ReportWire

Tag: hedge fund

  • The strategy a $69 billion hedge fund uses to make sure it never loses money in the stock market

    The strategy a $69 billion hedge fund uses to make sure it never loses money in the stock market

    [ad_1]

    Patrick McMullan/Getty Images; Jenny Chang-Rodriguez

    • Millennium Management has lost money in just one year since its 1989 founding.

    • The $69 billion hedge fund uses a strict trading strategy to make sure it consistently makes money.

    • This trading strategy has helped founder Israel Englander become a billionaire.

    The $69 billion Millennium Management hedge fund employs a simple yet effective trading strategy to make sure it almost always makes money in the stock market: cut losing stock positions as quickly as possible.

    The firm, which is one of the largest hedge funds in the world, was founded in 1989 and since then has lost money in just a single year — 2008, when a financial crisis turned into a sharp recession and sent the S&P 500 crashing 38%.

    The fund still managed to massively outperform the S&P 500 that year, delivering a small loss in the low single digits.

    Other than that outlier year, Millennium has posted gains every single year of its 35-year history, racking up $56 billion in cumulative profits for its investors.

    When the S&P 500 was down 10% in 2000 as the dot-com bust got underway, Millennium saw its best year ever, delivering a 35% return for its investors, according to data from Bloomberg. And in 2022, when the S&P 500 finished the year down 19%, Millennium was up 12%.

    The consistent string of positive returns at Millennium stems from it’s being a multi-strategy approach.

    That means its 2,600 traders, investment analysts, and portfolio managers run independent groups concurrently using various investment strategies across stocks, bonds, options, and commodities.

    According to a report from The Wall Street Journal, the game is simple: make money and stay employed, or lose money and probably get fired.

    The report said that when a Millennium portfolio manager that manages $1 billion loses $50 million, or 5%, the first threshold is reached and that manager’s pool of available capital to trade is slashed in half, to $500 million.

    From there, if the portfolio manager loses an additional $25 million, or a total of 7.5% on the initial $1 billion allocated to them, they will likely be fired, the report said, adding that sometimes exceptions are made.

    This strict stop-loss trading strategy means the hedge fund goes through a lot of employees, sporting a high turnover rate of about 15%-20% of its staff each year.

    But the trading strategy is also what turned its founder, Israel Englander, into a billionaire.

    According to data from Bloomberg, Englander is worth $13.3 billion, making him the 172nd richest person in the world.

    And the strategy is still working. Millennium posted returns of about 10% in 2023, and year-to-date it is up another 9.5%.

    Millennium Management declined to comment.

    Read the original article on Business Insider

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Billionaire investor Ray Dalio refuses to endorse Biden or Trump

    Billionaire investor Ray Dalio refuses to endorse Biden or Trump

    [ad_1]

    If you’re one of the millions of Americans wondering how the country wound up stuck between a twice-impeached convicted felon and an increasingly frail incumbent for its next President, Ray Dalio can sympathize. 

    The billionaire founder of Bridgewater, the world’s fourth largest hedge fund, said the unfortunate reality is that he, along with about half of the country, wished there was a realistic alternative to Donald Trump and Joe Biden.

    “I feel like I am faced with the choice between a strong, unethical, almost fascist Republican Party and a frail, untruthful and enigmatic Democratic Party,” he wrote in a column for Time he simultaneously posted on LinkedIn. “As things now stand, there is no good presidential contender and no good party for me to choose from.”

    The speculator, who handed over the reins at Bridgewater in 2022, had told Fortune CEO Alan Murray prior to the first primary contest in Iowa that he was already dreading a potential rematch of Trump vs Biden. 

    Since Dalio wrote that he respected and liked Biden, he turned his crosshairs instead towards leading Democrats who sought to hide the President’s “weak and rapidly declining condition” from the American public.

    By pretending the 82-year-old had the constitution to face another four years of the most demanding and important job around when it was clear the emperor had no clothes, the party undermined trust. 

    “That is obviously ridiculous and an insult to people’s intelligence,” Dalio wrote, adding claims that Biden could still function most hours of the day only lead to a “terrible loss of confidence in its honesty and judgement”.

    Major Democratic donors, including the Disney heiress Abigail Disney, have signaled their unwillingness to fund his re-election campaign any further, comparing Biden to an elderly parent whose car keys need to be taken away from them.

    ‘Four months left’ to prevent a sweep in November

    On Tuesday, Michael Bennet emerged as the first Senate Democrat to state publicly that Biden faced losing to his opponent in November.

    Speaking to CNN, the Colorado legislator even went a step further, arguing the President’s continued candidacy could spark a landslide victory for Trump’s party and a clean sweep of the House, Senate and Presidency.

    “We have four months to figure out how we’re going to save the country from Donald Trump,” he told the cable news network. “The stakes could not be higher.” 

    In a sign of how conflicted the party is, Bennet acknowledged he only came forward after his comments—made privately to his peers—had been leaked to the press.

    In Dalio’s column, the Bridgewater founder concluded the Democrats now had only three options left going forward, none of which were particularly appealing. 

    They could either unite behind Biden in the hopes of white-knuckling it to a re-election victory and then tackling the problem afterward (“bait and switch”), hand Vice President Kamala Harris the nomination on a silver platter and drop her into the race (“coronation”), or organize a shortened contest among leading contenders to take Biden’s stead (“mini-primary”).

    While the latter was Dalio’s preferred option, since it would offer Americans a choice as to who should lead the ticket, he acknowledged it would likely harm their chances of winning in November.

    “I am still hoping for honest, smart, strong and ideally moderate-bipartisan Democrats (or Republicans) to step forward,” he wrote.

    Until then, it looks as if neither Trump nor Biden will earn his vote—or his donation checks.

    [ad_2]

    Christiaan Hetzner

    Source link