[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Washington — Congressional leaders reached a deal Wednesday on a short-term funding extension to head off a partial government shutdown on Saturday.
The deal extends funding for some government agencies until March 8 and the rest until March 22.
It sets up potential votes next week for six of the 12 appropriations bills that fund the departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Justice, Interior, Energy, Veterans Affairs, Transportation, and Housing and Urban Development. Lawmakers would then have two more weeks to pass the remaining six spending bills that include funding for the departments of Defense, Homeland Security, State, Health and Human Services, and Labor.
“These bills will adhere to the Fiscal Responsibility Act discretionary spending limits and January’s topline spending agreement,” the bipartisan group of lawmakers said in a statement.
The deal was announced by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, House Speaker Mike Johnson, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, as well as the leaders of the Senate and House Appropriations committees.
“To give the House and Senate Appropriations Committee adequate time to execute on this deal in principle, including drafting, preparing report language, scoring and other technical matters, and to allow members 72 hours to review, a short-term continuing resolution to fund agencies through March 8 and the 22 will be necessary, and voted on by the House and Senate this week,” they said.
The new deadlines could still be a difficult task for the House, which has struggled to approve government funding amid Republican divisions. Congress has for months punted the spending fight down the road as House conservatives have pushed for steep cuts and policy changes, and those disagreements haven’t been resolved.
Congressional leaders met Tuesday with President Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris at the White House about keeping the government fully open beyond Friday, when funding for some agencies is set to expire. The remaining agencies are funded until March 8. Lawmakers left the meeting optimistic about averting a shutdown before the deadline at the end of this week.
A statement from White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said the agreement announced Wednesday “would help prevent a needless shutdown while providing more time to work on bipartisan appropriations bills and for the House to pass the bipartisan national security supplemental as quickly as possible.”
Alan He contributed reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Nearly as many House Republicans (106) voted to shut down the government, as voted to fund the government with a short term continuing resolution and keep it open (107).
CNN reported, “House Republicans were nearly evenly divided over the short-term funding extension, a sign of the deep rift within the conference and the challenges facing the speaker. One hundred and seven House Republicans voted for the bill, while 106 voted against it. Far more Democrats than Republicans voted for the measure with 207 Democrats in favor and just two opposed.”
The final vote was 314-108, and yes Democrats did provide roughly two thirds of the votes to keep the government open even though they are in the minority in the House.
It is supposed by the job of the House majority to lead and govern, but Republicans have zero interest in using their majority for governance.
House Republicans are such a mess that they can’t stop fighting with each other long enough to do the minimum that their job requires.
A Special Message From PoliticusUSA
If you are in a position to donate purely to help us keep the doors open on PoliticusUSA during what is a critical election year, please do so here.
We have been honored to be able to put your interests first for 14 years as we only answer to our readers and we will not compromise on that fundamental, core PoliticusUSA value.
Jason is the managing editor. He is also a White House Press Pool and a Congressional correspondent for PoliticusUSA. Jason has a Bachelor’s Degree in Political Science. His graduate work focused on public policy, with a specialization in social reform movements.
Awards and Professional Memberships
Member of the Society of Professional Journalists and The American Political Science Association
[ad_2]
Jason Easley
Source link

[ad_1]
Washington — The Senate approved a stopgap measure to keep the government funded through the beginning of March, teeing up a vote in the House to avoid a partial shutdown that would otherwise take effect Saturday morning.
In a bipartisan 77 to 18 vote, the upper chamber approved the continuing resolution to keep the government funded on Thursday afternoon, sending it to the House for approval.
“We have good news for America — there will not be a shutdown on Friday,” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said on the Senate floor ahead of the vote. “It’s precisely what Americans want to see — both sides working together and governing responsibly. No chaos, no spectacle, no shutdown.”
The House is expected to take up the measure later in the evening. House leaders announced earlier in the day that votes were no longer expected on Friday due to weather conditions, setting up a tight timeline to approve the stopgap measure and send it to the president’s desk.
The legislation would extend funding at current levels for some government agencies through March 1, while others will be extended through March 8. The two-step deadline is an extension of the current deadline originally conceived by House conservatives to avoid a massive omnibus spending bill to fund the government. But many of those members on the Republican conference’s right flank are expected to oppose the stopgap measure to keep the government funded.
Some House conservatives met with Speaker Mike Johnson on Thursday to attempt to add a border security amendment to the continuing resolution, briefly throwing its passage on Thursday into question with a maneuver that would have required the bill go to committee. But Johnson’s team quickly chimed in, saying that the plan had not changed, and that the House will vote Thursday night.
Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images
Facing opposition from hard right House members, Johnson is once again in a bind, likely without enough support within his razor-thin GOP majority to approve a funding measure with only Republican votes, or maneuver the chamber through the typical procedural votes to tee it up for final passage. Accordingly, Johnson will again need to rely on Democrats to keep the government funded, so he’s expected to bring up the bill under a move known as a suspension of the rules, which will require the backing of two thirds of the chamber.
The Louisiana Republican faced a nearly identical situation in November. That decision came just weeks after he was elected House speaker to replace former Speaker Kevin McCarthy, who was ousted for doing the same thing — working across the aisle to keep the government open. But for Johnson, just days into his speakership, enough good will seemed to exist among his conference to hold onto his gavel.
Whether the same holds true this time around remains to be seen.
After a GOP conference meeting on Wednesday, Rep. Dan Bishop, a North Carolina Republican, told reporters that there’s dissatisfaction with the continuing resolution, but he noted that “I haven’t seen the solution to come forward from anybody.”
Another House Republican, Rep. Kelly Armstrong of North Dakota, said that when the continuing resolution comes from the Senate, the House will “be ready.”
“We’ll be ready and it’s going to have to be bipartisan and it’s going to have to be on suspension, I think we know all of those things,” Armstrong said, adding that many Republicans would back the move because “we understand the realities of divided government.”
Alejandro Alvarez and Jaala Brown contributed reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Congressional leaders have reached a deal on a short-term funding bill that would avert a government shutdown, a source familiar with the deal confirmed to CBS News on Saturday.
The continuing resolution will fund the government through March 1 and March 8, the source said. The current funding deal, which went into effect in November, funds some federal departments through Jan. 19, and others through Feb. 2.
House Speaker Mike Johnson was expected to brief House Republicans on the measure in a call Sunday evening, the source said.
The text of the bill is expected to be released Sunday night.
This is a developing story and will be updated.
Thanks for reading CBS NEWS.
Create your free account or log in
for more features.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson faced backlash from his conservative colleagues on Sunday after announcing that congressional leaders had reached a tentative agreement to fund the government in 2024.
Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, was appointed the 56th speaker of the House of Representatives in October 2023 after Kevin McCarthy was ousted from the position the same month for negotiating with Democrats to avoid a government shutdown.
Senate and House leaders announced a 2024 budget deal of nearly $1.66 trillion on Sunday. Despite the agreement, it’s unclear whether Congress will be able to pass it into law in time to avert a partial government shutdown as the deadline looms less than two weeks away.
In a letter that Johnson sent to his Congressional colleagues on Sunday obtained by Newsweek, the speaker said that after weeks of debate, “we have secured hard-fought concessions” to allow the Appropriations Committee to finally begin negotiating and completing the annual appropriations bills. Johnson’s letter said the agreement includes $886 billion for defense and $704 billion for nondefense.
“The agreement today achieves key modifications to the June framework that will secure more than $16 billion in additional spending cuts to offset the discretionary spending levels,” the speaker said in the letter.
Despite the cuts highlighted by Johnson, critics argue that the agreement’s nearly $1.66 trillion price tag brings the spending in line with the deal struck last year between Democratic President Joe Biden and McCarthy that led to the former speaker’s removal.
Johnson noted in his letter that the deal’s “spending levels will not satisfy everyone” because the agreement didn’t cut as much as some Republicans had been demanding. However, the speaker said the deal provides Congress a way to “move the process forward” and “reprioritize funding within the topline towards conservative objectives.”
News of Johnson’s deal on Sunday sparked immediate conservative outrage, with the House Freedom Caucus blasting the agreement as a “total failure.”
While Johnson, in the letter to his Congressional colleagues, said the topline spending total was roughly $1.59 trillion, Democrats and critics noted that the true figure was higher. The House Freedom Caucus, which opposes the agreement, said the “true total programmatic spending level is $1.658 trillion — not $1.59 trillion.”
“To call this ‘unsustainable’ is an understatement,” The House Freedom Caucus said in the statement. “It is a fiscal calamity. Unfortunately, members of the House and Senate have done little to force a course correction from this calamity. Indeed, many have been party to it. Worse yet, we are extremely troubled that House Republican leadership is considering an agreement with Democrats to spend even higher than the modest $1.59 trillion statutory cap set six months ago by the Fiscal Responsibility Act and to obscure the actual spending numbers with more shady side deals and accounting tricks. This is totally unacceptable.”
It’s even worse than we thought.
Don’t believe the spin. Once you break through typical Washington math, the true total programmatic spending level is $1.658 trillion — not $1.59 trillion.
This is total failure. https://t.co/QBok5lpa6E
— House Freedom Caucus (@freedomcaucus) January 7, 2024
Representative Chip Roy, a Texas Republican, slammed the agreement’s terms as “terrible” in a post on X.
“A $1659 topline in spending is terrible & gives away the leverage accomplished in the (already not great) caps deal,” Roy said in the post. “We’ll wait to see if we get meaningful policy riders… but 1) the NDAA was not a good preview, & 2) as usual, we keep spending more money we don’t have.”
Newsweek reached out via email on Sunday to Roy’s office for comment.
Representative Matt Rosendale, a Montana Republican, also took to X to blast the deal, saying in a statement that the agreement “does nothing to increase border security, continues woke and wasteful spending by the Biden administration, and rubber stamps the policies of the Radical Left.”
“Unfortunately there are only microscopic concessions made by the D.C. Cartel in this new spending ‘deal’ compared to the hundreds of billions it is costing Americans from illegals crossing our border and the imminent national security threat it presents #ShutDownTheBorder,” Rosendale said on X.
Taylor Haulsee, a spokesperson for Johnson’s office, told Newsweek in an email that the agreement reached on Sunday was $30 billion less than what the Senate was working on. Haulsee also said that the deal “represents the first cut to non-defense discretionary spending in years and is the best spending deal for the GOP in a decade.”
Senator Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat, and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, also a New York Democrat, issued a joint statement on the agreement saying that it includes funding for “key domestic priorities.”
“By securing the $772.7 billion for nondefense discretionary funding, we can protect key domestic priorities like veterans benefits, health care and nutrition assistance from the draconian cuts sought by right-wing extremists,” the Democrats wrote.
Newsweek is committed to challenging conventional wisdom and finding connections in the search for common ground.
Newsweek is committed to challenging conventional wisdom and finding connections in the search for common ground.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Marty Nohe, who owns a family-run appliance store and distribution center in Woodbridge, Virginia, said his employees have asked him “why business was so quiet.”
He said, “I told them, ‘Haven’t you been watching the news?’”
He says he watched customer traffic dwindle at least twice in 2023 during the weeks when Congress nearly breached deadlines to avoid government shutdowns.
“There’s no question — even just the discussion of shutdowns causes a noticeable change in foot traffic. It hurts. I have fixed costs. I can’t just slash my employees’ hours,” Nohe told CBS News as he stood near his 20,000 foot appliance showroom, which sits on a major road near a Starbucks and a few large hotels.
His business, which employs 45 people and has been operated by his family since 1985, relies on purchases by federal workers and community members with ties to the Pentagon, the FBI facility in Quantico and Washington, D.C.
Those purchases could begin to dry up next week if Congress can’t complete its work. And Nohe knows it.
For the third time since September, Congress is scrambling to avert a partial government shutdown that could force the furlough of tens of thousands of federal workers, result in disruptions in pay for military servicemembers and jolt the stock market. In an effort to avoid a shutdown in late 2023, Congress approved a novel plan to split government spending in two chunks with two separate deadlines. Some federal agencies, including transportation, agriculture and water programs, are funded through Jan. 19. The remainder, including the Pentagon, homeland security, the State Department and Congress itself, currently have funding through Feb. 2.
Senate and House negotiators announced some progress Sunday, a $1.59 trillion compromise framework to help guide final negotiations between now and the deadlines. President Biden welcomed the news, saying in a statement, “The bipartisan funding framework congressional leaders have reached moves us one step closer to preventing a needless government shutdown and protecting important national priorities.”
Negotiators and congressional leaders acknowledged more work is needed to complete an agreement, with margins especially narrow in the House and Senate.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said in a statement that Democrats “made clear” to House Speaker Mike Johnson that they wouldn’t support the inclusion of “poison pill” provisions in the 12 appropriations bills.
After a year in which even a handful of dissenting voices have bedeviled spending negotiations, Johnson argued the agreement is worthy of support and said in a letter that it “represents the most favorable budget agreement Republicans have achieved in over a decade.”
Democratic Rep. Abigail Spanberger of Virginia, who took office in 2019 amid a prior partial government shutdown, said she worries the split deadlines have complicated forecasting the outcome, which worries federal workers and small businesses.
“I have constituents who are well aware and deeply worried,” Spanberger said. “But there’s confusion over time frames and when the impact will be felt.”
Spanberger said requests for unemployment benefits surged in her congressional district during the 2018-19 shutdown. She said food banks are at risk of getting squeezed this month, as workers who may be furloughed might lean on charities for food, while others cut back on donations.
Republicans and Democratic leaders have developed some recent muscle memory in their arguments about shutdowns. Each side spent much of 2023 accusing the other of intransigence. And both parties have emphasized the pain of a protracted standoff that strips paychecks from federal workers.
GOP Sen. John Cornyn of Texas said, “It creates a lot of collateral damage and a lot of collateral expense. It doesn’t actually save money. It actually costs more money because of the disruption, and shutdowns harm innocent people and create needless uncertainty for our economy.”
A representative of the National Treasury Employees Union, which represents IRS employees, EPA workers and members of the National Park Service, said its federal employee members are nervously awaiting action from Congress. Doreen Greenwald, the union president, told CBS News her members “have painful memories of running up credit card debt and taking out expensive short-term loans to make it through the disastrous 2018-19 shutdown. It can be difficult to build up a rainy-day fund when their budgets are stretched to cover rising costs.”
A spokesman for the American Federation of Government Employees, which represents approximately 750,000 federal employees, including in the nation’s veterans hospitals, told CBS News the government union is urging Congress to not only avert a shutdown, but to do so without “additional cuts or the imposition of a fiscal commission that will attack Social Security and other programs important to working people.”
The union has even posted printable protest posters on its website, including signs reading, “Congress: Do your job, stop the shutdown.”
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Washington — Congressional leaders announced Sunday they have reached an agreement on the overall spending level for the remainder of 2024 as they seek to avoid a government shutdown later this month.
In a letter to colleagues, House Speaker Mike Johnson said that the $1.59 trillion deal includes $886 billion for defense and $704 billion for non-defense spending.
The topline matches that of a bipartisan deal reached last year and includes changes to discretionary spending that was part of a side agreement between President Biden and then-House Speaker Kevin McCarthy. It cuts $6.1 billion in COVID-19 spending and makes modifications to IRS funding.
“The bipartisan topline appropriations agreement clears the way for Congress to act over the next few weeks in order to maintain important funding priorities for the American people and avoid a government shutdown,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, both New York Democrats, said in a statement Sunday.
So far, none of the annual appropriations bills that fund the government have made it through the Republican-controlled House and the Democratic-led Senate. Instead, Congress in recent months has relied on short-term funding extensions to keep the government operating.
Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images
It’s is now facing two fast-approaching deadlines to prevent another shutdown. Veterans programs, transportation, housing, agriculture and energy departments are funded through Jan. 19, while funding for eight other appropriations bills, including defense, expires Feb. 2.
“We must avoid a shutdown, but Congress now faces the challenge of having only 12 days to negotiate and write language, secure passage by both chambers, and get the first four appropriations bills signed into law,” Maine Sen. Susan Collins, the top Republican on the Senate Appropriations Committee, said in a statement about the deal.
Disagreements on the topline have impeded negotiations as House Republicans have insisted on spending levels far less than those established under a bipartisan budget deal reached last May.
Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, said the agreement “will not satisfy everyone” because it doesn’t “cut as much spending as many of us would like,” but he touted it as the “most favorable budget agreement Republicans have achieved in over a decade.”
Schumer and Jeffries said they have “made clear to Speaker Mike Johnson that Democrats will not support including poison pill policy changes in any of the twelve appropriations bills put before the Congress.”
Johnson and Schumer appeared hopeful in recent days that they could reach a deal soon.
“We have been working in earnest and in good faith with the Senate and the White House virtually every day through the holiday trying to come to an agreement,” Johnson said last week when asked about a potential shutdown.
Schumer said last week that he was hopeful there would be an agreement soon.
“We’ve made real good progress,” he said of budget negotiations. “I’m hopeful that we can get a budget agreement soon. And I’m hopeful that we could avoid a shutdown, given the progress we’ve made.”
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Kevin McCarthy has some company as he heads for the House exits.
Although they don’t agree on much these days, members of Congress are on the same page about one thing: It’s an especially miserable time to have their job, especially if you represent California.
With California’s Dec. 8 filing deadline to decide on running for reelection just days away, seven Golden State members of Congress have opted to leave — with four retiring outright rather than run for another office.
That list grew on Wednesday with the former speaker’s announcement that he would quit the House by the end of December.
The past year has been marked by an almost unprecedented level of chaos, dysfunction, and near misses on self-inflicted national economic catastrophes in the GOP-controlled House, all bookended by two separate speakership crises. McCarthy, who has been at the center of the House’s 2023 maelstrom, lost his grip on the gavel in October.
The disarray has led to a surge in retirements from both parties. Thirty-one House members are leaving, including 16 who aren’t running for other office. In November alone, 12 members announced their retirements — the most in any month for more than a decade, according to Ballotpedia.
For Californians, the day-to-day burdens of the job are heavier than they are for many of their colleagues. Californians always face some of the longest commutes of any member of Congress. Forty of the state’s 52 House members are Democrats, and being in the minority is a drag — especially during the current era of hyperpartisanship. On top of that, in the span of two years California’s delegation has gone from having two of its own at the helm of both parties in the House to having none, with former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-San Francisco) exit from leadership followed quickly by McCarthy’s ignominious demotion and decision to quit.
The real surprise isn’t how many California members are retiring — it’s how many are willing to stay after the past year of chaos.
“The travel sucks. It’s a long flight both ways. I get tired at random times of the day because of the time change,” Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Torrance) told The Times. On one recent flight, he was delayed six hours because the plane’s toilet wasn’t working — but he flies so much, he couldn’t remember when and where it happened.
Add to that a “Republican majority that’s doing a bunch of stupid stuff,” and the day-to-day in Congress “honestly feels more stupid” now than at any other point in Lieu’s decade in the House, he said.
And he’s a member of House Democratic leadership, serving as vice chairman.
It’s hard to overstate how maddening and demoralizing the last year in Congress has been for members of both parties.
McCarthy needed four days and 15 ballots to win the speakership in January. After months of struggling to get his conference to pass just about anything, he enraged his right-wing critics with a deal to temporarily avoid a government shutdown; they booted him weeks later. Since then, he has publicly lambasted the eight Republicans who voted to remove him; one of them accused him of elbowing him in the kidney, a claim McCarthy denied.
McCarthy announced his retirement in a Wall Street Journal op-ed in which he defended his decision to cross his right-wing critics on government funding deals — while hinting at Congress’ current dysfunction.
“We kept our government operating and our troops paid while wars broke out around the world,” he wrote. “No matter the odds, or personal cost, we did the right thing. That may seem out of fashion in Washington these days, but delivering results for the American people is still celebrated across the country.”
McCarthy’s allies are furious about how he was treated.
“Kevin did nothing wrong. He led us to victory. He led us to the majority. He led us well in the majority as our speaker. He’s done really great work. And he deserved to be our speaker,” Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Bonsall) told The Times last week, after indicating he expected McCarthy would retire. “A small gang, a gang of eight, took him out. And I hope that all eight of them recognize they made a mistake.”
Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.), one of McCarthy’s closest confidants and the man McCarthy made acting speaker when he was ousted from office, announced he would retire on Tuesday.
Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.), another close ally, said he could “certainly understand why” McCarthy wouldn’t want to stick around.
“He was shamefully mistreated. His removal was ridiculous,” he told The Times last week. “And I think those that voted that way and were responsible for it, particularly on our side, ought to think long and hard of the damage they inflicted to the institution and to our conference.”
Cole said he plans to run again himself. But when asked if he could think of another time in his two decades in Congress that has been less fun to serve, he didn’t pause.
“No!” he exclaimed with a wry laugh.
Three other House Republicans tried and failed to win the speakership after McCarthy’s ouster before an exhausted GOP conference was able to compromise on making little-known Rep. Mike Johnson (R-La.) speaker. He then cut a deal to punt a decision on a government shutdown past the new year — the exact same move that had sealed McCarthy’s fate.
But Johnson’s deal only runs through late January, when Congress will once again grapple with what was once an easy vote to keep the lights on and avoid a government shutdown. The past week, the House wasn’t voting on that issue — or high-stakes funding to help Ukraine ward off Russia’s invasion or supply more military aid to Israel. House Republicans instead moved toward an official impeachment vote of President Biden, before finally voting to kick out Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.) from the House after keeping him for the past year in spite of his many alleged felonies because they needed his vote in a closely divided chamber.
Rep. Julia Brownley (D-Westlake Village) said her belief that the U.S. is at “a critical point in the history of our country in terms of fighting for our democracy” motivates her to stay in Congress. But her train of thought was interrupted as Santos stormed off the House floor during his expulsion vote, followed by a pack of reporters who nearly trampled us in the narrow hallway—just the latest moment of dysfunctional chaos.
Once they cleared out, Brownley conceded that “it’s not a pleasant experience” to be a member of Congress right now.
“The last three months clearly weren’t a lot of fun here, with the chaos that we saw. And that might not change in the immediate future,” Rep. Ami Bera (D-Elk Grove) told The Times.
Later, as The Times interviewed Rep. Scott Peters (D-San Diego) on the topic, Bera interjected.
“I think you should do the story about why are members staying in Congress, as opposed to the opposite,” he said.
“I can’t walk away from the big money and the constant praise,” Peters, one of Congress’ wealthier members, remarked sardonically. He, like many members, went on to say he was sticking around not because the job was pleasant but because it was important. “People have died for democracy. I can put up with some long plane rides and average parties to try to help the country,” he said.
Rep. Grace F. Napolitano (D-Norwalk), who is retiring at age 84 after serving in the House for a quarter-century, told The Times that the current period was the least pleasant she’d experienced in Congress. She said when she first arrived she was able to work across the aisle on issues important for California with members like former Rep. David Dreier (R-Claremont) — but that has disappeared over the years.
“This trouble between both parties has got to stop. It’s not good for our country,” she said. She’ll miss “the infighting, the inability to work with people on issues that are really critical” the least.
Three of the seven Californians leaving the House are gunning for promotions rather than escape from Congress: Reps. Adam B. Schiff (D-Burbank), Katie Porter (D-Irvine) and Barbara Lee (D-Oakland) are all running for the Senate. But that doesn’t mean they’re loving their daily work right now.
“Things have become so much more personal and bitter, and we’ve seen the elevation of these kind of vile performance artists,” Schiff, whom Republicans removed from his committees in a retaliatory vote earlier this year, told The Times. “I think it contributes to some of the departures. One thing that attracts me about the Senate is the opportunity to get more things done.”
Add two transcontinental flights a week to a job where it’s tough to get much done, and you have a recipe for unhappiness.
“I don’t think I’ll miss the weekly commute. I won’t miss sitting in the middle seat economy in the back of the plane, and all the have-dos that come with this job,” said Rep. Anna G. Eshoo (D-Menlo Park), who is retiring at age 80.
Rep. Tony Cárdenas is also retiring. His decision was the only one that surprised his colleagues — he’s only 60.
He’s burnt out on the lifestyle. Cárdenas’ normal week begins with a 5 a.m Monday wakeup so he can say goodbye to his wife and make it to LAX by 6 a.m. — the commute is 35 minutes before 6, and close to an hour after. He arrives in D.C. late Monday afternoon, works all day for four days, then tries to get home for a bit of the weekend. “Going back and forth puts a strain on relationships with our loved ones,” he said.
The travel takes a physical toll too. Cárdenas told The Times that he’d never had any back problems in his life. But after a few years in Congress and more than 30 transcontinental flights a year, he developed severe pain. When his wife touched his back to check, it made him scream. He’d developed sciatica from all the time crammed into airplane seats (acupuncture and working on his posture have helped).
Eshoo told The Times that she hadn’t decided to leave Congress because of how miserable it’s become — ”I don’t run away from anything” — but that she felt it was time to go.
Eshoo has been friends with Pelosi, the former speaker, for a half-century, dating back to the 1970s, and said it was a “tough conversation” to tell her she was retiring, especially since Pelosi lobbied her to stay for another term.
Multiple members said they were surprised that the 83-year-old Pelosi would outlast McCarthy, 58, in Congress. With Pelosi and McCarthy both out of leadership, Rep. Pete Aguilar (D-Redlands), the third-ranking House Democrat, is now the most senior Californian in House leadership of either party.
Californians who’ve left Congress say they don’t miss it at all.
Multiple former members have opted to return home and run for local office. Former Democratic Reps. Janice Hahn and Hilda Solis are serving on the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors.
“I am 100% happy that I came home,” Hahn told The Times. “What has transpired in Congress recently only reaffirms that decision. It seems chaotic. It seems ineffective. And I think it causes the American public to be very disappointed in their policymakers in Congress.”
Los Angeles County is the most populous in the U.S. It has more than 10 million people — a population that’s larger than those of 40 U.S. states — and serving as one of the five supervisors is in many ways a more powerful position than being one of 435 members in an ineffective House.
Hahn spent three terms in the minority before retiring in 2016, having found “the partisan, polarizing atmosphere of Congress to be really almost debilitating at some times.” She said she was proud of creating a bipartisan caucus to support port cities. But her legislative achievements — like most minority members’ — were scant. “I mean, I named a post office,” she said.
Former Rep. Paul Cook, a Republican, is now a San Bernardino County supervisor. Democratic Rep. Gloria Negrete McLeod left Congress to run unsuccessfully for the same role. Democrat Jackie Speier, who retired from Congress after the last term, is now running for the San Mateo board of supervisors — a job she held early in her career.
Speier said she retired because she’d promised her husband she’d come home, and initially “almost resented” the decision. But now?
“As time wore on, I realized, oh my gosh, we live and work in this bubble, and don’t realize how insane it is. When you’re when you step back from it, you know, it’s like you’re a hamster on a treadmill. And you just keep doing it with no real positive results,” she said. “The institution is so dysfunctional now that it really frightens me.”
[ad_2]
Cameron Joseph
Source link

[ad_1]
President Biden has signed the bipartisan short-term funding bill that will keep the government open and operating until early 2024 ahead of a Friday night deadline.
The president signed the bill while in San Francisco for the Asian-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit, where he has met with Chinese President Xi Jinping and other Asian world leaders. He signed the bill at the Legion of Honor Museum, where he was hosting a dinner for APEC members, The Associated Press said.
A U.S. official said the bill was flown to California for the president’s signature.
The bill, known as a continuing resolution, extends funding for the Departments of Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, Energy and Veterans Affairs until Jan. 19, while other government entities are funded through Feb. 2.
The House and Senate passed the short-term fix earlier this week, with House Republicans unable to reach internal agreement on longer-term, individual appropriations bills. The bill passed the Senate in an 87-11 vote, with only one Democratic senator — Sen. Michael Bennet of Colorado — voting against the measure. It passed the House 336 to 95, with more Democrats supporting the bill than Republicans.
The House passed a stop-gap measure similar to the one Rep. Matt Gaetz and other hardline Republicans toppled former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy for backing. But House Speaker Mike Johnson isn’t facing similar public threats from the right flank of his party.
The measure clears the holiday calendar for Congress, which is often fighting over government funding in the days leading up to Christmas and Hanukkah, but potentially tees up an election-year funding battle, if Congress can’t come to an agreement over long-term funding in December.
— Caitlin Yilek contributed to this report
Thanks for reading CBS NEWS.
Create your free account or log in
for more features.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Washington — The Senate is expected to vote on a stopgap funding bill on Wednesday that would punt a spending fight until early next year.
The House passed the bill, known as a continuing resolution, Tuesday night, sending it to the Senate ahead of a Friday deadline. Without a funding extension, the government is set to shutdown Saturday.
House Speaker Mike Johnson unveiled the measure less than a week before funding from a short-term bill passed in September was set to expire.
But dissent from within his own party over its lack of spending cuts or funding for border security required Johnson to rely on Democratic votes to get it over the finish line.
The two-step bill extends appropriations dealing with veterans programs, transportation, housing, agriculture and energy until Jan. 19. Funding for eight other appropriations bills, including defense, would be extended until Feb. 2.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries originally called the two-step plan a nonstarter, but later said Democrats would support it given its exclusion of spending cuts and “extreme right-wing policy riders.” All but two Democrats voted to pass the measure, while dozens of Republicans opposed it.
In the Senate, Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said he hoped there would be a strong bipartisan vote for the House bill.
“Neither [Senate Minority Leader Mitch] McConnell nor I want a shutdown,” Schumer said Tuesday.
President Biden is expected to sign the bill if it passes the Senate.
Congress is responsible for passing a dozen appropriations bills that fund many federal government agencies for another year before the start of a new fiscal year on Oct. 1. The funding bills are often grouped together into a large piece of legislation, referred to as an “omnibus” bill.
The House has passed seven bills, while the Senate has passed three that were grouped together in a “minibus.” None have been passed by both chambers.
In September, Congress reached a last-minute deal to fund the government through Nov. 17 just hours before it was set to shutdown.
Hard-right members upset by the short-term extension that did not include spending cuts and who wanted the House to pass the appropriations bills individually moved to oust House Speaker Kevin McCarthy as their leader.
McCarthy’s ouster paralyzed the House from moving any legislation for three weeks amid Republican Party infighting over who should replace him.
By the time Johnson took the gavel, he had little time to corral his members around a plan to keep the government open, and ended up in the same situation as McCarthy — needing Democratic votes to pass a bill that did not include spending cuts demanded by conservatives.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Washington — The House on Tuesday passed a two-step plan from Speaker Mike Johnson to fund federal agencies into the new year, sending the legislation to the Senate days before the approaching deadline to avert a government shutdown.
The short-term measure cleared the House in a 336 to 95 vote. Known as a continuing resolution, it received substantial support from House Democrats, who helped ensure its passage over the objections of some conservative Republicans. The bill is the first major piece of legislation the House has approved since Johnson became speaker.
The plan, which Johnson unveiled Saturday, extends federal funding at current levels for one group of agencies and programs through Jan. 19, and a second batch through Feb. 2. Johnson argued the extension will allow lawmakers to avoid a massive end-of-year spending bill while negotiations over spending levels continue.
The resolution’s passage in the House all but eliminates the threat of a shutdown on Saturday, when most government funding expires. The Senate is expected to quickly approve the bill, which would allow President Biden to sign it into law before the deadline.
The House suspended its rules to pass the plan, raising the threshold for passage to two-thirds of the House. That meant Johnson, who was elected to lead the House just three weeks ago, had to rely on votes from dozens of Democratic lawmakers. Uncertainty about the bill’s fate was cleared up just before the vote on its passage, when Democratic leaders said in a joint statement they support it.
“We have consistently made clear that a government shutdown would hurt the economy, our national security and everyday Americans during a very fragile time and must be avoided,” they said. “To that end, House Democrats have repeatedly articulated that any continuing resolution must be set at the fiscal year 2023 spending level, be devoid of harmful cuts and free of extreme right-wing policy riders. The continuing resolution before the House today meets that criteria and we will support it.”
On Tuesday morning, the House Freedom Caucus, a group of far-right Republican lawmakers, announced its opposition to the stopgap measure because it failed to include spending cuts or provisions to strengthen border security.
“Republicans must stop negotiating against ourselves over fears of what the Senate may do with the promise ‘roll over today and we’ll fight tomorrow,’” the group said in a statement.
But the lack of additional policy changes, especially those favored by conservative lawmakers, helped to secure greater support from House Democrats, who said they want to avoid a government shutdown and favored a “clean” continuing resolution.
“From the very beginning of this Congress, Democrats have made clear that we are going to find common ground with our Republican colleagues on any issue in good faith whenever and wherever possible, but that we will also push back against their extremism whenever necessary,” Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries told reporters Tuesday. “That’s been the framework approach that we’ve taken from the beginning. That’ll be the lens through which we evaluate the continuing resolution today.”
Jeffries said Democrats were concerned about the bifurcated deadlines in Johnson’s plan, but said it’s “extremely important” to avoid a funding lapse.
White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said Monday that Johnson’s two-step plan is “untested,” but added that the White House’s goal is to “take the best path forward for the American people.” Mr. Biden separately has declined to say whether he would veto the short-term measure if it were sent to his desk, but he would have no incentive to shut down the government rather than extend current funding levels.
In the Senate, Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said he is “heartened” that Johnson’s proposal doesn’t include funding cuts, and pledged he and McConnell would work to determine the best way to “get this done quickly” if the funding package passed the House.
“Neither McConnell nor I want a shutdown,” Schumer said in a news conference.
The funding proposal posed a test for Johnson, who did not hold any positions in GOP leadership before he claimed the gavel last month. His ascension to the speakership capped a chaotic October for House Republicans, which began with former Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s historic removal from the post as a result of a deal he made with Democrats in late September to keep agencies funded for 45 days — through Nov. 17.
All House Democrats backed McCarthy’s stopgap measure. While his agreement avoided a lapse in government funding, it triggered a backlash from far-right Republicans that ultimately cost him the gavel. The House was left without a speaker for three weeks and found itself effectively paralyzed.
Though Johnson is following a similar path as McCarthy in pursuing a funding bill that maintains spending levels and does not include conservative priorities, there appears to be less of an appetite among conservative lawmakers to take action against the speaker.
The Freedom Caucus said in its statement announcing opposition to the two-step continuing resolution that it remains “committed” to working with Johnson, but called for “bold change.”
Johnson, meanwhile, has defended his approach and said his so-called “laddered” continuing resolution will avoid Congress being forced to accept a massive omnibus spending package right before the holidays.
“That is a gift to the American people, because that is no way to legislate. It is not good stewardship. It’s the reason we’re in so much debt,” he said.
Johnson said the Jan. 19 and Feb. 2 deadlines will allow lawmakers to work through the appropriations process “in good faith.”
“What we need to do is avoid the government shutdown,” he said. “Why? Because that would unduly harm the American people. Troops wouldn’t be paid. We know all the effects of that, and so we have to avoid that and we have a responsibility to do it.”
Left out of Johnson’s funding proposal is emergency assistance for Israel and Ukraine, which President Biden had requested Congress provide after the Oct. 7 attack on Israel by Hamas. It’s unclear when Congress could act to approve the additional funding, but the speaker said approving the short-term funding measure will allow Republicans to pursue discussions on necessary oversight for Ukraine aid and provide assistance to Israel.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Washington — House Speaker Mike Johnson’s plan to keep the government open past Friday faces several hurdles this week as time runs out to avert a shutdown.
Johnson unveiled his stopgap bill on Saturday that would extend government funding at current levels for some agencies until Jan. 19, while others would be funded until Feb. 2. It does not include steep spending cuts demanded by conservatives, but it also does not provide funding for Ukraine, Israel and the southern border.
“The bill will stop the absurd holiday-season omnibus tradition of massive, loaded up spending bills introduced right before the Christmas recess,” the Louisiana Republican said in a statement of the two-step plan.
The House Rules Committee is meeting Monday afternoon to take up the bill. Rep. Chip Roy of Texas, a member of the committee, was one of the first Republicans to come out against Johnson’s plan.
“I can swallow temporary extension if we are getting actual ‘wins’ on … well … ANYTHING. But not just a punt,” he wrote ahead of the committee’s meeting.
Even if the bill makes it out of committee, it could still fail on the House floor. Johnson can afford to lose only four Republican votes before he needs to rely on Democrats to help pass the bill.
In addition to Roy, Republican Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, Warren Davidson of Ohio, George Santos of New York, Bob Good of Virginia and Scott Perry of Pennsylvania have said they oppose the measure. So, if they all follow through in voting against the bill, Johnson will need Democratic support to pass it.
Before the start of a new fiscal year on Oct. 1, Congress is responsible for passing a dozen appropriations bills that fund many federal government agencies for another year. The bills are often grouped together into a large piece of legislation, referred to as an “omnibus” bill.
The House has passed seven bills, while the Senate has passed three that were grouped together in a “minibus.” None have made it through both chambers.
Congress passed a last-minute deal in September to keep the federal government open through mid-November just hours before a shutdown was set to take effect.
The bipartisan deal angered hard-right members who were opposed to any short-term extension that funded the government at current levels, and wanted the House to instead take up individual spending bills. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s detractors then ousted him from the role, which paralyzed the lower chamber from moving any legislation for three weeks as Republicans failed to come to a consensus over who should replace him.
Weeks later, Johnson is in the same predicament.
Roy told reporters Monday that he was “not going to go down that road” when asked whether Johnson could face a no-confidence vote if the House passes the bill.
Johnson acknowledged earlier this month that there was “a growing recognition” that another stopgap spending bill, known as a continuing resolution, is needed to avert a government shutdown, adding that Republicans were considering a new approach to temporarily funding the government.
He referred to the approach as a “laddered” continuing resolution that would set different lengths of funding for individual appropriations bills. The bill he rolled out Saturday extends appropriations dealing with veterans programs, transportation, housing, agriculture and energy until Jan. 19. Funding for eight other appropriations bills, including defense, would be extended until Feb. 2.
Last week, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York called the “laddered” approach a “nonstarter.” But the bill’s exclusion of spending cuts and amendments could make it more appealing to Democrats. Jeffries has said such a bill “is the only way forward.”
A White House statement on Saturday condemning the bill as an “unserious proposal” stopped short of a veto threat. President Biden signaled Monday that he could be open to signing it if it passes Congress.
“I’m not going to make a judgment on what I’d veto and what I’d sign, let’s wait and see what they come up with,” Mr. Biden told reporters.
Senate Democrats have mostly held back from criticizing it. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer on Monday called the bill “far from perfect,” but said the “most important thing” is that it excludes steep cuts and defense spending is included in the February extension.
The Senate was set to hold a procedural vote Monday night on a legislative vehicle for its short-term funding extension, but delayed the vote.
Jack Turman contributed reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]