ReportWire

Tag: harvard

  • Putting the Benefits of Fasting for Weight Loss to the Test  | NutritionFacts.org

    Putting the Benefits of Fasting for Weight Loss to the Test  | NutritionFacts.org

    [ad_1]

    For more than a century, fasting has been used as a weight-loss treatment.

    I’ve talked about the benefits of caloric restriction. Well, the greatest caloric restriction is getting no calories at all. Fasting has been branded “the next big weight loss fad,” but it has a long history throughout various spiritual traditions, practiced by Moses, Jesus, Muhammed, and Buddha. In 1732, a noted physician wrote, “He that eats till he is sick must fast till he is well.” About one in seven American adults today report taking that advice, “using fasting as a means to control body weight,” as I discuss in my video Benefits of Fasting for Weight Loss Put to the Test
     
    Case reports of the treatment of obesity through fasting date back more than a century in the medical literature. In 1915, two Harvard doctors indelicately described “two extraordinarily fat women,” one of whom “was a veritable pork barrel.” Their success led them to conclude that “successive moderate periods of starvation constitute a perfectly safe, harmless, and effective method for reducing the weight of those suffering from obesity.” 
     
    The longest-recorded fast, published in 1973, made it into the Guinness Book of World Records. To reach his ideal body weight, a 27-year-old man fasted for 382 days straight, losing 276 pounds, and managed to keep nearly all of it off. He was given vitamin and mineral supplements so he wouldn’t die, but no calories for more than a year. In the researchers’ acknowledgments, they thanked him “for his cheerful co-operation and steadfast application to the task of achieving a normal physique.” 
     
    In a U.S. Air Force study, more than 20 individuals at least 100 pounds overweight and most “unable to lose weight on previous diets” were fasted for as long as 84 days. Nine dropped out of the study, but the 16 who remained “were unequivocally successful” at losing 40 to 100 pounds. In the first four days, the subjects were noted as losing as much as four pounds a day, which “probably represents mostly fluid,” mostly water weight as the body starts to adapt. But, after a few weeks, they were steadily losing about a pound a day of mostly straight fat. The investigator described the starvation program as “a dramatic and exciting treatment for obesity.” 
     
    Of course, the single most successful diet for weight loss—namely no diet at all—is also the single least sustainable. What other diet can cure morbid obesity in a matter of months but practically be guaranteed to kill you within a year if you stick with it? The reason diets don’t work, almost by definition, is that people go on them, then they go off of them. Permanent weight loss is only achieved through permanent lifestyle change. So, what’s the point of fasting if you’re just going to go back to your regular diet and gain right back all of that lost weight? 
     
    Fasting proponents cite the psychological benefit of realigning people’s perceptions and motivation. Some individuals have resigned themselves to the belief that weight loss for them is somehow impossible. They may think “that they are ‘made differently’ from those of normal weight” in some way, and no matter what they do, the pounds don’t come off. But the rapid, unequivocal weight loss during fasting demonstrates to them that with a large enough change in eating habits, it’s not just possible, but inevitable. This morale boost may then embolden them to make better food choices once they resume eating. 
     
    The break from food may allow some an opportunity “to pause and reflect” on the role food is playing in their lives—not only the power it has over them but the power they have over it. In a fasting study entitled “Correction and Control of Intractable Obesity,” a patient’s personality was described as changing “from one of desperation, with abandonment of hope, to that of an eager extravert full of plans for a promising future.” She realized that her weight was within her own power to control. The researchers concluded: “This highly intellectual social worker has been returned to a full degree of exceptional usefulness.” 
     
    After a fast, newfound commitment to more healthful eating may be facilitated by a reduction in overall appetite reported post-fast, compared to pre-fast, at least temporarily. Even during a fast, hunger may start to dissipate within the first 36 hours. So, challenging people’s delusions about their exceptionality to the laws of physics—thinking they are “made differently”—with “short periods of total fasting may seem barbaric. In reality, this method of weight reduction is remarkably well tolerated by obese patients.” That seems to be a recurring theme in these published series of cases. In the influential paper “Treatment of Obesity by Total Fasting for up to 249 Days,” the researchers remarked that the “most surprising aspect of this study was the ease with which the prolonged fast was tolerated.” All of their patients “spontaneously commented on their increased sense of well-being, and in some, this amounted to frank euphoria.” They continued that, although “treatment by total fasting must only be prescribed under close medical supervision,” they “are convinced that it is the treatment of choice, certainly in cases of gross obesity.” 
     
    Fasting for a day can make people irritable and feel moody and distracted, but after a few days of fasting, many report feeling clear, elated, and alert—even euphoric. This may be in part due to the significant rise in endorphins that accompanies fasting, as you can see in the graph below and at 5:48 in my video. Mood enhancement during fasting is thought to perhaps represent an adaptive survival mechanism to motivate the food search. This positive outlook towards the future may then facilitate the behavioral change necessary to lock in some of the weight-loss benefits. 

    Is that what happens, though? Is fasting actually effective over the long term? There are articles with titles like “Death During Therapeutic Starvation for Obesity.” Is fasting even safe? We’ll find out next. 
     
    This is the sixth in a 14-part series on fasting for weight loss. In case you missed any of the others, see the related videos below. 

    My book How Not to Diet is all about weight loss. You can learn more about it and order it here

    [ad_2]

    Michael Greger M.D. FACLM

    Source link

  • Bill Ackman Claims Martin Luther King Jr. Would Have Been Against Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion—And Yes, He Was Serious

    Bill Ackman Claims Martin Luther King Jr. Would Have Been Against Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion—And Yes, He Was Serious

    [ad_1]

    Billionaire Bill Ackman, who’s been in the news a lot of late thanks to his quest to oust former Harvard president Claudine Gay, spent part of Martin Luther King Jr. Day in a conversation on X with Democratic presidential candidate Dean Phillips and X owner Elon Musk. The big takeaway from that chat? That Ackman believes King—who was, quite famously, against racism—would have hated diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts that have been implemented in schools and businesses.

    Yes, according to the hedge fund manager, King’s “I Have a Dream” speech is “precisely about a world where people will be judged not by the color of their skin, but the content of their character. And when I came to learn about the DEI movement, which is an ideological movement, it’s really the reverse of that…I think Dr. King would be very opposed to this sort of ideology, even though you know, diversity is a good thing, even though of course, a culture where everyone feels comfortable and included is critically important.”

    Ackman—who claimed earlier this month that DEI initiatives are “racist,” that he’s worried about “reverse racism,” and that DEI is “a powerful movement that has not only pervaded Harvard, but the educational system at large” and must be stopped—is of course not the first person to cherry-pick a single line from King’s most famous speech and argue that it is proof the civil rights leader was calling for color blindness. In fact, King’s words are regularly co-opted by the right* to do exactly that.

    Earlier this month, then GOP presidential hopeful Vivek Ramaswamy tried to argue that King would not have approved of critical race theory or DEI efforts. In 2021, while promoting Florida’s Stop Woke Act, which prohibits public schools and businesses from discussing race and racism in a way certain white people don’t like, Ron DeSantis boldly suggested MLK Jr. would be all for it, saying, “You think about what MLK stood for. He said he didn’t want people judged on the color of their skin, but on the content of their character. You listen to some of these people nowadays, they don’t talk about that.” The same year, then GOP lawmaker Kevin McCarthy tweeted, in all seriousness, “Critical Race Theory goes against everything Martin Luther King Jr. taught us.”

    Unfortunately for the individuals invoking King’s words to fit their worldview, his own daughter has said he would absolutely not be on their side. “People using ‘not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character’ to deter discussion of, teaching about, and protest against racism are not students of the comprehensive #MLK,” Bernice King wrote on X just a few months ago. “My father’s dream and work included eradicating racism, not ignoring it.” As Reverend William Barber of the Poor People’s Campaign told Axios, King “said to us that we must address fully systemic racism, systemic poverty, ecological devastation, and militarism. It’s dishonoring of the memory of King not to raise that full critique, no matter how unnerving, unsettling or uncomfortable it is.” And, in a revelation that those committed to the “MLK Jr. would have been against DEI initiatives” bit will very much not be pleased to hear, reporter Judd Legum noted on Monday that in 1965, King was asked if he supported “a multibillion-dollar program of preferential treatment for the Negro.” He responded: “I do indeed.”

    X content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    *Ackman has historically supported Democrats but said last week he no longer wants to associate with the party. He also said Saturday he would give $1 million to a political action committee supporting Democratic primary hopeful Dean Phillips.

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Did Harvard's plagiarism scandal doom DEI?

    Did Harvard's plagiarism scandal doom DEI?

    [ad_1]

    Aaron Sibarium, a staff writer at the Washington Free Beacon, whose work has been widely credited for exposing the plagiarism of former Harvard President Claudine Gay, joins Reason‘s Zach Weissmueller and Liz Wolfe on the latest episode of Just Asking Questions to discuss Gay’s downfall, as well as its implications for the Ivy League; diversity, equity, and inclusion; and writers and thinkers of all kinds who can now have their work subjected to AI-powered plagiarism detection.

    Watch the full conversation on Reason‘s YouTube channel or on the Just Asking Questions podcast feed on AppleSpotify, or your preferred podcatcher.

    Sources referenced in this conversation:

    Harvard President Claudine Gay Hit With Six New Charges Of Plagiarism,Washington Free Beacon

    Excerpts From Dr. Claudine Gay’s Work,” The New York Times

    Bill Ackman on X

    Claudine Gay: What Just Happened at Harvard Is Bigger Than Me,” The New York Times

    Christopher F. Rufo on X

    [ad_2]

    Zach Weissmueller

    Source link

  • Hell hath no fury

    Hell hath no fury

    [ad_1]

    Hell hath no fury like a Bill Ackman scorned: For those just tuning in, let me catch you up on the Harvard/antisemitism/plagiarism scandal that just won’t end.

    Back in December, three elite university presidents—including Harvard President Claudine Gay, University of Pennsylvania President Liz Magill, and MIT President Sally Kornbluth—were trotted before Congress to give testimonies related to their handling of antisemitic speech and pro-Palestine activism on campus. Rep. Elise Stefanik (R–N.Y.) raked them all over the coals, declaring their answers unsatisfactory and insensitive and full of legalese, and Magill soon resigned.

    Harvard initially stood by Gay, but then a mostly conservative collection of journalists and activists—as well as some big donors, like hedge fund manager Bill Ackman—publicized her extensive track record of plagiarism. Gay resigned, but not before calling everyone racist. (She is a black woman, and she claims that that’s the real reason people tried to take her down.)

    Now Business Insider has accused Ackman’s wife—Neri Oxman, an entrepreneur and former MIT professor—of plagiarism herself. Oxman, they say, “stole sentences and whole paragraphs from Wikipedia, other scholars and technical documents in her academic writing.” (As an aside: Oxman’s work is interesting. “Her team at the MIT Media Lab coaxed silkworms to build sculptures,” notes the article. Oxman “also made undulating structures out of natural materials like cellulose and chitin, the material found in shrimp cells.”)

    Now, Ackman has basically sworn revenge: “There has been no due process,” wrote Ackman this morning on X. “Neri Oxman was given 90 minutes to respond to a 7,000-word plagiarism allegation before Business Insider published a piece saying she was a plagiarist.” For the record, it’s good to give sources sufficient time to respond, but that’s not quite a due process issue.

    “This experience has inspired me to save all news organizations from the trouble of doing plagiarism reviews,” he declared, vowing to helpfully review the work of all Business Insider reporters and MIT faculty, after claiming that Insider‘s source is most likely inside MIT. (Side-by-side reviews for plagiarism are getting easier and faster to do in the era of artificial intelligence.)

    Now Ackman’s allegiance to his wife is being alternately memed and criticized:

    On one hand, it’s fair to collectively groan Why do we have another goddamn Harvard-related news cycle? On the other, we’re in a weird moment for plagiarism and the related subject of intellectual property. If ChatGPT is the death knell for plenty of academic writing, maybe it’s replacing something that had already mostly withered and died.

    The focus of the Harvard kerfuffle could have been the initial congressional testimony, and the speech double standards present on college campuses. Or it could’ve been the intellectual bankruptcy of DEI bureaucracy. Instead, it is becoming trench warfare over plagiarism, which seems like the dumbest possible way for this to all go.

    Israel pummels Hezbollah: Israeli military spokesman Daniel Hagari says the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have struck Iran-backed Hezbollah in Lebanon in retaliatory fire, killing at least seven fighters. The IDF claims that Hezbollah struck an Israeli military base on Saturday, most likely due to Israel’s killing of a senior Hamas leader inside Lebanon last week.

    Though war has been raging between Israel and Hamas since October 7, when Hamas terrorists infiltrated Israel, killing 1,200 civilians—in some cases brutally raping and beheading the victims—many had hoped that other factions in the Middle East, particularly those backed by Iran, would not be drawn into the conflict. With the increased Israel-Hezbollah conflict, as well as Houthi activity snarling global shipping and provoking some U.S. military action, that’s not looking likely.


    Scenes from New York:

    Surfer politics, spotted in Rockaway.

    (Liz Wolfe)

    QUICK HITS

    • The Supreme Court will decide whether former President Donald Trump can be kept off ballots via the 14th Amendment, which includes a section barring officials who have “engaged in insurrection” from holding public office. Oral arguments will be held on February 8.
    • Congress returns this week and is supposed to pass some funding bills, as another shutdown deadline looms on January 19.
    • A story about a salon upcharge for clients with autism is making the rounds, but the actual underlying facts seem…mostly fine, like a hairstylist is catering to an underserved market.
    • The National Park Service apparently has nothing better to do with its time than tear down statues of old white men.
    • Please enjoy the absolute worst segment on the Claudine Gay scandal, involving the most Hilaria Baldwin–esque overpronunciation of the word Latino you could possibly imagine.
    • “Often, when an issue becomes polarized, you’ll see thermostatic effects in public opinion, as when Democrats became more liberal on immigration in response to Donald Trump’s histrionic attacks on immigrants,” writes Josh Barro on Very Serious. “But while liberal figures on campus like to talk about themselves as a vanguard in a fight against conservative know-nothings who would take down knowledge and expertise, there is no pro-college backlash among liberals that is apparent in the polls.”
    • Alaska Airlines Flight 1282 had an accident while up in the air, and part of the plane flew off. A few injuries were sustained, but all passengers survived following an emergency landing.
    • Tell me you don’t know what unrealized gains are without telling me you don’t know what unrealized gains are:

    [ad_2]

    Liz Wolfe

    Source link

  • Wife of Billionaire Who Pushed for Harvard President’s Ouster Apologizes for Plagiarism in Dissertation

    Wife of Billionaire Who Pushed for Harvard President’s Ouster Apologizes for Plagiarism in Dissertation

    [ad_1]

    Neri Oxman, an architect and former MIT professor, as well as the wife of billionaire Bill Ackman, apologized Thursday for multiple instances of plagiarism in her 2010 dissertation that were reported by Business Insider.

    In the article, reporters Katherine Long and Jack Newsham wrote that Oxman had cited two authors, but did not use quotation marks around material plagiarized from their paper, and paraphrased a book without including a citation. In a post on X, responding to the story, Oxman wrote: “I regret and apologize for these errors.”

    X content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    Oxman’s husband, Ackman, has recently been in the news, regarding academia, over his push to oust former Harvard president Claudine Gay, who resigned from her post earlier this week. Ackman had called for Gay to be fired over her response to antisemitism at the university, and instances of plagiarism that had surfaced over the last several months. (In December, Harvard said Gay had requested corrections on two of her papers and would be updating her dissertation in several spots.) He has since called for members of Harvard’s governing board to step down.

    In response to the Business Insider article, and Oxman’s apology, Ackman wrote: “You know that you struck a chord when they go after your wife, in this case my love and partner in life, @NeriOxman. I am one of the most fortunate people in the universe in large part because of Neri. Please see her post below about today’s Business Insider piece about her dissertation. Part of what makes her human is that she makes mistakes, owns them, and apologizes when appropriate.”

    Fox News processes a stronger-than-expected jobs report

    X content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Sugar and Gaining Weight  | NutritionFacts.org

    Sugar and Gaining Weight  | NutritionFacts.org

    [ad_1]

    The sugar industry responds to evidence implicating sweeteners in the obesity epidemic. 
     
    In terms of excess body fat, the “well-documented obesity epidemic may merely be the tip of the overfat iceberg.” It’s been estimated that 91 percent of adults—nine out of ten of us—and 69 percent of children in the United States are overfat, a condition defined as having “excess body fat sufficient to impair health.” This can occur even in individuals who are “normal-weight and non-obese, often due to excess abdominal fat.” The way to tell if you’re overfat is if your waist circumference is more than half your height. What’s causing this epidemic? As I discuss in my video Does Sugar Lead to Weight Gain?, one primary cause may be all the added sugars we’re eating
     
    A century ago, sugar was heralded as one of the cheapest forms of calories in the diet. Just ten cents’ worth of sugar could furnish thousands of calories. Dr. Fredrick Stare, “Harvard’s sugar-pushing nutritionist,” bristled at the term “empty calories,” writing that the calories in sugar were “not empty but full of energy”—in other words, full of calories, which we are now getting too much of. The excess bodyweight of the U.S. population corresponds to about a daily 350- to 500-calorie excess on average. So, “to revert the obesity epidemic,” that’s how many calories we have to reduce, but which calories should we cut? As you can see below and at 1:33 in my video, the majority of Americans who fail to meet the Dietary Guidelines’ sugar limit get about that many calories in added sugars every day: Twenty-five teaspoons’ worth of added sugars is about 400 calories. 

    There are die-hard sugar defenders. James Rippe, for example, was reportedly paid $40,000 a month by the high fructose corn syrup industry—and that was on top of the $10 million it paid for his research. Even Dr. Rippe considers it “undisputable that sugars…contribute to obesity. It is also undisputable that sugar reduction…should be part of any weight loss program.” And, of all sources of calories to limit, since sugar is just empty calories and contains no essential nutrients, “reducing sugar consumption is obviously the place to start.” And, again, this is what the researchers funded by the likes of Dr. Pepper and Coca-Cola are saying. The primary author of “Dietary Sugar and Body Weight: Have We Reached a Crisis in the Epidemic of Obesity and Diabetes?…,” Richard Kahn, is infamous for his defense of the American Beverage Association—the soda industry—and he was the chief science officer at the American Diabetes Association when it signed a million-dollar sponsorship deal with the world’s largest candy company. “Maybe the American Diabetes Association should rename itself the American Junk Food Association,” said the director of a consumer advocacy group. What do you expect from an organization that was started with drug industry funding? 
     
    The bottom line is that “randomised controlled trials show that increasing sugars intake increases energy [calorie] intake” and “increasing sugar intake leads to body weight gain in adults, and…sugar reduction leads to body weight loss in children.” For example, when researchers randomized individuals to either increase or decrease their intake of table sugar, the added sugar group gained about three and a half pounds over ten weeks, whereas the reduced sugar group lost about two and a half pounds. A systematic review and meta-analysis of all such ad libitum diet studies—real-life studies where sugar levels were changed but people could otherwise eat whatever they wanted—found that reduced intake of dietary sugars resulted in a decrease in body weight, whereas “increased sugars intake was associated with a comparable weight increase.” The researchers found that, “considering the rapid weight gain that occurs after an increased intake of sugars, it seems reasonable to conclude that advice relating to sugars intake is a relevant component of a strategy to reduce the high risk of overweight and obesity in most countries.” That is, it’s reasonable to advise people to cut down on their sugar consumption. 
     
    Findings from observational studies have been “more ambiguous,” though, with an association found between obesity and intake of sweetened beverages, but failing to show consistent correlations with consumption of sugary foods. Most such studies rely on self-reported data, however, and “it is likely that this has introduced bias, especially as underreporting of diet has been found to be more prevalent among obese people and it is sugar-rich foods that are most commonly underreported.” However, one can measure trace sucrose levels in the urine, which gives an objective measure of actual sugar intake and also excludes contributions from other sweeteners such as high fructose corn syrup. When researchers did this, they discovered that, indeed, sugar intake is not only associated with greater odds of obesity and greater waist circumference on a snapshot-in-time cross-sectional basis, but that was also seen in a prospective cohort study over time. “Using urinary sucrose as the measure of sucrose intake,” researchers found that “participants in the highest v. the lowest quintile [fifth] for sucrose intake had 54% greater risk of being overweight or obese.” 
     
    Denying evidence that sugars are harmful to health has always been at the heart of the sugar industry’s defense.” But when the evidence is undeniable, like the link between sugar and cavities, it switches from denial to deflection, like trying to pull attention away from restricting intake to coming up with some kind of “vaccine against tooth decay.” We seem to have reached a similar point with obesity, with the likes of the Sugar Bureau switching from denial to deflection by commissioning research suggesting that obese individuals would not benefit from losing weight, a stance contradicted by hundreds of studies across four continents involving more than ten million participants. 
     
    For more on Big Sugar’s influence, check out Sugar Industry Attempts to Manipulate the Science
     
    You may also be interested in some of my other popular videos on sugar. See related videos below.

    [ad_2]

    Michael Greger M.D. FACLM

    Source link

  • Former Harvard president Claudine Gay speaks out about her resignation in New York Times op-ed

    Former Harvard president Claudine Gay speaks out about her resignation in New York Times op-ed

    [ad_1]

    A day after announcing her resignation as president of Harvard University, Claudine Gay wrote an op-ed for The New York Times defending her tenure.

    Gay said she stepped down from her position on Tuesday, just six months in the role, to stop political “demagogues” from using her in an attempt to undermine the university and the values it stands for. 

    “My hope is that by stepping down I will deny demagogues the opportunity to further weaponize my presidency in their campaign to undermine the ideals animating Harvard since its founding: excellence, openness, independence, truth,” she wrote. 

    Gay had come under sharp public scrutiny over her handling of antisemitism on campus since the start of the Israel-Hamas war, as well as accusations of plagiarism in some of her past academic writings. Republicans, led by GOP conference chair Rep. Elise Stefanik, called for her resignation after Gay and the presidents of Penn and MIT testified before a House committee last month.

    Gay said she fell into a “well-laid trap” when she testified about how she handled antisemitic incidents on campus since Hamas’ attack on Israel. 

    “Yes, I made mistakes,” she wrote. “In my initial response to the atrocities of Oct. 7, I should have stated more forcefully what all people of good conscience know: Hamas is a terrorist organization that seeks to eradicate the Jewish state.”

    At the hearing, she continued, “I fell into a well-laid trap. I neglected to clearly articulate that calls for the genocide of Jewish people are abhorrent and unacceptable and that I would use every tool at my disposal to protect students from that kind of hate.”

    She went on to address the accusations of plagiarism.


    House committee investigating allegations of plagiarism by president of Harvard University

    01:25

    “Most recently, the attacks have focused on my scholarship,” she wrote. “My critics found instances in my academic writings where some material duplicated other scholars’ language, without proper attribution. I believe all scholars deserve full and appropriate credit for their work.”

    “When I learned of these errors, I promptly requested corrections from the journals in which the flagged articles were published, consistent with how I have seen similar faculty cases handled at Harvard,” she added.

    Gay said she has been subjected to hateful racist messages and threats.

    “My inbox has been flooded with invective, including death threats. I’ve been called the N-word more times than I care to count,” she wrote.

    And she warned that the campaign against her is not just about her or Harvard.

    “This was merely a single skirmish in a broader war to unravel public faith in pillars of American society,” she wrote. “Campaigns of this kind often start with attacks on education and expertise, because these are the tools that best equip communities to see through propaganda. But such campaigns don’t end there. Trusted institutions of all types — from public health agencies to news organizations — will continue to fall victim to coordinated attempts to undermine their legitimacy.”

    -Emily Mae Czachor contributed reporting.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 1/2: CBS Evening News

    1/2: CBS Evening News

    [ad_1]

    1/2: CBS Evening News – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Harvard President Claudine Gay announces resignation; How Google is using AI to reduce traffic and emissions

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 1/2: Prime Time with John Dickerson

    1/2: Prime Time with John Dickerson

    [ad_1]

    1/2: Prime Time with John Dickerson – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    John Dickerson reports on the death of a senior Hamas leader in Lebanon, the resignation of Harvard’s president, and how the brain processes misinformation.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Harvard President Claudine Gay Resigns—Seemingly Over Plagiarism, Not Jewish Genocide Hearing

    Harvard President Claudine Gay Resigns—Seemingly Over Plagiarism, Not Jewish Genocide Hearing

    [ad_1]

    Harvard president Dr. Claudine Gay announced on Tuesday that she will resign from her post at the university. “It is with a heavy heart but a deep love for Harvard that I write to share that I will be stepping down as president,” she wrote in a letter to the community. One of three university presidents who came under fire last month for not unequivocally saying “yes” when asked at a congressional hearing whether “calling for the genocide of Jews” violated school rules or codes of conduct, Gay seems to have had her hand forced over new allegations of plagiarism.

    Following the blowback from her comments at the hearing on Capitol Hill, where she appeared alongside the presidents of the University of Pennsylvania and MIT, who gave similar answers,* Gay received the public backing of Harvard’s governing board, whose members said, “In this tumultuous and difficult time, we unanimously stand in support of President Gay.” (Before that, Gay apologized during an interview with The Harvard Crimson.) In the statement, the board noted that it was aware of claims of plagiarism against Gay and that a review had concluded she had not violated the school’s standards for “research misconduct”; it added that “a few instances of inadequate citation” had emerged, for which Gay would request four corrections.

    But over the ensuing weeks, more allegations of plagiarism emerged, as did findings by the university. Per The New York Times:

    >The latest accusations against Dr. Gay were circulated through an unsigned complaint published Monday in The Washington Free Beacon, a conservative online journal that has led a campaign against Dr. Gay over the past few weeks. The new complaint added additional accusations of plagiarism to about 40 that had already been circulated in the same way, apparently by the same accuser.

    In her letter, Gay did not use the word plagiarism or specifically mention the hearing on Capitol Hill. But she referenced both, writing: “My deep sense of connection to Harvard and its people has made it all the more painful to witness the tensions and divisions that have riven our community in recent months, weakening the bonds of trust and reciprocity that should be our sources of strength and support in times of crisis. Amidst all of this, it has been distressing to have doubt cast on my commitments to confronting hate and to upholding scholarly rigor—two bedrock values that are fundamental to who I am—and frightening to be subjected to personal attacks and threats fueled by racial animus.”

    As The New York Times previously noted, Harvard faculty members and academics elsewhere responded to the initial accusations with “varying assessments of the severity of the infractions, with some seeing a disturbing pattern, and others calling them minor or dismissing them as a partisan hit job.” Carol Swain, a former Vanderbilt University professor whose work was used by Gay with no citation, said she was “livid” about the matter. Steven Levitsky, a government professor at Harvard who organized a faculty petition in support of Gay, said the alleged plagiarism appeared to be nothing more than “mild sloppiness.” “She’s a quantitative scholar,” he told the Times. “She cares about the data. These guys don’t spend time fussing about their literature reviews.” Charles Fried, a Harvard Law School professor, blamed the far right, saying, “It’s part of this extreme right-wing attack on elite institutions. The obvious point is to make it look as if there is this ‘woke’ double standard at elite institutions. If it came from some other quarter, I might be granting it some credence. But not from these people.”

    *Penn president Liz Magill resigned four days after the hearing.

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Social media apps made $11 billion from children and teens in 2022

    Social media apps made $11 billion from children and teens in 2022

    [ad_1]

    When it comes to children’s mental health and privacy, their loss translates into massive gains for social media companies: $11 billion, to be exact.

    That’s according to a new Harvard study that shows social media platforms last year generated $11 billion in revenue from advertising directed at children and teenagers, including nearly $2 billion in ad profits derived from users age 12 and under. 

    Snaphat, TikTok and Youtube reaped the highest share of those billions, approximately 30% – 40% combined, according to the findings. 

    “Although social media platforms may claim that they can self-regulate their practices to reduce the harms to young people, they have yet to do so, and our study suggests they have overwhelming financial incentives to continue to delay taking meaningful steps to protect children,” said S. Bryn Austin, one of the authors of the study and a professor of social and behavioral sciences at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.


    Dozens of states sue Meta for allegedly addicting children to social media

    03:22

    Youtube, Instagram and Facebook brought in hundreds of millions of dollars last year in profits from advertising targeting children who use the platforms, generating $959.1 million, $801.1 million and $137.2 million respectively, Harvard researchers found. That same year, Instagram, Tiktok and Youtube generated a whopping $4 billion, $2 billion and $1.2 billion respectively in revenue from ads aimed at users in their teens. 

    The study, which draws from public survey and market research data from 2021 and 2022, focuses on two age groups within the U.S.: children 12 years old and younger and adolescents ranging from 13 to 17 years old.  Researchers examined advertising activities of both groups across six popular social media platforms: Youtube, X, TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat.

    Mounting pressure for child protections

    Social media platforms have increasingly come under fire as health officials express concern over the potential harmful effects of apps like Instagram, Snapchat and TikTok on young peoples’ mental health. 

    U.S. Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy in May called for stronger guidelines for social media use among children and teens, pointing to a growing body of research that the platforms may pose what he described as a “profound risk” to young people’s mental health.

    As reported by CBS’ 60 Minutes in June the number of families pursuing lawsuits has grown to over 2,000 since last December. More than 350 lawsuits are expected to move forward this year against TikTok, Snapchat, YouTube, Roblox and Meta — the parent company to Instagram and Facebook.


    Suing Social Media: Families say social media algorithms put their kids in danger | 60 Minutes

    13:45

    More recently, attorneys general in 33 states filed a federal lawsuit against Meta in October, claiming that the company harmed young users on its Facebook and Instagram platforms through the use of highly manipulative tactics to attract and sustain engagement, as it illegally collected personal information from children without parental consent.

    Also in October, New York lawmakers proposed legislation to prohibit minors from accessing what they described as “addictive feeds” without parental consent.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Actor Nick Searcy Hammers Liberal Columnist Whining About Leftists Getting Canceled for Anti-Semitism: 'You Made The Rules, B****'

    Actor Nick Searcy Hammers Liberal Columnist Whining About Leftists Getting Canceled for Anti-Semitism: 'You Made The Rules, B****'

    [ad_1]

    Opinion

    Custom: Screenshots – Democracy Now! and DailyWire+ YouTube Videos

    Conservative actor Nick Searcy unloaded on Peter Beinart after the MSNBC analyst suggested that outrage over Ivy League presidents failing to condemn anti-Semitism on their campuses was an affront to free speech.

    Several top university presidents took the banner of free speech and ran with it during a House committee meeting earlier this month, refusing to condemn calls for the genocide of Jews.

    The presidents of Harvard, the University of Pennsylvania, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) repeatedly offered excuses for the racist, often violent rants of left-wing students on campus.

    “We embrace a commitment to free expression – even views that are objectionable, offensive [and] hateful,” said Harvard President Claudine Gay. “It’s when that speech crosses into conduct that violates our policies against bullying and harassment. That speech did not cross that barrier.”

    Gay was responding to protesters on the campus calling for a “global intifada.”

    RELATED: Billionaire Cuts Off Donations To Columbia University Because College Kids Have ‘S*** For Brains’

    University Presidents Under Fire

    At the time of this post being written, Penn President Liz Magill had resigned following her testimony before the committee, a move critics celebrated as a notch against ‘woke’ universities letting their students run the asylum.

    There was pressure for Gay and MIT President Sally Kornbluth to follow suit.

    But Beinart didn’t feel the Ivy League presidents should be criticized or have to suffer the consequences of their actions.

    “The campaign to depose the presidents of Penn, Harvard + MIT is a campaign to restrict pro-Palestinian speech on campus,” he wrote on X. “If you support it, please have the decency never to sermonize about free speech, academic freedom or cancel culture again.”

    Searcy, best known for his role on FX’s Justified, gently reminded Beinart that it is liberals in this country that set the guidelines for what speech is allowed and what gets you canceled.

    “You made the rules about ‘hate speech,’ bitch,” he shot back. “Now you have to live by them. Tough titty.”

    RELATED: Actor Nick Searcy Blasts Open Borders After Illegal Immigrant Arrested For Raping 10-Year-Old Ohio Girl

    Ivy League Donor: Kids Have ‘S*** For Brains’

    Searcy is a frequent critic of liberals on social media, often subscribing to the James Woods School of obliterating the left using their own tactics.

    He shredded American Federation of Teachers (AFT) Randi Weingarten after she begged for a “pandemic amnesty” in which people would forgive and forget the actions taken by public officials and commenters during the COVID pandemic.

    “This bish ruined more children’s lives than the Grinch,” he countered. “Of course, she agrees with having no consequences for her stupid lies.”

    Beinart, meanwhile, likes to parrot anti-Semitic rants made by people like members of the ‘Squad.’ In an interview earlier this year, he cited sources denouncing Israel as an “apartheid state.”

    Beinart seems to share a common cause with some Ivy League students.

    Students that Leon Cooperman, an American billionaire investor and Columbia Business School graduate, recently described as being just shy of intelligent.

    “I think these kids at the colleges have s*** for brains,” he said.

    “We have one reliable ally in the Middle East, that’s Israel. We only have one democracy in the Middle East, that’s Israel. We have one economy tolerant of different people, you know, gays, lesbians, etc,” Cooperman said. “So, they have no idea what these young kids are doing.”

    Now is the time to support and share the sources you trust.
    The Political Insider ranks #3 on Feedspot’s “100 Best Political Blogs and Websites.”

    Rusty Weiss has been covering politics for over 15 years. His writings have appeared in the Daily Caller, Fox News, Breitbart, and many more.

    FREE NEWS ALERTS

    Subscribe to receive the most important stories delivered straight to your inbox. Your subscription helps protect independent media.



    By subscribing, you agree to receive emails from ThePoliticalInsider.com and that you’ve read and agree to our Privacy policy and to our terms and conditions.

    FREE NEWS ALERTS

    [ad_2]

    Rusty Weiss

    Source link

  • What does it take to get into an Ivy League college? For some students, a $750,000 consultant.

    What does it take to get into an Ivy League college? For some students, a $750,000 consultant.

    [ad_1]

    Ways to secure a scholarship, as cost of college soars


    Ways to secure a scholarship, as cost of college soars

    02:33

    Getting into an Ivy League college or another elite university requires hard work from a student, including top grades, scores and stellar essays. But for some wealthy families, it takes a bit more to tip the scales in their child’s favor: College consultants who can charge up to $750,000. 

    The rise of concierge college consultants comes as acceptance rates for top universities have continued to shrink. Only about 3.5% of the nearly 60,000 annual applicants for Harvard’s class of 2027 gained admittance — down from about 16% in 1980. Other top colleges have similarly shaved their acceptance rates to the low single digits.

    “These are the 1% of the 1%,” said Christopher Rim, the founder and CEO of Command Education, which charges $750,000 for a six-year consulting package, of his clients. “Their biggest priority is their child’s education and health — you can’t compare Harvard against a state school.”

    He added, “They want every resource out there. These parents care so much about who their kids are surrounded with. They want quality friends.”

    Across the U.S., thousands of high school seniors are now sending off their applications ahead of general admissions deadlines, which typically fall in early January. But wealthy families can start prepping their kids well before senior or junior year, with some hiring consultants as early as middle school to start honing their kids’ passions and to create a compelling case for top colleges’ admissions teams.

    It’s more than just bragging rights for these parents, as having an Ivy League pedigree is viewed as securing a foothold in an increasingly competitive world. And an elite college degree can pay dividends down the road, with a recent study from Harvard economists finding that grads of Ivy League and equivalent schools are 60% more likely to have incomes among the top 1% compared with those who didn’t attend those colleges.

    “For high-net-worth families, this is part of their generational wealth planning — to plan their children’s future,” said Adam Nguyen, the founder of Ivy Link, a consultancy that charges from about $150,000 up to $500,000. “In the U.S., we don’t have an aristocracy. It’s been about meritocracy and the way to achieve social status in the U.S. is based on education.”

    Most U.S. college students attend a school other than an Ivy League institution, with 99% of students choosing this route.  And a majority of the nation’s roughly 1,300 colleges and universities accept most of the students who apply, Pew Research Center found in 2017.

    Concierge college consulting

    Of course, the rich already have a leg up on gaining entry to Ivy League and other elite colleges. So-called “Ivy plus” colleges — the eight Ivy League colleges along with MIT, Stanford, Duke and University of Chicago — accept children from the 1% at more than twice the rate of any other income group who score similarly on SAT or ACT scores, the Harvard economists found.

    Such advantages reflect the yawning gap between the top 1% of income-earners in the U.S. and other Americans over the last half century, with wealth increasingly concentrated at the top and wage growth largely stagnant for the typical worker. Although a range of factors have contributed to rising inequality, some experts say that the skyrocketing cost of higher education and the prevalence of legacy admissions at top schools have aggravated the problem.

    The stakes of getting into highly competitive colleges were underscored by the Varsity Blues scandal, a nationwide scheme that was engineered by a college advisor, Rick Singer, and which ensnared wealthy celebrities and businesspeople. Parents paid Singer to bribe college officials and to find ways to cheat on the tests, boosting their children’s scores. Singer was sentenced to more than 3 years in prison, and many of his clients also served time. 

    High-end college counselors today say wealthy students need to work hard, and that a big bank account alone isn’t enough to gain entry to the Ivy League.

    “We are very upfront if they don’t do the work, it’s a waste of time and money,” said Rim, who is an alum of Yale University. “We even get rid of students. I’m not in the business of wasting time and money.”

    So what do these high-end consultants do? First, they often begin working with students in middle school because colleges scrutinize an applicant’s history starting in 9th grade, which means kids need to demonstrate their focus and drive as soon as they step foot into high school. 

    “To prepare, to have a strong footing in 9th grade, you have to start the child much earlier to build their interest and passion,” noted Nguyen, who is an alum of Columbia and Harvard and previously worked in Columbia’s admissions office. 

    “Every dollar was worth it”

    That means talking with a child and coaching them on developing their interests, with Rim noting that his team helped a young woman interested in fashion and beauty build her own YouTube channel and become an influencer in the space. Rim said the student was ultimately accepted at two Ivies and Stanford.

    They’re on call at all times, with one parent who hired Rim’s company telling CBS (and who asked that her name be disclosed because of the sensitivity of hiring an expensive consultant) noting that she’ll text her Command Education consultant at 11 p.m. and get a response in 5 minutes. 

    “Chris was able to help my son create his own project and was able to help him really develop his entrepreneurial skills,” the parent noted, adding that her son was accepted into University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, his top choice – while adding that their younger high-school age child is now working with Command Education as well.

    “As you know, applying to college is the most stressful process for the entire family,” the parent said. “I cannot believe some of these acceptance rates.” But, they added, because their son got into their top choice, “Every dollar was worth it.”

    “Parents are just nervous”

    It’s not only ultra-wealthy families who are anxious about getting their kids into good colleges — plenty of middle-class families share those worries, with the added pressure of how to pay for an education that can set you back $90,000 a year, before financial aid.

    But many families who hire college consultants pay far less, ranging from hundreds of dollars to thousands of dollars for their fees. And most start in high school, not middle school, to prep their kids for the process. 

    “Parents are just nervous,” said Michelle McAnaney, the founder of The College Spy and a former middle and high school counselor who charges from several hundred dollars to about $16,500 for various levels of counseling. “Most of my calls are from 11th-grade students or last-minute seniors” who need help to finish their applications.

    Some of that anxiety comes from Gen X parents who applied to colleges when they had much higher acceptance rates — and who are now frequently surprised to learn that so-called “safety” schools are far from that. For instance, Boston University now accepts 14% of applicants, down from 54% in 2007.

    “A lot of [colleges] have become a lot more difficult to get accepted to,” McAnaney said. “That might be where the families are coming from when they have this anxiety.”

    Students in public schools

    Erika Kerekes, a college essay coach in Los Angeles who works with mostly public school students, noted that one challenge is that current seniors were in 9th grade during the first full year of the pandemic, and lost a lot of school time and extracurriculars as a result. And many have never had to write the type of personal essay that’s part of college applications.

    On top of that, big city public schools might have one guidance counselor serving hundreds of students, which means they probably won’t know the kids as well as those at suburban or private schools or those who are hired, she said. 

    And Kerekes as well as other consultants and parents noted that having a third-party expert can help avoid friction in family relationships during a stressful time.

    “The parents are anxious about making sure the kids are okay during the process,” Kerekes said. “It’s a very difficult time for them — they know the stakes are high, they are taking heavy class loads, and they have things to do apart from college admissions. They feel this is a mountain on top of regular responsibilities.”

    In McAnaney’s experience, parents also turn to consultants to work with their child on a stressful task with deadlines that can’t be fudged. “They say, ‘We need your help to make sure they get that essay done on time’,” she added.

    That was one of the motivations for parent Marcia Zellers, a marketing executive in Los Angeles, who noted that she felt conflicted about paying several hundred dollars for a college counselor for her daughter, who attended a public high school and is now a student at Cornell. 

    “I felt guilty that I was feeding the college industrial process,” she noted. “But the pros were, for something that was affordable as it was, why not try to get a little extra help? I don’t think the parents should be too much in that process because it’s a very tense process and for a parent to be involved isn’t great anyway.”

    Finding a good fit

    Parents and consultants for middle-class families also noted that part of the work involves finding the right fit for a student — and it might not be an Ivy League college. Meg Rosequist, 53 and an attorney in Los Angeles, said she paid several thousand dollars for a consultant to help her son apply to colleges two years ago. He’s now a sophomore at University of California, Berkeley. 

    “I liked him because his approach was, ‘There are lot of good schools out there, let’s find a good fit,” she said, adding that her son didn’t apply to any Ivy League colleges. 

    The consultant also helped at a time when her son, like other students, was coping with his high school’s shutdown, which also ended some extracurriculars. In the end, her son co-founded a Model UN program during the pandemic, she noted.

    As for consultants to the 1%, it’s also about helping students find their passions and, possibly, a path in college that will carry them into their professional lives.

    “It’s not just about grades and test scores, those are a given,” said Nguyen. “A place like Columbia is looking for a talent, a niche — a passion and something that helps the student contribute to the school in a meaningful way.”

    Still, Nguyen noted that the edge that wealthy students can gain isn’t always fair. “Overall, having resources definitely helps increase your admissions odds significantly more,” he said. “And so there is no easy answer to that from where I’m standing.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How rich is Harvard? It’s bigger than the economies of 120 nations.

    How rich is Harvard? It’s bigger than the economies of 120 nations.

    [ad_1]

    Harvard University isn’t only among the most prestigious U.S. institutions of higher learning — it’s also the richest. 

    Harvard and other elite schools have drawn fierce criticism in recent weeks for their handling of student protests related to the conflict between Israel and Hamas, with some alumni threatening to withdraw large donations and to blacklist students for what they characterize as antisemitic statements.

    That’s no idle threat. Ivy League colleges and universities like Stanford and MIT have amassed massive endowments, with wealthy alumni exerting considerable influence on university policy and even curricula. Harvard’s endowment, at more than $50 billion, is the biggest among U.S. universities and is larger than the GDP of more than 120 nations, including countries such as Tunisia, Bahrain and Iceland.

    With the war also playing out as a fight over the competing narratives that hold sway in Gaza and Israel, moneyed donors to elite U.S. schools have sought to use their financial clout to dictate the debate on university campuses. University of Pennsylvania President Liz Magill stepped down as president only days after hedge fund manager Ross Stevens, a graduate of the institution’s Wharton business school, threatened to withdraw a $100 million donation following her congressional testimony last week in a hearing about antisemitism on college campuses. 

    Harvard on Tuesday said that its president, Claudine Gay, who has also became a lightning rod in the controversy, will stay in office after getting support from the university’s highest governing body and hundreds of faculty members. But she is likely to face tensions over the war 

    Harvard’s endowment in 2023

    Harvard’s endowment in fiscal year 2023 stood at $50.7 billion, down slightly from $50.9 billion the prior year, according to the most recent financial report from its endowment. 

    The Cambridge, Massachusetts-based school is the richest U.S. university, according to the National Center for Education Statistics, which based its rankings on 2021 endowment data.

    Universities, including Harvard, have typically built their endowments through two pathways: donations and investment gains. 

    Harvard noted that its endowment only returned 2.9% in fiscal year 2023 — far below its goal of 8%. But donations provided the university with 45% of its revenue through gifts and endowment income, signaling the importance of financial contributions from wealthy alumni. 

    Universities typically rely on their endowments to help fund operations and to provide financial aid to students, with Gay writing in the most recent financial report that Harvard provided more than $850 million in financial aid that year. 

    “Undergraduates from families with annual incomes below $85,000 are fully funded by the University — they pay nothing — and expected contributions for families with annual incomes between $85,000 and $150,000 max out at ten percent of annual income,” she wrote.

    Harvard tuition 2023

    Such financial aid would certainly be needed by families with annual income of less than $150,000, given that tuition and fees for the current academic year stands at $79,450.


    Fallout continues for university presidents after congressional hearing on campus antisemitism

    02:31

    By comparison, the cost to attend Harvard in 1975 was about $5,350, according to Business Insider, underlining the spiraling tuition in higher education nationwide.

    That means Harvard’s tuition has increased much faster than inflation — that $5,350 would today amount to roughly $30,000 if it had tracked the change in the Consumer Price Index over the last half century. Harvard isn’t alone in increasing tuition faster than inflation, with higher education in general outpacing the CPI.

    Harvard president’s salary

    Serving as Harvard’s president can be a lucrative job, with Gay earning $879,079 in 2021, when she was president-elect, according to the Harvard Crimson. Outgoing Harvard president Lawrence S. Bacow earned more than $1.3 million that year, it noted.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Claudine Gay To Stay On As Harvard President Despite Disastrous Congressional Testimony On Anti-Semitism

    Claudine Gay To Stay On As Harvard President Despite Disastrous Congressional Testimony On Anti-Semitism

    [ad_1]

    Opinion

    Source: CBS Boston YouTube

    Harvard has announced that Claudine Gay will be staying on as president of the university despite her disastrous testimony before Congress last week in which she claimed that calling for the genocide of Jews would only violate her school’s bullying and harassment policies “depending on the context.”

    Harvard Board Stands By Gay

    CNN reported that after deliberating on Monday night, the school’s board known as the Harvard Corporation decided to allow Gay, who has been touted as the school’s first black president, to keep her position despite widespread calls for her removal in the wake of her testimony.

    “As members of the Harvard Corporation, we today reaffirm our support for President Gay’s continued leadership of Harvard University,” read a statement signed by all board members, with the exception of Gay. “Our extensive deliberations affirm our confidence that President Gay is the right leader to help our community heal and to address the very serious societal issues we are facing.”

    “So many people have suffered tremendous damage and pain because of Hamas’s brutal terrorist attack, and the University’s initial statement should have been an immediate, direct, and unequivocal condemnation,” the board continued. “Calls for genocide are despicable and contrary to fundamental human values. President Gay has apologized for how she handled her congressional testimony and has committed to redoubling the University’s fight against antisemitism.”

    Related: Dr. Phil Rips U.S. Colleges As ‘Liberal Woke Hotbeds Fostering’ Antisemitism

    Rep. Elise Stefanik Fires Back

    House GOP Conference Chair Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) has already fired back by blasting Harvard’s board for its “complete moral failure” in standing by Gay.

    “There is a reason why the testimony at the Education Workforce Committee garnered 1 billion views worldwide, and it’s because those university presidents made history by putting the most morally bankrupt testimony into the Congressional Record, and the world saw it,” Stefanik said, according to Fox News. “As a Harvard graduate, I’m reminded of Harvard’s motto, Veritas, which goes back – and it’s older than the founding of our country, it goes back to the 1640s. In addition, the motto was Veritas Christo et Ecclesiae – Truth for Christ and the Church.”

    “Larry Summers, who was president of Harvard when I was an undergrad, talked about the meaning of Veritas is divine truth, moral truth. Let me be clear. Veritas does not depend on the context,” Stefanik said. “This is a moral failure of Harvard’s leadership and higher education leadership at the highest levels, and the only change they have made to their code of conduct, where they failed to condemn calls for genocide of the Jewish people, the only update to the code of conduct is to allow a plagiarist as the president of Harvard.”

    New York Democratic Rep. Daniel Goldman also blasted Harvard for keeping Gay on as president, arguing that the school is not doing enough to protect its students from the rise of antisemitism on college campuses.

    “If they are unable to enforce their code of conduct, then they either need to get a new code of conduct or they need to get a new president,” Goldman said. “I hope there is a significant change at Harvard if Dr. Gay is going to stay.”

    Related: Virulent Antisemitism And The Rot At Our Universities

    University Of Pennsylvania President Resigns

    Liz Magill, who also testified before Congress last week, resigned as president of the University of Pennsylvania over the weekend after she received similar backlash to Gay.

    “It has been my privilege to serve as President of this remarkable institution. It has been an honor to work with our faculty, students, staff, alumni, and community members to advance Penn’s vital missions,” Magill said in a brief statement, according to NPR.

    “One down. Two to go,” Stefanik wrote on social media afterwards, referring to Gay and MIT President Sally Kornbluth. “In the case of @Harvard, President Gay was asked by me 17x whether calling for the genocide of Jews violates Harvard’s code of conduct. She spoke her truth 17x. And the world heard.”

    Daily Mail reported that in the wake of Gay’s testimony, Harvard has lost a staggering $1 billion in donations. Gay’s school board may be standing by her, but she is facing an uphill battle when it comes to winning back the respect of many members of the Harvard community, given how many calls came in for her firing.

    Now is the time to support and share the sources you trust.
    The Political Insider ranks #3 on Feedspot’s “100 Best Political Blogs and Websites.”

    [ad_2]

    James Conrad

    Source link

  • University presidents face backlash for testimony in antisemitism hearing

    University presidents face backlash for testimony in antisemitism hearing

    [ad_1]

    University presidents face backlash for testimony in antisemitism hearing – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    University of Pennsylvania President Liz Magill is facing calls to resign over her testimony during a congressional hearing on antisemitism earlier this week. The House Education and Workforce Committee announced Thursday it is launching an investigation into UPenn, MIT and Harvard, with House GOP Conference Chair Elise Stefanik calling their presidents’ testimony “pathetic and morally bankrupt.” Nikole Killion has more.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Safety of Keto Diets  | NutritionFacts.org

    The Safety of Keto Diets  | NutritionFacts.org

    [ad_1]

    What are the effects of ketogenic diets on nutrient sufficiency, gut flora, and heart disease risk? 

    Given the decades of experience using ketogenic diets to treat certain cases of pediatric epilepsy, a body of safety data has accumulated. Nutrient deficiencies would seem to be the obvious issue. Inadequate intake of 17 micronutrients, vitamins, and minerals has been documented in those on strict ketogenic diets, as you can see in the graph below and at 0:14 in my video Are Keto Diets Safe?

    Dieting is a particularly important time to make sure you’re meeting all of your essential nutrient requirements, since you may be taking in less food. Ketogenic diets tend to be so nutritionally vacuous that one assessment estimated that you’d have to eat more than 37,000 calories a day to get a sufficient daily intake of all essential vitamins and minerals, as you can see in the graph below and at 0:39 in my video


    That is one of the advantages of more plant-based approaches. As the editor-in-chief of the Journal of the American Dietetic Association put it, “What could be more nutrient-dense than a vegetarian diet?” Choosing a healthy diet may be easier than eating more than 37,000 daily calories, which is like putting 50 sticks of butter in your morning coffee. 
     
    We aren’t just talking about not reaching your daily allowances either. Children have gotten scurvy on ketogenic diets, and some have even died from selenium deficiency, which can cause sudden cardiac death. The vitamin and mineral deficiencies can be solved with supplements, but what about the paucity of prebiotics, the dozens of types of fiber, and resistant starches found concentrated in whole grains and beans that you’d miss out on? 
     
    Not surprisingly, constipation is very common on keto diets. As I’ve reviewed before, starving our microbial self of prebiotics can have a whole array of negative consequences. Ketogenic diets have been shown to “reduce the species richness and diversity of intestinal microbiota,” our gut flora. Microbiome changes can be detected within 24 hours of switching to a high-fat, low-fiber diet. A lack of fiber starves our good gut bacteria. We used to think that dietary fat itself was nearly all absorbed in the small intestine, but based on studies using radioactive tracers, we now know that about 7 percent of the saturated fat in a fat-rich meal can make it down to the colon. This may result in “detrimental changes” in our gut microbiome, as well as weight gain, increased leaky gut, and pro-inflammatory changes. For example, there may be a drop in beneficial Bifidobacteria and a decrease in overall short-chain fatty acid production, both of which would be expected to increase the risk of gastrointestinal disorders. 
     
    Striking at the heart of the matter, what might all of that saturated fat be doing to our heart? If you look at low-carbohydrate diets and all-cause mortality, those who eat lower-carb diets suffer “a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality,” meaning they live, on average, significantly shorter lives. However, from a heart-disease perspective, it matters if it’s animal fat or plant fat. Based on the famous Harvard cohorts, eating more of an animal-based, low-carb diet was associated with higher death rates from cardiovascular disease and a 50 percent higher risk of dying from a heart attack or stroke, but no such association was found for lower-carb diets based on plant sources.  
     
    And it wasn’t just Harvard. Other researchers have also found that “low-carbohydrate dietary patterns favoring animal-derived protein and fat sources, from sources such as lamb, beef, pork, and chicken, were associated with higher mortality, whereas those that favored plant-derived protein and fat intake, from sources such as vegetables, nuts, peanut butter, and whole-grain bread, were associated with lower mortality…” 
     
    Cholesterol production in the body is directly correlated to body weight, as you can see in the graph below and at 3:50 in my video

    Every pound of weight loss by nearly any means is associated with about a one-point drop in cholesterol levels in the blood. But if we put people on very-low-carb ketogenic diets, the beneficial effect on LDL bad cholesterol is blunted or even completely neutralized. Counterbalancing changes in LDL or HDL (what we used to think of as good cholesterol) are not considered sufficient to offset this risk. You don’t have to wait until cholesterol builds up in your arteries to have adverse effects either; within three hours of eating a meal high in saturated fat, you can see a significant impairment of artery function. Even with a dozen pounds of weight loss, artery function worsens on a ketogenic diet instead of getting better, which appears to be the case with low-carb diets in general.  

    For more on keto diets, check out my video series here

    And, to learn more about your microbiome, see the related videos below.

    [ad_2]

    Michael Greger M.D. FACLM

    Source link

  • College presidents to testify in Congress about antisemitism on campuses

    College presidents to testify in Congress about antisemitism on campuses

    [ad_1]

    Washington — Three college presidents will testify in Congress on Tuesday about how they have handled antisemitic incidents on their campuses since the Oct. 7 terrorist attack by Hamas on Israel. 

    Harvard University’s Claudine Gay, the University of Pennsylvania’s Liz Magill and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Sally Kornbluth will testify before the House Committee on Education and the Workforce, as college campuses continue to be roiled by protests and tensions related to the Israel-Hamas war

    A number of reported antisemitic incidents have prompted accusations that universities are not doing enough to protect students. 

    The committee’s chairwoman, Rep. Virginia Foxx of North Carolina, said administrators “have largely stood by, allowing horrific rhetoric to fester and grow” amid “countless examples of antisemitic demonstrations on college campuses.” 

    There has also been an increase in the number of Islamophobic incidents in the country, but the hearing announcement does not mention whether there are plans to investigate Islamophobia on campuses. 

    After the Hamas terrorist attack, a number of student organizations at Harvard released a statement blaming Israel for the bloodshed, drawing backlash from prominent alumni and U.S. lawmakers. Harvard leaders were then criticized for being too slow to condemn the student organizations and not doing so more forcefully. 

    A number of antisemitic incidents have been reported at the University of Pennsylvania, including “vile” messages that were projected onto campus buildings and “disturbing” emails that threatened violence against members of the campus’ Jewish community. The FBI was alerted to the threats, according to the school’s president. 

    MIT has suspended a number of students from nonacademic activities after protesters refused to leave a campus building, bringing criticism that the punishment did not go far enough. Jewish students have said they feared for their safety and were physically blocked from attending classes. 

    The Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights is investigating Harvard and the University of Pennsylvania, among other schools, after receiving alleged complaints of antisemitism and Islamophobia. 

    How to watch the hearing about antisemitism on college campuses 

    • What: The presidents of Harvard, the University of Pennsylvania and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology testify on antisemitic incidents on their campuses
    • Date: Tuesday, Dec. 5, 2023 
    • Time: 10:15 a.m. EST 
    • Online stream: Live on CBS News in the player above or on your mobile or streaming device 

    Note: Streaming plans are subject to change

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Post-affirmative action, Asian American families are more stressed than ever about college admissions

    Post-affirmative action, Asian American families are more stressed than ever about college admissions

    [ad_1]

    The admissions consultant described what it takes to get into an elite college: Take 10 to 20 Advanced Placement courses. Create a “showstopper project.”

    Asian American students need to be extremely strategic in how they present themselves, “to avoid anti-Asian discrimination,” the consultant, Sasha Chada of Ivy Scholars, said at the October webinar to an audience of mostly Asian parents and students.

    Edward Yen, who doesn’t consider himself a “tiger parent,” wondered what extreme accomplishments his 11-year-old daughter will need to get into USC — considered a relative shoo-in back in the 1990s, when he attended.

    Parents and students at an annual college and career fair at Temple City High School.

    (Irfan Khan / Los Angeles Times)

    “I appreciated the honesty,” Yen said of Chada’s presentation, which was co-hosted by the Los Angeles County Asian American Employees Assn. and the nonprofit Faith and Community Empowerment.

    In the first college application season since the U.S. Supreme Court struck down affirmative action, Asian American students are more stressed out than ever. Race-conscious admissions were widely seen to have disadvantaged them, as borne out by disparities in the test scores of admitted students — but many feel that race will still be a hidden factor and that standards are even more opaque than before.

    At seminars like Chada’s around Southern California this fall, some held in Korean or Mandarin for immigrant parents, consultants reinforced the message — even students with superhuman qualifications are regularly rejected from Harvard and UC Berkeley.

    Parents who didn’t grow up in the American system, and who may have moved to the U.S. in large part for their children’s education, feel desperate and in the dark. Some shell out tens of thousands of dollars for consultants as early as junior high, fearing that anything less than a name-brand school could doom their children to an uncertain future. Sometimes, anxious students are the ones who ask their parents to hire a consultant.

    Some consultants say they try to push schools that fit the student best, not necessarily the top-ranked ones — even as skeptics wonder whether they are scare-mongering in an attempt to drum up business. But especially for parents from countries like South Korea, China and India, where a single exam determines a student’s college choices, the lack of objective standards can be overwhelming.

    “The worst part of stress comes out when kids feel helpless, not when someone sets a high bar for them,” said Chada, whose Indian father grew up in Northern Ireland.

    Yen pointed out that going to a top college is no guarantee for career success, with Asian Americans overrepresented at many campuses yet underrepresented in leadership positions in government and other workplaces.

    A woman stands next to her teenage daughter, who is wearing a mask.

    Julie Lin, left, and her 14-year-old daughter Jasmine Liao visit an annual college and career fair at Temple City High School.

    (Irfan Khan / Los Angeles Times)

    “A lot of our Asian parents are thinking it’s a golden ticket if you’re able to get into Harvard or Yale,” said Yen, president of the Los Angeles County Asian American Employees Assn., who lives in San Marino and whose parents immigrated from Taiwan. “I just want my daughter to be healthy, safe, and I want her to be successful in life.”

    Srikanth Nagarajan, a 52-year-old manager at DirecTV and an immigrant from India, has been nudging his daughter to shoot for top schools like Harvard.

    Sam Srikanth, a senior at El Segundo High, has a 4.41 GPA and has taken seven AP courses, which she said was the maximum number offered at her school. She is captain of the varsity swim team and is working on a research project about the role of race in college basketball recruiting.

    After asking teachers and school counselors to read her admissions essays, Srikanth decided to hire a private counselor. But she ended up not using the counselor’s suggestions because they didn’t feel like her voice.

    Srikanth said her “hopes got a little bit higher” after the Supreme Court’s decision.

    But with her last name, she said, “you actually fill out the application and realize there’s no way colleges won’t figure out what race you are.”

    Her older sister, who applied to colleges five years ago with a similar resume, got rejected from 18 of 20 or so schools and ended up at Boston College.

    “I can’t be let down if my expectations are already so low,” Srikanth said.

    When Sunny Lee came to the U.S. from South Korea in 2006 for postdoctoral work at USC, she thought that people could succeed in America even if they didn’t go to college.

    But after moving to San Marino about a decade ago to raise her three sons — the oldest is now in 7th grade — she saw neighbors hiring athletic coaches and academic consultants for kids who were still in elementary school.

    The moms she knows fret about students who seem like slam dunks being denied by top schools.

    “A student known as a genius at San Marino High ended up going to Pasadena City College,” said Lee, 48, a researcher at USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center. “Moms were having a mental breakdown.”

    A friend told Lee that she regretted spending only $3,000 for a consultant to go over her child’s admissions essays. For her next child, the friend would spend at least $10,000.

    With both her and her husband working full-time, Lee feels an admission consultant is necessary just to keep up, especially with opaqueness and unpredictability of college admissions.

    “It’s a fight over information,” she said.

    She said she doesn’t think her oldest son needs a consultant yet. But she would like her middle son, a fifth-grader, to start working with one.

    On the outskirts of Koreatown in July, dozens of Korean American students and parents attended a five-hour seminar hosted by Radio Seoul.

    Several admissions consultants said in Korean and English that the end of affirmative action could improve Asian American students’ chances of getting into elite colleges.

    One urged parents to give up their hobbies — no more golfing every weekend — so they can hover over their children.

    Won Jong Kim, director of the college consulting firm Boston Education, described several students who got into elite schools.

    Anna, who got into Harvard, took AP Calculus AB in 7th grade. Ben, who got into Stanford, took 15 AP classes.

    Esther’s academics weren’t “stellar,” Kim said — only a 4.3 GPA, 1520 SAT and nine AP courses. But in her personal statement, she wrote about her mother’s fight with breast cancer. And she was admitted to the University of Pennsylvania.

    “That was her trump card. It was a unique situation that she overcame,” Kim said. “To be frank, she got really lucky.”

    In an interview, Kim said he wanted to show the “common characteristics” of those who get into Ivy League schools.

    “Every year, the bar goes up for students looking to get into top colleges,” he said.

    Chung Lee, the chief consultant at Ivy Dream, said he tries to share information in free seminars hosted by various community organizations.

    Ethan Chen, 17, left, & Audrey Balthazar, 16, Arcadia High students, browse through material at annual college & career fair

    Ethan Chen, 17, left, and Audrey Balthazar, 16, both Arcadia High students, browse through material at a college and career fair at Temple City High School.

    (Irfan Khan / Los Angeles Times)

    “The colleges’ lack of transparency has created this sense of fear,” he said.

    In Temple City, Shun Zhang said she doesn’t want to put pressure on her son, Connor Sam.

    Zhang, a 48-year-old realtor, wants to give him the support structure she didn’t have growing up as an immigrant from China.

    Her only requirement is that he play a sport, to stay active and healthy. Still, Sam, a senior at Temple City High who is on the varsity soccer team and interns for Assemblymember Mike Fong, feels the need to push himself. He wants to double major in sociology and some kind of science at UCLA.

    Hoping to be “more organized and put together,” he asked his parents for a personal admissions counselor to help him reflect on his accomplishments and brainstorm essay topics. He has been working with the counselor for two years and finds it helpful.

    Sam, whose father is a refugee from Vietnam and works as a project manager, said he thinks about how well his parents have provided for him and wants to be as successful.

    Going to a good college would go a long way in securing a good job and “maintain where I am,” he said.

    But for all his hard work and preparation, he views college admissions as a crapshoot.

    “I don’t really know what they are looking for,” he said.

    [ad_2]

    Jeong Park

    Source link

  • Keto Diet to Effectively Fight Cancer?  | NutritionFacts.org

    Keto Diet to Effectively Fight Cancer?  | NutritionFacts.org

    [ad_1]

    What does the science say about the clinical use of ketogenic diets for epilepsy and cancer? 

    Blood sugar, also known as blood glucose, is the universal go-to fuel for the cells throughout our bodies. Our brain burns through a quarter pound of sugar a day because “glucose is the preferred metabolic fuel.” We can break down proteins and make glucose from scratch, but most comes from our diet in the form of sugars and starches. If we stop eating carbohydrates (or stop eating altogether), most of our cells switch over to burning fat. Fat has difficulty getting through the blood-brain barrier, though, and our brain has a constant, massive need for fuel. Just that one organ accounts for up to half of our energy needs. Without it, the lights go out…permanently. 

    To make that much sugar from scratch, our body would need to break down about half a pound of protein a day. That means we’d cannibalize ourselves to death within two weeks, but people can fast for months. What’s going on? The answer to the puzzle was discovered in 1967. Harvard researchers famously stuck catheters into the brains of obese subjects who had been fasting for more than a month and discovered that ketones had replaced glucose as the preferred fuel for the brain. Our liver can turn fat into ketones, which can then breach the blood-brain barrier and sustain our brain if we aren’t getting enough carbohydrates. Switching fuels has such an effect on brain activity that it has been used to treat epilepsy since antiquity. 

    In fact, the prescription of fasting for the treatment of epileptic seizures dates back to Hippocrates. In the Bible, even Jesus seems to have concurred. To this day, it’s unclear why switching from blood sugar to ketones as a primary fuel source has such a dampening effect on brain overactivity. How long can one fast? To prolong the fasting therapy, in 1921, a distinguished physician scientist at the Mayo Clinic suggested trying what he called “ketogenic diets,” high-fat diets designed to be so deficient in carbohydrates that they could effectively mimic the fasting state. “Remarkable improvement” was noted the first time it was put to the test, efficacy that was later confirmed in randomized, controlled trials. Ketogenic diets started to fall out of favor in 1938 with the discovery of the anti-seizure drug that would become known as Dilantin, but they’re still being used today as a third- or fourth-line treatment for drug-refractory epilepsy in children. 

    Oddly, the success of ketogenic diets against pediatric epilepsy seems to get conflated by “keto diet” proponents into suggesting a ketogenic diet is beneficial for everyone. Know what else sometimes works for intractable epilepsy? Brain surgery, but I don’t hear people clamoring to get their skulls sawed open. Since when do medical therapies translate into healthy lifestyle choices? Scrambling brain activity with electroshock therapy can be helpful in some cases of major depression, so should we get out the electrodes? Ketogenic diets are also being tested to see if they can slow the growth of certain brain tumors. Even if they work, you know what else can help slow cancer growth? Chemotherapy. So why go keto when you can just go chemo? 

    Promoters of ketogenic diets for cancer are paid by so-called ketone technology companies that offer to send you salted caramel bone broth powder for a hundred bucks a pound or companies that market ketogenic meals and report “extraordinary” anecdotal responses in some cancer patients. But more concrete evidence is simply lacking, and even the theoretical underpinnings may be questionable. A common refrain is that “cancer feeds on sugar.” But all cells feed on sugar. Advocating ketogenic diets for cancer is like saying Hitler breathed air so we should boycott oxygen. 

    Cancer can feed on ketones, too. Ketones have been found to fuel human breast cancer growth and drive metastases in an experimental model, more than doubling tumor growth. Some have even speculated that this may be why breast cancer often metastasizes to the liver, the main site of ketone production. As you can see below and at 4:59 in my video Is Keto an Effective Cancer-Fighting Diet?, if you drip ketones directly onto breast cancer cells in a petri dish, the genes that get turned on and off make for much more aggressive cancer, associated with significantly lower five-year survival in breast cancer patients, as you can see in the following graph and at 5:05 in my video. Researchers are even considering designing ketone-blocking drugs to prevent further cancer growth by halting ketone production.  

    Let’s also think about what eating a ketogenic diet might entail. High animal fat intake may increase the mortality risk among breast cancer survivors and potentially play a role in the development of breast cancer in the first place through oxidative stress, hormone disruption, or inflammation. This applies to men, too. “A strong association” has been found “between saturated fat intake and prostate cancer progression and survival.” Those in the top third of consumption of these kinds of fat-rich animal foods appeared to triple their risk of dying from prostate cancer. This isn’t necessarily fat in general either. No difference has been found in breast cancer death rates based on total fat intake. However saturated fat intake specifically may negatively impact breast cancer survival, increasing the risk of dying from it by 50 percent. There’s a reason the official American Cancer Society and American Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline recommend a dietary pattern for breast cancer patients that’s essentially the opposite of a ketogenic diet. It calls for a diet that’s “high in vegetables, fruits, whole grains, and legumes [beans, split peas, chickpeas, and lentils]; low in saturated fats; and limited in alcohol consumption.” 

    “To date, not a single clinical study has shown a measurable benefit from a ketogenic diet in any human cancer.” There are currently at least a dozen trials underway, however, and the hope is that at least some cancer types will respond. Still, even then, that wouldn’t serve as a basis for recommending ketogenic diets for the general population any more than recommending everyone get radiation, surgery, and chemo just for kicks. 

    “Keto” has been the most-searched keyword on NutritionFacts.org for months, and I didn’t have much specific to offer…until now. Check out my other videos on the topic in related videos below. 

     For an overview of my cancer work, watch How Not to Die from Cancer. 

    [ad_2]

    Michael Greger M.D. FACLM

    Source link