ReportWire

Tag: hemp

  • Texas Works to Save Its Hemp Beverage Industry

    Texas works to save its hemp beverage industry amid federal uncertainty and booming sales in convenience stores and liquor retailers.

    Texas works to save its hemp beverage industry as it is at a crossroads as it moves to preserve a booming hemp beverage industry. The state finds itself caught between evolving state regulations and looming federal restrictions. What started as a niche segment of the hemp market has quickly become a mainstream category, with hemp-derived drinks now available on convenience store shelves and even at large liquor retailers like Total Wine & More. Yet lawmakers in Austin and policymakers in Washington are locked in a debate which could redefine the future of this sector.

    RELATED: The Rebel Heart Of The South Includes Cannabis And Rock

    The hemp beverage market took off in Texas following the 2018 federal Farm Bill, which legalized hemp and its derivatives with limited amounts of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the psychoactive compound found in cannabis. Without clear federal guidelines specifically addressing consumable products, hemp drink manufacturers expanded rapidly — forming a product category that includes seltzers, sodas and “zero alcohol, buzz-oriented” beverages that appeal to adults seeking alternatives to traditional alcoholic drinks. These products often provide mild psychoactive effects, making them especially attractive to consumers who want a social buzz without the calories, hangovers or legal complexities of alcohol.

    Major brands have taken notice. Hemp-derived beverages from companies such as Bayou Beverage, hi Seltzer and Wana Brands have secured distribution deals with Total Wine & More, bringing THC-infused seltzers and sparkling drinks to hundreds of stores nationwide, including locations in Texas. These offerings deliver carefully measured doses of hemp-derived THC, often paired with cannabidiol (CBD) or other cannabinoids, positioned as adult recreational or relaxation beverages. The presence of these products in both convenience marts and big-box liquor stores signals how quickly the category has transcended its counterculture origins to enter mainstream retail channels.

    Yet that mainstream success has heightened scrutiny. At the state level, Texas lawmakers have grappled with how to regulate — or even whether to allow — intoxicating hemp products. Earlier legislative proposals sought a total ban on THC-containing hemp products, which business groups warned would dismantle a roughly $5 billion industry supporting tens of thousands of jobs. Critics of the ban argued that restrictive laws would push consumers toward unregulated black-market products while depriving adults of legally recognized alternatives.

    Gov. Greg Abbott’s administration vetoed an outright ban and directed regulators to create a workable regulatory framework, leading the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission to finalize rules requiring age verification and setting ongoing rule-making processes to oversee consumable hemp products. These regulations mirror some alcohol industry controls, such as restricting sales to adults 21 and over.

    RELATED: Marijuana Use And Guy’s Member

    Complicating matters further is federal action. Legislation passed by the U.S. Senate is poised to impose strict THC limits on hemp products nationally, effectively outlawing most of the current hemp beverage offerings when it takes effect in 2026. This shift would place Texas’s state-level market directly at odds with federal law, potentially forcing companies to reformulate products or face legal challenges.

    For consumers, hemp beverages represent a growing lifestyle trend. Their positioning as an alternative to alcohol resonates with adults who are cutting back on traditional drinking but still want social experiences or relaxation. As the market and regulatory landscapes evolve, Texas stands as a bellwether for how states and the federal government will balance innovation, public safety and commercial growth in an increasingly popular segment of the beverage world.

    Anthony Washington

    Source link

  • Is CBD Next On The Fed’s Hit List

    Is CBD next on the fed’s hit list amid slow cannabis reform, hemp restrictions, and rising regulatory pressure?

    For more than a decade, cannabis policy in the United States has moved at a glacial pace. Despite widespread public support, state-level legalization, and the emergence of a multibillion-dollar industry, federal reform has remained slow, fragmented, and often contradictory. That pattern has now raised a new and uncomfortable question across the wellness, agriculture, and retail sectors: Is CBD next on the fed’s hit list?

    RELATED: Cannabis Can Help PTSD

    The story begins with cannabis itself. While a majority of states have legalized medical or adult-use marijuana, federal law continues to classify cannabis as a Schedule I substance. Efforts to reschedule or deschedule cannabis have been announced, delayed, studied, and revisited, creating regulatory uncertainty touching everything from banking and research to interstate commerce. This slow walking of cannabis reform from both the current and past president has rippled outward, ensnaring industries once thought to be safely separated from marijuana.

    Hemp was supposed to be different. Federally legalized in the 2018 Farm Bill, hemp was championed as an agricultural and economic opportunity, particularly for struggling rural communities. No one played a more visible role in hemp’s return than Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, who made the crop a centerpiece of his push to revive farm economies in deeply red regions of the state. For Kentucky farmers, hemp was not a culture-war issue but a pragmatic replacement for declining tobacco revenues and shrinking commodity margins.

    Kentucky quickly became one of the nation’s leading hemp producers, investing in processing facilities, research partnerships, and pilot programs tied to CBD extraction. The political history makes the current regulatory climate especially fraught. As lawmakers debate tightening hemp definitions and closing cannabinoid “loopholes,” the consequences would land not just on coastal wellness brands, but on farmers in conservative states that were encouraged to plant hemp under federal guidance.

    CBD now sits at the center of this tension. Initially promoted as a non-intoxicating compound with potential wellness applications, CBD products flooded the market in everything from oils and capsules to beverages and pet treats. Yet the Food and Drug Administration has repeatedly declined to recognize CBD as a lawful dietary supplement, while also failing to propose a clear alternative regulatory pathway. The result has been a gray market defined by warning letters, uneven enforcement, and growing risk for compliant businesses.

    At the same time, proposed revisions to the Farm Bill have raised alarms across the hemp industry. Efforts to restrict intoxicating hemp-derived products may be politically popular, but critics warn that overly broad language could effectively ban or severely limit CBD itself. For farmers, processors, and retailers, this would represent a dramatic reversal of federal policy—one that undermines years of investment encouraged by Washington.

    RELATED: Is Cannabis Now The #1 Sleep Aid

    What makes this moment particularly striking is the broader landscape of U.S. health policy. Regulators increasingly emphasize harm reduction and data-driven decision-making. Cannabis is widely acknowledged to be less harmful than many legal substances, and CBD has been studied for potential therapeutic uses. Yet instead of clarity, the industry faces contraction and prohibition by attrition.

    And throughout these shifts, one category remains largely untouched. Despite well-documented links between alcohol and chronic disease, addiction, and public safety risks, alcohol continues to enjoy stable federal treatment and powerful political insulation. While cannabis is slow-walked, hemp is narrowed, and CBD faces mounting pressure, alcohol remains fully normalized and aggressively marketed.

    As federal health policies evolve and cannabis reform continues to stall, the question is no longer whether CBD will be regulated, but whether it will be regulated out of existence—leaving behind farmers, including those in Kentucky’s heartland, who answered the call to grow a crop Washington once promised was safe.

    Terry Hacienda

    Source link

  • What The Polymarket Says About Cannabis Rescheduling And More

    Markets reveal expectations on weed policy, Greenland, Bond, and beyond in what the polymarket says about cannabis rescheduling and more.

    Prediction markets have quietly become one of the most closely watched indicators of public expectations, and few platforms illustrate this better than Polymarket. Built on blockchain technology, Polymarket allows users to wager on real-world outcomes ranging from elections and public policy to pop culture and geopolitics. The resulting prices act as a constantly updating forecast, reflecting how traders collectively assess the likelihood of major events. Here is what the polymarket says about cannabis rescheduling and more.

    RELATED: Why Is Yawning Contagious

    One of the most closely followed policy questions on the platform has been whether the United States will reschedule cannabis under federal law. Markets asking whether marijuana would be moved out of Schedule I during 2025 collapsed to near zero by year’s end. Even contracts extending into early 2026 show limited optimism, with implied probabilities remaining in the single digits. Despite growing bipartisan rhetoric and widespread state-level legalization, traders appear unconvinced federal agencies will act quickly. The market suggests skepticism administrative or political hurdles will be resolved in the near term.

    Another surprising area of activity involves Greenland. Polymarket users have actively traded contracts speculating on whether the United States will acquire Greenland before the end of the decade. While the odds remain well below 50 percent, they have at times climbed into the low-to-mid teens, driven by renewed media attention on Arctic security, rare-earth minerals, and strategic shipping routes. The presence of meaningful trading volume indicates many participants see Greenland as more than a fringe geopolitical thought experiment.

    Beyond policy and geopolitics, Polymarket has become a venue for cultural forecasting. One of its most popular entertainment markets centers on who will be cast as the next James Bond. Following the conclusion of Daniel Craig’s run as 007, traders have assigned varying odds to a shortlist of actors rumored to be under consideration. While no single candidate commands overwhelming confidence, the market fluctuates rapidly with casting rumors, studio comments, and betting activity tied to press speculation surrounding the James Bond franchise and its future direction.

    Financial markets are also a major focus. Bitcoin price targets routinely attract large pools of liquidity, with traders betting on whether the cryptocurrency will reach specific milestones by set dates. These markets often respond instantly to macroeconomic news, regulatory announcements, and shifts in institutional sentiment. Observers note that Polymarket’s Bitcoin odds frequently move faster than traditional analyst forecasts, offering a real-time snapshot of market psychology.

    RELATED: The Rebel Heart Of The South Includes Cannabis And Rock

    Taken together, these bets highlight how Polymarket has evolved into a broader forecasting tool rather than a novelty platform. Unlike opinion polls or expert panels, prediction markets force participants to quantify their beliefs with capital at risk. While they are not guarantees of future outcomes, they provide a useful signal of how informed traders interpret available information.

    From cannabis reform and Arctic geopolitics to the future of James Bond and cryptocurrency prices, Polymarket’s odds offer a revealing glimpse into what people truly think will happen next — not just what they say publicly, but what they are willing to bet on.

    Anthony Washington

    Source link

  • Congress Rides To The Rescue Of Your Favorite Hemp Drink

    Congress rides to the rescue of your favorite hemp drink, delaying bans, sparking debates, and keeping America’s buzzy beverages flowing.

    For a brief, buzzy moment, it looked like America’s favorite chill-in-a-can was about to get iced out by Washington. But it now seems Congress rides to the rescue of your favorite hemp drink.

    Tucked deep inside the sprawling, ironically nicknamed “big beautiful bill,” Congress quietly slammed the brakes on hemp-derived drinks. The low-dose THC seltzers and mocktail alternatives have exploded in popularity from Austin patios to suburban dinner parties. With a few lines of legislative fine print, lawmakers effectively banned products derived from federally legal hemp, sending shockwaves through the beverage industry and confusing consumers who had no idea their sparkling lemon-lime was suddenly controversial.

    RELATED: The Best Cocktails For Holiday Day Drinking

    And yet, just as quickly as the ban arrived, Congress appears to be backing off—at least for now.

    Hemp drinks didn’t become popular by accident. As Americans continue drifting away from alcohol, these beverages hit a cultural sweet spot: social, functional, low-dose, and hangover-free. They offer a gentle buzz without the baggage, making them especially appealing to health-conscious consumers, professionals, and anyone tired of next-day regrets.

    Nowhere has this trend been louder—or more ironic—than Texas. Despite the state’s famously strict cannabis laws, hemp-derived THC drinks have flourished thanks to federal loopholes allowing products made from legal hemp. From Houston to Dallas to Austin, these drinks line bar menus, brewery fridges, and convenience store shelves. Texans, it turns out, like their rebellion cold and carbonated.

    Photo by GeorgePeters/Getty Images

    So who pulled the plug? The opposition to hemp drinks largely comes from a coalition of alcohol interests, prohibition-minded lawmakers, and regulators uneasy about how quickly the category has grown. Their argument: hemp drinks exploit a loophole, blur regulatory lines, and lack oversight. Critics warn of inconsistent dosing, youth access, and a marketplace moving faster than the rules designed to govern it.

    Supporters counter that this “loophole” is simply the law as written—and that hemp drinks are often more transparent, responsibly dosed, and safer than alcohol.

    Now comes the unexpected plot twist.

    Facing backlash from small businesses, farmers, distributors, and consumers—not to mention states suddenly staring at enforcement chaos—Congress has opted to delay the ban. Rather than pulling hemp drinks off shelves overnight, lawmakers are pressing pause, buying time to reassess how (or whether) these products should be regulated.

    RELATED: Upgrade Your Gift Game and Avoid the Lame

    For fans of hemp drinks, this is a temporary stay of execution—and possibly a sign of something bigger.

    The delay doesn’t mean the issue is settled. It means Congress has recognized banning a fast-growing, wildly popular category without a clear alternative may create more problems than it solves. Regulation, not eradication, is now back on the table.

    For now, your favorite hemp drink survives—still fizzy, still legal, still very much part of America’s evolving relationship with alcohol alternatives. Whether Congress ultimately becomes the hero of this story or just buys time for another showdown remains to be seen.

    But one thing is clear: hemp drinks aren’t going quietly.

    And Congress just learned banning America’s buzz—especially in Texas—isn’t as easy as it sounds.

    Anthony Washington

    Source link

  • What’s Next for Cannabis in 2026

    What’s next for cannabis in 2026 a look at federal policy, medical research, hemp drinks and state action.

    The U.S. cannabis industry enters the new year at a crossroads, shaped by federal policy debates, state-level legislative reviews and growing public acceptance of marijuana as both a consumer product and a medical treatment. While sweeping legalization remains uneven, the year ahead could bring some of the most consequential changes the industry has seen in decades. So what’s next for cannabis in 2026.

    At the center of the national conversation is whether marijuana will be rescheduled under federal law. Currently classified as a Schedule I substance — alongside heroin — cannabis is defined as having no accepted medical use. That designation has long conflicted with state medical programs and emerging scientific research.

    RELATED: Cannabis Can Help PTSD

    Federal agencies are now formally reviewing whether marijuana should be moved to Schedule III, a change would acknowledge medical value and significantly alter how cannabis businesses are taxed and regulated. A rescheduling decision would not legalize marijuana nationwide, but it could ease restrictions on research, improve access to banking services and remove a major tax burden faced by licensed operators.

    While momentum has grown, federal officials have not finalized a decision, making 2026 a critical year to watch for regulatory clarity.

    Photo by Anton Petrus/Getty Images

    Another major issue unfolding in 2026 involves hemp-derived THC beverages, which surged in popularity as alcohol alternatives. These drinks, often sold outside licensed cannabis dispensaries, exist in a gray area created by the 2018 Farm Bill.

    New federal and state proposals aim to redefine what qualifies as legal hemp, potentially restricting or eliminating intoxicating hemp products altogether. Some states are moving to regulate hemp drinks like alcohol, while others are considering outright bans.

    The outcome could reshape the beverage market, impact small hemp businesses and determine whether THC drinks remain widely available or move exclusively into regulated cannabis systems.

    If federal rescheduling moves forward, it is expected to unlock greater medical research funding and streamline approval for clinical trials. For decades, cannabis research has lagged due to regulatory hurdles.

    Medical professionals and researchers are increasingly studying cannabis for its potential benefits in treating or alleviating symptoms related to:

    • Chronic and neuropathic pain
    • Cancer-related nausea and appetite loss
    • Epilepsy and seizure disorders
    • Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
    • Multiple sclerosis
    • Anxiety and sleep disorders
    • Inflammatory and autoimmune conditions

    More funding could lead to standardized dosing, clearer safety guidelines and wider acceptance within mainstream medicine.

    RELATED: Is Cannabis Now The #1 Sleep Aid

    At the state level, cannabis remains a legislative priority in 2026. Several states are reviewing or carrying over bills related to legalization, medical expansion or criminal justice reform.

    Among those under active consideration are Pennsylvania, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Texas, each weighing changes ranging from expanded medical access to reduced penalties for possession. While not all proposals are expected to pass, the continued debate reflects shifting public opinion and political pressure.

    Taken together, 2026 could mark a turning point for cannabis in the United States. Federal rescheduling, tighter hemp regulation, increased medical research and renewed state legislative efforts suggest a slow but steady move toward normalization — even as legal contradictions persist.

    For consumers, patients and policymakers alike, the year ahead will help determine whether cannabis continues its gradual integration into American medicine, commerce and culture — or remains caught between reform and restriction.

    Terry Hacienda

    Source link

  • It’s high time to close the synthesized THC hemp legal loophole | Opinion

    The industry is loaded with bad actors selling intoxicating, largely unregulated products.

    The industry is loaded with bad actors selling intoxicating, largely unregulated products.

    AFP via Getty Images

    End run

    The U.S. hemp industry brought the federal ban on itself by repeatedly fighting attempts at regulation. Thirty-nine state and territorial attorneys general recently submitted a letter to the Justice Department in support of the ban, including some from states where cannabis is legal. That should tell us something.

    The industry is loaded with bad actors selling highly intoxicating THC synthesized from hemp. Makers of hemp products thought they could circumvent decades of established law with a loophole and a chemistry set. It doesn’t work that way, as they’re finding out.

    – Michael Moreland, Arlington

    Editor’s note: Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton did not sign the letter.

    Meet needs

    The Star-Telegram’s reporting shows how close to the edge many Fort Worth single mothers live. When more than one-third of single mothers with young children in Tarrant County are in poverty — and some neighborhoods approach 70% — every bit of support matters. (Nov. 16, 1A, “Report looks at how to help Tarrant County’s single mothers”) Rent takes more than half their income, child care is scarce and many lack health insurance.

    Cuts and tighter eligibility rules for Medicaid and SNAP in the One Big Beautiful Bill threaten the families highlighted in this report. Losing Medicaid means more mothers and children without basic care. Losing SNAP means less money for groceries in a city where food banks are already stretched thin. And as we saw during the federal government shutdown, even brief SNAP delays push families into crisis.

    Fort Worth single mothers work hard to keep their families afloat. Congress should strengthen Medicaid, SNAP and housing programs — not weaken them.

    – Craig C. Roshaven, Fort Worth

    Look at Houston

    In his Nov. 16 column “Weak arguments against state’s Fort Worth ISD takeover ignore a crisis” (6C), Ryan Rusak offers zero reasons that a state takeover of Fort Worth ISD would be effective. He calls for trust in a process overseen by a governor unabashedly hell-bent on supporting private and charter schools over public ones.

    Parents resisting the Texas Education Agency takeover care deeply about students in the Fort Worth district, where my own kids attend . We know a takeover is not the solution. It has already caused uncertainty and chaos , distracting from the marked progress under Superintendent Karen Molinar.

    We’ve seen what happened when the state took over the Houston ISD, and we know that test scores do not paint the full picture. Students and teachers are leaving that district at a significantly higher rate than they did before the takeover. If it was so effective, why?

    – Zach Leonard, Fort Worth

    Editor’s note: The writer is president of Families Organized and Resisting Takeover and wrote this on behalf of the group’s board.

    Tough love

    The state was right to take over the Fort Worth school district. Houston ISD appears to be an example of getting it done. I fear elected school board members eventually will return that district to personal fiefdoms and make it awful again.

    My parents divorced when I was 10, and I frequently switched schools. While my math skills were above average, my reading and writing skills were not. By the time I was 13 and back with my mom, they lagged so badly that I never caught up.

    Today, I’m a certified public accountant. Fort Worth, Houston and other struggling school districts have many students like me. Schools need tough love, and some students need to repeat grades until they can read and write at grade level.

    – Harvey Nelson, Katy

    Source link

  • Smoke shops in Philly suburbs mislead consumers by selling ‘straight-up marijuana,’ district attorney says

    Hundreds of unregulated smoke shops that sell hemp products in the Philadelphia suburbs use fraudulent lab reports that leave their customers “dangerously uninformed” about the potency of the drugs they’re taking, according to a Montgomery County grand jury report released Thursday.

    The 10-month investigation led by the district attorneys of Montgomery, Bucks and Chester counties examined a patchwork of businesses launched in recent years to take advantage of federal laws that allow hemp products to be sold legally with low levels of THC, the psychoactive ingredient in cannabis.


    MORE: Intercity bus terminal on Filbert Street to be renovated and reopened in 2026


    Montgomery County District Attorney Kevin Steele said an “unintended consequence” of the 2018 Farm Bill is that unregulated smoke shops now sell a wide range of products that they claim meet legal standards but are actually much stronger than advertised.

    “What we found in a lot of them is they’re selling straight-up marijuana,” Steele said at a news conference Thursday.

    Narcotics detectives from all three counties went undercover to purchase products from smoke shops and have them lab-tested for potency. More than 90% of the edibles, THC vapes and loose flower products that were analyzed exceeded federal standards, the grand jury found, and many were mislabeled or backed by dubious certificates from suppliers.

    “This deception means that adults and children alike are exposed to substances whose potency and risks are hidden from view,” the report says.

    Steele said the most troubling facet of the smoke shop industry is that the products are often marketed toward children and can be sold to anyone who walks through the door. Some shops also carry other intoxicating products, including kratom and tianeptine, that have been associated with hospitalizations and substance abuse issues. 

    The grand jury report details nine times in the past year children were sickened after ingesting THC products commonly sold at smoke shops. 

    “They’re selling illegal products without oversight, and without concern for the health of Pennsylvanians, especially without regard for the health of our children,” Steele said.

    The 107-page report calls on state lawmakers to impose standards for product safety and testing at accredited labs, establish an age limit of 21 for THC products, and regulate the marketing of THC products with the same rigor applied to tobacco and nicotine. The report also urges lawmakers to create clear definitions of marijuana derivatives — such as Delta-8, Delta-10 and THCA — to prevent them from being sold under the banner of “legal hemp.”

    Steele said Montgomery County’s 240 smoke shops now outnumber schools and have turned fuzzy federal hemp laws into big business.

    “People are hiding behind that, saying this is Farm Bill compliant,” he said.

    Steele was joined Thursday by Bucks County District Attorney Jennifer Schorn and Chester County District Attorney Chris de Barrena-Sarobe, who said the deceptive practices of smoke shops are “flagrant” and “unsustainable.”

    In Chester County, De Barrena-Sarobe said he’s already issued 16 search warrants at smoke shops, arrested some lawbreakers and seized more than half a million dollars in cash and other proceeds. Steele said his office has taken similar actions when illegal activities are found.

    “People that are selling drugs out of their stores — selling marijuana, that’s a felony,” Steele said. “If you continue on in this way, plan on getting arrested.”

    The grand jury report comes against the backdrop of Pennsylvania’s halting efforts to legalize recreational marijuana, a move that would create clear standards and a licensing process for sales of the drug, amid a monthslong budget standoff in Harrisburg. Some lawmakers hope to first establish a cannabis control board to lay the groundwork that would address the sale of marijuana derivatives.

    Steele said the problems found at smoke shops are separate from the state’s licensed medical marijuana dispensaries, noting that their business has been impacted by unregulated stores that circumvent taxes and other restrictions on cannabis.

    Last week, Pennsylvania Attorney General Dave Sunday joined colleagues across the country in a joint letter calling on Congress to close the loophole that has allowed “intoxicating hemp-derived THC products” to flourish at businesses that “pursue profits at the expense of public safety and health.”

    Steele said smoke shops in the region are getting away with selling products that don’t even hide their appeal to kids and teens. He displayed a photo from the grand jury report showing packages of edible THC products found at shops in the area.

    “You’ve got Cheetos with marijuana leaves on it,” he said.

    Michael Tanenbaum

    Source link

  • Cannabis In Candy And Other Halloween Myths

    Debunking cannabis in candy and other Halloween myths: what parents really need to know

    Curious about the cannabis in candy and other Halloween myths? Every autumn, a familiar rumor surfaces on social media and in group texts: “Someone’s handing out weed candy to trick‑or‑treaters.” But here’s the short version: no credible evidence supports the claim. What’s actually going on is a modern twist on a long history of candy‑tampering folklore.

    RELATED: Google Could Help You Pick A Halloween Costume

    Long before cannabis entered the public conversation, concerns about Halloween treats were dominated by tales of razor blades hidden in apples, pins in chocolates, or poison in candy. Those fears are largely urban legend.

    Where did it start? By the late 19th and early 20th centuries, as candy production grew industrial, some doctors and commentators began warning food adulteration was a hidden menace. The shift from small‑scale confectioners to mass manufacturing fueled distrust of what lurked inside sweets. In 1959, a California dentist, Dr. William Shyne, distributed laxative pills to trick‑or‑treaters in candy coatings—more prank than poison, but it entered the lore.

    In 1970, a New York Times op‑ed asked whether the “plump red apple” might conceal a razor blade, feeding parental fear.

    The most infamous case came in 1974, when an 8‑year‑old in Texas died after consuming a Pixy Stix laced with cyanide. But the twist is the child’s own father, Ronald Clark O’Bryan, was convicted—and later executed—for planting the poison to camouflage a murder as a “random” trick‑or‑treat crime.

    Folklorists like Joel Best have traced dozens of reports of candy tampering from 1958 to 1983; but after investigation, none could be confirmed as a stranger’s random act of harm. Many turned out to be misattributed, hoaxes, or even children themselves adding dangerous objects and calling attention to it.

    Over time, the razor‑blade apple myth became a cultural shorthand for parental anxiety. Ironically, apples were once common Halloween treats (candied or caramel apples). But the myth contributed to their decline as mass “give‑aways.”

    RELATED: Best Ways To Reduce Your Halloween Hangover

    The razor blade story is far from the only tale in the haunted folklore of Halloween sweets. Some of the persistent legends include:

    1. Needles or pins in candy bars: Occasionally reported, but often traced to local pranks or “copycats” rather than sinister strangers.
    2. Poisoned candy or drug‑laced treats: Tales of cyanide, lye, or drugs in sweets persist. But documented cases of poisoning via “random Halloween candy” are effectively non‑existent.
    3. “Blue star” lollipop tattoos or poisoned tattoos: A variant rumor claims temporary tattoos handed out include psychoactive or toxic compounds—another version in the “urban legend about drugs” canon.
    4. Mass poison scares tied to other events: For instance, after the 1982 Tylenol poisoning scandal (cyanide in over‑the‑counter pills), public fear of tainted consumables spiked—including Halloween candy warnings.

    These legends flourish because of what folklorists call availability cascade—when a vivid fear is repeated often, people assume it must be true.

    Cannabis In Candy And Other Halloween Myths

    So where did the weed candy myth come from? It’s essentially a new costume draped over an old scare. As legal cannabis markets have emerged, the idea someone might hide THC or marijuana edibles in trick‑or‑treat bags has gained traction online — yet it fails under scrutiny:

    • No documented cases. No credible report shows strangers distributing cannabis treats to kids on Halloween.
    • Cost is prohibitive. Legal THC edibles are expensive under regulation and taxation—handing out full doses to many kids isn’t cheap.
    • Strict regulation and packaging. Dispensaries are required to use child‑resistant packaging, labeling, and maintain records—anonymously distributing to random children would breach every rule.
    • Severe legal risk. Distributing THC to minors is criminal; any plausible motive is overshadowed by the consequences.
    • Counterfeit vs. real product confusion. Some rumors mix in fake or illegal edibles mimicking mainstream candy, creating fear, but they are not part of regulated cannabis commerce.

    RELATED: Perfect Drinks For These 5 Classic Horror Films

    Derived from older tampering myths and amplified by digital echo chambers, the cannabis candy scare is a modern variant—but one without substance.

    A practical Halloween safety checklist might include: supervise routes, cross at well‑lit streets, have children wait until home to open candy, discard unwrapped or suspicious items, and of course, check for choking risks or allergens.

    The myth someone is secretly giving cannabis candy to unsuspecting trick‑or‑treaters is more frightening than factual. It’s a modern reincarnation of a much older folklore of tainted treats, one built on fear, not evidence. The razor in the apple may be a chilling image, but it remains a legend, not a reality. This Halloween, the real risk is not a phantom dose of THC—but a car, a broken sidewalk, or too much sugar.

    Let’s protect kids with real caution, not ghost stories.

    Amy Hansen

    Source link

  • Hemp Is Being Helped By GOP Senator

    Hemp is being helped by GOP Senator Rand Paul, boldly tying government funding to hemp’s survival

    In a surprising twist of Senate strategy, hemp is being helped by GOP Senator. Randy Paul has positioned himself as the unlikely champion of hemp — threatening to keep the federal government shutdown alive unless protections for the industry are secured. With the Republican Party controlling the White House, the Senate and the House of Representatives, this move shows how intra-party battlegrounds can shape policy and put unexpected players into the spotlight.

    RELATED: Immersive Events Redefine Millennial Nights

    With Republicans holding the presidency oand congress, the GOP nominally holds the power to end the shutdown. But power isn’t the same as unity. While GOP leaders are pushing to fund the government, the details of what gets included in the continuing resolution remain hotly contested. Sen. Paul has effectively leveraged that dynamic by tying the fate of government-funding legislation to the fate of hemp policy.

    Paul warned that unless the hemp industry’s interests — particularly around hemp-derived THC products — are expressly protected, he may withhold his support for bringing the government back online. According to industry coverage, he’s told leadership that “we can do this the easy way or the hard way. The easy way is I give my consent, and the hard way is I don’t.” The result: a fresh sense that even with unified Republican control, the party must manage internal dissent if it hopes to reopen the government.

    Back in 2018, the Hemp Farming Act of 2018 (part of the larger Farm Bill) removed hemp — defined as cannabis sativa with less than 0.3 % THC — from Schedule I drug status, opening the door for industrial uses and new product development. Since then, the hemp industry has evolved far beyond fiber and seed. Now, hemp-derived cannabinoid products — including gummies, beverages, extracts and even low-dose THC items — have flooded the market, gaining significant consumer traction.

    One of the key sticking points in Washington is the proposed language in appropriations bills that would redefine “hemp” by eliminating any “quantifiable amount” of THC or THC-adjacent cannabinoids. The industry argues that such a definition would effectively bury the current hemp-derived products sector. Paul, fending for his state’s hemp farmers, said a tighter definition would “devastate” Kentucky’s hemp economy.

    RELATED: The Connection Between Country Music And Cannabis

    It’s not just niche farms anymore. Hemp-derived products are moving into mainstream retail channels and becoming a consumer trend. For instance, Total Wine & More now features hemp-derived THC beverages and other innovative hemp products on shelves, marking a signifier of how widely accepted the category has become. Retail articles highlight that “mainstream retailers like … Total Wine … are joining the THC Beverage Retail Revolution, signaling that hemp-derived cannabis drinks have officially entered the mainstream.” The combination of broad availability and elevated consumer demand helps explain why Paul is motivated to keep fighting for protections — this isn’t a fringe industry anymore.

    Paul’s core demand: don’t let the appropriations process or continuing resolution sneak in language that guts hemp-derived products by redefining hemp in a way that would ban many existing products. Instead, he proposes that Congress delay sweeping changes, conduct studies, and give the industry breathing room. Marijuana Moment+1
    For the hemp industry — and for retailers — the stakes are high. A ban on “any quantifiable THC” could force many products off shelves, disrupt supply chains, jeopardize investments and cost farmers and businesses tens or hundreds of millions of dollars.

    Photo by traffic_analyzer/Getty Images

    For younger and middle-aged consumers, this isn’t just about farmers and policy wonks. Hemp-derived products tie into wellness trends (CBD, functional beverages), alternative consumables (micro-dose THC drinks), and retail culture (finding such items in familiar stores). The mainstream move of hemp means suddenly your local beverage aisle or specialty store might carry hemp-derived options alongside other lifestyle products.
    So when Paul threatens to use a shutdown as leverage, it’s more than politics — it’s about whether your next casual drink could be a hemp-derived beverage, or whether those products could vanish or shift dramatically in how they’re regulated.

    As the shutdown drags on and GOP leadership wrestles internal divisions, Paul’s blockade of hemp-related changes creates a scenario where even a party with full control doesn’t necessarily have full command of the agenda. If he holds out, the shutdown could persist until either leadership makes a deal on hemp — or until Paul relents.
    For hemp brands, retailers and consumers, the message is: Washington is watching. The definition of hemp, the regulation of THC-adjacent products and the channels of mainstream retail are all in flux. Millennials who have embraced hemp as lifestyle, beverage or wellness category should keep their eye on Capitol Hill — because their everyday options might hinge on how this fight resolves.

    In the land of majority rule, one senator is reminding his party control doesn’t equal consensus — and the hemp industry just became the rope he’s pulling on.

    Terry Hacienda

    Source link

  • Tennessee alcohol wholesalers are grabbing control of the state’s hemp market

    Few things are more difficult to eradicate in our system of modern governance than a government-sanctioned monopoly or oligopoly. A recently passed bill in Tennessee, which will allow the state’s alcohol wholesalers to take over hemp distribution in the state, shows that these monopolies are not only difficult to eliminate but also often attempt to expand their reach.    

    The new law sets up a distribution system for hemp—which was legalized at the federal level in the 2018 Farm Bill—that mirrors the notorious three-tier system for alcohol distribution, which requires producers, wholesalers, and retailers to be legally separate entities. The three-tier system restricts producers and suppliers from selling directly to their customers and mandates that they work through a wholesaler to reach the market. This allows wholesalers to operate as functional monopolies or oligopolies in certain parts of states where only one or two wholesalers operate.

    The law, which takes effect on January 1, 2026, also requires all wholesalers and retailers of hemp products to maintain a physical presence within the state. Out-of-state hemp suppliers will be prohibited from engaging in direct-to-consumer shipping to customers in Tennessee, and instead will be forced to work through the state’s wholesaler and retailer tiers. While in-state Tennessee hemp suppliers cannot ship their products to Tennesseans either, they are able to sell on-site directly to their customers, providing a workaround to avoid the three-tier system.

    Cornbread Hemp, a Kentucky hemp supplier that recorded $1 million in Tennessee-based sales last year, is challenging the new law in federal court. Cornbread Hemp argues that Tennessee’s law unconstitutionally discriminates against out-of-state competitors in favor of in-state businesses, which is a violation of the Constitution’s Dormant Commerce Clause.

    Supreme Court observers will recognize how closely the case mirrors Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Association v. Thomas (2019). In the case, the majority struck down Tennessee’s requirement that applicants for alcohol wholesaling or retailing licenses must have resided in the state for over two years, finding it to be unconstitutional discrimination against out-of-state economic interests.

    Tennessee’s constitutional rationale for residency requirements in the hemp context is even weaker than with alcohol. The main constitutional defense in support of residency requirements for alcohol is that the 21st Amendment, which repealed Prohibition, devolved alcohol regulation back down to the state and local level. States, therefore, argue that the Constitution’s recognition of state power in the alcohol arena should inoculate residency clauses from Dormant Commerce Clause challenges. While some lower courts have continued to buy this argument, the Supreme Court has refused to go along in recent decades.

    As liquor attorney Sean O’Leary notes, the 21st Amendment allows a discriminatory state law in the alcohol context to face a lower level of constitutional scrutiny than a non-alcohol law. The argument essentially boils down to: Alcohol is uniquely treated under the U.S. Constitution. Hemp has no corollary to the 21st Amendment, meaning a discriminatory hemp law will face a higher level of constitutional scrutiny.

    Now alcohol wholesalers—already a government-sanctioned oligopoly or monopoly in many locales—are trying to expand their control beyond alcohol. The new law makes this power grab particularly blatant, since it moves hemp from under the purview of the Tennessee Department of Agriculture to the state Alcoholic Beverage Commission.

    In fact, this change was made “at the behest of the wholesaler lobby,” O’Leary notes. “The wholesaler’s goal is to mandate a three-tier system where they get a piece of the action.” He predicts that, given the power of the alcohol wholesaler lobby in state capitals across America, more state legislatures will be following Tennessee’s lead.

    C. Jarrett Dieterle

    Source link

  • Can Gummies Bring Down Election Anxiety

    Can Gummies Bring Down Election Anxiety

    Tensions are high, but can hemp, CBD, or cannabis gummies help you relax – especially with microdosing?

    The American Psychological Association recent poll should 69% of American’s are experiencing anxiety about the election. Compared with the previous two presidential elections, stress related to the 2024 election was slightly higher than in 2020 (69% vs. 68%) but significantly higher than in 2016 (52%). Stress related to the current election appeared to be driven, in part, by the potential consequences from the election results.  The barrage of news, memes, friends complain is making it hard on people’s mind and body. Can gummies bring down election anxiety?

    Anxiety can cause feelings of fear, dread, or uneasiness, and can make it hard to concentrate or make decisions. People with anxiety may also feel irritable, tense, or restless, and may have a sense of impending danger, panic, or doom. Not only does it leave you feeling miserable, it can interfere with your job and relationships. A short term solution may come from the cannabis plant. Can gummies bring down election anxiety?

    Studies have shown the cannabis plant can help with a variety of medical ailments, including anxiety. A Johns Hopkins Medicine-led research team has added to evidence that a chemical found naturally in cannabis (also known as marijuana) can — in the right amounts — lessen the anxiety-inducing effects of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the primary psychoactive sister chemical found in cannabis.

    The cannabis plant produces marijuana (with THC), CBD, and hemp. Studies show all can help with anxiety at some level, but is dependent on dosage.  Microdosing a new trend to provide a very low dosage to take off the edge but to stay focused. Most gummies are either 5 or 10 mg. A microcode would be between 2.5 – 5 mg.  So a half or third and you can avoid the “high” while reducing the anxiety and moving into a better state of mind.

    Marijuana Gummies

    Marijuana gummies are a way for adults to cope with anxiety. But you should start with a low dose as you want to have a calming effect with out the extra bells and whistles.  Consider 2.5 mg and see how it goes from there….and recognize it will take 45 minutes to an hour for impact.

    CBD Gummies

    While some CBD gummies products promise and don’t deliver, Epidiolex is the only FDA-approved prescription CBD medicine, which among many things, means that it has a safety and efficacy profile that has been thoroughly evaluated in clinical trials. CBD doesn’t have the THC high as with marijuana so this would completely avoid any high. It is also a popular aide to sleep issues.

    Other ways to reduce anxiety during this time is to focus on what you can control and what positive actions you can take. it is also important to set boundaries with how much information you will consume (including social media) and the conversations you will have.  Mostly, try to focus on things which help you relax.

     

    Amy Hansen

    Source link

  • Sacramento County bans sale of some hemp products containing cannabis

    Sacramento County bans sale of some hemp products containing cannabis

    (FOX40.COM) — The Sacramento County Board of Supervisors unanimously adopted an ordinance that will ban the sale of certain products containing intoxicating cannabinoids derived from hemp. 

    The ordinance, which applies to businesses in the unincorporated County, was passed Tuesday and becomes effective on Nov. 21.

    “Our primary concern is the safety and well-being of our community, particularly our children and adolescents,” said District 3 Supervisor Rich Desmond. “By prohibiting the sale of these intoxicating hemp products, we are taking a proactive step to eliminate the risks associated with unregulated substances that can lead to health emergencies.”

    According to Sacramento County, loopholes in the Farm Bill of 2018 and Assembly Bill 45 allowed unregulated products containing intoxicating cannabinoids to be sold in locations such as smoke shops, gas stations, and convenience stores.

    “Because people of any age could purchase those unregulated products, there was a subsequent rise in emergency room visits and ​hospitalizations due to ingestion and adverse events, particularly in young children and adolescents,” Sacramento County said.  

    The amended ordinance prohibits sales of chemically or synthetically altered industrial hemp products with a concentration of higher than .3% of THC. 

    Veronica Catlin

    Source link

  • Why vets recommend CBD to treat dogs with chronic pain and anxiety – The Cannabist

    Why vets recommend CBD to treat dogs with chronic pain and anxiety – The Cannabist

    Kristy Rosenberger swears by cannabidiol – more commonly known as CBD – not for herself, but for her dogs.

    Rosenberger was first introduced to CBD more than a decade ago when searching for something to help her dog, Punkie, who was anxious and epileptic. When thunderstorms rolled through, the Yorkie would whimper and shake. Rosenberger was afraid her behavior might trigger a seizure.

    Punkie’s neurologist recommended giving her CBD in combination with the dog’s seizure medication to sooth her symptoms. Rosenberger thought it couldn’t hurt to try, but was genuinely surprised when she noticed behavioral changes.

    Read the rest of this story on DenverPost.com.

    The Cannabist Network

    Source link

  • Ispire, Hidden Hills Club Strike Deal to Fortify the Future – Cannabis Business Executive – Cannabis and Marijuana industry news

    Ispire, Hidden Hills Club Strike Deal to Fortify the Future – Cannabis Business Executive – Cannabis and Marijuana industry news





    Ispire, Hidden Hills Club Strike Deal to Fortify the Future – Cannabis Business Executive – Cannabis and Marijuana industry news





























    skip to Main Content

    Tom Hymes

    Source link

  • Congress Accidentally Legalized Weed Six Years Ago – Cannabis Business Executive – Cannabis and Marijuana industry news

    Congress Accidentally Legalized Weed Six Years Ago – Cannabis Business Executive – Cannabis and Marijuana industry news





    Congress Accidentally Legalized Weed Six Years Ago – Cannabis Business Executive – Cannabis and Marijuana industry news




























    skip to Main Content

    AggregatedNews

    Source link

  • Cheech and Chong’s Global Holding Company Takes a Stand in California Legislature

    Cheech and Chong’s Global Holding Company Takes a Stand in California Legislature

    AB 2223 Unnecessarily Upends Low Dose Beverage Market Thriving in California, Says CCGHC

    Responding to legislative challenges in California, Cheech and Chong’s Global Holding Company (CCGHC) announces its opposition to AB 2223 (Aguiar-Curry D-Winters) unless amended, stating that the bill could severely impact the availability of popular hemp-derived THC beverages and other low-dose products currently sold statewide in liquor stores.

    AB 2223 is not without merit as it seeks to build upon previously approved AB 45 but unfortunately, says the organization, introduces limitations that would render responsibly produced and marketed compliant products, which adhere to current regulations, non-compliant under the new law.

    “Public safety, consumer demand, and industry viability are at the heart of our mission,” stated Brandon Harshbarger, President of Cheech and Chong’s Global Holding Company. “Our low-dose hemp THC beverages are rigorously tested and proven safe. They should be regulated similarly to alcohol, not restricted to a 1 milligram standard that is unnecessarily prohibitive and does not align with consumer or business needs.”

    Andrew Lee, Chief Legal Officer at CCGHC and Board Member of the Hemp Beverage Alliance, highlighted the importance of appropriate regulatory distinctions: “As part of our commitment to consumer safety, we emphasize the necessity for regulatory frameworks that differentiate between responsibly produced, low-dose hemp beverages and the unregulated high-dose products often marketed inappropriately,” explained Lee. “Aligning the regulation of our tested, low-dose products to be similar to how alcohol is regulated will serve public desire for low-dose THC options, address health and safety, and positively advance the cannabis industry as a whole.”

    The hemp industry significantly contributes to California’s economy and public wellness. The proposed legislative changes risk eliminating this growing category, removing beneficial alternatives responsibly provided by hemp-derived products.

    Ted Whitney of Squared also voiced support for refining legislation: “Under AB 45 these drinks are legal and regulated. We’re seeking to further clarify those laws and build on the success of this category in CA. Low dose beverages provide a massive benefit to distributors, retailers, and consumers in CA, and the amendments we’re proposing will be great for everyone.”

    As discussions around AB 2223 continue, CCGHC remains committed to advocating for regulations that ensure public safety without hindering innovation or access. The company urges all stakeholders to support legislative measures that acknowledge hemp’s significance to California’s social, economic, and health frameworks.

    For more information about Cheech and Chong’s Global Holding Company and their initiatives to support the hemp industry, please visit CheechandChong.com.

    Source: Cheech and Chong’s Global Holding Company

    Source link

  • In Hawaii, Hope Springs Eternal Following Adult-Use Defeat – Cannabis Business Executive – Cannabis and Marijuana industry news

    In Hawaii, Hope Springs Eternal Following Adult-Use Defeat – Cannabis Business Executive – Cannabis and Marijuana industry news





    In Hawaii, Hope Springs Eternal Following Adult-Use Defeat – Cannabis Business Executive – Cannabis and Marijuana industry news





























    skip to Main Content

    Tom Hymes

    Source link

  • Amendment killing nationally legal cannabis makes it into House farm bill – Cannabis Business Executive – Cannabis and Marijuana industry news

    Amendment killing nationally legal cannabis makes it into House farm bill – Cannabis Business Executive – Cannabis and Marijuana industry news





    Amendment killing nationally legal cannabis makes it into House farm bill – Cannabis Business Executive – Cannabis and Marijuana industry news



























    skip to Main Content

    AggregatedNews

    Source link

  • Texas Will Take Public Comments on Banning Intoxicating Hemp Products

    Texas Will Take Public Comments on Banning Intoxicating Hemp Products

    Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick wants state senators to look into banning or regulating delta-8 and delta-9 THC. Should you be so inclined, there might be something you can do about that…

    Jacob Vaughn

    Source link

  • Sweeping Cannabis/Hemp Bill Passed by CT Senate, Heads to Governor’s Desk – Cannabis Business Executive – Cannabis and Marijuana industry news

    Sweeping Cannabis/Hemp Bill Passed by CT Senate, Heads to Governor’s Desk – Cannabis Business Executive – Cannabis and Marijuana industry news





    Sweeping Cannabis/Hemp Bill Passed by CT Senate, Heads to Governor’s Desk – Cannabis Business Executive – Cannabis and Marijuana industry news



























    skip to Main Content

    Tom Hymes

    Source link