ReportWire

Tag: Health Care

  • AI’s Errors May Be Impossible to Eliminate – What That Means For Its Use in Health Care

    By Carlos Gershenson | Professor of Innovation, Binghamton University, State University of New York

    In the past decade, AI’s success has led to uncurbed enthusiasm and bold claims – even though users frequently experience errors that AI makes. An AI-powered digital assistant can misunderstand someone’s speech in embarrassing ways, a chatbot could hallucinate facts, or, as I experienced, an AI-based navigation tool might even guide drivers through a corn field – all without registering the errors.

    How exactly such prescribing would work if this or similar legislation passes remains to be seen. But it raises the stakes for how many errors AI developers can allow their tools to make and what the consequences would be if those tools led to negative outcomes – even patient deaths.

    Sign Up for U.S. News Healthcare of Tomorrow Bulletin

    Your trusted source for critical insights and solutions-focused analysis.

    Sign up to receive the latest updates from U.S. News & World Report and our trusted partners and sponsors. By clicking submit, you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions & Privacy Policy.

    For AI in particular, errors might be an inescapable consequence of how the systems work. My lab’s research suggests that particular properties of the data used to train AI models play a role. This is unlikely to change, regardless of how much time, effort and funding researchers direct at improving AI models.

    Nobody – And Nothing, Not Even AI – Is Perfect

    As Alan Turing, considered the father of computer science, once said: “If a machine is expected to be infallible, it cannot also be intelligent.” This is because learning is an essential part of intelligence, and people usually learn from mistakes. I see this tug-of-war between intelligence and infallibility at play in my research.

    In a study published in July 2025, my colleagues and I showed that perfectly organizing certain datasets into clear categories may be impossible. In other words, there may be a minimum amount of errors that a given dataset produces, simply because of the fact that elements of many categories overlap. For some datasets – the core underpinning of many AI systems – AI will not perform better than chance.

    For example, a model trained on a dataset of millions of dogs that logs only their age, weight and height will probably distinguish Chihuahuas from Great Danes with perfect accuracy. But it may make mistakes in telling apart an Alaskan malamute and a Doberman pinscher, since different individuals of different species might fall within the same age, weight and height ranges.

    This categorizing is called classifiability, and my students and I started studying it in 2021. Using data from more than half a million students who attended the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México between 2008 and 2020, we wanted to solve a seemingly simple problem. Could we use an AI algorithm to predict which students would finish their university degrees on time – that is, within three, four or five years of starting their studies, depending on the major?

    We tested several popular algorithms that are used for classification in AI and also developed our own. No algorithm was perfect; the best ones − even one we developed specifically for this task − achieved an accuracy rate of about 80%, meaning that at least 1 in 5 students were misclassified. We realized that many students were identical in terms of grades, age, gender, socioeconomic status and other features – yet some would finish on time, and some would not. Under these circumstances, no algorithm would be able to make perfect predictions.

    You might think that more data would improve predictability, but this usually comes with diminishing returns. This means that, for example, for each increase in accuracy of 1%, you might need 100 times the data. Thus, we would never have enough students to significantly improve our model’s performance.

    Additionally, many unpredictable turns in lives of students and their families – unemployment, death, pregnancy – might occur after their first year at university, likely affecting whether they finish on time. So even with an infinite number of students, our predictions would still give errors.

    The Limits of Prediction

    Thus, studying elements of the system in isolation would probably yield misleading insights about them – as well as about the system as a whole.

    Take, for example, a car traveling in a city. Knowing the speed at which it drives, it’s theoretically possible to predict where it will end up at a particular time. But in real traffic, its speed will depend on interactions with other vehicles on the road. Since the details of these interactions emerge in the moment and cannot be known in advance, precisely predicting what happens to the the car is possible only a few minutes into the future.

    Not With My Health

    These same principles apply to prescribing medications. Different conditions and diseases can have the same symptoms, and people with the same condition or disease may exhibit different symptoms. For example, fever can be caused by a respiratory illness or a digestive one. And a cold might cause cough, but not always.

    This means that health care datasets have significant overlaps that would prevent AI from being error-free.

    Certainly, humans also make errors. But when AI misdiagnoses a patient, as it surely will, the situation falls into a legal limbo. It’s not clear who or what would be responsible if a patient were hurt. Pharmaceutical companies? Software developers? Insurance agencies? Pharmacies?

    In many contexts, neither humans nor machines are the best option for a given task. “Centaurs,” or “hybrid intelligence” – that is, a combination of humans and machines – tend to be better than each on their own. A doctor could certainly use AI to decide potential drugs to use for different patients, depending on their medical history, physiological details and genetic makeup. Researchers are already exploring this approach in precision medicine.

    But common sense and the precautionary principle suggest that it is too early for AI to prescribe drugs without human oversight. And the fact that mistakes may be baked into the technology could mean that where human health is at stake, human supervision will always be necessary.

    The Conversation

    Source link

  • House OKs protections for hospital workers

    BOSTON — Beacon Hill lawmakers are moving to increase protections for health care workers in response to skyrocketing acts of violence against nurses and other hospital staff in recent years.

    A proposal approved by the state House of Representatives last week would set new criminal charges specifically for violence and intimidation against health care workers and require hospitals and state public health officials to establish new standards for dealing with security risks at medical facilities.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm&?56C E96 =68:D=2E:@?[ 2?J@?6 H9@ 4@>>:ED “3@5:=J :?;FCJ” 282:?DE 2 962=E9 42C6 H@C<6C 4@F=5 36 492C865 2?5 7246 FA E@ 7:G6 J62CD AC:D@? 2?5 Sd[___ 😕 7:?6D] %9@D6 492C865 H:E9 “D6C:@FD” 3@5:=J :?;FCJ 4@F=5 =2?5 @776?56CD 😕 AC:D@? 7@C FA E@ `_ J62CD[ 2D H6== 2D Sd[___ 😕 7:?6D]k^Am

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Letters: Walnut Creek bike path plan doesn’t enhance safety

    Submit your letter to the editor via this form. Read more Letters to the Editor.

    Bike-path gambit
    doesn’t enhance safety

    Re: “Safety debate at crossroads” (Page A1, Oct. 30).

    In a recent meeting held behind closed doors, Contra Costa County and the city of Walnut Creek agreed to use over $6 million in funds from programs designed to promote highway safety and improvements to carve out a three-block-long bicycle path on Treat Boulevard.

    The affected area runs from North Main St. to Jones Road, a stretch that currently handles over 40,000 vehicles a day. The proposed path duplicates the existing Canal Trail, which is dedicated to bikers and pedestrians, is located two blocks south of Treat Boulevard and connects directly to the Iron Horse Trail for access to the Pleasant Hill BART station.

    The city acknowledged both the high risk to bikers using the proposed paths and the negative impacts on traffic in this highly congested area. So, why is this project going forward?

    Larry McEwen
    Walnut Creek

    Opposing investment
    policy is out of step

    Re: “Ethical investment policy approved” (Page B1, Oct. 10).

    The Jewish Community Relations Council (JCRC) came out in opposition to an Alameda County Ethical Investment Policy at the Oct. 3 Board of Supervisors meeting. The supervisors passed the policy but delayed implementation.

    The majority of Jews present at that meeting were mobilized by Jewish Voice for Peace and supported the policy.

    A September Washington Post poll found that the majority of U.S. Jews do not support current Israeli policies. The JCRC’s position of opposing a pro-human rights policy is not a mainstream position, and it is not aligned with Jewish values.

    The JCRC accused Israel’s critics of antisemitism and expressed concern about Jewish safety. Associating Jews with the acts of a murderous regime makes Jews less safe. Jews are safer in a world that works for all, including Palestinians.

    We urge the supervisors to implement the Ethical Investment Policy as soon as possible.

    Cynthia Kaufman
    Oakland

    California must go its
    own way on health care

    Re: “Policyholders brace for price increases” (Page A1, Nov. 22).

    The recent story harkens back to a pre-ACA time when people went without insurance because of the high costs of insurance premiums. What we need for California is a Cal-Care for all solution. However, this year, a Cal-Care bill was sent to Gov. Gavin Newsom, and he vetoed it. The main reason is that the federal government is not willing to give money that is due to us, which messes with the state budget.

    Staying in the United States is not beneficial to California. In 2022, we gave $83 billion to the federal government, which ends up getting redistributed to other states. The California National Party is the only party that recognizes this and has universal health care (Cal-Care, or Medi-Cal for all) as part of its platform.

    Maya Ram
    Union City

    Constitution will halt
    third term for Trump

    Re: “Don’t think Trump won’t try for third term” (Page A6, Nov. 18).

    A letter writer opined that President Trump could seek a third term as president by being vice president on a ticket headed by JD Vance, and, after Vance won the presidency, Vance could, by prearrangement, resign, and Trump would become president.

    However, the 12th Amendment of the Constitution stipulates that one who is constitutionally ineligible to be president is also ineligible to be vice president, which would presumably prevent Trump from becoming president under this subterfuge.

    Trump could argue that the 22nd Amendment of the Constitution prohibits him only from being “elected” — but not actually serving — as president for a third term. But the Supreme Court would likely reject this subterfuge on grounds that it conflicts with the plain intent of the 22nd amendment to prevent a person from serving a third term as president through the electoral process, as Franklin Roosevelt did in the 1930s.

    Roderick Walston
    Orinda

    Don’t cancel comic;
    just move it

    Re: “Don’t cancel comic for having an opinion” (Page A8, Nov. 23).

    I am one of the people who have written to request that “Mallard Fillmore” be moved to the Opinion Page, since it is clearly political in nature. I’m not asking that it be censored or removed from the paper, just that it be recognized as political opinion.

    In the past few days, “Mallard Fillmore” has implied that the media only looks for bad things about Donald Trump and twists the truth, that liberals are stealing our tax dollars to support their own political party, and only care about disease in an election year, and the media is hypocritically misleading us about the destruction of the White House East Wing. Meanwhile, “Pickles” taught Nelson to say I love you to his grandma, and “Luann” adopted a puppy. Which of these is not like the other?

    Incidentally, “Doonesbury” is offering more-than-20-year-old strips. That’s not a fair balance.

    Sampson Van Zandt
    Walnut Creek

    Letters To The Editor

    Source link

  • House Speaker Mike Johnson says House GOP does not want to extend health care subsidies: sources

    The White House’s plan to draft an Affordable Care Act subsidies extension may have hit a snag. CBS News has confirmed that House Speaker Mike Johnson called senior Trump officials, telling them that most House Republicans have little interest in extending the tax subsidies once they expire at the end of the year. CBS News political reporter Hunter Woodall has more details.

    Source link

  • Clackamas County Sheriff’s Jail Earns National Correctional Health Care Award – KXL

    OREGON CITY, Ore. — The Clackamas County Sheriff’s Jail has been awarded the National Commission on Correctional Health Care Pinnacle Award.  It’s given to agencies that demonstrate the highest level of excellence in correctional health care.

    The Clackamas County Jail is the first in Oregon and one of only six correctional facilities in the nation to earn the Pinnacle Award.

    Learn more about the National Commission on Correctional Health Care and its accreditations here: https://ncchc.org

    More about:

    Brett Reckamp

    Source link

  • House OKs protections for hospital workers

    BOSTON — Beacon Hill lawmakers are moving to increase protections for health care workers in response to skyrocketing acts of violence against nurses and other hospital staff in recent years.

    A proposal approved by the state House of Representatives last week would set new criminal charges specifically for violence and intimidation against health care workers and require hospitals and state public health officials to establish new standards for dealing with security risks at medical facilities.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm&?56C E96 =68:D=2E:@?[ 2?J@?6 H9@ 4@>>:ED Q3@5:=J :?;FCJQ 282:?DE 2 962=E9 42C6 H@C<6C 4@F=5 36 492C865 2?5 7246 FA E@ 7:G6 J62CD AC:D@? 2?5 Sd[___ 😕 7:?6D] %9@D6 492C865 H:E9 QD6C:@FDQ 3@5:=J :?;FCJ 4@F=5 =2?5 @776?56CD 😕 AC:D@? 7@C FA E@ `_ J62CD[ 2D H6== 2D Sd[___ 😕 7:?6D]k^Am

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Blue Cross Blue Shield to end SilverSneakers coverage at YMCA, Life Time gyms

    Saturday afternoon at the Southdale YMCA in Edina, Minnesota, you could hear feet pounding on treadmills and weighted plates striking each other as people of all ages exercised. 

    Away from the machines, you could hear the sound of whispers, as senior members try to work out what they’re going to do in 2026 after finding out their insurance will no longer cover their gym membership.

    This week, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota began telling customers that both the YMCA of the North and Life Time gyms would no longer be covered as of Jan. 1, 2026. 

    For several years, those chains have been included under the SilverSneakers program, which covers the cost of gym membership for Blue Cross Blue Shield Medicare recipients.

    According to YMCA leadership, this impacts around 7,800 seniors who use the locations in the Twin Cities metro. Blue Cross Blue Shield said that YMCA locations in Greater Minnesota will not be impacted.

    “I’m just so angry at the way they did this,” Diane Hurley said.

    Hurley, 84, said that she was shocked to hear the news. After retirement, she said the Southdale YMCA became a lifeline for her; a place to follow a healthy routine and form social bonds with other senior members of the community who might otherwise be sitting at home.

    “We don’t want to lose our health insurance. We don’t want to lose our ability to work out and to stay healthy,” Hurley said. “I don’t want to lose that. It’s far too important.”

    In a statement to WCCO, a spokesperson for Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota confirmed this was about the money involved.

    “As a market, Minnesota is experiencing high cost pressures related to Medicare coverage. In order to ensure Blue Cross could continue offering SilverSneakers to our Medicare members in Minnesota, we needed to adjust the network structure of locations included in the program,” the statement read in part.

    The insurance company notes that when the coverage at the YMCA of the North and Life Time ends on Jan. 1, its Medicare members will still have access to more than 600 SilverSneakers locations. Hurley said that most cannot provide the same services as the YMCA when it comes to classes and support systems designed for seniors.

    “Did somebody just bump up their salary, find a new car they needed? This is unfair, totally unfair,” Hurley said.

    Hurley and thousands of others, like Greg Socha, are now looking at the possibility of having to change insurance providers or pay the YMCA $77 per month to maintain gym membership. Socha has a dedicated routine at the Edina gym that he loves, but he’s not sure what he’ll do now with just two weeks left in the open enrollment period. In fact, he said he only just signed with Blue Cross Blue Shield in large part because of the access to the YMCA.

    “Theoretically, I’m not coming here anymore,” Socha said, looking around the gym floor at the Southdale YMCA on Saturday.

    The open enrollment period began in mid-October and ends on Dec. 7. Hurley is one of several people frustrated that they only received this news in late November.

    “The makeup of the network itself is subject to change at any time. Specific participating locations are not guaranteed and can differ by plan,” a Blue Cross Blue Shield spokesperson said.

    One woman, who wished to remain anonymous, said that she had just agreed to a plan that would see her premium go up by 16% next year only to lose YMCA access.

    “There are going to be a lot of seniors, unfortunately, who are on fixed incomes and aren’t going to be able to afford the extra $1,000 a year and they may just give up, and that will be really sad,” the woman said. “It’s a very short-sighted decision on Blue Cross Blue Shield’s part. The way to keep health costs down is to keep us healthy and the way to keep us healthy is to encourage and motivate people to exercise.”

    Glen Gunderson, CEO for YMCA of the North, told WCCO that his team only found out about the change this week as well. He said that he considers Blue Cross Blue Shield to be a strong partner,  but he’s encouraging concerned seniors to consider other insurers that may work with the SilverSneakers program. 

    The YMCA is pointing to companies like Allina Health, Aetna, HealthPartners, Humana, Medica and UnitedHealthcare.

    “We have huge respect for Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota, their leaders are amazing, they are up against, I’m sure, very challenging economic times like we all are,” Gunderson said. “We’ve just been surprised. We came to find this out as I said on Wednesday late in the game and it’s unfortunate. We’re disappointed that seniors are being caught up in it.”

    Conor Wight

    Source link

  • Trump Could Save Himself by Saving Obamacare

    Trump could again draw in all the congressional leaders and force them into a deal.
    Photo: Melina Mara/Getty Images

    This isn’t the first time that we’re reading stories about Republicans taking their first baby steps toward a post–Donald Trump future. Pundits, rivals, and opponents have been looking over the horizon for signs that Trump’s grip on his party would fade since 2016. But the combination of sinking presidential job-approval ratings, terrible off-year election results, occasional acts of congressional defiance, and more-deranged-than-usual Truth Social posts has revived talk of Trump’s mojo eroding. Add in the fact that the president has run his last campaign and you can understand why the “lame duck” label is beginning to stick to him. If his so-far-faithful servants on the Supreme Court let him down in a series of big cases between now and next July, a real jailbreak atmosphere could infect the GOP and the whole world of political observers who have had to live with this turbulent man every minute for a decade.

    This trend has to be excruciating for the president, who believes he has already saved the country and has earned the right to a perpetual victory lap in which he consolidates his lofty place in global history by ending wars and cutting big investment deals wherever he goes. Instead he’s having to deal with a rebellion in the very core of his MAGA movement over his relationship with the late Jeffrey Epstein, and cope with widespread public concerns over the “affordability” of life in America. This last problem clearly baffles and sometimes angers Trump, who has bought his own spin about the economy being better than ever and on the brink of new heights thanks to AI.

    There is, however, something he could do right now that would reestablish his relevance, confirm his mastery of Congress, and address affordability concerns while reducing the odds of a GOP midterm apocalypse. He could reengage on the issue of extending Obamacare subsidies and buy some time for his party to finally figure out what to propose on health care.

    As you may recall, the Democratic calculation immediately before and throughout the recent record government shutdown was that Trump would negotiate a subsidy extension deal and impose it on his party. But he refused to come to the table, and instead, began denouncing Obamacare itself as though it was still 2015. He also began encouraging Republicans to go back to the poisoned well of proposals to repeal and replace Obamacare with some sort of beefed-up individual health accounts instead of fixing the current system and heading off a huge insurance-premium price spike. It has sure looked like Trump was leading his party back to the agenda that bombed in 2017 and led to the loss of the House in 2018.

    But now there are Republicans in both congressional chambers trying to steer their party and their president back to a temporary Obamacare subsidy patch that can head off electoral disaster while letting them continue to talk about some wonderful Obamacare alternative that will appear a bit down the road (say, after the 2026 midterms). As Punchbowl News reports, the talented dealmaker Katie Britt seems to be front and center in this effort:

    Republican senators have been privately lobbying President Donald Trump to support a limited short-term extension of Obamacare subsidies, arguing it would save the GOP from a 2026 drubbing and buy time for Congress to pass a longer-term health care plan that mirrors the president’s preferences.

    Sen. Katie Britt (R-Ala.) has spoken with the president several times this week to pitch the idea, according to multiple sources familiar with the matter.

    Britt seems to have a special rapport with Trump based in part on her physical appearance. She’s also a shrewd politician who understands her party’s immediate needs:

    A short-term extension of the Obamacare subsidies could mean one, two or even three years, with strict eligibility crackdowns, such as income caps and anti-fraud provisions. A Trump-led push would provide political cover for vulnerable Republicans; it would also save Thune from having to deal with a divided conference.

    There’s activity in the House, too, where a bipartisan group that includes Democrats Tom Suozzi and Josh Gottenheimer and Republicans Don Bacon and Jeff Hurd have a two-year extension plan, per Punchbowl:

    The bill would add a new income cap, extending the enhanced credits for families of four earning less than $200,000 per year and phasing them out for families of four earning between $200,000 and $300,000.

    One other idea under discussion is a one-year subsidy extension with income caps and fraud-prevention changes, paired with a commission to negotiate a longer-term solution next year.

    Time’s a-wasting, though, since the Senate vote on health care that John Thune agreed to is coming up in weeks and the politics of a short-term Obamacare subsidy-extension deal are tricky. Some Democrats are fine with Republicans doing nothing and giving them a powerful midterm message. And again, there is zero way House Republicans allow a vote on, much less agree to, any Obamacare extension unless Trump calls them in and demands it, along with all sorts of rhetorical window dressing about his determination to kill Obamacare and atomize its remains sometime real soon.

    A deal is still a long shot. But Democrats need to retroactively vindicate their government-shutdown strategy, which fell short of its principal goal when Trump refused to play his part. Republicans need to get the Obamacare premium spike out of the news until November 2026. And Trump needs to show he’s still the Man, the straw that stirs every drink in American politics. The ingredients are there for the deal that has eluded everyone for so long.

    Ed Kilgore

    Source link

  • Complaints about gaps in Medicare Advantage networks are common. Federal enforcement is rare.

    Along with the occasional aches and pains, growing older can bring surprise setbacks and serious diseases. Longtime relationships with doctors people trust often make even bad news more tolerable. Losing that support — especially during a health crisis — can be terrifying. That’s why little-known federal requirements are supposed to protect people with privately run Medicare Advantage coverage when contract disputes lead their health care providers and insurers to part ways.

    But government documents obtained by KFF Health News show the agency overseeing Medicare Advantage does little to enforce long-standing rules intended to ensure about 35 million plan members can see doctors in the first place.

    In response to a Freedom of Information Act request covering the past decade, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services produced letters it sent to only five insurers from 2016 to 2022 after seven of their plans failed to meet provider network adequacy requirements — lapses that could, in some cases, harm patient care.

    Agency officials said some plans lacked enough primary care clinicians, specialists, or hospitals, according to the letters. And they warned that failure to meet the requirements could result in a freeze on marketing and enrollment, fines, or closure of the plan.

    CMS declined to detail why it found so few plans with network violations over the 10 years. “The number of identified violations reflects the outcomes of targeted reviews, not a comprehensive audit of all plans in all years,” said Catherine Howden, a CMS spokesperson.

    Officials in states with Advantage network violations say CMS didn’t notify them, including directors of the government-funded State Health Insurance Assistance Program, which helps people navigate Medicare.

    “It’s hard for me to believe that only seven Medicare Advantage plans violated network rules,” said David Lipschutz, a co-director of the Center for Medicare Advocacy, a nonprofit group. “We often hear from folks — particularly in more rural areas — who have to travel significant distances in order to find contracted providers.”

    Medicare Advantage is an increasingly popular alternative to the government-run Medicare program, which covers adults 65 and older and some people with disabilities. Of the 63 million Americans who were eligible to join Advantage plans instead of traditional Medicare, 54% did so for this year. The plans usually offer lower out-of-pocket costs and extra benefits, like coverage for vision, dental, and hearing care, but typically require their members to stick to select networks of doctors, hospitals, and other providers. Last year, the federal government paid Advantage plans an estimated $494 billion to care for patients.

    Traditional Medicare, by comparison, has no network and is accepted by nearly all doctors and hospitals in the nation.

    Conflicts between Medicare Advantage plans and the doctors, hospitals, and other providers that serve their members are common. Just this year, at least 38 hospital systems serving all or parts of 23 states have cut ties with at least 11 Advantage plans after failing to agree on payment and other issues, according to a review of news releases and press reports. Over the past three years, separations between Advantage plans and health systems have increased 66%, said FTI Consulting, which tracks reports of the disputes.

    After March, Medicare Advantage beneficiaries are generally locked into their plans for the year until the annual open enrollment period happening now through Dec. 7, for coverage beginning Jan. 1. But hospitals, doctors, pharmacies, and other health providers can leave plans anytime.

    When providers and insurers separate, Advantage members can lose access to longtime doctors or preferred hospitals in the middle of the year. In response, CMS sometimes gives Advantage customers a little-known escape hatch called a “special enrollment period” to change plans or enroll in traditional Medicare midyear.

    How CMS decides who gets an SEP is a mystery even to well-versed state insurance regulators and U.S. senators who oversee federal health programs. Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden, the senior Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, and Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.) cited previous KFF Health News reporting on Medicare Advantage in an Oct. 30 letter asking CMS Administrator Mehmet Oz for an explanation.

    “Despite the serious impacts of SEPs on enrollees and the market, the process of SEP determinations is opaque, leaving enrollees and state regulators in the dark,” they wrote.

    “Seniors deserve to know their Medicare plan isn’t going to pull the rug out from under them halfway through the year,” Wyden told KFF Health News.

    “Help us”

    Oz spoke to Medicare Advantage insurers Oct. 15 at a conference organized by the Better Medicare Alliance, a trade group, and encouraged them to help CMS police fraud in the program.

    “Be our early-warning system,” he told them. “Tell us about problems you’re witnessing. Help us figure out better ways of addressing it.”

    When he finished speaking, he took a seat in the audience next to the president and chief executive of the group, Mary Beth Donahue, and smiled for photos.

    In six letters KFF Health News obtained, CMS officials told five insurers that their network adequacy violations could affect Advantage members’ access to care. Five letters listed the number or types of medical specialists or facilities missing from the networks. In three cases, CMS noted that plans could request exceptions to the rules but didn’t. In one letter, CMS requested the plan allow members to receive out-of-network care at no additional cost. Four letters required specific steps to address deficiencies, including submitting evidence that more clinicians were added to networks.

    Three letters required a “corrective action plan,” set deadlines for fixing problems, and warned that failure to comply with the rules could result in enrollment and marketing suspensions, fines, or forced plan closure. The other three letters were a “notice of non-compliance,” which urged insurers to comply with legal requirements. 

    Although CMS regards the letters as the first step in its enforcement process, the agency did not provide information about whether these violations were resolved or if they resulted in penalties.

    The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, a group created by Congress to monitor the program, said in a June 2024 report that “CMS has the authority to impose intermediate sanctions or civil monetary penalties for noncompliance with network adequacy standards, but it has never done so.”

    One of the network adequacy violation letters went to Vitality Health Plan of California in November 2020. That came after five hospitals and 13 nursing homes in one county and four hospitals in another all left the insurer’s network, according to the letter from Timothy Roe, then-director of CMS’ Division of Compliance, Surveillance, and Marketing. Two months before sending its letter, CMS granted Vitality plan members a special enrollment period.

    Beneficiaries welcomed the opportunity, said Marcelo Espiritu, program manager of the Santa Clara County office of California’s Health Insurance Counseling & Advocacy Program. But Espiritu didn’t know at the time that Vitality’s depleted network violated CMS requirements, which Roe said put “the health of Vitality’s beneficiaries at risk.”

    “By not having enough network providers, beneficiaries may not be able to receive necessary services timely, or at all,” Roe wrote.

    That’s information patients need to know, Espiritu said.

    “People would not be able to receive promised benefits and there would be delays in care and a lot of frustration in trying to find a new plan,” he said. “We would certainly warn people about the plan and remove it from our materials.”

    Representatives from Commonwealth Care Alliance, which acquired Vitality in 2022, did not respond to requests for comment.

    Network minimums

    Federal law requires Medicare Advantage plans to include in their networks a minimum of 29 types of health care providers and 14 kinds of facilities that members can access within certain distances and travel times. The rules, which vary depending on a county’s population and density, also limit how long patients should wait for appointments. The agency checks compliance every three years, or more often if it receives complaints.

    Networks can vary widely even within a county because the provider minimums apply to the insurer, not each plan it sells, according to a report from KFF, a health information nonprofit that includes KFF Health News. The company can offer the same network to members of multiple plans in one or more counties or create a separate network for each plan.

    In Arizona’s Maricopa County, KFF researchers found, UnitedHealthcare offered 12 plans with 12 different networks in 2022. Depending on the plan, the company’s customers had access to 37% to 61% of the physicians in the area available to traditional Medicare enrollees.

    In early 2016, CMS allowed 900 people in an Advantage plan in Illinois run by Harmony, then a WellCare subsidiary, to leave after the Christie Clinic, a large medical practice, left its provider network. The WellCare plan continued to operate without the clinic. But in June 2016, CMS told the plan in one of the letters KFF Health News obtained that losing the Christie Clinic meant the remaining provider network violated federal requirements.

    It was “a significant network change with substantial enrollee impact,” the letter said.

    Claudia Lennhoff, executive director at Champaign County Health Care Consumers, a government-funded Medicare counseling service that helped the WellCare members, said her group didn’t know about the letter at the time.

    “Not disclosing such information is a violation of trust,” Lennhoff said. “It could lead someone to make a decision that will be harmful to them, or that they will deeply regret.”

    Centene Corp. bought WellCare in 2020, and representatives for the St. Louis-based company declined to comment on events that occurred before the acquisition.

    Two violation letters KFF Health News obtained from CMS went to Provider Partners Health Plan of Ohio in 2019 and 2022. The Ohio Department of Insurance was unaware of the violations, spokesperson Todd Walker said. He said CMS also did not notify the Ohio Senior Health Insurance Information Program, the state’s free counseling service.

    Rick Grindrod, CEO and president of Provider Partners Health Plans, which is based in Maryland, said that after CMS reviewed its 2019 network, “we proactively reduced our service area and deferred enrollment in the plan until 2021.”

    But Grindrod said the plan enrolled only a small number of members in one county in 2021 and decided to withdraw from the Ohio market entirely at the end of that year.

    After Provider Partners withdrew from Ohio, CMS sent it another letter in March 2022 saying its network in 2021 had gaps in four counties for four types of providers and facilities. CMS asked the plan to comply with network rules by adding more providers.

    “We believe CMS’ network adequacy standards are generally clear and appropriate for ensuring beneficiary access,” Grindrod said. “While the standards are not difficult to understand, as a provider-sponsored plan with a small footprint, we sometimes face challenges securing contracts with large systems that prioritize larger Medicare Advantage plans.”

    In 2021, CMS also sent a violation letter to North Carolina’s Liberty Advantage. CMS didn’t tell the state’s free counseling service, the Seniors’ Health Insurance Information Program, about the letter, said its director, Melinda Munden.

    Liberty representatives did not respond to requests for comment.

    CMS sent a letter in 2016 to CareSource about network deficiencies in some of its Medicare Advantage plans sold in Kentucky and Indiana. The agency asked the company to fix the problems, including by reimbursing any members billed for services from doctors who were not in the plans’ networks.

    “In response to the 2016 violations, we promptly implemented a Corrective Action Plan, which included a thorough review of our provider network to ensure adequacy standards were met,” said Vicki McDonald, a CareSource spokesperson. “CMS approved our plan, and no further action was required.”

    KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF — the independent source for health policy research, polling, and journalism.

    Source link

  • After 8-year legal battle, Dracut doctor pleads guilty in landmark opioid case

    WOBURN — A case that stretched more than eight years reached its conclusion this week, as retired Dracut physician, Dr. Richard Miron, pleaded guilty to involuntary manslaughter and other charges tied to the illegal prescribing of opioids that led to a Lowell patient’s death.

    Attorney General Andrea Campbell’s office said Miron, 83, became the first doctor in Massachusetts to be convicted on involuntary manslaughter for prescribing opioids — a conviction that stemmed from the 2016 death of 50-year-old Michelle Craib. He also pleaded guilty to defrauding MassHealth and illegally prescribing medication to patients for no legitimate medical purpose.

    Miron was ultimately sentenced in Middlesex Superior Court in Woburn on Monday to what amounts to five years of probation, allowing him to avoid prison time.

    Miron’s attorney, Stephen Weymouth, said on Wednesday that he was prepared and confident to go to trial in a case that has faced a series of delays over the years, but after a conversation with his client earlier this month, the main concern became the possibility of serving time behind bars.

    “From the very beginning he said, ‘I didn’t do anything wrong, and I want to go to trial,’” Weymouth said about Miron. “But then he said he did not want to go to jail.”

    Weymouth pointed out that Miron was facing 47 charges, and any one of them could have resulted in a jail sentence. He said that prosecutors had previously sought four to five years in a plea deal, and the involuntary manslaughter charge carried a maximum of 20 years.

    “Going to trial would have been a mistake because all it would have taken was one guilty hook and he would have gotten a pretty lengthy sentence, and I just couldn’t do that. I just couldn’t take any chances,” Weymouth said. “If he had gone to trial and lost, who knows what would have happened.”

    Miron was indicted by a Middlesex County grand jury in December 2018 following an investigation that began in September 2017 by the AG’s Office, then headed by now-Gov. Maura Healey. Aside from involuntary manslaughter, he was charged with 23 counts of illegally prescribing controlled substances and 23 counts of filing false Medicaid claims.

    From September 2015 to February 2016, the AG’s Office said Miron, a solo practitioner of internal medicine, was the largest provider of high-dose, short-acting oxycodone prescriptions among all MassHealth care providers statewide.

    The Chief Medical Examiner’s Office determined Craib’s death was caused by acute intoxication from the combined effects of fentanyl, morphine, codeine, and butalbital — all prescribed by Miron. The AG’s Office said Miron was aware that Craib had previously overdosed on opioids he had prescribed, yet he continued to issue large doses to her on multiple occasions leading up to her death.

    Prosecutors also said Miron illegally prescribed opioids to several other at-risk patients for no legitimate medical purpose. The illegal prescriptions Miron issued led pharmacies to unknowingly submit false bills to MassHealth for medication.

    MassHealth terminated Miron from its program in September 2017, and he stopped practicing medicine in November 2018, following an agreement with the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine.

    In 2023, Miron’s daughter, Linda Miron, penned a 17-page letter to the AG’s Office urging that the case be dropped. She argued that prosecuting her father — who had already relinquished his medical license and lived under pretrial probation since 2018 — was not in the interest of justice.

    “To bring this flawed case to trial does not seem to me to be the best use of the Commonwealth’s resources, and I urge you to drop your prosecution of this case in the interest of justice,” Linda Miron said in the letter. “More broadly, I fear that prosecuting someone who was willing to take on disenfranchised, medically and psychologically complicated patients here in the Commonwealth, when some other physicians refused to take on MassHealth patients, will further discourage other physicians from treating these patients who deserve compassionate care.”

    The case marched on until Monday, when Miron appeared in Middlesex Superior Court before Judge Cathleen Campbell, where it was finally resolved.

    According to the AG’s Office, Miron was sentenced to two and a half years in a house of correction on illegal prescribing, suspended for five years — meaning he will serve the term as probation rather than prison time, unless he violates probation, in which case the sentence could be imposed. He was sentenced to five years of probation on the involuntary manslaughter charge. For Medicaid fraud, Miron was sentenced to six months in a house of correction, suspended for five years.

    As part of his probation, Miron was ordered to pay full restitution to MassHealth and barred from practicing medicine or seeking reinstatement of his license.

    According to Weymouth, Miron was glad to put the case behind him and most of all to avoid prison time. He noted that Miron had already given up his medical career and had no intention of practicing again.

    “I’m glad it’s over,” Weymouth added. “I know he’s glad it’s over.”

    In a press release announcing the case’s conclusion on Tuesday, the AG’s Office said the case reflects their “commitment to addressing the root causes of the opioid crisis and holding companies and individuals accountable for their role in contributing to the nationwide epidemic.”

    Earlier this year, the release states, Campbell helped negotiate a $7.4 billion settlement in principle with Purdue Pharma and the Sackler family, which is expected to bring up to $105 million to Massachusetts. To date, the office said they have secured more than $1 billion in opioid-related recoveries, with more than $390 million already received. Those funds are being directed to the state’s Opioid Recovery and Remediation Fund and distributed to cities and towns to support prevention, harm reduction, treatment and recovery efforts.

    The AG’s Office added in the release that valuable assistance with the investigation into Miron’s case was provided by the Lowell Police Department, the State Police, the Drug Enforcement Administration, and MassHealth.

    Follow Aaron Curtis on X @aselahcurtis, or on Bluesky @aaronscurtis.bsky.social.

    Aaron Curtis

    Source link

  • UPMC doc: Prioritize mental health during holiday season

    CUMBERLAND — The holiday season is often described as “the most wonderful time of the year,” but for many, it can be a source of anxiety and stress.

    Dr. Tooba Qadir of UPMC Western Maryland recently offered advice ahead of the holiday season designed to help people prioritize mental health.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm“%96C6 2C6 A6@A=6 E92E 5@ C6A@CE 2 =@E @7 2?I:6EJ 2?5 DEC6DD 2C@F?5 E96 9@=:52J E:>6D[” “25:C D2:5[ “H9:49 😀 >@DE=J 46?E6C65 2C@F?5 7:?2?46D[ 46?E6C65 2C@F?5 36:?8 =@?6=J 2?5 ?@E 92G:?8 DFAA@CE[ 2D H6== 36:?8 46?E6C65 2C@F?5 :?4C62D65 H6:89E @7 6IA64E2E:@?D]”k^Am

    kAm”25:C[ H9@ 92D H@C<65 2E &!|r 7@C EH@ 2?5 2 92=7 J62CD 2D 3@E9 2? :?A2E:6?E 2?5 @FEA2E:6?E ADJ49:2EC:DE[ D2JD E96C6 😀 ?@ :?4C62D65 4@?DF>AE:@? @7 &!|r’D C6D@FC46D 5FC:?8 E96 9@=:52J D62D@?] $96 D2:5 :7 2?JE9:?8[ :E 😀 86?6C2==J =@H6C]k^Am

    kAms6DA:E6 2 =@H6C ?F>36C @7 9@DA:E2=:K2E:@?D[ c`T @7 p>6C:42?D D2J E96:C DEC6DD :?4C62D6D 5FC:?8 E96 9@=:52J D62D@?[ 244@C5:?8 E@ 2 DEF5J 3J E96 p>6C:42? !DJ49@=@8:42= pDD@4:2E:@?]k^Am

    kAm”25:C D2:5 :E’D :>A@CE2?E E@ 2?E:4:A2E6 H92E J@FC >6?E2= 962=E9 >2J =@@< =:<6 2D E96 9@=:52JD 2AAC@249[ 2?5 E2<6 24E:@?D E@ FE:=:K6 C6D@FC46D AC:@C]k^Am

    kAm“$@[ C:89E 2C@F?5 E9:D E:>6[ E2<6 2 >@>6?E E@ C67=64E @? H92E E96 9@=:52JD >62? 7@C J@F[” D96 D2:5] “(92E 5@6D :E FDF2==J =@@< =:<6 7@C J@Fn pC6 J@F 2 86?6C2==J 92AAJ A6CD@?[ @C 😀 E9:D 2 E:>6 E92E J@F FDF2==J 6IA6C:6?46 2?I:6EJ 2?5 DEC6DD[ @C 56AC6DD:@? @C 8C:67n pC6 E96 9@=:52JD EC:886C:?8 7@C J@Fn”k^Am

    kAm~?46 E9@D6 2?DH6CD 2C6 56E6C>:?65[ “25:C D2:5 E9@D6 27764E65 3J :?4C62D65 DEC6DD 42? C6249 @FE E@ >6?E2= 962=E9 AC@G:56CD]k^Am

    kAm“x7 J@F 2C6 D@>63@5J E92E 😀 D6E FA H:E9 >6?E2= 962=E9 C6D@FC46D[ E2=< E@ J@FC AC@G:56CD D@ E96J 42? H2=< J@F E9C@F89 H92E E@ 2?E:4:A2E6[” D96 D2:5] “x7 J@F 2C6 D@>63@5J E92E’D 366? @? E96 76?46[ 5@ x ?665 E@ D66 2 E96C2A:DE @C ?@En s@ x ?665 E@ D66 2 AC@G:56Cn %96 2?DH6C 2C@F?5 9@=:52J E:>6 H@F=5 36 J6D]”k^Am

    kAm”25:C 2=D@ DF886DE65 4964<:?8 😕 @? 7C:6?5D @C 72>:=J >6>36CD H9@ >2J 36 27764E65 3J >6?E2= 962=E9 492==6?86D]k^Am

    kAm“(2E49 @FE 7@C J@FC 72>:=J >6>36CD[ <66A 2? 6J6 @? E96>[” “25:C D2:5] “x7 J@F @H D@>63@5J H9@ E96 9@=:52JD 2C6 2 5:77:4F=E E:>6 7@C[ <66A 2? 6J6 @? E96> >@C6 E92? J@F H@F=5 FDF2==J 5FC:?8 E96 J62C] !@:?E A6@A=6 😕 E96 5:C64E:@? @7 C6D@FC46D]”k^Am

    kAm”25:C D2:5 2?@E96C 724E@C 2C@F?5 E96 9@=:52JD E92E 27764ED >2?J 😀 :?4C62D65 2=4@9@= 4@?DF>AE:@?]k^Am

    kAm“q6 >:?57F= @7 3:?86 5C:?<:?8 6A:D@56D[ :E 5@6D E6?5 E@ :?4C62D6 @G6C E96 9@=:52JD[” D96 D2:5] “(6 92G6 >@C6 2=4@9@=C6=2E65 AC@3=6>D[ H6 92G6 >@C6 2=4@9@=C6=2E65 244:56?ED @G6C E96 9@=:52JD]”k^Am

    kAmu@C H@>6?[ 7@FC 5C:?@C6 😕 2 52J 2?5 6:89E 5C:?@C6 😕 2 H66<[ 😀 4@?D:56C65 3:?86 5C:?<:?8] u@C >6?[ 7:G6 5C:?@C6 😕 2 52J 2?5 `d 5C:?@C6 😕 2 H66< 😀 4@?D:56C65 3:?86 5C:?<:?8[ D96 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm”25:C D2:5 :E 😀 :>A@CE2?E E@ 86E DF? 2?5 6I6C4:D6 2D H6 4C66A 4=@D6C :?E@ E96 H:?E6C >@?E9D]k^Am

    kAm“x?5:G:5F2==J[ 36 >:?57F=[ “25:C D2:5] “!=62D6[ A=62D6 36 >:?57F= 23@FE 9@H E96 9@=:52JD 27764E J@F[ 2?5 :7 E96J 5@[ :7 J@F @H E92E E96J 27764E J@F 😕 2 ?682E:G6 H2J[ A=62D6 86E 42C6 D@@?6C :?DE625 @7 =2E6C]”k^Am

    Natalie Leslie can be reached at 304-639-4403.

    Natalie Leslie nleslie@times-news.com

    Source link

  • UPMC doc: Prioritize mental health during holiday season

    CUMBERLAND — The holiday season is often described as “the most wonderful time of the year,” but for many, it can be a source of anxiety and stress.

    Dr. Tooba Qadir of UPMC Western Maryland recently offered advice ahead of the holiday season designed to help people prioritize mental health.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm“%96C6 2C6 A6@A=6 E92E 5@ C6A@CE 2 =@E @7 2?I:6EJ 2?5 DEC6DD 2C@F?5 E96 9@=:52J E:>6D[” “25:C D2:5[ “H9:49 😀 >@DE=J 46?E6C65 2C@F?5 7:?2?46D[ 46?E6C65 2C@F?5 36:?8 =@?6=J 2?5 ?@E 92G:?8 DFAA@CE[ 2D H6== 36:?8 46?E6C65 2C@F?5 :?4C62D65 H6:89E @7 6IA64E2E:@?D]”k^Am

    kAm”25:C[ H9@ 92D H@C<65 2E &!|r 7@C EH@ 2?5 2 92=7 J62CD 2D 3@E9 2? :?A2E:6?E 2?5 @FEA2E:6?E ADJ49:2EC:DE[ D2JD E96C6 😀 ?@ :?4C62D65 4@?DF>AE:@? @7 &!|r’D C6D@FC46D 5FC:?8 E96 9@=:52J D62D@?] $96 D2:5 :7 2?JE9:?8[ :E 😀 86?6C2==J =@H6C]k^Am

    kAms6DA:E6 2 =@H6C ?F>36C @7 9@DA:E2=:K2E:@?D[ c`T @7 p>6C:42?D D2J E96:C DEC6DD :?4C62D6D 5FC:?8 E96 9@=:52J D62D@?[ 244@C5:?8 E@ 2 DEF5J 3J E96 p>6C:42? !DJ49@=@8:42= pDD@4:2E:@?]k^Am

    kAm”25:C D2:5 :E’D :>A@CE2?E E@ 2?E:4:A2E6 H92E J@FC >6?E2= 962=E9 >2J =@@< =:<6 2D E96 9@=:52JD 2AAC@249[ 2?5 E2<6 24E:@?D E@ FE:=:K6 C6D@FC46D AC:@C]k^Am

    kAm“$@[ C:89E 2C@F?5 E9:D E:>6[ E2<6 2 >@>6?E E@ C67=64E @? H92E E96 9@=:52JD >62? 7@C J@F[” D96 D2:5] “(92E 5@6D :E FDF2==J =@@< =:<6 7@C J@Fn pC6 J@F 2 86?6C2==J 92AAJ A6CD@?[ @C 😀 E9:D 2 E:>6 E92E J@F FDF2==J 6IA6C:6?46 2?I:6EJ 2?5 DEC6DD[ @C 56AC6DD:@? @C 8C:67n pC6 E96 9@=:52JD EC:886C:?8 7@C J@Fn”k^Am

    kAm~?46 E9@D6 2?DH6CD 2C6 56E6C>:?65[ “25:C D2:5 E9@D6 27764E65 3J :?4C62D65 DEC6DD 42? C6249 @FE E@ >6?E2= 962=E9 AC@G:56CD]k^Am

    kAm“x7 J@F 2C6 D@>63@5J E92E 😀 D6E FA H:E9 >6?E2= 962=E9 C6D@FC46D[ E2=< E@ J@FC AC@G:56CD D@ E96J 42? H2=< J@F E9C@F89 H92E E@ 2?E:4:A2E6[” D96 D2:5] “x7 J@F 2C6 D@>63@5J E92E’D 366? @? E96 76?46[ 5@ x ?665 E@ D66 2 E96C2A:DE @C ?@En s@ x ?665 E@ D66 2 AC@G:56Cn %96 2?DH6C 2C@F?5 9@=:52J E:>6 H@F=5 36 J6D]”k^Am

    kAm”25:C 2=D@ DF886DE65 4964<:?8 😕 @? 7C:6?5D @C 72>:=J >6>36CD H9@ >2J 36 27764E65 3J >6?E2= 962=E9 492==6?86D]k^Am

    kAm“(2E49 @FE 7@C J@FC 72>:=J >6>36CD[ <66A 2? 6J6 @? E96>[” “25:C D2:5] “x7 J@F @H D@>63@5J H9@ E96 9@=:52JD 2C6 2 5:77:4F=E E:>6 7@C[ <66A 2? 6J6 @? E96> >@C6 E92? J@F H@F=5 FDF2==J 5FC:?8 E96 J62C] !@:?E A6@A=6 😕 E96 5:C64E:@? @7 C6D@FC46D]”k^Am

    kAm”25:C D2:5 2?@E96C 724E@C 2C@F?5 E96 9@=:52JD E92E 27764ED >2?J 😀 :?4C62D65 2=4@9@= 4@?DF>AE:@?]k^Am

    kAm“q6 >:?57F= @7 3:?86 5C:?<:?8 6A:D@56D[ :E 5@6D E6?5 E@ :?4C62D6 @G6C E96 9@=:52JD[” D96 D2:5] “(6 92G6 >@C6 2=4@9@=C6=2E65 AC@3=6>D[ H6 92G6 >@C6 2=4@9@=C6=2E65 244:56?ED @G6C E96 9@=:52JD]”k^Am

    kAmu@C H@>6?[ 7@FC 5C:?@C6 😕 2 52J 2?5 6:89E 5C:?@C6 😕 2 H66<[ 😀 4@?D:56C65 3:?86 5C:?<:?8] u@C >6?[ 7:G6 5C:?@C6 😕 2 52J 2?5 `d 5C:?@C6 😕 2 H66< 😀 4@?D:56C65 3:?86 5C:?<:?8[ D96 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm”25:C D2:5 :E 😀 :>A@CE2?E E@ 86E DF? 2?5 6I6C4:D6 2D H6 4C66A 4=@D6C :?E@ E96 H:?E6C >@?E9D]k^Am

    kAm“x?5:G:5F2==J[ 36 >:?57F=[ “25:C D2:5] “!=62D6[ A=62D6 36 >:?57F= 23@FE 9@H E96 9@=:52JD 27764E J@F[ 2?5 :7 E96J 5@[ :7 J@F @H E92E E96J 27764E J@F 😕 2 ?682E:G6 H2J[ A=62D6 86E 42C6 D@@?6C :?DE625 @7 =2E6C]”k^Am

    Natalie Leslie can be reached at 304-639-4403.

    Natalie Leslie nleslie@times-news.com

    Source link

  • UPMC doc: Prioritize mental health during holiday season

    CUMBERLAND — The holiday season is often described as “the most wonderful time of the year,” but for many, it can be a source of anxiety and stress.

    Dr. Tooba Qadir of UPMC Western Maryland recently offered advice ahead of the holiday season designed to help people prioritize mental health.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm“%96C6 2C6 A6@A=6 E92E 5@ C6A@CE 2 =@E @7 2?I:6EJ 2?5 DEC6DD 2C@F?5 E96 9@=:52J E:>6D[” “25:C D2:5[ “H9:49 😀 >@DE=J 46?E6C65 2C@F?5 7:?2?46D[ 46?E6C65 2C@F?5 36:?8 =@?6=J 2?5 ?@E 92G:?8 DFAA@CE[ 2D H6== 36:?8 46?E6C65 2C@F?5 :?4C62D65 H6:89E @7 6IA64E2E:@?D]”k^Am

    kAm”25:C[ H9@ 92D H@C<65 2E &!|r 7@C EH@ 2?5 2 92=7 J62CD 2D 3@E9 2? :?A2E:6?E 2?5 @FEA2E:6?E ADJ49:2EC:DE[ D2JD E96C6 😀 ?@ :?4C62D65 4@?DF>AE:@? @7 &!|r’D C6D@FC46D 5FC:?8 E96 9@=:52J D62D@?] $96 D2:5 :7 2?JE9:?8[ :E 😀 86?6C2==J =@H6C]k^Am

    kAms6DA:E6 2 =@H6C ?F>36C @7 9@DA:E2=:K2E:@?D[ c`T @7 p>6C:42?D D2J E96:C DEC6DD :?4C62D6D 5FC:?8 E96 9@=:52J D62D@?[ 244@C5:?8 E@ 2 DEF5J 3J E96 p>6C:42? !DJ49@=@8:42= pDD@4:2E:@?]k^Am

    kAm”25:C D2:5 :E’D :>A@CE2?E E@ 2?E:4:A2E6 H92E J@FC >6?E2= 962=E9 >2J =@@< =:<6 2D E96 9@=:52JD 2AAC@249[ 2?5 E2<6 24E:@?D E@ FE:=:K6 C6D@FC46D AC:@C]k^Am

    kAm“$@[ C:89E 2C@F?5 E9:D E:>6[ E2<6 2 >@>6?E E@ C67=64E @? H92E E96 9@=:52JD >62? 7@C J@F[” D96 D2:5] “(92E 5@6D :E FDF2==J =@@< =:<6 7@C J@Fn pC6 J@F 2 86?6C2==J 92AAJ A6CD@?[ @C 😀 E9:D 2 E:>6 E92E J@F FDF2==J 6IA6C:6?46 2?I:6EJ 2?5 DEC6DD[ @C 56AC6DD:@? @C 8C:67n pC6 E96 9@=:52JD EC:886C:?8 7@C J@Fn”k^Am

    kAm~?46 E9@D6 2?DH6CD 2C6 56E6C>:?65[ “25:C D2:5 E9@D6 27764E65 3J :?4C62D65 DEC6DD 42? C6249 @FE E@ >6?E2= 962=E9 AC@G:56CD]k^Am

    kAm“x7 J@F 2C6 D@>63@5J E92E 😀 D6E FA H:E9 >6?E2= 962=E9 C6D@FC46D[ E2=< E@ J@FC AC@G:56CD D@ E96J 42? H2=< J@F E9C@F89 H92E E@ 2?E:4:A2E6[” D96 D2:5] “x7 J@F 2C6 D@>63@5J E92E’D 366? @? E96 76?46[ 5@ x ?665 E@ D66 2 E96C2A:DE @C ?@En s@ x ?665 E@ D66 2 AC@G:56Cn %96 2?DH6C 2C@F?5 9@=:52J E:>6 H@F=5 36 J6D]”k^Am

    kAm”25:C 2=D@ DF886DE65 4964<:?8 😕 @? 7C:6?5D @C 72>:=J >6>36CD H9@ >2J 36 27764E65 3J >6?E2= 962=E9 492==6?86D]k^Am

    kAm“(2E49 @FE 7@C J@FC 72>:=J >6>36CD[ <66A 2? 6J6 @? E96>[” “25:C D2:5] “x7 J@F @H D@>63@5J H9@ E96 9@=:52JD 2C6 2 5:77:4F=E E:>6 7@C[ <66A 2? 6J6 @? E96> >@C6 E92? J@F H@F=5 FDF2==J 5FC:?8 E96 J62C] !@:?E A6@A=6 😕 E96 5:C64E:@? @7 C6D@FC46D]”k^Am

    kAm”25:C D2:5 2?@E96C 724E@C 2C@F?5 E96 9@=:52JD E92E 27764ED >2?J 😀 :?4C62D65 2=4@9@= 4@?DF>AE:@?]k^Am

    kAm“q6 >:?57F= @7 3:?86 5C:?<:?8 6A:D@56D[ :E 5@6D E6?5 E@ :?4C62D6 @G6C E96 9@=:52JD[” D96 D2:5] “(6 92G6 >@C6 2=4@9@=C6=2E65 AC@3=6>D[ H6 92G6 >@C6 2=4@9@=C6=2E65 244:56?ED @G6C E96 9@=:52JD]”k^Am

    kAmu@C H@>6?[ 7@FC 5C:?@C6 😕 2 52J 2?5 6:89E 5C:?@C6 😕 2 H66<[ 😀 4@?D:56C65 3:?86 5C:?<:?8] u@C >6?[ 7:G6 5C:?@C6 😕 2 52J 2?5 `d 5C:?@C6 😕 2 H66< 😀 4@?D:56C65 3:?86 5C:?<:?8[ D96 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm”25:C D2:5 :E 😀 :>A@CE2?E E@ 86E DF? 2?5 6I6C4:D6 2D H6 4C66A 4=@D6C :?E@ E96 H:?E6C >@?E9D]k^Am

    kAm“x?5:G:5F2==J[ 36 >:?57F=[ “25:C D2:5] “!=62D6[ A=62D6 36 >:?57F= 23@FE 9@H E96 9@=:52JD 27764E J@F[ 2?5 :7 E96J 5@[ :7 J@F @H E92E E96J 27764E J@F 😕 2 ?682E:G6 H2J[ A=62D6 86E 42C6 D@@?6C :?DE625 @7 =2E6C]”k^Am

    Natalie Leslie can be reached at 304-639-4403.

    Natalie Leslie nleslie@times-news.com

    Source link

  • A record number of Americans are anxious about health care costs going into next year

    Americans are going into 2026 more anxious about health care costs than at any other point in recent years, a new West Health-Gallup survey finds.

    Almost half of adults, 47%, say they’re worried they won’t be able to afford health care next year — the highest level since West Health and Gallup began tracking in 2021, the survey published Tuesday found.

    Concerns about prescription drug costs have climbed steadily, the survey found — rising from 30% in 2021 to 37% in 2025, also the highest level recorded. And the share of adults who say health care costs cause “a lot of stress” in their daily lives has nearly doubled since 2022, rising from 8% to 15%. The survey also found that about 1 in 3 adults reported delaying or skipping medical care over the last year because they couldn’t afford it.

    The annual survey, conducted in June through August, was based on roughly 20,000 respondents across all 50 states and Washington, D.C., and asked 27 questions about people’s health care experiences.

    Health care has become a central issue in politics. Senate Democrats’ push to extend enhanced subsidies for the Affordable Care Act led to the longest government shutdown in history. The ACA tax credits, which have protected people from double-digit premium increases, are set to expire Dec. 31. Republicans blocked the effort, and the Trump administration has vowed to “fix Obamacare” but has yet to release a detailed plan.

    “The survey shows health care affordability isn’t just a political debate, it’s a problem many people are experiencing now,” said Larry Levitt, executive vice president for health policy at KFF, a nonpartisan research group. “Americans have been struggling to keep up with rising health costs generally and health care specifically.” He wasn’t involved in the survey.

    The survey didn’t touch on the subsidies’ expiring. Nor did it include questions about Medicaid work requirements that will go into effect in 2027.

    Taken together with the coverage losses that would follow, many people could face even greater challenges paying for health care in the years ahead, said Timothy Lash, president of West Health, a nonpartisan group that researches health care costs and aging.

    “The urgency around this is real,” Lash said. “When you look at the economic strain that is on families right now, even if health care prices didn’t rise, the costs are rising elsewhere, which only exacerbates the problem.”

    Lash said every metric in the survey has either held steady or gotten worse.

    “Americans are saying, ‘Hey, now that I really think about it, I’m paying too much and I’m not getting enough,’” Lash said. “Health care is not what it needs to be right now.”

    Differences across states

    How people experience health care varied greatly across states.

    Iowa, Massachusetts, Washington, D.C., and Rhode Island ranked highest for overall health care experiences, particularly in how easily residents can afford, access and get health care when and where they need it.

    Texas, New Mexico, Nevada and Alaska ranked at the bottom of the list.

    While 66% of people in Nebraska — which ranked 10th overall — said it’s easy to get the health care they need, just 30% in New Mexico and 31% in Nevada agreed.

    But even in the top-ranked states, many people still face difficulties, Lash said. About 15% of people in the top 10 states said they’ve been unable to pay for prescription drugs in the past three months, compared with 29% in the bottom 10.

    About 25% of people in the top 10 states reported skipping recommended lab tests or medical procedures because of the cost over the last year, compared with 40% of people in the bottom 10.

    Skipping or forgoing medical care was most common in states like Texas (43% reported doing so), Montana (43%) and Alaska (41%), the survey found.

    Beyond cost, Americans cited other barriers that have restricted access to care. Nationally, 55% said long wait times prevented or delayed care, and 27% cited work schedules as a barrier.

    The top 10 and the bottom 10 states had similar shares of people who delayed or prevented care because they didn’t know how to find providers: 25% and 31%, respectively.

    “When you look at the rankings … we have to be very careful to say that someone won,” Lash said. “It’s like being the tallest kid in kindergarten and then suddenly walking outside the classroom and realizing, like, maybe you’re not so tall after all.”

    Dr. Adam Gaffney, a critical care physician and assistant professor at Harvard Medical School, said the U.S. health care system is designed to make patients have “skin in the game” when it comes to paying for high health costs.

    “While it’s not surprising that states with high uninsurance rates — like Mississippi, which has not expanded Medicaid — have higher rates of cost problems than a state like Massachusetts, where I work,” Gaffney wrote in an email, “even here in the Bay State large numbers experience cost worries due to inadequate insurance.”

    Lawrence Gostin, director of the O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law at Georgetown University, said the findings may add pressure on Congress to extend the enhanced ACA subsidies before the end of the year.

    Even if they don’t, he said, the pressure could intensify once Medicaid work requirements begin in 2027. The Congressional Budget Office, a nonpartisan government group, projects that 4.8 million people will lose coverage because of the work requirements.

    “The public has major anxiety about access to affordable health care,” Gostin said. “Deep concern and anxiety over health insurance premiums and medical bills is only likely to become more acute due to the lapse in ACA premium subsidies and major cuts to Medicaid.”

    Americans’ health care expenses are double that of other wealthy nations, but we don’t use health care more, and we’re not healthier on average. So what exactly are we paying for? NBCLX storyteller Peter Hull breaks down why health care in the U.S. costs so much more than in other countries.

    Berkeley Lovelace Jr. | NBC News

    Source link

  • Pence group blasts Trump’s drug pricing plan as ‘socialist’ in new ad campaign

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    FIRST ON FOX: A conservative group founded by ex-Vice President Mike Pence is taking aim at a key policy being used by President Donald Trump’s White House.

    Advancing American Freedom (AAF) is rolling out a six-figure digital ad campaign Monday criticizing Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) drug pricing as “socialist price controls,” according to AAF President Tim Chapman.

    The 30-second advertisement begins, “China is America’s biggest economic competitor. They want, and often steal, what America has — our innovations, our manufacturing capabilities, our high-skilled, high-wage jobs.”

    “If politicians in Washington start to place price controls on our most innovative products, like prescription drugs, we’ll be handing over American jobs and life-saving research to China on a silver platter,” the ad continued.

    WATCH: PARODY DRUG AD SPOTLIGHTS RFK’S CRACKDOWN ON MISLEADING PHARMACEUTICAL MARKETING

    Former Vice President Mike Pence’s group, Advancing American Freedom, is criticizing President Donald Trump’s drug price policy. (Michael Loccisano/Getty Images; Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

    It ended with a call to action: “Tell Congress to say ‘no’ to China by saying ‘no’ to MFN price controls.”

    And while pressuring the GOP majority on Capitol Hill is the campaign’s main goal, it appears to be a response to Trump rolling out such a policy several times in recent months.

    Earlier this month, Trump unveiled agreements between the federal government and two top drug companies aimed at lowering the cost of popular weight-loss drugs like Ozempic and Wegovy, among others.

    TRUMP-ALIGNED LEGAL GROUP PROBES BIDEN-ERA ORGAN TRANSPLANT PROGRAM OVER ETHICAL CONCERNS

    The partnership with Eli Lilly & Co. and Novo Nordisk will make prices for drugs aimed at helping Americans with obesity, diabetes and heart disease fall by hundreds of dollars, Trump said.

    It would also lower prices for Medicare and Medicaid patients who rely on such drugs.

    Trump speaking in the Oval Office

    President Donald Trump speaks in the Oval Office on Oct. 10, 2025. (Shawn Thew/EPA/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

    A White House fact sheet said MFN drug pricing would also apply to “all new medicines that they bring to market.”

    It’s one of several similar announcements by Trump in recent months that are aimed at lowering the soaring costs of prescription drugs in the U.S.

    DR. MAKARY, DR OZ: PEOPLE TALK ABOUT LOWERING HEALTHCARE COSTS, BUT THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION IS DOING IT

    The new lower prices will be available at a website called TrumpRx.

    Most health insurance plans already help Americans pay less than the list price of prescription prices, but many do not cover the aforementioned drugs — including when used solely for weight loss.

    The president called the move “a triumph for American patients that will save lives and improve the health of millions and millions of Americans” in an announcement at the White House.

    But a memo released by AAF in September warned that Trump’s drug policies could “mean significant reductions in American research and development” in the pharmaceutical sphere.

    Chapman told Fox News Digital of the latest ad buy, “More regulations and red tape will result in fewer cures and life-saving drugs coming to market, ultimately costing American lives.”

    “Advancing American Freedom strongly supports the power of free markets. To deliver lower prices for Americans, we need fewer government regulations, not more,” he said.

    Wegovy, Ozempic, Victoza

    Three injectable prescription weight loss medicines — Ozempic, Victoza and Wegovy. (Michael Siluk/UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    It’s not the first time this year that Pence’s group has broken from Trump. AAF also criticized Trump’s use of tariffs as well as his more recent call to end the filibuster in the Senate.

    The White House pushed back on AAF’s characterization when reached by Fox News Digital.

    “Anyone calling President Trump’s historic drug pricing deals ‘price controls’ is either too stupid or dishonest to be taken seriously. Despite being just four percent of the world’s population, Americans have covered nearly 75 percent of global pharmaceutical research costs by paying several times more for drugs than our peers in other wealthy countries pay,” White House spokesman Kush Desai told Fox News Digital.

    “President Trump’s deals are equalizing this burden by making other wealthy countries shoulder their fair share for the pharmaceutical innovation that’s saving lives — thereby restoring the free market principles that Mike Pence supposedly support.”

    Source link

  • UPMC doc: Prioritize mental health during holiday season

    CUMBERLAND — The holiday season is often described as “the most wonderful time of the year,” but for many, it can be a source of anxiety and stress.

    Dr. Tooba Qadir of UPMC Western Maryland recently offered advice ahead of the holiday season designed to help people prioritize mental health.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm“%96C6 2C6 A6@A=6 E92E 5@ C6A@CE 2 =@E @7 2?I:6EJ 2?5 DEC6DD 2C@F?5 E96 9@=:52J E:>6D[” “25:C D2:5[ “H9:49 😀 >@DE=J 46?E6C65 2C@F?5 7:?2?46D[ 46?E6C65 2C@F?5 36:?8 =@?6=J 2?5 ?@E 92G:?8 DFAA@CE[ 2D H6== 36:?8 46?E6C65 2C@F?5 :?4C62D65 H6:89E @7 6IA64E2E:@?D]”k^Am

    kAm”25:C[ H9@ 92D H@C<65 2E &!|r 7@C EH@ 2?5 2 92=7 J62CD 2D 3@E9 2? :?A2E:6?E 2?5 @FEA2E:6?E ADJ49:2EC:DE[ D2JD E96C6 😀 ?@ :?4C62D65 4@?DF>AE:@? @7 &!|r’D C6D@FC46D 5FC:?8 E96 9@=:52J D62D@?] $96 D2:5 :7 2?JE9:?8[ :E 😀 86?6C2==J =@H6C]k^Am

    kAms6DA:E6 2 =@H6C ?F>36C @7 9@DA:E2=:K2E:@?D[ c`T @7 p>6C:42?D D2J E96:C DEC6DD :?4C62D6D 5FC:?8 E96 9@=:52J D62D@?[ 244@C5:?8 E@ 2 DEF5J 3J E96 p>6C:42? !DJ49@=@8:42= pDD@4:2E:@?]k^Am

    kAm”25:C D2:5 :E’D :>A@CE2?E E@ 2?E:4:A2E6 H92E J@FC >6?E2= 962=E9 >2J =@@< =:<6 2D E96 9@=:52JD 2AAC@249[ 2?5 E2<6 24E:@?D E@ FE:=:K6 C6D@FC46D AC:@C]k^Am

    kAm“$@[ C:89E 2C@F?5 E9:D E:>6[ E2<6 2 >@>6?E E@ C67=64E @? H92E E96 9@=:52JD >62? 7@C J@F[” D96 D2:5] “(92E 5@6D :E FDF2==J =@@< =:<6 7@C J@Fn pC6 J@F 2 86?6C2==J 92AAJ A6CD@?[ @C 😀 E9:D 2 E:>6 E92E J@F FDF2==J 6IA6C:6?46 2?I:6EJ 2?5 DEC6DD[ @C 56AC6DD:@? @C 8C:67n pC6 E96 9@=:52JD EC:886C:?8 7@C J@Fn”k^Am

    kAm~?46 E9@D6 2?DH6CD 2C6 56E6C>:?65[ “25:C D2:5 E9@D6 27764E65 3J :?4C62D65 DEC6DD 42? C6249 @FE E@ >6?E2= 962=E9 AC@G:56CD]k^Am

    kAm“x7 J@F 2C6 D@>63@5J E92E 😀 D6E FA H:E9 >6?E2= 962=E9 C6D@FC46D[ E2=< E@ J@FC AC@G:56CD D@ E96J 42? H2=< J@F E9C@F89 H92E E@ 2?E:4:A2E6[” D96 D2:5] “x7 J@F 2C6 D@>63@5J E92E’D 366? @? E96 76?46[ 5@ x ?665 E@ D66 2 E96C2A:DE @C ?@En s@ x ?665 E@ D66 2 AC@G:56Cn %96 2?DH6C 2C@F?5 9@=:52J E:>6 H@F=5 36 J6D]”k^Am

    kAm”25:C 2=D@ DF886DE65 4964<:?8 😕 @? 7C:6?5D @C 72>:=J >6>36CD H9@ >2J 36 27764E65 3J >6?E2= 962=E9 492==6?86D]k^Am

    kAm“(2E49 @FE 7@C J@FC 72>:=J >6>36CD[ <66A 2? 6J6 @? E96>[” “25:C D2:5] “x7 J@F @H D@>63@5J H9@ E96 9@=:52JD 2C6 2 5:77:4F=E E:>6 7@C[ <66A 2? 6J6 @? E96> >@C6 E92? J@F H@F=5 FDF2==J 5FC:?8 E96 J62C] !@:?E A6@A=6 😕 E96 5:C64E:@? @7 C6D@FC46D]”k^Am

    kAm”25:C D2:5 2?@E96C 724E@C 2C@F?5 E96 9@=:52JD E92E 27764ED >2?J 😀 :?4C62D65 2=4@9@= 4@?DF>AE:@?]k^Am

    kAm“q6 >:?57F= @7 3:?86 5C:?<:?8 6A:D@56D[ :E 5@6D E6?5 E@ :?4C62D6 @G6C E96 9@=:52JD[” D96 D2:5] “(6 92G6 >@C6 2=4@9@=C6=2E65 AC@3=6>D[ H6 92G6 >@C6 2=4@9@=C6=2E65 244:56?ED @G6C E96 9@=:52JD]”k^Am

    kAmu@C H@>6?[ 7@FC 5C:?@C6 😕 2 52J 2?5 6:89E 5C:?@C6 😕 2 H66<[ 😀 4@?D:56C65 3:?86 5C:?<:?8] u@C >6?[ 7:G6 5C:?@C6 😕 2 52J 2?5 `d 5C:?@C6 😕 2 H66< 😀 4@?D:56C65 3:?86 5C:?<:?8[ D96 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm”25:C D2:5 :E 😀 :>A@CE2?E E@ 86E DF? 2?5 6I6C4:D6 2D H6 4C66A 4=@D6C :?E@ E96 H:?E6C >@?E9D]k^Am

    kAm“x?5:G:5F2==J[ 36 >:?57F=[ “25:C D2:5] “!=62D6[ A=62D6 36 >:?57F= 23@FE 9@H E96 9@=:52JD 27764E J@F[ 2?5 :7 E96J 5@[ :7 J@F @H E92E E96J 27764E J@F 😕 2 ?682E:G6 H2J[ A=62D6 86E 42C6 D@@?6C :?DE625 @7 =2E6C]”k^Am

    Natalie Leslie can be reached at 304-639-4403.

    Natalie Leslie nleslie@times-news.com

    Source link

  • GOP Can’t Stop Touching Hot Stove of Obamacare Repeal

    We’ve seen this movie before.
    Photo: Sid Hastings/Alamy Stock Photo

    The big miscalculation Democrats made in handling the recent government shutdown was their belief that Donald Trump could be induced to force an extension of soon-to-expire Obamacare premium subsidies on congressional Republicans as part of a deal to reopen the government. He never even agreed to negotiate on the subject. So instead, the booby prize Democrats won was a guaranteed Senate vote on the Obamacare subsidies by the second week in December (huge premium spikes already announced by most insurers will go into effect on January 1 if no action is taken). The House promised nothing, and the Senate pledge is vague enough as to be potentially meaningless if a workable deal isn’t crafted in advance.

    There is a possible deal that would combine a minimal (probably one-year) extension on the subsidies with so-called Republican reforms (e.g., cutting off benefits at some fixed income point, measures preventing fake beneficiaries, and perhaps some GOP policy baubles like enhanced health savings accounts). But as health-care-policy maven Jonathan Cohn observes, it’s unclear how much of an appetite there is for compromise:

    Compromise requires meeting somewhere in the middle and already some members of the GOP are doing the opposite — taking this new round of debate as a cue to dust off ideas that would roll back or repeal big pieces of Obamacare. And these efforts seem to have attracted the interest of Trump, who has been posting messages like “Obamacare Sucks” on social media.

    Any bill will need 60 votes, just like the measure to reopen the government. And it would have a prayer in the House only if it’s truly bipartisan and if Trump comes down hard on conservatives who would vote against the Second Coming of Christ if it were in any way connected with the 44th president and his legacy health-care program.

    Unfortunately for the roughly 42 million people who depend on Obamacare policies for their health insurance, the White House seems less interested in a compromise on subsidies than in replacing them and perhaps undermining the entire structure set up by the Affordable Care Act, as Politico reports:

    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz said Monday that he’d spent “a good part of the weekend with the White House” working on a plan to replace ACA subsidies with a new policy.

    “We have lots of great ideas,” Oz said on Fox News on Monday. “But I don’t want to show our cards. As the president often says, why would I telegraph to you what we are going to do? …”

    “We want a health care system where we pay the money to the people instead of the insurance companies and I tell you, we’re going to be working on that very hard over the next short period of time — where the people get the money,” Trump said in the Oval Office on Monday.

    As Cohn notes, this sort of talk is the kind of thing we heard from Trump and his party when they were unsuccessfully trying to kill Obamacare during the president’s first term:

    Conservatives have long argued the best way to reform health care is by giving people more control over their health care dollars, which typically means scaling back insurance so that it covers only catastrophic expenses, and then having people pay for everything else out of their own pockets using money they’ve put into private accounts that get some kind of government assistance.

    Past versions of these proposals have, upon inspection, looked more like vehicles to give wealthy people a tax break. They have diverted money into broker and management fees. And as a practical matter, they have threatened to do what many other conservative proposals would — namely, to break up insurance pools so that people who are in good health spend less, while those who need medical care spend more.

    In other words, Republicans would prefer to return to the days of widespread age and health-condition discrimination by insurers and then encourage people to rely less on insurance to begin with. Many health experts warn that this approach would encourage younger and healthier people to bail out of risk pools and leave their less fortunate fellow citizens with reduced coverage at higher costs.

    If this is the direction Trump and the GOP are headed, there won’t be any feasible bipartisan deal in Congress in December — or at the next pressure point, January 30, when the current government-reopening measure expires. That might be why some Republicans have talked about abandoning bipartisanship altogether and pursuing another budget-reconciliation bill (like the recently enacted One Big Beautiful Act) to “reform” health care and achieve some other GOP legislative priorities on simple party-line votes. Trump himself, of course, would prefer to just “nuke” the filibuster and let Senate Republicans do whatever they want on health care or anything else they choose to address. Since that seems unlikely, we could enter a time machine to go back to 2017, when Republicans tried and failed to use reconciliation to “repeal and replace Obamacare.” Indeed, in a recent interview with Laura Ingraham, the president himself referred to Trumpcare — the term used generally for his repeal-and-replace legislation — for his vision of an improved health-care system.

    You get the sense listening to the president and his supporters that they are mostly focused on finding some rhetoric to show interest in the affordability concerns that are depressing Trump’s job-approval ratings and threatening GOP plans for the midterms. If that’s all Republicans care about, it’s very bad news for people losing health coverage, because they can’t afford the insurance that’s been keeping them alive.


    See All



    Ed Kilgore

    Source link

  • Marjorie Taylor Greene says “I don’t see political party lines” on health care

    Like many of her Democratic colleagues, GOP Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia is urging Congress to act quickly to address the spiraling cost of health care for millions of Americans who could soon see huge spikes in their insurance premiums.

    “Now that the [Affordable Care Act] tax credits are expiring, which the Democrats did put in place — and they set the expiration date for this year — I see a financial crisis for Americans,” Greene told “CBS Mornings” in an exclusive interview Friday. “And so on this issue, I don’t see political party lines.”

    About 22 million lower- and middle-income Americans rely on the tax credits to reduce their health insurance costs when they buy policies through the Affordable Care Act’s marketplaces. During the longest government shutdown in history, Democrats pushed Republicans to extend the subsidies as a condition for reopening the government, but the shutdown ultimately ended Wednesday without a deal to extend the tax credits. Democrats were promised, however, that a vote on the tax credits will be held next month.

    But House Democrats took notice of Greene’s views on health care. House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries, asked by “CBS Evening News” co-anchor John Dickerson if he had found any Republican allies during the 43-day impasse, replied,”Three words — Marjorie Taylor Greene.”

    “She’s been very clear that this health care crisis is not made up, it’s real, Republicans have no health care plan, and that Democrats are correct in fighting to extend the Affordable Care Act tax credits,” Jeffries continued.

    And top Republicans noticed, too. Earlier this week, President Trump said of Greene after she criticized him for focusing on foreign policy, rather than high prices at home, “I don’t know what happened to Marjorie — nice woman, but I don’t know what happened. She’s lost her way, I think.”

    “I haven’t lost my way — I’m for the American people only,” Greene told “CBS Mornings.” “I am America first and I make no apologies about that to anyone.” But she added that the rapidly rising health insurance costs had affected her personally. 

    “As far as health insurance is concern it hurt my own family. Back in 2010, the Democrats passed Obamacare, and in 2014 when it went into effect my family’s health insurance went from $800 to over $2,400 a month, and we’ve seen the health insurance industry prices just go up and up,” Greene said.

    “I see simply that the American people have been done wrong, and I want my party to produce a solution and a plan that fixes this mess once and for all,” Greene said. “And so that is what I’ve been urging here in Washington, and I really hope to see Republicans and Democrats both work together to come up with a very good solution with health care for the American people.”

    Source link

  • Failure to extend ACA tax credits in government funding package leaves millions in limbo, experts say

    The cost of health care remains in limbo for roughly 22 million Americans after the U.S. government reopened late Wednesday without a deal to extend an expiring federal tax credit that offsets the cost of some Affordable Care Act plans.

    The fate of the enhanced premium tax credit had been at the center of the longest government shutdown in U.S. history as Democrats pushed Republicans to extend the subsidy in order to reopen the government.

    Seven Democratic senators and one independent who caucuses with Democrats voted late Sunday with Republican senators to end the shutdown without resolving the future of the tax credit. 

    On Wednesday, the House passed a funding package — also without an extension of the tax credits — to end the 43-day shutdown in a 222 to 209 vote. Six Democrats voted with Republicans to send the bill to President Trump, who signed the legislation later the same evening. 

    While Senate Republicans have agreed to hold a vote on extending the ACA tax credits by mid-December, House Majority Leader Steve Scalise on Wednesday said he wouldn’t commit to such a plan. 

    Americans are now choosing their 2026 health plans on the ACA’s online marketplaces, and without congressional action, the tax credits will expire Dec. 31.

    “A lot of people are sort of in this limbo state where they have to buy their insurance for next year, but they really don’t know how this is going to shake out at the federal level,” Emma Wager, a senior policy analyst at nonprofit health policy site KFF, told CBS News.

    What happens without an extension?

    Without any action on Congress’s part, the enhanced premium tax credits, which were introduced in 2021 through the American Rescue Plan Act, will disappear at the end of 2025.

    That means low- and middle-income households that previously qualified for the tax credits would likely see their ACA premiums more than double next year, rising from an average of $888 in 2025 to $1,904 in 2026, according to a KFF analysis.

    Faced with higher costs for ACA insurance, about 4 million people are likely to drop their health coverage, the Congressional Budget Office has estimated

    “Americans are really just seeing how expensive health care is in this country, and it’s just completely unaffordable for a lot of people to pay their own entire health insurance premium,” Wager said.

    Currently, the enhanced ACA premium tax credit is available for people who earn between 100% to 400% of the poverty level, which sets the upper threshold at $62,000 for an individual, according to KFF. However, some Americans who earn above that 400% benchmark can qualify for the tax credit if their insurance rates exceed 8.5% of their income.

    Three-quarters of Americans favor renewing the subsidies, according to recent KFF polling. That includes 94% of Democrats and about half of Republicans.

    If Congress renews the subsidies, federal and state marketplaces would need to retool the 2026 plans already available to consumers. It’s possible a new plan could be made retroactive to January 2026, even if it’s passed later in the year, Wager said. 

    “At that point, people are sort of locked in on whatever plan they chose, but they can retroactively receive the tax credit,” she noted.

    Are there other options from Congress?

    Congress could pursue other ways to make health coverage more affordable. On Saturday, President Trump called for sending the money saved by not extending the tax subsidies “directly to the people.” On his Truth Social platform, he criticized the ACA and said Americans should be able to use the savings to purchase other kinds of insurance.

    “In other words, take from the BIG, BAD Insurance Companies, give it to the people, and terminate, per Dollar spent, the worst Healthcare anywhere in the World, ObamaCare,” he wrote.

    Wager said it remains to be seen if Mr. Trump’s plan is feasible, saying “we haven’t seen a concrete enough proposal at this point.”

    Some lawmakers have offered similar proposals, such as Senate Health Committee Chair Bill Cassidy, a Republican from Louisiana. In a floor speech last week, he said eligible Americans could be sent “a pre-funded federal flexible spending account” to use for health expenses, from dental care to prescription drugs and preventive services.

    In the meantime, as 2026 approaches and the future of the enhanced premium tax credit remains unclear, enrollees should consider speaking with a health insurance expert to get advice on their options, Wager advised.

    “The most important thing that you can do is talk to somebody — an agent, broker or a navigator — who can help you make sure that you really understand what your options are and that you get the best plan for your financial situation and your health care situation,” she said.

    Source link

  • President Trump signs government funding bill, ending shutdown after a record 43-day disruption

    President Donald Trump signed a government funding bill Wednesday night, ending a record 43-day shutdown that caused financial stress for federal workers who went without paychecks, stranded scores of travelers at airports and generated long lines at some food banks.The shutdown magnified partisan divisions in Washington as Trump took unprecedented unilateral actions — including canceling projects and trying to fire federal workers — to pressure Democrats into relenting on their demands.The Republican president blamed the situation on Democrats and suggested voters shouldn’t reward the party during next year’s midterm elections.“So I just want to tell the American people, you should not forget this,” Trump said. “When we come up to midterms and other things, don’t forget what they’ve done to our country.”The signing ceremony came just hours after the House passed the measure on a mostly party-line vote of 222-209. The Senate had already passed the measure Monday.Democrats wanted to extend an enhanced tax credit expiring at the end of the year that lowers the cost of health coverage obtained through Affordable Care Act marketplaces. They refused to go along with a short-term spending bill that did not include that priority. But Republicans said that was a separate policy fight to be held at another time.“We told you 43 days ago from bitter experience that government shutdowns don’t work,” said Rep. Tom Cole, the Republican chairman of the House Appropriations Committee. “They never achieve the objective that you announce. And guess what? You haven’t achieved that objective yet, and you’re not going to.”The frustration and pressures generated by the shutdown were reflected when lawmakers debated the spending measure on the House floor.Republicans said Democrats sought to use the pain generated by the shutdown to prevail in a policy dispute.”They knew it would cause pain and they did it anyway,” House Speaker Mike Johnson said.Democrats said Republicans raced to pass tax breaks earlier this year that they say mostly will benefit the wealthy. But the bill before the House Wednesday “leaves families twisting in the wind with zero guarantee there will ever, ever be a vote to extend tax credits to help everyday people pay for their health care,” said Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass.Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries said Democrats would not give up on the subsidy extension even if the vote did not go their way.”This fight is not over,” Jeffries said. “We’re just getting started.”The House had not been in legislative session since Sept. 19, when it passed a short-term measure to keep the government open when the new budget year began in October. Johnson sent lawmakers home after that vote and put the onus on the Senate to act, saying House Republicans had done their job.What’s in the bill to end the shutdownThe legislation is the result of a deal reached by eight senators who broke ranks with the Democrats after reaching the conclusion that Republicans would not bend on using a government funding to bill to extend the health care tax credits.The compromise funds three annual spending bills and extends the rest of government funding through Jan. 30. Republicans promised to hold a vote by mid-December to extend the health care subsidies, but there is no guarantee of success.The bill includes a reversal of the firing of federal workers by the Trump administration since the shutdown began. It also protects federal workers against further layoffs through January and guarantees they are paid once the shutdown is over. The bill for the Agriculture Department means people who rely on key food assistance programs will see those benefits funded without threat of interruption through the rest of the budget year.The package includes $203.5 million to boost security for lawmakers and an additional $28 million for the security of Supreme Court justices.Democrats also decried language in the bill that would give senators the opportunity to sue when a federal agency or employee searches their electronic records without notifying them, allowing for up to $500,000 in potential damages for each violation.The language seems aimed at helping Republican senators pursue damages if their phone records were analyzed by the FBI as part of an investigation into Trump’s efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss. The provisions drew criticism from Republicans as well. Johnson said he was “very angry about it.””That was dropped in at the last minute, and I did not appreciate that, nor did most of the House members,” Johnson said, promising a vote on the matter as early as next week.The biggest point of contention, though, was the fate of the expiring enhanced tax credit that makes health insurance more affordable through Affordable Care Act marketplaces.”It’s a subsidy on top of a subsidy. Our friends added it during COVID,” Cole said. “COVID is over. They set a date certain that the subsidies would run out. They chose the date.”Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said the enhanced tax credit was designed to give more people access to health care and no Republican voted for it.”All they have done is try to eliminate access to health care in our country. The country is catching on to them,” Pelosi said.Without the enhanced tax credit, premiums on average will more than double for millions of Americans. More than 2 million people would lose health insurance coverage altogether next year, the Congressional Budget Office projected.Health care debate aheadIt’s unclear whether the parties will find any common ground on health care before the December vote in the Senate. Johnson has said he will not commit to bringing it up in his chamber.Some Republicans have said they are open to extending the COVID-19 pandemic-era tax credits as premiums will soar for millions of people, but they also want new limits on who can receive the subsidies. Some argue that the tax dollars for the plans should be routed through individuals rather than go directly to insurance companies.Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, said Monday that she was supportive of extending the tax credits with changes, such as new income caps. Some Democrats have signaled they could be open to that idea.House Democrats expressed great skepticism that the Senate effort would lead to a breakthrough.Rep. Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut, the top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee, said Republicans have wanted to repeal the health overhaul for the past 15 years. “That’s where they’re trying to go,” she said.When could things return to normal?While the shutdown will end tonight, the return to pre-shutdown status will not be immediate. Air travel is expected to experience lingering impacts, as the transportation secretary noted that the speed of recovery will depend on how quickly air traffic controllers return to work, with many having retired during the shutdown. The FAA administrator stated that air traffic controllers will receive their full back pay within a week, but it remains unclear how quickly other federal workers will be compensated. In previous shutdowns, it took up to eight weeks for some workers to receive back pay.Regarding SNAP benefits, the American Public Human Services Association anticipates that most states will issue full benefits within three days after the shutdown ends, though some states may take about a week due to complications from issuing partial benefits during the shutdown. The Small Business Administration has indicated that once the government reopens, it will immediately begin processing and approving loans for small businesses. ___Associated Press writer Mary Clare Jalonick contributed to this report.

    President Donald Trump signed a government funding bill Wednesday night, ending a record 43-day shutdown that caused financial stress for federal workers who went without paychecks, stranded scores of travelers at airports and generated long lines at some food banks.

    The shutdown magnified partisan divisions in Washington as Trump took unprecedented unilateral actions — including canceling projects and trying to fire federal workers — to pressure Democrats into relenting on their demands.

    The Republican president blamed the situation on Democrats and suggested voters shouldn’t reward the party during next year’s midterm elections.

    “So I just want to tell the American people, you should not forget this,” Trump said. “When we come up to midterms and other things, don’t forget what they’ve done to our country.”

    The signing ceremony came just hours after the House passed the measure on a mostly party-line vote of 222-209. The Senate had already passed the measure Monday.

    Democrats wanted to extend an enhanced tax credit expiring at the end of the year that lowers the cost of health coverage obtained through Affordable Care Act marketplaces. They refused to go along with a short-term spending bill that did not include that priority. But Republicans said that was a separate policy fight to be held at another time.

    “We told you 43 days ago from bitter experience that government shutdowns don’t work,” said Rep. Tom Cole, the Republican chairman of the House Appropriations Committee. “They never achieve the objective that you announce. And guess what? You haven’t achieved that objective yet, and you’re not going to.”

    The frustration and pressures generated by the shutdown were reflected when lawmakers debated the spending measure on the House floor.

    Republicans said Democrats sought to use the pain generated by the shutdown to prevail in a policy dispute.

    “They knew it would cause pain and they did it anyway,” House Speaker Mike Johnson said.

    Democrats said Republicans raced to pass tax breaks earlier this year that they say mostly will benefit the wealthy. But the bill before the House Wednesday “leaves families twisting in the wind with zero guarantee there will ever, ever be a vote to extend tax credits to help everyday people pay for their health care,” said Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass.

    Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries said Democrats would not give up on the subsidy extension even if the vote did not go their way.

    “This fight is not over,” Jeffries said. “We’re just getting started.”

    The House had not been in legislative session since Sept. 19, when it passed a short-term measure to keep the government open when the new budget year began in October. Johnson sent lawmakers home after that vote and put the onus on the Senate to act, saying House Republicans had done their job.

    What’s in the bill to end the shutdown

    The legislation is the result of a deal reached by eight senators who broke ranks with the Democrats after reaching the conclusion that Republicans would not bend on using a government funding to bill to extend the health care tax credits.

    The compromise funds three annual spending bills and extends the rest of government funding through Jan. 30. Republicans promised to hold a vote by mid-December to extend the health care subsidies, but there is no guarantee of success.

    The bill includes a reversal of the firing of federal workers by the Trump administration since the shutdown began. It also protects federal workers against further layoffs through January and guarantees they are paid once the shutdown is over. The bill for the Agriculture Department means people who rely on key food assistance programs will see those benefits funded without threat of interruption through the rest of the budget year.

    The package includes $203.5 million to boost security for lawmakers and an additional $28 million for the security of Supreme Court justices.

    Democrats also decried language in the bill that would give senators the opportunity to sue when a federal agency or employee searches their electronic records without notifying them, allowing for up to $500,000 in potential damages for each violation.

    The language seems aimed at helping Republican senators pursue damages if their phone records were analyzed by the FBI as part of an investigation into Trump’s efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss. The provisions drew criticism from Republicans as well. Johnson said he was “very angry about it.”

    “That was dropped in at the last minute, and I did not appreciate that, nor did most of the House members,” Johnson said, promising a vote on the matter as early as next week.

    The biggest point of contention, though, was the fate of the expiring enhanced tax credit that makes health insurance more affordable through Affordable Care Act marketplaces.

    “It’s a subsidy on top of a subsidy. Our friends added it during COVID,” Cole said. “COVID is over. They set a date certain that the subsidies would run out. They chose the date.”

    Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said the enhanced tax credit was designed to give more people access to health care and no Republican voted for it.

    “All they have done is try to eliminate access to health care in our country. The country is catching on to them,” Pelosi said.

    Without the enhanced tax credit, premiums on average will more than double for millions of Americans. More than 2 million people would lose health insurance coverage altogether next year, the Congressional Budget Office projected.

    Health care debate ahead

    It’s unclear whether the parties will find any common ground on health care before the December vote in the Senate. Johnson has said he will not commit to bringing it up in his chamber.

    Some Republicans have said they are open to extending the COVID-19 pandemic-era tax credits as premiums will soar for millions of people, but they also want new limits on who can receive the subsidies. Some argue that the tax dollars for the plans should be routed through individuals rather than go directly to insurance companies.

    Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, said Monday that she was supportive of extending the tax credits with changes, such as new income caps. Some Democrats have signaled they could be open to that idea.

    House Democrats expressed great skepticism that the Senate effort would lead to a breakthrough.

    Rep. Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut, the top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee, said Republicans have wanted to repeal the health overhaul for the past 15 years. “That’s where they’re trying to go,” she said.

    When could things return to normal?

    While the shutdown will end tonight, the return to pre-shutdown status will not be immediate. Air travel is expected to experience lingering impacts, as the transportation secretary noted that the speed of recovery will depend on how quickly air traffic controllers return to work, with many having retired during the shutdown.

    The FAA administrator stated that air traffic controllers will receive their full back pay within a week, but it remains unclear how quickly other federal workers will be compensated. In previous shutdowns, it took up to eight weeks for some workers to receive back pay.

    Regarding SNAP benefits, the American Public Human Services Association anticipates that most states will issue full benefits within three days after the shutdown ends, though some states may take about a week due to complications from issuing partial benefits during the shutdown.

    The Small Business Administration has indicated that once the government reopens, it will immediately begin processing and approving loans for small businesses.

    ___

    Associated Press writer Mary Clare Jalonick contributed to this report.

    Source link