ReportWire

Tag: Guns

  • Family of Black man killed by Aurora police intends to sue the city

    [ad_1]

    The family of Rajon Belt-Stubblefield served notice Monday to the city of Aurora that they intend to file a lawsuit in connection with the August shooting death of the unarmed Black man.

    Belt-Stubblefield was 37 when he was shot and killed by an Aurora police officer during an Aug. 30 traffic stop, and his then 18-year-old son witnessed the shooting. A notice of claim — a legal step necessary before suing the city — was filed on behalf of Belt-Stubblefield’s family and a second notice was filed on behalf of his son, Zion Murphy.

    The family, along with their lawyer Milo Schwab, held a news conference to announce the filing and then attended the Aurora City Council meeting where they spoke about a lack of transparency surrounding the shooting and a need for accountability for officer Matthew Neely, who fired the fatal shots. Neely’s name had not been released by the police department.

    “No child should ever have to witness that,” said Erica Murphy, Zion Murphy’s mother. “No child should have to carry the trauma for the rest of their life. Rajon was more than a headline. He was more than a police report. He was a father. He was loved. He mattered.”

    On the night of the shooting, Neely tried to pull over Belt-Stubblefield for speeding and a possible DUI near East Sixth Avenue and Sable Boulevard. Zion Murphy was driving behind his father in another car.

    AURORA, CO – FEBRUARY 23: Family and attorneys of Rajon Belt-Stubblefield hold a press conference at the Aurora Municipal Center to announce legal action concerning Belt-Stubblefield who was fatally shot by Aurora police last August on February 23, 2026 in Aurora, Colorado. After the press conference, the crowd gather inside the Aurora City Council chambers to address the mayor and council members. (Photo By Kathryn Scott/Special to The Denver Post)

    Belt-Stubblefield fled and then rear-ended one car before crossing a median and hitting a second vehicle. He was armed but tossed a handgun into the grass before walking toward the officer, Aurora police Chief Todd Chamberlain said at the time.

    Belt-Stubblefield ignored orders to stop and raised his hands, and Neely punched him in an attempt to de-escalate the situation, according to Chamberlain’s account in the days after the shooting. Belt-Stubblefield raised his fist and repeatedly asked if the officer was “ready for this,” Chamberlain said.

    The officer shot Belt-Stubblefield as he continued to move toward him, backing Neely into the street, Chamberlain said.

    Belt-Stubblefield died at the scene.

    But the notices of claim filed by Schwab offer a different perspective on what happened.

    Neely pointed his weapon at Belt-Stubblefield as soon as he exited his wrecked car, and Belt-Stubblefield asked the officer not to shoot him as he tossed his gun into the grass. Neely tried to grab Belt-Stubblefield by the neck and take him to the ground, but the officer is the one who fell, according to the notice of claim. Belt-Stubblefield did not take aggressive action and tried to walk away.

    Neely then followed Belt-Stubblefield, shoved him in the back and then as Belt-Stubblefield turned to speak to his son Neely “suckerpunched Mr. Belt-Stubblefield in the back of the head, causing Mr. Belt-Stubblefield to put his fists up to protect his head,” the notice of claim stated.

    Neely backed into the street with his gun and fired three times. The first two shots struck Belt-Stubblefield in the chest, and he stopped and looked at Neely. Neely then fired the third shot into Belton-Stubblefield’s head, killing him at the scene, the notice of claim said.

    Schwab said the city has not communicated with the family in the six months since the shooting, and the officer has not been disciplined for his actions.

    “We’ve given it six months,” he said. “We’re done waiting.”

    The shooting drew national attention, leading prominent civil rights attorney Ben Crump to visit with Belt-Stubblefield’s widow and to condemn the fatal shooting.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Phan brothers seek chance at release amid fallout from State Police investigator’s fatal crash

    [ad_1]

    LOWELL — The Phan brothers charged in the 2020 killing of Tyrone Phet are asking a Middlesex Superior Court judge to reconsider the bail orders that have kept them behind bars for nearly five and a half years, arguing that new allegations of misconduct by a State Police homicide detective have thrown the case off course.

    In a motion filed on Feb. 13, attorney Mark Wester — representing Billy Phan — argues that the recent disclosure that State Police Sgt. Scott Quigley’s alleged intoxication and speeding in a 2023 fatal crash qualifies as the kind of “changed circumstances” that Massachusetts law requires for bail reconsideration, writing that the revelations have “delayed the just resolution of this case.”

    In the motion, Wester asks Judge Chris Barry‑Smith to reconsider holding Phan without bail and “grant him a reasonable cash bail.”

    Attorneys Lorenzo Perez and William Dolan filed similar motions on behalf of Channa Phan and Billoeum Phan.

    The three brothers, all in their 30s, each face life in prison without the possibility of parole after being charged with first‑degree murder in the shooting of 22‑year‑old Phet outside his home at 50 Spring Ave. in Lowell during the early‑morning hours of Sept. 14, 2020.

    Phet — a 2016 Chelmsford High graduate and former high school football standout — was struck by gunfire eight times, with one bullet passing through both lungs and his heart and another entering and exiting his brain.

    Police recovered 21 spent shell casings at the scene, including ten 10mm casings and eleven .40‑caliber casings.

    The Phan brothers have been held without bail since their arrests in October 2020.

    Dolan said earlier this month that while defendants in first‑degree murder cases are typically held without bail, the circumstances surrounding Quigley’s alleged misconduct justify reconsideration.

    Quigley — a key investigator in the Phan case — is accused of being under the influence of alcohol and speeding while on duty in a State Police cruiser when he crossed into oncoming traffic and caused the December 2023 Woburn crash that killed 37‑year‑old Angelo Schettino, a paraplegic man with special needs.

    Dolan also pointed to the outcome of the brothers’ first trial in November 2024, which ended in a hung jury and a mistrial, forcing the case into a second trial cycle.

    “Because (the Middlesex District Attorney’s Office) didn’t meet their burden in their first trial and because of all the other things going on, they shouldn’t have to wait in jail,” Dolan said of the Phan brothers.

    The defense had asked that the bail review be taken up alongside an evidentiary hearing they are seeking into the handling of Quigley’s 2023 crash.

    The defense has argued that the evidentiary hearing is necessary because they believe the State Police and the Middlesex District Attorney’s Office covered up information about Quigley after the crash.

    Quigley, who was assigned as a homicide investigator to the Middlesex District Attorney’s Office and played a central role in the Phan investigation, has since been suspended without pay. His crash has been referred to the Suffolk District Attorney’s Office for possible criminal charges. Schettino’s mother, Lynn Schettino, is also pursuing a civil‑rights lawsuit against the State Police over her son’s death.

    Michael Mahoney, who represents Schettino’s mother in the civil‑rights case, said of Quigley, “It keeps coming for this guy.”

    In the motion requesting the evidentiary hearing, the Phan brothers’ defense team states testimony from Quigley and another 18 members of law enforcement is needed to determine whether there was an effort to shield him from scrutiny and to establish why his toxicology results were not disclosed to the Phan defense until jury selection in January.

    Prosecutors were originally ordered to respond to the evidentiary‑hearing motion by Friday, but the Middlesex District Attorney’s Office requested — and was granted — an extension until Monday.

    Dolan said on Friday that he and his client were frustrated to learn the extension had been granted to the DA’s office, calling it “just more of the same dragging their feet.”

    The requests for the bail and evidentiary hearings come as the brothers’ retrial remains frozen, with Barry‑Smith halting jury selection late last month and dismissing the 12 jurors who had already been seated.

    The judge paused the proceedings after the disclosures about Quigley surfaced during jury selection, prompting the court to order a full review before the case could continue.

    Defense attorneys have also moved to dismiss the charges against the Phan brothers entirely, stating the delayed disclosures and questions surrounding Quigley’s conduct have irreparably tainted the prosecution.

    In the meantime, a new retrial date is currently scheduled to begin on April 27.

    The Middlesex District Attorney’s Office was unavailable for comment on the status of its response to the evidentiary‑hearing motion.

    Follow Aaron Curtis on X @aselahcurtis, or on Bluesky @aaronscurtis.bsky.social.

    [ad_2]

    Aaron Curtis

    Source link

  • East Bay juvenile, 4 others arrested after police chase

    [ad_1]

    A pursuit in Vallejo last week led to the recovery of three loaded firearms and two suspects booked into Solano County Jail.

    [ad_2]

    Thomas Gase

    Source link

  • Houston woman goes out of town. Then she realizes she’s missing 3 Rolexes, an $8K Chanel bag, and ammunition. Then she checks the Ring camera

    [ad_1]

    Dog and home sitters have become a popular alternative to kennels, but just how safe is it? As TikToker Halie Hope (@halie.hope1) found out, there is always a risk.

    In the tearful clip, Hope explained what happened, earning over 57,200 views. Approximately a year ago, her boyfriend hired a woman for dog and house sitting. Over time, the couple “built trust” with the girl, even letting her host friends and have small pool parties at their home. Hopped added that they learned to count on her.

    However, after a weekend work trip, Hope returned exhausted. The next day, she woke up to find that multiple valuables were missing. These included a PlayStation, four watches (including three Rolexes), a $12,000 tennis bracelet, an $8,000 Chanel bag, an AR-15, and various other guns and ammunition.

    Through the Ring camera, Hope said that she discovered “sketchy” people entering their home to party with the house sitter. So, she decided to call the sitter and nonchalantly mention that items were missing. The sitter allegedly replied, “Oh, really?”

    Hope also said she asked for the names and numbers of the people in their home.

    The Ring camera also showed these people arriving with a pack of beer and BuzzBalls. Their faces are in full view.

    @halie.hope1 ♬ original sound – Halie Hope

    Things soon escalate

    According to the camera, they left the property at 2:30 am and returned at 4 am wearing masks. They let her eight-month-old dog out in the front yard and entered the home. This causes the dog to get agitated and bark, but, according to Hope, the sitter said she was asleep.

    Hope then went on to explain how the incident impacted her two dogs. One of them broke the kennel and peed all around it as they tried to escape, while the other couldn’t stop barking.

    Cumulatively, Hope says that close to $40,000 of “prized possessions” were stolen, while her dogs remain “on edge.”

    “I feel violated, betrayed. I don’t feel safe in my own house because they know where they live, and they know what we have,” she said.

    Since the incident, Hope shared that she was getting a new security system and that there was an active police investigation.

    “You can’t take away this feeling, you can’t take away with what you did to my dogs,” Hope concluded.

    “Just be really careful in who you have in your home and who they have in your home,” she said. “And learn from this because this is the worst feeling ever.”

    As a final note, she also advised viewers to schedule all valuables on their home insurance policy.

    Essentially, there were two types of comments. Those who sympathized with Hope, and those who believe that she could have done more.

    “I’m sorry to be the one to say this but whyyyy was this stuff at reaches way, why not lock a closet or draw?” one asked. “I’m sorry this happened but why on earth would you leave Rolex and tennis bracelets in the house when you’re gone?” a second repeated.

    And a third chimed in, “Umm why would y’all leave all that out? That’s why you need a safe. Nobody is to be trusted ever.”

    Others urged her to call the police.

    “Guns?” a fourth wrote. “Ugh! You need to report this to the police!”

    “Stealing guns is a federal offense and the ATF should be involved,” a fifth advised. “I’m so sorry this happened to you.”

    Similarly, a sixth said, “Make sure you press charges on her too! Don’t drop those charges no matter what! I’m so sorry.”

    Is stealing a gun really a federal offense?

    Gun theft is indeed a federal offense.

    Federal laws governed under the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) dictate that stealing a gun is a serious crime, for which you can face up to 10 years in prison.

    According to Cannon & Associates’ law firm, stealing a firearm is a crime regardless of a gun’s value because the weapon can be used to commit other crimes.

    TikToker opens up about the theft in an interview with The Mary Sue

    In an Instagram direct message interview with The Mary Sue, Hope shared that, while the police investigation was still ongoing, two arrests had been made (although none of them were the house-sitter). She also shared that none of her belongings had been recovered.

    “I wanted to make a TikTok about this happening to urge people to make sure they list their valuables on their homeowners policy in case an incident happens,” she explained.  In our case, we are not able to get any compensation because our valuables were not scheduled on the policy. And secondly, I wanted to remind people to be very careful on who they allow in their homes and who they trust.”

    She added that while the reception to her video has been “great,” she also received some hate comments questioning why valuables weren’t in a safe. “The main takeaway is that you can never be too careful when it comes to protecting your home,” she concluded. “Security, locks, and insurance are very important.”

    Have a tip we should know? [email protected]

    Image of Charlotte Colombo

    Charlotte Colombo

    Charlotte is an internet culture writer with bylines in Insider, VICE, Glamour, The Independent, and more. She holds a Master’s degree in Magazine Journalism from City St George’s, University of London.

    [ad_2]

    Charlotte Colombo

    Source link

  • Man charged after boy hurt in accidental gun discharge inside Anne Arundel Co. elementary school – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    A man has been charged after a gun was fired inside an Anne Arundel County, Maryland, elementary school classroom, injuring a 7-year-old boy.

    A man has been charged after a gun was fired inside an Anne Arundel County, Maryland, elementary school classroom, injuring a 7-year-old boy.

    Eashan John Stefanski, 34, of Pasadena, was charged with leaving a loaded firearm accessible to a minor, Anne Arundel County police said in an update Thursday.

    The charge follows an incident Wednesday morning at Freetown Elementary School in Glen Burnie, during which the boy accidentally discharged a firearm, injuring his hand. The child was taken to Baltimore Shock Trauma for treatment of injuries that authorities said were not life-threatening.

    Detectives found that the gun was obtained from the child’s residence. Stefanski is the boyfriend of the child’s mother, The Baltimore Banner reported.

    A teacher took possession of the firearm and rendered aid to the student, a police spokesperson said. None of the other children in the classroom were injured.

    Freetown students were dismissed early Wednesday and returned to school Thursday morning.

    Anne Arundel County Public Schools Superintendent Mark Bedell said crisis counselors would be available Wednesday and Thursday to handle any trauma in the school community.

    “When we hear calls like this, especially involving children or elderly, it’s very unsettling for all of us, because there’s so many unknowns,” Anne Arundel County police Chief Amal Awad said during a news conference after the shooting.

    WTOP’s Ciara Wells contributed to this report.

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2026 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    [ad_2]

    Abigail Constantino

    Source link

  • Are guns barred at protests, as Patel said? Mostly not

    [ad_1]

    After the fatal shooting of concealed carry permitholder Alex Pretti, debate over gun rights added a new layer to the federal government’s aggressive immigration enforcement activity in Minneapolis.

    Top Trump administration officials said because Pretti carried a handgun and ammunition, he planned to assassinate law enforcement.

    The day after Pretti was killed, FBI Director Kash Patel discussed the case on Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures.” 

    Patel said, “You cannot bring a firearm loaded with multiple magazines to any sort of protest that you want. It’s that simple. You don’t have the right to break the law and incite violence.”

    The administration shared an image of a gun and extra ammunition it said Border Patrol agents took from Pretti on Jan. 24 on Nicollet Avenue in south Minneapolis. 

    Video footage that surfaced in the first 48 hours after the shooting does not show Pretti holding the gun in his hands or pointing it at federal agents at any point. Some footage shows agents had disarmed Pretti shortly before he was shot.

    The administration said the Department of Homeland Security would conduct an internal investigation, but its scope was reportedly limited

    The shooting of a protester who had a concealed carry permit prompted criticism by gun-rights advocates, who pointed to Second Amendment protections.

    “Every peaceable Minnesotan has the right to keep and bear arms — including while attending protests, acting as observers, or exercising their First Amendment rights,” the Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus wrote. “These rights do not disappear when someone is lawfully armed, and they must be respected and protected at all times.”

    The FBI declined to comment for this article. Patel sought to clarify his stance in a Jan. 26 interview with Fox News’ Sean Hannity, saying, “We are not going after people and infringing on their freedom of speech to peacefully protest. We are definitely not going after people in their Second Amendment rights to bear arms — only if you incite violence and or threaten to do harm to law enforcement officials and break the law in any other way.”

    We asked 13 legal experts about Patel’s statement. They agreed that Patel was wrong about the Minnesota law, although they cautioned that some states do ban guns at protests. 

    In general, “There is no blanket prohibition or long-standing tradition against bringing otherwise lawfully owned and carried firearms to a protest, parade, demonstration, or other public event,” said Clark Neily, senior vice president for legal studies at the libertarian Cato Institute. “To the contrary, the default practice or tradition is that someone who is lawfully carrying a firearm may bring it to public gatherings, including protests and demonstrations.”

    It hasn’t been unusual to see people carrying guns at protests in recent years, such as at a 2020 protest against Michigan’s pandemic laws at the state capitol in Lansing.

    Was Pretti within his rights to carry a gun?

    Experts widely agree that because the state legally permitted Pretti to carry a gun, he was within his rights in Minnesota to do so, including at a protest.

    While some states’ laws restrict guns at protests, “Minnesota has no such law in place,” said Konstadinos Moros, director of legal research and education at the Second Amendment Foundation. 

    Eleven states and the District of Columbia ban concealed weapons at demonstrations and protests, and 11 states and the district ban open carry of weapons at demonstrations or protests, according to a tracker assembled by the anti gun-violence group Giffords. Of these, seven states and D.C. ban both.

    Several gun law experts also told PolitiFact they are unaware of any states that explicitly ban something else Patel mentioned: extra magazines for ammunition. 

    Some social media commentators said Pretti broke the law by not physically carrying his permit or other identification. (Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and former top Customs and Border Patrol official in Minneapolis Greg Bovino have alleged that Pretti carried no ID.) State law says not carrying a permit is a “petty misdemeanor” subject to a fine of up to $25. Such a violation “does not constitute a crime,” state law says.

    Federal officials have said that Pretti went beyond observing and was interfering with a law enforcement activity. Experts agreed that Pretti would have been legally barred from threatening, interfering with or lying to officers. “As a general matter, peacefully observing a demonstration is different from criminally obstructing law enforcement,” said David B. Kopel, research director at the conservative Independence Institute.

    Video footage that has surfaced so far does not show that Pretti criminally obstructed law enforcement, though uncertainties and gaps remain. Some footage begins as he helps a woman who had been pushed into the snow by a federal agent; he was holding a phone in his hand.

    A majority of states have more expansive laws than Minnesota’s, allowing concealed carrying of guns without a permit. “In those states with broad public-carry rights, the mere fact that an individual is armed at a protest is not itself a crime,” said Darrell Miller, a University of Chicago law professor. 

    What have courts said about gun rights at protests?

    Legal experts said the Supreme Court’s record bolsters a Second Amendment right to carry guns at protests, which are sometimes referred to in laws as “public gatherings” or “assemblies.”

    The most recent notable Supreme Court decision is New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. Bruen from 2022. The justices, in a 6-3 decision, found that the right to carry a firearm in public for self-defense has deep historical roots, and that a “special need” is not necessary to exercise it.

    The decision allowed states to ban public carry in certain “sensitive places,” such as schools and government buildings, and some states have moved to restrict the carrying of firearms at some events, such as protests, said Timothy Zick, a William & Mary Law School professor. Whether those laws would pass muster at the Supreme Court depends on whether there were similar laws during the 18th and possibly the 19th century, Zick said.

    A Supreme Court case currently under review, Wolford v. Lopez, will decide whether Hawaii can restrict people’s ability to bring guns onto private property that is open to the public. As part of the previous ruling, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals struck down California’s ban on carrying guns at public gatherings. Moros said that victory at an appeals court that’s “pretty hostile” to the Second Amendment is notable.

    In another decision released Jan. 20, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals found that Maryland’s prohibition on carrying guns near public demonstrations is constitutional. This split between circuits could make the Supreme Court more likely to weigh in on a case that explicitly involves protests and gun rights, Moros said.

    Neily agreed that based on the recent court record, it’s “quite likely that laws against carrying otherwise lawfully possessed firearms at protests and other public events would be struck down under the Second Amendment.”

    Our ruling

    Patel said, “You cannot bring a firearm loaded with multiple magazines to any sort of protest that you want. It’s that simple.”

    Some states have laws that ban guns at protests, but Minnesota’s concealed carry law does not include such a ban. Pretti had a concealed carry permit. Even if he did not have the permit or an ID on him at the time, Minnesota law considers that a minor infraction. Some states’ laws are more permissive than Minnesota, allowing people to bring guns to protests even if they don’t have a concealed carry permit, as Pretti did.

    The statement contains an element of truth — the legality of bringing guns to protests depends on the state — but ignores that this incident happened in Minnesota, where the law allows guns at protests. We rate the statement Mostly False.

    CLARIFICATION, Jan. 27, 2026: This version clarifies the description of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision on a California law.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • US late night TV addresses Alex Pretti shooting: “Guns are the problem?”

    [ad_1]

    A number of hosts of late-night TV shows have been reacting to the fatal shooting of Alex Pretti by a federal agent in Minneapolis, tearing into the administration for its response to the incident.

    On Monday, The Daily Show‘s Jon Stewart questioned the assertions made by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and other officials that the fact that Pretti, a lawful gun owner, had a 9 mm semiautomatic handgun on his person at a protest was an indication that he was not there peacefully.

    “Are you saying that the problem is the guy had a gun?” Stewart said. “Are you saying that the guns are the problem? Is everyone on the right coming together to say carrying a legal firearm was the problem?”

    Newsweek reached out to DHS via email for comment.

    Why It Matters

    Pretti, 37, was an intensive care nurse who worked at a Department of Veterans Affairs hospital in Minneapolis and was shot by a U.S. Border Patrol agent on Saturday.

    DHS has said the Border Patrol agent fired in self-defense, saying that Pretti had a handgun and resisted law enforcement; however, other accounts say that the released video footage instead shows Pretti having his gun taken from him before he was shot and that all he had in his hands was his cellphone.

    Some reports have said that Border Patrol commander-at-large Greg Bovino was expected to be removed from his role in Minneapolis following the incident, but DHS has said the claims are not true and that Bovino “has not been relieved of his duties.”

    What To Know

    On his show on Monday evening, during a segment on the shooting of Pretti, Stewart also showed a clip of Bovino at a press conference that was reportedly cut short after only two questions.

    Stewart said that he had a lot of questions, like “who’s going to investigate this horrific killing by the Department of Homeland Security that the Department of Homeland Security has clearly misrepresented?”

    In a reference to O.J. Simpson, the former NFL star who was accused of killing his ex-wife, Stewart added: “Oh, good luck finding the real killer, O.J. We’re rooting for ya.” Simpson’s case is often described as the “Trial of the Century,” and while he was found not guilty of murdering his ex-wife and her friend, he was later found liable for the deaths in a lawsuit.

    “And pardon me for not trusting that the administration is going to do a fair and free investigation, when they are already going out on TV, moving the goalposts on why the shooting was justified, whether he was brandishing the weapon or not,” Stewart said.

    Stewart said Bovino was the “Border Patrol commander-in-short,” while Jimmy Kimmel said on Jimmy Kimmel Live! on Monday that Bovino was Trump’s “number one icehole.”

    In Monday’s show, Stewart played a clip of Bovino saying that politicians, community leaders and some journalists had been calling law enforcement “names like Gestapo.” The Gestapo was the official secret police of Nazi Germany, who were known to wear long trench coats.

    Stewart then showed a photo of Bovino wearing a dark trench coat. Stewart said, “It is slightly terrifying to Americans that you seem to be dressing for the job you want.”

    Kimmel also said during his show on Monday, while discussing Pretti’s death, that the Trump administration “won’t even admit that it was a mistake.”

    “They say the Honda SUV that Renee Good was driving was weaponized, they say the gun Alex Pretti had a license to carry in an open carry state…a gun that Alex Pretti did not even draw, did not touch, a gun that was taken from him by one of the agents before he was shot dead by the other ones,” Kimmel said. “They fired 10 times on an ICU nurse. They’re telling us, well, it was justified.”

    “Is that the law and order you voted for, if you voted for this?” Kimmel asked.

    What People Are Saying

    Jimmy Kimmel said on Monday’s show: “Can we agree that peaceful protesters, including moms driving SUVs on their way back after dropping their 6-year-old off at school, and a nurse who stepped in to protect a woman from harm, don’t deserve to be shot dead in the street by the people we are paying to protect us?”

    White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Monday: “Mr. Bovino is a wonderful man and he’s a great professional. He is very much going to continue CBP throughout and across the country. Mr. Homan will be the main point of contact on the ground in Minneapolis.”

    DNC Communications Director Rosemary Boeglin said on Monday: “Greg Bovino’s firing should be the first, not the last. An American citizen was murdered this weekend at the hands of federal agents. Donald Trump can hide away at movie screenings of ‘Melania,’ but the American people know he’s behind this campaign of terror and violence. And they won’t forget that in the immediate wake of a tragic murder, Trump, JD Vance and DHS Secretary Kristi Noem took to the airwaves to slander the victim and spread lies. Trump and Vance should immediately fire Noem, Stephen Miller, and Corey Lewandowski — or else they are sending a clear message to voters that getting murdered for exercising your constitutional rights is acceptable in Trump’s America.”

    In a polarized era, the center is dismissed as bland. At Newsweek, ours is different: The Courageous Center—it’s not “both sides,” it’s sharp, challenging and alive with ideas. We follow facts, not factions. If that sounds like the kind of journalism you want to see thrive, we need you.

    When you become a Newsweek Member, you support a mission to keep the center strong and vibrant. Members enjoy: Ad-free browsing, exclusive content and editor conversations. Help keep the center courageous. Join today.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump didn’t write ‘only criminals carry guns.’ It’s fake.

    [ad_1]

    After federal immigration agents shot and killed Alex Pretti in Minneapolis, social media users shared a screenshot of what appeared to be a Truth Social post, leaving some people confused about an apparent shift in President Donald Trump’s gun control views. 

    But Trump never shared such a post. It was fabricated. 

    X, Facebook and Threads users shared on Jan. 24 and 25 images of the supposed Truth Social post and tagged the National Rifle Association’s social media accounts. 

    “He had a gun, only criminals carry guns on our streets, we need law and order. Thank you for your attention to this matter. President Donald J. Trump,” reads what looks like a screenshot of the Truth Social post. 

    (Screenshot of a Threads post showing a fabricated Truth Social post.)

    A Facebook user shared the screenshot in a Facebook group writing, “Yo, Second Amendment bros. I’m so confused.”

    This post is not on Trump’s Truth Social account or in an archive that saves his current and deleted Truth Social posts. 

    After Pretti was killed, Trump posted a picture and long message on Truth Social, writing, “This is the gunman’s gun, loaded (with two additional full magazines!), and ready to go – What is that all about?”

    The NRA issued a “fake news alert” on X advising users not to believe the screenshot of the Truth Social post circulating online.

    “As bad actors among us attempt to further divide our country, it is now more important than ever to be vigilant against AI-generated content meant to mislead Americans,” the NRA wrote Jan. 25.

    We rate the claim that Trump posted on Truth Social that “only criminals carry guns on our streets” Pants on Fire!

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Phan brothers murder retrial set to begin Monday, weather permitting

    [ad_1]

    LOWELL — The murder retrial of Billy, Billoeum, and Channa Phan is officially ready to proceed.

    Jury impanelment is scheduled to begin in Middlesex Superior Court on Monday morning — or Tuesday if the winter storm forces the Kiernan Judicial Center to close.

    The schedule was set on Friday during the final pretrial hearing, where Judge Chris Barry-Smith also denied a defense motion to dismiss the indictment against one of the three brothers, each charged with first-degree murder for the shooting death of 22-year-old Tyrone Phet outside his Lowell home in 2020.

    Barry-Smith rejected the bid by attorney William Dolan, who represents defendant Channa Phan, ruling that although the Middlesex District Attorney’s Office failed to turn over information tied to a gang-motive theory in a timely fashion, the lapse did not rise to the level requiring dismissal.

    The motion stemmed from the prosecution’s recent attempt to broaden the scope of gang‑related evidence in the retrial, namely introducing details about a Sept. 13, 2020 drive‑by shooting at 478 Wilder St.

    Prosecutors have argued the residence functioned as a stash house for the Outlaws, street gang, which they claim the Phan brothers are members of. Due to the shooting, a search warrant was obtained by the Lowell Police for the Wilder Street home, where officers seized guns, ammunition, 200 grams of cocaine, and 100,000 pressed pills containing methamphetamine.

    The shooting — allegedly carried out by rival gang Crazy Mob Family — triggered a retaliatory motive for the killing of Phet less than 24 hours later.

    Phet was not alleged to be a CMF member, but prosecutors contend he lived in the same Spring Avenue building where a CMF member once resided.

    Phet was shot to death in a hail of gunfire while sitting in his car outside the multi-family residence at 55 Spring Ave. Phet — a 2016 Chelmsford High graduate and captain of the football team his senior year — was struck eight times during the shooting.

    The Lowell Police recovered 21 spent shell casings at the scene from two different caliber guns.

    Barry‑Smith said the prosecution’s decision to pursue a broader gang theory in the retrial “not surprisingly” prompted the defense to seek all information police and prosecutors possessed about the Wilder Street shooting and subsequent search warrant.

    Prior to the first trial — which ended in a mistrial after jurors became deadlocked —prosecutors turned over the police report about the incident but not the underlying investigative materials, Barry‑Smith said. That omission was not a major point of contention at the time because the initial trial’s lead prosecutor — former Middlesex Assistant District Attorney Daniel Harren — had elected not to pursue a wide‑ranging gang theory.

    Once the new prosecution team sought to expand that scope, Barry‑Smith said, they were obligated to produce the full set of Wilder Street information — something they did not do until recent weeks.

    “The Commonwealth’s principal shortcoming is that failure to produce Wilder Street information once it determined Wilder Street was relevant to the case,” Barry‑Smith said, adding that a secondary issue was that prosecutors “were not adequately familiar” with what evidence had been turned over during the first four years of the case, leading to a misunderstanding.

    The judge described the discovery violation as the product of “mistake, inadvertence, misunderstanding, and a failure to be fully familiar” with prior disclosures — not an attempt to ambush the defense.

    “It was not delivered, nor was it designed to spring evidence upon the defense,” Barry‑Smith said.

    The judge reiterated that he has already denied the Commonwealth’s request to expand the scope of gang evidence for the retrial, calling the proposed showing “too thin.”

    The Wilder Street material may be considered for rebuttal, but that will depend on how the trial unfolds.

    Because prosecutors have since turned over the missing materials, and because the expanded gang theory will not be permitted, Barry‑Smith said dismissal was not warranted.

    “I don’t find that the District Attorney’s Office’s conduct was purposeful or egregious,” he said.

    As for jury selection, the expectation is it will take two days to get the needed pool of 16 jurors.

    The trial will run daily from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. each day, with an hour‑long lunch break. Barry‑Smith said the case is expected to conclude by the end of the week of Feb. 9.

    Middlesex Assistant District Attorney Thomas Brant told Barry-Smith that the prosecution intends to call more than 40 witnesses.

    Brant also raised a scheduling wrinkle: Feb. 8 is Super Bowl Sunday, and with the New England Patriots still in contention for a spot in Super Bowl 60 as of the hearing, juror availability and the scheduling of witnesses could be affected.

    “I don’t care, and my desire is to move the case as quickly as possible, but …” Brant said.

    “I hadn’t thought of that,” Barry‑Smith replied, adding that he may delay the Feb. 9 start time to as late as 10 a.m.

    “I might delay things on that Monday, but I’m not going to call it off,” he said.’

    The Sun will publish weekly wrap-ups on the trial’s progress, with summaries appearing this Sunday and again on Feb. 8. A final story detailing the verdict will follow shortly after the jury reaches a decision, with the latest possible publication date being Feb. 15.

    Follow Aaron Curtis on X @aselahcurtis, or on Bluesky @aaronscurtis.bsky.social. 

    [ad_2]

    Aaron Curtis

    Source link

  • Armed 14-year-old among 2 arrested at Charlotte New Year’s Eve event, CMPD says

    [ad_1]

    Workers test the lights on a crown backstage at Charlotte’s New Year’s celebration in this file photo. During the city’s 2025 New Year’s Eve celebrations in uptown, police made fewer arrests than in 2024.

    Workers test the lights on a crown backstage at Charlotte’s New Year’s celebration in this file photo. During the city’s 2025 New Year’s Eve celebrations in uptown, police made fewer arrests than in 2024.

    Observer file photo

    Officers arrested two teens on weapons charges and seized two guns during Charlotte’s New Year’s Eve celebration in uptown, Charlotte-Mecklenburg police said Thursday.

    A 14-year-old was charged with carrying a concealed weapon and possession of a stolen firearm, police said. An 18-year-old was charged with carrying a concealed weapon.

    CMPD didn’t say if they know how the 14-year-old got a gun or whether a parent will be charged. Police didn’t reply to an email Thursday.

    Police reported no major incidents at the city’s annual celebration , including at Romare Bearden Park and Truist Field.

    “At last year’s celebration, officers made 18 arrests and confiscated six guns, The Charlotte Observer reported .

    Eight adults were also arrested on drug, weapon, disorderly conduct and other charges during the 2025 celebration. And 10 young people ages 10 through 15 were arrested on charges of violating the city’s youth protection ordinance, possession of marijuana and possession of drug paraphernalia.

    On Thursday, CMPD thanked these agencies for helping protect public safety on Wednesday night: Charlotte Fire Department, MEDIC, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Emergency Management, North Carolina State Highway Patrol, Mecklenburg County Alcohol Beverage Control, N.C. Division of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention and the FBI.

    This story was originally published January 1, 2026 at 10:47 AM.

    Related Stories from Charlotte Observer

    Joe Marusak

    The Charlotte Observer

    Joe Marusak has been a reporter for The Charlotte Observer since 1989 covering the people, municipalities and major news events of the region, and was a news bureau editor for the paper. He currently reports on breaking news.
    Support my work with a digital subscription

    [ad_2]

    Joe Marusak

    Source link

  • Lowell High students released on bail after alleged armed robbery

    [ad_1]

    LOWELL — Two Lowell High School students and two unidentified juveniles are facing several charges, including armed robbery, after police say they attacked a teenage boy and stole his backpack shortly after he stepped off a bus on Lincoln Street earlier this month.

    Devonathan Thanongsinh and Fidell Chan, both 18, along with two 17-year-old boys whose names were redacted from Lowell Police reports due to their age, are accused of striking the victim in the face with a handgun that officers later recovered.

    Police said they have not determined which suspect wielded the weapon.

    The group also allegedly assaulted the victim’s 58-year-old grandfather when he tried to intervene in the attack.

    According to an officer’s incident report, the assault occurred shortly after 3 p.m. on Dec. 5, when police were called to the 400 block of Lincoln Street for a report of a teen who had been attacked “by a group of kids” on the sidewalk.

    When one of the responding officers arrived in the area, he saw a blue Mazda traveling the wrong way on a one‑way section of Lincoln Street and noticed a pickup truck farther up the road that appeared to have been involved in a crash. The Mazda, meanwhile, had heavy damage to its doors and tires, the report said.

    The driver of the Mazda — later identified by police as Thanongsinh — attempted to maneuver around the cruiser but was unable to get by. The officer activated his lights and conducted a traffic stop.

    “(Thanongsin) … denied being involved,” the officer said in the report. “I then asked what had happened to the vehicle in which he did not have an answer.”

    The officer reported that three other “young male” occupants were inside the Mazda with Thanongsinh, including the two 17‑year‑old boys and Chan, who was seated in the rear driver’s‑side seat.

    As the officer was speaking with the group, he was approached by a woman who said her son — whose name was redacted from the report — had just been assaulted by the four males in the Mazda.

    According to the report, the woman told police she was inside her Lincoln Street home when she heard screaming outside. She tried calling her son, but he did not answer. Moments later, he ran into the house and told her he had been jumped.

    Another family member approached the officer and said that one of the occupants of the Mazda had “used a handgun to pistol whip” the victim, the report said.

    With that information, the officer told the four occupants to remain in the vehicle while additional units were called to the scene. At one point, one of the 17-year-olds allegedly opened his door and tried to get out despite the instructions.

    The officer said in the report that he “commanded him to remain inside and to close the door in which he complied. I then further instructed all four occupants to remain inside and do not do anything too stupid. All complied.”

    Once other officers arrived, the occupants were ordered out of the Mazda one at a time. None of them had weapons on them, according to the report, but officers spotted a handgun on the front passenger‑side floorboard in plain view.

    The weapon turned out to be a 9mm loaded with a magazine containing nine rounds.

    The victim later told police, according to the report, that he had just gotten off a bus with friends and was walking toward his home when a group approached him and struck him with a closed fist.

    He also said he was hit in the face with a “hard object.”

    He told police he could not identify his attackers because they were all dressed in black and wearing masks.

    The teen said he “blacked out” during the assault, the report said. When asked whether he saw a gun, he said “I thought, I think I did,” but added he could not be certain.

    A friend who had been walking with him told police he saw a gun as the group approached and immediately dropped his backpack and ran. Both his backpack and the victim’s were stolen and later allegedly found in the Mazda. The backpacks contained laptops and other personal belongings.

    Police also interviewed the victim’s grandfather, who said he saw four males “punching and kicking” his grandson. He tried to intervene but said the group then turned on him, striking him multiple times in the nose and head and causing him to fall and feel as though he had been “knocked out.”

    He said he was also unable to identify the attackers because they were dressed in black and wearing masks, according to the report.

    After the alleged assault, the victim’s grandfather told police he saw the four attackers get into the Mazda and drive off. He said he got into his pickup truck and followed them around the block. As he did, the Mazda drove the wrong way onto Lincoln Street and allegedly struck a parked vehicle.

    According to the report, the 58‑year‑old told officers he then positioned his truck to block the Mazda from leaving. The Mazda then is alleged to have struck his vehicle moments before the responding officer arrived on scene.

    The officer said in his report that none of the four suspects claimed responsibility for the handgun found in the Mazda or for the assaults. He added that the incident “appeared to be a planned attack on the victims,” noting that surveillance footage showed the masked assailants punching both the teen and his grandfather before stealing the backpacks.

    Both the teen and his grandfather were taken to Lowell General Hospital’s Saints Campus following the attack.

    Thanongsinh and Chan, along with the two juveniles, were charged with masked armed robbery, assault and battery with a dangerous weapon, carrying a firearm without a license, carrying a loaded firearm without a license, assault and battery, and assault with a dangerous weapon.

    Thanongsinh also faces a charge of leaving the scene of property damage.

    Because of their ages, the outcomes of the juveniles’ cases were not available in court records.

    Lowell District Court documents show that Thanongsinh and Chan were arraigned on Dec. 8 and ordered held without bail pending 58A dangerousness hearings on Dec. 11, a proceeding used to determine whether a defendant poses a risk to the public.

    The Middlesex District Attorney’s Office requested they be held without bail. However, after those hearings, a judge set bail for both men at $2,000 cash, which they posted the same day.

    Court documents show that roughly 30 letters were submitted in support of Thanongsinh as part of his 58A dangerousness hearing, including one from a Lowell High School staff member who said the 18‑year‑old “excelled academically” in the classes he taught during Thanongsinh’s sophomore year and again now as a senior.

    “Throughout the time I have known him, Devonathan has consistently demonstrated maturity, responsibility and strong character,” the staff member said in the letter. “He approaches his coursework with diligence and focus. His academic performance as a sophomore stood out among his peers.”

    The letter described him as “polite, respectful, and genuinely well‑mannered,” adding that he “conducts himself with kindness and humility, and interacts positively with both classmates and teachers.”

    “He may have made some poor decisions, but I believe his foundation of strong character and his family will help him atone for those lapses in judgment and become the productive adult I know he can be if given the opportunity,” the staff member concluded.

    Court records show neither Thanongsinh nor Chan have criminal records.

    As a condition of their release on bail, both Thanongsinh and Chan were ordered to remain in the custody of their mothers, continue with their high school educations, avoid all contact with the victims and witnesses, possess no dangerous weapons, abstain from drugs and alcohol, and comply with a 24/7 curfew and GPS monitoring.

    According to court documents, Thanongsinh was brought back to court the day after his release for what was initially believed to be a curfew violation.

    His attorney, Thomas Torrisi, stressed on Friday that the allegation was later determined to be unfounded, explaining that Thanongsinh had not left his home and that the issue stemmed from a GPS signal problem.

    “They determined he had absolutely never left the house, so there was no violation found by the judge,” Torrisi said.

    Torrisi added about the case that “we’re very much at the infant stages at this point.”

    “There’s an awful lot that still needs to be done before we’re in a position to know the totality of the circumstances,” he said.

    Chan’s attorney, Stephen Barton, was unavailable for comment.

    The pair are scheduled to return to court for a pretrial conference on Jan. 20.

    Follow Aaron Curtis on X @aselahcurtis, or on Bluesky @aaronscurtis.bsky.social.

    [ad_2]

    Aaron Curtis

    Source link

  • Arrest log

    [ad_1]

    The following arrests were made recently by local police departments. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty. Massachusetts’ privacy law prevents police from releasing information involving domestic and sexual violence arrests with the goal to protect the alleged victims.

    BILLERICA

    • Michael Parker, 50, 67 Salem Road, Billerica; assault with dangerous weapon, intoxicated licensee carrying firearm.

    • Katherine Marie Main, 41, unknown address; fugitive from justice on court warrant.

    LOWELL

    • Brian Cooper, 29, 17 Yarmouth Drive, Nashua, N.H.; warrant (unlicensed operation of motor vehicle), operating motor vehicle without license.

    • Luis Oliveras, 65, 144 High St., Apt. 2, Lowell; operation under influence of alcohol.

    • Emily Rogers, 33, homeless; warrant (shoplifting), trespassing.

    • Kosall Deth, 44, 73 Fort Hill Ave., Apt. 2, Lowell; warrant (failure to stop/yield).

    • Kenneth Eng, 21, 27 Hastings St., Lowell; warrant (operation of motor vehicle with suspended license), failing to submit motor vehicle for inspection.

    • Kevin Sok, 32, 21 Main St., Dunstable; operating motor vehicle after license suspension, failing to submit motor vehicle for inspection.

    • Nicholas Powell, 36, 301 Old Marshall Road, Dracut; warrant (failure to appear for unlicensed operation of motor vehicle).

    • Daniel Ramos-Vallejo, 23, 35 Temple St., Apt. 19, Lowell; operating motor vehicle after license suspension, failing to submit motor vehicle for inspection.

    • Thomas McGrath, 34, homeless; shoplifting, trespassing after notice.

    • Mason Cruz, 30, 619 Gorham St., Apt. 2, Lowell; assault and battery on police officer, resisting arrest.

    • Mary Foley, 45, 93 Berkeley St., Billerica; breaking and entering motor vehicle, disturbing peace.

    • Teddy Buckley, 36, homeless; trespassing.

    • Betsy Bettencourt, 60, homeless; two counts of trespassing.

    • Peter Gichuhi, 44, homeless; public drinking.

    • Kristen Butler, 25, 205 Farrwood Drive, Haverhill; warrants (failure to appear for two counts of trespassing, and shoplifting by asportation), trespassing.

    • Bryant Dottin, 28, 18 Morton St., Lowell; warrants (failure to appear for unregistered motor vehicle, and suspended license).

    • Divine Morse, 25, 271 E. Eighth St., No. 410, Boston; warrant (uninsured motor vehicle).

    • J’Lohn Moro, 33, 590 Market St., Apt. 325, Lowell; shoplifting.

    • Khaisone Sinlong, 30, 189 Walker St., No. 5, Lowell; operating motor vehicle without license, failure to stop/stop sign, warrant (malicious damage to motor vehicle).

    • Michael Picardi, 38, homeless; warrant (possession of Class E drug).

    • Joshua Rivera, 37, 57 Mount Vernon St., Lowell; warrant (distribution of Class A drug), trafficking in 18 grams or more of cocaine.

    • Jeffrey Breitwieser, 38, homeless; assault on emergency medical technician or health care provider, trespassing.

    NASHUA, N.H.

    • Nathaniel Ciardelli, 32, no fixed address; criminal trespassing, theft by unauthorized taking ($0-$1,000).

    • Dagoberto Vasquez Bamaca, 20, 46 Ledge St., Nashua; simple assault.

    • Jack Pearson Smith, 20, 56 Furber Lane, Wolfeboro, N.H.; driving under influence.

    • Trisha Morin, 40, no fixed address; nonappearance in court.

    • Jorge Lewis Curet, 40, 92 Ledge St., Apt. 2, Nashua; stalking.

    • Marion Smith, 49, no fixed address; theft by unauthorized taking ($0-$1,000), nonappearance in court.

    • Cara Kulingoski, 48, no fixed address; warrant.

    • Darryl Hudson, 43, 7 Van Buren St., Nashua; out of town warrants.

    • Cameron Joseph Sousa, 21, 24 Gillis St., Nashua; nonappearances in court, suspension of vehicle registration, driving motor vehicle after license revocation/suspension, unregistered motor vehicle, operation of motor vehicle without valid license.

    [ad_2]

    Staff Report

    Source link

  • How Cannabis Can Help A Family Thanksgiving

    [ad_1]

    Discover how cannabis can help a family Thanksgiving feel calmer, lighter, and far less stressful this holiday season.

    Thanksgiving is one of America’s most cherished holidays, but it also ranks among the most stressful. Family dynamics, hours of cooking, crowded homes, and the pressure of hosting can create tension before the turkey even hits the table. As attitudes around marijuana continue to shift, many adults are turning to it as a healthier, calmer way to manage the holiday’s emotional demands. Here is how cannabis can help a family Thanksgiving. From macrodosing for anxiety relief to choosing gummies over cocktails, cannabis is increasingly becoming part of the modern family coping toolkit.

    RELATED: Immersive Events Redefine Millennial Nights

    One of the biggest reasons people incorporate cannabis into holiday gatherings is to manage stress. The practice of macrodosing—using a moderate, intentional dose which is stronger than microdosing but still well below the level associated with being fully “high”—has gained traction for its ability to reduce anxiety without impairing social function. Unlike microdosing, which typically offers subtle effects, macrodosing provides a more noticeable sense of calm and emotional balance. For many adults, especially those navigating big personalities or long-standing family tensions, this controlled approach helps create a smoother, more relaxed holiday experience.

    Cannabis can also help keep the peace when conversations turn heated. Thanksgiving is notorious for discussions drifting into politics, family disagreements, and old resentments. A measured cannabis dose can help people stay grounded, patient, and less reactive. Many adults say it helps them disengage from escalating arguments or simply listen without feeling the need to “win” the moment. With 88% of Americans now supporting marijuana legalization in some form, cannabis is no longer the controversial topic it once was—making it more welcome at gatherings than some political debates.

    Another benefit is the growing shift away from alcohol, which has long dominated Thanksgiving celebrations. While wine, cocktails, and festive punches remain staples, they sometimes lead to arguments, sloppy moments, or hangovers dimming the holiday spirit. More hosts are now offering cannabis gummies or low-dose edibles as a calmer alternative. Gummies offer consistent dosing, slow onset, and no risk of overpouring—a major advantage for guests who want to “take the edge off” without sliding into drunken territory. Without alcohol’s depressant effects, people often maintain clearer conversations and create fewer messy incidents.

    RELATED: The Connection Between Country Music And Cannabis

    Then there’s the matter of overeating—a Thanksgiving tradition in its own right. While cannabis is often linked to the munchies, certain cannabinoids, especially THCV, can help regulate appetite. Many consumers report balanced, intentional dosing helps them avoid stress eating and stay mindful at the table. And those who choose cannabis over alcohol often find they have better control over cravings and portion sizes.

    As legalization spreads and stigma fades, cannabis is becoming a thoughtful tool for a calmer, more enjoyable Thanksgiving. Whether it’s helping reduce anxiety, easing family tensions, preventing arguments, or offering a healthier alternative to alcohol, cannabis is proving it can bring a little more peace to the holiday table.

    [ad_2]

    Sarah Johns

    Source link

  • Woman shot on I-20 was pregnant, died shielding other children, family says

    [ad_1]

    Bre’asia Simone Johnson, 29, was killed Wednesday, November 12, 2025 as she traveled along Interstate Highway 20 in Arlington.

    Bre’asia Simone Johnson, 29, was killed Wednesday, November 12, 2025 as she traveled along Interstate Highway 20 in Arlington.

    GoFundMe

    The woman shot and killed along Interstate 20 in Arlington on Nov. 12 was five months pregnant and died shielding her other children from gunfire, her family said.

    Twenty-nine-year-old Bre’asia Simone Johnson died from a gunshot wound to the torso, according to the Tarrant County Medical Examiner’s Office.

    Johnson was the mother of three children, aged 6, 7, and 2, her family said on a GoFundMe page for her funeral expenses.

    “Bre’Asia’s final, selfless act was to protect the very children she loved with all her heart,” her family wrote. “Tragically, her children are now left behind, without their mother, and the unborn child will never have the chance to know the love and warmth Bre’Asia was so ready to give.”

    Arlington police officers responded to an Arlington QuikTrip location in the 4900 block of Little Road shortly after 7:40 p.m. Wednesday night, police said.

    Homicide detectives learned the victims were traveling westbound on Interstate 20 near Bowman Springs Road when someone fired at their vehicle, the Star-Telegram previously reported.

    Investigators are working to determine what led to the shooting and who is responsible, police said.

    Anyone with information about the shooting is asked to contact Detective Allison Allen at 817-575-8613. Anonymous tips can be phoned in to Crime Stoppers of Tarrant County at 817-469-8477.

    Related Stories from Fort Worth Star-Telegram

    Lillie Davidson

    Fort Worth Star-Telegram

    Lillie Davidson is a breaking news reporter for the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. She graduated from TCU in 2025 with a bachelor’s degree in journalism, is fluent in Spanish, and can complete a crossword in five minutes.

    [ad_2]

    Lillie Davidson

    Source link

  • Five arrested in connection with San Jose home burglary

    [ad_1]

    SAN JOSE — A Halloween morning burglary at a West San Jose home ended in the arrest of five people, police said.

    [ad_2]

    Jason Green

    Source link

  • The Inconsistency About Cannabis And Guns

    [ad_1]

    Exploring the inconsistency about cannabis and guns, where freedom for firearms clashes with outdated marijuana laws

    In the ongoing culture‑war of American politics, few issues highlight the contradictions within the conservative, pro‑Second Amendment world quite like the pairing of gun ownership and marijuana use. the inconsistency about cannabis and guns makes for odd political alliances.

    On the one hand, many on the Right argue vigorously that the individual right to keep and bear arms must be protected from government infringement. Yet on the other, that same political cohort often supports strict federal prohibitions preventing lawful — and even state‑legal — cannabis users from purchasing firearms. By contrast, alcohol use, which is legal nationwide, is rarely treated as a disqualifier for gun ownership despite strong associations with firearm violence. That contrast raises questions about consistency, principle and policy.

    RELATED: Immersive Events Redefine Millennial Nights

    Here are some of the relevant statistics:

    • According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), in 2024 about 22.3 % of Americans aged 12 or older (roughly 64.2 million people) reported past‑year marijuana use.

    • Meanwhile, alcohol remains more widely used: in 2024, approximately 134.3 million Americans aged 12 or older reported past‑month alcohol use.

    • On firearms and substance risk: Alcohol misuse is documented to elevate the risk of firearm injury or death through homicide, suicide or unintended injury. For example, one advocacy page reports that alcohol misuse accounts for more than 140,000 deaths annually in the U.S. and that introducing firearms to alcohol‑misuse situations increases serious injury or death risk.

    Photo by Claire Anderson via Unsplash
    • By contrast, cannabis incident data tied to firearms (for example, use of marijuana plus gun‑possession) are far less publicly quantified, though one Hawaii report found that of some 23,528 firearm permit applications, 519 (~ 2.2 %) were denied — and of those, 211 (~ 40.7 %) were due to the applicant’s status as a medical‑marijuana patient.

    What emerges: legal alcohol is widespread, common among gun‑owners, and strongly implicated in firearm‑related violence; cannabis is increasingly used, often legal at the state level, but its users are often precluded from gun rights under federal law.

    At the federal level, under the Gun Control Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3) prohibits any person who is an “unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance” from possessing a firearm. Because cannabis remains a Schedule I controlled substance federally, state legal‑use does not override the restriction.

    In recent years, courts have challenged this blanket prohibition. For example:

    • The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has held that applying § 922(g)(3) to someone who uses marijuana but isn’t intoxicated at the moment may violate the standard set in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen (2022) because firearm regulations must be consistent with historical traditions.

    • The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in August 2025 that medical‑marijuana users in Florida had plausibly alleged that the federal prohibition violated their Second Amendment rights.

    • And the Supreme Court of the United States has agreed to review whether regular marijuana users can legally own guns, with arguments expected in early 2026.

    Thus, the legal collision is clear: dozens of states permit adult‑use or medical cannabis; federal law bans gun ownership by cannabis users; and courts are now reconsidering the constitutional footing of that ban.

    RELATED: The Connection Between Country Music And Cannabis

    From the vantage of many conservative advocates, gun rights are sacrosanct: the individual right to own firearms for self‑defense, deterrence of tyranny, and personal liberty. Meanwhile, proponents of cannabis reform argue that legal adult‑use meets the same liberty standard — and yet those who support gun rights often also support or accept federal cannabis prohibition that strips gun rights from users, even when state‑legal.

    The contradictory posture arises when one considers: if gun ownership is a fundamental individual right irrespective of political views, why exclude lawful adults simply because they also use cannabis? Especially when alcohol use, far more prevalent and demonstrably tied to firearm violence, does not (in most cases) lead to automatic loss of gun rights. That asymmetry suggests an underlying value‑judgment: alcohol is socially accepted (and taxed) despite risk; cannabis is socially stigmatized even as laws evolve. The Right’s selective focus — defending guns fiercely while accepting restrictions for cannabis users — raises questions about consistency of principle.

    This contradiction has real‑world consequences: legal ambiguity for millions of Americans, a patchwork of state laws vs. federal restrictions, and potential erosion of trust in institutions when liberty claims are applied unevenly. For the Right’s long‑term credibility on individual rights, the question becomes: can you credibly champion “freedom to keep and bear arms” while endorsing a regime that denies that freedom to law‑abiding adults because of a behavior (cannabis use) that’s legal in many states?

    In short: to claim consistency, the pro‑gun conservative movement must either defend gun rights across the board(including for cannabis users) or explain why this particular group is different. Until then, the contrast between alcohol, cannabis, and firearms under the law remains a striking example of “rights for some, restrictions for others.”

    [ad_2]

    Terry Hacienda

    Source link

  • Record-high 8 children killed in Colorado domestic violence incidents last year is ‘a wake-up call’

    [ad_1]

    Eight children were killed in domestic violence incidents across Colorado in 2024 — the highest number since the state began tracking annual domestic violence deaths eight years ago, according to a report released Tuesday by the Domestic Violence Fatality Review Board.

    The youngest child to die was 3-month-old Lesley Younghee Kim, who was found dead with her mortally injured mother in a Denver home in July 2024.

    The oldest were each 7. They include Jessi Hill, whose father killed her and her 3-year-old sister, Summer, before dying by suicide in January 2024, as well as 7-year-olds Dane Timms and Tristan Rael. The remaining children who died were toddlers: Xander Martinez-King, 1, Xena Martinez-King, 2, and Aaliyah Vargas-Reyes, 1.

    “It’s a wakeup call, I hope, for people in Colorado,” said Whitney Woods, executive director of the Rose Andom Center, which helped compile the board’s report. “This is a real problem.”

    Seventy-two people died in domestic violence incidents statewide in 2024. That’s up 24% from the 58 domestic violence deaths in 2023 but remains below pandemic-era peaks, when 94 people died in 2022 and 92 people died in 2021.

    The pandemic years also saw elevated numbers of children killed, with four children killed in 2021 and six in 2022. Across the other years, no more than three children died in any given year, the board’s reports show.

    Five of the eight children killed in 2024 died amid custody disputes between their parents, the report found.

    “These findings highlight custody litigation as a high-risk period for families experiencing domestic violence and point to the urgent need for stronger safeguards within family court proceedings,” the report concluded. The legislatively-mandated board, chaired by Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser, began tracking domestic violence statewide in 2017 and makes annual recommendations for policy changes aimed at preventing deaths.

    The fatality review board last year recommended that the state’s child and family investigators and parental responsibilities evaluators go through training on domestic violence, particularly around understanding the dynamics of domestic violence and how to evaluate the risk of lethality during the custody process. The Colorado Judicial Department is still developing such training, with work continuing in 2026, the report noted.

    “That is to my mind a call to action,” Weiser said. “And we are working with the court system on this right now — how do we make sure our family courts and the general system for addressing domestic violence provides protection, support, services, so that we don’t see these deaths happen?”

    The increase in domestic violence deaths came even as statewide homicides declined 17% to a five-year low. Roughly one in six homicide victims in Colorado in 2024 died during domestic violence incidents. Domestic violence victims account for 18% of all homicide victims statewide, the highest proportion in five years, the annual review found.

    “That is really alarming in this line of work, for us,” Woods said.

    The increase in domestic violence homicides amid the drop in overall homicides “suggests that while broader public safety interventions may be reducing general violence, they are not having the same impact on (domestic violence fatalities),” the report found.

    The increase also comes at a time when many organizations aimed at preventing domestic violence and supporting survivors are facing funding shortfalls and uncertainty, Woods noted.

    Among the 72 people killed in 2024, 38 were victims of domestic violence, 26 were perpetrators of domestic violence and eight — all of the children — were considered ‘collateral victims.’ The victims were overwhelmingly female and the perpetrators overwhelmingly male.

    Across all 72 deaths, guns were used 75% of the time. The second most common type of attack was asphyxiation, which was involved in 8% of all deaths, followed by a knife or sharp object, used in 7% of deaths.

    “Occasionally, people will make comments like, ‘If someone wants to kill someone they can kill them with a knife,’” Weiser said. “I think it’s fair to say access to firearms makes it far more likely that a domestic violence perpetrator will kill somebody.”

    Removing guns from a suspect when domestic violence begins can be an effective prevention strategy, Woods said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • San Diego firearms advocates file lawsuit challenging Glock sale ban

    [ad_1]

    A pile of guns in a box. (Photo courtesy San Diego County Sheriff’s Department)

    Days after the signing of a new state law that bans the sale or transfer of Glock and Glock-style handguns, firearms advocates filed a lawsuit in San Diego federal court this week challenging the ban.

    Assembly Bill 1127, which was signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom on Friday, bars California firearms dealers from selling semi-automatic firearms that include a “cruciform trigger bar,” which lawmakers behind the bill say allows semi-automatic guns to be converted into fully automatic weapons.

    The law takes effect next year.

    On Monday, a complaint was filed challenging the new law, which it states “is flagrantly unconstitutional.”

    The complaint cites case law stating that weapons “in common use at the time” are protected by the Second Amendment and that the guns targeted by the ban are “among the most popular firearms in the nation.”

    Plaintiffs in the case include national organizations like the National Rifle Association of America, Firearms Policy Coalition, and Second Amendment Foundation, along with local plaintiffs including firearms retailer Poway Weapons & Gear and its president, John Phillips, as well as San Diego County resident Danielle Jaymes.

    “The Constitution does not allow elitist politicians to decide which constitutionally protected guns the people may own, and California doesn’t get to tell people that their rights end where Gov. Newsom’s tyrannical, anti- Second Amendment politics begin,” Brandon Combs, president of the Firearms Policy Coalition, said in a statement.

    “Every American has a right to choose the tools they trust to defend their lives and liberty.”


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • A Lowell barber, a bullet, and a wedding turned tragic

    [ad_1]

    LOWELL — From the sidewalk outside Majestic Barber Shop on Middlesex Street on Friday, owner George Voutselas traced a finger toward the bullet hole in the window frame at the front of the shop that he’s run for five and a half decades. The now-cracked glass that bears the shop’s name stands strong despite this clash with a bullet, which Voutselas points out is still lodged in the wooden frame.

    The shooting that caused the damage must have happened in the early hours of Wednesday. The shop is closed that day, but Voutselas had stopped by in the late afternoon to grab something when he noticed the spiderweb cracks stretching across the exterior of the double-pane window.

    “I said, ‘What the hell,’” Voutselas recalled.

    At first, he didn’t realize a bullet grazing the edge of the glass had caused the cracks. It wasn’t until he called the Lowell Police and they came to investigate that he learned the truth.

    “The officer said, ‘That looks like a bullet in there,’ and I said, ‘What?!’” Voutselas said.

    Who fired the bullet — or why — is a mystery. At least for now.

    It was reported in an emergency radio broadcast on Wednesday afternoon that a spent shell casing was recovered nearby around the intersection of Middlesex Street and Moulton Avenue. The Lowell Police Department was unavailable to comment about the shot that struck Voutselas’ shop.

    The window will need to be replaced, and when it is, Voutselas said he’s been tasked with calling police so a detective can come by to dig the round out of the wood.

    Voutselas, who turns 84 in December, spent nearly his entire life in Lowell before moving a few years ago to a 55-and-older community in Dracut. His father, Arthur, started the shop in 1921 after immigrating from Greece in 1914. Voutselas bought it in the early 1960s, and he’s been cutting hair on Middlesex Street ever since.

    For 55 years, he’s been a fixture in the neighborhood — first just across the street, in a space that’s now a parking garage, and since 2001 at the current location at 50 Middlesex St.

    “It’s a long legacy,” Voutselas said. “They even gave me a key to the city when we turned 100 years here.”

    The framed key hangs next to the mirror in front of the barber chair.

    “I’ve been here a long time. I’ve never gotten hit by a bullet though,” he said with a chuckle.

    The cracked window wasn’t the first shock Voutselas faced in recent weeks — and it doesn’t come close to what he experienced last month.

    On Sept. 21, he and his family were caught in the chaos of a shooting at Sky Meadow Country Club in Nashua, New Hampshire, that led to the death of one man.

    “We met face to face with the shooter, actually,” Voutselas said, recalling the traumatic episode while seated in his desk chair situated next to his shop’s fractured front window.

    Voutselas was at the country club for the wedding of his great-niece. The outdoor ceremony took place that afternoon with about 120 guests in attendance. Later, everyone moved inside for the reception.

    While the celebration was underway that night, gunfire erupted at Prime, the club’s restaurant. Authorities say Hunter Nadeau, 23, of Nashua, a former employee of the restaurant, walked in and opened fire.

    Voutselas would later learn that Robert DeCesare Jr., 59, also of Nashua, stood up to protect his family from the shooter and was gunned down.

    “Killed him,” Voutselas said, “right in front of his wife and daughter.”

    As reported in multiple outlets from witness accounts, a guest is alleged to have struck Nadeau in the face with a chair, knocking the gun from his hands.

    “Thank God for that guy,” Voutselas said. “He saved a lot of lives, probably.”

    As this was going on inside Prime, Voutselas and members of his family, including his wife, daughter, and 12-year-old grandson, and the other wedding guests heard the gunfire and were urged by staff to escape through the kitchen. Voutselas recalled his daughter gripping his hand so tightly as they fled.

    Amid the chaos, he noticed a man running with them — his face bloodied and unfamiliar.

    “This guy is running with us,” he said. “We thought he had just fallen and banged his head. They opened up the door to go out back, and he ran ahead of us.”

    Voutselas said he was standing just a few feet away when they became aware of who this man was: the alleged gunman.

    “He looked at all of us, and said, ‘Free the children of Palestine, free the children of Palestine,’ and ‘I’m the shooter,’ and he’s going like this,” Voutselas said, mimicking the motion of a gun with his hand. “He was making believe he was shooting at us.”

    Voutselas noted that, at the time, none of them realized the gunman had been disarmed. There was fear he might pull out another weapon and start shooting. The group retreated back inside. The suspect fled.

    Following a massive police response, Nadeau was tracked down nearby. He has since been charged with second-degree murder and multiple other offenses related to the incident. While a motive has not been publicly confirmed, New Hampshire Attorney General John Formella has said they do not believe the shooting was a “hate-based act,” despite Nadeau’s alleged comments regarding Palestine.

    Authorities have also said there is no known connection between Nadeau and DeCesare.

    Though the shooter had fled by the time they went back inside the club, Voutselas recalled how police on scene warned there may be a second gunman — information that was later ruled out. Law enforcement instructed guests to run down a hill to get away from the scene. Women who had been dancing moments earlier left their shoes behind in the rush. The group was taken to the Spit Brook Road Fire Station, where the news of the shooting was already playing on TV.

    “It was like a movie,” Voutselas said. “I’m watching the drones, the helicopters, the SWAT teams.”

    From there, they were bussed to the Sheraton Hotel on Tara Boulevard, where news crews and a heavy police presence gathered. Voutselas noted that the bride and her bridesmaids had escaped out another door at the club during the chaos, knocking on the door of a nearby residence. They stayed there until they reunited with family at the hotel.

    “They fell to the ground and cried,” Voutselas said. “What a scene that was.”

    “Now every year they are going to have to relive that whole thing,” he added, referencing the future wedding anniversaries.

    Voutselas also reflected on the death of DeCesare. It was later revealed by DeCesare’s mother, Evie O’Rourke, that her son had been dining with family that night. His daughter’s wedding was scheduled just six weeks after the shooting. Voutselas said he heard the family still plans to hold the wedding on the original date, while adding, “But she won’t have a father to walk her down the aisle.”

    “The whole world has gone crazy,” Voutselas said. “Now you just go out and shoot people. In the old days, you’d go to the park and duke it out.

    “And to do that?” he added. “People are flipping out, but you can’t tell who is going to flip out at the time. They say take guns away from people. Listen, take away the machine guns and all that. No one is going to go hunting with a machine gun.”

    While sitting in his shop on Friday, Voutselas recalled seeing photos of Nadeau on the news the day after the shooting. He immediately recognized him as the man they had encountered outside the venue.

    Voutselas described the alleged gunman as a bizarre character — “out there,” he said, based on that brief but unsettling exchange.

    “His demeanor and the way he talked and the way his eyes were,” he said. “For a while there, I was seeing his face. I was seeing his eyes.”

    Voutselas added simply that his family is doing well, despite the tragic and horrific encounter. In the meantime, Voutselas is still trimming hair at his shop, behind the cracked front window with a bullet embedded in the frame, waiting to be recovered.

    It’s been an unusual few weeks, and he hopes nothing worse is waiting around the corner.

    “It’s crazy,” he chuckled. “It seems like they’re trying to get me. God is pissed off at me about something.”

    Follow Aaron Curtis on X @aselahcurtis, or on Bluesky @aaronscurtis.bsky.social. 

    [ad_2]

    Aaron Curtis

    Source link

  • Denver Public School using weapon detecting canines at large events

    [ad_1]

    DENVER – Denver Public Schools has launched a pilot program, using weapon detecting dogs as a safety tool for large district events.

    Vivian, the black labrador, was one of several K-9s working the homecoming game at All-City Stadium Friday night. At 8-years old she’s already worked a few Super Bowls, major league baseball games, concerts and is now helping DPS.

    “Vivian is imprinted on 29 different explosive odors and firearms, gunshot residue, ammunition that type of stuff. She’s pretty good at identifying those things just with the nose,” said her handler Bob Lovelace with K2 K9 Solutions.

    The dogs are being used as a pilot program.

    “We’re always looking at ways to ensure our schools, our events are safe and welcoming,” said Greg Cazzell, Chief of Climate and Safety for DPS.

    Some locations of big district events, like All-City, do have metal detectors too.

    “The metal detectors can be a little bit more intrusive to people than what the dogs are. We specifically use Labradors and a few a handful of German shorthair pointers, because they tend to be pretty friendly, pretty happy,” said Lovelace.

    The dogs will work all large district events with big crowds until the end of the first semester. The pilot cost around $160,000 and feedback from community members at the events will be a strong indication of whether the district will extend the program.

    In the last three weeks since the pilot launched, the dogs have not detected a weapon. Cazzell said that’s actually the point.

    “We don’t know what we have prevented from coming in. So again, that is one of the benefits that we believe: it’s proactive preventative,” he said.

    For Lovelace, it’s a full circle moment.

    “I was actually a first responder to Columbine, and had a son that went there,” he said, “We responded after the tragedy, and now I get the opportunity to be out here with Vivian trying to prevent that from happening in the first place.”



    Denver7 | Your Voice: Get in touch with Danielle Kreutter

    Denver7’s Danielle Kreutter covers stories that have an impact in all of Colorado’s communities, but specializes in reporting on affordable housing and issues surrounding the unhoused community. If you’d like to get in touch with Danielle, fill out the form below to send her an email.

    [ad_2]

    Danielle Kreutter

    Source link