ReportWire

Tag: gun

  • Man accused of pulling gun in Altamonte Springs gym, claimed it was a candy bar

    [ad_1]

    Man accused of pulling gun in Altamonte Springs gym, claimed it was a candy bar

    WESH TWO NEWS STARTS NOW. ORLANDO MAN IS BEHIND BARS AFTER POLICE SAY HE PULLED A GUN ON TWO PEOPLE AT A JIM. IT HAPPENED AT A CRUNCH FITNESS IN ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, WESH 2’S. LUANA MUNOZ IS LIVE IN SEMINOLE COUNTY TONIGHT, WHERE PEOPLE WHO GO TO THAT GYM ARE TALKING ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED. LUANA. THAT’S ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. THIS HAS BEEN A HOT TOPIC OF CONVERSATION TODAY. A LOT OF GYM GOERS ARE ON EDGE. WHILE SOME ARE SAYING THIS IS JUST NOW THE WORLD THAT WE’RE LIVING IN. CRUNCH FITNESS IN ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, OFF NORTH STATE ROAD 434, BECAME THE CENTER OF CONFUSION AND CHAOS TUESDAY MORNING. POLICE SAY THIS MAN, 45 YEAR OLD WINSTON MEDLEY, PULLED OUT A GUN AND POINTED IT AT TWO PEOPLE WHO WERE WORKING OUT. GYM MEMBER BLAKE SAFFORD SAYS HE NORMALLY WORKS OUT. AROUND THE SAME TIME OF THE INCIDENT, BUT WASN’T THERE THAT DAY. IT PUTS PEOPLE ON EDGE, YOU KNOW, YOU DON’T KNOW WHO’S NEXT TO YOU IN THE GYM ANYMORE. YOU DON’T. YOU DON’T KNOW WHO YOU’RE WALKING NEXT TO OR WHAT’S ON THEIR MIND OR WHAT THEY’RE GOING TO DO. ACCORDING TO POLICE RECORDS, ONE OF THE VICTIMS WAS WORKING OUT WITH A GROUP OF MEN WHEN MEDLEY APPROACHED THE GROUP AND BEGAN MAKING COMMENTS ABOUT THE WEIGHT THE MEN WERE USING. THE TWO STARTED ARGUING, AND THE VICTIM SAYS HE WALKED TO ANOTHER AREA TO CONTINUE HIS WORKOUT, BUT MEDLEY FOLLOWED. REPEATEDLY ASKING THE VICTIM IF HE HAD A PROBLEM WITH HIM, THE VICTIM CLAIMS HE TOLD MEDLEY. HE WAS, QUOTE, ACTING AGGRESSIVELY AND NEEDED TO STOP. THAT’S WHEN MEDLEY BRANDISHED A FIREARM AND POINTED IT DIRECTLY AT HIS FACE. COURT DOCUMENTS SAY THE VICTIM WAS IN FEAR OF HIS LIFE AND IMMEDIATELY RAN AWAY. HE THEN SAW MEDLEY MANIPULATING THE GUN AS IF HE WAS ATTEMPTING TO FIRE OR ADJUST IT. I DON’T THINK EITHER ONE OF US REALLY FEEL THAT WAY ABOUT IT, ESPECIALLY WITH THE WORLD THAT WE LIVE IN NOW. GIVEN THAT THIS HAPPENS A LOT, YOU KNOW WHAT I’M SAYING? LIKE, THIS IS SOMETHING THAT COULD HAPPEN TO ANYBODY AT ANY TIME. I’M A NATIVE OF THIS AREA, BORN AND RAISED, AND THIS STUFF NEVER USED TO HAPPEN IN MY COMMUNITY GROWING UP. AND NOW TO SEE THIS HAPPENING IN THE COMMUNITY THAT, YOU KNOW, I’M BORN AND RAISED IN NOW, RAISING MY OWN KIDS IN, IT’S SCARY. IT’S LIKE WHERE, YOU KNOW, WHAT’S WHAT’S HAPPENING. AND WE DID REACH OUT TO THE VICTIM WHO DID NOT WANT TO GO ON CAMERA. MEDLEY IS FACING A NUMBER OF CHARGES, INCLUDING FIRST DEGREE PREMEDITATED MURDER, AS WELL AS POSSESSION OF A FIREARM BY A CONVICTED FELON. HE’S ALSO DUE BACK IN COURT ON APRIL 7T

    Man accused of pulling gun in Altamonte Springs gym, claimed it was a candy bar

    Updated: 8:13 AM EST Feb 19, 2026

    Editorial Standards

    Police arrested a man on Tuesday after he allegedly pulled a gun on people inside a gym in Altamonte Springs.The Altamonte Springs Police Department said the incident happened at a Crunch Fitness on State Road 434 in Altamonte Springs. They were called to the scene for reports of a disturbance involving a firearm. The incident started because the suspect, Winston Medley, allegedly got into an argument with a couple of men over the amount of weight they were working out with, calling them weak, according to police.The group separated, but Medley approached them again minutes later and pulled out a gun. Multiple witnesses in the gym said it looked like he was trying to fire the gun, but was fiddling with it as if it were jammed. He ran away but was caught near 417 and State Road 400.When police asked him about the gun, he initially claimed it was a “king-size Snickers bar.”Medley then told officers it was fake and that he only pulled it out to scare others. Medley declined to reveal the gun’s location, and authorities were unable to recover it.He has been charged with attempted homicide, possession of a weapon by a state felon, and tampering with evidence, according to police.

    Police arrested a man on Tuesday after he allegedly pulled a gun on people inside a gym in Altamonte Springs.

    The Altamonte Springs Police Department said the incident happened at a Crunch Fitness on State Road 434 in Altamonte Springs. They were called to the scene for reports of a disturbance involving a firearm.

    The incident started because the suspect, Winston Medley, allegedly got into an argument with a couple of men over the amount of weight they were working out with, calling them weak, according to police.

    The group separated, but Medley approached them again minutes later and pulled out a gun.

    Multiple witnesses in the gym said it looked like he was trying to fire the gun, but was fiddling with it as if it were jammed. He ran away but was caught near 417 and State Road 400.

    When police asked him about the gun, he initially claimed it was a “king-size Snickers bar.”

    Medley then told officers it was fake and that he only pulled it out to scare others.

    Medley declined to reveal the gun’s location, and authorities were unable to recover it.

    He has been charged with attempted homicide, possession of a weapon by a state felon, and tampering with evidence, according to police.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Police Seek Man Who Struck Cop Fleeing Encore Boston Harbor

    [ad_1]

    Posted on: February 13, 2026, 01:03h. 

    Last updated on: February 13, 2026, 01:26h.

    • A suspect fleeing police allegedly struck a state trooper as they drove off at a high rate of speed
    • Police say the person of interest was reportedly carrying a weapon on the casino floor

    Police in Massachusetts are calling on the public’s help in locating a suspect who allegedly struck a state trooper while fleeing Encore Boston Harbor.

    Massachusetts police Encore Boston Harbor
    The exterior of Encore Boston Harbor in Everett, Mass. Massachusetts State Police report that a trooper was struck by a suspect driving a vehicle at a high rate of speed on Friday, Feb. 13, 2026. Police and casino security were chasing the suspect after he allegedly possessed a weapon inside the Wynn Resorts property. (Image: Shutterstock)

    Located across the Mystic River from Boston in Everett, Massachusetts State Police responded to an incident at the resort operated by Wynn Resorts early Friday morning after a report came in that a person was carrying a weapon on the casino floor. Upon being approached by casino security, the individual allegedly fled, prompting state troopers stationed at the casino to give chase.

    The suspect was reportedly able to get to his vehicle, where he drove off at a high rate of speed. As he exited the casino’s premises, police say he struck a state trooper with his vehicle’s side-view mirror.

    The troopers involved in the Friday incident are assigned to the state’s Gaming Enforcement Unit. The GEU, a division of the Massachusetts State Police, works with the Massachusetts Gaming Commission’s Investigations and Enforcement Bureau to investigate all possible criminal activity occurring at Encore Boston Harbor, MGM Springfield, and Plainridge Park Casino.

    Details Scant

    The Massachusetts State Police have not yet commented on the Encore Boston Harbor incident. Boston 25, which broke the story, reported that state officials said only that the suspected carrying of a weapon is what led to casino security approaching the person who fled.

    As of this time, there is no word on what sort of weapon was allegedly involved, most critically, whether it was a firearm. Massachusetts does have a concealed carry law, though out-of-state licenses do not apply. The commonwealth is considered among the nation’s most restrictive states when it comes to firearms possession.

    Massachusetts law prohibits any person from possessing a firearm within or upon the premises of a gaming establishment.

    If the gaming licensee learns that an individual possesses a firearm … the gaming licensee must immediately notify an official within the on-site office of the IEB, and the individual violating the policy shall be removed from the premises of the gaming establishment by officers assigned to the Gaming Enforcement Unit,” Massachusetts’ Internal Control for Gaming reads. “Thereafter, the gaming licensee shall promptly, and in any event no later than 48 hours of such removal, or violation of the policy, notify the Chief of the Gaming Enforcement Division of the Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office.”

    Exceptions to the regulation include on-duty Massachusetts State Police troopers, local law enforcement officers assigned to the casino, IEB officials, and federal law enforcement officials.

    Crime Impact

    Crime studies commissioned by the Massachusetts Gaming Commission have concluded that Encore Boston Harbor has had a negligible to “limited impact on crime in the region.” The $2.6 billion integrated resort opened in June 2019.

    Crime rates in Everett today are in line with the rates the city experienced in 2019. However, there has been a slight increase in certain public safety issues, including intoxicated driving.

    [ad_2]

    Devin O’Connor

    Source link

  • Here are the rules and data for a permit to carry in Minnesota

    [ad_1]

    Minnesota gun rights are in the spotlight after U.S. Border Patrol agents shot and killed a lawful gun carrier over the weekend.

    Here’s the latest data about permit-to-carry holders from the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension.

    As of Monday, there are 378,868 people with an active permit to carry in the state. In 2025, there were 73,846 permits issued. That’s an increase compared to recent years, but far from the back-to-back record-breaking years in 2020 and 2021.

    Permits issued by year in Minnesota:

    • 2025: 73,846
    • 2024: 57,248
    • 2023: 65,215
    • 2022: 65,257
    • 2021: 106,488
    • 2020: 96,554

    Many more people have firearms at home for hunting and protection in Minnesota, but that type of ownership doesn’t require a permit.

    Anyone wanting a permit to carry must: 

    • Be at least 18 years old.
    • Complete an application form.
    • Pass a federal and state background check.
    • Pass a permit-to-carry course, including a live shooting exercise.
    • Be a resident of the county from which you are requesting a permit if you reside in Minnesota. Nonresidents may apply to any Minnesota county sheriff’s office.
    • Pay up to a $100 fee.

    In the permit-to-carry course, students learn where they can and can’t carry their firearm. Generally, public spaces and common areas of public buildings are allowed. 

    But there are exceptions. Rob Doar, senior vice president of the Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus, explains them.

    K through 12 schools and daycare centers, you need permission of the principal or the owner or daycare center in order to carry there. You can’t carry in jail facilities or state hospitals. And then you can’t carry in courthouse complexes unless you’ve notified the sheriff,” Doar said, adding most courtrooms and court facilities are covered by a court order banning firearms.

    Federal agents on Saturday in Minneapolis fatally shot Alex Prett, who Minnesota officials say had a permit to carry. In reference to this incident, FBI Director Kash Patel claimed it is illegal to carry a gun at a protest.

    “You cannot bring a firearm, loaded, with multiple magazines, to any sort of protest that you want. It’s that simple. You don’t have that right to break the law and incite violence,” Patel said in an appearance on Fox News the day after federal agents killed Pretti.

    Doar disagrees, saying that permit-to-carry holders have every right to carry a firearm at a protest. 

    “There’s no prohibition in Minnesota statute that says you can’t carry a firearm at a protest,” he said.

    WCCO has seen on many occasions permit-to-carry holders with long guns actively demonstrating for gun rights at the Minnesota State Capitol.

    When a permit-to-carry holder interacts with law enforcement, they don’t have to declare that they’re carrying a gun unless law enforcement asks if they’re carrying, Doar said. If they’re asked, the holder must answer truthfully.

    The answer is no, unless law enforcement asks if they’re carrying, then they must answer truthfully.

    “But until they’re asked, you’re under no obligation to inform a peace officer. Interesting though is the statute uses the term ‘peace officer’, which, as defined in Minnesota statutes, doesn’t include federal agents,” said Doar.

    Federal officials said that Pretti did not have any identification on him.

    Permit-to-carry holders must have some form of ID when carrying their gun, along with their permit. If not, it’s a petty misdemeanor with a $25 fine.

    To learn more about Minnesota’s permit-to-carry law, click here.

    [ad_2]

    Jeff Wagner

    Source link

  • Phan brothers murder retrial set to begin Monday, weather permitting

    [ad_1]

    LOWELL — The murder retrial of Billy, Billoeum, and Channa Phan is officially ready to proceed.

    Jury impanelment is scheduled to begin in Middlesex Superior Court on Monday morning — or Tuesday if the winter storm forces the Kiernan Judicial Center to close.

    The schedule was set on Friday during the final pretrial hearing, where Judge Chris Barry-Smith also denied a defense motion to dismiss the indictment against one of the three brothers, each charged with first-degree murder for the shooting death of 22-year-old Tyrone Phet outside his Lowell home in 2020.

    Barry-Smith rejected the bid by attorney William Dolan, who represents defendant Channa Phan, ruling that although the Middlesex District Attorney’s Office failed to turn over information tied to a gang-motive theory in a timely fashion, the lapse did not rise to the level requiring dismissal.

    The motion stemmed from the prosecution’s recent attempt to broaden the scope of gang‑related evidence in the retrial, namely introducing details about a Sept. 13, 2020 drive‑by shooting at 478 Wilder St.

    Prosecutors have argued the residence functioned as a stash house for the Outlaws, street gang, which they claim the Phan brothers are members of. Due to the shooting, a search warrant was obtained by the Lowell Police for the Wilder Street home, where officers seized guns, ammunition, 200 grams of cocaine, and 100,000 pressed pills containing methamphetamine.

    The shooting — allegedly carried out by rival gang Crazy Mob Family — triggered a retaliatory motive for the killing of Phet less than 24 hours later.

    Phet was not alleged to be a CMF member, but prosecutors contend he lived in the same Spring Avenue building where a CMF member once resided.

    Phet was shot to death in a hail of gunfire while sitting in his car outside the multi-family residence at 55 Spring Ave. Phet — a 2016 Chelmsford High graduate and captain of the football team his senior year — was struck eight times during the shooting.

    The Lowell Police recovered 21 spent shell casings at the scene from two different caliber guns.

    Barry‑Smith said the prosecution’s decision to pursue a broader gang theory in the retrial “not surprisingly” prompted the defense to seek all information police and prosecutors possessed about the Wilder Street shooting and subsequent search warrant.

    Prior to the first trial — which ended in a mistrial after jurors became deadlocked —prosecutors turned over the police report about the incident but not the underlying investigative materials, Barry‑Smith said. That omission was not a major point of contention at the time because the initial trial’s lead prosecutor — former Middlesex Assistant District Attorney Daniel Harren — had elected not to pursue a wide‑ranging gang theory.

    Once the new prosecution team sought to expand that scope, Barry‑Smith said, they were obligated to produce the full set of Wilder Street information — something they did not do until recent weeks.

    “The Commonwealth’s principal shortcoming is that failure to produce Wilder Street information once it determined Wilder Street was relevant to the case,” Barry‑Smith said, adding that a secondary issue was that prosecutors “were not adequately familiar” with what evidence had been turned over during the first four years of the case, leading to a misunderstanding.

    The judge described the discovery violation as the product of “mistake, inadvertence, misunderstanding, and a failure to be fully familiar” with prior disclosures — not an attempt to ambush the defense.

    “It was not delivered, nor was it designed to spring evidence upon the defense,” Barry‑Smith said.

    The judge reiterated that he has already denied the Commonwealth’s request to expand the scope of gang evidence for the retrial, calling the proposed showing “too thin.”

    The Wilder Street material may be considered for rebuttal, but that will depend on how the trial unfolds.

    Because prosecutors have since turned over the missing materials, and because the expanded gang theory will not be permitted, Barry‑Smith said dismissal was not warranted.

    “I don’t find that the District Attorney’s Office’s conduct was purposeful or egregious,” he said.

    As for jury selection, the expectation is it will take two days to get the needed pool of 16 jurors.

    The trial will run daily from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. each day, with an hour‑long lunch break. Barry‑Smith said the case is expected to conclude by the end of the week of Feb. 9.

    Middlesex Assistant District Attorney Thomas Brant told Barry-Smith that the prosecution intends to call more than 40 witnesses.

    Brant also raised a scheduling wrinkle: Feb. 8 is Super Bowl Sunday, and with the New England Patriots still in contention for a spot in Super Bowl 60 as of the hearing, juror availability and the scheduling of witnesses could be affected.

    “I don’t care, and my desire is to move the case as quickly as possible, but …” Brant said.

    “I hadn’t thought of that,” Barry‑Smith replied, adding that he may delay the Feb. 9 start time to as late as 10 a.m.

    “I might delay things on that Monday, but I’m not going to call it off,” he said.’

    The Sun will publish weekly wrap-ups on the trial’s progress, with summaries appearing this Sunday and again on Feb. 8. A final story detailing the verdict will follow shortly after the jury reaches a decision, with the latest possible publication date being Feb. 15.

    Follow Aaron Curtis on X @aselahcurtis, or on Bluesky @aaronscurtis.bsky.social. 

    [ad_2]

    Aaron Curtis

    Source link

  • Gun rights groups fiercely criticize top L.A. federal prosecutor for response to Minneapolis shooting

    [ad_1]

    Top Los Angeles federal prosecutor Bill Essayli faced blistering criticism from gun rights groups, including the NRA, after he posted on X Saturday about the fatal shooting of a U.S. citizen in Minneapolis by federal immigration officers.

    Essayli, the first assistant U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California, wrote: “If you approach law enforcement with a gun, there is a high likelihood they will be legally justified in shooting you.”

    Alex Jeffrey Pretti, a 37-year-old intensive care unit nurse at a Department of Veterans Affairs hospital, was believed to be a “lawful gun owner with a permit to carry,” according to Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara. Bystander videos show Pretti holding a phone, but nothing appearing to be a weapon appeared in those that circulated in the hours after the shooting.

    In response to Essayli’s tweet, the NRA posted on X: “This sentiment from the First Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California is dangerous and wrong.”

    The post continued: “Responsible public voices should be awaiting a full investigation, not making generalizations and demonizing law-abiding citizens.”

    After receiving significant backlash, Essayli accused another gun rights organization of “adding words to mischaracterize my statement.”

    “I never said it’s legally justified to shoot law-abiding concealed carriers,” he posted on X. “My comment addressed agitators approaching law enforcement with a gun and refusing to disarm.

    “My advice stands: If you value your life, do not aggressively approach law enforcement while armed. If they reasonably perceive a threat and you fail to immediately disarm, they are legally permitted to use deadly force.”

    A spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney’s office in L.A. referred The Times to Essayli’s post on X clarifying what he initially said. He declined further comment.

    Gov. Gavin Newsom joined in the criticism, writing on X, “Wow. Even the NRA thinks Trump’s DOJ stooge in California has gone too far for claiming federal agents were ‘legally justified’ to kill Alex Pretti.”

    Earlier, a 2nd Amendment lobbying group, Gun Owners of America, also criticized Essayli.

    “We condemn the untoward comments of @USAttyEssayli. Federal agents are not ‘highly likely’ to be ‘legally justified’ in ‘shooting’ concealed carry licensees who approach while lawfully carrying a firearm,” the group posted on X. “The Second Amendment protects Americans’ right to bear arms while protesting — a right the federal government must not infringe upon.”

    Essayli’s post received a community note — a crowdsourced fact-check — noting that “the U.S. Constitution (particularly the 2nd, 4th, and 14th amendments) prohibit officers from shooting citizens merely for possessing a weapon that is not an “imminent threat.”

    The shooting drew a large crowd of protesters in a city that had already seen widespread demonstrations after the fatal shooting by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer of 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good on Jan. 7.

    Essayli, a former Riverside County assemblyman, was appointed as the region’s interim top federal prosecutor by U.S. Atty. Gen. Pam Bondi last April.

    Since taking office, he has doggedly pursued President Trump’s agenda, championing hard-line immigration enforcement in Southern California, often using the president’s language verbatim at news conferences.

    [ad_2]

    Brittny Mejia

    Source link

  • Supreme Court appears likely to strike down California law banning guns in stores and restaurants

    [ad_1]

    Do licensed gun owners have a right to carry a loaded weapon into stores, restaurants and other private places that are open to the public?

    California and Hawaii are among five states with new laws that forbid carrying firearms onto private property without the consent of an owner or manager. But the Trump administration joined gun-rights advocates on Tuesday in urging the Supreme Court to strike down these laws as unconstitutional under the 2nd Amendment.

    Such a law “effectively nullifies licenses to carry arms in public,” Trump’s lawyers said.

    If you “stop at a gasoline station, you are committing a crime,” Deputy Solicitor Gen. Sarah Harris told the court.

    An attorney representing Hawaii said the issue is one of property rights, not gun rights.

    “An invitation to shop is not an invitation to bring your Glock,” Washington attorney Neal Katyal told the court. “There is no constitutional right to enter property that includes a right to bring firearms.”

    The justices sounded split along the usual ideological lines, with the court’s conservatives signaling they are likely to strike down the new laws in five Democratic-led states.

    “You are relegating the 2nd Amendment to second-class status,” Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. told Katyal.

    He said the court had ruled law-abiding persons have a right to carry a firearm for self-defense when they leave home. That would include going to stores or businesses that are open to the public.

    “If the owners don’t like guns, why don’t they just put up a sign?” Alito said.

    Both sides agreed that business owners are generally free to allow or prohibit guns on their property. However, state officials said, the laws are important because business owners rarely post signs that either welcome or forbid the carrying of guns.

    Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. said the 2nd Amendment should have the same standing as the 1st Amendment.

    He said it was understood based on the 1st Amendment that a political candidate may walk up to a house and knock on the door or drop off a pamphlet. He questioned why the court should uphold a law that limits gun owners from entering places that are open to the public.

    Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil M. Gorsuch and Brett M. Kavanaugh said they too believed the “right to keep and bear arms” included the right to carry weapons, including into stores.

    Justice Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson said property rights should prevail over gun rights.

    “Is there a right to go on private property with a gun?” Sotomayor asked repeatedly. She said the court had never upheld such a broad right.

    But with the possible exception of Justice Amy Coney Barrett, none of the conservatives agreed.

    Four years ago, the court ruled law-abiding gun owners had a right to carry a concealed weapon for self-defense when they left home. They also said then that guns may be prohibited in “sensitive places” but they did not decide what that meant.

    In the wake of that decision, California, Hawaii, New York, New Jersey and Maryland adopted new laws that restricted carrying guns in public places, including parks and beaches.

    The laws also said gun owners may not take a gun into a privately owned business without the “express authorization” of an owner or manager. California’s law went a step further and said the owner must post a clear sign allowing guns.

    The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the laws from Hawaii and California, except for the required posting of a sign in California.

    Three Hawaii residents with concealed carry permits appealed to the Supreme Court and won the backing of the Trump administration.

    [ad_2]

    David G. Savage

    Source link

  • Watch the trailer for the KCRA 3 documentary “Liberty and Limits: Guns in California”

    [ad_1]

    I have these Black Panthers up here with guns on the 2nd floor. Is this the way the racist government works? Don’t let *** man, uh, exercise his, his, his constitutional rights. They never gave the party credit for anything. We were the boogeymen. It’s become, um, you know, *** very complicated, interesting area of law. Is it about who has the guns, who has the guns, you know, it’s, it’s plain to see. It’s what we call *** sentinel event. It’s not just that the event happened, it’s that that event was in everybody’s living room. There’s another one in California, and that was the mass shooting at Cleveland School in Stockton. Shortly before 120 Tuesday. *** lone gunman, Patrick Edward Purdy, walked onto the playground at Cleveland Elementary armed with 2 pistols and *** semi-automatic rifle. 18 bullets came through my wall. The whole room turned white. Mass shootings were not *** thing. School shootings were unheard of. I tried to find out where they were where they were hit. I tried to stop the bleeding. Her leg was shattered. All her bones in her leg was shattered, but this year there’s an all-out push by certain lawmakers to ban all semi-automatic military-type weapons. From my cold dead hands. Like this one, the Soviet designed AK-47 assault rifle. There is absolutely no reason why out on the street today *** civilian should be carrying *** loaded weapon. The Constitution says the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. You can turn back in time and you can say right there. It’s where the course of events change.

    Watch the trailer for the KCRA 3 documentary “Liberty and Limits: Guns in California”

    Our documentary looks at two major California events that have shaped how we talk about and regulate guns in the U.S.

    Updated: 10:23 AM PST Jan 11, 2026

    Editorial Standards

    On May 2, 1967, the Black Panther Party came to the California State Capitol armed in protest of a bill eliminating open carry in California.On Jan. 17, 1989, Patrick Purdy opened fire on a Stockton schoolyard, killing five children and injuring dozens. The dates of two of Northern California’s biggest historical events may seem unrelated but they both inform a discussion about one thing: guns.The KCRA 3 documentary “Liberty and Limits: Guns in California” looks at how these two events, decades apart, have rippled across time to inform us still today. In 1967, then-Gov. Reagan was on the steps of the California Capitol pushing for gun control. He switched his position in the 1980s. The documentary also shows how the tragic killing of schoolchildren may have helped reduce the death rate in California.”Liberty and Limits: Guns in California” takes a look at the impact on the law and the U.S. Constitution that came as a result of each event. How the Black Panthers were talking about the Second Amendment right to bear arms, leading to a law we’re still debating today: open carry. The first internationally known school shooting, in Stockton, would push lawmakers across the country to reflect on gaps in regulations.Our documentary, airing Sunday, Jan. 18, at 8 p.m. on KCRA 3, explores how these events continue to inform us and the legacy the people involved are leaving for others.See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    On May 2, 1967, the Black Panther Party came to the California State Capitol armed in protest of a bill eliminating open carry in California.

    On Jan. 17, 1989, Patrick Purdy opened fire on a Stockton schoolyard, killing five children and injuring dozens.

    The dates of two of Northern California’s biggest historical events may seem unrelated but they both inform a discussion about one thing: guns.

    The KCRA 3 documentary “Liberty and Limits: Guns in California” looks at how these two events, decades apart, have rippled across time to inform us still today. In 1967, then-Gov. Reagan was on the steps of the California Capitol pushing for gun control. He switched his position in the 1980s. The documentary also shows how the tragic killing of schoolchildren may have helped reduce the death rate in California.

    “Liberty and Limits: Guns in California” takes a look at the impact on the law and the U.S. Constitution that came as a result of each event. How the Black Panthers were talking about the Second Amendment right to bear arms, leading to a law we’re still debating today: open carry.

    The first internationally known school shooting, in Stockton, would push lawmakers across the country to reflect on gaps in regulations.

    Our documentary, airing Sunday, Jan. 18, at 8 p.m. on KCRA 3, explores how these events continue to inform us and the legacy the people involved are leaving for others.

    See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • California’s ban on open carry in more populated counties is unconstitutional, appeals panel says

    [ad_1]

    A federal appeals panel has ruled that a California law prohibiting open carry of firearms in heavily populated counties is unconstitutional.

    The ruling was issued Friday by two judges on a three-judge panel for the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The judges found that the state’s policy of limiting open carry to counties with a population of less than 200,000 is inconsistent with the Second Amendment.

    “California’s legal regime is a complete ban on open carry in urban areas — the areas of the state where 95% of the people live,” they said in the decision.

    The dissenting judge disagreed and said California could limit open carry in more populated areas because it allows for concealed carry throughout the state.

    The ruling comes in a long-running debate over gun laws in the United States and in California, which has passed a series of restrictions.

    It came after Mark Baird, a Siskiyou County resident, filed a lawsuit asking the courts to restore the historical practice of open carry being allowed.

    Chuck Michel, president of the California Rifle & Pistol Association, said he expected state officials will seek a review of the ruling by the full appeals court.

    “It’s a very significant opinion,” Michel said, adding that a key question in the case is how a 2022 Supreme Court decision expanding gun rights should be applied.

    The press office for Gov. Gavin Newsom said in a statement on social media that the state’s law was carefully crafted to comply with the Second Amendment.

    “California just got military troops with weapons of war off of the streets of our cities, but now Republican activists on the Ninth Circuit want to replace them with gunslingers and return to the days of the Wild West,” the statement said.

    In a statement to CBS Sacramento, Attorney General Rob Bonta’s office said it’s reviewing the opinion.

    “We are committed to defending California’s commonsense gun laws,” Bonta’s office said. “We are reviewing the opinion and considering all options.”

    Craig DeLuz is a California concealed carry permit holder and publisher of A2 News, who says allowing open carry permits in would change perceptions about gun rights.

    “It will remove a stigma which many on the left and many quite sadly in law enforcement want, which is if you’re a person carrying a gun and not wearing a badge you are a ‘bad guy,’ and so I think this addresses that,” DeLuz said. 

    California State Senator Catherine Blakespear (D-Encinitas) says the federal court ruling is bad for public safety.

    “I was truly alarmed by the decision,” Blakespear said. “I mean, this is not the ‘Wild West’ where everybody walks around with a gun on their waist. I mean, we see in other countries when there is a mass shooting, they tighten down on their gun laws.”

    [ad_2]

    CBS Bay Area

    Source link

  • DeLand home under gunfire on New Year’s; bullet misses sleeping family by inches

    [ad_1]

    A family of four was sleeping in their DeLand home when it was struck by several gunshots, according to the Volusia Sheriff’s Office. “We’re just very lucky to be alive and it could have had a different ending,” the wife and mother said.One bullet penetrated the wall and entered their bedroom.”My seven-year-old was in the bed with us in the middle. My four-year-old luckily, he normally sleeps in our bed and just by the Grace of God he wasn’t in there that night. He fell asleep in his own room,” the mother explained.The mother discovered the bullet.”The bullet was right by my pillow. I remember it being very hot and that’s when I grabbed my son and went into the other bedroom ’cause we didn’t know what else was coming in.”Deputies found five bullet holes on the exterior of the house.Surveillance footage captured several individuals on 6th Avenue, one street over. A witness informed deputies that he saw four people in a backyard, with a couple of them taking turns firing into the ground to celebrate the New Year. Volusia County Sheriff Mike Chitwood reported that 30 rounds were fired into the ground.”You know you got a couple of 20-year-olds, obviously they’re drinking. One of them had just purchased a firearm and let’s go out half drunk and fire into the ground. What could possibly go wrong?” Chitwood said.According to VSO, deputies found shell casings at a nearby residence in Daytona Park Estates, and a witness who saw four people firing a gun.When the suspects returned to the nearby residence, deputies say they found a gun inside their vehicle. Axel Gomez, 21, was arrested on the charge of shooting into an occupied dwelling. Amy Gomez, 25, and Ken Newbold, 25, are facing charges of recklessly discharging a firearm in a residential area.

    A family of four was sleeping in their DeLand home when it was struck by several gunshots, according to the Volusia Sheriff’s Office.

    “We’re just very lucky to be alive and it could have had a different ending,” the wife and mother said.

    One bullet penetrated the wall and entered their bedroom.

    “My seven-year-old was in the bed with us in the middle. My four-year-old luckily, he normally sleeps in our bed and just by the Grace of God he wasn’t in there that night. He fell asleep in his own room,” the mother explained.

    The mother discovered the bullet.

    “The bullet was right by my pillow. I remember it being very hot and that’s when I grabbed my son and went into the other bedroom ’cause we didn’t know what else was coming in.”

    Deputies found five bullet holes on the exterior of the house.

    Surveillance footage captured several individuals on 6th Avenue, one street over. A witness informed deputies that he saw four people in a backyard, with a couple of them taking turns firing into the ground to celebrate the New Year. Volusia County Sheriff Mike Chitwood reported that 30 rounds were fired into the ground.

    “You know you got a couple of 20-year-olds, obviously they’re drinking. One of them had just purchased a firearm and let’s go out half drunk and fire into the ground. What could possibly go wrong?” Chitwood said.

    According to VSO, deputies found shell casings at a nearby residence in Daytona Park Estates, and a witness who saw four people firing a gun.

    When the suspects returned to the nearby residence, deputies say they found a gun inside their vehicle.

    Axel Gomez, 21, was arrested on the charge of shooting into an occupied dwelling.

    Amy Gomez, 25, and Ken Newbold, 25, are facing charges of recklessly discharging a firearm in a residential area.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Bodycam video shows Ohio shoplifting suspect pulling gun on police officer

    [ad_1]

    A police officer in Canton, Ohio, is lucky to be alive after an accused shoplifter pointed a gun in his face and pulled the trigger. The whole incident was captured on body cam video.The video is in the player above, however, viewer discretion advised Canton police were called to the Walmart on Thursday afternoon for two people shoplifting.Police took 23-year-old Katerina Jeffrey and 21-year-old Shane Newman into custody after being accused of shoplifting.Before the two sat down, Newman was patted down.”Nothing on you that’s going to poke me, stab me?” the police officer asked Newman.Newman replied no.Minutes passed as the officer asked the two people for their names.After giving the officer a fake name, video showed Newman pulling a gun out of a pouch he was hiding. He shot the gun, but it did not go off. He then tried to reload and pointed it at the officer again.The theft prevention officer then jumped on Newman, causing him to drop the gun.The officer brought Newman to the ground and called for backup.Officers later found two bullets in Jeffrey’s pocket, who also had two warrants out for her arrest.Newman had one warrant of his own and was holding onto several pills.Jeffrey is facing a robbery charge and Newman is facing several charges, including assaulting a peace officer and attempted murder.

    A police officer in Canton, Ohio, is lucky to be alive after an accused shoplifter pointed a gun in his face and pulled the trigger.

    The whole incident was captured on body cam video.

    The video is in the player above, however, viewer discretion advised

    Canton police were called to the Walmart on Thursday afternoon for two people shoplifting.

    Police took 23-year-old Katerina Jeffrey and 21-year-old Shane Newman into custody after being accused of shoplifting.

    Before the two sat down, Newman was patted down.

    “Nothing on you that’s going to poke me, stab me?” the police officer asked Newman.

    Newman replied no.

    Minutes passed as the officer asked the two people for their names.

    After giving the officer a fake name, video showed Newman pulling a gun out of a pouch he was hiding. He shot the gun, but it did not go off.

    He then tried to reload and pointed it at the officer again.

    The theft prevention officer then jumped on Newman, causing him to drop the gun.

    The officer brought Newman to the ground and called for backup.

    Officers later found two bullets in Jeffrey’s pocket, who also had two warrants out for her arrest.

    Newman had one warrant of his own and was holding onto several pills.

    Jeffrey is facing a robbery charge and Newman is facing several charges, including assaulting a peace officer and attempted murder.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Australia announces gun buyback plans less than a week after Bondi Beach shooting

    [ad_1]

    Sydney — Australia will use a sweeping buyback scheme to “get guns off our streets,” Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Friday, showing his government was keen to take quick action less than a week after a terrorist attack left 15 people dead at a Jewish holiday gathering on Sydney’s famed Bondi Beach.

    Sajid Akram and his son Naveed are accused of opening fire on the festival, which was organized to mark the first day of Hanukkah on Sunday, in what was one of Australia’s deadliest mass shootings.

    Just hours after the attack, Albanese vowed to toughen national gun laws that allowed 50-year-old Sajid to own six high-powered rifles.

    “There is no reason someone living in the suburbs of Sydney needed this many guns,” he said.

    Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett are seen on Dec. 19, 2025, in Canberra, Australia, during a news conference in the wake of the Bondi Beach terrorist attack.

    Hilary Wardhaugh/Getty


    Australia would pay gun owners to surrender “surplus, newly banned and illegal firearms.”

    Albanese said Monday that his government was “prepared to take whatever action is necessary. Included in that is the need for tougher gun laws.” He specifically suggested measures that could limit the number of guns a licensed owner can obtain, and mandating a review process for existing licenses.

    The prime minister said the federal government would evenly split the cost of the buyback program with Australia’s state and territorial administrations, with further details to be worked out when lawmakers return to work next week.

    Investigation continues as Sydney remains on high alert

    Sajid Akram, 50, was killed in a gunfight with police, but his 24-year-old son Naveed survived. The unemployed bricklayer was charged earlier this week with 15 counts of murder, an act of terrorism, and dozens of other serious crimes after waking up from a coma in a Sydney hospital.

    Albanese said the attack was inspired by ISIS ideology, and Australian police are still investigating whether the pair may have met with Islamist extremists during a visit to the Philippines just a couple weeks before the shooting.

    They spent most of November in the south of the Asian nation, in a hotel in Davao City. A hotel employee told CBS News on Thursday that the father and son extended their stay week by week and paid in cash, and that they would go out during the day but return to the hotel every night, often bringing food back to eat in their room.

    He said staff noticed nothing particularly suspicious about the men during their nearly monthlong stay.

    Scenes From Davao Where Bondi Shooting Suspects Travelled In November

    A view of the GV Hotel, where Sajid and Naveed Akram, suspects in the Bondi Beach terror attack, stayed in November, as seen on Dec. 18, 2025, in Davao City, in the southern Philippines.

    Ezra Acayan/Getty


    Sydney, meanwhile, remains on high alert almost a week after the shootings.

    Armed police released seven men from custody on Friday, a day after detaining them on a tip they may have been plotting a “violent act,” as they reportedly headed for Bondi Beach.

    Police said there was no established link with the alleged Bondi gunmen and “no immediate safety risk to the community.”

    A second major Australian gun buyback spurred by a mass shooting

    The new buyback, assuming it is approved by lawmakers next week, will be the largest such government-funded program since 1996, when then-Prime Minister John Howard cracked down on firearms in the wake of another mass shooting, in which 35 people were killed in the town of Port Arthur.

    Just 12 days after that attack, Australian lawmakers approved legislation banning the sale and importation of all automatic and semi-automatic rifles and shotguns; forcing people to present a legitimate reason, and wait 28 days, to buy any firearm, and initiating the massive, mandatory gun-buyback for banned weapons.

    The government confiscated and destroyed nearly 700,000 firearms in the wake of the law’s adoption, reducing the number of gun-owning households by half.

    “It is incontestable that gun-related homicides have fallen quite significantly in Australia,” former premier Howard, who defied many in his own conservative party to usher in the 1996 law, told CBS News’ Seth Doane two decades later, in 2016.

    australia-gun-buyback-getty-158581520.jpg

    A Sept. 8, 1996 file photo shows Norm Legg, a project supervisor with a local security firm, holding an ArmaLite rifle similar to the one used in the Port Arthur mass shooting, which was handed in for scrap in Melbourne as part of a mandatory government gun buyback program after the attack.

    WILLIAM WEST/AFP/Getty


    In the 15 years before those laws were passed, there were 13 mass shootings in Australia. In the two decades after, there wasn’t a single one. Gun homicides overall decreased by nearly 60% in the same period.

    Asked to respond to critics who said the fall in gun deaths did not necessarily happen because of the legislation, Howard told CBS News: “The number of deaths from mass shootings, gun-related homicide has fallen, gun related suicide has fallen … Isn’t that evidence? Or are we expected to believe that that was all magically going to happen? Come on!”

    A study published earlier this year, however, found Australia still has some way to go to fully implement the 2016 legislation, called the National Firearms Agreement. The paper, by the Australia Institute think tank, said some of the measures had yet to be brought into force 29 years later, and others were being inconsistently enforced across different states.

    The law “was ambitious, politically brave, and necessary for public safety,” the report concluded, lauding Howard’s will to defy his fellow lawmakers.

    But “Australia still allows minors to hold firearm licenses, still lacks a National Firearms Register, and still has inconsistent laws that make enforcement difficult,” the group said, adding that overall gun ownership across the country had actually boomed over the last three decades.

    “There are now over four million registered privately owned guns in Australia: 800,000 more than before the (1996) buyback,” the institute said in its May report. “Australians needs gun laws that live up to the Howard Government’s bravery, and right now Australia does not have them.”

    Albanese, along with state and territorial leaders, agreed on Monday to look at ways to bolster gun laws, including by accelerating the launch of the national firearms register called for in the 1996 legislation, making gun licenses available only to Australian citizens, and imposing new restrictions the types of weapons that are legal for licensees to own.

    A memorial at sea, and a day of reflection planned for Bondi Beach victims

    Hundreds of people plunged into the ocean at Bondi Beach on Friday to honor the 15 people killed in the terror attack, forming a massive ring in the sea on surf and paddle boards, as Albanese announced a national day of reflection to be observed on Sunday.

    Albanese urged Australians to light candles at 6:47 p.m. on Sunday, “exactly one week since the attack unfolded.”

    Australia Shooting Beachgoers

    Surfers and swimmers paddle out into the ocean to hold a tribute for the victims of the terror attack at Bondi Beach, in Sydney, Australia, Dec. 19, 2025.

    Steve Markham/AP


    On Friday, swimmers and surfers paddled into a circle, bobbing in the gentle morning swell, splashing water and roaring with emotion.

    “They slaughtered innocent victims, and today I’m swimming out there and being part of my community again to bring back the light,” security consultant Jason Carr, 53, told AFP. “We’re still burying bodies. But I just felt it was important.”

    Carole Schlessinger, a 58-year-old chief executive of a children’s charity, said there was a “beautiful energy” at the ocean gathering. “To be together is such an important way of trying to deal with what’s going on.”

    “It was really lovely to be part of it,” she said, adding: “I personally am feeling very numb. I’m feeling super angry. I’m feeling furious.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 18-year-old wanted for stealing grandmother’s gun from her Volusia County apartment

    [ad_1]

    18-year-old wanted for stealing grandmother’s gun from her Volusia County apartment

    Updated: 11:28 PM EST Dec 16, 2025

    Editorial Standards

    Deputies are searching for Kendrick Graham, 18, who allegedly stole a loaded firearm from his grandmother’s apartment on Belltower Avenue in Deltona.According to the report, there were signs of forced entry to her bedroom. Graham has since been posting photos with the gun on social media.His family has been in contact with him, and he’s refusing to turn himself in. If you have information, contact VSO on 911 or email Det. Borbely at JBorbely@volusiasheriff.gov.

    Deputies are searching for Kendrick Graham, 18, who allegedly stole a loaded firearm from his grandmother’s apartment on Belltower Avenue in Deltona.

    According to the report, there were signs of forced entry to her bedroom. Graham has since been posting photos with the gun on social media.

    18-year-old wanted for stealing grandma's gun from volusia county apartment

    Volusia County Sheriff’s Office

    His family has been in contact with him, and he’s refusing to turn himself in. If you have information, contact VSO on 911 or email Det. Borbely at JBorbely@volusiasheriff.gov.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • USC coach Gottlieb weighs in on Brown shooting: ‘It’s the guns’

    [ad_1]

    USC women’s basketball coach Lindsay Gottlieb suffered a bitter defeat Saturday when her team lost 79-51 to top-ranked team UConn. But after she walked off court, she weighed in on a more pressing matter: the deadly shooting at her alma mater, Brown University.

    “It’s the guns,” Gottlieb said as she began a post-game news conference at the Ivy League school. “It doesn’t need to be this way.”

    Gottlieb said she got back to the locker room Saturday after the USC Trojans’ home game with No. 1 UConn Huskies and had “a million text messages” from former Brown teammates. A gunman had opened fire during final exams, killing two students and injuring nine others.

    “We’re the only country that lives this way,” Gottlieb said, her voice shaking as she noted that she knew people who have children at Brown. “Parents should not have to be worried about their kids.”

    Gottlieb, who graduated from Brown in 1999, was a member of the women’s basketball team and served as a student assistant coach during her senior season.

    One of her former teammates, she said, was flying into Providence on Sunday, because she had a daughter who had taken shelter in the basement of the library, and “she doesn’t know what’s going on there.”

    Oscar Perez, the Providence police chief, said Sunday that a person of interest in his 20s was in custody. No charges have been filed, he said, noting “we’re in the process of collecting evidence.”

    On Saturday, students and faculty spent the night on lockdown, trapped inside classrooms and dorms while law enforcement fanned out across Providence to search for the shooter.

    “Hopefully, everyone is safe and praying for peace for those that have lost people,” Gottlieb said before she assessed her team’s game against the Huskies. “And that’s that. It’s more important than basketball. We can all be better.”

    Brown University has canceled all remaining classes and exams for the fall semester.

    “The past 24 hours really have been unimaginable,” Christina Paxson, university president, wrote in an email to alumni. “It’s a tragedy that no university community is ever ready for.”

    [ad_2]

    Jenny Jarvie

    Source link

  • Suspect in NYC shooting of Jets cornerback Kris Boyd charged with attempted murder

    [ad_1]

    Frederick Green, a Bronx man who authorities said has four prior arrests, was charged Tuesday with attempted murder, assault and weapons possession in the shooting of New York Jets defensive back Kris Boyd on Nov. 16 outside a Midtown restaurant.

    Green, 20, was hiding in his girlfriend’s apartment in upstate New York and identified through social media posts and a Crime Stoppers tip, police sources told the New York Daily News. U.S. marshals took him into custody Monday in Amherst, N.Y., a suburb of Buffalo.

    Boyd, 29, was walking out of Asian fusion restaurant Sei Less with two teammates and another friend around 2 a.m. when he was shot in the abdomen and taken to Bellevue Hospital in critical condition. The bullet lodged near his right lung in the pulmonary artery, police said.

    He posted on social media Nov. 19 that he was “starting to breathe on my own,” but two weeks ago was readmitted to the hospital because of health complications. However, Boyd had recovered enough that last week he made a surprise appearance at the Jets’ practice facility and attended a special teams meeting.

    NYPD Chief of Detectives Joseph Kenny said at a news conference last month that the shooting occurred after a group of four to five men “chirped” at Boyd and his companions outside the restaurant, making fun of their fashionable attire.

    The confrontation continued when Boyd, Jets teammates Irvin Charles and Jamien Sherwood and another friend left the restaurant minutes later after deciding not to dine there. As they left, the same group again began to “verbally insult them, and once again, questioning their clothing,” Kenny said.

    A brawl ensued and one of the fighters — later allegedly identified as Green — fired two rounds from a gun, striking Boyd. Investigators released surveillance footage of the gunman and asked the public’s help identifying him.

    In an email to The Times on Nov. 17, an NYPD spokesman said, “The sought individual is described as male, medium complexion. He was last seen wearing a black cap, black sweatshirt, black pants, multi-colored sneakers, and carrying a black bookbag.”

    Green has four prior arrests, including one in 2024 for reckless endangerment and another in 2018 for robbery that was sealed because he was a juvenile, police told the Daily News.

    Boyd’s teammates were delighted to see him at the practice facility Dec. 3.

    “I’ve had friends that didn’t survive gunshot wounds, so to be able to see him walking around with a smile on his face, be able to [talk] with him, I mean, it’s always a blessing,” Jets edge rusher Jermaine Johnson told ESPN. “[Guns] aren’t toys and they’re very deadly, so the fact that he walked away from it is a blessing.”

    Boyd is in his first year with the Jets after playing the last two seasons with the Houston Texans and from 2019-2022 with the Minnesota Vikings, who drafted him in the seventh round in 2019 out of Texas.

    [ad_2]

    Steve Henson

    Source link

  • Md. man accused of pointing handgun at girls out singing Christmas carols – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    A group of 12-year-old girls were out visiting homes to sing Christmas carols Saturday night when Anne Arundel County police say a Maryland man pointed a gun at them.

    A group of 12-year-old girls were visiting homes to sing Christmas carols Saturday night when Anne Arundel County police say a Maryland man pointed a gun at them.

    Paul Susie is facing assault charges and is accused of pointing a loaded handgun at the three girls as they stood on his front stoop caroling in the 1700 block of Point No Point Drive, according to police.

    The group was going from home to home in the Annapolis neighborhood when one girl knocked twice on Susie’s door and said they were caroling, according to charging documents.

    While inside his house, 58-year-old Susie allegedly pointed a gun at the girls through a bay window next to the door at around 8:30 p.m., according to charging documents.

    Susie admitted being involved in the incident, police said.

    He was arrested and charged with first- and second-degree assault. According to charging documents, Susie also faces a charge related to handling a handgun while under the influence.

    Charging documents said Susie’s stoop was well lit and that Susie told a responding officer he had consumed at least one alcoholic beverage.

    Police recovered a loaded .40 caliber Glock handgun from Susie’s gun safe. He had a legal permit for the weapon.

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2025 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    [ad_2]

    Jessica Kronzer

    Source link

  • Sacramento man arrested, weapons cache seized after suspicious activity at schools

    [ad_1]

    A 29-year-old Sacramento man has been arrested after an investigation into suspicious activity at schools in east Sacramento County led to the seizure of multiple firearms, law enforcement patches and tactical gear, the sheriff’s office said. The investigation of Dalmin Muran began after he was repeatedly observed engaging in suspicious activity at schools, according to the Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office. In one case, he allegedly drove his vehicle onto the grounds of Rosemont High School during the evening and was observed wearing military-style clothing and night-vision optics. After a security guard told him to leave, he allegedly said he should be allowed access because the schools are “public grounds.” The sheriff’s office said during other visits he erroneously claimed to have prior military service and expressed interest in joining law enforcement. Deputies executed a search warrant at a home last week in connection with Muran and found “numerous” guns that had been modified, including an unserialized “ghost gun” rifle hidden in an attic, the sheriff’s office said. Hundreds of firearm parts and components for building or altering weapons were also seized, along with multiple smoke grenades, flash bangs and “pepper spray deployable smoke grenades.” Deputies also found multiple law enforcement patches and tactical gear, “including those from the Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office.”Muran was released on bond hours after being booked into custody at the Sacramento County Main Jail, the sheriff’s office said.Muran faces four felony counts related to weapons offenses, according to a criminal complaint filed on Nov. 13. One of the counts alleges that he stole firearm accessories from a gun range. An earlier complaint filed on Dec. 11, 2024, accuses Muran of unlawfully carrying a concealed firearm. He was arraigned on that case in June. He is next due in court in connection with both cases on Jan. 14. The sheriff’s office said it is concerned there may be unreported incidents where Muran represented himself as a law enforcement agent.See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    A 29-year-old Sacramento man has been arrested after an investigation into suspicious activity at schools in east Sacramento County led to the seizure of multiple firearms, law enforcement patches and tactical gear, the sheriff’s office said.

    The investigation of Dalmin Muran began after he was repeatedly observed engaging in suspicious activity at schools, according to the Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office. In one case, he allegedly drove his vehicle onto the grounds of Rosemont High School during the evening and was observed wearing military-style clothing and night-vision optics. After a security guard told him to leave, he allegedly said he should be allowed access because the schools are “public grounds.”

    The sheriff’s office said during other visits he erroneously claimed to have prior military service and expressed interest in joining law enforcement.

    Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office

    Deputies executed a search warrant at a home last week in connection with Muran and found “numerous” guns that had been modified, including an unserialized “ghost gun” rifle hidden in an attic, the sheriff’s office said.

    Weapons cache

    Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office

    Hundreds of firearm parts and components for building or altering weapons were also seized, along with multiple smoke grenades, flash bangs and “pepper spray deployable smoke grenades.”

    Gun parts

    Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office

    Deputies also found multiple law enforcement patches and tactical gear, “including those from the Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office.”

    Patches

    Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office

    Muran was released on bond hours after being booked into custody at the Sacramento County Main Jail, the sheriff’s office said.

    Muran faces four felony counts related to weapons offenses, according to a criminal complaint filed on Nov. 13. One of the counts alleges that he stole firearm accessories from a gun range.

    An earlier complaint filed on Dec. 11, 2024, accuses Muran of unlawfully carrying a concealed firearm. He was arraigned on that case in June.

    He is next due in court in connection with both cases on Jan. 14.

    The sheriff’s office said it is concerned there may be unreported incidents where Muran represented himself as a law enforcement agent.

    See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump pardons Jan. 6 rioter for gun offense and woman convicted of threatening to shoot FBI agents

    [ad_1]

    President Donald Trump has issued two pardons related to the investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, riot, including for a woman convicted of threatening to shoot FBI agents who were investigating a tip that she may have been at the Capitol, officials said Saturday.Related video above: BBC leaders resign amid scandal over misleading edit of Trump’s Jan. 6 speechIn a separate case, Trump issued a second pardon for a Jan. 6 defendant who had remained behind bars despite the sweeping grant of clemency for Capitol rioters because of a separate conviction for illegally possessing firearms.It’s the latest example of Trump’s willingness to use his constitutional authority to help supporters who were scrutinized as part of the Biden administration’s massive Jan. 6 investigation that led to charges against more than 1,500 defendants.Suzanne Ellen Kaye was released last year after serving an 18-month sentence in her threats case. After the FBI contacted her in 2021 about a tip indicating she may have been at the Capitol on Jan. 6, she posted a video on social media citing her Second Amendment right to carry a gun, and she threatened to shoot agents if they came to her house. In court papers, prosecutors said her words “were part of the ubiquity of violent political rhetoric that causes serious harm to our communities.”An email seeking comment was sent to a lawyer for Kaye on Saturday. Kaye testified at trial that she didn’t own any guns and didn’t intend to threaten the FBI, according to court papers. She told authorities she was not at the Capitol on Jan. 6 and wasn’t charged with any Capitol riot-related crimes.A White House official said Kaye suffers from “stress-induced seizures” and experienced one when the jury read its verdict. The White House said this is “clearly a case of disfavored First Amendment political speech being prosecuted and an excessive sentence.” The official requested anonymity because they weren’t authorized to publicly discuss the case.In a separate case, Trump pardoned Daniel Edwin Wilson, of Louisville, Kentucky, who was under investigation for his role in the riot when authorities found six guns and roughly 4,800 rounds of ammunition in his home. Because of prior felony convictions, it was illegal for him to possess firearms.Wilson’s case became part of a legal debate over whether Trump’s sweeping pardons for Jan. 6 rioters in January applied to other crimes discovered during the sprawling federal dragnet that began after the attack on the Capitol. The Trump-appointed federal judge who oversaw Wilson’s case criticized the Justice Department earlier this year for arguing that the president’s Jan. 6 pardons applied to Wilson’s gun offense.Wilson, who had been scheduled to remain in prison until 2028, was released Friday evening following the pardon, his lawyer said on Saturday.”We are grateful that President Trump has recognized the injustice in my client’s case and granted him this pardon,” attorney George Pallas said in an email. “Mr. Wilson can now reunite with his family and begin rebuilding his life.”The White House official said Saturday that “because the search of Mr. Wilson’s home was due to the events of January 6, and they should have never been there in the first place, President Trump is pardoning Mr. Wilson for the firearm issues.”Wilson had been sentenced in 2024 to five years in prison after pleading guilty to conspiring to impede or injure police officers and illegally possessing firearms at his home.Prosecutors had accused him of planning for the Jan. 6 riot for weeks and coming to Washington with the goal of stopping the peaceful transfer of power. Authorities said he communicated with members of the far-right Oath Keepers extremist group and adherents of the antigovernment Three Percenters movement as he marched to the Capitol.Prosecutors cited messages they argued showed that Wilson’s “plans were for a broader American civil war.” In one message on Nov. 9, 2020, he wrote: “I’m willing to do whatever. Done made up my mind. I understand the tip of the spear will not be easy. I’m willing to sacrifice myself if necessary. Whether it means prison or death.”Wilson said at his sentencing that he regretted entering the Capitol that day but “got involved with good intentions.”The Justice Department had initially argued in February that Trump’s pardons of the Jan. 6 rioters on his first day back in the White House didn’t extend to Wilson’s gun crime. The department later changed its position, saying it had received “further clarity on the intent of the Presidential Pardon.”U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich, who was nominated to the bench by Trump, criticized the department’s evolving position and said it was “extraordinary” that prosecutors were seeking to argue that Trump’s Jan. 6 pardons extended to illegal “contraband” found by investigators during searches related to the Jan. 6 cases.Politico first reported Wilson’s pardon on Saturday.Megerian reported from West Palm Beach, Fla.

    President Donald Trump has issued two pardons related to the investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, riot, including for a woman convicted of threatening to shoot FBI agents who were investigating a tip that she may have been at the Capitol, officials said Saturday.

    Related video above: BBC leaders resign amid scandal over misleading edit of Trump’s Jan. 6 speech

    In a separate case, Trump issued a second pardon for a Jan. 6 defendant who had remained behind bars despite the sweeping grant of clemency for Capitol rioters because of a separate conviction for illegally possessing firearms.

    It’s the latest example of Trump’s willingness to use his constitutional authority to help supporters who were scrutinized as part of the Biden administration’s massive Jan. 6 investigation that led to charges against more than 1,500 defendants.

    Suzanne Ellen Kaye was released last year after serving an 18-month sentence in her threats case. After the FBI contacted her in 2021 about a tip indicating she may have been at the Capitol on Jan. 6, she posted a video on social media citing her Second Amendment right to carry a gun, and she threatened to shoot agents if they came to her house. In court papers, prosecutors said her words “were part of the ubiquity of violent political rhetoric that causes serious harm to our communities.”

    An email seeking comment was sent to a lawyer for Kaye on Saturday. Kaye testified at trial that she didn’t own any guns and didn’t intend to threaten the FBI, according to court papers. She told authorities she was not at the Capitol on Jan. 6 and wasn’t charged with any Capitol riot-related crimes.

    A White House official said Kaye suffers from “stress-induced seizures” and experienced one when the jury read its verdict. The White House said this is “clearly a case of disfavored First Amendment political speech being prosecuted and an excessive sentence.” The official requested anonymity because they weren’t authorized to publicly discuss the case.

    In a separate case, Trump pardoned Daniel Edwin Wilson, of Louisville, Kentucky, who was under investigation for his role in the riot when authorities found six guns and roughly 4,800 rounds of ammunition in his home. Because of prior felony convictions, it was illegal for him to possess firearms.

    Wilson’s case became part of a legal debate over whether Trump’s sweeping pardons for Jan. 6 rioters in January applied to other crimes discovered during the sprawling federal dragnet that began after the attack on the Capitol. The Trump-appointed federal judge who oversaw Wilson’s case criticized the Justice Department earlier this year for arguing that the president’s Jan. 6 pardons applied to Wilson’s gun offense.

    Wilson, who had been scheduled to remain in prison until 2028, was released Friday evening following the pardon, his lawyer said on Saturday.

    “We are grateful that President Trump has recognized the injustice in my client’s case and granted him this pardon,” attorney George Pallas said in an email. “Mr. Wilson can now reunite with his family and begin rebuilding his life.”

    The White House official said Saturday that “because the search of Mr. Wilson’s home was due to the events of January 6, and they should have never been there in the first place, President Trump is pardoning Mr. Wilson for the firearm issues.”

    Wilson had been sentenced in 2024 to five years in prison after pleading guilty to conspiring to impede or injure police officers and illegally possessing firearms at his home.

    Prosecutors had accused him of planning for the Jan. 6 riot for weeks and coming to Washington with the goal of stopping the peaceful transfer of power. Authorities said he communicated with members of the far-right Oath Keepers extremist group and adherents of the antigovernment Three Percenters movement as he marched to the Capitol.

    Prosecutors cited messages they argued showed that Wilson’s “plans were for a broader American civil war.” In one message on Nov. 9, 2020, he wrote: “I’m willing to do whatever. Done made up my mind. I understand the tip of the spear will not be easy. I’m willing to sacrifice myself if necessary. Whether it means prison or death.”

    Wilson said at his sentencing that he regretted entering the Capitol that day but “got involved with good intentions.”

    The Justice Department had initially argued in February that Trump’s pardons of the Jan. 6 rioters on his first day back in the White House didn’t extend to Wilson’s gun crime. The department later changed its position, saying it had received “further clarity on the intent of the Presidential Pardon.”

    U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich, who was nominated to the bench by Trump, criticized the department’s evolving position and said it was “extraordinary” that prosecutors were seeking to argue that Trump’s Jan. 6 pardons extended to illegal “contraband” found by investigators during searches related to the Jan. 6 cases.

    Politico first reported Wilson’s pardon on Saturday.


    Megerian reported from West Palm Beach, Fla.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump pardons Jan. 6 rioter for gun offense and woman convicted of threatening to shoot FBI agents

    [ad_1]

    President Donald Trump has issued two pardons related to the investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, riot, including for a woman convicted of threatening to shoot FBI agents who were investigating a tip that she may have been at the Capitol, officials said Saturday.Related video above: BBC leaders resign amid scandal over misleading edit of Trump’s Jan. 6 speechIn a separate case, Trump issued a second pardon for a Jan. 6 defendant who had remained behind bars despite the sweeping grant of clemency for Capitol rioters because of a separate conviction for illegally possessing firearms.It’s the latest example of Trump’s willingness to use his constitutional authority to help supporters who were scrutinized as part of the Biden administration’s massive Jan. 6 investigation that led to charges against more than 1,500 defendants.Suzanne Ellen Kaye was released last year after serving an 18-month sentence in her threats case. After the FBI contacted her in 2021 about a tip indicating she may have been at the Capitol on Jan. 6, she posted a video on social media citing her Second Amendment right to carry a gun, and she threatened to shoot agents if they came to her house. In court papers, prosecutors said her words “were part of the ubiquity of violent political rhetoric that causes serious harm to our communities.”An email seeking comment was sent to a lawyer for Kaye on Saturday. Kaye testified at trial that she didn’t own any guns and didn’t intend to threaten the FBI, according to court papers. She told authorities she was not at the Capitol on Jan. 6 and wasn’t charged with any Capitol riot-related crimes.A White House official said Kaye suffers from “stress-induced seizures” and experienced one when the jury read its verdict. The White House said this is “clearly a case of disfavored First Amendment political speech being prosecuted and an excessive sentence.” The official requested anonymity because they weren’t authorized to publicly discuss the case.In a separate case, Trump pardoned Daniel Edwin Wilson, of Louisville, Kentucky, who was under investigation for his role in the riot when authorities found six guns and roughly 4,800 rounds of ammunition in his home. Because of prior felony convictions, it was illegal for him to possess firearms.Wilson’s case became part of a legal debate over whether Trump’s sweeping pardons for Jan. 6 rioters in January applied to other crimes discovered during the sprawling federal dragnet that began after the attack on the Capitol. The Trump-appointed federal judge who oversaw Wilson’s case criticized the Justice Department earlier this year for arguing that the president’s Jan. 6 pardons applied to Wilson’s gun offense.Wilson, who had been scheduled to remain in prison until 2028, was released Friday evening following the pardon, his lawyer said on Saturday.”We are grateful that President Trump has recognized the injustice in my client’s case and granted him this pardon,” attorney George Pallas said in an email. “Mr. Wilson can now reunite with his family and begin rebuilding his life.”The White House official said Saturday that “because the search of Mr. Wilson’s home was due to the events of January 6, and they should have never been there in the first place, President Trump is pardoning Mr. Wilson for the firearm issues.”Wilson had been sentenced in 2024 to five years in prison after pleading guilty to conspiring to impede or injure police officers and illegally possessing firearms at his home.Prosecutors had accused him of planning for the Jan. 6 riot for weeks and coming to Washington with the goal of stopping the peaceful transfer of power. Authorities said he communicated with members of the far-right Oath Keepers extremist group and adherents of the antigovernment Three Percenters movement as he marched to the Capitol.Prosecutors cited messages they argued showed that Wilson’s “plans were for a broader American civil war.” In one message on Nov. 9, 2020, he wrote: “I’m willing to do whatever. Done made up my mind. I understand the tip of the spear will not be easy. I’m willing to sacrifice myself if necessary. Whether it means prison or death.”Wilson said at his sentencing that he regretted entering the Capitol that day but “got involved with good intentions.”The Justice Department had initially argued in February that Trump’s pardons of the Jan. 6 rioters on his first day back in the White House didn’t extend to Wilson’s gun crime. The department later changed its position, saying it had received “further clarity on the intent of the Presidential Pardon.”U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich, who was nominated to the bench by Trump, criticized the department’s evolving position and said it was “extraordinary” that prosecutors were seeking to argue that Trump’s Jan. 6 pardons extended to illegal “contraband” found by investigators during searches related to the Jan. 6 cases.Politico first reported Wilson’s pardon on Saturday.Megerian reported from West Palm Beach, Fla.

    President Donald Trump has issued two pardons related to the investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, riot, including for a woman convicted of threatening to shoot FBI agents who were investigating a tip that she may have been at the Capitol, officials said Saturday.

    Related video above: BBC leaders resign amid scandal over misleading edit of Trump’s Jan. 6 speech

    In a separate case, Trump issued a second pardon for a Jan. 6 defendant who had remained behind bars despite the sweeping grant of clemency for Capitol rioters because of a separate conviction for illegally possessing firearms.

    It’s the latest example of Trump’s willingness to use his constitutional authority to help supporters who were scrutinized as part of the Biden administration’s massive Jan. 6 investigation that led to charges against more than 1,500 defendants.

    Suzanne Ellen Kaye was released last year after serving an 18-month sentence in her threats case. After the FBI contacted her in 2021 about a tip indicating she may have been at the Capitol on Jan. 6, she posted a video on social media citing her Second Amendment right to carry a gun, and she threatened to shoot agents if they came to her house. In court papers, prosecutors said her words “were part of the ubiquity of violent political rhetoric that causes serious harm to our communities.”

    An email seeking comment was sent to a lawyer for Kaye on Saturday. Kaye testified at trial that she didn’t own any guns and didn’t intend to threaten the FBI, according to court papers. She told authorities she was not at the Capitol on Jan. 6 and wasn’t charged with any Capitol riot-related crimes.

    A White House official said Kaye suffers from “stress-induced seizures” and experienced one when the jury read its verdict. The White House said this is “clearly a case of disfavored First Amendment political speech being prosecuted and an excessive sentence.” The official requested anonymity because they weren’t authorized to publicly discuss the case.

    In a separate case, Trump pardoned Daniel Edwin Wilson, of Louisville, Kentucky, who was under investigation for his role in the riot when authorities found six guns and roughly 4,800 rounds of ammunition in his home. Because of prior felony convictions, it was illegal for him to possess firearms.

    Wilson’s case became part of a legal debate over whether Trump’s sweeping pardons for Jan. 6 rioters in January applied to other crimes discovered during the sprawling federal dragnet that began after the attack on the Capitol. The Trump-appointed federal judge who oversaw Wilson’s case criticized the Justice Department earlier this year for arguing that the president’s Jan. 6 pardons applied to Wilson’s gun offense.

    Wilson, who had been scheduled to remain in prison until 2028, was released Friday evening following the pardon, his lawyer said on Saturday.

    “We are grateful that President Trump has recognized the injustice in my client’s case and granted him this pardon,” attorney George Pallas said in an email. “Mr. Wilson can now reunite with his family and begin rebuilding his life.”

    The White House official said Saturday that “because the search of Mr. Wilson’s home was due to the events of January 6, and they should have never been there in the first place, President Trump is pardoning Mr. Wilson for the firearm issues.”

    Wilson had been sentenced in 2024 to five years in prison after pleading guilty to conspiring to impede or injure police officers and illegally possessing firearms at his home.

    Prosecutors had accused him of planning for the Jan. 6 riot for weeks and coming to Washington with the goal of stopping the peaceful transfer of power. Authorities said he communicated with members of the far-right Oath Keepers extremist group and adherents of the antigovernment Three Percenters movement as he marched to the Capitol.

    Prosecutors cited messages they argued showed that Wilson’s “plans were for a broader American civil war.” In one message on Nov. 9, 2020, he wrote: “I’m willing to do whatever. Done made up my mind. I understand the tip of the spear will not be easy. I’m willing to sacrifice myself if necessary. Whether it means prison or death.”

    Wilson said at his sentencing that he regretted entering the Capitol that day but “got involved with good intentions.”

    The Justice Department had initially argued in February that Trump’s pardons of the Jan. 6 rioters on his first day back in the White House didn’t extend to Wilson’s gun crime. The department later changed its position, saying it had received “further clarity on the intent of the Presidential Pardon.”

    U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich, who was nominated to the bench by Trump, criticized the department’s evolving position and said it was “extraordinary” that prosecutors were seeking to argue that Trump’s Jan. 6 pardons extended to illegal “contraband” found by investigators during searches related to the Jan. 6 cases.

    Politico first reported Wilson’s pardon on Saturday.


    Megerian reported from West Palm Beach, Fla.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Elderly woman tells bank employees she was kidnapped, ordered to withdraw large sum of cash

    [ad_1]

    Two people were arrested after an older woman told bank employees in Ceres, California, that she had been kidnapped and was ordered to withdraw a large amount of money, according to police. Wells Fargo employees reported the incident to police on Thursday. Police responded and immediately arrested a woman who police later learned identified herself with a false name. Police said that 33-year-old Nicholas Payton, who is a felon on probation, was also involved in the kidnapping. He fled the area before police arrived but was arrested a block away.Officers said they found a loaded rifle without a serial number in Payton’s backpack. Both suspects were booked on kidnapping, elder abuse charges and conspiracy to commit a crime charges. Payton was also booked for being a prohibited person in possession of a firearm, a prohibited person in possession of ammunition, carrying a loaded firearm in public, carrying a firearm while in possession of a controlled substance, and possession of an unserialized firearm.The victim was reunited with her family.Police said Saturday that they later learned with the help of the Stanislaus County Sheriff’s Office and fingerprint analysis that one of the suspect’s real names was Stephanie Maghoney. She had an active felony warrant for her arrest in Tracy, California, for burglary. Maghoney was re-arrested for that outstanding warrant and now also faces a felony charge for false impersonation.

    Two people were arrested after an older woman told bank employees in Ceres, California, that she had been kidnapped and was ordered to withdraw a large amount of money, according to police.

    Wells Fargo employees reported the incident to police on Thursday. Police responded and immediately arrested a woman who police later learned identified herself with a false name.

    Police said that 33-year-old Nicholas Payton, who is a felon on probation, was also involved in the kidnapping. He fled the area before police arrived but was arrested a block away.

    Officers said they found a loaded rifle without a serial number in Payton’s backpack. Both suspects were booked on kidnapping, elder abuse charges and conspiracy to commit a crime charges.

    Payton was also booked for being a prohibited person in possession of a firearm, a prohibited person in possession of ammunition, carrying a loaded firearm in public, carrying a firearm while in possession of a controlled substance, and possession of an unserialized firearm.

    The victim was reunited with her family.

    Police said Saturday that they later learned with the help of the Stanislaus County Sheriff’s Office and fingerprint analysis that one of the suspect’s real names was Stephanie Maghoney.

    She had an active felony warrant for her arrest in Tracy, California, for burglary.

    Maghoney was re-arrested for that outstanding warrant and now also faces a felony charge for false impersonation.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Belen teen who brandished gun on video took it from grandfather’s closet: records

    [ad_1]

    Some victims depicted in the photos and videos were infants.

    Some victims depicted in the photos and videos were infants.

    A teenage boy told police that he was bullied several times before a video circulating among students at Belen Jesuit Preparatory School showed him holding and racking a handgun while on a Facetime call with another classmate last week, court records show.

    Miami-Dade Sheriff’s Office detectives went to the school Wednesday and a dean played them Facetime video showing the boy holding the gun and pulling the slide back, making it appear like he loaded a round in the chamber, according to a report from the agency petitioning for the boy to receive mandatory mental health care.

    The Facetime call was between the teen and a classmate, detectives say.

    The video did not have sound, but the school official also played detectives a voice memo that the boy sent in which he says, “Tomorrow it is going down,” and then making popping noises to mimic gunfire, the report states.

    Detectives went to the boy’s home and interviewed him and his mother, the report states. The boy, who the Miami Herald is not naming, told detectives he was the person in the video. He said he took the gun from his grandfather’s closet without permission, per the report.

    The teen told detectives he racked the gun to make it look like he loaded a bullet in the chamber “because he wanted to ensure his classmate heard the sound,” the report states.

    The gun was not loaded, he told detectives, according to the report, which notes the teen said he was bullied several times in the past, including by the classmate with whom he was on the call.

    The sheriff’s office told Miami Herald news partner CBS News Miami the teen is receiving mental health care under Florida’s Baker Act. His mother told detectives she was also getting her son mental health help, per the report.

    CBS News Miami also obtained a letter the school sent to parents saying that additional security measures have been put in place as a result of the video.

    “The safety of everyone on our campus will always be our number one priority,” the letter stated. “We hope that everyone—students, faculty, staff, and parents—can work together to remain vigilant.”

    This story was originally published October 20, 2025 at 8:05 PM.

    David Goodhue

    Miami Herald

    David Goodhue covers the Florida Keys and South Florida for FLKeysNews.com and the Miami Herald. Before joining the Herald, he covered Congress, the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Energy in Washington, D.C. He is a graduate of the University of Delaware.

    [ad_2]

    David Goodhue

    Source link