ReportWire

Tag: hollywood-tag/news-features

  • Coyote vs Acme and the blockbusters that may never be seen

    Coyote vs Acme and the blockbusters that may never be seen

    [ad_1]

    But why? There’s nothing wrong with a studio changing direction, but if Coyote vs Acme was finished, why not release it, anyway? The answer, apparently, is that distributing and promoting a film adds so much to the overall cost that it is hard for it to make a profit. It can be cheaper for a studio to dismiss the film as a “tax write-down”, and claw back millions of dollars. But the strategy is only legal if the film is never shown. Effectively, it has to cease to exist. Green has said that he is “beyond devastated”. Still, there is some hope that Wile E Coyote will return to life, as he so often does. On Monday, it was reported that Warner would permit Green and his colleagues to shop the film around to other potential distributors. But other film-makers who have suffered a similar fate haven’t been so lucky.

    In April 2022, WarnerMedia merged with Discovery Inc to become Warner Bros Discovery, and since then the conglomerate’s new CEO, David Zaslav, has been responsible for a swathe of controversial cost-cutting measures. The most astonishing of these came in August 2022, when the studio scrapped a $90m DC superhero blockbuster, Batgirl, that had already been shot. Leslie Grace starred as Gotham City’s newest crime fighter, alongside Brendan Fraser as the villainous Firefly and Michael Keaton as Batman. But, despite that tantalising cast, the studio’s top brass judged that the film was bound to flop, so they cut their losses. “We are saddened and shocked by the news,” the directors, Adil El Arbi and Bilall Fallah, said on Instagram. “We still can’t believe it.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • What does ‘Barbenheimer’ really mean for Hollywood?

    What does ‘Barbenheimer’ really mean for Hollywood?

    [ad_1]

    In that light, the Barbenheimer chatter starts to sound slightly desperate – like an invitation to one last party before fasting begins. It certainly seemed like that when the London premiere of Oppenheimer was brought forward by an hour so that the actors could pose on the red carpet in the final minutes before the SAG-AFRA strike came into effect. Buffeted by the Covid-19 pandemic and by the current writers’ and actors’ strikes, the film industry is in a shaky state. Barbenheimer feels more like a celebration of the past than the dawn of a bright new future. 

    Nolan, after all, is known for championing analogue film and resisting the advance of digital technology, while Barbie relies on the nostalgic appeal of a doll that has been around for decades. The toy company behind the doll, Mattel, is trumpeting a raft of films based on its products, but just this week it was revealed that an eye-watering $30m had been spent on developing Mattel’s Masters of The Universe, only for Netflix to drop the project.

    As for the Barbenheimer phenomenon, all the talk of dressing up and buying cocktails suggests that going to the cinema with friends has become a rare special occasion rather than a regular activity – something you put in the diary and plan ahead for, rather than something you just do. Maybe such gloomy thoughts are prompted because both Barbie and Oppenheimer ponder life and death, but you have to ask: what does it say about the movie business if it takes a meme as unique and absurd as Barbenheimer to get customers into their local multiplex?

    Love film and TV? Join BBC Culture Film and TV Club on Facebook, a community for cinephiles all over the world.

    If you would like to comment on this story or anything else you have seen on BBC Culture, head over to our Facebook page or message us on Twitter.

    And if you liked this story, sign up for the weekly bbc.com features newsletter, called The Essential List. A handpicked selection of stories from BBC Future, Culture, Worklife and Travel, delivered to your inbox every Friday.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One: Is Tom Cruise the last action hero?

    Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One: Is Tom Cruise the last action hero?

    [ad_1]

    There have been attempts to build non-superhero action franchises around younger actors, especially actors named Chris, eg The Gray Man with Ryan Gosling and Chris Evans, Extraction with Chris Hemsworth, and The Tomorrow War with Chris Pratt. But none of these has taken off, partly because they debuted on streaming services rather than at cinemas. “There’s so much content being pumped out that it’s really hard for one franchise or star to stand out,” De Semlyen says. “In the 80s, a blockbuster could be in the cinema all summer and people would keep talking about it. That’s different from turning on your TV and seeing Chris Hemsworth killing 1,000 people.”

    Still, while we’re feeling sorry for those youthful actors who can’t establish themselves as action superstars, we should spare a thought for those less youthful actors who can’t establish themselves as anything else. As far as mainstream cinema is concerned, they have almost no option but to sign up for action movies, because Hollywood has pretty much abandoned the quieter mid-budget films that might have allowed them to deliver dialogue without throwing bad guys through windows at the same time. The John Wick series, with Keanu Reeves (58), has demonstrated that action movies are currently the only way to revive an ailing career. Just think about Cruise. He can get audiences to watch him sprinting along the top of a train, but could he persuade them to watch him in a gentle romantic comedy or a political drama? That might be a mission impossible, even for him.

    Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One is on general release

    Love film and TV? Join BBC Culture Film and TV Club on Facebook, a community for cinephiles all over the world.

    If you would like to comment on this story or anything else you have seen on BBC Culture, head over to our Facebook page or message us on Twitter.

    And if you liked this story, sign up for the weekly bbc.com features newsletter, called The Essential List. A handpicked selection of stories from BBC Future, Culture, Worklife and Travel, delivered to your inbox every Friday.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Does Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny mark the era of the ‘flopbuster’?

    Does Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny mark the era of the ‘flopbuster’?

    [ad_1]

    Indiana Jones might be able to unearth the Ark of the Covenant, but can he fill cinemas? Apparently not. Fifteen years on from Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, Harrison Ford’s whip-cracking archaeologist is back in Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny, but, so far, audiences haven’t come back with him. The film made $130m (£102m) at the global box office on its opening weekend, which may sound impressive, but which is actually “underwhelming”, Rebecca Rubin wrote in Variety. This is, she pointed out, “one of the most expensive movies ever, [costing] $295m before marketing”, so it is unlikely to make a profit in cinemas. Anthony D’Alessandro at Deadline went further. It was, he said, a “disastrous result”.

    More like this:
    Mission: Impossible 7 is ideal escapism
    New Indiana Jones is ‘like fan fiction’
    The films ‘too bad for the cinema’

    The sad fact is that The Dial of Destiny didn’t deserve to do any better: the film is a dour, dreary, and largely pointless rehash of Indy’s other escapades. But he wasn’t the only hero to fall short last weekend. According to Rubin, DC’s beleaguered superhero blockbuster, The Flash, had an “embarrassing” showing; DreamWorks and Universal’s Ruby Gillman, Teenage Kraken, “cratered”; and another animation, Elemental, “hasn’t lived up to Pixar standards”. In his review of Elemental in The Guardian, Peter Bradshaw pondered “the question of whether Pixar’s golden age is irrevocably behind us” – the film was Pixar’s worst US box office opening weekend since their very first film, the original Toy Story.

    Overall, said Rubin, this summer has so far had “a series of underwhelming tentpoles”. And before the summer, things were hardly overwhelming, either. Both DC’s Black Adam and Marvel’s Ant-Man and The Wasp: Quantumania fared badly, leading to claims that audiences might have “superhero fatigue”. Bucking the trend, Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse has done even better than the first film in the series, Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse. But there are too many “flopbusters” coming out these days to ignore. Ever since Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker and Avengers: Endgame came out in 2019, Hollywood seems to be in some sort of endgame itself.

    Mark Harris is the author of Pictures at a Revolution, a book about Bonnie and Clyde and the other radical “New Hollywood” dramas that took over in the mid-1960s when the traditional studio system was faltering. What’s happening in the film industry now, he said on Twitter this week, is frighteningly reminiscent of what happened just before the New Hollywood revival: “I don’t think any moment since [20 years ago] has resembled the pre-revolution crisis as much as this one does. Bigger, longer, more bloated movies, most of which are lesser versions of what worked 20 years ago, a panic about the waning clout of movie stars, a fearful understanding that old marketing approaches are simply failing to reach or excite vast swathes of the moviegoing audience, a dread that Hollywood’s best creative days are behind it … Dark times!”

    Streaming is undoubtedly a factor. All four of Indiana Jones’s previous adventures are currently available on Disney+ at the touch of a button, so why buy tickets to see an inferior version? Besides, so much money and talent is being shovelled into high-profile TV series, and so many A-list stars are signing up to appear in them, that films are left looking like the poor relation. It’s significant that Britain’s biggest film magazine, Empire, has put such Disney+ TV shows as The Mandalorian, Ahsoka and Secret Invasion on its front covers in recent months, rather than actual cinema releases.

    Television aside, the WGA writers’ strike has stalled numerous productions, including Marvel’s Blade and Thunderbolts. And warnings that films might be made by AI have only thickened the air of uncertainty surrounding the industry. The Covid-19 pandemic and other global events are factors, too, Charles Gant, Screen International’s box office editor, tells BBC Culture. “Cinemas’ recovery from pandemic-blighted 2020 is taking longer than everyone had hoped,” says Gant, “and it’s concerning that in the UK and Ireland, the recovery has essentially stalled, with box office for 2023 so far level with the same period of 2022. China is a worry, too – most Hollywood titles are not performing strongly there – and of course Russia is missing.”

    Still, says Gant, we shouldn’t read too much into Indy’s duff weekend. “I don’t think Hollywood is in crisis because the revival of a franchise didn’t do as well as the last revival of said franchise. Let’s see what happens with the new Mission: Impossible, and the Barbie/Oppenheimer head-to-head, then we’ll have a clearer picture.”

    Could those three films be the saviours of cinema this summer? “I am rooting for all three of these movies to succeed, because we are definitely in the ‘A rising tide lifts all boats’ phase of the crisis, and it is a crisis,” said Harris on Twitter. “But the thing is, none of these three movies are going to fix the cracks in the hull.” However well they do, it’s worth noting that Mission: Impossible is the seventh instalment of a franchise that was itself based on a TV show from 1966, and Barbie is based on a doll brand that was launched in 1959. Neither of them suggests that Hollywood is bursting with creativity and drive.

    Maybe all of this means that the industry is due to have a New Hollywood-style resurgence, as it did in the 1960s, but there is no sign of it yet. And, as Harris said, “the business cannot go on like this indefinitely”. We used to think of the cinema as a dream palace. At the moment, it’s more like a temple of doom.

    Love film and TV? Join BBC Culture Film and TV Club on Facebook, a community for cinephiles all over the world.

    If you would like to comment on this story or anything else you have seen on BBC Culture, head over to our Facebook page or message us on Twitter.

    And if you liked this story, sign up for the weekly bbc.com features newsletter, called The Essential List. A handpicked selection of stories from BBC Future, Culture, Worklife and Travel, delivered to your inbox every Friday.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • No Hard Feelings: Jennifer Lawrence in Hollywood’s coyest sex comedy

    No Hard Feelings: Jennifer Lawrence in Hollywood’s coyest sex comedy

    [ad_1]

    In a widely reported comment about her punningly-titled No Hard Feelings, Jennifer Lawrence said: “Everybody in some sense will be offended by this film – you’re welcome.” Wishful thinking on her part. Tame and inoffensive, No Hard Feelings is Hollywood’s coyest sex comedy. Lawrence’s character, Maddie (who’s 32), is hired by 19-year-old Percy’s parents to “date” him, as they put it, so he doesn’t head off to college a virginal wallflower. That high concept was so full of edgy comic potential that Sony’s publicity and the media coverage bought into the studio’s talking points about the film being outrageous and subversive.

    In fact, it’s retro, following the lead of Pretty Woman, playing into the “Wholesome Escort” meme. But that coyness reveals larger social trends. The modest success of its opening weekend – Variety characterised the $15m US box office as “not bad” – speaks to the audience’s hunger for sex comedies, even this bland one. Yet the film also reveals how cautious Hollywood studios remain about sex, especially at a time when the cultural politics of the US is torn between an ever-more conservative right wing and the progressive left.

    More like this:
    The 1998 film that predicted the future
    David Lynch on ‘the beauty in the dark’
    Dating culture’s most toxic stereotype

    Maddie is set up as the most sympathetic of sell-outs, a financially-strapped Uber driver whose car is repossessed just when she’s trying to save the house her mother left her. In one of the more realistic, funnier scenes, Maddie and her best friend go through worse reasons they’ve had sex, including not wanting to make the commute home at night. To them, sex is no big deal, so why not get a car out of it? Except in this movie, it is such a big deal that Percy resists. As Owen Gleiberman said in his Variety review: “No Hard Feelings is the first Hollywood comedy about a teenager losing his virginity in which the teenager in question has no apparent desire to lose his virginity.”

    It might sound as if No Hard Feelings is playing into the “Puriteen” concept: the idea, which many have questioned, that Generation Z doesn’t have much sex. Maddie even asks at a high school party, “Doesn’t anyone [have sex] anymore?” – using a common, but unquotable here, term.

    But the generational allusions are no more than throwaway lines. In the film, Percy is actually depicted as out of step with other people his age. He doesn’t drive. He doesn’t drink. He stands out at the party where others are pairing off and heading into bedrooms where, even if Maddie doesn’t see them at it, they probably have sex. He’s not typical, but an anomaly. That’s part of the joke.

    The fact that No Hard Feelings is a comedy really matters. Recent articles have cited the lack of sex in movies today, looking back to a freer period and suggesting an appetite for more freewheeling films. Karina Longworth’s podcast You Must Remember This has seasons called Erotic 80s and Erotic 90s, and the Criterion Channel has a programming package called Erotic Thrillers. But in thrillers, sex is fraught with danger. A comedy has to accept sex as a part of life for it to be funny. No Hard Feelings only pretends to accept it as the plot heads to a sentimental ending about Maddie and Percy finding themselves.

    [ad_2]

    Source link