ReportWire

Tag: Gwyneth Paltrow

  • Gwyneth Paltrow not responsible for ski crash, jury finds in civil trial

    Gwyneth Paltrow not responsible for ski crash, jury finds in civil trial

    [ad_1]

    Gwyneth Paltrow was not responsible for a 2016 collision on a Utah ski slope, a jury ruled Thursday. Retired optometrist Terry Sanderson sued Paltrow over the crash and had been seeking “more than $300,000” in damages. 

    Paltrow countersued, seeking $1 in damages along with attorneys’ fees, which the jury awarded.

    “I felt that acquiescing to a false claim compromised my integrity,” Paltrow said in a statement after the verdict was read. “I am pleased with the outcome and I appreciate all of the hard work of Judge Holmberg and the jury, and thank them for their thoughtfulness in handling this case.”

    The eight-person jury throughout the trial heard testimony focused heavily on which skier was downhill at the time of the crash, because, according to a skier code of responsibility, the uphill skier is at fault in a collision. 

    After a relatively short deliberation, the jury concluded that Sanderson, who suffered four broken ribs in the crash, was 100% at fault for the collision.

    “We are pleased with this unanimous outcome and appreciate the judge and jury’s thoughtful handling of the case,” Patlrow’s attorney, Steve Owen, said in a statement. “Gwyneth has a history of advocating for what she believes in – this situation was no different and she will continue to stand up for what is right.”   

    Both Sanderson and Paltrow testified during the trial, each telling considerably different stories. 

    Paltrow testified that at first, she thought the accident was a “sexual assault” or a “practical joke.” She said two skis slid right between her legs and her skis. She felt a body “press against my back,” she said, before the two skiers fell to the ground. 

    “He was groaning and grunting in a disturbing way,” Paltrow testified. She clarified that she didn’t think the collision was an assault but that was the thought that went through her head during that split second.  

    Sanderson, however, testified that he had heard “a blood-curdling scream,” and assumed another skier was out of control. 

    “I got hit in my back so hard, and right at my shoulder blades. It felt like it was perfectly centered, the fists and the poles were right there, at my shoulder blades. Serious, serious smack. I’ve never been hit that hard,” he testified, claiming that the collision sent him “flying.”

    Only one other person claimed to have witnessed the crash, and evidence presented at trial showed that, at the time, that man thought Paltrow had crashed into Sanderson.

    But Paltrow’s attorneys called a series of experts who used computer-animated renderings and physics demonstrations drawn on a whiteboard to show that Paltrow was downhill when the two collided.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Jury finds Gwyneth Paltrow not at fault in ski crash

    Jury finds Gwyneth Paltrow not at fault in ski crash

    [ad_1]

    Jury finds Gwyneth Paltrow not at fault in ski crash – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    A jury in Park City, Utah, on Thursday found that actor Gwyneth Paltrow was not at fault in a 2016 ski collision. Paltrow was being sued for $300,000.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Gwyneth Paltrow not liable in Utah ski collision, jury says – National | Globalnews.ca

    Gwyneth Paltrow not liable in Utah ski collision, jury says – National | Globalnews.ca

    [ad_1]

    Gwyneth Paltrow won her court battle over a 2016 ski collision at a posh Utah ski resort after a jury decided Thursday that the movie star wasn’t at fault for the crash.

    A jury dismissed the complaint of a retired optometrist who sued Paltrow over injuries he sustained when the two crashed on a beginner run at Deer Valley ski resort, siding with Paltrow after eight days of live-streamed courtroom testimony that made the case a pop culture fixation.

    Paltrow, an actor who in recent years has refashioned herself into a celebrity wellness entrepreneur, looked to her attorneys with a pursed lips smile when the judge read the eight-member jury’s verdict in the Park City courtroom. She sat intently through two weeks of testimony in what became the biggest celebrity court case since actors Johnny Depp and Amber Heard faced off last year.

    Read more:

    Gwyneth Paltrow takes stand in ski crash trial, denies ‘risky behaviour’ that day

    Story continues below advertisement

    The dismissal concludes two weeks of courtroom proceedings that hinged largely on reputation rather than the monetary damages at stake in the case. Paltrow’s attorneys described the complaint against her as “utter B.S.” and painted the Goop founder-CEO as uniquely vulnerable to unfair, frivolous lawsuits due to her celebrity.

    Paltrow took the witness stand during the trial to insist the collision wasn’t her fault, and to describe how she was stunned when she felt “a body pressing against me and a very strange grunting noise.”


    Click to play video: '‘I did not cause the accident’: Gwyneth Paltrow testifies in ski collision trial'


    ‘I did not cause the accident’: Gwyneth Paltrow testifies in ski collision trial


    Throughout the trial, the word “uphill” became synonymous with “guilty, ” as attorneys focused on a largely unknown skiing code of conduct that stipulates that the skier who is downhill or ahead on the slope has the right of way.

    Worldwide audiences followed the celebrity trial as if it were episodic television. Viewers scrutinized both Paltrow and Sanderson’s motives while attorneys directed questions to witnesses that often had less to do with the collision and more to do with their client’s reputations.

    Story continues below advertisement

    The trial took place in Park City, a resort town known for hosting the annual Sundance Film Festival, where early in her career Paltrow would appear for the premieres of her movies including 1998’s “Sliding Doors,” at a time when she was known primarily as an actor, not a lifestyle influencer. Paltrow is also known for her roles in “Shakespeare in Love,” which won her an Academy Award, and the “Iron Man” movies.

    Trending Now


    Click to play video: 'Gwyneth Paltrow ski crash trial: Terry Sanderson testifies he was hit in the back by skier, went ‘flying’'


    Gwyneth Paltrow ski crash trial: Terry Sanderson testifies he was hit in the back by skier, went ‘flying’


    The jury’s decision marks a painful court defeat for Terry Sanderson, the man who sued Paltrow for more than $300,000 over injuries he sustained when they crashed on a beginner run. Both parties blamed the other for the collision. Sanderson, 76, broke four ribs and sustained a concussion after the two tumbled down the slope, with Paltrow landing on top of him.

    Read more:

    Man suing Gwyneth Paltrow takes stand at ski crash trial: ‘I’m living another life now’

    Story continues below advertisement

    He filed an amended complaint after an earlier $3.1 million lawsuit was dismissed. Paltrow in response countersued for $1 and attorney fees, a symbolic action that mirrors Taylor Swift’s response to a radio host’s defamation lawsuit. Swift was awarded $1 in 2017.

    Paltrow’s defense team tried to paint Sanderson as an angry, aging and unsympathetic man who had over the years become “obsessed” with his lawsuit against Paltrow. They argued that Paltrow wasn’t at fault in the crash and also said, regardless of blame, that Sanderson was overstating the extent of his injuries.

    AP writer Anna Furman contributed from Los Angeles.

    &copy 2023 The Canadian Press

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Gwyneth Paltrow ski lawsuit: When skiers collide, who is at fault?

    Gwyneth Paltrow ski lawsuit: When skiers collide, who is at fault?

    [ad_1]

    The trial over a 2016 ski accident involving Gwyneth Paltrow is expected to wrap up Thursday, with attorneys presenting their closing arguments ahead of sending the case to the jury for deliberations. Beyond the spectacle of watching the Oscar-winning actress and businesswoman recount the incident, the decision could set a legal precedent affecting millions of skiers and snowboarders: Who is liable when collisions occur on the slopes?

    Terry Sanderson, 76, sued Paltrow for $3.1 million after alleging that she crashed into him at the tony Deer Valley resort in Park City, Utah. After a judge dismissed his initial suit, he later refiled his complaint seeking more than $300,000. Paltrow, 50, countersued for a symbolic $1 and attorney fees.

    In each taking the stand last week, Paltrow and Sanderson presented starkly different accounts of the collision and called a succession of medical experts and witnesses to buttress their claims. Paltrow’s ski instructor at the time of the incident, Deer Valley veteran Eric Christiansen, blamed Sanderson for the crash, which occurred on a beginner ski run. 

    “Gwyneth was making her turns very rhythmically,” he said under oath, while alleging that Sanderson “was making wide radius turns and taking up a large swath of the ski slope.”

    For his part, Sanderson has accused Paltrow of barreling into him, breaking four of his ribs and causing a severe concussion whose symptoms lingered for years. Despite these dueling accounts, legal experts said the case will likely turn on something more tangible: Paltrow’s and Sanderson’s respective location on the mountain just before the crash occurred. 

    Uphill or downhill?

    Sanderson sued Paltrow in 2019, claiming she was skiing recklessly and crashed into him from above. Paltrow’s countersuit claimed Sanderson hit her from behind. The case hinges on which of the two parties acted in an unreasonable manner while on skis, attorneys told CBS MoneyWatch.

    “When one skier hits another, the issue is negligence. Did they do something wrong?” said personal injury attorney Roger Kohn, of Kohn Rath Law.

    Gwyneth Paltrow Skiing Lawsuit
    Gwyneth Paltrow enters the courtroom after a lunch break in her trial, Thursday, March 23, 2023, in Park City, Utah, where she is accused in a lawsuit of crashing into a skier during a 2016 family ski vacation.

    Jeff Swinger / AP


    As far as conduct on the ski slopes go, it’s almost always the duty of the uphill skier to beware of the downhill skier. In other words, the downhill skier — the person who is further down the slope — has the right of way. 

    “The uphill skier has to watch out for the downhill skier. If you’re overtaking someone and hit them, chances are you are liable and at fault,” Kohn added. 

    According to the National Ski Areas Association’s responsibility code, which governs ski resorts in North America, “people ahead or downhill of you have the right of way. You must avoid them.”

    Skiers must also “always stay in control” and be able to stop to avoid other people.

    An animated recreation of the pair’s crash, which was introduced in court Monday, shows the skiers’ positions relative to one another from Christiansen’s perspective. It also depicted Paltrow lying on top of Sanderson following the collision.

    Christiansen explained that Paltrow could only have ended up on top of Sanderson if she had been hit from behind. 

    screen-shot-2023-03-27-at-4-23-21-pm.png
    A simulation of the ski collision between that took place on Deer Valley’s Bandana ski run in 2016, shows the aftermath of the collision between Ms. Paltrow and Ms. Sanderson.

    Collisions happen

    Ski collisions are not uncommon and when injuries result, lawyers sometimes get involved. 

    “Some lawyers based their whole career on ski accidents,” Bryn “Butch” Peterson, a veteran Colorado ski instructor, told CBS MoneyWatch. He added that he once saw a woman get hit by a skier who came “blasting out of a tree trail” in Vail, Colorado. 

    Gwyneth Paltrow Skiing Lawsuit
    Terry Sanderson (left) arrives at court Tuesday, March 21, 2023, in Park City, Utah. The retired optometrist is suing actor Gwyneth Paltrow over a 2016 ski collision that took place at Deer Valley Resort.

    Rick Bowmer / AP


    But unlike that incident, most ski accidents aren’t caused by skier-skier or skier-snowboarder collisions; they happen when skiers hit a tree or other type of obstacle. 

    There were 57 reported fatal incidents during the 2021-2022 ski season, according to NSAA, most of which resulted from skiers hitting trees. Males represented 95% of all fatalities. There were an additional 54 reported “catastrophic” incidents during the same season.

    Homeowners insurance

    Most homeowners insurance policies also include general liability coverage that essentially follows a homeowner around even when they’re outside of their residence, including when they are on skis. 

    “It covers you if there’s something dangerous in your home or on your property and someone gets hurt and sues you, but it also follows you around if you’re at the grocery store and run a kid over with a shopping cart, and it covers ski collision claims,” said David Cutt, of Cutt, Kendell & Olson in Salt Lake City, Utah. 

    “So that’s what is going on here. In this case, if Paltrow has homeowners coverage, then that steps in and pays a settlement or a judgement unto the limits of the policy,” he said.

    Typically, a lawyer would only get involved if the defendant is wealthy or has homeowners insurance, according to Kohn. 

    “If you sue someone who doesn’t have homeowners coverage, it’s a waste of time,” he said. 

    But, he added, if they have insurance, that policy will kick in, and the insurer will defend the claim as well as pay it.

    It’s not always the case that one party is negligent in a two-person collision. 

    “But there is a clear case of liability if you can show the other skier was skiing too fast, acting improperly or should’ve seen the other skier,” he said.

    He said, she said

    Cutt said he’s tried dozens or more of these cases in Utah and the judgment always hinges on who the jury believes were the uphill and downhill skiers. 

    “In this trial, Sanderson says he was the downhill skier and she ran into him from behind, and she says exactly the opposite — that she was skiing along and he plowed into her from uphill,” Cutt said. 

    “So what it’s going to come down to is, the jury is going to listen to everybody about the collision itself and the aftermath and decide who they think is credible and who isn’t,” Cutt said. “And the fact that it’s Gwyneth Paltrow is the big elephant in the room.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Gwyneth Paltrow won her ski trial. Here’s how it played out

    Gwyneth Paltrow won her ski trial. Here’s how it played out

    [ad_1]

    PARK CITY, Utah (AP) — When two skiers collided on a beginner run at an upscale Utah ski resort in 2016, no one could foresee that seven years later, the crash would become the subject of a closely watched celebrity trial.

    But Gwyneth Paltrow’s live-streamed trial over her collision with Terry Sanderson, a 76-year-old retired optometrist, in Park City emerged as the biggest celebrity court case since actors Johnny Depp and Amber Heard faced off last year — spawning memes, sparking debate about the burden of fame, and making ski etiquette rules of who was uphill and who had the right of way relevant beyond those who can afford resort chairlift tickets.

    On Thursday, Paltrow won her court battle after a jury decided the movie star wasn’t at fault for the crash. Here is a look back at highlights from the two-week trial:

    ___

    LIFESTYLES OF THE RICH AND THE FAMOUS

    For seven days, attorneys highlighted — and downplayed — Paltrow and Sanderson’s extravagant lifestyles.

    Sanderson’s attorneys sought more than $300,000 in damages, but the money at stake for both sides paled in comparison to the typical legal costs of a multiyear lawsuit. Both sides marshalled brigades of expert witnesses, including a biomechanical engineer and collision expert.

    Paltrow’s legal team attempted to represent Sanderson as an angry, aging man who continued to travel internationally after the collision. They introduced photos into evidence of Sanderson camel riding in Morocco, trekking the Inca Trail to Machu Picchu in Peru, and taking a continent-wide loop through Europe with stops in the Netherlands, Germany, Switzerland, Italy, France and Belgium.

    Sanderson’s attorneys questioned Paltrow about that day’s $8,890 bill for private ski instructors for four children accompanying her, as well as her decision to leave the slope after the crash to get a massage. They said the accident caused Sanderson to grow distant from friends and family, and they called his ex-girlfriend to testify about how their relationship deteriorated because he “had no joy left in his life.”

    To keep jurors engaged, Paltrow’s team shared a series of advanced, high-resolution animations to accompany their witnesses’ recollections. The renderings reflected the financial investment Paltrow and her defense team devoted to the case.

    ___

    THE BURDEN OF FAME

    Attorneys on both sides tapped into the power of celebrity to make their cases that reputations and moral principles were what was at stake in the trial.

    Sanderson’s side tried to characterize Paltrow, the actor-turned-lifestyle influencer, as clumsy, out of touch and evading accountability. They likened her decision to file a $1 countersuit against Sanderson to Taylor Swift, who filed a similar counterclaim in a lawsuit in 2017 — drawing attention to Paltrow’s testimony that she was “not good friends” with Swift but just “friendly.”

    Paltrow’s defense team called the highly publicized case an attempt to exploit her fame and suggested she is vulnerable to unfair, frivolous lawsuits. They questioned witnesses about Sanderson’s “obsession” with the case and homed in on an email subject line in which Sanderson wrote after the collision: “I’m famous.”

    “To become famous, he will lie,” one of Paltrow’s attorneys said. “I’m not into celebrity worship,” Sanderson later rebutted.

    ___

    FACTORY OF MEMES

    Though the trial tested the jury’s endurance as its eight members gradually sunk deeper into their chairs through hours of expert-witness testimony, it titillated spectators worldwide, became late-night television fodder and fed the internet’s insatiable appetite for memes.

    Viewers tuning into proceedings on CourtTV saw Paltrow complain about losing a half-day of skiing after the crash and heard a radiologist testify that Sanderson could no longer enjoy wine tasting. They compared the spectacle to “The White Lotus” — an HBO series that satirizes the petty grievances of rich, white vacationers — and, in a reflection of the courtroom theatrics and rapt public attention, likened Paltrow’s defense to the Salem witch trials of Arthur Miller’s “The Crucible.”

    Photographs of Paltrow entering and exiting the courtroom — often shielding her face, perp-walk style, with a blue GP-initialed notebook — also have gone viral on social media.

    ___

    UTAH’S POSHEST SKI TOWN

    The proceedings have drawn the world’s attention to Park City, Utah, the silver boomtown-turned posh ski resort where Paltrow and Sanderson crashed and the trial was held. The city annually hosts the Sundance Film Festival, where early in her career Paltrow would appear for the premieres of her movies, including 1998’s “Sliding Doors,” at a time when she was known primarily as an actor, not a celebrity wellness entrepreneur.

    The jury and local residents who have braved blizzards to get to the courthouse each day nodded along as attorneys referenced local landmarks like The Montage Deer Valley, the slope-side luxury resort where Paltrow got a massage after the crash.

    The all-white jury was drawn from registered voters in Summit County, where the average home sold for $1.3 million last month and residents tend to be less religious than the rest of Utah, where the majority of the population belongs to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

    Unlike the high-powered Hollywood attorneys that become household names at celebrity trials, both sides were represented by local lawyers. Paltrow’s team specializes in medical malpractice lawsuits, while Sanderson’s lead counsel, Bob Sykes, is known in Salt Lake City for his work suing police departments. Sykes attempted to play up his folksiness, referring to himself as “just a country lawyer” more than six times during the trial. After jurors were sent home Wednesday, both legal teams joked about the trial lawyer gimmick.

    ___

    THE MYSTERIOUS MISSING GOPRO

    Paltrow’s attorneys intrigued the jury with questions about the collision potentially being captured on a helmet-cam video, though no footage was included as evidence in the trial.

    Sanderson’s daughter testified this week that an email she sent the day of the accident referring to a GoPro didn’t imply footage existed. She said she and her father speculated that on a crowded beginner run, someone wearing a camera must have turned to look at the crash after hearing Paltrow scream.

    Internet sleuths following the trial later found and sent attorneys the link included in the email. Rather than revealing GoPro footage though, it contained a chatroom discussion between members of Sanderson’s ski group, including the man claiming to be the sole eyewitness who testified Paltrow crashed into Sanderson.

    ___

    THE VERDICT

    Paltrow looked to her attorneys with a pursed-lips smile when the judge read the eight-member jury’s verdict in the Park City courtroom.

    The jury awarded her $1; however, the attorney fees she asked for in her countersuit were not included in the verdict, leaving the bulk of the final award for the Park City judge to decide. It’s unknown when the judge will make that decision. No decision was posted Friday in the online court docket.

    Paltrow thanked the judge and jury for their work.

    “I felt that acquiescing to a false claim compromised my integrity,” the actor said in a statement released by her representatives.

    As Paltrow left court, she touched Sanderson’s shoulder and told him, “I wish you well,” Sanderson told reporters outside court. He responded, “Thank you, dear.”

    ___

    Furman reported from Los Angeles.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Gwyneth Paltrow gets vindication at ski collision trial

    Gwyneth Paltrow gets vindication at ski collision trial

    [ad_1]

    PARK CITY, Utah (AP) — Gwyneth Paltrow wasn’t to blame for a 2016 collision with a retired optometrist on a beginner run at a posh Utah ski resort during a family vacation, a jury decided Thursday following a live-streamed trial that became a pop culture fixation.

    A jury awarded Paltrow $1 — a symbolic amount she asked for in order to show it wasn’t about money — and delivered her the vindication she sought when she opted to take it to trial rather than settle out of court.

    “I felt that acquiescing to a false claim compromised my integrity,” Paltrow said in a statement released by her representatives that she also posted as an Instagram story for her 8.3 million followers. She also thanked the judge and jury for their work.

    As Paltrow left court she touched Terry Sanderson’s shoulder and told him, “I wish you well,” he told reporters outside court. He responded, “Thank you dear.”

    Paltrow’s attorney, Steve Owens, added in a statement he read outside court that “Gwyneth has a history of advocating for what she believes in – this situation was no different and she will continue to stand up for what is right.”

    Paltrow, an actor who in recent years has refashioned herself into a celebrity wellness entrepreneur, looked to her attorneys with a pursed lips smile when the judge read the eight-member jury’s verdict in the Park City courtroom. She sat intently through two weeks of testimony in what became the biggest celebrity court case since actors Johnny Depp and Amber Heard faced off last year.

    After the verdict was read, the judge polled the jury, which was unanimous on the decision. In civil court in Utah, only three-fourths of jurors need to agree on a verdict. The attorney fees Paltrow asked for in her countersuit were not included in the jury’s verdict, leaving the bulk of the final award for the Park City judge to decide.

    Addressing reporters after the verdict, Sanderson questioned whether the lawsuit was worth it and said he believed that people tend to naturally trust celebrities like Paltrow.

    “You get some assumed credibility from being a famous person,” Sanderson said. “Really, who wants to take on a celebrity?”

    The dismissal concludes two weeks of courtroom proceedings that hinged largely on reputation rather than the monetary damages at stake in the case. Paltrow’s attorneys described the complaint against her as “utter B.S.” and painted the Goop founder-CEO as uniquely vulnerable to unfair, frivolous lawsuits due to her celebrity.

    Paltrow took the witness stand during the trial to insist that the collision wasn’t her fault, and to describe how she was stunned when she felt “a body pressing against me and a very strange grunting noise.”

    Throughout the trial, the word “uphill” became synonymous with “guilty, ” as attorneys focused on a largely unknown skiing code of conduct that stipulates that the skier who is downhill or ahead on the slope has the right of way.

    Worldwide audiences followed the celebrity trial as if it were episodic television. Viewers scrutinized both Paltrow and Sanderson’s motives while attorneys directed questions to witnesses that often had less to do with the collision and more to do with their client’s reputations.

    The trial took place in Park City, a resort town known for hosting the annual Sundance Film Festival, where early in her career Paltrow would appear for the premieres of her movies including 1998’s “Sliding Doors,” at a time when she was known primarily as an actor, not a lifestyle influencer. Paltrow is also known for her roles in “Shakespeare in Love” and the “Iron Man” movies.

    The jury’s decision marks a painful court defeat for Sanderson, the man who sued Paltrow for more than $300,000 over injuries he sustained when they crashed on the ski slope at Deer Valley Resort.

    “He never returned home that night as the same man. Terry has tried to get off that mountain but he’s really still there,” attorney Robert Sykes said during closing arguments.

    Both parties blamed the other for the collision. Sanderson, 76, broke four ribs and sustained a concussion after the two tumbled down the slope, with Paltrow landing on top of him.

    He filed an amended complaint after an earlier $3.1 million lawsuit was dismissed. In response, Paltrow countersued for $1 and attorney fees, a symbolic action that mirrors Taylor Swift’s response to a radio host’s defamation lawsuit. Swift was awarded $1 in 2017.

    Paltrow’s defense team represented Sanderson as an angry, aging and unsympathetic man who had over the years become “obsessed” with his lawsuit against Paltrow. They argued that Paltrow wasn’t at fault in the crash and also said, regardless of blame, that Sanderson was overstating the extent of his injuries.

    ___

    AP writer Anna Furman contributed from Los Angeles.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Gwyneth Paltrow’s Trial Is So Camp

    Gwyneth Paltrow’s Trial Is So Camp

    [ad_1]

    I love it when the rich and famous go on trial to display how vastly out of touch they are with the rest of humble society. Bone-broth-drinking, Goop-founding, avid skier Gwyneth Paltrow is social media’s current favorite spectacle. And I’m calling it: this might be the greatest celeb trial of all time. It started way back in 2016, when poor Gwyneth was simply trying to enjoy a peaceful day skiing … until she collided with another skier.

    And it’s all getting dredged up now for our entertainment.

    The accuser claims Gwyneth ran into him and caused lasting injuries and even brain damage! But a twist: Gwyneth claims the skier ran into her back while she was reveling in a wintry getaway with her children Apple and Moses Martin, and husband Brad Falchuck. A wealthy white woman on trial for a skiing accident? Snooze! So, I totally get if you’re thinking, borinngggg. But don’t tune out just yet. The real fun starts in the courtroom.

    Let’s begin with the iconic outfits. It’s obvious that Gwyneth has dusted off her actress chops to play the role of beleagured-Ski-Mom. Her wardrobe has so far featured a pair of clear-framed aviator glasses (giving 70’s serial killer) and a beige turtleneck (almost now sold-out at $600 from none other than Goop.com). If you’re gonna be on trial, might as well make it a press tour for your brand!

    That’s when I knew this trial was meant for the big screen, and not just for the eyes of a few Park City, Utah jurors. Oscar-winner Gwyneth never under-serves, and her counter-lawsuit against 76-year-old Terry Sanderson is no different.

    With an initial lawsuit of $3.1 million in 2019, Sanderson has since knocked down the reparations to $300,000…but no amount of money can lead to Gwyneth saying “No, I wouldn’t say [Taylor Swift] and I are good friends…we’re friendly, I’ve taken my kids to one of her concerts before but we don’t talk very often.” while taking the stand with a straight face.

    @niche_allison_content Did the defense lawyer just take this case to try and get Eras tour tickets or what? 💀 #gwynethpaltrow#gwynethpaltrowtrial#taylorswift#erastour#taylorswifterastour#tserastour♬ sonido original – – g 🦙

    What people fail to mention is that Gwyneth probably didn’t have to take the stand. But she’s a woman for America! I choose to believe she wants to give us these moments. Moments like her forlornly admitting she “lost a half a day of skiing” or apologizing for her language when she reiterates “you skied directly into my effing back.”

    @davejorgenson Hang in there, Gwyneth.
    ♬ Space Song – Beach House

    The whole thing is the definition of camp. It’s like seeing an SNL skit come to life in the best possible way. Watching Gwyneth Paltrow’s jaw drop as the defense attorney said she lied under oath multiple times is my favorite raw reaction to date. PSA to the general public: start suing celebs for all your minor inconveniences, please.

    [ad_2]

    Jai Phillips

    Source link

  • Gwyneth Paltrow’s Ski Trial Style and the Cult of Stealth Luxury

    Gwyneth Paltrow’s Ski Trial Style and the Cult of Stealth Luxury

    [ad_1]

    Style Points is a weekly column about how fashion intersects with the wider world.

    This season, fashion pulled a fast one. Dopamine dressing? Serotonin-seeking maximalism? Aughts bodycon? We don’t know her. Instead, trends were out and wardrobe-building was in; on the runways, stealth wealth reigned in a way it hasn’t since the glory days of Phoebe Philo (who, appropriately enough, will be making her return to fashion this fall).

    gwyneth paltrow court looks

    Rick Bowmer//Getty Images

    While the covetable fall 2023 clothes we saw won’t hit stores anytime soon, we can already see the aesthetic in action on a longtime practitioner of minimalism, Gwyneth Paltrow, as she navigates the most stealth-wealth court case possible (namely, one that’s ski collision-related). The back-and-forth on the stand has a riveting banality—with bombshells including the fact that Paltrow is just under 5’10” and that she doesn’t consider Taylor Swift to be a close friend—but the style has without a doubt been the biggest takeaway.

    gwyneth paltrow court looks

    Paltrow in gray suiting, another fall 2023 trend.

    Jeff Swinger//Getty Images

    Meme-makers and fashion mood boarders everywhere must be thanking their lucky stars that the courtroom goings-on are televised, because Paltrow is giving a master class in the style Max Berlinger has dubbed “low-key rich bitch.” A perfectly rolled-up white turtleneck sweater and Smythson notebook? Immaculate blond waves that are more like ripples? Gold statement jewelry, a bone broth-hued tote, and a slim-cut gray blazer accessorized with the requisite green juice? It doesn’t get more LKRB. Paltrow even nodded to her power color, green, with an olive coat, evoking immediate associations to Great Expectations in anyone who follows ’90s fashion Instagram.

    gwyneth paltrow court looks

    Paltrow in an olive green coat.

    MEGA

    The Row Jaka Oversized Wool-Blend Felt Coat

    Jaka Oversized Wool-Blend Felt Coat

    The Row Jaka Oversized Wool-Blend Felt Coat

    Fashionista has tabulated her fashion credits, which include quiet-luxury brands like Celine, The Row, and, of course, her own G. Label. But the look is less about branding than WASPy restraint, a territory Paltrow has been tilling for decades now. She comes by it honestly—it’s in her bones. (Even her ski outfit, she claimed on the stand, is one she’s owned for years; she said she dresses to blend in on the slopes.) Chic ski gear and tennis whites have proliferated since the pandemic, and old-money aesthetic feels like the antidote to the look-at-me, trend-enthralled world of TikTok. Fashion’s ongoing fascination with women like Carolyn Bessette Kennedy and Princess Diana and the stealth-wealth looks on Succession has only begun to burn. In an era of watered-down luxury, there’s a fascination with the idea of an innate style that you can’t buy. And Paltrow is its embodiment.

    gwyneth paltrow court looks

    A subdued look from The Row.

    Courtesy of the designer.

    The courtroom can be almost as heightened a fashion hothouse as the runway or red carpet, as plaintiffs, defendants, and witnesses try to walk the uneasy tightrope of looking stylish but not superficial, trustworthy but not dowdy, tasteful but not ostentatious. No wonder Anna Delvey’s courtroom looks got their own Instagram account, Winona Ryder’s Marc Jacobs wardrobe is still a touchstone, and Cardi B followed up her many designer moments in court with a panoply of community service fashions. If designers are, like the rest of us, tuning in to Court TV, we might well see a new muse for spring 2024.

    Headshot of Véronique Hyland

    ELLE Fashion Features Director

    Véronique Hyland is ELLE’s Fashion Features Director and the author of the book Dress Code, which was selected as one of The New Yorker’s Best Books of the Year. Her writing has previously appeared in The New York Times Magazine, The New Yorker, W, New York magazine, Harper’s Bazaar, and Condé Nast Traveler. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Plaintiff takes stand in Gwyneth Paltrow ski crash trial

    Plaintiff takes stand in Gwyneth Paltrow ski crash trial

    [ad_1]

    Plaintiff takes stand in Gwyneth Paltrow ski crash trial – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Lawyers for Gwyneth Paltrow began presenting their case Monday as the actress remains on trial for a 2016 ski crash. The plaintiff, who claims Paltrow injured him, took the stand.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Man suing Gwyneth Paltrow takes stand at ski crash trial: ‘I’m living another life now’ – National | Globalnews.ca

    Man suing Gwyneth Paltrow takes stand at ski crash trial: ‘I’m living another life now’ – National | Globalnews.ca

    [ad_1]

    The retired optometrist suing actor Gwyneth Paltrow for allegedly crashing into him on a ski hill in 2016 took the stand Monday as the buzzed-about trial heads into its second week.

    Paltrow, 50, has been accused of causing serious injury to Terry Sanderson after she allegedly collided with him while skiing at Deer Valley Resort in Park City, Utah.

    Sanderson, 76, alleged Paltrow skied into him, “knocking him down hard, knocking him out.” He claimed the collision caused “permanent traumatic brain injury, 4 broken ribs, pain, suffering, loss of enjoyment of life.”

    He maintains that Paltrow left him collapsed on the slope and skied away. He is suing Paltrow for more than US$300,000.

    Read more:

    Prince Harry makes surprise U.K. court appearance for tabloid lawsuit

    Story continues below advertisement

    Paltrow denies any responsibility for the crash and is countersuing for $1 and lawyers’ fees. She claims Sanderson is the one who hit her and is now suing to “exploit her celebrity and wealth.”

    Before calling Sanderson on Monday, his lawyer first recalled Craig Ramon, the sole eyewitness to the ski crash, to testify again. Ramon was shown several messages he sent shortly after the ski collision, which claimed he saw Sanderson injured by Paltrow.

    Sanderson next took the stand. He said prior to the accident he was an “advanced-intermediate” skier who usually hit the slopes two or three times a week.

    He said recounting the accident is “hard” for him. Sanderson testified he heard a “bloodcurdling scream” before he was hit in the back by another person on skis, presumably Paltrow. He said the person’s ski poles hit beneath his shoulder blades and sent him “flying.”


    Click to play video: 'Gwyneth Paltrow ski crash trial: Terry Sanderson testifies he was hit in the back by skier, went ‘flying’'


    Gwyneth Paltrow ski crash trial: Terry Sanderson testifies he was hit in the back by skier, went ‘flying’


    Sanderson said he fell to the ground and briefly “blacked out.” When he came to, Sanderson testified he could not move but knew there was a man shouting at him. The unknown man, according to Sanderson, was trying to “bully” him into believing he’d hurt someone in the accident.

    Story continues below advertisement

    Read more:

    Jeremy Renner posts video update on treadmill after snowplow injury

    Sanderson testified that he only learned it was Paltrow who had allegedly hit him after he was helped down the slope and received medical attention.

    “I’m living another life now,” Sanderson said, referring to the lasting injuries he claimed to have sustained from the accident. He testified that he cannot ski anymore.

    Sanderson said he gets easily lost and has had “difficult” relationships with his family since the ski collision. He became emotional on the stand, recounting how his daughters have reacted to alleged changes in his personality caused by brain trauma.

    He said the accident has made him a “self-imposed recluse” and caused him to lose his “spark” for life.


    Click to play video: 'Gwyneth Paltrow ski crash trial: Terry Sanderson blames Paltrow for his ‘other personality’'


    Gwyneth Paltrow ski crash trial: Terry Sanderson blames Paltrow for his ‘other personality’


    Upon cross-examination, Paltrow’s lawyer, Stephen Owens, insisted there were several inconsistencies between Sanderson’s testimony and an earlier deposition. One such inconsistency Owens pointed out was the amount of time Sanderson claimed to be unconscious after the collision, with varying time frames in the deposition, his testimony and various medical records.

    Story continues below advertisement

    After Sanderson’s testimony, Paltrow’s lawyers are expected to call on her two children, 16-year-old Moses and 18-year-old Apple — who were present on the day of the incident — along with a ski instructor.

    On Friday afternoon, Paltrow told a lawyer from Sanderson’s team that she “was not engaging in any risky behaviour” on the day of the crash, saying she was skiing with her two kids as well as with Brad Falchuk — her boyfriend at the time, now her husband — and his two kids.

    Read more:

    Gwyneth Paltrow takes stand in ski crash trial, denies ‘risky behaviour’ that day

    The group was taking ski lessons on a green run, considered to be the easiest of runs on a ski hill, at the time, when she said she felt a pair of skis come between her skis, spreading her legs apart, and felt a “large body” hit her from behind.

    “There was a body pressing against me and there was a very strange grunting noise,” she testified of the moment of the collision. “My brain was trying to make sense of what was happening. I thought, ‘Am I… is this a practical joke? Is someone, like, doing something perverted?’ This is really, really strange,” she said in her testimony, adding that she “froze” while trying to make sense of what was happening.

    Trending Now

    Story continues below advertisement

    Read more:

    Reese Witherspoon and husband Jim Toth announce plans to divorce 

    The pair skied down the hill for a short period, before “someone’s ski caught an edge,” Paltrow testifed, and they collapsed, with Paltrow landing on top of Sanderson, their skis entwined.

    “He struck me in the back, yes, that’s exactly what happened,” Paltrow said, as the lawyer read back a portion of her description of the events from a deposition.


    Gwyneth Paltrow enters the courtroom for her trial on March 24, 2023, in Park City, Utah.

    Rick Bowmer / Pool / Getty Images

    Paltrow said she waited for Sanderson to stand up – “long enough for him to say that he was OK” – before she skied away, adding that she did not ask about his condition any further and did not know the extent of his injuries at the time.

    “I think you have to keep in mind when you’re the victim of a crash, right, your psychology is not necessarily thinking about the person who perpetrated it,” Paltrow testified.

    Story continues below advertisement


    Click to play video: '‘I did not cause the accident’: Gwyneth Paltrow testifies in ski collision trial'


    ‘I did not cause the accident’: Gwyneth Paltrow testifies in ski collision trial


    During her testimony, Paltrow said she was left with an “overstretched” right knee and back pain after Sanderson collided with her from behind. In a since-viral clip, Paltrow testified she “lost half a day of skiing” as a result of her alleged injuries. Her lawyers entered the US$8,980 daily ski trip receipt into evidence on Friday, noting the amount paid for she and her two children to use the luxury slopes.

    Story continues below advertisement

    Paltrow said she feels empathy for Sanderson, but said she did not give him brain injuries that showed up on an MRI he received in 2016.

    “I feel very sorry for him. It seems like he’s had a very difficult life, but I did not cause the accident so I cannot be at fault for anything that subsequently happened to him,” she testified.

    [ad_2]

    Sarah Do Couto

    Source link

  • Watch Live: Gwyneth Paltrow ski collision trial continues as man accusing her of crashing into him expected to testify

    Watch Live: Gwyneth Paltrow ski collision trial continues as man accusing her of crashing into him expected to testify

    [ad_1]


    CBS News Live 2

    Live

    The man claiming Gwyneth Paltrow ran into him on a ski slope seven years ago is expected to take the stand Monday, after the Hollywood star and lifestyle influencer’s testimony in what is expected to be an eight-day trial.

    Paltrow, 50, told the Utah jury unequivocally Friday that Terry Sanderson, 76, collided with her from behind on the slope at Deer Valley Resort in Park City, Utah. Sanderson, a retired optometrist, initially sued her for more than $3 million in damages, an amount later reduced to $300,000. Paltrow is counter-suing for $1 and attorneys fees.

    How to watch Terry Sanderson testify in civil suit against Gwyneth Paltrow

    • What: Terry Sanderson, who is suing Gwyneth Paltrow over a 2016 ski accident, is expected to take the sand

    • Date: Monday, March 27, 2023  

    • Time: 11 a.m. ET

    • Location: Park City, Utah

    • Online stream: Live on CBS News in the player above or on your mobile or streaming device

    Note: Streaming plans are subject to change 

    Testimony has also focused on Sanderson’s health. Witnesses, including his doctor and his daughters, have testified about Sanderson’s medical problems, including brain injury symptoms and broken bones.

    Attorneys are trying to establish whether Sanderson or Paltrow was uphill at the time of the crash, a point of ski etiquette that will also likely determine who is liable for the accident. Paltrow said Friday that Sanderson skied into her back

    Paltrow was called by Sanderson’s attorneys. Her attorneys are expected to call her children, Moses and Apple, and now-husband, Brad Falchuck.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • “And That Is The Truth”: Gwyneth Paltrow Denies Fault in Ski Collision

    “And That Is The Truth”: Gwyneth Paltrow Denies Fault in Ski Collision

    [ad_1]

    When A-Listers end up on camera in Park City, Utah it’s usually for the Sundance Film Festival, but this week had different plans for Gwyneth Paltrow. The Academy Award-winning actress and Goop CEO is being sued, to the tune of $300,000, for an alleged hit-and-run skiing incident in 2016 by retired optometrist Terry Sanderson. 

    Paltrow, however, claims that it was she who was hit by Anderson, and accused him of “attempt[ing] to exploit her celebrity and wealth.” As such, she is countersuing him for the symbolic amount of one dollar plus the cost of her legal fees. 

    The incident happened at the Deer Valley Ski Resort, on the beginner’s slopes. Anderson claims that Paltrow was skiing “out of control” and that the collision “caus[ed] a brain injury, four broken ribs and other serious injuries.” In 2019 he sued for $3.1 million, but a judge ruled that the amount must be capped at $300,000.

    In an opening statement, Sanderson’s lawyer Lawrence Buhler claimed that Paltrow was looking at her children, not where she was skiing, and hit his client. He also claimed that she left the area three to four minutes later. Sanderson was taken to a first aid tent by sled. But Paltrow contends that Sanderson hit her; her attorney Stephen Owens said that Sanderson apologized to her following the incident, and that she stayed on the scene until the ski patrol came by. 

    Paltrow took to the witness stand on Friday, the fourth day of the trial. If nothing else, onlookers were reminded that the woman is schooled at delivery. Case in point: this meme-worthy moment in which she apologized for swearing after (allegedly) being hit on a ski slope. 

    Twitter content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    She described the sensation as “there was a body pressing against me and a very strange grunting noise.” She said that she and her children were taking a ski lesson when “he struck me in the back.”

    Sanderson’s team has claimed that Paltrow left the scene before any help arrived, but she says that she remained “long enough for him to say that he was OK.” She said it was “absolutely not” a hit-and-run scenario. 

    She added that she experienced no injuries, but the collision made her feel like her knee was “over-stretched,” and her back hurt. She sought out a massage later that day. 

    She further stated that “Mr. Sanderson categorically hit me on that ski slope, and that is the truth,” but added “I feel very sorry for him. It seems like he’s had a very difficult life, but I did not cause the accident so I cannot be at fault for anything that subsequently happened to him.”

    Earlier, Kristin A. VanOrman, one of Sanderson’s attorneys, said (almost in an aside) that Paltrow had lied under oath. This led to a Paltrow dropping her jaw in a very dramatic fashion and Owens demanding a retraction. Judge Kent R. Holmberg asked VanOrman if she wanted to rephrase her statement, which she did. 

    [ad_2]

    Jordan Hoffman

    Source link

  • The Saturday Six: Blockbuster has fans hoping for a comeback, scientists explore best way to split an Oreo and more

    The Saturday Six: Blockbuster has fans hoping for a comeback, scientists explore best way to split an Oreo and more

    [ad_1]

    Body Brokers | CBS Reports


    Body Brokers | CBS Reports

    22:37

    The weekend is finally here.

    During a busy news week, we learned methods you can use to find cheap airline flights, soccer star Ali Krieger announced her retirement and we delved into the legal landscape of ski crashes as Oscar-winning actor Gwyneth Paltrow appears in court for a trial over a 2016 collision at a Utah resort.

    The Trial Of Gwyneth Paltrow In Her Ski Accident Lawsuit Begins
    PARK CITY, UT: Actress Gwyneth Paltrow sits in court on March 23, 2023, in Park City, Utah. Terry Sanderson is suing Paltrow for $300,000, claiming she recklessly crashed into him while the two were skiing on a beginner run at Deer Valley Resort in Park City, Utah in 2016.

    Jeff Swinger / Getty Images


    Meanwhile, a five-planet alignment is expected in the night sky on March 28, the New Mexico Department of Fish and Game is seeking a professional bear hugger and we found out more about the fertility process of freezing eggs. 

    But that’s not nearly all. 

    Below is our weekly Saturday Six, a recap of half a dozen news stories — in no particular order — ranging from the heartfelt to the weird to the tragic, and everything in between. 

    • We looked into the unregulated market for bodies donated to science. From the story: Every year, an estimated 20,000 people donate their bodies to science for the purpose of medical research and education. But unlike organ donation, these body parts can be bought and sold for profit — a market with very few federal regulations.
    • Scientists created a seven-ingredient 3D printed cheesecake. From the story: Researchers with the department of mechanical engineering at Columbia University created a seven-ingredient slice of cake using a 3D printer, and they say printing foods could be a new cooking option with several benefits. 
    • Rental retailer Blockbuster ignited nostalgia after the company’s website became active again. From the story: In a tweet this month, the company joked about reopening: “New business idea: We’re going to come back as a bank and use VHS and DVDs as currency. Time to go visit your mom.”
    • We found out which cities are best — and worst — for those with seasonal allergies. From the story: The 2023 “Allergy Capitals” were determined based on pollen scores, over-the-counter medication use and the number of allergy specialists. 
    • If you want to track down your tax refund, we figured out some tips. From the story: There’s a good reason why many workers are anxious to get their hands on their refunds — the payment typically represents the biggest check most Americans will receive all year. And although refunds are 11% lower so far this tax season compared with a year earlier, it’s still a big chunk of change, averaging $2,972, according to the latest IRS data. 
    • Finally, if you’re a fan of Oreo cookies,a team of scientists from MIT took on the task of examining the science of Oreos — particularly, the best way to split them. From the story: They bestowed the tongue-in-check name “Oreology,” publishing their findings last year in the peer-reviewed journal Physics of Fluids. Determined to get to the bottom of the creme dispersion phenomenon, the team tested more than 1,000 Oreos, according to the Wall Street Journal, which earlier reported on the research.

    See you next week. Until then, follow CBS News on Twitter, YouTube and Facebook.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Gwyneth Paltrow testifies in a civil trial that she ‘froze’ in 2016 skiing crash at a Utah resort | CNN

    Gwyneth Paltrow testifies in a civil trial that she ‘froze’ in 2016 skiing crash at a Utah resort | CNN

    [ad_1]



    CNN
     — 

    Gwyneth Paltrow, the award-winning actress facing a civil trial for a 2016 skiing crash at a Utah resort, testified that she “froze” when a man allegedly skied directly into her back, causing them to collapse to the ground as their skis tangled together.

    Paltrow testified on Friday that the collision forced her legs apart as she felt someone from behind her.

    “I was skiing, and two skis came between my skis, forcing my legs apart. And then there was a body pressing against me. And there was a very strange grunting noise. So, my brain was trying to make sense of what was happening,” Paltrow testified. “I froze when he slid between my skis. I absolutely froze.”

    “I was confused at first, and I didn’t know exactly what was happening. It’s a very strange thing to happen on the ski slope,” Paltrow continued.

    Paltrow and the man both fell slowly and were nearly spooning once they hit the ground, “and I moved away quickly,” Paltrow said previously in a deposition read during the trial Friday in Park City, Utah.

    Friday marked the fourth day in the skiing crash case against Paltrow, who is being sued by Terry Sanderson, a 76-year-old retired optometrist – the man she maintains crashed into her in February 2016 at Deer Valley Resort in Park City.

    Meanwhile, Sanderson claims that Paltrow crashed into him and caused him lasting injuries and brain damage while they were both skiing on a beginner’s run. Sanderson also accuses Paltrow and her ski instructor of skiing away after the incident without getting him medical care.

    Kristin A. VanOrman, an attorney representing Sanderson, questioned Paltrow for nearly two hours Friday. At one point, VanOrman asked whether Paltrow can demonstrate the crash with her in at the courtroom, but the judge declined that request.

    Instead, VanOrman walked around the courtroom trying to reenact where the skis were and how Paltrow and Sanderson were positioned, based on how Paltrow described the incident.

    VanOrman asked Paltrow whether the actress had been present when paperwork about the crash was filled out, and Paltrow said she was not but that her ski instructor stayed with Sanderson and made sure he was OK.

    Later, Paltrow said she stayed on the mountain “long enough for him to say that he was OK” and to stand up, saying it was “absolutely not” a hit-and-run.

    Paltrow didn’t seek medical treatment after that crash, she said, but she pointed out her knee felt like it had been “over-stretched” and her “back hurt” and decided to go for a massage later that day.

    Sanderson had initially sued Paltrow for $3.1 million dollars, later amending his complaint to seek more than $300,000 in damages, according to court documents.

    Paltrow has filed a counter lawsuit in which she is seeking $1 in damages plus attorneys’ fees.

    Court is slated to resume Monday.

    VanOrman pressed Paltrow more than once about whether the actress had sought information about Sanderson’s medical condition following the crash.

    “I think you have to keep in mind when you’re the victim of a crash, right, your psychology is not necessarily thinking about the person who perpetrated it,” Paltrow testified.

    Paltrow also did not ask anyone at the resort about Sanderson “because at the time I did not know that he had sustained injuries like that. I thought it was very minor on the day,” she said.

    Throughout the testimony, Paltrow maintained that Sanderson skied into her and that she did not cause the crash.

    “Mr. Sanderson categorically hit me on that ski slope, and that is the truth,” adding that she feels sympathetic for him.

    “I feel very sorry for him. It seems like he’s had a very difficult life, but I did not cause the accident so I cannot be at fault for anything that subsequently happened to him,” she testified.

    The collision happened on the first day of a family trip that Paltrow, her now-husband Brad Falchuk and both of their children were attending. It was the first time Paltrow and her then-boyfriend were introducing their children to each other to gauge whether they had a future as a “blended family.”

    According to Paltrow’s countersuit, she “was enjoying skiing with her family on vacation in Utah, when Plaintiff – who was uphill from Ms. Paltrow – plowed into her back. She sustained a full ‘body blow.’ Ms. Paltrow was angry with Plaintiff, and said so. Plaintiff apologized. She was shaken and upset, and quit skiing for the day even though it was still morning.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Gwyneth Paltrow testifies in civil trial over Utah skiing accident

    Gwyneth Paltrow testifies in civil trial over Utah skiing accident

    [ad_1]

    Gwyneth Paltrow testifies in civil trial over Utah skiing accident – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Actress Gwyneth Paltrow took the stand in a Utah courtroom to testify in a civil trial over a 2016 skiing accident over claims she crashed into a retired optometrist at a Utah ski resort. The optometrist is seeking $300,000, while Paltrow is countersuing for a symbolic $1. Randy Kessler, a trial law professor at Emory University, joined CBS News to discuss the case.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Gwyneth Paltrow testifies in Utah ski crash lawsuit

    Gwyneth Paltrow testifies in Utah ski crash lawsuit

    [ad_1]

    Gwyneth Paltrow testifies in Utah ski crash lawsuit – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Actress Gwyneth Paltrow testified Friday in a civil trial in which she is accused of knocking down another skier on the slopes of the Deer Valley Resort in Utah back in 2016 and then skiing away, leaving him injured on the ground. Carter Evans has the details.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Gwyneth Paltrow in court: Actor offers ‘treats’ to security amid ski crash trial – National | Globalnews.ca

    Gwyneth Paltrow in court: Actor offers ‘treats’ to security amid ski crash trial – National | Globalnews.ca

    [ad_1]

    Actor and entrepreneur Gwyneth Paltrow is in the spotlight this week as she appears in court for a civil lawsuit regarding a 2016 skiing incident.

    Paltrow, 50, has been accused of causing serious injury to retired optometrist Terry Sanderson after she allegedly collided with him while skiing at Deer Valley Resort in Park City, Utah.

    Sanderson, 76, alleged Paltrow skied into him, “knocking him down hard, knocking him out.” He claimed the collision caused “permanent traumatic brain injury, 4 broken ribs, pain, suffering, loss of enjoyment of life.” He maintains that Paltrow left him collapsed on the slope and skied away. He is suing Paltrow for more than US$300,000.

    Read more:

    ‘Bachelor in Paradise Canada’: Meet the hopefuls looking for love

    Paltrow denies any responsibility for the crash and is countersuing for $1 and lawyers’ fees. She claims Sanderson is the one who hit her and is now suing to “exploit her celebrity and wealth.”

    Story continues below advertisement

    The trial is being livestreamed by multiple outlets. Both parties have agreed the trial will last eight days.

    Paltrow and Sanderson are expected to testify on Friday.

    Paltrow brings ‘treats for the bailiffs’

    On Thursday, the Goop founder brought “treats” for the law enforcement officers in the courtroom. Before testimony of the day began, Paltrow’s lawyer, Steve Owens, introduced the goodies.

    “Private security for my client wanted to bring in treats for the bailiffs for how helpful they’ve been,” Owens told the judge. “So, I wanted to do that transparently and see if there are any objections.”

    Sanderson’s lawyer, Lawrence Buhler, objected to the abnormal request.

    Read more:

    Gwyneth Paltrow to take the stand in $330K ski crash lawsuit

    Judge Kent Holmberg barred Paltrow and her people from distributing the treats in the courtroom.

    “OK, there’s an objection so thank you, but no thank you,” Holmberg said, noting either party could take the treats later if they decided to do so.

    It is not clear what kind of treats Paltrow was offering.

    Story continues below advertisement

    Media coverage and cameras in the courtroom

    Paltrow and her lawyers have been clearly upset with the amount of media coverage surrounding the civil trial. On Wednesday, the second day in court, Owens argued that a camera with a live video feed should not be pointed at Paltrow and her council table, as per alleged decorum agreements.

    “We have a new camera pointed directly at my client, right there, on the right,” Owens told the judge.

    Read more:

    Florida principal ousted after students shown Michelangelo’s David in class

    Paltrow removed her glasses and remained stoic. Owens said photographers had also swarmed Paltrow at her car outside the courtroom the day prior.

    Holmberg recognized the camera “as a problem” and said the court would investigate the request to divert the view and adjust proceedings accordingly. Holmberg did not make a ruling on photography outside of the courtroom.

    Story continues below advertisement

    Paltrow argues Sanderson’s injuries are exaggerated

    Paltrow and her lawyers have claimed Sanderson is exaggerating his “traumatic” injuries to capitalize on Paltrow’s celebrity and status.

    Psycho-neurologist Dr. Alina Fong, who is Sanderson’s witness, testified on Thursday that Sanderson was diagnosed with persistent post-concussive symptoms (PCS) after the ski incident. All of Sanderson’s medical witnesses have testified his injuries are consistent with someone crashing into him from behind.

    Read more:

    On the ground at the Zellers opening: Is it worth your money?

    Owens previously called Sanderson’s diagnosis and symptoms “utter BS.”

    Paltrow’s council said Sanderson was able to travel to 10 countries in the years following the ski accident. They also complained a separate witness for Sanderson, neuroradiology expert Dr. Wendell Gibby, did not review Sanderson’s 2009 MRI that allegedly showed he had sustained past brain injuries.

    “I’m famous … At what cost?”

    On the same day as the crash between Paltrow and Sanderson, the retired optometrist wrote an email to his daughters with the subject line “I’m famous.”

    In a string of emails back and forth, one of Sanderson’s daughters, Shae Herath, insinuated that the collision must have been caught on a GoPro camera. Much of the trial has revolved around whether that GoPro footage exists at all.

    Story continues below advertisement

    In her reply to Sanderson, Herath testified Friday that she changed the email’s subject line to “I’m famous …At what cost?”

    She clarified during her testimony that Sanderson called her and said there had been another skier on the hill with a GoPro – though she admitted her memory was “fuzzy,” as she had suffered an injury to her ACL around the same time as her father was allegedly hurt. She said she had never seen GoPro footage of the collision and was not sure it existed.

    Sanderson’s changing personality 

    Herath testified that her father’s personality changed for the worse as a result of the alleged brain injury.

    Trending Now

    She claimed the trauma left Sanderson frustrated, easily distracted and unable to multitask as he used to. She recalled an incident where Sanderson allegedly “belittled” her own young daughter, his granddaughter, to the point of tears over commotion surrounding how to close a van door.

    “He damaged his relationship with her because he was so awful to her,” she said.

    Herath claimed the behaviour was “uncharacteristic” of Sanderson prior to his accident.

    Mark Herath, Sanderson’s son-in-law, also testified Friday that Sanderson’s personality changed after the ski incident. He claimed Sanderson was hostile, paranoid and difficult to be around.

    Story continues below advertisement

    Polly Sanderson, Sanderson’s other daughter, testified earlier in the week. She was asked by Owens about an incident that allegedly saw Sanderson punch a man he believed to be having an affair with his ex-wife. Polly said she had no memory of the incident.

    After a brief recess, Owens apologized for “being an ass” to Polly. He said: “It was wrong for me to triangulate you, your dad and your sister and your mom, and I ask for your forgiveness.”

    Read more:

    Rapper Tekashi 6ix9ine hospitalized after attack in Florida gym, lawyer says

    Paltrow’s ‘Jeffrey Dahmer’ glasses

    Much of the online reaction to the Sanderson vs. Paltrow trial has surrounded Paltrow’s fashion choices.

    Since the first moments Paltrow appeared in court on Tuesday, social media was flooded with comments about her “Jeffrey Dahmer glasses.”

    Though currently in trend, the thin, gold wire frames, complete with a full brow bar, have a striking resemblance to the pair worn by Dahmer, an infamous American serial killer.

    Story continues below advertisement

    Story continues below advertisement

    —

    This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

    [ad_2]

    Sarah Do Couto

    Source link

  • Gwyneth Paltrow ski lawsuit: When skiers collide, who is at fault?

    Gwyneth Paltrow ski lawsuit: When skiers collide, who is at fault?

    [ad_1]

    Oscar-winning actress and businesswoman Gwyneth Paltrow is in court this week for a civil trial over a 2016 collision with another skier, with the case raising questions about who is legally liable when collisions occur on the slopes.

    In court arguments, lawyers for Paltrow and plaintiff Terry Sanderson have painted their clients as prudent skiers, while trading mutual accusations about who was at fault for a crash at Deer Valley resort in Park City, Utah. 

    Sanderson, 76, is expected to testify on Friday, while Paltrow also may take the stand. Sanderson’s lawyer has sought to portray the actor as out of touch, while Paltrow’s attorney cast doubt on Sanderson’s memory, noting his age and prior brain injuries. Paltrow, who also founded wellness and lifestyle brand GOOP, also alleges Sanderson sued her to exploit her fame and wealth.  

    Yet the case could turn on something more tangible, attorneys say: their location on the mountain when the crash occurred. 

    Uphill or downhill?

    Sanderson sued Paltrow, 50, in 2019, claiming she was skiing recklessly and crashed into him from above, causing serious injuries and emotional distress. Paltrow later countersued, claiming it was Sanderson who hit her from behind. 

    The case hinges on which of the two parties acted in an unreasonable manner while on skis, experts told CBS MoneyWatch.

    “When one skier hits another, the issue is negligence. Did they do something wrong?” said personal injury attorney Roger Kohn, of Kohn Roth Law.

    Gwyneth Paltrow Skiing Lawsuit
    Gwyneth Paltrow enters the courtroom after a lunch break in her trial, Thursday, March 23, 2023, in Park City, Utah, where she is accused in a lawsuit of crashing into a skier during a 2016 family ski vacation.

    Jeff Swinger / AP


    As far as conduct on the ski slopes go, it’s almost always the duty of the uphill skier to beware of the downhill skier. In other words, the downhill skier — the person who is further down the slope — has the right of way. 

    “The uphill skier has to watch out for the downhill skier. If you’re overtaking someone and hit them, chances are you are liable and at fault,” Kohn added. 

    According to the National Ski Areas Association’s responsibility code, which governs ski resorts in North America, “people ahead or downhill of you have the right of way. You must avoid them.”

    Skiers must also “always stay in control” and be able to stop to avoid other people.

    Collisions happen

    Ski collisions are not uncommon and when injuries result, lawyers sometimes get involved. 

    “Some lawyers based their whole career on ski accidents,” Bryn “Butch” Peterson, a veteran Colorado ski instructor, told CBS MoneyWatch. He added that he once saw a woman get hit by a skier who came “blasting out of a tree trail” in Vail, Colorado. 

    Gwyneth Paltrow Skiing Lawsuit
    Terry Sanderson arrives at court Tuesday, March 21, 2023, in Park City, Utah. The retired optometrist is suing actor Gwyneth Paltrow over a 2016 ski collision that took place at Deer Valley Resort.

    Rick Bowmer / AP


    But unlike that incident, most ski accidents aren’t caused by skier-skier or skier-snowboarder collisions; they happen when skiers hit a tree or other type of obstacle. 

    There were 57 reported fatal incidents during the 2021-2022 ski season, according to NSAA, most of which resulted from skiers hitting trees. Males represented 95% of all fatalities. There were an additional 54 reported “catastrophic” incidents during the same season.

    Homeowners insurance

    Most homeowners insurance policies also include general liability coverage that essentially follows a homeowner around even when they’re outside of their residence, including when they are on skis. 

    “It covers you if there’s something dangerous in your home or on your property and someone gets hurt and sues you, but it also follows you around if you’re at the grocery store and run a kid over with a shopping cart, and it covers ski collision claims,” said David Cutt, of Cutt, Kendell and Olson in Salt Lake City, Utah. 

    “So that’s what is going on here. In this case, if Paltrow has homeowners coverage, then that steps in and pays a settlement or a judgement unto the limits of the policy,” he said.

    Typically, a lawyer would only get involved if the defendant is wealthy or has homeowners insurance, according to Kohn. 

    “If you sue someone who doesn’t have homeowners coverage, it’s a waste of time,” he said. 

    But, he added, if they have insurance, that policy will kick in, and the insurer will defend the claim as well as pay it.

    It’s not always the case that one party is negligent in a two-person collision. 

    “But there is a clear case of liability if you can show the other skier was skiing too fast, acting improperly or should’ve seen the other skier,” he said.

    He said, she said

    Cutt said he’s tried dozens or more of these cases in Utah and the judgment always hinges on who the jury believes were the uphill and downhill skiers. 

    “In this trial, Sanderson says he was the downhill skier and she ran into him from behind, and she says exactly the opposite — that she was skiing along and he plowed into her from uphill,” Cutt said. 

    “So what it’s going to come down to is, the jury is going to listen to everybody about the collision itself and the aftermath and decide who they think is credible and who isn’t,” Cutt said. “And the fact that it’s Gwyneth Paltrow is the big elephant in the room.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Chris Martin No Longer Eats Dinner

    Chris Martin No Longer Eats Dinner

    [ad_1]

    Chris Martin has cut back from three square meals a day to one at the advice of The Boss.

    A week after his ex-wife Gwyneth Paltrow shared her controversial broth-based diet, the musician revealed his own complicated eating schedule on the Conan O’Brien Needs a Friend podcast published Monday, confessing that he doesn’t “actually have dinner anymore.” Martin explained, “I stop eating at 4, and I learned that from having lunch with Bruce Springsteen.” He added that he, “was lucky enough to go over there to lunch the day after [Coldplay] played Philadelphia last year,” noting that even before implementing Springsteen’s routine he already “was on a really strict diet anyway.” But when he sat down to eat with the legendary singer, Martin realized that the 73-year-old looked “more in shape” than him at the time. When Springsteen’s wife Patti Scialfa revealed that it’s because her husband “only eat[s] one meal a day,” Martin thought, “Well, there you go. That’s my next challenge.” He then joked that Springsteen’s one meal a day is comprised of a “flank of buffalo with a steroid sauce.”

    In 2021, Springsteen spoke with Tim McGraw in an interview for Apple Music, during which he was also asked about how he stays in top physical condition. “The biggest thing is diet, diet, diet,” the “Born in the U.S.A.” musician explained. “I don’t eat too much, and I don’t eat bad food, except for every once in a while when I want to have some fun for myself. So I think anybody that’s trying to get in shape, exercise is always important of course, but diet is 90 percent of the game.”

    And last week, Paltrow admitted that she is also a big fan of intermittent fasting, taking long stretches between eating and waiting until 12 p.m. to have her first meal of the day. On the March 13 episode of the Art of Being Well podcast, she said, “I have bone broth for [lunch] a lot of the days. Then for dinner I try to eat according to paleo, so lots of vegetables.” During the conversation, the Goop founder was also hooked up to an IV drip which she claims made her “feel so good.” Clips from that conversation went viral on TikTok and soon after stars like Tess Holliday and Meghan McCain accused the actor of disordered eating. But in an Instagram Story on Friday, Paltrow addressed some of those concerns, explaining that her diet choices are due to “very high levels of inflammation” caused by her battle with long COVID-19. “I have been really working to really focus on foods that aren’t inflammatory,” she explained. The former actor also noted that her eating habits are not “meant to be advice for anyone else” as they are “based on [her] medical results and extensive testing.”

    [ad_2]

    Emily Kirkpatrick

    Source link

  • Gwyneth Paltrow ski lawsuit: When two skiers collide, who is at fault?

    Gwyneth Paltrow ski lawsuit: When two skiers collide, who is at fault?

    [ad_1]

    Oscar-winning actress turned businesswoman Gwyneth Paltrow is appearing in court this week in a civil trial over a 2016 collision with another skier at Deer Valley resort in Park City, Utah. The lawsuit raises questions about who is liable when one skier hits another on the slopes.

    In court arguments, lawyers for Paltrow and plaintiff Terry Sanderson each painted their clients as conservative skiers who were stunned when the other party crashed into them from above. Sanderson’s lawyer described Paltrow as wealthy and out of touch, while Paltrow’s attorney cast doubt on Sanderson’s memory, noting his age of 76 and prior brain injuries.

    But it’s Paltrow’s location on the mountain in relation to Sanderson that will likely determine whether or not she’ll be ordered to pay him as much as millions in damages, attorneys say. 

    The Deer Valley guest sued Paltrow in 2019, claiming she was skiing recklessly and crashed into him from above, causing serious, permanent injuries and emotional distress. Paltrow later countersued, claiming it was Sanderson who hit her from behind. 

    Paltrow, who founded wellness and lifestyle brand GOOP, has alleged — and some legal experts speculate — that Sanderson sued her in an attempt to exploit her fame and wealth. 

    “He demanded Ms. Paltrow pay him millions. If she did not pay, she would face negative publicity resulting from his allegations,” her attorneys wrote in a 2019 court filing.

    US-ENTERTAINMENT-FILM-COURT-PALTROW
    Actress/entrepreneur Gwyneth Paltrow looks on before leaving the courtroom in Park City, Utah, on March 21, 2023, where she is accused in a lawsuit of crashing into a skier during a 2016 family ski vacation, leaving him with brain damage and four broken ribs. 

    RICK BOWMER/POOL/AFP via Getty Images


    Uphill or downhill?

    In any event, the case hinges on which of the two parties acted in an unreasonable manner while on skis. 

    “When one skier hits another, the issue is negligence. Did they do something wrong?” personal injury attorney Roger Kohn, of Kohn Roth Law, told CBS MoneyWatch.

    As far as conduct on the ski slopes go, it’s almost always the duty of the uphill skier to beware of the downhill skier. In other words, the downhill skier — the person who is further down the slope — has the right of way. 

    “The uphill skier has to watch out for the downhill skier. If you’re overtaking someone and hit them, chances are you are liable and at fault,” Kohn added. 

    According to the National Ski Areas Association’s responsibility code, which governs ski resorts in North America, “people ahead or downhill of you have the right of way. You must avoid them.”

    Skiers must also “always stay in control” and be able to stop to avoid other people.

    Collisions happen

    Ski collisions are not uncommon and when injuries result, lawyers sometimes get involved. 

    “Some lawyers based their whole career on ski accidents,” Bryn “Butch” Peterson, a veteran Colorado ski instructor, told CBS MoneyWatch. He added that he once saw a woman get hit by a skier who came “blasting out of a tree trail” in Vail, Colorado. 

    But unlike that incident, most ski accidents aren’t caused by skier-skier or skier-snowboarder collisions; they happen when skiers hit a tree or other type of obstacle. 

    There were 57 reported fatal incidents during the 2021-2022 ski season, according to NSAA, most of which resulted from skiers hitting trees. Males represented 95% of all fatalities. There were an additional 54 reported “catastrophic” incidents during the same season.

    screen-shot-2023-03-22-at-5-03-21-pm.png
    Plaintiff Terry Anderson, 76, at a press conference in 2019 in which he says Gwyneth Paltrow, 50, crashed into him while skiing in 2016, “causing a brain injury, four broken ribs and other serious injuries.”

    @TVDanRascon/Twitter


    Homeowners insurance

    Most homeowners insurance policies also include general liability coverage that essentially follows a homeowner around even when they’re outside of their residence, including when they are on skis. 

    “It covers you if there’s something dangerous in your home or on your property and someone gets hurt and sues you, but it also follows you around if you’re at the grocery store and run a kid over with a shopping cart, and it covers ski collision claims,” said David Cutt, of Cutt, Kendell and Olson in Salt Lake City, Utah. 

    “So that’s what is going on here. In this case, if Paltrow has homeowners coverage, then that steps in and pays a settlement or a judgement unto the limits of the policy,” he said.

    Typically, a lawyer would only get involved if the defendant is wealthy or has homeowners insurance, according to Kohn. 

    “If you sue someone who doesn’t have homeowners coverage, it’s a waste of time,” he said. 

    But, he added, if they have insurance, that policy will kick in, and the insurer will defend the claim as well as pay it.

    It’s not always the case that one party is negligent in a two-person collision. 

    “But there is a clear case of liability if you can show the other skier was skiing too fast, acting improperly or should’ve seen the other skier,” he said.


    Legal analyst on Gwyneth Paltrow ski accident trial in Utah

    03:46

    He said, she said

    Cutt said he’s tried dozens or more of these kinds of cases in Utah and the judgement always hinges on who the jury believes were the uphill and downhill skiers. 

    “In this trial, Sanderson says he was the downhill skier and she ran into him from behind, and she says exactly the opposite — that she was skiing along and he plowed into her from uphill,” Cutt said. 

    “So what it’s going to come down to is, the jury is going to listen to everybody about the collision itself and the aftermath and decide who they think is credible and who isn’t,” Cutt said. “And the fact that it’s Gwyneth Paltrow is the big elephant in the room.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link