,130,000 ($1,000,000 plus 13% HST). That means $884,956 plus 13% HST.

    Use our mortgage payment calculator

    Our calculator will help you understand what a mortgage will cost you in real terms while factoring for interest rates, amortization period, fixed or variable terms, and more.

    Available rebates

    In several circumstances, there may be GST/HST rebates available that put sales tax refunds back in your pocket. 

    Article Continues Below Advertisement


    • You built or substantially renovated, or engaged someone else to build or renovate, a house on land that you already owned or leased to use as your primary place of residence. Some of the sales tax paid on your costs may be recoverable.
    • You converted a non-residential property into your home. Likewise, some of the sales tax paid on your costs may be recoverable.
    • You bought a new home from a builder to use as your primary place of residence. Some of the sales tax paid on the purchase may be recoverable.
    • You built, substantially renovated, or bought housing to rent to individuals as their primary place of residence for long-term residential use. Some of the sales tax paid on your costs or purchase may be recoverable.
    • You qualified for new first-time home buyer rebate of the GST on homes valued up to $1.5 million, under a rule introduced in May 2025.

    The rules are complex, and may depend on the value of the home, or the province or territory where the home is located. 

    For example, an owner-built home in Ontario may not qualify for the HST rebate on the federal portion of the sales tax if the fair market value at the time that the work is substantially completed is more than $450,000. However, the home may be eligible for a rebate of the provincial portion of the sales tax, up to $24,000 if you paid HST when you purchased the land, or $16,080 if you did not. 

    What to do if you are building or renovating a home 

    Given the complexity, it is advisable to consult a professional before starting a major build or renovation. The rules are complicated and the CRA is looking very closely at these transactions by conducting GST/HST audits. There can be province or territory-specific considerations, as well. 

    A mistake can lead to a large tax bill, along with interest and penalties.

    Have a personal finance question? Submit it here.

    Read more about real estate:



    About Jason Heath, CFP


    About Jason Heath, CFP

    Jason Heath is a fee-only, advice-only Certified Financial Planner (CFP) at Objective Financial Partners Inc. in Toronto. He does not sell any financial products whatsoever.

    Jason Heath, CFP

    Source link

  • HUD accuses the ‘Radical Left’ of driving government shutdown, vows to ‘support our most vulnerable’

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) accused congressional Democrats on Tuesday of forcing a government shutdown, warning that the “Radical Left” is putting vulnerable families at risk while pledging to keep critical housing services operating.

    “The Far Left is barreling our country toward a shutdown, which will hurt all Americans,” a HUD spokesperson told Fox News Digital. 

    “At HUD, we are working to keep critical services online and support our most vulnerable. Why is the media more focused on a banner than reporting on the impact of a shutdown on the American people?”

    HUD is led by Secretary Scott Turner, a former NFL player and member of the Texas legislature.

    HOUSE DEMOCRATS’ GOVERNMENT FUNDING PROPOSAL GOES DOWN IN FLAMES WITH SHUTDOWN DEADLINE IN HOURS

    In this screenshot of a banner posted to the HUD website on Tuesday, the “Radical Left” is blamed for the upcoming government shutdown. (U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development)

    In a memorandum circulated to all federal agencies late Tuesday, Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Russell Vought confirmed that government funding expires at 11:59 p.m. and instructed departments to execute their plans for an orderly shutdown.

    “President Trump supports passage of H.R. 5371, but it is now clear that Democrats will prevent passage of this clean CR prior to 11:59 p.m. tonight and force a government shutdown,” Vought wrote. 

    The OMB director said Democrats were blocking the House-passed measure over “insane policy demands,” including $1 trillion in new spending, and warned that the length of the shutdown is “difficult to predict.” 

    Employees were told to report for duty to begin shutdown activities until a new appropriations bill is signed into law.

    SHUTDOWN EXPLAINED: WHO WORKS, WHO DOESN’T AND HOW MUCH IT COSTS

    Scott Turner

    Scott Turner appears before the Senate ahead of his confirmation vote to serve as HUD secretary.  (Getty Images)

    HUD’s official website displayed a pop-up message on Tuesday stating, “The Radical Left are going to shut down the government and inflict massive pain on the American people unless they get their $1.5 trillion wish list of demands. The Trump administration wants to keep the government open for the American people.” 

    Reuters also reported on the banner earlier in the day, which prompted pushback from Democrats.

    Rep. Sylvia Garcia, D-Texas, said, “We should not be putting political messages on government webpages. I have never seen that kind of message. I don’t think that would be acceptable with any other prior administration.” 

    Jeffries and Schumer at the White House

    Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., right, and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., walk to speak to members of the media outside the West Wing at the White House in Washington Monday, Sept. 29, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

    Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., said, “Unfortunately, it’s become normal under the Trump administration, but it’s a radical departure from American history, and it is the use of public taxpayer funds for overtly political and polemical reasons.”

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    At midnight, parts of the federal government will shutter after Democrats rejected the Republican-backed seven-week continuing resolution that passed the House of Representatives Sept. 19. 

    Source link

  • Tri-Valley is one of the fastest growing regions in the Bay Area

    Since the 1970s, the Tri-Valley region of the Bay Area has seen significant growth. In places like Dublin and San Ramon, the population has tripled. Meanwhile, other cities in the region have seen their populations double. The Tri-Valley is nestled into the Diablo Mountain Range and is made up of the cities of Pleasanton, Livermore, Dublin, San Ramon and Danville and the surrounding communities. “We saw a growth that changed the community,” said Alameda County District 1 Supervisor David Haubert. “We literally saw Dublin change.”Haubert and his family moved to Dublin 25 years ago. They raised their daughters there and were active in the community, including joining the school board. Haubert went on to become the mayor of Dublin before becoming a county supervisor. “When I left as mayor in the city of Dublin, I said, ‘We’ve seen a lot of great things to happen. But, I want you to know our best days are yet to come.’ Dublin has continued to progress, I say we have even greater days yet to come,” Haubert said. Some of the reasons people are choosing to move to the Tri-Valley include the open spaces, great school districts, and cheaper housing costs. Nearly 10,000 single-family homes have been built in the Tri-Valley in the last 15 years. Developer Trumark Homes currently has approvals for more than 1,500 homes in the Tri-Valley, according to the San Francisco Chronicle. One of Trumark’s biggest developments is Francis Ranch in Dublin. That development has 573 homes under construction. And as the population has grown, communities have seen their demographics shift as well. “Twenty years back, there were not that many people from the South Asian community,” said Prasad Ramakrishnan. Ramakrishnan moved with his family from Fremont to San Ramon two decades ago. He still commutes to Silicon Valley for work, but was drawn to the open spaces and parks in the Tri-Valley.Ramakrishnan is on the board of the Indian Community Center and says the diversity of San Ramon is one of the reasons he’s grown to love the city so much. According to census data, 23% of residents in San Ramon identify as Indian, including Ramakrishnan.”It doesn’t matter where you’re from. All of us are humans, let’s all get together. San Ramon creates that kind of an environment where you have people from different ethnic backgrounds kind of coming together,” Ramakrishnan said. “We celebrate Diwali, we celebrate Christmas, we celebrate the Muslim functions.”But of course, growth doesn’t come without growing pains. Many of those pains can be found along the highways. “680 is the only real highway from here to South Bay. These are called bedroom communities, and then they work in the South Bay. Giving them an easy way by which to get there would be a nice thing,” Ramakrishnan said. However, Haubert is betting on a future without so many people having to commute outside of the Tri-Valley for work. “I truly believe businesses will locate here,” Haubert said. “I understand that’s often the decision of the CEO. So a lot of CEOs live in Silicon Valley, but a lot of future CEOs live in the Tri-Valley. That’s my belief.”See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    Since the 1970s, the Tri-Valley region of the Bay Area has seen significant growth. In places like Dublin and San Ramon, the population has tripled. Meanwhile, other cities in the region have seen their populations double.

    The Tri-Valley is nestled into the Diablo Mountain Range and is made up of the cities of Pleasanton, Livermore, Dublin, San Ramon and Danville and the surrounding communities.

    “We saw a growth that changed the community,” said Alameda County District 1 Supervisor David Haubert. “We literally saw Dublin change.”

    Haubert and his family moved to Dublin 25 years ago. They raised their daughters there and were active in the community, including joining the school board. Haubert went on to become the mayor of Dublin before becoming a county supervisor.

    “When I left as mayor in the city of Dublin, I said, ‘We’ve seen a lot of great things to happen. But, I want you to know our best days are yet to come.’ Dublin has continued to progress, I say we have even greater days yet to come,” Haubert said.

    Some of the reasons people are choosing to move to the Tri-Valley include the open spaces, great school districts, and cheaper housing costs. Nearly 10,000 single-family homes have been built in the Tri-Valley in the last 15 years.

    Developer Trumark Homes currently has approvals for more than 1,500 homes in the Tri-Valley, according to the San Francisco Chronicle.

    One of Trumark’s biggest developments is Francis Ranch in Dublin. That development has 573 homes under construction. And as the population has grown, communities have seen their demographics shift as well.

    “Twenty years back, there were not that many people from the South Asian community,” said Prasad Ramakrishnan. Ramakrishnan moved with his family from Fremont to San Ramon two decades ago. He still commutes to Silicon Valley for work, but was drawn to the open spaces and parks in the Tri-Valley.

    Ramakrishnan is on the board of the Indian Community Center and says the diversity of San Ramon is one of the reasons he’s grown to love the city so much. According to census data, 23% of residents in San Ramon identify as Indian, including Ramakrishnan.

    “It doesn’t matter where you’re from. All of us are humans, let’s all get together. San Ramon creates that kind of an environment where you have people from different ethnic backgrounds kind of coming together,” Ramakrishnan said. “We celebrate Diwali, we celebrate Christmas, we celebrate the Muslim functions.”

    But of course, growth doesn’t come without growing pains. Many of those pains can be found along the highways.

    “680 is the only real highway from here to South Bay. These are called bedroom communities, and then they work in the South Bay. Giving them an easy way by which to get there would be a nice thing,” Ramakrishnan said.

    However, Haubert is betting on a future without so many people having to commute outside of the Tri-Valley for work.

    “I truly believe businesses will locate here,” Haubert said. “I understand that’s often the decision of the CEO. So a lot of CEOs live in Silicon Valley, but a lot of future CEOs live in the Tri-Valley. That’s my belief.”

    See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    Source link

  • Is it better to rent or own in California? That depends.

    The debate over renting vs. owning has long posed a challenge for households in California. Arguments have morphed in recent years as home prices and mortgage rates soared beyond the increasing rents. To illustrate the complexities, we’ve created a hypothetical rent vs. buy scenario to track housing finances over a 30-year period. However, the math doesn’t account for the intangibles: the flexibility of renting compared to the stability of owning.

    HOW MONTHLY COSTS COMPARE

    Key in any housing calculation is monthly cost. Our example estimates California house rent today at $4,000 a month vs. buying a $900,000 house with a 10% down mortgage at 6.5% plus property taxes, insurance, association fees, and repairs. The scenario assumes costs grow with historical inflation and the mortgage rate is lowered twice by a half-point through refinancing.

     

    RUNNING THE TAB

    Homeowners need to repay their mortgage plus cover a range of additional costs. So renting’s total costs run cheaper for nearly two decades. But owning ends up costing slightly less over time. Here’s cumulative costs by year, in thousands of dollars.

    THE BOUNTY: Ownership’s edge

    Owning’s true financial benefit arises from the increasing value of the home. Assuming historical gains of 5% per year, the owners gets a $3.8 million asset after 30 years. The renter, who hypothetically invested the $90,000 down payment in the stock market, would accumulate $929,000. Here’s investment value by year, in thousands of dollars.

    WHERE IT GOES

    Look at the slices of 30 years of housing expenditures, rent vs. own. The renter just pays the landlord. Owner costs go to principal and interest on the mortgage, property taxes, home insurance, association fees, and repair and maintenance costs. Note: Interest payments and property taxes can be tax deductible.

    A HISTORY LESSON

    Look at the past 30 years of historical returns for three key factors in this rent vs. buy calculation, using 10-year moving averages for rent (California Consumer Price Indexes); home values (federal California index) and stocks (Standard & Poor’s 500).

    Unfathomable, unaffordable

    California’s long-running and steep affordability crunch makes the rent vs. buy debate a moot argument for many people. Housing costs throttle numerous California family budgets. The state’s flock of high- paying jobs pushes up housing costs well past what more typical paychecks can easily afford. That’s true for households considering renting or buying.

    Stagnant ownership

    Stubbornly high ownership costs have kept California’s share of people living in homes they own relatively stable, except for a temporary surge in the early 2000s when mortgages were too easily obtained. Those risky loans played a key role in the Great Recession, as borrowers defaulted in huge numbers.

    Housing afforability index

    It’s tough to be a California homebuyer. The estimated number of Californians earning the statewide median income who could comfortably purchase a single-family home is falling sharply, according to a California Association of Realtors index. The Golden State share of qualified buyers is significantly below the national norm.

    Housing-cost stresses

    The 2024 edition of Census housing data details how California’s cost of shelter varies between renters and homeowners — with or without mortgages on the property.

    But because renters typically earn less than owners, it’s more likely that their housing costs exceed 50% of their household incomes, an extreme level of financial stress.

    Big housing worries

    A statewide survey last year asked “How often do you worry about the cost of housing for you and your family?” Those who said “every day” or “almost every day” …

     

     

     

    Jeff Goertzen1, Jonathan Lansner

    Source link

  • Denver slashes rental assistance as eviction cases hit record highs

    Denver’s tenant eviction clinic takes place on the first floor of the City and County Building. July 25, 2023.

    Kevin J. Beaty/Denverite

    Updated at 6:56 p.m. on Friday, Sept. 26, 2025

    As Denver courts see record-high eviction cases, Mayor Mike Johnston is slashing the $23 million his administration promised in eviction prevention funding in 2025 by $9 million. 

    City-funded eviction prevention services came to a halt Friday morning, leaving dozens of clients the city promised to help uncertain about whether that help would actually arrive.  

    Service providers were left wondering whether they could offer any additional rental assistance support this year, and spent most of the day in conversations with Denver’s Department of Housing Stability. The funding is used to help people catch up on rent in no-payment eviction cases and is used to keep people housed when they would otherwise face homelessness. 

    The $9 million cut from this year’s budget will be transferred to next year’s Temporary Rental Assistance and Utility fund, now budgeted at $12 million. 

    Though the need is greater, the total amount of funding Denver provided for rental assistance was already lower this year than in 2024, when the city offered $29 million.

    Of the $23 million initially allocated for 2025, $15 million came from one-time pandemic-era federal American Rescue Plan Act funds that must be spent down, according to the mayor’s office. While the administration acknowledges the need for more rental assistance, the money is just not there, the mayor’s spokesperson Jon Ewing wrote in an email.

    “It hurts us all to see the TRUA numbers, but there’s nothing we can do about it,” said Councilmember Amanda Sawyer in a Wednesday Denver City Council budget hearing. “That money is gone.” 

    But the $9 million is still there. The new policy is that it can’t be spent until next year, even as Denver is on track to see an increase of more than 5,000 eviction cases this year, based on year-to-date court data. 

    The city will be able to serve as many as 1,500 fewer households with rental assistance in 2025 and 2026 than it did in 2024, Jeff Kositsky, with the Department of Housing Stability said at the budget hearing. 

    Nobody knows how permanent the stop-work order is. 

    On Friday morning, Denver’s housing department sent an immediate stop-work order to organizations like the Community Economic Defense Project contracted to help prevent eviction. 

    “After meeting with each agency to discuss the changes in the 2025 and 2026 TRUA budgets, we have determined we need to pause spending effective immediately while we reassess where we are with spending to date,” HOST wrote service providers in a letter obtained by Denverite. “To ensure TRUA has $9M remaining to rollover into 2026 as outlined in the proposed 2026 budget, we need to assess projected September expenditures and the remaining funds available for 2025.”

    The programs’ suspension left around 60 clients — likely around 150 people — who had been told they would receive city help uncertain whether that would ever come, said Community Economic Defense Project head Zach Neumann.

    “While the city had communicated 2025 budget reductions, providers were not aware that a full stop-work was coming,” he said. “We thought there were going to be reductions so money could be carried over. We didn’t think it would be a full stop to all activity.” 

    Neumann and CEDP were in conversations with HOST through Friday trying to determine if they would be allowed to resume their work this year. 

    Leaders at nonprofits say families facing eviction are devastated as they try to determine their next steps. 

    Without the help the city promised, in some cases, people will be forced out of their homes by the Denver Sheriff Department. In others, they may have evictions on their permanent records, making it harder to rent again. 

    Eviction prevention groups are scrambling for solutions for their clients and pushing the city to keep these programs running under a tight budget. 

    “We really deeply understand that the city has profound budget challenges and that the city has to make very tough choices,” Neumann said. “I also think that families who are receiving this news today have even bigger problems that they have to face, including the loss of their home. That’s what service providers are grappling with today.” 

    Neumann said his organization is optimistic HOST will find a way to resume work this year, but he is uncertain what that might look like. 

    “Later next week, HOST will determine the status of any remaining 2025 funds, and whether additional TRUA applications will be accepted this year,” HOST spokesperson Derek Woodbury wrote Denverite in an email.

    The context of the cuts

    The cuts are part of Johnston’s broader efforts to reduce government spending as he attempts to close a $50 million general fund budget deficit this year and a $200 million general fund budget deficit next year. 

    Councilmember Sarah Parady told Denverite that she’s disappointed in the 2025 eviction prevention cuts that undermine long negotiations the council had with the mayor’s office last year.  

    “I know that we save so much money and so much trauma by preventing evictions,” she said. 

    Restricting how rental assistance can be used could ultimately be more costly, she said. Housing someone who is already homeless is far more expensive than keeping a person facing a financial crisis housed through eviction prevention. 

    Changing priorities

    Johnston recently told Denverite the city will prioritize those most likely to experience homelessness, though he did not specify what metrics the city would use to assess risk. 

    “Every city is struggling with the same question right now: How do we target our resources in a way that prevents the most homelessness?” said housing department head Jamie Rife at the budget hearing. “And we’ve worked really hard to do that.”

    Without rolling over the money, the administration contends there would only be $3 million available for eviction prevention next year.

    Shifting money around to make it appear that the city is not drastically cutting rental assistance dollars next year is “prioritizing optics over human beings,” Parady said.

    Editor’s note: This story has been updated with additional information about the source of temporary eviction prevention funding.

    Source link

  • Now is the worst time to flip a home. It hasn’t been this bad in nearly two decades | Fortune

    It pays less and less to buy and flip a home these days. From April through June, the typical home flipped by an investor resulted in a 25.1% return on investment, before expenses. That’s the lowest profit margin for such transactions since 2008, according to an analysis by Attom, a real estate data company.

    Gross profits — the difference between what an investor paid for a property and what it sold for — fell 13.6% in the second quarter from a year earlier to $65,300, the firm said. Attom’s analysis defines a flipped home as a property that sells within 12 months of the last time it sold.

    Home flippers buy a home, typically with cash, then pay for any repairs or upgrades needed to spruce up the property before putting it back on the market.

    The shrinking profitability for home flipping is largely due to home prices, which continue to climb nationally, albeit at a slower pace, driving up acquisition costs for investors.

    “We’re seeing very low profit margins from home flipping because of the historically high cost of homes,” said Rob Barber, Attom’s CEO. “The initial buy-in for properties that are ideal for flipping, often lower priced homes that may need some work, keeps going up.”

    The median price of a home flipped in the second quarter was bought by an investor for $259,700, a record high according to data going back to 2000, according to Attom.

    The median sales price of flipped homes was $325,000, unchanged from the first quarter, the firm said.

    A chronic shortage of homes on the market and heightened competition for lower-priced properties are also helping drive up investors’ acquisition costs.

    Home flipping profits have declined for more than a decade as home prices rose along with the housing market’s recovery from the housing crash in the late 2000s.

    Consider, in the fall of 2012, the typical flipped home netted a 62.9% return on investment before expenses, Attom said.

    Even as home flipping has become less profitable, such transactions remain widespread.

    Some 78,621 single-family homes and condos were flipped in the April-June quarter, accounting for 7.4% of all home sales during the quarter — a slight decline from both the first quarter and the second quarter of 2024, according to Attom.

    The U.S. housing market has been in a sales slump since early 2022, when mortgage rates began to climb from pandemic-era lows. Sales of previously occupied U.S. homes sank last year to their lowest level in nearly 30 years. Sales have remained sluggish this year as mortgage rates, until recently, remained elevated.

    As home sales have slowed, properties are taking longer to sell. That’s led to a sharply higher inventory of homes on the market, benefiting investors and other home shoppers who can afford to bypass current mortgage rates by paying in cash or tapping home equity gains.

    With many aspiring homeowners priced out of the market, real estate investors — whether those looking to buy and rent or home flippers — are taking up a bigger share of U.S. home sales overall.

    Some 33% of all homes sold in the second quarter were bought by investors — the highest share in at least five years, according to a report by real estate data provider BatchData.

    Between 2020 and 2023, the share of homes bought by investors averaged 18.5%.

    All told, investors bought 345,752 homes in the April-June quarter, an increase of 15% from the first quarter, but a 12% decline from the same period last year, the firm said.

    Even so, investor-owned homes account for roughly 20% of the nation’s 86 million single-family homes, the firm said.

    Fortune Global Forum returns Oct. 26–27, 2025 in Riyadh. CEOs and global leaders will gather for a dynamic, invitation-only event shaping the future of business. Apply for an invitation.

    Alex Veiga, The Associated Press

    Source link

  • Marshall fire payments due by year’s end, but how Xcel’s $640 million settlement will be divvied up to remain secret

    Marshall fire victims who joined the massive lawsuit against Xcel Energy are expected to receive their portion of the $640 million settlement before the end of the year, but the amount of money each plaintiff receives will not be publicly disclosed.

    Xcel and plaintiffs’ attorneys announced the settlement Wednesday, just one day before the start of jury selection in a two-month civil trial to determine blame for the 2021 wildfire that killed two people and destroyed more than 1,000 homes in Boulder County.

    The full terms of the settlement will not be released, though private corporations involved in the litigation may need to disclose their payouts to shareholders. The individual homeowners who participated in the lawsuit will be required to sign nondisclosure agreements, said Paul Starita, a lawyer at Singleton Schreiber, one of the firms that represented homeowners.

    Teleport Communications America and Qwest Corporation, two co-defendants in the lawsuit, will contribute an undisclosed amount toward the settlement total.

    Not every person or company among the more than 4,000 plaintiffs will receive the same amount of money, Stirata said. The amount each receives will depend on the level of damages.

    Plaintiffs whose houses burned to the ground would be in line to receive more money than people who suffered smoke and soot damage, he said. People who rented housing or owned rental properties were also parties to the lawsuit, as were some people who only evacuated and sued for the nuisance. And claims involving deaths would be compensated with a higher amount.

    Attorneys figured out months ago what percentage of any settlement or jury award each plaintiff should receive, because those dollar figures were part of the mediation and settlement negotiations, Stirata said.

    “You add up all of those figures and the defendant pays you that lump sum and you give that to your clients,” he said. “It’s a fair settlement.”

    Payments should start being distributed within 60 days and be complete by the end of the year, Stirata said.

    The lawyers will also get a cut of the settlement as their payment for taking on the case. Each firm sets its own fee for the clients it accepted, Sirata said. He declined to reveal what percentage Singleton Schreiber will receive.

    A large chunk of the settlement will go to the 200 insurance companies that sued Xcel to compensate for the massive property damage claims they paid in the fire’s aftermath. In a legal filing ahead of the trial, those insurance firms said they suffered $1.7 billion in losses. It is not known what settlement amount they agreed to.

    The Target Corporation was a plaintiff as well because its store in Superior was closed for months due to fire damage. The city of Boulder, Boulder County and the Boulder Valley School District were also plaintiffs.

    The Dec. 30, 2021, Marshall fire was the most devastating wildfire in Colorado history, costing more than $2 billion in damages.

    The fire ignited first on the property of the Twelve Tribes religious cult, which has a compound on Eldorado Drive, near the Marshall Mesa Open Space. That ignition was caused by smoldering embers left over from a Dec. 24 burn-pit fire on the property.

    Noelle Phillips

    Source link

  • Jack Kerouac’s old hangout gets a historic makeover

    LOWELL — By next October, fans of Beat writer Jack Kerouac will be able to add the building located at 484 Merrimack St. to their homage itinerary during the Lowell Celebrates Kerouac 2026 Fall Festival.

    In his youth, Kerouac spent afternoons at the old Royal Theater that was attached to the rear of the rooming house that fronted Merrimack Street in the Acre neighborhood.

    The Lowell-born Kerouac memorialized those days in his semiautobiographical novel “Dr. Sax,” in which the main character, Jackie Duluoz, describes afternoons at the theater waiting for “Tim McCoy to jump on screen, or Hoot Gibson, or Mix, Tom Mix” and looking up at the cherubs in the “pink and gilt and crystal-crazy ceiling.”

    The theater was demolished 30 years ago, but the four-story brick boarding house Kerouac undoubtedly walked past on his way to the box office is being gut renovated and restored by Lowell-born Patrick Tighe, a Los Angeles-based architect.

    In August, Tighe’s project, New Royal LLC, received $1.3 million in Housing Development Incentive Program tax credits for 24 market-rate housing units during an awards ceremony in Revere.

    “We are thrilled to have received the tax credits,” Tighe said by email.

    HDIP is a tool for the state’s Gateway Cities to create more market-rate housing championed by the Healey-Driscoll administration to support economic development, expand diversity of housing stock and create more vibrant neighborhoods.

    The building dates to 1915 and was built in the Colonial Revival style. Tighe said the massive granite foundation walls and first-floor brick walls of the theater still remain and will be incorporated into a sunken garden for the first-floor commercial development.

    Tighe’s building is listed on the national and state registry of historic places through its inclusion in the Lowell National Historical Park and Preservation District and the Downtown Lowell Historic District. The building has been vacant for years and was condemned by the city. Tighe bought it in 2016.

    Tighe said the abandoned and derelict 7,000-square-foot building stood the test of time thanks to a robust steel frame with wood construction and a masonry exterior. He said the design will restore many of the unique period features and bring the building back to its “original splendor.”

    “The façade at the street is a tan glazed brick in decorative patterns, with red brick at the sides,” Tighe said. “Distinct to the building are two three-story oriel windows clad with sheet metal. The bay windows create a rhythmic streetscape pattern continued at the adjacent building. The oriels and the original oak door are details which give the building its Colonial Revival spirit.”

    The building originally housed a market on the street level and Tighe said he was working closely with Sophia’s Greek Pantry (a shop that is currently on an adjacent site on Market Street) to occupy the 2,600-square-foot space.

    The historic project joins housing developments underway throughout the city that were granted HDIP funds in an April round of funding. Lowell received $7.5 million to build 132 units including $5 million to the Mullins Company’s Mass Mills IV development for a total of 95 units; and $2.5 million to Heritage Properties to build 37 units at The Emery, on a vacant lot at Pearl and Middlesex Streets.

    In July 2024, Lowell received $4.5 million for two downtown housing developments, again, the largest share of the $27 million distributed to 14 projects from the HDIP program, to create 547 total new units in 11 Gateway Cities across the state.

    The Hildreth Building, built in 1884 on Merrimack Street, received $2.5 million in HDIP funding. The historic building is being redeveloped to create 50 units on the upper floors and a retail space on the first floor, a part of which will be occupied by businesses displaced by the closure of Mill No. 5.The other Mill City HDIP project, the 26-unit Isobel Lofts on Middlesex Street, was awarded $2 million.

    “When Kerouac fans come to visit they can stand in the sunken garden surrounded by the massive granite walls of the Royal Theater and imagine what it was once like,” Tighe said.

    The Lowell Celebrates Kerouac Fall Festival runs from Thursday, Oct. 9 through Monday, Oct. 13. A variety of public events are scheduled in Lowell and the surrounding area, including music, poetry and tours. The festival features a mix of free, donation- and fee-based events. For more information, visit lowellcelebrateskerouac.org.

    Melanie Gilbert

    Source link

  • How Taylor Morrison CEO Sheryl Palmer leads differently after almost 20 years—and who she’s met along the way | Fortune

    On this episode of Fortune’s Leadership Next podcast, cohosts Diane Brady, executive editorial director of the Fortune CEO Initiative and Fortune Live Media, and editorial director Kristin Stoller talk to Sheryl Palmer, chairman and CEO of Taylor Morrison. They reflect on the pressure CEOs face to speak about societal issues; how to work effectively with both sides of the political aisle; and why Palmer has spent almost 20 years with the company despite a brief resignation in 2010.

    Listen to the episode or read the transcript below.


    Transcript:

    Diane Brady: Hello everybody, and welcome to Leadership Next. I’m Diane Brady.

    Kristin Stoller: And I’m Kristin Stoller. 

    Brady: Quantum computing has the potential to transform industries by solving optimization problems, boosting machine learning, and sparking innovation in logistics, finance, and material science. Jason Girzadas, CEO of Deloitte US, is a longtime sponsor of this podcast and is here with us today. Hi Jason, thanks for joining us.

    Jason Girzadas: Great to see you Diane.

    Brady: So what is quantum computing, and how do you see it transforming industries?

    Girzadas: Well, quantum computing has been a topic for some time in research circles, certainly closely watched by business, but it’s fundamentally a different computing paradigm that uses the principles of physics instead of mathematics to drive the computing outcomes. That’s been largely the domain of research, and it’s becoming seen as being a more viable commercial computing methodology and an approach. And I think the real uses will be ultimately around very complex optimization scenarios, further enhancements to scaling, machine learning, and also very complicated simulations that could be relevant to a whole host of different business applications.

    Stoller: Jason, what steps should leaders take to prepare for both its potential benefits as well as its potential risks?

    Girzadas: It’s really about readiness planning right now, and preparing an organization to understand the implications. So it’s about understanding what skill sets would be required, what type of cybersecurity protocols would need to be in place, and begin to think about the types of use cases that would be very germane around optimization and simulation.

    Stoller: Excellent advice. Thank you so much, Jason.

    Brady: Thanks, Jason.

    Brady: In this episode, we are speaking with Sheryl Palmer, who is the Chairman and CEO of Taylor Morrison. And Sheryl, you are the first and only woman to lead a public home builder. Still to this day. You went there in 2007 and it’s an incredible job you’ve done, we’ll be talking about that. We are taping this episode here in Scottsdale, Arizona, before an audience of leaders. So thank you—for Deloitte’s North America Next Generation CEO program. Thank you all for joining us for this live conversation.

    Stoller: Absolutely, and thank you, Sheryl, for joining us as well. 

    Sheryl Palmer: Yeah, of course. 

    Stoller: So one of the things I love, Sheryl, and that you’re so good at, is—I love hearing stories. You’re really good at telling stories. You have interviewed so many high profile people, and I have it here, George W. Bush, Michelle Obama, Steve Case. You told Diane and I that you also worked for Ray Kroc at McDonald’s, which is a really fun surprise. But I’d love to hear your top story of interacting with them and the leadership lessons that you think about to this day.

    Palmer: Oh, goodness, so many. But if I were to–specific to your question, Kristin–you know, I think about—I’ve had the absolutely amazing opportunity to interview George W. three times, and so the first time was very systematic. I had to go through Secret Service to get all my questions. And the third time was very casual, and his authenticity and candor really came out because he was just not—he wasn’t on guard at all. He was very engaging. But what I loved about him was just his genuine one care: that I looked good in the interview, which how unique would that be? Right? We’re walking from the green room, and he’s like, “don’t worry. You got this. It’s my job to make you look good.” And I’m like, “No, I don’t think it goes that way, but I so appreciate that.” But he was really quite genuine. And then from a leadership standpoint, and this might sound so silly, but three interviews, I also had the opportunity to be in the rotunda when his dad passed and I’d sent him a note that I was sending my respects, and each one of those four communications, I got a handwritten letter from him, and that’s a lost…

    Stoller: My mom says it really matters. 

    Palmer: And it really matters!

    Brady: I just want to, because we’re before an audience of leaders, I want to also level-set why you’re doing interviews. You’ve got a podcast: is that something you’re doing because you think it’s important for a CEO to do? Is it something you’re doing just because of natural curiosity? And just give us some sense as to why you’re doing these interviews? It’s intimidating for us, the interviewers, as you can imagine.

    Palmer: Well, you know, I’ve been very fortunate. The first time was a circumstance where we were owned by private equity, and at our closing dinner when we went public, one of my new board members was Senator Flake, and he arranged it. And so it was just a very small intimate group, probably about 50 of us, and that was my first time. I had dinner with him, and then I interviewed him. Then I got asked to do the others. One was for a veterans cause, and he supports and paints veterans. But what it did for me, Diane, is in the research, which you will know so much better than I do, I learned so much. I read like three of his books, and I reached out to find friends that knew him personally, so that you’re more prepared. And that, to me, is the exciting part. Same with Donna Brazile and Karl Rove, when I interviewed them together. On TV, they’re very different, and this was for the home building association that they had very different beliefs. But the reality is, they’re two humans that are on different sides of the aisle, but at the end of the day, they’re still friends, and so being able to get into that chemistry and really get into the issues that can affect the veterans, if it was George Bush or our home builder association with the other two, you actually can make a difference through that process.

    Brady: Well, let’s stay in the moment. You have a fascinating background—some of the people you’ve met—but you actually gave up an opportunity to go to Washington, which many of you in this room will have to do throughout your careers if you don’t already do it, to come here. Life’s about tough choices. What did you give up to be here? And why?

    Palmer: Well, it really wasn’t a tough choice, because I had already made the commitment quite some time ago, and we have been trying to schedule a meeting with the new director of the FHFA, Bill Pulte. And in our industry, I think I’m known as the one with a lot of mortgage knowledge. I’ve taken the time to really understand. And so Bill had reached out to me and said, “I really need you at this meeting.” And so there were five CEOs in total that were going to join. He had reached out, and so I really wanted to be there. But in all fairness, we had been trying to schedule this for three months, and two weeks ago, he finally settled on a date, and we tried to see, could I be in both places? And it just wasn’t possible. So as important as that was, I know the meeting is in good hands with a lot of my peers, and I’m delighted to be here.

    Stoller: But you’ve been going to Washington—this wouldn’t have been your first time, right? So I wonder, Sheryl, what advice do you have for CEOs who are going to have to do this at some point in their career, you know, dealing with administrations on both sides of the aisle?

    Palmer: You know, it’s a really good question Kristin, because, like anywhere, it’s about relationships. And when you’re—I remember my first time on the Hill, you know, I was really focused on lobbying particular initiatives. This goes back almost 20 years, and it was daunting. It was scary, I have to be honest. It was like, these guys, they’re representatives of our country. They’ve been voted in by the people. They must be so informed. First thing I learned is they’re not as informed as you think, about all the issues. 

    Brady: We see that on TV. 

    Palmer: Okay, good. And I say that with respect that they’re learning almost as they’re walking in the meeting on some issues. And here, for the folks that are out there lobbying, these are really big, important issues that affect our business and affect the consumer. I mean, our business affects consumers all over the country, and so I was actually a little tiffed that they wouldn’t take the time, just like we talked about being prepared. But what you quickly realize is it’s not about the relationships you build when you’re in D.C. It’s about the relationships you build when you’re not in their office with their staff, because now all of a sudden, you have a different and personal connection, and that’s when real things happen, and it doesn’t matter what the issue is. So it’s about education, informing, relationships, and perseverance, because none of this stuff happens fast. I think about the Great Financial Crisis and how difficult that was. And how impactful the decisions they were making in banking [were] on our industry, and honestly, they were somewhat oblivious to it. And so it’s really about educating.

    Brady: Now, you came to the role in 2007, and I hope you don’t mind that I mentioned that you’re the first and only woman. I don’t want to see everything through a gender lens, of course. But I am curious, first of all, what positioned you to get that? You started at McDonald’s…

    Palmer: …I did. 

    Brady: You even knew Ray Kroc, who I believe, yelled at you.

    Palmer: He did.

    Brady: So what made you the right person to lead Taylor Morrison was in a very interesting time, the company had just come together, pre-IPO. Frankly, we knew at least some type of crisis was looming. In 2007, it hadn’t fully come to rest yet. What made you the right person for that job?

    Palmer: It hadn’t come to roost across the country, but it had in certain markets. And I had been the area president in Nevada for another brand. Another big, top five builder, and they had gone through a significant crisis. It was the first place that it hit. I left that to actually stay home with my kids, because they were heading off to college, and I felt like I’ve been traveling my entire career. And then this opportunity came, and when I joined, honestly, I joined Morrison Homes in 2006, so I’m just about at my 20 years. And I joined as an area president. It seemed like five minutes after I joined, there were discussions about—and we were a private U.S. company of a U.K. public, so we were a [subsidiary] of a U.K. public [company]. And it seemed like five minutes after I joined there was discussion about the two U.K. publics that had North American holdings coming together. So we spent about seven, eight months working on that. And there’s a lot of different laws in the U.K. So somebody else was brought in, the CEO of one of the companies was appointed, and about 90 days later, the CEO from the U.K. said, I think we need to make a change, and asked me to come to meet the board in the U.K. And I did. And you know, to be quite honest, there’s a little bit of fake it till you make it when you take on a new, big role. And it was private, so I didn’t have any public concerns about how to run a public company. Got the role, and it was all about surrounding myself with good people. I don’t think either of the companies, if I were to be really honest, I don’t think either of the companies would have made it independent at that time. Because, you’re right. It was 2006, then 2007 when I took over. But the next five years were really tough, and then the U.K. sold us to private equity.

    Stoller: Was there a moment either, you know, around 2008 during the housing crash, or, you know, a few years later, when you did the IPO, that you thought, this is too much for me. I want out?

    Palmer: There was a point in 2010 where I actually resigned.

    Stoller: Really? Tell us about that. 

    Palmer: I was owned by two private equity firms. They, and I hate to talk about the woman card, but they really didn’t have females…

    Brady: …I talk about the women card all of the time, I just like to disclose…

    Palmer: …they didn’t have any women in their portfolio as leaders, and, honestly, their style was about second guessing every decision, and you can’t run a company that way. I mean, I can’t stop with every decision and go ask permission, and if you don’t have trust in my judgment, then I’m the wrong person. And so I made a really, really hard decision, and thought, the best thing I can do for this company is step away and they can bring somebody in that they have confidence in. And so I took the day off because I knew this would be hard for me. I had been there for, you know, a number of years already, and I sent the note, and I had one of the board members call, and I’m like, I’ll be happy to stay, you know, as long as you need, or I’ll be happy to pack up. Whatever works best for you, but I’m happy to help find my replacement. And he calls, he’s like, “so where are you going?” And I’m like, “just like I said in my letter, I’m not.” But I had been through other experiences in life, that life is short, and, you know, things really matter. And he’s like, “you really don’t have another job?” I’m like, “No. I mean, what I said is true. I’ll stay as long as you need.” And he called one of the other private equity guys and asked him to come meet. And I’m like, “we don’t need to do that. It’s really okay.” And they came, we met for dinner, and after about four hours, he’s like, “I’d really ask you to give me another chance.” And next year, I was the CEO of the Year for their private equity firm. I took the company public

    Stoller: How did he convince you? What did he say? 

    Palmer: You know, at that point, I had nothing to lose, and sometimes it’s okay just to stand alone and not have the fear of repercussions. I had already resigned, and you don’t resign and think you’re staying, that wasn’t my plan. And he just, I was very honest with him on the whys and the way he was treating and the way he was undermining, and how difficult it was to operate a company that way. And if you don’t trust, then really you should move on.  

    Brady: Which gets back to one of the questions that this program addresses, which is, not who wants to be a CEO, but why would you want to be a CEO? Let’s start with, when did you realize, you know what, I can run this thing, and I want to run this?

    Palmer: When I got it. I mean, if I were truly honest, it was a big move from running a region to running a company that was being merged. So two big companies. But that’s, like I said, it’s when you really surround yourself with experts in every function, and you know enough to be dangerous at 5,000 feet because you’re generally operating at 30,000 and you have to know when to, like, swoop in and when to swoop out and let your team do what they do. You know, the honest-to-God truth, Diane, is I didn’t know anything more the day I took the job than the day before. But when you get in the role, you have access to a lot more information and a lot more people, and if you use that well and the team well, you begin to grow confidence.

    Brady: So when you lead in, day one, now you’re 18 years into the job. 20, if you include when you joined the unit. How do you lead differently today? Obviously the environment is different. But when you think about yourself as a leader, and you go back to that starting-out point, any advice you would give yourself?

    Palmer: Well, leading in crisis is different than leading a stable business. When we brought the two companies together, it was a crisis. The Great Financial Crisis was hard, and it was almost taking a street fighting mentality, and it did mean you were involved in a lot of details. I would say COVID [was] similar. It’s a crisis when someone is uncertain and scared and nervous, and everyone’s got a different emotion, and there’s no right or wrong. You do swoop in. But I think my lesson is to know the times when to do that and when to back away.

    Stoller: I’ll also add on that, because Sheryl, I feel like for me, in my career, I’ve been told the only way to get ahead is by job hopping, moving companies. You’ve now been at the same one for 20 years. Why didn’t you move around? Why have you stuck it out for that?

    Palmer: I love what we do. I love what our company does. When I joined, [and] our two companies came together, we were [worth] less than $1 billion dollars, and this year we’ll be closer to $9 billion. We went down to 600 people, and now we’re at almost 3,500. So I feel like, in some ways, I gave birth to this company, and what we’ve built—we’ve done seven acquisitions. Most of my senior team has been here. I think among my 10 direct reports, we have over 150 years of experience in the company. So I did it for the people. I’ve stayed for the people. I love what we do, and I love the impact. And it’s really important to stay grounded, Kristin, in what we do. It’s not just running a company, but building communities where people get—it’s soft and squishy. It really is, but it’s important to keep a foot on the ground and recognize the impact that we have every day when families get to move into a home and raise their families.

    Stoller: You have a very diverse workforce too. You have people of all ages. One of the things I was always really curious about, especially now, when you have all these external pressures coming at you, and a young generation—Gen Z, Gen alpha—who really want their CEOs to be very candid, very open: how do you balance that with with the pressures you have from up top? Everybody wants to know you. You can’t know all of them.

    Palmer: Yeah, it’s interesting. I have a CMO who is remarkably talented. She joined the organization I think just about 10 years ago, very young. I think I brought her in as a PR manager, and now she’s our CMO, and she keeps me pretty grounded on the difference in our workforce, and particularly about the issues. And my own internal policy is I will talk about the issues within the organization, [but] I won’t talk about people. So for me, if I can keep that separation, it should never be personal. I think for anybody in my role, it should never be personal. But what the organization knows they have, from me, is total honesty and transparency. COVID is a great example of that. I had half the organization that was like, do not make us get a vaccine. You know, that is not your decision. I had half the organization that’s like, don’t let them come to work if they don’t get a vaccine. And all I could really do is provide facts and data. We never made a decision that you had to do that. Now there was almost a time where we would have been required, but that came and went. But I was so transparent. I had weekly calls with the entire organization when we had to lay off people. These are hard conversations, but I didn’t hide behind a computer. I didn’t hide behind a memo I would get on camera. And so I don’t know them all, but I think they all think they know me really well.

    Brady: One of the things, and keeping with the demographics—talk a little bit about what differentiates you from the other home builders, because I think that we tend to sometimes see it as—we talk about home building as more of a macro issue, right? Like what’s happening to housing prices. You have many different brands that I think are adapting to how people buy. You know, you’ve got a brand for renters. Talk about how you are seeing the market right now, because there’s no question there’s an affordability crisis. What are you doing about it?

    Palmer: There is a significant affordability crisis, and we’ve attacked it with our rental brand, Yardly, and it’s still building lifestyle communities like we do. So we buy land, we build houses, we have a management company that rents them, but it allows for affordability with gates and a lifestyle component. So it’s very similar to what we do, but then we ultimately sell that asset to somebody that does this for a living. I used to have a business in Canada. We sold it, and we built high rises. And I remember, Diane, so vividly that over my years there we probably started with an average square footage in those units of 1,300 square feet. And maybe they sold for $600,000 or $700,000. By the time I sold that business, our average size was 600 square feet, still selling for $600,000 or $700,000 so you can only do so much to squish it down. So there’s other ways, but it all starts with the land. And it starts with some of the things we talked about with policy, because 25% of the average selling price of a home today is spent on regulation. Before I buy land, before I get a building permit, before I build the house, 25% of that average sales price is on regulation. So that’s where we’re spending a lot of time in Washington. That’s why I was supposed to be there today to talk about the things we can do. Because other countries have figured it out honestly, much better than we have.

    Stoller: That’s what I’m wondering. Because you travel a lot and you get a lot of different perspectives on that. What do you think other countries are doing that the U.S. should adopt?

    Palmer: Well, I had the fortune when I was owned by the Taylor Wimpey company in the U.K., and I was on their board for about eight years. So their whole process is different. We had board meetings every month. Nine months a year I was over in the U.K. But one of the most basic differences, Kristin, is every single map. So when we get an entitlement and get land approved to build houses, we get a final map. And every entitlement or final map had an overlay that said 15% of these houses are going to have to be delivered at an affordable level, meaning they have to be sold to someone at a median income, and we had to build them the same way. We all were bidding for this land, we all knew the same rules. And I’m not an advocate that we should go build section 16 housing and just go build a community of cheap or affordable houses, but integrate people, and that’s what it allowed for. So I wish we could do something like that here. There’s a few markets that have figured it out, but not enough.

    Brady: One of the big questions that a lot of leaders have to deal with is, do I want to go public? And sometimes you have a choice, of course, but what have you learned in terms of running a public company? Because that’s something that a lot of companies I see now try to put off, and when you’re such a public figure—it’s very different to be a public figure now than it was two decades ago. So talk a little bit about that and just share your experience and any advice you’ve had.

    Stoller: And leading through IPO, I think that’s a hard thing to do.

    Palmer: But so fun. I mean, honestly, the best experience of my career. 

    Stoller: I haven’t heard fun yet, but I’m curious.

    Palmer: It’s a lot of work, but I guess it’s because I love what I do so much. But getting to go on the road for 17 days and tell your story, probably no less than 250 times, about how we’re positioned, how we’re different. We’re the biggest home building IPO that’s ever happened. I think it’s going to be a hard one to beat, to be honest. And it was amazing. It was an amazing experience ringing the bell the first time. I think my cheekbones hurt by the end of that day. But just the pride of—I grew up in New York, but I had never been to the stock exchange. But the why, Diane, [inaudible]. I mean, if you were to really be honest about it. Sometimes I feel I live my life in six week increments. Earnings, call a board meeting, earnings, call a board meeting, and it’s a treadmill you’re on 20 hours a day.

    Brady: You have this great story—this gets to the other point I was mentioning about being a public figure—where you approached Arnold Schwarzenegger. I believe he was working out at the time, and he had that like “I’ve been recognized.” But I talk to a lot of CEOs who—that is the constant scrutiny. I think you become, to your point, very humanizing to your team. And we have not talked about the various ways that you’ve done that, but you’ve done a lot. I do think to understand the public figure nature of a role, especially in areas like home building, there’s a lot of anger out there about the cost of housing, and you could be sort of a symbol of that to a lot of people. So I’d love to just get your sense as to how you navigate that, because I think you lean into it in many ways.

    Palmer: Yeah, now it’s amazing how much time a day companies are spending on security. And with what happened in New York many weeks ago, it’s a little daunting. And everyone should appreciate that. Everyone believes they have the right to know everything about you and everything you’re doing at any time. I know when I separated from my husband, 10 years ago, everyone felt like they needed to know every detail. And so there are things in life that should be private, and that’s hard in a public role. I have chosen to own the impact of what we do, and so I’ve leaned in instead of out. So I do do a fair amount of media, but it’s helpful for our industry, because consumers need to be educated, and so I don’t do it for self promotion. I do it because it helps consumers recognize because, with all due respect, not everything that’s shared in the media is accurate. And so to be able to have a voice and share, I hear how often it’s impactful. Also, interestingly enough, this was the part that was surprising to me, how impactful It is to my team. They have a great deal of pride that their CEO is out and making a difference and tackling the big issues, but I’ll tackle the big issues in our industry once again. I think where it’s been most difficult for me, just honestly, is police violence, things that really don’t affect our industry, but every CEO is asked, “what’s your opinion on this or that?”

    Stoller: Yeah, and when do you choose to speak up?  

    Palmer: And that’s the debate that I have with my team on many of these big ones. And is there a way to speak up and not take a view? Because no view, when you have these issues that are so divisive in our country today, there’s no winning. I mean, there just isn’t. Winning is being strong enough and competent enough to say how you feel, but how you do it is really important, because some people are going to agree and some aren’t. The people that agree, those are potential home buyers, and the people that don’t, aren’t. That’s not how I want to be displayed.

    Brady: I want to ask, I know we’re winding up soon. The official part of this, when I talk to a lot of leaders, they often have a philosophy or tactics and strategies. For example, the more complex the external environment, sometimes people feel you need radical simplicity internally. Give me some sense as to what you’ve learned and advice you have as to the tactics for leading in what is always going to be a very complex environment that’s not going away. What have you done to sort of prioritize and know where you make the best impact?

    Palmer: Great question. Volatility, to your point, is not going away. I’ve always been a believer, and I don’t know if I always have or I’ve just learned it over time, but don’t let a good crisis be wasted. When you can influence change, when you’re running 100 miles an hour, it’s really hard. But I look at the environment that we’re in today, and it’s very difficult. To your point, the affordability crisis is daunting, and our homeless challenges across the country are growing.  Don’t waste the opportunity to really make a different impact. And sometimes that impact in today’s environment would be through innovation and technology and making sure we can control the things we can in the business today. And sometimes it’s about: how do you get through the other side and be in a position—many people pull back in an environment like this, in my opinion. This is the time to lean in and start making a difference. You know, we bought a big, transformational public company three weeks before COVID. I went from the smartest person in the industry, to: how stupid was that after it closed? And I believed in what we did, and you have to stay with that. We came out the other side much better. It was a good move, but it doesn’t always appear that way, and you have to, like I said before, you have to have the courage to stand alone and fight for what you believe in, because in the public market, a lot of people that don’t understand the business feel like they have a better view on it. If I could mention one other, coming right before COVID, I introduced a theme in our organization called Love the Customer. Now, love is not something that’s generally used in home building, right? It’s pretty street fighting, macho…

    Brady: …I love this kitchen. 

    Palmer: Yeah, love doesn’t have to be sexual, right? I mean, people love football. They love bacon, right? But I would tell you, when I traveled the country to share this new mantra of who we are and how we’re going to rep ourselves internally and externally, they thought I’d lost my mind. Finally, and now, seven years into it, we stand alone because our customer experience stands apart, and that matters. So dare to be different and look for how you can differentiate yourself amongst all the noise. I think that’s really valuable, and surrounding yourself with the best of the best, you have to have a lot of humility to do that. But to me, those are probably two ingredients that really allow you to manage and lead through anything.

    Stoller: That’s a great way to end. Thank you so much. Sheryl for joining us.

    Brady: Thank you.

    Palmer: Thank you.

    Brady: Leadership Next is produced and edited by Hélène Estèves.

    Stoller: Our executive producer is Lydia Randall.

    Brady: Our head of video is Adam Banicki.

    Stoller: Our theme is by Jason Snell.

    Brady: Leadership Next is a production of Fortune Media. I’m Diane Brady.

    Stoller: And I’m Kristin Stoller.

    Brady: See you next time.

    Leadership Next episodes are produced by Fortune‘s editorial team. The views and opinions expressed by podcasters and guests are solely their own and do not reflect the opinions of Deloitte or its personnel. Nor does Deloitte advocate or endorse any individuals or entities featured on the episodes.

    Fortune Editors

    Source link

  • America’s love-hate relationship with California echoes in this poll

    How divided are America’s feelings about California?

    Ponder a curious poll of 1,000 American adults conducted for Clever Real Estate, which asked about various traits of the 50 states. My trusty spreadsheet’s review of this popularity contest dug into the nation’s love-hate relationship with the Golden State.

    For example, the survey took a curious route to gain insight into “desirability” – asking folks to rank states as both “most” and “least” desirable.

    Most desirable? California ranked No. 2, behind Florida. Then came Hawaii, Texas, and New York. Each have big economies and/or great vacation spots.

    The lowest scores were in Mississippi, Kansas and Nebraska. Need I say more?

    However, look what popped up when the question of “least desirable” was asked: conflicted feelings for California.

    The Golden State got the No. 1 ranking followed by Alabama, New York, Alaska and Florida. Lowest scores were for North Carolina, New Hampshire, and Montana.

    Price points

    A somewhat more logical split was found in the rankings on twin questions about affordability.

    California ranked No. 3 as a place for a relocation with “an unlimited budget” – trailing Hawaii and Florida. The lowest scores were in Iowa, Nebraska and Kansas.

    But if you’re financially struggling, a move to California ranked 42nd best. Can’t argue with that, considering the Golden State’s lofty cost of living.

    Top bargains were Alabama, Arkansas and West Virginia. Worst? Massachusetts, Hawaii and New Jersey.

    Other grades

    California was also poorly graded as a “most underrated” state with a No. 43 ranking.

    To score well, size mattered, as in small populations. Tops were Vermont, Wyoming and Maine. Worst rankings had less of a theme: Mississippi, New York and Louisiana.

    Two other poll questions were harder to define if they were tracking good or bad traits.

    “Most boring” could mean dull or peaceful. California ranked a mid-range No. 29.

    Iowa, Idaho and Wyoming were the most boring. The least were Hawaii, North Carolina and Massachusetts.

    And, finally, there’s the “quirkiest residents” grades. Quirky could be a positive or a negative, depending on one’s tolerance for the out-of-the-ordinary.

    California ranked No. 1, ahead of Alaska, New York, Utah and Oregon. Least quirky? North Carolina, South Carolina and Maryland.

    Final score

    California got very divergent grades.

    Six of its rankings fell within the top or bottom 10 among the seven questions. That tied North Carolina for the most extreme grades.

    Six states had five extreme rankings: Florida, New York, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi and North Dakota.

    Or ponder a geeky “standard deviation” stat that tracks volatility. Only three states had wilder deviations in their poll rankings than California: New York, North Carolina and Mississippi.

    Jonathan Lansner is the business columnist for the Southern California News Group. He can be reached at jlansner@scng.com

    Jonathan Lansner

    Source link

  • What hurricane laws mean for vacation rentals in North Carolina

    Getting into the vacation rental business started off as a necessity for Ashley Harkrader.

    “I became a single mom in 2015, and I needed to figure out how to take care of my daughter,” said Harkrader of Pretty Stays CLT.

    She now has almost 100 properties nationwide and most of them are in North Carolina.


    What You Need To Know

    • North Carolina last year received about 40 million visitors from across the country, making it the fifth-most-visited state, according to the North Carolina Department of Commerce
    • With an increase in tourism, property owners like Ashley Harkrader say it’s important that state laws protect visitors during hurricane season 
    • She says she knows first-hand why these laws are essential because one of her properties in Boone was destroyed by Hurricane Helene 


    According to the North Carolina Department of Commerce, last year there were around 40 million visitors from across the country, ranking North Carolina the fifth-most-visited state. 

    With an increase in tourism, property owners like Harkrader think it’s important that state laws protect visitors during hurricane season.

    “Because I think we all need to care about each other in situations that none of us can control, and I think that gives us the ability to create a better rapport. So that way, when the time is appropriate for them to travel back to you, they know that you truly believe in their safety and vice versa,” Harkrader said.

    The North Carolina Vacation Rental Act says renters must follow mandatory evacuation orders and they are entitled to a prorated refund if they do have to evacuate. There is an exception if someone opts out of insurance that covers the risk of evacuation. If a vacation rental can’t be delivered as promised, renters must be refunded or offered a comparable property. 

    “I encourage those individuals who are entering into short-term leases to make sure that they’re reading the leases and what all of their rights and responsibilities are under the lease and paying particular attention to the insurance coverage. Of course, any of the mandatory evacuation orders that may be put in place during this hurricane season,” said Kristen Fetter of the North Carolina Real Estate Commission. 

    Harkrader says she knows first-hand why these laws are so essential since one of her properties in Boone was destroyed by Helene. 

    “We actually had a family that was going to be staying there, but we obviously refunded and gave them their money back just because we didn’t know what was going to happen,” Harkrader said.

    Arin Cotel-Altman

    Source link

  • A new mobile home in Anchorage costs up to $300,000. New city proposals aim to fix that.

    Sep. 16—There hasn’t been a new mobile home park built in Anchorage in more than three decades, a recent report found, and most of the existing mobile home stock is deteriorating or outright decrepit.

    The city has about three dozen such mobile home parks, formally designated “Mobile Home Communities” in municipal code, and accounting for approximately 4,600 housing units.

    Mayor Suzanne LaFrance’s administration is preparing two separate ordinances that aim to slow the disappearance of one of the city’s biggest reservoirs of low-income housing.

    One huge reason new mobile home parks aren’t being built is expense. Mobile homes exploded in popularity because setting them up was cheap, and served as “an avenue for homeownership for hundreds of thousands of Americans in the post-war decades,” according to the report, prepared for the Municipality of Anchorage by the McKinley Research Group.

    Nowadays, permitting, building and developing new mobile homes would cost about the same as constructing a single-family house or townhome. In the McKinley analysis, each new mobile home in the municipality would cost $226,000 to $332,000 — and that’s if you could even get ahold of the land and receive the right permits.

    To address the underlying factors, the administration’s two measures are intended to better use the property available in existing mobile home parks and make it easier to add small, affordable, potentially unconventional houses onto those properties.

    “We must take care of the housing we have, especially when it’s lower-cost housing. We need to make it easier to repair existing homes. And we need to allow all forms of safe housing in mobile home parks,” Mayor Suzanne LaFrance said in an emailed statement. “That’s exactly what these two reforms do.”

    Red tape and repairs

    One of the new ordinances provides flexibility for adding new, small housing models, both in mobile home parks, as well as on other residential properties.

    The second eliminates red tape around repairs and renovations to all kinds of residential properties, but it would be particularly applicable to the kind of older structures that don’t align with today’s building codes.

    Both measures have been working their way through the Planning and Zoning Commission process this summer, and could go before the Assembly for approval later this fall.

    “As you drive around, you just see the awful conditions a lot of these trailer parks are in, and we know it’s a source of affordable housing,” said Graham Downey, a special assistant to the mayor who has worked closely on the new measures. “These ordinances are really about making it easier to repair existing housing.”

    In the latest draft of the first ordinance, a copy of which was provided by Downey, the term “mobile home” is replaced in city code with “relocatable dwelling units.” The broadened term includes single- and double-wide trailers, but also “any manufactured home … tiny home, or other type of small dwelling that can be moved and certified as safe for permanent occupancy” by either Housing and Urban Development standards or by a local building official.

    It could also include intermodal shipping containers, typically called conexes in Alaska, if they can be modified in a way that meets residential safety standards.

    Essentially, the ordinance adjusts Title 21 to add greater flexibility to what kinds of structures can go into the mobile home parks that are already scattered across town.

    “It does not change where trailer parks are allowed,” Downey said. “What we’re doing is allowing these other types of units to be used in the trailer parks.”

    The other significant change is code density, boosting the maximum number of units allowed in a mobile home park from eight per acre to 25 per acre.

    The measure would not permit new mobile home parks or “relocatable dwelling unit communities” to easily be added in other residential zoning districts.

    But it would give property owners more options if they want to add a tiny home or converted shipping container to their private lots.

    “Relocatable dwelling units may be used as an accessory dwelling unit only if placed on a permanent foundation,” the draft ordinance states.

    The second ordinance allows “more flexibility for the reconstruction or rehabilitation of nonconforming structures.” In the world of planning and zoning, “nonconformity” has a specific technical definition: It means elements that were legal and up to code when the home was built, but through revisions to local rules and standards, they would not be allowed today. Houses or buildings with those older design elements have been grandfathered into legality, but they are officially “nonconforming.”

    One problem identified by the LaFrance administration in the city’s housing shortage is that building owners are sometimes leery of renovating aging structures because in seeking permits to update one part of the property, they become liable for bringing it fully into compliance.

    For example, the owner of a house or a traielr from the 1960s may want to replace the roof, but to get the permits to do so, they may have to also bring the driveway and heating system up to code, too. That raises the price tag significantly.

    The new measure extends beyond just mobile homes and would apply to a fuller range of property owners, Downey said, and is “really about helping people repair their own properties without having to address unrelated zoning issues.”

    According to a memorandum submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission by Daniel Mckenna-Foster, head of the city’s Long-Range Planning Division, the ordinance would allow more renovation work to occur without requiring a zoning code review.

    “While previously only small internal changes were allowed, now, any internal changes are allowed as long as they don’t increase the footprint of the building,” Mckenna-Foster wrote in the memorandum from June.

    Likewise, the measure would raise the financial threshold on a renovation project that would require a review by the city.

    Currently, if a renovation at a commercial or multifamily structure is projected to cost 10% or more of the property’s assessed value, the owner must also fix the unrelated zoning issues, even if they’ve established grandfather rights. The new ordinance raises that threshold to 50% of the property’s value. A building owner could repair their roof without being required to also modernize the driveway or landscaping.

    Code, cost squeeze out mobile homes

    The new proposals come as the LaFrance administration is pursuing a number of policy changes aimed at making it easier to build new homes, fix up old ones and encourage new forms of development.

    “We know Anchorage needs to build and rehabilitate a lot more housing, and that’s why my administration developed our 10,000 Homes in Ten Years strategy,” LaFrance said in a statement Monday. “Around half of those homes should come from rehabilitating aging properties in the Municipality. And it’s clear our community needs many more affordable and entry-level housing options like mobile homes.”

    Part of the reason Downey and others who are focused on housing policy say they are digging into Title 21 is because restrictive measures in recent iterations of the code effectively zoned certain forms of housing out of existence in Anchorage.

    Mobile home parks are perhaps the starkest example.

    “In Anchorage, and nationally, a backlash against (Mobile Home Communities) began in the 1980s and centered around the often poor maintenance of these neighborhoods, the concentration of poverty, and the unsightliness of communities that were not built to the same standards as other subdivisions,” the McKinley report states. “Regulations to make the construction of (Mobile Home Communities) more difficult have proliferated, and in Anchorage these regulations were written into the revised Title 21 Housing Code passed by the Anchorage Assembly in 2012.”

    Of the 38 mobile home parks in the municipality, 12 of them are big enough that they account for 80% of the overall mobile home units, and “the average build year of units … is 1977,” said the McKinley report.

    The smaller parks, with fewer than 100 units, tend to be older, on average built in 1966.

    When the McKinley analysis broke down why no new mobile homes and mobile home parks have come to market in Anchorage since 1990, they found a number of factors making the proposition prohibitively expensive.

    There’s far less easily developable land available in the Anchorage Bowl than there was in the 1960s and 1970s. The last local business that built “prefabricated houses in Anchorage closed in 2022,” and the cost of buying similar units in the Lower 48 and shipping them to Alaska adds “more than 40% to the total cost of each unit,” the report said.

    In terms of infrastructure, local rules require that “developers bear the cost of installing or extending water and wastewater, road, and other utility” components, the report said.

    “New (Mobile Home Communities) would likely not be able to provide housing units for sale at rates much below what is currently available in the condominium and townhouse market,” the report found.

    But one of the biggest factors was the overhaul of the Title 21 code that happened between 2009 and 2012, which made it “exceedingly difficult” to build new trailer parks, the report said. One nail in the coffin was density: New developments couldn’t have more than four units per acre, which, the McKinley report concluded, “precludes any efficient construction” of a trailer park.

    Since basically all of the trailers and trailer parks in Anchorage are older, just about every home is out of compliance with modern codes and standards.

    “Consequently, redevelopment of older (Mobile Home Communities) is a costly proposition, as the entire development would have to conform to the new standards,” the McKinley report notes. That would mean increasing the space between units, widening roads, adding landscaping — expenses that most landowners are not able or willing to finance.

    Because new parks are not being built, and there are few new mobile homes being added to the overall housing stock, once a mobile home goes away it is typically not replaced.

    That presents an additional liability for municipal housing officials because roughly a quarter of the mobile homes in Anchorage have five or more people living in them, according to the McKinley analysis.

    Factoring in all of the costs associated, potential new buyers of mobile homes in Anchorage would be paying a minimum of $3,375 a month in the cheapest scenario, the McKinley analysts calculated.

    “The resulting available housing units, while representing new construction and new homeownership opportunities, would nevertheless be more expensive than most low- to moderate-income households could afford,” the report states.

    Among the policy changes recommended by McKinley are infrastructure subsidies, targeted investment funds and greater allowable density in mobile home communities.

    Correction: This article has been updated to better reflect requirements in the non-conformity review process with respect to residential and commercial properties. The financial threshold for requiring nonconformity updates applies to commercial properties, not internal renovations to residential units.

    Source link

  • San Francisco NIMBYism strikes again as one neighborhood recalls a city supervisor who created a new park for the whole city to enjoy | Fortune

    During the coronavirus pandemic, the city closed a stretch of a four-lane highway along San Francisco’s Pacific Coast and made it an automobile-free sanctuary where bicyclists and walkers flocked to exercise and socialize under open skies and to the sound of crashing waves.

    But with the post-pandemic return to school and work, resentment grew among neighborhood residents who relied on the artery to get around. Some blamed the district city supervisor who helped make the change permanent by placing on a citywide ballot a measure to turn the 2-mile (3.2-kilometer) stretch into a new park.

    On Tuesday, district voters will decide whether to recall Supervisor Joel Engardio.

    The recall of a local supervisor who represents one-tenth of a city of 800,000 might seem like minor politics. But the election highlights a San Francisco in flux and a still cranky, even emboldened electorate as leaders prepare to make tough decisions about the city’s future.

    Controversial housing proposal collides with NIMBY legacy

    The action also speaks to San Francisco’s long history of “Not In My Backyard,” or NIMBY politics. Since the 1970s, the formerly bohemian city’s unusually direct form of democracy has increasingly empowered small, local groups to block development with wider social benefits, resulting in a relatively small city that competes with New York and Los Angeles for the title of worst housing crisis in the country. Although San Francisco is relatively dense by American standards, much of the city has height limits in place, preventing an even denser and more affordable city.

    Researchers from Australia studied San Francisco NIMBYism in 2021 and found that it “continues to dominate the dialog at public hearings on development proposals. Planning meetings appear to be dominated by older, white, and financially stable residents, and this is a major (though not sole) barrier to the city’s social mix.” In fact, the scourge of housing advocates, single-family zoning, was invented in the Bay Area, in nearby Berkeley, in the 1910s.

    Tuesday’s vote comes as San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie faces his biggest test with a controversial plan to construct taller, denser buildings with tens of thousands of new housing units, which San Francisco very much needs. Engardio, who is a moderate Democrat like Lurie, supports the plan, which has strong opposition in his district.

    The recall election will be the city’s third in four years. It’s fueled by many of the same people who tossed out three liberal school board members in February 2022 followed by the ouster of politically progressive San Francisco District Attorney Chesa Boudin in June of that year.

    “Anybody that thought that the recalls were just a rejection of progressive politics is wrong,” said Jason McDaniel, who teaches political science at San Francisco State University.

    He says other politicians are getting the message, “and it’s going to make them less likely to embrace difficult positions.”

    “This recall is really about the future of our city,” said Engardio in an interview with The Associated Press. “Do we want to be a city that just preserves itself in amber and goes back in time? Or do we want to be a city that innovates, thinks ahead, is forward-looking and welcomes new people?”

    Who is Joel Engardio?

    Engardio, a crime victims’ advocate, supported the previous recalls. He was among detractors who said Boudin was too lenient on crime and the San Francisco Unified School Board too focused on progressive politics, including renaming 44 school sites.

    Later in 2022, he defeated an incumbent to win one of 11 seats on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors. Engardio represents the Sunset District, a low-key residential neighborhood of single-family homes on the west side with a high Chinese population.

    Last year, he was one of five city supervisors who placed a proposal to permanently ban cars from the Great Highway on the November 2024 ballot. Measure K passed citywide, but failed in his district. In May, recall petitioners submitted 10,500 valid signatures to qualify the initiative for Tuesday’s ballot.

    A new park divides the city

    On an overcast afternoon last week, people jogged and rode bikes down what had once been called the Great Highway. Moms pushed babies in strollers on a road divided by a median of blowing sand and creeping ice plant succulents, still striped with dotted white lines marking what used to be driving lanes. An older man walked by slowly, using a cane.

    The new park dubbed Sunset Dunes is popular with many San Francisco residents — but not so much with those in its home community.

    Backers of the recall say Engardio betrayed his constituents by going back on support for a compromise that would have kept the highway open to vehicles during the week and banned them on weekends. They say he failed to listen to their concerns about quality of life and traffic safety in the district.

    Engardio says he was always clear about his preference for an oceanside park and only supported the compromise because it was up against a ballot measure at the time that would have fully reopened the highway to cars.

    His supporters say the ocean belongs to everyone and that the supervisor is being targeted unfairly. They also say the city has made significant changes to mitigate traffic flow through the district.

    Dueling campaigns

    Wearing a blue cap and white sneakers, volunteer Heather Davies slips a recall flier under a door. At another house, she thanks a man for returning his ballot with a yes vote.

    Davies says the recall is what regular people like herself have to counter the interests of Engardio’s wealthy donors, including Yelp co-founder Jeremy Stoppelman and Ripple cryptocurrency co-founder Chris Larsen. The tech entrepreneurs have contributed a combined $375,000 to support the anti-recall campaign, which has raised more than $800,000 total; the pro-recall campaign has raised about $250,000.

    “We don’t have the levers to pull in democracy like these guys. They can flood the market with social media, and we can’t afford to do that,” she said.

    But Alex Wong, a father of two young children, says he supports Engardio because the supervisor has always endorsed family-friendly policies, like building more housing and improving schools.

    “The recall itself is centered around a road closure that the rest of the city voted on in support. It may not be popular among my neighbors, but I don’t think that in itself is worthy enough of a recall,” Wong said. “The Sunset is better than this.”

    Janie Har, Nick Lichtenberg, The Associated Press

    Source link

  • More affordable housing opens in Durham with a new look

    DURHAM, N.C. — Some affordable housing units in the Bull City are getting a makeover.

    The Durham Housing Authority reopened the Vanguard Apartments and recently broke ground on the Dillard Street Apartments. It’s an effort to open up more affordable housing opportunities while also creating a new vision for what these communities can look like.


    What You Need To Know

    • Durham Housing Authority reopened Vanguard Apartments in May
    • The $200 million redevelopement project will replace 214 old unites with 538 mixed-income homes
    • 21 Vanguard units are set aside for former residents
    • The next phase, Commerce Street Apartments, is expected to open in 2026 with 172 units


    Inside her newly developed apartment at the Vanguard, Bianca Rivera says it’s finally setting in that this is her space to call home.

    “I’ve been sitting outside on the patio and just enjoying it,” Rivera said as she reflected on the new space she now shares with her 10-year-old son, Micah.

    Rivera and her son previously lived at Liberty Street Apartments before moving to Oxford Manor to live temporarily as the city made space for new developments.

     She says that she and her family can now feel safe.

    “There was trash all over the place, and me coming here and not seeing trash all over the place, not seeing drug activity or gun violence,” she explained, “so far, that has made a big change in our lives.”

    The Vanguard Apartments just reopened after a major renovation as part of Durham Housing Authority’s efforts to build what’s officials hope will be vibrant, mixed-income communities. 

    The $200-million redevelopment project began with two aging properties downtown.

    It’s a four-phase project. In all, 214 units will be replaced with 538 new homes, 348 being affordable and 190 being market rate. Twenty-one units are prioritized for former residents like Rivera.

    Interim CEO of DHA Anthony Snell says this project and others to come reflect the importance of building safe, beautiful and affordable homes for people no matter the socioeconomic status.

    “I know people think it’s innovative and it’s a model, right? We are just building communities that are totally inclusive of the entire community,” Snell said. “And so, that’s where we think we’re going to have our success.”

    The need for more affordable housing is urgent.

    In a recent National Low Income Housing Coalition report, it found that there are over 330,000 extremely low-income households in North Carolina. For every 100 of them, there are only 41 affordable rental homes available.

    For Rivera, the move is more than just about having a new space. It has allowed her to dream big.

    “It has helped me grow into wanting more and bigger and better living in the future,” she said.

    The first phase, the Vanguard, officially opened in May with 72 new homes. The next step is the Commerce Street Apartments, where construction began in July 2024. It is expected to open in 2026 with 172 units for both seniors and families. Phases three and four will add nearly 300 more units for individuals and families.

    Ryan Hayes-Owens

    Source link

  • California Lawmakers Propose Overhaul of L.A.’s Mansion Tax

    Lawmakers in Sacramento look to make changes to the 2022 bill

    1316 Beverly Grove Pl
    Credit: (Via Zillow/The MLS)

    State lawmakers proposed a new bill to overhaul measure ULA or L.A. ‘s ‘mansion tax’ on Tuesday. 

    The new bill, SB-423, aims to take out parts of ULA that critics have said do more harm than good to the current housing market. By reducing the taxes imposed by Measure ULA for people looking to sell commercial buildings constructed in the last 15 years, think apartment buildings, offices, and shopping centers. 

    Measure ULA was originally intended to raise taxes on high-value properties and funnel that money into affordable housing projects and programs to alleviate homelessness. The measure was passed by city voters in 2022, and since April 2023, the city has levied a tax on sales of properties worth $5 million or more. 

    The ‘Mansion tax’ did not only apply to celebrity single-family houses in the hills, but also commercial buildings, including apartment complexes. While backers say that it is working as intended, those who oppose the tax say that it is having a much larger impact on slowing the development of new housing. This leads to making affordability worse in an already tight housing market. 

    With the higher increase of taxes on higher-value property, it can scare away developers, leaving L.A. with less housing than it started with. 

    Mott Smith, adjunct professor of real estate development at the USC Price School told LAist, “The units that we need to support all the households coming into the city — or that have to move and deal with their lives — those aren’t happening,” he said. “And when we squeeze the housing supply, the poor feel it the most.”

    Tara Nguyen

    Source link

  • Australia debuts first multi-story 3D printed home – built in just 5 months

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    A major milestone in construction has arrived. This time from Western Australia. Contec Australia has completed the nation’s first multi-story 3D concrete printed home. Located in Tapping near Perth, the two-story residence was finished in just five months. Most impressive? The structural walls were 3D printed in only 18 hours of active printing time.

    This matters because it points to where housing might be heading here, too. With rising costs, labor shortages and a push for more sustainable building methods, this kind of breakthrough could shape the future of American neighborhoods.

    Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
    Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide – free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter.

    SUSTAINABLE 3D-PRINTED HOME BUILT PRIMARILY FROM SOIL

    Why this build is a game-changer

    Contec’s project isn’t just a prototype. It demonstrates how 3D concrete printing can bring major benefits to everyday housing. Compared to traditional masonry construction, the Tapping home achieved:

    • 22% cost savings on structural walls
    • 3x the strength of brick (50MPa vs 15MPa)
    • Faster delivery, with the entire project completed in just five months

    Contec Australia prints the final wall of the second level of a multi-story 3D printed home in Perth. (Contec Australia)

    And it doesn’t cut corners on durability. The walls are fire-resistant, water-resistant, termite-proof and cyclone rated, features U.S. regions facing hurricanes, floods and wildfires could find especially appealing.

    AMERICA’S LESSONS FROM WORLD’S LARGEST 3D-PRINTED SCHOOLS

    exterior of a modern home

    Exterior of a multi-story 3D concrete printed home located in Tapping, Australia. (Contec Australia)

    How 3D concrete printing works

    Instead of stacking bricks, Contec’s robotic printer extrudes a specialized concrete mix based on a digital 3D model. The mix sets in under three minutes, allowing new layers to be stacked without scaffolding or formwork.

    The walls are printed in precise layers over the course of 18 hours of active machine time. Once the structural shell is complete, traditional crews step in to add the roof, wiring, windows, flooring and finishing touches.

    WORLD’S BIGGEST 3D-PRINTED SCHOOLS ARE UNDERWAY IN QATAR

    interior of a while bathroom

    Bathroom of a multi-story 3D concrete printed home located in Tapping, Australia. (Contec Australia)

    Benefits that could apply in the U.S.

    Speed: Structural walls finished in 18 hours; full build completed in five months.
    Cost efficiency: 22% cheaper than comparable masonry builds in WA.
    Design freedom: Complex shapes, curves and openings without added expense.
    Sustainability: 30% lower CO₂ emissions than conventional concrete and minimal waste.
    Durability: More than three times stronger than brick, fire- and water-resistant and able to withstand harsh weather.

    dining room next to kitchen in modern home

    Dining room of a multi-story 3D concrete printed home located in Tapping, Australia. (Contec Australia)

    How this compares to 3D printed homes in the U.S.

    You may have already heard of Icon, the Texas-based startup that has been pioneering 3D printed homes. Icon’s builds include entire neighborhoods of single-story houses in Austin, as well as experimental multi-level projects. However, most of Icon’s multi-story designs rely on a hybrid approach, with 3D printing for the ground floor and timber or steel frames for the upper levels.

    That’s what makes the Tapping project stand out. Contec printed the structural walls for both stories in just 18 hours of active printing time, something not yet widely seen in the U.S. This could signal the next step for American 3D printing: scaling beyond single-story housing into more complex multi-story designs.

    BRICKS MADE FROM RECYCLED COFFEE GROUNDS REDUCE EMISSIONS AND COSTS

    bed with white comforters in modern home

    Bedroom of a multi-story 3D concrete printed home located in Tapping, Australia.  (Contec Australia)

    How much does a 3D printed home cost?

    One of the biggest questions people have is price. Contec hasn’t shared the exact cost of the Tapping home, but the company says it delivered the structural walls 22% cheaper than a standard masonry build. That saving adds up when you consider how much of a home’s budget goes toward labor and materials.

    In the U.S., companies like Icon have priced 3D printed homes starting around $100,000 to $150,000, depending on size and finishes. While final costs vary by region, land and design, the potential savings from reduced labor and faster timelines make 3D printing an attractive option as housing costs continue to rise.

    VERTICAL TINY HOMES REDEFINE COMPACT LIVING

    interior view of dining area of home

    Kitchen and dining room of a multi-story 3D concrete printed home located in Tapping, Australia. (Contec Australia)

    What this means for you

    For American homeowners, builders and communities, the Tapping project shows how 3D concrete printing could offer faster, cheaper and more resilient housing. Imagine moving into a new home months earlier, with walls that are stronger, more sustainable and better able to handle extreme conditions.

    Take my quiz: How safe is your online security?

    Think your devices and data are truly protected? Take this quick quiz to see where your digital habits stand. From passwords to Wi-Fi settings, you’ll get a personalized breakdown of what you’re doing right – and what needs improvement. Take my Quiz here: Cyberguy.com.

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    Kurt’s key takeaways

    3D printed housing is moving from concept to reality. This home shows that walls can go up in just 18 hours, and a full build can be finished in only a few months. That kind of speed changes the way we think about construction. With rising costs and ongoing labor shortages, builders need new solutions. 3D concrete printing offers a path to faster, more affordable and more sustainable homes without cutting corners on strength or safety.

    The big question is, if a 3D-printed home became available in your area, would you move in? Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com.

    Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
    Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide – free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter.

    Copyright 2025 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved. 

    Source link

  • La Alma Lincoln Park residents weigh new Broncos stadium at Burnham Yard: ‘It’s going to change everything’

    Two schools of thought flitter through the streets just behind the Denver Broncos’ planned future home, separated by just one block but standing an entire world apart.

    On a sunny Tuesday morning, 35-year-old Rita Guerrero stepped out from her door on North Mariposa Avenue, lively pup Olive barely contained by her leash. Guerrero bought her home in the La Alma Lincoln Park neighborhood five years ago, and smiled when she thinks of the wealth of possibilities that now exist a quarter mile away at the defunct Burnham Yard.

    The Broncos just announced their plans to construct a new stadium in her backyard, and it could mean a livelier neighborhood. And exciting features for families. And increased property values.

    “This is very exciting,” Guerrero beamed. “I’m very happy. It’ll be great for the team, great for the neighborhood. I really see that there’s, probably — I mean, there really can only be upside.”

    Broncos name Burnham Yard preferred site for new stadium development

    On a cloudy Tuesday afternoon, a few hundred feet away, 46-year-old Nicole Jones and 51-year-old Desiree Maestas crossed onto North Lipan Street, discussing the change to come. Jones has lived all her life a few houses up the block, and frowned when she thinks of the wealth of possibilities that now exist with the Broncos’ professed plan to develop at Burnham Yard.

    It could mean more traffic. And more construction. And increased property values.

    “I think it’s going to change everything,” Jones said. “Because everything’s going to go up. Especially in this neighborhood, everything’s going to go up. And a lot of us ain’t even going to be able to afford to live here anymore. Because the stadium is going to be right in our neighborhood. Right in our backyard.”

    “So, yeah,” she repeated, somber. “We’re not going to be able to afford to live here no more.”

    Residents of La Alma Lincoln Park who spoke to The Denver Post on Tuesday were split on the complicated reality that now awaits, after the Broncos officially announced that they’ve zeroed in on Burnham Yard as the planned site of a privately-financed mixed-use stadium district.

    Some residents lamented the change that continues to rattle the historic Denver neighborhood, one that has already experienced generations of displacement. Some residents championed the city’s efforts to keep the team local: they are the Denver Broncos, 39-year-old Barbara Ott emphasized from her porch, not the Lone Tree Broncos.

    The general median is a sort of cautious optimism, as community leader Simon Tafoya put it.

    Luca Evans, Elizabeth Hernandez

    Source link