ReportWire

Tag: Homeland Security

  • Pro-Biden flyers were not made by migrant resource center

    Pro-Biden flyers were not made by migrant resource center

    [ad_1]

    False claims that Democrats want noncitizens to vote have been amplified by former President Donald Trump, Elon Musk and Republican influencers. Now a social media post is claiming to have evidence of a scheme to encourage noncitizen migrants to vote for President Joe Biden. 

    The Oversight Project run by the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, posted on X what it said was a Spanish-language flyer distributed by the Resource Center Matamoros in Mexico. The Mexican organization provides legal and social support services to migrants trying to get to the United States.

    “Flyers distributed at NGO in Mexico encouraging illegals to vote for President Biden,” said the caption of Oversight Project’s April 15 post, which has more than 9 million views. (NGO stands for nongovernmental organization.)

    The flyer said in Spanish: “Reminder to vote for president Biden when you are in the United States. We need another four years of his mandate to stay open.” 

    The flyer shows the Resource Center Matamoros’ logo, address, website and phone number. It also shows a Biden campaign logo with the phrase in Spanish: “Todos con Biden,” (All with Biden.)

    But a Biden campaign spokesperson called the flyer “disinformation” and the center’s leader told news outlets her group didn’t make it. Here’s what we know.

    The Oversight Project said on X that the flyer was posted throughout the Resource Center Matamoros’ facilities, including the wall of a portable bathroom and that “they also appear to be handed out when illegal aliens” seek the center’s assistance.

    The Oversight Project shared a video that it said comes from an X account, @realmuckraker that posts about the border and immigration. The video shows tents and portable bathrooms; the person filming the video enters multiple bathrooms and finds the flyer hanging on a wall. 

    The flyer raised concerns with conservatives. On X, Florida state Sen. Blaise Ingoglia, R-Spring Hill,  shared the Oversight Project’s post, and said he would file a bill in the next legislative session that would make it a felony to distribute literature such as the flyer and would fine any Florida organization that distributed such literature.

    U.S. Reps. Dan Bishop, R-N.C., and Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., also showed a poster with the flyer at an April 16 House hearing questioning Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. The Oversight Project has linked Mayorkas to the center.  

    Oversight Project Executive Director Mike Howell told PolitiFact his organization made no claims about who made or distributed the flyer, but was shocked “that such a flyer was at a non-profit that is staging illegal aliens to enter the United States.”

    “The Oversight Project is currently investigating a myriad of threads to the integrity of our election system and remains concerned about the foreign influence that illegals can have in our voting system,” Howell said.

    The Oversight Project on X also posted a nine-second audio clip of a conversation between a man and a woman, which the center said is Resource Center Matamoros founder Gaby Zavala. “In all honesty, we’re just trying to help as many people as possible before, you know, before Trump gets re-elected,” the man said. “Believe me, we are in the same boat,” the woman said. It’s unclear from the clip whether the woman’s voice is Zavala’s or the conversation is in full context.

    The flyer mentions that the center is the home of HIAS, the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society. The center has rented space to the society, for which Mayorkas served on the board before becoming DHS secretary. But the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society told The Associated Press that it neither made the flyers nor supported the flyer’s message. The society also said it hasn’t rented space or had ties with the Mexican center since 2022.

    Biden’s campaign told PolitiFact it had nothing to do with that flyer.

    “This is disinformation, and should be labeled that way on platforms Americans trust to provide truthful information — from the social platform where it originated to the media organizations reporting on it,” Ammar Moussa, a Biden campaign spokesperson, told PolitiFact via email.

    Zavala told The Associated Press she doesn’t know who made the flyer and that her group “does not encourage immigrants to register to vote or cast ballots in the U.S.”

    We called and emailed Zavala and her organization, but received no response.

    Fox News National Correspondent Bill Melugin posted on X that the flyer “seems fake or doctored, even at first glance,” and noted several dubious elements, including that the Spanish word for welcome is misspelled and that some of the text is a translation of the organization’s website.

    PolitiFact also examined the flyer closely. Here are some notable details:

    • Flyer says “Bienvedinos,” a misspelling of “bienvenidos” — the Spanish word for welcome.

    • The first two sentences in the flyer appear to be an exact Spanish translation of the organizations Who We Are page. We pasted the English sentences on Google Translate and it gave us the exact Spanish phrasing seen in the flyer. 

    (Screenshot of flyer from Oversight Project’s X post.)

    The center’s Our Mission, Who We Are and Our Services website pages do not say it supports Biden, nor do they tell asylum seekers to support him. The Who We Are page says that the center has worked “closely with representatives from the US and Mexican governments … for more humane treatment of asylum seekers.”

    PolitiFact has debunked similar misinformation about noncitizens voting. Some false claims say that voter registration by noncitizens is rampant and that the Biden administration wants to end voter ID laws so that noncitizens can register and vote. Only U.S. citizens are eligible to vote in federal elections for Congress and president. Some cities, including in California, Maryland and Vermont, allow noncitizens to vote in local elections, such as for mayor or city council. 

    Election officials told PolitiFact that fears of noncitizen voting ignore states’ safeguards to prevent it from happening.

    “It’s important for people to know that voter registration is secure, and eligibility is verified through several mechanisms,” said Amanda López Askin, the local elections official in Doña Ana County, New Mexico. “Disinformation is dangerous to migrants, election officials, and is overall unhealthy for our democracy.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Senate Dismisses One Of Two Articles Of Impeachment Against Homeland Security Secretary – KXL

    Senate Dismisses One Of Two Articles Of Impeachment Against Homeland Security Secretary – KXL

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate has voted to dismiss the first of two articles of impeachment against Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, the first step in ending its trial on his handling of the U.S.-Mexico border.

    Democrats said the article, which charged Mayorkas with “willful and systemic refusal to comply with the law,” is unconstitutional.

    Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said the articles of impeachment against Mayorkas “fail to meet the high standard of high crimes and misdemeanors.”

    The House narrowly voted in February to impeach Mayorkas, arguing in the articles that he refused to enforce immigration laws.

    Mayorkas has said he’s focused on the work of his department.

    More about:

    [ad_2]

    Grant McHill

    Source link

  • Venezuela did not send its prison population to the U.S.

    Venezuela did not send its prison population to the U.S.

    [ad_1]

    There was no breaking news that Venezuela’s prison population was moved to the U.S., as an Instagram post claims. 

    “FBI Now Admitting That Venezuela Emptied Their Prisons And sent their Inmates to U.S.,” a March 29 Instagram post with improper capitalization reads. An image of shirtless men in orange prison uniform pants appears under the text. 

    This post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    (Screengrab from Instagram)

    A Reuters photographer took the photograph in the post in 2011 at a Chino, California, prison. 

    We searched Google and the Nexis news archives, but found no reports of the FBI saying Venezuela had sent its prisoners to the U.S.

    The FBI’s press release archives also had no such announcement. An FBI spokesperson said the agency had no comment in response to the post’s claim.

    U.S. Customs and Border Protection publishes data on how many people with criminal convictions or who are wanted by law enforcement have encounters with immigration officials at U.S. borders. Criminals encountered are not let into the country, “absent extenuating circumstances,” according to the agency.

    The U.S. and Venezuela swapped some prisoners in December: Venezuela released to the U.S. 10 Americans who had been detained in Venezuela and the U.S. freed a top ally of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro while also requiring Maduro to free 20 Venezuelan political prisoners. 

    But this does not equate to a prison-emptying scenario.

    The claim harks back to one that circulated in 2022, when 13 Republican members of Congress sent a letter to Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, requesting more information on an “intelligence report” that they said the Department of Homeland Security sent to Border Patrol agents. According to the lawmakers, DHS had told agents to look for violent criminals that Venezuela was deliberately releasing from prisons and pushing them to join caravans headed to the U.S. PolitiFact examined the claim then and found its only source was an article from the conservative news site Breitbart that credited an anonymous source.

    Republican members of Congress wrote another letter to Mayorkas in February, telling him that he failed to respond to their initial letter and once again asked him to investigate claims that violent criminals were being sent to the U.S. border from Venezuela.

    We have seen no new evidence that supports the 2022 claim that DHS sent an “intelligence report” about Venezuelan criminals being sent to the U.S. 

    Former President Donald Trump made a similar claim about the Democratic Republic of Congo emptying its prisons and sending criminals to the U.S. border, which CNN could not substantiate.

    We rate the claim that the FBI admitted Venezuela emptied its prisons and sent the inmates to the U.S. False. 

    PolitiFact Staff Writer Maria Ramirez Uribe contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Officials: St. Cloud father and son sexually abused neighborhood kids, created child pornography

    Officials: St. Cloud father and son sexually abused neighborhood kids, created child pornography

    [ad_1]

    Starting on Tuesday morning, law enforcement swarmed a home in a St. Cloud neighborhood just east of Canoe Creek Road.A man who neighbors say was known as “Santa” was arrested in a Homeland Security raid as part of a child pornography investigation.Neighbors told WESH 2 they saw up to 30 law enforcement officers from multiple agencies swarm a house on Countryside View Drive around 10 a.m. on Tuesday. At the time, officials would not confirm the nature of the raid.Neighbors say they saw a body being removed from the house and the Orange County Medical Examiner confirmed to WESH 2 that they responded to a “death call” at the home. Records filed in federal court show the target was 79-year-old James Cox and another man in the home, Henry Cox, who neighbors told WESH 2 is the elder Cox’s son. James Cox is in the Seminole County jail. St. Cloud police say Henry Cox was found dead from an apparent self-inflicted gunshot wound in the home on Tuesday. A criminal complaint against James Cox says the investigation began with a cyber-tip about child pornography being uploaded from the family’s home. It says St. Cloud police searched the house in January and found several hard drives with images and videos of children being sexually abused and exploited.Detectives say they also found videos that appear to have been recorded secretly that showed young children using the bathroom and changing clothes. At least two of the victims appear to be kids who live in the same neighborhood as Cox.The complaint alleges Henry Cox produced some of the pornography, while the elder Cox uploaded it. “You just don’t think it’s going to be so close to your house, and having four girls myself, it’s a little unsettling,” Emily Jenkins, who lives nearby, said. “I think it confirms that we can’t be restful and let our kids play outside. It’s always play in the backyard now. It’s not like it used to be.”

    Starting on Tuesday morning, law enforcement swarmed a home in a St. Cloud neighborhood just east of Canoe Creek Road.

    A man who neighbors say was known as “Santa” was arrested in a Homeland Security raid as part of a child pornography investigation.

    Neighbors told WESH 2 they saw up to 30 law enforcement officers from multiple agencies swarm a house on Countryside View Drive around 10 a.m. on Tuesday. At the time, officials would not confirm the nature of the raid.

    Neighbors say they saw a body being removed from the house and the Orange County Medical Examiner confirmed to WESH 2 that they responded to a “death call” at the home.

    Records filed in federal court show the target was 79-year-old James Cox and another man in the home, Henry Cox, who neighbors told WESH 2 is the elder Cox’s son.

    James Cox is in the Seminole County jail. St. Cloud police say Henry Cox was found dead from an apparent self-inflicted gunshot wound in the home on Tuesday.

    A criminal complaint against James Cox says the investigation began with a cyber-tip about child pornography being uploaded from the family’s home. It says St. Cloud police searched the house in January and found several hard drives with images and videos of children being sexually abused and exploited.

    Detectives say they also found videos that appear to have been recorded secretly that showed young children using the bathroom and changing clothes. At least two of the victims appear to be kids who live in the same neighborhood as Cox.

    The complaint alleges Henry Cox produced some of the pornography, while the elder Cox uploaded it.

    “You just don’t think it’s going to be so close to your house, and having four girls myself, it’s a little unsettling,” Emily Jenkins, who lives nearby, said. “I think it confirms that we can’t be restful and let our kids play outside. It’s always play in the backyard now. It’s not like it used to be.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • PolitiFact – GOP claims that Homeland Security Secretary Mayorkas is ‘responsible’ for fentanyl crisis are false

    PolitiFact – GOP claims that Homeland Security Secretary Mayorkas is ‘responsible’ for fentanyl crisis are false

    [ad_1]

    In their failed push to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, some House Republicans focused on the fentanyl crisis. They made it a central part of their effort to prove he willfully shirked his duty to secure and monitor the U.S.-Mexico border, through which much of the synthetic opioids consumed in the U.S. flow. 

    In a Jan. 19 impeachment hearing, U.S. Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, said Mayorkas and his border policy is “personally responsible” for fentanyl, a dangerously powerful and cheaply made synthetic opioid, coming across the southern border.

    “(Fentanyl) comes from China, and they make it in Mexico, and they kill our children here. Two hundred thousand — more than Vietnam, World War II,” he said. “I have seen it personally, the destruction it does every five minutes. It is a fentanyl superhighway, and (Secretary Mayorkas’) border policy is personally responsible for it.”

    The border “is a fentanyl superhighway, and (Secretary Mayorkas’) border policy is personally responsible for it,” said McCaul, who represents a district that stretches from Austin to Houston.

    McCaul has tied Mayorkas to the fentanyl overdose death toll in the U.S. in several other media appearances, including Jan. 28 on “Fox News Sunday.”

    “Two hundred million people (are) dead now, thanks to fentanyl poisoning that this one man (Mayorkas) is responsible for,” McCaul said. (A spokesperson for McCaul told us he meant to say 200,000 people have died of fentanyl overdoses during President Joe Biden’s term, a statistic he correctly stated in the impeachment hearing.)

    More than 190,000 Americans have died of overdoses from fentanyl during the Biden administration — more than in the previous decade, according to provisional data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. But it’s wrong to solely blame Mayorkas for a crisis that has roots in the 1990s, opioid policy experts said.

    Border policies are shaped by both the Department of Homeland Security chief, the president and Congress, not just by Mayorkas. (PolitiFact has ruled as false claims that Biden’s border policies are to blame for U.S. fentanyl deaths.)

    Although Border Patrol agents seize a small percentage of illicitly produced fentanyl, the vast majority of the drug enters the country in vehicles driven by U.S. citizens, Customs and Border Protection and sentencing data shows. 

    Vanda Felbab-Brown, a senior foreign policy fellow at the Brookings Institution think thank who co-directs its series “The Opioid Crisis in America: Domestic and International Dimensions,” said congressional funding for more vehicle scanners would significantly reduce the amount of fentanyl that comes into the U.S. — and that is outside of Mayorkas’ control.

    Most fentanyl in U.S. comes through legal ports of entry

    Felbab-Brown, an internationally recognized international crime and foreign policy expert, said the fentanyl influx in the U.S. couldn’t be blamed on Mayorkas or the Biden administration.

    This is because the vast majority of fentanyl seizures — more than 90% — happen at official ports of entry, as the same CBP dataset shows.

    These drugs are smuggled almost entirely in vehicles driven by U.S. citizens, according to U.S. Sentencing Commission data, not by illegal immigrants wading through the Rio Grande.

    As PolitiFact has previously found, drug smugglers prefer to traffic fentanyl and other illicit substances in cargo trucks to reduce risk of loss and waste. 

    The quantities smuggled into the country away from legal ports of entry, however, are still significant. In House testimony that McCaul’s office referred to as evidence for his claim, National Border Patrol Council President Brandon Judd stated that Biden’s border policies have led to a historically high number of “got-aways,” or people who were found to be crossing the border illegally but evaded apprehension. However, the estimated annual apprehension rate of undocumented migrants under Mayorkas has averaged 78%, identical to that of the Trump administration, per a Jan. 28 DHS memo.

    Judd also noted Border Patrol seized about 3,243 pounds of fentanyl in Biden’s first two years in office, which means hundreds of millions of lethal doses of the synthetic opioid were brought into the country outside of legal ports of entry. The National Border Patrol Council  is the Border Patrol union.

    But given a far higher quantity of fentanyl comes in cargo vehicles, the best tool we have to combat fentanyl trafficking is the use of large, noninvasive cargo scanners, Felbab-Brown said. And only Congress can allocate funds to CBP to buy new scanners or add border patrol agents.

    Historically, about 2% of passenger vehicles and 17% of cargo trucks have been inspected, significantly limiting detection capability, per an October 2023 White House memo

    To increase fentanyl seizures, Mayorkas and the Biden administration are requesting 123 new large-scale scanners with a goal of scanning 70% of cargo trucks by 2026. The drive-through machines use X-ray technology to scan a vehicle’s full contents in about eight minutes, compared with two hours for physical inspections that CBP has traditionally used, the memo said. 

    The Biden administration and Mayorkas worked with a bipartisan group of senators for months to draft a border security package that would include funding for those scanners and allocate money for additional Border Patrol agents. The Senate reached a deal on the bill Feb. 4 but House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said the legislation would be “dead on arrival” if it reaches his chamber.

    It’s another reason that claims Mayorkas is responsible for all fentanyl coming through the border don’t hold up, Andrew Kolodny, medical director for the Opioid Policy Research Collaborative at Brandeis University, told the Austin American-Statesman and PolitiFact.

    “Congress should be appropriating funds to help with fentanyl detection,” Kolodny said. “It’s hypocritical to blame Biden fentanyl coming in from Mexico if Congress is not appropriating funds that could help with interdiction.”

    Danny W. Davis, a professor at Texas A&M’s Bush School of Government and Public Service who specializes in homeland and national security, said scanners are “a necessary piece, but just one piece of the puzzle” to prevent drug smuggling. 

    “Is (Mayorkas) responsible for every gram of fentanyl that comes across? No,” he said. “But he is responsible for securing the border.”

    In response to requests for comment, McCaul did not restate his previous claims that Mayorkas is responsible for fentanyl deaths or fentanyl that enters the U.S. border.

    “Secretary Mayorkas — as the head of the Department of Homeland Security — is responsible for the porous southern border,” McCaul wrote in a statement. “His rescission of successful policies and refusal to enforce our nation’s laws has directly led to the chaos and death plaguing our state, as border patrol agents tell me each and every time I visit South Texas.” (Read McCaul’s full statement here.)

    Despite Judd’s past criticism as head of the National Border Patrol Council, the union endorsed the bipartisan border package Monday, saying it is “far better than the status quo.” 

    As evidence for his claim, McCaul’s office also pointed PolitiFact to an article from a news website run by the conservative Heritage Foundation that quoted National Border Patrol Council  spokesman Chris Cabrera stating “It has made (the cartels’) job a whole lot easier,” seemingly in response to a question about drug cartels and the Biden administration’s changes in border policy. The article provides no evidence for McCaul’s specific claim about Mayorkas and fentanyl. It also includes an X post in which Cabrera writes, “When is Congress going to wake up and get to work on the problems along our southern border?” 

    Congress, president help shape homeland security policy

    The DHS secretary is the top Homeland Security official and an appointed member of the president’s Cabinet. His job is to oversee enforcement of U.S. laws and executive orders relating to border security, immigration, cybersecurity, disaster response and national and economic security — a role that requires cooperation with “federal, state, local, international and private sector partners,” the DHS website says.  

    Congress passes the laws that the DHS must enforce and sets the department’s budget with stipulations for how money can be spent, limiting how much influence any individual secretary can have. Executive orders from the White House also direct the agency’s actions, though they are superseded by federal laws.

    As such, high-level policy changes are shaped by Mayorkas and Biden, not one or the other.

    One major change Biden’s administration made was to end Title 42, which allowed the U.S. to expel migrants without considering their requests for asylum, in May 2023. The administration also shifted from detaining all apprehended migrants to allowing some of them to remain in the country while awaiting asylum hearings, which critics call “catch and release.”

    As DHS head, Mayorkas has led operations targeting cartels, U.S. distributors

    Preventing and fighting fentanyl smuggling is a multinational, multiagency affair, requiring cooperation among Mexican law enforcement officials, the Chinese government and countless other organizations. 

    Also, many different federal and state entities, such as the Drug Enforcement Agency and the Federal Bureau of Investigations, share responsibility with DHS for investigating, arresting and prosecuting suspected criminals and smugglers, Davis noted. 

    “You can’t just say the Homeland Security Department has all responsibility,” he said.

    Over the past three years, Mayorkas has overseen several undercover operations targeting cartels in Mexico and domestic fentanyl distributors in the U.S., such as Operation Sentinel, as USA Today has reported. 

    In a letter responding to the House Homeland Security Committee’s impeachment allegations, Mayorkas said more than 14,000 smugglers had been arrested during his tenure and “thousands have been prosecuted under federal law.”

    The letter also said, “DHS has seized more fentanyl and arrested more individuals for fentanyl-related crimes in the last two years than in the previous five years combined.”

    Mayorkas does not completely control other factors that affect fentanyl smuggling, such as negotiations with China, which ships chemical precursors for the drugs to Mexico. Biden negotiated a deal with Chinese President Xi Jinping last year to help reduce those shipments. 

    Fentanyl crisis has roots in 1990s opioid epidemic

    Medicine and public policy experts have explained that the fentanyl crisis’s roots go far deeper than what Mayorkas or any one official controls.

    “We have a fentanyl problem because there’s an epidemic of opioid use disorder in the United States and it’s coming into demand for millions of people who are addicted to opioids,” Kolodny said.

    The opioid epidemic began in the 1990s, long before Mayorkas became DHS secretary, and largely involved prescription opioids. After President George W. Bush’s administration cracked down on pills, Mexican cartels rushed to fill that vacuum with heroin. Synthetic opioids — a cheaper alternative to heroin and pills — began to flood the market in the early 2010s, during President Barack Obama’s administration. 

    Synthetic opioid-related deaths started to sharply increase in 2013 and skyrocketed during President Donald Trump’s administration, jumping from more than 28,000 in 2017 to 57,000 in 2020, according to CDC data. These deaths continued climbing during Biden’s term, with more than two-thirds of 106,699 overdose deaths in 2021 — 71,689 — resulting from synthetic opioid use. 

    Kolodny has criticized the Obama and Trump administrations’ federal response to fentanyl and said the Food and Drug Administration failed to sufficiently regulate opioid manufacturers and pharmaceutical companies.

    Our ruling

    McCaul said during an impeachment hearing that Mayorkas’ border policy is “personally responsible” for fentanyl crossing the border.

    The opioid epidemic has roots in the 1990s, and illicitly-produced fentanyl began flooding U.S. markets long before Mayorkas became DHS chief. 

    Although more migrants have tried to enter the U.S. under Mayorkas’ watch, the vast majority of fentanyl enters the country in vehicles driven by U.S. citizens through legal ports of entry, CBP and other data show. Noninvasive scanners are the best option for seizing fentanyl shipments, experts say, but Congress has so far declined to approve requests from Biden and Mayorkas for funding to purchase them.

    Under Mayorkas, the DHS has led several efforts to target domestic networks and outside cartels, and fostered greater cooperation with Mexico to enforce laws against drug trafficking, experts said. 

    We rate the claim False.



    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • PolitiFact – Asa Hutchinson’s Mostly True claim that China is allowed to do crypto mining in the U.S.

    PolitiFact – Asa Hutchinson’s Mostly True claim that China is allowed to do crypto mining in the U.S.

    [ad_1]

    MANCHESTER, N.H. — Addressing a forum of cryptocurrency enthusiasts, Republican 2024 presidential candidate and former Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson said he wants the crypto industry to thrive — but with some regulation.

    “I want them to have rules that can be followed, and Congress needs to act,” Hutchinson said Dec. 11 at a candidate forum sponsored by the U.S.-based advocacy group Stand with Crypto Alliance. “It makes no sense to me: If we’re trying to prohibit communist China from buying farmland in America, why are we allowing them to do crypto mining in the United States of America?”

    All of the GOP presidential primary candidates have made China a favorite talking point and say it has outsized influence on U.S. policy and business.

    Lawmakers in 31 states introduced bills this year to block Chinese citizens, businesses and government from buying U.S. agricultural land or property near military bases, The Washington Post reported.

    But elected leaders generally haven’t taken such steps on China crypto mining, as Hutchison said. The effect of Chinese influence on crypto mining is an emerging area of concern among lawmakers and policy analysts.

    The federal Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States is authorized to review certain transactions involving foreign investment to identify national security threats. Some states are grappling with balancing laws that encourage cryptocurrency industry growth with regulations that guard against potential security threats from foreign actors.

    Asked about his claim, Hutchinson’s team said “states have the ability” to restrict and regulate foreign crypto mining operations.

    What is crypto mining?

    Cryptocurrencies involve a decentralized network of computers around the globe that track digital currency transactions. Crypto mining is the act of generating new “coins” when computers solve complex mathematical problems. Facilities that house crypto mining computers require immense amounts of electricity as the computers operate around the clock.

    Security experts worry about the risks these energy-gobbling computers pose to the U.S. power grid. But Hutchinson’s focus goes beyond energy to national security risks.

    In 2021, China banned domestic crypto mining, leading Chinese crypto miners to move their operations elsewhere, including the U.S. With support from Republican Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, Texas emerged as an attractive place for crypto miners to set up shop; the state offered a mix of tax subsidies, relatively low-cost electricity and incentives.

    How many U.S. crypto mining operations have connections to China?

    An October New York Times investigation found Chinese-owned or -operated crypto mines in Texas and at least 11 other states. Collectively, the article said, these crypto miners use as much energy as more than 1 million homes. The mines the investigation examined included a Wyoming one near a Pentagon-supported Microsoft Corp. data center and close to a U.S. Air Force base that controls intercontinental ballistic missiles.

    The Times reported that Microsoft wrote to the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States that “the location could allow the Chinese to ‘pursue full-spectrum intelligence collection operations.’”

    The article also said that some of the U.S. mining operations “appear to be straightforward efforts by wealthy Chinese nationals to make money outside the purview of Chinese authorities.” But “for others the ownership is opaque, while several can be traced to the Chinese government.”

    Energy experts say these mines operate in a gray regulatory area. With concerns about Chinese government influence, some states are turning to foreign landholder laws as a possible model.

    On Dec.13, Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin, a Republican, announced that his office was investigating more than two dozen potential crypto mining operations. The move came in response to a letter from Arkansas Agriculture Secretary Wesley Ward, who said his agency believed that two companies — including a crypto mining company — were not complying with a recent state law barring businesses controlled by a foreign entity from owning land.

    Communist Party influence in Chinese businesses

    U.S. crypto mining operations that are part of China’s private sector could pose a risk of Chinese government or Communist Party influence, experts in China policy told PolitiFact. 

    “Many Chinese companies will have direct or indirect ties to the Chinese government,” said Daniel S. Markey, a senior adviser on South Asia for the U.S. Institute of Peace. “At the end of the day the state has tremendous power to control the activities of even the most powerful Chinese businesses.”

    These include very large state-owned enterprises, which are closely connected to the government, and privately owned companies. The Communist Party has been trying to tighten its  influence on private companies. For instance, since 2018 the party has required private companies listed on stock markets to have a Communist Party unit, said Deborah Brautigam, an emerita professor of international political economy at Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies.

    According to Communist Party-provided figures, 73% of private companies had established party units by 2017, and among the top 500 private enterprises, the share exceeded 92%, according to research by the Centre for International Relations at Sciences Po in Paris.

    Party units within private companies historically have been tied to the recruitment and management of employees who are party members, but China’s President Xi Jinping has sought to increase the degree of party influence in private companies, experts said.

    “If they want to invest overseas or do foreign trade, they need permits and approvals from various government agencies,” said Yun Sun, director of the China program at the Stimson Center, an international affairs think tank. “They may not always be the government’s agent, but they will have to follow the government’s instructions and directions, or at the minimum not act against them.”

    Our ruling

    Hutchinson said China is allowed to do crypto mining in the U.S.

    A New York Times investigation found Chinese-owned or -operated crypto mines in Texas and at least 11 other states. Texas has offered tax subsidies, relatively low-cost electricity and incentives to attract the businesses.

    There are no laws that specifically allow countries like China to engage in crypto mining in the U.S. But a lack of laws prohibiting it means that it is “allowed.” There are, however, federal safeguards, and some state laws protecting against foreign government-backed business influence. Arkansas is investigating at least one crypto mining company for not complying with a state law barring businesses controlled by a foreign entity from owning land.

    The statement is accurate but needs clarification or additional information. We rate it Mostly True.

    PolitiFact Researcher Caryn Baird contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Texas Border Patrol agents seize over 4,000 pounds of marijuana – Medical Marijuana Program Connection

    Texas Border Patrol agents seize over 4,000 pounds of marijuana – Medical Marijuana Program Connection

    [ad_1]

    LAREDO, Texas (KWTX) – U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and Office of Field Operations officers assigned to the World Trade Bridge seized over 4,000 pounds of marijuana in a single stop on Thursday.

    The seizure happened on Sept. 14 when a CBP officers referred a Freightliner tractor trailer for a second inspection.

    During the inspection, CBP officers found 177 packages containing a total of 4,466 pounds of alleged marijuana in the trailer.

    The estimated street value of the narcotics is $9,904,204, according to U.S. CBP

    USDA Certified Organic Tinctures and salves

    CBP seized the narcotics and Homeland Security Investigations special agents are investigating the incident.

    Original Author Link click here to read complete story..

    [ad_2]

    MMP News Author

    Source link

  • Why is the U.S. punishing foreign musicians with higher visa fees? This is going to hurt – National | Globalnews.ca

    Why is the U.S. punishing foreign musicians with higher visa fees? This is going to hurt – National | Globalnews.ca

    [ad_1]

    Back in the fall of 2020, when COVID-19 shut down the live music industry, the United States Department of Homeland Security quietly proposed increases in the cost of visas necessary for foreign musicians who want to tour America.

    The new asking price of a “P-3″ visa, the one needed by musicians who want to play live in America, would rise to US$690 from US$460, a jump of 67 per cent. Another document, the four flavours of the “O” visa (required by people with “extraordinary ability or achievement” or accompanying people/relatives of such people) also had a proposed increase.

    These proposals landed at a time when no one was on the road, so the timing suggests that the U.S. wanted the new fees to slip under the radar. Those who noticed expressed concern about the increased financial burden on any non-American act. There was some initial chatter about the situation, but with months of COVID lockdowns ahead, no one paid too much attention and the increases were never put into place.

    Story continues below advertisement

    Read more:

    How much longer will new vehicles come with AM/FM radios?

    But then earlier this year, the U.S. Citizen and Immigration Services (USIC) tried again. This time, the all-important “P” visa would jump to US$1,615 from US$460. That’s a bump of 250 per cent. Let’s break this down:

    • US$1,615 for a solo artist or a band (P visa)
    • US$1,615 for the road crew (P via)
    • US$190 (at minimum) per relative/accompanying person)

    Assuming a four-piece band, their road crew, a manager, and one boyfriend/girlfriend/spouse, that’s US$3,420 (nearly $4,600 Canadian) before you even get to the border — actually, you have to apply at least three months before you leave home. Sure, you can have your petition expedited and pushed through within five days or so, but that’s another US$1,440 (or roughly C$1,935). That means a grand total of C$6,535 before the band sees a dime from the tour. This, of course, is in addition to transportation, fuel, salaries, hotel rooms, and food.

    Those costs have also gone up, of course. With so much touring activity going on the cost of renting gear, trucks, and buses has skyrocketed. And because so many roadies left the business during COVID-19, their kind of labour and expertise is in short supply and costs more.

    Story continues below advertisement

    Homeland Security/USIC say that the increases in visa fees are necessary because they haven’t increased since 2016 when P visas went up to the current US$460 from around US$275, a bump of 42 per cent. That raised some red flags at the time, but for the most part, this became a normal cost of doing business.

    So why just a hike now? The revenue from new ultra-high fees will be applied (at least partly) to hiring more people to deal with the post-COVID backlog of requests for visas. Some of the money will also help pay for some U.S. asylum programs. In other words, the U.S. government is making foreign acts pay for its inability to get its bureaucratic act together when it comes to its borders.

    If you’re an act of a certain size, any new fee is just another annoying line item in the touring budget spreadsheet. But if you’re an emerging artist, an artist from a marginalized community, or even a solid medium-sized group, this kind of money doom any possibility of touring the biggest music market in the world.

    This is a disaster because staying home and touring through just Canada is very expensive. I’ve heard from some acts who have returned from a Canadian tour in debt. And if it becomes too expensive to tour the U.S. — well, you see the problem. More Canadian artists looking toward Europe instead, but that features its own financial hassles.

    Story continues below advertisement

    Read more:

    Here’s proof that there’s just too much music being made. WAY too much.

    Let’s say you’re in a solid middle-class band that often ducks south to play a couple of border cities on short regional tours. Cities like Buffalo and Detroit get plenty of these shows. But if you’re in the hole by $4,600 to begin with, it’s just not possible. And imagine the panic of Mexican bands who want to head north for a tour.

    Fine. So let’s retaliate by hiking our visa fees for American bands who want to play shows up here. The crazy thing is that there’s nothing reciprocal about this. Depending on how many dates an American artist wants to play in Canada, the visa costs may be — wait for it — zero.

    And just in case you think that only Canadian musicians are being asked to pay for U.S. bureaucratic bungling, these proposed new fees will affect all touring acts from anywhere in the world. There’s a U.K. campaign launched by the Featured Artists Coalition called Let the Music Move. Its goal is to ask people “to call on the U.K. government to do more to support the future of the music industry, and to raise awareness of proposals in the U.S. to significantly increase the costs for performers seeking visas to perform in the country.”

    Read more:

    The live music industry is in big trouble. Here’s why

    Story continues below advertisement

    There have also been calls by the Music Managers Forum for something to be done. It says that 84 per cent of the acts under the care of its member managers want to tour the U.S. but 70 per cent of them say they’ll abandon those plans if the fees kick in.

    (Britain has to be careful about pointing fingers. Since Brexit, it’s been very difficult for British bands to tour the continent and vice-versa. The recent plight of a German band called Trigger Happy is a case in point; they had a U.K. tour scuppered because of border bureaucracy. Meanwhile, it’s estimated that the post-Brexit cost of a U.K. band to tour the continent has increased by at least 40 per cent.)

    Even bigger acts are taking notice of the costs and hassles. Roger Daltrey of The Who recently told USA Today that it’s doubtful the band will ever tour America again. “[T]ouring has become very difficult since COVID. We cannot get insured and most of the big bands doing arena shows, by the time they do their first show and rehearsals and get the staging and crew together, all the buses and hotels, you’re upwards $600,000 to a million in the hole. To earn that back, if you’re doing a 12-show run, you don’t start to earn it back until the seventh or eighth show. That’s just how the business works.”

    The U.S. should tread carefully with this cash grab. Andrew Cash, the president and CEO of the Canadian Independent Music Association penned an op-ed for The Globe and Mail:

    Story continues below advertisement

    In the U.S., every $1 spent on a concert ticket has a ripple effect of $3.30 in the local economy, according to a study by Oxford Economics Group,” Cash wrote.

    “That multiplier includes concertgoer spending on things such as transportation, band merch, meals and drinks, lodging, retail, and recreation. And by some estimates, musicians touring the U.S. spend an average of US$3,000 a week on food, gas and lodging. In total, the Canadian Independent Music Association estimates that Canadian touring contributes more than $2 billion annually to the U.S. economy. Now include artists from the U.K., Europe and Asia to this list — not to mention Mexico and South America — and you’d think even the biggest music market in the world would want a piece of this action.”

    It’s insanity, really. How is this a win for anyone other than the USIC and Homeland Security?

    Entire careers are riding on the outcome. Ottawa needs to do something.

    Alan Cross is a broadcaster with Q107 and 102.1 the Edge and a commentator for Global News.

    Subscribe to Alan’s Ongoing History of New Music Podcast now on Apple Podcast or Google Play

    [ad_2]

    Alan Cross

    Source link

  • US Gathered Intel On Oregon Protesters, Report Shows

    US Gathered Intel On Oregon Protesters, Report Shows

    [ad_1]

    SALEM, Ore. (AP) — U.S. Department of Homeland Security officials in the Trump administration compiled extensive intelligence dossiers on people who were arrested, even for minor offenses, during Black Lives Matter protests in Oregon.

    Initial drafts of the dossiers even included friends of the subjects as well as their interests, but those were later removed and replaced with a note that they would be made available upon request, according to an internal review by the Department of Homeland Security.

    The dossiers, known by agents as baseball cards, were previously normally compiled on non-U.S. citizens or only on Americans with “a demonstrated terrorism nexus,” according to the 76-page report. It was previously released last year but contains new revelations based on extensive redactions that were removed by the Biden administration.

    Ben Wizner, an attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union’s free speech, privacy and technology project, said the report indicates leaders of the Department of Homeland Security wanted to inflate the risk caused by protesters in Portland. The city became an epicenter of sometimes violent demonstrations in the wake of the killing of George Floyd, a Black man, by a Minneapolis police officer. But many protesters, including women belonging to a “Wall of Moms” ad hoc group and military veterans, were peaceful.

    “We have a dark history of intelligence agencies collecting dossiers on protesters,” Wizner said over the phone from New York, referring to domestic spying in the 1960s and 1970s against civil rights activists, Vietnam War protesters and others.

    “We need to be especially careful if agencies that are tasked with intelligence gathering are going to step in to to look at protest activity and where Americans are exercising their First Amendment rights,” Wizner said.

    Protesters who break the law aren’t immune from being investigated, Wizner said, but intelligence agencies should be careful not to create “a chilling environment” for Americans to legally exercise their right to dissent.

    The report reveals actions carried out by the DHS’ Office of Intelligence and Analysis in June and July 2020, when militarized federal agents were deployed to Portland.

    When the dossiers, officially known as Operational Background Reports, were being compiled, some DHS analysts voiced concerns over the legality of collecting intelligence “on protestors arrested for trivial criminal infractions having little to no connection to domestic terrorism,” the report said. Some of the employees even refused to participate.

    FILE – Federal agents arrest a demonstrator during a Black Lives Matter protest in Portland, Ore., on July 29, 2020. U.S. Department of Homeland Security officials under then-President Donald Trump sought to compile intelligence dossiers on everyone attending Black Lives Matter protests, according to a newly unredacted report. Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, who obtained the report, said in an email to reporters that surveillance of Portland protesters in 2020 “included lists of friends, family and social media associates for people who posed no threat to homeland security.” (AP Photo/Marcio Jose Sanchez, File)

    U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, obtained the report with most redactions removed and provided it to reporters Thursday. Wyden, a member of the Senate select committee on intelligence, criticized DHS leaders in the Trump administration for actions revealed in the document.

    “Political DHS officials spied on Oregonians for exercising their First Amendment right to protest and justified it with baseless conspiracy theories,” Wyden said.

    Brian Murphy, who was then the acting undersecretary of DHS’ intelligence unit, insisted on calling violent protesters “Violent Antifa Anarchists Inspired,” even though “overwhelming intelligence regarding the motivations or affiliations of the violent protesters did not exist,” according to the report.

    Top DHS leaders even wanted the department’s Office of Intelligence and Analysis to create dossiers on everyone participating in the Portland protests, but Murphy advised that the unit could only look at people who were arrested.

    Surveillance was broadly used in other cities as well during the 2020 protests, with federal agencies sending unmanned drones and military aircraft to assist local law enforcement. But it’s not clear exactly how that surveillance was used: The ACLU filed a federal lawsuit against several government agencies seeking that information late last year, but the case is still underway in the Southern District of New York.

    Still, some agencies have acknowledged the surveillance was problematic. An investigation by the Inspector General Department of the Air Force, completed in August 2020, found that Air National Guard aircraft was used to monitor protests in Minnesota, Arizona, California and Washington, D.C. without clear approval from military leaders.

    The surveillance in Phoenix, Arizona was “particularly concerning,” the Inspector General’s investigation found, because documentation associated with the flight suggested it was being used to allow law enforcement agencies to rapidly deploy to locations where they hoped to deter protest or looting.

    “There is no scenario in which it is acceptable or permissible to use DoD (Department of Defense) assets to deter demonstrations and protests, assuming they remain lawful,” the report said.

    The DHS’ internal review on Portland also shows the baseball cards — which were usually one-page summaries — included any past criminal history, travel history, “derogatory information from DHS or Intelligence Community holdings,” and publicly available social media. Draft dossiers included friends and family of protesters as well.

    Wyden credited current Undersecretary for Intelligence and Analysis Kenneth Wainstein for reviewing the Trump administration’s “unnecessary redactions” and releasing the unredacted report.

    Associated Press reporter Rebecca Boone contributed to this report from Boise, Idaho.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • TCR Acquisition LLC Responds to Kaleyra, Inc.’s Recent SEC Filing Regarding Its Alien Ownership

    TCR Acquisition LLC Responds to Kaleyra, Inc.’s Recent SEC Filing Regarding Its Alien Ownership

    [ad_1]

    Highlights U.S. Political Campaign Concerns

    Press Release


    Aug 3, 2022

    TCR Acquisition LLC, a U.S.-owned and operated entity headquartered in Alexandria, Virginia, today issued the following statement in response to Kaleyra, Inc.’s July 25, 2022 “Regulation FD” filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. In that filing, Kaleyra stated that it is “confident” that it is in compliance with the regulations and other laws administered by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS).

    According to Frederick Joyce, C.E.O. and General Counsel of TCR Acquisition (www.tcr-acquisition.com), “[t]here is only one way to safely determine if Kaleyra’s ownership of The Campaign Registry complies with CFIUS and the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act, and that is to have this matter reviewed by appropriate federal authorities, not by Kaleyra’s executives and its paid attorneys. If Kaleyra’s board and senior officers are confident that they have complied with CFIUS and other alien ownership requirements in the U.S., then they should be willing to submit this matter to U.S. governmental review.”

    The Campaign Registry is the exclusive vendor used by all nationwide mobile telephone companies to verify who sends text messages and what is contained in text messages sent to mobile phones used by U.S. customers. This registry is responsible for screening billions of text messages sent to U.S. mobile phones every month. The senders of these text messages include public law enforcement and safety officials, state and federal election campaigns, not for profit organizations, and thousands of commercial entities.

    Increasingly, political campaigns around the country at all levels — from school boards to the U.S. Senate and the Presidency — are relying on text messaging as a convenient means of connecting and communicating directly with voters and supporters. The Campaign Registry plays a crucial role in authenticating and protecting these increasingly important communication channels. Public confidence in the integrity of The Campaign Registry is essential for maintaining and bolstering confidence in the electoral process. It is therefore particularly concerning that foreign ownership and interests could put a thumb on the scale of information flow – or could distort or bias these communication channels in favor of unknown or foreign goals. With 2022 federal election campaigns already in progress, and to ensure the integrity of the 2024 Presidential campaigns, it is critical that The Campaign Registry be owned by a transparent, U.S.-owned and operated entity.”

    In 2018, Congress passed the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act (FIRRMA) — a major expansion of CFIUS’s authority and a standardization of CFIUS processes — enacted largely in response to the threat that Chinese investments sought to dominate U.S. industries such as semiconductors, artificial intelligence, robotics, and information technology, as well as to stem potential spying in widely used applications such as TikTok. Public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission reveal that The Campaign Registry is owned and controlled by Chinese, Italian and Indian individuals and corporate entities.   

    “CFIUS review is just one area of concern here,” said Frederick Joyce. “The more fundamental problem is that this critically important data registry, The Campaign Registry, with responsibility for screening and validating the entities and phone numbers that the mobile phone sector uses to send billions of messages every month, is owned and controlled by a foreign entity with funding from China and other foreign sources. This has the potential to seriously impact national security and personal data security. It is reasonable to assume that many if not most of the customers that use The Campaign Registry are not even aware of these Chinese ownership issues.”

    Two years ago, the government of Italy signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the People’s Republic of China to participate in China’s ‘Belt and Road’ program that seeks global dominance in every critical infrastructure sector. The fact that Kaleyra is headquartered in Milan, Italy, brings additional attention to this China connection. The high incidence of cyberattacks on Italian businesses provides another justification for ensuring that The Campaign Registry be independently owned by U.S. citizens and operated in accordance with the highest U.S. standards for cyber security and customer data privacy.

    “TCR Acquisition” stands for ‘Telecommunications Company Repatriation Acquisition.’ According to Mr. Joyce: “That is our defining mission: to repatriate into the United States critical and essential telecommunications and Internet services that have been acquired, in whole or in part, by China and other foreign entities that intend to usurp U.S. technology for their own commercial and political benefit.” Key members of the TCR Acquisition team have held the nation’s highest security clearances and have served in senior positions in the federal government with respect to national security and public safety communications. “We couldn’t be more serious about this mission, said Mr. Joyce. “Every member of the TCR Acquisition Team is firmly committed to ‘bringing home’ essential U.S. communications and Internet services starting with The Campaign Registry.”

    Contact:

    Frederick M. Joyce, C.E.O./General Counsel

    TCR Acquisition LLC

    (202) 505-3966

    Email: Frederick.joyce@tcr-acquisition.com

    www.tcr-acquisition.com

    Source: TCR Acquisition LLC

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Luna Global Networks Supports Private-Sector Campaign Against COVID-19 Fraudulent Goods

    Luna Global Networks Supports Private-Sector Campaign Against COVID-19 Fraudulent Goods

    [ad_1]

    Luna Global Networks joins coalition of private-sector partners in the launch of a new initiative to spotlight resources available to help combat the trade in fraudulent goods.

    Press Release



    updated: Jul 13, 2020

    ​​​​Luna Global Networks today joined Philip Morris International Inc. (PMI) in launching a new two-month advertising campaign designed to raise awareness of the trade of fraudulent personal protective equipment and resources available to combat the trade of these goods.

    “We are proud to be partnering with PMI and other private industry brand protection leaders and long-time partners in fighting illicit trade,” said David M. Luna, President & CEO, Luna Global Networks. 

    To date, there have been nearly 1,000 COVID-19-related seizures of prohibited test kits and medicine, counterfeit masks, and other medical equipment in the U.S., which has accounted for $17.9 million in disrupted transactions and recovered funds. 

    Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, global illicit trade was already booming from an array of trafficking and smuggling crimes. In fact, today’s global illicit markets generate trillions of U.S. dollars every year for transnational criminal organizations, complicit corrupt facilitators, and other threat networks. These profitable criminal activities include the trafficking of narcotics, opioids, arms, and people, fake medicines, counterfeit and pirated goods, illegal tobacco and alcohol products, endangered wildlife, pillaged oil, diamonds, gold, natural resources and precious minerals, and other contraband or commodities. They are sold on our main streets, social media, online marketplaces, and the dark web every hour of every day. 

    From the onset of the COVID-19 crisis, as the virus spread worldwide, numerous market and supply chain disruptions created new opportunities for criminals in vulnerable sectors. As police and security resources were re-directed, prosecuting the battle against illicit trade was attenuated. Bad actors and threat networks have further accelerated illicit trade in recent months and continue to exploit vulnerabilities in global supply chains to expand illicit economies and criminalized markets in areas such as the life science and healthcare sectors, excisable products, fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG), frauds, cybercrime and other profitable illicit enterprises.

    “In fact, COVID-19 has mutated criminality to a higher level of danger as corrupt regimes and criminals enrich themselves through an illicit trade pandemic that puts the health and safety of all citizens and communities at risk, such as fake medicines and counterfeited medical equipment and supplies,” said Luna.

    About Luna Global Networks & Convergence Strategies LLC

    David M. Luna is also a former U.S. diplomat and national security official. He is the current Chair of the Business at OECD Anti-Illicit Trade Experts Group (AITEG); Chair, Anti-Illicit Trade (AIT) Committee of the U.S. Council for International Business (USCIB); co-Director, Anti-Illicit Trade Institute, Terrorism, Transnational Crime and Corruption Center (TraCCC), Schar School of Policy and Government, GMU.

    Luna Global Networks is an international security consultancy well-positioned to help clients tackle the most pressing illicit trade and governance challenges and related security threats globally

    Media Contact:

    David M. Luna, Luna Global Networks

    Info@LunaGlobalNetworks.com

    Source: Luna Global Networks

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Florida Church Safety & Liability Conference

    Florida Church Safety & Liability Conference

    [ad_1]

    Best Safety Practices and Liabilities for Your Houses of Worship – Trinity FL, October 14th

    Press Release



    updated: Sep 28, 2017

    Trinity Security Allies is pleased to announce their Inaugural Church Safety & Liability Conference to be held October 14, 2017 at Generations Christian Church in Trinity, Florida. This training is designed for pastors, staff, volunteers and those that are interested in the safety of their church. Experts of church safety will bring relevant insight to better prepare your church in the event of an incident and educate your church on avoiding foreseeable lawsuits against your organization.

    With the recent shooting in Antioch, TN and disruptive attendees creating disturbances more and more frequently during church services. Domestic violence isn’t kept at home anymore, but rather bleeding into the churches at an alarming rate. Is your church prepared? With the increasing number of attacks against churches, all houses of worship must train and network with one another. Further, churches must share best practices along with potential community threats with one another and just as important, with local law enforcement agencies. Churches must ensure all procedures are in place to best protect their house of worship.

    With the alarming number of attacks against houses of worship, these experts will bring relevant insight to better prepare your church in the event of an incident and educate you on preventing avoidable lawsuits against your organization.

    James Howard, Executive Director, Trinity Security Allies

    This conference brings together national and local resources offering valuable information and best practices to protect your church including Rev. Jamie Johnson, Director Center for Faith-Based & Neighborhood Partnerships, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Corporal Alan Wilkett from Pasco Sheriff’s Office and several other experts. Also, an interactive attorney panel will provide solutions to questions covering OSHA, premise liability and personal injury.  A key topic is how to lower the risk of losing a lawsuit in the event of an incident.

    A MUST-ATTEND event for pastors, church staff, volunteers or any individual or group with a heart to protect their church.

    For more information:

     For more information about the Church Safety & Liability Conference, Trinity Security Allies, or the latest news, photos, videos, and much more, go to http://www.trinitysecurityallies.com

    About Trinity Security Allies:

    Trinity Security Allies, is a non-profit organization offering education, training and consulting to churches using their own resources to build and implement a safety plan. Trinity Security Allies provides a platform for local community churches to network, share best practices and potential community threats.

    Media Contact: James Howard       Email: jim@trinitysecurityallies.com          Ph: (727) 267-0590

    Source: MyNetworkOne on behalf of Trinity Security Allies, Inc.

    [ad_2]

    Source link