ReportWire

Tag: Google

  • Google employees scramble for answers after layoffs hit long-tenured and recently promoted employees

    Google employees scramble for answers after layoffs hit long-tenured and recently promoted employees

    [ad_1]

    Google employees are scrambling for answers from leadership and from colleagues as the company undergoes a massive layoff.

    On Friday, Alphabet-owned Google announced it was cutting 12,000 employees, roughly 6% of the full-time workforce. While employees had been bracing for a potential layoff, they are questioning leadership about the criteria for layoffs which surprised some employees, who woke up to find their access to company properties cut off. Some of the laid-off employees had been long-tenured or recently promoted, raising questions about the criteria used to decide whose jobs were cut.

    related investing news

    CNBC Investing Club

    Shortly after CEO Sundar Pichai’s initial email to employees Friday morning, Google’s search boss Prabhakar Raghavan sent an email to employees saying he “also feels the responsibility to reach out” and asking for them to save questions for next week’s town hall. There will be “bumps in the road” as the organization moves forward with the layoffs, Raghavan noted.

    The company provided an FAQ for the layoffs, which CNBC has seen, but employees have complained that it doesn’t give much detail on many answers. Employees have flooded Dory, the company’s question-asking platform, and set up virtual communities to figure out who’s been laid off and why. Directors have been telling employees to hold questions for the town hall taking place next week.

    Google did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    The scramble highlights the challenges Google could face in maintaining a supportive and productive company culture for its restive workforce of more than 160,000 full-time employees. Further confrontations are possible, as the company said it plans to lay off international employees but has yet to determine which ones.

    So far in the U.S., employees have been laid off across business units including Chrome, Cloud, and its experimental Area 120 unit. Some employees working on the company’s artificial intelligence programs were also laid off, according to Bloomberg.

    A list of top-rated inquiries from employees, viewed by CNBC, contained pointed questions for executives.

    “How were the layoffs decided? Some high performers were let go from our teams,” one top-rated question read. “This negatively impacts the remaining Googlers who see someone with high recognition, positive reviews, promo but still getting laid off.”

    “What metrics were used to determine who was laid off?” another top-rated question read. “Was the decision based on their performance, scope of work, or both, or something else?”

    Another asked: “How much runway are we hoping to gain with the layoffs?” and “Would you explain clearly what the layoff allows Google to do that Google could not have done without layoffs?”

    Another highly rated one questioned CEO Sundar Pichai’s statement, which said, “I take full responsibility for the decisions that led us here.”

    “What does taking full responsibility entail?,” one employee asked on Dory. “Responsibility without consequence seems like an empty platitude. Is leadership forgoing bonuses and pay raises this year? Will anyone be stepping down?”

    Some employees came together on their own, organizing ad hoc groups to try and get answers. Employees created a Google doc spreadsheet as a way to keep track of people who were laid off and which part of the business they worked in.

    More than 5,000 laid-off employees started a Discord channel called Google post-layoffs, ranging in topics from venting to labor organizing and visa immigration. Some employees organized virtual Google meetings with people on video calls. Others tried to organize physical meet-ups.

    Some turned to the company’s internal meme-generator as a means to connect with each other, for answers and for comfort. 

    One meme showed Mila Kunis from the film “Friends with Benefits.” Kunis spoke to the Google logo, saying the line: “The sad thing is, I actually thought you were different.” Another meme showed former President Bill Clinton gesturing the word “zero” with the title “Leadership paycut.”

    “Alphabet leadership claims ‘full responsibility’ for this decision, but that is little comfort to the 12,000 workers who are now without jobs,” said Parul Koul, executive chair of Alphabet Workers Union-CWA in a statement Friday. “This is egregious and unacceptable behavior by a company that made $17 billion dollars in profit last quarter alone.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 1/20: CBS News Weekender

    1/20: CBS News Weekender

    [ad_1]

    1/20: CBS News Weekender – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Catherine Herridge reports on Google layoffs, Elon Musk’s testimony in court, the latest T-Mobile breach, and eggs seized at the border.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • CBS Evening News, January 20, 2022

    CBS Evening News, January 20, 2022

    [ad_1]

    CBS Evening News, January 20, 2022 – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Google axes 12,000 jobs amid major tech layoffs; Teen born without legs inspires on the basketball court

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Google axes 12,000 jobs amid major tech layoffs

    Google axes 12,000 jobs amid major tech layoffs

    [ad_1]

    Google axes 12,000 jobs amid major tech layoffs – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Silicon Valley was hit with another round of layoffs on Friday as Google announced that it would be cutting 12,000 jobs. The move comes during the same week that Microsoft and Amazon also announced layoffs, and companies nationwide look at cost-cutting measures amid growing concerns about a pending recession. Janet Shamlian has more.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Google to slash 12,000 jobs as tech industry layoffs surge

    Google to slash 12,000 jobs as tech industry layoffs surge

    [ad_1]

    Google is laying off 12,000 workers, becoming the latest technology company to trim staff after rapid expansions during the COVID-19 pandemic have worn off.

    Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai shared the news Friday in an email to staff at the Silicon Valley giant that was also posted on the company’s news blog.

    “Over the past two years we’ve seen periods of dramatic growth,” Pichai wrote. “To match and fuel that growth, we hired for a different economic reality than the one we face today.”

    He said the layoffs reflect a “rigorous review” carried out by Google of its operations. The jobs being eliminated “cut across Alphabet, product areas, functions, levels and regions,” Pichai said.

    The cuts represent just over 6% of Alphabet’s workforce, which numbered 186,000 in September, according to a securities filing.

    Laid-off employees in the U.S. will receive a severance package starting at 16 weeks salary plus two weeks for every additional year at Google, as well as six months of health care, job placement services and immigration support.

    Added Pichai, “As an almost 25-year-old company, we’re bound to go through difficult economic cycles. These are important moments to sharpen our focus, reengineer our cost base, and direct our talent and capital to our highest priorities.”


    Microsoft joins list of tech companies to announce sweeping layoffs

    05:10

    Earlier this week, Microsoft announced 10,000 job cuts, or nearly 5% of its workforce. Also in January, Amazon said it would cut 18,000 jobs, Facebook parent Meta announced it is eliminating 11,000 positions and software maker Salesforce said it would shed 7,000 workers. Netflix, Peloton, Twitter and other industry players have also announced sizable layoffs or scaled back hiring in recent months.

    “All the tech giants have now entered the layoff game,” Wall Street analyst Adam Crisafulli of Vital Knowledge said in a report, adding that “myriad others are reducing jobs, too.”

    Job cuts are hitting smaller players as well. U.K.-based cybersecurity firm Sophos laid off 450 employees, or 10% of its global workforce. Cryptocurrency trading platform Coinbase cut 20% of its workforce, about 950 jobs, in its second round of layoffs in less than a year.

    The technology industry shed the most jobs of any sector last year, eliminating nearly 100,000 positions in 2022 after expanding rapidly during the pandemic, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas.

    “We are seeing 5%-10% headcount cuts across the tech sector as many of these companies (both big and small) were spending money like 1980s rock stars and now need to rein in the expense controls ahead of a softer macro,” Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives said in a research note.

    Economic growth has weakened as the Federal Reserve moves to sharply raise its benchmark interest rate in an effort to tame inflation. Although experts forecast a slowdown in the labor market this year, hiring across the U.S. has remained robust. The nation’s unemployment rate in December fell to 3.5%, matching a 50-year low. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Dead Stadia Game Lives On Through Sneaky Steam Update

    Dead Stadia Game Lives On Through Sneaky Steam Update

    [ad_1]

    Image: Necrosoft

    As Google prepares to kill off its Stadia streaming service for good, there have been a few parting gifts to emerge from its demise. Users got a final game, along with the ability to unlock the Bluetooth capabilities of their controllers (even if that was something they should have been able to do from day one), but one of the last surprises can be enjoyed by all of us. Especially those of us who never paid for Stadia in the first place.

    Back in 2020 Necrosoft (finally) released Gunsport, a sci-fi take on 2D volleyball, as a Stadia exclusive. It was pretty cool! It was also, as a Stadia exclusive, a game that most of us never got to enjoy. In June 2022 it was followed by a sequel, Hyper Gunsport, which was much more widely available, since it came out on PC, Switch, Xbox and PlayStation.

    Gunsport Stadia Teaser

    While two completely separate games, they’ve now been brought a lot closer, with Necrosoft saying in a tweet earlier today Since we care about game preservation we’ve made an offline version of Gunsport available in the Steam version of Hyper Gunsport, through the beta channel.”

    You can see a video of this game-smuggling move (done by Necrosoft’s Lotte May) in action below:

    If you’ve never had to use a Steam game’s beta channel system before, the video above will give you a quick rundown on how to activate the original game, then be able to easily switch between playing it and the sequel.

    This is a very cool move! Not just because people are getting essentially a free video game, but because this is a super interesting way to implement a form of game preservation, one that thinks way outside the box but which, thanks to the way Steam is structured, also seems to work pretty damn well!

    [ad_2]

    Luke Plunkett

    Source link

  • Released Today, The Last Google Stadia Game Is A Piece Of History

    Released Today, The Last Google Stadia Game Is A Piece Of History

    [ad_1]

    Image: Google

    If you haven’t heard, Google Stadia is shutting down and closing shop next week. But before the never-quite-successful game streaming service dies, it has provided one neat (and free) little gift you can only play for a few days before it all goes offline.

    Launched back in 2019, Google Stadia was a costly and massive investment from Google into the world of video games. Powered by the cloud aka a bunch of servers and off-site computers, Stadia’s big promise was instantaneous gaming on the go. No more updates or expensive consoles. And while it sometimes worked, the high cost of games, lack of features, small library, and internet costs ended up dooming the service. Sure, some superfans logged thousands of hours into it, but for most, it just wasn’t what they wanted or needed from a video game platform.

    So it wasn’t surprising that in September of last year, Google announced the end of Stadia. In five days, on January 18, the video game streaming service will shut down. With the end so near, it seemed unlikely that Stadia would receive any new game releases. Yet, Google has published one final game. But don’t expect some big open-world RPG or remake. Instead, the final Stadia game is Worm Game, an internally developed title used to test Stadia long before it became a public service.

    We probably were never meant to see or play this Snake-like test game as it sports fairly rudimentary graphics and kinda ugly menus. But in the final days of Stadia, it appears the devs working on the project were able to provide its community one final treat. Even better, anyone can play Worm Game as it’s free. (Which makes sense considering the Stadia store stopped working already.)

    The game’s store page features this nice and touching description of the game and what it was used for:

    Play the game that came to Stadia before Stadia came to the world. “Worm Game” is a humble title we used to test many of Stadia’s features, starting well before our 2019 public launch, right through 2022. It won’t win Game of the Year, but the Stadia team spent a LOT of time playing it, and we thought we’d share it with you. Thanks for playing, and for everything.

    Is Worm Game some incredibly important or amazing thing? Not really. However, it’s still really cool to get a peek behind the scenes, and thanks to videos of Worm Game, this little piece of test software will be somewhat preserved for folks to look back at years from now.

    In other cool End Of Stadia news, Google has confirmed that starting next week, it will start allowing players to unlock the Bluetooth functionally of its Stadia controller.

    This is a nice way to make the controller—which has one of my favorite modern D-pads on it—more useful and easier to hook up to more devices. I doubt the devs who worked on Stadia for years were planning for the controller to be the only thing left of Stadia in 2023, but here we are.

    [ad_2]

    Zack Zwiezen

    Source link

  • BEST OF 2022: Supermom In Training: Why you NEED to talk to your kids about sex

    BEST OF 2022: Supermom In Training: Why you NEED to talk to your kids about sex

    [ad_1]

    Want to know why you need to talk to your kids about sex?!

    Just Google “what is sex?”. If you don’t tell them what sex is, this is what they will think it is.

    Scary, no?

    About a year ago, I had the full “sex talk” with my 8-year-old. He’s always been a pretty mature kid so I knew he was ready to hear it. Now, in third grade, he and his friends are doing a lot of joking around that centres around sexuality. The difference is, I know my son understands these jokes… but I also know the kids who are throwing around these terms and sound effects, and they most definitely don’t know or understand the depth of what they are saying.

    Yes, sound effects. Moaning, to be precise.

    There are lots of jokes about penises. Doodles of dinkies. Mentions of “humping” and more. So much more.

    Perhaps it’s better that your kids hear about sex and sexuality not from their friends, who are tossing around words without really knowing what they’re talking about. Sure, it might seem uncomfortable to say certain things about sex to your kids. After all, they’re so innocent, right?

    Trust me: Coming from a mom whose son trusts her enough to divulge all the on-goings of 8-, 9-, and 10-year-old kids, you want to help them out on this one. Because if you don’t fill in the blanks, Google or Siri or the kid in the schoolyard will. 

    A full-time work-from-home mom, Jennifer Cox (our “Supermom in Training”) loves dabbling in healthy cooking, craft projects, family outings, and more, sharing with readers everything she knows about being an (almost) superhero mommy.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Google fixes leading definition of

    Google fixes leading definition of

    [ad_1]

    Search engine giant Google said it has fixed the search results for the word “Jew” after an offensive definition of the word was appearing as the top result. For at least several hours on Tuesday morning and into the early afternoon, internet users who typed the word “Jew” into a Google search bar encountered a series of pejorative phrases as the engine’s leading result, which appeared above the dictionary definition describing a person affiliated with cultural and religious Judaism.

    Prior to the fix, the leading result for the word “Jew” read: “Bargain with someone in a miserly or petty way.” The definition, which cited Oxford Languages as a source and characterized the term as a verb, included a small bolded banner marked “offensive” in capital letters. The search engine also presented the word in various “tenses,” including “jewed” and “jewing.” 

    Google updated the result after 1 p.m. ET, after many online pointed out the offensive error. 

    The offensive definition’s origin was listed as having been rooted in a 19th-century slur and “in reference to old stereotypes associating Jewish people with trading and moneylending.”

    Google posted a statement confirming that the derogatory definition had been removed from its search engine results just before 1:30 p.m. ET on Tuesday, after it was flagged on Twitter by Amy Spitalnick, the executive director of the nonprofit organization Integrity First for America, who is also a vocal advocate against antisemitism.

    “Our apologies. Google licenses definitions from third-party dictionary experts,” the company said in response to Spitalnick. “We only display offensive definitions by default if they are the main meaning of a term. As this is not the case here, we have blocked this & passed along feedback to the partner for further review.”

    The definition that now populates following a Google search for “Jew” — again, citing information from the dictionary publisher Oxford Languages, which describes itself as Google’s English dictionary provider — reads: “A member of the people and cultural community whose traditional religion is Judaism and who trace their origins through the ancient Hebrew people of Israel to Abraham.”

    The incident involving the offensive definition appearing comes amid rising antisemitism across the country. A spokesperson for the Anti-Defamation League, which tracks hateful and antisemitic incidents nationwide, told CBS News that “there is no excuse” for “an obviously antisemitic result” to be displayed first on Google.

    “We are thankful that Google removed the offensive definition of the word Jew from its initial dictionary definition today after ADL and the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs reported it,” the spokesperson said.

    Google’s partnerships with “third-party dictionary experts” likely mean its search engines can directly access a partner company’s data or API — a software interface that facilitates communication and information exchanges between multiple computer programs — and offer quick results to internet users, said Dan Patterson, a former tech reporter at CBS News and CNET and the husband of Spitalnick.

    “In some cases, they [Google] will pay a fee to have direct access to the company’s data, so they can serve it directly and faster,” Patterson explained. “It wasn’t a Google definition.”

    Instead of asking users to click through links to find a given dictionary definition, Google indexes the API for an online dictionary service so that a filtered result can be conveniently displayed at the top of the page, “which is probably what they did here,” Patterson added. Pulling the offensive definition from a third-party’s API could be one reason why Google was seemingly able to remove it from its top search results without difficulty.

    While Patterson acknowledged that the response from Google’s search liaison “makes sense,” he also pointed to lingering questions about what caused the error.

    “How did this happen in the first place?” he said. “I don’t understand how you partner with a site that serves this type of information through a Google search. Shouldn’t there be some sort of filter, especially with a term like that, in a time of rising antisemitism? Why was nobody watching that search term?”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Google’s CEO Is Asking Employees 3 Simple Questions to Boost Productivity

    Google’s CEO Is Asking Employees 3 Simple Questions to Boost Productivity

    [ad_1]

    Productivity tends to wane as the holiday season comes along, leaving many companies to look for ways to combat the slump and keep morale (and output) high.


    Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Google’s CEO Sundar Pichai is implementing a new strategy that he hopes will not only bolster productivity among the company’s employees but also foster a stronger sense of community and togetherness.

    [ad_2]

    Emily Rella

    Source link

  • Google tells employees more of them will be at risk for low performance ratings next year

    Google tells employees more of them will be at risk for low performance ratings next year

    [ad_1]

    CEO of Alphabet and Google Sundar Pichai during press conference at the Chancellery in Warsaw, Poland on March 29, 2022.

    Mateusz Wlodarczyk | Nurphoto | Getty Images

    More Google employees will be at risk for low performance ratings and fewer are expected to reach high marks under a new performance review system that starts next year, according to internal communications obtained by CNBC.

    In a recent Google all-hands meeting and in a separate presentation last week, executives presented more details of its new performance review process. Under the new system, Google estimates 6% of full-time employees will fall into a low-ranking category that puts them at higher risk for corrective action, versus 2% before. Simultaneously, it will be harder to achieve high marks: Google projects 22% percent of employees will be rated with in one of the two highest categories, versus 27% before.

    As an example, in order to make the new, highest rated category, “Transformative Impact,” an employee must have “achieved the near-impossible” and contributed “more than we thought possible.”

    Earlier this year, Google announced the new process for performance reviews, known as Google Reviews and Development, or GRAD.

    But CNBC recently reported that employees have complained about procedural and technical issues with GRAD close to the year-end deadlines, making them anxious they won’t be accurately rated. The anxiety is compounded by a wave of layoffs in the tech industry. While Google has so far avoided the widespread job cuts that have hit other tech companies like Meta, employees have grown anxious if they could be next.

    In a December all-hands meeting on the topic, employees expressed frustration with executives, who have long touted transparency but are not providing direct answers to questions about headcount. Some employees believe new performance review system might be a way for the company to reduce headcount.

    Headcount has been a subject of employee concern throughout the latter part of 2022. CEO Sundar Pichai found himself on the defensive in September, as he was forced to explain the company’s changing position after years of supercharged growth. Executives said at the time that there would be small cuts, and they didn’t rule out layoffs.

    And in November, a number of employees in an all-hands meeting asked for clarification on executives’ plans around headcount, and even asked if executives mismanaged headcount when Google grew its workforce by 24% year-over-year in Q3 2022.

    As of Q3, the company employed 186,779 full-time employees. It also employs a similar amount of contractors.

    Recent documents about the GRAD also say the company will be looking at bonuses, pay and equity and expects to “spend more per capita on compensation overall.” It also states the company still plans on paying within the top 5% to 10% of market rates.

    Google did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    ‘A lot of distress and anger’

    At the company’s most recent all-hands meeting on Dec. 8, many of the top-rated questions described stress around year-end performance reviews, according to audio of the meeting obtained by CNBC. The questions also suggested some employees don’t trust the company’s leadership is being transparent in how it handles headcount.

    “Why did Google push support check-in quotas to front line managers days before the deadline?,” one employee asked, in a question read aloud by Pichai. “I’ve been through a lot in Google in 5+ years but this is a new low.”

    “It seems like a lot of last-minute support check-ins were forced through part of Cloud in order to meet a quota, causing a lot of distress and anger,” another employee asked. “With only two weeks to correct course, how is this helpful feedback? How do we prevent this from happening in the future?”

    “The support check-in process is confusing, increasingly becoming a cause of stress and anxiety in Googlers, especially given the current economic situation and rumors around layoffs,” said another top-rated employee question.

    Earlier this month, CNBC reported employees began receiving “support check-ins” often associated with lower performance ratings in the final days leading up to year-end deadlines. They also said executives changed parts of the process in the final days.

    “I know it’s been bumpy,” Google’s chief people officer Fiona Cicconi, eventually said, briefly acknowledging the issues with GRAD in a recent all-hands meeting.

    “It’s not ideal to have support check-ins occur so late in the review cycle and we know that people need time to absorb the feedback and take action on it,” admitted Cicconi, adding that “Googlers should have plenty of time to course-correct.”

    Several employees also asked executives whether they had quotas for placing people in lower performance categories in order to reduce headcount in 2023. Even though executives said they don’t have quotas, it didn’t seem to convince employees.

    One question asked executives if Google was becoming “a stack-ranking company like Amazon,” referring to the process of using quotas to place employees in certain performance buckets. 

    “Uncertainties around GRAD processes have been putting a lot of pressure on lower level managers to pass down information” about performance reviews and sometimes force “conflicting items,” another highly-rated question stated.

    Another read: “Layoffs across the industry has been a topic impacting Googlers, raising stress, anxiety and burnout,” another read. There’s been no official comms on this, which raises even more concern around this. When will the company address this topic?” 

    But executives largely avoided answering the questions directly. CEO Sundar Pichai kept saying he “doesn’t know what the future holds.”

    “What we’ve been trying hard to do is we are trying to  prioritize where we can so we are set up to better weather the storm, regardless of what’s ahead,” Pichai said. “We really don’t know what the future holds so unfortunately I cannot make forward looking commitments but everything we’ve been planning on as a company for the past six to seven months has been do all the hard work to try and work our way through this as best as possible so, that’s all I can say.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ‘Wordle’ Is 2022’s Most-Googled Search Term

    ‘Wordle’ Is 2022’s Most-Googled Search Term

    [ad_1]

    “Wordle” was the most-searched term on Google in 2022, both in the United States and globally, beating out “Ukraine” and “Queen Elizabeth.” What do you think?

    “Just more proof that Americans aren’t watching enough porn.”

    Kate Rozenfeld, Package Resealer

    “I guess my fetish isn’t so niche after all.”

    Zidane Guddeman, Pen Repairman

    “I guess there just wasn’t much else going on this year.”

    Yusuf Faez, Sherpa Intern

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ChatGPT Made Me Question What It Means to Be a Creative Human

    ChatGPT Made Me Question What It Means to Be a Creative Human

    [ad_1]

    I don’t say this lightly, but this tech is one of the most astonishing, and terrifying, technologies I’ve ever seen, and I’ve been writing about technology for almost two decades. Not only because of what it is capable of today, with its ability to output truly “creative” text (or at least text that appears creative), but because of what this technology will be capable of in the next year or two—and the number of jobs it could (or should I say “will”) replace when it gets there. For example, when I asked ChatGPT to list 50 jobs that could be replaced by ChatGPT, it spit out this list in less than a second: customer service representative, technical support specialist, sales representative, receptionist, data entry clerk, call center agent, transcriptionist, legal secretary, medical secretary, executive assistant, personal assistant, journalist, novelist, travel agent, insurance agent, retail salesperson, bookkeeper, court reporter, marketing manager, public relations manager, advertising manager, and on and on and on.

    While there are already examples of crude AI writing simple articles for news outlets today—some basic stock reports, sports updates, and weather-related stories are written by robots—the advent of ChatGPT, and the coming iterations of this tech, illustrate that in the coming year or so, my editor (if he or she still has a job) might not ask me or another journalist to write a story with an analysis of what Elon Musk will do to Twitter, or a detailed look at how people voted in Georgia to determine how they may vote in 2024; instead, they could simply type a prompt into an app like ChatGPT. The same is true with art and design and illustration, as we’ve seen a spate of other new AI products released in recent months that are threatening all areas of the arts and creative careers. There are the text varieties, like GPT-3, which is the basis for ChatGPT and is capable of reading and writing like a human. And then there are the astonishing image-generation abilities of computers, like DALL·E 2 and Stable Diffusion, which can draw or paint anything in mere seconds, in any style you want, based on a single command. 

    Already, I’m hearing anecdotal reports from friends with kids in high school and college that some professors and teachers who have learned about the technology are in a panic after seeing ChatGPT and what it’s capable of, with some proclaiming the impending death of the high school and college essay. ChatGPT is already being used to automatically generate essays based on a prompt or topic, which makes the traditional process of brainstorming, researching, and writing essays obsolete. Why waste your time doing all that when you can just put your homework assignment as a prompt into ChatGPT and receive a complete essay in a matter of seconds? You might think a professor or teacher could decipher the difference between something written by an AI and something written by a human, but that is impossible, and it’s also impossible for an AI to tell the difference. One of the things you can do with ChatGPT is give it a paragraph or sentence and make it continue writing the rest of the essay. I did this with a made-up science fiction story and asked people to tell me which parts of the essay were written by me and which were written by AI. No one could tell the difference; it felt a little like the Pepsi Challenge. Then I fed the same text back to the AI and asked it to tell me which parts were written by a computer and which were written by a human, and ChatGPT guessed incorrectly. 

    In 2017, a research paper titled “Attention Is All You Need” landed on the internet to little fanfare outside of the esoteric tech circles of people interested in the cutting edges of natural language processing and artificial intelligence. The paper talked about “dominant sequence transduction models,” an idea called the “Transformer,” and “recurrent neural networks,” and for 99.999999% of society, trying to read the theories in this 11-page report would be akin to trying to read a book written in a language you’ve never heard of before while wearing a blindfold. But the paper, written by a team of researchers at Google Brain, an AI research team that is part of Google’s AI division, proposed a new approach to natural language processing—the branch of artificial intelligence concerned with giving computers the ability to understand human language in much the same way human beings can—that has arguably changed the field forever. 

    The paper essentially reimagined how to model information processing. The researchers argued that traditional models—which worked like a librarian who carefully sorts each book into its proper place on the shelves, making sure that everything is organized and easy to find—were inefficient. Instead, they proposed an “attention-based model.” It works like this: When a reader is looking for something, it scans all the books and focuses its attention on the ones that contain the information it needs, without worrying about organizing all the books on the shelves.

    These programs have since been fed millions of examples of human writing and art and music and creativity, and the machines have since learned how to replicate these styles. All of this has made me ask myself: What does it mean to be human in a future where robots can potentially be more creative than us? Can the next iteration of AI (or the one after that) have better ideas than humans? Or will these things just become tools that help us? 

    Members of the pro-AI tech set concede that this technology has the potential to automate many tasks that today require human creativity, but they point out that machines are not truly capable of understanding or appreciating art in the same way that humans are. Machines do not have consciousness; a computer can’t feel what it’s like to fall in love or lose a loved one or be tormented to a point that you have to chop off your ear. The argument goes: Machines can mimic our creations, but they cannot truly understand the emotions and experiences that inspire us to create. But, to me, if machines are able to imitate art with emotion and depth because they are learning from things humans have created over hundreds of years, then the machines are, in turn, an extension of those human emotions. A machine does not have to be conscious or capable of experiencing emotions to create art that is meaningful to us. The value and significance of the art lie not in the machine’s ability to feel, but in the ability of the viewer to appreciate it. 

    [ad_2]

    Nick Bilton

    Source link

  • The Best Fits At The Game Awards 2022

    The Best Fits At The Game Awards 2022

    [ad_1]

    Sydnee Goodman at The Game Awards

    “Everyone is talking about drip tonight, Geoff, it’s incredible.”
    Screenshot: The Game Awards / Kotaku

    Two days ago, in the days leading up to The Game Awards 2022, I wrote about how the wildly inconsistent fashion at the event was indicative of the industry’s identity crisis. Things quickly got out of hand.

    The discourse machine revved up and began spinning at an impossibly fast rate: Nintendo president Doug Bowser tweeted at me, Xbox president Phil Spencer replied to the thread and confirmed he is now aware of what Mike Mercante wears to go get bagels, everyone was weighing in on the “T-shirt with a blazer” fit, and the word “drip” was learned and subsequently overused by half the industry.

    Other publications wrote about the discourse, developers weighed in, and the lead-up to The Game Awards became less about speculation over which game would win GOTY (spoilers: it was Elden Ring) and more about whether or not Josef Fares would wear a skin-tight t-shirt again (spoilers: he didn’t).

    Ultimately, it seems like my call-out worked. Numerous people who attended the event told me via DM that I shamed attendees into dressing better. The presenters and on-stage talent at this year’s Game Awards were almost uniformly sharper-dressed than in previous years, and even Phil Spencer seemed to be wearing a slightly more formal outfit.

    The Game Awards is a chance to have fun with fashion and to lean into the themes that are so often in the games the night is celebrating, so it was great to see some people really doing that last night. That’s why I decided to highlight the best-dressed attendees and honorees at gaming’s biggest night. You all did amazing, sweeties.

    [ad_2]

    Alyssa Mercante

    Source link

  • ‘Hailey Bieber Nails,’ ‘Addison Rae Lipgloss’ and ‘Old Money Aesthetic’ Among Top Trending Google Searches of 2022

    ‘Hailey Bieber Nails,’ ‘Addison Rae Lipgloss’ and ‘Old Money Aesthetic’ Among Top Trending Google Searches of 2022

    [ad_1]

    As the year ends and we reflect on the last 12 months, Google‘s annual Year in Search reveals what the most culturally significant moments, people and trends of 2022 were — according to what we typed into our search engines. 

    Based on the top trending queries (which the company defines as searches with a high spike in traffic over a sustained period within the U.S.), the Year in Search yields some fascinating results, some more surprising than others: On the fashion front, “how to style leather pants” was a trending styling tip, while many also inquired about the “preppy aesthetic“; Hailey Bieber’s nails, meanwhile, topped beauty searches, as did “passport makeup trend” and “What skincare products should not be refrigerated?”

    [ad_2]

    Angela Wei

    Source link

  • EU set to bar Meta from ads based on personal data

    EU set to bar Meta from ads based on personal data

    [ad_1]

    Meta will only be able to run advertising based on personal data with users’ consent, according to a confidential EU privacy watchdog decision, a person familiar with the matter said on Tuesday, in a blow to the US social network.

    The Irish data protection agency, which oversees Meta because its European headquarters is located in Dublin, has been given a month to issue a ruling based on the European Data Protection Board’s (EDPB) binding decision.

    The EDPB will likely require the Irish body to hand out fines, the person said, asking not to be named because of the senstivity of the issue.

    Big Tech’s targeted ad model and how data is collected and used has drawn regulatory scrutiny around the world.

    Shares of the company were down 6.2% in mid-session trade. Google, Snap and Pinterest which are reliant on digital advertising, fell 2.2%, 8% and 4% respectively.

    The Irish case against Meta was triggered by a complaint by Austrian privacy activist Max Schrems in 2018.

    “Instead of having a yes/no option for personalised ads, they just moved the consent clause in the terms and conditions. This is not just unfair but clearly illegal. We are not aware of any other company that has tried to ignore the GDPR in such an arrogant way,” Schrems said in a statement.

    He said the EDPB’s ruling means that Meta must allow users to have a version of all apps that do not use personal data for ads while the company would still be allowed to use non-personal data to personalise ads or simply ask users for consent.

    The 27-country bloc’s landmark privacy rules known as the General Data Protection Regulation went into effect in 2018.

    Meta is engaging with the Irish body, a Meta spokesperson said.

    “GDPR allows for a range of legal bases under which data can be processed, beyond consent or performance of a contract. Under the GDPR there is no hierarchy between these legal bases, and none should be considered better than any other,” the spokesperson said.

    Apple’s new privacy rules, which limit digital advertisers from tracking iPhone users, have also been a blow to the Facebook parent.

    An EDPB spokeswoman declined to provide details of the decisions made. The agency said it stepped in after other national watchdogs disagreed with the Irish agency’s draft decision.

    Its draft decisions on Meta’s parent Facebook and Instagram focus on the lawfulness and transparency of processing for behavioural advertising, while its decision on WhatsApp concerns the lawfulness of processing for the purpose of the improvement of services.

    “The DPC cannot comment on the contents of the decisions at this point. We have one month to adopt the EDPB’s binding decisions and will publish details then,” the Irish Data Protection Commission said.

    Meta may have to change its business model, said Helena Brown, head of data & privacy at London-based law firm Addleshaw Goddard.

    “The direction of travel seems to be that the European regulators will not allow Meta to hide behind “provision of services” as its basis for using personal data for behavioural advertising,” she said.

    “Instead, Meta may need to change its approach to seeking clear, explicit consent instead. It will be a challenge for Meta to be able to explain its practices in a way that such consent can be lawful and well-informed,” Brown said.

    The WSJ first reported on the EDPB ruling.
     

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Facebook owner Meta may remove news from platform if US Congress passes media bill

    Facebook owner Meta may remove news from platform if US Congress passes media bill

    [ad_1]

    Facebook parent Meta Platforms Inc on Monday threatened to remove news from its platform if the US Congress passes a proposal aimed at making it easier for news organizations to negotiate collectively with companies like Alphabet Inc’s Google and Facebook.

    Sources briefed on the matter said lawmakers are considering adding the Journalism Competition and Preservation Act to a must-pass annual defense bill as way to help the struggling local news industry.

    Meta spokesperson Andy Stone in a tweet said the company would be forced to consider removing news if the law was passed “rather than submit to government-mandated negotiations that unfairly disregard any value we provide to news outlets through increased traffic and subscriptions.”

    He added the proposal fails to recognize that publishers and broadcasters put content on the platform because “it benefits their bottom line – not the other way around.”

    The News Media Alliance, a trade group representing newspaper publishers, is urging Congress to add the bill to the defense bill, arguing that “local papers cannot afford to endure several more years of Big Tech’s use and abuse, and time to take action is dwindling. If Congress does not act soon, we risk allowing social media to become America’s de facto local newspaper.”

    More than two dozen groups including the American Civil Liberties Union, Public Knowledge and the Computer & Communications Industry Association on Monday urged Congress not to approve the local news bill saying it would “create an ill-advised antitrust exemption for publishers and broadcasters” and argued the bill does not require “funds gained through negotiation or arbitration will even be paid to journalists.”

    A similar Australian law, which took effect in March 2021 after talks with the big tech firms led to a brief shutdown of Facebook news feeds in the country, has largely worked, a government report said.

    Since the News Media Bargaining Code took effect, various tech firms including Meta and Alphabet have signed more than 30 deals with media outlets, compensating them for content that generated clicks and advertising dollars, the report added.

     

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Lawsuit against Google over app store competition gets class-action designation

    Lawsuit against Google over app store competition gets class-action designation

    [ad_1]

    A U.S. judge in California on Monday allowed litigation against Alphabet Inc’s Google to proceed as a consumer class action of 21 million individuals who accuse the company of violating U.S. anti-competition laws in how it runs its Google Play app store.

    U.S. District Judge James Donato said in a 27-page order that the plaintiffs had established the legal elements of “commonality” and other factors to form a class action that alleges anticompetitive business practices.

    The class members are Google Play Store individual consumers in 12 states, including Ohio, Michigan and Georgia, in addition to American Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

    The case is among an array of pending antitrust actions against Google, and state prosecutors in more than three dozen other states lodged similar claims against Google last year. The plaintiffs’ lawyers in the newly certified class action are jointly working with those state enforcers.

    Nationwide, plaintiffs have identified aggregate damages of $4.7 billion.

    Google has defended its Play Store business practices, denying the claims in the case before Donato and others.

    A spokesperson for Google said on Monday: “We’re evaluating the ruling, and after that, we’ll assess our options.”

    Lawyers for the company at U.S. law firm Morgan, Lewis & Bockius on Monday did not immediately respond to a message seeking comment.

    In arguing against class-action certification, attorneys for Google said the plaintiffs failed to show how they were harmed, an argument that Donato rejected.

    A lead attorney for the class at plaintiffs’ firm Bartlit Beck declined to comment.

    The class attorneys allege among other things that Google prohibited app developers from steering customers to competitors and used “misleading warnings to deter customers from downloading apps outside the Google Play Store.”

    They claimed that “but for Google’s anticompetitive conduct, plaintiffs and class members would have paid lower prices for apps and in-app purchases and would have benefited from expanded choice.”

    A trial is scheduled to begin in June 2023.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Marine biologists capture audio recordings of coral to analyze reef health

    Marine biologists capture audio recordings of coral to analyze reef health

    [ad_1]

    Marine biologists capture audio recordings of coral to analyze reef health – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    As climate change and human activity threaten ocean life, researchers are now monitoring the sound of coral reefs in an attempt to analyze their health. And the public can listen in and help. Ian Lee has more.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Report: Streamer Deleted From TV Station’s Feed After Abusive, Misogynist Video Resurfaces

    Report: Streamer Deleted From TV Station’s Feed After Abusive, Misogynist Video Resurfaces

    [ad_1]

    iShowSpeed

    Photo: Zac Goodwin – PA Images (Getty Images)

    Streamer, YouTuber and all-round internet celebrity IShowSpeed has recently been helping one of the biggest TV stations in Europe, Sky Sports, with its broadcasts of English Premier League matches. That was, reportedly, until the executives at the channel found out about a video that went viral back in April.

    IShowSpeed—more commonly known as simply ‘Speed’—had been in the stands earlier this month to watch his team Manchester United play Fulham in the league (and then my beloved Aston Villa for the League Cup). While there, he helped present segments for the channel and appeared on their social media feeds. Here’s one (surviving) example:

    And here’s another (uploaded independently by someone who had saved the footage), showing him failing to recognise either Jamie Redknapp or Louis Saha:

    Ishowspeed in SKY SPORTS STUDIO reacting to no RONALDO

    Speed, who got famous streaming games like Fortnite, NBA 2K and FIFA, was presumably brought in by Sky to leverage his internet following and supposed appeal to younger football fans, which at time of posting stands at 13 million YouTube subscribers and 5.4 million Instagram followers (he is permanently banned from Twitch).

    As of today, though, nearly all of Speed’s promotional material on Sky’s social media has been deleted (with the exception of that single Tweet above), with The Athletic reporting that Sky made the decision after they were made aware of a video that did the rounds in April—one that became so notorious we reported on it—in which Speed made incredibly hostile and misogynistic comments to his teammates:

    While Speed later apologised for those comments, they were so bad that Riot Games banned him from not just Valorant, but League of Legends as well. His Twitch ban, meanwhile, was also for misogyny, just a different video. It’s weird—given that it was so widely reported, the tweet above having 180,000 likes and 11.7 million views and it was only 7 months ago—that nobody at Sky thought to even Google his name before putting him in the spotlight like this!

    [ad_2]

    Luke Plunkett

    Source link