The new filling worried some fans about the future of fan-favorite ride WaterWorld
Credit: Tada Images via Adobe Stock
New documents submitted to Los Angeles County in June reveal more information regarding an upcoming expansion of Universal Studios Hollywood, as part of a multi-decade project.
The “Evolution Plan,” as it’s called, was first unveiled in 2006 with an estimated cost of around $7 billion. The plan includes expansions to the exciting studio, theme park, retail, hotel and entertainment areas. The “Evolution Plan” was officially filed in 2013 and promises a multi-decade time frame.
“The NBC Universal Evolution Plan is a comprehensive planning and development effort to maintain Universal City’s status as a center of entertainment and tourism,” says the official plan guidelines. “To meet the future needs of southern California’s entertainment industry, and to allow the site to grow in a way that is compatible with Los Angeles.”
The latest filing of the plan, which was originally submitted for a new technical services building set behind the E.T. parking garage, also includes a map with more never-before-seen conceptual plans for the “Evolution Project.” Fans were quick to notice that a site currently occupied by fan-favorite stunt show WaterWorld is overlaid on the map with a designation for a “New Theme Park Attraction w/ Food & Beverage Retail.”
While Universal currently has no plans to remove WaterWorld, the map does grant them the authority to do so in the future or simply expand the land around it. This left many theme-park fans nervous about the future of WaterWorld, which was originally introduced to the park in 1995. Theme Park Insider speculated about the possibility of an “entire WaterWorld land around the show theater,” like Universal’s parks in Asia currently have.
The map also indicates a brand new CityWalk “Future Destination Venue,” as well as “Parking/Tram maintenance” in a section currently being used for Halloween Horror Nights. The future 500-room hotel originally included in the proposal is also designated on the map, yet Universal has yet to announce the project officially.
Federal agents congregated in Hollywood Sunday in what appears to be another immigration enforcement operation targeting a Home Depot store.
The operation was carried out Sunday afternoon at the home improvement store on Sunset Boulevard near the 101 Freeway, according to a witness.
Video shared with NBCLA shows masked Border Patrol agents detaining at least two people who are thrown inside an unmarked vehicle.
Bystanders are seen swarming the unmarked vehicles as the federal agents attempt to make an exit from the store’s parking lot. Video shows what appears to be at least one bystander getting pepper-sprayed by a Border Patrol officer.
It’s unclear why the operation was executed at the Home Depot location.
NBCLA has reached out to DHS and Border Patrol for details on the operation, but has not received a response.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a ruling in August to maintain the temporary restraining order, granted by a federal judge, over how the federal government conducts immigration enforcement operations in Southern California.
The restraining order bars the detention of people unless the officer or agent “has reasonable suspicion that the person to be stopped is within the United States in violation of U.S. immigration law.” Officers or agents may not base that suspicion solely on a person’s apparent race or ethnicity; the fact that they’re speaking Spanish or English with an accent, or their presence at a particular location like a bus stop or a day laborer pickup site.
Several Home Depot stores in LA County have been subject to immigration enforcement raids since June. The Hollywood location along Sunset Boulevard was targeted on June 19, which ended with several people being detained, including a U.S. citizen.
The recent immigration enforcement operations in Los Angeles and other parts of Southern California are part of President Trump’s campaign promise to carry out a mass deportation plan.
Through Sept. 7, nearly 61,000 migrants had been taken into ICE detention since the start of President Trump’s second term, according to NBC News, which used ICE data both public and internal as well as data from the U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency. About 29.9% of those in detention had criminal convictions; 25.6% had pending criminal charges; 45% were listed as “other immigration violator;” and 11.6% were fast-tracked for deportation.
The highly anticipated Michael Jackson biopic Michael won’t hit theaters for awhile, but it’s already at the center of controversy. Paris Jackson, the 27-year-old daughter of the late King of Pop, took to her Instagram to slam the upcoming biopic from director Antoine Fuqua and writer John Logan, calling it “dishonest” and saying she has “0% involvement” in the film.
Jackson’s comments came two days after statements made by Oscar-nominated actor Colman Domingo, who plays Joe Jackson, the family patriarch, in the film. On Sunday, while leading the amfAR benefit gala for AIDS research during the Venice Film Festival, Domingo told People that Paris and her younger brother Prince Jackson were “very supportive of the film.” Paris Jackson, whom Domingo told People has been “lovely” to him, also performed at the amfAR event. “I’m excited to be here at amfAR tonight with Paris,” he added. “It feels like that’s a nice way for us to be together.”
The feeling was apparently not mutual. On Tuesday, Paris Jackson responded directly to Domingo’s comments on Instagram, distancing herself from the film. “[Colman], don’t be telling people I was ‘helpful’ on the set of a movie I had 0% involvement in lol. That is so weird,” she wrote.
The singer and actress explained that she had seen an early draft of the film and pointed out the parts that she felt were unconvincing: “I read one of the first drafts of the script and gave my notes about what was dishonest [and] didn’t sit right with me and when they didn’t address it I moved on with my life,” she wrote. “Not my monkeys, not my circus. God bless and godspeed.”
In follow-up videos posted to her Instagram story, Jackson expanded on her involvement with the film, saying that after she was explicitly informed her suggestions would not be considered, “I wasn’t involved at all, aside from giving feedback on the first draft and then getting the feedback that [production] was not actually going to address your notes at all. So I just butted out and left it alone because it’s not my project.”
She continued, saying that the filmmakers are “going to make whatever they’re going to make” and that the project would most likely make her father’s diehard fans happy. “A big reason why I haven’t said anything up until this point is because I know a lot of you guys are gonna be happy with it,” Jackson added. “A big section of the film panders to a very specific section of my dad’s fandom that still lives in the fantasy, and they’re gonna be happy with it.”
Michael has been in development since 2019 in collaboration with the Jackson family. It stars Domingo, Miles Teller, Nia Long, Kat Graham, and, in his big screen debut, Michael Jackson’s grandson Jafar Jackson as the pop icon. The film has already faced several controversies. According to Puck, the production has reportedly been mired in rewrites and reshoots. The entire third act of the film reportedly had to be rewritten and re-shot, allegedly because the first version had overlooked terms of a settlement between the Jackson estate and a child-abuse accuser.
A source close to the production, however, flatly denied rumors that the production was a mess. “The Michael Jackson biopic is not in total chaos,” they told People in January. “The inflammatory headlines about the moving halting are simply not true. The film is moving forward, and reshoots are happening in March.”
Michael is currently set for release on April 24, 2026 from Lionsgate.
She was born “Marilyn,” but she eventually became Kim Novak. After starting out as the face of an appliance brand, she made film history with Vertigo (1958), a masterpiece by Alfred Hitchcock.
Throughout Novak’s career, which spanned four prolific decades, the actress fought to be recognized for the value of her talent as a performer and not only as a beauty queen. Against all odds—humiliating directors, tyrannical studio bosses, angry partners—she managed to build a filmography that made her a legend of Hollywood’s Golden Age—the replacement (and rival) of Rita Hayworth, Elizabeth Taylor, and Marilyn Monroe.
Novak starred in Picnic (1955), Jeanne Eagels (1957), Pal Joey (1957), Just a Gigolo (1978), and many more. But by the early 90s, her career was in decline and her roles were taking a turn for the worse. Tired of letting male actors shape her image and voice as they saw fit, she quit the business after yet another chaotic shoot for Liebestraum (1991). Far from Hollywood, she has since devoted herself to her two passions: animals and painting.
Instagram content
This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.
For the past 25 years, cinema has continued to celebrate the rebellious career, fierce freedom, and grace of one of the Golden Age’s last great stars. This year, that celebration comes in the form of two awards. The first was at the Venice Film Festival, as part of the presentation of Alexandre O.Philippe’s documentary Kim Novak’s Vertigo, an intimate portrait of her retirement from public life and her extraordinary career.
To mark the occasion, Kim Novak received an honorary Golden Lion in Venice. And this weekend, Novak is expected at the Deauville American Film Festival, thirty-six years after a tribute was last paid to her on this stage. This time, she will receive the Icon Award before a screening of the documentary dedicated to her. The festival is delighted to welcome a “free-spirited pioneer and complete artist” who has become “one of the most fascinating figures in American cinema,” it said in a statement. Let’s take an opportunity to look back, in images, on the life and career of an anti-establishment star.
Michelle Dockery will soon be a mother. The British actor, who became famous for playing Lady Mary Crawley in Downton Abbey, revealed her pregnancy Wednesday at the London premiere of Downton Abbey: The Grand Finale, which will be released to theaters September 12.
Looking ravishing in a powder blue gown, the actor showed off her baby bump. The child will be the first for Dockery and husband Jasper Waller-Bridge—younger brother of Fleabag creator Phoebe Waller-Bridge—who accompanied Dockery on the red carpet.
The actor and her husband, a creative director of a management company, were married in 2023 in an intimate London ceremony. Their wedding came just over a year after they announced their engagement in the pages of the Times, in a very classic and formal manner. The pair has not discussed how they met, though they were first spotted together in 2019 at the Rome Film Festival. They married at St. Nicholas Church in Chiswick, London.
Dockery’s romance with Waller-Bridge follows her relationship with partner John Dineen, who died in 2015 at 34 from a rare form of cancer. Allen Leech, who plays Tom Branson on Downton, had introduced them. “I refer to myself as a widow, yes. We were engaged, and married at heart, and so I do consider myself a widow,” Dockery told The Guardian of her fiancé in the aftermath of his passing. “I’ve never been more committed to anything in my life than to him. So at the time everything just shut down: work, everything. Work didn’t matter. You suddenly become an [oncological] expert. This stuff becomes your world, and that of course was my priority.”
“I had met many great designers before, but he was different: he wore worn Stan Smiths, spoke naturally, loved the same bands and artists I did, and shared my same appreciation and sense of humor about the idea of being ‘feminine,’” Sofia Coppola writes of Marc Jacobs in the introduction to the 2019 book Marc Jacobs Illustrated.
You can tell: it was love at first sight between Coppola and the New York designer, an immediate connection. One of those bonds so instant and true that it seems almost the residue of another life; so predisposed, spontaneous, easy. Their friendship was so monumental to both of them that it inspired Coppola to direct a documentary about him, giving the world a glimpse at their megawatt friendship.
Sofia Coppola and Marc Jacobs backstage at the Louis Vuitton spring/summer 2014 fashion show.
Rindoff/Dufour/Getty Images
As previously announced, Marc by Sofia—that’s the film’s title, winking at the Marc By Marc Jacobs fashion line—will be presented out of competition at the Venice Film Festival 2025 Tuesday. Rather than a classic celebratory biography detailing the designer’s (staggering) life and achievements, the film is presented as an intimate portrait of an unpretentious, straightforward friendship, which extended to an artistic and professional partnership. With Coppola behind the camera, audiences will be treated to a cinematic portrait created by someone who has known Jacobs since he was just a 29-year-old with a great passion for grunge.
Instagram content
This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.
Marc Jacobs burst onto the scene on November 3, 1992, when he was creative director of Perry Ellis—a brand carved out of practical American elegance—and decided to pay homage to Seattle’s vibrant grunge scene. He incorporated flannel shirts, plaid skirts, Dr. Martens, worn-out T-shirts, deliberately offbeat patterns, and wild hair into his designs. It was an aesthetic cataclysm that short-circuited the entire fashion establishment—and riled the likes of Kurt Cobain and Courtney Love, who reportedly burned samples out of disdain. Jacobs was fired on the spot. While the press railed against him, with fashion journalist Suzy Menkes at the forefront, high-profile fans began to emerge in support of Jacobs and his shocking presentation. For Gianni Versace, the collection “is fresh, very New York, and besides, he’s a very nice guy.” For Sofia Coppola, it is “an epiphany.”
The Venice Film Festival 2025 has begun, bringing with it a major spike in hair creativity. The fest is just beginning, but already several head-turning hairstyles have been spotted on the red carpet, drawing attention with their originality and detail.
Between long beach waves that nostalgically recall the soon-to-end summer and evergreen sophisticated crops, red carpet hair is getting a creative twist. Undoubtedly, in the crosshairs, Rose Villain‘s two-tone mohawk hair took the headline for the trend on opening night, and Barbara Palvin‘s disheveled braid studded with pearls rewarded close inspection. At first glance it looked like a cascade of curly waves, but was much more complex in reality. Paola Turani sported a two-in-one crop, Shannon Murphy opted for a high-volume chignon, and more stars locked in their place in the creative hair conversation. Take a closer look below at the most creative hairstyles of the 2025 Venice Film Festival.
Rose Villain’s mohawk
Rose Villain’s hairstyle certainly did not go unnoticed Wednesday, as she recreated the typical mohawk style in her hair by knotting her lengths, section by section, over her head. She gave it a pop of color with a two-tone treatment, sporting light blue tips offset by a dark base. Talk about being on the crest of the wave.
Rose Villain.
Andreas Rentz/Getty Images
Barbara Palvin’s disheveled braid
At first glance, they look like classic beach waves, except when you look closer, you discover that the model decided to style the ends of her lengths in a mini disheveled braid, with a relaxed, almost ruffled look. The result was a creative hairstyle complete with pearls applied here and there to give the whole thing a romantic touch.
Barbara Palvin.
Dominique Charriau
Paola Turani’s mix
Paola Turani went all out for a two-in-one style, mixing a “Croydon facelift”—that is, a pulled-back hairstyle capable of lifting the eyes—and a sleek bun divided in two with a sharp center part for perfect symmetry. It all exploded into a cloud of curls that falling softly on the top of her head.
Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce are engaged to be married, the singer confirmed via an Instagram post Tuesday featuring a carousel of photos of the two canoodling in a garden, a very large diamond on Swift’s ring finger. This, friends, is no paper ring.
Instagram content
This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.
“Your English teacher and your gym teacher are getting married,” Swift, who wore a striped Polo Ralph Lauren sundress in the photos, wrote in the caption. Kelce wore a cableknit sweater, also by Polo Ralph Lauren.
The couple have been dating publicly for nearly two years. Their debut, when Swift showed up in a VIP box at a Kansas City Chiefs game on September 24, 2023 to cheer Kelce on, was Jumbotron-worthy. After the football player’s team won, the pair literally rode off into the sunset in a convertible after weeks of rumors that they were dating. In the months following (with a side of seemingly ranch), the couple’s profiles only got bigger: Swift continued on her globe-spanning Eras Tour, and Kelce and the Chiefs went all the way to a Super Bowl win, with both parties literally cheering each other on along the way. Swift became a fixture at Kansas City’s Arrowhead Stadium when her tour dates permitted, and managed a wild feat of time zone management and air travel to make it to Las Vegas from Japan in time to watch the Chiefs take the W in the big game and provide victory smooches and go to karaoke after. For his part, Kelce trotted to multiple continents including South America, Australia, Asia, Europe (a bunch of times, including an on-stage cameo), and, of course, home sweet North America.
It makes sense that Kelce would keep that streak of Eras tour appearances going: It was an important part of their origin story. He saw Swift perform in his adopted hometown of Kansas City in July 2023 and tried to shoot his shot with his then-crush by delivering a beaded friendship bracelet with his phone number on it. It didn’t work, he moaned on an episode of New Heights, the podcast he co-hosts with brother Jason Kelce, saying, “She doesn’t meet anybody, or at least, she didn’t want to meet me, so I took it personal. But it was an unbelievable show.” That got Swift’s attention, evidently. As she revealed in an interview with TIME, “This all started when Travis very adorably put me on blast on his podcast, which I thought was metal as hell.”
“We actually had a significant amount of time that no one knew, which I’m grateful for, because we got to get to know each other,” she said. “By the time I went to that first game, we were a couple.”
The Venice Film Festival 2025 boasts a dream line-up for cinephiles and lovers of glamour. Here’s an in-depth look at this not-to-be-missed event in the 7th art.
American director Alexander Payne, whose films include Sideways and Nebraska, will head the jury for its 82nd edition, succeeding Isabelle Huppert. “Although I share a filmmaker’s ambivalence about comparing films against one another, I revere the Venice Film Festival’s nearly 100-year history of loudly celebrating film as an art form. I couldn’t be more excited,” he said in a statement. He will be joined by other 7th art figures from around the world: filmmakers Stéphane Brizé, Maura Delpero, Cristian Mungiu, and Mohammad Rasoulof, as well as actresses Fernanda Torres and Zhao Tao. French director Julia Ducournau will serve as president of the Orizzonti international jury.
What’s the opening film?
After presenting his latest film, Parthenope, at the Cannes 2024 Festival, where he is a regular, Italian director Paolo Sorrentino returns to Italy. He will have the honor of opening Mostra 2025 with La Grazia, a film that reunites actor Toni Servillo with Anna Ferzetti. No details of the plot have been released except that it is a love story. The director’s last visit to the Lido was a successful one: in 2021, he won the Silver Lion (Grand Prix du Jury) for The Hand of God.
Who will receive the Golden Lions?
German director Werner Herzog will receive an honorary award for his impressive career spanning fiction (Fitzcarraldo) and documentary (Grizzly Man). A second Honorary Lion will be awarded to Kim Novak, the American actress seen in films by Billy Wilder (Kiss Me, You Idiot) and Alfred Hitchcock (Cold Sweat), also highlighted at the Deauville 2025 Festival.
What are the most anticipated films?
The film festival will be packed with stars and prestigious directors this year. Event previews include Guillermo del Toro’s Frankenstein with Oscar Isaac and Jacob Elordi, Yorgos Lanthimos’s Bugonia with Emma Stone,Luca Guadagnino’s After the Hunt with Julia Roberts, Noah Baumbach’s Jay Kelly with George Clooney, and Jim Jarmusch’s Father Mother Sister Brother with Cate Blanchett.
The French will also be present, with François Ozon’s adaptation of Albert Camus’ The Stranger,Valérie Donzelli’s À pied d’œuvre with Bastien Bouillon and Virginie Ledoyen, and Olivier Assayas’s latest feature, Le Mage du Kremlin. Out of competition, Jacques Audiard‘s series adaptation of Un prophète, due soon on Canal+, and Cédric Jimenez’s Chien51, starring Adèle Exarchopoulos and Gilles Lelouch, will close the festival.
Ne Zha 2‘s visuals blend modern effects with traditional Chinese aesthetics. Courtesy A24
Americans with K-pop fans at home might think Netflix’s KPop Demon Hunters is the hottest story in animation right now. The musical, about a fictional girl group that moonlights as demon fighters, has dominated Netflix’s charts since June. But when it hits theaters this weekend, it will face an unlikely challenger: Ne Zha 2, a mythological fantasy from China arriving in the U.S. through a partnership between A24 and China’s CMC Pictures. Most U.S. audiences have never heard of it, yet the film has already grossed more than $2 billion (almost entirely from China), making it the highest-grossing animated movie of all time. Its Aug. 22 release sets up a fascinating box office showdown between two very different kinds of animated hits.
Ne Zha 2 is the sequel to the 2019 smash Ne Zha, which earned $720 million and is now available in the U.S. via on-demand platforms like Apple TV. The new film had a limited American run in February, including a screening at Grauman’s Chinese Theatre in Hollywood. Thanks to the A24-CMC partnership, it’s now poised for a much wider release.
A beloved mythological figure turned big-screen hero
The story centers on a rebellious boy born with destructive powers who must confront an ancient force bent on destroying humanity. The English-language version features Oscar-winner Michelle Yeoh, who has said she was drawn to the film’s universal themes of identity and resilience.
The scale of the production is staggering: more than 4,000 artists from 138 studios worked for five years to complete nearly 2,400 animation shots and 2,000 visual effects shots. Set pieces like the Battle of Chentang Pass—where magma splits the earth as monsters pour into the battlefield—were designed specifically for IMAX and 3D. As the press notes put it, “it’s not much of an exaggeration to say the entire Chinese animation industry had a hand in the making of Ne Zha 2.”
Audiences have responded in kind. The film currently holds a near-perfect 99 percent audience score on Rotten Tomatoes, making it not just the top-rated animated release of 2025 but one of the year’s highest-rated films overall. Its U.S. rollout includes regular, IMAX and 3D formats, with a fresh English dub likely to broaden its appeal.
A24’s quiet ambition beyond its indie roots
While A24 typically keeps quiet about its strategy, the studio told Observer it backed Ne Zha 2 to champion bold, distinctive films and spark conversation around a global hit that had gone largely unnoticed stateside. This isn’t the studio’s first foray into global cinema; In 2023, A24 distributed The Zone of Interest in the U.S., a Holocaust drama that went on to win the Oscar for Best International Feature Film.
The figure of Ne Zha has deep cultural roots. In Chinese mythology, he is a rebellious warrior who defies the gods in pursuit of his destiny—a household name embodying both the search for identity and resistance to authority. The Ne Zha films are the first time this folklore has been told on a blockbuster scale and exported around the world.
That makes Ne Zha 2 an ideal project for A24, which is expanding beyond its indie-film roots into a global distribution role. Known for edgy, auteur-driven work like Moonlight and HBO’s Euphoria, A24 has built a reputation as a tastemaker while growing through smart partnerships. The Ne Zha 2 release lets it expand its reach without abandoning the offbeat, distinctive style that defines the brand.
The film’s cultural impact also lies in its art. Its visuals blend modern effects with traditional Chinese aesthetics: ink-wash landscapes, jade palaces inspired by Han Dynasty architecture, and monsters modeled on ancient bronzeware. Combined with large-scale battle scenes, the result is a visual spectacle built for the biggest screens possible.
Tinder co-founder Justin Mateen has invested in Hollywood with the $69-million purchase of retail property near the legendary TCL Chinese Theatre on Hollywood Boulevard.
In a bet on the future value of local real estate, Mateen and his brother Tyler bought the Hollywood Galaxy shopping center and the historic Petersen Building next door.
The purchase comes at a time when most institutional investors such as pension funds have stopped acquiring property in Los Angeles. Values of many buildings in the region, including office skyscrapers, have fallen in recent years as the loss of tenants that started during the pandemic and other factors have driven down sale prices.
The Mateens, however, see this as an opportunity. They bought prominent properties in Beverly Hills and Westchester last year and are now stakeholders in Hollywood.
Justin Mateen is known for being a co-founder of popular dating app Tinder but is also a solo venture capitalist through his JAM Fund. He and his brother have a strategy to invest in their hometown of Los Angeles during a cooling commercial real estate market because they expect the region to bounce back in the years ahead.
“I’ve always been a contrarian investor,” he said. “Whether it’s startups, public markets or real estate, I take the long view and hold through cycles for forever. While others are pulling back from cities like L.A., we’re doubling down. Its resurgence feels inevitable.”
The Mateens plan to spruce up the Hollywood property sold by Federal Realty Investment Trust and seek tenants who want to interact with the millions of tourists who visit the blocks around the intersection of Hollywood Boulevard and Highland Avenue annually.
The three-story Hollywood Galaxy shopping center, which was completed in 1990, is nearly 80% leased to tenants including Target and LA Fitness. The remaining space could go to a high-profile business such as Nintendo or Lego that wants to create an interactive, immersive attraction for Hollywood visitors, Tyler Mateen said.
The brothers are looking for tenants “who benefit off heavy foot traffic and value a large format with visibility,” he said. That might also be a flagship store for a big brand such as Nike, Adidas or Sephora.
Rendering of the historic Petersen Building, which was once a Cadillac dealership.
(It-makes-Architects)
The Petersen Building at Hollywood Boulevard and Orange Drive, which is also part of the deal, was built in 1929 as the home of a Cadillac dealership. It’s now occupied by a Marshalls department store and La La Land souvenir shop.
Last year the Mateens and their partner Pouya Abdi bought Wilshire Rodeo Plaza, a five-story office building at Wilshire Boulevard and Rodeo Drive in Beverly Hills. They are in the process of signing new retail tenants for the building and planning a rooftop restaurant.
The Mateens also bought the HHLA entertainment center in Westchester near Playa Vista last year and are in the process of refurbishing it. Among its new tenants will be Meow Wolf, an immersive entertainment firm.
All three properties are in high-profile locations where it is difficult to develop new projects, Tyler Mateen said. “We want to own assets that you can’t build again and that the market can’t ignore.”
One of the oldest movie studios in Los Angeles is up for sale, perhaps to the newest generation of content creators.
The potential sale of Occidental Studios comes amid a drop in filming in Los Angeles as the local entertainment industry faces such headwinds as rising competition from studios in other cities and countries, as well as the aftermath of filming slowdowns during the pandemic and industry strikes of 2023.
Occidental Studios, which dates back to 1913, was once used by Mary Pickford and Douglas Fairbanks to make silent films. It is a small version of a traditional Hollywood studio with soundstages, offices and writers’ bungalows in a 3-acre gated campus near Echo Park in Historic Filipinotown.
Kermit the Frog above the Jim Henson Company studio lot in Hollywood.
(AaronP/Bauer-Griffin/GC Images)
The seller hopes its boutique reputation will garner $45 million, which would rank it one of the most valuable studios in Southern California at $651 per square foot. A legendary Hollywood studio founded by Charlie Chaplin in 1917 sold last year for $489 per foot, according to real estate data provider CoStar.
The Chaplin studio, known until recently as the Jim Henson Company Lot, was purchased by singer-songwriter John Mayer and movie director McG from the family of Muppets creator Jim Henson.
Occidental Studios may sell to one of today’s modern content creators in search of a flagship location, said real estate broker Nicole Mihalka of CBRE, who represents the seller.
She declined to name potential buyers but said she is showing the property to new-media businesses who don’t present themselves through traditional channels such as television shows and instead rely on social media and the internet to reach younger audiences.
Occidental Studios, which dates back to 1913, was once used by Mary Pickford and Douglas Fairbanks to make silent films.
(CBRE)
New media entrepreneurs may not often need soundstages, “but they like the idea of having the history, the legacy” of a studio linked to the early days of cinema, she said. It might lend credibility to a brand and become a destination for promotional activities as well as being a place to create content, she said. Mihalka envisions the space being used for events for partners, sponsors and advertisers as well as press junkets for new product launches.
Entertainment businesses located nearby include filmmaker Ava DuVernay’s Array Now, independent film and production company Blumhouse Productions and film and production company Rideback Ranch.
Neighborhoods east of Hollywood such as Los Feliz, Silver Lake, Echo Park and Highland Park have become home to many people in the entertainment industry, which Mihalka hopes will elevate the appeal of Occidental Studios.
“We’ve been seeing film and TV talent heading this way for a while,” she said, including executives who also live in those neighborhoods.
The owner of of Occidental Studios said it’s gotten harder for smaller studios to operate in the current economic climate that includes competition from major independent studio operators that have emerged in recent decades.
“Once upon a time, you did not have multibillion-dollar global portfolio companies swimming in the waters of Hollywood,” said Craig Darian, chief executive of Occidental Entertainment Group Holdings Inc., citing Hudson Pacific Properties, Hackman Capital Partners and CIM Group. “They are not content producers, but have a long history of providing services for multiple television shows and features.”
Competition now includes overseas studios in such countries as Canada, Ireland and Australia, he said. “When production was really robust and domiciled in Los Angeles, it was much easier to remain very competitive.”
Another factor threatening the bottom line for conventional studios is rapidly changing technology used to create entertainment including tools as simple as lighting.
“You used to know that equipment would last for decades,” Darian said. “The new tools for production are becoming obsolete in far shorter order.”
Writers’ bungalows at Occidental Studios.
(CBRE)
Nevertheless, Darian said, the potential sale “is not motivated by distress or urgency. Nothing is driving the decision other than the timing of whether or not this remains to be a relevant asset to keep within our portfolio. If we get an offer at or above the asking price, then we’re a seller.”
Darian said he may also seek a long-term tenant to take over the studio.
Occidental Studios at 201 N. Occidental Blvd. comprises over 69,000 square feet of buildings including four soundstages and support space such as offices and dressing rooms.
It’s among the oldest continually operating studios in Hollywood, used by pioneering filmmakers Cecil B. DeMille, D.W. Griffith and Pickford, who worked there as an actor and filmmaker in its early years. She reportedly kept an apartment on the lot for years.
More recently it has been used for television production for shows including “Tales of the City,” “New Girl” and HBO’s thriller “Sharp Objects.”
Local television production area declined by 30.5% in the first quarter compared with the previous year, according to he nonprofit organization FilmLA, which tracks shoot days in the Greater Los Angeles region. All categories of TV production were down, including dramas (-38.9%), comedies (-29.9%), reality shows -(26.4%) and pilots (-80.3%).
Feature film production decreased by 28.9%, while commercials were down by 2.1%, FilmLA said.
A death investigation was underway in Hollywood Sunday after a person was stabbed and killed near the Walk of Fame.
Officers responded to a scene in the 7100 block of Hawthorne Avenue after getting a call about a homicide just blocks away from the Hollywood and Highland Metro station at around 5 p.m., the Los Angeles Police Department said.
The officers did find the victim already deceased at the location.
Police said a man, who was described to be about 6 feet 1 inch tall and 200 pounds in black clothing, was seen running away from the scene.
It’s not clear what caused the deadly stabbing to transpire.
Los Angeles County district attorney George Gascón has announced that he is recommending that the Menendez brothers, who murdered their parents with shotguns in 1989, be resentenced. This will begin a judicial process that gives them a new chance at freedom.
Today, at a press conference in LA, the DA said that after careful review he believes Erik and Lyle Menendez should be sentenced to life with the possibility of parole.
“I believe they have paid their debt to society,” Gascón said. He added that people who have survived sexual assault are often done great injustice, and he introduced members of Erik and Lyle’s extended family, who were in attendance.
He made clear that he was not excusing murder: “Even if you get abused, the right path is to call police, seek help,” he said. But he said he took into account the age of the brothers at the time of the murders, and the fact that, even without the hope of parole, they have been on “a journey of redemption and a journey of rehabilitation.” Gascón said that some in the DA’s office still believe the brothers should spend the rest of their life in prison, and may appear in court to argue against resentencing.
If Judge William C. Ryan, who is presiding over the case, agrees with the DA’s recommendation, the brothers will appear in front of the parole board.
Gascón is up for reelection on November 5 against Nathan Hochman, who leads him in the polls. Hochman has called the timing of Gascón’s interest in the case “incredibly suspicious.” But Michael Romano, the director of the Three Strikes Project at Stanford Law School, which works to release people serving life sentences for nonviolent crimes, says he doubts that politics have affected the DA’s decision. “I know George pretty well,” he says. “I absolutely think that he [made this announcement] because he thinks it’s the right thing to do. I mean, regardless of the new evidence, sentencing 19- and 21-year-olds to life without parole is very, very harsh and something that Gascón probably opposes across the board.”
If Hochman wins the election, as expected, it’s unknown what his position would be, but he is running on a tough-on-crime platform, and his website criticizes Gascón for “the ‘abandonment’ of victims in favor of lenient policies toward offenders.”
The brothers’ extended family has a right to attend a resentencing hearing under Marsy’s Law. That group could include Kitty Menendez’s older brother, Milton Andersen, who does not support their release. “Mr. Andersen firmly believes that his nephews were not molested,” his attorney, Kathy Cady, said in a statement last week. “He believes that is a fabrication and he believes that the motive was pure greed.”
Kitty’s older sister, Joan VanderMolen, disagrees and has supported her nephews since their arrest. “As details of Lyle and Erik’s abuse came to light it became clear that their actions, while tragic, were the desperate response of two boys trying to survive the unspeakable cruelty of their father,” she said, adding, “Looking back, I see the fear and tension their father had instilled in them. They were just children—children who could have been protected but were instead brutalized in the most horrific of ways.”
The infamous Menendez case captivated the world in the early ’90s, when the brothers’ first trial—which resulted in hung juries—was broadcast on Court TV. The prosecution argued that Erik and Lyle killed their parents, Jose and Kitty Menendez, for their estimated $14 million inheritance. The defense maintained that Jose molested them and that they feared for their lives. The glamorous lifestyle of the wealthy Beverly Hills family and graphic testimony became a true crime sensation, and the brothers were found guilty of first-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole in a second trial.
The case became top of mind again when Netflix’s hit series, Monsters: The Menendez Brothers, by showrunner Ryan Murphy, was released in September, followed by a new documentary by director Alejandro Hartmann. Gascón said in a press conference earlier this month that his office was fielding calls regarding the brothers’ release, while Erik and Lyle’s attorney, Mark Geragos, says that social media campaigns to free them were an unexpected boon: “It’s the craziest phenomenon I’ve ever seen. It happened at warp speed, mostly because of this younger, kind of more vibrant and, I would argue, evolved [generation].” Eager to keep up the momentum, the brothers’ extended family hosted a press conference last week to express their continued support of their release.
The new evidence that Geragos sent the district attorney’s office in May of 2023 is compelling, says Romano. A letter that Erik purportedly wrote to his late cousin, Andy Cano, eight months before the murders was found in his personal effects in which Erik wrote, “It’s still happening Andy [sic] but it’s worse for me now … Every night I stay up thinking [my father] might come in.” And, in another potentially potent piece of evidence, Roy Rosselló, a former member of the boy band Menudo, has come forward alleging that Jose drugged and raped him when he was 13 or 14.
According to Romano, a parole board hearing may take time. “Even though they become immediately eligible, there’s a long wait list,” he says. The brothers have been behind bars for over three decades.
Just last year, Jennifer Lawrenceannounced her willingness to return to the Hunger Games franchise, saying “If Katniss ever could ever come back into my life, 100 percent.” But right now, she has an even more demanding project on her plate: the upcoming birth of her second child.
The news came after the Lawrence—once the highest paid female actor in the world—was spotted in Los Angeles on her way to dinner. Her appearance spurred speculation that the 34-year-old might be expecting, with her representative confirming the pregnancy to Vogue on Sunday.
This will be the second child for Jennifer Lawrence and husband Cooke Maroney, who tied the knot on October 19, 2019. (Does that make last night’s dinner an anniversary celebration? Perhaps!) Maroney is “the greatest human being I’ve ever met,” Lawrence said the year they wed. “He really is, and he gets better.”
The two welcomed their first child, Cy Maroney, in April 2022. In the years surrounding her first pregnancy, Lawrence took a break from the business, telling Vanity Fair in 2021 that “everybody had gotten sick of me.”
“I’d gotten sick of me. It had just gotten to a point where I couldn’t do anything right. If I walked a red carpet, it was, ‘Why didn’t she run?’”
In recent years, the star has been far more elusive, appearing in fewer films than she did during her awards-studded rise to the top in the 2010s. That retreat began even before she realized she pregnant with her first child, a revelation she had while in New Orleans to film Causeway, a 2022 release in which she played a veteran injured during the war in Afghanistan. “It was coming out of my performance in all these different creative ways, but I wasn’t conscious of it,” she told the New York Times in 2022.
“Then I went back, and when I’m home with my husband making this family, I’m so happy,” she said then.
Since then, she’s spoken less about her personal life and family. “It’s so scary to talk about motherhood. Only because it’s so different for everybody,” she told Vogue in 2022. “If I say, ‘It was amazing from the start,’ some people will think, ‘It wasn’t amazing for me at first,’ and feel bad.”
“My heart has stretched to a capacity that I didn’t know about,” she said then. “I include my husband in that. And then they’re both just, like, out there—walking around, crossing streets. He’s gonna drive one day. He’s gonna be a stupid teenager and be behind the wheel of a car. And I’m just gonna be like, ‘Good night!’ You know? Like, who sleeps?”
Content warning: This article deals with claims of sexual assault and emotional abuse.
Once one of the world’s most adored pop stars, Liam Payne rocketed to fame as part of One Direction. It was the boy band that captured hearts across the globe. Alongside his bandmates Harry Styles, Louis Tomlinson, Niall Horan, and Zayn Malik, Payne enjoyed a meteoric rise from the talent show The X Factor to stadium tours, chart-topping hits, and a devoted fanbase that seemingly had no limits. However, as the spotlight on One Direction dimmed after their split in 2015, Payne’s personal and professional life took a turn that few could have predicted.
While his former bandmates smoothly transitioned into solo careers, Harry Styles winning Grammy awards and Niall Horan selling out international tours. Payne’s post-1D era has been marked by a series of questionable decisions and scandals that have left fans and critics puzzled. It’s not his talent that’s under scrutiny, but rather the behaviours and controversies that have continued to plague his public image.
From the infamous Logan Paul podcast interview to his problematic romantic relationships and cringeworthy moments on social media, it seems Payne has consistently been his own worst enemy. Let’s strip it all down.
Liam Payne’s public image took a significant hit during his notorious appearance on Logan Paul’s Impaulsive podcast in 2022. What should have been a casual chat quickly turned uncomfortable as Payne made several eyebrow-raising remarks. Among the more memorable moments, Payne claimed that One Direction was “built around him”, a statement that left both fans and critics confused. Even more shocking was his story about a physical altercation with an unnamed bandmate, where he alleged that someone had thrown him against a wall. Payne’s tough-guy response? “If you don’t remove those hands, there’s a high likelihood you’ll never use them again”.
This comment, along with the rest of his strange claims during the interview, sparked outrage online. Fans cringed at his attempts to paint himself as the band’s central figure and the mystery surrounding the wall altercation only deepened as Payne refused to name names.
The Reunion at Niall Horan’s Concert
After a brief reprieve from the spotlight, Payne recently re-emerged at former bandmate Niall Horan’s concert in Argentina. What could have been a nostalgic and wholesome One Direction reunion quickly turned awkward, as Payne’s behaviour left fans scratching their heads.
Seated in a private box at the concert, Payne wasn’t exactly low-key. Before Horan even hit the stage, videos circulated showing Payne engaging in bizarre antics, including leaning over the balcony to sing to fans and even doing the Macarena — a spectacle that led to a security guard asking him to stop. Of course, Payne didn’t listen.
Fans quickly took to social media to call out his behaviour, branding him an attention-seeker. One user on X shared a clip of Payne dancing and wrote, “Oh Liam Payne, you’re never beating the attention seeker allegations”.
LIAM PAYNE DOING THE MACARENA WHILE SECURITY IS TRYING TO ASK HIM TO STOP RILING UP THE CROWD AT NIALL’S CONCERT HAS ME FUCKING CRYINGGGGG 😭😭😭😭😭 pic.twitter.com/Jvc6O893Zf
Perhaps one of the most enduring mysteries surrounding Payne’s post-One Direction life is the alleged altercation he mentioned during the Impaulsive interview. For over a year, fans speculated which band member had thrown Payne against the wall, with theories ranging from Harry Styles to Louis Tomlinson.
The mystery, however, was recently solved by none other than Payne’s ex-fiancée, Maya Henry. In a TikTok video, Henry revealed that Payne had told her the assailant was Zayn Malik. Her casual tone — “I’ve heard his insufferable stories so many times, and he told me it was Zayn” — sent fans into a frenzy, finally offering clarity on a rumour that had been swirling for years.
However, Henry’s video didn’t come without backlash. Some fans criticised her for still discussing Payne, long after their breakup. In response, Henry posted a follow-up TikTok, doubling down and making more damning accusations about Payne’s post-breakup behaviour.
Maya Henry’s Revelations: Allegations of Harassment
In her second TikTok, Henry didn’t hold back. Addressing fans who labelled her “obsessed” with Payne, she detailed disturbing claims about his behaviour following their breakup. According to Henry, Payne would frequently message her from different phone numbers, making it impossible for her to avoid him. “He’ll blow up my mum’s phone. Is that normal behaviour to you?” she asked.
But perhaps the most shocking revelation came when Henry alleged that Payne had openly admitted to her that he “preys on One Direction fans because they will always be loyal to him, and they won’t tell on him”. This accusation struck a nerve with fans, as it suggested a manipulative side of Payne that had previously gone unspoken.
Henry’s claims only intensified public scrutiny, as fans who had long supported Payne began to question his actions. As she pointed out, “When you constantly enable someone, they’re never going to realise what they’ve done is bad. Or they do realise and know they can get away with it.”
Fan Allegations of Harassment: A Troubling Pattern?
Henry’s accusations opened the floodgates for others to share their experiences with Payne. One fan, in particular, posted TikTok video claiming that Payne had harassed her for explicit content over the span of two years.
“I was a One Direction fan. Liam was my favourite. He messaged me on Instagram, and at first, I was like, ‘Oh my god, this is so cool’,” the fan said in a now deleted video, describing the initial excitement of being noticed by a celebrity. But what began as friendly messaging quickly turned inappropriate. “Then it turned into him asking me for explicit videos, explicit photos, and I would send them because I was like, ‘it’s Liam Payne, I’m going to send them’.”
The fan went on to reflect on the situation, recognising that Payne’s actions were manipulative and inappropriate. “I took years to reflect on it, and it was harassment. He was harassing me for videos and photos, and I was sending them.” She also noted that this occurred while Payne was in relationships with other women.
As more fans began to share their stories, it became clear that this was not an isolated incident. While Payne has yet to respond to these allegations, the mounting claims have painted a troubling picture of a once-beloved pop star.
If this article brings up any issues for you or anyone you know, or if you just feel like you need to speak to someone, please contact 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) — the National Sexual Assault, domestic and Family Violence Counselling Service.
Want some entertainment stories? Click through the articles below:
As far as movies about female aging go, Death Becomes Her has long been the gold standard (as Sabrina Carpenter recently wanted to remind in her video for “Taste”). With the arrival of Coralie Fargeat’s sophomore film, The Substance, however, Robert Zemeckis’ 1992 classic has a bit of competition. But that’s not the only movie Fargeat seemingly pays homage to/draws from. Being someone who has cited David Cronenberg, David Lynch and John Carpenter as key influences, it’s easy to see these auteurs’ mark on her work as well. Regardless, Fargeat clearly delivers her own unique take on the subject of female aging in general and female aging in Hollywood in particular as no man possibly could.
Focusing on a formerly adored starlet named Elisabeth Sparkle (Demi Moore), who, yes, has lost her sparkle, Fargeat opens the movie on the Hollywood Walk of Fame (well, after a shot of an egg yolk “generating” another egg yolk out of itself—foreshadowing). Specifically, during the creation of Elisabeth’s star. Its freshness, of course, is ripe with the metaphor that Elisabeth herself is still fresh. And as she stands on her own star to “inaugurate” it, the crowd that surrounds her is reverent, laudatory. In short, lapping her up because she’s still young and beautiful (indeed, it was a missed opportunity not to sardonically include Lana Del Rey’s “Young and Beautiful” at some point during the movie). To show the usual trajectory of a beloved star—particularly an actress—Fargeat then lapses the time to show decreased foot traffic approaching Elisabeth’s star or bothering to take a picture of it. The scene finally culminates with snow falling on it (an obvious metaphor for Elisabeth’s youth having turned to the “winter” associated with being old) before another passerby drops his burger, fries and ketchup all over it. He then smears the ketchup into the star as though trying to clean up, but the lingering effect is one that looks like somebody’s blood (strategically covering up her last name, to boot).
To be sure, Elisabeth has put a lot of blood (sweat and tears) into her career, only to end up as an aerobics instructor for a decreasingly popular workout program called Sparkle Your Life with Elisabeth (which has nothing on Sheila Rubin’s [Rose Byrne] aerobics show on Physical). Being that aerobics is automatically associated with the 1980s, viewers might, upon initial glance, assume this is a “period” piece. Instead, however, Fargeat’s aim seems to be creating a world that exists unto itself while still being contemporary (previously noting the abilities of certain films to do this—namely, Mad Max and Kill Bill). Hence, the presence of modern devices like smartphones.
As it happens, Elisabeth is turning fifty the day we’re first introduced to her (and yes, Demi Moore, despite approaching her sixty-second birthday, really doesn’t look a day over forty-something—plastic surgery aids or not). Perfect timing for her to be summarily “dismissed,” as far as the producer of the show, Harvey (Dennis Quaid), is concerned (side note: the name Harvey—now synonymous with Hollywood ignominy—doesn’t seem like a coincidence). However, before the viewer bears witness to her cruel firing, they’re given a glimpse of yet another overt influence on Fargeat’s filmic style: Stanley Kubrick. This occurs after Elisabeth wraps up filming what will turn out to be her last show, walking out the door of the studio and into a hallway that’s outfitted with a nearly identical carpet to the one in The Shining’s Overlook Hotel. On either side of her is a wall featuring posters of her younger self (Moore’s actual 80s self dressed in aerobics attire) during the heyday of the show. Making her way to the bathroom, she sees the women’s is out of order and, thus, goes into the men’s. The audience is then given another nod to The Shining with the stark red and white color palette that mirrors the bathroom setting in which “Mr. Grady” (Philip Stone) tells Jack Torrance (Jack Nicholson) that he’s always been the caretaker.
Elisabeth is faced with some similarly grim news while in the bathroom, overhearing Harvey tell someone on the phone that she’s finished, screaming, “This is network TV, not a fucking charity. Find me somebody new. Now!” He then very undiplomatically and indirectly tells her that she’s finished over a lunch during which he grossly eats the heads of his shrimp (a scene Moore described as “by far the most violent scene in the whole movie”—which is definitely not true). Driving back home afterward, Elisabeth notices a billboard for toothpaste that she’s the spokeswoman for is being taken down, distracting her long enough to get into a car accident. Finding herself in the hospital for a check-up afterward, the doctor notices it’s her birthday on her chart and brings it up, prompting her to start crying. Luckily for the doctor, he gets called to another patient so as to avoid the awkwardness, while the younger nurse (Robin Greer) stays behind to observe her.
Like Mr. Chagall (Ian Ogilvy) in Death Becomes Her, this nurse is the conduit—the “connect,” if you will—between the woman willing to do anything to look younger and the youth that can be given via some Faustian pact. In Elisabeth’s case, that pact comes in the form of “the substance.” Something she’s tipped off about when the nurse slips a hard drive wrapped inside a piece of paper that reads, “It changed my life.” It’s tantamount to the staid white business card that Chagall slips Madeline Ashton (Meryl Streep), featuring the cursive script that reads only: 1091 Rue La Fleur. A.k.a. Lisle Von Rhuman’s (Isabella Rossellini) address. The woman who holds the supernatural key to youth and beauty. For it does take nothing short of magic to make Madeline (and Helen Sharp [Goldie Hawn]) look as young as she wants to.
As Chagall puts it, “Unfortunately, we are mere mortals here. We are restricted by the laws of nature.” In The Substance, Fargeat doesn’t treat the idea of a loophole to staying “forever young” as necessitating anything supernatural, so much as scientific. This being, perhaps, a sign o’ the times in terms of how much further advancements in anti-aging treatments have come since 1992, when Death Becomes Her was released in theaters. It’s just a matter of having the massive amounts of money required to obtain that youth. Funnily enough, though, there is no mention of money being paid for this service in The Substance, whereas Madeline is upfront in declaring that money is no object. She’ll pay whatever it takes to get her youth back. With Elisabeth, though, it seems as though she’s part of some elaborate “pay it forward” ring. Albeit one with a much sicker notion of what it means to “give back.” For while it might initially appear to be a “gift” to share a consciousness with a younger, “better” version of herself named Sue (Margaret Qualley), it doesn’t take long for Elisabeth to realize that Sue’s existence has made her become even more self-loathing when it comes to her age.
In fact, it’s almost like “the substance” should be free since it comes across like a sadistic experiment designed to prove that no aging person, least of all an aging woman, can resist the urge to erase herself the way society has effectively done so. Alas, as the disembodied voice on the hard drive forewarns, “You can’t escape from yourself.” Something Elisabeth can’t ignore even after she initially throws away the “business card,” writing it off as some bullshit scam. But in the wake of a lonely night out and staring at her haggard appearance in the mirror back at home, she’s compelled to finally call the number.
Of course, the process for “duplication” is much more than Elisabeth bargained for as Fargeat brings the Cronenbergian body horror to the extreme for the moment when Sue “hatches” out of her back. And, like any “baby” birthed by “Mother,” Sue proves to be an immediate physical drain. Because it is while she inhabits the consciousness of Sue that she can’t resist the temptation to stay younger, violating one of the only rules of the system: each self is allowed only seven days to be that self before needing to switch back (in some regards, it reminds one of the Severance premise). If the amount of days is surpassed, an irrevocable mutation occurs on the “matrix” self (because, of course, the matrix self isn’t trying to surpass her seven days, wanting to immediately toss the baton to Sue, fiending for that time as her younger self like a crackhead).
After understanding how addictive it is to feel young—ergo, how cruel it is to make her return to her old body after a week—Elisabeth finds herself being stalked into a diner by the older version of the nurse who informed her of “the substance” in the first place. Goading her under the guise of “commiserating,” his old self remarks, “It gets harder each time to remember that you still deserve to exist. That this part of yourself is still worth something, that you still matter.” It’s a scene that is decidedly Lynchian in tone, with Elisabeth running off as she gets increasingly creeped out, but not before the nurse shouts, “Has she started yet? Eating away at you?” This further horrifies Elisabeth as she runs of in her Hitchockian-coded yellow coat (because, needless to say, Hitchcock was a fan of leading ladies wearing a signature article of clothing in a signature color). Horrifies her not as a suggestion, but because it cuts to the core of what’s been happening, with her youthful self becoming greedier and greedier for more time as her older self starts to become more and more resentful, acting out in her own destructive ways…like overeating (resulting in another body horror sequence involving a chicken leg that Sue has to pull out through her belly button).
Fargeat, however, saves her ultimate pièce de résistance body horror for last in a denouement that reeks of a similar kind of denouement in Brian Yuzna’s Society. Let’s just say that, yes, there’s a grotesque mash-up of body parts and flesh. And yet, Seth Meyers said to Demi Moore (when she sat down to be his guest as part of her promotion of the film), “It’s like nothing I’ve ever seen before.” But the fact of the matter is that The Substance is an amalgam of many things that have been seen before (including The Picture of Dorian Gray or even Norma Desmond [Gloria Swanson] in Sunset Boulevard going through the marathon ordeal of various “miracle” beauty/anti-aging “remedies”). This even extends to the South Korean film styles that Fargeat mentioned during her promotion of Revenge, telling Jezebel, “I was more sensitive to South Korean extreme movies like Oldboy or I Saw the Devil. I think also what I like is to escape from reality in a way, and I think South Korean movies have had such a strong impact on me, or directors like Cronenberg for instance. They escape from reality, they build a totally different universe, and it’s not realistic horror.”
But through the “unrealistic,” Fargeat shows us the reality of just how distorted our own thinking has become with regard to staying young at any cost. Even at the expense of our own mental and physical health. Something that Death Becomes Her also acknowledged “back in the day,” but with far more levity. In The Substance, the darkness beneath the “absurdist” comedy is too impossible to ignore. This, again, indicating that female body image has only worsened over the decades rather than improved. Which, one would think, shouldn’t be the case with a theoretically more progressive worldview among the “collective.” All the more reason that a film like The Substance has arrived at a time when its scathing message is as needed as ever to shake society out of its youth and “perfect body” obsession.
This article was originally published on December 22, 2023. Emma Stone has since won her second Oscar for the leading role in Poor Thingsand reportedly shaved her head for her fourth collaboration with director Yorgos Lanthimos, set to release in 2025.
The quintessential Emma Stone acting choice comes near the end of Battle of the Sexes, a solid but unremarkable 2017 tennis bio-drama in which she plays Billie Jean King to Steve Carell’s Bobby Riggs. King is all nerves before their famous match; as attendants carry her down a hallway on a garish throne, preparing for a grand entrance, she is visibly fretful over the reputational damage of agreeing to this in the first place. She ducks her head as she enters the stadium — and looks up as she emerges into the light, smiling like a superstar.
It’s a split-second reveal of the machinery behind preternatural charisma. Stone has always known how to let you in on a metamorphosis. Her best roles are those in which her character transforms and ascends: an unknown actress becomes a movie star, a newcomer to the queen’s court acquires power, a talented tennis player turns icon. She doesn’t disappear into her roles; she makes you aware of the games her characters are playing. In All About Eve terms, she’s Bette Davis and she’s Anne Baxter. With her giant eyes — which can project vulnerability or shift into unearthly confidence — and her raspy voice, Stone locates the star inside the striver and vice versa.
More recently, though, she has expanded into roles that distort these tropes. This winter, she stars in both the Showtime series The Curse, as a deluded house flipper who yearns for basic-cable celebrity, and Yorgos Lanthimos’s film Poor Things, as a woman implanted with the brain of an infant who goes on a journey of steampunk self-discovery. In both, the actress seems to be winking at the narratives that defined her earlier work — and it’s clear that she is hitting a new, more experimental high.
Stone, 35, made her name with a distinctly millennial kind of role: the sardonic yet earnest girl next door. For a while, her go-to interview anecdote was about how, as a teenager, she had made a PowerPoint to try to convince her parents she needed to move to L.A. to pursue acting. (As she later explained it, “I make presentations because when I feel strongly about something, I cry.”) After scattered roles in comedies like Superbad, her star-is-born moment was Will Gluck’s 2010 film Easy A, a twee teen update of The Scarlet Letter, in which her character, Olive, pretends to have sex with her gay classmate to help him convince everyone he’s straight. Then she pretends to do it with a bunch more people, too, for the social cachet and just for the hell of it. On paper, it’s an impossible role; she has to be an outcast and a smart aleck and a vlogger as well as charming enough that we believe her classmates believe she could hook up with half the school. That’s where Stone excels. When Olive decides to embrace her identity as a woman of ill repute, strutting down a walkway in Ray-Bans while she mugs and blows kisses, she’s doing an uncool person’s imitation of “cool and hot” in addition to being actually cool and hot. Stone makes Olive relatable: You get that she thinks high-school popularity is dumb and that she wants it anyway.
With Nathan Fielder in The Curse. Photo: Richard Foreman Jr./SHOWTIME/Richard Foreman Jr./A24/Paramount+ with SHOWTIME
Easy A took Stone to a new echelon. She was nominated for a Golden Globe (they love an ingénue), won an MTV Movie Award, and hosted Saturday Night Live for the first time. For a while, her career looked like an attempt to follow the path of early-’90s Julia Roberts, another star with megawatt charisma who knows how to let you in on the joke. Stone kept on doing comedies. She took a tiny role in Gluck’s next movie, Friends With Benefits. She starred opposite Ryan Gosling in Crazy, Stupid, Love. She was Gwen Stacy in the rom-comish The Amazing Spider-Man. Her role as the protagonist’s daughter in Alejandro González Iñárritu’s Birdman, from 2014, earned Stone her first Oscar nomination, but the performance, like a lot of that film, is pitched to 11, manic and attention-grabbing without being artful. Her most infamous role may be that of Allison Ng — whose father is supposed to be half-Chinese and half-Hawaiian — in Cameron Crowe’s directionless 2015 comedy, Aloha. (Stone has apologized for this informally: When Sandra Oh made a joke about it onstage at the 2019 Golden Globes, Stone shouted from her seat, “I’m sorry!”)
After Aloha, Stone’s prospects looked uncertain. Studio comedies were on the wane. She wasn’t an obvious choice for dramas, nor was she an indie darling. But Stone picked up a part in La La Land,Damien Chazelle’s reconstructed Hollywood love-story musical. As Mia, a barista and wannabe actress, Stone portrayed the apotheosis of a striver. Mia may cloak her ambition in wry self-deprecation, especially when she flirts with Gosling’s Über-serious jazz musician, but the movie depends on the idea that she deserves to be discovered. Stone’s Oscar win for the role seemed almost inevitable from the scene in which Mia auditions for a big Hollywood film. Over the course of one song, she goes from a shrinking unknown — who cites her aunt who “used to live in Paris” as the dreamer who imparted her love of art — to a star and back, her voice gaining power as she builds through the bridge. In a long take, Chazelle brings us close to Stone as emotion overtakes her face, her eyes glimmering; the camera circles her, and when it comes back around she’s suddenly someone else. Maybe it’s a trick of eyeline: A novice looks down and away from the camera; the star, just above and beyond it.
Stone had her Oscar, but where do you go from there? She did Battle of the Sexes and Netflix’s Maniac, a curio of a series quickly buried by algorithmic churn. But it was during her first collaboration with Lanthimos, in 2018’s The Favourite, when she uncovered a fruitful new valence for her career. She played Abigail, the new girl in the 18th-century court of Olivia Colman’s Queen Anne, who uses her natural star power to scheme her way into the queen’s affections while trying to outflank Anne’s standby, Rachel Weisz. In her most memorable gambit, Stone monologues about her plans while jerking off a young nobleman played by Joe Alwyn. Lanthimos pushes the camera toward Stone’s face, the candlelight bringing out its shadows. Abigail thinks of herself as a victim — “My life is like a maze I continually think I’ve gotten out of,” she mutters — but it’s clear she’s also seizing control of her situation and, literally, of Alwyn.
The Favourite unlocked a darkness in Stone’s performances. While she had always made her characters self-aware, she began to lean harder into deviousness and delusion. On repeat visits to SNL, Stone explored fully unleashed defensiveness as the mother of a sensitive boy in 2016 and, in 2019, as an actress obsessed with finding the truth of her minor character in a gay porno. When she announces, as the star of 2021’s Cruella, that she was “born brilliant, born bad, and a little bit mad,” she plays it cocky, comedic, and entirely heartfelt, pointing herself in a different, possibly freeing, direction: The dreamer becomes a villain. In an interview about that film — a 101 Dalmatians prequel that barely justifies its existence outside Stone’s go-for-broke performance — she admitted that she had been “asking myself a lot of questions about that charm offensive or ingénue idea in my own life.” She was excited by “this phase of playing these women who are much less concerned with what people think about them.”
Now when she plays a woman obsessed with likability, Stone knows she can treat it like a joke — or a trap. In The Curse, her character Whitney’s belief in her own charm is just one of her many self-deceptions. She is the daughter of slumlords who, along with her husband, Asher (Nathan Fielder), runs a house-flipping operation in New Mexico. They build “passive homes” that are obvious rip-offs of other people’s designs and that Whitney tries to fill with work by a Native artist who finds her cringe-inducing. Whitney wants her show to be called Green Queen. She is convinced that she deserves what would amount to HGTV stardom.
It’s a self-immolating role — not least because Stone is from Arizona and played a white savior in The Help. Whitney has all the obliviousness of someone who would take that part in Aloha. In a defining scene, she and Asher stumble into a genuinely sweet moment when he tries to help her out of a sweater and it gets stuck around her head. They collapse into giggles. “This is us, Ash,” Whitney says, then adds, “I wish the network could see this.” She scurries across the room, grabs her phone, and tries to get him to re-create the scene on-camera.
In Poor Things. Photo: Searchlight Pictures
In Poor Things, Stone performs the most literal kind of becoming. She is Bella Baxter, a once-dead woman who has been zapped back to life but with the brain of a baby and must now grow into a worldly, self-actualized individual. The film has its surreal and twisted qualities as well as its obvious ones; the script and direction tend to overemphasize their points about misogyny. As Bella, though, Stone progresses through this strange personal growth without judgment in a performance that has made her an Oscar front-runner. She works with technical precision: As Bella’s brain ages inside her adult body, her gait changes from stilted lumbering to a posture of confidence and control. Her face, which she can spread open with wonder, scrambles with confusion and interest at new ideas and experiences, especially once she heads out to traipse across Europe in search of enlightenment. She’s gloriously uninhibited in the bedroom or while scarfing down her first pastel de nata. On the dance floor with Mark Ruffalo, she cavorts like a Victorian Raggedy Ann. Although Stone has always been good in close-up — and she’s especially good here, those watery irises offset by that jet-black hair — Bella’s discovery comes through her whole physical being.
The film invites allegorical readings. You could interpret it as a comment on what it can be like to chart your own way as a woman in Hollywood or how to find some sense of self even when forced into a role. But it’s also, of all Stone’s metamorphoses, one of the simplest — and the most internal. Olive, Mia, Abigail, and even Whitney long for social acceptance. Bella’s hunger, in the end, isn’t social. What she wants from life is pleasure and knowledge, especially of her body’s forgotten history. She’s trying to become herself.
Kathy Bates won an Oscar in 1991 for her magnificent performance in the Stephen King thriller “Misery” – but it wasn’t until recently that she realized she’d thanked her mother in her acceptance speech.
In an interview with “CBS Sunday Morning,” Bates told Turner Classic Movies host Ben Mankiewicz that her parents had sacrificed a lot for her to study to become an actress. But she also noted that – despite receiving a Tony Award nomination for “‘Night, Mother,” and then an Academy Award – her mother’s reaction to her success was less than charitable.
“When I won the Oscar for ‘Misery,’ she said, ‘I don’t know what all the excitement’s about. You didn’t discover the cure for cancer,’” she told “Sunday Morning.”
Bates said that she had neglected to mention her mother in her acceptance speech, suggesting that was possibly the reason for the slight. “I forgot to thank her that night,” Bates said.
“You know, you did thank her at the end of your speech,” Mankiewicz said. “You thanked her.”
“No, I did not. I did not,” Bates replied. “You go back and look at it. I didn’t.”
It was then that Mankiewicz played back for Bates a recording of her acceptance speech, at the 63rd Academy Awards ceremony from March 25, 1991.
Watching the recording, Bates froze, then stared at Mankiewicz in disbelief. Her hands came up to her mouth as she heard herself say: “I would like to thank my family, my friends, my mom at home, and my dad, who I hope is watching somewhere.”
Kathy Bates watches her Oscar acceptance speech.
CBS News
“Thank you! Why did I think I didn’t thank her?” said Bates after watching the video.
“Why does that mean so much to you?” asked Mankiewicz.
“‘Cause she should have had my life,” Bates said. “When she died, I remember I said, ‘Come into me.’ I wanted her spirit to come into me, even though we had so many difficulties. I wanted her spirit to come into me and enjoy everything I was enjoying, because of what she’d given up.
“Wow! Thank you so much for that,” she added.
In addition to winning an Oscar for “Misery,” Bates has appeared in such films as “Straight Time,” “Dolores Claiborne,” “Titanic,” “Primary Colors,” “About Schmidt” “The Waterboy,” “Midnight in Paris,” “Richard Jewell,” “Are You There God? It’s Me Margaret,” and the TV series “American Horror Story.” Now 76 and a two-time cancer survivor, Bates had recently suggested she would retire from acting, and in the interview talked about how women of a certain age are in a sense invisible in society, and on screen. But now, she is starring in the new CBS series “Matlock,” in a role that plays off that notion of invisibility.
“It’s fantastic. I think it’s one of the most wonderful roles I’ve ever had to play,” she said.
Asked if she had given up the plans on retiring, she affirmed: “Not retiring. I want to stay for this show for as long as it runs, and I hope it runs for a very long time.”
David Morgan is senior producer for CBSNews.com and the Emmy Award-winning “CBS News Sunday Morning.” He writes about film, music and the arts. He is author of the books “Monty Python Speaks” and “Knowing the Score,” and editor of “Sundancing,” about the Sundance Film Festival.