ReportWire

Tag: hiring

  • 5 Ways Franchises Can Benefit From Leveraging Offshore Talent | Entrepreneur

    5 Ways Franchises Can Benefit From Leveraging Offshore Talent | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    Emerging franchise brands are laser-focused on growth, and rightfully so. However, growth consumes a lot of cash, and many are undercapitalized and unable to staff adequately in the initial stages of the business. A more nuanced approach to talent acquisition can facilitate success.

    Leveraging offshore talent is a lesser-utilized growth strategy for emerging franchise brands. Outsourcing no longer fills just junior or customer service roles — a common misconception in today’s landscape. Now, high-value, skilled workers are available around the globe to support completing higher-level work. Offshoring helps franchisors proactively hire as part of their growth strategy, instead of staying reactive while conserving cash.

    Historically, I have seen very few brands leverage outsourced labor. However, that is beginning to shift as franchise leaders begin to understand the benefits of having an international talent strategy. There are compelling reasons that fast-growing franchisors can benefit from leveraging offshore talent.

    Related: Your Most Pressing Offshoring Questions, Answered

    1. Access to a broader talent pool

    Talent scarcity persists as a substantial issue that won’t soon go away. It’s becoming harder to find, afford and retain top talent. A ManpowerGroup report revealed that 75% of employers say they have difficulty filling roles, and a study by Korn Ferry found that by 2030, there could be a global talent shortfall of 85 million people — to the tune of $8.5T in unrealized annual revenues if the issue is left unaddressed.

    A shift in the talent procurement process is necessary to address this scarcity. Offshoring provides access to a much broader, global talent pool. Franchises need access to a wide range of skills and expertise that may be limited or fiscally prohibitive in their local markets. Offshoring can be particularly beneficial for more specialized roles within the business.

    2. Cost efficiency and scalability

    A significant outsourcing advantage is cost savings. Offshore talent carries a much lower expense compared to local hiring, with significantly reduced budgets for wages and benefits. With the right offshore talent, work quality won’t be sacrificed. This can be crucial for franchisors that need to maximize their resources during periods of rapid growth.

    It takes a long time for a franchise brand to become royalty-sufficient, which is why growth is especially important for new businesses. As franchises grow, the need for broader skills and additional staff rises. Offshoring provides the flexibility to expand or contract the workforce as needed, without the expense or complexity of hiring locally.

    3. Quality improvement

    Any business in growth mode struggles to hire ahead of the demand curve. Hiring proactively can help franchisors expand their capacity ahead of that curve to maintain high quality, brand value and customer satisfaction. Often, they delay hiring crucial roles or bring on less experienced workers to reduce costs. These are not mutually exclusive.

    Most people think of outsourcing as transactionally delegating low-level tasks that no one wants to do. Instead, franchisors should consider offshoring, hiring skilled workers to fill roles earlier than they could otherwise with domestic workers.

    For example, leveraging offshore talent could mean that domestic employees can take on new roles, such as management responsibilities, expanding capacity and facilitating greater business value.

    4. Round-the-clock operations

    Offshore teams often operate in different time zones. Meaning, they can complete their work outside of the franchise’s local business hours, effectively enabling 24/7 operations.

    Operating with longer hours can significantly increase project turnaround times and improve customer satisfaction.

    5. Leadership focus

    Within growing companies, executives often get mired in operational or administrative details. Through offshoring, franchise executives can affordably find support that relieves operational burdens and allows them to focus on core activities, such as franchise development and strategy and management, which spur growth and expansion. Offshore teams can handle repetitive and time-consuming tasks, which in turn increases organizational efficiency and productivity.

    With this level of support, leaders can expand their bandwidth and add strategic value to the organization.

    Related: Hiring Offshore Talent? Here Are the Top 10 Countries to Recruit From.

    Investing in offshore talent allows room for franchises to grow. Businesses gain access to a wider range of skilled talent, and they can upgrade internal teams and foster leadership capacity and effectiveness. Cost-efficiency and 24/7 service provide much-needed relief to young franchise businesses — and customer service and profitability don’t suffer in the process.

    Offshoring helps growing franchises increase organizational value. The flexibility that engaging today’s offshore talent provides creates a skilled global workforce that fulfills more roles than customer service.

    [ad_2]

    David Nilssen

    Source link

  • University confronted about illegal hiring on racial lines in leaked audio

    University confronted about illegal hiring on racial lines in leaked audio

    [ad_1]

    A psychology professor warned that hiring based on race alone was illegal, even as the University of Washington (UW) psychology department was downgrading white and Asian candidates, an audio recording obtained by Newsweek has shown.

    The university later banned the faculty from hiring tenure-track employees for two years after finding major discrimination in hiring practices.

    In an audio recording of a meeting from March 16, 2023, psychology professor Ione Fine objected to the hiring process in which the first- and second-ranked candidates, who were white and Asian American, respectively, got overlooked in favor of the third-ranked hopeful, who was Black.

    For that to be achieved, a new “threshold” system was introduced in which any candidate could be chosen once they reached a certain level, circumventing the previous practice of hiring the highest-ranking candidate.

    In 1998, Washington state passed a referendum banning race-based hiring in universities, which appears to have been ignored by the psychology department.

    At the meeting, Fine objected to staff having just a 15-minute meeting to approve the decision of the selection committee.

    “I feel like this idea that we are just deciding on candidates above threshold is a huge change in what we are looking at as a department and I think it should be something that we discuss as a faculty, not something that is decided by the planning committee,” Fine told the meeting.

    She added: “I personally am in favor of affirmative action but we are legally not allowed to do it. I actually think we do owe the taxpayers who pay our salaries—the fact that it is illegal and has been democratically decided to be illegal by the taxpayers.”

    Students at the University of Washington are pictured on March 6, 2020, in Seattle, Washington. The university has banned its psychology department from hiring tenure-track employees for two years after finding discrimination against white and Asian candidates.
    Karen Ducey/Getty Images

    “So can you explain how we are respecting taxpayers? How are we not doing a [work-] around on what we are legally supposed to do?” she asked.

    In response, a member of the selection committee denied that they were hiring based on race alone.

    “This is not kind of like we are giving someone a position because of their identity. We have three extremely qualified candidates and we are making a strategic offer based on what the department has deemed the most important … so that is not at all what is happening,” the committee member told Fine.

    Fine’s objections came one month before the Black candidate was hired after some Black faculty members urged that she be hired over the white candidate, who was then downgraded from first to third in the rankings.

    Newsweek previously reported the university’s comment that “an internal whistleblower” exposed the discrimination. We can now reveal that the internal whistleblower was Fine, who specializes in the psychology of blindness and other areas of research.

    An internal report discovered the discrimination in hiring procedures.

    Other violations included the absence of white staff from meetings with job candidates, deleting a passage from a hiring report to hide discrimination, and discussing ways to “think our way around” a Supreme Court ruling that banned affirmative action in colleges.

    A UW spokeswoman told Newsweek on January 3 that the case was exposed when “the dean of the College of Arts & Sciences, responding to an internal whistleblower, requested an internal review of this process by what was then called UCIRO (University Complaints, Investigation and Resolution Office) and is now the Civil Rights Investigation Office.”

    The UW report found that when five finalists for a tenure-track assistant professor position were selected in January 2023, they were due to be interviewed by the Women Faculty and Faculty of Color groups so they could assess the general atmosphere of the faculty.

    The report said a member of the Faculty of Color did not want any white women at the meeting and complained that the interviews were “awkward” when there was a white candidate. The names of everyone involved are redacted from the UW report.