ReportWire

Tag: gladiator

  • Russell Crowe calls the script of his Oscar-winning movie Gladiator ‘absolute rubbish’

    Russell Crowe calls the script of his Oscar-winning movie Gladiator ‘absolute rubbish’

    Russell Crowe is currently making headlines after he revealed some major reservations about acting in his Oscar winning movie Gladiator. Calling the script ‘absolute rubbish’, the actor told Vanity Fair that he thought it had several confusing scenes that didn’t make sense and it might confuse the audiences. He was quoted saying, “At the core of what we were doing was a great concept, but the script was absolute rubbish. It had all sorts of strange sequences.” He further added, “The audience are gonna go, “What the f**k is this?”. The energy around what we were doing was very fractured.” Furthermore, he admitted that it was director Ridley Scott who convinced him to do it and ensured him they wouldn’t film anything Crowe didn’t ‘100% believe in’.

    Russell Crowe would love to play Gough Whitlam

    Russell’s decision for Gladiator was a right one as it made him win an Oscar for Best Actor and propelled him to Hollywood stardom. However, this comes after the actor revealed that he would love to play an Australian Prime Minister in a biopic. Talking about bringing the life of Gough Whitlam to the big screen, Russell said, “I think he was one of Australia’s great statesmen. I think he set things in place that give us the confidence we have as a nation today.”

    Russell Crowe talked about Gough Whitlam’s painting purchases

    Talking about Gough Whitlam’s painting purchases, Russell said, “You know, little decisions that he made, like buying blue poles, the painting. And everybody just castigated him at the time and called him irresponsible. That painting is worth $500 million now or something… every government decision should have that result. You know, you get a 500 multiple out of every single dollar you spend and we’d be in a great place.”

    ALSO READ: The Pope’s Exorcist: Russell Crowe transforms himself into Chief Exorcist of the Vatican in new VIDEO

    1136876

    Source link

  • Russell Crowe Won’t Return For ‘Gladiator 2’

    Russell Crowe Won’t Return For ‘Gladiator 2’

    Ridley Scott’s Gladiator is now considered one of the best historical epics ever. Unfortunately, its star won’t be returning for the sequel. The long-in-development Gladiator 2 is going to be helmed once again by director Ridley Scott. But Crowe doesn’t generally make sequels, and the story of the film doesn’t necessarily lend itself to an appearance by his character anyway.

    Russell Crowe recently appeared on an episode of the podcast Fitzy And Wippa to speak a bit about the sequel. It turns out that he actually knows a good bit about the production and has had dinner with Scott recently, but no kind of partnership materialized.

    He explained…

    Yeah we’ve had dinner and talked about it and all that stuff. So I know roughly how he’s shaping the story. But yeah, if you remember, there was a young kid who wanted to beat the Gladiator, which leads to the ‘My name is’ speech. So that young kid has grown up, and he’s now the Emperor. I don’t know what else happens at that point, so that’s the idea. So it’s not a remake.

    Crowe’s character, Maximus, died in the original film, so that would seemingly preclude him making an appearance in this sequel. Or maybe not; for many years, there was a Gladiator sequel in development that would have starred Crowe and seen his character get resurrected from the afterlife and rejoin his son in the real world. Other drafts of the movie reportedly included Jesus Christ as a character — and possibly an opponent! — of Maximus. In this version Maximus would have supposedly become an immortal, and survived to see the fall of Rome, and then lived through countless other wars up to the present day.

    The story for the sequel they’re actually making now takes place a while after Maximus dies. And with Crowe not returning for this film it will instead star Aftersun actor Paul Mescal, supposedly as Maximus’ adult son.

    Historical Movies That Are Wildly Inaccurate

    These films are based on real people and events … but just barely. Most of what was up on screen was invented by screenwriters.

    Cody Mcintosh

    Source link

  • Paul Mescal Will Star in Ridley Scott’s Long-Awaited ‘Gladiator’ Sequel

    Paul Mescal Will Star in Ridley Scott’s Long-Awaited ‘Gladiator’ Sequel

    Paul Mescal is headed into the arena. More than 20 years after the original Gladiator made over $460 million worldwide and won best picture at the Oscars, a sequel directed by Ridley Scott and starring Mescal is coming, a rep for the filmmaker confirms to Vanity Fair.

    Scott will produce the follow-up, which is penned by David Scarpa (All the Money in the World), with costume designer Jenny Yates and production designer Arthur Max returning to their roles from the 2002 film. According to Deadline, Mescal was the first actor to meet with Scott about the lead role shortly after the script’s final draft was completed in November. Although the director continued to meet with other stars, “Mescal clearly was Scott’s top choice following a fantastic meeting,” the outlet reports.

    The 26-year-old actor, who earned an Emmy nomination for Hulu’s Normal People and is currently garnering Oscar buzz in Charlotte Wells’ Aftersun, will play Lucious, the grown son of Connie Nielsen’s Lucilla. That solves the central problem of a Gladiator sequel—what is there left to explore after (spoiler alert) Russell Crowe’s Maximus dies saving Lucilla and her son from the villainous Commodus (Joaquin Phoenix), who also happens to be Lucious’ uncle?

    Getting to more swords and sandals has been somewhat of a Colosseum-worthy battle. In 2018, the BBC delved into this outlandish development history, branding Gladiator’s the “strangest sequel never made.” In the years after the film’s smash success, both Scott and Crowe, who won the Academy Award for best actor, commissioned dueling concepts for a sequel. Scott reportedly enlisted John Logan, one of Gladiator’s writers for a follow-up without Crowe or gladiators themselves. Meanwhile, Crowe recruited singer-songwriter Nick Cave to write a script that his character could be in, cinematic death be damned. The supernatural final product featured Maximus in the afterlife and unsurprisingly died on the vine. “I enjoyed writing it very much because I knew on every level that it was never going to get made,” Cave would later admit.

    Plans more recently got underway in 2018, when it was reported that Peter Craig (Top Gun: Maverick, The Batman) would pen the script. That iteration was seemingly scrapped in favor of the current vision, which Scott teased to Empire in 2021. “I’m already having [the next] Gladiator written now,” he said before referencing his upcoming Napoleon Bonaparte biopic starring Joaquin Phoenix. “So when I’ve done Napoleon, Gladiator will be ready to go.”

    Savannah Walsh

    Source link

  • The Most Historically Inaccurate Movies

    The Most Historically Inaccurate Movies

    Period films give us a glimpse into what life was like during a completely different era of history. Well, sort of. They may give us an idea how people lived, but since they’re movies, we need to leave room for a certain degree of artifice. Movies are designed to either entertain us, or to explore universal themes, or to provide a feast for our senses. They’re not designed to tell us the truth, and nothing but the truth.

    So, that’s why it’s not surprising to learn that some of the most popular period films ever made are full of historical inaccuracies. As with most films based on true events, creative liberties are taken to ensure the narrative flows in an effective, compelling way. But when you add the period element — think ancient civilizations, English royal society, or wars that spanned multiple years — there are even more opportunities for facts to be replaced by fiction. It could be a certain style of clothing that hadn’t been invented yet, or the inclusion of a historical figure who, by all accounts, shouldn’t have been alive during the events of the film.

    In some cases, these changes feel completely warranted. Reality is almost always messier than what’s presented to us on the big screen, and leaving out certain details results in a more satisfying end result. Other times, the inaccuracies are so glaring and obvious, they take us out of the film entirely. Here are ten period movies that relied on audiences’ suspension of disbelief to tell their (mostly) true stories.

    Historical Movies That Are Wildly Inaccurate

    These films are based on real people and events … but just barely. Most of what was up on screen was invented by screenwriters.

    The Sexiest Period Dramas to Stream at Home

    Loved Bridgerton? Here‘s what to watch next.

    Claire Epting

    Source link