ReportWire

Tag: Health care industry

  • What to know about the impacts Medicaid cuts are having on rural health care

    FRANCONIA, N.H. (AP) — The closing of a health center in rural New Hampshire has raised concerns that the projected cuts in Medicaid are already taking a toll.

    Last month, a site of the Ammonoosuc Community Health Services in Franconia, a town of around 1,000 people, closed for good.

    Ammonoosuc officials and a Democratic senator have blamed Medicaid cuts for the closure of the facility that served 1,400 patients from Franconia, Easton, Lincoln and Sugar Hill. These are all tiny communities around the White Mountains, whose patients typically are older and sicker than in other parts of the state.

    Threats to rural health care

    The closure of the Franconia center reflects the financial struggles facing community health centers and rural health care systems more broadly amid Medicaid cuts and a feared spike in health insurance rates. The government shutdown, which ended last week, was driven by a Democratic demand to extend tax credits, which ensure low- and middle-income people can afford health insurance through the Affordable Care Act, or ACA.

    More than 100 hospitals closed over the past decade, according to the Center For Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform, a policy and advocacy group, and more than 700 more hospitals are at risk of closure. A branch of the HealthFirst Family Care Center, a facility in Canaan, New Hampshire also announced it was closing at the end of October due in part to “changes in Medicaid reimbursement and federal funding” for these facilities.

    On average, the federally-funded community health centers like the one in Franconia are losing money, relying heavily on cash reserves, making service changes and sometimes closing locations to stay afloat, NACHC found. Nearly half have less than 90 days’ cash on hand, according to the association. And the future is even more bleak with at least 2 million community health center patients expected to lose Medicaid coverage by 2034 and 2 million more who are newly uninsured turning to the centers for care.

    Hard choices for CEO

    Ed Shanshala, the CEO of Ammonoosuc, said the Medicaid cuts are to blame for the closure of the Franconia center.

    Shanshala runs a network of five health centers in New Hampshire which relies more than $2 million in federal funding — out of a $12 million budget. He faced a $500,000 shortfall due to the cuts and realized closing Franconia would save about half that money. It also was the only facility where they leased space.

    “We’re really left with no choice,” Shanshala said, adding the closure would save $250,000. Finding additional cuts is hard, given that the centers provide services to anyone under 200% of federal poverty levels, he said. And if he cuts additional services, Shanshala fears some patients will end up in a hospital emergency room or “stop engaging in health care period.”

    Patients struggle to adjust

    Susan Bushby, a 70-year-old housekeeper, talked about how much she loved the staff and feared going to a new health center. She wouldn’t know her way around a larger facility and wouldn’t have the same rapport with the people there.

    “I was very disturbed. I was down right angry,” said Bushby, who was brought to tears as she discussed the challenges of starting over at a new health center. “I just really like it there. I don’t know, I’m just really going to miss it. It’s really hard for me to explain, but it’s going to be sad.”

    Marsha Luce, whose family moved from Washington, D.C. area, in 2000, is especially concerned about the impact on her 72-year-old husband, a former volunteer firefighter who has a left ear and part of his jaw removed due to cancer. He also has heart and memory issues.

    She worries about longer waits to see his doctor and the loss of relationships built up over decades in Franconia.

    “It’s going to be hard,” she said. “But it’s a relationship that’s going to be missed. It’s a relationship that you can talk to people and you tell them something and you go, yeah, well, I’ve had cancer. Oh, let’s see. Oh, yeah. There it is in your chart. Do you know what I mean?”

    Source link

  • Republicans promised health care negotiations after the shutdown, but Democrats are wary

    WASHINGTON — Now that the government shutdown is over, House and Senate Republicans say they will negotiate with Democrats on whether to extend COVID-era tax credits that help tens of millions of Americans afford their health care premiums. But finding bipartisan agreement could be difficult, if not impossible, before the subsidies expire at the end of the year.

    The shutdown ended this week after a small group of Democrats made a deal with Republicans senators who promised a vote by mid-December on extending the Affordable Care Act subsidies. But there is no guaranteed outcome, and many Republicans have made clear they want the credits to expire.

    House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., called the subsidies a “boondoggle” immediately after the House voted Wednesday to end the shutdown, and President Donald Trump said the Obama-era health overhaul was “disaster” as he signed the reopening bill into law.

    It is far from the outcome that Democrats had hoped for as they kept the government closed for 43 days, demanding that Republicans negotiate with them on an extension before premiums sharply increase. But they say they will try again as the expiration date approaches.

    “It remains to be seen if they are serious,” said House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York. But he said Democrats “are just getting started.”

    Republicans have been meeting privately to discuss the issue. Some want to extend the subsidies, with changes, to avoid the widespread increases in premiums. Others, like Johnson and Trump, want to start a new conversation about overhauling “Obamacare” entirely — a redo after a similar effort in 2017 failed.

    Health care has long been one of the most difficult issues on Capitol Hill, marked by deep ideological and political divides. Partisan disagreement over 2010 law has persisted for more than a decade, and relationships are already strained from weeks of partisan tensions over the shutdown.

    Connecticut Rep. Rosa DeLauro, the top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee, said that while Republicans have promised negotiations and a Senate vote, Democrats are wary. She noted that Johnson has not committed to anything in the House.

    “Do I trust any of them? Hell no,” DeLauro said.

    If the two sides cannot agree, as many as 24 million people who get their health care from the exchanges created by the law could see their premiums go up Jan. 1. New Hampshire Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, one of the Democrats who struck a deal with Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., to reopen the government, said she thinks an agreement on the tax credits is possible.

    During the talks that led to the shutdown’s end, Shaheen said she and other moderate Democrats sat across from Thune and “looked him eye to eye” as he committed to a serious effort.

    “We’re going to have a chance to vote on a bill that we will write by mid-December, in a way that gives us a chance to build — hopefully build — bipartisan support to get that through,” Shaheen said.

    While Democrats would like to see a permanent extension of the tax credits, most realize that is unlikely. Just before the shutdown ended, Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York proposed a one-year extension and a bipartisan committee to address Republican demands for changes to the ACA. But Thune said that was a “nonstarter” as the government remained shut down.

    In the House, Democrats have proposed a three-year extension.

    While Republicans have long sought to scrap Obamacare, they have had challenges over the years in figuring out what would replace it. That problem plagued the 2017 effort, when then-Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., cast the deciding vote to kill a bill on the Senate floor that was short on detail.

    Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, chairman of the Senate Health Education Labor and Pensions Committee, and Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., have proposed overhauling the law to create accounts that would direct the money to individuals instead of insurance companies. Those are ideas that Trump echoed as he signed the funding bill Wednesday evening.

    “I want the money to go directly to you, the people,” Trump said.

    It is unclear exactly how that would work, and scrapping the law in its current form would take months, if not years, to negotiate, even if Republicans could find the votes to do it.

    Some moderate Republicans in the House have said they want to work with Democrats to extend the subsidies before the deadline, which is only weeks away. In a letter to Thune and Schumer on Wednesday, Pennsylvania Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, the Republican co-chair of the Bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus, encouraged negotiations.

    “Our sense of urgency cannot be greater,” Fitzpatrick wrote. “Our willingness to cooperate has no limits.”

    So far, though, Senate Republicans have been meeting on their own to figure out their own differences.

    “Right now, it’s just getting consensus among ourselves,” Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., said Monday after GOP members of the Senate Finance Committee met to discuss possible ways forward.

    Tillis is supportive of extending the tax credits, but said lawmakers also need to find a way to reduce costs. If the two sides cannot eventually agree, Tillis said, Republicans may have to try and figure out a way to do it on their own, potentially using budget maneuvers that enabled them to pass Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” this summer without any Democratic votes.

    “We should have that in our back pocket too,” Tillis said.

    Some House Democrats have raised the possibility that there could be another shutdown if they are unable to win concessions on health care. The bill signed by Trump will fully fund some parts of the government, but others run out of money again at the end of January if Congress does not act.

    “I think it depends on the vulnerable House Republicans who are not going to be able to go back to their constituents without telling them that they’ve done something on health care,” said Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash.

    “We’ll just have to see” if there could be another shutdown, said Rep. Mark Takano, D-Calif.

    Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass., said he is “not going to vote to endorse their cruelty” if Republicans do not extend the subsidies.

    DeLauro said that Republicans have wanted to repeal the ACA since it was first enacted. “That’s where they’re trying to go,” she said.

    “When it comes to January 30 we’ll see what progress has been made,” she said.

    Source link

  • Speaker faces unruly House as lawmakers return for shutdown vote

    WASHINGTON — After refusing to convene the U.S. House during the government shutdown, Speaker Mike Johnson is recalling lawmakers back into session — and facing an avalanche of pent-up legislative demands from those who have largely been sidelined from governing.

    Hundreds of representatives are preparing to return Wednesday to Washington after a nearly eight-week absence, carrying a torrent of ideas, proposals and frustrations over work that has stalled when the Republican speaker shuttered the House doors nearly two months ago.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAmu:CDE H:== 36 2 G@E6 E@ k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^8@G6C?>6?ED9FE5@H?FA52E6g_67f4252f3b4_ddh242bggge675g7h_QmC6@A6? E96 8@G6C?>6?Ek^2m] qFE E92E’D ;FDE E96 DE2CE] (:E9 677@CED E@ C6=62D6 E96 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^6ADE6:?>2IH6==4@?8C6DD;FDE:4656A2CE>6?EECF>Ab6_5a`ce46_45_7e464223_`hgc_a24fQmy677C6J tADE6:? 7:=6Dk^2m 2?5 E96 DH62C:?8 😕 @7 pC:K@?2’D k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^256=:E28C:;2=G2DH62C4@?8C6DD6ADE6:?7:=6Dadebe764`5hhhe_2d73“d_`24ge44ehQm#6A]6=64E p56=:E2 vC:;2=G2[k^2m E96 F?7:?:D965 3FD:?6DD H:== A@D6 2 7C6D9 E6DE E@ y@9?D@?’D 8C:A @? A@H6C 2?5 AFE 2 C6?6H65 7@4FD @? 9:D =6256CD9:A]k^Am

    kAm“xE’D 6IEC2@C5:?2CJ[” D2:5 |2EE96H vC66?[ 2 AC@76DD@C 2E E96 A@=:E:4D 56A2CE>6?E 2E %96 r2E9@=:4 &?:G6CD:EJ @7 p>6C:42]k^Am

    kAm“(92E $A62<6C y@9?D@? 2?5 #6AF3=:42?D 2C6 5@:?8[ J@F 92G6 E@ 8@ 324< 564256D E@ 7:?5 2? 6I2>A=6 H96C6 E96 w@FD6 — 6:E96C 492>36C — 564:565 ?@E E@ >66E]”k^Am

    kAm(96? E96 w@FD6 82G6=D 324< :?E@ D6DD:@?[ :E H:== 4=@D6 E9:D C6>2C<23=6 492AE6C @7 y@9?D@?’D E6?FC6 H96? 96 D9@H65 9:>D6=7 E@ 36 2 =6256C H9@ 😀 BF:6E=J[ 3FE 3C2K6?=J[ H:==:?8 E@ FA6?5 :?DE:EFE:@?2= ?@C>D 😕 AFCDF:E @7 9:D 3C@256C DEC2E68J[ 6G6? 2E E96 C:D< @7 5:>:?:D9:?8 E96 w@FD6 :ED6=7]k^Am

    kAm#2E96C E92? FD6 E96 :>>6?D6 A@H6CD @7 E96 DA62<6C’D @77:46 E@ 7@C467F==J DE66C E96 5632E6 😕 r@?8C6DD[ 2D 2 4@6BF2= 3C2?49 @7 E96 8@G6C?>6?E @? A2C H:E9 E96 6I64FE:G6 2?5 E96 4@FCED[ y@9?D@? D:>A=J 4=@D65 FA D9@A — 2==@H:?8 E96 w@FD6 E@ 364@>6 F?FDF2==J 5676C6?E:2=[ A2CE:4F=2C=J E@ k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^9F3^5@?2=5ECF>AQm!C6D:56?E s@?2=5 %CF>Ak^2m]k^Am

    kAm~G6C E96D6 A2DE H6636C 92D D:56DE6AA65 :ED 32D:4 C6DA@?D:3:=:E:6D[ 7C@> A2DD:?8 C@FE:?6 =68:D=2E:@? E@ 4@?5F4E:?8 @G6CD:89E] %96 D:=6?4:?8 @7 E96 DA62<6C’D 82G6= 92D 366? 3@E9 F?FDF2= 2?5 DFCAC:D:?8 😕 2 DJDE6> @7 8@G6C?>6?E H96C6 E96 7@F?56CD 6?G:D:@?65 E96 3C2?496D H@F=5 G:8@C@FD=J AC@E64E E96:C :?DE:EFE:@?2= AC6C@82E:G6D]k^Am

    kAm“*@F 42? D66 :E 😀 AC6EEJ 6>AEJ 2C@F?5 96C6[” y@9?D@?[ #{2][ D2:5 @? 52J E9C66 @7 E96 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^ECF>AD9FE5@H?D?2AG@=F?E66C675hefac4c`g6b`7e44he4hfc32d5a`dQmD9FE5@H?k^2m[ E@FC 8C@FAD ?@ =@?86C 4C@H5:?8 E96 92==D]k^Am

    kAm“(96? r@?8C6DD 564:56D E@ EFC? @77 E96 =:89ED[ :E D9:7ED E96 2FE9@C:EJ E@ E96 6I64FE:G6 3C2?49] %92E 😀 9@H :E H@C:?8 s6>@4C2ED[ H:E9 E96:C k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^D9FE5@H?962=E9E2I4C65:ED277@C523=642C624Ea3d26bed`77`efgb2__6__54`46aec37Qm7:89E @G6C 962=E9 42C6 7F?5Dk^2m[ 7@C E96 4=@DFC6D]k^Am

    kAm%96 DA62<6C 92D 5676?565 9:D 564:D:@? E@ D9FEE6C E96 w@FD6 5FC:?8 H92E’D ?@H E96 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^8@G6C?>6?ED9FE5@H?=@?86DEECF>A56>@4C2EDD6?2E67:=:3FDE6C`7`cffce223dg52775g2g43dfg57_3g`Qm=@?86DE 8@G6C?>6?E D9FE5@H?k^2m 😕 &]$] 9:DE@CJ] w6 2C8F65 E92E E96 492>36C[ F?56C E96 v~! >2;@C:EJ[ 925 2=C625J 5@?6 :ED ;@3 A2DD:?8 2 DE@A82A 7F?5:?8 3:== 😕 $6AE6>36C] xE H@F=5 36 FA E@ E96 $6?2E6 E@ 24E[ 96 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm(96? E96 $6?2E6 72:=65 @G6C 2?5 @G6C E@ 25G2?46 E96 w@FD6 3:==[ >@C6 E92? 2 5@K6? E:>6D[ 96 C67FD65 E@ 6?E6C E2=AC@>:D6] y@9?D@? 2=D@ 6?4@FC2865 %CF>A E@ 42?46= 2? :?:E:2= D:E5@H? H:E9 E96 s6>@4C2E:4 =6256CD k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^9F3^492C=6DD49F>6CQm$6?] r9F4< $49F>6Ck^2m 2?5 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^9F3^92<66>;677C:6DQm#6A] w2<66> y677C:6Dk^2m E@ 2G@:5 2 3C@256C ?68@E:2E:@? H9:=6 E96 8@G6C?>6?E H2D DE:== 4=@D65]k^Am

    kAmx?DE625[ E96 DA62<6C[ H9@D6 ;@3 😀 @FE=:?65 😕 E96 r@?DE:EFE:@?[ D64@?5 😕 =:?6 @7 DF446DD:@? E@ E96 AC6D:56?4J[ 96=5 2=>@DE 52:=J AC6DD 4@?76C6?46D @? 9:D D:56 @7 E96 r2A:E@=[ 2 H66<=J 4@?76C6?46 42== H:E9 v~! =2H>2<6CD[ 2?5 AC:G2E6 E2=A] w6 ;@:?65 E96 AC6D:56?E 7@C $F?52J’D k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^ECF>A?7==:@?D4@>>2?56CD4a4e6d“_daedb6fc36_25ff63d`45ecQm}u{ (2D9:?8E@? r@>>2?56CDk^2m 82>6 2D E96 $6?2E6 H2D D=@88:?8 E9C@F89 2 H66<6?5 D6DD:@?]k^Am

    kAm“!6@A=6 D2J[ H9J 2C6?’E J@F ?68@E:2E:?8 H:E9 $49F>6C 2?5 y677C:6Dn x BF:E6 =:E6C2==J 92G6 ?@E9:?8 E@ ?68@E:2E6[” y@9?D@? D2:5 2E @?6 A@:?E]k^Am

    kAm“pD x’G6 D2:5 E:>6 2?5 E:>6 282:?[ x 5@?’E 92G6 2?JE9:?8 E@ ?68@E:2E6 H:E9[” 96 D2:5 @? 52J `b @7 E96 D9FE5@H?] “(6 5:5 @FC ;@3] (6 925 E92E G@E6]”k^Am

    kAmp?5 36D:56D 96 D2:5 @7 E96 v~! =2H>2<6CD[ “%96J 2C6 5@:?8 D@>6 @7 E96:C 36DE H@C< 😕 E96 5:DEC:4E[ 96=A:?8 E96:C 4@?DE:EF6?ED ?2G:82E6 E9:D 4C:D:D]”k^Am

    kAmx? >2?J H2JD[ y@9?D@? 92D 364@>6 2 DFCAC:D:?8=J 67764E:G6 =6256C[ 2? 244:56?E2= DA62<6C H9@ H2D k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^9@FD6DA62<6CC6AF3=:42?D6>>6C>442CE9Jdcbda2ec36_c`45ccd352g57ag3ac7_bQm6=64E65 E@ E96 ;@3k^2m 3J 9:D 4@==628F6D 27E6C 2== @E96CD 72:=65 E@ H:? :E] w6 92D ?@H =2DE65 >@C6 E92? EH@ J62CD[ =@?86C E92? >2?J @?46 6?G:D:@?65]k^Am

    kAm%9:D J62C[ H:E9 %CF>A’D C6EFC? E@ E96 (9:E6 w@FD6[ E96 DA62<6C 92D 4@>>2?566C65 9:D D=:> v~! >2;@C:EJ 2?5 A2DD65 =68:D=2E:@? :?4=F5:?8 E96 AC6D:56?E’D D@42==65 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^:?D:56ECF>AC6AF3=:42?DA6?5:?83:==AC@G:D:@?D56E2:=D_e63`_325c75a2f62a24abe6edbd6e`5Qm“@?6 3:8 362FE:7F= 3:==”k^2m @7 E2I 3C626 =2H E9:D DF>>6C]k^Am

    kAmy@9?D@?’D D9FE5@H? DEC2E68J 2=D@ =2C86=J 249:6G65 9:D 8@2=[ 7@C4:?8 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^8@G6C?>6?ED9FE5@H?g56>@4C2ED6gb`g_4_3eheca2__2abc4acc5h62fe6Qm$6?2E6 s6>@4C2ED E@ 3C62< C2?6?E H:E9@FE E96 6IE6?D:@? @7 962=E9 42C6 DF3D:5:6D E96J H6C6 56>2?5:?8 E@ 96=A 62D6 E96 DE:4<6C D9@4< @7 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^D9FE5@H?962=E9E2I4C65:ED277@C523=642C624Ea3d26bed`77`efgb2__6__54`46aec37QmC:D:?8 :?DFC2?46 AC6>:F> 4@DEDk^2m H:E9 E96 p77@C523=6 r2C6 p4E]k^Am

    kAmy@9?D@?’D 2AAC@249 😀 D66? 2D @?6 E92E >2?286D FA — 96 DE2JD 4=@D6 E@ %CF>A 2?5 D2JD E96J DA62< @7E6? — 2?5 2=D@ 92>>6CD 5@H?[ :>A@D:?8 2 C:8:5 4@?EC@= @G6C E96 52JE@52J D4965F=6 @7 E96 w@FD6[ 2?5 :ED =2H>2<6CD]k^Am

    kAm&?56C 2 w@FD6 CF=6D 492?86 E9:D J62C[ y@9?D@? H2D 23=6 E@ <66A E96 492>36C D9FEE6C65 :?567:?:E6=J @? 9:D @H?[ H:E9@FE E96 FDF2= C6BF:C65 G@E6] %9:D J62C 9:D =6256CD9:A E62> 92D 2==@H65 76H6C @AA@CEF?:E:6D 7@C 2>6?5>6?ED @? =68:D=2E:@?[ 244@C5:?8 E@ 2 C646?E E2==J] ~E96C 492?86D 92G6 4FCE2:=65 E96 w@FD6’D 23:=:EJ E@ AC@G:56 2 C@3FDE 4964< @? E96 6I64FE:G6 3C2?49 @G6C k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^4@?8C6DDECF>AE2C:77D49:?2dad5edadch27a736ahb`72df2622ba6eQm%CF>A’D E2C:77Dk^2m 2?5 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^ECF>A42CE6=DH2CA@H6C4@?8C6DDa4g4ch`7gggbeachg_`3e3`d3`ha`f3dQmFD6 @7 H2C A@H6CDk^2m]k^Am

    kAmy@9?D@?’D C67FD2= E@ DH62C:? vC:;2=G2 😀 2 C6>2C<23=6 7=6I @7 E96 DA62<6C’D A@H6C[ =625:?8 E@ 4@>A2C:D@?D H:E9 $6?2E6 v~! {6256C |:E49 |4r@??6==’D 564:D:@? ?@E E@ 4@?D:56C !C6D:56?E q2C24< ~32>2’D $FAC6>6 r@FCE ?@>:?66[ D2:5 s2G:5 #2A2==@[ 2? 2DD@4:2E6 AC@76DD@C 2?5 5:C64E@C @7 E96 u656C2= {68:D=2E:@? r=:?:4 2E v6@C86E@H? &?:G6CD:EJ {2H r6?E6C] pC:K@?2 92D k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^256=:E28C:;2=G2DH62C:?4@?8C6DD6ADE6:?7:=6D2563h6f_caa_3ed4h26`bh6ddf4fabg`QmDF65k^2m E@ D62E 96C]k^Am

    Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

    By LISA MASCARO – AP Congressional Correspondent

    Source link

  • How Americans are feeling about their chances on the job market, according to an AP-NORC poll

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Americans are growing increasingly concerned about their ability to find a good job under President Donald Trump, an Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll finds, in what is a potential warning sign for Republicans as a promised economic boom has given way to hiring freezes and elevated inflation.

    High prices for groceries, housing and health care persist as a fear for many households, while rising electricity bills and the cost of gas at the pump are also sources of anxiety, according to the survey.

    Some 47% of U.S. adults are “not very” or “not at all confident” they could find a good job if they wanted to, an increase from 37% when the question was last asked in October 2023.

    Electricity bills are a “major” source of stress for 36% of U.S. adults at a time when the expected build-out of data centers for artificial intelligence could further tax the power grid. Just more than one-half said the cost of groceries are a “major” source of financial stress, about 4 in 10 said the cost of housing and health care were a serious strain and about one-third said they were feeling high stress about gasoline prices.

    The survey suggests an ongoing vulnerability for Trump, who returned to the White House in January with claims he could quickly tame the inflation that surged after the pandemic during Democratic President Joe Biden’s term. Instead, Trump’s popularity on the economy has remained low amid a mix of tariffs, federal worker layoffs and partisan sniping that has culminated in a government shutdown.

    Linda Weavil, 76, voted for Trump last year because he “seems like a smart businessman.” But she said in an interview that the Republican’s tariffs have worsened inflation, citing the chocolate-covered pecans sold for her church group fundraiser that now cost more.

    “I think he’s doing a great job on a lot of things, but I’m afraid our coffee and chocolate prices have gone up because of tariffs,” the retiree from Greensboro, North Carolina, said. “That’s a kick in the back of the American people.”

    Voters changed presidents, but they’re not feeling better about Trump’s economy

    The poll found that 36% of U.S. adults approve of how Trump is handling the economy, a figure that has held steady this year after he imposed tariffs that caused broad economic uncertainty. Among Republicans, 71% feel positive about his economic leadership. Yet that approval within Trump’s own party is relatively low in ways that could be problematic for Republicans in next month’s races for governor in New Jersey and Virginia, and perhaps even in the 2026 midterm elections.

    At roughly the same point in Biden’s term, in October 2021, an AP-NORC poll found that 41% of U.S. adults approved of how he was handling the economy, including about 73% of Democrats. That overall number was a little higher than Trump’s, primarily because of independents — 29% approved of how Biden was handling the economy, compared with the 18% who currently support Trump’s approach.

    The job market was meaningfully stronger in terms of hiring during Biden’s presidency as the United States was recovering from pandemic-related lockdowns. But hiring has slowed sharply under Trump with monthly job gains averaging less than 27,000 after the April tariff announcements.

    People see that difference.

    Four years ago, 36% of those in the survey were “extremely” or “very” confident in their ability to get a good job, but that has fallen to 21% now.

    Biden’s approval on the economy steadily deteriorated through the middle of 2022 when inflation hit a four-decade high, creating an opening for Trump’s political comeback.

    Electricity costs are an emerging worry

    In some ways, Trump has made the inflation problems harder by choosing to cancel funding for renewable energy projects and imposing tariffs on the equipment needed for factories and power plants. Those added costs are coming before the anticipated construction of data centers for AI that could further push up prices without more construction.

    Even though 36% see electricity as a major concern, there are some who have yet to feel a serious financial squeeze. In the survey, 40% identified electricity costs as a “minor” stress, while 23% said their utility bills are “not a source” of stress.

    Kevin Halsey, 58, of Normal, Illinois, said his monthly electricity bills used to be $90 during the summer because he had solar panels, but have since jumped to $300. Halsey, who works in telecommunications, voted Democratic in last year’s presidential election and described the economy right now as “crap.”

    “I’ve got to be pessimistic,” he said. “I don’t see this as getting better.”

    At a fundamental level, Trump finds himself in the same economic dilemma that bedeviled Biden. There are signs the economy remains relatively solid with a low unemployment rate, stock market gains and decent economic growth, yet the public continues to be skeptical about the economy’s health.

    Some 68% of U.S. adults describe the U.S. economy these days as “poor,” while 32% say it’s “good.” That’s largely consistent with assessments of the economy over the past year.

    In addition, 59%, say their family finances are “holding steady.” But only 12% say they’re “getting ahead,” and 28% say they are “falling behind.”

    People see plenty of expenses but few opportunities

    The sense of economic precarity is coming from many different directions, with indications that many think middle-class stability is falling out of reach.

    The vast majority of U.S. adults feel at least “minor” stress about the cost of groceries, health care, housing, the amount they pay in taxes, what they are paid at work and the cost of gas for their cars.

    In the survey, 47%, say they are “not very” or “not at all” confident they could pay an unexpected medical expense while 52% have low confidence they will have enough saved for their retirement. Also, 63%, are “not very” or “not at all” confident they could buy a new home if they wanted to.

    Young adults are much less confident about their ability to buy a house, though confidence is not especially high across the board. About 8 in 10 U.S. adults under age 30 say they are “not very confident” or “not at all confident” they would be able to buy a house, compared with about 6 in 10 adults 60 and older.

    For 54% of U.S. adults, the cost of groceries is a “major source” of stress in their life right now.

    Unique Hopkins, 36, of Youngstown, Ohio, said she is now working two jobs after her teenage daughter had a baby, leaving Hopkins with a sense that she can barely tread water as part of the “working poor.” She voted for Trump in 2016, only to switch to Democrats after she felt his ego kept him from uniting the country and solving problems.

    “It’s his way or no way,” she said. “Nobody is going to unite with Trump if it’s all about you, you, you.”

    ___

    The AP-NORC poll of 1,289 adults was conducted Oct. 9-13, using a sample drawn from NORC’s probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 3.8 percentage points.

    ___

    This story has been corrected to reflect that the name of the NORC Center is NORC Center for Public Research, not Public Affairs.

    Source link

  • Lawmakers grasping for ways to end government shutdown

    Certain senators know it’s time for the government shutdown to come to an end. So does House Speaker Mike Johnson. And with President Donald Trump arriving back in Washington from his overseas trip, perhaps the White House knows it, too.…

    By LISA MASCARO – AP Congressional Correspondent

    Source link

  • California union proposes taxing billionaires to offset Medicaid cuts

    SACRAMENTO, Calif. — SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — A major union announced a proposal Thursday to impose a one-time 5% tax on billionaires in California to address federal funding cuts to health care for low-income people.

    Proponents, including the Service Employees International Union, hope to place the statewide measure before voters next year. The tax would be on the net worth of California’s richest residents. A small portion of the money would also help fund K-12 education since the federal government has threatened to withhold grant money from public schools.

    Backers of the measure sent a request to Attorney General Rob Bonta this week to get approval to start collecting signatures. The proposal would have to receive more than 870,000 signatures by next spring to qualify for the ballot in November 2026. If it qualifies, it’s not guaranteed to pass. Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, for example, has opposed tax hikes in the past, including those specifically targeting the rich.

    Proponents of the initiative said it was critical to backfill cuts to Medicaid because lives are at stake.

    “If we do not do this, millions of people are going to lose health care, an untold number of people will go without treatment and there will be tragedy after tragedy,” said Dave Regan, president of SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West.

    Billionaires would have to pay for tax year 2026, and the money could start being appropriated in 2027. The tax would generate $100 billion in revenue for the state, backers say. The initiative says it’s “designed to make the State tax system more equitable.”

    The big tax and spending cuts law President Donald Trump signed earlier this year will cut more than $1 trillion over a decade from Medicaid and federal food assistance.

    The California Budget and Policy Center, a think tank in Sacramento, estimated the state could lose $30 billion in federal funding a year for Medicaid, which would result in up to 3.4 million people losing their coverage.

    Newsom said earlier this month that people enrolled in Covered California, the state’s health insurance marketplace, could see their monthly health care bills nearly double next year as a result of the spending cuts law.

    “California has led the nation in expanding access to affordable health care, but Donald Trump is ripping it away,” he said.

    Proponents of the proposed ballot initiative say billionaires have an obligation to do their part.

    “We hope that some and perhaps hopefully a large number of billionaires will recognize that it’s important in the state where they’ve grown their fortune that they have a responsibility to society to preserve the future of California,” said Emmanuel Saez, a professor of economics at the University of California, Berkeley.

    Source link

  • Trump hosts Senate Republicans at renovated White House

    But as President Donald Trump welcomed Republican senators for lunch in the newly renovated Rose Garden Club — with the boom-boom of construction underway on the new White House ballroom — he portrayed a different vision of America, as a unified GOP refuses to yield to Democratic demands for health care funding and the government shutdown drags on.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    By LISA MASCARO, MARY CLARE JALONICK and SEUNG MIN KIM – Associated Press

    Source link

  • Senate Democrats reject government funding bill for 10th time

    Senate Democrats are rejecting for the 10th time a stopgap spending bill that would reopen the government. They are insisting they won’t back away from demands that Congress take up health care benefits. The repetition of votes on the funding…

    By STEPHEN GROVES and MARY CLARE JALONICK – Associated Press

    Source link

  • FACT FOCUS: Democrats did not shut down the government to give health care to ‘illegal immigrants’

    President Donald Trump and other high-ranking Republicans claim Democrats forced the government shutdown fight because they want to give free health care to immigrants in the U.S. illegally.

    Democrats are trying to extend tax credits that make health insurance premiums more affordable on marketplaces established by the Affordable Care Act, commonly known as Obamacare, and reverse Medicaid cuts in Trump’s big bill passed this summer. But immigrants who entered the country illegally are not eligible for either program.

    Here’s a closer look at the facts:

    CLAIM: Democrats shut down the government because they want to give free health care to immigrants who entered the U.S. illegally.

    THE FACTS: This is false. Democrats say they are pushing for the inclusion of key health care provisions in the next congressional spending package. In particular, they are seeking an extension of tax credits that millions of Americans use to buy insurance on the Affordable Care Act exchange and a reversal of Medicaid cuts made in the bill Trump signed into law in July. However, immigrants in the U.S. illegally are not eligible for any federal health care programs, including insurance provided through the Affordable Care Act and Medicaid. Hospitals do receive Medicaid reimbursements — which would be reduced under Trump’s bill — for emergency care that they are obligated to provide to people who meet other Medicaid eligibility requirements but do not have an eligible immigration status, according to KFF, a nonprofit health policy research, polling and news organization. This spending accounted for less than 1% of total Medicaid spending between fiscal years 2017 and 2023.

    Sabrina Corlette, founder and co-director of Georgetown University’s Center on Health Insurance Reforms, called the Republicans’ claims “a flat-out lie.”

    “The law is very clear,” Corlette said.

    Speaking in the Oval Office on Tuesday about a deal with Pfizer to lower drug prices, Trump predicted the shutdown and made the false claim: ”We’ll probably have a shutdown because one of the things they want to do is they want to give incredible Medicare, Cadillac, the Cadillac Medicare, to illegal immigrants.” He added later that “they want to have illegal aliens come into our country and get massive health care at the cost to everybody else.”

    Asked by a reporter to clarify what his comments referred to, Trump said “when an illegal person comes, a person who came into our country illegally, therefore breaking the law,” adding that “we just as a country cannot afford to take care of millions of people who have broken the law coming in.”

    Other Republicans, including Vice President JD Vance and House Speaker Mike Johnson, have made similar claims.

    The Senate’s Democratic leader, Sen. Chuck Schumer, rebutted these allegations, calling them “a lie, plain and simple.”

    Immigrants in the U.S. illegally are not eligible for insurance bought on the Affordable Care Act exchange or for Medicaid. To qualify for the former, an enrollee must live in the U.S., be a U.S. citizen or have another lawful status and not be incarcerated. A Medicaid enrollee must meet certain financial requirements, be a resident of the state in which Medicaid is being received and be a U.S. citizen or have a qualifying lawful status.

    Health care premiums for millions of Americans could skyrocket if Congress fails to extend tax credits that many people use to buy insurance through Affordable Care Act marketplaces. Those subsidies were put in place during the COVID-19 pandemic but are set to expire.

    Among the Medicaid cuts Democrats are seeking to reverse is a reduction to reimbursements hospitals receive when they perform emergency care they are legally mandated to provide on people who would qualify for Medicaid if not for their immigration status. This would affect the 40 states, plus Washington, D.C., that have adopted a Medicaid expansion created by the Affordable Care Act.

    The law Trump signed would also restrict the eligibility of lawfully present immigrants such as refugees and asylees for insurance through the Affordable Care Act, Medicaid and Medicare.

    Some states use their own money, not federal funds, to provide health care to immigrants who don’t have lawful status. An earlier version of Trump’s tax breaks and spending cuts bill tried to curb these programs, but the provisions did not make it into the final version.

    “It’s a compelling talking point to say that Democrats want to provide health care to undocumented immigrants, but it’s just not true in terms of the cuts they’re trying to reverse,” said Larry Levitt, executive vice president for health policy at KFF.

    ___

    This story was first published on Oct. 1, 2025. It was published again on Oct. 3, 2025, to correct that to qualify for insurance bought on the Affordable Care Act exchange, not for Medicaid, an enrollee must live in the U.S., be a U.S. citizen or have another lawful status and not be incarcerated.

    ___

    Find AP Fact Checks here: https://apnews.com/APFactCheck.

    Source link

  • As the shutdown drags on, these people will lose if health care subsidies expire

    TYLER, Texas — TYLER, Texas (AP) — Celia Monreal worries every day about the cartilage loss in her husband’s knees. Not just because it’s hard for her to see him in pain but also because she knows soon their health care costs could skyrocket.

    Monreal, 47, and her husband, Jorge, 57, rely on the Affordable Care Act marketplace for health coverage. If Congress doesn’t extend certain ACA tax credits set to expire at the end of the year, their fully subsidized plan will increase in cost, putting it out of reach. Without insurance, they won’t be able to afford his expected knee replacement surgeries, much less the treatment they need for other issues, like her chronic high blood pressure and his high cholesterol.

    “It worries me sometimes, because if you’re not healthy, then you’re not here for your kids,” Monreal said. “It’s a difficult decision, because, OK, do I spend $500 on a doctor’s visit or do I buy groceries?”

    Those are the types of choices facing the millions of Americans whose state or federal marketplace health insurance plans will be up for renewal in November. The enhanced premium tax credits that have made coverage more affordable for low- and middle-income enrollees for the last four years will expire this year if Congress doesn’t extend them. On average, that will more than double what subsidized enrollees currently pay for premiums next year, according to an analysis by health care research nonprofit KFF.

    The tax credits are at the heart of the federal government shutdown, in its third week with no end in sight. Democrats have demanded the subsidies be extended as part of any funding deal they sign, while Republicans say they’ll only negotiate on the issue once the government is funded.

    With Congress deadlocked and the open enrollment period for ACA plans approaching on Nov. 1 in most states, Americans like Monreal are left to navigate the unknown.

    More than 24 million people have ACA health insurance, a group including farmers, ranchers, small business owners and other self-employed people who don’t have other health insurance options through their work.

    The enhanced premium tax credits set to expire this year have made costs far more manageable for many of them, allowing some lower-income enrollees to get health care with no premiums and higher earners to pay no more than 8.5% of their income.

    If the tax credits expire, annual out-of-pocket premiums are estimated to increase by 114% — an average of $1,016 — next year, according to the KFF analysis.

    While some premium tax credits will remain, the level of support will decrease for most enrollees. Anyone earning more than 400% of the poverty level — or around $63,000 per year for a single person — won’t be eligible for the remaining tax credits.

    As a result, especially hard-hit groups will include a small number of higher earners who’ll have to pay a lot more without the extra subsidies and a large number of lower earners who’ll have to pay a small amount more, said Cynthia Cox, a vice president and director of the ACA program at KFF.

    With higher premiums, some people will drop out of health insurance altogether, Cox said. When many younger, healthier people inevitably forgo coverage, insurance companies will increase costs for members of the covered population to account for them being older and sicker.

    The change may also strain hospitals, since more uninsured people will need emergency care they can’t afford. That could lead to hospital closures or cost increases.

    “If you have less subsidies for people getting health insurance, you’re going to have less health coverage and less health care,” said Jason Levitis, a senior fellow in the health policy division at the Urban Institute. “People are going to be sicker and die more.”

    Erin Jackson-Hill has allergies, asthma and searing hip pain she’s managing with prescribed medications until she can get a hip replacement. But even with all those conditions, the 56-year-old in Anchorage, Alaska, doesn’t think she can pay for health insurance next year if the ACA subsidies aren’t extended.

    The executive director of two nonprofits, who also cares for her 89-year-old father full time, already pays nearly $500 a month for her premiums. If the subsidies disappear, she plans to forgo health insurance and pay for her asthma and allergy medications out of pocket.

    Jackson-Hill said she worries about what will happen if her hip worsens and she can’t make it up the stairs in her father’s two-story home without treatment.

    “I will have to go to the emergency room, or I’ll have to go bankrupt in order to pay for it,” she said.

    Another ACA enrollee, Salt Lake City freelance filmmaker and adjunct professor Stan Clawson, said he’ll find a way to pay for health insurance next year — even if it means he must buy cheaper groceries or get a new job that provides it.

    Clawson, 49, has lived with paralysis below his abdomen since falling while rock climbing when he was 20. He’s active and generally healthy, but his spinal cord injury has resulted in tendonitis in his shoulders and frequent urinary tract infections.

    He also has to buy catheters to use every time he urinates — a cost he said would add up to around $1,400 a month without insurance.

    “I don’t think a lot of people realize how expensive it is to have a disability,” Clawson said, adding that trying to live without health insurance would be “financially devastating.”

    Chrissy Meehan, a hair stylist in Upper Chichester, Pennsylvania, has a neck condition that may require surgery. She says if ACA subsidies expire, she’ll further delay the procedure.

    The 51-year-old voted for Republican Donald Trump for president last year, something she said she’s almost embarrassed about now that the Republican-led government hasn’t renewed the subsidies that help her afford her coverage through the state marketplace.

    “I work hard, and I’m trying to survive and do it the right way and pay my way,” Meehan said. “I don’t want free. I just want affordable for my income.”

    Health policy analysts note that even if the subsidies are extended, insurance rate hikes for 2026 are already higher because insurers had to factor in their potential expiration when they set premium prices earlier this year.

    There are also concerns the delay will cause chaos, confusion and stress for Americans, some of whom have already started receiving notices that their premiums will skyrocket next year.

    “Once those people say, ’Oh, wait, forget it, I’m out,’ it’s going to be hard to get a lot of them back,” said the Urban Institute’s Levitis.

    Monreal’s husband will likely need both knees replaced, which will force him to take time off his job filling concrete. On their already tight $45,000 joint annual income, budgeting for themselves and their five children will become that much harder.

    The concern over their budget and the uncertainty over their health care coverage send her thoughts into yet another worrisome spiral with just two weeks until open enrollment begins.

    “They haven’t told us nothing,” she said of her insurance provider. “And you know what? At the end, you end up with no health care.”

    ___

    Swenson reported from New York. Associated Press video journalist Tassanee Vejpongsa contributed to this report.

    Source link

  • Senate Democrats, holding out for health care, ready to reject government funding bill for 10th time

    WASHINGTON — WASHINGTON (AP) — Senate Democrats are poised for the 10th time Thursday to reject a stopgap spending bill that would reopen the government, insisting they won’t back away from demands that Congress take up health care benefits.

    The repetition of votes on the funding bill has become a daily drumbeat in Congress, underscoring how intractable the situation has become as it has been at times the only item on the agenda for the Senate floor. House Republicans have left Washington altogether. The standoff has lasted over two weeks, leaving hundreds of thousands of federal workers furloughed, even more without a guaranteed payday and Congress essentially paralyzed.

    “Every day that goes by, there are more and more Americans who are getting smaller and smaller paychecks,” said Senate Majority Leader John Thune, adding that there have been thousands of flight delays across the country as well.

    Thune, a South Dakota Republican, again and again has tried to pressure Democrats to break from their strategy of voting against the stopgap funding bill. It hasn’t worked. And while some bipartisan talks have been ongoing about potential compromises on health care, they haven’t produced any meaningful progress toward reopening the government.

    Democrats say they won’t budge until they get a guarantee on extending subsidies for health plans offered under Affordable Care Act marketplaces. They warned that millions of Americans who buy their own health insurance — such as small business owners, farmers and contractors — will see large increases when premium prices go out in the coming weeks. Looking ahead to a Nov. 1 deadline in most states, they think voters will demand that Republicans enter into serious negotiations.

    “We have to do something, and right now, Republicans are letting these tax credits expire,” said Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer.

    Still, Thune was also trying a different tack Thursday with a vote to proceed to appropriations bills — a move that could grease the Senate’s wheels into some action or just deepen the divide between the two parties.

    Democrats have rallied around their priorities on health care as they hold out against voting for a Republican bill that would reopen the government. Yet they also warn that the time to strike a deal to prevent large increases for many health plans is drawing short.

    When they controlled Congress during the pandemic, Democrats boosted subsidies for Affordable Care Act health plans. It pushed enrollment under President Barack Obama’s signature health care law to new levels and drove the rate of uninsured people to a historic low. Nearly 24 million people currently get their health insurance from subsidized marketplaces, according to health care research nonprofit KFF.

    Democrats — and some Republicans — are worried that many of those people will forgo insurance if the price rises dramatically. While the tax credits don’t expire until next year, health insurers will soon send out notices of the price increases. In most states, they go out Nov. 1.

    Sen. Patty Murray, the top Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee, said she has heard from “families who are absolutely panicking about their premiums that are doubling.”

    “They are small business owners who are having to think about abandoning the job they love to get employer-sponsored health care elsewhere or just forgoing coverage altogether,” she added.

    Murray also said that if many people decide to leave their health plan, it could have an effect across medical insurance because the pool of people under health plans will shrink. That could result in higher prices across the board, she said.

    Some Republicans have acknowledged that the expiration of the tax credits could be a problem and floated potential compromises to address it, but there is hardly a consensus among the GOP.

    House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., this week called the COVID-era subsidies a “boondoggle,” adding that “when you subsidize the health care system and you pay insurance companies more, the prices increase.”

    President Donald Trump has said he would “like to see a deal done for great health care,” but has not meaningfully weighed into the debate. And Thune has insisted that Democrats first vote to reopen the government before entering any negotiations on health care.

    If Congress were to engage in negotiations on significant changes to health care, it would likely take weeks, if not longer, to work out a compromise.

    Meanwhile, Senate Republicans are setting up a vote Thursday to proceed to a bill to fund the Defense Department and several other areas of government. This would turn the Senate to Thune’s priority of working through spending bills and potentially pave the way to paying salaries for troops, though the House would eventually need to come back to Washington to vote for a final bill negotiated between the two chambers.

    Thune said it would be a step toward getting “the government funded in the traditional way, which is through the annual appropriations process.”

    It wasn’t clear whether Democrats would give the support needed to advance the bills. They discussed the idea at their luncheon Wednesday and emerged saying they wanted to review the Republican proposal and make sure it included appropriations that are priorities for them.

    While the votes will not bring the Senate any closer to an immediate fix for the government shutdown, it could at least turn their attention to issues where there is some bipartisan agreement.

    Source link

  • Broadway enters an anxious time as labor action threatens to roil theaters

    NEW YORK — NEW YORK (AP) — Broadway is a tense place these days after two major labor unions authorized strike action amid ongoing contract negotiations with producers.

    Actors’ Equity Association — which represents over 51,000 members, including singers, actors, dancers and stage managers — and American Federation of Musicians Local 802 — which represents 1,200 musicians — have voted in favor of a strike authorization, a strategic step ahead of any work stoppage. No strike has been called.

    Members of both unions are currently working under expired contracts. The musicians’ contract expired on Aug. 31, and the Equity contract expired on Sept. 28.

    Both unions want pay increases and higher contributions by producers toward employee health care costs, a key sticking point. Actors Equity also wants producers to hire more backup performers and stage managers, add protections for performers in the event of injury and put limits on how many performances in a row actors can be asked to do without a day off.

    The health of Broadway — once very much in doubt due to the COVID-19 pandemic — is now very good, at least in terms of box office. The 2024-2025 season took in $1.9 billion, the highest-grossing season in recorded history, overtaking the pre-pandemic previous high of $1.8 billion during the 2018-2019 season. It has been a long road back from the days when theaters were shuttered and the future looked bleak.

    The unions are pointing to the financial health of Broadway to argue that producers can afford to up pay and benefits for musicians and actors. Producers, represented by The Broadway League, counter that the health of Broadway could be endangered by increasing ticket prices.

    “On the heels of the most successful season in history, the Broadway League wants the working musicians and artists who fueled that very success to accept wage cuts, threats to healthcare benefits, and potential job losses,” Local 802 President Bob Suttmann said in a statement Tuesday.

    A strike would cripple most of Broadway, but some shows might continue. “Beetlejuice” and “Mamma Mia!” arrived as part of tours and so do not have a traditional Broadway contract. And shows playing at nonprofit theaters, such as the musical “Ragtime” at Lincoln Center Theater and the play “Punch” from the Manhattan Theatre Club, have separate labor agreements.

    The most recent major strike on Broadway was in late 2007, when a 19-day walkout dimmed the lights on more than two dozen shows and cost producers and the city millions of dollars in lost revenue.

    More than 30 members of Congress, including the entire New York delegation, have signed a letter urging all sides to bargain in good faith and avoid a strike.

    “A disruption to Broadway will result in significant economic disruption to not just the New York metropolitan area but harm theater workers and patrons across the country and around the world,” the letter states.

    Source link

  • 31K Kaiser Permanente nurses, other health care workers strike for better wages

    SAN FRANCISCO — SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — An estimated 31,000 registered nurses and other front-line Kaiser Permanente health care workers went on strike Tuesday to demand better wages and staffing from the California-based health care giant.

    Organizers say the five-day strike across 500 medical centers and offices in California, Hawaii and Oregon is the largest in the 50-year history of the United Nurses Associations of California/Union of Health Care Professionals. The strike could grow to include 46,000 people.

    Those on strike, including pharmacists, midwives and rehab therapists, say wages have not kept pace with inflation and there is not enough staffing to keep up with patient demand.

    They are asking for a 25% wage increase over four years to make up for wages they say are at least 7% behind their peers.

    Kaiser Permanente has countered with a 21.5% increase over four years. The company says that represented employees earn, on average, 16% more than their peers, and it would have to charge customers more to meet strikers’ pay demand.

    The company said health clinics and hospitals will remain open during the strike, with some in-person appointments shifted to virtual appointments, and some elective surgeries and procedures being rescheduled.

    Kaiser Permanente is one of the nation’s largest not-for-profit health plans, serving 12.6 million members at 600 medical offices and 40 hospitals in largely western U.S. states. It is based in Oakland, California.

    Source link

  • Harry and Meghan ask families to join fight against predatory social media policies

    NEW YORK — NEW YORK (AP) — Prince Harry and Meghan Markle urged parents to stand against social media companies that they said prey upon children with exploitative algorithms as the “explosion of unregulated artificial intelligence” adds to their concerns that technologies’ benefits are inseparable from its dangers.

    To underscore that point, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex cited research from advocacy group ParentsTogether that found researchers posing as children experienced harmful interactions every five minutes they spent with an artificial intelligence chatbot.

    “This wasn’t content created by a third party. These were the companies’ own chatbots working to advance their own depraved internal policies,” said Prince Harry at Spring Studios in Manhattan Thursday night as he and Markle were named Humanitarians of the Year by the nonprofit Project Healthy Minds. “But here’s what gives us hope: these families aren’t facing this alone.”

    To build their movement of families fighting for online safety, the couple also announced Thursday that their foundation’s Parents Network would join forces with ParentsTogether.

    Their remarks came at the annual gala for Project Healthy Minds, a Millennial- and Gen Z-driven tech nonprofit that runs a free online marketplace aiming to connect patients with the exact mental health care they seek.

    The couple has made youth mental health a cornerstone of their philanthropic work since launching the Archewell Foundation in 2020 after stepping aside as working royals. Through its network for families who have experienced online harm and support of youth-led organizations shaping responsible technology, the nonprofit works to make digital spaces safer.

    Prince Harry has previously stressed the need to hold powerful social media companies accountable. He warned last year that young people are experiencing an “epidemic” of anxiety, depression and social isolation driven by negative experiences online.

    According to numerous studies, few guardrails exist to mitigate kids’ exposure to age-inappropriate content including pornography and violence on social media, where they also face cyberbullying and sexual harassment.

    The issue could also be considered personal for the couple. Markle has been open about her mental health struggles due to what she describes as the royal family’s intense pressures and tabloid attacks. Harry’s own personal life has been the subject of much tabloid reporting, including targeted phone hacking and surveillance.

    Prince Harry brought his awareness campaign to a reception Wednesday night hosted by men’s health nonprofit Movember. In a conversation with television journalist Brooke Baldwin, he emphasized that men should not feel isolated because he repeatedly hears the same struggles when he speaks with them.

    “The biggest barrier is the belief that no one will understand,” he said in comments reshared on his blog. “Loneliness convinces you you’re the only one, which is rarely true.”

    “Culture makers” such as Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are important voices in mental health conversations because they inspire their enormous audiences to seek care, according to Project Healthy Minds CEO Phil Schermer.

    But Schermer emphasized that the “moment of inspiration is fleeting” and it’s important for celebrities to take the extra step of partnering with trusted organizations that can actually deliver care.

    He pointed to NBC television personality Carson Daly, the gala’s host, as an example. Daly opened up about his own anxiety on the air after reading a 2018 essay by NBA champion Kevin Love about an in-game panic attack.

    Daly, a Project Healthy Minds board member, said mental health is now the most common topic that comes up when fans recognize him in public.

    “I was like, ’I want to put all my eggs in this basket’ because I see the power even when I tell my story, it unlocks so many other people telling their story,” Daly told the Associated Press. “And I think that process — that’s how the destigmatization works.”

    The money raised Thursday night will help the nonprofit build new filters that break down care options by their insurance providers and preferences for in-person or telehealth service options, according to Schermer. He compared the features to those on travel planning sites such as Expedia that allow users to choose the times, prices and airlines of their flight options.

    Schermer said that having a recognizable host in Daly also helps “make it cool to talk about your emotions.”

    “It’s not just the absence of a stigma,” Schermer said. “It’s also the presence of a sense of pride that by being vulnerable, being honest, being open, that that’s actually your greatest superpower.”

    Thursday night’s other honoree was Indianapolis Colts co-owner and chief brand officer Kalen Jackson. The NFL executive — who talks openly about dealing with anxiety — has continued the team’s staunch support for mental health after the death of her father and beloved former owner Jim Irsay.

    Project Healthy Minds recognized Jackson with its inaugural Sports Visionary of the Year Award, presented by NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell. Jackson leads her family’s Kicking The Stigma initiative, which raises awareness about mental health disorders and tries to expand access to care across Indiana and country.

    ______

    Associated Press coverage of philanthropy and nonprofits receives support through the AP’s collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content. For all of AP’s philanthropy coverage, visit https://apnews.com/hub/philanthropy.

    Source link

  • Prince Harry and Meghan Markle ask families to join fight against predatory social media policies

    NEW YORK — NEW YORK (AP) — Prince Harry and Meghan Markle urged parents to stand against social media companies that they said prey upon children with exploitative algorithms as the “explosion of unregulated artificial intelligence” adds to their concerns that technologies’ benefits are inseparable from its dangers.

    To underscore that point, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex cited research from advocacy group ParentsTogether that found researchers posing as children experienced harmful interactions every five minutes they spent with an artificial intelligence chatbot.

    “This wasn’t content created by a third party. These were the companies’ own chatbots working to advance their own depraved internal policies,” said Prince Harry at Spring Studios in Manhattan Thursday night as he and Markle were named Humanitarians of the Year by the nonprofit Project Healthy Minds. “But here’s what gives us hope: these families aren’t facing this alone.”

    To build their movement of families fighting for online safety, the couple also announced Thursday that their foundation’s Parents Network would join forces with ParentsTogether.

    Their remarks came at the annual gala for Project Healthy Minds, a Millennial- and Gen Z-driven tech nonprofit that runs a free online marketplace aiming to connect patients with the exact mental health care they seek.

    The couple has made youth mental health a cornerstone of their philanthropic work since launching the Archewell Foundation in 2020 after stepping aside as working royals. Through its network for families who have experienced online harm and support of youth-led organizations shaping responsible technology, the nonprofit works to make digital spaces safer.

    Prince Harry has previously stressed the need to hold powerful social media companies accountable. He warned last year that young people are experiencing an “epidemic” of anxiety, depression and social isolation driven by negative experiences online.

    According to numerous studies, few guardrails exist to mitigate kids’ exposure to age-inappropriate content including pornography and violence on social media, where they also face cyberbullying and sexual harassment.

    The issue could also be considered personal for the couple. Markle has been open about her mental health struggles due to what she describes as the royal family’s intense pressures and tabloid attacks. Harry’s own personal life has been the subject of much tabloid reporting, including targeted phone hacking and surveillance.

    Prince Harry brought his awareness campaign to a reception Wednesday night hosted by men’s health nonprofit Movember. In a conversation with television journalist Brooke Baldwin, he emphasized that men should not feel isolated because he repeatedly hears the same struggles when he speaks with them.

    “The biggest barrier is the belief that no one will understand,” he said in comments reshared on his blog. “Loneliness convinces you you’re the only one, which is rarely true.”

    “Culture makers” such as Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are important voices in mental health conversations because they inspire their enormous audiences to seek care, according to Project Healthy Minds CEO Phil Schermer.

    But Schermer emphasized that the “moment of inspiration is fleeting” and it’s important for celebrities to take the extra step of partnering with trusted organizations that can actually deliver care.

    He pointed to NBC television personality Carson Daly, the gala’s host, as an example. Daly opened up about his own anxiety on the air after reading a 2018 essay by NBA champion Kevin Love about an in-game panic attack.

    Daly, a Project Healthy Minds board member, said mental health is now the most common topic that comes up when fans recognize him in public.

    “I was like, ’I want to put all my eggs in this basket’ because I see the power even when I tell my story, it unlocks so many other people telling their story,” Daly told the Associated Press. “And I think that process — that’s how the destigmatization works.”

    The money raised Thursday night will help the nonprofit build new filters that break down care options by their insurance providers and preferences for in-person or telehealth service options, according to Schermer. He compared the features to those on travel planning sites such as Expedia that allow users to choose the times, prices and airlines of their flight options.

    Schermer said that having a recognizable host in Daly also helps “make it cool to talk about your emotions.”

    “It’s not just the absence of a stigma,” Schermer said. “It’s also the presence of a sense of pride that by being vulnerable, being honest, being open, that that’s actually your greatest superpower.”

    Thursday night’s other honoree was Indianapolis Colts co-owner and chief brand officer Kalen Jackson. The NFL executive — who talks openly about dealing with anxiety — has continued the team’s staunch support for mental health after the death of her father and beloved former owner Jim Irsay.

    Project Healthy Minds recognized Jackson with its inaugural Sports Visionary of the Year Award, presented by NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell. Jackson leads her family’s Kicking The Stigma initiative, which raises awareness about mental health disorders and tries to expand access to care across Indiana and country.

    ______

    Associated Press coverage of philanthropy and nonprofits receives support through the AP’s collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content. For all of AP’s philanthropy coverage, visit https://apnews.com/hub/philanthropy.

    Source link

  • Government shutdown drags on as health care compromise remains elusive

    WASHINGTON — To hear party leaders talk, the seventh day of the government shutdown sounded a lot like the first. Democrats are seeking negotiations on expiring health care subsidies while Republicans say they won’t discuss it, or any other policy, until the government reopens.

    The two sides are also offering starkly different visions of the Affordable Care Act and how to deal with the expanded premium assistance that will soon expire for millions of people — Democrats want the aid extended, while Republicans insist the subsidized health care system is broken and must be cut back.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm“s6>@4C2ED’ A@D:E:@? 92D ?@E 492?865[” D2:5 $6?2E6 s6>@4C2E:4 {6256C r9F4< $49F>6C] “(6 H2?E E96 D2>6 E9:?8 E92E 2 >2;@C:EJ[ 2? @G6CH96=>:?8 >2;@C:EJ[ @7 p>6C:42?D H2?E[ H9:49 😀 E@ 6?5 E9:D D9FE5@H? 2?5 92=E E96 962=E9 42C6 4C:D:D E92E H:== D6?5 AC6>:F>D DA:<:?8 7@C E6?D @7 >:==:@?D @7 A6@A=6]”k^Am

    kAmw@FD6 $A62<6C k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^C6AF3=:42?DECF>AG@F89ED9FE5@H?4@?8C6DD56>@4C2EDEC2?DA@CE2E:@?_577f`636c7“d763gech2_cdece43d4Qm|:<6 y@9?D@?k^2m[ #{2][ >6E H:E9 $6?2E6 #6AF3=:42?D @? %F6D52J 2?5 D2:5 E96 A2CEJ 😀 “`__T F?:E65[” H9:49 96 D2:5 😀 “2 8@@5 A=246 E@ 36 :?]”k^Am

    kAmxE’D F?4=62C 9@H E96 :>A2DD6 H:== 6?5[ 6G6? 2D 9F?5C65D @7 E9@FD2?5D @7 7656C2= H@C<6CD 2C6 8@:?8 F?A2:5 2?5 >2?J 8@G6C?>6?E D6CG:46D 2C6 D=@H65 @C DFDA6?565] s6>@4C2ED 36=:6G6 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^D9FE5@H?E2I4C65:ED962=E9:?DFC2?46ECF>AA@==@32>242C6523f3`_37`b564bb2ggc57d7h76bcb7eQmE96 AF3=:4 😀 @? E96:C D:56k^2m 2D E96J 7:89E E@ <66A E96 r~’xs6C2 DF3D:5:6D[ 3FE 962=E9 42C6 😀 2=D@ @?6 @7 E96 >@DE :?EC24E23=6 :DDF6D 😕 r@?8C6DD — 2?5 2 C62= 4@>AC@>:D6 😀 F?=:<6=J E@ 36 62DJ[ @C BF:4<]k^Am

    kAm%96C6 2C6 D@>6 #6AF3=:42?D 😕 r@?8C6DD H9@ H2?E E@ 6IE6?5 E96 2:5 2D >:==:@?D @7 A6@A=6 H9@ C646:G6 E96:C :?DFC2?46 E9C@F89 E96 prp >2C<6EA=246D 2C6 D6E E@ C646:G6 ?@E:46D E92E E96:C AC6>:F>D k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^4@?8C6DD962=E942C6E2I4C65:ED@32>242C6D9FE5@H?7`66ebe5532f7ed322dabc4dd43_4he6QmH:== :?4C62D6 2E E96 368:??:?8 @7 E96 J62Ck^2m] qFE >2?J v~! =2H>2<6CD 2C6 DEC@?8=J @AA@D65 E@ 2?J 6IE6?D:@? — 2?5 D66 E96 5632E6 2D 2 ?6H @AA@CEF?:EJ E@ ECJ E@ C67@C> E96 AC@8C2>]k^Am

    kAm“x7 #6AF3=:42?D 8@G6C? 3J A@== 2?5 72:= E@ 8C23 E9:D >@>6?E[ E96J H:== @H? :E[” HC@E6 %6I2D #6A] r9:A #@J[ 2 #6AF3=:42?[ 😕 2 =6EE6C AF3=:D965 😕 %96 (2== $EC66E y@FC?2= @G6C E96 H66<6?5] w6 6?4@FC2865 D6?2E@CD ?@E E@ 8@ “H@33=J” @? E96 :DDF6]k^Am

    kAm“%96 ;:8 😀 FA[ E96 A2?56>:4 😀 @G6C 2?5 >J 4@==628F6D D9@F=5?’E 3=:?< 😕 2?J @E96C 5:C64E:@?[” #@J HC@E6]k^Am

    kAm#6AF3=:42?D 92G6 366? C2:=:?8 282:?DE E96 p77@C523=6 r2C6 p4E[ 7@C>6C !C6D:56?E q2C24< ~32>2’D D:8?2EFC6 962=E9 42C6 =2H[ D:?46 :E H2D 6?24E65 `d J62CD 28@] qFE H9:=6 E96J 92G6 366? 23=6 E@ 49:A 2H2J 2E :E[ E96J 92G6 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^F?:E65DE2E6D4@?8C6DDd`ag5h47c444c5_2gedd544eegg5gb32Qm?@E 366? 23=6 E@ DF3DE2?E:2==J 2=E6C :Ek^2m 2D 2 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^@32>242C6242962=E942C64@G6C2863:56?ECF>A_4fb5456c2`h262ed43gb56_`7a5d5a6QmC64@C5 ac >:==:@? A6@A=6k^2m 2C6 ?@H D:8?65 FA 7@C :?DFC2?46 4@G6C286 E9C@F89 E96 prp[ 😕 =2C86 A2CE 3642FD6 3:==:@?D @7 5@==2CD 😕 DF3D:5:6D 92G6 >256 E96 A=2?D >@C6 277@C523=6 7@C >2?J A6@A=6]k^Am

    kAm}@H[ D@>6 @7 E96> D66 E96 s6>@4C2ED’ 7:89E 2D E96:C 492?46 E@ C6G:D:E E96 :DDF6 — AFEE:?8 #6AF3=:42? 4@?8C6DD:@?2= =6256CD 2?5 !C6D:56?E s@?2=5 %CF>A 😕 2 4@>A=:42E65 A@D:E:@?]k^Am

    kAm“x 2> 92AAJ E@ H@C< H:E9 s6>@4C2ED @? E96:C u2:=65 w62=E942C6 !@=:4:6D[ @C 2?JE9:?8 6=D6[ 3FE 7:CDE E96J >FDE 2==@H @FC v@G6C?>6?E E@ C6@A6?[” %CF>A HC@E6 @? D@4:2= >65:2 |@?52J ?:89E[ k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^8@G6C?>6?ED9FE5@H?ECF>A4@?8C6DDf5f6e7h3c6da5_d3eha44c_64e4he47bQmH2=<:?8 324< 62C=:6C 4@>>6?EDk^2m D2J:?8 E96C6 H6C6 @?8@:?8 ?68@E:2E:@?D H:E9 s6>@4C2ED]k^Am

    kAmk2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^8@G6C?>6?ED9FE5@H?E9F?62A:?E6CG:6H@>3>6>@e3fh45echgf3e`fb7`3bahd54bd_dhhcQm$6?2E6 |2;@C:EJ {6256C y@9? %9F?6k^2m[ #$]s][ E@=5 C6A@CE6CD |@?52J E92E “E96C6 >2J 36 2 A2E9 7@CH2C5” @? prp DF3D:5:6D[ 3FE DEC6DD65[ “x E9:?< 2 =@E @7 :E H@F=5 4@>6 5@H? E@ H96C6 E96 (9:E6 w@FD6 =2?5D @? E92E]”k^Am

    kAm$@>6 v~! D6?2E@CD 2C8F6[ E9@F89[ E92E E96 @?=J A2E9 7@CH2C5 😀 E@ @G6C92F= E96 =2H] “%96 H9@=6 AC@3=6> H:E9 2== @7 E9:D 😀 ~32>242C6[” D2:5 u=@C:52 $6?] #:4< $4@EE]k^Am

    kAmy@9?D@? D2:5 E96C6 H6C6 @?8@:?8 E2=2E:4 492?86D” E@ E96 =2H E92E r@?8C6DD >:89E 4@?D:56C @?46 E96 8@G6C?>6?E C6@A6?D]k^Am

    kAm%96 $6?2E6 92D ?@H C6;64E65 2 w@FD6A2DD65 3:== E@ 6IE6?5 8@G6C?>6?E 7F?5:?8 F?E:= >:5}@G6>36C 7:G6 E:>6D[ H:E9 s6>@4C2ED 56?J:?8 #6AF3=:42?D E96 G@E6D E@ A2DD :E F?=6DD E96J H:? 4@?46DD:@?D @? 962=E9 42C6]k^Am

    kAm(:E9 =6256CD 2E @55D[ D@>6 C2?<2?57:=6 D6?2E@CD 😕 3@E9 A2CE:6D 92G6 366? 😕 AC:G2E6 E2= @FE] $6?2E6 pAAC@AC:2E:@?D r@>>:EE66 r92:CH@>2? $FD2? r@==:?D[ #|2:?6[ 92D DF886DE65 AFD9:?8 29625 H:E9 2 8C@FA @7 3:A2CE:D2? DA6?5:?8 3:==D E92E 2C6 A6?5:?8 2?5 E96? D64FC:?8 2 4@>>:E>6?E E@ 5:D4FDD E96 962=E9 42C6 :DDF6]k^Am

    kAmqFE >2?J s6>@4C2ED D2J 2 4@>>:E>6?E :D?’E 8@@5 6?@F89[ 2?5 #6AF3=:42?D D2J E96J ?665 566A6C C67@C>D — =62G:?8 E96 E2=6?E[ 2E 2 DE2?5DE:==]k^Am

    kAm|2:?6 $6?] p?8FD z:?8[ 2? :?56A6?56?E H9@ 42F4FD6D H:E9 s6>@4C2ED[ G@E65 H:E9 #6AF3=:42?D E@ <66A E96 8@G6C?>6?E @A6?] qFE 96 D2:5 |@?52J E92E 96 >:89E DH:E49 9:D G@E6 E@ “?@” :7 #6AF3=:42?D 5@ ?@E “@776C D@>6 C62= D@=:5 6G:56?46 E92E E96J 2C6 8@:?8 E@ 96=A FD H:E9 E9:D 4C:D:D” @? 962=E9 42C6]k^Am

    kAm#6AF3=:42? $6?] |2C2 D2:5 9:D A2CEJ 😀 “?@E 3F58:?8[” 9@H6G6C]k^Am

    kAm“u:CDE 2?5 7@C6>@DE[ 367@C6 H6 42? E2=< 23@FE 2?JE9:?8[ E96J ?665 E@ C6@A6? E96 8@G6C?>6?E[” |F==:? D2:5]k^Am

    kAm$E:==[ D@>6 #6AF3=:42?D D2J E96J 2C6 @A6? E@ 6IE6?5:?8 E96 DF3D:5:6D — 6G6? :7 E96J 5@?’E =:<6 E96> — 2D :E 364@>6D 4=62C E92E E96:C 4@?DE:EF6?ED H:== 7246 C:D:?8 4@DED]k^Am

    kAm“x’> H:==:?8 E@ 4@?D:56C G2C:@FD C67@C>D[ 3FE x E9:?< H6 92G6 E@ 5@ D@>6E9:?8[” D2:5 #6AF3=:42? $6?] y@D9 w2H=6J @7 |:DD@FC:] w6 D2:5 r@?8C6DD D9@F=5 255C6DD E96 :DDF6 “D@@?6C C2E96C E92? =2E6C” 367@C6 @A6? 6?C@==>6?E 368:?D }@G] `]k^Am

    kAm#6A] |2C;@C:6 %2J=@C vC66?6[ #v2][ D2:5 D96 😀 “?@E 2 72?” @7 ~32>242C6 3FE :?5:42E65 D96 >:89E G@E6 E@ 6IE6?5 :E]k^Am

    kAm“x’> 8@:?8 E@ 8@ 282:?DE 6G6CJ@?6 @? E9:D :DDF6 3642FD6 H96? E96 E2I 4C65:ED 6IA:C6 E9:D J62C >J @H? 25F=E 49:=5C6?’D :?DFC2?46 AC6>:F>D 7@C a_ae 2C6 8@:?8 E@ s~&q{t[ 2=@?8 H:E9 2== E96 H@?56C7F= 72>:=:6D 2?5 92C5H@C<:?8 A6@A=6 😕 >J 5:DEC:4E[” D96 A@DE65 @? D@4:2= >65:2 |@?52J 6G6?:?8]k^Am

    kAm(:E9 3@E9 D:56D 5:88:?8 :?[ E96 D9FE5@H? 4@F=5 8@ @? 7@C D@>6 E:>6[ =62G:?8 7656C2= H@C<6CD H:E9@FE E96:C C68F=2C A2J4964A k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^ECF>A7656C2=H@C<6CD324<32JD9FE5@H?fgd63ffe5ab`a5`7eg7f6h`he`5_2hb2Qm>2J 3=@4< 324< A2J :7 E96 8@G6C?>6?E C6@A6?Dk^2m]k^Am

    kAm%CF>A D:8?65 =68:D=2E:@? :?E@ =2H 😕 a_`h E92E 6?DFC6D 324< A2J 7@C 7656C2= H@C<6CD 5FC:?8 2?J 8@G6C?>6?E 7F?5:?8 =2AD6] qFE 2 (9:E6 w@FD6 >6>@ H:E9 E96 C2E:@?2=6 7@C ?@ 324< A2J 😀 F?56C 4@?D:56C2E:@?]k^Am

    kAmy@9?D@? E@=5 C6A@CE6CD %F6D52J E92E 96 5@6D?’E @H E96 56E2:=D @7 E96 >6>@[ 3FE “:7 E92E 😀 ECF6[ E92E D9@F=5 EFC? FA E96 FC86?4J 2?5 E96 ?646DD:EJ @7 E96 s6>@4C2ED 5@:?8 E96 C:89E E9:?8 96C6]”k^Am

    kAms6>@4C2ED AFD965 324< @? E96 (9:E6 w@FD6 C2E:@?2=6] “u656C2= H@C<6CD[ :?4=F5:?8 7FC=@F8965 H@C<6CD[ 2C6 6?E:E=65 E@ E96:C 324< A2J 7@==@H:?8 2 D9FE5@H?[” D2:5 (2D9:?8E@? $6?] !2EEJ |FCC2J[ E96 E@A s6>@4C2E @? E96 $6?2E6 pAAC@AC:2E:@?D r@>>:EE66]k^Am

    kAm%96 (9:E6 w@FD6 2=D@ D2:5 %F6D52J E92E :E H:== FD6 E2C:77 C6G6?F6 E@ 3@=DE6C E96 $A64:2= $FAA=6>6?E2= }FEC:E:@? !C@8C2> 7@C k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^H:48@G6C?>6?ED9FE5@H?7@@52:5f3`5d74b`f3ad3fh_`d62bbd`hf7bf35Qm(@>6?[ x?72?ED 2?5 r9:=5C6?k^2m[ H9:49 😀 724:?8 7F?5:?8 D9@CE286D 3642FD6 @7 E96 D9FE5@H?]k^Am

    kAm!C6DD D64C6E2CJ z2C@=:?6 {62G:EE D2:5 😕 2 A@DE @? ) E92E %CF>A 92D “:56?E:7:65 2 4C62E:G6 D@=FE:@? E@ EC2?D76C C6D@FC46D” 7C@> E2C:77D E96 25>:?:DEC2E:@? 92D :>A@D65 @? &]$] EC25:?8 A2CE?6CD] $96 5:5 ?@E AC@G:56 56E2:=D @7 9@H DF49 7F?5:?8 EC2?D76CD >:89E H@C<]k^Am

    Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

    By MARY CLARE JALONICK, LISA MASCARO and KEVIN FREKING – Associated Press

    Source link

  • Lawsuit seeks to stop Trump’s $100,000 fee for H-1B visas

    SEATTLE (AP) — In what appears to be the first major challenge to the new $100,000 fee required for H-1B visa applications, a coalition of health care providers, religious groups, university professors and others filed a federal lawsuit Friday to stop the plan, saying it has “thrown employers, workers and federal agencies into chaos.”

    President Donald Trump signed a proclamation on Sept. 19 requiring the new fee, saying the H-1B visa program “has been deliberately exploited to replace, rather than supplement, American workers with lower-paid, lower-skilled labor.” The changes were slated to go into effect in 36 hours, which caused panic for employers, who instructed their workers to return to the U.S. immediately.

    The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in San Francisco, said the H-1B program is a critical pathway to hiring healthcare workers and educators. It drives innovation and economic growth in the U.S., and allows employers to fill jobs in specialized fields, the lawsuit said.

    “Without relief, hospitals will lose medical staff, churches will lose pastors, classrooms will lose teachers, and industries across the country risk losing key innovators,” Democracy Forward Foundation and Justice Action Center said in a press release. “The suit asks the court to immediately block the order and restore predictability for employers and workers.”

    They called the new fee “Trump’s latest anti-immigration power grab.”

    Messages seeking comment from the Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Customs and Border Protection, which are named as defendants along with Trump and the State Department, were not immediately returned.

    The H-1B visa program was created by Congress to attract high-skilled workers to fill jobs that tech companies find difficult to fill. About a third of H-1B workers are nurses, teachers, physicians, scholars, priests and pastors, according to the lawsuit.

    Critics say the program is a pipeline for overseas workers who are often willing to work for as little as $60,000 annually, well below the $100,000-plus salaries typically paid to U.S. technology workers.

    Historically, H-1B visas have been doled out through a lottery. This year, Seattle-based Amazon was by far the top recipient of H-1B visas with more than 10,000 awarded, followed by Tata Consultancy, Microsoft, Apple and Google. Geographically, California has the highest number of H-1B workers.

    The $100,000 fee will discourage the best and brightest minds from bringing life-saving research to the U.S., said Todd Wolfson, president of the American Association of University Professors.

    Mike Miller, Region 6 Director of the United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, said Trump’s plan “prioritizes wealth and connections over scientific acumen and diligence.”

    Skye Perryman, president and CEO of Democracy Forward, contends the “exorbitant fee” invites corruption and is illegal. Congress created the program and Trump can’t rewrite it overnight or levy new taxes by executive order, the groups said.

    Source link

  • New Mexico governor signs bills to counter federal cuts

    SANTA FE, N.M. (AP) — New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham signed a package of bills Friday aimed at shoring up food assistance, rural health care and public broadcasting in response to recently enacted federal cuts.

    The new legislation responds to President Donald Trump’s big bill as well as fear that health insurance rates will rise with the expiration of COVID-era subsidies to the Affordable Care Act exchange in New Mexico. Exchange subsidies are a major point of contention in the Washington budget standoff and related federal government shutdown.

    New Mexico would set aside $17 million to backfill the federal credits if they are not renewed, under legislation signed by the governor.

    The Democratic-led Legislature met on Wednesday and Thursday to approved $162 million in state spending on rural health care, food assistance, restocking food banks, public broadcast and more.

    Starting this year, New Mexico expects to lose about $200 million annually because of new federal tax cuts. But the state still has a large budget surplus thanks to booming oil production.

    “When federal support falls short, New Mexico steps up,” Lujan Grisham said in a statement.

    Many federal health care changes under Trump’s big bill don’t kick in until 2027 or later, and Democratic legislators in New Mexico acknowledged that their bills are only a temporary bandage.

    Source link

  • Hopes fade for quick end to shutdown as Trump readies layoffs and cuts

    WASHINGTON — WASHINGTON (AP) — Hopes for a quick end to the government shutdown were fading Friday as Republicans and Democrats dug in for a prolonged fight and President Donald Trump readied plans to unleash layoffs and cuts across the federal government.

    Senators were headed back to the Capitol for another vote on government funding on the third day of the shutdown, but there has been no sign of any real progress toward ending their standoff. Democrats are demanding that Congress extend health care benefits, while Republicans are trying to wear them down with day after day of voting on a House-passed bill that would reopen the government temporarily, mostly at current spending levels.

    “I don’t know how many times you’re going to give them a chance to vote no,” Senate Majority Leader John Thune said at a news conference Friday. He added that he would give Democratic senators the weekend to think it over.

    Although Republicans control the White House and both chambers of Congress, the Senate’s filibuster rules make it necessary for the government funding legislation to gain support from at least 60 of the 100 senators. That’s given Democrats a rare opportunity to use their 47 Senate seats to hold out in exchange for policy concessions. The party has chosen to rally on the issue of health care, believing it could be key to their path back to power in Washington.

    Their primary demand is that Congress extend tax credits that were boosted during the COVID-19 pandemic for health care plans offered under the Affordable Care Act marketplace.

    Standing on the steps of the U.S. Capitol on Thursday, House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries said, “Understand this, over the last few days and over the next few days, what you’re going to see is more than 20 million Americans experience dramatically increased health care premiums, co-pays and deductibles because of the Republican unwillingness to extend the Affordable Care Act tax credits.”

    Democrats are running the high-risk strategy of effectively voting for a government shutdown to make their stand. Trump has vowed to make it as painful as possible for them.

    The Republican president has called the government funding lapse an “unprecedented opportunity” to make vast cuts to federal agencies and potentially lay off federal workers, rather than the typical practice of furloughing them. White House budget director Russ Vought has already announced that he is withholding billions of dollars for infrastructure projects in states with Democratic senators.

    On Friday morning, Vought said he would withhold another $2.1 billion for Chicago infrastructure projects to extend its train system to the city’s South Side.

    Jeffries has displayed no signs of budging under those threats.

    “The cruelty that they might unleash on everyday Americans using the pretense of a shutdown is only going to backfire against them,” he said during an interview with The Associated Press and other outlets at the Capitol.

    Still, the shutdown, no matter how long it lasts, could have far-reaching effects on the economy. Roughly 750,000 federal employees could be furloughed, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, and they could lose out on $400 million in daily wages. That loss in wages until after the government reopens could drive down wider demand for goods and services.

    “All around the country right now, real pain is being endured by real people because the Democrats have decided to play politics,” said House Speaker Mike Johnson on Friday.

    The American public usually spreads the blame around to both major political parties when it comes to a government shutdown. While Trump took a significant portion of the blame during the last partial government shutdown in 2018 as he demanded funding for a U.S.-Mexico border wall, this standoff could end differently because now it is Democrats making the policy demands.

    Still, lawmakers were relentlessly trying to make their case to the American public with a constant beat of news conferences, social media videos and livestreams. Congressional leaders have been especially active.

    Both sides expressed confidence that the other would ultimately be found at fault. And in the House, party leaders seemed to be moving farther apart rather than closer to making a deal to end the shutdown.

    Jeffries on Thursday called for a permanent extension to the ACA tax credits. Meanwhile, Johnson and Thune told reporters that they would not negotiate on the tax credits until the government is reopened.

    A few senators have engaged in bipartisan talks about launching negotiations on extending the ACA tax credits for one year while the Senate votes to reopen the government for several weeks. But those discussions are in their early stages and appear to have little involvement from leadership.

    As senators prepared for their last scheduled vote for the week on Friday, they appeared resigned to allow the shutdown to continue at least into next week. Thune said that if the vote failed, he would “give them the weekend to think about it” before holding more votes.

    Sen. Amy Klobuchar, in a floor speech, called for Republicans to work with her and fellow Democrats to find “common ground” on the ACA subsidies, saying their expiration would impact plenty of people in states with GOP senators — especially in rural areas where farmers, ranchers and small business owners purchase their own health insurance.

    “Unfortunately, right now our Republican colleagues are not working with us to find a bipartisan agreement to prevent the government shutdown and address the health care crisis,” she said. “We know that even when they float ideas — which we surely do appreciate — in the end the president appears to make the call.”

    ___

    Associated Press writers Lisa Mascaro, Kevin Freking and Joey Cappelletti contributed.

    Source link

  • Asian shares are mixed as tech shares lead Wall Street ticks to more records

    MANILA, Philippines — MANILA, Philippines (AP) — Asian shares were mixed on Friday after heavy buying of tech shares led benchmarks on Wall Street to more records.

    US. futures and oil prices were higher.

    Markets have largely shrugged off the shutdown of the U.S. government after Democrat and Republican lawmakers failed to reach agreement on funding.

    U.S. President Donald Trump and congressional leaders were not expected to meet again soon and the Democrats have held fast to their demands to preserve health care funding, warning of price spikes for millions of Americans nationwide.

    Japan’s Nikkei 225 rose nearly 1.7% to 45,691.32 as tech stocks gained despite data showing Japan’s unemployment rate rose 2.6% in August, the highest in 13 months and above the expected 2.4%.

    Shares in Hitachi jumped 9.2% after it signed a memorandum of understanding with OpenAI to provide cooling systems for its data centers.

    Stocks in the computer chip and artificial-intelligence industries also have climbed this week after OpenAI announced partnerships with South Korean companies for Stargate, a $500 billion project aimed at building AI infrastructure.

    Stock exchanges in China and South Korea were closed Friday for holidays.

    Hong Kong’s Hang Seng index shed nearly 0.9% to 27,052.32, as traders sold to lock in profits from Thursday’s gains.

    Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 added more than 0.3% to 8,977.80. India’s BSE Sensex shed 0.2%, while Taiwan’s Taiex rose 1%.

    Thursday on Wall Street, the S&P 500 added 0.1% to its all-time high set the day before, closing at 6,715.35. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 0.2% to 46,519.72, and the Nasdaq composite climbed 0.4% to 22,844.05.

    The government shutdown means this week’s usual report on jobless claims was delayed. An even more consequential report, Friday’s monthly tally of jobs created and destroyed across the economy, will likely also not arrive on schedule.

    That increases uncertainty when much on Wall Street is riding on investors’ expectation that the job market is slowing by enough to convince the Federal Reserve to keep cutting interest rates, but not by so much that it leads to a recession.

    So far, the U.S. stock market has looked past the delays of such data. Shutdowns of the U.S. government have tended not to hurt the economy or stock market much, and the thinking is that this one could be similar, even if Trump has threatened large-scale firings of federal workers this time around.

    That left corporate announcements as the main drivers of trading Thursday.

    Excitement around AI and the massive spending underway because of it are a major reason the U.S. stock market has hit record after record, along with hopes for easier interest rates. But AI stocks have become so dominant, and so much money has poured into the industry that worries are rising about a potential bubble that could eventually lead to disappointment for investors.

    Still, Advanced Micro Devices climbed 3.5%, and Broadcom gained 1.4%. Nvidia’s 0.9% rise was the strongest single force pushing the S&P 500 upward.

    In other dealings early Friday, benchmark U.S. crude added 36 cents to $60.84 per barrel. Brent crude, the international standard, rose 36 cents to $64.47 per barrel.

    The U.S. dollar climbed to 147.64 Japanese yen from 147.26 yen. The euro edged up to $1.1725 from $1.1717.

    ___

    AP Writers Stan Choe and Matt Ott contributed.

    Source link