ReportWire

Tag: Greenwich Village

  • The Daily Dirt: Pol dances on megaproject’s grave

    [ad_1]

    The demise of Innovation QNS, a planned $2 billion development allowed by a City Council rezoning in November 2022, drew a nasty response from the local Council member.

    Astoria’s Julie Won released a statement that was one part anger, one part threat and one part “I told you so.” None of the parts made sense, although they might seem logical to someone who does not understand how development works.

    Won said the project had “no political support.” But Won herself voted for it, and the rezoning passed 46-1. Mayor Eric Adams and Queens Borough President Donovan Richards backed it as well.

    Won also said, “The remaining partners who are moving forward with a portion of Innovation Queens and those who will purchase other parcels of the land to benefit from this ill-fated rezoning are still expected to fulfill the same community benefit obligations.”

    Ill-fated? The rezoning was approved. I call that success.

    Perhaps Won was referring to the fate of the rezoned area, which allows for about 3,200 new homes.

    Nothing has been built yet, but if multifamily projects on these sites pencil out, they will happen. If not, two reasons would be the city’s affordability requirements and the state’s property tax regime.

    The government also controls other levers that determine the viability of housing development. Take the scaffold law, which only exists in New York and makes insurance for projects more expensive. (Business groups on Thursday launched a new effort to repeal the law — see “Elsewhere,” below — but many previous attempts have failed.)

    Other factors that can doom projects, such as high borrowing costs, are beyond New York’s control. But they are certainly not the fault of developers.

    Won concluded her statement with this: “The Astoria community is ready to keep landlords accountable and those who don’t respect community agreements will be met with severe backlash.”

    Whatever benefits Won wanted, she should have included in the language of the rezoning. But the enforceability of some elements of community benefits agreements has long been an unresolved debate among land-use lawyers. As for the additional low-income housing she demanded, that was always going to require public subsidies.

    The Council member, like too many people, seems to treat rezonings as a benefit bestowed on real estate that obliges the industry to give something back. That’s the wrong way to think about them.

    Zoning reflects what the government wants to be built. The city wanted more housing in Astoria, and rezoned to allow it. If it doesn’t get built, the city and state can take steps to make it financially viable.

    If the rezoning for Innovation QNS were a pot of gold for developers, Silverstein Properties would not have pulled out. The firm’s decision suggests that building apartments on the government’s terms carried too much risk for the firm. (Megaprojects also require a lot of work, and Silverstein has other fish to fry.)

    If the Astoria parcels are built out, the risk will be borne by developers, investors and lenders. Not by Julie Won.

    What we’re thinking about: At least one landlord besides the one we wrote about last week applied this year for the state’s hardship program for owners of rent-stabilized housing. The application involved “hours and hours of work,” the landlord said by email, but several months have since passed and he has yet to hear back from the Division of Homes and Community Renewal. The landlord added that he is “not holding my breath.” If you’d like to share any experiences you’ve had with DHCR, email me at eengquist@therealdeal.com.

    A thing we’ve learned: Silverstein Properties’ abandonment of Astoria megaproject Innovation QNS was evident as far back as July 2023, when it quietly terminated its 2019 contract to buy 42-11 Northern Boulevard from Premier Equities, the firm co-founded by Uzi Ben Abraham and Yaron Jacobi. Abraham Jacobi signed the termination agreement on behalf of Premier.

    The parcel, which is in an Opportunity Zone and was just put back on the market, was given a floor-area ratio of 9 by the 2022 rezoning for Innovation QNS, allowing for a 219,000-square-foot multifamily or mixed-use building. The site has a one-story retail building formerly leased to Harley-Davidson, which closed its dealership and service center there 11 months ago.

    Premier took out a $27 million mortgage on the property in late 2021 from Signature Bank, which later folded. The FDIC took over the loan and sold it to Blackstone, property records indicate.

    Elsewhere…

    — A coalition of business and civic groups is backing a bill from Rep. Nick Langworthy that would strip federal funding from any project that’s held to New York’s 140-year-old scaffold law, according to the Times Union. The congressional bill aims to pressure the state legislature to scrap the law, which has survived numerous repeal efforts thanks to support from construction unions and trial lawyers.

    — Manhattan Council member Christopher Marte has launched a bid to become the next Council speaker, PIX11 reported. Marte unveiled a website outlining ideas for reforming the Council, including more transparency for the chamber. Other contenders include Amanda Farías of the Bronx, Crystal Hudson of Brooklyn and Julie Menin of Manhattan.

     — A new analysis warns the soon-to-be-chosen downstate casinos may cause a sharp decrease in business for other New York gambling venues, Gothamist reported. The report, by New Hampshire-based Capacity Consulting for Sullivan County, estimated that Resorts World Catskills would lose 26 percent of its gaming revenue from one new casino in the New York City area and up to 76 percent when three are operating.

    — Quinn Waller

    Closing time

    Residential: The top residential deal recorded Thursday was $12 million for a 2,436-square-foot, sponsor-sale condominium unit at The Surrey, 20 East 76th Street in Lenox Hill. Lauren Muss and Michelle Griffith of Douglas Elliman had the listing.

    Commercial: The top commercial deal recorded was $9.4 million for a 32,010-square-foot, 24-unit apartment building at 3450 Broadway in Hamilton Heights.

    New to the Market: The highest price for a residential property hitting the market was $28.9 million for a 6,600-square-foot condominium unit at 345 West 13th Street in Greenwich Village. Kelly Killoren Bensimon of Douglas Elliman has the listing. The property last sold for $2.7 million in 2005.

    — Matthew Elo

    [ad_2]

    Erik Engquist

    Source link

  • Victim speaks out after being doused in flaming liquid, set on fire on No. 1 train in Manhattan

    Victim speaks out after being doused in flaming liquid, set on fire on No. 1 train in Manhattan

    [ad_1]

    GREENWICH VILLAGE, Manhattan (WABC) — A man is speaking out after being set on fire onboard a subway train in Manhattan.

    In exclusive video obtained by Eyewitness News, first responders are seen rushing to help Petrit Alijaj after a stranger doused him with a flaming liquid.

    At the time, the 23-year-old victim was with his fiancée and cousins on a No. 1 train. After the attack, video shows Alijaj at the corner of Varick and King Street with his shirt off and in visible pain.

    “I was on the train and a maniac like put fire on my body, and he left the train,” said Alijaj over the phone from the hospital.

    Alijaj says it happened in a split second around 2:45 p.m. on Saturday as his southbound train was pulling into the Houston Street station. He tells Eyewitness News that the suspect didn’t say anything to him, but proceeded to give him a weird look.

    “He had a cup with the fire and the train stopped at Houston Street. We thought when he go for the foor, we thought he’s leaving, he’s getting off. He waited for the door to open and then he put the fire on me,” Alijaj said.

    Now Alijaj has burns all over his body.

    Fortunately, no one with him was hurt. He says he was able to successfully shield his family from the burning liquid.

    “When I saw it, I protect the others with my body,” he said.

    Aljaj says he is traumatized, and that the only place he’s ever seen anything like this is in the movies.

    Police arrested 49-year-old Nile Taylor shortly after the incident occurred on Saturday.

    Taylor is charged with assault, arson, and reckless engagement. He is also charged with petty larceny and criminal possession of a weapon.

    Unrelated to the incident, authorities separately charged Taylor with criminal possession of stolen property, after he picked up a phone that a woman dropped on the train platform.

    Though the suspect is in custody, it provides little comfort to Alijaj.

    “They caught the guy, they will keep him in prison for a week and they will release him,” Alijaj said.

    ALSO READ | NYPD officers rescue injured puppy in Washington Heights

    Janice Yu has the story of Rocket’s rescue.

    ———-

    * Get Eyewitness News Delivered

    * More Manhattan news

    * Send us a news tip

    * Download the abc7NY app for breaking news alerts

    * Follow us on YouTube

    Submit a tip or story idea to Eyewitness News

    Have a breaking news tip or an idea for a story we should cover? Send it to Eyewitness News using the form below. If attaching a video or photo, terms of use apply.

    Copyright © 2024 WABC-TV. All Rights Reserved.

    [ad_2]

    WABC

    Source link

  • Jane Fonda Reveals Why Her Father Once Slapped Her In The Face

    Jane Fonda Reveals Why Her Father Once Slapped Her In The Face

    [ad_1]

    Opinion

    Source YouTube: Kerry Washington, On Golden Pond

    The radically liberal actress Jane Fonda is speaking out this week to reveal why her legendary Hollywood star father Henry Fonda once smacked her across the face.

    Jane’s Father Smacked Her

    While appearing on the former “Scandal” actress Kerry Washington’s “Street You Grew Up On” podcast, Jane recalled when her father married his second wife Susan Blanchard, a Jewish socialite and stepdaughter of musical theater director and composer Oscar Hammerstein II, after the suicide of her mother. When he married Susan, Henry moved to Greeenwich Village in New York City, across the country from where Jane and her younger brother Peter were raised in Los Angeles.

    “She (Susan) had African-American friends, and for the first time I got to know Geoffrey Holder, who I now realize — I always thought of him as a dancer — but someone just gave me a book … of his artwork. He was a great artist,” said Jane, 86.

    When asked by Kerry if she was exposed to black people in Los Angeles, Jane replied, “No, not at all. Not exposed to people of color at all.”

    “I didn’t know racism until I went to Greenwich,” she continued. “That was the first time I ever heard the N-word, and I repeated the N-word once, and [it was] the only time in his life that my dad whacked me across the face. He said, ‘Don’t you ever, ever say that word again.’”

    Jane went on to say that when Henry was a child, his father forced him to watch a Black man be hanged and his body be dragged around the town’s square in Omaha, Nebraska.

    “That had a huge impact on my father,” she explained, adding that it inspired him to make movies like The Ox-Bow Incident (1943), The Wrong Man (1956), and 12 Angry Men (1957).

    “He cared about justice and he hated racism, and, you know, with that slap taught me to pay attention,” Jane concluded.

    Related: Jane Fonda, 85, Announces She’s Leaving Acting Until 2024 Presidential Election To Focus On Political Activism

    Henry Was A Republican

    Though Jane has been known for decades for her radically liberal activism that earned her the nickname Hanoi Jane during the Vietnam War, her father was actually a registered Republican in his younger days, something that shocked both of his children when they found out.

    “Several years ago a friend of mine sent me a wallet that had belonged to my father,” her late brother Peter told AARP in 2013. “Inside was an uncashed check from my maternal grandmother and his first voter I.D.  And the card had him as a Republican!”

    “My sister could not and would not believe it,” he added with a laugh. “She had the worst time with that! I figured I’d wait until she really dug herself into a hole, and then I’d drop it on her, because I had the weapon in my hand.”

    Related: Jane Fonda Launches Vile Attack On ‘White Men’ – Blames Them For Climate Change

    Jane Slams Henry

    Last year, Jane spoke out to slam her father, who died in 1982, for the way he raised her.

    “He never brought joy home,” Jane said of Henry, according to Daily Mail. “I never felt that he got joy… it never manifested when he came home, so it was not like ‘oh my God, I want what he’s got.’”

    Jane said this as she spoke about why she decided to become an actress.

    “I’m not one of those who grew up wanting to perform, wanting to be an actor. I didn’t think that I had talent,” she explained. “I wish that somebody had said to me, ‘Don’t give up, keep going, it’ll get better,’ because I saw no future. I didn’t think that I would live past 30. That’s why…I don’t take anything for granted.”

    One can’t help but think that Henry would be very dismayed to see how his daughter turned out. What do you think of Jane’s latest comments? Let us know in the comments section.

    Now is the time to support and share the sources you trust.
    The Political Insider ranks #3 on Feedspot’s “100 Best Political Blogs and Websites.”

    An Ivy leaguer, proud conservative millennial, history lover, writer, and lifelong New Englander, James specializes in the intersection of culture and politics.

    FREE NEWS ALERTS

    Subscribe to receive the most important stories delivered straight to your inbox. Your subscription helps protect independent media.



    By subscribing, you agree to receive emails from ThePoliticalInsider.com and that you’ve read and agree to our Privacy policy and to our terms and conditions.

    FREE NEWS ALERTS

    [ad_2]

    James Conrad

    Source link

  • ‘An Extraordinarily Hostile Move’: New School Threatens to Withhold Pay in Adjunct Strike

    ‘An Extraordinarily Hostile Move’: New School Threatens to Withhold Pay in Adjunct Strike

    [ad_1]

    Nearly 1,800 part-time faculty members at the New School, who have been on strike since November 16 for better pay and working conditions, remained out of work and on the picket lines on Wednesday even as the university said it would start withholding their pay. Meanwhile, the university, which faces a threatened lawsuit by angry parents, has demanded that all full-time faculty members, many of whom sympathize with the strikers, prove they’re working.

    Part-time workers make up more than 80 percent of the teaching faculty at the private liberal-arts university in New York City’s Greenwich Village. The workers contend that their real wages have declined, given inflation, since their last raise. Adjunct professors earn $5,753 for a three-credit course. The university says that covers 45 hours of scheduled teaching, including “course-related work.” But officials of the United Auto Workers Local 7902, a union representing the instructors, say that encompasses about 135 hours of work, including such out-of-class duties as preparing for lessons, grading assignments, and advising students.

    The university has said the union demands would push the university into financial crisis and could lead to tuition increases. Both sides were scheduled for another round of bargaining late Wednesday.

    The striking workers are among the rapidly growing ranks of contingent or adjunct faculty members nationwide, who are often forced to cobble together six or more courses a semester or live on food stamps in order to cover their basic living costs. Classes are often assigned just weeks before the semester, making planning difficult.

    The New School strike comes at a time when academic workers on the opposite coast — nearly 48,000 graduate students, postdocs, and researchers across the University of California system — were withholding work in what has been billed as the largest higher-education strike in American history. Postdocs and academic researchers there reached a settlement with the university last week that includes significant pay raises, but the money would come mostly from grants that principal investigators bring in.

    The New School, a progressive university started in 1919, houses five schools and colleges, including the Parsons School of Design and the New School for Social Research.

    A ‘Last, Best, and Final Offer’

    In a phone call late Wednesday, the New School’s president, Dwight A. McBride, said he understands that people are upset about not being paid. “What gets lost in the discussion is that for three weeks, we have paid our striking employees, and we’ve done that in the hopes that we might come to a deal quickly,” he said. “But we have to divert those funds to grading … and the possibility of hiring new faculty in the spring if this drags on.”

    McBride assured about 1,000 parents during a Zoom call on Saturday that the university was doing all it could to resolve the standoff. He told them the union had rejected the school’s “last, best, and final offer” of an 18-percent pay raise over five years and better access to subsidized health care. Union representatives countered that they’d been flexible in the negotiations, cutting their wage demands in half.

    Meanwhile, a group representing more than 1,500 parents has threatened to file a class-action lawsuit against the university and to withhold tuition payments unless the dispute is resolved. The school, a lawyer for the parents wrote, “refuses to use tuition monies already received — in many cases close to $80,000 per year per student — to provide adequate compensation and benefits to the faculty charged with providing our clients’ children with their education.”

    In a message posted on Tuesday, university leaders reiterated why they’d decided to stop paying faculty members who weren’t teaching, and assured students and their families that they’d be able to complete the semester. The statement was signed by President McBride; the university’s provost, Renée T. White; and its executive vice president for business and operations, Tokumbo Shobowale.

    Students, they said, would receive grades “in an educationally responsible manner” so they could progress in their academic studies and not risk losing financial-aid eligibility, visa status, or their ability to graduate.

    Starting this week, all full-time faculty members, many of whom have pledged to support the striking workers by not crossing picket lines, must fill out weekly “work certification” forms that attest they’re working. That move prompted a backlash on social media.

    Paulo L. dos Santos, an associate professor of economics, said in an interview on Wednesday that the new requirement amounts to “a serious escalation that poisons the atmosphere and ultimately boils down to an effort to coerce faculty back into the classroom.”

    Faculty members at the New School, he said, “are particularly motivated by a sense of identity and mission, by notions of egalitarianism and social justice and bold, if not radical, change. To see the administration’s approach to this dispute is thoroughly demoralizing.”

    In an email to the faculty on Wednesday that was shared with The Chronicle, the university’s vice president for human resources, Sonya Williams, wrote that the required certification forms will allow faculty members to demonstrate that they’re fulfilling their teaching, research, and service responsibilities. It will also, she wrote, assure the university’s accreditors that it’s continuing to deliver its curriculum “even if, in a moment of protest, that delivery looks different in mode, platform, or format than usual.”

    We have faced a period of tumult and discord that feels to me like the fabric of our university has been torn apart.

    In a message to the community last week, White, the provost, said the university was at a crossroads. “We have faced a period of tumult and discord that feels to me like the fabric of our university has been torn apart, but hopefully not irreparably,” she wrote. “This is an opportunity for us to be courageous in building a vision of the New School that works for everyone: all part-time and full-time faculty, students, and staff.”

    The university’s leadership, she wrote, is committed to working with the community to develop “creative solutions that bring equity and repair trust.”

    New School leaders said, in the negotiation updates posted on the university’s website, that they understood that withholding pay, including contributions to health-insurance and retirement benefits, would cause frustration and anger. “As we enter the fourth week of disruptions, we must use our resources carefully to ensure that our students’ academic needs are met,” they wrote.

    The union’s proposed compensation package would cost the university more than $200 million over the course of the five-year contract, university officials wrote. For perspective, they wrote that the amount is nearly 50 percent of the university’s annual operating budget of around $460 million.

    Tactics of ‘Corporate Behemoths’

    The union’s president, Zoe Carey, a doctoral candidate in sociology and part-time instructor, said in a blog post on Tuesday that many workers would be boycotting university events to protest the administration’s latest moves.

    “The threat to strip workers of wages and health insurance is an extraordinarily hostile move, throwing almost the entirety of the university’s faculty into significant financial insecurity,” she wrote. The school also threatened to withhold pay from faculty members and graduate-student workers who refuse to cross picket lines, she said.

    “By threatening the livelihoods of those joining the strike in solidarity, the university is pitting its workers against each other, while stoking the fears of our students — these tactics are typical of corporate behemoths, not purportedly progressive institutions, as the New School claims to be,” Carey wrote. She urged faculty members to ignore the work-certification forms they’ve been told to fill out.

    Jerzy Gwiazdowski, a part-time faculty member and member of the union’s bargaining team, said in an interview on Wednesday that the union had made significant compromises in its demands and that none of them would create a financial hardship for the university.

    He said he understands why many parents and students are upset. “I’m angry, too,” he said. “This strike never should have happened. The university did everything in its power to drag this on as long as possible. They’re using students as pawns” to try to get the faculty to return to work, he said. Faculty members want to finish the semester with their students, “but we need to be paid fairly to do it — we need to pay our rent and be compensated for the many hours we spend working outside the classroom.”

    Gwiazdowski, who teaches in the School of Drama, said he picks up gigs and takes other jobs in the arts to make ends meet. When his classes were moved to Zoom during the Covid outbreaks, “I would hop in a truck and deliver beer” around Manhattan, Brooklyn, and Queens, he said.

    Asked about concerns that adjuncts couldn’t afford to live on their pay, McBride said no one doubts that living in New York is expensive. “But if you’re working part time in any job, you can’t expect that part-time wages are going to be sufficient alone to pay your living expenses,” he said. In addition to wages, part-timers at the New School receive health and retirement benefits that adjuncts at many other campuses lack, the president said.

    Sanjay G. Reddy, an associate professor of economics, argued in a blog post on Tuesday that the university’s approach “threatens to bring about the very financial crisis that it claims to forestall, by causing a precipitous collapse in student enrollments.”

    The university has taken issue with Reddy’s assertions that the university’s finances are opaque, its administration bloated, and many of its investment decisions ill planned, as “misleading or incorrect.”

    Controversy erupted last week when the university sent hiring managers an email seeking “temporary progress reviewers” to grade students’ work. The reviewers would need a master’s degree and teaching experience, but wouldn’t have to be subject experts, the email said. Three days later, the university described the email as an unapproved message that had been sent out by mistake.

    [ad_2]

    Katherine Mangan

    Source link