ReportWire

Tag: Government and politics

  • House China committee demands Elon Musk open SpaceX Starshield internet to U.S. troops in Taiwan

    House China committee demands Elon Musk open SpaceX Starshield internet to U.S. troops in Taiwan

    [ad_1]

    Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla and X, speaks at the Atreju political convention organized by Fratelli d’Italia (Brothers of Italy), in Rome, Dec. 15, 2023.

    Antonio Masiello | Getty Images

    The House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party sent a letter on Saturday to Elon Musk demanding that U.S. troops stationed in Taiwan get access to SpaceX’s Starshield, a satellite communication network designed specifically for the military.

    The letter, obtained by CNBC and first reported by Forbes, claimed that by not making Starshield available to U.S. military forces in Taiwan, SpaceX could violate its Pentagon contract, which requires “global access” to Starshield technology.

    “I understand, however, that SpaceX is possibly withholding broadband internet services in and around Taiwan — possibly in breach of SpaceX’s contractual obligations with the U.S. government,” read the letter, which was signed by Rep. Mike Gallagher, R-Wi., who chairs the House CCP committee.

    The Pentagon awarded SpaceX a one-year contract for Starshield in September, after commissioning SpaceX’s Starlink network months earlier for Ukraine’s war against Russia, which hit the two-year mark on Saturday.

    The letter comes after Gallagher led a visit to Taiwan where he and a delegation of other lawmakers met with Taiwan officials like President Tsai Ing-wen and President-Elect Lai Ching-te.

    The letter said that the lawmakers learned that U.S. troops stationed in Taiwan were not able to use Starshield despite the Pentagon’s stipulation of global access: “Multiple sources have disclosed to the Committee that Starshield is inactive in and around Taiwan.”

    The letter requests that Musk provide the House committee with a briefing on its Taiwan operations by March 8.

    Taiwan has been governing itself independently of China since the island split from the mainland during the 1949 civil war. China has said it still lays claim to Taiwan and has repeatedly made clear its intention to reunify the sovereign island with the mainland.

    “In the event of CCP military aggression against Taiwan, American servicemembers in the Western Pacific would be put at severe risk,” read the letter. “Ensuring robust communication networks for U.S. military personnel on and around Taiwan is paramount for safeguarding U.S. interests in the Indo-Pacific region.”

    Tesla’s success hinges on favorable business relations with China, which has led Musk, its CEO, to cultivate cozy relations with the country, despite its broader tensions with the U.S. Tesla operates its own factory in Shanghai while other foreign automakers in China had been required to establish joint ventures.

    Musk came under fire from Taiwanese officials last September for seemingly siding with China’s reunification doctrine toward Taiwan, stating that the self-governing island was an essential part of China.

    “I think I’ve got a pretty good understanding as an outsider of China,” Musk said on the All-In Podcast. “From their standpoint, maybe it is analogous to Hawaii or something like that, like an integral part of China that is arbitrarily not part of China.”

    “Listen up, #Taiwan is not part of the #PRC & certainly not for sale,” Taiwan’s Minister of Foreign Affairs Jaushieh Joseph Wu wrote on X in response to Musk’s comment.

    SpaceX and Musk did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the letter.

    This story is developing. Please check back for updates.

    Read the full letter here:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • South Carolina GOP voters choose between presidential candidates Nikki Haley and Donald Trump, with immigration and the economy top of mind

    South Carolina GOP voters choose between presidential candidates Nikki Haley and Donald Trump, with immigration and the economy top of mind

    [ad_1]

    South Carolina voters on Saturday are casting their ballots, deciding between former President Donald Trump or their former governor, Nikki Haley.

    Polls close at 7 p.m. ET after which votes will be counted and the winner announced. Haley intends to speak once the winner is declared. Trump is holding a watch party in South Carolina where he is also likely to speak.

    South Carolina holds an open primary, meaning that voters of any party can vote in the Republican primary as long as they have not already voted in the Democratic primary, which President Joe Biden won on Feb. 3.

    As South Carolinians head to the polls, Trump has a roughly 30-point lead against Haley, according to a February survey from USA Today and Suffolk University, disintegrating any hopes of her home-court advantage.

    Would Haley’s loss end the primary?

    Haley vowed on Tuesday to stay in the race until at least Super Tuesday on March 5, no matter the results in South Carolina. Her campaign confirmed that she does have the funding to keep her afloat after a record fundraising month in January.

    “We have the resources to go the distance,” a spokesperson for Haley’s campaign told CNBC on Tuesday.

    Republican candidates need 1,215 delegates to secure the nomination. Trump currently has 63 to Haley’s 17. As long as Haley does not drop out, the Republican primary will continue to be a two-person race, much to Trump’s dismay.

    But even with her financing and resolve, Haley’s campaign faces a steep path forward.

    Haley’s campaign has been tempering expectations over the past week, arguing that she does not need to win South Carolina to garner momentum for future primaries. The former U.N. ambassador has yet to win a race this primary season, though she managed to pull out a slimmer loss against Trump in New Hampshire due to the state’s wide population of undeclared voters.

    South Carolina is much less undecided. Along with holding a polling lead, Trump has the endorsements of local South Carolina GOP chapters, South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster, South Carolina Rep. Nancy Mace and other lawmakers in the state. Trump also has a healthy track record in the Palmetto State, having won the GOP primary in 2016 and taking 55% of the votes in 2020 against Joe Biden.

    Where are the candidates on South Carolina’s top issues?

    South Carolinians have immigration and the economy top of mind as they cast their ballots, mirroring sentiments nationwide. According to the February USA Today/Suffolk University poll, 42% of likely South Carolina GOP voters view immigration as the most important issue, while 26% prioritize the economy.

    Trump has made immigration a central pillar of his campaign so far, pledging to revive his immigration bans and execute militarized mass deportations that he intends to make far more aggressive than his first term in the White House.

    Despite his hardline approach to border security, Trump simultaneously worked behind the scenes to tank a bipartisan congressional border deal that would have provided $20 billion of border funding.

    Trump reportedly told Republican lawmakers to torpedo the bill so that he could continue lambasting Biden and Haley for their immigration stances on the campaign trail.

    Haley criticized Trump for derailing the bill: “Donald Trump, the last thing he needs to do is tell them to wait to pass the border deal until the election.”

    Haley herself has a hardline immigration record, despite the Trump campaign’s attempts to paint her as weak on the issue. She said she would defund sanctuary cities, close the border and deport unauthorized immigrants.

    Under the Biden administration, South Carolina’s economy has improved.

    Unemployment in the state is at 3%, down from 3.3% a year ago and under the national average of 3.7%. The state also was a major beneficiary of Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), which poured investment into electric vehicles that has created more than 12,000 jobs so far. Inflation in the state is slowly cooling at 4.3% compared to the national rate of 3.1%.

    However, both Trump and Haley have repeatedly slammed Biden’s economy. Their economic agendas both tend to include similar rhetoric of cracking down on trade with China and cutting taxes.

    Haley’s economic platform, dubbed the Freedom Plan, is centered around tax breaks for the middle class, boosting small businesses and eliminating Biden’s $500 billion investment in clean energy projects, which South Carolina has benefited from.

    Trump would also roll back Biden’s IRA, reinstate his first-term tax cuts, which for the most part benefited the wealthy, and impose major tax increases on foreign goods, specifically to restrict trade with China. During his first term, Trump’s China tariffs nearly started a trade war, which disrupted the global economy and drove prices higher for consumers.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump will quit NATO, Hillary Clinton says, as anxiety mounts over U.S. commitment to the alliance

    Trump will quit NATO, Hillary Clinton says, as anxiety mounts over U.S. commitment to the alliance

    [ad_1]

    Former U.S. President and current GOP Presidential candidate Donald Trump addresses the press at Mar-a-Lago on February 16, 2024, in West Palm Beach, Florida.

    Joe Raedle | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    MUNICH, Germany — NATO members on Saturday weighed the U.S.’ possible withdrawal from the military alliance if Donald Trump returns to the White House, with Hillary Clinton saying he would waste no time in quitting if re-elected.

    Clinton urged delegates at the Munich Security Conference to take her one-time presidential rival’s tough talk “literally and seriously” as anxiety mounts over the future of the U.S.-led pact.

    “He will pull us out of NATO,” Clinton told attendees during a lunchtime session.

    Trump stoked fresh concerns over the U.S.’ commitment to NATO last weekend when he said he would “encourage” Russia to attack any member that doesn’t meet its spending targets. He has long criticized the alliance’s failure to ensure members make good on their obligation to contribute 2% of gross domestic product to defense.

    Amid such rhetoric, the U.S. Congress passed a bill in December aimed at preventing any U.S. president from unilaterally withdrawing from the alliance without congressional approval.

    U.S. Republican Senator Jim Risch, ranking member of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, on Saturday dismissed talk of the U.S. quitting NATO, saying: “We have answered that question.”

    “It would take a two-thirds vote in the United States Senate to get out — that is never going to happen,” he told CNBC in Munich.

    Clinton said, however, that Trump could actually just refuse to fund the alliance. “The U.S. will be there in name only,” she said.

    Trump versus NATO

    Concerns over the U.S. and Europe’s continued military coordination have dominated discussions at this year’s annual defense summit in Germany, as the specter of a second Trump presidency looms large and a contentious aid package for Ukraine hangs in the balance in the U.S. House of Representatives.

    Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte earlier Saturday referenced constant “moaning and whining” at the event about the future of NATO under Trump.

    “Stop moaning and whining and nagging about Trump,” he said.

    He was one of many European voices, including that of German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, who said that Europe needed to become self-sufficient in the face of a more uncertain future with its closest diplomatic ally.

    NATO head says the U.S. won't withdraw from alliance: It makes them 'stronger'

    “No matter what happens in the U.S. … we have to be able to protect ourselves,” Frederiksen said.

    Indeed, Germany’s defense minister said that his country’s commitment to spend 2% of GDP on defense should be just the start, noting that the threshold could rise to 3.5% if necessary.

    NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg struck a more sanguine tone on transatlantic coordination, however, saying that believes the U.S. will remain “a staunch and committed NATO ally” whatever happens in the upcoming election.

    “I expect that regardless of the outcome of the U.S. elections in November, the U.S. will remain a staunch and committed NATO ally,” he told CNBC’s Silvia Amaro.

    “It is in the security interests of the United States to have a strong NATO,” he added.

    Stoltenberg acknowledged Trump’s frustration with member spending, but said “that is now changing.” On Wednesday, NATO announced that 18 of the alliance’s 31 members will meet the 2% spending target this year.

    NATO member countries first committed to minimum spending targets in 2006, but by 2014 only three had met the threshold.

    The alliance will mark its 75th anniversary this year at an annual summit to be held in Washington in July.

    Senator Risch said he would like to see all members committing to meeting their target by that point.

    “Talk about it happening years in the future isn’t now, and we’re always interested in now,” he said. “That’s helpful to the relationship: everybody keeping the commitments that they made.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump ordered to pay $454 million in fines and interest in NY business fraud case

    Trump ordered to pay $454 million in fines and interest in NY business fraud case

    [ad_1]

    Former U.S. President Donald Trump walks outside the courtroom on the day of a court hearing on charges of falsifying business records to cover up a hush money payment to a porn star before the 2016 election, in New York State Supreme Court in the Manhattan borough of New York City, U.S., February 15, 2024.

    Andrew Kelly | Reuters

    A New York judge on Friday ordered Donald Trump to pay about $454 million in total penalties as part of his ruling in the former president’s civil business fraud trial.

    The staggering figure includes about $355 million in disgorgement, a term for returning ill-gotten gains, plus more than $98 million in prejudgment interest that will accrue every day until it is paid, according to a spokesperson for the attorney general’s office.

    Manhattan Supreme Court Judge Arthur Engoron also barred Trump from running a business in New York for three years.

    The former president also faces a three-year ban on applying for loans from financial institutions registered with the state.

    “New York means business in combating business fraud,” Engoron wrote in the 92-page ruling.

    The judge delivered the final decision from the trial, which was held without a jury.

    “We’ve employed tens of thousands of people in New York, and we pay taxes like few other people have ever paid in New York,” Trump said in remarks at his Mar-a-Lago resort after the ruling. “They don’t care about that. It’s a state that’s going bust because everybody’s leaving.”

    His attorney Chris Kise said in a statement earlier Friday that Trump “will of course appeal.”

    The former president “remains confident the Appellate Division will ultimately correct the innumerable and catastrophic errors made by a trial court untethered to the law or to reality,” Kise said.

    The appeals process could take several years to resolve.

    The explosive trial stemmed from New York Attorney General Letitia James’ lawsuit accusing Trump, his two adult sons, his company and top executives of fraudulently inflating Trump’s assets to boost his stated net worth and obtain various financial perks.

    New York Attorney General Letitia James speaks during a press conference following a ruling against former U.S. President Donald Trump ordering him to pay $354.9 million and barring him from doing business in New York State for three years, in the Manhattan borough of New York City, U.S., February 16, 2024. 

    David Dee Delgado | Reuters

    “There simply cannot be different rules for different people,” James said in a statement celebrating the ruling Friday afternoon.

    “Everyday Americans cannot lie to a bank to get a mortgage to buy a home, and if they did, our government would throw the book at them,” James said.

    James had asked Engoron to ban Trump for life from New York’s real estate industry, and for $370 million in disgorgement.

    Instead, Engoron fined Trump $354,868,768 in disgorgement. He also ordered Trump to pay a total of $98.6 million in prejudgment interest, which will accrue at an annual rate of 9%.

    The grand total, including disgorgement and interest, for all defendants in the case: just under $464 million.

    Of that sum, Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr., who took over the Trump Organization after their father became president in 2017, have been ordered to pay more than $4 million each.

    Eric and Donald Jr. also face two-year bans from serving as officers or directors of any New York corporation or legal entity.

    Donald Trump Jr. and his brother Eric Trump arrive at New York Supreme Court for former President Donald Trump’s civil fraud trial on November 02, 2023 in New York City. 

    David Dee Delgado | Getty Images

    Co-defendants Allen Weisselberg, the Trump Organization’s former chief financial officer, and the company’s comptroller, Jeffrey McConney, are permanently banned from controlling the finances of a New York business, Engoron ruled.

    But the judge vacated his own prior directive to cancel the defendants’ business certificates, meaning he is no longer pursuing what some legal experts described as a “corporate death penalty” for the Trump Organization.

    The decision is only the latest court-ordered punishment imposed on Trump, who is running for president while dealing with numerous criminal and civil lawsuits. Last month, a jury in a separate civil case in New York federal court ordered Trump to pay $83.3 million for defaming writer E. Jean Carroll when he responded to her claim that he had raped her in the mid-1990s.

    Trump is the clear front-runner for the Republican presidential nomination, setting up a likely rematch with President Joe Biden, who beat him in 2020.

    Lawyers for Trump and the other defendants quickly blasted Friday’s ruling, accusing the judge and the prosecutor of political bias and warning that the outcome will drive business away from New York.

    “Countless hours of testimony proved that there was no wrongdoing, no crime, and no victim,” Trump attorney Alina Habba said in a statement.

    But Engoron wrote in his ruling that the statute used in the case does not require that a victim lose money.

    “It is undisputed that defendants have made all required payments on time; the next group of lenders to receive bogus statements might not be so lucky,” he wrote.

    “Defendants submitted blatantly false financial data” as they sought to borrow more money at better loan rates, “resulting in fraudulent financial statements,” Engoron wrote.

    He also pointed to the Trump team’s legal defenses, saying they proved the company and its officers would keep operating the same way they always had unless he forced them to change.

    “When confronted at trial with the statements, defendants’ fact and expert witnesses simply denied reality,” the judge wrote.

    Their “refusal to admit error” led the judge to conclude “that they will engage in it going forward unless judicially restrained.”

    “Indeed, Donald Trump testified that, even today, he does not believe the Trump Organization needed to make any changes based on the facts that came out during this trial,” Engoron wrote.

    “Their complete lack of contrition and remorse borders on pathological.”

    Read more on this Trump fraud trial

    Trump has frequently raged against his many legal battles as “witch hunts,” claiming they are part of a Biden administration-backed conspiracy to tank his political ambitions.

    He vociferously denied all wrongdoing in the New York fraud case, blaring his claims of total innocence on social media, at the courthouse and even on the witness stand.

    Trump claimed to be worth far more than what was reported on his financial statements, while asserting that a disclaimer on the records protected him from liability for any inaccuracies.

    But Trump and the other defendants were found liable for fraud by Engoron before the trial even began.

    In a bombshell pretrial ruling, Engoron granted summary judgment on James’ main cause of action — that the defendants committed fraud in violation of New York law.

    Justice Arthur Engoron speaks during the trial of former U.S. President Donald Trump, his adult sons, the Trump Organization and others in a civil fraud case brought by state Attorney General Letitia James, at a Manhattan courthouse, in New York City, U.S., October 3, 2023. 

    Shannon Stapleton | Reuters

    Engoron found that Trump’s statements of financial condition between 2014 and 2021 overvalued his assets between $812 million and $2.2 billion.

    The ruling razed Trump’s defense claims, accusing him and his co-defendants of trying to convince the court to “not believe its own eyes.”

    The trial was conducted to determine the amount to be paid in penalties and resolve other claims of wrongdoing from James’ lawsuit.

    The trial also doubled as a soapbox for Trump to air his grievances about his perceived political foes, including those sitting feet away from him in court.

    On the witness stand, Trump railed against Engoron and James while defending the values that were reported on his statements of financial condition. Trump also tore into another key witness, his former fixer and personal lawyer Michael Cohen, who testified that Trump had directed him to falsely manipulate his net worth.

    Trump’s venting brought consequences. On the second day of the trial, Engoron imposed a narrow gag order after Trump repeatedly targeted the judge’s principal law clerk, Allison Greenfield, who sat in court.

    Trump violated the gag order twice within four weeks, catching fines totaling $15,000.

    Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump’s pro-Anheuser-Busch post came after UFC boss Dana White urged him to back company, source says

    Trump’s pro-Anheuser-Busch post came after UFC boss Dana White urged him to back company, source says

    [ad_1]

    Republican presidential candidate and former U.S. President Donald Trump attends a Nevada caucus night party at Treasure Island Resort & Casino in Las Vegas, Nevada, U.S. February 8, 2024. 

    David Swanson | Reuters

    Former President Donald Trump wrote a social media post earlier in the week asking his supporters to give Anheuser-Busch a “second chance” after UFC president Dana White personally asked him to back the beer company, a source told CNBC.

    Anheuser-Busch last year suffered a major backlash over its Bud Light marketing promotion with a transgender influencer, Dylan Mulvaney.

    White, whose UFC is the leading mixed martial arts promotion, reached out directly to Trump to encourage positive commentary about Anheuser-Busch, according to the source, who was familiar with the situation.

    In his Truth Social post on Tuesday, Trump appeared to be well-informed about detailed aspects of the beer company’s operations.

    He noted that the company spends $700 million a year “with our GREAT Farmers,” employs 65,000 Americans and has provided scholarships to families of fallen members of the military. Trump wrote, “Anheuser-Busch is a GREAT American brand that perhaps deserves a Second Chance?”

    UFC, which is owned by TKO Group Holdings, in October announced a partnership with Anheuser-Busch to make Bud Light the official beer partner of the mixed martial arts company, in a deal that was reported at the time to be worth $100 million.

    In a press release announcing the deal, White said, “There are many reasons why I chose to go with Anheuser-Busch and Bud Light, most importantly because I feel we are very aligned when it comes to our core values and what the UFC brand stands for.”

    A spokesman for UFC declined to comment on White’s conversation with Trump. A spokesperson for Anheuser-Busch did not respond to a request for comment.

    In his social media post on Tuesday, Trump threatened to release a list of companies – other than Anheuser-Busch – that he considers to be “woke.”

    “Am building a list, and might just release it for the World to see,” Trump wrote. His followers, Trump suggested, should be “going after those companies that are looking to DESTROY AMERICA!”

    “Those comments came after Trump in a social media post on Sunday was much more critical of the company, saying: “the Bud Light ad will go down as the WORST AD in history.”

    “In a matter of minutes 30 billion dollars worth of market cap simply disappeared from the face of the earth. Will they ever get it back? Who knows, but what a mess!” Trump wrote.

    Trump, who is the front-runner for the Republican presidential nomination, attended UFC’s Dec. 16 event in Las Vegas, where he walked out into the audience with White and the musical artist Kid Rock.

    Trump had attended two other UFC events previously in 2023, and had been at other of the promotion’s events in prior years.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Biden wins Nevada Democratic primary, NBC News projects

    Biden wins Nevada Democratic primary, NBC News projects

    [ad_1]

    U.S. President Joe Biden holds a campaign rally ahead of the state’s Democratic presidential primary, in Las Vegas, Nevada, U.S. February 4, 2024.

    Kevin Lamarque | Reuters

    President Joe Biden has won Nevada’s Democratic primary, NBC News projects.

    The other Democrat on the ballot was self-help author and former 2020 Democratic candidate Marianne Williamson. Biden’s other competitor was a ballot option for “None of these candidates.”

    The president’s victory comes days after he won his first official primary in South Carolina on Saturday in a landslide, winning 96.2% of the votes against House Rep. Dean Phillips, D-Minn., and Williamson.

    Nevada will award its 36 Democratic delegates proportionally, based on the final vote count. Democratic candidates need 1,968 delegates to secure the nomination.

    Ahead of Tuesday’s in-person primary, 14,400 early votes had already been cast and over 127,700 mail-in ballots had been accepted for counting, according to Nevada’s Secretary of State. Of those, 62% were votes in the Democratic primary, and 38% were in the Republican primary.

    There, former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley is running Tuesday without an opponent. Former President Donald Trump is skipping Tuesday, and will participate in the state party’s caucus on Thursday instead.

    Nevada is the first 2024 primary contest in the West, and come November it will be a closely-watched swing state.

    Democrats have won Nevada in the past four presidential elections. But voters there elected a Republican, Joe Lombardo, as governor in 2022. Lombardo has already endorsed Republican Donald Trump for president.

    In the 2020 general election, Latino voters helped Biden to win Nevada by a razor-thin margin of just over 33,000 votes in a state with 1.8 million registered voters.

    That close-call has made Democrats even more focused on growing voter this year.

    Still, without a competitive opponent in the primary here, the actual significance of turnout numbers Tuesday will be difficult to interpret. That’s because significantly fewer voters go out to cast ballots in races that are not competitive, where one candidate holds an overwhelming advantage.

    Ahead of Tuesday’s in-person primary, 14,400 early votes had already been cast and over 127,700 mail-in ballots had been accepted for counting, according to Nevada’s Secretary of State.

    Next on Biden’s primary calendar is Michigan, another major swing state, where 117 Democratic delegates are up for grabs.

    This is breaking news. Check back for updates.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Russia’s war in Ukraine has had an unlikely consequence — it has revived the EU’s plans to get even bigger

    Russia’s war in Ukraine has had an unlikely consequence — it has revived the EU’s plans to get even bigger

    [ad_1]

    People hold a banner and Ukrainian flags during a rally to mark the one-year anniversary of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2023 in Belgrade, Serbia. As part of the Western Balkans block waiting for EU-membership, Serbia is caught in a geostrategic rivalry between its Western allies and Russia.

    Vladimir Zivojinovic | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    Davos, SWITZERLAND — Russia’s invasion of Ukraine gave fresh political momentum to the European Union and its plans for enlargement in the strategically important Western Balkans. But whether the neighboring region is ready — and willing — to finally make the steps needed to join the union remains unclear.

    The Western Balkans, comprised of Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, North Macedonia, Montenegro, Kosovo and Serbia, represent a notable gap in the map of EU membership in southeastern Europe.

    Though each has applied for — and been granted — candidate or potential candidate member status over the past two decades following the fall of the socialist federation of Yugoslavia in 1992, progress on accession has been generally slow.

    “I see the European Union more ready for the Balkans than the Balkans for the European Union,” Miroslav Lajčák, EU special representative for the Belgrade-Pristina dialogue and Western Balkans, told CNBC last month.

    Accession to the bloc is a rigorous and often lengthy process involving several phases of negotiations and reforms to ensure a candidate state meets the EU’s judicial, administrative and economic standards.

    Lajčák said that countries in the Western Balkans, in the past, had been hesitant to truly engage in such reforms because they “did not believe in a true European future” — or that they could realistically meet the requirements.

    But all that changed with the outbreak of war on Europe’s doorstep in February 2022.

    Ukraine and Moldova and Georgia brought a fresh energy and commitment – something that was almost lost in the Balkans.

    Miroslav Lajčák

    EU Special Representative for the Belgrade-Pristina Dialogue and Western Balkans

    Within days of Russia’s invasion, Ukraine, neighboring Moldova and, soon after, nearby Georgia applied for EU candidate status. By late 2023, the EU launched accession talks with Ukraine and Moldova, and granted candidate status to Georgia, adding momentum to the European project and signaling renewed hope for other would-be members.

    “Ukraine and Moldova and Georgia brought a fresh energy and commitment – something that was almost lost in the Balkans,” Lajčák said. “Now, it’s very clear that the European Union is serious.”

    Though Ukraine, Moldova, and Georgia are outside of the Western Balkans, constituting part of Europe’s former Eastern bloc, Lajčák said that progress should drive the region forward in accession talks. Negotiations are currently underway in every country except Kosovo, a potential candidate member, but Lajčák noted that that openness may not remain indefinitely.

    “The train is here and the train will leave the station. If they don’t board, they will miss a huge historic opportunity,” he said.

    An atmosphere of EU enlargement

    The EU’s accelerated enlargement comes as the bloc seeks to strengthen its assertiveness given Russia’s war in Ukraine and a fracturing of the U.S.-led world order. Lajčák said this has caused the atmosphere in Brussels to become “more political” than in the past.

    “Before, it was always said that enlargement means expanding the area where European values and rules apply. Now, it’s seen more geopolitically,” Lajčák said.

    “It makes us stronger, it makes us bigger, it makes our market bigger. So it’s less idealistic and more pragmatic.”

    It would be economically insane [for European countries] to look elsewhere.

    Miroslav Lajčák

    EU Special Representative for the Belgrade-Pristina Dialogue and Western Balkans

    The heightened political emphasis has made foreign policy alignment more critical than ever to the accession process, with the EU’s unity already vexed by the intransigence of existing member Hungary. That could prove a sticking point for certain prospective members.

    Serbia, for instance — the largest country in the region — has been vocal in condemning Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, but has resisted imposing sanctions on the country. Indeed, Belgrade has often clashed with Western allies on foreign policy issues, and continues to maintain close ties with Russia and China.

    Read more CNBC politics coverage

    Meanwhile, both Moscow and Beijing have sought to strengthen their economic and political influence in the Western Balkans in a potential bid to destabilize the wider region.

    Still, Lajčák insisted that neither country could compete with Brussels in terms of its investment and trade offering. “The credible enlargement process is the best answer to any third-party’s interference,” Lajčák said. “It would be economically insane [for European countries] to look elsewhere.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Biden nets landslide victory in South Carolina Democratic primary, over 95% of votes

    Biden nets landslide victory in South Carolina Democratic primary, over 95% of votes

    [ad_1]

    U.S. President Joe Biden reacts as he attends the opening of the Biden for President campaign office in Wilmington, Delaware, U.S., February 3, 2024. 

    Joshua Roberts | Reuters

    President Joe Biden won a landslide victory in South Carolina’s Democratic primary Saturday, where voters sent a clear message that they are ready for Biden to pivot to the November election.

    As of 12:00 a.m. ET, Sunday, Biden had won 96.2% of ballots cast, with 97% of the total votes tallied.

    The other two Democrats on the ballot, House Rep. Dean Phillips, D-Minn., and self-help author and 2020 Democratic candidate Marianne Williamson each won around 2% of ballots.

    The win injects fresh momentum into Biden’s reelection campaign, and it offers a compelling rebuttal to the narrative that Democratic voters are ambivalent — or worse — about their party’s standard bearer.

    “In 2020, it was the voters of South Carolina who proved the pundits wrong, breathed new life into our campaign, and set us on the path to winning the Presidency,” Biden said in a statement following Saturday’s results.

    “Now in 2024, the people of South Carolina have spoken again and I have no doubt that you have set us on the path to winning the Presidency again — and making Donald Trump a loser — again.”

    Biden will be awarded all 55 of the state’s Democratic delegates, NBC News projects, as neither Williamson nor Phillips broke the 15% threshold for being awarded any delegates. 

    Biden’s overwhelming margin of victory left no question about who Democratic voters want to be on the ballot in November. 

    But it came amid reports of lower than expected turnout, potentially a sign of weakened enthusiasm for Biden among Democrats. 

    In 2020, approximately 16% of the state’s 3.3 million registered voters cast ballots in the Democratic primary. On Saturday, that number dropped to roughly 4% of voters.

    In particular, polls have shown Biden’s support lagging among Black voters, a core Democratic party bloc that was key to his 2020 win. 

    Black voters account for a majority of the Democratic electorate in South Carolina, so his victory there Saturday could help to ease some of those concerns. 

    Biden’s campaign has also been under pressure to show momentum, a real challenge this year given that Democrats’ official primary season kicked off late. 

    In Iowa, the Democratic party decided not to cast any ballots at their caucuses, denying Biden the chance to win there. 

    In New Hampshire, Biden’s name was not on the formal ballot, but he won the contest as a write-in candidate with 64% of the vote.

    Republicans will vote in their party primary on Feb. 24, where former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley will attempt to pull off an upset in her home state, against former President Donald Trump.

    The GOP primary is expected to garner much higher turnout and more attention than Saturday’s vote.

    Unlike the Republican battle, the Democratic primary has, so far, been notable for its civility.

    “Congratulations, Mr. President, on a good old fashioned whooping,” Phillips wrote on X.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Nikki Haley makes surprise ‘Saturday Night Live’ cameo asking ‘Trump’ questions

    Nikki Haley makes surprise ‘Saturday Night Live’ cameo asking ‘Trump’ questions

    [ad_1]

    Republican presidential candidate former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley delivers remarks at her primary night rally at the Grappone Conference Center on January 23, 2024 in Concord, New Hampshire. 

    Joe Raedle | Getty Images

    Nikki Haley made a surprise — and funny — appearance on “Saturday Night Live,” where she asked a cast member playing her Republican presidential primary opponent Donald Trump a series of zingers in the cold open.

    A beaming Haley also delivered the NBC show’s signature line, “Live from New York, it’s Saturday night!” at the end of the skit right after the show’s guest host, actor Ayo Edeberi, delivered a sharp joke that referenced Haley’s famously flubbed answer when she was recently asked about the cause of the Civil War.

    “Had a blast tonight on SNL,” Haley tweeted after her appearance.

    “Know it was past Donald’s bedtime so looking forward to the stream of unhinged tweets in the a.m.”

    Haley’s cameo came in the middle of the first skit at a CNN town hall where “Trump,” played by James Austin Johnson, was being asked a series of questions by audience members.

    Town hall host “Charles Barkley,” played by Kenan Thompson, said, “Our next question comes from someone who describes herself as a concerned South Carolina voter.”

    The live audience let out a whoop when Haley stood up.

    “My question is, why won’t you debate Nikki Haley?” Haley asked “Trump.”

    “Trump” exclaimed, “Oh, my god, it’s her! The woman who was in charge of security on Jan. 6. It’s Nancy Pelosi!”

    When “Barkley” pointed out that was not Pelosi.

    “Are you doing OK, Donald? You might need a mental competency test,” Haley said.

    “Trump” quickly assured her that he “aced” that test, and, “they told me I’m a 100% mental and I’m competent because I’m a man.”

    He added that women “should never run our economy. Women are terrible with money.”

    “In fact, a woman I know recently asked me for $83 million,” he said, referencing the amount of monetary damages a New York civil jury recently awarded writer E. Jean Carroll for the real Trump defaming her after she alleged he had raped her.

    Haley cracked, “And you spent $50 million in your own legal fees. Do you need to borrow some money?”

    “Trump” then went into a Trump-like search for nicknames for Haley — “Nikki-Tikki-Tavi,” “Nikki Don’t Lose that Number” — before landing on a mashup of her name with the star of “The Sixth Sense.”

    “Nikki Haley Joel Osman, we call her,” he said. ” ‘Sixth Sense,’ remember that one: ‘I see dead people.’ “

    Haley then said, “Yeah, that’s what voters will say if they see you and Joe [Biden] on the ballot.”

    “Trump” moaned “that;s not nice,” and insisted he was always nice to Haley except when he implied that she was not born in the United States.

    “Even though you were born in South Carolina, and I’m gonna beat you in your state,” he said.

    “And did you win your home state in the last election?” Haley asked.

    “Trump” replied, “I won Staten Island!”

    “And the parts of Long Island where the fist fights happen, where they get out of the cars if you honk your horn at them,” said Trump, who lost his home state of New York in both the 2016 and 2020 elections.

    Read more CNBC politics coverage

    But then it was Haley’s turn to be the target of a pointed jibe when Edeberi, a star of the FX on Hulu series “The Bear,” stood up and asked her a question.

    “I was just curious, what would you say was the main cause of the Civil War, um, and do you think it starts with an ‘s’ and ends with a ‘lavery?’ ” Edeberi asked.

    Haley replied, “Yep, I probably should have said that the first time.”

    Comcast owns NBCUniversal, the parent of NBC and CNBC.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • House Speaker Johnson announces ‘standalone’ Israel funding package

    House Speaker Johnson announces ‘standalone’ Israel funding package

    [ad_1]

    Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) holds a news conference following a caucus meeting at the U.S. Capitol Visitors Center on January 30, 2024 in Washington, DC. 

    Chip Somodevilla | Getty Images

    House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., on Saturday announced an Israel-only funding package to be voted on next week, another step in the deadlocked negotiations over emergency aid that President Joe Biden initially proposed in October.

    The House proposal comes as a challenge to a long-awaited Senate package that is expected to be released this weekend. The Senate’s bill is expected to include broader foreign aid than just Israel and address border security funding.

    But the Republican-majority House has voiced its intention to be hard on the Senate’s proposal, especially as Johnson tries to appease Republican hardliners who expect him to deliver on their ultraconservative wish list to limit spending and maximize border security.

    “While the Senate appears poised to finally release text of their supplemental package after months of behind closed door negotiations, their leadership is aware that by failing to include the House in their negotiations, they have eliminated the ability for swift consideration of any legislation,” Johnson wrote in a letter he addressed to “Friends.”

    “Next week, we will take up and pass a clean, standalone Israel supplemental package,” the speaker added.

    The House bill includes $17.6 billion for Israel’s military and U.S. military forces in the region as the war with Hamas in Gaza continues. If approved, this funding would add to the $14.3 billion that the House passed for Israel in the wake of Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack.

    This bill separates aid to Israel from Ukraine, Taiwan and the U.S. southern border, all of which were linked in Biden’s original $105 billion aid proposal. That initial bill included $61 billion for Ukraine, $14.3 billion for Israel, $6.4 billion for the U.S. border and $2 billion for Taiwan.

    But disagreements over how to address the U.S. border and whether to continue funding Ukraine’s defense against Russia stalled the passage of Biden’s October aid package.

    Democrats and Republicans have gone back and forth for months negotiating the proposal, leading to a near-miss government shutdown and eating into some lawmakers’ holiday break.

    Democrats argue that Ukraine funding is essential to preventing the further rise of authoritarian Russian leader Vladimir Putin and his threat to global democracy. Meanwhile, Republicans want to rein in Ukraine aid, claiming that without a clear end in sight, the nearly two-year war has led to U.S. overspending.

    The border has been another major sticking point, as the number of migrants crossing over to the U.S. reached record highs over the past few months. The influx has overwhelmed some cities, whose mayors say they do not have the resources or infrastructure to accommodate the incoming migrant population. That crisis has led Republicans to press even harder for their border security wish list, which includes policies that the Democrat-majority Senate would likely never pass.

    These clashes deadlocked the emergency aid package for months. Democrat and Republican lawmakers assured that they were working to find middle ground.

    Both sides appeared optimistic that they were making progress. For example, in January, Johnson and Democratic Majority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said they had a productive meeting with Biden where they assured they would be able to reach a bipartisan agreement to address the border, Ukraine and the rest of the president’s funding requests.

    However, in recent weeks, politics have hindered that progress. In closed-door meetings, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky reportedly told senators that former President Donald Trump wanted to torpedo the deal so as not to deliver Biden a campaign victory during an election year. Trump has regularly used the border crisis as a campaign talking point against Biden in his 2024 bid for re-election.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How RealPage influences rent prices across the U.S.

    How RealPage influences rent prices across the U.S.

    [ad_1]

    Share

    RealPage software is used to set rental prices on 4.5 million housing units in the U.S. A series of lawsuits allege that a group of landlords are sharing sensitive data with RealPage, which then artificially inflates rents. The complaints surface as housing supply in the U.S. lags demand. Some of the defendant landlords report high occupancy within their buildings, alongside strong jobs growth in their operating regions and slow home construction.

    09:56

    Sat, Feb 3 20248:27 AM EST

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • US starts retaliatory strikes in Iraq and Syria against Iran-linked targets

    US starts retaliatory strikes in Iraq and Syria against Iran-linked targets

    [ad_1]

    President Joe Biden arrives to board Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland, on January 30, 2024.

    Andrew Caballero-Reynolds | AFP | Getty Images

    The United States launched airstrikes in Iraq and Syria against more than 85 targets linked to Iran’s Revolutionary Guard (IRGC) and the militias it backs, reportedly killing more than 30 people, in retaliation for a deadly attack on U.S. troops.

    The strikes, which included the use of long-range B-1 bombers flown from the United States, were the first in a multi-tiered response by President Joe Biden’s administration to the attack last weekend by Iran-backed militants.

    More U.S. military operations were expected in the coming days.

    The strikes intensified a conflict that has spread into the region since war erupted between Israel and Hamas after the militant Palestinian group’s deadly assault on Israel on Oct.7.

    Iran’s foreign ministry spokesperson Nasser Kanaani said in a statement the U.S. attacks represented “another adventurous and strategic mistake by the United States that will result only in increased tension in instability in the region”.       

    Iraq also condemned the U.S. attacks, saying they had killed 16 people including civilians. In Syria, the strikes killed 23 people who had been guarding the targeted locations, said Rami Abdulrahman, director of the Syrian

    Observatory for Human Rights, an organization that reports on war in Syria.

    Joint Chiefs of Staff Director for Operations Lt. Gen. Douglas A. Sims II arrives to brief members of the House of Representatives in a classified, closed-door briefing about Hamas’ attack on Israel in the Capitol Visitors Center Auditorium on October 11, 2023 in Washington, DC.

    Chip Somodevilla | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    U.S. Lieutenant General Douglas Sims, the director of the Joint Staff, said the attacks appeared to be successful, triggering large secondary explosions as the bombs hit militant weaponry. He said the strikes were undertaken knowing that there would likely be casualties among those in the facilities.

    Despite the strikes, the Pentagon has said it does not want war with Iran and does not believe Tehran wants war either, even as Republican pressure has increased on the Biden to deal a blow directly.

    Iran, a backer of Hamas, has sought to stay out of the regional conflict itself even as it supports groups that have entered the fray from Lebanon, Yemen, Iraq and Syria – the so-called “Axis of Resistance” that is hostile to Israeli and U.S. interests.   

    ‘We do not seek conflict’ 

    U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin said after the strikes that Biden had directed additional action against the IRGC and those linked to it. “This is the start of our response,” Austin said.

    “We do not seek conflict in the Middle East or anywhere else, but the president and I will not tolerate attacks on American forces,” Austin said.   

    An Iraqi government statement said the areas bombed by U.S. aircraft included places where Iraqi security forces are stationed near civilian locations. It said 23 people had been wounded in addition to the 16 killed.

    The White House said the United States had informed Iraq ahead of strikes. Baghdad later accused the United States of deception, saying a U.S. claim of coordination with the Iraqi authorities was “unfounded”.

    The Syrian foreign ministry said the United States was fueling conflict in the region in a “very dangerous way”.

    On Friday, Iran’s President Ebrahim Raisi said his country will not start a war, but it will “respond strongly” to anyone who bullies it.

    Hamas condemned the U.S. strikes and said Washington was pouring “oil on the fire”.

    Britain called the United States its “steadfast” ally and said it supports Washington’s right to respond to attacks.

    Polish Foreign Minister Radek Sikorski, arriving for an EU meeting in Brussels, said the U.S. strikes were the result of Iranian proxies “playing with fire”.  

    More than 160 attacks on U.S. troops   

    The strikes hit targets including command and control centers, rockets, missiles and drone storage facilities, as well as logistics and munition supply chain facilities, the U.S. military said in a statement.

    In Iraq, local residents said several strikes hit the Sikak Neighborhood in Al-Qaim, a residential area that locals said was also used by armed groups to store large amounts of weapons. Militants had left the area and gone into hiding in the days since the Jordan attack, local sources said.

    U.S. troops have been attacked over 160 times in Iraq, Syria and Jordan since Oct. 7, usually with a mix of rockets and one-way attack drones, prompting the United States to mount several retaliatory attacks even before the latest strikes.

    The United States has assessed that the drone that killed the three soldiers and wounded more than 40 other people in Jordan was made by Iran, U.S. officials have told Reuters.

    “Our response began today. It will continue at times and places of our choosing,” Biden said.

    The top Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, Roger Wicker, criticized Biden for failing to impose a high enough cost on Iran, and taking too long to respond.

    Iranian advisers assist armed groups in both Iraq, where the United States has around 2,500 troops, and Syria, where it has 900.   

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Russian war critic poses an awkward challenge for Putin and the Kremlin as the election nears

    Russian war critic poses an awkward challenge for Putin and the Kremlin as the election nears

    [ad_1]

    Boris Nadezhdin, the Civic Initiative Party presidential hopeful, arrives at the Central Election Commission to submit signatures collected in support of his candidacy, in Moscow on January 31, 2024.

    Vera Savina | Afp | Getty Images

    Over President Vladimir Putin‘s 24 years in power, a systemic opposition has been wiped out in Russia with the Kremlin’s political opponents either jailed or in self-imposed exile or, in some circumstances, even dead.

    But a challenger to Putin’s long reign in office has emerged from an unlikely place — within Russia’s existing political establishment — in the form of Boris Nadezhdin.

    Standing on a platform for peace with Ukraine, friendly and cooperative global relations and fair elections, as well as a fairer civil society and smaller state, Nadezhdin submitted his bid to run for the presidency Wednesday.

    The Kremlin has sought to dismiss Nadezhdin’s potential to upset an election whose win for Putin is seen as a done deal. Kremlin Press Secretary Dmitry Peskov told CNBC Thursday that “we are not inclined to exaggerate the level of support for Mr. Nadezhdin.”

    Nonetheless, the fact that Nadezhdin is even attempting to stand for election on an anti-war platform — and has garnered a certain level of public support — shows there is public appetite for his views, and that’s likely to make the Kremlin nervous after it has staked its political legacy and future on a victory in Ukraine.

    Russian political analysts point out that Nadezhdin, 60, isn’t a political outsider or upstart but part of Russia’s political establishment — a former lawmaker who had been a member of political parties that endorsed Putin’s leadership at the start of his political career over two decades ago.

    His recent foray into frontline politics, and bid to run for the presidential election, has seemingly been tolerated by Russia’s political leadership and domestic policy makers, despite the misgivings of some pro-Kremlin activists, with Nadezhdin seen previously as a member of the system opposition that gives a veil of political plurality and legitimacy to Russia’s largely autocratic leadership.

    However, Nadezhdin’s recent growing popularity and prominence has changed that, political analysts say, and he now poses a challenge and a dilemma for the Kremlin as the election nears.

    “He has been always anti war and critical but he played the rules and respected the rules, so he didn’t dare [challenge the political status quo], he was absolutely a part of the systemic opposition … but he decided to go further,” Russian political analyst Tatiana Stanovaya told CNBC Thursday.

    “[As soon as] he believed that thousands of people were behind him or even hundreds of thousands, he decided to play another game,” Stanovaya, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center and the founder of analysis firm R.Politik, said.

    “And it doesn’t please domestic policy overseers at all. For them, this is a set up, this is a headache and a problem. Nadezhdin has now become a challenge,” she said.

    Skating on thin ice?

    Nadezhdin is a well-known face in Russia. A former State Duma lawmaker, he has made a name for himself on popular TV chat shows on which he’s become known for his critical views on Russia’s war against Ukraine, or what Moscow calls the “special military operation.” However, analysts note that he has been careful to stay within recent legislation that has made “discrediting” the armed forces a criminal offense that can lead to imprisonment.

    Nadezhdin has gained a popular following among sections of the Russian public and late last year he was nominated to stand in the election by the center-right Civic Initiative party.

    Formed just over 10 years ago, the party states in its manifesto that “its goal is the state to be man’s servant, not his master” and says it wants to restore individual freedoms in Russia, such as freedom of speech and the right to protest, and to revive relations with the West. Nadezhdin has said in interviews that he would end the war with Ukraine, describing the war as a “fatal mistake.”

    Those are brave words in Russia, and Nadezhdin himself has said he’s unsure why he has not yet been arrested for his views.

    Many of his supporters have queued in freezing temperatures to add their support and, crucially, their signatures to back his bid to stand in the Mar. 15-17 election.

    Candidates representing political parties in Russia must collect at least 100,000 signatures from at least 40 regions in Russia in order to be considered as an election candidate. Putin, running as an independent (and requiring at least 300,000 signatures), reportedly gathered over 3.5 million signatures.

    People queue to sign for the presidential candidacy of anti-war candidate Boris Nadezhdin. It is considered impossible that Nadezhdin could win the upcoming presidential election in Russia. However, the candidacy of the war opponent has met with unexpected approval from many Russians. 

    Picture Alliance | Picture Alliance | Getty Images

    Surrounded by his supporters and a gaggle of press as he delivered his bid to the Central Election Commission this week, Nadezhdin said 105,000 signatures had been submitted although just over 200,000 had been collected, his campaign website states. His campaign decided not to submit signatures collected from Russian citizens abroad, fearing they would be rejected.

    The Central Election Commission, which oversees electoral processes in Russia, will now review the eligibility of those signatures. Given the recent display of support for Nadezhdin, that could prove uncomfortable for the Kremlin, and there are concerns that the electoral authorities could find fault with a significant number of those signatures, meaning that a technicality — real or otherwise — could see him barred from running in the election.

    Stanovaya said that was a likely scenario, saying “it is really difficult for me to imagine that Nadezhdin will be allowed to run in the election, it would be absolutely weird.” Stanovaya believed it was likely that the CEC would not recognize a portion of the signatures that Nadezhdin has garnered.

    CNBC was unable to reach the CEC for a response to the comment.

    András Tóth-Czifra, a fellow in the Eurasia Program at the Foreign Policy Research Institute, told CNBC that the Kremlin now had to weigh up the risks of letting Nadezhdin’s name onto the ballet paper, and the potential for him to perform better than expected in the vote, or to disallow his candidacy before any real reputational damage can be done — even while knowing that stopping Nadezhdin standing could also fan discontent.

    “Many have speculated, and I think this is true, that the original idea to let him stand as a candidate and collect signatures, and to express the mildly anti anti war message in his campaign, was to showcase how little support this position enjoys in today’s Russia,” Tóth-Czifra said.

    Boris Nadezhdin, Civic Initiative party’s candidate for Russia’s 2024 presidential election, bringing 105,000 signatures to the polling station in Moscow, Russia on January 31, 2024. 

    Boris Nadezhdin Press Service/Handout/Anadolu via Getty Images

    “Now … the question is how risky the Kremlin’s political technologists deem it to allow this to go further and to let Nadezhdin be on the ballot,” he told CNBC Thursday.

    “I’m pretty sure that the Kremlin will weigh these risks over the week while the Central Electoral Commission is verifying signatures … There are arguments for letting Naezhdin run and there are arguments for taking him off the ballot paper. There are risks associated with letting him run and there are risks associated with taking him off the ballot,” Tóth-Czifra said.

    “I believe, from what we have seen so far, that probably the Kremlin thinks that the risks associated with taking him off the ballot are lower than the risks associated with letting him run,” he added, particularly given that the Kremlin’s risk perception is likely to be elevated in a time of war.

    “I’m pretty sure that there are already people in the Kremlin who think that he has gone too far already,” Tóth-Czifra said.

    Even if Nadezhdin is allowed to stand, there are no illusions that he can win the election in a country where Putin’s approval ratings remain remarkably high and pro-Putin media dominate, and where political opponents are subject to extensive smear campaigns.

    Kremlin’s Press Secretary Peskov told CNBC last fall that Russian “society is consolidated around the president” and that the Kremlin was confident Putin would win another term in office.

    Stanovaya said Nadezhdin is running the risk of falling foul of Russian authorities now, having openly challenged its long-standing leadership.

    “He takes a lot of risks now, and I’m pretty sure that the Kremlin’s domestic policy overseers, who are very well acquainted with Nadezhdin, are now thinking of how to deal with this and how to signal to Nadezhdin that either he stops and really he rows backwards, or he will have troubles.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump allies ramp up attacks on Taylor Swift ahead of Super Bowl

    Trump allies ramp up attacks on Taylor Swift ahead of Super Bowl

    [ad_1]

    Taylor Swift performs during The Eras Tour at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood Monday, Aug. 7, 2023. (Allen J. Schaben / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)

    Allen J. Schaben | Los Angeles Times | Getty Images

    Taylor Swift endorsed President Joe Biden‘s winning 2020 campaign — and while she hasn’t backed Biden’s reelection bid yet, allies of former President Donald Trump are already getting ready for it.

    Swift, the pop-music megastar so influential that her latest tour is making a tangible impact on the U.S. economy, is increasingly the target of criticism and conspiracy theories from Trump’s allies.

    Those attacks have ramped up ahead of the Super Bowl, which Swift is expected to try to attend to cheer on her boyfriend, Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce.

    Vivek Ramaswamy, a Republican former presidential candidate who has endorsed Trump, wondered aloud on X whether an “artificially culturally propped-up couple” would endorse Biden after the Super Bowl.

    Ramaswamy even suggested that the Super Bowl outcome itself would be manipulated as part of an effort to boost Biden, though he added it was “just some wild speculation.”

    Trump’s attorney Alina Habba, who represents the former president in a federal civil defamation case where a jury last week ordered Trump to pay $83.3 million in damages, on Monday reposted a message comparing herself favorably to Swift.

    “Who thinks this country needs a lot more women like Alina Habba, and a lot less like Taylor Swift?” read the social media post, which Habba shared on her Instagram Story.

    Earlier this month, Fox News host Jesse Watters floated the idea that Swift was some sort of political asset for the Pentagon.

    Swift was already a mega-celebrity when she endorsed Biden in 2020. But in the years since then, she has attained a level of fame and cultural significance that places her closer to a folk hero than a pop singer.

    Ticket sales for her concerts have not only shattered records, but crashed Ticketmaster’s website and spurred a backlash over outlandish ticket prices, a fiasco that prompted Congress to get involved.

    Her appearances at pro football games after she began dating Kelce have consumed coverage of the sporting events and massively boosted ratings.

    Her power also extends to politics: An Instagram post last September, encouraging her 279 million followers to vote, directed a wave of tens of thousands of new registrations to the website Vote.org.

    So it’s no surprise that Swift’s endorsement is reportedly the biggest prize the Biden campaign is seeking, as the Democratic incumbent gears up for a rematch of the 2020 race against Trump.

    Read more CNBC politics coverage

    A Biden campaign spokesman and a representative for Swift did not immediately respond to CNBC’s requests for comment.

    Rolling Stone reported earlier Tuesday that Trump has been in discussions with Republican and conservative media figures in recent months about the prospect of Swift endorsing Biden.

    While the Trump campaign did not confirm those discussions on the record, they are clearly thinking about Swift in the context of November’s election.

    “Joe Biden might be counting on Taylor Swift to save him, but voters are looking at these sky-high inflation rates and saying We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together,” campaign spokesman Jason Miller said in a statement to CNBC.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Biden faces demands from Republicans in Congress to strike Iran after U.S. troop deaths

    Biden faces demands from Republicans in Congress to strike Iran after U.S. troop deaths

    [ad_1]

    U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham speaks at a press conference at the U.S. Capitol on August 05, 2022 in Washington, DC.

    Kevin Dietsch | Getty Images

    Congressional lawmakers are demanding President Joe Biden strike Iran after three U.S. troops were killed Sunday night in Jordan in a drone strike claimed by the Islamic Resistance in Iraq, an Iranian-backed militia group.

    The deadly drone attack, which also injured at least 34 U.S. personnel, marks the first deaths of U.S. troops by enemy fire since the latest Israel-Hamas war began after Palestinian militant group Hamas’ Oct. 7 terror attack on Israel. Iran has not commented on the strike, while Jordan’s government denied it took place on its soil.

    “I am calling on the Biden Administration to strike targets of significance inside Iran, not only as reprisal for the killing of our forces, but as deterrence against future aggression,” Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said in a statement.

    “The only thing the Iranian regime understands is force. Until they pay a price with their infrastructure and their personnel, the attacks on U.S. troops will continue,” he added. “Hit Iran now. Hit them hard.”

    Roger Wicker of Mississippi, the most senior Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said: “We must respond to these repeated attacks by Iran and its proxies by striking directly against Iranian targets and its leadership. … The Biden administration’s responses thus far have only invited more attacks.” 

    Biden for his part vowed to retaliate, saying in a statement that “we will hold all those responsible to account at a time and in a manner our choosing.”

    An infographic titled ‘Three US service members killed, dozens injured in drone attack’ created in Ankara, Turkiye on January 28, 2024.

    Elmurod Usubaliev | Anadolu | Getty Images

    The attack marks another regional escalation in a war that the Biden administration has tried to contain.

    Already, conflict has spilled over into the Red Sea, with Yemeni Houthi rebels attacking ships in protest of the Israeli bombardment of Gaza and Israel’s U.S. backer. The U.S. and U.K. have launched airstrikes against Houthi positions in Yemen, but so far have failed to deter the group’s activities.

    Meanwhile, Lebanese Shia militia group Hezbollah and Israel are exchanging fire along the Israeli-Lebanese border, while Iran earlier this month struck targets in Iraq, Syria and Pakistan. Only the Iraqi target was purportedly linked to Israel, but Tehran’s recent assertiveness is likely a signal to the U.S. and Israel about its capabilities. Both Hezbollah and the Houthis are supported by Iran.

    Despite this, numerous regional analysts warn that Iran does not necessarily have full control over the actions of the proxy groups that it arms around the Middle East.

    “Unlike Lebanese Hezbollah, which has been more measured in its response to the Gaza war, the Iraqi militias and the Houthis have displayed a high tolerance for direct confrontation with the United States,” Helima Croft, head of global commodity strategy and MENA research at RBC Capital Markets, wrote in an analysis note.

    The risk of wider conflict and deeper U.S. involvement led oil prices to jump Monday morning. Both Washington and Tehran have expressed their desire to avoid more kinetic involvement in the war, likely understanding the sheer scale of destruction a direct confrontation between the two adversaries would cause.

    “Striking Iran directly would be extremely costly, extremely risky for the U.S.,” Dominic Pratt, a senior country analyst for the Middle East and Africa at the Economist Intelligence Unit, told CNBC. Short of that approach, he said, would be for the U.S. to continue on its current path of attacking Iranian proxy groups in Syria, Iraq and Yemen, as well as expanding financial pressures like sanctions.

    Read more CNBC politics coverage

    But that has clearly failed to deter the latest attacks on U.S. personnel in the region — there have been at least 160 attacks by Iran-backed groups on Middle Eastern bases where Americans are present during the more than 3½ months since the Israel-Hamas war began.

    “As long as the war in Gaza continues, we’re likely to see these attacks carry on,” Pratt said.

    “A lot of these groups have tied their attacks directly to Israel’s war against Hamas in Gaza and the U.S. support for it. … So for as long as this this war continues, we’ll continue to see an escalation of these attacks, or at least that these attacks will carry on as they are, which broadens the risk that there will be an escalation like what we’ve seen with the attack on the base in Jordan.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Beijing intensifies military pressure on Taiwan as U.S.-China talks resume

    Beijing intensifies military pressure on Taiwan as U.S.-China talks resume

    [ad_1]

    Chinese President Xi Jinping meets with U.S. President Joe Biden at Filoli Estate in the U.S. state of California, Nov. 15, 2023.

    Li Xueren | Xinhua News Agency | Getty Images

    Beijing sent dozens of military aircraft and naval ships toward Taiwan on Friday, the same day of a low-profile meeting between U.S. national security adviser Jake Sullivan and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi aimed at stabilizing U.S.-China relations.

    From 6 a.m. Friday to 6 a.m. Saturday local time, China sent 33 military aircraft and six naval vessels toward Taiwan, according to Taiwan’s Defense Ministry. Thirteen of the planes crossed over the Taiwan Strait.

    The intensified military pressure comes as the U.S. and China are attempting to steer relations back on track after an icy couple of years. For example, at their meeting, Sullivan and Wang confirmed the plan to launch a collaborative U.S.-China “Counternarcotics Working Group” on Tuesday to address the fentanyl crisis.

    “Mr. Sullivan underscored during the meeting that the United States and the PRC are in competition but the United States does not seek conflict or confrontation, and there are areas of cooperation in the relationship,” a senior administration official said Saturday.

    But China’s military moves over the past 24 hours could complicate hopes for cooperation.

    China’s approach to Taiwan, which it considers its territory, is a sensitive sticking point in its precarious relationship with the U.S., which believes in Taiwan keeping its self-governing status. The contentious issue comes up at nearly every U.S.-China meeting, including the high-profile talks between President Joe Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping in November.

    During their two-day meeting in Bangkok on Thursday and Friday, Sullivan and Wang talked about reopening military-to-military communications, curbing the flow of fentanyl and mitigating the risks of artificial intelligence.

    Sullivan also reiterated the U.S. stance on maintaining the status quo of Taiwan’s sovereignty. But China has repeatedly rebuffed the U.S. position and has been vocal about its intention to “reunify” Taiwan with the mainland.

    China’s military pressure on Taiwan comes during what senior administration officials have called “a period of higher tension.”

    Taiwan voters recently elected Democratic Progressive Party candidate Lai Ching-te to be their next president. Lai was China’s least favorite candidate due to his support of maintaining Taiwan’s status quo.

    Ahead of that election, the U.S. prepared for a range of responses from China.

    “Anytime we’re heading into a period of higher tension, there are of course always contingency conversations in the U.S. government,” a senior administration official said at the time.

    “I don’t want to get into specifics on those, but of course, we have to be prepared and thinking through any eventuality … ranging from no response to the higher end.”



    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Jury rules Trump must pay E. Jean Carroll $83.3 million in damages for defamation

    Jury rules Trump must pay E. Jean Carroll $83.3 million in damages for defamation

    [ad_1]

    E. Jean Carroll and her attorneys Shawn Crowley and Roberta Kaplan react outside the Manhattan Federal Court, after the verdict in the second civil trial after she accused former U.S. President Donald Trump of raping her decades ago, in New York City, U.S., January 26, 2024. 

    Brendan Mcdermid | Reuters

    A federal jury on Friday said Donald Trump must pay E. Jean Carroll a total of $83.3 million in damages for defaming her in statements he made as president after the writer said he had raped her in a New York department store in the 1990s.

    The massive civil verdict — which comes on top of a $5 million sexual abuse and defamation verdict that Carroll won against Trump last year — was delivered less than three hours after the nine-member jury began deliberating in U.S. District Court in Manhattan.

    Trump was not in court for the reading of the unanimous verdict on compensatory and punitive damages by the anonymous jury at 4:40 p.m. ET.

    But shortly afterward, he said in a social media post that he would appeal it.

    “This is a great victory for every woman who stands up when she’s been knocked down, and a huge defeat for every bully who has tried to keep a woman down,” Carroll said in a statement.

    E. Jean Carroll hugs her team after the verdict was read during the second civil trial where Carroll accused former U.S. President Donald Trump of raping her decades ago, at Manhattan Federal Court in New York City, U.S., January 26, 2024, in this courtroom sketch. 

    Jane Rosenberg | Reuters

    Her attorney Roberta Kaplan said, “Today’s verdict proves that the law applies to everyone in our country, even the rich, even the famous, even former presidents. There is a way to stand up to someone like Donald Trump who cares more about wealth, fame, and power than respecting the law.”

    Jurors awarded Carroll $7.3 million for compensatory damages for emotional harm, and another $11 million for compensatory damages to her reputation. Compensatory damages are awarded for actual losses suffered by someone.

    They then awarded her another $65 million in punitive damages after finding that Trump in a June 21, 2019, statement about Carroll had “acted maliciously, out of hatred, ill will or spite, vindictively or out of wanton, reckless, or willful disregard of Ms. Carroll’s right.”

    Trump in those comments and others since then has denied ever meeting Carroll, suggested she made her claim to sell a book, and said she was not “my type.”

    Punitive damages are meant to punish wrongdoing by a defendant.

    Earlier Friday, Carroll’s lawyer in her closing argument had urged jurors to award her a “very large” amount of money, to make the billionaire former president “stop” slandering her.

    “He doesn’t care about the law or truth but does care about money, and your decision on punitive damages is the only hope that he stops,” Kaplan said.

    Former U.S. President Donald Trump gestures to his supporters, as he departs for his second civil trial after E. Jean Carroll accused Trump of raping her decades ago, outside a Trump Tower in the Manhattan borough of New York City, U.S., January 26, 2024. 

    Eduardo Munoz | Reuters

    “How much will it take to make him stop? You cost him lots and lots of money,” she said.

    Trump in a social media post on his TruthSocial site after the verdict wrote, “Absolutely ridiculous!”

    “I fully disagree with both verdicts, and will be appealing this whole Biden Directed Witch Hunt focused on me and the Republican Party,” wrote Trump, who is the frontrunner for the GOP presidential nomination.

    “Our Legal System is out of control, and being used as a Political Weapon. They have taken away all First Amendment Rights. THIS IS NOT AMERICA!”

    Trump so far has not received much help from appeals courts in challenging the two separate lawsuits by Carroll before they went to trial.

    But it is possible that on appeal of the verdicts he could at least win a reduction in the amount of money he owes her.

    Last month, the 2nd Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals rejected Trump’s argument that he was immune from damages in the current case because he was president at the time he defamed Carroll.

    The appeals court ruled that Trump had waived the potential defense of presidential immunity for not raising it for years after Carroll first sued him in 2019.

    Trump last year posted $5.6 million as security while he appeals the verdict in the prior sex abuse and defamation case.

    When he appeals the current case’s verdict, he will likely have to post more than $90 million in security.

    Until the appeals are resolved, Carroll will not collect any money from Trump.

    Former U.S. President Donald Trump walks out during attorney Roberta Kaplan’s closing argument, during E. Jean Carroll’s second civil trial as Carroll accused Trump of raping her decades ago, at Manhattan Federal Court in New York City, U.S., January 26, 2024, in this courtroom sketch.

    Jane Rosenberg | Reuters

    Judge Lewis Kaplan, who is not related to Roberta, told jurors before dismissing them from court: “My advice to you is that you never disclose that you were on this jury, and I won’t say anything more about it.”

    Before their deliberations began, Judge Kaplan instructed them that they had to accept as facts that Trump “sexually assaulted” Carroll in the mid-1990s and defamed the writer in 2019.

    “What remains for you to decide,” the judge said, is whether “Mr. Trump acted maliciously when he made his two statements” about Carroll.

    “You must accept as true the facts as I explained to you as they have already been decided,” the judge said, referring to Trump’s sexual assault of Carroll and his slandering of her decades later.

    Trump looked on during the instructions with a frown.

    Earlier, Trump stalked out of the courtroom after Carroll’s lawyer began her closing argument, in which she urged jurors to award monetary damages “large enough that it will finally make him stop” slandering the writer.

    Trump’s dramatic departure came minutes after the judge warned his lawyer Alina Habba that she was risking being tossed into jail before summations began in the case.

    “The record will reflect that Mr. Trump just rose and walked out of the courtroom,” the judge said.

    Trump returned about an hour later, after Carroll’s attorney finished her summation and just before his attorney began her closing argument.

    Former U.S. President Donald Trump looks on as his attorney Alina Habba, delivers closing arguments during E. Jean Carroll’s second civil trial as Carroll accused Trump of raping her decades ago, at Manhattan Federal Court in New York City, U.S., January 26, 2024, in this courtroom sketch. 

    Jane Rosenberg | Reuters

    Carroll in a 2019 New York magazine article wrote that in the mid-1990s, Trump had raped her in a dressing room at Bergdorf Goodman department store on Fifth Avenue, just up the street from the Trump Tower, where he lived and worked.

    Trump denied her allegation at the time, saying she had made it up.

    Another Manhattan federal court jury last year found he had sexually abused Carroll in the attack and had defamed her in statements he made in late 2022 denying her claims.

    Kaplan ruled later in 2023 that that jury’s verdict meant that jurors in the current trial would have to accept as legally established that Trump had sexually assaulted Carroll and had defamed her in his 2022 statements.

    Trump on Friday posted several social media messages attacking Kaplan for rulings in the case, accusing the judge of having “absolute hatred of Donald J. Trump (ME!).” Trump’s Truth social account posted 14 times about Carroll when he was in the courtroom.

    In her closing argument, Carroll’s lawyer Kaplan asked jurors to impose punitive damages on Trump for refusing to stop defaming Carroll even after a jury last year held him liable for doing so and ordered him to pay her $5 million.

    Trump’s comments have sparked death threats and vicious emails and tweets directed at Carroll, the lawyer said.

    Read more CNBC politics coverage

    “The dollar amount has to be very large,” Roberta Kaplan said. “It is at least as much and probably much more than the $12 million” that the lawyer noted an expert witness had testified it could cost to repair Carroll’s reputation after Trump accused her of inventing her claim.

    “Last trial, Donald J. Trump didn’t even bother to show up, but this trial where it is about damages he has been sure to be here and the one thing he cares about his money,” Kaplan said.

    Trump “is worth billions of dollars, he said that under oath, he could pay a million dollars a day for 10 years and still have money in the bank,” Kaplan said.

    “When you begin deliberations I encourage you to step back and think of bigger picture, a former president of the United States who sexually assaulted, defamed and continues to defame.”

    Earlier, Trump’s lawyer Habba, who had already irked Judge Kaplan for showing up late in court, angered him when she persisted in arguing that defense lawyers should be able to show a slide to jurors during their summation that represented some tweets related to Carroll.

    “You are not going to use a slide to represent how many tweets there were, you are not using that slide, period,” Judge Kaplan said.

    When Habba said, “I need to make a record,” referring to putting her argument on the record, the judge issued his warning.

    “You are on the verge of spending time in the lockup, now sit down!” the judge told Habba.

    Kaplan snapped at Habba several more times during her closing argument, at one point telling her that if she continued pressing a particular point “there will be consequences.”

    Former U.S. President Donald Trump’s attorney Alina Habba delivers closing arguments during E. Jean Carroll’s second civil trial, as Carroll accused Trump of raping her decades ago, at Manhattan Federal Court in New York City, U.S., January 26, 2024 in this courtroom sketch.

    Jane Rosenberg | Reuters

    In her summation, Habba said that Carroll “has failed to show she is entitled to any damages at all.”

    “It is Ms. Carroll’s burden, not President Trump’s, to prove that his statements caused harm, and she failed to meet that burden, it is common sense,” Habba said.

    The attorney also suggested that Carroll had made up her claims of receiving “thousands of threats.”

    Carroll had testified that she deleted most of those threats, making them unavailable as evidence.

    “Either Ms. Carroll is lying to you and those messages never existed in the first place or she deleted them and wants you to rely on them, and guess what, they are not here, and she has to give them to you to support her claim for damages, and that is a fact,” Habba said.

    Habba also said that not only did Carroll “not suffer any emotional harm” after publishing her claim in 2019 about Trump raping her, “she was happier than ever.”

    “She told Vanity Fair [magazine] that the support she received walking down the streets was heartwarming,” Habba said. “One of the most carefree and happy times of her life, that she was in a cocoon of love … does this sound like someone whose world has come crashing down, who can’t sleep?”

    “She was enjoying the newfound attention she was receiving,” the lawyer said.

    Before the arguments began and jurors entered the courtroom, the judge issued a warning.

    “During closing arguments, no one is to say anything other than opposing counsel,” said Kaplan. “There are to be no interruptions or audible comments by anyone else and that will apply when I charge the jury and that will apply to counsel then as well.”

    Carroll’s lawyers have complained during the trial about Trump making comments that were audible to jurors while sitting with his attorneys at the defense table.

    Kaplan previously ruled that because of the prior verdict, there was no legal question that Trump defamed Carroll. That ruling left only the question of monetary damages remaining for the jury.

    Trump during his very brief testimony in the trial Thursday said of Carroll’s claim, “I consider it a false accusation.”

    Kaplan struck that testimony, in light of the prior jury’s verdict which found he had sexually abused Carroll.

    Trump earlier this week defeated former United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley in the Republican presidential primary in New Hampshire. Last week, he won the Iowa GOP caucuses.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Oil tanker hit by missile after transiting Red Sea — Houthis claim responsibility

    Oil tanker hit by missile after transiting Red Sea — Houthis claim responsibility

    [ad_1]

    Children walk near a billboard bearing the image of targeting ships, on the day Yemen’s Houthi-run forces targeted an American ship in the Red Sea, on a street in Sana’a, Yemen, on Jan. 10, 2024.

    Mohammed Hamoud | Getty Images

    An oil tanker operated on behalf of Trafigura was struck by a missile on Friday after transiting the Red Sea, a company spokesperson told CNBC in statement.

    The Marlin Luanda, a petroleum products tanker vessel, was struck by the missile in the Gulf of Aden. Firefighting equipment on board is being used to suppress a fire in one of the cargo tanks, the spokesperson said.

    “We remain in contact with the vessel and are monitoring the situation carefully,” Trafigura said. “Military ships in the region are underway to provide assistance.”

    Houthi militants claimed responsibility for the attack, describing the vessel as a “British oil ship.” Trafigura said the vessel is flagged under the Marshall Islands.

    The militants used a “number of appropriate naval missiles, the strike was direct and resulted in the burning of the vessel,” the Houthis’ military spokesperson Yahya Saree said in a statement.

    Houthi militants in Yemen have attacked commercial vessels transiting the Red Sea since November in support of Palestinians. The U.S. and UK began a series of airstrikes against the militia on Jan. 11 aimed at deterring the Iranian-backed group.

    Houthi militants fired a ballistic missile at the U.S. Navy destroyer Carney in the Gulf of Aden earlier on Friday, according to U.S. Central Command. The missile was shot down by the Carney. No injuries or damage were reported, according to CENTCOM.

    Several of the world’s major oil tanker companies paused traffic toward the Red Sea immediately after the U.S. and Britain began launching airstrikes against the Houthis earlier this month.

    U.S. crude oil on Friday settled at $78.01 a barrel to close out its best week since Sept. 1. The global Brent benchmark settled at $83.55 a barrel, posting its best week since Oct. 13.

    The West Texas Intermediate contract for March was last up 74 cents, or 0.96%, at $78.10 a barrel. The Brent March contract was trading at $83.73 a barrel, up $1.30 or 1.58%.

    Oil futures have not responded dramatically to escalating tensions in the Middle East so far because there has not been a major disruption to supply. Analysts have warned that a direct confrontation between the U.S. and Iran could send prices significantly higher.

    Robert Thummel, portfolio manager at Tortoise Capital, told CNBC on Thursday that the market is not pricing enough geopolitical risk into crude prices. Thummel said WTI should really be trading at $85 right now given the tensions in the Middle East.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • World Court rules Israel must prevent genocide in Gaza, falls short of ordering a cease-fire

    World Court rules Israel must prevent genocide in Gaza, falls short of ordering a cease-fire

    [ad_1]

    The Peace Palace building of the International Court of Justice a few hours before the court delivers its ruling in the case brought by South Africa against Israel.

    Nurphoto | Nurphoto | Getty Images

    The U.N.’s highest court on Friday ordered Israel to take all measures within its power to prevent acts of genocide against the Palestinian people, but fell short of insisting that Israel should implement a cease-fire.

    It comes as Israeli forces continue a military campaign in the Gaza Strip that has claimed tens of thousands of Palestinian lives.

    The court further ordered Israel to submit a report within one month on the steps it is taking.

    “Israel must, in accordance with its obligations under the genocide convention, in relation to Palestinians in Gaza, take all measures within its power to prevent the commission of acts under article 2 of the convention, in particular, a) killing members of the group, b) causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group, c) inflicting upon the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole and in part, and d) imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group,” a reading of the International Court of Justice decision said Friday.

    The court said it has jurisdiction to rule on the case and will not be dismissing it, despite Israel’s request to do so.

    “Israel must ensure, with immediate effect, that its military forces do not commit any of the aforementioned acts,” the reading continued, saying that Israel must also take measures to prevent the incitement of genocide against Palestinian people.

    The World Court judgment was issued in response to a full case submitted by the South African government on Dec. 29, which accused Israel of genocide against the Palestinian people. The court heard South Africa’s allegations on Jan. 11 and Israel’s response on Jan. 12.

    ICJ rulings are “binding upon the parties concerned,” final and allow no right of appeal. The World Court lacks the means to directly enforce its pronouncements, but its rulings can often deal heavy reputational blows to the accused.

    The court also said it was “gravely concerned” about the welfare of the over 200 Israeli hostages abducted by Palestinian militant Hamas during their Oct. 7 terror attacks that triggered Israel’s retaliatory military response in the Gaza Strip. The World Court called for the immediate release of the captives.

    Questions have mounted internationally over the proportionality of Israel’s military activity in the Gaza Strip and the extent to which it is minimizing civilian casualties.

    At least 23,000 Palestinian people have been killed in the Gaza Strip, according to the Palestinian Ministry of Health, while humanitarian agencies have rung alarm bells over the spread of diseases, overcrowded shelters and a critical lack of food and electric resources.

    Israel has denied the allegations and Israeli forces have repeatedly cited the right to self-defense. They sau that Hamas forces have intentionally entrenched themselves in non-combatant facilities in the Gaza Strip, such as schools and hospitals, and are using civilians as human shields.

    This is a breaking news item, and it is being updated.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Former Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani raises less than $1 million from 13 donors in legal defense fund

    Former Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani raises less than $1 million from 13 donors in legal defense fund

    [ad_1]

    Rudy Giuliani was able to raise less than $1 million from just 13 donors, among them his friends and a group of former President Donald Trump‘s allies, to help pay off his legal fees as he faces a $146 million defamation judgment and a criminal prosecution, a new Federal Election Commission filing reviewed by CNBC shows.

    Giuliani’s political action committee raised just over $727,000 from August through December, according to the FEC filing Thursday. His son Andrew Giuliani, who is helping run the PAC, did not return a request for comment on the haul.

    The single biggest donation came from a Corona del Mar, California, woman named Caryn Borland, who donated $300,000, more than 40% of the total donations to Giuliani, the filing shows.

    Borland, who also is known as Caryn Hildenbrand, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    Last year, the Caryn L Hildenbrand Living Trust donated $1 million to a legal defense fund for Trump, which also was the single largest donation to that fund, which had raised $1.6 million, according to a disclosure filed to the Internal Revenue Service.

    Hildenbrand and her husband Michael, who donated more than $1 million in campaign-related contributions to Trump’ 2020 reelection bid, have shared memes and social media posts about the QAnon conspiracy theory according to The New York Times. The newspaper last month also reported that Trump’s vice president, Mike Pence, had once canceled a fundraiser with the couple because of their QAnon posts.

    Though the Giuliani PAC misspells Caryn Borland’s first name on their filing as “Garyn,” the address matches that of the mailing address listed on the IRS filing for the donation made to Trump’s defense fund.

    His PAC has spent over $500,000 on his legal fees so far and had $180,000 on hand entering 2024.

    The attorney is facing a litany of legal and financial struggles as a result of his work for Trump trying to reverse Trump’s loss in the 2020 election to President Joe Biden.

    In August, Giuliani, Trump and more than a dozen other defendants were criminally charged in Georgia state court with racketeering related to efforts to reverse Trump’s 2020 election loss in the state. He also is being sued for defamation by the voting machine manufacturers Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic.

    In December, a federal court jury in Washington, D.C., found Giuliani liable for $146 million in damages for defaming two Georgia election workers whom he falsely accused of ballot fraud in 2020.

    A week later, Giuliani filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, citing that judgment, and money he owes various law firms and attorneys.

    A court filing shows that Giuliani owes more than $1.3 million to the law firm Davidoff Hutcher & Citron. The lawyer Robert Costello sued Giuliani in September for $1.36 million in unpaid legal fees dating to 2019.

    Giuliani had planned to raise some of his legal defense money at two of Trump’s properties, Andrew Giuliani previously said.

    Donors were asked to each give $100,000 to the PAC to get access to a September event at Trump’s golf course in Bedminster, which featured a discussion between him and Giuliani.

    But just three people are listed on the filing as giving $100,000 or more to the PAC.

    One of them was Elizabeth Ailes, the widow of former Fox News CEO Roger Ailes, according to the filing.

    “Yes, I gave Rudy $100,000 for his legal defense PAC and I was happy to do so,” Elizabeth Ailes told CNBC.

    “I am upset by the way Rudy has been persecuted and I believe it’s important to push back against a politicized judicial system,” Ailes said.

    She called Giuliani a “friend” and noted that as mayor he had officiated at her wedding to Roger Ailes.

    Roger Ailes resigned from Fox News in 2016 after being accused by current and former Fox News employees of sexual harassment. Settlements based on those accusations reportedly cost Fox’s parent company millions of dollars.

    Before he was ousted from Fox, Roger Ailes’ conservative news network tried to bolster Trump’s candidacy in 2016.

    “They were friends for a very long time, way before Fox News,” Elizabeth Ailes told Newsmax last May. The only other person closest to Roger [besides Elizabeth] is Donald Trump.”

    Other Trump backers gave less to Giuliani.

    Businessman and longtime Trump supporter, Lewis Topper, gave $25,000 to the PAC, according to the filing.

    And the real estate investment firm Probity International, which is run by Trump donor Robert Zarnegin, gave $35,000 to the Giuliani PAC.

    Arnold Gumowitz, a veteran real estate executive, gave $50,000 to the PAC. He also donated to Andrew Giuliani’s failed gubernatorial run.

    Matthew Martorano, who donated $5,000 to the Trump Save America Joint Fundraising Committee last year, gave $100,000 to the Giuliani committee.

    Martorano could not be reached for comment.

    [ad_2]

    Source link