ReportWire

Tag: Government

  • City Council approves $447.4 million bond order to pay for construction of new high school

    [ad_1]

    SALEM — The City Council voted unanimously Thursday night to borrow up to $447 million to pay for the construction of a new high school.

    The Massachusetts School Building Authority (MSBA) is expected to reimburse the city around 44% of the total project cost, but that percentage won’t be finalized until after the MSBA’s meeting in February. The MSBA requires communities to commit to paying up to the full amount of a new school project in order to move forward.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAmsFC:?8 2 y2?] a` AC6D6?E2E:@? 7C@> E96 $2=6> w:89 $49@@= qF:=5:?8 r@>>:EE66 E@ E96 4@F?4:=[ 4@>>:EE66 >6>36CD D2:5 E96 4:EJ 😀 AC@;64E65 E@ C646:G6 2AAC@I:>2E6=J S`hg >:==:@? 7C@> |$qp[ C6AC6D6?E:?8 ccT @7 E96 E@E2= AC@;64E 4@DE] %92E ?F>36C 😀 D=:89E=J 5@H? 7C@> E96 :?:E:2= 6DE:>2E6D @7 cdT E@ e_T]k^Am

    kAm%96 3@?5 @C56C 2FE9@C:K2E:@? @7 Sccf[bgd[d`g C6AC6D6?ED E96 7F== AC@;64E 4@DE 2D DF3>:EE65 E@ E96 |$qp[ :?4=F5:?8 D@7E 4@DED[ 4@?DECF4E:@? 4@DED 2?5 4@?E:?86?4:6D[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 4:EJ]k^Am

    kAm%96 AC@;64E H@F=5 4C62E6 2? 6?E:C6=J ?6H[ 7@FCDE@CJ[ bed[___DBF2C67@@E 3F:=5:?8 36EH66? E96 4FCC6?E 9:89 D49@@=’D 7@@EAC:?E 2?5 w:89=2?5 pG6?F6 H:E9 2? 6DE:>2E65 4@?DECF4E:@? A6C:@5 @7 b_ >@?E9D]k^Am

    kAm%96 4:EJ :?E6?5D E@ C2:D6 AC@A6CEJ E2I6D E@ A2J 7@C >F49 @7 :ED D92C6 @7 E96 AC@;64E 3J E6>A@C2C:=J 6I4665:?8 E96 =:>:ED @7 !C@A@D:E:@? aœ G:2 2 563E 6I4=FD:@? @G6CC:56 E92E H@F=5 4@>6 367@C6 G@E6CD 5FC:?8 2 DA64:2= 6=64E:@? @? |2J d[ a_ae] %96 4:EJ H@?’E @F?E E@ 36 C2:D65 =@42==J F?E:= E96 |$qp 92D 2? 6I24E C6:>3FCD6>6?E 7:8FC6]k^Am

    kAmp7E6C E96 7:?2?4:2= 724E@CD 2C6 AC@G:565[ E96 4:EJ A=2?D E@ 92G6 2 42=4F=2E@C @? E96 qF:=5:?8 r@>>:EE66’D H63D:E6 H96C6 AC@A6CEJ @H?6CD 42? 56E6C>:?6 H92E :?4C62D65 4@DED E96J’== D66]k^Am

    kAmsFC:?8 E96 y2?] a` >66E:?8[ E96 r:EJ r@F?4:= F?2?:>@FD=J 2AAC@G65 2? 2AAC@AC:2E:@? @7 Sah[dc_ 7C@> 7C66 42D9 7@C 255:E:@?2= D2=2C:6D ?66565 E@ A2J A@== H@C<6CD 2?5 DE277 @G6CE:>6 2DD@4:2E65 H:E9 E96 |2J DA64:2= 6=64E:@?]k^Am

    kAmpD @AA@D65 E@ 2 C68F=2C E2I @G6CC:56[ H9:49 😀 2 A6C>2?6?E :?4C62D6 @7 E96 E2I =6GJ[ 2 563E 6I4=FD:@? 😀 2 E6>A@C2CJ :?4C62D6 7@C 2 DA64:7:4 AC@;64E[ H:E9 E96 =6GJ =:>:E C6EFC?:?8 @?46 E92E 563E 😀 A2:5 @77] %96 4:EJ’D 7:?2?46 5:C64E@C 2?5 3@?5 4@F?D6= 2C6 H@C<:?8 E9C@F89 9@H =@?8 E96 AC@;64E H:== E2<6 E@ 36 7F==J A2:5 @77 E9C@F89 E96 3@?5[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 4:EJ]k^Am

    kAmx7 G@E6CD H6C6 E@ C6;64E E96 563E 6I4=FD:@? @G6CC:56[ $2=6> 😀 DE:== C6BF:C65 E@ 5@ 2 32D:4 C6?@G2E:@? @7 E96 6I:DE:?8 3F:=5:?8 E@ 3C:?8 :E FA E@ 4@56] %92E D>2==6C D42=6 AC@;64E 😀 DE:== 6DE:>2E65 2E Sbdb]e >:==:@?[ 3FE H:E9 E96 4@DE 6?E:C6=J A=2465 @? E96 4:EJ]k^Am

    kAm%96 3F:=5:?8 4@>>:EE66 D2JD E92E C6?@G2E:@? H@F=5 2=D@ =:<6=J 92G6 E@ 36 DAC625 @FE @G6C >@C6 E92? b_ J62CD[ H:E9 2? 2DDF>65 dT 😕 4@DE 6D42=2E:@? 6249 J62C[ >2<:?8 E96 ECF6 4@DE >F49 8C62E6C E92? ?6H 4@?DECF4E:@? ?@H]k^Am

    kAm(9:=6 2== AF3=:4 E6DE:>@?J 5FC:?8 %9FCD52J’D >66E:?8 C6=2E:?8 E@ E96 3@?5 @C56C 6IAC6DD65 DFAA@CE 7@C E96 ?6H 9:89 D49@@=[ C6D:56?E $E6G6? z2A2?E:D C2:D65 4@?46C?D @G6C 7:?2?4:2= BF6DE:@?D E92E DE:== =:?86C 7@C C6D:56?ED]k^Am

    Michael McHugh can be contacted at mmchugh@northofboston.com or at 781-799-5202

    [ad_2]

    By Michael McHugh Staff Writer

    Source link

  • ICE becomes one of the most-blocked accounts on Bluesky after its verification | TechCrunch

    [ad_1]

    ICE (U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement) has now become the No. 3 most-blocked account on Bluesky, after receiving its official verification on Friday, according to third-party trackers. Bluesky users, unsurprisingly, are angry about the government account being hosted on the platform. Many are recommending that others block the account directly or subscribe to a block list that includes all of the U.S. government’s official accounts.

    The blocklist was introduced after the White House and other government agencies under the Trump administration signed up for Bluesky last October to post messages blaming Democrats for the government shutdown. The accounts that joined at the time included the Departments of Homeland Security, Commerce, Transportation, the Interior, Health and Human Services, State, and Defense, in addition to the White House itself.

    The move made the White House one of the most-blocked accounts on Bluesky, and today it remains in the No. 2 position, just behind Vice President J.D. Vance, per stats shared on the tracking site Clearsky. (The site leverages Bluesky’s API to track which accounts are the most blocked and other blocking activity.)

    ICE, however, did not join Bluesky in October. According to Bluecrawler’s Join Date Checker, the account @icegov.bsky.social joined the social network on November 26, 2025.

    The account was verified a few days ago according to the independently-run Verified Account Tracker, which suggests that either Bluesky’s team didn’t have enough information to apply the verification checkmark, was somehow unaware of the account’s existence (doubtful!), or was internally debating how to handle the issue. Bluesky hasn’t responded to a request for comment.

    One tracker now shows the ICE account as being over 60% of the way to being the most-blocked Bluesky account.

    Image Credits:https://bsky.app/profile/verified.evil.gay/post/3mcla755rbs24

    ICE today has many accounts across other social media sites, including X, Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, and LinkedIn. These accounts tend to be verified on platforms that have a verification mechanism, with YouTube being an exception.

    Techcrunch event

    San Francisco
    |
    October 13-15, 2026

    The decision from Bluesky to host and verify ICE establishes the social network as one that’s now fitting in more with other, larger social media giants, rather than with the original ethos of the open social web known as fediverse, where the user community is more in control of which accounts gain attention and traction.

    The fediverse, which represents a network of independent but interconnected social media platforms, includes apps like Mastodon, Pixelfed, PeerTube, Flipboard, and, to some extent, Instagram Threads, though Meta’s app isn’t fully federated. The U.S. government doesn’t have Mastodon accounts, but users can follow accounts like @potus on Threads from their Mastodon accounts, if they choose.

    One reason for avoiding Mastodon, an open source federated app that runs on the ActivityPub protocol, could be its smaller size. But also, any government account joining this network could be easily blocked by individual server operators. This wouldn’t prevent the account from setting up its own server to post to the fediverse, but other communities could refuse to federate (interoperate) with that server, greatly diminishing its reach.

    Mastodon’s founder Eugen Rochko, who stepped down as CEO in November, citing burnout, recently posted an anti-ICE message on Mastodon, noting that “Abolish ICE” doesn’t go “nearly far enough” to address the problem in the U.S.

    A day later, he announced he was opting his account out of the bridge that connects Mastodon with Bluesky.

    Bridging technology, which includes the project known as Bridgy Fed, is meant to allow different decentralized platforms to connect with each other, even if they run different protocols, as is the case with Bluesky, which runs on AT Protocol. Coincidentally, Bridgy Fed today launched a way to add domain blocklists to bridged accounts, which would conceivably allow fediverse users to block the government agencies posting on Bluesky.

    Reached for comment, Rochko wouldn’t confirm whether or not ICE’s participation on Bluesky was a factor in his decision to leave the bridge, saying that the decision was a “personal” one.

    However, there has often been tension between the fediverse and the atmosphere, or the decentralized social platform that includes Bluesky and other, newer networks and apps like Blacksky, Northsky Social, and more. Because the networks have different approaches to decentralization, they each have their own supporters and critics, some of whom can’t even agree that the networks should be bridged in the first place.

    [ad_2]

    Sarah Perez

    Source link

  • L.A.’s defense industry is booming. Federal funding crunch could change that

    [ad_1]

    When former Space X engineer Josh Giegel launched his North Hollywood tech company Gambit in 2023, he had a vision for the battlefield of the future, one with fewer soldiers and more AI-driven assets.

    His software would allow unmanned tanks and swarms of armed drones to communicate and adapt in real time — without human intervention.

    The company now employs more than a dozen people and has contracts with the military, which is testing his software. But its growth has been clouded because of a funding dispute on Capitol Hill over the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program, which provides companies seed capital to develop new technology that can assist the government. Funding for it and related programs expired in September.

    The seed fund has been vital to many local tech startups. Gambit received $3.3 million from the program early on and was hoping to get another $5 million of the Small Business Administration money, which is allocated by the military.

    Workers at K2 Space in Torrance, where the startup is building high-capacity satellites for Medium Earth Orbit. (K2 Space)

    (K2 Space)

    “That funding really helps companies like ours that are putting tech into warfighters’ hands,” Giegel said. “Losing that money becomes more leg work to find other sources.”

    Gambit’s predicament is widely shared across Southern California, which has experienced a proliferation of tech startups launched by SpaceX alumni and other entrepreneurs with the support of SBA money.

    In 2024, 124 contracts worth $173 million were awarded to 71 California companies through SpaceWERX, an El Segundo-based arm of the Space Force that distributes SBA funding to innovative defense startups.

    The money also is disbursed by other branches of the military and departments of the government, which do not take stakes in the companies. Gambit received funds through the Air Force.

    Other local recipients of SBA funding include Costa Mesa autonomous weapons maker Anduril Industries, now valued at more than $30 billion; and satellite platform manufacturers K2 Space in Torrance and Apex Space in Los Angeles.

    The funds are allocated in phases, with initial feasibility awards up to about $300,000 and as much as $2 million for the development of prototypes. A maximum of $15 million is available through a companion SBA-funded program if the companies can bring in other funding.

    “I don’t know if I can name a single company that I work with, or that I know of, that did not start with SBIR” funding, said Maggie Gray, a partner at Silicon Valley venture capital firm Shield Capital, which invested in Apex. “We see SBIR as a crucial part of the defense-tech ecosystem. It’s kind of the way to get your initial foot in the door with the government.”

    Established in 1982, the SBA program provides more than $4 billion to government departments, with the military receiving the lion’s share. But SBA funding ran out on Sept. 30 as lawmakers clashed over proposed reforms.

    Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), who chairs the Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, introduced a bill that would set a $75-million lifetime cap on funds for individual companies and establish performance benchmarks. The bill also would beef up due diligence to prevent new technology falling into the hands of foreign adversaries and end diversity, equity and inclusion preferences in funds distribution.

    The legislation, however, has faced stiff opposition from Massachusetts Sen. Ed Markey, the ranking Democrat on the committee, who contends the reforms go overboard and would crimp innovation. A bipartisan House bill that would have reauthorized SBA funding for a year failed in the Senate amid opposition by Ernst, who is leaving Congress in a year.

    While negotiations have restarted on Capitol Hill, there is no guarantee SBA financing will be restored, though the military and other government agencies could fund startups through their own budgets.

    The SpaceWERX program, which has played a critical role in Southern California’s resurgent space economy, was established in 2020, just one year after the Space Force was founded.

    Director Arthur Grijalva said the program distributes several hundred million dollars in SBA funding annually across the nation and has not had an issue with foreign influence or companies receiving repeat awards without much to show for it.

    “Even though it might be small [funding] for a really big company, it’s really impactful for these small companies, these startups, where if they don’t have this funding, they might have to do layoffs, they might have to go into debt, or they might ultimately not be successful,” Grijalva said.

    Since September, $94 million in larger contracts has been held up for more than 25 companies, which follow funding for feasibility studies and prototypes, according to SpaceWERX.

    The impasse comes at an inopportune time for the Trump administration, which has been overhauling weapons procurement.

    Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth announced in November a policy to speed up weapons development by first finding capabilities in the commercial market before the government attempts to develop new systems. Last week he visited several L.A.-area defense companies, including Torrance startup Castelion, a manufacture of hypersonic missiles that received SBIR funding.

    Kirsten Bartok Touw, managing partner of New Vista Capital, which invested in Castelion, agreed the program may have flaws but said it plays an invaluable role in attracting venture capital to companies that have drawn the funding.

    “That is an important signal to the market, which says, ‘You should invest in more of these, because this is a technology we want and need,’” she said.

    A report this month by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine found that one dollar of the funding distributed by the military attracts more than four dollars of venture capital or other third-party investment.

    Markey’s office said last week he submitted a proposal to Ernst that includes making the SBIR program permanent, increased allocations, a performance metric, foreign due diligence standards and fellowships for underserved small businesses, among other provisions.

    “This bill is [his] second attempt at breaking the logjam and restarting these critical programs to ensure America’s most nimble allies — small businesses — are not decimated,” a Markey spokesperson said.

    A spokesperson for Ernst said last week that the senator “remains focused on ensuring taxpayer investments in R&D do not benefit China and actually deliver cutting-edge technology for our warfighters.”

    Giegel said that while he is optimistic future SBA funding might come through for Gambit, he is not counting on it. He now assumes he will have to look for other sources of money to grow the company, which already attracted undisclosed venture capital.

    “We’re trying to find operational relevance faster,” he said.

    [ad_2]

    Laurence Darmiento

    Source link

  • After U.S. strike and Maduro’s fall, is Venezuelan ‘Chavismo’ facing its end?

    [ad_1]

    Hugo Chávez called the United States “the empire,” and President George W. Bush “the devil.” Denouncing capitalism as “the road to hell,” he pushed an alternative economic model that nationalized key industries and redistributed wealth.

    During his 14-year presidency of Venezuela, Chávez warned of a CIA plot to kill him and steal his country’s vast oil reserves, declaring: “Fatherland, socialism or death!”

    Now, after the U.S. attacked Venezuela and imprisoned Chávez’s successor, Nicolás Maduro, the future of the leftist movement forged by Chávez — known as Chavismo — may be at stake.

    Venezuela’s interim leader, Delcy Rodríguez, insists her country “will not be a colony” of any imperial force, but appears willing to tolerate President Trump’s demands that the U.S. get “total access” to Venezuela’s oil.

    Rodríguez, Maduro’s vice president, has called for reforms to Venezuela’s energy sector to attract foreign investment and has freed dozens of dissidents once deemed enemies of the Chavista revolution.

    “Venezuela is entering a new political era, one that allows for understanding despite political and ideological differences and diversity,” Rodríguez said last week. On Thursday, she sat down in Caracas, the capital, with CIA Director John Ratcliffe, whose agency helped plot Maduro’s abduction.

    “It’s pretty interesting to see how a hard-line Chavista like Delcy has taken a 180-degree turn just one week after assuming the presidency,” said Imdat Oner, a former Turkish diplomat in Caracas.

    Some analysts now wonder whether the days are numbered for Chavismo, which allowed Chávez to concentrate power under a banner extolling nationalism, populism and what he described as “socialism of the 21st century.”

    “I think it’s in intensive care, and I don’t think it will leave the operating room,” said Enrique Krauze, a Mexican historian who wrote a biography of Chávez. The movement has been undermined by the U.S. attack, Krauze said, and discredited by authoritarianism, widespread corruption among leaders and an economic crisis triggered by falling oil prices and U.S. sanctions that prompted a quarter of the population to flee.

    The ideas of ChĂĄvez, a charismatic figure who inspired a generation of Latin American leftists, have been irrevocably tarnished, Krauze said.

    “Venezuelans are exhausted after 26 years of Chavismo,” Venezuelan journalist Boris Muñoz wrote in Time magazine. “Understandably, many are willing to accept American tutelage as the price to pay.”

    Other political analysts say Chavismo remains strong, even if aspects of its identity have shifted since its namesake died of cancer 13 years ago.

    Chavismo is not a fad. It is a lifestyle and a conviction with principles.

    — Wilson Barrios

    “What is left of Chavismo? Everything,” said Javier Corrales, a political science professor at Amherst College. Except for the removal of Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, who now face drug-trafficking charges in the U.S., “not a single person has been displaced,” Corrales said. “The inner circle, the military generals, the colectivos, the governors, the mayors — they’re all there.”

    He noted that Chávez, despite his fierce anti-U.S. rhetoric, maintained extensive oil trade with the United States. The current deal-making with the Americans, he said, “isn’t a departure from anything that Chavismo ever represented.”

    In Caracas, where scattered faded portraits of Chávez still grace walls, there is a sense that little of substance has shifted since U.S. bombs jolted residents awake in the pre-dawn hours of Jan. 3. For the many Venezuelans who despised Maduro and his rule, that is disappointing. For those who support the government, it’s a relief.

    On a sunny morning last week, about 2,000 Chavistas rallied on a downtown street.

    “It won’t be easy to erase socialism overnight with a few bombs and the kidnapping of a president,” said Wilson Barrios, 37, who works at the Education Ministry.

    “Chavismo is not a fad,” he said. “It is a lifestyle and a conviction with principles.”

    Leader of the Pink Tide

    ChĂĄvez, a former army officer inspired by Marxist thinkers and revolutionaries such as SimĂłn Bolivar and Fidel Castro, was one of the most consequential political figures in recent Latin American history.

    His election in 1998 helped unleash Latin America’s “pink tide,” in which leftist leaders swept into power from Argentina to Brazil to Ecuador.

    His populist rhetoric and mixed-race background appealed to the masses in a nation long run by an elite minority of mostly white pro-business politicians with close ties to the U.S. and foreign oil giants.

    At a rally in Caracas in 2024, a supporter holds a statue of late President Hugo ChĂĄvez as his successor, NicolĂĄs Maduro, delivers a speech formalizing his candidacy to run for reelection.

    (Getty Images)

    Buoyed by record oil prices that inflated state coffers, ChĂĄvez launched social programs that cut poverty rates. His government built homes for the poor and provided free and subsidized staples for those in need. It opened hospitals and schools and slashed infant mortality.

    An outspoken critic of U.S. intervention in Latin America and what he saw as rampant materialism in the “imperialist” United States, Chávez forged alliances with Washington’s adversaries, such as China, Cuba and Iran.

    Addressing the U.N. General Assembly in 2006 a day after Bush gave a speech about the Iraq war, ChĂĄvez declared: “The devil was here yesterday … this place still smells of sulfur!”

    Venezuela’s unhappy elites tried to unseat Chávez — mostly notably during a short-lived coup d’etat in 2002 — but he continued to win elections.

    The tide began to shift after his 2013 death and the ascension of Maduro, a former trade union leader who lacked the charisma of his mentor. Then came a dramatic decline in oil prices — inevitable in an industry prone to boom-and-bust cycles.

    As revenue sank, the economy collapsed amid soaring inflation. Bread and medicine lines stretched for hours. Malnutrition and infant mortality rose. Millions fled the country.

    Support for Maduro plummeted, and the opposition handily beat his party’s candidates in 2015 parliamentary elections. Sanctions on Venezuela’s oil industry during Trump’s first term made things worse for Maduro.

    From the beginning, Maduro had been deepening the authoritarianism that had begun under Chávez, a model Corrales said was “based on the idea that the revolution will never relinquish power.”

    Maduro claimed he won a disputed election in 2018, although the U.S. and other countries refused to recognize the results. In 2024, Maduro declared victory again, though tally sheets from voting machines collected by the opposition showed he lost by a wide margin.

    Maduro clamped down on dissent, jailing hundreds of activists, ordering government forces to fire on protesters and triggering another exodus of migrants.

    These days, the pink tide is far in the rear-view mirror, with conservatives winning recent elections in Ecuador, Argentina and Chile.

    John Polga-Hecimovich, a Latin America expert at the United States Naval Academy, said emigration from Venezuela to neighboring countries in recent years has colored many people’s views of leftist politics in general and Chavismo in particular.

    Across the region, it is now common for right-wing candidates to accuse left-wing opponents of being like Chávez and wanting to turn their country into “another Venezuela.”

    True believers or pragmatists?

    Rodríguez has deep revolutionary roots. Her father was a Marxist guerrilla who was killed after he abducted an American businessman in 1976. Rodríguez, an early disciple of Chávez, whom she still refers to as “comandante,” said constructing a socialist state was “personal revenge” for her father’s death.

    But in recent years, as she rose in the ranks of Maduro’s government, Rodríguez showed a pragmatic side.

    To help right the economy, she made deals with business elites and pushed a reform that allows Venezuelans to use the dollar instead of the bolĂ­var. She helped change laws to make the energy industry more attractive to foreign capital.

    Her efforts attracted the attention of White House officials last year as they weighed a possible operation to remove Maduro.

    Now Rodríguez must walk a fine line, continuing to signal her revolutionary bona fides to hard-line Chavístas while placating Trump, who has warned that she will “pay a very big price” if she does not comply with U.S. demands.

    She denounced the “terrible military aggression” carried out by U.S. forces, but also had what she called a “long and courteous phone conversation” with Trump, saying that with “mutual respect” they discussed a bilateral agenda to benefit both nations. He, in turn, called her “a terrific person.”

    People hold paintings of Hugo Chavez during a rally.

    A pro-government supporter holds paintings of late President Hugo ChĂĄvez during a campaign rally on Nov. 18, 2021, in Caracas.

    (Manaure Quintero / Getty Images)

    Oner, the former diplomat, said her coziness with Washington does not mean RodrĂ­guez has abandoned her revolutionary ideology. He believes she and other leaders have sacrificed some key tenets of Chavismo in order to save it.

    “They are doing this for the regime’s survival,” Oner said. “They have to be flexible to stay in power, or they’ll lose everything.”

    Still, there’s little doubt, Oner said, that Chávez would be disappointed.

    “He would feel deeply betrayed by Delcy’s actions.”

    Linthicum and McDonnell reported from Mexico City and James from California. Special correspondent Mery MogollĂłn contributed from Caracas, Venezuela.

    [ad_2]

    Kate Linthicum, Ian James, Patrick J. McDonnell

    Source link

  • Former Peabody police officer decertified by POST Commission

    [ad_1]

    PEABODY — A former police officer’s law enforcement certification has been permanently revoked following an investigation by the Massachusetts Peace Officer Standards and Training Commission.

    The commission, in a decision dated Dec. 18, found that Peabody police officer Gerald Fitzgerald Jr. included false information in a police report that led to a woman being arrested and wrongly charged with serious crimes in November 2023. Fitzgerald resigned from the department about a year later.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAmu:EK86C2=5 H2D 6>A=@J65 3J E96 !623@5J !@=:46 s6A2CE>6?E 7C@> ~4E] `g[ `hhg[ E@ ~4E] b_[ a_ac] p44@C5:?8 E@ E96 4@>>:DD:@? C64@C5D[ 96 H2D DFDA6?565 D6G6C2= E:>6D H9:=6 @? E96 7@C46 – 7@C >:DD:?8 4@FCE 52E6D[ 72:=FC6 E@ 4@>A=6E6 C6BF:C65 EC2:?:?8[ 2?5 @?46 7@C D9@H:?8 FA E@ 2 7:C62C> EC2:?:?8 D6DD:@? H9:=6 :?E@I:42E65]k^Am

    kAm~? }@G] `_[ a_ab[ u:EK86C2=5 C6DA@?565 E@ 2 C6A@CE @7 2? 2C>65 C@336CJ 2?5 2DD2F=E 2E 2 C6DE2FC2?E 😕 !623@5J H9:=6 96 H2D @? 5FEJ[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 5646CE:7:42E:@? @C56C C6=62D65 3J E96 !~$% r@>>:DD:@?]k^Am

    kAm%9@D6 H9@ C6A@CE65 E96 C@336CJ 2?5 2DD2F=E D2:5 2 >2? 2?5 H@>2? 925 E2<6? A2CE 😕 E96 :?4:56?E[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 @C56C]k^Am

    kAm%96 H@>2? H2D 2CC6DE65 ?62C E96 D46?6 D9@CE=J 27E6C A@=:46 C6DA@?565] %96 >2? H2D ?@E 2CC6DE65 F?E:= 2 =2E6C 52E6]k^Am

    kAm%96 ?6IE 52J[ u:EK86C2=5 HC@E6 2? :?4:56?E C6A@CE 32D65 @? E96 244@F?E @7 E96 C6A@CE:?8 A2CE:6D[ H9@ D2:5 E96 H@>2? E@@< A2CE 😕 E96 C@336CJ 2?5 2DD2F=E65 E96>[ E96 !~$% r@>>:DD:@? D2:5]k^Am

    kAmu:EK86C2=5 HC@E6 😕 E96 C6A@CE E92E E96 H@>2? H@F=5 36 492C865 H:E9 EH@ 4@F?ED @7 2DD2F=E 2?5 32EE6CJ[ 2EE6>AE65 C@336CJ[ @3DECF4E:@? @7 ;FDE:46[ 2?5 A@DD6DD:@? @7 2 r=2DD r DF3DE2?46[ E9@F89 E96 !~$% r@>>:DD:@? ?@E65 E96 =:DE65 DF3DE2?46 H2D 24EF2==J 2 r=2DD q 5CF8]k^Am

    kAmu:EK86C2=5’D DFA6CG:D@C 7@F?5 9:D C6A@CE E@ 36 G28F6[ 2?5 E@=5 9:> E@ 8@ 324< E@ E96 C6DE2FC2?E E@ G:6H DFCG6:==2?46 G:56@ 7@@E286] w6 H2D :?DECF4E65 E@ :?4=F56 😕 9:D C6A@CE E96 6I24E 56E2:=D @7 E96 :?4:56?E D9@H? 😕 E96 G:56@ E@ DFAA@CE E96 492C86D 282:?DE E96 H@>2?]k^Am

    kAmu:EK86C2=5 E@=5 E96 DFA6CG:D@C 96 5:5 C6G:6H E96 7@@E286 2?5 7@F?5 :E 4@?7:C>65 E96 492C86D[ E96 !~$% r@>>:DD:@? D2:5]k^Am

    kAmw6 FA52E65 E96 C6A@CE H:E9 >@C6 56E2:=D] pD 2 C6DF=E[ E96 H@>2? H2D 492C865 H:E9 EH@ 4@F?ED @7 2DD2F=E 2?5 32EE6CJ[ 2C>65 2DD2F=E E@ >FC56C[ 2C>65 2DD2F=E E@ C@3[ 2?5 A@DD6DD:@? @7 2 r=2DD q DF3DE2?46]k^Am

    kAmp7E6C 36:?8 96=5 😕 4FDE@5J 2== H66<6?5[ E96 H@>2? H2D 2CC2:8?65 @? }@G] `b[ a_ab] $96 H2D DF3D6BF6?E=J <6AE 😕 ;2:= A6?5:?8 2 52?86C@FD 962C:?8]k^Am

    kAmqFE :DDF6D H:E9 u:EK86C2=5’D C6A@CE 42>6 E@ =:89E H96? 2 56E64E:G6 2DD:8?65 E@ 7@==@H FA @? E96 :?G6DE:82E:@? H2E4965 E96 DFCG6:==2?46 G:56@]k^Am

    kAm%96 56E64E:G6 7@F?5 E96 2==682E:@?D 369:?5 E96 G:@=6?E 492C86D H6C6 F?ECF6[ 2?5 E96 H@>2? H2D C6=62D65 @? }@G] `d[ a_ab[ @?46 E96 492C86D 282:?DE 96C H6C6 5C@AA65] %96 5CF8 A@DD6DD:@? 492C86 :?:E:2==J C6>2:?65 3FE H2D 2=D@ 6G6?EF2==J 5C@AA65]k^Am

    kAmu:EK86C2=5 =2E6C 25>:EE65 96 5:5 ?@E H2E49 E96 G:56@ 😕 7F== 367@C6 4@?7:C>:?8 E96 492C86D 2?5 255:?8 E@ 9:D C6A@CE[ E96 !~$% r@>>:DD:@? D2:5]k^Am

    kAm%96 !623@5J !@=:46 s6A2CE>6?E @A6?65 2? :?E6C?2= 2772:CD :?G6DE:82E:@? @7 u:EK86C2=5’D 24E:@?D :?G@=G:?8 E96 :?4:56?E] w6 C6D:8?65 H9:=6 E96 :?G6DE:82E:@? H2D @?8@:?8 2?5[ 2D 2 C6DF=E[ E96 56A2CE>6?E 6?565 E96 :?G6DE:82E:@? 2?5 >256 ?@ 7:?5:?8D]k^Am

    kAm%96 !~$% r@>>:DD:@? 2FE9@C:K65 :ED s:G:D:@? @7 !@=:46 $E2?52C5D E@ @A6? 2 AC6=:>:?2CJ :?BF:CJ :?E@ u:EK86C2=5’D >:D4@?5F4E 😕 s646>36C a_ac[ E96? G@E65 E@ A6C>2?6?E=J 5646CE:7J 9:> 2D 2 A@=:46 @77:46C =2DE >@?E9]k^Am

    kAm%9:D >62?D u:EK86C2=5 H:== ?@ =@?86C 36 2==@H65 E@ H@C< 2D 2 46CE:7:65 A@=:46 @77:46C 😕 |2DD249FD6EED]k^Am

    kAmpD 56E2:=65 😕 E96 5646CE:7:42E:@? @C56C[ u:EK86C2=5 H2D DFDA6?565 7@FC E:>6D AC:@C E@ E96 }@G6>36C a_ab :?4:56?E]k^Am

    kAmw6 H2D DFDA6?565 7@C EH@ 52JD 😕 pF8FDE a_`d 7@C >:DD:?8 4@FCE 52E6D E96 >@?E9 367@C6[ 2?5 C646:G65 2 EH@52J DFDA6?D:@? 2?5 7@FC 9@FCD @7 4@>>F?:EJ D6CG:46 😕 |2C49 a_`e 7@C 72:=:?8 E@ 4@>A=6E6 C6BF:C65 D6CG:46 EC2:?:?8 7@C a_`ea_`f[ 27E6C 72:=:?8 E@ 4@>A=6E6 E96 D2>6 EC2:?:?8 7@C E96 EH@ J62CD AC:@C[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 !~$% r@>>:DD:@?]k^Am

    kAmu:EK86C2=5 H2D 8:G6? 2 7:G652J DFDA6?D:@? 😕 s646>36C a_`f[ H:E9 E9C66 52JD E@ D6CG6 2?5 EH@ 96=5 😕 236J2?46[ 7@C 72:=:?8 E@ 2AA62C 😕 4@FCE @? 7@FC 52E6D E92E J62C]k^Am

    kAmx? y2?F2CJ a_`h[ 96 C646:G65 7@FC 52JD F?A2:5 DFDA6?D:@?[ 2? 255:E:@?2= 7@FC 52JD F?A2:5 DFDA6?D:@? 96=5 😕 236J2?46 7@C @?6 J62C 2?5 e_ 9@FCD @7 4@>>F?:EJ D6CG:46 7@C 2EE6?5:?8 2 7:C62C>D EC2:?:?8 2E E96 |2?496DE6C3JE96$62 7:C:?8 C2?86 H9:=6 5CF?<]k^Am

    kAmu:EK86C2=5 2CC:G65 2E E96 s64] “[ a_`g[ EC2:?:?8 H:E9 E96 D>6== @7 2=4@9@= @? 9:D 3C62E9[ 2?5 H2D “36:?8 CF56[ :>A@=:E6[ 4@?E6>AEF@FD @C :?D@=6?E E@ 2 76==@H @77:46C[” E96 !~$% r@>>:DD:@? D2:5] w6 56?:65 5C:?<:?8 2?J 2=4@9@= E92E 52J[ 3FE D2:5 96 5C2?< E96 ?:89E 367@C6]k^Am

    kAmp 3C62E92=JK6C E6DE C6G62=65 96 925 2 _]_ebT 3=@@5 2=4@9@= 4@?E6?E 2E E96 E:>6]k^Am

    kAmu:EK86C2=5 H2D @C56C65 E@ 7@==@H 2 DECF4EFC65 t>A=@J66 pDD:DE2?46 !C@8C2> 7@C @?6 J62C F?56C E96 DFA6CG:D:@? @7 !623@5J’D A@=:46 49:67]k^Am

    kAm%96 !~$% r@>>:DD:@? D2:5 E96 DFDA6?D:@?D 2?5 u:EK86C2=5’D 24E:@?D C682C5:?8 E96 }@G] `_[ a_ab[ 2CC6DE “56>@?DEC2E6 2 A2EE6C? @7 F?AC@76DD:@?2= A@=:46 >:D4@?5F4E E92E >2J 6D42=2E6]”k^Am

    kAm!@=:46 r9:67 %@> vC:77:? E@=5 %96 $2=6> }6HD uC:52J E92E 96 “C6DA64ED E96 4@>>:DD:@?’D 564:D:@?]”k^Am

    kAm“%96 4@>>:DD:@? D6CG6D 2 8@@5 AFCA@D6[ 2?5 x C6DA64E E96 724E E92E E96J 92G6 2 ;@3 E@ 5@[” 96 D2:5]k^Am

    kAmr@?E24E r2C@=:?6 t?@D 2E k6>mk2 9C67lQ>2:=E@irt?@Do?@CE9@73@DE@?]4@>Qmrt?@Do?@CE9@73@DE@?]4@>k^2mk^6>m]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Caroline Enos | Staff Writer

    Source link

  • New group to oppose repeal of recreational pot law

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Backers of recreational cannabis have formed a committee to oppose a referendum inching toward the November ballot that would repeal the state’s 2016 pot law.

    The group behind the ballot initiative, Coalition for a Healthy Massachusetts, wants to effectively halt recreational cannabis sales and prohibit non-medical home growing, among other changes.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm%96 AC@A@D2=[ :7 2AAC@G65 3J G@E6CD[ H@F=5 7@C46 E96 DE2E6’D S`]f 3:==:@? C6E2:= 42??23:D :?5FDECJ E@ 4@?G6CE E@ >65:42= A@E D9@AD]k^Am

    kAm$FAA@CE6CD @7 E96 677@CE 4=62C65 2 >2;@C 9FC5=6 E@ E96 32==@E 27E6C E96J DF3>:EE65 >@C6 E92? fg[___ G@E6C D:8?2EFC6D E@ $64C6E2CJ @7 $E2E6 q:== v2G=:?’D @77:46 7@C 46CE:7:42E:@? @7 E96 x?:E:2E:G6 !6E:E:@? 7@C 2 {2H #6=2E:G6 E@ #68F=2E:?8 |2C:;F2?2] v2=G:? 46CE:7:65 E96 D:8?2EFC6D =2DE H66<]k^Am

    kAmqFE 4C:E:4D 2C8F6 E92E E96 8C@FA 369:?5 E96 677@CE “7C2F5F=6?E=J” 4@==64E65 D:8?2EFC6D 7C@> G@E6CD 3J 9:C:?8 2 E9:C5A2CEJ 8C@FA E92E >256 5646AE:G6 4=2:>D 23@FE H92E E96 AC@A@D65 32==@E BF6DE:@? H@F=5 5@ :7 2AAC@G65]k^Am

    kAm%96 ?6H=J 7@C>65 r@>>:EE66 E@ !C@E64E r2??23:D #68F=2E:@?[ H9:49 @AA@D6D E96 32==@E BF6DE:@? E@ C6A62= E96 =2H[ 92D 7:=65 2 4@>A=2:?E H:E9 E96 $E2E6 q2==@E {2H r@>>:DD:@? 492==6?8:?8 46CE:7:42E:@? @7 D:8?2EFC6D[ 4:E:?8 “>F=E:A=6” DH@C? 277:52G:ED 7C@> G@E6CD “2==68:?8 5646AE:G6 2?5 7C2F5F=6?E” D:8?2EFC682E96C:?8 E24E:4D]k^Am

    kAm“%96 6G:56?46 D9@HD 2 EC@F3=:?8 A2EE6C? @7 D:8?2EFC6 82E96C:?8 3F:=E @? >:DC6AC6D6?E2E:@? 2?5 5646AE:@?[” %@> z:=6J[ 2? 2EE@C?6J C6AC6D6?E:?8 E96 8C@FA[ D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E] “%9:D @3;64E:@? 😀 23@FE 6?DFC:?8 E92E @?=J =2H7F==J 2?5 9@?6DE=J @3E2:?65 D:8?2EFC6D 2C6 46CE:7:65]”k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • While celebrating Maduro’s capture, Venezuelan immigrants worry about deportation

    [ad_1]

    After President Trump ordered strikes that led to the capture of Venezuela’s president, Nicolás Maduro, celebrations erupted in Venezuelan communities across the U.S.

    But for many of the hundreds of thousands of Venezuelan immigrants facing possible deportation, their relief and joy were cut by the fear about what comes next from an administration that has zeroed in on Venezuelans as a target.

    “Many of us asked ourselves, ‘What’s going to happen with us now?’” said A.G., a 39-year-old in Tennessee who asked to be identified by her initials because she lacks legal status. Even so, Maduro’s ouster gave her a lot of hope for her mother country.

    Venezuelans began fleeing in droves in 2014 as economic collapse led to widespread food and medicine shortages, as well as political repression. Nearly 8 million Venezuelans are now living outside the country — including 1.2 million in the U.S.

    Venezuelans migrants walk toward Bucaramanga, Colombia, in 2019.

    (Marcus Yam/Los Angeles Times)

    A.G. and her now-18-year-old son arrived at the southern border in 2019. Since then, she said, they have built a good life — they own a transport company with delivery trucks, pay taxes and follow the law.

    Maduro’s fall left her with mixed feelings.

    “He’s obviously a dictator, many people have died because of him and he refused to give up power, but the reason that they entered Venezuela, for me what President Trump did was illegal,” she said. “Innocent people died because of the bombs. I’m asking God that it all be for good reason.”

    Dozens of Venezuelans and others were killed in the U.S. invasion — more than 100, a government official said — including civilians.

    The Trump administration is framing its Venezuela operation as an opportunity for Venezuelans like A.G. “Now, they can return to the country they love and rebuild its future,” said U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services spokesman Matthew Tragesser.

    Katie Blankenship, a Miami-based attorney with Sanctuary of the South who has represented many Venezuelans facing deportation, sees a less promising future.

    “We’re going to see increased targeting of Venezuelans to force them to leave the U.S. into a political and socioeconomic environment that’s likely only more destabilized and subject to more abuse,” she said.

    The Venezuelan community in the U.S. swelled, in part, because the Biden administration expanded pathways for them to enter the country.

    Volunteer help a Venezuelan immigrant at the storage units

    Volunteer help a Venezuelan immigrant at the storage units from a volunteer-run program that distributes donations to recently arrived Venezuelan immigrants in need, in Miami, Fla., in 2023.

    (Eva Marie Uzcategui / Los Angeles Times)

    One of those programs allowed more than 117,000 Venezuelans to purchase flights directly to the U.S. and stay for two years if they had a U.S.-based financial sponsor and passed a background check. Other Venezuelans entered legally at land ports of entry after scheduling interviews with border officers.

    By the end of the Biden administration, more than 600,000 Venezuelans had protection from deportation under Temporary Protected Status, a program used by both Republican and Democratic administrations for immigrants who cannot return home because of armed conflict, natural disaster or other “extraordinary and temporary conditions.”

    On the campaign trail, Trump repeatedly referred to Venezuelan immigrants as criminals, singling them out more than any other nationality — in 64% of speeches, an Axios analysis showed. He has said repeatedly, without evidence that Venezuela emptied its prisons and mental institutions to flood the U.S. with immigrants.

    One of Trump’s first acts as president was to designate the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua as a foreign terrorist organization. Within two months, he invoked an 18th century wartime law, the Alien Enemies Act, to deport 252 Venezuelan men accused of being Tren de Aragua members to El Salvador, where they were imprisoned and tortured despite many having no criminal histories in the U.S. or Latin America.

    Later, the Trump administration stripped away protections for Venezuelans with financial sponsors and TPS, with Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem calling the latter “contrary to the national interest.”

    In a September Federal Register Notice, Noem said that TPS for Venezuelans undercut the administration’s foreign policy objectives because one result of allowing Venezuelans in the U.S. was “relieving pressure on Maduro’s regime to enact domestic reforms and facilitate safe return conditions.” In other words, if Venezuelans returned home, that would pressure the government to enact reforms.

    Attorney General Pam Bondi, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry at a news conference

    Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, along with U.S. Atty. Gen. Pam Bondi, left, and Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry, right, participates in a news conference near Camp 57 at Angola prison, the Louisiana State Penitentiary and America’s largest maximum-security prison farm, to announce the opening of a new Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility that will house immigrants convicted of crimes in West Feliciana Parish, Louisiana, on Sept. 3, 2025.

    (Matthew Hilton / AFP via Getty Images)

    The administration has offered contrasting assessments of conditions in Venezuela. Noem wrote that although certain adverse conditions continue, “there are notable improvements in several areas such as the economy, public health, and crime.”

    Throughout the year, though, the State Department continued to reissue an “extreme danger” travel advisory for Venezuela, urging Americans to leave the country immediately.

    Conditions for Venezuelans in the U.S. grew more complicated after a man from Afghanistan was accused of shooting two National Guard members in November; in response, the administration froze the immigration cases of people from 39 countries, including Venezuela, that the administration considers “high-risk.” That means anyone who applied for asylum, a visa, a green card or any other benefit remains in limbo indefinitely.

    After a panel of the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals struck down the Trump administration’s use of the Alien Enemies Act in September, the Justice Department appealed. In a support brief filed in December, the Justice Department cited escalating tensions with Venezuela.

    David Smilde, a Tulane University sociologist and expert on Venezuelan politics, said that invading Venezuela could justify renewed use of the Alien Enemies Act.

    The law says the president can invoke the Alien Enemies Act not only in times of “declared war,” but also when a foreign government threatens or carries out an “invasion” or “predatory incursion” against the U.S.

    “Now it will be difficult, I think, for the court to say, ‘No, you can’t use this,’” Smilde said.

    With U.S. officials promising improved conditions in Venezuela and encouraging citizens to return, Smilde said, they could invoke the Alien Enemies Act to quickly deport undocumented immigrants who don’t leave willingly.

    “There’s several layers to this,” he said, “and none of it looks very good for Venezuelan immigrants.”

    a man wearing an American flag shirt embraces a woman in a church

    This couple from Venezuela shared their story of why they left their three children back in their home country and spoke of the the experiences of their travel to the United States at the Parkside Community Church in Sacramento on June 16, 2023.

    (Jose Luis Villegas / For The Times)

    Jose, a 28-year-old Venezuelan living east of Los Angeles, fled Venezuela in 2015 after being imprisoned and beaten for criticizing the government. He lived in Colombia and Peru before illegally crossing the U.S. border in 2022, and now has a pending asylum application. Jose asked to be identified by his middle name out of fear of retaliation by the U.S. government.

    The news this week that an ICE agent had shot and killed a woman in Minnesota heightened his anxiety.

    “You come here because supposedly this is a country with freedom of expression, and there is more safety, but with this government, now you’re afraid you’ll get killed,” he said. “And that was a U.S. citizen. Imagine what they could do to me?”

    People visit a memorial for Renee Nicole Good on Jan. 7 in Minneapolis.

    People visit a memorial for Renee Nicole Good on Jan. 7 in Minneapolis.

    (Scott Olson / Getty Images)

    Jose qualifies for a work permit based on his pending asylum, but his application for one is frozen because of the executive order following the National Guard shooting.

    The news of Maduro’s arrest was bittersweet, Jose said, because his mother and grandmother didn’t live to witness that day. He said his mother died last year of kidney failure due to lack of medical care, leaving him as the primary breadwinner for his two young sisters who remain in Venezuela with their father, who is disabled.

    Still, he said he’s happy with what Trump has done in Venezuela.

    “People are saying he’s stealing our petroleum,” he said, “but for 25 years, Cuba, China and Iran have been stealing the petroleum and it didn’t improve our lives.”

    Many Venezuelans were encouraged by news that Venezuela would release a “significant number” of political prisoners as a peace gesture.

    For Jose, that’s not enough. Venezuela’s government ordered police to search for anyone involved in promoting or supporting the attack by U.S. forces, leading to detentions of journalists and civilians.

    “Venezuela remains the same,” he said. “The same disgrace, the same poverty and the same government repression.”

    A.G. said she was heartened to hear Noem say Sunday on Fox News that every Venezeulan who had TPS “has the opportunity to apply for refugee status and that evaluation will go forward.” But the administration quickly backtracked and said that was not the case.

    Instead, Noem and other administration officials have doubled down on the notion that Venezuelans without permanent lawful status should leave. Noem told Fox News that there are no plans to pause deportation flights despite the political uncertainty in Venezuela.

    Tragesser, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services spokesman, said the agency’s posture hasn’t changed.

    “USCIS encourages all Venezuelans unlawfully in the U.S. to use the CBP Home app for help with a safe and orderly return to their country,” he said.

    [ad_2]

    Andrea Castillo

    Source link

  • U.S. Senate moves to limit Trump’s war powers

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Massachusetts’ two U.S. senators have joined other Democrats and a handful of Republicans in passing a war powers resolution to limit President Donald Trump’s military action in Venezuela, as the U.S. House of Representatives prepares to vote on a similar measure.

    The Senate voted 52-47 Thursday to approve a resolution that prohibits further U.S. military action in Venezuela, unless Congress authorizes it. The move comes after Trump ordered the capture of Venezuelan President NicolĂĄs Maduro and his wife, who were brought to New York to face drug trafficking and weapons charges.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAmq@E9 @7 E96 DE2E6’D &]$] D6?2E@CD[ s6>@4C2ED t=:K236E9 (2CC6? 2?5 t5 |2C<6J[ G@E65 😕 72G@C @7 E96 C6D@=FE:@?]k^Am

    kAm“xE’D ‘6?6KF6=2 E@52J 2?5 :E 4@F=5 36 rF32 @C vC66?=2?5 E@>@CC@H[” |2C<6J A@DE65 @? D@4:2= >65:2] “(6 >FDE 5C2H E96 =:?6] }@ >@C6 H2CD 7@C @:=]”k^Am

    kAm%96 $6?2E6 2AAC@G2= @7 E96 >62DFC6 <:46C:42? 4@F?ECJ]k^Am

    kAm&]$] #6A] y:> |4v@G6C?[ 2 (@C46DE6C s6>@4C2E[ 92D 7:=65 2?@E96C H2C A@H6CD C6D@=FE:@? E92E 😀 6IA64E65 E@ 36 E2<6? FA 3J E96 w@FD6 ?6IE H66<] %96 AC@A@D2= 😀 324<65 3J 2== ?:?6 >6>36CD @7 E96 DE2E6’D 2==s6>@4C2E w@FD6 56=682E:@?]k^Am

    kAm“(6 42??@E =6E E96 %CF>A 25>:?:DEC2E:@? 5C28 FD :?E@ 2?@E96C 7@C6G6C H2C[” &]$] #6A] $6E9 |@F=E@?[ 2 $2=6> s6>@4C2E[ D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E] “%96 p>6C:42? A6@A=6[ E9C@F89 E96:C 6=64E65 C6AC6D6?E2E:G6D[ 564:56 H96? H6 8@ E@ H2C — 2?5 E96J 5@ ?@E H2?E H2C 😕 ‘6?6KF6=2]”k^Am

    kAms6>@4C2ED D2J %CF>A’D 2EE24< @? ‘6?6KF6=2 H2D :==682= 2?5 F?2FE9@C:K65] %CF>A 2C8F6D E96 >@G6 H2D ;FDE:7:65 E@ DE@A E96 7=@H @7 :==682= 5CF8D :?E@ E96 &?:E65 $E2E6D 7C@> ‘6?6KF6=2 2?5 6I6CE &]$] 9686>@?J @G6C E96 C68:@?]k^Am

    kAm%96 AC6D:56?E =2D965 @FE 2E E96 7:G6 $6?2E6 #6AF3=:42?D[ :?4=F5:?8 |2:?6 $6?] $FD2? r@==:?D[ H9@ G@E65 H:E9 s6>@4C2ED @? %9FCD52J[ D2J:?8 E96J D9@F=5 ?@E 36 C66=64E65]k^Am

    kAm“#6AF3=:42?D D9@F=5 36 2D92>65 @7 E96 $6?2E@CD E92E ;FDE G@E65 H:E9 s6>@4C2ED 😕 2EE6>AE:?8 E@ E2<6 2H2J @FC !@H6CD E@ 7:89E 2?5 5676?5 E96 &?:E65 $E2E6D @7 p>6C:42[” %CF>A A@DE65 @? D@4:2= >65:2] “%9:D ‘@E6 8C62E=J 92>A6CD p>6C:42? $6=7 s676?D6 2?5 }2E:@?2= $64FC:EJ[ :>A65:?8 E96 !C6D:56?E’D pFE9@C:EJ 2D r@>>2?56C 😕 r9:67]”k^Am

    kAmx7 2AAC@G65 3J E96 $6?2E6[ E96 C6D@=FE:@? H@F=5 DE:== ?665 E@ C6EFC? E@ E96 w@FD6 7@C 2 7:?2= G@E6[ 2?5 :E 7246D 2 =:<6=J G6E@ 7C@> %CF>A] xE’D F?4=62C :7 6:E96C 492>36C H@F=5 92G6 E96 EH@E9:C5D >2;@C:EJ ?66565 E@ @G6CC:56 E96 AC6D:56?E’D G6E@]k^Am

    kAm%96 :DDF6 @7 D6EE:?8 =:>:ED @? E96 AC6D:56?E’D H2C A@H6CD 92D 364@>6 2 42>A2:8? :DDF6 😕 E96 &]$] $6?2E6 AC:>2CJ C246[ H:E9 |@F=E@? 4C:E:4:K:?8 |2C<6J 62C=:6C E9:D H66< @G6C 9:D DFAA@CE 7@C H2C 2FE9@C:K2E:@? 😕 xC2B[ >@C6 E92? EH@ 564256D 28@ H96? 96 H2D 2 w@FD6 =2H>2<6C]k^Am

    kAm|@F=E@?[ 2 7@C>6C |2C:?6 42AE2:?[ D6CG65 7@FC 4@>32E E@FC 5FE:6D 😕 xC2B 27E6C r@?8C6DD 2FE9@C:K65 >:=:E2CJ 24E:@? 😕 E96 |:55=6 t2DE6C? 4@F?ECJ]k^Am

    kAmw6 D2:5 E96 C6D@=FE:@? “H:== 7@C46 2 G@E6 E@ 9@=5 E96 %CF>A p5>:?:DEC2E:@? 244@F?E23=6 7@C :ED 24E:@?D[ 2?5 AC6G6?E 2 H2C E92E E96 p>6C:42? A6@A=6 5@ ?@E H2?E 2?5 r@?8C6DD 5:5 ?@E 2AAC@G6]”k^Am

    kAm“pD D@>6@?6 H9@ 92D D66? 7:CDE92?5 E96 4@DE @7 CFD9:?8 :?E@ 4@?7=:4E 7@C E96 HC@?8 C62D@?D[ x 6C:42’D D@?D 2?5 52F89E6CD :?E@ 92C>’D H2J[” 96 D2:5] “x H:D9 >6>36CD @7 r@?8C6DD 925 ?@E 235:42E65 E96:C C6DA@?D:3:=:EJ 29625 @7 E96 :?G2D:@? @7 xC2B]”k^Am

    kAmk6>mr9C:DE:2? |] (256 4@G6CD E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E69@FD6 7@C }@CE9 @7 q@DE@? |65:2 vC@FAUCDBF@jD ?6HDA2A6CD 2?5 H63D:E6D] t>2:= 9:> 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>Qm4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>k^2m]k^6>mk^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Methuen council shoots down increase in mayoral powers on contracts

    [ad_1]

    METHUEN — A bid by Mayor D.J Beauregard aimed at increasing government efficiency through cutting down on City Council oversight failed resoundingly.

    The council voted 7-2 on Monday against approving an ordinance, proposed by Beauregard, to raise the dollar limit from $25,000 to $50,000 on contracts not requiring council approval.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAmsFC:?8 E96 >66E:?8[ >2?J 6=64E65 @77:4:2=D D2:5 E96J H6C6 H2CJ @7 C@==:?8 324< H92E 925 366? 2? 2EE6>AE 3J 2? 62C=:6C 4@F?4:= E@ AFE 2 4964< @? >2J@C2= A@H6C E92E 925 366? 23FD65[ 244@C5:?8 E@ D@>6 @77:4:2=D]k^Am

    kAm“x 5@ DFAA@CE 677:4:6?E 8@G6C?>6?E[” r@F?4:=@C !2EC:4:2 ‘2==6J D2:5] “qFE x E9:?< E9:D @C5:?2?46 D9:7ED E@@ >F49 =:<6 2FE9@C:EJ 2H2J 7C@> E96 4:EJ 4@F?4:=]”k^Am

    kAmq62FC682C5 D2:5 =2DE J62C E96 4@F?4:= G@E65 @? hf G6?5@C 4@?EC24ED[ ac @7 H9:49 H6C6 F?56C Sd_[___]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Teddy Tauscher | ttauscher@eagletribune.com

    Source link

  • Delaware County police chief placed on leave over a work schedule dispute, lawyer says

    [ad_1]

    Shanee Mitchell, a police chief in Collingdale, Delaware County, was placed on administrative leave over a dispute about her work schedule, her lawyer said.

    [ad_2]

    Michaela Althouse

    Source link

  • Healey taps $250M to offset rising health insurance premiums

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — The Healey administration is pumping an additional $250 million into the state-subsidized health care system to help offset the impact of now expired federal tax credits, which have driven up premiums for many people insured through the federal health care exchange.

    On Thursday, Gov. Maura Healey and other state officials said they are moving ahead with plans to increase spending on the ConnectorCare program by $250 million, for a total of $600 million this fiscal year.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAmw62=6J 42==65 :E E96 “=2C86DE DE2E6 :?G6DE>6?E 😕 E96 4@F?ECJ” 2?5 D2:5 :E >62?D 23@FE af_[___ A6@A=6 6?C@==65 😕 r@??64E@Cr2C6[ H9@D6 :?4@>6D 2C6 36=@H c__T @7 E96 7656C2= A@G6CEJ =6G6=[ H:== “D66 =:EE=6 E@ ?@ AC6>:F> :?4C62D6D” 3642FD6 @7 E96 6IA:C:?8 7656C2= 4C65:ED]k^Am

    kAm“|2DD249FD6EED 72>:=:6D 42??@E 277@C5 !C6D:56?E %CF>A’D 5C2DE:4 :?4C62D6D E@ E96:C 962=E9 :?DFC2?46 AC6>:F>D[” w62=6J[ 2 s6>@4C2E[ D2:5 %9FCD52J] “(9:=6 (2D9:?8E@? C2:D6D 4@DED[ H6 2C6 H@C<:?8 92C5 E@ =@H6C E96> — :E’D H9J H6 42AA65 962=E9 42C6 565F4E:3=6D 2?5 4@A2JD 7@C E96 7:CDE E:>6[ 2D H6== 2D E96 4@DE @7 :?DF=:? 2?5 :?92=6CD]”k^Am

    kAm“(6 H:== 4@?E:?F6 E@ 5@ 2== H6 42? E@ >2<6 962=E9 42C6 >@C6 277@C523=6 😕 E9:D DE2E6[” D96 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm%96 w62=6J 25>:?:DEC2E:@? D2:5 E96 EC2?496 @7 ?6H 7F?5:?8 H:== 2=D@ 96=A =@H6C @E96C @FE@7A@4<6E 4@DED DF49 2D 4@A2JD 2?5 565F4E:3=6D 7@C r@??64E@Cr2C6 C64:A:6?ED] %96 7F?5:?8 4@>6D 7C@> E96 r@>>@?H62=E9 r2C6 %CFDE uF?5[ H9:49 😀 7F?565 😕 A2CE 3J 962=E9 42C6 AC6>:F>D[ E@3244@ E2I 4@==64E:@?D 2?5 @E96C D@FC46D @7 C6G6?F6]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Moulton hits Markey over prior support for war authorization

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — An expected vote by the U.S. Senate on a war powers resolution to restrict U.S. military action in Venezuela has become a campaign issue in the Democratic primary race between incumbent U.S. Sen. Ed Markey and challenger U.S Rep. Seth Moulton.

    The Senate on Thursday is poised to vote on a war powers resolution, filed by Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia, to halt President Donald Trump’s use of military force against Venezuela. The move comes after Trump ordered the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, who were brought to New York to face drug trafficking and weapons charges.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAms6>@4C2ED D2J %CF>A’D 2EE24< @? ‘6?6KF6=2 H2D :==682= 2?5 F?2FE9@C:K65] %CF>A 2C8F6D E96 >@G6 H2D ;FDE:7:65 E@ DE@A E96 7=@H @7 :==682= 5CF8D :?E@ E96 &?:E65 $E2E6D 7C@> ‘6?6KF6=2 2?5 6I6CE &]$] 9686>@?J @G6C E96 C68:@?]k^Am

    kAm|@F=E@?[ 2 7:G6E6C> s6>@4C2E D66<:?8 E@ F?D62E |2C<6J 😕 E96 $6AE6>36C AC:>2CJ[ 😀 2>@?8 E96 s6>@4C2ED 2?5 >:=:E2CJ G6E6C2?D 😕 r@?8C6DD FC8:?8 E96 #6AF3=:42?4@?EC@==65 $6?2E6 E@ 2AAC@G6 C6DEC:4E:@?D @? E96 FD6 @7 >:=:E2CJ 7@C46 😕 E96 $@FE9 p>6C:42? 4@F?ECJ H96? :E 4@>6D FA 7@C 2 G@E6]k^Am

    kAmqFE |@F=E@? 2=D@ D66D E96 FA4@>:?8 G@E6 2D 2? @AA@CEF?:EJ E@ 9:89=:89E 9:D A@=:E:42= C:G2=’D DFAA@CE 7@C E96 H2C 2FE9@C:K2E:@? 3J r@?8C6DD >@C6 E92? EH@ 564256D 28@[ H9:49 =625 E@ 9:D 56A=@J>6?E E@ xC2B 2D 2 J@F?8 |2C:?6 42AE2:?]k^Am

    kAmx? 2 G:56@ A@DE65 @? D@4:2= >65:2[ |@F=E@? A@:?ED @FE E92E |2C<6J — 2D 2 >6>36C @7 E96 w@FD6 @7 #6AC6D6?E2E:G6D — G@E65 😕 a__a E@ DFAA@CE C6D@=FE:@?D 2FE9@C:K:?8 E96 FD6 @7 7@C46 xC2B] |@F=E@? D6CG65 7@FC 4@>32E E@FCD @7 5FEJ 😕 xC2B]k^Am

    kAmw6 2=D@ 4C:E:4:K65 |2C<6J 7@C G@E:?8 E@ 4@?7:C> 7@C>6C u=@C:52 $6?] |2C4@ #F3:@ 7@C $64C6E2CJ @7 $E2E6] %CF>A 92D C6A@CE65=J AFE #F3:@[ 2 =@?8E:>6 |25FC@ 4C:E:4[ 😕 492C86 @7 @G6CD66:?8 E96 &]$] >:=:E2CJ @A6C2E:@?D 😕 ‘6?6KF6=2]k^Am

    kAm“t5 |2C<6J G@E65 7@C E96 xC2B H2C 32D65 @? 2 =:6[” |@F=E@? D2:5 😕 E96 G:56@] “%96? 96 2AA2C6?E=J =62C?65 ?@E9:?8 2?5 G@E65 E@ CF336C DE2>A |2C4@ #F3:@[ H9@ 😀 D6?5:?8 EC@@AD :?E@ ‘6?6KF6=2 32D65 @? 2 =:6]”k^Am

    kAm|@F=E@? 92D 42==65 %CF>A’D F?:=2E6C2= :?4FCD:@? 😕 ‘6?6KF6=2 “xC2B a]_” 2?5 😀 2>@?8 s6>@4C2ED H9@ 2C8F6 E92E E96 4@?7=:4E 😀 23@FE D6:K:?8 E96 4@F?ECJ’D @:= C6D6CG6D[ ?@E 5CF8 EC277:4<:?8 @C E6CC@C:D>]k^Am

    kAm“(6’G6 8@EE2 DE@A DFAA@CE:?8 E9:D #6AF3=:42? H2C >@?86C:?8] xE’D ?@E E96 <:?5 @7 =6256CD9:A E92E H6 ?665[” |@F=E@? D2:5 😕 E96 G:56@] “p?5 x 5@?’E E9:?< $6?2E@C |2C<6J F?56CDE2?5D E96 DE2<6D 7@C J@F?8 A6@A=6 =:<6 >JD6=7 H9@ 2C6 D6?E E@ 7:89E 2?5 5:6 😕 E96D6 H2C E92E H6 5@?’E ?665]”k^Am

    kAmx? C6DA@?D6[ |2C<6J’D @77:46 :DDF65 2 DE2E6>6?E A@:?E:?8 @FE E92E E96 G6E6C2? =2H>2<6C 324<65 2 D:>:=2C H2C A@H6CD C6D@=FE:@? E92E 42>6 FA 7@C 2 G@E6 😕 E96 $6?2E6 😕 }@G6>36C[ H9:49 “H@F=5 92G6 3=@4<65 s@?2=5 %CF>A 7C@> 2FE9@C:K:?8 >:=:E2CJ DEC:<6D @? ‘6?6KF6=2]” %96 C6D@=FE:@? 72:=65 E@ A2DD 2>:5 #6AF3=:42? @AA@D:E:@?]k^Am

    kAm“(96? $6?2E@C z2:?6 3C:?8D 9:D C6D@=FE:@? E@ E96 $6?2E6 7=@@C 7@C 2 G@E6 E9:D H66<[ $6?2E@C |2C<6J H:== DFAA@CE :E 282:?[” E96 DE2E6>6?E D2:5] “#6AF3=:42?D H:== 92G6 2 492?46 E@ 8@ @? C64@C5i 5@ E96J DE2?5 7@C s@?2=5 %CF>A’D H2C 7@C @:= @C 5@ E96J DE2?5 7@C A6246 7@C E96 p>6C:42? A6@A=6n $6?2E@C |2C<6J 49@@D6D E96 p>6C:42? A6@A=6 6G6CJ E:>6]”k^Am

    kAm%96 DE2E6>6?E 5:5?’E 255C6DD |@F=E@?’D 4C:E:4:D> @7 E96 D6?2E@C 7@C 9:D AC6G:@FD G@E6D @? E96 xC2B H2C C6D@=FE:@?D]k^Am

    kAm|@F=E@? 2?5 @E96C 4C:E:4D D2J E96 4=2:> 3J !C6D:56?E v6@C86 (] qFD9’D 25>:?:DEC2E:@?E92E xC2B 925 H62A@?D @7 >2DD 56DECF4E:@? 29625 @7 E96 ~4E@36C a__a G@E6D E@ 2FE9@C:K6 7@C46 😕 E96 4@F?ECJ H2D 32D6=6DD] }62C=J d[___ &]$] EC@@AD H6C6 <:==65 😕 E96 H2C] xC2B: 562E9D H6C6 6DE:>2E65 😕 E96 9F?5C65D @7 E9@FD2?5D]k^Am

    kAmx? a_ab[ E96 E96?s6>@4C2E:4=65 $6?2E6 A2DD65 2 3:A2CE:D2? 3:== E@ C6A62= E96 `hh` 2?5 a__a H2C A@H6CD 2FE9@C:K2E:@? 7@C xC2B 😕 2 DJ>3@=:4 >@G6 2:>65 2E 6?5:?8 5632E6 @G6C E96 =682= ;FDE:7:42E:@? 7@C E96 H2CD] qFE E96 3:== DE2==65 😕 E96 v~!4@?EC@==65 w@FD6 2?5 72:=65 E@ C6249 E96?!C6D:56?E y@6 q:56?’D 56D<]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • CIA advised Trump against supporting Venezuela’s democratic opposition

    [ad_1]

    A highly confidential CIA assessment produced at the request of the White House warned President Trump of a wider conflict in Venezuela if he were to support the country’s democratic opposition once its president, Nicolás Maduro, was deposed, a person familiar with the matter told The Times.

    The assessment was a tightly held CIA product commissioned at the request of senior policymakers before Trump decided whether to authorize Operation Absolute Resolve, the stunning U.S. mission that seized Maduro and his wife from their bedroom in Caracas over the weekend.

    Announcing the results of the operation on Sunday, Trump surprised an anxious Venezuelan public when he was quick to dismiss the leadership of the democratic opposition — led by María Corina Machado, last year’s Nobel Peace Prize laureate, and Edmundo González Urrutia, the opposition candidate who won the 2024 presidential election that was ultimately stolen by Maduro.

    Instead, Trump said his administration was working with Maduro’s handpicked vice president, Delcy Rodríguez, who has since been named the country’s interim president. The rest of Maduro’s government remains in place.

    Endorsing the opposition would probably have required U.S. military backing, with the Venezuelan armed forces still under the control of loyalists to Maduro unwilling to relinquish power.

    A second official said that the administration sought to avoid one of the cardinal mistakes of the invasion of Iraq, when the Bush administration ordered party loyalists of the deposed Saddam Hussein to be excluded from the country’s interim government. That decision, known as de-Baathification, led those in charge of Iraq’s stockpiles of weapons to establish armed resistance to the U.S. campaign.

    The CIA product was not an assessment that was shared across the 18 government agencies that make up the U.S. intelligence community, whose head, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, was largely absent from deliberations — and who has yet to comment on the operation, despite CIA operatives being deployed in harm’s way before and throughout the weekend mission.

    The core team that worked on Absolute Resolve included Homeland Security Advisor Stephen Miller, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan Caine and CIA Director John Ratcliffe, who met routinely over several months, sometimes daily, the source added.

    The existence of the CIA assessment was first reported by the Wall Street Journal.

    Signs have emerged that Trump’s team was in communication with Rodríguez ahead of the operation, although the president has denied that his administration gave Rodríguez advance notice of Maduro’s ouster.

    “There are a number of unanswered questions,” said Evan Ellis, who served in Trump’s first term planning State Department policy on Latin America, the Caribbean and international narcotics. “There may have been a cynical calculation that one can work with them.”

    Rodríguez served as a point of contact with the Biden administration, experts note, and also was in touch with Richard Grenell, a top Trump aide who heads the Kennedy Center, early on in Trump’s second term, when he was testing engagement with Caracas.

    While the federal indictment unsealed against Maduro after his seizure named several other senior officials in his government, Rodríguez’s name was notably absent.

    Rodríguez was sworn in as Venezuela’s interim president Monday in a ceremony attended by diplomats from Russia, China and Iran. Publicly, the leader has offered mixed messages, at once vowing to prevent Venezuela from becoming a colonial outpost of an American empire, while also offering to forge a newly collaborative relationship with Washington.

    “Of course, for political reasons, Delcy Rodríguez can’t say, ‘I’ve cut a deal with Trump, and we’re going to stop the revolution now and start working with the U.S.,” Ellis said.

    “It’s not about the democracy,” he said. “It’s about him not wanting to work with Maduro.”

    In an interview with Fox News on Monday, Machado said she had yet to speak with Trump since the U.S. operation over the weekend, but hoped to do so soon, offering to share her Nobel Peace Prize with him as a gesture of gratitude. Trump has repeatedly touted himself as a worthy recipient of the award.

    “What he has done is historic,” Machado said, vowing to return to the country from hiding abroad since accepting the prize in Oslo last month.

    “It’s a huge step,” she added, “towards a democratic transition.”

    [ad_2]

    Michael Wilner

    Source link

  • Israel strikes multiple sites in Lebanon

    [ad_1]

    Israel’s air force struck areas in southern and eastern Lebanon on Monday and early Tuesday, including in the country’s third-largest city.A strike around 1 a.m. Tuesday leveled a three-story commercial building in the southern coastal city of Sidon, a few days before Lebanon’s army commander is scheduled to brief the government on its mission of disarming militant group Hezbollah in areas along the border with Israel.An Associated Press photographer at the scene said the area was in a commercial district containing workshops and mechanic shops and the building was uninhabited.At least one person was transported by ambulance and rescue teams were searching the site for others, but there were no immediate reports of deaths.On Monday, the Israeli army hit several sites in southern and eastern Lebanon saying they held infrastructure for the militant groups Hezbollah and Hamas.Those strikes took place nearly two hours after Israel’s military Arabic language spokesman Avichay Adraee posted warnings on X that the military would strike targets for Hezbollah and the Palestinian Hamas groups in two villages in the eastern Bekaa Valley and two others in southern Lebanon. The later strike in Sidon was unannounced and the Israeli army did not immediately issue a statement on it.Lebanon’s state-run National News Agency said a home struck in the village of Manara in the Bekaa Valley belonged to Sharhabil al-Sayed, a Hamas military commander who was killed in an Israeli drone strike in May 2024.The areas were evacuated after the Israeli warning and there were no reports of casualties in those strikes. Earlier Monday, Lebanon’s Health Ministry said a drone strike on a car in the southern village of Braikeh earlier Monday wounded two people. The Israeli military said the strike targeted two Hezbollah members.The Lebanese army last year began the disarmament process of Palestinian groups while the government has said that by the end of 2025 all the areas close to the border with Israel — known as the south Litani area — will be clear of Hezbollah’s armed presence.The Lebanese government is scheduled to discuss Hezbollah’s disarmament during a meeting Thursday that will be attended by army commander Gen. Rudolph Haikal.Monday’s airstrikes were in villages north of the Litani river and far from the border with Israel.The disarmament of Hezbollah and other Palestinian groups by the Lebanese government came after a 14-month war between Israel and Hezbollah in which much of the political and military leadership of the Iran-backed group was killed.The latest Israel-Hezbollah war began Oct. 8, 2023, a day after Hamas attacked southern Israel, when Hezbollah fired rockets into Israel in solidarity with Hamas. Israel launched a widespread bombardment of Lebanon in September 2024 that severely weakened Hezbollah, followed by a ground invasion.The war ended in November 2024 with a ceasefire brokered by the U.S.Israel has carried out almost daily airstrikes since then, mainly targeting Hezbollah members but also killing at least 127 civilians, according to the office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights.Mroue reported from Beirut. Associated Press writer Abby Sewell in Beirut contributed to this report.

    Israel’s air force struck areas in southern and eastern Lebanon on Monday and early Tuesday, including in the country’s third-largest city.

    A strike around 1 a.m. Tuesday leveled a three-story commercial building in the southern coastal city of Sidon, a few days before Lebanon’s army commander is scheduled to brief the government on its mission of disarming militant group Hezbollah in areas along the border with Israel.

    An Associated Press photographer at the scene said the area was in a commercial district containing workshops and mechanic shops and the building was uninhabited.

    At least one person was transported by ambulance and rescue teams were searching the site for others, but there were no immediate reports of deaths.

    On Monday, the Israeli army hit several sites in southern and eastern Lebanon saying they held infrastructure for the militant groups Hezbollah and Hamas.

    Those strikes took place nearly two hours after Israel’s military Arabic language spokesman Avichay Adraee posted warnings on X that the military would strike targets for Hezbollah and the Palestinian Hamas groups in two villages in the eastern Bekaa Valley and two others in southern Lebanon. The later strike in Sidon was unannounced and the Israeli army did not immediately issue a statement on it.

    Mohammad Zaatari

    Lebanese Red Cross volunteers search for possible victims in a building destroyed by an Israeli airstrike in the southern port city of Sidon, Lebanon, early Tuesday, Jan. 6, 2026.

    Lebanon’s state-run National News Agency said a home struck in the village of Manara in the Bekaa Valley belonged to Sharhabil al-Sayed, a Hamas military commander who was killed in an Israeli drone strike in May 2024.

    The areas were evacuated after the Israeli warning and there were no reports of casualties in those strikes. Earlier Monday, Lebanon’s Health Ministry said a drone strike on a car in the southern village of Braikeh earlier Monday wounded two people. The Israeli military said the strike targeted two Hezbollah members.

    The Lebanese army last year began the disarmament process of Palestinian groups while the government has said that by the end of 2025 all the areas close to the border with Israel — known as the south Litani area — will be clear of Hezbollah’s armed presence.

    The Lebanese government is scheduled to discuss Hezbollah’s disarmament during a meeting Thursday that will be attended by army commander Gen. Rudolph Haikal.

    Monday’s airstrikes were in villages north of the Litani river and far from the border with Israel.

    The disarmament of Hezbollah and other Palestinian groups by the Lebanese government came after a 14-month war between Israel and Hezbollah in which much of the political and military leadership of the Iran-backed group was killed.

    The latest Israel-Hezbollah war began Oct. 8, 2023, a day after Hamas attacked southern Israel, when Hezbollah fired rockets into Israel in solidarity with Hamas. Israel launched a widespread bombardment of Lebanon in September 2024 that severely weakened Hezbollah, followed by a ground invasion.

    The war ended in November 2024 with a ceasefire brokered by the U.S.

    Israel has carried out almost daily airstrikes since then, mainly targeting Hezbollah members but also killing at least 127 civilians, according to the office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights.

    Mroue reported from Beirut. Associated Press writer Abby Sewell in Beirut contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Israel strikes multiple sites in Lebanon

    [ad_1]

    Israel’s air force struck areas in southern and eastern Lebanon on Monday and early Tuesday, including in the country’s third-largest city.A strike around 1 a.m. Tuesday leveled a three-story commercial building in the southern coastal city of Sidon, a few days before Lebanon’s army commander is scheduled to brief the government on its mission of disarming militant group Hezbollah in areas along the border with Israel.An Associated Press photographer at the scene said the area was in a commercial district containing workshops and mechanic shops and the building was uninhabited.At least one person was transported by ambulance and rescue teams were searching the site for others, but there were no immediate reports of deaths.On Monday, the Israeli army hit several sites in southern and eastern Lebanon saying they held infrastructure for the militant groups Hezbollah and Hamas.Those strikes took place nearly two hours after Israel’s military Arabic language spokesman Avichay Adraee posted warnings on X that the military would strike targets for Hezbollah and the Palestinian Hamas groups in two villages in the eastern Bekaa Valley and two others in southern Lebanon. The later strike in Sidon was unannounced and the Israeli army did not immediately issue a statement on it.Lebanon’s state-run National News Agency said a home struck in the village of Manara in the Bekaa Valley belonged to Sharhabil al-Sayed, a Hamas military commander who was killed in an Israeli drone strike in May 2024.The areas were evacuated after the Israeli warning and there were no reports of casualties in those strikes. Earlier Monday, Lebanon’s Health Ministry said a drone strike on a car in the southern village of Braikeh earlier Monday wounded two people. The Israeli military said the strike targeted two Hezbollah members.The Lebanese army last year began the disarmament process of Palestinian groups while the government has said that by the end of 2025 all the areas close to the border with Israel — known as the south Litani area — will be clear of Hezbollah’s armed presence.The Lebanese government is scheduled to discuss Hezbollah’s disarmament during a meeting Thursday that will be attended by army commander Gen. Rudolph Haikal.Monday’s airstrikes were in villages north of the Litani river and far from the border with Israel.The disarmament of Hezbollah and other Palestinian groups by the Lebanese government came after a 14-month war between Israel and Hezbollah in which much of the political and military leadership of the Iran-backed group was killed.The latest Israel-Hezbollah war began Oct. 8, 2023, a day after Hamas attacked southern Israel, when Hezbollah fired rockets into Israel in solidarity with Hamas. Israel launched a widespread bombardment of Lebanon in September 2024 that severely weakened Hezbollah, followed by a ground invasion.The war ended in November 2024 with a ceasefire brokered by the U.S.Israel has carried out almost daily airstrikes since then, mainly targeting Hezbollah members but also killing at least 127 civilians, according to the office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights.Mroue reported from Beirut. Associated Press writer Abby Sewell in Beirut contributed to this report.

    Israel’s air force struck areas in southern and eastern Lebanon on Monday and early Tuesday, including in the country’s third-largest city.

    A strike around 1 a.m. Tuesday leveled a three-story commercial building in the southern coastal city of Sidon, a few days before Lebanon’s army commander is scheduled to brief the government on its mission of disarming militant group Hezbollah in areas along the border with Israel.

    An Associated Press photographer at the scene said the area was in a commercial district containing workshops and mechanic shops and the building was uninhabited.

    At least one person was transported by ambulance and rescue teams were searching the site for others, but there were no immediate reports of deaths.

    On Monday, the Israeli army hit several sites in southern and eastern Lebanon saying they held infrastructure for the militant groups Hezbollah and Hamas.

    Those strikes took place nearly two hours after Israel’s military Arabic language spokesman Avichay Adraee posted warnings on X that the military would strike targets for Hezbollah and the Palestinian Hamas groups in two villages in the eastern Bekaa Valley and two others in southern Lebanon. The later strike in Sidon was unannounced and the Israeli army did not immediately issue a statement on it.

    Mohammad Zaatari

    Lebanese Red Cross volunteers search for possible victims in a building destroyed by an Israeli airstrike in the southern port city of Sidon, Lebanon, early Tuesday, Jan. 6, 2026.

    Lebanon’s state-run National News Agency said a home struck in the village of Manara in the Bekaa Valley belonged to Sharhabil al-Sayed, a Hamas military commander who was killed in an Israeli drone strike in May 2024.

    The areas were evacuated after the Israeli warning and there were no reports of casualties in those strikes. Earlier Monday, Lebanon’s Health Ministry said a drone strike on a car in the southern village of Braikeh earlier Monday wounded two people. The Israeli military said the strike targeted two Hezbollah members.

    The Lebanese army last year began the disarmament process of Palestinian groups while the government has said that by the end of 2025 all the areas close to the border with Israel — known as the south Litani area — will be clear of Hezbollah’s armed presence.

    The Lebanese government is scheduled to discuss Hezbollah’s disarmament during a meeting Thursday that will be attended by army commander Gen. Rudolph Haikal.

    Monday’s airstrikes were in villages north of the Litani river and far from the border with Israel.

    The disarmament of Hezbollah and other Palestinian groups by the Lebanese government came after a 14-month war between Israel and Hezbollah in which much of the political and military leadership of the Iran-backed group was killed.

    The latest Israel-Hezbollah war began Oct. 8, 2023, a day after Hamas attacked southern Israel, when Hezbollah fired rockets into Israel in solidarity with Hamas. Israel launched a widespread bombardment of Lebanon in September 2024 that severely weakened Hezbollah, followed by a ground invasion.

    The war ended in November 2024 with a ceasefire brokered by the U.S.

    Israel has carried out almost daily airstrikes since then, mainly targeting Hezbollah members but also killing at least 127 civilians, according to the office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights.

    Mroue reported from Beirut. Associated Press writer Abby Sewell in Beirut contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Cuba faces uncertain future after US topples Venezuelan leader Maduro

    [ad_1]

    Cuban officials on Monday lowered flags before dawn to mourn 32 security officers they say were killed in the U.S. weekend strike in Venezuela, the island nation’s closest ally, as residents here wonder what the capture of President NicolĂĄs Maduro means for their future.The two governments are so close that Cuban soldiers and security agents were often the Venezuelan president’s bodyguards, and Venezuela’s petroleum has kept the economically ailing island limping along for years. Cuban authorities over the weekend said the 32 had been killed in the surprise attack “after fierce resistance in direct combat against the attackers, or as a result of the bombing of the facilities.”Related video above: What happens next: Venezuela’s future after U.S. capture of MaduroThe Trump administration has warned outright that toppling Maduro will help advance another decades-long goal: Dealing a blow to the Cuban government. Severing Cuba from Venezuela could have disastrous consequences for its leaders, who on Saturday called for the international community to stand up to “state terrorism.”On Saturday, Trump said the ailing Cuban economy will be further battered by Maduro’s ouster.“It’s going down,” Trump said of Cuba. “It’s going down for the count.” Loss of key supporterMany observers say Cuba, an island of about 10 million people, exerted a remarkable degree of influence over Venezuela, an oil-rich nation with three times as many people. At the same time, Cubans have long been tormented by constant blackouts and shortages of basic foods. And after the attack, they woke to the once-unimaginable possibility of an even grimmer future.“I can’t talk. I have no words,” 75-year-old Berta Luz Sierra Molina said as she sobbed and placed a hand over her face.Even though 63-year-old Regina MĂ©ndez is too old to join the Cuban military, she said that “we have to stand strong.”“Give me a rifle, and I’ll go fight,” MĂ©ndez said.Maduro’s government was shipping an average of 35,000 barrels of oil daily over the last three months, about a quarter of total demand, said Jorge Piñón, a Cuban energy expert at the University of Texas at Austin Energy Institute.“The question to which we don’t have an answer, which is critical: Is the U.S. going to allow Venezuela to continue supplying Cuba with oil?” he said.Piñón noted that Mexico once supplied Cuba with 22,000 barrels of oil a day before it dropped to 7,000 barrels after U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio visited Mexico City in early September.“I don’t see Mexico jumping in right now,” Piñón said. “The U.S. government would go bonkers.”Ricardo Torres, a Cuban economist at American University in Washington, said that “blackouts have been significant, and that is with Venezuela still sending some oil.”“Imagine a future now in the short term losing that,” he said. “It’s a catastrophe.”Piñón noted that Cuba doesn’t have the money to buy oil on the international market.“The only ally that they have left out there with oil is Russia,” he said, noting that it sends Cuba about 2 million barrels a year.“Russia has the capability to fill the gap. Do they have the political commitment, or the political desire to do so? I don’t know,” he said.Torres also questioned whether Russia would extend a hand.“Meddling with Cuba could jeopardize your negotiation with the U.S. around Ukraine. Why would you do it? Ukraine is far more important,” he said.Torres said Cuba should open its doors to the private sector and market and reduce its public sector, moves that could help prompt China to step in and help Cuba.“Do they have an alternative? I don’t think they do,” he said.Rebuilding Venezuela’s oil industryOn Monday, Trump told NBC News in an interview that the U.S. government could reimburse oil companies making investments in Venezuela to maintain and increase oil production in that country.He suggested that the necessary rebuilding of the country’s neglected infrastructure for extracting and shipping oil could happen in less than 18 months.“I think we can do it in less time than that, but it’ll be a lot of money,” Trump said. “A tremendous amount of money will have to be spent and the oil companies will spend it, and then they’ll get reimbursed by us or through revenue.”It still remains unclear how quickly the investment could occur given the uncertainties about Venezuela’s political stability and the billions of dollars needed to be spent.Venezuela produces on average about 1.1 million barrels of oil a day, down from the 3.5 million barrels a day produced in 1999 before a government takeover of the majority of oil interests and a mix of corruption, mismanagement and U.S. economic sanctions led output to fall.___Coto reported from San Juan, Puerto Rico. Associated Press reporters Milexsy DurĂĄn in Havana, Isabel DeBre in Buenos Aires and Joshua Boak in Washington, D.C., contributed.

    Cuban officials on Monday lowered flags before dawn to mourn 32 security officers they say were killed in the U.S. weekend strike in Venezuela, the island nation’s closest ally, as residents here wonder what the capture of President Nicolás Maduro means for their future.

    The two governments are so close that Cuban soldiers and security agents were often the Venezuelan president’s bodyguards, and Venezuela’s petroleum has kept the economically ailing island limping along for years. Cuban authorities over the weekend said the 32 had been killed in the surprise attack “after fierce resistance in direct combat against the attackers, or as a result of the bombing of the facilities.”

    Related video above: What happens next: Venezuela’s future after U.S. capture of Maduro

    The Trump administration has warned outright that toppling Maduro will help advance another decades-long goal: Dealing a blow to the Cuban government. Severing Cuba from Venezuela could have disastrous consequences for its leaders, who on Saturday called for the international community to stand up to “state terrorism.”

    On Saturday, Trump said the ailing Cuban economy will be further battered by Maduro’s ouster.

    “It’s going down,” Trump said of Cuba. “It’s going down for the count.”

    Loss of key supporter

    Many observers say Cuba, an island of about 10 million people, exerted a remarkable degree of influence over Venezuela, an oil-rich nation with three times as many people. At the same time, Cubans have long been tormented by constant blackouts and shortages of basic foods. And after the attack, they woke to the once-unimaginable possibility of an even grimmer future.

    “I can’t talk. I have no words,” 75-year-old Berta Luz Sierra Molina said as she sobbed and placed a hand over her face.

    Even though 63-year-old Regina MĂ©ndez is too old to join the Cuban military, she said that “we have to stand strong.”

    “Give me a rifle, and I’ll go fight,” MĂ©ndez said.

    Maduro’s government was shipping an average of 35,000 barrels of oil daily over the last three months, about a quarter of total demand, said Jorge Piñón, a Cuban energy expert at the University of Texas at Austin Energy Institute.

    “The question to which we don’t have an answer, which is critical: Is the U.S. going to allow Venezuela to continue supplying Cuba with oil?” he said.

    Piñón noted that Mexico once supplied Cuba with 22,000 barrels of oil a day before it dropped to 7,000 barrels after U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio visited Mexico City in early September.

    “I don’t see Mexico jumping in right now,” Piñón said. “The U.S. government would go bonkers.”

    Ricardo Torres, a Cuban economist at American University in Washington, said that “blackouts have been significant, and that is with Venezuela still sending some oil.”

    “Imagine a future now in the short term losing that,” he said. “It’s a catastrophe.”

    Piñón noted that Cuba doesn’t have the money to buy oil on the international market.

    “The only ally that they have left out there with oil is Russia,” he said, noting that it sends Cuba about 2 million barrels a year.

    “Russia has the capability to fill the gap. Do they have the political commitment, or the political desire to do so? I don’t know,” he said.

    Torres also questioned whether Russia would extend a hand.

    “Meddling with Cuba could jeopardize your negotiation with the U.S. around Ukraine. Why would you do it? Ukraine is far more important,” he said.

    Torres said Cuba should open its doors to the private sector and market and reduce its public sector, moves that could help prompt China to step in and help Cuba.

    “Do they have an alternative? I don’t think they do,” he said.

    Rebuilding Venezuela’s oil industry

    On Monday, Trump told NBC News in an interview that the U.S. government could reimburse oil companies making investments in Venezuela to maintain and increase oil production in that country.

    He suggested that the necessary rebuilding of the country’s neglected infrastructure for extracting and shipping oil could happen in less than 18 months.

    “I think we can do it in less time than that, but it’ll be a lot of money,” Trump said. “A tremendous amount of money will have to be spent and the oil companies will spend it, and then they’ll get reimbursed by us or through revenue.”

    It still remains unclear how quickly the investment could occur given the uncertainties about Venezuela’s political stability and the billions of dollars needed to be spent.

    Venezuela produces on average about 1.1 million barrels of oil a day, down from the 3.5 million barrels a day produced in 1999 before a government takeover of the majority of oil interests and a mix of corruption, mismanagement and U.S. economic sanctions led output to fall.

    ___

    Coto reported from San Juan, Puerto Rico. Associated Press reporters Milexsy DurĂĄn in Havana, Isabel DeBre in Buenos Aires and Joshua Boak in Washington, D.C., contributed.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Region’s lawmakers slam Trump’s invasion of Venezuela

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump’s invasion of Venezuela and the kidnapping of its president and his wife drew swift and harsh rebukes from area members of Congress, who branded the military action as “regime change,” a “rogue attack” and an unauthorized act of war.

    On Friday night, the United States carried out a major military operation in Venezuela, capturing President Nicolas Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, during the overnight raid in Caracas and removing them from the country. They landed in New York on Saturday to face federal charges related to narco-terrorism and drug trafficking, Trump said in a press conference from his home in Mar-a-Lago, Florida.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm%CF>A 2??@F?465 E92E E96 &?:E65 $E2E6D H@F=5 E6>A@C2C:=J “CF?” ‘6?6KF6=2 “F?E:= DF49 E:>6 2D H6 42? 5@ 2 D276[ AC@A6C 2?5 ;F5:4:@FD EC2?D:E:@?” @7 8@G6C?>6?E] w6 2=D@ :?5:42E65 E92E E96 &]$] A=2?D E@ E2A :?E@ 2?5 AC@E64E ‘6?6KF6=2’D @:= C6D6CG6D]k^Am

    kAmqFE k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^9F3^>2C4@CF3:@Qm$64C6E2CJ @7 $E2E6 |2C4@ #F3:@k^2m DF886DE65 $F?52J E92E E96 &?:E65 $E2E6D H@F=5 ?@E 8@G6C? ‘6?6KF6=2 52JE@52J @E96C E92? 6?7@C4:?8 2? 6I:DE:?8 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^ECF>AG6?6KF6=2>25FC@@:=E2?<6CDead2f4h2b`_e6b`e4hf463eg2ca2`43dQm“@:= BF2C2?E:?6” @? E96 4@F?ECJk^2m]k^Am

    kAm#F3:@’D DE2E6>6?ED @? %’ E2=< D9@HD D66>65 56D:8?65 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^ECF>AG6?6KF6=2C6AF3=:42?D2>6C:427:CDE7@C6G6CH2CDg3hd5“`hdd`gca_35aabba3df2735ahQmE@ E6>A6C 4@?46C?Dk^2m E92E E96 2DD6CE:G6 24E:@? E@ 249:6G6 C68:>6 492?86 😕 ‘6?6KF6=2 >:89E =625 E96 &]$] :?E@ 2?@E96C AC@=@?865 7@C6:8? :?E6CG6?E:@? @C 72:=65 2EE6>AE 2E ?2E:@?3F:=5:?8] %96J DE@@5 😕 4@?EC2DE E@ %CF>A’D 3C@25 3FE G28F6 4=2:>D E92E E96 &]$] H@F=5 2E =62DE E6>A@C2C:=J “CF?” E96 @:=C:49 ?2E:@?[ 4@>>6?ED E92E DF886DE65 D@>6 D@CE @7 8@G6C?:?8 DECF4EFC6 F?56C H9:49 r2C242D H@F=5 36 4@?EC@==65 3J (2D9:?8E@?]k^Am

    kAm“p?5 D@ E92E’D E96 D@CE @7 4@?EC@= E96 AC6D:56?E 😀 A@:?E:?8 E@ H96? 96 D2JD E92E[” #F3:@ D2:5 @? rq$’ “u246 E96 }2E:@?]” “(6 4@?E:?F6 H:E9 E92E BF2C2?E:?6[ 2?5 H6 6IA64E E@ D66 E92E E96C6 H:== 36 492?86D[ ?@E ;FDE 😕 E96 H2J E96 @:= :?5FDECJ 😀 CF? 7@C E96 36?67:E @7 E96 A6@A=6[ 3FE 2=D@ D@ E92E E96J DE@A E96 5CF8 EC277:4<:?8]”k^Am

    kAm{6256CD 😕 ‘6?6KF6=2 92G6 D@ 72C AFD965 324<[ 2E =62DE AF3=:4=J[ 42==:?8 @? E96 %CF>A 25>:?:DEC2E:@? E@ C6=62D6 |25FC@]k^Am

    kAmtG6? 367@C6 E96 @A6C2E:@? E92E ?23365 |25FC@[ 6IA6CED H6C6 2=C625J BF6DE:@?:?8 E96 =682=:EJ @7 2DA64ED @7 E96 25>:?:DEC2E:@?’D AC6DDFC6 42>A2:8? @? ‘6?6KF6=2[ :?4=F5:?8 E96 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^ECF>A>25FC@G6?6KF6=25CF842CE6=D>:=:E2CJE:>6=:?6h`6aca6d4de664bh3e3f5fa37dd535a5Qm5625=J 3@>3:?8 @7 3@2EDk^2m 244FD65 @7 EC277:4<:?8 5CF8D E92E D@>6 D49@=2CD D2:5 DEC6E4965 E96 3@F?52C:6D @7 :?E6C?2E:@?2= =2H]k^Am

    kAm%96 5C2>2E:4 D6:KFC6 @7 E96 |25FC@D 42AA65 2? k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^ECF>A>25FC@G6?6KF6=25CF842CE6=D>:=:E2CJE:>6=:?6h`6aca6d4de664bh3e3f5fa37dd535a5Qm:?E6?D:G6 %CF>A 25>:?:DEC2E:@? AC6DDFC6 42>A2:8?k^2m @? ‘6?6KF6=2’D 2FE@4C2E:4 =6256C 2?5 >@?E9D @7 D64C6E A=2??:?8[ C6DF=E:?8 😕 E96 >@DE 2DD6CE:G6 p>6C:42? 24E:@? E@ 249:6G6 C68:>6 492?86 D:?46 E96 a__b :?G2D:@? @7 xC2B] k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^=682=BF6DE:@?D>25FC@ECF>AG6?6KF6=242AEFC64@?8C6DDf4ege`_e26f774fdh6d2`fae6`3gddfeQm{682= 6IA6CED C2:D65 BF6DE:@?Dk^2m 23@FE E96 =2H7F=?6DD @7 E96 @A6C2E:@?[ H9:49 H2D 5@?6 H:E9@FE 4@?8C6DD:@?2= 2AAC@G2=]k^Am

    kAmk2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^G6?6KF6=2:?E6C:>AC6D:56?EC@5C:8F6K>25FC@492G6K3bda3d27`f563_23fgegc3gbhg_cd`fhQm’6?6KF6=2’D G:46 AC6D:56?E[ s6=4J #@5C:8F6Kk^2m[ 56>2?565 E92E E96 &]$] 7C66 |25FC@ 2?5 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^G6?6KF6=2ECF>A>25FC@>:=:E2CJC@5C:8F6K=6254_35bh7hg2fh4`g4dd_`324hbh4ec_76Qm42==65 9:> E96 4@F?ECJ’D C:89E7F= =6256Ck^2m 2D 96C ?2E:@?’D 9:89 4@FCE ?2>65 96C :?E6C:> AC6D:56?E] $@ 5:5 E96 4@F?ECJ’D 5676?D6 >:?:DE6C[ ‘=25:>:C !25C:?@ {ĂłA6K[ H9@ D2:5 $F?52J E92E E96 4@F?ECJ’D 2C>65 7@C46D “42E68@C:42==J C6;64E E96 4@H2C5=J <:5?2AA:?8” 2?5 H:== “>2:?E2:? :?E6C?2= @C56C 2?5 A6246]”k^Am

    kAm|25FC@ 😀 5F6 E@ >2<6 9:D 7:CDE 2AA62C2?46 |@?52J 😕 |2?92EE2?’D 7656C2= 4@FCE]k^Am

    kAm|25FC@ 2?5 @E96C ‘6?6KF6=2? @77:4:2=D H6C6 :?5:4E65 😕 a_a_ @? ?2C4@E6CC@C:D> 4@?DA:C24J 492C86D[ 2?5 E96 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^>25FC@:?5:4E>6?E;FDE:4656A2CE>6?EECF>A3@?5:ad2e735haacfaahe4fcc63d“`45h`c4QmyFDE:46 s6A2CE>6?E C6=62D65 2 ?6H :?5:4E>6?Ek^2m $2EFC52J @7 |25FC@ 2?5 9:D H:76 E92E A2:?E65 9:D 25>:?:DEC2E:@? 2D 2 “4@CCFAE[ :==68:E:>2E6 8@G6C?>6?E” 7F6=65 3J 2 5CF8EC277:4<:?8 @A6C2E:@? E92E 7=@@565 E96 &]$ H:E9 4@42:?6] %96 &]$] 8@G6C?>6?E 5@6D ?@E C64@8?:K6 |25FC@ 2D E96 4@F?ECJ’D =6256C]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    Staff and Wire Reports

    Source link

  • In Venezuela after Maduro, a common refrain: The oil is ours

    [ad_1]

    Like many other Venezuelans, Ramón Arape said the image of ex-President Nicolás Maduro in U.S. custody was a stunning — and welcome — sight.

    “I confess that I felt a sense of relief when I saw the photo of Maduro in the hands of los gringos,” said Arape, 59, a welder and father of three.

    Less reassuring, however, were President Trump’s comments about Washington’s determination to take over the government and the oil industry, the nation’s defining natural resource.

    “We’ve already had it with outsiders — Cubans, Iranians, Chinese — and now the Americans come along and want to name leaders and sell our oil?” said Arape, referring to a series of foreign allies sought out by the socialist governments of Maduro and his predecessor, the late Hugo Chávez. “It’s a violation of law and sovereignty.”

    Many Venezuelans are hoping for a deliverance, but not, it seems, at the cost of selling off the country’s riches. How that plays out with Trump’s view that Venezuela “stole” a U.S.-built oil industry is one of the big questions as Washington embarks on a massive nation-building endeavor in South America.

    Like many other nations, Venezuela nationalized its oil industry in the 20th century, a process begun in the 1970s under a U.S.-allied government in Caracas. Several U.S. oil giants later made claims of illegal expropriation against the government of Chávez, Maduro’s mentor. But few here seemed inclined to believe in Trump’s assertion, made on social media, that Venezuela must return “all of the Oil, Land and other Assets that they previously stole from us.”

    Sunday was just a day after the shocking events that saw U.S. forces sweep into the capital and snatch Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, from Miraflores Palace, the seat of government, and fly them out of the country — and, eventually, to New York, where both face drug-trafficking charges. Both deny the charges, calling them U.S. propaganda.

    Venezuelans with internet access had the opportunity to view the unlikely image of Maduro, bundled up for distinctly non-tropical temperatures and flanked by federal agents, doing a perp walk at a military base in New York and apparently telling onlookers: “Happy New Year.”

    In the Venezuelan capital, life was slowly returning to a semblance of normalcy on Sunday, albeit on a weekend pace.

    Cars and some public transport circulated on streets that had been deserted the day before. People ventured cautiously from their homes after spending much of Saturday indoors, fearing the explosions and a potential aftermath. Many went to church in this overwhelmingly Roman Catholic nation. Sermons called for peace.

    There was a palpable sense of relief that the threat of war had abated, at least temporarily. Many were still absorbing the almost unbelievable turn of events that has surely transformed the nation’s future — albeit in still unpredictable ways.

    But there was an overriding determination, among both supporters and critics of the ousted president, that the country’s oil and other resources were sacrosanct, and not to be handed over to the United States — or anyone else.

    “Really it was very emotional to finally see Maduro and Cilia handcuffed and prisoners,” said Fernando González, 29, a plumber who says he supports Marína Corina Machado, the Nobel Peace Prize laureate and longtime opposition leader. “Those two have to pay for their crimes. For that we thank Trump. But that’s not to say we are in agreement with everything he seems to want to do.”

    The president’s determination to “run” Venezuela — and take over its oil — didn’t go down well with González, a fervent nationalist in a country with a long history of nationalist activism.

    “This is all a farce if they get rid of Maduro just to appropriate and sell the oil,” he said. “It can’t be that way. We want progress, change, but a transition led by Venezuelans. It can’t all be at the will of the Americans.”

    González saw a role for the United States: “To help us deal with this social drama of an impoverished country.” But, he added: “They must respect our will.”

    Arape, the welder, summed up the sentiment of many. “We didn’t go through all this so that Trump can name his people and take over our oil,” he said.

    On Saturday, Trump had said, “We’re going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and judicious transition.” On Sunday, however, administration officials walked back that statement, saying the U.S. would pressure the Venezuelan government to acquiesce to U.S. demands.

    Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the threat of more military action would serve as “leverage” over the Venezuelan government.

    In Caracas, confusion about the future was a prevalent sentiment, among both critics and supporters of Maduro.

    “We would like to know who is really in charge,” said William Rojas, 31, a father of two who lives in the El Valle district, long a Maduro stronghold.

    In his news conference Saturday, Trump said that Maduro’s vice president, Delcy Rodríguez, had been named interim president, a fact seemingly confirmed Sunday by Telesur, the government broadcast outlet. But Rodríguez, in an address Saturday from Miraflores Palace, demanded that Washington return the “kidnapped” Maduro, whom she called the “sole” president of the country.

    “Delcy Rodríguez says that Maduro remains the president, but he’s no longer here,” said Rojas. “And how were they able to whisk him away? Who betrayed our president?”

    He added, “We can’t live with the idea that the ones who really govern us are Trump and Marco Rubio! We are totally confused.”

    Amid all the prevailing ambiguity, authorities called on people to revert to everyday patterns — as though Maduro were still around.

    There were still no official casualty counts from Saturday’s raid. In an address, the defense secretary, Gen. Vladimir Padrino López, called the operation a “cowardly kidnapping” that was carried out “after cold-bloodedly assassinating a large part of the president’s security detail, soldiers and innocent civilians,” according to Telesur.

    Padrino urged Venezuelans to return to their jobs and to school, adding, “I call on the Venezuelan people to peace, to order, to not fall to temptations or a psychological war, to threats, to the fear that they want to impose upon us.”

    Special correspondent MogollĂłn reported from Caracas and staff writer McDonnell from Boston.

    [ad_2]

    Mery MogollĂłn, Patrick J. McDonnell

    Source link

  • Maduro arrives in US after capture in operation that Trump says will let US ‘run’ Venezuela

    [ad_1]

    Deposed Venezuelan leader NicolĂĄs Maduro arrived in the United States to face criminal charges after being captured in an audacious nighttime military operation that President Donald Trump said would set the U.S. up to “run” the South American country and tap its vast oil reserves to sell to other nations.Video above: U.S. strikes Venezuela, captures President Maduro in overnight operationMaduro landed Saturday evening at a small airport in New York following the middle-of-the-night operation that extracted him and his wife, Cilia Flores, from their home in a military base in the capital, Caracas — an act that Maduro’s government called “imperialist.” The couple faces U.S. charges of participating in a narco-terrorism conspiracy.The dramatic action capped an intensive Trump administration pressure campaign on Venezuela’s autocratic leader and months of secret planning, resulting in the most assertive American action to achieve regime change since the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Legal experts raised questions about the lawfulness of the operation, which was done without congressional approval. Venezuela’s vice president, Delcy Rodriguez, meanwhile, demanded that the United States free Maduro and called him the country’s rightful leader as her nation’s high court named her interim president.Some Venezuelan civilians and members of the military were killed, said RodrĂ­guez, who didn’t give a number. Trump said some U.S. forces were injured, but none were killed.Speaking to reporters hours after Maduro’s capture, Trump revealed his plans to exploit the leadership void to “fix” the country’s oil infrastructure and sell “large amounts” of oil to other countries. Video below: ‘We are going to run the country,’ Trump says of VenezuelaTrump says US will ‘run the country’The Trump administration promoted the ouster as a step toward reducing the flow of dangerous drugs into the U.S. The president touted what he saw as other potential benefits, including a leadership stake in the country and greater control of oil.Trump claimed the U.S. government would help lead the country and was already doing so, though there were no immediate visible signs of that. Venezuelan state TV aired pro-Maduro propaganda and broadcast live images of supporters taking to the streets in Caracas in protest.“We’re going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and judicious transition,” Trump said at a Mar-a-Lago news conference. He boasted that this “extremely successful operation should serve as warning to anyone who would threaten American sovereignty or endanger American lives.”Maduro and other Venezuelan officials were indicted in 2020 on narco-terrorism conspiracy charges, and the Justice Department released a new indictment Saturday of Maduro and his wife that painted his administration as a “corrupt, illegitimate government” fueled by a drug-trafficking operation that flooded the U.S with cocaine. The U.S. government does not recognize Maduro as the country’s leader.The Trump administration spent months building up American forces in the region and carrying out attacks on boats in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean for allegedly ferrying drugs. Last week, the CIA was behind a drone strike at a docking area believed to have been used by Venezuelan drug cartels — the first known direct operation on Venezuelan soil since the U.S. campaign began in September.Video below: Fact checking President Trump’s Venezuela claimsEarly morning attackTaking place 36 years to the day after the 1990 surrender and seizure of Panama leader Manuel Antonio Noriega following a U.S. invasion, the Venezuela operation unfolded under the cover of darkness early Saturday. Trump said the U.S. turned off “almost all of the lights” in Caracas while forces moved in to extract Maduro and his wife.Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said U.S. forces had rehearsed their maneuvers for months, learning everything about Maduro — where he was and what he ate, as well as details of his pets and his clothes.“We think, we develop, we train, we rehearse, we debrief, we rehearse again and again,” Caine said. “Not to get it right, but to ensure we cannot get it wrong.”Multiple explosions rang out that morning, and low-flying aircraft swept through Caracas. Maduro’s government accused the United States of hitting civilian and military installations, calling it an “imperialist attack” and urging citizens to take to the streets. The explosions — at least seven blasts — sent people rushing into the streets, while others took to social media to report what they saw and heard.Restrictions imposed by the U.S. government on airspace around Venezuela and the Caribbean expired early Sunday, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said on X, an announcement that suggested any further immediate major U.S. military action was unlikely. “Airlines are informed, and will update their schedules quickly,” he posted.Under Venezuelan law, RodrĂ­guez would take over from Maduro. RodrĂ­guez, however, stressed during a Saturday appearance on state television that she did not plan to assume power, before Venezuela’s high court ordered that she become interim president.“There is only one president in Venezuela,” Rodriguez said, “and his name is NicolĂĄs Maduro Moros.”Video below: President Donald Trump’s full comments on Venezuela strike and Nicolas Maduro captureSome streets in Caracas fill upVenezuela’s ruling party has held power since 1999, when Maduro’s predecessor, Hugo ChĂĄvez, took office, promising to uplift poor people and later to implement a self-described socialist revolution.Maduro took over when ChĂĄvez died in 2013. His 2018 reelection was widely considered a sham because the main opposition parties were banned from participating. During the 2024 election, electoral authorities loyal to the ruling party declared him the winner hours after polls closed, but the opposition gathered overwhelming evidence that he lost by a more than 2-to-1 margin.In a demonstration of how polarizing Maduro is, people variously took to the streets to protest his capture, while others celebrated it. At a protest in the Venezuelan capital, Caracas, Mayor Carmen MelĂ©ndez joined a crowd demanding Maduro’s return.“Maduro, hold on, the people are rising up!” the crowd chanted. “We are here, NicolĂĄs Maduro. If you can hear us, we are here!”In other parts of the city, the streets were empty hours after the attack.“How do I feel? Scared, like everyone,” said Caracas resident Noris Prada, who sat on an empty avenue looking at his phone. “Venezuelans woke up scared. Many families couldn’t sleep.”In Doral, Florida, home to the largest Venezuelan community in the United States, people wrapped themselves in Venezuelan flags, ate fried snacks and cheered as music played. At one point, the crowd chanted “Liberty! Liberty! Liberty!”Questions of legalityWhether the United States violated any laws, international or otherwise, was still a question early Sunday. “There are a number of international legal concepts which the United States might have broken by capturing Maduro,” said Ilan Katz, an international law analyst.In New York, the U.N. Security Council, acting on an emergency request from Colombia, planned to hold a meeting on U.S. operations in Venezuela on Monday morning. That was according to a council diplomat, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a meeting not yet made public.Lawmakers from both American political parties have raised reservations and flat-out objections to the U.S. attacks on boats suspected of drug smuggling. Congress has not approved an authorization for the use of military force for such operations in the region.Connecticut Rep. Jim Himes, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said he had seen no evidence that would justify Trump striking Venezuela without approval from Congress and demanded an immediate briefing by the administration on “its plan to ensure stability in the region and its legal justification for this decision.”___Toropin and Tucker reported from Washington. Associated Press writers Jorge Rueda in Caracas, Venezuela; Lisa Mascaro, Michelle L. Price, Seung Min Kim and Alanna Durkin Richer in Washington; Farnoush Amiri in New York; and Larry Neumeister in South Amboy, New Jersey, contributed to this report.

    Deposed Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro arrived in the United States to face criminal charges after being captured in an audacious nighttime military operation that President Donald Trump said would set the U.S. up to “run” the South American country and tap its vast oil reserves to sell to other nations.

    Video above: U.S. strikes Venezuela, captures President Maduro in overnight operation

    Maduro landed Saturday evening at a small airport in New York following the middle-of-the-night operation that extracted him and his wife, Cilia Flores, from their home in a military base in the capital, Caracas — an act that Maduro’s government called “imperialist.” The couple faces U.S. charges of participating in a narco-terrorism conspiracy.

    The dramatic action capped an intensive Trump administration pressure campaign on Venezuela’s autocratic leader and months of secret planning, resulting in the most assertive American action to achieve regime change since the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Legal experts raised questions about the lawfulness of the operation, which was done without congressional approval.

    Venezuela’s vice president, Delcy Rodriguez, meanwhile, demanded that the United States free Maduro and called him the country’s rightful leader as her nation’s high court named her interim president.

    Some Venezuelan civilians and members of the military were killed, said Rodríguez, who didn’t give a number. Trump said some U.S. forces were injured, but none were killed.

    Speaking to reporters hours after Maduro’s capture, Trump revealed his plans to exploit the leadership void to “fix” the country’s oil infrastructure and sell “large amounts” of oil to other countries.

    Video below: ‘We are going to run the country,’ Trump says of Venezuela

    Trump says US will ‘run the country’

    The Trump administration promoted the ouster as a step toward reducing the flow of dangerous drugs into the U.S. The president touted what he saw as other potential benefits, including a leadership stake in the country and greater control of oil.

    Trump claimed the U.S. government would help lead the country and was already doing so, though there were no immediate visible signs of that. Venezuelan state TV aired pro-Maduro propaganda and broadcast live images of supporters taking to the streets in Caracas in protest.

    “We’re going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and judicious transition,” Trump said at a Mar-a-Lago news conference. He boasted that this “extremely successful operation should serve as warning to anyone who would threaten American sovereignty or endanger American lives.”

    Maduro and other Venezuelan officials were indicted in 2020 on narco-terrorism conspiracy charges, and the Justice Department released a new indictment Saturday of Maduro and his wife that painted his administration as a “corrupt, illegitimate government” fueled by a drug-trafficking operation that flooded the U.S with cocaine. The U.S. government does not recognize Maduro as the country’s leader.

    The Trump administration spent months building up American forces in the region and carrying out attacks on boats in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean for allegedly ferrying drugs. Last week, the CIA was behind a drone strike at a docking area believed to have been used by Venezuelan drug cartels — the first known direct operation on Venezuelan soil since the U.S. campaign began in September.

    Video below: Fact checking President Trump’s Venezuela claims

    Early morning attack

    Taking place 36 years to the day after the 1990 surrender and seizure of Panama leader Manuel Antonio Noriega following a U.S. invasion, the Venezuela operation unfolded under the cover of darkness early Saturday. Trump said the U.S. turned off “almost all of the lights” in Caracas while forces moved in to extract Maduro and his wife.

    Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said U.S. forces had rehearsed their maneuvers for months, learning everything about Maduro — where he was and what he ate, as well as details of his pets and his clothes.

    “We think, we develop, we train, we rehearse, we debrief, we rehearse again and again,” Caine said. “Not to get it right, but to ensure we cannot get it wrong.”

    Multiple explosions rang out that morning, and low-flying aircraft swept through Caracas. Maduro’s government accused the United States of hitting civilian and military installations, calling it an “imperialist attack” and urging citizens to take to the streets. The explosions — at least seven blasts — sent people rushing into the streets, while others took to social media to report what they saw and heard.

    Restrictions imposed by the U.S. government on airspace around Venezuela and the Caribbean expired early Sunday, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said on X, an announcement that suggested any further immediate major U.S. military action was unlikely. “Airlines are informed, and will update their schedules quickly,” he posted.

    Under Venezuelan law, Rodríguez would take over from Maduro. Rodríguez, however, stressed during a Saturday appearance on state television that she did not plan to assume power, before Venezuela’s high court ordered that she become interim president.

    “There is only one president in Venezuela,” Rodriguez said, “and his name is NicolĂĄs Maduro Moros.”

    Video below: President Donald Trump’s full comments on Venezuela strike and Nicolas Maduro capture

    Some streets in Caracas fill up

    Venezuela’s ruling party has held power since 1999, when Maduro’s predecessor, Hugo Chávez, took office, promising to uplift poor people and later to implement a self-described socialist revolution.

    Maduro took over when ChĂĄvez died in 2013. His 2018 reelection was widely considered a sham because the main opposition parties were banned from participating. During the 2024 election, electoral authorities loyal to the ruling party declared him the winner hours after polls closed, but the opposition gathered overwhelming evidence that he lost by a more than 2-to-1 margin.

    In a demonstration of how polarizing Maduro is, people variously took to the streets to protest his capture, while others celebrated it. At a protest in the Venezuelan capital, Caracas, Mayor Carmen MelĂ©ndez joined a crowd demanding Maduro’s return.

    “Maduro, hold on, the people are rising up!” the crowd chanted. “We are here, Nicolás Maduro. If you can hear us, we are here!”

    In other parts of the city, the streets were empty hours after the attack.

    “How do I feel? Scared, like everyone,” said Caracas resident Noris Prada, who sat on an empty avenue looking at his phone. “Venezuelans woke up scared. Many families couldn’t sleep.”

    In Doral, Florida, home to the largest Venezuelan community in the United States, people wrapped themselves in Venezuelan flags, ate fried snacks and cheered as music played. At one point, the crowd chanted “Liberty! Liberty! Liberty!”

    Questions of legality

    Whether the United States violated any laws, international or otherwise, was still a question early Sunday. “There are a number of international legal concepts which the United States might have broken by capturing Maduro,” said Ilan Katz, an international law analyst.

    In New York, the U.N. Security Council, acting on an emergency request from Colombia, planned to hold a meeting on U.S. operations in Venezuela on Monday morning. That was according to a council diplomat, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a meeting not yet made public.

    Lawmakers from both American political parties have raised reservations and flat-out objections to the U.S. attacks on boats suspected of drug smuggling. Congress has not approved an authorization for the use of military force for such operations in the region.

    Connecticut Rep. Jim Himes, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said he had seen no evidence that would justify Trump striking Venezuela without approval from Congress and demanded an immediate briefing by the administration on “its plan to ensure stability in the region and its legal justification for this decision.”

    ___

    Toropin and Tucker reported from Washington. Associated Press writers Jorge Rueda in Caracas, Venezuela; Lisa Mascaro, Michelle L. Price, Seung Min Kim and Alanna Durkin Richer in Washington; Farnoush Amiri in New York; and Larry Neumeister in South Amboy, New Jersey, contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Maduro arrives in US after capture in operation that Trump says will let US ‘run’ Venezuela

    [ad_1]

    Deposed Venezuelan leader NicolĂĄs Maduro arrived in the United States to face criminal charges after being captured in an audacious nighttime military operation that President Donald Trump said would set the U.S. up to “run” the South American country and tap its vast oil reserves to sell to other nations.Maduro landed Saturday evening at a small airport in New York following the middle-of-the-night operation that extracted him and his wife, Cilia Flores, from their home in a military base in the capital, Caracas — an act that Maduro’s government called “imperialist.” The couple faces U.S. charges of participating in a narco-terrorism conspiracy.The dramatic action capped an intensive Trump administration pressure campaign on Venezuela’s autocratic leader and months of secret planning, resulting in the most assertive American action to achieve regime change since the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Legal experts raised questions about the lawfulness of the operation, which was done without congressional approval. Venezuela’s vice president, Delcy Rodriguez, meanwhile, demanded that the United States free Maduro and called him the country’s rightful leader as her nation’s high court named her interim president.Some Venezuelan civilians and members of the military were killed, said RodrĂ­guez, who didn’t give a number. Trump said some U.S. forces were injured, but none were killed.Speaking to reporters hours after Maduro’s capture, Trump revealed his plans to exploit the leadership void to “fix” the country’s oil infrastructure and sell “large amounts” of oil to other countries. Trump says US will ‘run the country’The Trump administration promoted the ouster as a step toward reducing the flow of dangerous drugs into the U.S. The president touted what he saw as other potential benefits, including a leadership stake in the country and greater control of oil.Trump claimed the U.S. government would help lead the country and was already doing so, though there were no immediate visible signs of that. Venezuelan state TV aired pro-Maduro propaganda and broadcast live images of supporters taking to the streets in Caracas in protest.“We’re going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and judicious transition,” Trump said at a Mar-a-Lago news conference. He boasted that this “extremely successful operation should serve as warning to anyone who would threaten American sovereignty or endanger American lives.”Maduro and other Venezuelan officials were indicted in 2020 on narco-terrorism conspiracy charges, and the Justice Department released a new indictment Saturday of Maduro and his wife that painted his administration as a “corrupt, illegitimate government” fueled by a drug-trafficking operation that flooded the U.S with cocaine. The U.S. government does not recognize Maduro as the country’s leader.The Trump administration spent months building up American forces in the region and carrying out attacks on boats in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean for allegedly ferrying drugs. Last week, the CIA was behind a drone strike at a docking area believed to have been used by Venezuelan drug cartels — the first known direct operation on Venezuelan soil since the U.S. campaign began in September.Early morning attackTaking place 36 years to the day after the 1990 surrender and seizure of Panama leader Manuel Antonio Noriega following a U.S. invasion, the Venezuela operation unfolded under the cover of darkness early Saturday. Trump said the U.S. turned off “almost all of the lights” in Caracas while forces moved in to extract Maduro and his wife.Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said U.S. forces had rehearsed their maneuvers for months, learning everything about Maduro — where he was and what he ate, as well as details of his pets and his clothes.“We think, we develop, we train, we rehearse, we debrief, we rehearse again and again,” Caine said. “Not to get it right, but to ensure we cannot get it wrong.”Multiple explosions rang out that morning, and low-flying aircraft swept through Caracas. Maduro’s government accused the United States of hitting civilian and military installations, calling it an “imperialist attack” and urging citizens to take to the streets. The explosions — at least seven blasts — sent people rushing into the streets, while others took to social media to report what they saw and heard.Restrictions imposed by the U.S. government on airspace around Venezuela and the Caribbean expired early Sunday, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said on X, an announcement that suggested any further immediate major U.S. military action was unlikely. “Airlines are informed, and will update their schedules quickly,” he posted.Under Venezuelan law, RodrĂ­guez would take over from Maduro. RodrĂ­guez, however, stressed during a Saturday appearance on state television that she did not plan to assume power, before Venezuela’s high court ordered that she become interim president.“There is only one president in Venezuela,” Rodriguez said, “and his name is NicolĂĄs Maduro Moros.”Some streets in Caracas fill upVenezuela’s ruling party has held power since 1999, when Maduro’s predecessor, Hugo ChĂĄvez, took office, promising to uplift poor people and later to implement a self-described socialist revolution.Maduro took over when ChĂĄvez died in 2013. His 2018 reelection was widely considered a sham because the main opposition parties were banned from participating. During the 2024 election, electoral authorities loyal to the ruling party declared him the winner hours after polls closed, but the opposition gathered overwhelming evidence that he lost by a more than 2-to-1 margin.In a demonstration of how polarizing Maduro is, people variously took to the streets to protest his capture, while others celebrated it. At a protest in the Venezuelan capital, Caracas, Mayor Carmen MelĂ©ndez joined a crowd demanding Maduro’s return.“Maduro, hold on, the people are rising up!” the crowd chanted. “We are here, NicolĂĄs Maduro. If you can hear us, we are here!”In other parts of the city, the streets were empty hours after the attack.“How do I feel? Scared, like everyone,” said Caracas resident Noris Prada, who sat on an empty avenue looking at his phone. “Venezuelans woke up scared. Many families couldn’t sleep.”In Doral, Florida, home to the largest Venezuelan community in the United States, people wrapped themselves in Venezuelan flags, ate fried snacks and cheered as music played. At one point, the crowd chanted “Liberty! Liberty! Liberty!”Questions of legalityWhether the United States violated any laws, international or otherwise, was still a question early Sunday. “There are a number of international legal concepts which the United States might have broken by capturing Maduro,” said Ilan Katz, an international law analyst.In New York, the U.N. Security Council, acting on an emergency request from Colombia, planned to hold a meeting on U.S. operations in Venezuela on Monday morning. That was according to a council diplomat, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a meeting not yet made public.Lawmakers from both American political parties have raised reservations and flat-out objections to the U.S. attacks on boats suspected of drug smuggling. Congress has not approved an authorization for the use of military force for such operations in the region.Connecticut Rep. Jim Himes, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said he had seen no evidence that would justify Trump striking Venezuela without approval from Congress and demanded an immediate briefing by the administration on “its plan to ensure stability in the region and its legal justification for this decision.”___Toropin and Tucker reported from Washington. Associated Press writers Jorge Rueda in Caracas, Venezuela; Lisa Mascaro, Michelle L. Price, Seung Min Kim and Alanna Durkin Richer in Washington; Farnoush Amiri in New York; and Larry Neumeister in South Amboy, New Jersey, contributed to this report.

    Deposed Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro arrived in the United States to face criminal charges after being captured in an audacious nighttime military operation that President Donald Trump said would set the U.S. up to “run” the South American country and tap its vast oil reserves to sell to other nations.

    Maduro landed Saturday evening at a small airport in New York following the middle-of-the-night operation that extracted him and his wife, Cilia Flores, from their home in a military base in the capital, Caracas — an act that Maduro’s government called “imperialist.” The couple faces U.S. charges of participating in a narco-terrorism conspiracy.

    The dramatic action capped an intensive Trump administration pressure campaign on Venezuela’s autocratic leader and months of secret planning, resulting in the most assertive American action to achieve regime change since the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Legal experts raised questions about the lawfulness of the operation, which was done without congressional approval.

    Venezuela’s vice president, Delcy Rodriguez, meanwhile, demanded that the United States free Maduro and called him the country’s rightful leader as her nation’s high court named her interim president.

    Some Venezuelan civilians and members of the military were killed, said Rodríguez, who didn’t give a number. Trump said some U.S. forces were injured, but none were killed.

    Speaking to reporters hours after Maduro’s capture, Trump revealed his plans to exploit the leadership void to “fix” the country’s oil infrastructure and sell “large amounts” of oil to other countries.

    Trump says US will ‘run the country’

    The Trump administration promoted the ouster as a step toward reducing the flow of dangerous drugs into the U.S. The president touted what he saw as other potential benefits, including a leadership stake in the country and greater control of oil.

    Trump claimed the U.S. government would help lead the country and was already doing so, though there were no immediate visible signs of that. Venezuelan state TV aired pro-Maduro propaganda and broadcast live images of supporters taking to the streets in Caracas in protest.

    “We’re going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and judicious transition,” Trump said at a Mar-a-Lago news conference. He boasted that this “extremely successful operation should serve as warning to anyone who would threaten American sovereignty or endanger American lives.”

    Maduro and other Venezuelan officials were indicted in 2020 on narco-terrorism conspiracy charges, and the Justice Department released a new indictment Saturday of Maduro and his wife that painted his administration as a “corrupt, illegitimate government” fueled by a drug-trafficking operation that flooded the U.S with cocaine. The U.S. government does not recognize Maduro as the country’s leader.

    The Trump administration spent months building up American forces in the region and carrying out attacks on boats in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean for allegedly ferrying drugs. Last week, the CIA was behind a drone strike at a docking area believed to have been used by Venezuelan drug cartels — the first known direct operation on Venezuelan soil since the U.S. campaign began in September.

    Early morning attack

    Taking place 36 years to the day after the 1990 surrender and seizure of Panama leader Manuel Antonio Noriega following a U.S. invasion, the Venezuela operation unfolded under the cover of darkness early Saturday. Trump said the U.S. turned off “almost all of the lights” in Caracas while forces moved in to extract Maduro and his wife.

    Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said U.S. forces had rehearsed their maneuvers for months, learning everything about Maduro — where he was and what he ate, as well as details of his pets and his clothes.

    “We think, we develop, we train, we rehearse, we debrief, we rehearse again and again,” Caine said. “Not to get it right, but to ensure we cannot get it wrong.”

    Multiple explosions rang out that morning, and low-flying aircraft swept through Caracas. Maduro’s government accused the United States of hitting civilian and military installations, calling it an “imperialist attack” and urging citizens to take to the streets. The explosions — at least seven blasts — sent people rushing into the streets, while others took to social media to report what they saw and heard.

    Restrictions imposed by the U.S. government on airspace around Venezuela and the Caribbean expired early Sunday, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said on X, an announcement that suggested any further immediate major U.S. military action was unlikely. “Airlines are informed, and will update their schedules quickly,” he posted.

    Under Venezuelan law, Rodríguez would take over from Maduro. Rodríguez, however, stressed during a Saturday appearance on state television that she did not plan to assume power, before Venezuela’s high court ordered that she become interim president.

    “There is only one president in Venezuela,” Rodriguez said, “and his name is NicolĂĄs Maduro Moros.”

    Some streets in Caracas fill up

    Venezuela’s ruling party has held power since 1999, when Maduro’s predecessor, Hugo Chávez, took office, promising to uplift poor people and later to implement a self-described socialist revolution.

    Maduro took over when ChĂĄvez died in 2013. His 2018 reelection was widely considered a sham because the main opposition parties were banned from participating. During the 2024 election, electoral authorities loyal to the ruling party declared him the winner hours after polls closed, but the opposition gathered overwhelming evidence that he lost by a more than 2-to-1 margin.

    In a demonstration of how polarizing Maduro is, people variously took to the streets to protest his capture, while others celebrated it. At a protest in the Venezuelan capital, Caracas, Mayor Carmen MelĂ©ndez joined a crowd demanding Maduro’s return.

    “Maduro, hold on, the people are rising up!” the crowd chanted. “We are here, Nicolás Maduro. If you can hear us, we are here!”

    In other parts of the city, the streets were empty hours after the attack.

    “How do I feel? Scared, like everyone,” said Caracas resident Noris Prada, who sat on an empty avenue looking at his phone. “Venezuelans woke up scared. Many families couldn’t sleep.”

    In Doral, Florida, home to the largest Venezuelan community in the United States, people wrapped themselves in Venezuelan flags, ate fried snacks and cheered as music played. At one point, the crowd chanted “Liberty! Liberty! Liberty!”

    Questions of legality

    Whether the United States violated any laws, international or otherwise, was still a question early Sunday. “There are a number of international legal concepts which the United States might have broken by capturing Maduro,” said Ilan Katz, an international law analyst.

    In New York, the U.N. Security Council, acting on an emergency request from Colombia, planned to hold a meeting on U.S. operations in Venezuela on Monday morning. That was according to a council diplomat, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a meeting not yet made public.

    Lawmakers from both American political parties have raised reservations and flat-out objections to the U.S. attacks on boats suspected of drug smuggling. Congress has not approved an authorization for the use of military force for such operations in the region.

    Connecticut Rep. Jim Himes, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said he had seen no evidence that would justify Trump striking Venezuela without approval from Congress and demanded an immediate briefing by the administration on “its plan to ensure stability in the region and its legal justification for this decision.”

    ___

    Toropin and Tucker reported from Washington. Associated Press writers Jorge Rueda in Caracas, Venezuela; Lisa Mascaro, Michelle L. Price, Seung Min Kim and Alanna Durkin Richer in Washington; Farnoush Amiri in New York; and Larry Neumeister in South Amboy, New Jersey, contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link