ReportWire

Tag: Greenland

  • Trump Leaks World Leaders’ Private Texts in Greenland Bullying Fit

    [ad_1]

    Photo: Michael Kappeler/Picture Alliance/Getty Images

    While it’s cliché to call Donald Trump’s behavior childish, there’s really no other way to characterize his demand to take Greenland. Polls show that Greenlanders don’t want to be part of the U.S., and Americans’ support for forcibly taking the Arctic island is in the single digits. While Greenland is important for strategic and defense reasons, experts say Trump could get pretty much everything he wants there if he just asks nicely. But Trump keeps insisting he has to have Greenland, and he has to have it now.

    Now the president is using increasingly immature tactics in his quest to obtain the Arctic island, pouting about how he was robbed of a Nobel Peace Prize and publicly sharing world leaders’ private text messages about Greenland on Truth Social.

    Trump kicked off the long MLK Day weekend by inviting countries to join a new “Board of Peace,” which he will chair. It appears he’s envisioning an American-dominated alternative United Nations with a $1 billion admission fee. Then, in a lengthy Truth Social post on Saturday, Trump announced he will impose tariffs on several nations if they don’t let the U.S. purchase Greenland:

    Starting on February 1st, 2026, all of the above mentioned Countries (Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, The United Kingdom, The Netherlands, and Finland), will be charged a 10% Tariff on any and all goods sent to the United States of America. On June 1st, 2026, the Tariff will be increased to 25%. This Tariff will be due and payable until such time as a Deal is reached for the Complete and Total purchase of Greenland.

    A day later, Trump’s text-based behind-the-scenes tantrum-ing spilled into public. In a Sunday message to Jonas Gahr Støre, the prime minister of Norway, Trump said he’s demanding Greenland because he didn’t win the Nobel Peace Prize.

    “Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America,” Trump wrote. He went on to question Denmark’s claim to Greenland.

    Støre said in a statement that he has repeatedly explained to Trump that — as everyone else is well aware — Norway has nothing to do with who gets the Nobel as “it is an independent Nobel Committee, and not the Norwegian government, that awards the prize.”

    Nevertheless, it seems Team Trump thought this error-ridden text was smart messaging. The Atlantic noted, “The text was forwarded by the White House National Security Council to ambassadors in Washington, and was clearly intended to be widely shared.”

    So it does not seem that Trump’s next unhinged move was an act of retaliation for his message being shared publicly. While traveling to Davos, Switzerland, for the World Economic Forum early on Tuesday morning, Trump posted what France later confirmed was a private text from French president Emmanuel Macron:

    A day earlier, Trump had publicly threatened France with a 200 percent tariff on wines and Champagnes following reports that Macron would refuse to join the Board of Peace. It seems Macron was attempting to smooth things over by reminding his “friend” Trump of their agreement on other foreign-policy issues and offering to set up a Thursday G7 meeting in Paris, along with a private dinner, to hash out the Greenland issue.

    Attempting to humiliate foes by sharing their private messages is a common Trump tactic (it was actually the premise for one of his coffee-table books). But this is the first time he has posted private messages from a foreign leader, aside from a fawning text NATO chief Mark Rutte sent him last summer.

    Trump continued his Truth Social taunting by posting altered images that showed him taking over Greenland (along with Venezuela and Canada):

    Next, Trump lashed out at the U.K. for giving away the island of Diego Garcia, arguing that it’s yet another reason why the U.S. must take Greenland:

    Then Trump shared a private message in which Rutte praised him and promised to hype his foreign-policy achievements in Davos:

    Trump told the New York Post that he shared the messages because they show European leaders are behaving differently toward him behind the scenes as they publicly issue warnings about Greenland.

    “It just made my point. They’re saying, ‘Oh gee, let’s have dinner, let’s do this, let’s do that.’ It just made my point,” he said.

    Both Macron and the White House confirmed on Tuesday that the proposed G7 meeting in Paris isn’t happening, as AFP reports:

    ‘No meeting is scheduled. The French presidency is willing to hold one,’ Macron told AFP in brief remarks after he delivered a speech to the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.

    … A White House official told AFP that Trump has ‘no plans to travel to Paris at this time’. The US president is set to arrive in Davos on Wednesday and leave on Thursday.

    So what’s next for Greenland? For now, it seems we’re all being held hostage, at the whim of a leader who’d rather bully allies via threats and nasty online posts than sit down to find a reasonable way to get what he wants.

    This post was updated to include Trump’s remarks to the Post.


    See All



    [ad_2]

    Margaret Hartmann

    Source link

  • Trump takes on angry European leaders over Greenland with memes and published text messages

    [ad_1]

    President Trump will face shocked European leaders in Davos, Switzerland, as he remains defiant in his stance on Greenland. CBS News’ Holly Williams reports.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Congressman Ami Bera says Republicans privately concerned about President Trump

    [ad_1]

    As Congress returns from recess this week, Sacramento Congressman Ami Bera says Republican lawmakers have privately expressed growing concern over President Donald Trump’s recent decisions.“I think they are very worried about what they’re seeing coming out of the President,” Bera said. “Even the actions with Venezuela — they weren’t consulted about any of this.”Bera, a Democrat who serves on the House Foreign Affairs and Intelligence Committees, returned Sunday from South America, where he met with Peru’s foreign minister. He said it was too dangerous for him to travel to Venezuela, describing the country as fragile following U.S. military action that led to the capture of President Nicolás Maduro.“They’re happy Maduro is gone,” Bera said of Peruvian officials. “They want to see a stable Venezuela, but they’re cautious because you still have the Maduro regime in place, and a lot could go wrong.”He added that while Peru welcomes Maduro’s removal, leaders there are concerned that ongoing instability could lead to increased migration into neighboring countries.Back in Washington, Congress faces a potential government shutdown at the end of the month. Bera said lawmakers must address unresolved issues, including healthcare subsidies and immigration policy, after the action in Minneapolis. He also pointed to President Trump’s recent remarks about taking control of Greenland, which Trump has said is necessary for national security.“President Trump is not listening to anyone,” Bera said. “Now he’s talking about invading Greenland, and our closest allies in Europe are pissed off with us. He’s alienating everyone. I hope when I get back there tomorrow, Republicans will say enough is enough — let’s go around the president and get some of this stuff done.”Despite the challenges, Bera said he remains optimistic that a shutdown can be avoided.“I do not think the government will shut down because we saw how it hurt Americans,” he said. “We should negotiate. There’s going to be give and take. As Democrats, we’re not going to get everything we want. That’s how we’ve passed the appropriations bills so far, and I hope we get it done this week.”Bera also highlighted bipartisan support for extending health care subsidies, noting that 17 Republicans joined Democrats to back the measure, despite opposition from President Trump.See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    As Congress returns from recess this week, Sacramento Congressman Ami Bera says Republican lawmakers have privately expressed growing concern over President Donald Trump’s recent decisions.

    “I think they are very worried about what they’re seeing coming out of the President,” Bera said. “Even the actions with Venezuela — they weren’t consulted about any of this.”

    Bera, a Democrat who serves on the House Foreign Affairs and Intelligence Committees, returned Sunday from South America, where he met with Peru’s foreign minister. He said it was too dangerous for him to travel to Venezuela, describing the country as fragile following U.S. military action that led to the capture of President Nicolás Maduro.

    “They’re happy Maduro is gone,” Bera said of Peruvian officials. “They want to see a stable Venezuela, but they’re cautious because you still have the Maduro regime in place, and a lot could go wrong.”

    He added that while Peru welcomes Maduro’s removal, leaders there are concerned that ongoing instability could lead to increased migration into neighboring countries.

    Back in Washington, Congress faces a potential government shutdown at the end of the month. Bera said lawmakers must address unresolved issues, including healthcare subsidies and immigration policy, after the action in Minneapolis. He also pointed to President Trump’s recent remarks about taking control of Greenland, which Trump has said is necessary for national security.

    “President Trump is not listening to anyone,” Bera said. “Now he’s talking about invading Greenland, and our closest allies in Europe are pissed off with us. He’s alienating everyone. I hope when I get back there tomorrow, Republicans will say enough is enough — let’s go around the president and get some of this stuff done.”

    Despite the challenges, Bera said he remains optimistic that a shutdown can be avoided.

    “I do not think the government will shut down because we saw how it hurt Americans,” he said. “We should negotiate. There’s going to be give and take. As Democrats, we’re not going to get everything we want. That’s how we’ve passed the appropriations bills so far, and I hope we get it done this week.”

    Bera also highlighted bipartisan support for extending health care subsidies, noting that 17 Republicans joined Democrats to back the measure, despite opposition from President Trump.

    See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump Says Had a Telephone Call With NATO’s Rutte Concerning Greenland

    [ad_1]

    Jan 20 (Reuters) – U.S. ‌President ​Donald Trump ‌said on Tuesday he ​had a “very good” telephone call ‍with NATO Secretary ​General Mark Rutte ​concerning ⁠Greenland.

    Trump also said he had agreed to a meeting of various parties in Davos, Switzerland, at ‌the World Economic Forum. He ​did not ‌specify who ‍the various ⁠parties were.

    “As I expressed to everyone, very plainly, Greenland is imperative for National and World Security. There can ​be no going back – On that, everyone agrees!” he said in a post on Truth Social.

    Trump had earlier told reporters the United States would talk about acquiring Greenland at this week’s World ​Economic Forum because Denmark cannot protect the territory.

    (Reporting by Chandni Shah in Bengaluru; ​Editing by Jacqueline Wong and Tom Hogue)

    Copyright 2026 Thomson Reuters.

    Photos You Should See – January 2026

    [ad_2]

    Reuters

    Source link

  • 1/19: The Takeout with Major Garrett

    [ad_1]


    1/19: The Takeout with Major Garrett – CBS News









































    Watch CBS News



    Minneapolis ICE protests continue in face of Trump’s Insurrection Act threat; Indiana and Miami students reflect on lead-up to football championship.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • 1/19: CBS Evening News

    [ad_1]



    Watch CBS News



    Lake effect snow sweeps Eastern U.S.; Trump ties Greenland threat to perceived Nobel Peace Prize snub.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • The origins of the U.S.-Greenland military relationship

    [ad_1]

    President Trump maintains that the U.S. needs Greenland for American and NATO security, but many defense experts point out that a 1951 treaty already allows the U.S. to keep a consistent military presence on the island. CBS News’ Lindsey Reiser explains.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • What we know about Trump’s message on Greenland that mentions Nobel Peace Prize snub

    [ad_1]


    What we know about Trump’s message on Greenland that mentions Nobel Peace Prize snub – CBS News









































    Watch CBS News



    A message from President Trump to Norway’s Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre has emerged, and it may contain clues on the topic of a U.S. takeover of Greenland. CBS News’ Olivia Rinaldi reports.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • Trump ties his stance on Greenland to not getting Nobel Peace Prize, European officials say

    [ad_1]

    President Donald Trump linked his aggressive stance on Greenland to last year’s decision not to award him the Nobel Peace Prize, telling Norway’s prime minister that he no longer felt “an obligation to think purely of Peace,” two European officials said Monday.Trump’s message to Jonas Gahr Støre appears to ratchet up a standoff between Washington and its closest allies over his threats to take over Greenland, a self-governing territory of NATO member Denmark. On Saturday, Trump announced a 10% import tax starting in February on goods from eight nations that have rallied around Denmark and Greenland, including Norway.Those countries issued a forceful rebuke. But British Prime Minister Keir Starmer sought to de-escalate tensions on Monday. While the White House has not ruled taking control of the strategic Arctic island by force, Starmer said he did not believe military action would occur.”I think this can be resolved and should be resolved through calm discussion,” he said.Still, the American leader’s message to Gahr Støre could further fracture a U.S.-European relationship already strained by differences over how to end the nearly four-year war in Ukraine, previous rounds of tariffs, military spending and migration policy.In a sign of how tensions have increased in recent days, thousands of Greenlanders marched over the weekend in protest of any effort to take over their island. Greenland Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen said in a Facebook post Monday that the tariff threats would not change their stance.“We will not be pressured,” he wrote.Meanwhile, Naaja Nathanielsen, Greenland’s minister for business, minerals, energy, justice and equality, told The Associated Press that she was moved by the quick response of allies to the tariff threat and said it showed that countries realize “this is about more than Greenland.”“I think a lot of countries are afraid that if they let Greenland go, what would be next?”Trump sends a message to the Norwegian leaderAccording to two European officials, Trump’s message to Gahr Støre read in part: “Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America.”It concluded: “The World is not secure unless we have Complete and Total Control of Greenland.”The officials, who were not authorized to comment publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity, said it had been forwarded to multiple European ambassadors in Washington. PBS first reported on the content of Trump’s note.U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent defended the president’s approach in Greenland during a brief Q&A with reporters in Davos, Switzerland, which is hosting the World Economic Forum meeting this week.“I think it’s a complete canard that the president would be doing this because of the Nobel,” Bessent said, immediately after saying he did not “know anything about the president’s letter to Norway.”Bessent insisted Trump “is looking at Greenland as a strategic asset for the United States,” adding that “we are not going to outsource our hemispheric security to anyone else.”The White House did not respond to questions about the message or the context for Trump sending it.Gahr Støre confirmed Monday that he had received a text message the day before from Trump but did not release its contents.The Norwegian leader said Trump’s message was a reply to an earlier missive sent on behalf of himself and Finnish President Alexander Stubb, in which they conveyed their opposition to the tariff announcement, pointed to a need to de-escalate, and proposed a telephone conversation among the three leaders.“Norway’s position on Greenland is clear. Greenland is a part of the Kingdom of Denmark, and Norway fully supports the Kingdom of Denmark on this matter,” the Norwegian leader said in a statement. “As regards the Nobel Peace Prize, I have clearly explained, including to President Trump what is well known, the prize is awarded by an independent Nobel Committee and not the Norwegian Government.”He told TV2 Norway that he hadn’t responded to the message, but “I still believe it’s wise to talk,” and he hopes to talk with Trump in Davos this week.The Norwegian Nobel Committee is an independent body whose five members are appointed by the Norwegian Parliament.Trump has openly coveted the peace prize, which the committee awarded to Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado last year. Last week, Machado presented her Nobel medal to Trump, who said he planned to keep it though the committee said the prize can’t be revoked, transferred or shared with others.Starmer says a trade war is in no one’s interestIn his latest threat of tariffs, Trump indicated they would be retaliation for last week’s deployment of symbolic numbers of troops from the European countries to Greenland — though he also suggested that he was using the tariffs as leverage to negotiate with Denmark.European governments said that the troops traveled to the island to assess Arctic security, part of a response to Trump’s own concerns about interference from Russia and China.Starmer on Monday called Trump’s threat of tariffs “completely wrong” and said that a trade war is in no one’s interest.He added that “being pragmatic does not mean being passive and partnership does not mean abandoning principles.”Six of the eight countries targeted are part of the 27-member European Union, which operates as a single economic zone in terms of trade. European Council President Antonio Costa said Sunday that the bloc’s leaders expressed “readiness to defend ourselves against any form of coercion.” He announced a summit for Thursday evening.Starmer indicated that Britain, which is not part of the EU, is not planning to consider retaliatory tariffs.“My focus is on making sure we don’t get to that stage,” he said.Denmark’s defense minister and Greenland’s foreign minister are expected to meet NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte in Brussels on Monday, a meeting that was planned before the latest escalation.___Associated Press writers Josh Boak in West Palm Beach, Florida; Emma Burrows in Nuuk, Greenland; and Bill Barrow in Atlanta contributed to this report.

    President Donald Trump linked his aggressive stance on Greenland to last year’s decision not to award him the Nobel Peace Prize, telling Norway’s prime minister that he no longer felt “an obligation to think purely of Peace,” two European officials said Monday.

    Trump’s message to Jonas Gahr Støre appears to ratchet up a standoff between Washington and its closest allies over his threats to take over Greenland, a self-governing territory of NATO member Denmark. On Saturday, Trump announced a 10% import tax starting in February on goods from eight nations that have rallied around Denmark and Greenland, including Norway.

    Those countries issued a forceful rebuke. But British Prime Minister Keir Starmer sought to de-escalate tensions on Monday. While the White House has not ruled taking control of the strategic Arctic island by force, Starmer said he did not believe military action would occur.

    “I think this can be resolved and should be resolved through calm discussion,” he said.

    Still, the American leader’s message to Gahr Støre could further fracture a U.S.-European relationship already strained by differences over how to end the nearly four-year war in Ukraine, previous rounds of tariffs, military spending and migration policy.

    In a sign of how tensions have increased in recent days, thousands of Greenlanders marched over the weekend in protest of any effort to take over their island. Greenland Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen said in a Facebook post Monday that the tariff threats would not change their stance.

    “We will not be pressured,” he wrote.

    Meanwhile, Naaja Nathanielsen, Greenland’s minister for business, minerals, energy, justice and equality, told The Associated Press that she was moved by the quick response of allies to the tariff threat and said it showed that countries realize “this is about more than Greenland.”

    “I think a lot of countries are afraid that if they let Greenland go, what would be next?”

    Trump sends a message to the Norwegian leader

    According to two European officials, Trump’s message to Gahr Støre read in part: “Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America.”

    It concluded: “The World is not secure unless we have Complete and Total Control of Greenland.”

    The officials, who were not authorized to comment publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity, said it had been forwarded to multiple European ambassadors in Washington. PBS first reported on the content of Trump’s note.

    U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent defended the president’s approach in Greenland during a brief Q&A with reporters in Davos, Switzerland, which is hosting the World Economic Forum meeting this week.

    “I think it’s a complete canard that the president would be doing this because of the Nobel,” Bessent said, immediately after saying he did not “know anything about the president’s letter to Norway.”

    Bessent insisted Trump “is looking at Greenland as a strategic asset for the United States,” adding that “we are not going to outsource our hemispheric security to anyone else.”

    The White House did not respond to questions about the message or the context for Trump sending it.

    Gahr Støre confirmed Monday that he had received a text message the day before from Trump but did not release its contents.

    The Norwegian leader said Trump’s message was a reply to an earlier missive sent on behalf of himself and Finnish President Alexander Stubb, in which they conveyed their opposition to the tariff announcement, pointed to a need to de-escalate, and proposed a telephone conversation among the three leaders.

    “Norway’s position on Greenland is clear. Greenland is a part of the Kingdom of Denmark, and Norway fully supports the Kingdom of Denmark on this matter,” the Norwegian leader said in a statement. “As regards the Nobel Peace Prize, I have clearly explained, including to President Trump what is well known, the prize is awarded by an independent Nobel Committee and not the Norwegian Government.”

    He told TV2 Norway that he hadn’t responded to the message, but “I still believe it’s wise to talk,” and he hopes to talk with Trump in Davos this week.

    The Norwegian Nobel Committee is an independent body whose five members are appointed by the Norwegian Parliament.

    Trump has openly coveted the peace prize, which the committee awarded to Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado last year. Last week, Machado presented her Nobel medal to Trump, who said he planned to keep it though the committee said the prize can’t be revoked, transferred or shared with others.

    Starmer says a trade war is in no one’s interest

    In his latest threat of tariffs, Trump indicated they would be retaliation for last week’s deployment of symbolic numbers of troops from the European countries to Greenland — though he also suggested that he was using the tariffs as leverage to negotiate with Denmark.

    European governments said that the troops traveled to the island to assess Arctic security, part of a response to Trump’s own concerns about interference from Russia and China.

    Starmer on Monday called Trump’s threat of tariffs “completely wrong” and said that a trade war is in no one’s interest.

    He added that “being pragmatic does not mean being passive and partnership does not mean abandoning principles.”

    Six of the eight countries targeted are part of the 27-member European Union, which operates as a single economic zone in terms of trade. European Council President Antonio Costa said Sunday that the bloc’s leaders expressed “readiness to defend ourselves against any form of coercion.” He announced a summit for Thursday evening.

    Starmer indicated that Britain, which is not part of the EU, is not planning to consider retaliatory tariffs.

    “My focus is on making sure we don’t get to that stage,” he said.

    Denmark’s defense minister and Greenland’s foreign minister are expected to meet NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte in Brussels on Monday, a meeting that was planned before the latest escalation.

    ___

    Associated Press writers Josh Boak in West Palm Beach, Florida; Emma Burrows in Nuuk, Greenland; and Bill Barrow in Atlanta contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Global shock and panic over Trump’s threats on Greenland

    [ad_1]


    Global shock and panic over Trump’s threats on Greenland – CBS News









































    Watch CBS News



    NATO allies are reacting to President Trump’s threats of tariffs against nations that oppose his mission to take over Greenland. CBS News’ Willie James Inman and Holly Williams report.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • Trump escalates Greenland standoff with allies, linking it to perceived Nobel Peace Prize snub

    [ad_1]

    America’s European allies stood united Monday against President Trump’s escalating campaign to take control of Greenland, accusing him of blackmail with a new threat of tariffs if they continue rejecting his bid for the U.S. to acquire the vast island. Mr. Trump, meanwhile, appeared to hint that he was still willing to use the U.S. military to achieve his objective.

    In a message sent to Norway’s Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre and shared with other NATO allies, Mr. Trump said that due to the decision to award someone other than himself the Nobel Peace Prize this year, he no longer feels “an obligation to think purely of Peace,” and that he “can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America.”  

    In the next sentence, Mr. Trump refers to his controversial demand that the U.S. take ownership of Greenland, which has been a territory of American ally Denmark for centuries. He renews his claim that only full U.S. control can prevent the strategic Arctic island from falling into the hands of China or Russia.

    Trump’s claims about Greenland and U.S. security

    America’s closest allies in NATO have rejected Mr. Trump’s argument, along with U.S. lawmakers from both sides of the aisle, that the U.S. needs to own Greenland for security reasons.

    Getty/iStockphoto


    They note that Greenland already falls under the transatlantic alliance’s protection as a Danish territory, that the U.S. has had at least one military base on the island since World War II and Denmark has given an open invitation for Washington to boost that defense presence in partnership with its allies.

    Despite those facts, and efforts by Denmark and other European NATO members to show an understanding of and willingness to address rising competition over control of vital new shipping lanes around the resource-rich island, Mr. Trump claims again in his message to Norway’s leader that “the World is not secure unless we have Complete and Total Control of Greenland.”

    He argues that Denmark is incapable of securing the Arctic territory in the face of Russian and Chinese threats — threats that Senator Mark Warner, the Democratic vice chairman of the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee, called fictitious over the weekend.

    “Denmark cannot protect that land from Russia or China,” Mr. Trump wrote, ignoring the fact that, for almost 80 years, since the U.S. and its European allies committed to the principle of joint security with NATO’s founding treaty, Greenland’s protection has been a shared responsibility.

    Mr. Trump questions in the note, as he’s done previously, Denmark’s right to any claim over Greenland, arguing that the basis is only that “a boat landed there hundreds of years ago, but we had boats landing there, also.”

    Denmark became the colonial power in Greenland in the early 18th century, about 50 years before the United States became a sovereign nation with its own navy. Greenland remained a Danish colony until 1953, when the island gained its current semi-autonomy. 

    Protesters rally in Greenland against Trump annexation threat

    Greenlandic Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen waves a flag during a protest against President Trump’s demand that the Arctic island be ceded to the U.S., in Nuuk, Greenland, Jan. 17, 2026.

    Marko Djurica/REUTERS


    Though the population is tiny at around 60,000 people, Greenland has its own elected government, and both the island’s leaders and the Greenlandic people have made it abundantly clear that they do not want to become part of the U.S.

    Norway’s leader responds to Trump’s message

    The Norwegian government shared a statement on Monday from Prime Minister Støre in which he confirms that he received Mr. Trump’s message on Sunday afternoon.

    He said it came in response to a text message he’d sent along with Finland’s President Alexander Stubb. 

    “In our message to Trump we conveyed our opposition to his announced tariff increases against Norway, Finland and select other countries. We pointed to the need to de-escalate and proposed a telephone conversation between Trump, Stubb and myself on the same day. The response from Trump came shortly after the message was sent,” Støre said in the statement, adding that it was Mr. Trump’s “decision to share his message with other NATO leaders.”

    NATO leaders at summit

    NATO leaders attend the North Atlantic Council plenary meeting at a summit in The Hague, Netherlands, on June 25, 2025.

    LUDOVIC MARIN/POOL/AFP/Getty


    “Norway’s position on Greenland is clear. Greenland is a part of the Kingdom of Denmark, and Norway fully supports the Kingdom of Denmark on this matter. We also support that NATO in a responsible way is taking steps to strengthen security and stability in the Arctic,” said Støre. 

    He added, “As regards the Nobel Peace Prize, I have clearly explained, including to President Trump what is well known, the prize is awarded by an independent Nobel Committee and not the Norwegian Government.”

    U.K. leader doubts Trump will use U.S. military to take Greenland

    Mr. Trump stunned America’s NATO allies over the weekend by threatening to impose new tariffs on Denmark and seven other European nations if they continue to reject his demands to take over Greenland.

    After holding talks among themselves on Sunday, the eight countries issued a joint statement saying they were “committed to strengthening Arctic security as a shared transatlantic interest,” while reiterating their support for Denmark and Greenland.

    They said they were “ready to engage in a dialogue based on the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity that we stand firmly behind,” and warned that threats of tariffs undermine “transatlantic relations and risk a dangerous downward spiral.”

    British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who has maintained good relations with Mr. Trump and spoke with him on the phone Sunday, acknowledged in televised remarks on Monday morning that the Arctic region “will require greater attention, greater investment and stronger collective defense” and said the U.S. would “be central to that effort and the U.K. stands ready to contribute fully alongside our allies, through NATO.”

    UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer Sets Out Approach to US After Trump Tariff Threat

    U.K. Prime Minster Keir Starmer is seen during a news conference in London, England, Jan. 19, 2026.

    Tolga Akmen/EPA/Bloomberg/Getty


    “But there is a principle here that cannot be set aside, because it goes to the heart of how stable and trusted international cooperation works, and so any decision about the future status of Greenland belongs to the people of Greenland and the Kingdom of Denmark alone,” said Starmer.

    “Denmark is a close ally of the U.K. and of the U.S. — a proud NATO member that has stood shoulder to shoulder with us, including at real human cost in recent decades,” Starmer said, alluding to Danish troops fighting alongside U.S. and British forces in Afghanistan and Iraq, as part of the NATO alliance.

    “Alliances endure because they’re built on respect and partnership, not pressure. That is why I said the use of tariffs against allies is completely wrong. It is not the right way to resolve differences within an alliance, nor is it helpful to frame efforts to strengthen Greenland’s security as a justification for economic pressure,” he said. “A trade war is in no one’s interest.”

    As for Mr. Trump not ruling out the use of the American military to seize territory from a NATO ally, Starmer said he didn’t believe it would come to that. 

    “I don’t, actually,” he said. “I think this can and should be resolved through calm discussion, but with the application of principles I’ve set out in terms of who decides the future of Greenland.” 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • European leaders denounce Trump’s tariff threat over Greenland

    [ad_1]


    European leaders denounce Trump’s tariff threat over Greenland – CBS News









































    Watch CBS News



    European countries held an emergency meeting in Brussels Sunday in response to President Trump’s post threatening tariffs against countries that have sent military forces into Greenland amid his push to annex the Arctic island. Leigh Kiniry reports.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • Europeans reeling as Trump threatens tariffs on 8 countries over Greenland dispute

    [ad_1]

    Europeans were reeling Sunday from President Trump’s announcement that eight countries will face a 10% tariff for opposing American control of Greenland.

    The responses to Mr. Trump’s decision ranged from saying it risked “a dangerous downward spiral” to predicting that “China and Russia must be having a field day.”

    Mr. Trump’s threat sets up a potentially dangerous test of U.S. partnerships in Europe. Several European countries have sent troops to Greenland in recent days, saying they are there for Arctic security training. Mr. Trump’s announcement came Saturday as thousands of Greenlanders were wrapping up a protest outside the U.S. Consulate in the capital, Nuuk.

    The Republican president appeared to indicate that he was using the tariffs as leverage to force talks with Denmark and other European countries over the status of Greenland, a semiautonomous territory of NATO ally Denmark that he regards as critical to U.S. national security. Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Finland would face the tariff.

    The eight countries issued a joint statement Sunday: “As members of NATO, we are committed to strengthening Arctic security as a shared transatlantic interest. The pre-coordinated Danish exercise ‘Arctic Endurance,’ conducted with Allies, responds to this necessity. It poses no threat to anyone.”

    The statement added: “We stand in full solidarity with the Kingdom of Denmark and the people of Greenland. Building on the process begun last week, we stand ready to engage in a dialogue based on the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity that we stand firmly behind. Tariff threats undermine transatlantic relations and risk a dangerous downward spiral. We will continue to stand united and coordinated in our response. We are committed to upholding our sovereignty.”

    Protesters wave Greenland flags during a demonstration at City Hall Square in Copenhagen on Jan. 17, 2026.

    Kristian Tuxen Ladegaard Berg/NurPhoto via Getty Images


    There are immediate questions about how the White House could try to implement the tariffs, because the EU is a single economic zone in terms of trading. Norway and the U.K. are not part of the 27-member EU, and it was not immediately clear if Mr. Trump’s tariffs would impact the entire bloc. EU envoys scheduled emergency talks for Sunday evening to determine a potential response.

    It was unclear, too, how Mr. Trump could act under U.S. law, though he could cite emergency economic powers that are currently subject to a Supreme Court challenge.

    European Union foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said China and Russia will benefit from the divisions between the U.S. and Europe. She added in a post on social media: “If Greenland’s security is at risk, we can address this inside NATO. Tariffs risk making Europe and the United States poorer and undermine our shared prosperity.”

    Mr. Trump’s move also was panned domestically.

    Sen. Mark Kelly, a former U.S. Navy pilot and Democrat who represents Arizona, posted that Mr. Trump’s threatened tariffs on U.S. allies would make Americans “pay more to try to get territory we don’t need.”

    “Troops from European countries are arriving in Greenland to defend the territory from us. Let that sink in,” he wrote on X. “The damage this President is doing to our reputation and our relationships is growing, making us less safe. If something doesn’t change we will be on our own with adversaries and enemies in every direction.”

    A CBS News poll released Sunday found widespread opposition among Americans to buying Greenland or taking it by military force. Seventy percent said they would oppose using federal funds to buy the territory, and 86% said they would oppose seizing it militarily.

    The tariffs announcement even drew blowback from Mr. Trump’s populist allies in Europe.

    Italy’s right-wing Premier Giorgia Meloni, considered one of Mr. Trump’s closest allies on the continent, said Sunday she had spoken to him about the tariffs, which she described as “a mistake.”

    The deployment to Greenland of small numbers of troops by some European countries was misunderstood by Washington, Meloni told reporters during a two-day visit to South Korea. She said the deployment was not a move against the U.S. but aimed to provide security against “other actors” that she didn’t name.

    Jordan Bardella, president of Marine Le Pen’s far-right National Rally party in France and also a European Parliament lawmaker, posted that the EU should suspend last year’s tariff deal with the U.S., describing Mr. Trump’s threats as “commercial blackmail.”

    Mr. Trump also achieved the rare feat of uniting Britain’s main political parties — including the hard-right Reform UK party — all of whom criticized the tariff threat.

    “We don’t always agree with the U.S. government and in this case we certainly don’t. These tariffs will hurt us,” Reform UK leader Nigel Farage, a longtime champion and ally of Mr. Trump, wrote on social media. He stopped short of criticizing Mr. Trump’s designs on Greenland.

    Meanwhile, U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who leads the center-left Labour Party, said the tariffs announcement was “completely wrong” and his government would “be pursuing this directly with the U.S. administration.”

    The foreign ministers of Denmark and Norway are also expected to address the crisis Sunday in Oslo during a news conference.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • CBS News poll finds more Americans say ICE being too tough; Republicans feel protesters have gone too far

    [ad_1]

    More Americans now describe ICE’s operations as too tough when stopping and detaining people, and there’s a growing view that President Trump’s deportation program is targeting more people than just dangerous criminals. 

    Meanwhile, Republicans overwhelmingly feel the protesters have gone too far.

    In the wake of events in Minneapolis, overall support for the deportation program — which has roughly divided the nation for months — has dipped even as it continues to draw strong backing from Republicans and especially strong backing from MAGA. 

    And in sum, the public expresses a difference between how they see the goals of the deportation program and how it’s being carried out. 

    protests-by-party.png

    There are shifting perceptions of who is being targeted by the program. Americans are increasingly likely to say the administration isn’t prioritizing dangerous criminals, and most think the administration is trying to deport more people than they thought it would.

    prioritize-criminals.png

    So, as Americans look overall, a slight majority feel ICE is making the communities where it is conducting operations less safe, many more than feel it’s improving safety.

    ice-safe-less-safe.png

    Over the course of the term, overall approval of the deportation program started net positively, became more divided over the summer, and then hovered near that division for months. In the wake of events in Minneapolis, it dropped to its lowest overall mark of the term.

    trump-deport-program.png

    trump-deport-program-by-pty.png

    More people like what they believe the program’s goals are than like the approach being taken. The former is mixed, while the latter is negative.

    trump-deport-goals-approach.png

    Overall, Mr. Trump’s approval on handling immigration has also ticked down to its lowest point of his second term, though it continues to outpace his approval on the economy and inflation. 

    Views on the shooting of Renee Good by an ICE agent in Minneapolis hew closely to party lines. Republicans tend to call it justified, while Democrats and independents say it was not. Most also say that they don’t believe the administration’s response to it has been fair.

    Non-MAGA Republicans are less inclined than MAGA to call the shooting justified.

    shooting-justified.png

    Thinking about what should be next for ICE, the recent events in Minneapolis appear to have at least partially reinforced preexisting views about the deportation program. Democrats say recent events mean ICE operations in the U.S. should be decreased, though they already opposed the program. Republicans either say it means operations should be increased or kept the same; they’ve long favored the program.

    ice-increase-decrease.png

    Looking overseas to Greenland and Iran

    Looking overseas, with widespread opposition to the prospect of military action in Greenland or Iran, a majority of Americans appear pessimistic about what Mr. Trump’s policies might bring in terms of peace and stability in 2026.

    trump-peace.png

    Most Americans think the U.S. does have strategic interests in Iran, but they are more divided on whether or not it has moral responsibilities there. 

    Most don’t think the U.S. has effective plans for military action there, and two-thirds feel it would be a long and costly involvement. Those sentiments are closely connected to opposition to the idea of force.

    iran-mil-action.png

    iran-mil-action-by-party.png

    potential-action-against-iran.png

    The idea of using military force to take Greenland faces overwhelming opposition across party lines, including most MAGA Republicans, who say they would disapprove. For context, they have largely backed the president after he has taken military actions, including in Venezuela and the strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities last year.

    buy-greenland.png

    military-force-greenland.png

    Whether they support military action in Greenland and Iran or not, most Republicans do think Mr. Trump has made the U.S. position in the world stronger.

    greenland-by-force-by-pty.png

    What do Americans think would happen if the U.S. took Greenland by force?

    Some think taking Greenland would constitute a show of force to Russia and China, and just over half think it would provide access to needed natural resources. But large majorities also think it would cause the U.S. to leave the NATO alliance and create instability in the world. 

    Views about the latter two implications are very closely associated with opposition to the idea.

    happen-if-take-greenland-by-force.png


    This CBS News/YouGov survey was conducted with a nationally representative sample of 2,523 U.S. adults interviewed between January 14-16, 2026. The sample was weighted to be representative of adults nationwide according to gender, age, race, and education, based on the U.S. Census American Community Survey and Current Population Survey, as well as 2024 presidential vote. The margin of error is ±2.3 points.

    Toplines

    CBS News Poll — Jan. 14-16, 2026

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • World Markets Face Fresh Jolt as Trump Vows Tariffs on Europe Over Greenland

    [ad_1]

    By Karin Strohecker and Dhara Ranasinghe

    LONDON, Jan 18 (Reuters) – Global markets face a fresh ‌bout ​of volatility this week after President Donald Trump ‌vowed to slap tariffs on eight European nations until the U.S. is allowed to buy Greenland.

    Trump said he ​would impose an additional 10% import tariffs from February 1 on goods from Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Finland and Britain, which will rise to 25% ‍on June 1 if no deal is reached.

    “Hopes ​that the tariff situation has calmed down for this year have been dashed for now – and we find ourselves in the same situation as last spring,” ​said Berenberg chief ⁠economist Holger Schmieding.

    Sweeping “Liberation Day” tariffs in April 2025 sent shockwaves through financial markets. Investors then largely looked past Trump trade threats in the second half of the year, viewing them as noise and responding with relief as Trump made deals with the likes of Britain and the European Union. 

    While that lull might be over, market moves on Monday could be dampened by the experience that investor sentiment had been more resilient and global ‌economic growth stayed on track. 

    Nonetheless, Schmieding expected the euro could come under some pressure when Asian trade begins. The euro ended Friday at ​around $1.16 against ‌the dollar, having hit its lowest ‍levels since late November. 

    Implications for ⁠the dollar were less clear. It remains a safe haven, but could also feel the impact of Washington being at the centre of geopolitical ruptures, as it did last April.

    “For European markets it will be a small setback, but not something comparable to the Liberation Day reaction,” Schmieding said. 

    European stocks are trading near record highs, with Germany’s DAX and London’s blue-chip FTSE index up more than 3% since the start of the year, outperforming the S&P 500, which is up 1.3%. 

    European defence shares are likely to remain an outlier – benefiting from increased geopolitical tensions. Defence stocks have jumped almost 15% this month, as the U.S. seizure of Venezuela’s Nicolas ​Maduro fuelled concerns about Greenland.

    Denmark’s closely managed crown will also likely be in focus. It has been weakening, but rate differentials are a major factor and it is still close to the central rate at which it is pegged to the euro. It is trading not far from six-year lows against the euro.

    “The U.S.-EU trade war is back on,” said Tina Fordham, geopolitical strategist and founder of Fordham Global Foresight.

    Trump’s latest move came as top officials from the EU and South American bloc Mercosur signed a free trade agreement. 

    ‘UNTHINKABLE SORTS OF DEVELOPMENTS’

    The dispute over Greenland is just one hot spot.

    Trump has also weighed intervening in unrest in Iran, while the U.S. administration’s threat to indict Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell has reignited concerns about its independence. 

    Against this backdrop, safe-haven gold remains near record highs.

    The World Economic Forum’s annual risk perception survey, released ahead of its annual meeting in Davos, which will be attended by Trump, identified ​economic confrontation between nations as the number one concern replacing armed conflict.

    While investors have grown increasingly wary of geopolitical risk, they have also become used to it to some extent.

    “Investor sentiment has proven quite resilient in the face of the sort of continuing unthinkable sorts of developments, which probably reflects a combination of like faith that Trump just won’t be able to do all of the things that ​he talks about mixed with a sense that none of this kind of moves the needle on asset prices,” said Fordham. 

    (Reporting by Karin Strohecker and Dhara Ranasinghe ; Editing by Alexander Smith)

    Copyright 2026 Thomson Reuters.

    Photos You Should See – January 2026

    [ad_2]

    Reuters

    Source link

  • EU Warns of Downward Spiral After Trump Threatens Tariffs Over Greenland

    [ad_1]

    BRUSSELS, Jan 17 (Reuters) – European ‌Union ​leaders on Saturday ‌warned of a “dangerous downward spiral” over ​U.S. President Donald Trump’s vow to implement increasing ‍tariffs on European allies ​until the U.S. is allowed to ​buy ⁠Greenland.

    “Tariffs would undermine transatlantic relations and risk a dangerous downward spiral. Europe will remain united, coordinated, and committed to upholding its sovereignty,” European Commission ‌President Ursula von der Leyen and EU Council President ​Antonio Costa ‌said in posts ‍on ⁠X.

    The bloc’s top diplomat Kaja Kallas said tariffs would hurt prosperity on both sides of the Atlantic, while distracting the EU from its “core task” of ending Russia’s war in Ukraine.

    “China and Russia ​must be having a field day. They are the ones who benefit from divisions among allies,” Kallas said on X.

    “Tariffs risk making Europe and the United States poorer and undermine our shared prosperity. If Greenland’s security is at risk, we can address this inside NATO.”

    Ambassadors from the European Union’s ​27 countries will convene on Sunday for an emergency meeting to discuss their response to the tariff threat.

    (Reporting by Bart Meijer ​and Phil Blenkinsop, Editing by Mark Potter and Chris Reese)

    Copyright 2026 Thomson Reuters.

    Photos You Should See – January 2026

    [ad_2]

    Reuters

    Source link

  • Trump says he will impose 10% tariffs on countries that send military forces to Greenland

    [ad_1]

    President Trump said Saturday that he would impose 10% tariffs on countries that have sent military forces into Greenland amid his push to annex the Arctic island.

    Mr. Trump said in a Truth Social post that the tariffs will be levied against Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Finland and take effect on Feb. 1, 2026. All eight countries are members of NATO. 

    The tariffs will be increased to 25% on June 1, Mr. Trump wrote, and remain in place “until such time as a Deal is reached for the Complete and Total purchase of Greenland.”

    There was no forewarning from official channels to U.S. allies and NATO partners before Mr. Trump posted on Truth Social Saturday, two European diplomats told CBS News. Officials in those allied nations feel alienated, frustrated and see this as a potential breaking point in the U.S.-Europe relationship, multiple diplomats said. Mr. Trump is scheduled to travel on Tuesday to the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, where he likely will run into the European leaders he just threatened with tariffs.

    Sen. Thom Tillis, a Republican from North Carolina, criticized the tariffs early Saturday afternoon. 

    “This response to our own allies for sending a small number of troops to Greenland for training is bad for America, bad for American businesses, and bad for America’s allies,” he wrote on X. “It’s great for Putin, Xi and other adversaries who want to see NATO divided. The fact that a small handful of “advisors” are actively pushing for coercive action to seize territory of an ally is beyond stupid. It hurts the legacy of President Trump and undercuts all the work he has done to strengthen the NATO alliance over the years.”

    CBS News senior foreign correspondent Liz Palmer described the Danish soldiers as a “token force” and said the military presence “is a signal to Washington that if Trump is worried about Arctic security, his NATO allies are willing to do their part in helping to look after it.” On Truth Social, Mr. Trump accused the countries of having “journeyed to Greenland, for purposes unknown.” 

    “These Countries, who are playing this very dangerous game, have put a level of risk in play that is not tenable or sustainable,” Mr. Trump wrote. “Therefore, it is imperative that, in order to protect Global Peace and Security, strong measures be taken so that this potentially perilous situation end quickly, and without question.” 

    European leaders react to Trump tariff threats

    In a statement posted to X on Saturday, French President Emmanuel Macron said the country is “committed to the sovereignty and independence of nations, in Europe and elsewhere,” and it is on that basis that France “decided to take part in the exercise organized by Denmark in Greenland.”

    “Tariff threats are unacceptable and have no place in this context,” Macron said. “Europeans will respond in a united and coordinated manner should they be confirmed. We will ensure that European sovereignty is upheld.”

    Mr. Trump’s threat to impose tariffs on European nations “come as a surprise,” Denmark’s foreign minister said Saturday in a statement sent to Agence France-Presse.

    “The purpose of the increased military presence in Greenland, to which the president refers, is precisely to enhance security in the Arctic,” said Danish Minister for Foreign Affairs Lars Lokke Rasmussen. “We are in close contact with the European Commission and our other partners on the matter.”

    Other European leaders are also having discussions to form a joint response, according to Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson. In a statement to AFP on Saturday, Kristersson said, “We won’t let ourselves be intimidated.”

    “I will always defend my country and our allied neighbours,” he added, stressing that this was “a European question.”

    U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Saturday that NATO allies should be working together, adding he will be talking with the Trump administration directly about the tariff threats.

    “Applying tariffs on allies for pursuing the collective security of NATO allies is completely wrong,” Starmer said in a statement.

    Trump’s interest in Greenland

    Mr. Trump has said he believes the U.S. needs to acquire the island for national security reasons. He has said the island is vital for the Golden Dome missile defense system he intends to build, and has expressed concern about Russia or China acquiring Greenland. The sparsely populated island is the location of the northernmost U.S. military base and has reserves of oil, natural gas and minerals. Its northern position also means it is near valuable shipping routes that may become even more useful as warm temperatures melt sea ice in the area.  

    Leaders of the semi-autonomous Danish territory have repeatedly stated that the island is not for sale, and residents of Greenland have protested a potential acquisition.

    Mr. Trump’s post came as a bipartisan U.S. Congressional delegation attempted to reassure Greenlandic and Danish leaders during a visit to the Arctic island. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, an Alaska Republican, said that Greenland needs to be viewed as a U.S. ally, “not as an asset.” 

    On Friday, Mr. Trump said he was considering tariffs on countries that “did not go along with” his plans to acquire Greenland, though he did not offer specifics. 

    Greenlandic and Danish leaders met with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Vice President JD Vance at the White House on Wednesday to discuss long-term security in Greenland. Denmark and the U.S. still have “fundamental” disagreements about Greenland’s future, Denmark’s foreign minister said that afternoon, but a working group to discuss cooperation was established. A Danish official told CBS that Denmark offered more security access and greater defense investment. The official added that Denmark has set two things as a red line: territorial integrity and self-determination for Greenlanders.

    The White House has not ruled out the use of military force to take the island, despite warnings from Denmark that doing so would be seen as a threat to the NATO alliance. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • “This Is Our Land”: Greenland’s Filmmakers Reject U.S. Takeover Rhetoric and Reclaim Their Story

    [ad_1]

    Greenland’s film community has spent years fighting to be seen on its own terms. In recent weeks, as U.S. rhetoric about taking control of the Arctic territory — “if necessary by military force” — has escalated, that struggle has taken on a sharper urgency.

    “I think a lot of Greenlanders, myself included, are just tired. It’s so emotionally draining,” says Greenlandic film producer Inuk Jørgensen. “The recent rhetoric feels like it’s gone up a notch, and I think that really affects a lot of people. Even though people are very united, but people are drained. People are very tired of this.”

    The past few weeks have seen tensions spike dramatically. After a high-stakes meeting in Washington this week between Greenlandic and Danish officials and senior U.S. figures failed to ease the standoff, European allies moved quickly to show support. Troops from France, Germany, the U.K., Norway and Sweden have been sent to Greenland as part of joint military exercises led by Denmark, under Operation Arctic Endurance. Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen called Greenland’s defense a “common concern” for NATO, while reiterating that there remains a “fundamental disagreement” over Washington’s ambitions.

    “The American ambition to take over Greenland is intact,” Frederiksen said in a statement on Thursday. “This is obviously serious and therefore we continue our efforts to prevent that scenario from becoming a reality.”

    On the ground in Nuuk, the symbolism has been impossible to ignore. Inuk Silis Høegh, director of award-winning music documentary Sumé: The Sound of a Revolution and the TV history series History of Greenland and Denmark recalls a visible shift in public mood when the threat of force was raised again. “A few days ago, when [Trump] repeated this claim and that they might use military force, people here started hoisting the Greenlandic flag everywhere,” he says. “I think most people see it as a lack of respect: Trying to buy us, or take us by military control. Or speaking over the tops of our heads, straight to Denmark.”

    Sumé: The Sound of a Revolution

    Anorak Film/Bullitt Film/Jabfilm

    That sense of being talked about, rather than listened to, cuts particularly deep for artists. “One of the things I think hurts a lot of Greenlandic filmmakers and artists at least, and Greenlandic people in general, is that a lot of international media talk about us like a commodity to be exchanged,” Jørgensen says. “The talk is all done over our heads … It underlines the value of what we in the Greenlandic art community have been fighting for for many years: To tell our own stories about us and our place in the world.”

    Høegh says the latest claims coming out of Washington have been accompanied by what he calls a distorted narrative. “All the ‘facts’ they are putting out about us, most of it is not true,” he says. “They’re trying to make a story about us wanting to be a part of America, that we’re so fed up with Denmark.” He points to polling and public sentiment at home. “The vast majority, 85 percent, 90 percent of the population does not want to be American.”

    If the pressure has sparked fear, it has also forced a reckoning around identity. “I feel that we were kind of under attack, and we’ve never been before,” Høegh says. “People who used to post pictures of their morning coffee are posting long posts about who they are as Greenlanders, what they want. It’s forcing people to think about their identity. So in that way, it’s healthy.”

    Jørgensen describes a similar mix of anxiety and resolve. “Every day I wake up and I check the news, something new has been going on,” he says. “Because of the fact that this is going so quickly, the Greenland people can sometimes feel that they’re not part of the conversation about them.” The uncertainty is personal as well as political. “I do fear that the Greenland that will be here in a year won’t be the same Greenland that I know, that I love and where I do my work. I’m hopeful for the best, and I hope cooler heads will prevail, but, like a lot of Greenlandic people, I’m also afraid.”

    At the same time, filmmakers say the moment has brought renewed attention to Greenlandic stories — and tangible support from abroad. “I wouldn’t say it’s been positive, but this has definitely put a spotlight on Greenland, on Greenlandic stories,” Jørgensen says. “Even when I travel internationally, to film festivals in Europe or to Toronto, people are showing really heartfelt support for Greenland, and for Greenlandic filmmakers.”

    That support has been particularly strong from Europe’s film institutions. “Within the Nordic and European community, I feel there’s a strong sense of wanting to show that Greenland is included,” Jørgensen says. “Because of our Nordic and European partners, because of this whole crazy situation, we are maybe able to punch a little above our weight.” He singles out the European Film Academy, as being “very inclusive” of Greenlandic filmmakers. “They really want Greenland to have a seat at the table, which is fantastic. Growing up in Greenland, I never saw a Greenlandic person having a seat at the table.”

    European Film Academy CEO Matthijs Wouter Knol says that connection long predates the current crisis. “Greenland is one of the countries where members of the European Film Academy live, so they’ve been for many years an active part of our community,” he tells THR. In recent years, that relationship has deepened through youth initiatives, training programs in Nuuk and support for building a stronger industry infrastructure. Just this year, Greenland set up its first national film agency, the Kalaallit Nunaanni Filminstitutti (Greenlandic Film Institute), to coordinate and promote local and visiting productions to the island.

    Next week, the European Film Academy will host a spotlight on Greenlandic cinema on its VOD platform for Academy members. The event, scheduled before the latest political escalation, now feels pointedly timely. “We’ll focus on Greenlandic cinema and highlight basically the work of our members,” Knol says, “but also give a better view of what is Greenland and what is important in Greenland.”

    For Høegh, the stakes are not abstract. Greenland has often been framed through an outsider’s lens, he says, and the current moment only sharpens the need to reclaim that narrative. “As a filmmaker, it just reaffirms that we want to tell our own stories,” he says. “It seems like for a lot of film history, it was mostly foreigners coming to tell the story of Greenland. We want to take that narrative back.”

    The rhetoric has even begun to filter into how stories might be told on screen. “In the American movies, the bad guys are the Russians or the Chinese,” Høegh says. “But now, I think, you might see some stories coming out of Greenland where the Americans are the bad guys.”

    Despite the troop deployments and diplomatic brinkmanship, Høegh does not believe Greenland will disappear under outside pressure. If anything, he sees a hardening of resolve. “We need to show we are here and we have a strong identity,” he says. “We’ve been here for 1,000 years. No one else has been able to survive here. This is our land and no one is going to tell us who we are or how we should live.”

    [ad_2]

    Scott Roxborough

    Source link

  • What The Polymarket Says About Cannabis Rescheduling And More

    [ad_1]

    Markets reveal expectations on weed policy, Greenland, Bond, and beyond in what the polymarket says about cannabis rescheduling and more.

    Prediction markets have quietly become one of the most closely watched indicators of public expectations, and few platforms illustrate this better than Polymarket. Built on blockchain technology, Polymarket allows users to wager on real-world outcomes ranging from elections and public policy to pop culture and geopolitics. The resulting prices act as a constantly updating forecast, reflecting how traders collectively assess the likelihood of major events. Here is what the polymarket says about cannabis rescheduling and more.

    RELATED: Why Is Yawning Contagious

    One of the most closely followed policy questions on the platform has been whether the United States will reschedule cannabis under federal law. Markets asking whether marijuana would be moved out of Schedule I during 2025 collapsed to near zero by year’s end. Even contracts extending into early 2026 show limited optimism, with implied probabilities remaining in the single digits. Despite growing bipartisan rhetoric and widespread state-level legalization, traders appear unconvinced federal agencies will act quickly. The market suggests skepticism administrative or political hurdles will be resolved in the near term.

    Another surprising area of activity involves Greenland. Polymarket users have actively traded contracts speculating on whether the United States will acquire Greenland before the end of the decade. While the odds remain well below 50 percent, they have at times climbed into the low-to-mid teens, driven by renewed media attention on Arctic security, rare-earth minerals, and strategic shipping routes. The presence of meaningful trading volume indicates many participants see Greenland as more than a fringe geopolitical thought experiment.

    Beyond policy and geopolitics, Polymarket has become a venue for cultural forecasting. One of its most popular entertainment markets centers on who will be cast as the next James Bond. Following the conclusion of Daniel Craig’s run as 007, traders have assigned varying odds to a shortlist of actors rumored to be under consideration. While no single candidate commands overwhelming confidence, the market fluctuates rapidly with casting rumors, studio comments, and betting activity tied to press speculation surrounding the James Bond franchise and its future direction.

    Financial markets are also a major focus. Bitcoin price targets routinely attract large pools of liquidity, with traders betting on whether the cryptocurrency will reach specific milestones by set dates. These markets often respond instantly to macroeconomic news, regulatory announcements, and shifts in institutional sentiment. Observers note that Polymarket’s Bitcoin odds frequently move faster than traditional analyst forecasts, offering a real-time snapshot of market psychology.

    RELATED: The Rebel Heart Of The South Includes Cannabis And Rock

    Taken together, these bets highlight how Polymarket has evolved into a broader forecasting tool rather than a novelty platform. Unlike opinion polls or expert panels, prediction markets force participants to quantify their beliefs with capital at risk. While they are not guarantees of future outcomes, they provide a useful signal of how informed traders interpret available information.

    From cannabis reform and Arctic geopolitics to the future of James Bond and cryptocurrency prices, Polymarket’s odds offer a revealing glimpse into what people truly think will happen next — not just what they say publicly, but what they are willing to bet on.

    [ad_2]

    Anthony Washington

    Source link

  • Vance, Rubio meet with Greenland and Denmark’s foreign ministers

    [ad_1]

    Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and other White House officials met Wednesday with Danish and Greenlandic foreign ministers amid the Trump administration’s ongoing threats to take over Greenland

    The meeting came one day after Greenland’s Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen said at a news conference, “If we have to choose between the United States and Denmark here and now, we choose Denmark.”

    President Trump has repeatedly said he wants to acquire Greenland, a semi-autonomous territory of Denmark, citing national security reasons. He repeated that again on Wednesday morning, saying “it is vital for the Golden Dome that we are building” and that “NATO should be leading the way for us to get it.”

    “IF WE DON’T, RUSSIA OR CHINA WILL, AND THAT IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN!” Mr. Trump said in a post on Truth Social. 

    “NATO becomes far more formidable and effective with Greenland in the hands of the UNITED STATES,” he said. “Anything less than that is unacceptable.”

    On Tuesday, Mr. Trump told reporters that if Greenland’s premier said the territory wanted to stay part of Denmark, “that’s their problem.”

    “I disagree with him,” Mr. Trump said. “I don’t know who he is, don’t know anything about him, but that’s going to be a big problem for him.” 

    Leaders of both Denmark and Greenland have stated Greenland is “not for sale,” which has led Trump officials to say that the administration is considering all options, including military force. 

    “I’d love to make a deal with them. It’s easier,” Mr. Trump said Sunday. “But one way or the other, we’re going to have Greenland.” Rubio has downplayed the possibility of military force to acquire Greenland.

    Vance visited Greenland last year. Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen said Tuesday that the Trump administration is applying “completely unacceptable pressure from our closest ally.” 

    Frederiksen said earlier this month that an American military move to seize control of Greenland would amount to the end of the NATO military alliance. Denmark is a NATO member, and NATO’s Article 5 states that if a NATO ally suffers an armed attack, all members will consider it an attack on them as well and do what they need to aid the attacked nation.

    Tensions were high ahead of the meeting, as was concern about a further fracturing of the relationship with the U.S. NATO ally, sources familiar with the situation told CBS News. The Danish government expected to present an offer for enhanced cooperation with the U.S. and access in Greenland in terms of military presence and NATO presence, the sources said.

    The Danes wanted clarity on what the U.S. is pressing for beyond that offer, and whether a financial plus-up is being demanded, the sources said. They wanted to know if Mr. Trump’s intent is to have control or political ownership, which concerns them, given the clear objection of the Greenlandic government to either. Greenlandic officials have been clear that they want the island to belong to Denmark.

    A European official from a nearby country said there is some concern that Denmark may be miscalculating by demanding this meeting with the U.S. because it could formalize and potentially harden positions around what could otherwise be rhetorical pressure by Mr. Trump.

    On Wednesday, Republican Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky took to the Senate floor to voice his disapproval of intervening in Greenland’s affairs and to emphasize the importance of maintaining a united NATO alliance. 

    “Unless and until the President can demonstrate otherwise, then the proposition at hand today is very straightforward: incinerating the hard-won trust of loyal allies in exchange for no meaningful change in U.S. access to the Arctic,” McConnell said. “That’s allies – plural. Because this is about more than Greenland. It’s about more than America’s relationship with its highly capable Nordic allies. It’s about whether the United States intends to face a constellation of strategic adversaries with capable friends … or commit an unprecedented act of strategic self-harm and go it alone.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link