ReportWire

Tag: HIV / AIDS

  • 41st AIDS Walk LA steps out with “Community Is the Cure” message

    [ad_1]

    Thousands gathered Sunday at West Hollywood Park for the 41st annual AIDS Walk Los Angeles.

    This year’s theme, “Community is the Cure,” was meant to reflect a sobering reality: the fight against HIV is not over, and the community must once again lead the way.

    Founded in 1985 as a response to government inaction, AIDS Walk Los Angeles continues to raise critical funds for APLA Health, which provides comprehensive services to more than 22,000 Angelenos each year, with a strong focus on people with or at risk for HIV.

    Team ABC7 | Disney PRIDE shows their spirit at AIDS Walk Los Angeles

    Support ABC7 & Disney PRIDE’s AIDS Walk Team by purchasing merchandise from the ABC7 Pride collection!

    These include access to free and low-cost HIV medical care, PrEP and PEP, testing, case management, benefits counseling, mental health services, and the nation’s largest food pantry for people living with HIV.

    “This event was born out of urgency, and it’s just as relevant today,” said Craig E. Thompson, CEO of APLA Health. “We’ve made incredible progress in the fight against HIV, but that progress is under direct threat from funding cuts and political attacks.”

    While scientific advances like U=U (Undetectable = Untransmittable) and PrEP have transformed HIV prevention and treatment, organizers say too many people still face barriers to accessing the care they need.

    “We’re being pushed back-but we’re still facing forward,” said Thompson. “AIDS Walk is how we protect each other, amplify our voices, and keep moving forward, together.”

    Participants in the 41st AIDS Walk LA tell us why they walk

    This year’s opening ceremony was hosted by ABC7’s Coleen Sullivan, and featured speakers U.S. Rep. Maxine Waters, West Hollywood Mayor Chelsea Lee Byers and L.A. County Supervisor Lindsey P. Horvath among others, as well as a special live performance by Heidi N Closet, star of RuPaul’s Drag Race, who was introduced by fellow Drag Race alum Monét X Change.

    For more information, visit aidswalk.la.

    Copyright © 2025 KABC Television, LLC. All rights reserved.

    [ad_2]

    KABC

    Source link

  • Why I Don’t Recommend Moringa Leaf Powder  | NutritionFacts.org

    [ad_1]

    “Clearly, in spite of the widely held ‘belief’ in the health benefits of M. oleifera [moringa], the interest of the international biomedical community in the medicinal potential of this plant has been rather tepid.” In fact, it has been “spectacularly hesitant in exploring its nutritional and medicinal potential. This lukewarm attitude is curious, as other ‘superfoods’ such as garlic and green tea have enjoyed better reception,” but those have more scientific support. There are thousands of human studies on garlic and more than ten thousand on green tea, but only a few hundred on moringa.

    The most promising appears to be moringa’s effects on blood sugar control. Below and at 0:55 in my video The Efficacy and Side Effects of Moringa Leaf Powder, you can see the blood sugar spikes after study participants ate about five control cookies each (top line labeled “a”), compared with cookies containing about two teaspoons of moringa leaf powder into the batter (bottom line labeled “b”). Even with the same amount of sugar and carbohydrates as the control cookies, the moringa-containing cookies resulted in a dampening of the surge in blood sugar.

    Researchers found that drinking just one or two cups of moringa leaf tea before a sugar challenge “suppressed the elevation in blood glucose [sugar] in all cases compared to controls that did not receive the tea initially” and instead drank plain water. As you can see here and at 1:16 in my video, drinking moringa tea with sugar dampened blood sugar spikes after 30 minutes of consumption of the same amount of sugar without moringa tea. It’s no wonder that moringa is used in traditional medicine practice for diabetes, but we don’t really know if it can help until we put it to the test. 
    People with diabetes were given about three-quarters of a teaspoon of moringa leaf powder every day for 12 weeks and had significant improvements in measures of inflammation and long-term blood sugar control. The researchers called it a “quasi-experimental study” because there was no control group. They just took measurements before and after the study participants took moringa powder, and we know that simply being in a dietary study can lead some to eat more healthfully, whether consciously or unconsciously, so we don’t know what effect the moringa itself had. However, even in a moringa study with a control group, it’s not clear if the participants were randomly allocated. The researchers didn’t even specify how much moringa people were given—just that they took “two tablets daily with one tablet each after breakfast and dinner,” but what does “one tablet” mean? There was no significant improvement in this study, but perhaps the participants weren’t given enough moringa. Another study used a tablespoon a day and not only saw a significant drop in fasting blood sugars, but a significant drop in LDL cholesterol as well, as seen below and at 2:27 in my video

    Two teaspoons of moringa a day didn’t seem to help, but what about a third, making it a whole tablespoon? Apparently not, since, finally, a randomized, placebo-controlled study using one tablespoon of moringa a day failed to show any benefit on blood sugar control in people with type 2 diabetes.

    So, we’re left with a couple of studies showing potential, but most failing to show benefit. Why not just give moringa a try to see for yourself? That’s a legitimate course of action in the face of conflicting data when we’re talking about safe, simple, side–effect–free solutions, but is moringa safe? Probably not during pregnancy, as “about 80% of women folk” in some areas of the world use it to abort pregnancies, and its effectiveness for that purpose has been confirmed (at least in rats), though breastfeeding women may get a boost of about half a cup in milk production based on six randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trials.

    Just because moringa has “long been used in traditional medicine” does not in any way prove that the plant is safe to consume. A lot of horribly toxic substances, like mercury and lead, have been used in traditional medical systems the world over, but at least “no major harmful effects of M. oleifera [moringa]…have been reported by the scientific community.” More accurately, “no adverse effects were reported in any of the human studies that have been conducted to date.” In other words, no harmful effects had been reported until now. 

    Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) is probably the most dreaded drug side effect, “a rare but potentially fatal condition characterized by…epidermal detachment and mucous membrane erosions.” In other words, your skin may fall off. Fourteen hours after consuming moringa, a man broke out in a rash. The same thing had happened three months earlier, the last time he had eaten moringa, causing him to suffer “extensive mucocutaneous lesions with blister formation over face, mouth, chest, abdomen, and genitalia.” “This case report suggests that consumption of Moringa leaf is better avoided by individuals who are at risk of developing SJS.” Although it can happen to anyone, HIV is a risk factor.

    My take on moringa is that the evidence of benefit isn’t compelling enough to justify shopping online for something special when you can get healthy vegetables in your local market, like broccoli, which has yet to be implicated in any genital blistering. 

    [ad_2]

    Michael Greger M.D. FACLM

    Source link

  • Local organization to help fill need left from Rainbow Health closure

    Local organization to help fill need left from Rainbow Health closure

    [ad_1]

    Local organization to help fill need left from Rainbow Health closure


    Local organization to help fill need left from Rainbow Health closure

    02:12

    MINNEAPOLIS — Thousands of Minnesotans living with HIV were left in limbo earlier this month when their clinic suddenly closed.

    The news that Rainbow Health, a leading advocate for those living with HIV, would be shutting its doors with only hours of notice, came as a sudden shock to its now former employees.
        
    The Rainbow Health closure left people in the dark about how they would be getting emergency assistance with rent checks and food.
        
    Now comes news from the Minnesota Department of Human Services that it has reached an agreement with The Aliveness Project to help fill the gap.

    “Rainbow’s closure has been sad for the community, for me,” said Matt Toburen, Executive Director for the Aliveness Project.
        
    The Aliveness Project is a non-profit that does similar work to Rainbow, supporting those with HIV with things like food access and housing help. Under the agreement, The Aliveness Project will take on the most urgent needs of Rainbow Health clients, like help with paying rent.

    “There are individuals who need their rent paid today, who need their rent paid before the end of the month,” said Toburen.
        
    But Toburen said their organization cannot do it all, and will reach out to other community partners to help with the rest.

    “I’m confident that the core services that the community really relies on are going to continue in some shape or form. Will everything come back? No,” said Toburen.
        
    On Tuesday, Minneapolis city council members said they support moving more than $1.8 million of grant money, originally meant for Rainbow Health, to Aliveness.
        
    It is money that Toburen said would help dozens of people and families move to stable housing.

    The council will make a final decision Thursday.

    “What I want to tell people who are very afraid and who are very worried right now about these services that they rely on, is that there are a lot of people working overtime to make sure that you will get those services that you rely on,” said Toburen.

    [ad_2]

    Jason Rantala

    Source link

  • A Twice-Yearly Shot Prevents HIV, Study Finds

    A Twice-Yearly Shot Prevents HIV, Study Finds

    [ad_1]

    CAPE TOWN, South Africa — Twice-yearly shots used to treat AIDS were 100% effective in preventing new infections in women, according to study results published Wednesday.

    There were no infections in the young women and girls that got the shots in a study of about 5,000 in South Africa and Uganda, researchers reported. In a group given daily prevention pills, roughly 2% ended up catching HIV from infected sex partners.

    “To see this level of protection is stunning,” said Salim Abdool Karim of the injections. He is director of an AIDS research center in Durban, South Africa, who was not part of the research.

    The shots made by U.S. drugmaker Gilead and sold as Sunlenca are approved in the U.S., Canada, Europe and elsewhere, but only as a treatment for HIV. The company said it is waiting for results of testing in men before seeking permission to use it to protect against infection.

    Read More: How Depression Can Affect Dental Hygiene

    The results in women were published Wednesday in the New England Journal of Medicine and discussed at an AIDS conference in Munich. Gilead paid for the study and some of the researchers are company employees. Because of the surprisingly encouraging results, the study was stopped early and all participants were offered the shots, also known as lenacapavir.

    While there are other ways to prevent HIV infection, like condoms or daily pills, consistent use has been a problem in Africa. In the new study, only about 30% of participants given Gilead’s Truvada or Descovy prevention pills actually took them—and that figure dropped over time.

    The prospect of a twice-a-year shot is “quite revolutionary news” for our patients, said Thandeka Nkosi, who helped run the Gilead research at the Desmond Tutu Health Foundation in Masiphumelele, South Africa. “It gives participants a choice and it just eliminates the whole stigma around taking pills” to prevent HIV.

    Experts working to stop the spread of AIDS are excited about the Sunlenca shots but are concerned Gilead hasn’t yet agreed on an affordable price for those who need them the most. The company said it would pursue a “voluntary licensing program,” suggesting that only a select number of generic producers would be allowed to make them.

    “Gilead has a tool that could change the trajectory of the HIV epidemic,” said Winnie Byanyima, executive director of the Geneva-based U.N. AIDS agency.

    Read More: Why It Took So Long to Finally Get an RSV Vaccine

    She said her organization urged Gilead to share Sunlenca’s patent with a U.N.-backed program that negotiates broad contracts allowing generic drugmakers to make cheap versions of drugs for poorer countries worldwide. As an HIV treatment, the drug costs more than $40,000 a year in the U.S., although what individuals pay varies.

    Dr. Helen Bygrave of Doctors Without Borders said in a statement that the injections could “reverse the epidemic if it is made available in the countries with the highest rate of new infections.” She urged Gilead to publish a price for Sunlenca that would be affordable for all countries.

    In a statement last month, Gilead said it was too early to say how much Sunlenca would cost for prevention in poorer countries. Dr. Jared Baeten, Gilead’s senior vice president of clinical development, said the company was already talking to generics manufacturers and understood how “deeply important it is that we move at speed.”

    Another HIV prevention shot, Apretude, which is given every two months, is approved in some countries, including in Africa. It sells for about $180 per patient per year, which is still too pricey for most developing countries.

    Byanyima said the people who need long-lasting protection the most include women and girls who are victims of domestic violence and gay men in countries where same-sex relationships are criminalized. According to UNAIDS, 46% of new HIV infections globally in 2022 were in women and girls, who were three times more likely to get HIV than males in Africa.

    Byanyima compared the news about Sunlenca to the discovery decades ago of AIDS drugs that could turn HIV infection from a death sentence into a chronic illness. Back then, South African President Nelson Mandela suspended patents to allow wider access to the drugs; the price later dropped from about $10,000 per patient per year to about $50.

    Read More: Dengue Is Rising in the U.S. Here’s How to Protect Yourself

    Olwethu Kemele, a health worker at the Desmond Tutu Health Foundation, predicted the shots could boost the number of people coming in for HIV prevention and slow the virus’ spread. She said young women often hide the pills to avoid questions from boyfriends and family members. “It makes it hard for the girls to continue,” she said.

    In a report on the state of the global epidemic released this week, UNAIDS said that fewer people were infected with HIV in 2023 than at any point since the late 1980s. Globally, HIV infects about 1.3 million people every year and kills more than 600,000, mainly in Africa. While significant progress has been made in Africa, HIV infections are rising in Eastern Europe, Latin America and the Middle East.

    In other research presented at the AIDS conference, Andrew Hill of the University of Liverpool and colleagues estimated that once production of Sunlenca is expanded to treat 10 million people, the price should fall to about $40 per treatment. He said it was critical that health authorities get access to Sunlenca as soon as possible.

    “This is about as close as you can get to an HIV vaccine,” he said.

    ___

    Cheng reported from London.

    [ad_2]

    MARIA CHENG and GERALD IMRAY/AP

    Source link

  • How Dianne Feinstein led San Francisco through the AIDS epidemic

    How Dianne Feinstein led San Francisco through the AIDS epidemic

    [ad_1]

    How Dianne Feinstein led San Francisco through the AIDS epidemic – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Lawmakers across the political spectrum are remembering Sen. Dianne Feinstein as a trailblazer in the nation’s Capitol. But her career began in San Francisco local politics, where she served on the city’s Board of Supervisors — and later as mayor. California State Sen. Scott Wiener joins CBS News to discuss Feinstein’s mayoral legacy.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • More gay and bisexual men would be able to donate blood as FDA moves to ease restrictions

    More gay and bisexual men would be able to donate blood as FDA moves to ease restrictions

    [ad_1]

    The U.S. is moving to ease restrictions on blood donations from gay and bisexual men and other groups that traditionally face higher risks of HIV.

    The Food and Drug Administration on Friday announced draft guidelines that would do away with the current three-month abstinence requirement for donations from men who have sex with men. Instead, potential donors would be screened with a questionnaire that evaluates their individual risks for HIV based on sexual behavior, recent partners and other factors.

    If finalized, the shift would be the latest FDA move to broaden donor eligibility, with the potential to boost the U.S. blood supply.

    FDA Commissioner Robert Califf said the hope is to make donation available to everyone possible in the context of a safe blood supply.

    “Blood is life-saving and essential and almost all of us will need blood products at one time or another as we go through life,” Califf said at a news conference Friday.

    Gay rights groups have long opposed blanket restrictions on who can give blood, saying they discriminate against the LGBTQ community. Medical societies including the American Medical Association have also said such exclusions are unnecessary given advances in technology to test blood for infectious diseases.

    “Current and former blood donation policies made unfounded assumptions about gay and bisexual men and really entangled individuals’ identity with their likelihood of having HIV,” said Sarah Warbelow of the Human Rights Campaign, an LGBTQ advocacy group.

    The U.S. and many other countries started blocking blood donations from gay and bisexual men during the early 1980s AIDS epidemic, aiming to prevent the spread of HIV through the blood supply.

    In 2015, the FDA dropped the lifetime ban and replaced it with a one-year abstinence requirement. Then in 2020, the agency shortened the abstinence period to three months, after donations plummeted during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Regulators said there has been no negative impact on the blood supply as a result of those changes.

    The FDA sets requirements and procedures for blood banks throughout the U.S. All potential donors answer questions about their sexual history, drug use and any recent tattoos or piercings, among other factors that can contribute to the spread of blood-borne infections. Donated blood is then tested for HIV, hepatitis C, syphilis and other infectious diseases.

    Under the new questionnaire, men who have sex with men will be asked about new or multiple partners in the last three months. Those who answer affirmatively to either question and also report having anal sex would be barred from donating until a later date. The policy would also apply to women who have sex with gay or bisexual men.

    The policy mirrors those used in Canada and the U.K.

    “This is a really a significant step forward. It puts us in line with the other countries in the world that have moved to the most inclusive policies that could be supported by the available science,” said Peter Marks, director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, during the agency’s Friday news conference.

    The FDA based its latest proposal on a recent study of 1,600 gay and bisexual men. The FDA-funded research compared the effectiveness of a detailed, personalized questionnaire on sexual behavior to the current time-based abstinence rules.

    It will take several months for blood banks to make the changes, according to Cliff Numark, an executive with Vitalant, a blood center that participated in the study. The changes will require new questionnaires, training for staff and updating computer software.

    The Red Cross said it supports the FDA changes but added that it’s too early to know if they will result in more blood donations.

    Lukas Pietrzak of Washington, D.C., said he eagerly volunteered for the FDA study. He credits emergency blood transfusions with saving his father’s life after a cycling accident in 1991.

    Pietrzak donated blood in high school but became ineligible after becoming sexually active as a gay man.

    “Until I fully came out to my friends, I had to skirt around why I never went to blood drives with them,” says Pietrzak, 26, who now works for the federal government.

    When there are calls for blood donations “now we’re able to be part of that,” Pietrzak said.

    Alexander Tin contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link