ReportWire

Tag: Hotels/Restaurants/Casinos

  • Here’s how the Republican presidential candidates say they’ll whip inflation

    Here’s how the Republican presidential candidates say they’ll whip inflation

    Inflation remains a top concern among Americans, so what do the Republicans seeking President Joe Biden’s job say they’ll do about it?

    MarketWatch asked the 2024 GOP White House hopefuls to give at least three ways that they would address the elevated prices that have blown up many household budgets.

    Most campaigns provided responses, while some didn’t but have offered proposals in other venues. See what they’re all planning below.

    The economy is the No. 1 issue for Republican voters, according to a recent Wall Street Journal poll, which found 36% citing the economy generally and an additional 10% citing inflation.

    MarketWatch contacted the eight contenders who took part in their primary’s first debate, along with former President Donald Trump, who skipped the debate, and two relatively well-known contenders who failed to qualify for the first debate, Larry Elder and former Congressman Will Hurd. They are listed below in order of their ranking in the latest polls, based on a RealClearPolitics moving average.

    Inflation was low when Trump became president, with prices rising less than 2% a year. That was even considered a problem before the COVID-19 pandemic, with inflation often characterized as stubbornly or persistently low. Inflation began to spike in 2021, shortly after Biden took office, due to a global shortage of goods and a huge rebound in consumer demand following the pandemic’s early stages. Economists say massive stimulus by both the Trump and Biden administrations as well as low interest rates fostered by the Federal Reserve helped to push inflation to a 40-year high.

    Biden has stressed that inflation, as measured by the consumer-price index, has “fallen by around two-thirds,” and he and his team have talked up their efforts to lower costs for prescription drugs and insulin, to crack down on junk fees for a range of services, and to use the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to lower gasoline prices. Biden’s re-election campaign didn’t respond to MarketWatch’s request for comment.

    Donald Trump

    “I would get inflation down,” Trump said in a recent interview with NBC’s “Meet the Press,” while saying that “we did a great job with inflation.” His campaign pointed MarketWatch to a number of policy proposals in which Trump himself is quoted.

    Former President Donald Trump walks over to speak with reporters before departing from Atlanta’s airport last month.


    AP

    • The former president says he’ll rein in what he calls Biden’s “wasteful spending,” which Trump says is key to stopping inflation. Trump is proposing to use what’s known as impoundment authority to reduce federal spending. That term refers to the ability of a president to withhold congressionally appropriated funds from their intended use, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.

    • Trump also calls for boosting energy output. “When I’m back in the White House, I will immediately unleash energy production, slash regulations, like I did just three years ago, and repeal Biden’s tax hikes to get inflation down as fast as possible, and it will go quickly, so that interest rates can get back under control,” Trump says on his campaign website. “I would get inflation down, because drill we must,” he told “Meet the Press.”

    • A Trump spokesman did not respond when asked for specifics about which Biden-approved tax increases Trump would repeal. The former president and his advisers, meanwhile, have reportedly discussed deeper cuts to both individual and corporate rates that would build on the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

    Ron DeSantis

    Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, says a spokesman, “will reduce inflation by, among other measures, tackling government spending, unleashing domestic energy and removing burdensome Biden administration regulations.”

    Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis speaks in July during a press conference in West Columbia, S.C.


    AP Photo/Sean Rayford

    • In his economic plan, DeSantis leans heavily into energy policy for addressing inflation. “DeSantis will unleash our domestic energy sector, modernize and protect our grid and advance American energy independence. This will not only increase our economic and national security while reducing inflation, [but] it will also help fuel a manufacturing renaissance that will create jobs, revitalize our communities and improve our standard of living,” says his plan.

    • He told “CBS Evening News with Norah O’Donnell” that, as president, he would “stop spending so much money. We need a president that’s going to be a force for spending restraint, because that’s one of the root causes, with Congress spending so much.” He criticized both Democrats and Republicans for government spending.

    Vivek Ramaswamy

    Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy speaks in April at an event in Iowa.


    AP

    “This isn’t complicated,” entrepreneur and author Vivek Ramaswamy said in a recent post on X. “Fight inflation, unleash growth by taking the handcuffs [off] the U.S. energy sector & dismantling the regulatory state.” His campaign didn’t respond to MarketWatch’s request for comment, but his campaign website offers the following proposals:

    • “Drill, frack & burn coal : abandon the climate cult & unshackle nuclear energy.”

    • “Launch deregulatory ‘Reagan 2.0’ revolution: cut > 75% headcount amongst U.S. regulators.”

    • Ramaswamy is also calling for dramatically changing the Federal Reserve, by ending the central bank’s dual mandate of keeping inflation low and maintaining full employment. “Limit the U.S. Fed’s scope: stabilize the dollar
      DXY
      & nothing more,” his campaign site says.

    Nikki Haley

    A spokesman for Nikki Haley’s campaign pointed to a Fox Business interview on Wednesday in which she called for ending the federal gas tax and cutting spending, as well as to her speech Friday in New Hampshire on her economic plan.

    Republican presidential candidate Nikki Haley is a former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations and former South Carolina governor.


    Getty Images

    • “We want to eliminate the federal gas tax completely,” Haley told Fox Business. “We have to get more money in our taxpayers’ pockets.” That tax helps pay for highways, but she said the system isn’t working, echoing a point that some policy analysts have previously made. Biden pushed for temporarily suspending the federal gas tax in 2022, but Congress didn’t provide sufficient support for his proposal. In her economic speech, Haley also promised to cut income taxes for working families and make permanent the tax cuts that small businesses scored in 2017’s GOP tax overhaul.

    • The former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations said members of Congress are “spending like drunken sailors,” as she promised to reduce the federal government’s outlays. “I will veto any spending bill that doesn’t take us back to pre-COVID levels,” she told Fox Business, referring to budgets that date to before the onset of the coronavirus pandemic in March 2020.

    • Haley in her speech Friday pledged to support the U.S. energy industry, as she suggested that Washington has been “stifling it.” She said: “We’ll drill so much oil and gas, families will save big on their utility bills.”

    Mike Pence

    A spokesman for Pence’s campaign pointed to the former vice president’s plan for “ending inflation,” which calls for actions such as reducing the federal government’s spending and changing the Federal Reserve’s job description.

    Former Vice President Mike Pence served as governor of Indiana and as a congressman before becoming Donald Trump’s running mate in 2016.


    AP

    • A Pence administration would “end runaway deficits by freezing non-defense spending, eliminating unnecessary government programs, repealing over $3 trillion in new spending under Biden, and reforming mandatory programs that drive our debt,” the plan says. Earlier this year, he urged “commonsense and compassionate” reforms for programs such as Social Security and Medicaid.

    • Pence wants to end the Fed’s dual mandate, which calls for the U.S. central bank to focus on full employment and stable prices. “Trying to serve two, often contradictory goals has led to wild fluctuation in rates,” his plan says, adding that it’s better to “leave employment policy to the president and Congress.”

    • The former vice president’s plan said he aims to bring supply chains and production “back home,” and that would happen by “removing regulatory burdens, enacting pro-growth tax policies, and ensuring access to abundant American energy.” In other words: “We will fight inflation by making America the best place to do business again.”

    • Similar to his 2024 GOP rivals, Pence blasts Biden’s energy policies, though some of the Democratic incumbent’s stances, such as his approval of the Willow drilling project in Alaska, have also been criticized by environmental groups. Pence’s plan says: “It is time to reverse Biden’s attack on American energy by restarting oil and gas leasing on federal lands, opening the Arctic and offshore regions for exploration
      XOP,
      approving safe transportation of oil and gas, mining rare earth minerals, and rejecting climate change hysteria that is causing U.S. energy
      XLE
      production to fall.”

    Chris Christie

    Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie addresses a New Hampshire audience in April.


    AP Photo/Charles Krupa

    Chris Christie’s White House campaign didn’t respond to MarketWatch’s requests for comment, but the former New Jersey governor has emphasized that reducing government spending will help tame inflation.

    “The out-of-control government spending has created this inflation,” Christie said in June during a CNN town hall. “I mean, even Larry Summers, who I don’t agree with much on, former Democratic Treasury secretary, warned Joe Biden, ‘Don’t do this spending. It’s going to cause the inflation.’ So, first, we need to bring spending down, and we’ve talked about that before.”

    Related: Larry Summers has a new inflation warning

    Tim Scott

    U.S. Sen. Tim Scott pointed to reducing the federal government’s spending and repealing one of Biden’s signature legislative packages, when asked about how he would address inflation.

    Tim Scott, a U.S. senator from South Carolina, speaks last month during the presidential debate in Milwaukee.


    Getty Images

    • Scott, from South Carolina, said in a statement that he would aim to “snap non-defense discretionary spending back to the pre-COVID 2019 baseline.” He described that as stopping Democrats from “turning the temporary pandemic into permanent socialism.”

    • Scott said he would rescind the Inflation Reduction Act, which is Democrats’ big economic package aimed at addressing climate change, capping drug costs and raising hundreds of billions of dollars through taxes on corporations. “The Inflation Reduction Act actually increased inflation and the only thing it reduced was money in our pockets,” he said in his statement. “Cutting that off and restoring tax cuts and eliminating the tax increases would go a long way to having the kind of stimulative impact in our economy and controlling spending.”

    • Scott called for stronger economic growth. “We have to also grow our economy somewhere near 5% consistently,” he said, adding that could create 10 million jobs. The U.S. economy grew by nearly 6% in 2021 after contracting in 2020 as COVID hit, then it expanded by about 2% in 2022.

    Related: Republican presidential candidate Tim Scott says he wants to put the focus on tax cuts

    Asa Hutchinson

    Former Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson blames “excessive federal spending” for leading to inflation when giving speeches, and outlines a plan for “fiscal responsibility” on his campaign site.

    Asa Hutchinson, governor of Arkansas from 2015 until this year, speaks at an Iowa event in April.


    Scott Olson/Getty Images

    • “Restore discipline by reducing federal government size, cutting spending, balancing the budget, and lowering the deficit to tame inflation,” it states.

    • When Hutchinson was governor, he signed a $500 million tax-cut package, saying “it could not come at a better time with the continued challenge of high food and gas prices.” That was in August 2022. On his campaign website, he repeats a call to cut taxes and “reduce regulations to boost the private sector and enhance wages for American workers.”

    Hutchinson’s campaign did not respond to a request for comment from MarketWatch.  

    Doug Burgum

    North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum, a GOP presidential hopeful, speaks at the Iowa State Fair in August.


    Brandon Bell/Getty Images

    North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum’s website says that as president he would “get inflation under control, cut taxes, lower gas prices
    RB00,
    +0.31%
    ,
    reduce the cost of living and help people realize their fullest potential.” It doesn’t provide specifics.

    A spokesman for Burgum’s White House campaign didn’t respond to MarketWatch’s requests for comment. A spokesman reportedly told the New York Times that the campaign will roll out its vision and plans on its own timeline.

    Larry Elder

    Larry Elder, a conservative radio host and a gubernatorial candidate in California in the failed 2021 recall of Democratic incumbent Gavin Newsom, said he views energy and tax policy and a constitutional amendment as ways to whip inflation.

    Larry Elder is a conservative radio host and former gubernatorial candidate in California.


    AP

    • “Reverse the war on oil
      CL00,
      +0.93%

      and gas
      NG00,
      -2.65%

      ; permit drilling in Anwar [Arctic National Wildlife Refuge]; authorize the Keystone Pipeline; reverse the Biden restrictions on drilling on federal lands; and encourage nuclear energy
      NLR,
      ” Elder said in a statement.

    • “Encourage an amendment to the Constitution to set spending to a fixed percent of the GDP,” he also said.

    • Elder said the reduction in spending forced by that constitutional amendment would “coincide with a steep reduction in personal and corporate income taxes,” offering further help to Americans with stretched budgets.

    Will Hurd

    2024 Republican presidential hopeful Will Hurd, a former Texas congressman, speaks in Iowa in July.


    AFP via Getty Images

    Former U.S. Rep. Will Hurd of Texas announced his candidacy in June but so far hasn’t made it to the debate stage. In his campaign-launch video, he labeled inflation “still out of control.”

    • In a post on X in June, Hurd called for reining in spending. “You cannot be putting government funds into, at a time where you’re seeing the rising inflation,” he said.

    • And he said tax hikes are a nonstarter when inflation is high. “The worst time to talk about increasing taxes is when everybody’s hurting from inflation.”

    • Hurd also said the deficit should be addressed, to “start bending the curve back on the debt.”

    Hurd’s campaign did not respond to a request for comment from MarketWatch.

    Now read: Republican presidential debate: Candidates could win with a clear economic message about the ‘crisis among working people’

    And see: As Biden joins UAW picket line, poll shows Democrats’ edge over GOP on ‘caring about people like me’ has vanished

    Jeffry Bartash contributed.

    Source link

  • A stranger in your hotel room? Kitty-litter shortages? Online attacks are causing real-world effects.

    A stranger in your hotel room? Kitty-litter shortages? Online attacks are causing real-world effects.

    It was past midnight when Alessandra Millican and a friend entered the Bellagio hotel room that was costing them hundreds of dollars a night, but unexpected noises made them stop cold.

    “We started hearing grunts,” she said. “It’s somebody waking up — we were halfway through the room and we realized there’s somebody sleeping in here.”

    Millican…

    Source link

  • Howard Schultz steps down from Starbucks board of directors

    Howard Schultz steps down from Starbucks board of directors

    Starbucks Corp. on Wednesday said former Chief Executive Howard Schultz is stepping down from its board of directors, capping a nearly 40-year career during which the company grew from a handful of stores in Seattle into a global coffee chain.

    Schultz’s retirement from the board, which ends his involvement in the company’s leadership, took effect Wednesday and was part of a planned transition, the coffee chain said. Schultz stepped down as Starbucks
    SBUX,
    +0.72%

    chief executive in March.

    The company on Wednesday also said that it had elected Wei Zhang to its board of directors, effective Oct. 1. Zhang was most recently a senior adviser to Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba Group
    BABA,
    -0.75%

    and also held leadership positions at News Corp China and CNBC China.

    Shares of Starbucks were down 0.7% after hours on Wednesday.

    Starbucks said Schultz “will now turn his attention with his wife, Sheri, to focus on a range of philanthropic and entrepreneurial investments to create greater opportunity, accessible to all.” The company noted that the two were co-founders of the Schultz Family Foundation in 1996, and of the emes project.

    Although he was not technically the founder of the coffee chain, Schultz became the modern face of it. Schultz joined Starbucks in 1982 as its director of operations and marketing. After a brief hiatus from the company, he returned in 1987 as chief executive and bought the business with backing from local investors, according to a biography on the Starbucks website. The chain went public in 1992.

    As the chain’s footprint expanded beyond the U.S., Schultz stepped down from the CEO role in 2000 but returned in 2008. He retired from Starbucks in 2018, then came back as interim chief executive and board member last year.

    Over those years, Starbucks has banked on China for international growth — even as that country’s economy remains turbulent following the postpandemic reopening. It also added food and cold and customizable drinks to its menus and built out its mobile-ordering infrastructure.

    The company has branded itself as a progressive employer and a supporter of social justice. But over the past two years, the company, and Schultz in particular, have faced criticism over the handling of employees who were trying to unionize. Union members have accused the chain of unfair labor practices, retaliation for organizing and delaying contract negotiations, leading to deeper scrutiny from lawmakers.

    “We hope this is an opportunity for Starbucks to change course and leave their union-busting behind them,” Starbucks Workers United, the union representing those workers, said Wednesday in a tweet.

    Still, even as inflation has eaten into consumer savings, Schultz said coffee has remained an “affordable luxury” for many customers. And Starbucks management said that younger, loyal consumers and customizable drinks would help sustain demand.

    According to a filing on Wednesday, Schultz will still be connected to the company in other ways. Starbucks said it would amend Schultz’s retirement agreement from 2018 and continue to provide him and his spouse with security services.

    “The security services will be provided for a period of 10 years and will be evaluated on an annual basis,” the filing said. “In recognition of Mr. Schultz’s leadership as the company’s founder and chairman emeritus, the company will also provide Mr. Schultz with the reimbursement of his monthly healthcare insurance premiums.”

    Source link

  • Penn dumps Barstool for ESPN-branded sports-gambling service

    Penn dumps Barstool for ESPN-branded sports-gambling service

    Online sports-betting company Penn Entertainment Inc. sealed a $1.5 billion deal with Walt Disney Co.’s
    DIS,
    +1.50%

    ESPN to launch ESPN Bet, a branded sportsbook for fans in the U.S., and pivoted away from Barstool Sports on Tuesday, selling the platform back to founder Dave Portnoy.

    Penn Entertainment
    PENN,
    -0.68%

    will rebrand its current sportsbook and relaunch as ESPN Bet in the fall in 16 legalized-betting states where Penn is licensed.

    The rebrand — which includes the mobile app, website, and mobile website — sent Penn’s stock soaring 13% in after-hours trading Tuesday. ESPN Bet will benefit from exclusive promotional services across ESPN’s platforms, including access to ESPN talent, the companies said.

    Penn will pay ESPN $1.5 billion over 10 years as part of the strategic partnership, and will grant ESPN $500 million of warrants to purchase about 31.8 million Penn common shares, with additional bonus warrants possible.

     “Together, we can utilize each other’s strengths to create the type of experience that existing and new bettors will expect from both companies, and we can’t wait to get started,” Penn Entertainment Chief Executive Jay Snowden said in a release. 

    Penn also said it has divested 100% of its stake in Barstool Sports to Portnoy, allowing the sports media platform “to return to its roots of providing unique and authentic content to its loyal audience without the restrictions associated with a publicly traded, licensed gaming company.”

    For Penn, the ESPN partnership represents “a clear step up from Barstool in terms of mass appeal…and minimal regulatory risk,” according to Wells Fargo analyst Daniel Politzer, who said it was a “nearly impossible challenge for a publicly traded, licensed gaming company” to own “a media platform that thrived on viral/provocative content.”

    Still, he said in a note to clients that “it’s premature to conclude this is a game change” since past partnerships between online sports-betting companies and media players have come up short of what initial fanfare would’ve suggested.

    The news sent rival DraftKings Inc. shares
    DKNG,
    +0.25%

    sinking about 5% in after-hours trading.

     The decline in DraftKings shares comes as they’ve advanced 178% so far in 2023, through Tuesday’s close. Two analysts upgraded DraftKings’ stock just this week.

    See more: DraftKings’ stock has nearly tripled this year — and it just won a new fan

    Disney shares rose fractionally in after-hours trading.

    Mike Murphy contributed to this report.

    Source link

  • Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway swings to Q2 profit, operating earnings up 6%

    Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway swings to Q2 profit, operating earnings up 6%

    Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway swung to a profit in the second quarter owed to its investment portfolio and insurance holdings, according to a release out Saturday. 

    The holding company with businesses that range from insurer Geico and railroad BNSF Railway to Dairy Queen restaurants and its own energy division posted net income of $35.9 billion, or $24,775 a class A share equivalent. That compared with a loss of $43.8 billion, or $29,754 a class A share equivalent, a year earlier. 

    Berkshire’s
    BRK.A,
    -1.37%

    BRK.B,
    -1.08%

    after-tax operating earnings, a figure Warren Buffett wants shareholders to and which excludes some investment results, rose 6% to just over $10 billion from $9.3 billion a year earlier. Regulations do require Berkshire to include unrealized gains and losses from its investment portfolio when it reports its net income. 

    Berkshire’s stock repurchases totaled $1.4 billion in the second quarter, compared with $4.4 billion in the first quarter and $1 billion for the year-earlier period. The Q2 repurchases were below an estimate of $2.2 billion from UBS analyst Brian Meredith.

    Reduced buybacks did come alongside appreciation in Berkshire stock, which was up 10% in the second quarter.

    Berkshire ended the second quarter with $147.4 billion in cash and cash equivalents, compared with $105.4 billion in the same period a year ago. 

    Berkshire’s Class A shares have been hovering near all-time highs, up 21% over the past year and bringing the company’s market value to roughly $780 billion. 

    Source link

  • ‘The Fed will take comfort from moderating job growth’ — economists react to July’s employment report

    ‘The Fed will take comfort from moderating job growth’ — economists react to July’s employment report

    The July jobs report on Friday showed the U.S. economy gained 187,000 jobs last month, with the unemployment rate dipping to 3.5% from 3.6%.

    Economists polled by The Wall Street Journal had expected an addition of 200,000 jobs and unemployment staying at 3.6%.

    See: U.S. adds 187,000 jobs in July

    Below are some initial reactions from economists and other analysts, including their views on what the jobs report means for the Federal Reserve as the central bank considers how to proceed with interest-rate hikes. U.S. stocks
    ES00,
    +0.48%

    SPX
    looked set to trade up modestly following the data on nonfarm payrolls.

    • “The Fed will take comfort from moderating job growth, but will continue to fret about the tight labor market. So far, the July employment and CPI reports are a wash for the Fed’s September 20 decision (we expect no change in rates), placing extra pressure on the August releases to add some clarity.” — Sal Guatieri, senior economist at BMO Capital Markets, in a tweet

    • “This month’s slow job growth is a sign the economy is continuing to cool; while a negative in some senses, this is a positive indicator for the Fed and may soon end its interest rate hikes. … Moving forward, we anticipate the unemployment rate will remain low.  We also expect unemployment will rise to its natural long-run rate of 4.5% over the next two years.” — Steve Rick, chief economist at TruStage, previously known as CUNA Mutual Group, in a note

    • “Since bad news is good news these days, Jay Powell will be smiling this morning, if not entirely happy. The below consensus reading in hiring in the July payrolls is the type of labor market softening the Fed is looking for. … But there were some more mixed elements in the report as well. The unemployment rate ticked down a notch to 3.5% and average nominal wages grew 0.4% for the second consecutive month. The Fed will continue to be looking for a broader set of data and will be focused on a further deceleration in prices before throwing in the towel for September.” — Ali Jaffery, economist at CIBC, in a note

    • “The wage data is stronger than the payroll data, suggesting that demand for labor is still robust, and that the slowing pace of hiring is more due to a lack of supply of labor. [Average hourly earnings] rose 0.4% in July, same as May and June. AHE Y/Y was steady at +4.4%. This, combined with the firmer household survey data, should keep the Fed on their toes for another rate hike as soon as next month, but the [consumer price index] data next week will have a big influence in that decision as well.” — Thomas Simons, U.S. economist at Jefferies, in a note

    • “If you were to write the script of what a soft landing looks like, this is it. Payrolls grew a strong +187k, signaling a slower yet still strong — and more sustainable —pace.” — Justin Wolfers, University of Michigan economics professor, in a tweet

    Source link

  • Starbucks sees a big rebound in China, but results fail to impress investors

    Starbucks sees a big rebound in China, but results fail to impress investors

    Shares of Starbucks Corp. fell after hours Tuesday after the coffee chain reported third-quarter same-store sales that missed expectations, despite a big rebound in China.

    The coffee chain reported fiscal third-quarter net income of $1.14 billion, or 99 cents a share, compared with $912.9 million, or 79 cents a share, in the same quarter last year. Adjusted for restructuring and impairment costs, Starbucks earned $1 a share.

    Revenue rose 12.5% to $9.17 billion, compared with $8.15 billion in the prior-year quarter. Same-store sales rose 10% worldwide, with a 7% gain in North America. Those same-store sales jumped 24% internationally, with a 46% gain in China.

    Analysts polled by FactSet expected Starbucks
    SBUX,
    -0.31%

    to report adjusted earnings per share of 95 cents, on revenue of $9.29 billion and same-store sales growth of 11%.

    Operating margins rose to 17.3%, from 15.9% a year ago, with higher prices and productivity offset by greater spending on employee wages and benefits.

    Shares slipped 1.2% after hours on Tuesday. Shares of Starbucks are roughly where they were at the beginning of the year.

    Starbucks executives over the past year have said that amid stubborn inflation, customers see coffee as an affordable luxury worth treating themselves to. But Wall Street has struggled to find a reason to push the stock higher amid questions about trends in North America and slowing same-store sales in the years ahead, as well as China’s uneven economic recovery as it shakes off pandemic restrictions.

    UBS analysts said that demand in the U.S. was likely still “solid.” But they said that the focus would be on demand in China. Quo Vadis analyst John Zolidis, meanwhile, said that along with China, investors had been focused on the chain’s efforts to set up more drive-through locations in the U.S., and any benefits from higher-priced cold drinks and customizable orders.

    The coffee chain also continues to fight with its unionized employees. Bargaining has stalled. Last month, unionized workers accused Starbucks of banning Pride-themed decorations. Starbucks aggressively denied those allegations.

    Source link

  • Am I being tricked into overtipping when I eat out? Should I tip before or after sales tax is added?

    Am I being tricked into overtipping when I eat out? Should I tip before or after sales tax is added?

    Dear Quentin,

    I’ve read your previous responses to letters on tipping, and my thoughts are simple: Tipping is dependent on the service given. I won’t tip at a deli counter, but I will tip more in a diner. I see no reason to tip a deli counter person on a regular basis. The person who rings up my groceries isn’t allowed to accept tips, and they do a lot more than put a sandwich in a bag.

    As far as restaurants go, 15% is the starting point and I will go up from that as warranted. I do tend to tip a high percentage in diners. The waitstaff there are generally fabulous, deal with lower price points and a varied clientele. I feel they also suffer from customer bias where some people seem to think it’s only a diner not a fancy restaurant.

    ‘Helping others is not always through money. I volunteer my time with several charities and donate blood.’

    The job is the same whether my meal is $10 or $100. I try to pay in cash to ensure the waitstaff is promptly getting their tip, and to ensure that the money does indeed go to the wait staff. Are we expected to tip on a total that includes credit-card charges? What’s more, helping others is not always through money. I volunteer my time with several charities and donate blood.

    What troubles me is that throughout the New York City metro area, tipping recommendations in restaurants are based on faulty calculations. My friends and I all agree that tips are supposed to be based on the price of the meal — that is the subtotal or pre-tax figure. Restaurants frequently encourage people to tip on the final amount. 

    A Fair Tipper

    Related: I’m sick and tired of tipping 20% every time I eat out. Is it ever OK to tip less? Or am I a cheapskate? 

    Dear Fair,

    Yes, yes, yes, and yes. 

    Yes, wait staff in diners work as hard as any restaurant worker, and they deserve whatever your optimum tip — 15% or 20% — and as much as you would tip in a white-tablecloth restaurant. Yes, consumers should not be expected to tip in a deli — unless you have a good relationship with the staff, and you tip occasionally for goodwill. If you choose to “skip” the charity donation in a pharmacy, that’s OK too. Yes, donations and tips are increasingly being conflated, and that’s not always a good thing. We should be comfortable with the charity and 100% sure that the donation is going to the charity in question. 

    And your main point: Yes, tipping on the subtotal before tax and before credit-card charges is absolutely fair, although a lot of people — especially when calculating the tip among friends — tip on the after-tax total. Why? Perhaps we don’t want to be seen splitting hairs over the tax among friends and/or in front of a service worker who has given us exemplary service. Calculating tips is often done under pressure, and no one likes to be seen as a cheapskate. I almost always tip on the total amount, knowing that the sales tax is included, primarily because I figure that extra $1 or more is going to the person who served my table.

    My colleague, MarketWatch news editor Nicole Pesce, put together a guide for how much you should tip everyone, and who you should NOT tip. She also cited three reasons why tipping has become such a note of contention, and why it appears we are tipping more: people tipped staff more during the pandemic (they were, after all, putting their health and lives at risk with their jobs); 40-year high inflation over the last 12 months has increased the cost of everything and, as such our tips rose in tandem with prices; and, finally, digital tipping appears to be ubiquitous, and people have been suffering from tipping fatigue. 

    ‘You’re not the only one: Americans are souring on tipping.’

    You’re not the only one with tipping fatigue, though: Americans are generally souring on tipping. A large majority (66%) of U.S. adults have a negative view about tipping, according to a poll released by the personal-finance site Bankrate last month. The bottom line: consumers feel they are being forced to compensate employees for low pay (41%) and they don’t appreciate all that digital guilt tipping (32%) and, as a result, they believe that tipping culture has gotten out of control (30%). Respondents also said they were confused about how much to tip (15%), but a small minority (a paltry 16%) said they would be willing to pay higher prices in lieu of tipping.

    People appear to be less generous with their tipping amounts, and they also appear to be tipping less often. What’s perhaps most surprising from Bankrate’s research is that only 65% of diners actually tip when they eat out (that’s down from 73% last year). After restaurants, people are most likely to tip barbers/hairdressers (53% of those polled) and food-delivery workers (50%). From thereon, only a minority of people say they tip taxi or rideshare drivers (New York City cabs, which give tipping options upon payment, may be an outlier here), hotel housekeepers, baristas and food-delivery workers.

    It’s important that we have this conversation about tipping because expectations and digital tipping methods are evolving all the time. On the one hand, people are facing higher prices and they are understandably feeling under pressure to tip. On the other hand, this conversation naturally overlaps with the working conditions and pay of service workers. Americans are tipping less than they did during the worst days of the pandemic. Service workers — along with medical personnel, bus and train drivers and first responders — were among the heroes of the pandemic. That is something I hope we never forget.

    “The person who rings up my groceries isn’t allowed to accept tips, and they do a lot more than put a sandwich in a bag,” the letter writer says.


    MarketWatch illustration

    Also read:

    ‘I respect every profession equally, but I feel like so many people look down on me for being a waitress’: Americans are tipping less. Should we step up to the plate? 

    ‘We’re very upset!’ We gave a friend $400 concert tickets and $2,000 Rangers seats, but weren’t invited to his wedding. Do we speak up?

    ‘All of these tips add up’: If a restaurant adds a 20% tip, am I obliged to pay? Should tipping not be optional? 

    Source link

  • ‘I was outraged’: Our restaurant bill was $35 each, but our friend wanted to pay $22 for a gluten-free dish. Who’s right?

    ‘I was outraged’: Our restaurant bill was $35 each, but our friend wanted to pay $22 for a gluten-free dish. Who’s right?

    Dear Quentin,

    I went for dinner with six friends last weekend, and we each ordered entrees and desserts, and some side orders. One of our group only eats gluten-free food, so he ordered two starters. We split the bill, and it worked out at $36 each. But our gluten-free friend cried foul, and asked for a separate check to pay $22 for his gluten-free dish. I was outraged — and almost felt physically sick. I kicked my husband under the table, and said under my breath, “Can you believe that?’

    Can you believe it? Do you think he should have just paid the $35 instead of asking for a separate check? Adding insult to injury, he left the waiter a $10 tip. Why not just pay $35 like everyone else? I told my husband I was never going for dinner with him again. Don’t you think he should have just paid $35 like everyone else? It was a big crowd. If everyone did that, you’d need a forensic accountant to figure out how many breadsticks someone ate. 

    We otherwise had a nice evening, and it was a bring-your-own-bottle restaurant. I work as a teacher and my husband works in tech. We own a home together and have three kids. Our gluten-free friend is a freelance consultant, and is divorced with two kids. He had a very privileged upbringing. I worked hard for everything I have. I’m not saying any of us are rich, but when we go out to eat, we like to share and share alike, and split the bill down the middle. 

    When did eating out become so full of these cringeworthy moments?

    Equal Bill Splitter

    Dear Equal,

    I’m sorry to say that the most cringeworthy moment here happened when you kicked your husband under the table. I’m not a big fan of under-table communication in a group, and while we could debate the pros and cons of asking for a separate check for a $13 difference, I don’t think there’s much of a gray area when it comes to calling someone out at the dinner table, especially when your eye-rolling and disapproval could be picked up by the other guests.

    As far as your friend is concerned, $13 is a lot of money to pay when you did not eat all the food that was ordered by the table. Maybe it doesn’t seem like it to you or anyone reading this column, but your friend is divorced with two kids, and works as a freelancer — so let’s assume his income is not always stable. Could he have just split it down the middle and paid $35 and another 15% or 20% for a tip? Sure. But he has good financial boundaries. I applaud him.

    The real issue here may go back to your respective upbringings, and could explain your dramatic — and I would argue disproportionate reaction — to your friend asking for a separate $22 check. You’ve worked hard, and maybe your friend had an easier start in life, but that doesn’t mean he’s not entitled to pay for what he ate, and watch every dollar. Divorce is like a recession. You can end up struggling to get back on your financial feet for years.

    Perhaps your friend had always intended to pay $22 for his gluten-free dish, and tip the server 50%, or perhaps he has a well-trained side eye and caught your reaction to his paying for his own order, and he decided to pay closer to what everyone else had paid. But ordering separate checks, I suspect, will become more common as prices continue to rise, even at a slower pace, and people feel uncertain about spending money in restaurants. 

    You believe in equality of bill splitting. I suggest you apply that equality to all dinner guests, regardless of upbringing and dietary restrictions, and allow them to make their own choices about what they pay for at dinner. People often have problems — financial or otherwise — that we are not aware of, so try to leave space for that. And if your friend did see your eye-rolling and under-the-table antics? I’d like to think he made space for your behavior too.

    Readers write to me with all sorts of dilemmas. 

    By emailing your questions, you agree to have them published anonymously on MarketWatch. By submitting your story to Dow Jones & Co., the publisher of MarketWatch, you understand and agree that we may use your story, or versions of it, in all media and platforms, including via third parties.

    The Moneyist regrets he cannot reply to questions individually.

    More from Quentin Fottrell:

    I had a date with a great guy. I didn’t drink, but his wine added $36 to our bill. We split the check evenly. Should I have spoken up?

    ‘I’m living paycheck to paycheck and I feel drained’: My fiancé said he would pay half of the mortgage. Guess what happened next?

    ‘We live in purgatory’: My wife has a multimillion-dollar trust fund, but my mother-in-law controls it. We earn $400,000 and spend beyond our means.

    Source link

  • Cava Group’s stock soars 11% as analysts start coverage on a bullish note

    Cava Group’s stock soars 11% as analysts start coverage on a bullish note

    The stock of Mediterranean-style fast-casual restaurant chain Cava Group Inc. soared 11% Monday, after analysts initiated coverage on the stock which made its debut on public markets in mid-June with a flurry of buy ratings.

    At least four of the banks that were underwriters on the initial public offering — JP Morgan, Stifel, William Blair and Jefferies — assigned the stock a buy rating or the equivalent.

    FactSet shows one bank has a hold rating but it’s a restricted listing so it’s not clear who it’s from.

    The company
    CAVA,
    +8.04%

    raised $317 million in its initial public offering, which priced above its proposed range at $22 a share and immediately rallied on opening. The company issued 14.4 million shares at a valuation of $2.45 billion. The stock was last trading at $43.83.

    See also: Like choosy shoppers at a retail store, IPO investors are demanding discounts and displaying price sensitivity

    The company is not profitable and has high cash burn and just $23 million in cash and cash equivalents on its balance sheet, according to its IPO filing documents.

    But analysts were unfazed, with William Blair analysts calling it a clear leader in a fast-growing category with proven geographic appeal.

    “CAVA has hit upon a winning formula with its customizable menu of bowls and pitas featuring bold Mediterranean flavors that can fit in any dietary preference,” wrote analysts led by Sharon Zackfia.

    “CAVA’s customer appeal is evident in average unit volumes (AUVs) of roughly $2.5 million and a 44% five-year revenue CAGR through 2022.”

    The company accelerated its growth with the 2018 acquisition of Zoës Kitchen, “which provided immediate access to attractive real estate in new markets while enabling capital-efficient densification in top-tier trade areas (Zoës conversions roughly half the cost of a typical greenfield CAVA),” they wrote.

    That has set the company up to end 2023 with roughly triple the number of locations as it had in 2020.

    William Blair estimates that there’s room for at least 1,200 domestic Cava restaurants based on the population per restaurant already achieved in Virginia, where it’s still adding locations.

    That supports management’s target of 1,000-plus locations by 2032.

    “We also see the potential for digital drive-thrus to further lengthen CAVA’s growth runway while lifting AUVs (and potentially returns), with about one-third of this year’s new units having drive-thrus, ramping up to about half in 2024 (versus roughly 20 drive-thrus today),” they wrote. William Blair initiated coverage with an outperform rating.

    JP Morgan launched coverage with an overweight rating and a December 2024 $45 stock price target. Analysts cheered the entrepreneurial sprit of Founder and CEO Brett Schulman with help from Chairman Ron Shaich, the founder of Panera Bread.

    “In-store design/operational procedures and back-end support for the network allows CAVA to be efficient, safe and consistent as the brand leverages these systems for its goal national brand penetration,” they wrote in a note to clients.

    Mediterranean cuisine covers many types of food and occasions, so the end-market is large, topping out at more than $1 trillion in U.S. sales.

    While bowl builds priced at $10.95 to $16.95 will likely limit a high frequency of lower-income consumers, “we believe the brand has an enduring appeal to a very broad customer base for at least occasional usage.”

    And suburbs are 82% of the site mix and are expected to remain a key location base, they added.

    Stifel and Jefferies analysts initiated coverage with a buy rating and $48 price target. Stifel analysts led by Chris O’Cull also cheered the wide appeal of the food and compelling unit-level returns and highlighted the company’s healthy balance sheet.

    “The company is in strong financial condition with no funded debt and roughly $340M in cash on hand following the company’s IPO,” they wrote in a note to clients. “We project the company’s average quarterly cash balance will remain above $200M with no funded debt for the foreseeable future. We project positive annual free cash flow starting in 2026.”

    Still, not everyone is convinced the company is a buy. David Trainer, chief executive of New Constructs, an independent equity research firm that uses machine learning and natural-language processing to parse corporate filings and model economic earnings, published a series of critical reports before the IPO.

    Trainer questioned Cava’s ability to reach profitability and its high valuation. He even compared it to WeWork 
    WE,
    +5.80%
    ,
     the infamous startup created by Israeli entrepreneur Adam Neumann, that at its peak was valued at $47 billion, but is now trading at just 26 cents a share, or a market cap of $521 million.

    The Renaissance IPO ETF 
    IPO,
    +0.52%

     has gained 32% in the year to date, while the S&P 500 
    SPX,
    -0.07%

    has gained 15%.

    For more, see: Fast-casual restaurant chain Cava Group’s IPO documents raise some red flags: analyst

    Read now: Cava Group CFO is confident restaurant chain will be profitable—but she won’t say when

    Related: 5 things to know about the fast-casual Mediterranean restaurant chain Cava

    Source link

  • ‘This is the best possible jobs report’ — economists react to June employment data

    ‘This is the best possible jobs report’ — economists react to June employment data

    The June jobs report on Friday showed the U.S. economy gained 209,000 jobs last month, with the unemployment rate dipping to 3.6% from 3.7%.

    Economists polled by The Wall Street Journal had expected an addition of 240,000 jobs and an unemployment rate of 3.6%.

    See: Jobs report shows 209,000 gain in June — smallest increase since end of 2020

    Below are some initial reactions from economists and other analysts, including their views on what the jobs report means for the Federal Reserve as the central bank considers how to proceed with interest-rate hikes. The main U.S. stock indexes
    SPX,
    -0.29%

    DJIA,
    -0.55%

    COMP,
    -0.13%

    traded mixed following the data on nonfarm payrolls, also called NFP.

    • “This is actually a great number. This is a number that is something we can sustain. We can’t sustain adding 300,000, 400,000, 500,000 jobs a month. We need to see it slow. It’s doing exactly what it needs. If we’re going to have a soft landing, this is what it looks like. So I don’t think that we should make too much of this number being bad. But I do think that the Fed train is rolling toward another rate hike, but I wouldn’t put my money on a second one yet.” — Betsey Stevenson, economics professor at the University of Michigan and a former Obama White House economist, in a CNBC interview

    Related: July Fed rate hike remains largely priced in, expectations for September or November hike soften somewhat

    • “In a sense, this is the best possible jobs report, then, threading the needle between too strong and too weak. People should be happy to see decent job growth and decent wage growth. The Fed can take pleasure in slowing momentum and wage growth stabilizing rather than rising, while bond traders can breathe a sigh of relief there is no sign of the strength picked up by ADP yesterday. It is win, win, win.” — Chris Low, chief economist at FHN Financial, in a note

    • “The 209,000 rise in non-farm payrolls in June was the weakest gain since December 2020 and suggests labor market conditions are finally beginning to ease more markedly. That said, it is unlikely to stop the Fed from hiking rates again later this month, particularly when the downward trend in wage growth appears to be stalling.” — Andrew Hunter, deputy chief U.S. economist at Capital Economics, in a note

    • “Overall, the cooling in hiring is a welcome development, but the pace is still above growth in the working-age population, and combined with continued wage pressures and the drop in the unemployment rate, this leaves the Fed on track to hike rates by 25 [basis points] in both July and September.” — Katherine Judge, senior economist at CIBC, in a note

    • “Black unemployment went up to 6.0% for June, and is a statistically significant change from 5.0% in March. So while the employment rate is historically high, there is still room for growth. (As always when we’re talking about historical exclusion & discrimination).” — Kate Bahn, economist and research director at WorkRise, which is affiliated with the Urban Institute, in a tweet

    • “The markets maybe made too much of the ADP number, as that has shown to be not always exactly a great indicator. … The labor market is cooling, but marginally. Most importantly, though, the average hourly earnings number suggests still some firming in that space, and that’s where the Fed has been primarily focused. So for me, this is maybe a little lighter, but not a dramatic change in terms outlook and expectations.” — Roger Ferguson, former Fed vice chair, in a CNBC interview

    Now read: Part-time work surged in June as hours cut back, U.S. jobs report says

    Source link

  • This Bud’s for investors. Buy the stock even if Bud Light sales never recover, says analyst.

    This Bud’s for investors. Buy the stock even if Bud Light sales never recover, says analyst.

    The summer haze settling over stocks doesn’t look ready to budge Thursday, with the S&P 500 index
    SPX,
    -0.52%

    in the throes of its longest losing streak since May.

    On the bright side, the index is looking at a 6% gain for the June quarter, whose end is just a few days away.

    In other corners of the market, the quarter has been less forgiving. Consumer staples, those things you can’t live without, have lost over 1%, perhaps reflecting the tougher economic times we are living in. Within that sector, though, is beer and one name that has indeed had a quartarius horriblis.

    Anheuser-Busch InBev’s
    ABI,
    +1.82%

    BUD,
    -0.05%

    U.S.-listed shares are down about 15%, as Bud Light sales have tumbled following consumer backlash to a social-media campaign featuring trans activist Dylan Mulvaney in April.

    But our call of the day from Deutsche Bank says it’s time to buy this unloved stock, even if those Bud Light sales never recover. A team of analysts led by Mitch Collett have upgraded Anheuser-Busch shares to buy from hold and lifted their price target to €60 euros from €59 euros (they didn’t offer an ADR price target).

    Recent underperformance of the stock “implies a permanent reduction in ABI’s U.S. business. Our proprietary survey data suggests these headwinds are likely to fade even if we do not expect the U.S. business ever to fully recover from its current challenges,” said Collett.

    The analysts pointed to recent Nielson data that showed ABI’s U.S. business currently down 12%, with Bud Light sales off 24% and the rest of its portfolio down 7%. But an analysis of distribution data shows ABI itself isn’t “losing shelf presence” as sales velocity is the primary driver of the decline, which bodes well if consumer sentiment improves, said Deutsche Bank.

    Those declines are about a 12% headwind to ABI’s annual net income, which is in line with European underperformance seen by the stock, added Collett and the team.

    Read: Bud Light dethroned as top-selling beer by Modelo, as boycott cuts into sales

    Deutsche Bank conducted its own survey that showed 24% of Bud Light consumers are no longer buying that brand, with 18% buying less, but 21% buying more and 37% buying the same amount. Those findings are largely consistent with Nielson;s, said the analysts.

    Deutsche Bank’s own survey also showed that 42% of Bud Light drinkers expect to be buying Bud Light again in three to six months, versus 29% who see that as unlikely. And 50% expect that battered beer’s reputation will recover in time, versus 30% who says it won’t. “We believe this bodes well for the brand, recapturing some of its lost share,” said Collett and the team.

    Analysts at RBC Capital also recently pushed back on the selloff for the stock, saying the hit to the shares and forecasts for the stock are “excessive,” as they don’t see Bud Light’s troubles hurting AB InBev outside the U.S.. They said AB InBev is a “nerve-racking buying opportunity.”

    Ahead of Thursday’s open, U.S.-listed Bud shares were up about 1.3%, tracking gains from its Belgian shares.

    The markets

    U.S. stock index futures
    ES00,
    -0.25%

    YM00,
    -0.27%

    NQ00,
    -0.31%

    are drifting lower, with bond yields
    TMUBMUSD02Y,
    4.730%

    TMUBMUSD10Y,
    3.743%

    on the rise and oil prices
    CL.1,
    -1.82%

    also weaker. The Norwegian krone
    USDNOK,
    -0.80%

    is up 1.5% against the dollar after the country’s central bank hiked interest rates 50 basis points. Switzerland also hiked rates, but the Swiss franc is steady
    USDCHF,
    +0.12%
    .
    The British pound
    GBPUSD,

    is higher after the Bank of England also hiked interest rates by 50 basis points. The Turkish lira was falling slightly after the central bank, under new management, hiked interest rate to 15% from 8.5%, against forecasts for a hike to 20%.

    China markets were closed for a holiday, with losses elsewhere, such as Japan
    NIK,
    -0.92%

    and Australia
    XJO,
    -1.63%
    .

    For more market updates plus actionable trade ideas for stocks, options and crypto, subscribe to MarketDiem by Investor’s Business Daily.

    The buzz

    Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell’s second day of testimony on Capitol Hill kicks off at 10 a.m. Eastern. On Wednesday, he said higher interest rates should be expected , but didn’t offer any clues on timing. U.S. weekly jobless benefit claims and current account data are due at 8:30 a.,m. ET, with leading indicators also at 10 a.m., alongside a speech from Cleveland Fed President Loretta Mester. Richmond Fed President Tom Barkin will speak at 4:30 p.m.

    The Bank of England will announce an interest-rate decision at 7 a.m. ET and after worse-than-expected inflation data on Wednesday, a 50 basis-point hike hasn’t been ruled out.

    Darden Restaurants
    DRI,
    +0.36%

    will report ahead of the open, with Smith & Wesson
    SWBI,
    +0.52%

    due after the close.

    Tesla stock
    TSLA,
    -5.46%

    is down 2% in premarket trading on the heels of the EV maker’s worst loss in two months.

    Joining recent actions by other big stakeholders cashing in on big gains for Nvidia
    NVDA,
    -1.74%
    ,
    a board member just sold $51 million in stock.

    Best of the web

    Amazon allegedly duped people into subscribing to Prime and made it nearly impossible to cancel. Here’s how the feds say they did it.

    The Biden administration is reportedly exploring whether it can mount a campaign against Chinese tech giants like Alibaba and Huawei.

    A giant drilling machine is moving Stockholm toward an emissions-free future

    Wife of missing Titanic exploring sub pilot Stockton Rush is reportedly a descendant of two first-class passengers who died on the ship.

    The tickers

    These were the top searched tickers on MarketWatch as of 6 a.m. :

    Ticker

    Security name

    TSLA,
    -5.46%
    Tesla

    MULN,
    +24.24%
    Mullen Automotive

    NVDA,
    -1.74%
    Nvidia

    AMC,
    -1.31%
    AMC Entertainment

    APE,
    -2.30%
    AMC Entertainment preferred holdings

    NIO,
    -2.99%
    Nio

    PLTR,
    -7.28%
    Palantir Technologies

    MANU,
    +1.11%
    Manchester United

    SPCE,
    -4.99%
    Virgin Galactic Holdings

    AAPL,
    -0.57%
    Apple

    Random reads

    Are Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg ready for a cage match?

    It’s summertime. Let your kids get bored.

    Tokyo streets now offer the chance to snuggle an alpaca

    Need to Know starts early and is updated until the opening bell, but sign up here to get it delivered once to your email box. The emailed version will be sent out at about 7:30 a.m. Eastern.

    Listen to the Best New Ideas in Money podcast with MarketWatch reporter Charles Passy and economist Stephanie Kelton.

    Source link

  • Cava Group CFO is confident restaurant chain will be profitable — but she won’t say when

    Cava Group CFO is confident restaurant chain will be profitable — but she won’t say when

    Cava Group, the Mediterranean-focused fast-casual restaurant chain that’s making its trading debut on Thursday, is confident it has access to enough funding to expand its business and make a profit, according to Chief Financial Officer Tricia Tolivar.

    But Tolivar declined to provide a timeline to profitability in an interview with MarketWatch.

    The…

    Source link

  • Mediterranean fast-casual restaurant chain Cava prices IPO at $22 a share

    Mediterranean fast-casual restaurant chain Cava prices IPO at $22 a share

    Mediterranean fast-casual restaurant chain Cava Group on Wednesday priced its initial public offering of 14.4 million shares at $22 a share, up from a prior range, giving the company a valuation of roughly $2.45 billion.

    Shares are expected to begin trading Thursday on the New York Stock Exchange with the ticker symbol CAVA.

    The rapidly-growing…

    Source link

  • ‘Taco Tuesday’ is for everyone, argues Taco Bell. Taco John’s says it owns the trademark to the phrase.

    ‘Taco Tuesday’ is for everyone, argues Taco Bell. Taco John’s says it owns the trademark to the phrase.

    CHEYENNE, Wyo. (AP) — Declaring a mission to liberate “Taco Tuesday” for all, Taco Bell is asking U.S. regulators to force Wyoming-based Taco John’s to abandon its longstanding claim to the trademark.

    Too many businesses and others refer to “Taco Tuesday” for Taco John’s to be able to have exclusive rights to the phrase, Taco Bell asserts in a U.S. Patent and Trademark Office filing that is, of course, dated Tuesday.

    It’s the latest development in a long-running beef over “Taco Tuesday” that even included NBA star LeBron James making an unsuccessful attempt to claim the trademark in 2019.

    “Taco Bell believes ‘Taco Tuesday’ is critical to everyone’s Tuesday. To deprive anyone of saying ‘Taco Tuesday’ — be it Taco Bell or anyone who provides tacos to the world — is like depriving the world of sunshine itself,” the Taco Bell filing reads.

    A key question is whether “Taco Tuesday” over the years has succumbed to “genericide,” New York trademark lawyer Emily Poler said. That’s the term for when a word or phrase become so widely used for similar products — or in this case, sales promotions — they’re no longer associated with the trademark holder.

    Well-known examples of genericide victims include “cellophane,” “escalator” and “trampoline.”

    “Basically what this is about is you cannot trademark something that is ‘generic,’ ” Poler said. “That means it doesn’t have any association with that particular source or product.”

    Basketball legend James — a well-known taco lover — encountered this problem when he tried to trademark “Taco Tuesday” in 2019. The Patent and Trademark Office, in a ruling that didn’t refer to Taco John’s, deemed “Taco Tuesday” too much of a “commonplace term” to qualify as a trademark.

    With more than 7,200 locations in the U.S. and internationally, Taco Bell — a Yum Brands
    YUM,
    -2.45%

    chain along with Pizza Hut, KFC and the Habit Burger Grill — is vastly bigger than Cheyenne-based Taco John’s. Begun as a food truck more than 50 years ago, Taco John’s now has about 370 locations in 23 mainly in western and midwestern states.

    The chain’s size hasn’t discouraged big-time enforcement of “Taco Tuesday” as trademark, which dates to the 1980s. In 2019, the company sent a letter to a brewery just five blocks from its corporate headquarters, warning it to stop using “Taco Tuesday” to promote a taco truck parked outside on Tuesdays.

    Actively defending a trademark is required to maintain claim to it, and the letter was just one example of Taco John’s telling restaurants far and wide to stop having “Taco Tuesdays.”

    Taco John’s responded to Taco Bell’s filing by announcing a new two-week Taco Tuesday promotion, with a large side of riposte.

    Press release: Ring the Bell! Every Day is Taco Tuesday® at Taco John’s

    “I’d like to thank our worthy competitors at Taco Bell for reminding everyone that Taco Tuesday is best celebrated at Taco John’s,” CEO Jim Creel said in an emailed statement. “We love celebrating Taco Tuesday with taco lovers everywhere, and we even want to offer a special invitation to fans of Taco Bell to liberate themselves by coming by to see how flavorful and bold tacos can be at Taco John’s all month long.”

    The filing is one of two from Taco Bell involving “Taco Tuesday.” One contests Taco John’s claim to “Taco Tuesday” in 49 states, while a similar filing contests a New Jersey restaurant and bar’s claim to “Taco Tuesday” in that state. Both Taco John’s and Gregory’s Restaurant and Bar in Somers Point, N.J., have been using “Taco Tuesday” for over 40 years.

    A Taco John’s franchisee in Minnesota first came up with “Taco Twosday” to promote two tacos for 99 cents on a slow day of the week, Creel told the Associated Press in a recent interview.

    The Patent and Trademark Office approved the Taco John’s “Taco Tuesday” trademark in 1989. Even with its many letters, Creel said, the company — established in 1969 in Cheyenne, Wyo. — has never had to go to court over the phrase.

    He’s not feeling too picked on, either, by the much bigger Taco Bell. “It’s OK. It’s kind of nice that they’ve noticed,” Creel said.

    From the archives (January 2022): Taco Bell takes taco subscription program nationwide

    Source link

  • Fanatics to buy PointsBet’s U.S. sports-betting business for $150 million

    Fanatics to buy PointsBet’s U.S. sports-betting business for $150 million

    Fanatics Inc. will buy the U.S. operations of Australia’s PointsBet for about $150 million, in the company’s largest foray yet into sports betting.

    PointsBet
    PBH,
    -18.70%

    announced the deal Sunday night, specifying that the acquisition only applies to PointsBet’s U.S. assets, not its businesses in Australia and Canada. CNBC first reported the deal. Fanatics did not immediately reply to MarketWatch’s request for comment Sunday night.

    PointsBet is an online sportsbook that launched in the U.S. in 2019, and operates in 15 states, including New Jersey, Iowa, Illinois and Colorado.

    “Despite the strategic success building a valuable asset in the U.S., the costs of operating in a state-by-state environment, together with the requirement to build significant scale to compete against well capitalized operators, led us to explore a number of options,” PointsBet Chief Executive Sam Swanell said in a statement. “The sale of the U.S. Business to Fanatics Betting and Gaming delivers the most attractive risk-adjusted value outcome for shareholders compared to the risks and benefits of other options including the status quo.”

    PointsBet shareholders are expected to vote on the sale at their annual meeting in late June.

    The deal should increase pressure on U.S. sports-gambling companies such as DraftKings Inc.
    DKNG,
    -1.96%

    and FanDuel. In late April, Fanatics launched sportsbook wagering for its customers in Ohio and Tennessee, and the Wall Street Journal reported at the time that the company pans to invest about $1 billion in its new sports-betting division.

    In an interview, Fanatics CEO Michael Rubin told the Journal he wants Fanatics to be the world’s top sports-betting company within the next 10 years, and expects its betting operations to be profitable by 2025 or 2026.

    In December, Florida-based Fanatics — which got its start in sports apparel and collectibles — closed a $700 million funding round, valuing it at about $31 billion, the Wall Street Journal reported. The privately held company is expected to eventually launch an IPO.

    Last year, Fanatics acquired trading-card company Topps.

    Source link

  • Airbnb stock falls sharply on cautious forecast and as record bookings miss estimates

    Airbnb stock falls sharply on cautious forecast and as record bookings miss estimates

    Nights booked on Airbnb Inc. hit a record high in the first quarter as more guests traveled overseas and returned to cities, leading to the company’s first profitable start to the year on record, executives announced Tuesday.

    But executives’ forecast was less bullish, even though they expect a strong summer travel season and second-quarter revenue growth. They cautioned that growth in nights and experiences booked will be “unfavorable” compared with the year-ago quarter, when there was a surge in travel demand as fears about…

    Source link

  • Hotel housekeeping jobs have fallen by 102,000 during the pandemic. What happened?

    Hotel housekeeping jobs have fallen by 102,000 during the pandemic. What happened?

    As some U.S. hotels hung on to practices they adopted during the early stages of the coronavirus pandemic — such as eliminating daily room cleanings — the number of hotel housekeepers fell by more than 102,000 last year from prepandemic levels, new data show.

    The total number of hotel housekeeping jobs as of May 2022 was 364,990, a 22% decline from the total of 467,270 such positions during the same period in 2019, according to numbers released last week by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

    Unions…

    Source link

  • ‘We don’t ask for spring break in our city’: Miami Beach officials impose curfew after two fatal shootings amid nightly chaos

    ‘We don’t ask for spring break in our city’: Miami Beach officials impose curfew after two fatal shootings amid nightly chaos

    MIAMI BEACH, Fla. (AP) — Miami Beach officials imposed a curfew beginning Sunday night during spring break after two fatal shootings and rowdy, chaotic crowds that police have had difficulty controlling.

    The city said in a news release the curfew would be from 11:59 p.m. Sunday until 6 a.m. Monday, with an additional curfew likely to be put in place Thursday through next Monday, March 27. The curfew mainly affects South Beach, the most popular party location for spring breakers.

    The release said the two separate shootings Friday night and early Sunday that left two people dead and “excessively large and unruly crowds” led to the decision. The city commission plans a meeting Monday to discuss potential further restrictions next week.

    Miami Beach Mayor Dan Gelber said in a video message posted Sunday that the crowds and presence of numerous firearms has “created a peril that cannot go unchecked” despite massive police presence and many city-sponsored activities meant to keep people busy.

    “We don’t ask for spring break in our city. We don’t want spring break in our city. It’s too rowdy, it’s too much disorder, and it’s too difficult to police,” Gelber said.

    The latest shooting happened about 3:30 a.m. Sunday on Ocean Drive in South Beach, according to Miami Beach police. A male was shot and died later at a hospital, and officers chased down a suspect on foot, police said on Twitter. Their identities were not released, nor were any possible charges.

    In the Friday night shooting, one male victim was killed and another seriously injured, sending crowds scrambling in fear from restaurants and clubs into the streets as gunshots rang out. Police detained one person at the scene and found four firearms, but no other details have been made available.

    Under the curfew, people must leave businesses before midnight, although hotels can operate later only in service to their guests. The city release said restaurants can stay open only for delivery and the curfew won’t apply to residents, people going to and from work, emergency services and hotel guests. Some roads will be closed off and arriving hotel guests may have to show proof of their reservations.

    Last year, the city imposed a midnight curfew following two shootings, also on Ocean Drive. The year before that, there were about 1,000 arrests and dozens of guns confiscated during a rowdy spring break that led Miami Beach officials to take steps aimed at calming the situation.

    Source link

  • Philadelphia Eagles emerge as early Super Bowl favorites over Kansas City Chiefs

    Philadelphia Eagles emerge as early Super Bowl favorites over Kansas City Chiefs

    The Kansas City Chiefs were still celebrating on the field Sunday night when oddsmakers moved them from slight favorites to win the Super Bowl over the Philadelphia Eagles to slight underdogs.

    After the Chiefs opened as a 1.5-point favorite by BetMGM
    MGM,
    +0.24%
    ,
    the betting line quickly shifted, favoring the Eagles by 2.5 points, with the over/under at 49.5 points. FanDuel sports book odds also swung from the Chiefs to the Eagles, by 2 points, and DraftKings
    DKNG,
    +5.17%

    favored the Eagles by 2.5 points.

    The betting line will likely continue to change slightly over the next two weeks.

    Super Bowl LVII (that’s 57 to you non-Romans) will kick off at 6:30 p.m. Eastern on Sunday, Feb. 12, in Glendale, Ariz.

    The Chiefs edged the Cincinnati Bengals, 23-20, on Sunday night in the AFC Championship game in Kansas City, winning on a last-second field goal. Kansas City will be playing in its third Super Bowl in the past four years; the Chiefs last won it in 2020 over the San Francisco 49ers.

    Earlier in the day, the Eagles earned their spot by demolishing the 49ers, 31-7, in an NFC Championship game in Philadelphia that was never close and saw both 49ers quarterbacks — starter Brock Purdy and backup Josh Johnson — leave the game with injuries (Purdy returned in the second half, but essentially could not throw the ball). The Eagles were last in the Super Bowl five years ago, when they beat the New England Patriots.

    Last year, PlayUSA estimated there were more than $1 billion in legal wagers on the Super Bowl — a record amount — while AmericanGaming estimated a total of $7.61 billion was wagered in the U.S., when including casual bets, bookies and pool contests.

    Sports betting is legal in some form in 32 states, as well as the District of Columbia, according to the American Gaming Association.

    Source link