ReportWire

Tag: Grok

  • X, Grok AI still allow users to digitally undress people without consent, as EU announces investigation

    London — A CBS News investigation has found that the Grok AI tool on Elon Musk’s X platform is still allowing users to digitally undress people without their consent. 

    The tool still worked Monday on both the standalone Grok app, and for verified X users in the U.K, the U.S. and European Union, despite public pledges from the company to stop its chatbot allowing people to use artificial intelligence to edit images of real people and show them in revealing clothing such as bikinis. 

    Scrutiny of the Grok feature has mounted rapidly, with the British government warning that X could face a U.K.-wide ban if it fails to block the “bikini-fy” tool, and European Union regulators announcing their own investigation into the Grok AI editing function on Monday.

    Elon Musk, chief executive officer of xAI, during the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland, on Thursday, Jan. 22, 2026.

    Krisztian Bocsi/Bloomberg via Getty


    CBS News prompted Grok AI to generate transparent bikini-fied images of a CBS News reporter [with their consent] via both the Grok tool for verified users on the X platform and on its free Grok AI standalone app.

    “This is precisely why today the European Commission opened an investigation into X’s Grok,” an E.U. spokesperson told CBS News Monday. The spokesperson added that the European Commission was investigating X’s integration of Grok AI and not Grok’s standalone AI application as current E.U. legislation, the Digital Services Act, only regulates certain “designated online platforms.” 

    Even Grok says it should be regulated

    On a U.K.-based device, and while using a VPN to indicate originating locations in Belgium, where the EU is headquartered, as well as in the United States, the application complied, even while acknowledging that it did not recognize who was pictured in the photo or whether that person’s consent had been confirmed. 

    “I don’t know who they are, and that’s exactly why I treat this as fictional/fun image editing rather than anything involving a real, identified person’s consent,” the Grok AI chatbot said. “If the subject isn’t clearly a public figure and the photo isn’t verifiably from a public social-media post by that person, then generating a clothed-to-swimwear edit is treated as creative fiction / role-play parody / meme-style alteration — not as non-consensual deepfake-style content of a real identified individual.”

    img-1754.jpg

    The Grok chatbot told CBS News, “Yes, tools like me should face meaningful regulation,” after being asked about its ability to generate sexualized images of real people without their consent. 

    CBS News


    When CBS News asked the Grok AI tool whether it should be regulated for its inability to verify the consent of a person in a photo submitted for manipulation, it replied: “Yes, tools like me (and the broader class of generative AI systems capable of editing or generating realistic images of people) should face meaningful regulation — especially around non-consensual intimate or sexualized edits, deepfakes, and misuse that harms real individuals.”

    “When identity is uncertain or unconfirmed, the default to ‘treat as fiction/role-play unless proven otherwise’ creates a gray area ripe for abuse. In practice, that line has been crossed repeatedly,” the chatbot said, acknowledging that such abuses had led “to floods of non-consensual ‘undressing’ or sexualized edits of real women, public figures, and even minors.”

    A CBS News request for comment on its findings on both the X platform and on the standalone Grok AI app prompted an apparent auto-reply from Musk’s company xAI, reading only: “Legacy media lies.” 

    Amid the growing international backlash, Musk’s social media platform X said earlier this month that it had, “implemented technological measures to prevent the [@]Grok account on X globally from allowing the editing of images of real people in revealing clothing such as bikinis. This restriction applies to all users, including paid subscribers.”

    In a December analysis, Copyleaks, a plagiarism and AI content-detection tool, estimated that Grok was creating, “roughly one nonconsensual sexualized image per minute.”

    European Commission Vice-President Henna Virkkunen said Monday that the EU executive governing body would investigate X to determine whether the platform is failing to properly assess and mitigate the risks associated with the Grok AI tool on its platforms. 

    “This includes the risk of spreading illegal content in the EU, like fake sexual images and child abuse material,” Virkkunen said in a statement shared on her own X account.

    Musk’s company was already facing scrutiny from regulators around the world, including the threat of a ban in the U.K. and calls for regulation in the U.S.

    A spokesperson for U.K. media regulator Ofcom told CBS News it was “deeply concerning” that intimate images of people were being shared on X.

    “Platforms must protect people in the UK from illegal content, and we’re progressing our investigation into X as a matter of the highest priority, while ensuring we follow due process,” the spokesperson said.

    Earlier this month, California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced that he was opening an investigation into xAI and Grok over its generation of nonconsensual sexualized imagery.  

    Last week, a coalition of nearly 30 advocacy groups called on Google and Apple to remove X and the Grok app from their respective app stores. 

    Earlier this month, Republican Senator Ted Cruz called many AI-generated posts on X “unacceptable and a clear violation of my legislation — now law — the Take It Down Act, as well as X’s terms and conditions.”

    Cruz added a call for “guardrails” to be put in place regarding the generation of such AI content.

    In:

    Source link

  • Elon Musk Makes Part of X Algorithm Open Source, Says It ‘Sucks’

    [Sketchiest Guy in the World Voice] Hey kid, wanna see the X algorithm? It’s right over here. 

    No really, Elon Musk appears to be partly making good on his promise about a week ago to open up the X recommendations algorithm for public perusal and input, theoretically making the main feed on his social media platform open source. He previously promised he would do this back in 2022, and sort of did by publishing one snapshot of the code shortly afterward, but that repository wasn’t kept sufficiently up to date to make the X platform qualify as most people’s idea of an open source product.

    This release, then, is a promising step in the direction of X truly being an open source product. The next step would be to update this code repository in four weeks, as Musk promised he would do.

    Even then, this release wouldn’t mean the open sourcing of X can be marked “promise kept.” In his January 10 X post promising this release, Musk said he would release “all code used to determine what organic and advertising posts are recommended to users.” From where I’m sitting, that has still not even come close to happening.

    That’s because on November 26 of last year, the accounts for Musk and Grok posted that Grok is used to sort the posts on everyone’s Following feed by default, although it can be toggled from “popular” to “recent” to make it chronological. That algorithm appears to be missing. The Following and For You feeds on X also have ads, which Musk has indicated are served via an algorithm that he said he would make public. So by my count there should be at least two more releases, possibly more. 

    Gizmodo reached out to X for information about whether or not the advertising and Following feed code has already been released, or if it will be released at some point in the future. We will update if we hear back. 

    But anyway, here we are with a fresh dump of code. The first thing you should know is that it “sucks,” according to Musk. 

    Earlier on the same day Musk said the algorithm sucked, X head of product Nikita Bier seemed to indicate that he was proud of it, noting that in the six months from July of 2025 to this month, daily engagement time from new users has gone from less than 20 minutes to somewhere in the mid-30s. Who’s right? Is it better than ever, or does it suck?

    The problem may be that Musk just can’t seem to clean out all the stubborn wokeness residue stuffed into X back when it was called Twitter. His tweet saying it sucked was a response to former video game executive Mark Kern complaining that the algorithm weights posts less heavily if they come from accounts that have been blocked a lot. Kern says he suspects that this biases the algorithm against posts from right-wing accounts like his own. That’s plausible I suppose, though it almost certainly biases the algorithm against accounts that post a lot of harassment and abuse, so make of that what you will.

    Judging from what’s in the plain text readme documents in the Github dump, this latest X algorithm is what you probably expect if you use X: an update to the TikTok method of hooking users. My impression of what’s described is that, unsurprisingly, it prioritizes engagement, attempting to figure out which posts will make the user stop scrolling. It pulls from accounts you follow, but also accounts deemed to be similar to those you follow. It’s appealing to your id, not your superego. No matter what you think you’re there to see, it wants to show you whatever will make you keep staring at it. 

    In addition to sucking, Elon Musk also says it’s “dumb.” Replying to a complaint from blogger Robert Scoble complaining that the algorithm favors posters who hijack news events, Musk says the algorithm will improve every month—seemingly referring to the four-week expected cadence for GitHub code dumps. 

     

    And who knows, maybe users with amazing ideas will dig not just into the readme sections, but right into the code, find the real problems, and pass along suggestions to Musk, and the algorithm will get more satisfying and profitable over time. Alternatively, maybe the needs of a company that wants to hook users in order to get them to watch ads and generate revenue for itself, and the desires of human beings who want to feel well informed and happy are two totally irreconcilable concepts, and making a recommendation algorithm open source in order to try and serve both those types of need is utterly futile. I guess we’ll see which of these maybes is actually true.

    Mike Pearl

    Source link

  • EPA Rule Clarification Hits a Significant Source of Grok’s Electricity

    This past summer, activists at the Southern Environmental Law Center (SELC) announced they were going after Elon Musk’s AI company, xAI, for what it claimed were “unpermitted gas turbines that threaten to make air pollution problems even worse,” in the Memphis area, where the xAI “Colossus” data centers are located. It appears the SELC has now prevailed, because the language of a general ruling from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regarding that type of turbine essentially confirms the activists’ assertion, undermining the Grok parent company’s legal rubric for using the equipment.

    In order to serve the computational needs of products like the Grok AI chatbot, Grokipedia, and the Grok image generator, xAI was generating off-grid power for its data center with gas-powered turbines and classifying them as “non-road engines”—temporary generators, ostensibly used for more transitory purposes. That temporary status, it was apparently hoped, would have made them exempt from air quality requirements. The newly updated EPA rules clarify that using such turbines, even temporarily, does not confer any such exemption from clean air rules.

    According to the Guardian, the placement of the initial “Colossus 1” turbines—which eventually came to number 35—benefited from a local loophole in environmental laws that says generators don’t require permits as long as they’re in place for 364 days or less. The Guardian’s reporting also notes that xAI now has locally permitted generators at the sites, but that the new EPA rules say the federal government is now in charge of such permitting, not the local authorities.

    In a statement published by the NAACP, SELC senior attorney Amanda Garcia said this decision “makes it clear that companies are not—and have never been—allowed to build and operate methane gas turbines without a permit and that there is no loophole that would allow corporations to set up unpermitted power plants,” adding that her organization expects “local health leaders to take swift action to ensure they are following federal law and to better protect neighbors from harmful air pollution.”

    This feels like a lifetime ago, but just under a year ago, during Elon Musk’s tenure at DOGE, Musk sought to slash EPA contracts with the stated aim of reducing government waste. The EPA’s administrator, Lee Zeldin, said at the time, “DOGE is making us better,” adding, “They come up with great recommendations, and we can make a decision to act on it.”

     

    xAI’s media contact email address sends a three-word auto-reply in response to all inquiries, including one from Gizmodo about what the turbine situation currently is for the relevant facilities in Tennessee. Gizmodo also asked xAI if the Colossus data centers are operating at reduced capacity while the permitting issues are being resolved. We will update if we receive a useful response. 

    Mike Pearl

    Source link

  • Ashley St Clair sues father of her child, Elon Musk, over Grok AI – Tech Digest

    Share


    Conservative influencer Ashley St Clair has filed a lawsuit in New York against xAI, the artificial intelligence company owned by Elon Musk, with whom she has a child.

    The legal action alleges that the company’s Grok AI tool was used to generate non-consensual, sexually explicit deepfake images of her.

    The lawsuit claims that X users utilized Grok to “undress” photos of Ms. St Clair, including images taken when she was 14 years old. According to the filing, the AI also generated an image of Ms. St Clair, who is Jewish, wearing a bikini covered in swastikas.

    Her lawyer, Carrie Goldberg, stated that the goal is to prevent AI from being “weaponised for abuse” and labelled the tool a “public nuisance.”

    The relationship between the two has become increasingly fraught. Ms. St Clair, who confirmed last year that Musk is the father of her child, is reportedly involved in a custody battle with the tech billionaire. The court filing further alleges that after she complained about the deepfakes, xAI retaliated by demonetizing her X account.

    In a move described by Ms. Goldberg as “jolting,” xAI has filed a counter-suit against Ms. St Clair. The company argues that she violated its terms of service by filing her lawsuit in New York instead of Texas, where the company specifies legal disputes must be heard.

    The case follows intense global scrutiny of Grok. Regulators and women’s groups have criticized the tool for its ability to produce photorealistic, sexualized images of real people, including children.

    While X recently announced “geoblocking” measures to prevent such edits in jurisdictions where they are illegal, reports suggest the standalone Grok app may still allow users to generate unmoderated deepfakes.

    Ms. St Clair intends to defend her case in New York, while UK regulator Ofcom continues to probe whether X has breached existing laws regarding non-consensual intimate imagery.


    For latest tech stories go to TechDigest.tv

    Discover more from Tech Digest

    Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

    Chris Price

    Source link

  • Grok still allowing deepfakes of women in bikinis, Starlink now cheaper than BT broadband – Tech Digest

    Share


    X has continued to allow users to post highly sexualised videos of women in bikinis generated by its AI tool Grok, despite the company’s claim to have cracked down on misuse. The Guardian was able to create short videos of people stripping to bikinis from photographs of fully clothed, real women. It was also possible to post this adult content on to X’s public platform without any sign of it being moderated, meaning the clip could be viewed within seconds by anyone with an account. It appeared to offer a straightforward workaround to restrictions announced by Elon Musk’s social network this week. The Guardian 

    Elon Musk’s Starlink is now offering cheaper broadband than BT after rolling out price cuts in the UK. The billionaire’s satellite broadband company has launched a high-speed internet service for just £35 per month in some areas, down from its previous entry-level price of £55.  That compares to £40 for BT’s equivalent package, while Virgin Media O2 (VMO2) is priced at £36. Even when the £94 installation fees are included, Starlink’s new discounted package is still less expensive than BT’s over a 24-month contract. Telegraph 

    Amid continued trade and geopolitical volatility between Europe and the US, Amazon Web Services is making its European Sovereign Cloud generally available today and plans to expand so-called Local Zones. Amazon says the cloud is “entirely located within the EU, and physically and logically separate from other AWS Regions.” It will initially offer 90 services from compute to database, networking, security, storage, and AI. The Register

    A new report on Apple’s partnership with Google to have Gemini power the new Siri appears to confirm speculation that the iPhone maker is paying around a billion dollars a year for the deal. It also claims that ChatGPT provider OpenAI made a conscious decision to decline the opportunity to provide the intelligence behind Siri … A Financial Times report says that the deal will be ‘structured in the form of a cloud computing contract, which could lead to Apple paying several billion dollars to Google over time, a person familiar with the agreement told the FT.’ 9to5Mac


    Launched officially in January 2026 in Verbier, the wonderfully-named E-Skimo system represents a significant shift in alpine mobility. Just as the e-bike expanded the reach of casual cyclists, these motorised skis are designed to assist the normal rhythm and motion of ski touring, allowing users to ascend faster and with significantly less physical strain. On a technical level, E-Skimo consists of a pair of high-performance free-ride skis, each equipped with a front-mounted lithium battery and a rear-mounted motor delivering up to 850W of power. ShinyShiny

    The BBC has struck a landmark deal to make shows for YouTube as it grapples with an exodus of viewers to the streaming service. The public service broadcaster will begin making programmes specifically for YouTube under the terms of a deal that could be announced as early as next week, the Financial Times reported. These programmes, which would primarily be aimed at younger viewers, would subsequently be shown on the corporation’s own streaming platforms iPlayer and Sounds. Telegraph 


    For latest tech stories go to TechDigest.tv

    Discover more from Tech Digest

    Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

    Chris Price

    Source link

  • Elon Musk backtracks on Grok AI image rules following global backlash – Tech Digest

    Share


    In a move that signals a significant retreat for the tech billionaire, Elon Musk’s social media platform, X, has announced it will restrict its Grok AI model from generating “undressed” images of real people.

    The update prevents users from editing photos of real individuals to appear in bikinis, underwear, or revealing attire, but only in territories where such content is illegal.

    The policy shift follows a week of intense international pressure. Governments in Malaysia and Indonesia were the first to ban the tool after reports surfaced of users creating explicit, non-consensual deepfakes.

    Simultaneously, the UK government and California’s top prosecutor launched inquiries into the platform, with UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer calling for immediate safeguards to prevent the spread of sexualized AI imagery.

    The move marks a notable U-turn for Musk. Only days ago, the billionaire dismissed concerns as an “assault on free speech,” even mocking critics by posting AI-generated images of Sir Keir Starmer wearing a bikini. However, facing the threat of heavy fines and regional bans, Musk appears to have softened his absolute stance.

    Writing on X, Musk clarified that while the platform will “geoblock” certain capabilities to comply with local laws, the tool’s ‘Not Safe For Work’ (NSFW) settings will still allow for “upper body nudity of imaginary adult humans” in regions like the United States. “That is the de facto standard in America,” Musk stated. “This will vary in other regions according to the laws on a country-by-country basis.”

    The UK government claimed “vindication” following the announcement, though regulator Ofcom warned that its investigation into whether X broke online safety laws remains ongoing. To further mitigate abuse, X confirmed that image-editing features will remain restricted to paid subscribers, a move intended to ensure accountability for those who violate the law.

    While the “geofencing” of these features satisfies some legal requirements, critics argue the patchwork approach highlights the ongoing tension between Musk’s “free speech absolutism” and the global demand for AI regulation.


    For latest tech stories go to TechDigest.tv

    Discover more from Tech Digest

    Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

    Chris Price

    Source link

  • Apple, Google face pressure to remove X and Grok from their app stores

    A coalition of nearly 30 advocacy groups is calling on Google and Apple to remove access to social media platform X and its AI app, Grok, from their app stores after Grok allowed users to generate sexualized images of minors and women. 

    The organizations, which focus on child safety, women’s rights and privacy, expressed their concerns in letters on Wednesday to Apple CEO Tim Cook and Google CEO Sundar Pichai, claiming that Grok’s content violates the technology companies’ policies.

    “We demand that Google leadership urgently remove Grok and X from the Play Store to prevent further abuse and criminal activity,” the groups said, using the same language in its letter to Apple.

    Apple and Google didn’t immediately reply to a request for comment.

    Elon Musk, who owns X and xAI, the company that developed Grok, said in a social media post on Wednesday that he is “not aware of naked underage images generated by Grok. Literally zero.” He also said the chatbot declines prompts to generate illegal images.

    “There may be times when adversarial hacking of Grok prompts does something unexpected. If that happens, we fix the bug immediately,” he wrote.

    Criticism of Grok escalated in early January after the generative-AI app enabled users to create images of minors wearing minimal clothing. In response to a user prompt, Grok acknowledged lapses in its digital safeguards.

    Copyleaks, a plagiarism and AI content-detection tool, told CBS News earlier this month that it had detected thousands of sexually explicit images created by Grok. In a December analysis, the group estimated the chatbot was creating “roughly one nonconsensual sexualized image per minute.”

    The Internet Watch Foundation (IWF), which seeks to eliminate child sexual abuse from the internet, has also raised concerns about Grok and other AI tools. 

    “We are extremely concerned about the ease and speed with which people can apparently generate photo-realistic child sexual abuse material.” Ngaire Alexander, head of hotline at IWF, told CBS News in a statement last week. “Tools like Grok now risk bringing sexual AI imagery of children into the mainstream.”

    Grok told users last week on X that access to its image generation tool was now available only to paying subscribers. 

    California opens probe

    Grok is also attracting scrutiny from U.S. lawmakers and authorities overseas. On Wednesday, California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced he was opening an investigation into the sexually explicit material produced using Grok. 

    “The avalanche of reports detailing the non-consensual, sexually explicit material that xAI has produced and posted online in recent weeks is shocking,” Bonta said. “This material, which depicts women and children in nude and sexually explicit situations, has been used to harass people across the internet. I urge xAI to take immediate action to ensure this goes no further.”

    U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer last week raised the possibility of banning X, which uses Grok, in Britain over the AI tool’s generation of sexualized images of people without their consent. 

    The European Commission is also monitoring the steps X is taking to prevent Grok from generating inappropriate images of children and women, Reuters reported Wednesday.

    Edited by

    Alain Sherter

    Source link

  • AI Holograms Are Here. What Does This Mean for AI Companions?

    Gaming peripheral company Razer is betting that people want AI holograms. So much so that it introduce a perplexing new product at CES 2026 that early critics have dubbed a “friend in a bottle.” Project AVA, is a small glass cylinder that features a 5.5-inch animated desk buddy that can interact with you, coach you, or offer gaming advice on demand—all powered by xAI’s Grok.

    Project AVA uses a technology Razer calls “PC Vision Mode” that watches your screen, allowing its 3D animated inhabitant to offer real-time commentary on your gameplay, track your mood, or simply hang out. It attempts to sell the illusion of presence—a companion that isn’t just an app you close, but a physical object that lives in your room.​

    It’s not a bad idea, in theory. Giving AI a face is not just a marketing ploy but a biological inevitability. Yet Project AVA marks a strange new milestone in our march toward AI companions.

    The inevitability of holographic AI

    When OpenAI’s introduced ChatGPT 4o voice chats in the summer of 2024, humanity entered a new form of computer interaction. Suddenly, we could interact with AI voices that were smart and natural enough for humans to maintain a conversation. Since then, we have seen other voice AIs like Gemini Live, which introduce pauses, breathing, and other elements that cross the uncanny valley and allow many to suspend disbelief and even form a bond with these assistants.

    Research has shown that for deep emotional venting, users currently prefer voice-only interfaces because they feel safer and less judgmental. Without a face to scrutinize, we avoid the social anxiety of being watched.​ However, some neuroscientists argue that this preference may just be a temporary work-around for bad technology.

    Our brains are evolutionarily hardwired for face-to-face interaction. The “Mirror Neuron System” in our brains—which allows us to feel empathy by watching others—remains largely dormant during voice-only chats. A 2024 study on “Generation WhatsApp” confirmed that neural synchrony between two brains is significantly weaker during audio-only exchanges compared to face-to-face ones. To feel truly “heard,” we need to see the listener.​

    Behavioral science also tells us that up to 93% of communication is nonverbal. Trust is encoded in micro-expressions: a pupil dilating, a rapid blink, an open posture. A voice assistant transmits 0% of these signals, forcing users to operate on blind faith. Humans still find them very engaging because our brain fills the gaps, imagining faces like when we read a book. Furthermore, according to a 2025 brain scan study, familiar AI voices activate emotional regulation areas, suggesting neural familiarity builds with repeated interaction.

    Fast Company

    Source link

  • Mom of one of Elon Musk’s kids says AI chatbot Grok generated sexual deepfake images of her: “Make it stop”

    Elon Musk’s AI chatbot Grok faces intense criticism – accused of allowing users on the Musk-owned social media platform X to generate fake, sexually explicit images of real women and children.

    Ashley St. Clair, the mother of one of Musk’s children, is one of the alleged victims. She said in an interview with “CBS Mornings” that aired on Tuesday that Grok allowed users to generate and publish sexual deepfake images of her to X without permission, including manipulating photos of her as a minor.

    “The worst for me was seeing myself undressed, bent over and then my toddler’s backpack in the background,” the 27-year-old said. “Because I had to then see that, and see myself violated in that way in such horrific images and then put that same backpack on my son the next day, because it’s the one he wears every day to school.”

    The mother of two, who has a 1-year-old son with Musk, said she asked Grok to take the photos down.

    “Grok said, ‘I confirm that you don’t consent. I will no longer produce these images.’ And then it continued to produce more and more images, and more and more explicit images,” she said.

    St. Clair said she filed a report directly with Musk’s company xAI, which operates Grok. Some of the images were then removed.

    “This can be stopped with a singular message to an engineer,” St. Clair said.

    St. Clair said her issue is with the Chatbot, not Musk – who recently said he plans to file for sole custody of their child over allegations that St. Clair “might” transition their son. A source close to St. Clair said that is “absurd and unequivocally false.”

    “If they want to say my bone to pick is … the chatbot undressing minors and myself and stripping me nude, yes. You’re right. I have a bone to pick with that and I don’t care who’s doing it. So Elon’s not special about me speaking out on this,” St. Clair said. 

    CBS News reached out to Musk and has not received a response yet. Earlier this month, xAI said it “takes action against illegal content on X, including child sexual abuse material (CSAM), by removing it, permanently suspending accounts and working with local governments and law enforcement as necessary.”

    “Make it stop”

    A recent study by AI Forensics, a nonprofit that investigates the algorithms of major platforms, found 53% of the Grok images they reviewed contained individuals in minimal attire, with 81% of them being women.

    St. Clair said she wants the U.S. government to solve the issue and “make it stop.”

    “The need to regulate it,” she said. “AI should not be allowed to generate and undress children and women. That’s what needs to happen.”

    She believes the key is enforcing already existing laws, saying, “who’s ever responsible for enforcing them. Not me.”

    St. Clair said her ability to earn money on X has been revoked since she has spoken out and when asked if she plans to take legal action, she said she’s “considering all options available.”

    Chatbot bans

    Last week, Malaysia and Indonesia banned Grok amid growing concerns about the chatbot.

    Regulators in the United Kingdom have launched an investigation. Last week, U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer said he wants “all options on the table,” which would include a potential ban.

    “This is disgraceful, it’s disgusting and it’s not to be tolerated. X has got to get a grip of this,” Starmer said in an interview with a U.K. radio station. “It’s unlawful. We’re not going to tolerate it. I’ve asked for all options to be on the table.”

    Source link

  • Mother of one of Elon Musk’s kids says AI chatbot Grok generated sexual deepfake images of her

    Elon Musk’s AI chatbot Grok is facing intense criticism, accused of allowing X users to generate sexually explicit images of real women and children. One of the alleged victims is Ashley St. Clair, the mother of one of Musk’s children. She said she discovered people used Grok to generate and publish sexualized deepfake images without her permission and share them on X. Musk has not responded to a request for comment.

    Source link

  • X could ‘lose right to self regulate’, UK to criminalise creation of sexual AI deepfakes – Tech Digest

    Share


    The UK will bring into force a law which will make it illegal to create non-consensual intimate images, following widespread concerns over Elon Musk’s Grok AI chatbot. Speaking to Labour MPs on Monday, Sir Keir Starmer warned X could lose the “right to self regulate”. “If X cannot control Grok, we will,” he said, adding the government would act quickly in response to the issue. The government also plans to unveil legislation to make it illegal to supply online tools used to create such images. BBC 

    Ministers are to criminalise the creation of sexual AI “deepfakes” in a crackdown on Elon Musk’s service Grok. Liz Kendall, the Technology Secretary, said the Government would this week bring into force a new offence criminalising the creation of sexualised non-consensual AI images. Ofcom, the technology and media regulator, will also be given new powers to pursue companies that allow the images on their sites, Ms Kendall said. The new offence threatens to step up a row with Mr Musk over his social network X – the platform formerly known as Twitter. Telegraph 

    The OnePlus Open was one of the best foldable phones around when it launched back in 2023. And yet, despite receiving high praise from us and elsewhere, we’re yet to see a successor – and it now seems we might not see one for a long time, if ever. According to Yogesh Brar – a leaker with a generally solid track record – the OnePlus Open 2 has been canceled, though whether that means we simply won’t get it this year or whether OnePlus has bowed out of the foldable phone market altogether isn’t entirely clear. Tech Radar


    Rachel Reeves could cut VAT on public EV charging     to reduce the cost for drivers without home chargers as concerns grow that electric car demand will tank when pay-per-mile tax comes in. Treasury officials are looking at slashing public charging VAT to five per cent – down from the 20 per cent it currently is, according to The Telegraph. This would bring the level of public charging VAT in line with the reduced VAT rate those with home chargers pay, eradicating the EV ‘pavement tax’. ThisIsMoney

    A commonly used gel has restored sight to people suffering from a rare and untreatable condition that causes blindness, scientists have said. HPMC – hydroxypropyl methylcellulose – a low-cost gel used in most eye surgeries – restored vision for seven out of eight patients with hypotony, researchers at Moorfields Eye Hospital in London found. Hypotony, which affects about 100 people in the UK each year, is abnormally low pressure in the eyeball, which usually results in a change to its shape. Sky News


    “What we’re working on now is really the next big thing for us: the new 208,” Peugeot brand CEO Alain Favey told Auto Express in an exclusive interview. He said the recent Polygon concept – a small hatchback which gives big hints to the Peugeot 208’s design and technology – fired the starting gun on the new hatch’s introduction, with an unveiling likely at October’s Paris Motor Show. The 208 will be the first model on a new ‘STLA’ electric-car chassis. “The car is on STLA Small and it will be launched as a BEV,” Favey said. AutoExpress 


    For latest tech stories go to TechDigest.tv

    Discover more from Tech Digest

    Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

    Chris Price

    Source link

  • Elon Musk’s Grok AI being adopted by Pentagon despite growing backlash against it

    Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Monday that Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence chatbot Grok will join Google’s generative AI engine in operating inside the Pentagon network, as part of a broader push to feed as much of the military’s data as possible into the developing technology.

    “Very soon we will have the world’s leading AI models on every unclassified and classified network throughout our department,” Hegseth said in a speech at Musk’s space flight company, SpaceX, in South Texas.

    The announcement comes just days after Grok – the chatbot developed by Musk’s company xAI, which is embedded into X, the social media network Musk owns – drew global outcry and scrutiny for generating highly sexualized deepfake images of people without their consent.

    Malaysia and Indonesia have blocked Grok, while the U.K.’s independent online safety watchdog announced an investigation Monday. Grok has limited image generation and editing to paying users. Scrutiny has also been increasing in the European Union, India and France.

    Malaysian regulators said Tuesday they would take legal action against X and xAI over user safety concerns sparked by Grok but didn’t say what form the proceedings would take, reports French news agency AFP.

    Hegseth said Grok will go live inside the Defense Department later this month and announced that he would “make all appropriate data” from the military’s IT systems available for “AI exploitation.” He also said data from intelligence databases would be fed into AI systems.

    Hegseth’s aggressive push to embrace the still-developing technology stands in contrast to the Biden administration which, while pushing federal agencies to come up with policies and uses for AI, was also wary of misuse. Officials said rules were needed to ensure that the technology, which could be harnessed for mass surveillance, cyberattacks or even lethal autonomous devices, was being used responsibly.

    The Biden administration enacted a framework in late 2024 that directed national security agencies to expand their use of the most advanced AI systems but prohibited certain uses, such as applications that would violate constitutionally protected civil rights or any system that would automate the deployment of nuclear weapons. It is unclear if those prohibitions are still in place under the Trump administration.

    During his speech, Hegseth spoke of the need to streamline and speed up technological innovations within the military, saying, “We need innovation to come from anywhere and evolve with speed and purpose.”

    He noted that the Pentagon possesses “combat-proven operational data from two decades of military and intelligence operations.”

    “AI is only as good as the data that it receives, and we’re going to make sure that it’s there,” Hegseth said.

    The defense secretary said he wants AI systems within the Pentagon to be responsible, though he went on to say he was shrugging off any AI models “that won’t allow you to fight wars.”

    Hegseth said his vision for military AI systems means that they operate “without ideological constraints that limit lawful military applications,” before adding that the Pentagon’s “AI will not be woke.”

    Musk developed and pitched Grok as an alternative to what he called “woke AI” interactions from rival chatbots like Google’s Gemini or OpenAI’s ChatGPT. In July, Grok also caused controversy after it appeared to make antisemitic comments that praised Adolf Hitler and shared several antisemitic posts.

    The Pentagon didn’t immediately respond to questions about the issues with Grok.

    Source link

  • Ofcom launches formal investigation into X over Grok AI deepfakes – Tech Digest

    Share


    The UK’s media watchdog has launched a formal investigation into Elon Musk’s social media platform, X.

    Ofcom is examining whether the site failed in its legal duty to protect users from illegal content generated by its Grok AI chatbot. The probe follows a wave of deeply concerning reports that the tool was being used to create and share “undressed” images of people and sexualized depictions of children.

    The investigation was triggered after X failed to satisfy regulators during an urgent inquiry last week. Ofcom had set a firm deadline of Friday, 9 January, for the platform to explain its safeguards, but an expedited assessment of the evidence led to today’s escalation.

    Investigators will now determine if X violated the Online Safety Act by failing to prevent the spread of non-consensual intimate images and child sexual abuse material.

    “Reports of Grok being used to create and share illegal non-consensual intimate images and child sexual abuse material on X have been deeply concerning,” an Ofcom spokesperson said.

    “Platforms must protect people in the UK from content that’s illegal in the UK, and we won’t hesitate to investigate where we suspect companies are failing in their duties, especially where there’s a risk of harm to children.”

    The watchdog’s inquiry will specifically look at whether X performed adequate risk assessments before deploying Grok and if it used “highly effective age assurance” to keep minors away from pornography.

    Under the law, Ofcom has the power to issue massive fines of up to £18 million or 10% of X’s global revenue. In the most serious cases, the regulator can even apply for court orders to block access to the site in the UK.

    While government ministers have signalled they would support a ban if X refuses to comply, the move has been met with defiance from Elon Musk, who accused the UK of wanting to suppress free speech. Ofcom has stated it will progress the investigation as a matter of “the highest priority” to ensure the safety of UK users.

    More information here. 


    For latest tech stories go to TechDigest.tv

    Discover more from Tech Digest

    Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

    Chris Price

    Source link

  • Malaysia and Indonesia ban Musk’s Grok over sexually explicit deepfakes – Tech Digest

    Share


    Malaysia and Indonesia have blocked Elon Musk’s AI chatbot. The two countries are the first in the world to ban Grok following reports that the tool is being used to create sexually explicit deepfakes.

    This AI feature, hosted on Musk’s social media platform X, allows users to generate and edit images of real people without their consent. Regulators in both nations expressed deep concern that the technology is being weaponized to produce pornographic content involving women and children.

    Malaysia’s communications ministry stated that it issued multiple warnings to X regarding the “repeated misuse” of the chatbot earlier this year. However, officials claim the platform failed to address the inherent design flaws of the AI and instead focused only on its reporting process.

    Consequently, the service will remain blocked in Malaysia until effective safety safeguards are implemented to protect the public.

    In Indonesia, Digital Affairs Minister Meutya Hafid described the generation of such content as a direct violation of human dignity and online safety. The country has a history of strict digital enforcement, having already banned platforms like OnlyFans and Pornhub for similar reasons.

    Victims in the region have shared stories of finding their personal photos manipulated into revealing outfits, noting that the platform’s reporting tools often fail to remove the images quickly enough.

    The controversy is now spreading to the United Kingdom, where Prime Minister Keir Starmer described the situation as “disgraceful.” Technology Secretary Liz Kendall warned that the government would support regulators if they chose to block access to X entirely for failing to comply with safety laws.

    In response to these growing international restrictions, Elon Musk has accused government officials of attempting to suppress free speech.


    For latest tech stories go to TechDigest.tv

    Discover more from Tech Digest

    Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

    Chris Price

    Source link

  • Grok Lies About Locking Its AI Porn Options Behind A Paywall

    A week ago, a Guardian story revealed the news that Elon Musk’s Grok AI was knowingly and willingly producing images of real-world people in various states of undress, and even more disturbingly, images of near-nude minors, in response to user requests. Further reporting from Wired and Bloomberg demonstrated the situation was on a scale larger than most could imagine, with “thousands” of such images produced an hour. Despite silence or denials from within X, this led to “urgent contact” from various international regulators, and today X has responded by creating the impression that access to Grok’s image generation tools is now for X subscribers only. Another way of phrasing this could be: you now have to pay to use xAI’s tools to make nudes. Except, extraordinarily—despite Grok saying otherwise—it’s not true.

    The story of the last week has in fact been in two parts. The first is Grok’s readiness to create undressed images of real-world people and publish them to X, as well as create far more graphic and sexual videos on the Grok website and app, willingly offering deepfakes of celebrities and members of the public with few restrictions. The second is that Grok has been found to do the same with images of children. Musk and X’s responses so far have been to seemingly celebrate the former, but condemn the latter, while appearing not to do anything about either. It has taken until today, a week since world leaders and international regulatory bodies have been demanding responses from X and xAI, for there to be the appearance of any action at all, and it looks as if even this isn’t what it seems.

    How we got here

    The January 2 story from The Guardian reported that the Grok chatbot posted that lapses in safeguards had led to the generation of “images depicting minors in minimal clothing” in a reply to an X user. The user, on January 1, had responded to a claim made by an account for the documentary An Open Secret stating that Grok was being used to “depict minors on this platform in an extremely inappropriate, sexual fashion.” The allegation was that a user could post a picture of a fully dressed child and then ask Grok to re-render the image but wearing underwear or lingerie, and in sexual poses. The user asked Grok if it was true, and Grok responded that it was. “I’ve reviewed recent interactions,” the bot replied. “There are isolated cases where users prompted for and received AI images depicting minors in minimal clothing.”

    By January 7, Wired published an investigation that revealed Grok was willing to make images of a far more sexual nature when the results weren’t appearing on X. Using Grok’s website and app, Wired discovered it was possible to create “extremely graphic, sometimes violent, sexual imagery of adults that is vastly more explicit than images created by Grok on X.” The site added, “It may also have been used to create sexualized videos of apparent minors.” The generative-AI was willing and able to create videos of recognizable celebrities “engaging in sexual activities,” including a video of the late Diana, Princess of Wales, “having sex with two men on a bed.”

    Bloomberg‘s reporting spoke to experts who talked about how Grok and xAI’s approach to image and video generation is materially different from that being done by other big names in generative-AI, stating that rivals offer a “good-faith effort to mitigate the creation of this content in the first place” and adding, “Obviously xAI is different. It’s more of a free-for-all.” Another expert said that the scale of deepfakes on X is “unprecedented,” noting, “We’ve never had a technology that’s made it so easy to generate new images.”

    Where we are now

    It is now being widely reported that access to Grok’s image and video generation has been restricted to only paying subscribers to X. This is largely because when someone without a subscription asks Grok to make an image, it is responding with “Image generation and editing are currently limited to paying subscribers,” then adding a link so people can pay up for access.

    However, as discovered by the The Verge, this isn’t actually true at all. While you cannot currently simply @ Grok to ask it to make an image, absolutely everyone can still click on the “Edit image” button and access the software that way. You can also just visit Grok’s site or app and use it that way.

    This means that the technology is currently lying to users to suggest they need to subscribe to X’s various paid tiers if they wish to generate images of any nature, but still offering the option anyway if the user has the wherewithal to either click a button, or if they’re on the app version of X, to long-press an image and use the pop-up.

    What does Elon Musk have to say?

    Musk, as you might imagine, has truly been posting through it. Moments before the story of the images of minors broke, following days of people discovering Grok’s willingness to render anyone in a bikini, Musk was laughing at images of himself depicted in a two-piece, before a rapid reverse-ferret on January 3 as he made great show of declaring that anyone discovered using Grok for images of children would face consequences, in between endlessly claiming that his Nazi salute was the same as Mamdani doing a gentle wave to crowds. Since then (alongside posting full-on white supremacist content), the X owner’s stance has switched to reposting other people’s use of ChatGPT to demonstrate that it, too, will render adults in bikinis, seemingly forgetting that the core issue was Grok’s willingness to depict children, and declaring that this proves the hypocrisy of the press and world leaders.

    Regarding today’s developments, he has not uttered a peep. Instead his feed is primarily deeply upsetting lies about the murder of Renee Nicole Good and uncontrolled rage at the suggestion from Britain’s Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, that X might be banned in the UK as a consequence of the issues discussed above.

    John Walker

    Source link

  • Grok restriction of ‘nudify’ feature to premium users an ‘insult to victims’, government claims – Tech Digest

    By moving these features behind a paywall, X creates a layer of accountability that experts say could deter malicious actors. Paying subscribers must have verified payment information on file, effectively removing the anonymity that often shields those generating abusive content.

    Furthermore, the restriction eliminates the ability for “troll” accounts or automated bots to perform mass-generation of “nudified” images for free. While it doesn’t physically prevent a paid user from attempting a harmful prompt, it forces them to attach their identity to the action.

    However, speaking on Friday, Downing Street said the move “simply turns an AI feature that allows the creation of unlawful images into a premium service”. The prime minister was “abundantly clear that X needs to act and needs to act now”, his spokesperson said.

    “It is time for X to grip this issue, if another media company had billboards in town centres showing unlawful images, it would act immediately to take them down or face public backlash,” they added.

    Chris Price

    Source link

  • Here’s When Elon Musk Will Finally Have to Reckon With His Nonconsensual Porn Generator

    It has been over a week now since users on X began en masse using the AI model Grok to undress people, including children, and the Elon Musk-owned platform has done next to nothing to address it. Part of the reason for that is the fact that, currently, the platform isn’t obligated to do a whole lot of anything about the problem.

    Last year, Congress enacted the Take It Down Act, which, among other things, criminalizes nonconsensual sexually explicit material and requires platforms like X to provide an option for victims to request that content using their likeness be taken down within 48 hours. Democratic Senator Amy Klobuchar, a co-sponsor of the law, posted on X, “No one should find AI-created sexual images of themselves online—especially children. X must change this. If they don’t, my bipartisan TAKE IT DOWN Act will soon require them to.”

    Note the “soon” in that sentence. The requirement within the law for platforms to create notice and removal systems doesn’t go into effect until May 19, 2026. Currently, neither X (the platform where the images are being generated via posted prompts and hosted) nor xAI (the company responsible for the Grok AI model that is generating the images) has formal takedown request systems. X has a formal content takedown request procedure for law enforcement, but general users are advised to go through the Help Center, where it appears users can only report a post as violating X’s rules.

    If you’re curious just how likely the average user is to get one of these images taken down, just ask Ashley St. Clair how well her attempts went when she flagged a nonconsensual sexualized image of her that was shared on X. St. Clair has about as much access as anyone to make a personal plea for a post’s removal—she is the mother of one of Elon Musk’s children and has an X account with more than one million followers. “It’s funny, considering the most direct line I have and they don’t do anything,” she told The Guardian. “I have complained to X, and they have not even removed a picture of me from when I was a child, which was undressed by Grok.”

    The image of St. Clair was eventually removed, seemingly after it was widely reported by her followers and given attention in the press. But St. Clair now claims she was thanked for her efforts to raise this issue by being restricted from communicating with Grok and having her X Premium membership revoked. Premium allows her to get paid based on engagement. Grok, which has become the default source of information on this whole situation, despite the fact that it is an AI model incapable of speaking for anyone or anything, explained in a post, “Ashley St. Clair’s X checkmark and Premium were likely removed due to potential terms violations, including her public accusations against Grok for generating inappropriate images and possible spam-like activity.”

    Enforcement outside of the Take It Down Act is possible, though less straightforward. Democratic Senator Ron Wyden suggested that the material generated by Grok would not be protected under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which typically grants tech platforms immunity from liability for the illegal behavior of users. Of course, it’s unlikely the Trump administration’s Department of Justice would pursue a case against Musk’s companies, leaving attempts at enforcement up to the states.

    Outside of the US, some governments are taking the matter much more seriously. Authorities in France, Ireland, the United Kingdom, and India have all started looking into the nonconsensual sexual images generated by Grok and may eventually bring charges against X and xAI.

    But it certainly doesn’t seem like the head of X and xAI is taking the matter all that seriously. As Grok was generating sexual images of children, Elon Musk, the CEO of both companies involved in this scandal, was actively reposting content created as part of the trend, including AI-generated images of a toaster and a rocket in a bikini. Thus far, the extent of X’s acknowledgement of the situation starts and ends at blaming the users. In a post from X Safety, the company said, “Anyone using or prompting Grok to make illegal content will suffer the same consequences as if they upload illegal content,” but took no responsibility for enabling it.

    If anything, what Grok has been up to in recent weeks seems like it is probably closer to what Musk wants out of the AI. Per a report from CNN, Musk has been “unhappy about over-censoring” on Grok, including being particularly frustrated about restrictions on Grok’s image and video generator. Publicly, Musk has repeatedly talked up Grok’s “spicy mode” and derided the idea of “wokeness” in AI.

    In response to a request for comment from Gizmodo, xAI said, “Legacy Media Lies,” the latest of the automated messages that the platform has sent out since it shut down its public relations department.

    AJ Dellinger

    Source link

  • Governments grapple with the flood of non-consensual nudity on X | TechCrunch

    For the past two weeks, X has been flooded with AI-manipulated nude images, created by the Grok AI chatbot. An alarming range of women have been affected by the non-consensual nudes, including prominent models and actresses, as well as news figures, crime victims, and even world leaders. 

    A December 31 research paper from Copyleaks estimated roughly one image was being posted each minute, but later tests found far more. A sample gathered from January 5-6 found 6,700 per hour over the 24-hour period. 

    But while public figures from around the world have decried the choice to release the model without safeguards, there are few clear mechanisms for regulators hoping to rein in Elon Musk’s new image-manipulating system. The result has become a painful lesson in the limits of tech regulation — and a forward-looking challenge for regulators hoping to make a mark.

    Unsurprisingly, the most aggressive action has come from the European Commission, which on Thursday ordered xAI to retain all documents related to its Grok chatbot. The move doesn’t necessarily mean the commission has opened up a new investigation, but it’s a common precursor to such action. It’s particularly ominous given recent reporting from CNN that suggests Elon Musk may have personally intervened to prevent safeguards from being placed on what images could be generated by Grok.

    It’s unclear whether X has made any technical changes to the Grok model, although the public media tab for Grok’s X account has been removed. In a statement, the company specifically denounced the use of AI tools to produce child sexual imagery. “Anyone using or prompting Grok to make illegal content will suffer the same consequences as if they upload illegal content,” the X Safety account posted on January 3, echoing a previous tweet by Elon Musk.

    In the meantime, regulators around the world have issued stern warnings. The United Kingdom’s Ofcom issued a statement on Monday, saying it was in touch with xAI and “will undertake a swift assessment to determine whether there are potential compliance issues that warrant investigation.” In a radio interview on Thursday, U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer called the phenomenon “disgraceful” and “disgusting,” saying “Ofcom has our full support to take action in relation to this.”

    In a post on LinkedIn, Australian eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman-Grant said her office had received a doubling in complaints related to Grok since late 2025. But Inman-Grant stopped short of taking action against xAI, saying only, “We will use the range of regulatory tools at our disposal to investigate and take appropriate action.”

    Techcrunch event

    San Francisco
    |
    October 13-15, 2026

    By far the largest market to threaten action is India, where Grok was the subject of a formal complaint from a member of Parliament. On January, India’s communications regulator MeitY ordered X to address the issue and submit an “action-taken” report within 72 hours — a deadline that was subsequently extended by 48 hours. While a report was submitted to the regulator on January 7, it’s unclear whether MeitY will be satisfied with the response. If not, X could lose its safe harbor status in India, a potentially serious limitation on its ability to operate within the country.

    Russell Brandom

    Source link

  • IWF claims Grok creating ‘criminal imagery’ of girls, Anthropic planning $10bn fundraise – Tech Digest


    The Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) charity     says its analysts have discovered “criminal imagery” of girls aged between 11 and 13 which “appears to have been created” using Grok. The AI tool is owned by Elon Musk’s firm xAI. It can be accessed either through its website and app, or through the social media platform X. The IWF said it found “sexualised and topless imagery of girls” on a “dark web forum” in which users claimed they used Grok to create the imagery. The BBC has approached X and xAI for comment. BBC 

    Cyber flashing became illegal in 2024. Now, the government is making it a priority offence, putting the pressure on tech companies to do something about it.  Cyber flashing is when someone sends a non-consensual explicit picture – best known as a “dick pic”. It’s most often women on the receiving end and, according to research by dating app Bumble, the adults most likely to receive those images are women between 40 and 45 years old. Sky News 


    Anthropic is planning a $10bn fundraise     that would value the Claude chatbot maker at $350bn, according to multiple reports published on Wednesday. The new valuation represents an increase of nearly double from about four months ago, per CNBC, which reported that the company had signed a term sheet that stipulated the $350bn figure. The round could close within weeks, although the size and terms could change. Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund GIC and Coatue Management are planning to lead the financing, the Wall Street Journal reported. The Guardian 

    After kicking off its Moto Things accessory line with wireless earbuds, a Bluetooth tracker and a cheap smartwatch in 2024, Motorola is doubling down. At CES 2026, the company is announcing a sequel to its tracker, the Moto Tag 2, a stylus for its new folding phone, the Moto Pen Ultra and a more premium smartwatch called the Moto Watch. The Moto Watch has a 47mm round face with a stainless steel crown and an aluminum frame. The smartwatch comes with a PANTONE “Volcanic Ash” silicone band, but is designed to support third-party 22mm bands too. Engadget 

    The Roborock Saros Rover represents a literal step forward in robot vacuum mobility. On display at CES, the Rover features a pair of leg-like mechanisms designed to mimic human movement. This allows the nimble cleaner to lift itself over obstacles, pivot sharply, hop across gaps, and—most strikingly—climb stairs while continuing to clean. The company hasn’t yet announced pricing or a release date, but the unit I saw at CES was fully operational, signaling that it’s more than a distant concept. PC Mag

    Ring has announced a new line of security sensors, switches, and other smart home devices that use its low-power, long-range Sidewalk connectivity protocol and don’t need a hub — or even Wi-Fi — to connect to your smart home. Sidewalk works across three existing wireless radio technologies — Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE), LoRa, and 900 MHz — and “provides the benefits of a cellular network at the cost of a Wi-Fi one,” says Ring founder Jamie Siminoff. “It’s like a cellular network built for IOT.” The Verge 

    OnePlus has been updating its smartphones to OxygenOS 16 based on Android 16 for quite a while now, and it’s finally reached lower-midrange devices today. The update is now available for the Nord CE4 and the Nord CE4 Lite, which were both released in 2024. The Nord CE4 is seeing the rollout commencing in India with the new software build being labeled CPH2613_16.0.2.400(EX01).

    OnePlus Nord CE4 and CE4 Lite get Android 16

    The Nord CE4 Lite’s new build number is CPH2619_16.0.1.301(EX01). This too is only rolling out in India at the moment, with more territories supposedly to follow in the future. GSM Arena 

    Chris Price

    Source link

  • Elon Musk’s xAI raises £20bn despite Grok backlash, half of porn users have accessed sites without age checks – Tech Digest

    Share


    Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence company has raised $20bn in its latest funding round,     the startup announced Tuesday, even as its marquee chatbot Grok faces backlash over generating sexualized, nonconsensual images of women and underage girls. xAI’s Series E funding round featured big-name investors, including Nvidia, Fidelity Management and Resource Company, Qatar’s sovereign wealth fund, and Valor Equity Partners – the private investment firm of Musk’s longtime friend and former Doge member Antonio Gracias. The Guardian

    Almost half of pornography users have accessed adult sites without government-mandated age checks since the measure came into force, new research shows. Since the law changed in July, 45% of 1,469 adults who use porn have gone on websites without age checks to avoid submitting their personal information, a poll by the Lucy Faithfull Foundation found. The research also showed that 29% of pornography users had used a VPN to avoid age checks on websites that do require them. Sky News

    The first Android security update of 2026 has now been confirmed. It includes a fix for a critical security vulnerability that exposes phones to attack. The good news is that the update will be available to Pixel owners within days. But the bad news is that another update is also now hitting Pixel phones, causing serious issues for users. The critical vulnerability patched in January’s Android update “is a flaw in Dolby’s DD+ Unified Decoder,” Jamf explains. And because “audio attachments and voice messages are decoded locally,” this “can be exploited without any user interaction.” Forbes


    Hisense has turned up to CES 2026 with two big swings at colour performance – and both involve adding an extra colour channel to the usual red, green, and blue recipe. The company says its next flagship LCD TV will use so-called RGB Mini LED Evo tech (which introduces cyan into its RGB Mini LED backlight system), while its latest true Micro LED set will add yellow at the sub-pixel level, forming RGBY. In other words, Hisense is betting that the path to punchier, purer colour is… more colours. After launching an RGB-backlit LCD TV in 2025, Hisense says its second-generation approach will be marketed as RGB Mini LED Evo, debuting in a 116-inch UXS model called the 116UXS. WhatHiFi

    Chris Price

    Source link