ReportWire

Tag: HB 433

  • Florida lobbyists leaned on pols to get ban on local heat safety and wage laws across the finish line, records show

    Florida lobbyists leaned on pols to get ban on local heat safety and wage laws across the finish line, records show

    [ad_1]

    click to enlarge

    Photo via Colin Hackley/NSF

    House Speaker Paul Renner, R-Palm Coast, outlined priorities Tuesday for the 2024 legislative session.

    On the final day of Florida’s legislative session, state lawmakers approved one of the most controversial bills of the year, blocking local governments from requiring employers to provide basic heat safety protections for their workers, such as shade,  water breaks, employee monitoring and “appropriate first-aid measures.”

    It also bans cities and counties from regulating employers’ scheduling practices and, effective Sept. 30, 2026, from requiring employers they contract with to pay employees a rate higher than Florida’s minimum wage, which is currently $12 an hour.

    Florida Gov. DeSantis signed the bill into law, with no fanfare or statement, on March 11, after regular business hours. He later rhetorically distanced himself from the bill, telling reporters during a press conference the day after that “it wasn’t anything that was coming from me.”

    Florida’s House Bill 433 — modeled after bills that have failed to pass the Legislature before — almost didn’t make it through both legislative chambers this year, as its Republican bill sponsors added, subtracted and meticulously crafted its language to avoid a political disaster come election time for their Republican colleagues in swing districts. A few of those Republicans ultimately joined Democrats in voting it down.

    But records obtained by Orlando Weekly through a public records request show industry lobbyists scrambled in the final days and weeks of the legislative session to ensure its passage, with a direct connection to the Florida House Speaker’s chief of staff.

    “I haven’t texted you in weeks–HEAT cannot die,” wrote Associated Builders and Contractors lobbyist Carol Bowen in a text message to House Speaker Paul Renner’s chief of staff Allison Carter.

    The text was sent on Thursday, March 7, the night before the final day of session, at 9:10 p.m.

    “The entire business community is in lock step on this. Thank you for your attention to this concern” Bowen added.

    [Editor’s note: Those who have been in Orlando for more than a decade may remember another nasty batch of lobbyist-led text bullying. In 2012, Orange County voters passed a referendum approving paid sick leave, and then-Mayor Teresa Jacobs — now chair of the Orange County School Board — was found to be texting with lobbyists from Darden, Disney and the Florida Chamber of Commerce even during a hearing on the matter, asking for talking points. No spoiler here: They were against it, even down to using some of the same messaging they’re using now.]

    Sponsored by first-term Republican Rep. Tiffany Esposito, HB 433 was a priority of business lobbying groups this session, with backing from the Florida Chamber of Commerce — an influential force among both parties in the state Legislature, representing the interests of business giants like Disney, Publix and U.S. Sugar.

    The Florida Chamber has sought to block local governments from mandating things like paid sick leave, advance notice of one’s work schedule, and wages higher than the state’s minimum wage for literally 20 years.

    Other major lobbying groups — including the Associated Industries of Florida, an organization largely funded by companies like the Hospital Corporation of America (HCA), Florida Blue, and TECO Energy this past quarter — were also in “lock step” on Esposito’s bill.

    “Hey…looking for insight on HB 433. Are yall looking to put the wage stuff back on?” asked Associated Industries of Florida lobbyist Adam Basford in a text to Carter, on Tuesday, March 5.

    The “wage stuff” — referring to part of the bill that would dissolve local living wage ordinances in communities like Miami-Dade and St. Petersburg — was cut from the bill by Senate bill sponsor Jay Trumbull (R-Panama City) that day, leaving the bill strictly about preempting local heat safety laws for workers.

    That is, Trumbull’s amended version would solely prevent local governments from doing anything that would guarantee that outdoor workers, such as agricultural and construction workers exposed to Florida heat, would have the right to basic things like water.

    “We obviously would like to see both the heat and the wage stuff get through but a little worried about what the Senate might do,” Basford texted.

    No response from Carter.

    “Can I please talk to you about HB 433?” Basford texted again, after 27 hours with no response.

    The “wage stuff” was ultimately tacked back onto the bill on March 7, ahead of its final passage, along with a ban on local fair workweek laws (also known as “predictive scheduling”) and prevailing wage laws, which essentially require contractors that receive public money from local governments to follow established wage and benefit standards, some of which can be stronger than standards under state law.

    The Chamber argues such mandates create a “patchwork of regulations” that unduly burden business owners. That was their argument, again, literally 20 years ago, and their lobbyists — and political allies — continue to parrot the same talking points today.

    Public records show the Chamber drafted the “wage stuff” language and emailed that to Esposito on Nov. 14, the day after Esposito initially filed it.

    As filed, the bill only targeted laws regulating heat exposure requirements for workers.

    Metadata on the Word document sent by the Chamber also indicates that the Chamber collaborated with the Foundation for Government Accountability, a right-wing think-tank with connections to the governor’s office that has also lobbied for rollbacks to child labor law, anti-union legislation, and tougher eligibility requirements for social safety net programs like Medicaid, food stamps and unemployment assistance.

    Esposito is herself president of SWFL Inc. — a regional chamber of commerce in Southwest Florida — and was first elected to her state House seat in November 2022.

    Last year, she championed a law that similarly preempted local governments from enacting or maintaining local tenant rights ordinances that real estate lobbyists likewise characterized as creating inconsistencies for Florida landlords.

    According to email records, the Florida Chamber increased the stakes the day before the end of session.

    Carolyn Johnson, the Chamber’s chief lobbyist, sent out email blasts to state lawmakers on March 7 urging them to support HB 433, which was broadly opposed by Democrats, organized labor, environmental justice groups like the Sierra Club, and labor-conscious groups like WeCount! and the Farmworker Association of Florida that advocate for immigrant workers.

    Specifically, Johnson (who texted Renner’s chief of staff Carter to “check in” that day) urged lawmakers to support amendments that would, in effect, add the “wage stuff” back in.

    Such changes, Johnson wrote, were “important to the business community” in order to “continue to foster a business-friendly environment that will lead to the state’s continued economic growth.”

    As an added pressure — or incentive — the Chamber added that lawmakers’ votes on the legislation would be double-weighted in their upcoming legislative report cards — or “How They Voted” reports to their members.

    Such reports indicate lawmakers’ support for the Chamber’s priorities, with generally only Republicans making their “Distinguished Advocates” list. (Last year, for instance, the only Democrat to make that list was Orange County’s Sen. Linda Stewart, who’s term-limited from seeking reelection this year.)

    Additionally, campaign finance records show the business lobby used more than just their words to push their members’ priorities.

    Records show the Florida Chamber of Commerce, across its 11 main associated political committees, paid out roughly $1.44 million to the campaign accounts (and PACs) of state legislators and the Republican Party of Florida from Oct. 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024.

    The Associated Industries of Florida similarly pitched in roughly $1.8 million to the campaign accounts, or associated committees, of state legislators and both major parties (with the bulk going to the GOP) in the same time frame across its six active PCs.

    But it wasn’t just the Associated Industries and Chamber vying to get this past the finish line. As Bowen of the ABC of Florida implied, groups representing the restaurant and tourism industries (the Florida Restaurant and Lodging Association) and lobbying groups for the home builder and agricultural industries were also in support.

    Several of these groups have historically poured money into (unsuccessfully) blocking efforts to increase Florida’s minimum wage, and are affiliated with national organizations that push for similar anti-worker policies in other state legislatures across the country and on a federal level.

    Opponents of Florida’s House Bill 433 — which can best be described as a preemption measure — have argued the legislation stomps on the powers of local governments and could result in pay cuts for thousands of working Floridians employed by government contractors, such as janitorial workers and airport employees who handle baggage and push passenger wheelchairs.

    That threat is tied to the part of the bill that preempts local living wage laws, which aren’t established in all communities, but have been enacted in places like Miami-Dade County, Palm Beach County and St. Petersburg, where Florida’s minimum wage of $12 an hour — or roughly $24,960 annually — isn’t enough for a working adult or family to make rent, let alone live comfortably.

    Rep. Esposito, the GOP House sponsor of the bill, admitted during session that employers could decide to reduce pay — the income that supports Florida’s working families — once this is effective.

    “Could wages go down? Maybe,” she said during the bill’s first committee hearing. “It’s up to the prerogative of the employer.”

    Thanks to a last-minute amendment by Republican Sen. Trumbull, that part of the bill won’t go into effect until Sept. 30, 2026 — the very day that Florida’s minimum wage is officially scheduled to rise to $15 an hour.

    The preemption of workplace heat safety laws will go into effect July 1 — and there’s no mystery where that policy priority came from.

    There is not a single city or county in Florida that currently requires employers to offer basic protections for workers who are exposed to extreme heat on the job.

    But an effort to do so was underway in Miami-Dade County last year, thanks to years of organizing by outdoor laborers, until a vote on whether to approve such a policy was delayed.

     Esposito filed the state preemption bill just a week later, preempting workplace “heat exposure” requirements to the state — meaning no city or county can enact regulations stronger than those under federal or state law.

    As of today, there is no federal or state standard for protecting workers from extreme heat on the job — only federal guidelines, and a risk of being cited by the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration for failure to foster a workplace that “is free from recognized hazards that are causing or likely to cause death or serious harm to employees.”

    That agency, per direction from the Biden administration, is in the process of developing a federal heat safety standard, but that process could take years.

    Efforts in Florida by Democrats to establish a statewide standard have gone nowhere, due to lack of Republican support. Democrats are outnumbered by the GOP in the state Legislature more than two to one.

    The dangers of a failure to act aren’t hypothetical. A 26-year-old man who moved from Mexico to South Florida for work on a sugar cane farm through the federal H-2 Visa program suffered fatal heat-related injuries on the job last September.

    The heat index reached 97 degrees the day he collapsed, according to a federal OSHA investigation. It was just his fourth day on the job.

    The contractor who employed the young man, McNeill Labor Management, didn’t report the 26-year-old’s hospitalization or his death, which is required under law. The contractor faces just $27,655 in proposed penalties, an amount set by federal statute.

    According to federal data, an estimated 36 U.S. workplace deaths related to environmental heat exposure were recorded in 2021, down from 56 deaths in 2020. Even OSHA, however, has admitted that records of heat-related illness and death on the job are likely “vast underestimates.

    For Johana Lopez, a local agricultural worker in Apopka, Florida who has seen coworkers pass out on the job from extreme heat, Esposito’s bill feels “unjust.”

    For the business lobby, the bill “protects small businesses from ‘gotcha’ regulations” and creates “a stable environment where owners can grow their businesses.”

    Subscribe to Orlando Weekly newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | or sign up for our RSS Feed

    [ad_2]

    McKenna Schueler

    Source link

  • ‘It’s unjust’: Florida Gov. DeSantis signs bill banning local heat safety and wage laws

    ‘It’s unjust’: Florida Gov. DeSantis signs bill banning local heat safety and wage laws

    [ad_1]

    click to enlarge

    Photo via Ron DeSantis/Twitter

    Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis Thursday quietly signed into law one of the business lobby’s top priorities this year, preempting local governments from passing laws on workplace heat safety measures to protect outdoor workers from heat exhaustion.

    The bill, HB 433, also preempts the regulation of employer scheduling practices to the state, and — effective Sept. 30, 2026 — will strip local “living wage” laws passed in some Florida cities and counties that require their contractors to pay employees a wage that’s higher than the state’s minimum. A earlier version of the bill would have preempted all local mandates affecting the terms and conditions of employment.

    DeSantis signed the bill in its final version Thursday night, after hours, with no statement or fanfare.

    Florida Democrats on Friday criticized the move.

    “Outdoor workers are all around us – working on construction sites, repairing and paving roads, picking fruit and vegetables on farms and more,” said Florida Sen. Victor Torres, D-Orlando, in a statement.

    “They’re just trying to make a living for their families – and instead of putting protections in place to ensure businesses are prioritizing their workers’ health and well-being from record-setting temperatures, we tied the hands of proactive local governments to do so,” Torres continued. “This bill is an attack on our outdoor workers – the rent is too damn high and the sun is too damn hot!”

    Sponsored by Republican Tiffany Esposito, a first-term member of the Florida House, the bill was a priority of the Florida Chamber of Commerce — a deep-pocketed business lobbying group that represents the interests of companies like Publix, AT&T, restaurant chains, and U.S. Sugar, which fork over tens of thousands of dollars to help fund their political operations.

    Records obtained by the investigative newsletter Seeking Rents show the Chamber was also directly involved in drafting the language of the legislation, along with a conservative think-tank that was behind a new law rolling back certain child labor protections.

    The bill was a priority of the Florida Chamber of Commerce — a business lobbying group that represents the interests of companies like Publix, AT&T, restaurant chains, and U.S. Sugar

    tweet this

    Esposito herself, who argued the bill was in the best interest of taxpayers, is herself the president of a regional chamber of commerce in Southwest Florida.

    Thousands of working Floridians could be affected by the preemption of local living wage laws alone, which have been implemented over the years in expensive areas of the state, like St. Petersburg and Miami, in order to lift wages for workers on contracted public projects — like building and road construction — as well as airport workers.

    Local governments in Florida have been barred from requiring private employers to pay above minimum wage for more than 20 years.

    The idea of the so-called “living wage” laws is that if you’re an employer who wants to enter into a government, taxpayer-funded contract, you have to pay your workers at least something closer to a living wage — which, generally, under these laws is somewhere between at least $15 to $20 minimum depending on the city or county.

    Ideally, workers covered by these contracts are locals — friends and neighbors of these communities who contribute to the local economy and who may not be able to live comfortably on less.

    The Chamber of Commerce has been trying to gut these living wage laws in Florida for years, framing wage and benefit mandates as “unnecessary government interference.”

    “Lawmakers in other parts of the country are passing job killing mandates at the local level,” reads a legislative agenda released by the Chamber for the 2024 session. “We need to keep Florida, Florida by allowing employers to flourish free of unnecessary governmental interference and inconsistencies.”

    For workers who benefit from these local laws, however, the new bill could create confusion and inconsistency. It also could result in cuts to pay once that portion of the bill goes into effect on Sept. 30, 2026 — the day Florida’s $15 minimum wage also fully goes into effect.

    The statewide minimum wage is currently $12 an hour, or $7.98 for tipped workers, and will rise $1 each year on Sept. 30 before reaching $15 by Sept. 30, 2026 under a ballot initiative approved by 61% of Florida voters in 2020.

    Rep. Esposito, the GOP House sponsor of the bill, admitted during session that employers could decide to reduce pay — the income that supports Florida’s working families — once this is effective.

    “Could wages go down? Maybe,” she said during the bill’s first committee hearing. “It’s up to the prerogative of the employer.” The chair of that committee cut the public off from providing personal testimony. Dozens had signed up to speak.

    Esposito herself could not say how many workers across the state would be affected by the preemption, which broadly ties the hands of local government leaders. So the full scope of the preemption, while standing to affect thousands of airport workers and other contracted workers in South Florida alone, is still unclear.

    The preemption of heat safety mandates for working Floridians, on the other hand, was a direct attack on a local ordinance being considered in Miami-Dade County last year.

    That ordinance sought to require construction and agriculture companies, specifically, to take steps to protect their employees from heat exhaustion. For instance, ensuring they have access to water and giving them 10-minute, shaded breaks every couple of hours when the heat index is at least 95 degrees.

    Following industry backlash, that ordinance was delayed for a vote last fall until mid-March — after session had already ended and House Bill 433 passed the state legislature. The bill was filed for consideration by lawmakers this year just a week after the vote on that local ordinance was delayed last fall.

    Miami-Dade County was the only municipality in Florida considering such an ordinance, which has been proposed at the state level by Democrats but has failed to garner enough interest from the Republican majority to make much progress.

    As it is, there is no federal or state standard in Florida for heat exposure protections in the workplace. Just a few states — California, Washington, and Oregon — have their own state laws requiring certain workplace heat safety measures.

    Colorado also regulates heat exposure requirements for farmworkers, while Minnesota has heat standards for workers indoors. As any warehouse worker can tell you (we heard this from UPS workers here in Orlando, for instance) — it’s not just those laboring outside who stand to suffer from Florida’s scorching heat.

    And it’s only getting hotter in Florida. Opponents of the bill argued that failing to act on workplace heat safety protections could be costly due to lost productivity. An agricultural worker in Apopka told us the bill is “unjust” and “unfair.”

    “This cruel and shameful action by Governor DeSantis, our Republican-led Legislature, and a small group of powerful industry lobbyists will endanger the lives of our working families and cause preventable deaths,” Oscar Londoño, co-executive director of the immigrant advocacy group WeCount! Shared in an email newsletter on Friday.

    The bill passed the Republican-dominated state legislature on the final day of Florida’s legislative session last month, largely along party lines. Four Republicans joined Florida Democrats in opposing the bill in the state Senate, while four Republicans similarly crossed party lines to vote it down in the Florida House.

    GOP House member Mike Beltran, who voted in opposition to the bill, explained his vote by stating he only opposed the heat safety preemption provision.

    “Due to Florida’s unusually hot climate, the variation thereof throughout the state, and the diverse economy, I believe that local regulation may be appropriate,” he said.

    The preemption on regulating workplace heat exposure and scheduling goes into effect July 1, while the preemption on wage and benefit mandates will go into effect Sept. 30, 2026.

    Subscribe to Orlando Weekly newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | or sign up for our RSS Feed

    [ad_2]

    McKenna Schueler

    Source link

  • Florida Legislature approves bill blocking local workplace heat protection standards

    Florida Legislature approves bill blocking local workplace heat protection standards

    [ad_1]

    click to enlarge

    photo by McKenna Schueler

    Organizers with the Farmworkers Association of Florida at the ‘March for Our Dreams & Freedom’ in downtown Orlando (May 1, 2023)

    Florida’s Republican-dominated Legislature muscled through an industry-backed bill last week that, if approved by Gov. Ron DeSantis, would block local governments from requiring their contractors to provide heat safety measures, such as water breaks and other cooling measures, for employees who work outdoors.

    Approved on the final day of the state’s legislative session, the bill (HB 433) would also gut local “living wage” ordinances passed in some communities, beginning in the fall of 2026, and prevent local governments from enacting predictive scheduling laws, which essentially require employers to notify hourly workers of their work schedules in advance.

    The predictive scheduling ban was a last-minute edit to the legislation, which previously would have prevented local governments from enacting any regulation of terms and conditions of employment.

    The legislation, sponsored by first-term Republican Rep. Tiffany Esposito, was opposed by most Democrats (and a smattering of Republican legislators in swing districts), but backed by the deep-pocketed business lobby.

    Records obtained by the investigative newsletter Seeking Rents show the legislation was at least in part drafted by lobbyists for the business-friendly Florida Chamber of Commerce, which has historically campaigned against minimum wage increases and has sought a ban on “living wage” ordinances for years.

    Esposito herself is the president of a regional Chamber of Commerce in Bonita Springs, and sponsored similarly preemptive legislation targeting local communities’ tenant rights laws last year.

    The ban on local living wage ordinances has been years in the making. These are essentially local laws passed by some city or county governments that require the employers they contract with to pay a minimum wage that’s higher than the state minimum wage of $12 an hour.

    Florida’s minimum wage is already set to rise $1 each year until it reaches $15 an hour on Sept. 20, 2026, due to a constitutional amendment Florida voters approved in 2020 (despite an opposition campaign spearheaded in part by the Florida Chamber of Commerce).

    Under the bill approved Friday, thousands of employees in communities with such ordinances in place could see their wages change, come October 2026. The bill would not affect direct employees of the city or county governments, however, which would maintain the right to regulate the wages of their own employees.

    It’s unclear how many contracted workers would be affected (and Esposito couldn’t say for sure herself) but in Miami-Dade, it’s expected to affect more than 28,000 employees — from airport baggage handlers to custodians and healthcare professionals — according to the Miami Herald.

    Esposito, who argued the bill would “protect” taxpayer dollars, refused to answer whether workers could see pay cuts if the bill is signed into law. “Could wages go down? Maybe,” she admitted, during the bill’s first hearing. “It’s up to the prerogative of the employer.”

    The ban on workplace heat safety standards — which gained national attention after a summer of record-breaking heat — appears to be largely targeting a proposed ordinance in Miami-Dade County, where county commissioners last fall considered adopting landmark standards for heat exposure that would have been stronger than what’s already required under state and federal law (which isn’t much).

    No other community in Florida has passed any local ordinance mandating such a thing. This bill would prevent local communities from trying.

    Lobbyists for the agricultural industry, which employs a lot of the workers who would have been affected, managed to water down the proposed ordinance in Miami-Dade County before ultimately delaying a vote on it last fall.

    County commissioners were scheduled to take up a vote on it on March 19.

    The state legislation approved last week was strongly opposed by the organized labor movement — which has fought similar preemption attempts in the past — in addition to immigrant rights groups and other workers’ rights organizations.

    “This is all about some really unscrupulous folks wanting to come in and not play by the rules,” Dr. Rich Templin, director of politics and public policy for the Florida AFL-CIO, told Orlando Weekly earlier this month. “And the Legislature is all too happy to oblige them.”

    Democratic lawmakers filed amendments throughout session to either water down the proposal or otherwise strengthen statewide heat protection standards ahead of its passage, but as usual, all were rejected by the Republican majority.

    The federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), which has published voluntary guidelines on heat safety in workplaces, has been called upon by the Biden administration to develop federal heat exposure standards, but has not yet done so.

    Only three states — California, Oregon and Washington — required heat breaks for outdoor workers, as of last June. A couple other states, such as Colorado and Minnesota, have limited regulations. A set of bills in Florida this year (SB 762/HB 945) sponsored by Democrats sought to similarly adopt limited standards, but were ultimately ignored.

    Currently, employers that fail to provide a heat-safe workplace in Florida can face a potential fine from OSHA under the agency’s “general duty” clause, but few ever do.

    Florida Republicans, regardless, pointed to OSHA’s voluntary guidelines and the risk of being fined for failing to protect workers on the job as defense of the preemptive legislation, which remained divisive to the end.

    The preemption on wage and scheduling policies in Florida’s bill, in particular, almost died in the Florida Senate, which didn’t get on board with that portion of the bill until the second-to-last day of session. That’s when Esposito (the House sponsor) agreed to delay the implementation date to Sept. 30, 2026.

    The Senate version of the proposal (SB 1492), sponsored by GOP Sen. Jay Trumbull, only targeted workplace heat safety requirements, but the Senate ultimately agreed to take up its broader companion in the House.

    House Bill 433 passed the state Senate on Friday in a 24-15 vote, with four Republicans joining Democrats in voting “no” on the bill. The Republican-dominated Florida House approved the bill in a 74-36 vote just an hour later, similarly with just a handful of Republican representatives joining Democrats in opposition.

    The bill now heads to DeSantis for his signature.

    Subscribe to Orlando Weekly newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | or sign up for our RSS Feed

    [ad_2]

    McKenna Schueler

    Source link