ReportWire

Tag: Homelessness

  • Man dies of injuries after being shot at San Jose homeless encampment next to Highway 280

    Man dies of injuries after being shot at San Jose homeless encampment next to Highway 280

    [ad_1]

    PIX Now – Morning Edition 5/14/24


    PIX Now – Morning Edition 5/14/24

    12:03

    A man who was shot at a homeless encampment in San Jose last week has died of his injuries, police said Tuesday.

    The shooting happened on May 9 at about 5:46 p.m. at an encampment in the area of McLaughlin Avenue and Interstate Highway 280. San Jose police said officers responding to a report of a shooting found a man suffering from at least one gunshot wound.

    The officers began life-saving measures on the victim who was neither conscious nor breathing, police said. He was taken to a hospital where he was stabilized but remained in critical condition. 

    San Jose homeless encampment shooting
    San Jose police officers at the scene of a shooting at a homeless encampment on McLaughlin Ave. next to Interstate Highway 280, May 9, 2024.

    KPIX


    The suspect fled before officers arrived. Police were later seen detaining several people from the encampment on unrelated matters.

    On May 12, police said the department was notified that the unidentified victim had died of his injuries at the hospital.

    The Santa Clara County Coroner’s Office will release the victim’s identity after notifying his family members. Police said the motive and circumstances surrounding the shooting were being investigated. There was no suspect information available.

    The homicide was the 13th in San Jose this year.

    Anyone with information was asked to contact Detective Sergeant Taylor #4257 and Detective Harrington #4365 of the San José Police Department’s Homicide Unit at 4257@sanjosecagov and/or 4365@sanjoseca.gov or at 408-277-5283.

    [ad_2]

    Carlos Castañeda

    Source link

  • Here’s Mayor Mike Johnston’s plan to make Downtown Denver the most vibrant city center in the country

    Here’s Mayor Mike Johnston’s plan to make Downtown Denver the most vibrant city center in the country

    [ad_1]

    City officials stand beside Mayor Mike Johnston as he holds a press conference, in front of Union Station, to announce a new plan to boost affordability and activity downtown. May 9, 2024.

    Kevin J. Beaty/Denverite

    Mayor Mike Johnston is trying to fulfill his pledge to make Downtown Denver the most vibrant city center in the country.  Right now, he knows the area is struggling, and while some families are happily living there, others in the region have mixed views

    Johnston points to the shuttered businesses, empty offices, unsheltered homelessness and a spike in fentanyl use. 

    “I think cities across America are facing a shared crisis as offices and downtowns have struggled to recover post-pandemic,” he said. “Many are wondering: Will our downtowns ever recover again? Should we just give up on them as some relic from a bygone era?” 

    As Johnston sees it, to make Downtown Denver vibrant, the city needs to invest half a billion dollars toward revitalizing it.

    Mayor Mike Johnston holds a press conference in front of Union Station, announcing a new plan to boost affordability and activity downtown. May 9, 2024.
    Kevin J. Beaty/Denverite

    Downtown Denver is a regional economic hub, and the entire region relies on its success, Johnston said.  

    “We know we cannot have a thriving Denver without a thriving downtown,” he said. “We can’t have a thriving Colorado without a thriving Denver. We can’t have a Rocky Mountain West that thrives without a thriving Colorado, which means the economic recovery of 10 states starts in this neighborhood.”

    On Thursday morning, Johnston announced his push to expand the Downtown Denver Authority, a funding mechanism that helped revitalize Union Station and the surrounding blocks. 

    “If we successfully activate that tool, that will allow us to invest more than $500 million dollars into the investment in Downtown,” he said.

    Alongside him stood City Council members Amanda Sandoval, Darrell Watson, and Chris Hinds, who pledged to champion the expansion of the authority. 

    Conversations between the city, businesses and the Downtown Denver Partnership have already begun.

    “We definitely need intervention to ensure that the investments that we’ve historically made are protected, and that we’re moving Downtown forward,” said Kourtny Garrett, head of the Downtown Denver Partnership.

    Garrett describes the potential $500 million investment as a “force multiplier” that will attract private sector investment in Downtown. The money could be used, in part, to fill financing gaps for developers wanting to convert office space into homes, projects that would otherwise be hard to fund.

    Mayor Mike Johnston holds a press conference in front of Union Station, announcing a new plan to boost affordability and activity downtown. May 9, 2024.
    Kevin J. Beaty/Denverite

    Johnston is starting a conversation with Downtown residents about what exactly they’d like to see. After that, all Denverites will have a say in the future of the city center. 

    The mayor has launched a website where residents can offer suggestions about what they want in a revitalized Downtown. There will also be meetings in neighborhoods citywide to gather residents’ ideas for the city center.

    Specific goals could include more daycare centers, parks, open space and the adaptive reuse of office buildings. 

    “Our vision is to create the fastest-growing economic engine in the West,” he said. “But one that also brings a more diversified central neighborhood district where people of all ages and incomes can make their home.”

    If Johnston has his way, Downtown won’t just be a playground for the wealthy. Restaurant workers will be able to afford apartments close to their jobs, first-year nurses will be able to enjoy the fruits of the city center, and retirees will be able to safely relish their golden years.  

    City Council will ultimately need to approve the expansion of the Downtown Denver Authority, as would residents and businesses under the current authority. 

    Johnston says he has not abandoned the city’s other neighborhoods, arguing that the renewal of Downtown is, in part, designed to help them. 

    As the mayor has focused his efforts on ending street homelessness in Downtown, he has moved many people from city center streets to neighborhoods across Denver. Some communities have complained that his efforts have created new issues in their communities, and some businesses outside Downtown say they need more economic support to stay afloat, too. 

    “We are deeply committed to a vibrant Denver in every neighborhood across the city,” Johnston said. “And we’ll continue to work this year to roll out plans for how we have the same conversations across every neighborhood in Denver for what people want in their own neighborhoods.”

    In the fall, Johnston plans to host revitalization town halls in communities citywide, though the details are not yet firm.

    Mayor Mike Johnston speaks with Sage Hospitality CEO Walter Isenberg before a press conference in front of Union Station, where he’ll announce a new plan to boost affordability and activity downtown. May 9, 2024.
    Kevin J. Beaty/Denverite

    “What we do know is Downtown is still the economic driver for the city,” he said. “Even if you work in Southeast or Northeast Denver, you have a business that relies on some of the economic activity of Downtown Denver, whether that’s tourism, whether that’s business, whether that’s a tax revenue that comes from this location.” 

    As Johnston sees it, people from every neighborhood congregate in Downtown to celebrate birthday dinners, enjoy sports, celebrate anniversaries and take a bike ride on Sunday mornings.

    “We do think it is at the heart of the city,” he said. “But of course, we will pay attention to every part of the city, but we think this is the right place to begin.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Yuba County deputies arrest two homeless men for alleged wire and grand theft

    Yuba County deputies arrest two homeless men for alleged wire and grand theft

    [ad_1]

    (FOX40.COM) — Two homeless men were recently arrested in connection to a series of wire thefts and other crimes, according to the Yuba County Sheriff’s Office

    “In response to the high number of wire theft crimes reported lately by unsuspecting
    victims, deputies with the Yuba County Sheriff’s Department set out this past Friday
    evening,” YCSO said in a press release.

    On April 26, Yuba County deputies said they were on patrol in the more rural parts of the county when they observed two people on bicycles who matched the description of a recent wire
    theft suspect who was recorded on a trail camera. Deputies said the alleged culprits were a 23-year-old man and a 43-year-old-man who were both homeless.

    The two men were arrested after evidence allegedly connected them to wire theft crimes, according to YCSO. They were book into the Yuba County jail under suspicion of grand theft, vandalism, burglary, and other related crimes.

    [ad_2]

    Veronica Catlin

    Source link

  • Manor Lords Players Can’t Get Families To Stop Being Homeless

    Manor Lords Players Can’t Get Families To Stop Being Homeless

    [ad_1]

    As its name suggests, Manor Lords is a city builder about managing a medieval village. You help it grow, fight off bandits, and eventually take part in larger military campaigns. But none of it amounts to a hill of beans if you can’t get families to move in and help your society grow, and some players seem to be struggling on that front. “I have houses, the homeless people won’t take them,” one player wrote in the Discord. “Approval is NOT the issue here. I was at 90% before the homeless people arrived.”

    The most-wishlisted game on Steam ahead of its Early Access launch today, Manor Lords has exploded to over 150,000 concurrent players without even including all of those playing through Game Pass PC. That pushed it ahead of Helldivers 2 in terms of total current players and made it the top seller on Steam in front of Counter-Strike 2. All good news for the developers at Slavic Magic and their publisher, Hooded Horse, and all of it apparently contributing to a record number of unhoused peasants.

    Screenshot: Slavic Magic / Hooded Horse

    Players start off with just a few groups of villagers, some basic resources, and a single ox. At first they work in camps to harvest resources and make lumber. Eventually they are supposed to move from the camps into homes players have built with them, leading to a virtuous cycle of industrious workers, expanding villages, and satisfied populaces. Except that some players can’t seem to get their serfs to oblige. It sounds frustrating, but also hilarious.

    “So I’ve build my first couple of houses but families don’t move in,” wrote one player on Steam. “Instead, I still get the homeless warnings…” Some are wondering if it’s a bug. “I ALWAYS have 5 people who are constantly homeless, despite me having more than enough burgage plots I can’t do anything about it,” wrote a player on the Manor Lords subreddit. “I swear to god I encountered some bug, my 5 original families do not move into the built burgage’s, but any new family that comes to town has moved in, so now I have 4 families moved in and 5 homeless, even though I HAVE enough burgage and half is empty,” a third wrote on Discord.

    Screenshot shows players talking about homelessness on Discord and Reddit

    Screenshot: Reddit / Discord / Kotaku

    So what’s going on here? Are there gremlins in the Manor Lords Early Access code, or do players just need a few days to figure out the nuances of the realism-driven management sim? “We’ve seen the same reports,” Hooded Horse spokesperson Joe Robinson told Kotaku in an email. “While on the surface they can appear to be the same top-level issue, there are a few things that could be going on. Some are by design, but others are connected to known bugs that are already being addressed.”

    One current cause of homelessness is a known bug that prevents burnt-down homes from being rebuilt. Another more devilish glitch is that upgrading the starting family camps will cause them to never move to nearby burgage plots until you demolish the camps. Finally, even if you solve the homelessness issue, the corresponding negative modifier can keep hanging around for a bit. “We’re investigating a possible bug where the malus outstays its welcome, so we’re not sure on that one,” Robinson said.

    This is just the first day of Manor Lords’ Early Access journey as player feedback helps Slavic Magic deliver on the ambitious promise of its medieval strategy game. I’m sure players will discover even weirder bugs and idiosyncrasies as they try to unravel what makes Manor Lords tick and I can’t wait to find out what they are.

    .

    [ad_2]

    Ethan Gach

    Source link

  • San Francisco could be given more leeway in how it removes encampments

    San Francisco could be given more leeway in how it removes encampments

    [ad_1]

    Residents and many of the unhoused in the Tenderloin near Leavenworth Avenue say sidewalk sweeps happen several times a week, and the Supreme Court may give cities more leeway to continue the practice.

    Amigo’s Market owner Nageeb Quraish has noticed a difference over the last couple of months. 

    “Not so many people hanging around. The streets have been cleaned,” said Quarish.  

    The small business owner opened his store on Leavenworth and Ellis 20 years ago. He said the proliferation of tent encampments on nearby sidewalks has been problematic. 

    “If it’s blocking the way of people walking on the sidewalk to get here and tents are blocking them then that’s a concern,” said Quarish. 

    He supports the city’s effort to keep the sidewalks clear. 

    “Some people would be afraid to come into businesses like this when they see a lot of people gathering or on the street,” said Quarish.

    Cities like San Francisco have been limited in how they can enforce encampment cleanups because of previous lower court rulings. 

    “So the question is ‘Do the homeless have some constitutional protection from being criminalized for what they have to do,” said Rory Little. 

    Little is a constitutional law professor at UC Law San Francisco. 

    “The likely result is that they will reverse the night circuit ruling,” said Little. 

    A Supreme Court reversal would give cities more leverage in how they address homelessness, including encampments on sidewalks and parks. 

    “They’re not going to get into the business of detailed regulation of the homelessness issue, and that in itself will be in a sense of victory for the city of Grants Pass,” said Little. 

    Little believes federal courts will have less of a role to play in the detailed day-to-day treatment of the homelessness issue.

    Quarish said he’s open to more city enforcement to keep sidewalks clear of tents.  

    “They’re supposed to follow. That’s fair.  If that means they have to move them from one place to another they’re supposed to follow and move,” said Quarish. 

    He believes that’s good for small businesses and the city as a whole. The case is among the last to be argued this term. 

    It’s unlikely to be decided before late June.

    [ad_2]

    Kenny Choi

    Source link

  • Supreme Court to hear major cases on homelessness, abortion, presidential immunity

    Supreme Court to hear major cases on homelessness, abortion, presidential immunity

    [ad_1]

    Supreme Court to hear major cases on homelessness, abortion, presidential immunity – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Jan Crawford looks ahead at an important week for the Supreme Court. The justices will hear arguments on several contentious issues, including abortion limits and a claim by former President Trump that presidents have legal immunity for their actions in office. First, they’ll hear a case focusing on homelessness and what can be done about it.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Supreme Court to weigh constitutionality today of anti-camping ordinances in major homelessness case

    Supreme Court to weigh constitutionality today of anti-camping ordinances in major homelessness case

    [ad_1]

    Washington — The Supreme Court is convening Monday to hear arguments in a dispute over whether laws that ban public camping violate the Constitution’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.

    The case is the most significant involving homelessness to come before the nation’s highest court in decades, and its outcome could impact how cities and states respond to high rates of homelessness that have given rise to encampments on public property. 

    The dispute involves the constitutionality of laws that punish homeless people with civil citations for camping on public property. Arguments come as the nation confronts a spike in homelessness driven in part by high housing costs, and a ruling is likely to reach beyond the borders of the Oregon city at the center of the dispute.

    There were an estimated 256,000 unsheltered people in the U.S. on a given night in 2023, according to a December report from the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Homelessness rose 12% from 2022 to 2023, its highest level since tracking began in 2007, the report found, as housing prices soared and pandemic-era assistance programs expired.

    At the center of the case is Grants Pass, a city of roughly 40,000 in southern Oregon with ordinances that bar camping or sleeping on public property or in city parks. The city’s rules define “campsite” as “any place where bedding, sleeping bag, or other material used for bedding purposes, or any stove or fire is placed.”

    Violators face fines of at least $295, but repeat offenders may be banned from a city park for 30 days. If a person violates that order by camping in a park, they are committing criminal trespass, punishable by up to 30 days in jail and a $1,250 fine.

    The city said in court papers that it enforced the ordinances “with moderation,” issuing more than 500 citations from 2013 to 2018. A policy from the Grants Pass Department of Public Safety states “homelessness is not a crime,” and the department does “not use homelessness solely as a basis for detention or law enforcement action.”

    In 2018, three homeless people in Grants Pass sued the city on behalf of its homeless population, alleging its public sleeping and camping ordinances unconstitutionally punished them by violating the Eighth Amendment’s protections against cruel and unusual punishment.

    A federal district court in Oregon ruled for the challengers and barred Grants Pass from enforcing the public-camping ordinances during daytime hours without 24-hour notice, and at night entirely against the roughly 600 homeless people in the city. A divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit upheld the district court’s ruling as to the public-camping rules.

    “The City of Grants Pass cannot, consistent with the Eighth Amendment, enforce its anti-camping ordinances against homeless persons for the mere act of sleeping outside with rudimentary protection from the elements, or for sleeping in their car at night, when there is no other place in the city for them to go,” Judge Roslyn Silver, who was on the 9th Circuit panel, wrote for the majority.

    The full 9th Circuit declined to rehear the case over the dissent of 13 active judges and four senior judges.

    Grants Pass officials appealed the ruling to the Supreme Court, arguing that “modest” fines and short jail terms for camping on public property are not cruel and unusual punishments under the Eighth Amendment. 

    They said that allowing it to stand prevents governments from “proactively addressing the serious social problems associated with the homelessness crisis,” and threatens many other criminal prohibitions. 

    “The homelessness crisis is a significant challenge for communities large and small throughout the nation. But ‘[n]ot every challenge we face is constitutional in character,’” lawyers for the city wrote in a filing. “And the solution is not to stretch the Eighth Amendment beyond its limits and place the federal courts in charge of this pressing social problem.”

    But Ed Johnson, director of litigation at the Oregon Law Center, who brought the suit on behalf of the homeless people in Grants Pass, said the word “camping” in the city’s ordinances is misleading.

    “The city has simply described the condition of living outside while trying not to die of hypothermia, and called it camping,” he said in a call with reporters, noting that Grants Pass has no homeless shelters and a “severe” shortage of affordable housing.

    He said the Eighth Amendment does not allow governments to fine, arrest and incarcerate those with no place else to go.

    “Our case has always been about this narrow and fundamental issue that’s currently before the Supreme Court,” Johnson said. “Can a city make it illegal on every inch of city land, every minute of the day, for people to live outside when they have nowhere else to go? We believe the answer is no.”

    In court filings, Johnson and his co-counsel accused the city of punishing homeless people for sleeping or resting “anywhere on public property at any time with so much as a blanket to survive the cold” and said the laws make it “physically impossible for a homeless person who does not have access to shelter” to stay in Grants Pass without facing fines and jail time.

    Efforts to address a homelessness crisis

    The dispute has attracted input from a range of advocacy and law enforcement organizations, cities, states, members of Congress and the Biden administration.

    The Justice Department said in a filing that the 9th Circuit was right to find that the Eighth Amendment prohibits a local government from effectively criminalizing homelessness by prohibiting individuals who lack access to shelter from residing in that area. But it said applying that principle to a particular person requires a look at their circumstances, and the lower court was wrong to issue the broad injunctive relief that it did.

    Those broad injunctions issued by U.S. district courts “may limit cities’ ability to respond appropriately and humanely to encampments and other legitimate public health and safety concerns,” Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, who represents the government before the Supreme Court, said.

    She urged the Supreme Court to wipe away the 9th Circuit’s decision and send the case back for further proceedings.

    Several major cities have asked the justices to allow them to address public health and safety concerns that arise from homeless encampments.

    The city of Phoenix and the League of Arizona Cities and Towns said municipalities must have the authority to “arrest, cite, or forcibly remove individuals camping on public property when their actions jeopardize public safety.”  In San Francisco, which is facing a homelessness crisis, city leaders told the Supreme Court that the 9th Circuit’s decision has prevented it from enforcing six state and local laws that place limits on where and when homeless people can sleep and erect tents on public property. 

    “The city has been unable to implement the considered policy decisions of its Mayor and local legislature; unable to enforce the will of San Francisco voters; unable to allow conscientious City employees to do their jobs; and unable to protect its public spaces,” lawyers for the city said in their brief, filed in support of neither party.

    The lower court decisions have “harmed both San Francisco’s housed and unhoused populations by causing obstructed and inaccessible sidewalks, unsafe encampments, and fewer unhoused people to accept services,” they continued.

    A decision from the Supreme Court is expected by the end of June.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Colorado takes action to fight deadly spike of syphilis in newborns

    Colorado takes action to fight deadly spike of syphilis in newborns

    [ad_1]

    Colorado is experiencing an alarming spike in syphilis among newborns, leading the state to issue a public health order Thursday aimed at curbing the disease’s spread through wider testing.

    In 2023, 50 infants in Colorado were born with syphilis, up from only seven in 2018. So far this year, the state is halfway to last year’s total, with five infected babies who were stillborn and two who died in their first months of life, state epidemiologist Dr. Rachel Herlihy said.

    “We’ve already had 25 cases so far this year, putting us on track to have maybe 100 cases,” she said at a news conference, addressing what Gov. Jared Polis’s office called a “growing epidemic.” 

    Syphilis is a sexually transmitted infection that sometimes causes no symptoms in adults, though the bacteria can eventually damage the heart and brain if a person doesn’t receive treatment. But roughly two out of five babies born to infected mothers will be stillborn or die in infancy, and those who survive are at risk of intellectual disability, bone deformities and other lifelong health problems, Herlihy said.

    The new public health order from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment requires all health care providers to offer syphilis testing at least three times to pregnant patients: in the first trimester, in the third trimester and at birth.

    Nearly all insurance plans cover the testing, and people without insurance can receive it for free at public health clinics or by ordering a home test kit.

    “We hope to save many babies from death and suffering,” Polis said at the news conference.

    On Thursday, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists issued a recommendation that all pregnant patients receive testing three times. Previously, it only recommended more than one test if a patient had certain risk factors for getting infected while pregnant.

    “The cases of congenital syphilis are definitely climbing, and they’ve been climbing over the last 10 years. And it’s completely preventable… It’s unacceptable,” said Dr. Laura Riley, who chairs the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Weill Cornell Medicine and helped with the guidance. “We need to be able to do better diagnostics and treatment.”

    The Colorado order also requires offering tests to prisoners who are pregnant, and to people who have experienced a stillbirth after 20 weeks of pregnancy, when spontaneous miscarriages are rare. While it would be too late for that particular fetus after a stillbirth, antibiotic treatment would protect the mother, her sex partners and any future pregnancies.

    Patients and prisoners aren’t required to undergo testing if they don’t want to, but their providers have to give them the option, said Jill Hunsaker Ryan, executive director of the state health department. State law already required that providers offer everyone syphilis testing in the first trimester.

    Last year, 3,266 people in Colorado received a syphilis diagnosis, which was a 5% increase over the previous year and more than three times the number diagnosed in 2018. Most of the diagnoses are still in men, because the bacteria became entrenched in the community of gay and bisexual men. About one-third are in women, though, and diagnoses have risen faster among women than among men.

    Nationwide, syphilis diagnoses reached their highest rate since at least 1950 in 2022, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cases peaked in the 1940s, before antibiotics became widely available, and fell throughout the 20th century.

    People of color and those who lack access to reliable health care, such as the homeless population, have been hit disproportionately hard in the resurgence over the last few years.

    Earlier this year, the state health department asked for $8 million over four years to fund an opt-out syphilis screening program at two hospital emergency departments in Denver and Pueblo County, which both have a significant share of new infections.

    The department also proposed to distribute rapid tests to organizations that work with at-risk people; to fund delivering treatment to some people in their homes; and to build up a stockpile of the antibiotics used to treat syphilis. Most antibiotics are cheap, but the best option for syphilis, Bicillin, is relatively expensive and in short supply, so providers don’t always opt to stock it.

    The legislature appropriated about $1.9 million for the first year of the syphilis response, and will have to vote on additional money in subsequent years.

    The state and the Pueblo Department of Public Health and Environment already run a small pilot program to bring treatment to people in their homes. Jails in Pueblo, El Paso and Jefferson counties also have started screening female prisoners and offering treatment to anyone who tests positive.

    [ad_2]

    Meg Wingerter

    Source link

  • DC-based service agency that helps people without homes is expanding to Northern Va. – WTOP News

    DC-based service agency that helps people without homes is expanding to Northern Va. – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    D.C.-based Central Union Mission, which helps people experiencing homelessness, is expanding into Northern Virginia.

    It’s been helping people experiencing homelessness in D.C. since the Civil War. Now Central Union Mission is expanding into Northern Virginia.

    President and CEO Joseph Mettimano said there’s a great need.

    “There is a tremendous population of low-income families and homeless folks in Northern Virginia as well,” Mettimano said.

    In fact, he said homelessness spiked 17% in Arlington County alone last year.

    The new venture will operate out of Greenbriar Baptist Church in south Arlington. Mettimano said it will offer the essentials, such as food and clothing.

    “But in addition to that we’re going to provide job training and job placement, education, helping people with addictions.”

    He said ESL classes will also be offered, along with after school programs for kids.

    The mission accepts volunteers and donations, but he said you can start helping by doing something simple if you see someone who could use a little help.

    “When you see a person on the street, you know I think we all tend to not want to make eye contact” Mettimano said. “That’s very dehumanizing to a person on the street, to not even be recognized as a person, so I encourage people just to say hello.”

    Central Union Mission began it’s work in D.C. during the Civil War, helping soldiers who found themselves on the street. The organization recently celebrated 140 years of helping vulnerable people in the community.

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2024 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    [ad_2]

    Kyle Cooper

    Source link

  • Residents near south Minneapolis homeless encampment decry crime and

    Residents near south Minneapolis homeless encampment decry crime and

    [ad_1]

    MINNEAPOLIS — For the second time in less than three years, residents near East 29th Street and Fifth Avenue South in Minneapolis are living next to an encampment.

    “We have so much anger behind the city allowing this to happen. We feel so wronged,” said one neighbor.

    This homeowner says he did not want his face shown for fear of what would happen if the occupants of the encampment knew it was him speaking out.

    RELATED: Businesses along East Lake Street feeling the weight of a growing homeless encampment

    “If I walk down the street, I am going to get harassed. We can’t even be outside without people like getting mad at us for looking at them walking through our alley,” he said.

    He says on March 27, from inside his home, he watched as people cut the locked fence to gain access to the yard.

    “As they are breaking in, more of us are calling the cops and more and more of them are showing up, it happened so fast. They are pulling cars up, they are pulling trailers up, they are unloading everything,” he said.

    He says many in his neighborhood do not feel safe.

    “I’m looking outside and I got people sitting on their blankets, shooting drugs on the other side of my alley. We just had a homicide, right? They’ve only been here for two weeks but it’s back to the same thing that it was,” the neighbor said.

    The body of a 24-year-old man was found near the encampment on April 8.

    In 2021, another encampment went up in the same area. According to 911 records, there were more than 2,800 calls for service to that area from July through December. Officers responded to reports of shots fired, damage to property, assaults and drug activity.

    “But now, them allowing our block to go back through the same thing that we had gone through is a complete injustice to our neighborhood,” he said.

    In just the last five weeks, there have been seven disturbance calls, three stabbings, one explosion, two ShotSpotter activations and one murder on that block.

    RELATED: Minneapolis City Council members, Mayor Jacob Frey clash on homelessness response after fire at encampment

    Neighbors came together to present a letter to city leaders describing what they call “the chaos” in their community.

    “We are again struggling with drug dealers doing business so close to our homes and harassing our kids,” the letter read, in part.

    They want the city to take action immediately for their survival.

    “If you were to talk to other homeowners, they’ve got bullet holes in their houses,” he said.

    The city of Minneapolis sent a statement saying it is working to close the encampment on 5th Avenue South:

    Closure is likely to take place next week and the city will provide one week advance notice prior to closure. Outreach workers continue working on connecting community members at the encampment with available services from Hennepin County and other community partners. These resources include shelters, housing, mental health, and addiction services.

    The city continues to balance the needs of encampment residents with those of nearby residents and businesses when considering its response.

    [ad_2]

    Reg Chapman

    Source link

  • How Houston is successfully reducing homelessness

    How Houston is successfully reducing homelessness

    [ad_1]

    How Houston is successfully reducing homelessness – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    In 2012, the nation’s fourth-largest city went all-in on a new system to address homelessness in which dozens of agencies join forces under a single umbrella organization to put those without homes in their own apartments, rather than in shelter beds. Correspondent Martha Teichner looks at a concept that has succeeded in reducing homelessness in the greater Houston area by 63%.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Los Angeles expands its overnight RV parking ban on the westside

    Los Angeles expands its overnight RV parking ban on the westside

    [ad_1]

    Los Angeles is cracking down on RV encampments after the city council voted Friday to restrict overnight parking for the large vehicles in about 30 streets in neighborhoods on the westside.

    New signs regarding the change are already being posted along several streets in neighborhoods including Arlington Heights, Van Nuys, Porter Ranch and more. They state overnight parking from 2 to 6 a.m. is prohibited for vehicles more than 22 feet long or more than 7 feet high.

    The move comes as LA Mayor Karen Bass’ plan to dismantle RV encampments as part of her Inside Safe program, which aims to move unhoused individuals to motel rooms.

    Neighbors in Westside Village told NBC4 they try to avoid the RV encampments, especially while walking.

    “The problem is that some dogs are without leash and I’m scared the dogs attack my dogs,” one woman, who wished not to be named, said. “And another problem is sometimes, we can’t walk in the alley because they have a lot of things and we have to walk outside the alley, the street. And, I don’t know, I feel bad for them, too.”

    According to the city council’s resolution, the areas where the new parking ban has been enacted are in spaces where “an RV task force operation has taken place.”

    In addition to the signs stating the new rules, signs warning about tows have also been posted in the last 24 hours.

    According to the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, the department is struggling with capacity with the number of RV’s that have been removed from the streets.

    NBC4’s I-Team learned the city of LA has hundreds of more RV encampments to clear out as Mayor Karen Bass’ Inside Safe program moves forward. The I-Team’s Joel Grover reports.

    [ad_2]

    Anastassia Olmos and Karla Rendon

    Source link

  • California fails to track effectiveness of billions spent on homelessness, audit finds

    California fails to track effectiveness of billions spent on homelessness, audit finds

    [ad_1]

    California has failed to adequately monitor the outcomes of its vast spending on homelessness programs, according to a state audit released Tuesday, raising questions about whether billions of dollars meant to thwart the crisis has been worth it as the number of people living unsheltered has soared.

    A new report from the California State Auditor’s Office found that a state council created to oversee the implementation of homelessness programs has not consistently tracked spending or the outcomes of those programs.

    That dearth of information means the state lacks pertinent data and that policymakers “are likely to struggle to understand homelessness programs’ ongoing costs and achieved outcomes,” the audit says.

    “The state must do more to assess the cost-effectiveness of its homelessness programs,” California State Auditor Grant Parks said in a letter sent to Gov. Gavin Newsom and state lawmakers Tuesday accompanying the audit.

    California has spent $20 billion over the past five years dedicated to the state’s homelessness crisis, including funneling money toward supporting shelters and subsidizing rent. Still, homelessness grew 6% in 2023 from the year prior, to more than 180,000 people, according to federal “point in time” data. Since 2013, homelessness has grown in California by 53%.

    The California Interagency Council on Homelessness — created in 2016 to oversee the state’s implementation of programs dedicated to the worsening crisis — has not ensured the accuracy of the information in a state data system and has not evaluated homelessness programs’ success, according to the state auditor.

    The audit recommends that the state Legislature require that the council report spending plans and outcomes of state funded homelessness programs annually and to make that information public. It recommends a type of “scorecard” to track the success of programs.

    The council consists of state officials including Health and Human Services Secretary Dr. Mark Ghaly and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Secretary Jeff Macomber.

    In a response to the audit’s findings, Meghan Marshall, executive officer for the council, said it has already “established a consistent method for gathering information on homelessness” but agreed with the state auditor’s recommendations and plans to pursue them “where possible.”

    Out of five programs analyzed, auditors found that two were likely cost effective: Project Homekey — Newsom’s COVID driven project to convert hotels into housing — and the CalWORKs Housing Support Program, which offers financial assistance and other services to low income residents. The others analyzed, including a state rental assistance program, could not be reviewed because “the state has not collected sufficient data on the outcomes of these programs,” according to auditors.

    “Collecting and reporting all state homelessness programs’ financial data allows for more complete and timely information about the state’s overall spending on homelessness. It also makes possible greater coordination of homelessness programs’ funding and may enable cost‑effectiveness comparisons,” the audit stated.

    Based on the data available, the audit also revealed that most people involved in state programs are placed into interim housing such as shelters and do not end up in permanent housing.

    A bipartisan group of lawmakers including state Sen. Dave Cortese (D-San Jose) and Assemblyman Josh Hoover (R-Folsom) requested that the Joint Legislative Audit Committee authorize a state audit of the efficacy of state homeless funding last year as California’s unhoused population — the nation’s largest — has continued to grow despite record state funding invested to combat it.

    “The biggest conclusion that the auditors came back with is there’s just inadequate transparency and data and information available,” Cortese told reporters in Sacramento on Tuesday.

    Cortese said the audit will act as a blueprint for the Legislature to consider stricter reporting on homelessness spending in the future and said it should not deter the state from funding homelessness responses.

    “I think our constituents want us to continue to invest, and I think our constituents are going to want us to continue to audit the effectiveness of our efforts,” he said. “I don’t think it’s a time to stop.”

    State Republicans chastised the Newsom administration for the lack of data and said it’s proof that Democrat-backed strategies are not working as the state grapples with a multibillion-dollar budget deficit.

    “California is facing a concerning paradox: despite an exorbitant amount of dollars spent, the state’s homeless population is not slowing down,” Sen. Roger Niello (R-Roseville) said in a statement. “These audit results are a wake-up call for a shift toward solutions that prioritize self-sufficiency and cost effectiveness.”

    Tuesday’s audit comes just weeks after voters approved Proposition 1, Newsom’s $6.4-billion bond measure that aims to address one aspect of homelessness by building more treatment facilities for people who have problems with drug addiction or mental illness.

    Another part of the audit examined spending by the cities of San José and San Diego, which have both struggled to help unhoused residents. The audit found that neither of those cities have “evaluated the effectiveness” of their programs despite millions in funding to respond to homelessness.

    “San José and San Diego identified hundreds of millions of dollars in spending of federal, state, and local funding in recent years to respond to the homelessness crisis. However, neither city could definitively identify all its revenues and expenditures related to its homelessness efforts because neither has an established mechanism, such as a spending plan, to track and report its spending,” the audit states. “The absence of such a mechanism limits the transparency and accountability of the cities’ uses of funding to address homelessness.”

    Cortese — whose Silicon Valley district has long been home to some of the nation’s largest homelessness encampments, a stark juxtaposition against the backdrop of stunning wealth — said the findings regarding the two major cities could be a harbinger for future data discoveries.

    “If those two cities are experiencing issues or if there’s symptoms of challenges that we need to correct, that probably exists in many, many other cities in the state of California,” he said.

    [ad_2]

    Mackenzie Mays

    Source link

  • Manatee County to start new emergency shelter to keep homeless off the street

    Manatee County to start new emergency shelter to keep homeless off the street

    [ad_1]

    MANATEE COUNTY, Fla. — More help is coming to take people off the streets in Manatee County. County officials are in the works of opening an emergency shelter.


    What You Need To Know

    • The county is investing in an alternative to follow House Bill 1365. It’s called the Fresh Start Manatee proposal
    • County officials plan on replicating a similar style to Pinellas Hope
    • Those staying at the shelter will receive a wide range of on-site help such as substance abuse and mental health services

    This comes after Gov. Ron DeSantis signed House Bill 1365 that goes into effect in October. The law will ban Florida’s homeless will be banned from sleeping on sidewalks and in parks and other public spaces.

    “The reason for our people being unhoused is that there is not enough affordable housing and we need to provide alternatives,” said Kathleen Cramer, the executive director of Turning Points in Bradenton.

    The county is investing in an alternative to follow House Bill 1365. It’s called the Fresh Start Manatee proposal and will be an emergency homeless shelter that will help about 100 men and women for 90 days.

    “I think we have an opportunity to do this program correctly. We do it with a plan and strategy. How we can help people who are experiencing homelessness and not just put them in a camp,” Cramer said.

    County officials plan on replicating a similar style to Pinellas Hope. The organization uses tents for shelters and has one structure that houses basic needs like an outside area, a kitchen, a laundry room, and bathrooms and showers.

    “I’ve toured the program. It is a camp. Some people don’t like the idea of a camp, but the feel of it is incredible. It feels calm, safe. People are working towards stability and long-term housing,” Cramer said.

    Those staying at the shelter will receive a wide range of on-site help such as substance abuse and mental health services, along with employment and financial assistance to help people get on the right track. In order to check these off the list, commissioners want to partner with organizations like Turning Points, which Cramer says could happen.

    “The services I think we need are navigation services, people to help individuals create a stability plan and connect to the resources to make that plan possible,” she said.

    But she does have some concerns.

    “October is going to be here really quickly and it comes with no additional money from our local government to implement this, so that’s a concern,” she said.

    Cramer hopes that the county will make it happen before the law goes into effect.

    According to a county commissioner, meetings will be needed to discuss where the emergency shelter will be located and when it will open.

    [ad_2]

    Julia Hazel

    Source link

  • California voters approve Prop. 1, ballot measure aimed at tackling homeless crisis

    California voters approve Prop. 1, ballot measure aimed at tackling homeless crisis

    [ad_1]

    A statewide ballot measure aimed at overhauling California’s mental health care system, primarily through the issuance of nearly $6.4 billion in bonds, has been approved by voters.

    Proposition 1 is a two-pronged measure backed heavily by Gov. Gavin Newsom and a host of Southland elected officials, including Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and county Supervisors Hilda Solis and Janice Hahn. Backers of the measure say that it will dramatically increase access to treatment beds and supportive housing, but opponents claim it would slash funding for already successful programs. 

    It took more than two weeks for the vote tallying process to be completed, with the officials results being announced on Wednesday. 

    County officials across California will now be required to redirect money to create drug and mental health treatment beds and bolster their response to lessen the homeless issue that many major cities face.

    According to Newsom’s office, the proposition is slated to create 11,150 behavioral health treatment beds across the state, along with housing and 26,700 outpatient treatment slots. Roughly $1 billion of the bond measure is earmarked specifically for veterans. 

    “This is the biggest change in decades in how California tackles homelessness, and a victory for doing things radically different,” Gov. Newsom said in a statement. “Now, counties and local officials must match the ambition of California voters. This historic reform will only succeed if we all kick into action immediately – state government and local leaders, together.”

    What happens now that Prop. 1 passed?

    Since Proposition 1 is a bond measure, there will be no immediate impact on taxes. However, California is now slated to take on the new debt proposed in the measure — $6.4 billion — and pay it back with interest.

    Additionally, counties will now be required to change some of their mental health care and drug or alcohol treatment services, shifting some of the focus to housing and personalized support services. 

    The money for Proposition 1 will come in two methods, primarily the issuance of $6.38 billion in bonds and also through a re-apportionment of funds generated by the Mental Health Services Act, which was passed by California voters in 2004, and it imposed a 1% income tax on people earning more than $1 million per year. Funds from that measure are largely directed to counties for mental health programs, but Proposition 1 would give the state control over much of the funding. 

    The Associated Press suggests that annual revenue from the tax runs between $2 billion and $3 billion a year, providing one-third of the state’s mental health budget. 

    Counties will be required to spend around two-thirds of the funds on housing and homeless outreach programs for people with serious mental health illness or substance abuse problems. 

    The bill also authorizes California to borrow more than $6 billion to build 4,350 housing units. Half of the units would be reserved for veterans and add nearly 7,000 mental health and addiction treatment beds. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Tenant rights lawyer Ysabel Jurado pulls ahead of Councilmember Kevin de León in L.A. election

    Tenant rights lawyer Ysabel Jurado pulls ahead of Councilmember Kevin de León in L.A. election

    [ad_1]

    Los Angeles City Council candidate Ysabel Jurado didn’t have any big-money backers spending lavishly on her behalf.

    The Highland Park resident didn’t mail out glossy campaign mailers either, opting instead for an estimated 3,000 postcards, which were less expensive and personally handwritten.

    What Jurado, a tenant rights attorney, did have was a supercharged canvassing operation. According to her campaign, she sent 20 paid staffers and about 250 volunteers to 85,000 doors across the 14th District, which stretches from Boyle Heights and downtown north to Eagle Rock and El Sereno.

    That strategy is paying dividends. On Tuesday, she pulled ahead of Councilmember Kevin de León, who had been leading in the eight-way race to represent his Eastside district, according to the latest election results. Now in first place and likely headed to a runoff, Jurado is yet another example of the electoral might being wielded by the city’s political left.

    Jurado, in an interview, said she’s not certain who her opponent will be in the Nov. 5 runoff election, since votes are still being counted. She portrayed her campaign as a lean operation, one focused on supporting renters, fighting gentrification and “uplifting the voices of those who haven’t been heard.”

    “We don’t have an office. We haven’t sent mailers. We are talking to voters one-to-one,” she said. “Everything involved in building this campaign has been an uphill battle.”

    Jurado’s first-place showing was revealed Tuesday as part of the latest daily election update from the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk since the March 5 primary. Jurado had 24.5% of the vote, compared with 23.5% for De León — a difference of 318 ballots.

    On Tuesday, Assemblymember Miguel Santiago was 730 votes behind De León, with 21.2% of the vote.

    Election officials say an estimated 126,000 ballots are left to be processed countywide. Up until now, each of the county’s daily updates has broken in Jurado’s favor.

    On Friday, Jurado pulled into second place, securing more votes than Santiago. Four days later, she was leading the pack.

    De León, who is seeking a second four-year term, will face some serious challenges if he makes the second round. A former state lawmaker, he was at the center of the 2022 scandal over leaked racist remarks that spurred the resignations of former Council President Nury Martinez and Ron Herrera, former head of the Los Angeles County Federation of Labor.

    De León repeatedly apologized for his remarks during that conversation, and for failing to put a stop to those made by others. He resisted calls to step down from a wide array of politicians, including President Biden, showing up at meetings where he was frequently jeered by audience members.

    Less than a fourth of voters opted to keep De León in office, according to the results so far.

    If he and Jurado end up in the top two, voters in the 14th District will have a clear choice on several of the city’s most contested issues.

    De León voted last year for Mayor Karen Bass’ budget, which called for the hiring of 1,000 police officers. Jurado said she would have voted against the spending plan, pushing for funds to be allocated to social services instead.

    De León also voted for a four-year package of police raises, which Jurado opposed. In addition, De León is a supporter of Municipal Code 41.18, which bars homeless encampments within 500 feet of schools, day-care centers and “sensitive” locations designated by the council, such as senior centers and freeway overpasses.

    Jurado has called for 41.18 to be repealed, saying it has led to the criminalization of homelessness.

    On Tuesday, a De León representative made clear that his candidate would highlight some of those differences in a runoff against Jurado.

    “The voters have a clear choice in November between an experienced, results-driven elected official and someone who has promised to undo some of the progress we’ve made in housing Angelenos and cleaning up sidewalks,” said David Meraz, a De León spokesperson.

    Meraz pointed out that 18 months ago, in the wake of the audio leak scandal, many political groups called for De León to step down. The results so far show that “the community makes the choice of the candidate, not outside organizations,” he said.

    Jurado has been running to push the council to the left, expanding the size of the council’s ultra-progressive bloc if she wins. She would be the first Filipino American to serve on the council, representing a district that is 61% Latino, 16% white and nearly 15% Asian, according to a demographic breakdown posted by the city in 2021.

    De León, who was born in Los Angeles, is of Mexican, Guatemalan and Chinese descent, Meraz said. During the campaign, De León highlighted his own efforts to reduce homelessness, aid renters and halt gentrification in downtown L.A. and Boyle Heights.

    Brian VanRiper, a political consultant who does not have any clients in the race, said Jurado is in a strong position to prevail in the runoff. Still, he offered a word of caution for the Jurado camp, noting that the district has a “history of forgiving” incumbents with major political baggage.

    District voters reelected Councilmember Jose Huizar in 2015, even after he was sued by a former staffer who alleged that he had sexually harassed her. In that contest, Huizar easily defeated former County Supervisor Gloria Molina, a political “titan” who had been in office for about three decades.

    “[Huizar] doubled down on constituent services and making the case that he delivered for the district,” VanRiper said. “It seems like Kevin de León is following that playbook.”

    Huizar was later charged in a sweeping federal corruption case and was sentenced to 13 years in prison. De León was elected to the seat in 2020.

    In recent months, many of the groups that supported De León four years ago lined up behind other candidates. The Los Angeles County Federation of Labor, Western States Regional Council of Carpenters and other groups spent a combined $687,000 on efforts to elect Santiago, the state lawmaker who was in third place.

    A consultant for Santiago did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    Jurado, for her part, has secured endorsements from an array of politicians and community groups, many of them at the left end of the political spectrum.

    Councilmember Eunisses Hernandez, City Controller Kenneth Mejia and former mayoral candidate Gina Viola have been campaigning for Jurado. Volunteers from the Democratic Socialists of America-Los Angeles, Ground Game LA and Boyle Heights Vota — formerly known as Boyle Heights for Bernie — have knocked on doors for her.

    Caleb Elguezabal, who lives in Eagle Rock and is a member of the DSA, said the district has not “had the best representation” over the last decade.

    Elguezabal, who volunteered on Jurado’s campaign, said he expects her to bring change to City Hall with a new approach to homelessness, fighting for a tax on vacant residential units and helping renters purchase their apartment buildings.

    “Having someone with integrity would be a massive sea change,” he said.

    Times staff writer Angie Orellana Hernandez contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    David Zahniser

    Source link

  • Lakeside Men’s Homeless Shelter Extension Opens, Putting Dent in County’s Demand for Beds

    Lakeside Men’s Homeless Shelter Extension Opens, Putting Dent in County’s Demand for Beds

    [ad_1]

    click to enlarge

    Mark Oprea

    Melissa Sirak, director of the county’s Office of Homeless Services, speaking at 2020 Lakeside on Tuesday.

    A year ago, in March 2023, Cuyahoga County released a strategic plan to best combat growing rates of homelessness exacerbated in wake of the global pandemic. Among the call for outreach workers and more affordable homes, the report clocked a goal for 2028: to house 500 more.

    On Tuesday, the county seemingly stepped a bit closer to hitting its mark when it cut the ribbon on 2020 Lakeside Avenue, a brand new building intended as a sibling operation to the next-door men’s shelter at 2100, which Cuyahoga County has been overseeing in partnership with the Lutheran Metropolitan Ministry for almost two decades.

    Out of the 5,000 or so the county estimated are homeless inside its boundaries, roughly 350 of those people are unsheltered, single men. (About the number of beds at 2100.) And, for the past few years, local governments and nonprofits have been drumming up solutions on the best way to steer this population—and the growing population of homeless women—into permanent housing.

    click to enlarge Lutheran Men's Shelter at 2100 Lakeside Ave. - Google

    Google

    Lutheran Men’s Shelter at 2100 Lakeside Ave.

    That is, if those that occupy the numerous tents that dot Superior Avenue choose to check in to 2020, or if they find greater value sleeping out on the sidewalks, without noisy neighbors, potential drug interference, or the nagging intimidation of barriers-to-entry.

    “It’s bittersweet, because we need these beds, we need this space,” County Executive Chris Ronayne said from a podium inside 2020 on Tuesday. He recalled a recent tour of the shelter next door: “I was just making the rounds and walking, and realizing that it’s crowded. It’s crowded. And we need to give our residents the dignity of space.”

    What looks to be a far cry from conditions in the past including spoiled food, the county’s newest shelter features 113 beds—the majority of them bunked—in a 14,000 square-foot room that resembles more of a barracks than a hostel. Each “semi-private” room contains one or two Hallowell lockers, and are separated with nine-foot, powder blue walls. There are lights for reading, outlets for charging phones, among other amenities.

    It’s a stark contrast, it seems, from what lingers feet away from the new building.

    “They really did a better job,” Loh, an activist who was present at county meetings rallying for action “every week,” told Scene, as she walked through 2020’s pristine shower stalls. In other shelters, “you can’t use the toilets. They run out of drinking water. Run out of bathroom tissue.”

    click to enlarge Brand new sinks and showers at 2020 Lakeside. "It's a big improvement" from 2100's shelter next door, housing advocate Loh told Scene. - Mark Oprea

    Mark Oprea

    Brand new sinks and showers at 2020 Lakeside. “It’s a big improvement” from 2100’s shelter next door, housing advocate Loh told Scene.

    click to enlarge Most of 2020's beds are bunked, and grouped in a very open room setting. Most have just one or two lockers. Some walls are color-coded, a county employee said, to help those with mental deficiencies find their beds. - Mark Oprea

    Mark Oprea

    Most of 2020’s beds are bunked, and grouped in a very open room setting. Most have just one or two lockers. Some walls are color-coded, a county employee said, to help those with mental deficiencies find their beds.

    It’s what, one thinks as they tour, $4.4 million in American Rescue Plan Act dollars can build. But that was then, back in 2021, when the county’s budget for solving homeless issues was given more financial grace by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

    Which makes one wonder how exactly, as Ronayne and others suggested on Tuesday, the county could wrangle more funds together to fix the shelter next door. “We’re at this cross-current of ARPA winding down,” Ronayne said, “at exactly the moment when, sadly, our rates of unhoused are going off.”

    As are hesitation to build facilities. Last February, residents of Ohio City sounded off at a Board of Zoning Appeals meeting, fearing that LMM converting an office building off Franklin Avenue would be hazardous to their neighborhood. BZA approved the construction regardless.

    Similar tones of fear were seen at a town hall meeting in Munson Township last month, where hundreds of anxious locals showed up in attempt to steer the Geauga Faith Rescue Mission away from constructing a 10-bed shelter for women in their apparent backyards. (It worked; GFRM is now hunting for another site.)

    Michael Sering, LMM’s Vice President of Housing & Shelter, said that he believed 2020’s opening would create an absorbing effect, both deflating some of the overcrowding at 2100 and other shelters, and speeding up renovation of their first space.

    “We will no longer need offsite location and shuttle trips to meet periodic influxes” of people, Stearns told press. As for 2100, “we can now rearrange or de-concentrate one-third of our beds. And that will make for better spaces for everyone.”

    Subscribe to Cleveland Scene newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | Or sign up for our RSS Feed

    [ad_2]

    Mark Oprea

    Source link

  • San Jose to clear 1,000 homeless people from creeks and waterways

    San Jose to clear 1,000 homeless people from creeks and waterways

    [ad_1]

    For decades, homeless people have camped along San Jose’s 140 miles of creeks and rivers. Now, at the direction of state regulators, city officials are devising an ambitious plan to move about a thousand people into shelter by the middle of next year.

    On Friday, before a line of tents near Coyote Creek, Mayor Matt Mahan announced the plan in response to a state mandate to clear encampments polluting the city’s watersheds.

    “What they’re telling us, which is what I’ve been saying all along, is that the status quo is unacceptable,” Mahan said.

    To ensure homeless people have a place to go, the mayor and a handful of City Council members pledged to continue adding shelter space across the city, including a newly proposed group shelter with about 1,000 beds south of downtown.

    Officials said the clean-up and shelter effort — which could start in earnest in about six months and must be completed by June 2025 — will cost tens of millions of dollars at a time when the city’s budget is already stretched thin.

    But they maintain that the hefty price tag is worth it, not just to meet environmental requirements but to ease the human suffering on the street and ensure that neighbors feel safe visiting city parks and trails.

    “We must treat this like the emergency that it is,” Mahan said. “This is going to be hard. It’s going to be challenging, and it’s going to be expensive.”

    Pedro Reyes, who lives along the grassy floodplain near Coyote Creek and Tully Road, said he’d be open to accepting a bed at the new shelter. But Reyes, 39, added he’s also comfortable staying outside, despite tending to recent stab wounds after he said he was attacked at his encampment.

    Besides, he said he doesn’t think he needs help. And even if he did, he finds it hard to trust people offering support.

    “I can’t believe it when people are talking to me, like, sweet,” he said. “I don’t trust anyone.”

    On Tuesday, the City Council is set to vote to direct officials to devise plan details, including which areas along waterways across the city need to be prioritized for clean-up and where no-camping zones could be established to prevent homeless people from returning. The city has an estimated 6,340 homeless residents, about 70% of whom are unsheltered.

    The agency forcing the city into action is the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, which has recently ramped up pressure on cities across California to move encampments out of sensitive waterways that often empty into the ocean. It’s threatening San Jose with litigation and tens of thousands of dollars in daily fines if it fails to comply.

    The city has long struggled with what to do about encampments along its creeks and rivers, dating back at least 10 years when it took multiple attempts to clear hundreds of people from a massive Coyote Creek encampment known as “The Jungle.”

    More recently, the city cleared around 200 people from parts of Coyote Creek to make way for a flood protection project. In February, it set in motion plans to create a no-encampment zone along the downtown stretch of the Guadalupe River after clearing dozens of tents and RVs from the area.

    Homeless advocates say clearing camps can be traumatizing for unsheltered people, who can be torn from encampment communities and forced to part with their possessions. Without providing a roof over their heads, advocates say, encampment sweeps do little but push homeless people into new neighborhoods.

    “If you’re going to abate, you have to have a place for them to go,” said Todd Langton, founder of the Coalition for the Unhoused of Silicon Valley. “It’s common sense. It’s humanity.”

    Under a 2018 federal court ruling, local governments across the Western U.S. are expected to at least offer shelter before clearing encampments. However, after frustrated officials petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to modify or do away with the mandate, the justices agreed to review the rule later this year.

    Mahan, who’s expected to sail to reelection next week, has made adding tiny homes, safe overnight parking spots and other “interim” shelter options with supportive services a centerpiece of his push to end street homelessness.

    Critics of that position argue that shelter, while needed, is but a temporary solution that won’t help many people out of homelessness without significantly more investment in permanent affordable and supportive housing. A city report from last year found that about half of the roughly 900 people who stayed in interim shelters in 2022 moved on to permanent housing.

    Mahan and his allies on the council respond that faster and more cost-effective solutions are needed because building low-income homes can take years and cost as much as $1 million for a single unit.

    “For far too long we have enabled unsafe, inhumane, and dangerous living conditions for the unsheltered by relying on woefully slow and brutally expensive projects,” Councilman Bien Doan said in a statement.

    Doan on Friday announced the proposed 1,000-bed group shelter for his district, south of Highway 280 between Highways 101 and 87. Doan’s office declined to give potential locations and did not immediately respond to a question about how much it could cost.

    [ad_2]

    Ethan Varian

    Source link

  • Winter Haven organizations rally to aid homeless after Salvation Army closure

    Winter Haven organizations rally to aid homeless after Salvation Army closure

    [ad_1]

    WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — At the Bible Way Resource Center in Winter Haven, volunteers put together food boxes meant to feed a family. They make enough in a single day for at least 50.


    What You Need To Know

    • Salvation Army recently closed emergency shelter in Winter Haven over financial issues 
    • Local organizations along with city officials are coming up with solutions to find more housing for families in need 
    • Heart for Winter Haven is considering purchasing the property and open it up to families in need again 

    Outreach coordinator Lydia Adcock helps to get things organized.

    “If people come and have an emergency, a homeless situation, then we will put together a quick care package for them, especially someone with a family,” she said. “You know they just need to eat now.”

    Helping others in need is Adcock’s passion.

    “If I could do this full time and still get my rent paid, Hallelujah!” she said.

    Adock experienced homelessness herself after escaping domestic violence. She says the need for resources like affordable housing, food, clothing and transitional housing is growing.

    This comes after the Salvation Army recently shut down a family emergency shelter for women and children in the city. The facility was nearly $125,000 in debt. More than a dozen families have been relocated to other facilities.

    However, the facility might have a new beginning. Heart for Winter Heaven, a center that provides rental assistance, mental health and education to get people back on their feet, is considering purchasing the property. Executive Director Brad Beatty says they are working toward that goal.

    “We’re working with some of our city leadership and investors to see what can be done with the homeless coalition of Polk County to maybe see if we can resurrect it,” Beatty said.

    Heart for Winter Haven helped Adcock during her darkest time and says the organization is a lifesaver.

    “I know if I hadn’t had the opportunity, I would have hightailed it back to what I knew,” Adcock said.

    Adcock is now giving back by volunteering for the Bible Way Resource Center. The organization is small but its looking to expand and provide transitional housing. She also wants to expand services, but they are in need of funding and more volunteers to help out.

    The organization recently created a Facebook page to bring more attention to their efforts and hopefully gain more funding.

    For Adcock, this is her calling.

    “I am a great testimony by God’s grace of paying it forward. Somebody helped me and here I am wanting to help someone else,” she said.

    [ad_2]

    Jeff Van Sant

    Source link

  • Denver opening severe weather shelter Tuesday night

    Denver opening severe weather shelter Tuesday night

    [ad_1]

    Denver city officials will open a severe weather shelter Tuesday night as temperatures are forecast to drop below 20 degrees.

    The McNichols Civic Center Building at 144 W. Colfax Ave. will be open from 6 p.m. Tuesday to 9 a.m. Wednesday for walk-up service, the city said in a news release Monday.

    People can also access shelter through the city’s other access points, including:

    • For individual men at the Lawrence Street Community Center, 2222 Lawrence St.;
    • For individual women at Samaritan House, 2301 Lawrence St.;
    • For youth ages 15-20 at Urban Peak, 2100 Stout St.

    Families in need of shelter should call the Connection Center at 303-295-3366.

    Get more Colorado news by signing up for our daily Your Morning Dozen email newsletter.

    [ad_2]

    Katie Langford

    Source link