The Trump administration is changing how H-1B work visas are awarded.
Via U.S. State Department
With the stated goal of “protecting American workers,” the Trump administration has imposed a new visa process that will affect thousands of foreign nationals.
The new system will affect H-1B visa applications for professionals, which are capped annually at 65,000 visas, with an additional 20,000 reserved for workers holding advanced degrees from U.S. institutions.
According to USCIS, the change modifies the rules governing visa selection to prioritize applicants who are “more highly skilled and higher paid,” in an effort to better protect wages, working conditions, and opportunities for U.S. workers.
The policy replaces the current random lottery with a selection process that gives greater weight to skills and salary levels. “The existing random selection process was exploited and abused by U.S. employers seeking to hire foreign workers at lower wages than they would pay American workers,” said USCIS spokesperson Matthew Tragresser.
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) also released a statement Tuesday outlining changes to the application process under the widely used H-1B work visa program.
The measure was announced by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) through a “final rule” published in the Federal Register. The final rule is scheduled to take effect on Feb. 27, 2026, and will apply to H-1B visa registrations subject to the annual cap for fiscal year 2027, the agency said.
The change is part of a broader push by the Trump administration to tighten oversight of work visa programs. Through an executive order, the president previously raised the fee for sponsoring an H-1B visa to $100,000, up from about $5,000 or less.
The move also comes amid renewed scrutiny of other immigration programs, including the Diversity Visa Program, which was recently suspended following a shooting at Brown University in which a Portuguese national was named as the primary suspect.
Trump had previously sought to end the so-called “visa lottery” program during his first term in 2017.
The Diversity Visa Program allows thousands of applicants from countries with low immigration rates to the United States to legally enter the country and obtain permanent residency if they meet eligibility requirements.
This story was originally published December 27, 2025 at 8:44 PM.
Iterate.ai has relied heavily on highly trained tech workers from around the globe to meet demand for its customized artificial intelligence agent systems, bringing some of them to the U.S. under the H-1B program when the company can obtain a visa.
Last month, the tech firm’s growth plans were upended when the Trump administration, via a presidential proclamation, added a $100,000 fee per visa to new petitioners of the H-1B program. It also warned that a higher-wage floor was likely, tilting the odds in favor of older and more highly-skilled workers.
“We have a number of guys on H-1B visas and a number we are trying to bring in. If we have to pay $100,000 (per worker), that makes it impossible to hire people on those types of visas,” said Jon Nordmark, CEO and co-founder of Iterate.ai, which maintains an office in Highlands Ranch.
Iterate.ai general counsel Niharika Shukla, left, talks to CEO Jon Nordmark at the artificial intelligence company’s office in Centennial, Colorado, on Wednesday, Oct. 1, 2025. (Photo by Hyoung Chang/The Denver Post)
The company, among the U.S. firms riding the AI wave, may end up locating more workers in Toronto and fewer in Denver and San Jose, California, where it is based, as it tries to meet the rising demand for its products and services, Nordmark said.
Moving beyond an initial focus on deporting immigrants with criminal records, the Trump administration is now revising rules for several visa programs used to actively recruit foreign workers to the U.S. Some of the earliest and most dramatic changes have come in the H-1B program, which currently accommodates an estimated 600,000 college-educated workers with specialized skills nationwide.
The addition of a $100,000 application fee for new H-1B petitions, alongside reforms to favor higher-wage and higher-skilled roles, could have significant implications for tech employers in states like Colorado, where younger and smaller firms dominate.
The changes could slow innovation and force smaller technology firms to locate more of their workforce outside the country, said Nathan Mondragon, chief innovation officer at Hirevue, a Utah firm that specializes in AI hiring solutions.
“The immediate effect is that the cost of hiring skilled foreign talent will rise dramatically, particularly for startups and mid-sized companies that depend on specialized skills but may not have deep resources,” said Mondragon, who is a Colorado State University graduate.
The country’s largest and most established tech firms are expected to have the easiest time covering the fee as the country moves away from a straight lottery system. Jensen Huang, CEO of the world’s most highly valued public company, pledged to pay the $100,000 fee for his company’s H-1B recruits.
“As one of many immigrants at Nvidia, I know that the opportunities we’ve found in America have profoundly shaped our lives,” Huang wrote to his employees. “And the miracle of Nvidia — built by all of you, and by brilliant colleagues around the world — would not be possible without immigration.”
Colorado’s tech sector is pushing the envelope in emerging areas like quantum computing and AI, as well as in niche sectors like cybersecurity and financial technology, or fintech. Emerging firms, lacking profits, run leaner and are typically more dependent on the flow of talent emerging from nearby universities, including international students.
If emerging tech firms can’t obtain the talent they need, they will fall behind. If the state’s tech sector starts to fall behind, Colorado’s economy could find itself coping with slower growth and smaller wage gains, those closest to the tech sector warn.
“Pay-to-play H1-Bs will box out all smaller companies, including startups, from bringing talented foreigners on board. This will give big companies another advantage in talent acquisition, as if they needed any more advantages,” said Basalt resident Jonathan Greechan, CEO of the Founder Institute, which has tech accelerator chapters in 100 countries.
Why the H-1B matters
The H-1B program, which started in 1990, is capped at 65,000 new visas for those with a bachelor’s degree and another 20,000 reserved for applicants with a master’s degree or higher. Colorado employers applied for about 3,800 H-1B visas during the last fiscal year.
About three-quarters of the workers coming to the country under the H-1B program, which typically has a three-year term, are from India, with Chinese workers accounting for one-tenth, according to a report from the Pew Research Center. The program is not for permanent residency, although employers can and do seek visa renewals, often to allow employees more time to obtain a green card or citizenship.
Educational institutions, which until recently were exempt from the cap but now will fall under it, also rely on the program. The University of Colorado’s Denver campus requested 130 visas and the Boulder campus sought 108 last fiscal year, while Denver Public Schools had 101 petitions, according to Citizenship and Immigration Services.
Nordmark said the program has historically served as a career bridge for foreign students coming to the U.S. to obtain degrees. Upon graduation, they shift from a student visa to an H-1B visa. In some cases, international students obtain multiple and highly specialized degrees until they find employment in the U.S.
Several of the country’s top tech leaders, including Google CEO Sundar Pichai, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and Sun Microsystems co-founder Vinod Khosla, worked under H-1B visas before rising through the ranks.
The Trump administration has argued that the H-1B program has been misused, suppressing wages and denying native workers higher-paying job opportunities. Third-party firms have used the program to place workers, taking a cut in the process, and vague job titles allow employers to bypass program rules.
Supporters point to studies that show companies, especially small ones, that employ H-1B workers have stronger earnings growth and are more likely to survive than rivals that don’t. They argue the changes being made will disadvantage the one sector that has contributed more to making the American economy great and will open the door to other countries snagging talent.
China launched a new K-visa program on Oct. 1 to recruit young science, tech and engineering workers from abroad, the kind that will find it harder to participate in the U.S. H-1B program. Canada, Germany, New Zealand, South Korea and the United Kingdom are also easing rules for foreign workers with specialized skills.
But China’s new visa program also appears to have created a backlash among unemployed Chinese workers, echoing some of the pushback seen in the U.S., and critics come from both ends of the political spectrum.
“It’s a complex issue and I can see two sides to the argument that a reasonable person could make,” said David Cohen, CEO of Techstars in Boulder. “If the talent is truly that ‘extraordinary,’ companies are likely to find a way to pay this fee in most cases.”
He worries that the U.S. could be putting at risk a core competitive advantage — “having great talent wanting to be in this country.”
The program’s new emphasis on higher wage earners, who will receive more slots in the visa lottery compared to recent college graduates, will favor older, more experienced applicants, said Ben Johnston, COO of Kapitus, a small business lender.
“Many international students come to U.S. schools with the expectation that they will be able to work here under the H-1B program upon graduation. If fewer visas are available for lower wage earners, this may curtail the demand for a U.S. education for some international students,” Johnston said.
Many of the greatest tech innovations the country has seen have come from young and hungry entrepreneurs working outside corporate confines, with young immigrants playing a critical role. Greechan said he believes the fee and wage restrictions will make the U.S. less attractive for the best and brightest talent from abroad.
“I don’t think the current administration cares how much the U.S. has benefited from this consistent influx of talent, simply because it’s not in line with their anti-immigration sentiment,” Greechan said.
And there is a psychological toll on workers. Niharika Shukla, an attorney working at Iterate.ai, said the changes have left H-1B workers in limbo as they try to navigate the country’s complicated and drawn-out process for obtaining permanent status and citizenship.
Iterate.ai general counsel Niharika Shukla poses for a portrait at the artificial intelligence company’s office in Centennial, Colorado, on Wednesday, Oct. 1, 2025. (Photo by Hyoung Chang/The Denver Post)
Initially, it wasn’t clear if the fee would apply to existing visa holders or new petitioners, creating a sense that all jobs could be at risk. Some workers who were on vacation or visiting family thought they needed to return to the U.S. immediately. The administration clarified that it was only for new petitioners.
Overall, it has created uncertainty about what comes next and a deepening sense of unease, even fear.
“I have friends — people with advanced degrees, stable jobs, American-raised kids — who still live in visa limbo. They pay taxes, work hard and give back in every way, but every year, they hold their breath during H-1B season. They don’t know if this will be the year it all unravels,” Shukla said.
Shukla’s husband came to the country on an H-1B visa, which allowed her to obtain an H-4 visa as a spouse and an employment authorization document, or EAD, that allowed her to continue her legal career in the U.S.
“If anything had happened to his visa, my legal ability to work would’ve disappeared, too,” she said.
Shukla said a friend’s daughter, who recently started middle school, asked her mom if the family would have to leave this year.
“That little girl was born here. Her whole world is here. But because her parents are still stuck in the visa queue, even she lives with uncertainty,” Shukla said. “This is the human side of immigration policy that’s so often overlooked. It’s not just about foreign workers or companies. It’s about families, children, stability. It’s about people who want to belong, but are made to feel temporary, year after year.”
Other industries watching
Employers in landscaping, tourism and agriculture are keeping an eye on what might come next for the foreign worker visa programs they rely on.
And the construction industry, which has a heavy concentration of foreign-born workers, is lobbying hard for a visa program as it struggles with stricter immigration enforcement and a looming wave of retirements.
Ski resorts and resort hotels also use that program, along with the J-1 visa, a cultural exchange program that brings in multilingual workers able to converse with international guests.
Finding enough workers to fill open landscaping positions has long been a struggle, even when firms can bring in foreign laborers. The H-2B program is capped at 66,000 new applicants a year nationally, split between 33,000 workers from Oct. 1 to March 31 and 33,000 workers from April 1 to Sept. 30.
Petitioners are cautious about asking for too many visas, which could draw scrutiny from immigration officials, McMahon said.
The program allowed for another 64,716 workers, mostly returning workers, last year. But even at 131,000, the allocation is far below the 500,000 that some estimates say are needed to meet actual demand for seasonal workers, he said.
Most H-2B visa holders work for up to nine months and then return home, although some try to bridge the two seasons. Raids by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement have increasingly made authorized visa holders, including those working in Colorado for years, uneasy and asking themselves if they want to keep coming back, McMahon said.
On Sept. 2, the administration started requiring that all seasonal workers under the H-2A and H-2B programs, for agricultural and non-ag workers, have in-person interviews at a U.S. consulate location. Returning workers and those with clean records were not exempt. The rule change is expected to result in 350,000 additional interviews in Mexico alone.
In contrast to the H-2B and H-1B programs, the H-2A program for farm workers doesn’t have a cap. Around 5,000 to 6,000 workers are brought into Colorado each season under that visa. It does have additional requirements that employers provide free housing and meals or access to cooking facilities.
Unlike California, farms and orchards in Colorado have seen minimal raids from immigration enforcement, said Marilyn Bay Drake, executive director of the Colorado Fruit and Vegetable Growers Association.
Instead, a state rule that requires overtime pay after 48 hours or 56 hours, depending on the intensity of the harvest season, is complicating their operations and resulting in some H-2A visa holders going elsewhere to work.
Harvesting requires intense stretches of long hours during short windows of time to bring in and process crops, one reason that ag workers have been excluded from federal overtime requirements.
Rather than paying overtime, farmers, who often operate on razor-thin margins, are capping hours in Colorado. That has upset some workers, who want to earn as much as they can in the limited time they are in the country.
Farmworkers sort out freshly picked onions on a conveyor belt at a storage facility at Fagerberg Produce in Eaton, Colorado, on Thursday, Oct. 09, 2025. (Photo by Andy Cross/The Denver Post)
“We haven’t seen impacts from immigration policy, but we have seen negative impacts from the overtime regulations in our state,” said Emily King, compliance and marketing manager at Fagerberg Produce in Eaton.
The onion farm has three H-2A workers from South Africa who operate harvesting equipment. In June of last year, one of those workers came in on a Friday to say he was resigning and would be leaving Sunday to work at a producer in Idaho who offered him 100 hours a week with no overtime restrictions, King said.
Duncan Stevens, left, a farmworker from South Africa who has an H-2A visa, drives a truck that’s getting loaded with fresh onions in 50-pound burlap sacks on a stack-loader machine, which are then emptied by a crew onto a conveyor belt into the truck on a farm at Fagerberg Produce in Eaton, Colorado, on Thursday, Oct. 9, 2025. (Photo by Andy Cross/The Denver Post)
Not only did Fagerberg Produce lose a key worker, but it had also paid for his trip to come to the U.S.
“For H-2A workers, it’s a proposition of, ‘Is it worth it to come?’ And our state overtime rules weigh heavily on that calculus. It’s magnifying and exacerbating ag’s No. 1 problem, which is access to labor,” said Ashley House, vice president of advocacy and strategy at the Colorado Farm Bureau.
Construction struggling
Tougher immigration policies are taking a toll on the construction sector, where about a third of workers are foreign-born, and which lacks a dedicated visa program.
About nine in 10 construction firms nationally report having a difficult time finding enough qualified workers to hire. They cite those labor shortages as a primary cause behind delayed construction projects, according to a survey released last month by the Associated General Contractors of America.
About one-third of respondents nationally and in Colorado said tougher immigration enforcement this year had complicated their operations.
Of the 44 Colorado contractors who took part in the survey, 5% said their work sites had been visited by immigration agents. Another 7% reported workers not showing up because of concerns over actual or rumored enforcement actions. Close to a quarter of the firms surveyed said their subcontractors had lost workers, according to the AGC.
A construction crew works on a roof in Loveland, Colorado, on Monday, July 14, 2025. (Photo by AAron Ontiveroz/The Denver Post)
Anirban Basu, chief economist with the Associated Builders and Contractors, another construction trade group, said that construction spending and new starts are down. Between July and August, the number of job openings in construction took a dramatic fall, from 303,000 to 180,000, and the number of construction workers quitting shot up from 90,000 to 146,000.
“Shifting immigration policy also plays a part in shaping the data. More workers have been quitting, and that may reflect undocumented workers leaving their positions,” Basu said. “An increase in hiring is a natural response to an increase in quits, but many contractors appear to be embracing the attrition and not immediately replacing departing workers.”
To help alleviate the labor shortfalls, the AGC has thrown its full support behind the Essential Workers for Economic Advancement, a bipartisan bill introduced by Rep. Lloyd Smucker, R-Pennsylvania. The bill seeks to create a new H-2C visa program to address labor shortages in nonagricultural, less-skilled, year-round jobs.
General contractors, hotels, retailers and long-term care facilities are expected to be the employers using the program, which would offer 65,000 visas a year for three-year terms.
“Establishing a visa program for construction occupations provides the kind of lawful, temporary, traceable and taxable pathway needed to serve as a short-term solution while we rebuild the domestic pipeline for preparing new construction workers,” the AGC said in a news release.
The group, which represents 28,000 member firms, said it would throw its full weight behind having the act get passed and having President Donald Trump sign it swiftly once it does.
Yesterday, a broad coalition of groups filed the first lawsuit challenging President Trump’s imposition of a $100,000 fee on applications for H-1B visas, which are used by tech firms, research institutions, and other organizations to hire immigrant workers and researchers with various specialized skills. If allowed to stand, the fee would effectively end most H-1B visas, by making them prohibitively expensive, thereby inflicting serious harm on the US economy.
The case is called Global Nurse Force v. Trump. The plaintiffs are a broad coalition including the Global Nurse Force (which supplies nurses to health care providers), education groups (e.g. – the American Association of University Professors), religious organizations, and labor unions. I am a little surprised that multiple labor unions joined this lawsuit, as one might think they would want to keep out potential competitors to their members. However, I would guess they have H-1B visa holders among those members. In addition, studies show that H-1B workers actually increase wages for many US-citizen workers by increasing productivity and innovation.
The complaint argues the H-1B visa is illegal for a number of different reasons. Here’s a brief excerpt that summarizes some of them:
Defendants’ abrupt imposition of the $100,000 Requirement is unlawful. The President has no authority to unilaterally alter the comprehensive statutory scheme created by Congress. Most fundamentally, the President has no authority to unilaterally impose fees, taxes or other mechanisms to generate revenue for the United States, nor to dictate how those funds are spent. The Constitution assigns the “power of the purse” to Congress, as one of its most fundamental premises. Here, the President disregarded those limitations, asserted power he does not have, and displaced a complex, Congressionally specified system for evaluating petitions and granting H-1B visas. The Proclamation transforms the H-1B program into one where employers must either “pay to play” or seek a “national interest” exemption, which will be doled out at the discretion of the Secretary of Homeland Security, a system that opens the door to selective enforcement and corruption.
The plaintiffs also argue that the government’s assertion of virtually unlimited power to impose visa fees goes against the major questions doctrine (which requires Congress to speak clearly when it delegates broad powers to the executive over issues of vast economic and political significance), and the constitutional nondelegation doctrine, which limits delegation of legislative power to the executive branch.
I made similar points in an earlier post about the H-1B visa fee policy, where I explained why it goes against the statutory scheme enacted by Congress, and why it would violate the nondelegation doctrine if Congress had delegated this power.
As the Global Nurse Force complaint notes, enforcing nondelegation is particularly crucial when it comes to the power to raise revenue, which is a specifically enumerated congressional power. The $100,000 fee goes far beyond anything that could plausibly be described as defraying administrative expenses, and is essentially a form of taxation. The Framers of the Constitution were careful to ensure that only the legislative branch could impose taxes, in order to avoid the abusive executive taxation pursued by 17th century British monarchs. This is one of several areas where Trump is attempting to usurp this legislative power. Others include his unilateral imposition of massive tariffs, and his unconstitutional export taxes (which even Congress lacks the power to impose under the Constitution).
I hope the plaintiffs prevail here. I expect there may also be other lawsuits challenging the H-1B fee.
President Donald Trump announced that H-1B visa fees would increase to $100,000, a move that some social media users said could worsen U.S. physician shortages.
As of Sept. 21, new H-1B visa applications will require a $100,000 fee, up from $2,000 to $5,000.
The Trump administration said the fee is to prevent American workers from “being replaced with lower-paid foreign labor.” The H-1B visa program lets employers temporarily hire foreign workers in specialty fields.
Several medical associations sent a Sept. 25 letter to Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, asking for physicians and other medical personnel to be exempted from the new H-1B visa fee, because of a critical need for doctors as the U.S. population grows. While policy experts said the proclamation allows for exempting certain industries from the fee, the Trump administration hasn’t announced any exceptions yet.
A doctor who also hosts a podcast posted data on X that he said showed how many medical residency spots are filled by H-1B visa holders.
Sign up for PolitiFact texts
“This will be absolutely devastating in the medical field. ~30% residents are international medical graduates & ~10k of 43k residency spots are filled by docs with H-1B visas,” the Sept. 19 post said. “Previously the h-1B fee was <$5,000. No hospital will pay a $100k fee for a $55k resident salary.”
Residency is the phase of physician training when recent medical school graduates participate in supervised clinical training in a healthcare facility.
The X post is partially accurate but leaves out important details about international students and medical residents in the U.S.
The X post cited as evidence a 2025 National Resident Matching Program report that says approximately 30% of U.S. medical residents are international medical graduates. It’s important to note, though, that this category includes foreign graduates and U.S. citizens who graduated from international schools. The report says that of international medical graduates who obtained a spot in first-year U.S. residency programs, 3,108 were U.S. citizens and 6,653 were noncitizens.
It’s inaccurate that 10,000 of 43,000 resident spots are filled by H-1B visa holders. The X post cites a 2017 report that analyzed 2016 Labor Department data. This data shows how many working U.S. physicians were certified for H-1B visas. It includes all doctors, not only those in residency. (More recent Labor Department data from the last quarter of 2025, covering determinations from Oct. 1, 2024, through June 30, shows that around 9,000 physicians were certified for H-1B visas.)
The majority of H1-B visa workers have been hired in STEM — science, technology, engineering and math — occupations, with about two-thirds working in computer-related fields, according to the Congressional Research Service.
Nancy Nielsen, University at Buffalo senior associate dean for health policy, also confirmed to PolitiFact that the most common visa used for medical residency is the J-1 visa. She said for context, in her school, they have about 830 medical residents and only 27 are on H-1B visas.
PolitiFact reached out to the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates, a division of Intealth, which helps medical graduates with sponsorship obtain training in the U.S., and the commission said to its knowledge, no centralized data repository exists for H-1B physicians in residency.
What is the H-1B visa program?
The H-1B visa is available to graduates of foreign medical schools who have a license or other authorization required by the state where they’ll practice, and people who have an unrestricted license to practice medicine or have graduated from a U.S. medical school, according to the American Medical Association.
Prospective H-1B employers must attest that they will pay the H-1B worker the greater of the actual wage paid to similar employees or the prevailing wages for that occupation.
The visa status is generally valid for up to three years and renewable for another three years, but can be extended if the employer sponsors the worker for permanent residency.
Congress caps the number of new H-1B visas at 85,000 per fiscal year, including 20,000 for noncitizens who earned a U.S. master’s degree or higher. The fiscal year 2025 cap was met in December 2024.
Daniel Costa, director of immigration law and policy research at the Economic Policy Institute, a left-of-center think tank, told PolitiFact that the H-1B visa fee must be paid by the employer, not the employee.
“The H-1B employees are generally not allowed to pay for the primary fees for visas and processing, they are the responsibility of the employer,” Costa said via email Sept. 24.
Our ruling
An X user said that 30% of medical residents are international medical graduates and 10,000 of 43,000 medical residency spots are filled by doctors with H-1B visas.
Data shows that approximately 30% of medical residents are international medical graduates, which includes both U.S. citizens and noncitizens. Ten thousand doctors hold H-1B visas, but that represents all physicians, not only those in residency. The American Medical Association says the most common visa used by medical graduates for medical residency is the J-1 visa.
The statement is partially accurate but leaves out important details. We rate it Half True.
The bottom line is that, unlike the US, China is not a country of immigrants. In 2020, only about .1 percent of the mainland population was made up of foreigners, according to one estimate by researchers from the Kiel Institute for the World Economy. That’s roughly 1.4 million people in a country of more than 1.4 billion. In the United States, by contrast, 15 percent of the population is made up of immigrants. Even other East Asian nations, like Japan and South Korea, are home to far more foreigners than China in terms of their relative population size.
Because the US already has a large immigrant population from all over the world, it can be easier for new arrivals to adjust. Local companies operate in English, the language of global business. Colleagues and friends communicate through platforms like Gmail and Instagram, which are available in most parts of the world. And when it comes to creature comforts, H-1B recipients from India or China who land in San Francisco or New York will have no trouble finding restaurants (even good ones!) that serve food that tastes like home.
In China, however, newcomers must navigate a corporate landscape that operates largely in Chinese, a language few foreigners study in grade school or while pursuing a STEM degree. The country’s tech ecosystem is also totally unique. New arrivals face not only an unfamiliar language and culture, but also a suite of unfamiliar programs and apps, most notably WeChat.
Better Reputation
There are signs that more people might be willing to overcome these barriers to experience the benefits of living in China, a place now increasingly associated with high-speed trains, electric cars, and futuristic cities. In places like Greece, Spain, and Germany, the majority of people now view China as the world’s top economic power, according to the Pew Research Center. Africa, the continent with the world’s youngest and fastest-growing population, already sends more students to study in China each year than to the US or UK.
I’ve personally noticed that my American friends and family seem to have much more positive impressions of China than they did a few years ago. That might be in part due to the popularity of Chinese exports like TikTok, Temu, and Labubu. Several friends have even told me they specifically want to visit Chongqing, a Chinese megacity that didn’t attract many foreign tourists until videos of its skyline and hot pot restaurants went viral on Instagram and TikTok.
Whether this growing curiosity translates into people actually moving to China will depend in part on how the government handles programs like the new K visa. The policy lowers barriers for people who want to study or work there, but it has also stirred anxieties at home. For now, it’s unclear whether it will become a genuine gateway for new waves of international talent, or falter in the face of the same rising nationalist sentiments reshaping politics around the world.
By PAUL WISEMAN, BARBARA ORTUTAY and PIYUSH NAGPAL, Associated Press
The Trump administration’s abrupt decision to slap a $100,000 fee on H-1B visas has stunned and confused employers, students and workers from the United States to India and beyond.
Since announcing the decision Friday, the White House has tried to reassure jittery companies that the fee does not apply to existing visa holders and that their H-1B employees traveling abroad will not be stranded, unable to re-enter the United States without coming up with $100,000. The new policy took effect at 12:01 a.m. Eastern Sunday.
Despite the effort at reassurance, “there’s still some folks out there recommending to their H-1B employees that they not travel right now until it’s a little clearer,” Leon Rodriguez, a partner at the Seyfarth law firm who was director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services in the Obama administration.
Other questions remain, some of them basic. “What actually is the process for paying this $100,000,” Rodriguez said. “Usually, when an agency is going to charge a fee, there’s a whole process. There’s the creation of forms for collecting that fee. … At this point, we don’t actually know what that process will be like.”
“Key questions remain, such as whether the new fee will apply to universities and nonprofit research organizations, employers that Congress has exempted from the annual limit on H-1B visas,” said Bo Cooper, partner at the immigration law firm Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy.
Here’s a look at what the H-1B visa program is and what the Trump administration is doing to it.
What are H-1B visas and who uses them?
Created by the 1990 Immigration Act, they are type of nonimmigrant visa, meant to allow American companies to bring in people with technical skills that are hard to find in the United States. The visas are not intended for people who want to stay permanently. Some eventually do, but only after transitioning to different immigration statuses.
An H-1B allows employers to hire foreign workers who have specialized skills and a bachelor’s degree or the equivalent. They are good for three years and can be extended another three years, suggesting that there are now “around 700,000 H-1B visa holders in the country and another half a million or so dependents,” economist Stephen Brown of Capital Economics wrote in a commentary Monday.
At least 60% of the H-1B visas approved since 2012 have been for computer-related jobs, according to the Pew Research Center. But hospitals, banks, universities and a wide range of other employers can and do apply for H-1B visas.
The number of new visas issued annually is capped at 65,000, plus an additional 20,000 for people with a master’s degree or higher. Those visas are handed out by a lottery. Some employers, such as universities and nonprofits, are exempt from the limits.
According to Pew, nearly three-quarters of those whose applications were approved in 2023 came from India.
What did Trump do?
The White House announced the $100,000 fee. The application fee is currently $215, plus other relatively nominal processing charges. It took effect barely 24 hours later.
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the fee would be applied annually, for a total of $600,000 over the maximum number of renewals allowed. The White House clarified Saturday that it was a one-time fee and said it would not apply to current visa holders.
Trump also rolled out a $1 million “gold card” visa for wealthy individuals.
The moves are certain to draw lawsuits charging that the president was improperly sidestepping Congress with a dramatic overhaul of the legal immigration system.
Why target H-1B visas?
Critics say they undercut American workers, luring people from overseas who are often willing to work for less than American tech workers do. Staffing companies such as Tata Consultancy Services often supply Indian workers to corporate clients.
“To take advantage of artificially low labor costs incentivized by the program, companies close their IT divisions, fire their American staff, and outsource IT jobs to lower-paid foreign workers,” the White House said in its proclamation Friday.
In a 2020 report, the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute found that 60% of the H-1B positions certified by U.S. Labor Department are assigned wages below the median for the job.
Brown at Capital Economics wrote that “it is hard to disagree with the administration’s argument that the program needs reform.”
Giovanni Peri, director of the Global Migration Center at the University of California, Davis, said that abuses of the program — such as bringing in mid-level coders to replace higher-paid Americans — do occur but are relatively rare.
Most H-1B visa holders, he said, really are highly skilled workers who are hard to find. “Most of these people come in, and they have helped the productivity of firms; they have helped innovation,” Peri said. “They have complemented the work of Americans, and they have allowed growth.’’
What impact will the H-1B crackdown have?
Brown said that many tech firms can probably afford to pay $100,000 to bring in skilled workers.
“Nonetheless,″ he wrote, “the upfront fee will clearly be too high for many companies to stomach. Last year, the healthcare, retail and accommodation & food services sectors accounted for a quarter of H-1B visas between them, and firms in those sectors will probably find it harder to afford the fee.″
The higher fee — along with other Trump administration attempts to curb immigration — is likely to reduce the U.S. labor supply and push wages higher, Brown said.
Foreign workers like Alan Wu are worried – and stunned by the speed with which Trump disrupted the H-1B process. “Can you release some policy which impacts tons of people just like that?” said Wu, who is working in Indianapolis as a data scientist for a pharmaceutical company.
He is working legally on his student visa after earning a doctorate. He’s failed to win the H-1B lottery for two consecutive years. And he’s now rethinking his plan to live permanently in the United States, where he’s lived for more than a decade. “I am definitely concerned about my job now that the cost and risk of hiring a foreigner is so high,” he said.
Navneet Singh, who runs a consultancy “Go Global Immigration” in India’s Punjab state, said changes to H-1B visa policies are likely to significantly impact future migration to the U.S., particularly from India.
“Trump is trying to suffocate new immigrants who are skilled, so that they won’t take the jobs away from the average American. But by doing so, they will be making (U.S.) production expensive,” Singh said.
He said the new policy is likely to create advantages for competitors in other countries. “Countries like France, Netherlands, Germany and Canada are set to gain from this move,” he added.
Some Indian students aspiring to pursue higher studies in the U.S. are disappointed. “It feels like a door closing,” said one aspiring student who requested anonymity.
What businesses will be hurt the most?
Greg Morrisett, dean and vice provost at Cornell Tech, said startups and small businesses are likely to be the most affected by the fees since there’s “no way they can” pay them. Cornell Tech, for instance, has launched about 120 startups and the “vast majority” have students coming from overseas. The result? “They’ll pick up and move to Europe or Asia, wherever they can find,” he said.
“The big tech companies will likely move a lot of operations and things into other countries. We saw this when, for example, you know, Ireland made it really attractive from a tax perspective. All of a sudden all the headquarters move to Ireland,” Morrisett said.
And startups, he added, “the next Amazon, the next Google will give up here and go somewhere else and then we won’t have that advantage in the next generation of tech leadership.”
____
Barbara Ortutay reported from Oakland, California, and Piyush Nagpal from New Delhi, India.
Donald Trump’s announcement on Friday that his administration will impose a $100,000 annual fee on H1-B visa applications, which allows foreign laborers in specialty occupations to work in the United States, has sent industries and governments into a spiral of confusion. With the policy set to go into effect Sunday, Big Tech companies are reportedly telling H-1B holders in their workforces to either remain in the United States or return from overseas before the new policy is enacted, according to CNBC.
According to the report, Amazon sent a memo to its employees advising workers on an H-1B or H-4 visa holders (given to dependent family members of H-1B workers) to return from overseas before 12:01 a.m. ET on September 21. Microsoft reportedly sent out a similar message, warning its employees that the Trump administration’s policy is “structured as a travel restriction” and international travel could put their worker status at risk. It advised H-1B visa holders to cancel future travel plans and remain in the US “for the foreseeable future.”
Tech firms are by far the biggest users of the H-1B visa program. Five of the top six employers of H-1B workers are Amazon, Microsoft, Meta, Apple, and Google, according to data from Citizenship and Immigration Services. Under the new rules, which would require either the H-1B visa holder or their sponsor to pay $100,000 annually to keep the work permit active, Amazon could, in theory, be staring down a $1 billion bill every year to keep the more than 10,000 H-1B visa holders it currently employs in its workforce.
But tech is also far from the only industry that counts on specialized labor from overseas. According to the Business Standard, over 30% of medical residents in the United States are international graduates, and between 10,000 to 43,000 residency spots are currently filled by H-1B visa holders. There is an ongoing doctor shortage in the country that was expected to worsen without new restrictions. The Association of American Medical Colleges projected a shortage of 20,200 to 40,400 primary care doctors by 2036, prior to the new H-1B fees.
It’s not just industry players freaking out, either. Foreign governments are scrambling to respond to the new policy, with little lead time to sort through all the details. “This measure is likely to have humanitarian consequences by way of the disruption caused for families. Government hopes that these disruptions can be addressed suitably by the U.S. authorities,” India’s Ministry of External Affairs said in a statement. South Korea’s foreign ministry also said it is sorting out the potential implications for Korean workers, per CNBC.
The Trump administration, as has become customary for its policy prescriptions, is spending the day trying to sort out the ill-defined information it initially provided. Axios reported that officials have clarified the new H-1B visa fees won’t apply to existing holders of valid visas re-entering the country, so workers should be able to get back to the country without getting hit with a $100,000 fee. Reportedly, the fee won’t go into effect until the next cycle of new applicants to the H-1B program. Whether visa holders want to risk taking this administration at its word is another question.
Gov. Ron DeSantis holds up two bills related to China he signed on June 07, 2021, in Miami, Florida. … [+] A bill he signed in 2023 is the subject of a new lawsuit. Two H-1B visa holders and an international student are plaintiffs in a lawsuit alleging Florida’s new law preventing many Chinese citizens from purchasing real estate in the state is unconstitutional. (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
Getty Images
Two H-1B visa holders and an international student are plaintiffs in a lawsuit alleging Florida’s new law preventing many Chinese citizens from purchasing real estate in the state is unconstitutional. The state will also require U.S. citizens in Florida to attest that the law doesn’t apply to them when buying real estate. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has highlighted the new law while pursuing the Republican nomination for president. Analysis shows the law is likely more restrictive than the plaintiffs in the lawsuit argue due to the use of the term “visa” in the bill rather than “status.”
The Florida Law’s Main Provisions
Starting July 1, 2023, Florida law S.B. 264 prohibits a citizen of China from buying real estate in the state unless certain exceptions apply. The exceptions include that it is only “one residential real property that is up to 2 acres” and the “parcel is not on or within 5 miles of any military installation in the state.” The person must have a “current verified United States Visa that is not limited to authorizing tourist-based travel” or have been granted asylum.
The measure applies to “Any person who is domiciled in the People’s Republic of China and who is not a citizen or lawful permanent resident of the United States.” A person who is a citizen of China (and not a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident) who meets one of the exceptions and already owns property in Florida “may not purchase . . . any additional real property” in the state.
Other provisions apply to citizens of China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela and Syria unless they qualify for an exception. These include prohibitions on purchasing agricultural land or real estate near a military installation or critical infrastructure.
The law also places new requirements on American citizens in Florida. “At the time of purchase, a buyer of real property in this state must provide an affidavit signed under penalty of perjury attesting that the buyer is” not prevented from buying the real estate due to the new law. This illustrates how immigration-related restrictions often also affect U.S.-born citizens.
The Lawsuit
A lawsuit filed on May 22, 2023, challenges the Florida law, arguing it “imposes discriminatory prohibitions on the ownership and purchase of real property based on race, ethnicity, alienage, and national origin—and imposes especially draconian restrictions on people from China.”
The complaint discusses the impact of the law on the plaintiffs—four Chinese citizens who live in Florida and a real estate brokerage firm that serves Chinese and Chinese American clients.
“They will be forced to cancel purchases of new homes, register their existing properties with the State under threat of severe penalties, and face the loss of significant business,” according to the complaint. “The law stigmatizes them and their communities, and casts a cloud of suspicion over anyone of Chinese descent who seeks to buy property in Florida. Under this discriminatory new law, people who are not U.S. citizens or permanent residents, and whose ‘domicile’ is in China, will be prohibited from purchasing property in Florida.
“A similar but less restrictive rule will apply to people whose permanent home is in Cuba, Venezuela, or other ‘countries of concern.’ The sole exception to these prohibitions is incredibly narrow: people with non-tourist visas or who have been granted asylum may purchase one residential property under two acres that is not within five miles of any military installation in the state. Notably, there are more than a dozen military installations in Florida, many of them within five miles of city centers like Orlando, Tampa, Jacksonville, Pensacola, Panama City, and Key West. Florida’s new law will also impose requirements on people from China and other ‘foreign countries of concern’ to register properties they currently own, at the risk of civil penalties and civil forfeiture. People who own or acquire property in violation of the law are subject to criminal charges, imprisonment, and fines.”
The attorneys for the plaintiffs are the ACLU Foundation of Florida, the American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, the DeHeng Law Offices and the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund. The attorneys filed the complaint in the U.S. District Court for The Northern District of Florida Tallahassee Division.
“The law may be even more restrictive than the lawsuit indicates,” according to Kevin Miner, a partner at Fragomen. “This is because the statute uses incorrect immigration terminology to describe the exception. The statute appears to try to create an exception for individuals who are in the U.S. on a longer-term nonimmigrant status but does so by referencing a ‘visa’ rather than nonimmigrant status. The exception in the finalized bill, as enacted, exempts someone from the law if ‘the person has a current verified United States Visa that is not limited to authorizing tourist-based travel or official documentation confirming that the person has been granted asylum in the United States and such visa or documentation authorizes the person to be legally present within this state.’
“From a U.S. immigration law perspective, a ‘visa’ has a specific meaning. It is a sticker on a page of someone’s passport issued by a U.S. consulate abroad authorizing travel to the United States. It is different than having nonimmigrant status, like holding H-1B status while living in the U.S. and working for a U.S. employer. Because a visa is only needed for travel, many people in the U.S. are lawfully present holding H-1B, L-1 or F-1 student status and don’t have an unexpired visa stamp in their passport. The Florida statute incorrectly references a ‘visa’ rather than ‘nonimmigrant status.’ This could cause further complications for people who may have been intended to be exempted from the law but will be swept up in its restrictions anyway.”
Two H-1B Visa Holders And An International Student As Plaintiffs
The lawsuit includes two plaintiffs who are H-1B visa holders and one international student on an F-1 visa.
“Plaintiff Yifan Shen is neither a citizen nor a permanent resident of the United States but has permission to stay and live in the United States as the holder of a valid H-1B visa, which is a nonimmigrant worker visa,” according to the complaint. “Ms. Shen has lived in the United States for seven years and has lived in Florida for the past four years. She is not a member of the Chinese government or of the Chinese Communist Party. She has a master’s degree in science and is working as a registered dietitian in Florida.
“In April 2023, Ms. Shen signed a contract to buy a single-family home in Orlando to serve as her primary residence. The property, which is a new construction, appears to be located within ten miles of a critical infrastructure facility and within five miles of a military installation. The estimated closing date for Ms. Shen’s new property is in December 2023. Because Ms. Shen’s closing date is after July 1, 2023, Florida’s New Alien Land Law will prevent Ms. Shen from acquiring her new home, specifically, by forcing her to cancel the contract for the purchase and construction of her new property. Ms. Shen stands to lose all or part of her $25,000 deposit if the law goes into effect and she is forced to cancel the real estate contract.”
“Plaintiff Yongxin Liu is neither a citizen nor a permanent resident of the United States but has permission to stay and live in the United States as the holder of a valid H-1B visa, which is a nonimmigrant worker visa,” according to the complaint. “Mr. Liu has lived in the United States for five years and in Florida for four years. He is not a member of the Chinese government or of the Chinese Communist Party. He is an assistant professor at a Florida university in the field of data science. He owns a property close to Daytona Beach, which is his primary residence. As an owner of real property in Florida, Mr. Liu will be required under Florida’s New Alien Land Law to register his property with DEO [Department of Economic Opportunity].
“In addition, because Mr. Liu’s property appears to be located within ten miles of a critical infrastructure facility, Mr. Liu is further subject to the law’s registration requirement. This registration requirement is burdensome, discriminatory, and stigmatizing to Mr. Liu. Mr. Liu also has plans to purchase a second property in the vicinity of Pelican Bay, Florida, for his and his parents’ use as a vacation home. However, Mr. Liu will be prohibited from purchasing a second property under the new law. Furthermore, there is a substantial likelihood that the second property would be within ten miles of a military installation or critical infrastructure facility, resulting in an additional prohibition on the purchase under the new law.
“Due to Florida’s New Alien Land Law, Mr. Liu reasonably fears that real estate agents will refuse to represent him because he is Chinese, that he will be disadvantaged when bidding on property because he is Chinese, and that his search for real estate will be more costly, time-consuming, and burdensome as a result.”
“Plaintiff Xinxi Wang is neither a citizen nor a permanent resident of the United States but has permission to stay and live in the United States as the holder of a valid F-1 visa, which is a nonimmigrant visa for international students. Ms. Wang has lived in the United States and in Florida for the past five years. She is not a member of the Chinese government or of the Chinese Communist Party. She is currently pursuing her Ph.D. degree in earth systems science at a Florida university.
“Ms. Wang owns a home in Miami, which is her primary residence. Ms. Wang is also devoted Christian who worships with a congregation in the Miami area, about ten minutes from her home. As an owner of real property in Florida, Ms. Wang will be required to register her property . . . In addition, because Ms. Wang’s property appears to be located within ten miles of a critical infrastructure facility, Ms. Wang is further subject to the law’s registration requirement. This registration requirement is burdensome, discriminatory, and stigmatizing to Ms. Wang.”
Why The Law May Be Unconstitutional
The complaint asks the court to find the law unconstitutional under the 14th Amendment because it violates plaintiffs’ rights to equal protection and procedural due process. “The law was enacted with the purpose and intent to discriminate against persons based on race, ethnicity, color, alienage, and national origin, in particular, Chinese persons,” according to the complaint. “The law makes impermissible classifications based on race, ethnicity, color, alienage, and national origin that are not justified by a compelling state interest. . . . The law is impermissibly vague, indefinite, and ambiguous because it fails to clearly define ‘critical infrastructure facility,’ ‘military installation,’ and ‘domicile,’ and therefore fails to provide sufficient notice about which properties and persons are subject to its classifications, prohibitions, penalties, and requirements . . . [and] fails to provide sufficient notice as to where the ten-mile and five-mile exclusion zones tied to the covered critical infrastructure facilities and military installations begin and end.”
The complaint also argues the law violates plaintiffs’ rights under the Fair Housing Act. “The law discriminates against persons based on their race, color, and national origin, particularly Chinese persons, with respect to dwellings and residential real estate-related transactions.”
Finally, the plaintiffs ask that the law be declared unconstitutional under the U.S. Constitution’s Supremacy Clause and argue it is preempted by federal law. “The governor and legislators have repeatedly emphasized the need to take action ‘to stand against the United States’ greatest geopolitical threat—the Chinese Communist Party,’” write the plaintiffs. “Accordingly, the law violates the Supremacy Clause because it regulates a field exclusively occupied by the federal government, specifically, the intersection between foreign affairs, national security, and foreign investment, including foreign real estate acquisitions. In so doing, the new landownership prohibitions usurp the power vested by the Constitution and by Congress in the federal government to investigate, review, and take actions with respect to foreign investments, including real estate transactions that raise issues of national security.”
The plaintiffs ask the court for an injunction against the state of Florida from implementing and enforcing the law.
The Impact On U.S. Competitiveness In Attracting Talent
The new law is likely to have an impact on attracting talent to the United States. “China remains a vital source of high-skilled talent for the United States, especially in STEM [science, technology, engineering and math] fields where there is a particularly acute shortage of qualified U.S. workers,” said Fragomen’s Kevin Miner. “By making it more difficult for Chinese nationals to purchase property in Florida, employers who rely on foreign national talent from China and other affected countries may rethink plans to expand their operations into Florida, and this would mean that the jobs for American workers from such an expansion would go away as well.”
Perceptions of Chinese nationals toward the United States as a place to work and study could continue to erode in light of the new law. U.S. consular officers are still denying visas for Chinese graduate students based on the Chinese university they attended, as became apparent in this recent case of a Ph.D. student who cannot return to the United States to complete her doctoral research. Fewer international students from China have chosen to attend U.S. universities in recent years.
“The lawsuit makes an excellent point that regardless of what exceptions the statute may try to create, Chinese nationals will still be disadvantaged as buyers,” said Miner. “Real estate agents may be less willing to work with them, and sellers may be scared by the language of the law and choose not to sell property to a Chinese national. This is detrimental to people doing nothing more than trying to build a career and a life in the United States, and ultimately hurts U.S. competitiveness in the global economy.”