ReportWire

Tag: Goldman Sachs Group Inc

  • KKM's Jeff Kilburg breaks down how to trade recent bank earnings

    KKM's Jeff Kilburg breaks down how to trade recent bank earnings

    [ad_1]

    Jeff Kilburg, KKM Financial founder and CEO, joins 'The Exchange' to discuss how to trade recent bank earnings.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Goldman Sachs tops revenue estimates on better-than-expected asset management results

    Goldman Sachs tops revenue estimates on better-than-expected asset management results

    [ad_1]

    CNBC's Leslie Picker joins 'Squawk Box' to report on the company's quarterly earnings results.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • CNBC Daily Open: Down to Davos

    CNBC Daily Open: Down to Davos

    [ad_1]

    Signage ahead of the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting in Davos, Switzerland on Jan. 15th, 2024.

    Adam Galici | CNBC

    This report is from today’s CNBC Daily Open, our international markets newsletter. CNBC Daily Open brings investors up to speed on everything they need to know, no matter where they are. Like what you see? You can subscribe here.

    What you need to know today

    Asia markets dip
    U.S. markets were closed Monday for Martin Luther King Day, but futures trading on Tuesday pointed to a softer start to the week as investors looked forward to more earnings from big Wall Street banks including
    Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley. Asia markets fell, led lower by declines in Hong Kong stocks, as Japan shares cooled off from their record-breaking rally.

    ECB tug of war

    European Central Bank policymaker and hawk Robert Holzmann said the ECB may not deliver any interest rate cuts this year. Speaking to CNBC at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, he said there’s a possibility of zero rate cuts this year — it’s not something markets were expecting. Still, Portugal’s central bank governor Mario Centeno said the ECB is on the right track in its fight against inflation, and the medium term trajectory is “very positive right now.”

    China needs fixing
    Kristalina Georgieva, managing director of the International Monetary Fund, warned China needs significant and structural reforms in order to avoid any large slowdown in growth. Georgieva told CNBC on the sidelines of Davos that the world’s second-largest economy is facing both short-term and long-term challenges.

    AI out for your jobs
    Almost 40% of jobs globally could be taken over by the rise of artificial intelligence, according to the International Monetary Fund. And it could also affect high-income countries more than low-income economies, the IMF warned, noting that AI could worsen inequality as well.

    [PRO] Morgan Stanley picks ‘alpha’ stocks 
    Alpha stocks are those that can beat the benchmark index, and Morgan Stanley picked its favorite plays in Asia. They include the Asia-Pacific region excluding Japan, and had a market capitalization of over $5 billion. Quality, value and sentiment were the basis of the U.S. investment bank’s selection.

    The bottom line

    It’s typically quieter on days when the U.S. markets are shut, but action continued from across the Atlantic as the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland commenced Monday.

    Day 1 of the forum saw discussions on everything ranging from China and artificial intelligence, to crypto and the European Central Bank. Global leaders and thinkers raised some key points and fears about these hot topics.

    China, for one, cannot seem to catch a break. IMF chief Kristalina Georgieva warned that the world’s second largest economy could see an even bigger cooldown in growth if its property and debt crisis isn’t tackled by major structural reforms.

    “Ultimately, what China needs are structural reforms to continue to open up the economy, to balance the growth model more towards domestic consumption, meaning create more confidence in people, so [they] don’t save, they spend more,” Georgieva said.

    The fund also reaffirmed its expectations that China’s GDP could slow, predicting a 4.6% growth this year, if the real estate sector doesn’t improve.

    The IMF also touched upon AI taking over about 40% of global jobs, which could have a much larger impact on high income economies.

    Its predicted about 60% of jobs in high-income nations will be impacted, 40% in emerging markets and 26% in low-income economies, given their respective exposure to AI.

    — CNBC’s Vicky McKeever and Sam Meredith contributed to this story.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • Citigroup posts $1.8 billion fourth-quarter loss after litany of charges

    Citigroup posts $1.8 billion fourth-quarter loss after litany of charges

    [ad_1]

    Citigroup on Friday posted a $1.8 billion fourth-quarter loss after booking several large charges tied to overseas risks, last year’s regional banking crisis and CEO Jane Fraser’s corporate overhaul.

    All told, the charges — so massive the bank preannounced their effect this week — hit quarterly earnings by $4.66 billion, or $2 per share, Citigroup said. Excluding their effect, earnings would’ve been 84 cents a share, the bank said.

    Here’s what the company reported versus what Wall Street analysts surveyed by LSEG, formerly known as Refinitiv, expected:

    • Earnings: 84 cents a share, adjusted, may not compare with 81 cents, expected.
    • Revenue: $17.44 billion vs. $18.74 billion expected.

    Fraser called her company’s performance “very disappointing” because of the charges but said Citigroup had made “substantial progress” simplifying the bank last year.

    The CEO announced plans for a sweeping corporate reorganization in September after previous efforts failed to boost the bank’s results and share price. On Friday, Citi said it expects to cut its headcount by 20,000 and post up to $1 billion in severance costs over the medium term.

    Citigroup previously said it would exit municipal bond and distressed debt trading operations as part of the streamlining exercise. Earlier this week, the company said it booked bigger charges in the quarter than previously disclosed by Chief Financial Officer Mark Mason.

    Citigroup revenue slipped 3% to $17.44 billion in the quarter, though the bank said revenue rose 2% after excluding the effect of divestitures and charges tied to exposure to Argentina. Despite the noise, Citi’s institutional services operations, U.S. personal banking and investment banking performed well, according to the bank.

    “Citigroup’s earnings looked awful with a big loss of $1.8 billion, but the bank’s underlying business showed resilience,” Octavio Marenzi, CEO of consulting firm Opimas LLC, said in an email. Fraser will be under mounting pressure to deliver results this year, he added.

    Shares of Citigroup rose 2% during premarket trading.

    JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America posted results earlier Friday, while Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley report Tuesday.

    Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • JPMorgan Chase profit falls after $2.9 billion fee from regional bank rescues

    JPMorgan Chase profit falls after $2.9 billion fee from regional bank rescues

    [ad_1]

    Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase, testifies during the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee hearing titled Annual Oversight of Wall Street Firms, in the Hart Building on Dec. 6, 2023.

    Tom Williams | Cq-roll Call, Inc. | Getty Images

    JPMorgan Chase reported fourth-quarter earnings before the opening bell Friday.

    Here’s what the company reported compared with what Wall Street analysts surveyed by LSEG, formerly known as Refinitiv, were expecting:

    • Earnings per share: $3.04, may not compare with expected $3.32
    • Revenue: $39.94 billion, vs. expected $39.78 billion

    JPMorgan will be watched closely for clues on how banks fared amid volatile interest rates and rising loan losses.

    While the biggest U.S. bank by assets has navigated the rate environment capably since the Federal Reserve began raising rates in early 2022, smaller peers have seen their profits squeezed.

    The industry has been forced to pay up for deposits as customers shift cash into higher-yielding instruments, squeezing margins. At the same time, rising yields mean the bonds owned by banks fell in value, creating unrealized losses that pressure capital levels.

    Concern is also mounting over rising losses from commercial loans, especially office building debt, and higher defaults on credit cards.

    Beyond guidance on net interest income and loan losses for this year, analysts will want to hear what CEO Jamie Dimon has to say about the economy and banks’ efforts to tone down coming increases in capital requirements.

    Wall Street may provide some help this quarter, with investment banking revenue higher than a year earlier, while trading may be “flattish,” JPMorgan said last month at a conference.  

    Beaten-down shares of banks recovered in November on expectations that the Fed had successfully managed inflation and could cut rates this year.

    Shares of JPMorgan jumped 27% last year, the best showing among big bank peers and outperforming the 5% decline of the KBW Bank Index.

    Bank of America, Wells Fargo and Citigroup are scheduled to release results later Friday, while Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley report Tuesday.

    This story is developing. Please check back for updates.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Citigroup at risk of quarterly loss after charges come in far higher than initially disclosed

    Citigroup at risk of quarterly loss after charges come in far higher than initially disclosed

    [ad_1]

    Jane Fraser CEO, Citi, speaks at the 2023 Milken Institute Global Conference in Beverly Hills, California, May 1, 2023.

    Mike Blake | Reuters

    Citigroup warned investors late Wednesday that charges tied to the decline of the Argentine peso as well as the bank’s reorganization came in far higher than disclosed by the company’s CFO just weeks ago.

    The bank said its fourth-quarter results, scheduled to be released Friday morning, were impacted by $880 million in currency conversion losses from the peso and $780 million in restructuring charges tied to CEO Jane Fraser’s corporate simplification project.

    Those charges are significantly higher than the “couple hundred million dollars” apiece that CFO Mark Mason told investors to expect at a Dec. 6 conference hosted by Goldman Sachs.

    “They gave guidance just a month ago, and now its several hundred million dollars higher for two categories,” veteran banking analyst Mike Mayo of Wells Fargo said in a phone interview. “If your problem is credibility with investors, then you shouldn’t be doing this type of thing.”

    Fraser faces a key moment this week as Citigroup reports fourth-quarter and full-year 2023 earnings in the middle of restructuring efforts aimed at making the bank into a leaner, more profitable company. Throughout the past two decades, Citigroup has been dogged by high expenses and eroding credibility after Fraser’s predecessors underdelivered on targets. That’s left Citigroup the lowest-valued among the six biggest U.S. banks.

    Beyond the two charges, Citigroup disclosed Wednesday that it needed to build reserves by $1.3 billion because of its exposure to Argentina and Russia, and that it would post a $1.7 billion expense for a special FDIC assessment tied to the 2023 regional bank failures.

    All told, the charges are likely to result in a $1 per share fourth-quarter loss, according to Mayo. Despite his own skepticism that the bank can achieve its targets, Mayo recommends Citigroup stock, saying it is so beaten down that it can double within three years.

    Shares of the bank dipped about 1% in after hours trading Wednesday.

    A Citigroup spokeswoman declined to comment on the bank’s shifting guidance, instead pointing to remarks from Mason published late Wednesday.

    “While these items are meaningful for our 2023 results, we remain on track to meet the 2023 expense guidance (excluding FDIC and divestitures) and all of our medium-term targets,” Mason said. “The items we disclosed today do not change our strategy.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How to invest in Wall Street's artificial intelligence boom

    How to invest in Wall Street's artificial intelligence boom

    [ad_1]

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Generative AI has landed on Wall Street. Here's how it can help propel 'massive' revenue growth

    Generative AI has landed on Wall Street. Here's how it can help propel 'massive' revenue growth

    [ad_1]

    Yuichiro Chino | Moment | Getty Images

    Like it or not, generative artificial intelligence has arrived on Wall Street — and experts expect it to transform the way firms do business.

    To be clear, artificial intelligence, like natural language processing and machine learning, has been used by wealth management and asset management firms for years. Yet with generative AI now on the scene, it can have a powerful impact when combined with other AI technologies, said Roland Kastoun, U.S. asset and wealth management consulting leader for PwC.

    “We see this as a massive accelerator of productivity and revenue growth for the industry,” he said.

    In fact, the banking sector is expected to have one of the largest opportunities in generative AI, according to McKinsey & Company. Gen AI could add the equivalent of $2.6 trillion to $4.4 trillion annually in value across the 63 use cases the McKinsey Global Institute analyzed. While not the largest beneficiaries within banking, asset management could see $59 billion in value and wealth management could see $45 billion.

    Some of the biggest names in the business are already on board.

    Earlier this month, BlackRock sent a memo to employees that in January it will roll out to its clients generative AI tools for Aladdin and eFront to help users “solve simple how-to questions,” the memo said.

    “GenAI will change how people interact with technology. It will improve our productivity and enhance the great work we are already doing. GenAI will also likely change our clients’ expectations around the frequency, timeliness, and simplicity of our interactions,” the memo said.

    Meanwhile, Morgan Stanley unveiled its generative AI assistant for financial advisors, called AI @ Morgan Stanley Assistant, in September. The firm’s co-President Andy Saperstein said in a memo to staffers that generative AI will “revolutionize client interactions, bring new efficiencies to advisor practices, and ultimately help free up time to do what you do best: serve your clients.”

    Earlier this year, both JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs said they were developing ChatGPT-style AI in house. JPMorgan’s IndexGPT will tap “cloud computing software using artificial intelligence” for “analyzing and selecting securities tailored to customer needs,” according to a filing in May. Goldman said its technology will help generate and test code.

    Read more from CNBC Pro:
    How to invest in Wall Street’s artificial intelligence boom

    Those who don’t embrace AI will be left behind, said Wells Fargo bank analyst Mike Mayo.

    “If the bank across the street has financial advisors that are using AI, how can you not be using it too?” he said. “It certainly increases the stakes for competition, and you can keep up or fall behind.”

    In fact, as the younger generation ages, those digitally native investors will seek greater digitization, more personalized solutions and lower fees, William Blair analyst Jeff Schmitt said in an Oct. 20 note.

    “Given that these investors will control an increasing share of invested assets over time, wealth management firms and advisors are leveraging AI to enhance offerings and adjust service delivery models to win them over,” he wrote.

    Cerulli Associates estimated some $72.6 trillion in wealth will be transferred to heirs through 2045.

    Not just generative AI

    The big appeal of generative AI — and a differentiator from other AI tech — is its ability to generate content, said PwC’s Kastoun.

    It’s one thing for technology to analyze a large set of content, he pointed out. “It’s another thing for it to be able to generate new content based on the data that it has, and that’s what’s creating a lot of hype.”

    Yet what he’s seeing in both the wealth management and asset management business is the use of multiple elements of AI, not just generative AI, he said.

    “It’s the power of combining these different technologies and methodologies that is really creating an impact across the industry,” Kastoun said.

    Firms are now figuring out how to incorporate generative AI into their businesses and existing AI technologies. At T. Rowe Price, its New York City Technology Development Center has been building AI capabilities for several years.

    “We ultimately are looking to help our decision makers get the benefit of data and insights to do their job better,” said Jordan Vinarub, head of the center.

    His team made a big pivot with the arrival of generative AI.

    “We kind of saw this as an existential moment for the firm to say, we need to understand this and figure out how we can use it to support the business,” Vinarub said. “Over the past, I guess, six months … we’ve gone from just pure research and proofs of concept to then building our own internal application on top of the large language model to help assist our investors and research process.”

    New entrants

    It’s not only the big firms adapting to generative AI; smaller upstarts are looking for ways to disrupt the industry.

    Wealth-tech firm Farther is one of those. Its co-founder, Brad Genser, said the company is a “new type of financial institution” that was built to combine expert advisors and AI.

    “If you don’t build the technology, along with the human processes, and you don’t control both, you end up with something that’s incomplete,” he said. “If you do it together, you’re building people processes and technology together, then you get something that’s greater than the sum of its parts.”

    Then there is Magnifi, an investing platform that uses ChatGPT and computer programs to give personal investing advice. Investors link the technology to their various accounts, and Magnifi can monitor their portfolios. About 45,000 subscribers have connected over $500 million in aggregate assets to the platform, Magnifi said in November.

    “It’s a copilot alongside individual consumers that they’re interacting with over time,” said Tom Van Horn, Magnifi’s chief operating and product officer. “It’s not taking over control, it’s empowering those individuals to get to better wealth outcomes.”

    An AI coworker

    The technology is so fast moving, it’s difficult to know what use cases could exist in the future. Yet certainly as productivity continues to increase, advisors can increase their time and level of engagement with their clients.

    “It could change the way we think about a lot of the way we set up our business models,” PwC’s Kastoun said.

    It’s also about people working with the technology and not the technology necessarily replacing humans, experts said.

    “The dream state is that every employee will have an AI copilot or AI coworker and that each customer will have the equivalent of an AI agent,” Wells Fargo’s Mayo said. “I’m not talking about computers alone. I’m not talking about humans alone, but humans plus AI can compete better than either computers or humans alone.”

    — CNBC’s Michael Bloom contributed reporting.

    Correction: This article has been updated to reflect that Magnifi said in November that about 45,000 subscribers have connected over $500 million in aggregate assets to the platform. A previous version misstated the amount of assets.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The market is mispricing Webster Financial's return potential, says KBW's Chris McGratty

    The market is mispricing Webster Financial's return potential, says KBW's Chris McGratty

    [ad_1]

    Share

    Christopher McGratty, KBW head of U.S. bank research, joins ‘Closing Bell Overtime’ to talk the bank sector and how to invest in the space in 2024.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Wall Street CEOs say proposed banking rules will hurt small businesses, low-income Americans

    Wall Street CEOs say proposed banking rules will hurt small businesses, low-income Americans

    [ad_1]

    (L-R) Brian Moynihan, Chairman and CEO of Bank of America; Jamie Dimon, Chairman and CEO of JPMorgan Chase; and Jane Fraser, CEO of Citigroup; testify during a Senate Banking Committee hearing at the Hart Senate Office Building on December 06, 2023 in Washington, DC.

    Win Mcnamee | Getty Images

    Wall Street CEOs on Wednesday pushed back against proposed regulations aimed at raising the levels of capital they’ll need to hold against future risks.

    In prepared remarks and responses to lawmakers’ questions during an annual Senate oversight hearing, the CEOs of eight banks sought to raise alarms over the impact of the changes. In July, U.S. regulators unveiled a sweeping set of higher standards governing banks known as the Basel 3 endgame.  

    “The rule would have predictable and harmful outcomes to the economy, markets, business of all sizes and American households,” JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon told lawmakers.

    If unchanged, the regulations would raise capital requirements on the largest banks by about 25%, Dimon claimed.

    The heads of America’s largest banks, including JPMorgan, Bank of America and Goldman Sachs are seeking to dull the impact of the new rules, which would affect all U.S. banks with at least $100 billion in assets and take until 2028 to be fully phased in. Raising the cost of capital would likely hurt the industry’s profitability and growth prospects.

    It would also likely help non-bank players including Apollo and Blackstone, which have gained market share in areas banks have receded from because of stricter regulations, including loans for mergers, buyouts and highly indebted corporations.

    While all the major banks can comply with the rules as currently constructed, it wouldn’t be without losers and winners, the CEOs testified.

    Those who could be unintentionally harmed by the regulations includes small business owners, mortgage customers, pensions and other investors, as well as rural and low-income customers, according to Dimon and the other executives.

    “Mortgages and small business loans will be more expensive and harder to access, particularly for low- to moderate-income borrowers,” Dimon said. “Savings for retirement or college will yield lower returns as costs rise for asset managers, money-market funds and pension funds.”

    With the rise in the cost of capital, government infrastructure projects will be more expensive to finance, making new hospitals, bridges and roads even costlier, Dimon added. Corporate clients will need to pay more to hedge the price of commodities, resulting in higher consumer costs, he said.

    The changes would “increase the cost of borrowing for farmers in rural communities,” Citigroup CEO Jane Fraser said. “It could impact them in terms of their mortgages, it could impact their credit cards. It could also importantly impact their cost of any borrowing that they do.”

    Finally, the CEOs warned that by heightening oversight on banks, regulators would push yet more financial activity to non-bank players — sometimes referred to as shadow banks — leaving regulators blind to those risks.

    The tone of lawmakers’ questioning during the three-hour hearing mostly hewed to partisan lines, with Democrats more skeptical of the executives and Republicans inquiring about potential harms to everyday Americans.

    Sen. Sherrod Brown, an Ohio Democrat, opened the event by lambasting banks’ lobbying efforts against the Basel 3 endgame.

    “You’re going to say that cracking down on Wall Street is going to hurt working families, you’re really going to claim that?” Brown said. “The economic devastation of 2008 is what hurt working families, the uncertainty and the turmoil from the failure of Silicon Valley Bank hurt working families.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Wells Fargo CEO warns of severance costs of nearly $1 billion in fourth quarter as layoffs loom

    Wells Fargo CEO warns of severance costs of nearly $1 billion in fourth quarter as layoffs loom

    [ad_1]

    Charlie Scharf, CEO, Wells Fargo, speaks during the Milken Institute Global Conference in Beverly Hills, California on May 2, 2023. speaks during the Milken Institute Global Conference in Beverly Hills, California on May 2, 2023. 

    Patrick T. Fallon | Afp | Getty Images

    Wells Fargo CEO Charlie Scharf said Tuesday that low staff turnover means the company will likely book a large severance expense in the fourth quarter.

    “We’re looking at something like $750 million to a little less than a billion dollars of severance in the fourth quarter that we weren’t anticipating, just because we want to continue to focus on efficiency,” Scharf told investors during a Goldman Sachs conference.

    The company needs to get “more aggressive” on managing headcount because employee attrition has slowed this year, Scharf said. While the bank has made progress under his tenure, Wells Fargo is “not even close” to where it should be in terms of efficiency, he added.

    That expense is an accrual for worker layoffs that Wells Fargo expects to make next year, according to a spokeswoman for the bank. Wells Fargo had 227,363 employees as of September.

    Under previous leadership, employees had fanned out across the country. Now, Scharf wants them near one of the bank’s office hubs. Some workers will be offered paid relocations, while others will only be offered severance. Workers who don’t opt to move may lose their roles, according to a person with knowledge of the situation.

    This story is developing. Please check back for updates.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Market vulnerabilities and a possible U.S. recession: Strategists give their cautious predictions for 2024

    Market vulnerabilities and a possible U.S. recession: Strategists give their cautious predictions for 2024

    [ad_1]

    A security guard at the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York, US, on Tuesday, March 28, 2023.

    Victor J. Blue | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    With central banks having hiked interest rates at breakneck speed and those rates likely to stay higher for longer while the lagged effects set in, the macroeconomic outlook for 2024 is far from clear.

    The International Monetary Fund baseline forecast is for it to slow from 3.5% in 2022 to 3% in 2023 and 2.9% in 2024, well below the historical average of 3.8% between 2000 and 2019, led by a marked slowdown in advanced economies.

    The Washington-based institution sees U.S. GDP growth, which has remained surprisingly resilient in the face of over 500 basis points of interest rate hikes since March 2022, to remain among the strongest developed market performers at 2.1% this year and 1.5% next year.

    The U.S. economy’s resilience has fueled an emerging consensus that the Federal Reserve will achieve its desired “soft landing,” slowing inflation without tipping the economy into recession.

    The market is now largely pricing a peak at the current Fed funds target range of 5.25-5.5%, with interest rate cuts to come next year.

    Yet Deutsche Bank‘s economists, in a 2024 outlook report published Monday, were quick to point out that monetary policy operates with lags that are “highly uncertain in their timing and impact.”

    “With the lagged impact of rate hikes taking effect, we can already see clear signs of data softening. In the U.S., the most recent jobs report showed the highest unemployment rate since January 2022, credit card delinquencies are at 12-year highs, and high yield defaults are comfortably off the lows,” Deutsche’s Head of Global Economics and Thematic Research, Jim Reid, and Group Chief Economist David Folkerts-Landau said in the report.

    “At the outer edges of the economy there is obvious stress that is likely to spread in 2024 with rates at these levels. In the Euro Area, Q3 saw a -0.1% decline in GDP, with the economy in a period of stagnation since Autumn 2022 that will likely extend to mid-Summer 2024.”

    The German lender has a considerably bleaker prognosis than market consensus, projecting that Canada will have the highest GDP growth among the G7 in 2024 at just 0.8%.

    “Although that is still positive and the profile improves through the year, it means the major economies will be more vulnerable to a shock as they work through the lag of this most aggressive hiking cycle for at least four decades,” Reid and Folkerts-Landau said, noting that potential “macro accidents” would be more likely in the aftermath of such rapid tightening.

    “We had 10-15 years of zero/negative rates, plus an increase in global central bank balance sheets from around $5 to $30 trillion at the recent peak, and it was only a couple of years ago that most expected ultra-loose policy for much of this decade. So it’s easy to see how bad levered investments could have been made that would be vulnerable to this higher rate regime.”

    U.S. regional banks triggered global market panic earlier this year when Silicon Valley Bank and several others collapsed, and Deutsche Bank suggested that some vulnerabilities remain in that sector, along with commercial real estate and private markets, creating “a bit of a race against time.”

    ‘Higher for longer’ and regional divergence

    The prospect of “higher for longer” interest rates has dominated the market outlook in recent months, and Goldman Sachs Asset Management economists believe the Fed is unlikely to consider cutting rates next year unless growth slows by substantially more than current projections.

    In the euro zone, weaker growth momentum and a large drag from tighter fiscal policy and lending conditions increase the likelihood that the European Central Bank pauses its monetary policy tightening and potentially pivots toward cuts in the second half of 2024.

    “While the Fed and ECB seem to have steered away from a hard landing path during the tightening cycle, exogenous shocks or a premature pivot to policy easing may reignite inflation in a way that requires a recession to force it lower,” GSAM economists said.

    “Conversely, further monetary tightening might trigger a downturn just as the effects of prior tightening begin to take hold.”

    CEO explains why economies are still 'relatively resilient' to interest rate rises

    GSAM also noted regional divergence in the trajectory of growth prospects and inflation patterns, with Japan’s economy surprising positively on the back of resurgent domestic demand driving wage growth and inflation after many years of stagnation, while China’s property market indebtedness and demographic headwinds skew its risks to the downside.

    Meanwhile Brazil, Chile, Hungary, Mexico, Peru and Poland were early hikers of interest rates in emerging markets and were among the first to see inflation slow sharply, meaning their central banks have either begun cutting rates or are close to doing so.

    “In a desynchronized global cycle, with higher-for-longer rates and slower growth in most advanced economies, the road ahead remains uncertain,” GSAM said, adding that this calls for a “diversified and risk conscious investment approach across public and private markets.”

    Recession risk ‘delayed rather than diminished’

    In a roundtable event on Tuesday, JPMorgan Asset Management strategists echoed this note of caution, claiming that the risk of a U.S. recession was “delayed rather than diminished” as the impact of higher rates feeds through into the economy.

    JPMAM Chief Market Strategist Karen Ward noted that many U.S. households took advantage of 30-year fixed rate mortgages while rates were still around 2.7%, while in the U.K., many shifted to five-year fixed rates during the Covid-19 pandemic, meaning the “passthrough of interest rates is much slower” than previous cycles.

    However, she highlighted that U.K. exposure to higher rates is due to rise from about 38% at the end of 2023 to 60% at the end of 2024, while first-time buyers in the U.S. will be exposed to much higher rates and the cost of other consumer debt, such as auto loans, has also risen sharply.

    “I think the the key conclusion here is that interest rates do still bite, it’s just taking longer this time around,” she said.

    We see slowdown in the U.S. economy in 2024 and no Europe recession: SocGen economist

    The U.S. consumer has also been spending pent-up savings at a faster rate than European counterparts, Ward highlighted, suggesting this is “one of the reasons why the U.S. has outperformed” so far, along with “incredibly supportive” fiscal policy in the form of major infrastructure programs and post-pandemic support programs.

    “All of that fades into next year as well, so the backdrop for the consumer just doesn’t look as strong for us as we go into 2024 that will start to bite a little bit,” she said.

    Meanwhile, corporates will over the next few years have to start refinancing at higher interest rates, particularly for high-yield companies.

    “So growth slows in 2024, and we still think the risks of a recession are significant, and therefore we’re still pretty cautious about the idea that we’ve been through the worst and we’re looking at an upswing from here on,” Ward said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Apple is trying to unwind its Goldman Sachs credit card partnership

    Apple is trying to unwind its Goldman Sachs credit card partnership

    [ad_1]

    David Solomon, Chairman and CEO, Goldman Sachs, participates in a panel discussion during the annual Milken Institute Global Conference at The Beverly Hilton Hotel on April 29, 2019 in Beverly Hills, California.

    Michael Kovac | Getty Images Entertainment | Getty Images

    Apple has given Goldman Sachs a proposal to end its credit-card and savings account partnership within the next 12 to 15 months, a person familiar with the matter told CNBC’s Leslie Picker.

    The move, if it were to happen, would effectively end one of the highest profile partnerships between a bank and a tech company.

    It would also mean that Apple would need to find a new financial partner for its popular credit card, Apple Card, and its high-yield savings accounts under the Apple brand. While Apple offers both its credit card and savings account through the wallet app on iPhones, the banking backend is handled by Goldman Sachs.

    When Apple first launched the Apple Card in 2019, Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon was in attendance at a glitzy Apple launch event at its California campus.

    But the partnership has been rocky in recent years as Goldman Sachs, under CEO David Solomon, has retreated from its previous consumer banking ambitions as costs stacked up. Goldman has also faced scrutiny from regulators into how it handles refunds and billing errors, and over alleged gender discrimination when determining credit limits.

    Earlier this year, Goldman Sachs said that it would “consider strategic alternatives” for its consumer banking business.

    For Apple, the credit card and savings accounts are a way to add value and additional features to its iPhone, as well as bolster its quickly growing services business with fees. It’s not clear whether Apple has found a new partner or would consider bigger changes to its financial products if it were to exit the agreement with Goldman Sachs.

    “Apple and Goldman Sachs are focused on providing an incredible experience for our customers to help them lead healthier financial lives,” an Apple representative told CNBC. “The award-winning Apple Card has seen a great reception from consumers, and we will continue to innovate and deliver the best tools and services for them.”

    The proposal from Apple was previously reported by the Wall Street Journal. A Goldman Sachs representative declined to comment.

    CNBC’s Leslie Picker and Steve Kovach contributed to this story.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Apple scotches credit-card partnership with Goldman Sachs: report

    Apple scotches credit-card partnership with Goldman Sachs: report

    [ad_1]

    Apple Inc. AAPL is calling it quits on its credit-card partnership with Goldman Sachs Group Inc. GS, ending the Wall Street bank’s push into consumer lending, according to a Wall Street Journal report Tuesday. The iPhone maker sent a proposal to Goldman to leave the contract within 15 months, according to people briefed on the matter. The exit would cover the companies’ consumer partnership, which includes the credit card the companies launched in 2019 and the savings account rolled out in 2023. It is unclear if Apple has lined up a new issuer for the card.

    Master your money.

    Subscribe to MarketWatch.

    Get this article and all of MarketWatch.

    Access from any device. Anywhere. Anytime.


    Subscribe Now

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Shein files for U.S. IPO as fast-fashion giant looks to expand its global reach

    Shein files for U.S. IPO as fast-fashion giant looks to expand its global reach

    [ad_1]

    A Shein pop-up store inside a Forever 21 store in Times Square in New York on Nov. 10, 2023.

    Yuki Iwamura | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Shein has confidentially filed to go public in the U.S. as the Chinese-founded fast-fashion juggernaut looks to expand its global reach with a long-rumored initial public offering, CNBC has learned. 

    The retailer was last valued at $66 billion and could be ready to start trading on the public markets as soon as 2024, people familiar with the matter said Monday. 

    It is unclear how much the company is currently worth, but its valuation has been a central point of debate among Shein and the advisors it’s working with, people familiar with the matter said. 

    A confidential filing is common, as it allows companies to communicate with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and make any necessary adjustments to their filings in private. Over the next few months, Shein will likely make tweaks to its paperwork and answer numerous questions from the agency. The filing will be made public once the company is ready to move forward with its IPO. At that point, those communications with the SEC and any adjustments to its paperwork will be released as well.

    Shein has been on a meteoric rise over the past few years after it won over consumers across the globe with its fashion-forward designs, endless assortment and dirt-cheap prices. But Shein has faced a series of challenges along the way and faced accusations of using forced labor in its supply chain, violating labor laws, harming the environment and stealing designs from independent artists.

    The company is currently under investigation by the newly formed House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party and has faced scrutiny over its ties to Beijing. Numerous lawmakers, including 16 Republican attorneys general, have called on the SEC to ensure Shein isn’t using forced labor in its supply chain before it’s allowed to start trading in the U.S.

    In October, Marcelo Claure, the company’s newly minted group vice chair and former SoftBank CEO, told CNBC in an interview that Shein is cooperating with lawmakers and taking time to meet with them to explain the business. He said, “there’s no such thing as forced labor” in the Shein factories that he has visited. But the company has repeatedly acknowledged that forced labor has been found in its supply chain and noted that it’s taking steps to fix it.

    As Shein grew from an obscure Chinese retailer into a global behemoth with headquarters in Singapore, it largely stayed in the shadows. It said and did very little publicly until this year, when it began to open up in an apparent attempt to prepare for a U.S. IPO.

    With Chinese CEO Sky Xu still at the helm, Shein tapped former Bear Stearns investment banker Donald Tang to be its executive chair and public face earlier this year. It has hosted a series of well-publicized pop-up events, sent influencers to its Chinese factories in a poorly received public relations campaign and courted the business press with splashy parties that featured its independent designers and other friends of the company.

    Shein has worked hard to beat the many negative accusations that have come to define the company and has made its executives available for interviews as it worked to change the narrative.

    Recently, it acquired about one-third of Sparc Group — a joint venture that includes brand management firm Authentic Brands Group and mall owner Simon Property Group — and in doing so, made a powerful U.S. ally that could help legitimize the company in the eyes of U.S. regulators.

    As part of the deal, Shein has partnered up with former rival Forever 21 to unveil a co-branded clothing line that will see Shein design, manufacture and distribute the clothes primarily on its website. Shein has been hosting pop-up events inside of Forever 21’s stores.

    Shein still has more work to do before it can win the trust of U.S. regulators. Beyond its myriad of issues, its CEO remains a mysterious figure who doesn’t give interviews or speak publicly about the company. The practice is a major departure from other firms that are publicly traded in the U.S., which regularly make their CEOs available. In October, the company did not tell CNBC whether Xu is still a Chinese citizen.

    The company has tapped Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley to be the lead underwriters on the offering, the people said. 

    Shein declined to comment. Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley did not comment.

    Earlier Monday, Chinese media reported on Shein’s filing.

    Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Goldman Sachs paid pro golfer Patrick Cantlay more than $1 million annually, sources say

    Goldman Sachs paid pro golfer Patrick Cantlay more than $1 million annually, sources say

    [ad_1]

    Patrick Cantlay of the United States plays his shot from the 18th tee during the final round of the Workday Charity Open on July 12, 2020 at Muirfield Village Golf Club in Dublin, Ohio.

    Sam Greenwood | Getty Images

    Goldman Sachs paid professional golfer Patrick Cantlay more than $1 million annually in a sponsorship deal linked to the bank’s consumer-banking efforts, CNBC has learned.

    A three-year deal signed by Cantlay in 2020 included a minimum of $1.1 million annually, according to people with knowledge of the contract, with performance bonuses for PGA Tour and Major victories and hitting top rankings worth potentially far more.

    Goldman opted not to renew Cantlay’s sponsorship this year in the latest example of the bank’s retrenchment from its retail banking push. After CEO David Solomon capitulated to demands to end the money-losing effort, the bank shut down a personal loan unit, shelved a planned checking account and sold off businesses.

    Cantlay initially wore a cap emblazoned with the bank’s short-lived Marcus brand. That was replaced by the Goldman Sachs name after the bank’s president, John Waldron, said to be a fan of the sport, pushed for the change, said one of the people, who declined to be identified speaking about sponsorship deals.  

    The first Cantlay deal was considered a relatively modest sum for a Top-10 ranked PGA golfer, mostly because his brand was still rising when he was signed, according to one of the people.

    He got paid significantly more when Goldman renewed his sponsorship in a one year extension earlier in 2023, this person said. Cantlay has earned more than $42 million in official competitions since turning pro in 2012, according to the PGA Tour.

    Goldman spokesman Tony Fratto declined to comment on the financial aspects of the sponsorship, as did Cantlay’s representative Molly Levinson.

    “We constantly evaluate the firm’s partnerships, and at this time, our logo will no longer appear on his hat,” Fratto told The New York Times, which first reported that Goldman wasn’t renewing Cantlay.  

    Cantlay still appears on Goldman’s website as a brand ambassador, along with LGPA golfer Nelly Korda and McLaren’s Formula 1 racing team.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • UBS sees a raft of Fed rate cuts next year on the back of a U.S. recession

    UBS sees a raft of Fed rate cuts next year on the back of a U.S. recession

    [ad_1]

    U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell takes questions from reporters during a press conference after the release of the Fed policy decision to leave interest rates unchanged, at the Federal Reserve in Washington, U.S, September 20, 2023.

    Evelyn Hockstein | Reuters

    UBS expects the U.S. Federal Reserve to cut interest rates by as much as 275 basis points in 2024, almost four times the market consensus, as the world’s largest economy tips into recession.

    In its 2024-2026 outlook for the U.S. economy, published Monday, the Swiss bank said despite economic resilience through 2023, many of the same headwinds and risks remain. Meanwhile, the bank’s economists suggested that “fewer of the supports for growth that enabled 2023 to overcome those obstacles will continue in 2024.”

    UBS expects disinflation and rising unemployment to weaken economic output in 2024, leading the Federal Open Market Committee to cut rates “first to prevent the nominal funds rate from becoming increasingly restrictive as inflation falls, and later in the year to stem the economic weakening.”

    Between March 2022 and July 2023, the FOMC enacted a run of 11 rate hikes to take the fed funds rate from a target range of 0%-0.25% to 5.25%-5.5%.

    The central bank has since held at that level, prompting markets to mostly conclude that rates have peaked, and to begin speculating on the timing and scale of future cuts.

    However, Fed Chairman Jerome Powell said last week that he was “not confident” the FOMC had yet done enough to return inflation sustainably to its 2% target.

    UBS noted that despite the most aggressive rate-hiking cycle since the 1980s, real GDP expanded by 2.9% over the year to the end of the third quarter. However, yields have risen and stock markets have come under pressure since the September FOMC meeting. The bank believes this has renewed growth concerns and shows the economy is “not out of the woods yet.”

    “The expansion bears the increasing weight of higher interest rates. Credit and lending standards appear to be tightening beyond simply repricing. Labor market income keeps being revised lower, on net, over time,” UBS highlighted.

    “According to our estimates, spending in the economy looks elevated relative to income, pushed up by fiscal stimulus and maintained at that level by excess savings.”

    The bank estimates that the upward pressure on growth from fiscal impetus in 2023 will fade next year, while household savings are “thinning out” and balance sheets look less robust.

    “Furthermore, if the economy does not slow substantially, we doubt the FOMC restores price stability. 2023 outperformed because many of these risks failed to materialize. However, that does not mean they have been eliminated,” UBS said.

    U.S. Treasury yield curve will likely continue to steepen, analyst says

    “In our view, the private sector looks less insulated from the FOMC’s rate hikes next year. Looking ahead, we expect substantially slower growth in 2024, a rising unemployment rate, and meaningful reductions in the federal funds rate, with the target range ending the year between 2.50% and 2.75%.”

    UBS expects the economy to contract by half a percentage point in the middle of next year, with annual GDP growth dropping to just 0.3% in 2024 and unemployment rising to nearly 5% by the end of the year.

    “With that added disinflationary impulse, we expect monetary policy easing next year to drive recovery in 2025, pushing GDP growth back up to roughly 2-1/2%, limiting the peak in the unemployment rate to 5.2% in early 2025. We forecast some slowing in 2026, in part due to projected fiscal consolidation,” the bank’s economists said.

    Worst credit impulse since the financial crisis

    Arend Kapteyn, UBS global head of economics and strategy research, told CNBC on Tuesday that the starting conditions are “much worse now than 12 months ago,” particularly in the form of the “historically large” amount of credit that is being withdrawn from the U.S. economy.

    “The credit impulse is now at its worst level since the global financial crisis — we think we’re seeing that in the data. You’ve got margin compression in the U.S. which is a good precursor to layoffs, so U.S. margins are under more pressure for the economy as a whole than in Europe, for instance, which is surprising,” he told CNBC’s Joumanna Bercetche on the sidelines of the UBS European Conference.

    Signs of a recession may be on the horizon, says fmr. Fed economist Claudia Sahm

    Meanwhile, private payrolls ex-health care are growing at close to zero and some of the 2023 fiscal stimulus is rolling off, Kapteyn noted, also reiterating the “massive gap” between real incomes and spending that means there is “much more scope for that spending to fall down towards those income levels.”

    “The counter that people then have is they say ‘well why are income levels not going up, because inflation is falling, real disposable incomes should be improving?’ But in the U.S., debt service for households is now increasing faster than real income growth, so we basically think there is enough there to have a few negative quarters mid-next year,” Kapteyn argued.

    A recession is characterized in many economies as two consecutive quarters of contraction in real GDP. In the U.S., the National Bureau of Economic Research Business Cycle Dating Committee defines a recession as “a significant decline in economic activity that is spread across the economy and that lasts more than a few months.” This takes into account a holistic assessment of the labor market, consumer and business spending, industrial production, and incomes.

    Goldman ‘pretty confident’ in the U.S. growth outlook

    The UBS outlook on both rates and growth is well below the market consensus. Goldman Sachs projects the U.S. economy will expand by 2.1% in 2024, outpacing other developed markets.

    Kamakshya Trivedi, head of global FX, rates and EM strategy at Goldman Sachs, told CNBC on Monday that the Wall Street giant was “pretty confident” in the U.S. growth outlook.

    “Real income growth looks to be pretty firm and we think that will continue to be the case. The global industrial cycle which was going through a pretty soft patch this year, we think, is showing some signs of bottoming out, including in parts of Asia, so we feel pretty confident about that,” he told CNBC’s “Squawk Box Europe.”

    Trivedi added that with inflation returning gradually to target, monetary policy may become a bit more accommodative, pointing to some recent dovish comments from Fed officials.

    “I think that combination of things — the lessening drag from policy, stronger industrial cycle and real income growth — makes us pretty confident that the Fed can stay on hold at this plateau,” he concluded.

    Correction: Between March 2022 and July 2023, the FOMC enacted a run of 11 rate hikes to take the fed funds rate from a target range of 0%-0.25% to 5.25%-5.5%. An earlier version misstated the range.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • World economy to perform better than expected in 2024, says Goldman Sachs

    World economy to perform better than expected in 2024, says Goldman Sachs

    [ad_1]

    New York city skyline

    Alexander Spatari | Moment | Getty Images

    Goldman Sachs predicts the global economy will top expectations in 2024, driven by strong income growth and confidence that the worst of rate hikes is already over.

    The investment bank forecasts the world economy to expand 2.6% next year on an annual average basis, above the 2.1% consensus forecast of economists polled by Bloomberg. The U.S. is expected to outpace other developed markets again with estimated growth of 2.1%, Goldman said.

    Goldman also believes that the bulk of the drag from monetary and fiscal tightening policies is over.

    To curtail rising inflation, the U.S. Federal Reserve started its aggressive rate hike campaign in March 2022 as inflation climbed to its highest levels in 40 years. Last Thursday, Fed Chair Jerome Powell said he is “not confident” the Fed has done enough to tackle inflation, and suggested that more rate hikes may be necessary.

    Goldman said policymakers in developed markets are unlikely to cut interest rates before the second half of 2024 unless economic growth comes in weaker than estimated.

    The bank noted inflation has also continued to cool across G10 and emerging market economies, and is expected to ease further.

    “Our economists forecast this year’s decline in inflation to continue in 2024: sequential core inflation is predicted to fall from 3% now to an average 2-2.5% range across the G10 (excluding Japan),” the report stated.

    Global factory activity

    The investment bank also expects global factory activity to recover from a recent slump as headwinds are set to dissipate this year. Goldman noted global manufacturing activity has been weighed down by a weaker-than-expected rebound in Chinese manufacturing and the European energy crisis, as well as an inventory cycle that had to correct for overbuilding last year.

    We continue to see only limited recession risk and reaffirm our 15% U.S. recession probability.

    Jan Hatzius

    Chief Economist at Goldman Sachs

    Global production has been in a slump for most of the year. S&P Global’s gauge of worldwide manufacturing activity came in at 49.1 in September. A reading below 50 indicates a contraction in activity. Additionally, China’s Caixin/S&P Global manufacturing PMI fell to 49.5 in October from 50.6 in September, marking the first contraction since July.

    Manufacturing activity should recover somewhat in 2024 from a subdued 2023 pace, Goldman economists led by chief economist Jan Hatzius said, especially as “spending patterns normalize, gas-intensive European production finds a trough, and inventories-to-GDP ratios stabilize.”

    Big economies to avoid recession

    Rising real income also contributed to Goldman’s positive growth outlook.

    “Our economists have a positive outlook for real disposable income growth at a time of much lower headline inflation and still-strong labor markets,” Goldman wrote in a release based on the report. While they hold the view that U.S. real income growth is set to slow from its strong 2023 pace of 4%, it is still purported to support consumption and GDP growth of at least 2%.

    “We continue to see only limited recession risk and reaffirm our 15% U.S. recession probability,” Hatzius continued in the outlook report, owed in part to the real disposable income growth.

    In September, the bank had cut their forecast for a U.S. recession from 20% to 15% on the basis of cooling inflation and a resilient labor market.

    While rate hikes and fiscal policy will still continue to weigh on the growth across G10 economies, Hatzius is confident that the worst of that “drag” is already over.

    “Both the Euro area and the UK are expected to have a meaningful acceleration in real income growth — to around 2% by end-2024 — as the gas shock following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine fades,” the economists also noted.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Goldman Sachs leads gainers among the 30 stocks in the Dow Jones Industrial Average; Bank of America up handily

    Goldman Sachs leads gainers among the 30 stocks in the Dow Jones Industrial Average; Bank of America up handily

    [ad_1]

    Goldman Sachs Group Inc.’s stock
    GS,
    +4.42%

    is the biggest gainer among the 30 stocks in the Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA,
    +0.66%

    at midday Friday with a rise of 4%. The stock has risen 12.6% so far this week. It’s also on pace for largest percent increase since November 10, 2022, when it rose 4.51%, according Dow Jones Market Data. Meanwhile, Bank of America Corp.’s stock
    BAC,
    +2.90%

    was up about 3% and is on track for a 13% gain this week, which would be its best since it rose by 16.5% in the week ending June 5, 2020.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Goldman Sachs says the Israel-Hamas war could have major implications for Europe’s economy

    Goldman Sachs says the Israel-Hamas war could have major implications for Europe’s economy

    [ad_1]

    Armoured vehicles of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) are seen during their ground operations at a location given as Gaza, as the conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Islamist group Hamas continues, in this handout image released on November 1, 2023. 

    Israel Defense Forces | Reuters

    The Israel-Hamas war could have a significant impact on economic growth and inflation in the euro zone unless energy price pressures remain contained, according to Goldman Sachs.

    The ongoing hostilities could affect European economies via lower regional trade, tighter financial conditions, higher energy prices and lower consumer confidence, Europe Economics Analyst Katya Vashkinskaya highlighted in a research note Wednesday.

    Concerns are growing among economists that the conflict could spill over and engulf the Middle East, with Israel and Lebanon exchanging missiles as Israel continues to bombard Gaza, resulting in massive civilian casualties and a deepening humanitarian crisis.

    Although the tensions could affect European economic activity via lower trade with the Middle East, Vashkinskaya highlighted that the continent’s exposure is limited, given that the euro area exports around 0.4% of the GDP to Israel and its neighbors, while the British trade exposure is less than 0.2% of the GDP.

    She noted that tighter financial conditions could weigh on growth and exacerbate the existing drag on economic activity from higher interest rates in both the euro area and the U.K. However, Goldman does not see a clear pattern between financial conditions and previous episodes of tension in the Middle East

    The most important and potentially impactful way in which tensions could spill over into the European economy is through oil and gas markets, Vashkinskaya said.

    “Since the current conflict broke out, commodities markets have seen increased volatility, with Brent crude oil and European natural gas prices up by around 9% and 34% at the peak respectively,” she said.

    Goldman’s commodities team assessed a set of downside scenarios in which oil prices could rise by between 5% and 20% above the baseline, depending on the severity of the oil supply shock.

    “A persistent 10% oil price increase usually reduces Euro area real GDP by about 0.2% after one year and boosts consumer prices by almost 0.3pp over this time, with similar effects observed in the U.K.,” Vashkinskaya said.

    “However, for the drag to appear, oil prices must remain consistently elevated, which is already in question, with the Brent crude oil price almost back at pre-conflict levels at the end of October.”

    Gas price developments present a more acute challenge, she suggested, with the price increase driven by a reduction in global LNG (liquefied natural gas) exports from Israeli gas fields and the current gas market less able to respond to adverse supply shocks.

    “While our commodities team’s estimates point to a sizeable increase in European natural gas prices in case of a supply downside scenario in the range of 102-200 EUR/MWh, we believe that the policy response to continue existing or re-start previous energy cost support policies would buffer the disposable income hit and support firms, if such risks were to materialize,” Vashkinskaya said.

    Nobody knows the endgame of the Israel-Hamas war, says former Italian ambassador to Iraq

    Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey told CNBC on Thursday that knock-on effects of the conflict on energy markets posed a potential risk to the central bank’s efforts to rein in inflation.

    “So far, I would say, we haven’t seen a marked increase in energy prices, and that’s obviously good,” Bailey told CNBC’s Joumanna Bercetche. “But it is a risk. It obviously is a risk going forward.”

    Oil prices have been volatile since Hamas launched its attack on Israel on Oct. 7, and the World Bank warned in a quarterly update on Monday that crude oil prices could rise to more than $150 a barrel if the conflict escalates.

    General consumer confidence is the final potential channel for spillover affects, according to the Wall Street bank, and Vashkinskaya noted that the euro area experienced a substantial deterioration in the aftermath of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in March 2022.

    The same effect has not been historically observed alongside outbreaks of elevated tensions between Israel and Hamas, but Goldman’s news-based measure of conflict-related uncertainty reached record highs in October.

    [ad_2]

    Source link