ReportWire

Tag: Ghislaine Maxwell

  • Congress is set to receive the first batch of Epstein files. It’s not likely to quell the drama.

    [ad_1]

    The Justice Department is expected on Friday to start handing the first batch of Jeffrey Epstein files over to Congress. But it may be a while before lawmakers get the information they want — if ever.

    The DOJ is taking a piecemeal approach to transmitting documents to Capitol Hill, pursuant to a subpoena issued this month by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee after Democrats on the panel forced the matter.

    The committee, led by Kentucky Republican Rep. James Comer, anticipates receiving an initial tranche of files related to the convicted sex offender by the end of the day Aug. 22. Making these materials public, however, will be a slow, deliberative process.

    That’s because House Oversight intends to coordinate with the Justice Department on taking steps to shield the names of the women who were victims of Epstein, who died by suicide in 2019, and information around ongoing criminal cases.

    “The Committee intends to make the records public after thorough review to ensure all victims’ identification and child sexual abuse material are redacted,” said an Oversight Committee spokesperson, granted anonymity to share details about the panel’s internal activities. “The Committee will also consult with the DOJ to ensure any documents released do not negatively impact ongoing criminal cases and investigations.”

    If the Justice Department follows precedent, both Democrats and Republicans on House Oversight would get access to the materials. While under a typical arrangement, the majority — in this case Republicans — would control its disclosure, either party could release the materials unilaterally.

    Democrats, however, intend to review the files before releasing them publicly, according to a person familiar with Oversight Democrats’ planning, speaking on condition of anonymity to share internal party strategy.

    The files they receive could include FBI reports of witness interviews; materials seized from the searches of Epstein’s vast properties in New York, the Virgin Islands, Palm Beach and New Mexico; and the affidavits used to gain permission from judges to execute those searches.

    There are a variety of complicating factors to consider, among them the ongoing legal challenge that Ghislaine Maxwell, a longtime Epstein associate, is pursuing against her 20-year conviction for sex trafficking crimes. House Oversight previously subpoenaed Maxwell for testimony and is negotiating the conditions of the interview with her legal team. Maxwell, who was sentenced in 2021, is demanding that she be granted immunity from further criminal proceedings in exchange for her cooperation.

    The plodding process is unlikely to satisfy demands for transparency from lawmakers on both sides of the aisle, though. And House GOP leaders shouldn’t expect to return from the August recess free from the drama that consumed them in July.

    “After months of stonewalling, calling Epstein files a hoax, and telling people nothing but porn exists in their possession, the administration now admits the files exist, and agrees to release some of them,” Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) said in a social media post this week. “Americans want transparency though, not smoke and mirrors.”

    Massie, with Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), has been leading the charge to force a floor vote on a resolution that would compel the release of the Epstein files, and the two men say they’ll follow through on plans when Congress returns to use procedural maneuvers to call the measure up without leadership’s consent.

    The Massie-Khanna resolution would call for the materials to be made public with redactions only for the purposes of protecting names of victims, hiding sexually explicit content and in instances where ongoing legal cases could be compromised. In other words, the lawmakers want to guarantee the identities of Epstein’s associates, if applicable, are revealed.

    Last month, Speaker Mike Johnson said Republicans should give the DOJ time to reveal the documents in a responsible manner that would respect the privacy of Epstein’s victims. However, President Donald Trump — who had ties to Epstein, a well-known financier — was also pushing to move past the issue after his allies had stoked conspiracy theories for years about what authorities were hiding.

    Yet Massie, Khanna and allies would not budge from their stance that members must be allowed to vote to bring the files to light, disrupting the Rules Committee that tees up floor consideration for most legislation. Leaders opted to send their members home a few days ahead of schedule for the summer recess rather than stay in Washington to take politically uncomfortable votes.

    Democrats are also signaling they won’t be satisfied by the DOJ’s game plan and will continue to make the issue a political headache for Republicans.

    “Releasing the Epstein files in batches just continues this White House cover-up. The American people will not accept anything short of the full, unredacted Epstein files,” Rep. Robert Garcia, the top Democrat on the Oversight Committee, said in a statement. “We will keep pressing until the American people get the truth — every document, every fact, in full. The administration must comply with our subpoena, by law.”

    Efforts to draw a wedge in the GOP over the Epstein files were taking place as far away as Texas this week, where Gene Wu, chair of the state’s House Democratic Caucus, offered an amendment to delay Republicans’ mid-decade redistricting efforts until after the release of Epstein materials.

    Meanwhile, back in Washington, lawmakers will regroup on Capitol Hill on Sept. 2 with just four weeks left to avert a government shutdown, and there’s already concern in GOP leadership over the time the House could waste continuing to fight over perceived distractions.

    “I’d really like to see this resolved, if possible, before we get back,” Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-Va.), chair of the House Rules Committee, told reporters this week. “We’re going to have a lot of work to do when we get back in September. I’ve already looked at my September calendar, and it looks pretty busy.”

    Foxx, whose committee work was derailed by members’ efforts to force Epstein-related votes, called the saga “a tempest in a teapot.”

    In February, the Department of Justice released what it called the “first phase” of documents related to the Epstein investigation, which has been a fixation of some of the president’s supporters. It has long been public that Trump — along with other prominent figures, like Bill Clinton — are referenced in documents previously released in court cases surrounding Epstein. But Trump is not accused of any wrongdoing linked to Epstein.

    The real firestorm, however, began in earnest in early July, when the department quietly released a memo saying the federal government did not find evidence of a so-called Epstein “client list.” Conspiracists had long postulated that Epstein kept such a list of people with whom he trafficked young women, and that it was being hidden to protect the rich and powerful.

    No additional disclosures would be forthcoming, the unsigned memo said, which quickly — and predictably — set off a complicated political quagmire for the president and the GOP amid accusations that the administration was reneging on its promise for transparency.

    Trump, in an effort to quash the outrage, asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek the release of grand jury materials in the most recent investigations of Epstein and Maxwell in New York, as well as an earlier federal probe of Epstein in Florida. In recent weeks, all three judges assigned to resolve the unsealing requests rebuffed the administration, with the most recent rejection coming Wednesday.

    The judges said the department hadn’t justified taking the unusual step of unsealing the secret files and that, in any event, most of material in the files had already been made public through Maxwell’s trial or other means.

    Still, even if the grand jury transcripts and exhibits were made public, they represent a tiny fraction of the material the Justice Department possesses in the Epstein and Maxwell investigative files that are the subject of the congressional subpoena.

    When the House Oversight Committee interviewed Trump’s former attorney general, Bill Barr, as part of its probe into the Epstein matter earlier this month, Barr told congressional investigators that he did not know why the documents were being withheld, according to a person familiar with his testimony and granted anonymity to describe the private conversation.

    The lack of transparency around the process, however, might have to do with the fact that some grand jury materials may need court approval, Barr suggested, and that current policy prohibits the release of unsubstantiated information.

    Ultimately, the House Oversight subpoena currently represents the best chance for bringing some information to light — and for the Trump administration to get limited details released to satisfy those clamoring for action.

    Longstanding DOJ policies as well as a federal law — the Privacy Act of 1974 — limit disclosures about living individuals investigated for potential crimes. However, that law and those DOJ rules do not apply to Congress, which is generally free to ignore individuals’ pleas for discretion. DOJ has sometimes used that distinction to effectively make sensitive information public by transmitting it to Congress — with GOP and Democratic lawmakers then able to cherry pick what of the sensitive information they choose to share.

    A DOJ spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment.

    Erica Orden, Josh Gerstein and Jordain Carney contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Judge denies Justice Department request to unseal Epstein grand jury transcripts

    [ad_1]

    Judge denies Justice Department request to unseal Epstein grand jury transcripts

    Mr President, I know that it’s been an extremely busy week between this executive order, trade, Russia, Gaza, but also the family of Virginia Giuffre released *** statement overnight in response to some of the comments that you made this week. You said that Jeffrey Epstein stole people from Mar *** Lago at the time. Did you know why he was taking those young women, including Virginia? No, I didn’t know. I mean, I would, I would figure it was ABC fake news that would ask that question, one of the worst. Uh, but, uh, no, I don’t know really why, uh, but I said if he’s taken anybody from Mar *** Lago, he’s hiring or whatever he’s doing. I didn’t like it and we threw him out. We said we don’t want him, you know, at the place. This is *** story that’s been known for many years, as you know, uh, but it’s, uh, I didn’t like it that he was doing that. Yeah, please.

    Judge denies Justice Department request to unseal Epstein grand jury transcripts

    Updated: 10:45 AM PDT Aug 20, 2025

    Editorial Standards

    A federal judge in New York who presided over the sex trafficking case against the late financier Jeffrey Epstein has rejected the government’s request to unseal grand jury transcripts.The ruling Wednesday by federal Judge Richard Berman in Manhattan came after the judge presiding over the case against British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell also turned down the government’s request.Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence after her conviction on sex trafficking charges for helping Epstein sexually abuse girls and young women.Epstein died in jail awaiting trial. A Justice Department spokesperson declined to comment.This is a breaking news story. Check back for updates.

    A federal judge in New York who presided over the sex trafficking case against the late financier Jeffrey Epstein has rejected the government’s request to unseal grand jury transcripts.

    The ruling Wednesday by federal Judge Richard Berman in Manhattan came after the judge presiding over the case against British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell also turned down the government’s request.

    Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence after her conviction on sex trafficking charges for helping Epstein sexually abuse girls and young women.

    Epstein died in jail awaiting trial. A Justice Department spokesperson declined to comment.

    This is a breaking news story. Check back for updates.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Judge denies Justice Department request to unseal Epstein grand jury transcripts

    [ad_1]

    Judge denies Justice Department request to unseal Epstein grand jury transcripts

    Mr President, I know that it’s been an extremely busy week between this executive order, trade, Russia, Gaza, but also the family of Virginia Giuffre released *** statement overnight in response to some of the comments that you made this week. You said that Jeffrey Epstein stole people from Mar *** Lago at the time. Did you know why he was taking those young women, including Virginia? No, I didn’t know. I mean, I would, I would figure it was ABC fake news that would ask that question, one of the worst. Uh, but, uh, no, I don’t know really why, uh, but I said if he’s taken anybody from Mar *** Lago, he’s hiring or whatever he’s doing. I didn’t like it and we threw him out. We said we don’t want him, you know, at the place. This is *** story that’s been known for many years, as you know, uh, but it’s, uh, I didn’t like it that he was doing that. Yeah, please.

    Judge denies Justice Department request to unseal Epstein grand jury transcripts

    Updated: 1:45 PM EDT Aug 20, 2025

    Editorial Standards

    A federal judge in New York who presided over the sex trafficking case against the late financier Jeffrey Epstein has rejected the government’s request to unseal grand jury transcripts.The ruling Wednesday by federal Judge Richard Berman in Manhattan came after the judge presiding over the case against British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell also turned down the government’s request.Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence after her conviction on sex trafficking charges for helping Epstein sexually abuse girls and young women.Epstein died in jail awaiting trial. A Justice Department spokesperson declined to comment.This is a breaking news story. Check back for updates.

    A federal judge in New York who presided over the sex trafficking case against the late financier Jeffrey Epstein has rejected the government’s request to unseal grand jury transcripts.

    The ruling Wednesday by federal Judge Richard Berman in Manhattan came after the judge presiding over the case against British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell also turned down the government’s request.

    Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence after her conviction on sex trafficking charges for helping Epstein sexually abuse girls and young women.

    Epstein died in jail awaiting trial. A Justice Department spokesperson declined to comment.

    This is a breaking news story. Check back for updates.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ghislaine Maxwell’s Petition to the Supreme Court

    [ad_1]

    The Supreme Court has been busy during its summer break, issuing decisions on emergency petitions that have enabled President Donald Trump to gut the Department of Education, deport people to South Sudan, and fire swaths of federal employees and agency heads. The Justices have so far kept clear of the revival of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, which has managed to wobble the MAGA movement’s support for Trump—but, when they return to considering ordinary petitions this fall, one awaits that invites them into the matter. The petition is from Ghislaine Maxwell, who was convicted, in 2021, of federal crimes related to enabling Epstein’s sexual abuse of underage girls, and who was then sentenced to twenty years in prison. She maintains that the federal government’s non-prosecution agreement with Epstein gave her immunity, and so her convictions must be thrown out. And, amazingly enough, she has a point.

    Recall that, back in 2007, when Epstein was being federally investigated for sex trafficking of minors, he agreed to plead guilty to state-law crimes and serve an eighteen-month prison sentence in Florida. In exchange, Alex Acosta, then the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, promised that his office would not prosecute Epstein for the federal crimes under investigation. The wider Epstein scandal that blew up in 2018 was triggered by new reporting about that sweetheart deal, including the government’s failure to inform his victims about the non-prosecution agreement at the time, and the extent of Epstein’s predations. Julie K. Brown, of the Miami Herald, identified about eighty possible victims. Epstein had ended up serving only thirteen months, including time in the Palm Beach County jail, work release, and house arrest. In the wake of significant public outcry about the case, which became an element of the #MeToo movement, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York indicted Epstein for sex trafficking in 2019. Epstein died while in federal custody—the Justice Department concluded that he killed himself—before he could pursue a challenge to the indictment or proceed to trial.

    After his death, federal prosecutors indicted Maxwell, and it fell to her to brandish the 2007 agreement between Epstein and the government—which included the promise that “the United States also agrees that it will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein.” Maxwell is undeniably a co-conspirator of Epstein with respect to the matters addressed in the agreement. Yet federal prosecutors in New York did indict her—apparently not feeling bound by the promise of federal prosecutors in Florida.

    Given the slow pace of indictment, trial, and appeal, it is only now that the Supreme Court might consider the question that the case has raised from the start: Does one U.S. Attorney’s agreement on behalf of the United States bind federal prosecutors in other districts? After all, they are all part of the Department of Justice, and all of them represent the U.S. government in enforcing federal law. If so, Maxwell, as a beneficiary of the agreement’s provision of immunity, is entitled to have her conviction for sex trafficking of a minor, for which she received the longest sentence, vacated. (She was also convicted of several other crimes that occurred before the 2001-07 time frame covered by the non-prosecution agreement.) The issue extends well beyond Maxwell. At least two appellate courts—including the Second Circuit, which rejected Maxwell’s appeal of her convictions—hold that an agreement binds only the specific U.S. Attorney’s Office that is a party to it. At least four appellate courts have taken a contrary position: that a U.S. Attorney’s promise on behalf of the United States binds all federal prosecutors, meaning that none of them could bring charges covered by a non-prosecution agreement. The upshot of the split is that, in addition to federal prosecutors in Florida who are bound by the Epstein agreement, those in, say, New Jersey, Virginia, California, and Iowa—and even the U.S. Virgin Islands, where Epstein’s notorious island was located—could not have brought charges resolved in that agreement, while federal prosecutors in New York could and did.

    Maxwell is asking the Supreme Court to resolve this conflict in favor of the majority of courts that have addressed the issue. As a convicted sex offender serving time for trafficking underage girls, she is an unappealing messenger for that request, to say the least. One can imagine the outcry of victims’ advocates if the Court agrees to hear Maxwell’s case. But the sole amicus brief that the Court has received is in support of Maxwell. It was filed by the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, which argues that allowing the United States to escape a non-prosecution agreement “would work a detriment on the entire plea system” because “defendants must be able to rely on the written promises made by the government and trust that courts will honor and enforce those promises down the road.” Plea bargains resolve the vast majority of criminal cases. If a non-prosecution agreement on behalf of the United States does not actually resolve a defendant’s criminal liability, then such agreements may become much less attractive—a result that neither defense attorneys nor prosecutors should want.

    But there’s a more deeply vexing question raised by this case: What exactly is “the United States”? In our federal system, each of the states is a distinct government with its own laws. At the same time, all exist within the United States—a sovereign government whose laws are, in fact, supreme. When Congress, in the Judiciary Act of 1789, created federal judicial districts, it also provided for the appointment of a U.S. Attorney in each of them, with the responsibility to “prosecute in such district” crimes “under the authority of the United States.” (In those days, few crimes would have spanned several districts.) Some judges have read “in such district” to mean that, even though federal prosecutors enforce the laws of the United States, a U.S. Attorney’s actions do not bind colleagues in other districts. That seems sensible when you imagine the possible chaos of federal prosecutors in each of the country’s ninety-four districts purporting to bind prosecutors in the other ones. But, given that the United States is supposed to be one sovereign with one body of federal law, it is possibly even more bizarre to imagine that a U.S. Attorney who claims to speak on behalf of the United States is in reality making a promise only on behalf of a single district. As the Third Circuit put it in 2002, while holding that agreements with federal prosecutors in Ohio bar prosecution by a U.S. Attorney in Pennsylvania for the same crimes, “United States Attorneys should not be viewed as sovereigns of autonomous fiefdoms.”

    In past months, conflicts among offices in the Department of Justice have spilled into public view—for instance, when the acting U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Danielle Sassoon, resigned rather than obey the order of Emil Bove, then the Deputy Attorney General (and now a Third Circuit judge) to dismiss corruption charges against Eric Adams. Sassoon saw no “good-faith basis” for the dismissal, because it was in exchange for the Mayor’s agreement to carry out the Administration’s immigration priorities. Several other federal prosecutors in New York and Washington, D.C., also resigned over the matter. Other prosecutors stepped in to do what they would not and asked a district court to dismiss the case. The court did so, “with prejudice,” meaning the prosecution cannot be revived. But the government had actually asked for a dismissal “without prejudice,” so that the charges could be resurrected whenever the government wanted, giving Adams more reason to be helpful to the Administration. Had the government got what it wanted, one unintended result would have been that—consistent with the Second Circuit’s position in Maxwell’s case—the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District, which covers Brooklyn, could have indicted Adams, despite the understanding of federal prosecutors in the Southern District, which covers Manhattan, that he wouldn’t be indicted so long as he coöperated with the Administration.

    Maxwell’s claim to immunity from prosecution bears some resemblance to Bill Cosby’s case, in which the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, in 2021, reversed Cosby’s sexual-assault conviction, finding that a prior prosecutor’s promise not to charge him (in exchange for Cosby’s testimony in a civil case) was binding. Both situations involved sex crimes that the public later came to believe had been treated too leniently; prosecutors then acted contrary to previous agreements in response to changing expectations. Prosecutors responding to public outrage is not new, but, if there’s a lesson here, it is that galvanizing outrage against specific offenders may lead to convictions that do not last, because they may dispense with the fairness that even people who’ve committed the most reprehensible crimes are owed.

    [ad_2]

    Jeannie Suk Gersen

    Source link

  • Zoë Kravitz Aims to Open Eyes With Blink Twice

    Zoë Kravitz Aims to Open Eyes With Blink Twice

    [ad_1]

    As a film whose working title was Pussy Island, it’s to be expected that the subject matter of Blink Twice is “controversial.” That is, if one is “off-put” by the notion that women are still “bitter” about men’s behavior—even after all the supposed progress that’s occurred in the wake of #MeToo. And yes, it’s no coincidence that Zoë Kravitz first started writing the screenplay (with E.T. Feigenbaum, who also wrote an episode of the Kravitz-starring High Fidelity) the same year that the “male backlash” began. Or rather, the appropriate and long overdue response to an abuse of power so entrenched in “the system,” it took ousting many men at the top for anything to start making a difference.

    Some of those men at the top were known for going to Little Saint James Island a.k.a. “Epstein Island.” Like Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew and Donald Trump. None of these men ever got quite the smackdown that Harvey Weinstein did, but there was no denying that further ignominy befell their already less than upstanding reputations when it came to being pervy sexual abusers. Something that happens to Blink Twice’s own “Jeffrey Epstein,” Slater King (Channing Tatum). A tech billionaire that someone like Frida (Naomi Ackie) can’t help but lust after and idolize—something we see as she scrolls through her phone and adoringly watches an interview he gives about how he’s a “changed man” now that he’s “taken some time” to “reassess” himself and his priorities on the remote island he currently lives on (and, needless to say, owns). It’s all very familiar-sounding, with no shortage of potential inspirations for Kravitz when it comes to similar rich douchebags from which to mine material.

    As Frida watches the interview on the toilet, transfixed, her drooling is interrupted by her best friend and roommate, Jess (Alia Shawkat). When Frida admits she doesn’t have her portion of the money for the super because she’s invested it in something else for the two of them, Jess is surprisingly chill about it. Almost as if there’s nothing Frida could do that would ever make Jess turn her back. Such is the nature of a truly strong female friendship bond. By the same token, that doesn’t mean that women don’t get in their fair share of contentious spats, one of which arises between Jess and Frida when, while the two are at work (serving as cater waiters—or, for the more misogynistically-inclined, “cocktail waitresses”), Frida accuses Jess of having no self-respect because she keeps going back to the same toxic asshole every time they break up. This, of course, will turn out to be extremely ironic later on, when the biggest twist of Blink Twice comes to light, and viewers see that Frida has been doing exactly the same thing.

    In any case, Frida immediately realizes how harsh she sounds and apologizes right away to Jess as they continue to prep for serving drinks at Slater’s big, fancy event (with their male boss annoyingly telling them, “Don’t forget to smile!”)—presumably something “benefit”-oriented. It doesn’t much matter to Frida, who is so unabashed in her eye-fucking of Slater from afar, that it comes as no surprise when she tells Jess that what she spent all her money on happened to be two gowns for each of them to wear so that they could infiltrate the event as guests rather than servers (though, to be honest, the gowns look more like they’re from Shein than, say, Chanel). Jess, ever the down-ass bitch, complies even though she is not even remotely affected by Slater’s looks or wealth. Eventually making a fool out of herself by tripping in the most visible way possible, Slater takes Frida under his wing at the event and, by the end, the two have such a “connection” that he decides to invite her and Jess back to his island with the entourage he’s been parading.

    If it all sounds somewhat implausible, Kravitz is well-aware of that, stating during an interview with CBS News Sunday Morning, “I like playful filmmaking.” This is made apparent by her use of stark, all-white backdrops (think: Blur’s “The Universal” video, itself an homage to A Clockwork Orange) whenever the audience is in Slater’s world outside of the island, as though to emphasize that, to him, there are no gray areas. Kravitz also added, “I like when the audience has a sense of, ‘It’s a movie,’ you know what I mean? And we’re all in it together and it’s not reality.” But it is, indeed, very true to the reality of how power is so grossly abused by white men with billions (or even just millions) of dollars, finding loopholes for being as disgusting and depraved as they want to be no matter how much cancel culture continues to thrive post-#MeToo. In this case, that loophole is found through the manipulation of the five women on the island’s memory. In addition to Frida and Jess, there’s also Sarah (Adria Arjona), Camilla (Liz Caribel) and Heather (Trew Mullen), all of whom keep spraying themselves with a perfume called Desideria that’s strategically placed in their rooms, just begging them to use it. As Slater says, it’s made from a special “extract” of a flower that can only be found on the island. How convenient for him and his fellow rich white men that it also acts as a kind of super-charged Rohypnol.

    It is the memory loss element of Blink Twice that most closely aligns it with Jordan Peele’s own seminal psychological thriller, Get Out. For the loss of each woman’s memories of the particularly traumatic events that happen to them during the night are what make them trapped inside a kind of “sunken place” during the day. Thus, prone to chirpily answering, almost Stepford wife-style, “I’m having a great time!” whenever Slater asks, “Are you having a good time?” Their muddled memory—almost tantamount to being lobotomized—makes it retroactively all the more cruel when they first arrive and a Polaroid is taken of the group as Vic (Christian Slater), Slater’s “right- and left-hand man,” shouts, “Everybody say, ‘Makin’ memories!’” The irony being, of course, that the women on the island will have no ability to recall what’s going on. What horrors are being wrought upon their bodies when night falls.

    At one point, Slater promises a fellow rich man named, what else, Rich (Kyle MacLachlan) that he can do whatever he wants because: it’s like the more traumatic the event, the more readily they forget. And it is true—women’s minds are extremely adept at that form of self-protection, mainly because dealings with men in any sphere tend to be violating in some way or another, so “blotting out” becomes a kind of automatic coping mechanism. And in the world of rich men, violation is merely the rule, not the exception.

    Of course, in these “polite” times, men like Slater feign going along with the “new world order.” For example, when the group arrives on the island and Stacy (Geena Davis, in a kind of Ghislaine Maxwell role) starts collecting everyone’s phone into a bag, Slater assures, “You don’t have to do anything that you don’t wanna do.” But, of course, the pressure to oblige him—one that is perennially ingrained within women—gets the better even of Jess. Even though it is she who is the one to be hit much more quickly with the revelation, “Did we just jet off to a billionaire’s island with a bunch of strangers?” For the number one rule learned by every millennial as a child was: don’t talk to or go anywhere with strangers. Frida insists, “He’s not a stranger. He’s Slater King.” Such is the danger of 1) parasocial relationships being intensely nurtured in a social media age and 2) the automatic carte blanche that powerful people—nay, powerful men—are given when it comes to trust. Despite all long-running evidence that suggests only inherent distrust ought to be placed in them.

    It doesn’t take long for Frida and Jess to fall into the “routine” of the island. Which goes something like: wake up, get high, swim, start drinking, eat a dinner prepared by Cody (Simon Rex), another alpha male (though there are also beta males like Tom [Haley Joel Osment] and Lucas [Levon Hawke, a fellow nepo baby like Kravitz), get so trashed you “black out,” repeat. Soon enough, the days and nights all meld into one, with Frida and the others long ago losing track of what day it is or even how long they’ve been on the island. At one point, Frida asks Slater, “When are we leaving?” He shrugs, “Whenever you want.” Naturally, that’s not true, nor is it really an answer. Besides, he knows Frida will soon forget, informing her during one of their “intimate walks,” “Forgetting is a gift.”

    Indeed, one would think that the female gender does have collective amnesia sometimes when considering how willing they are to “forgive” men for all their transgressions. And this, too, is another key theme of Blink Twice, which essentially posits the Carrie Bradshaw-penned question: “Can you ever really forgive, if you can’t forget?” As Slater will tell Frida during their final showdown, the answer is definitely no, resulting in an Oscar clip-type performance as he angrily repeats, “I’m sorry” to her and then demands if she forgives him yet. “No?,” he says when she doesn’t reply. Of course not.

    Nor does she seem likely to ever forgive a woman like Stacy, who is not only complicit in what’s happening on the island, but also prefers the “ignorance is bliss” philosophy that Slater keeps promoting through Desideria. That Davis is involved in the film is also especially significant considering she runs the Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media, which “advocates for equal representation of women and men.” Blink Twice certainly has plenty of that. Though perhaps the most memorable character out of anyone is the woman billed as “Badass Maid” (María Elena Olivares). Tasked primarily with catching the snakes on the island that, according to Slater, have become a blight, it is she who will become the savior of the oppressed in this fucked-up situation.

    As for Frida’s past history with Slater (which she, of course, forgot), it begs the question: are people—particularly women—doomed to repeatedly gravitate toward the same toxic situation so long as it “feels good” enough of the time to forget, so to speak, about how bad it is overall? The conclusion of the film would like to make viewers believe otherwise, ending on a “hopeful” even if “sweet revenge” note.

    As for changing the name from Pussy Island to Blink Twice, it wasn’t just because marketing the film was going to be nothing short of an ordeal with the MPA’s censorship limitations, but also because, as Kravitz found, “Interestingly enough, after researching it, women were offended by the word, and women seeing the title were saying, ‘I don’t want to see that movie,’ which is part of the reason I wanted to try and use the word, which is trying to reclaim the word, and not make it something that we’re so uncomfortable using. But we’re not there yet. And I think that’s something I have the responsibility as a filmmaker to listen to.”

    Perhaps if women had taken the word in the spirit intended when it refers to callow men, there might have been more acceptance. However, regardless of the title change, Blink Twice will undoubtedly still come across as “hardcore” to plenty of filmgoers. Mainly the ones who don’t like to see a mirror held up to a society run by soulless, amoral, bacchanalian knaves. Post-#MeToo or not.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Prince Andrew Claims Pedophilia Scandal Was Just Palace’s Attempt To Cover Up His Ongoing Battle With Cancer

    Prince Andrew Claims Pedophilia Scandal Was Just Palace’s Attempt To Cover Up His Ongoing Battle With Cancer

    [ad_1]

    LONDON—Saying the accusations made against him over the years were not just disgusting but patently false, Prince Andrew, Duke of York, told reporters Monday the scandal over his alleged pedophilia was just Buckingham Palace’s attempt to cover up his ongoing battle with cancer. “Sadly, rather than being honest about a very serious threat to my health, my family and its advisors chose to distract the public from my potentially terminal condition by spreading awful rumors that I had slept with young teenage prostitutes,” said the embattled royal, adding that the longstanding allegations that he had engaged in sex with a 17-year-old at Ghislaine Maxwell’s home in London and participated in an orgy with several underage girls on Jeffrey Epstein’s private island were all part of a ploy to keep his tragic diagnosis private. “The truth is, all the witnesses who claim I groped them or sexually assaulted them when they were being trafficked as minors were paid a hefty fee by the palace to keep the spotlight off my long, arduous battle with cancer, which is a terrible disease. A lot worse than being forced to have sex with someone, I should think.” Andrew went on to ask the press for space during this difficult time, saying he was still trying to find the best way to explain his cancer to the many confused and saddened underage women in his life.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ex-cop claims he has sex tape of Andrew filmed by Epstein stashed away

    Ex-cop claims he has sex tape of Andrew filmed by Epstein stashed away

    [ad_1]

    A FORMER US cop is at the centre of claims he is in possession of the sex tapes secretly recorded by depraved Jeffrey Epstein.

    Court papers released in New York this week alleged that the tycoon had footage of the Duke of York.

    7

    Former US cop John Mark Dougan claims to have footage of CCTV recorded by Jeffrey EpsteinCredit:
    Dougan says the FBI seized the footage but not before he took a copy

    7

    Dougan says the FBI seized the footage but not before he took a copyCredit:

    And now controversial US former cop John Mark Dougan says he has a computer hard drive containing Epstein footage.

    He claims the videos were passed to him by a dead cop pal who first investigated Epstein when he was arrested for child sex in 2006.

    Dougan says he does not know if it contains footage of Andrew because he cannot bring himself to watch it.

    But he pointed to a report in The Sunday Times from 2019 which revealed that MI6 was “concerned” he had handed evidence involving the then-senior royal over to the Russian government after moving there.

    Tracked down last week by The Sun on Sunday, he said: “Apparently the FBI freaked out and told MI6 I was in possession of compromising material relating to Prince Andrew.

    “At that point I’d never been through the content of the hard drive and even after that I’ve only taken a quick glance, enough to know it’s s**t I don’t want to see.

    Corruption claims

    “The couple of videos I saw were very grainy and it was hard to see who was who.

    “But it’s my contention that the FBI knows who is on those videos.”

    Dougan has previously said he moved to Russia after the FBI raided his Florida home in 2016 and seized the hard drive.

    But he added: “They thought they had the only copy until they found out in 2019 that I’d had a back-up copy sent to me in Russia.”

    It is the latest astonishing twist in the case of paedophile financier Epstein and his decade-long friendship with Prince Andrew.

    Dougan suspects there is footage of Prince Andrew on the recordings

    7

    Dougan suspects there is footage of Prince Andrew on the recordingsCredit: Jae Donnelly
    He says the the videos were passed to him by a dead cop pal who first investigated Epstein

    7

    He says the the videos were passed to him by a dead cop pal who first investigated EpsteinCredit: Reuters

    Epstein committed suicide in a New York prison in 2019 amid suspicious circumstances while awaiting trial for sex trafficking offences.

    The sex tape claim resurfaced when Epstein victim Sarah Ransome claimed in court papers released this month that she had seen videos of Prince Andrew, Virgin mogul Richard Branson and former US president Bill Clinton having sex with an unnamed friend of hers.

    Ransome, 39, who worked as a masseuse for Epstein at his New York mansion, later told reporters she had made up the claims.

    Then she insisted in an appearance on Good Morning Britain this week that the secretly filmed footage DID exist.

    She said: “There are videos that exist. The people that know they exist — I’m sure are very frightened of them being released.”

    Dougan says his late friend Joe Recarey, a detective for the Palm Beach Police Department, took CD-ROMs to Dougan’s home containing the evidence and Dougan then “burned” them on to his hard drive.

    Recarey was lead investigator when Epstein was first arrested there for child sex offences in 2006, and discovered hidden cameras at his Palm Beach mansion.

    The detective was disgusted, said Dougan, when the paedophile ­financier was allowed to plea-bargain his way to a “sweetheart deal” in 2008 which saw him serve less than 13 months in jail for procuring a child for prostitution.

    Dougan was never involved in that case but resigned in 2009 and became a whistleblower after making a series of claims about corruption in Florida police.

    Recarey then enabled him to make copies of the tapes for safekeeping, he said, in case someone “above his pay grade” came looking for it.

    Dougan claimed he didn’t give much thought to it until the FBI raided his home and took his computers in connection to whistleblowing and seized the evidence.

    He fled to Russia to avoid any charges related to the raid. In 2017 he was eventually charged in his absence with wiretapping and extortion.

    Last year US journalist Craig Unger claimed he had been sent proof by Dougan purportedly showing that one of the sex videos in his possession features an unidentified media executive.

    Unger also pointed to a picture of Dougan with Russian government official Pavel Borodin, said to be a mentor to President Vladimir Putin.

    The writer said: “When you see John Mark Dougan with this guy, the inevitable conclusion is, ‘Is Dougan selling them these sex tapes?’”

    Dougan claims he met Borodin only once in 2013 on a business matter and insists any suggestion he has been paid by the Russian government or granted asylum there in exchange for the sex tapes is wrong.

    Epstein died in jail in 2019 with US investigators ruling it as a suicide

    7

    Epstein died in jail in 2019 with US investigators ruling it as a suicideCredit: Getty

    ‘I have goosebumps’

    He said: “No one from the Russian government has ever approached me about the videos.”

    After it emerged that he was in possession of a back-up of the videos in 2019, Dougan claims he had his American passport revoked by the US State Department.

    He has since been granted Russian citizenship and has been accused of working for the country’s Sputnik TV channel.

    He denies that and says he has never been paid for any of his appearances on Russian TV.

    In July 2022 he appeared in a video with captured British fighter Aiden Aslin, who was serving as a Ukrainian marine, while Aslin sang the Russian national anthem.

    The clip was picked up by Russian state TV. In it, Dougan tells Aiden after the rendition: “I have goosebumps.”

    Meanwhile, the FBI faced fresh calls this week to release hundreds of missing pieces of evidence, including tapes, CDs, passports and photos found in a safe at Epstein’s New York home in July 2019, when he was arrested for sex trafficking minors.

    He died a month later in his New York jail in what was ruled to be ­suicide by hanging.

    Prince Andrew strenuously denies all claims made against him

    7

    Prince Andrew strenuously denies all claims made against himCredit: AFP

    Prince Andrew — who paid millions in a civil settlement to Epstein victim Virginia Guiffre — has not responded to the tape claims but has repeatedly denied all the allegations against him.

    As for Sir Richard Branson, a Virgin Group spokesperson said: “We categorically reject all allegations made by Sarah Ransome.

    “In 2019 she admitted to The New Yorker that the ‘tapes’ had been ‘invented’.

    “Any suggestion that Sir Richard Branson was involved in a ‘sex tape’ is entirely false. The allegations are baseless.

    “The actions of Jeffrey Epstein were abhorrent and we support the right to justice for the many victims impacted by his abuse.”

    In 2020, following Epstein’s death a spokesman for Bill Clinton said: “President Clinton knows nothing about the terrible crimes Jeffrey Epstein pleaded guilty to in Florida some years ago, or those with which he has been recently charged in New York.

    “In 2002 and 2003 President Clinton took a total of four trips on Jeffrey Epstein’s airplane, one to Europe, one to Asia and two to Africa, which included stops in connection with the work of the Clinton Foundation.

    “He had one meeting with Epstein in his Harlem office in 2002, and around the same time made one brief visit to Epstein’s New York apartment with a staff member and his security detail.”

    Despite the released court papers that claim Bill Clinton had twice visited Epstein Island, his spokesperson said in 2020: “He has not spoken to Epstein in well over a decade, and has never been to (Epstein’s) Little St James island, Epstein’s ranch in New Mexico, or his residence in Florida.”

    Prince nod in FBI doc

    PRINCE ANDREW was mentioned in an FBI interview report linked to Jeffrey Epstein, we can reveal.

    The Duke of York’s name appeared in paperwork, known as a 302 form, revealed by lawyers for Andrew’s accuser Virginia Giuffre.

    Unredacted files name Prince Andrew in an FBI interview  linked to Jeffrey Epstein

    7

    Unredacted files name Prince Andrew in an FBI interview linked to Jeffrey EpsteinCredit: AP

    It is unclear if it was the result of an FBI interview with Giuffre.

    Her lawyers have touted the strength of their defamation case in 2016 against Epstein’s madam, Ghislaine Maxwell.

    Listing an alleged cache of evidence, Sigrid McCawley wrote: “We have pictures, hospital records from when my client was a minor in New York with them.

    “We have time and travel records, message pads, the FBI 302, which was taken in 2011, mentions Prince Andrew in it, in the unredacted part.”

    A legal source in the US said: “The FBI takes these reports seriously.”

    The status of the bureau’s probe into Andrew is unclear. It has not commented.

    [ad_2]

    Dan Coombs

    Source link

  • The Limits of the Epstein Doc Dumps

    The Limits of the Epstein Doc Dumps

    [ad_1]

    Hillary Clinton had +300 odds. Jared Kushner was at +2,000. You could bet more broadly on the presence of “any current congressman.” A several-years-old half-joke was spreading anew, and the gambling site BetOnline seemed to see an opportunity. In late December, the company listed high-profile politicians, actors, and athletes and their odds of showing up on what has come to be known, mostly through force of repetition, as “the Epstein list.”

    A few days earlier, a federal judge had ordered the unsealing of about 240 documents related to a lawsuit that Virginia Giuffre, an outspoken victim of Jeffrey Epstein’s extensive sexual abuse, filed against Ghislaine Maxwell in 2015. After Maxwell, the financier’s ex-girlfriend who would later be convicted of facilitating his predation, called Giuffre a liar, Giuffre sued the British socialite for defamation. They settled in 2017—when Epstein was infamous but not yet at the saturation point of global notoriety—and the case was largely sealed. Two years later, after reporting by the Miami Herald’s Julie K. Brown brought Epstein’s crimes to their place at the center of a storm of continuing intrigue, Brown and the paper succeeded in an appeal to have materials from the Giuffre suit released. They were joined in the effort by right-wing conspiracy theorist Mike Cernovich and attorney and longtime Epstein associate Alan Dershowitz.

    A first batch of documents was unsealed in August 2019, the day before Epstein died by suicide in a federal jail while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. His arrest that July and the intrigue surrounding his death became a blockbuster international news story and turned him into an emblem for the sins of the wealthy and powerful. By the time US district judge Loretta Preska ruled last month that the names of 187 “J. Does” who appeared in documents related to the Giuffre suit would be released, tabloid anticipation was fervent. The order, carrying a list of pseudonymous people and an invocation of sealed legal materials, compounded some of the prevailing senses simmering around the case.

    Bill Clinton to be unmasked as ‘Doe 36’ and identified more than 50 times in Jeffrey Epstein doc dump,” read one New York Post headline that preceded the tabloid’s live blog about the unveiling of the list.

    “It’s supposed to be coming out soon,” New York Jets quarterback Aaron Rodgers said with a grin on ESPN last week, tapping into the space the Does list had come to occupy in pop culture as he used it as fodder for his ongoing feud with late-night host Jimmy Kimmel, who he falsely insinuated would be on the list. Kimmel threatened legal action, ESPN apologized, and Rodgers said in his next appearance on the network that he didn’t mean to suggest that Kimmel was a “P-word.” Rodgers’s accusation and Kimmel’s response created their own sports-media news cycle that continued well into this week.

    The notion of an “Epstein list” as hidden but singular evidence of elite malfeasance has taken a particular hold on the far right, where the involvement of Clinton adds to the perception of retributive potential. “I’m pleased that this court agrees with my calls for transparency and accountability on Epstein and his associates,” Republican senator Marsha Blackburn wrote on X after Preska’s order. “There will be lots of names you’ve never heard of,” Georgia congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene wrote. “Pedophiles belong in jail not on secret government lists.”

    BetOnline eventually removed its odds offerings, but by then the site had captured the tenor of the loudest expectations.

    When Preska ordered the unsealing, she listed a rationale for the presence of each newly unredacted name that would appear in the documents. A few reasons appeared throughout: the Doe hadn’t bothered objecting to the unsealing; there wouldn’t be any salacious material about the Doe; the material about the Doe had already been covered in the press. In instances where the Doe’s name remained redacted, it was often because they were an underage victim of sexual abuse.

    Epstein’s abuse took place over the course of decades, and he left behind scores of victims as he cultivated relationships with what could be called, without wading into conspiracy, a subset of the global elite: a former president, a future president, a British royal, an American retail billionaire. The broad story of his crimes contains some significant remaining questions—how did he get all his money, and how did he maintain his sway over the wealthy businessmen who bankrolled him or else stood by him?

    But then there’s the list. The details of Epstein’s and Maxwell’s lives have continued to provide red meat to conspiracists, and even acquired a kind of fashionability on account of the pair’s brushes with sordid glamour. Interest in the scandal, with its mixture of wealth, fame, and sex trafficking, has often involved the idea that a break in the case would reveal the names of the powerful men to whom Epstein provided victims.

    When the documents began to emerge last week, most of the names had appeared before in the last several years of Epstein coverage. The details largely echoed portions of what had already been known about his abuse. More often than not, the anticipated files were depositions of his victims.

    As news outlets and online enthusiasts tore through the pages, the involvement of bold-faced names tended to stick out. Tabloids homed in on how one Epstein accuser, Johanna Sjoberg, claimed in a 2016 deposition that “he said one time that Clinton likes them young, referring to girls.” Clinton had been without objection to the unsealing. In response to press inquiries this week, his spokesperson referred to a 2019 statement saying that “President Clinton knows nothing about the terrible crimes Jeffrey Epstein pleaded guilty to in Florida some years ago, or those with which he has been recently charged in New York.” It added that Clinton had “not spoken to Epstein in well over a decade” and that he had “never been to Little St. James Island, Epstein’s ranch in New Mexico, or his residence in Florida.”

    [ad_2]

    Dan Adler

    Source link

  • Jeffrey Epstein's brother said the pedophile was 'just having a good time' when confronted by the financier's sex trafficking allegations

    Jeffrey Epstein's brother said the pedophile was 'just having a good time' when confronted by the financier's sex trafficking allegations

    [ad_1]

    • Mark Epstein said on Tuesday that his late brother was “just having a good time.”

    • He was on News Nation’s “On Balance,” calling for an investigation into his brother’s death.

    • But when asked about the allegations against Jeffrey Epstein, he said he didn’t want to speculate.

    Mark Epstein, the brother of late financier Jeffrey Epstein, said the pedophile was “just having a good time” when asked about the wave of sex trafficking allegations against the latter.

    “It doesn’t make sense to me,” Epstein said on News Nation’s “On Balance” on Tuesday. Host Leland Vittert had asked him if he was surprised by the allegations against his brother.

    Epstein’s interview with Vittert focused on his call to have the financier’s death investigated further. Authorities ruled that Jeffrey Epstein died by suicide in 2019 while in prison, a conclusion that Mark Epstein has repeatedly questioned and criticized.

    But when Vittert asked Mark Epstein to discuss the abuse and trafficking allegations against Jeffrey Epstein, the financier’s brother demurred.

    “He was just having a good time. Jeffrey liked to have a good time,” Epstein said. “Unfortunately, he chose a-“

    “There’s, hold on,” Vittert said. “There’s a, there’s a big difference though between having-“

    “I wasn’t there,” Epstein said. “So if you’re asking me to speculate, I really don’t want to speculate because I wasn’t there.”

    Mark Epstein has said that he believes that his brother was murdered, a conspiracy theory that up to 45% of Americans believed on the year of Jeffrey Epstein’s death, according to a SurveyMonkey Audience poll by Business Insider.

    With Jeffrey Epstein dead, public scrutiny fell on Ghislaine Maxwell, his sex trafficking partner who recruited underage girls for the financier and sexually abused them herself. She was sentenced to 20 years in prison in June 2022 but is appealing her conviction.

    The full breadth of allegations against Jeffrey Epstein once again entered the spotlight in early January when several tranches of unredacted court documents revealed the names of more than 200 people associated with the financier.

    Some were victims who filed lawsuits against Jeffrey Epstein and Maxwell or were members of his house staff. Others were powerful or famous figures, like Michael Jackson and David Copperfield, who weren’t previously known to be connected to the pedophile.

    Notably, having their names revealed didn’t necessarily indicate wrongdoing from any of them.

    Read the original article on Business Insider

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Eleven bombshells in Epstein court docs from ‘sex tapes to puppet groping’

    Eleven bombshells in Epstein court docs from ‘sex tapes to puppet groping’

    [ad_1]

    IT has been a terrible week for a string of disgraced paedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s pals and associates who have been exposed in a cache of newly unsealed court docs.

    Here are the 11 of the biggest bombshell revelations that reveal a depraved and sordid tale of sex tapes, underage orgies, baths, billionaires, a prince and two presidents.

    15

    The splew of unsealed docs have exposed Jeffrey Epstein’s inner circle and further detail of his depraved sexual crimes he committed alongside disgraced British socialised, Ghislaine MaxwellCredit: The Mega Agency
    The new files reveal an alleged plot to blackmail Prince Andrew over his alleged sexual encounter with Virginia Giuffre

    15

    The new files reveal an alleged plot to blackmail Prince Andrew over his alleged sexual encounter with Virginia GiuffreCredit: Jae Donnelly
    Former President Bill Clinton (pictured with Epstein and Maxwell) has also been dragged into the spotlight with allegations he likes girls 'young'

    15

    Former President Bill Clinton (pictured with Epstein and Maxwell) has also been dragged into the spotlight with allegations he likes girls ‘young’Credit: The Mega Agency
    Giuiffre has alleged she was trafficked by Epstein and given to Andrew and 'two of the world's most respected politicians'

    15

    Giuiffre has alleged she was trafficked by Epstein and given to Andrew and ‘two of the world’s most respected politicians’Credit: PA

    In total, 215 documents have been released as part of a 2015 defamation lawsuit brought by the Duke of York’s accuser Virginia Giuffre against Epstein‘s former lover and associate, Ghislaine Maxwell.

    Delivered in several anticipated drops, the files have revealed the inner-workings of Epstein’s world – while dragging a sprinkling of previously unmentioned celebrities and politicians into the mix.

    The docs have made public the lurid details of a string of sexual allegations made against Prince Andrew, former presidents Bill Clinton and Donald Trump, physicist Stephen Hawking and A-list celebrities.

    1. Andrew, Clinton & Branson’s ‘sex tapes’

    Epstein victim Sarah Ransome wrote emails to a reporter in 2016 claiming the duke, Bill Clinton and billionaire businessman Sir Richard Branson were filmed having sex by Epstein on separate occasions.

    READ MORE ON EPSTEIN DOCS

    She later retracted the claims and told the New Yorker in 2019 “she had invented the tapes to draw attention to Epstein’s behaviour, and to make him believe that she had ‘evidence that would come out if he harmed me’”.

    However, on Tuesday she stood by allegations she made in 2016 that the tapes had existed and claimed she had been forced to withdraw them when her family was threatened by Maxwell and “others”.

    All of the above have always vehemently denied any wrongdoing over their association with Epstein and no tapes have ever emerged publicly.

    A spokesman for Branson blasted the claims as “baseless and unfounded”. 

    2. Stephen Hawking’s ‘underage orgy’

    The doc drop revealed an email that had been sent from Epstein to Maxwell that showed the billionaire asking her to “issue a reward” to any of Giuffre’s friends who “come forward and help prove her allegations are false”.

    Among the allegations listed by Epstein in the email were a “Clinton dinner” and a claim that Stephen Hawking “participated in an underage orgy”.

    In the message, Epstein suggested Giuffre had made claims about both the British scientist and former US President Bill Clinton.

    The email read: “You can issue a reward to any of Virginia’s friends, acquaints, family that come forward and help prove her allegations are false.

    “The strongest is the Clinton dinner, and the new version in the Virgin Islands that Stephen Hawking participated in an underage orgy.”

    In 2015, photos emerged showing Hawking, who died in 2018 aged 76, being hosted on Epstein’s private Caribbean island before he was first charged in 2006.

    The internationally renowned physicist was pictured at a barbecue on Little St James, often referred to as Epstein’s “Paedo Island”.

    He was part of a group of 21 scientists attending a conference in March 2006, which Epstein had funded.

    3. Duke of York’s ‘underage orgy’

    A woman named only as Jane Doe 3 alleged she was “forced” into sexual relations with “a member of the British Royal Family, Prince Andrew (a/k/a Duke of York)”.

    The accuser alleged the encounters took place at three locations including on Epstein’s private island “in an orgy with numerous other underaged girls”.

    The alleged victim said she was to “give the Prince whatever he demanded” and also told to report back to Epstein the “details of the sexual abuse”.

    The duke has always strenuously denied the now resurfaced allegations.

    4. Andrew and a puppet

    During testimony in May 2016, a woman named Johanna Sjoberg, 42, claimed Prince Andrew had groped her when she was 21.

    She alleged that the duke used a puppet of himself to touch her breast while sitting on a couch inside Epstein’s Manhattan apartment in March 2001.

    Buckingham Palace previously blasted the allegations as “categorically untrue”.

    Clinton was claimed in court docs to have liked girls 'young' as well as alleged to have been filmed having sex by Epstein

    15

    Clinton was claimed in court docs to have liked girls ‘young’ as well as alleged to have been filmed having sex by EpsteinCredit: The Mega Agency
    Epstein suggested in an email Giuffre had made claims about Stephen Hawking and Clinton

    15

    Epstein suggested in an email Giuffre had made claims about Stephen Hawking and ClintonCredit: Getty
    The world-renowned physicist pictured on Epstein's 'Paedo Island' in 2006

    15

    The world-renowned physicist pictured on Epstein’s ‘Paedo Island’ in 2006
    The email sent by Epstein to Maxwell that allegedly asks for her to pay bribes to Giuffre's friends to help disprove allegations made against Hawking

    15

    The email sent by Epstein to Maxwell that allegedly asks for her to pay bribes to Giuffre’s friends to help disprove allegations made against Hawking

    5. Bill Clinton ‘likes them young’

    In Sjoberg’s interview under oath, she said Epstein had told her that former president Bill Clinton “likes them young, referring to girls”.

    In 2019, Clinton’s spokesman said he knew “nothing about the terrible crimes Jeffrey Epstein pleaded guilty to” and that the pair had not spoken “in over a decade”.

    6. Giuffre ‘trafficked’ to Andrew and ‘two of world’s most respected politicians’

    In an email exchange with journalist Sharon Churcher in May 2011, Giuffre said she was concerned about speaking out after Clinton had allegedly “threatened them not to write sex-trafficking articles” about Epstein.

    In a follow up email, Churcher said it would be a “gamble” for Giuffre to not have more to say about how she was “sex-trafficked to PA [Prince Andrew] and other men including two of the world’s most respected politicians”.

    The names of the two politicians in the email remain redacted.

    In Giuffre’s deposition released on Tuesday, she alleged she had sex with New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson who passed away in September and another “prominent US politician” when she was 17.

    Asked how many times she allegedly had sex with the unnamed official, she replied “twice that I can recall.”

    7. Donald Trump’s sex with ‘many girls’

    Ransome also claimed that “many girls” had sexual relations with former US president Donald Trump, including her friend who wasn’t named.

    In an email written to a journalist in 2016 and filed in court papers, Ransome said: “She confided in me about her casual ‘friendship’ with Donald. Mr. Trump definitely seemed to have a thing for her and she told me how he kept going on about how he liked her ‘pert nipples,’”.

    The claims were also flagged by Dershowitz in his letter which attempted to prove the Epstein victim lacked credibility.

    The former President has slammed the since-retracted claims and branded them “simply false”.

    8. Maxwell’s computer search terms

    Provisional search terms used by lawyers to find relevant files on Maxwell’s computers were also disclosed in the documents.

    Amongst the terms on a list were “Andrew”, “Prince”, “Royal”, “PA”, “Kensington”, “Duke” and “York”.

    A picture of Ransome on Epstein's island included in the newly unsealed files

    15

    A picture of Ransome on Epstein’s island included in the newly unsealed files
    Sarah Ransome  doubled down on her previous sex tape claims this week

    15

    Sarah Ransome doubled down on her previous sex tape claims this weekCredit: Netflix
    She also alleged Epstein raped her 'three times' in a single day

    15

    She also alleged Epstein raped her ‘three times’ in a single dayCredit: AFP

    9. Duke and Duchess of York ‘friends’ with Epstein

    Epstein’s former housekeeper Juan Alessi claimed Andrew had “daily massages” while he stayed at the paedophile financier’s Florida home.

    During his video-taped interview under oath in 2009, Alessi said Sarah, Duchess of York, only paid a short visit to Epstein, but the duke “spent weeks with us”.

    10. Epstein quizzed over Andrew ‘blackmail plot’

    Epstein refused to answer questions over whether he attempted to blackmail the duke after his alleged sexual encounter with Giuffre in London in 2001.

    The disgraced financier pleaded the fifth amendment eight times as he was quizzed during a former trial against his ex-lover, Maxwell.

    He was directly asked whether he and Maxwell instructed Giuffre to have sex with Andrew and whether he had asked her to gather a “full report” to be later used as “blackmail material”.

    He was also questioned over whether Andrew had sex with Giuffre “several times” and if the information gathered for the trial had “the potential to affect the reputation” of the duke.

    To each targeted question, Epstein exercised his right to the fifth amendment – refusing to answer to avoid incriminating himself.

    The revelations, uncovered in the last dump of bombshell court documents, followed allegations that Epstein paid Giuffre £11,800 to have sex with the prince.

    Andrew’s accuser has previously claimed he sexually assaulted her in a Victorian-style bath at Ghislaine’s mews house in Belgravia in March 2001.

    Monday’s drop of documents revealed Maxwell’s lawyer had claimed that Giuffre lied about having sex with Andrew because he was “too big for the bath”.

    The prince strenuously denies any wrongdoing.

    However, the late Queen’s second son stepped down from public life after the furore over his friendship with Epstein, and paid millions to settle a civil sexual assault case with Giuffre – a woman he claimed never to have met.

    11. Maxwell’s fears over links to Andrew

    Maxwell could be seen sending an email in January 2015, shortly after a civil claim had been filed against her, in which she described herself as “out of my depth”.

    The socialite said: “I have already suffered such a terrible and painful loss over the last few days that I can’t even see what life after press hell even looks like – statements that don’t address all just lead to more questions… what is my relationship to Clinton? Andrew on and on.”

    Maxwell has been imprisoned since July 2020 despite attempts by her defence counsel to have her released on bail.

    She was sentenced to 20 years in prison at the federal court in the Southern District of New York in June 2022.

    Epstein was found hung in a prison cell in New York on August 10, 2019, while awaiting trial for a range of offences, including trafficking minors for sex, and multiple rapes.

    How you can get help

    Women’s Aid has this advice for victims and their families:

    • Always keep your phone nearby.
    • Get in touch with charities for help, including the Women’s Aid live chat helpline and services such as SupportLine.
    • If you are in danger, call 999.
    • Familiarise yourself with the Silent Solution, reporting abuse without speaking down the phone, instead dialing “55”.
    • Always keep some money on you, including change for a pay phone or bus fare.
    • If you suspect your partner is about to attack you, try to go to a lower-risk area of the house – for example, where there is a way out and access to a telephone.
    • Avoid the kitchen and garage, where there are likely to be knives or other weapons. Avoid rooms where you might become trapped, such as the bathroom, or where you might be shut into a cupboard or other small space.

    If you are a ­victim of domestic abuse, SupportLine is open Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday from 6pm to 8pm on 01708 765200. The charity’s email support ­service is open weekdays and weekends during the crisis – messageinfo@supportline.org.uk.

    Women’s Aid provides a live chat service – available weekdays from 8am-6pm and weekends 10am-6pm.

    You can also call the freephone 24-hour ­National Domestic Abuse Helpline on 0808 2000 247.

    Most of Epstein's sexual crimes took place on 'Paedo island' - Little Saint James in the US Virgin Islands

    15

    Most of Epstein’s sexual crimes took place on ‘Paedo island’ – Little Saint James in the US Virgin IslandsCredit: AP:Associated Press
    Dozens of haunting photos taken at Epstein’s 'Paedo Island' show him and Maxwell hosting famous pals and scantily-clad young girls and women

    15

    Dozens of haunting photos taken at Epstein’s ‘Paedo Island’ show him and Maxwell hosting famous pals and scantily-clad young girls and womenCredit: The Mega Agency
    A new cache of allegations against the Duke of Yorke have been unsealed - he denies wrongdoing

    15

    A new cache of allegations against the Duke of Yorke have been unsealed – he denies wrongdoingCredit: PA
    Victims of Jeffrey Epstein - Sarah Ransome, Virginia Roberts Giuffre, and Marijke Chartouni

    15

    Victims of Jeffrey Epstein – Sarah Ransome, Virginia Roberts Giuffre, and Marijke ChartouniCredit: Alamy

    [ad_2]

    Iona Cleave

    Source link

  • Whoopi Goldberg Denies Rumor She's On Epstein Flight Log List: “I Didn't Go Anywhere”

    Whoopi Goldberg Denies Rumor She's On Epstein Flight Log List: “I Didn't Go Anywhere”

    [ad_1]

    Whoopi Goldberg has assured she never stepped foot on Jeffrey Epstein‘s plane after a rumor spread about her being on the recently unsealed court documents.

    As The Shade Room previously reported, a federal judge overseeing Virginia Giuffre‘s case against Epstein ordered the unsealing of legal paperwork mentioning almost 200 names associated with the disgraced sex offender.

    Whoopi Goldberg Address Jeffrey Epstein Flight Log List

    The public officially got hold of the docs on Wednesday (January 3). Given how quickly misinformation can spread on the internet, several “fake” files began circulating on platforms such as X.

    It practically became impossible to tell which list was real and which was fake unless you were following a verified source.

    Surprisingly enough, one of the altered documents included a list of celebrities who allegedly shared some sort of connection to Epstein, and it mentioned Goldberg.

    The EGOT winner wasted no time to address the rumor when she appeared on ‘The View’ on Thursday (January 4) to dispel any allegations tying her to the situation.

    RELATED: Jeffrey Epstein Court Records Aren’t A Client List, But Social Users Are Still Cuttin’ Up Over The Pending Docs

    The hour-long show started with its Hot Topics segment, where the ‘Sister Act’ actress made it very clear she did not fly on Epstein’s plane, the Lolita Express.

    She also denied having visited his island, Little Saint James.

    “They said I was on an island, and I’m like, I don’t go anywhere!” she told the panel. “And there’s been a lot of stuff recently. I don’t know what I’ve done to anybody.”

    In previous lawsuits against Epstein, multiple victims alleged that the island was predominantly used to lure underage children who were then abused, tortured, and sexually assaulted, per The Independent.

    Goldberg also slammed the satirical sites reposting false information about the case and stressed the potential harm of fabricating and making baseless claims against someone.

    Goldberg also touched on the actual unsealed documents, which, according to Maca, included names such as Michael Jackson, Oprah Winfrey, and Donald Trump.

    Some Names Mentioned Were Of People Who Only Shared A “Passing Connection” With Epstein

    She stated that just because a suit names someone, it doesn’t necessarily accuse them of any wrongdoing. Goldberg added that it was “extremely important” for people to do their research and understand what the documents mean because “conspiracy theorists seem to not understand or enjoy facts.”

    TODAY reports that some celebrities listed on the doc only shared a “passing connection” with Epstein. But there were also high-profile public figures, believed to have flown regularly with Epstein to his island.

    The docs also reportedly mention former president Bill Clinton, but it’s still unclear whether he was simply an acquaintance of Epstein, or if he was among the associates who engaged in criminal activity on the island.

    The controversial unsealed docs come eight years after Giuffre filed a lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell, where she accused the socialite and Epstein of sexual abuse for two years from 2000 to 2002.

    RELATED: Ghislaine Maxwell Sentenced To 20 Years In Prison For Her Role In Jeffrey Epstein Sex Trafficking Scandal

    [ad_2]

    Maurice Cassidy

    Source link

  • Details on Prince Andrew allegations emerge from new Jeffrey Epstein documents — but no U.K. police investigation

    Details on Prince Andrew allegations emerge from new Jeffrey Epstein documents — but no U.K. police investigation

    [ad_1]

    London’s Metropolitan Police said they were not conducting any new investigations into Prince Andrew after a 2016 deposition accusing him of groping a woman’s breast was released this week. The deposition was among hundreds of pages of mostly unredacted documents related to Jeffrey Epstein unsealed this week under the order of a judge in a now-settled defamation case brought by Virginia Giuffre, one of Epstein’s victims.

    What the documents say

    In the deposition, Johanna Sjoberg alleges she was groped by Prince Andrew in 2001, when she was 21. The allegation is not new, and BBC News reports Buckingham Palace previously called her allegations “categorically untrue.”

    Sjoberg says she met Andrew when she was brought to Epstein’s home in New York in 2001 by Ghislaine Maxwell. Virginia Giuffre, whose lawsuit accusing Prince Andrew of sexual abuse was settled out of court in 2022, was also at the house at the time.

    Sjoberg said she initially didn’t know who the British royal was, until Maxwell took her to get a caricature puppet of him from a BBC show. Then, she said, she sat on Andrew’s lap, while Giuffre sat beside him on the couch with the puppet in her own lap. The group took a photo with the Prince Andrew puppet groping Giuffre’s breast, and Andrew himself groping Sjoberg’s.

    In an excerpted transcript from a deposition of Maxwell released among the documents unsealed this week, she seemingly confirmed the existence of the puppet — which she called “Not a puppet. I don’t know how you would describe it. A caricature of Prince Andrew that was in Jeffrey’s home.” When asked about the incident Sjoberg described, she said, “I don’t recollect. I recollect the puppet but I don’t recollect anything around the puppet,” before saying again it was a “characterization of Andrew.”

    Reaction in the U.K.

    “We are aware of the release of court documents in relation to Jeffrey Epstein,” London’s Metropolitan Police said in a statement. “As with any matter, should new and relevant information be brought to our attention we will assess it. No investigation has been launched.”

    Virginia Giuffre accused Prince Andrew of sexually assaulting her on three separate occasions when she was 17, which were among the information included in the documents released this week. Prince Andrew denied the allegations and claimed to have no recollection of meeting Giuffre, though the two were photographed together when Giuffre was a teenager.

    Graham Smith, CEO of the British anti-monarchy group Republic, said in a statement that he had reported Prince Andrew to police.

    “To date there appears to have been no serious criminal investigation, no interview of the accused or other witnesses and no clear justification for taking no action,” Smith said, calling on authorities to look into the allegations against Prince Andrew.

    “Given the seriousness of the incidents, the conviction of Ghislaine Maxwell, Andrew’s payment of an estimated £12m to Guiffre and the related accusations from other victims it seems there must be grounds for a full criminal investigation into these events and those involved,” he said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Prince Andrew's Alleged Puppet Fetish Exposed In Disturbing Epstein Documents

    Prince Andrew's Alleged Puppet Fetish Exposed In Disturbing Epstein Documents

    [ad_1]

    Opinion

    Source: BBC News YouTube

    Prince Andrew was publicly humiliated this week as his alleged puppet fetish has been revealed to the world in unsealed documents relating to the late billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

    Andrew’s Alleged Puppet Fetish

    Andrew’s name came up repeatedly in unsealed documents that listed over 150 names of Epstein associates. In one of the documents, Epstein accuser Johanna Sjoberg talked about allegedly meeting Epstein years ago with her fellow “victim” Virginia Roberts Giuffre.

    “At one point, Ghislaine told me to come upstairs, and we went into a closet and pulled out the puppet, the caricature of Prince Andrew, and brought it down,” she claimed, according to The Messenger. “And there was a little tag on the puppet that said ‘Prince Andrew’ on it, and that’s when I knew who he was.”

    “It looked like him,” Sjoberg continued. “And she brought it down and presented it to him; and that was a great joke, because apparently it was a production from a show on BBC. And they decided to take a picture with it, in which Virginia and Andrew sat on a couch. They put the puppet on Virginia’s lap, and I sat on Andrew’s lap, and they put the puppet’s hand on Virginia’s breast, and Andrew put his hand on my breast, and they took a photo.”

    Related: Prince Andrew Accused Of Having ‘Underage Orgy On Jeffrey Epstein’s Private Island’ In Bombshell Court Documents

    Sjoberg’s History With Epstein

    Daily Mail reported that Sjoberg previously testified that she was a 20 year-old student at Palm Beach Atlantic University when Maxwell recruited her and hired her to be Epstein’s personal assistant in 2001. Sjoberg claimed that she was immediately forced to perform sex acts, and that she knew Giuffre was underage from the time that she met her.

    In other unsealed documents, Giuffre’s legal team said, “Johanna confirms that she knew Virginia was underage when she met her on the trip to NY with Jeffrey in 2001 because Virginia couldn’t get into the casino and then later Johanna asked her and Virginia said she was 17.”

    “Johanna testified that Virginia looked young,” they continued. “Johanna added: ‘At the time I had the impression that she did not have a family or she had walked away from her family. And it seemed to me, you know, they had just sort of adopted her, not as a child, but they would take care of her.’”

    “Johanna confirmed that she witnessed Virginia when she was seventeen in Jeffrey Epstein’s New York mansion with Prince Andrew and Ghislaine Maxwell,” the documents stated. “Johanna also testified that Prince Andrew sat with Virginia and Johanna and took a picture with a puppet in his image that had its hand and Prince Andrew’s hand on their respective breasts.”

    Related: Court Documents: Bill Clinton ‘Likes Them Young,’ Is ‘Key Person’ Who Can Provide Information On Jeffrey Epstein

    Andrew Has Yet To Be Charged

    At the time of this writing, Andrew has never been charged in connection with Epstein’s crimes, though he did resign from his public roles in May of 2020. Epstein allegedly committed suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial for various sex crime charges, and Maxwell is currently serving a 20 year prison sentence for her role in his crimes.

    What do you think about the latest revelations about Andrew? Let us know in the comments section.

    Now is the time to support and share the sources you trust.
    The Political Insider ranks #3 on Feedspot’s “100 Best Political Blogs and Websites.”

    An Ivy leaguer, proud conservative millennial, history lover, writer, and lifelong New Englander, James specializes in the intersection of culture and politics.

    FREE NEWS ALERTS

    Subscribe to receive the most important stories delivered straight to your inbox. Your subscription helps protect independent media.



    By subscribing, you agree to receive emails from ThePoliticalInsider.com and that you’ve read and agree to our Privacy policy and to our terms and conditions.

    FREE NEWS ALERTS

    [ad_2]

    James Conrad

    Source link

  • Jeffrey Epstein associates named in unsealed documents

    Jeffrey Epstein associates named in unsealed documents

    [ad_1]

    Jeffrey Epstein associates named in unsealed documents – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    The names of dozens of people connected to Jeffrey Epstein, including business associates and accusers, among others, were made public Wednesday. Nancy Chen reports on the fallout.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Second set of Jeffrey Epstein court filings unsealed in New York

    Second set of Jeffrey Epstein court filings unsealed in New York

    [ad_1]

    Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell attend de Grisogono Sponsors The 2005 Wall Street Concert Series Benefiting Wall Street Rising, with a Performance by Rod Stewart, at Cipriani Wall Street in New York City on March 15, 2005.

    Joe Schildhorn | Patrick McMullan | Getty Images

    A second batch of court filings related to sex predator Jeffrey Epstein were unsealed in New York on Thursday.

    The release comes a day after the first group of more than three dozen court filings were unsealed, making public names of people associated with Epstein, a money manager who accumulated a fortune in excess of $500 million at the time of his death by suicide in 2019.

    The fact that peoples’ names appear in the files does not necessarily mean they engaged in wrongdoing.

    The new filings Thursday comprise 19 exhibits, totaling 327 pages of previously sealed court documents that were docketed in a Manhattan federal court lawsuit filed by Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre against Epstein’s procurer, Ghislaine Maxwell. That case was settled out of court in 2017.

    Names mentioned in the new documents include Doug Band, a former aide to ex-President Bill Clinton, Yucaipa Companies co-founder Ron Burkle, the journalists Vicky Ward and Sharon Churcher, and Eva Dubin, who is the wife of billionaire Glenn Dubin.

    A spokesperson for Glenn Dubin on Wednesday told NBC News that he “strongly den[ies] these allegations” that Giuffre was direct to have sex with him, calling them unsubstantiated statements. CNBC has requested comment from Ward, Burkle, and Band.

    Churcher told CNBC she had not seen the document released Thursday, which related to Maxwell’s attempt to subpoena her because of her reporting on Giuffre. Maxwell’s lawyer had argued that Church was not acting as a journalist but as a friend to Giuffre in her dealings with her.

    “I’m a professional journalist and throughout this saga the only input I’ve had to this saga is as a journalist,” Churcher said. She added, referring to Giuffre, that “I have huge admiration for her character in this.”

    Clinton himself is mentioned in the new documents, and he was previously mentioned by name in the first tranche of filings unsealed Wednesday.

    A spokesman for Clinton, when asked for comment by NBC News, referred to a statement issued in 2019 that said he “knows nothing about the terrible crimes Jeffrey Epstein pleaded guilty to in Florida some years ago, or those with which he has been recently charged in New York.”

    The same statement in 2019 said that Clinton had not spoken to Epstein “in well over a decade.”

    The documents include details from a Florida police detective of how Epstein and Maxwell recruited young women to be abused. The detective says in a filing that he learned of 30 victims of Epstein in his probe in the mid-2000s.

    Other people were mentioned by name in the context of potentially having insight into the relationship between Epstein and Maxwell. 

    Epstein killed himself in 2019, a month after being arrested on federal child sex trafficking charges.

    The British socialite Maxwell is serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for charges related to recruiting and grooming young women to be sexually abused by her former boyfriend Epstein.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Andrew ‘DID have knowledge of Epstein's sex crimes’, witness list states

    Andrew ‘DID have knowledge of Epstein's sex crimes’, witness list states

    [ad_1]

    PRINCE Andrew “does have knowledge” of Jeffrey Epstein’s sex crimes, a witness list has claimed – as a second batch of documents were unsealed.

    Andrew is named in a list of potential witnesses filed by Virginia Giuffre, one of Epstein’s victims.

    5

    A second batch of Jeffrey Epstein docs is being releasedCredit: Getty
    Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein in New York’s Central Park

    5

    Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein in New York’s Central ParkCredit: Jae Donnelly
    Andrew with Virginia Roberts, now Giuffre, at Ghislaine Maxwell's London townhouse

    5

    Andrew with Virginia Roberts, now Giuffre, at Ghislaine Maxwell’s London townhouseCredit: AFP
    Former US president Bill Clinton is named in the docs (pictured with Epstein)

    5

    Former US president Bill Clinton is named in the docs (pictured with Epstein)Credit: Netflix

    Giuffre’s counsel submitted the list – Exhibit 13, page 7 – as part of her defamation suit against Ghislaine Maxwell.

    The listing for Andrew claims that he “has knowledge of Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking conduct and interaction with underage minors, including Virginia Giuffre”.

    Andrew denies all allegations of wrongdoing.

    A total of 300 more pages of documents dropped last night.

    Among the documents was a chilling testimony from a Jane Doe, who told how “something horrible” happened to her at Epstein’s house in exhibit 3 page 3.

    She added that “Jeffrey took my clothes off without my consent the first time I met him” – and that she was intimidated by people working for Epstein after going to the police.

    She also claimed Epstein asked her to live with him and that he wanted her “to be emancipated”.


    It comes as…

    • A further 300 pages of documents dropped on Thursday
    • An accuser detailed Bill Clinton’s “threat to Vanity Fair
    • A Jane Doe told how ‘something horrible’ happened to her at Epstein’s house – and he “wanted her to be
    • Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, Stephen Hawking and Michael Jackson are among 90 people named in documents so far
    • Other names featured in the documents include Leonardo Dicaprio, Cate Blanchett and Bruce Willis – but they are not accused of wrongdoing
    • Jackon is alleged to have visited Epstein at his mansion in New York
    • Epstein is claimed to have offered a reward to disprove claims Hawking took part in an ‘underage orgy’
    • And the paedophile trafficker is alleged to have told a victim that Clinton “likes them young”
    • Another ‘mystery prince’ is mentioned – but not named in the docs
    • Ghislaine Maxwell claimed that Andrew had visited Epstein’s infamous ‘Paedo Island’
    • She also whinged questions about Prince Andrew go “on and on” in an email

    The bulk of Thursday’s papers saw Maxwell claim a journalist helped Ms Giuffre “concoct” sexual assault allegations against Prince Andrew.

    In one document from 2016 – titled Response to Non-Party Sharon Chrucher’s Motion to Quash Subpena – Maxwell’s lawyers made submissions that journalist Churcher should be compelled to give evidence as part of the case.

    Ms Churcher was helping Ms Giuffre write her book.

    The socialite’s legal team claimed Ms Churcher was “aware” the allegations made by Ms Giuffre against Prince Andrew were “false” and said she “helped manufacture some of the stories that have been denied”.

    The document showed that Maxwell’s legal team accused Ms Churcher, who was working for the Mail on Sunday, of explaining to Ms Giuffre “how she can corroborate a story to tell the FBI – that she was ‘given to’ Prince Andrew”.

    Her legal team also alleged that a handwritten diary by Ms Giuffre, which contained information about her alleged encounter with Andrew, was a “completely fabricated document”.

    And in an email from Guiffre to Churcher dated May 2011, the former claims ex-President Bill Clinton once “walked into Vanity Fair and threatened them not to write sex-trafficking articles about his good friend Jeffrey Epstein”.

    In Wednesday’s documents, Donald TrumpMichael Jackson, Cate Blanchett and Leonardo DiCaprio were among the high-profile names revealed.

    An order for the bombshell files to be released was given by New York judge Loretta Preska in relation to the 2015 defamation case brought by Virginia Roberts Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell.

    More than 100 people are named in the new files, which include emails, legal documents and depositions.

    There is no suggestion many of those named are accused of any wrongdoing.

    Among the allegations made in the documents is the claim that Prince Andrew allegedly had an “underage orgy” while staying on Epstein’s private island.

    Andrew is mentioned 69 times in the court papers naming Epstein‘s associates.

    An unnamed Jane Doe – widely understood to be his accuser Virginia Giuffre – was allegedly “forced” by convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein to “have sexual relations” with the Duke of York.

    She was allegedly told to “give the Prince whatever he demanded”.

    It is also claimed that one of Prince Andrew’s accusers was sat in his lap “like Santa” as he groped her at Epstein’s mansion.

    Johanna Sjoberg‘s witness testimony describes the shamed Duke of York using a puppet to touch her breast.

    He allegedly did this while playing with a Spitting Image puppet of himself.

    King Charles is now under ­pressure to punish Prince Andrew and “lance the boil”.

    Maxwell is currently in prison for sex trafficking

    5

    Maxwell is currently in prison for sex traffickingCredit: PA

    [ad_2]

    Harry Goodwin

    Source link

  • Jeffrey Epstein court files: ‘There's lots more to come,’ victim's lawyer says

    Jeffrey Epstein court files: ‘There's lots more to come,’ victim's lawyer says

    [ad_1]

    Jeffrey Epstein attends the launch of RADAR MAGAZINE at Hotel QT on May 18, 2005.

    Patrick McMullan | Getty Images

    The lawyer for multiple victims of Jeffrey Epstein says more court documents detailing the sex predator’s actions and names of associates will be released in the coming days after the bombshell disclosure of an initial set of files.

    “This is just the beginning batch,” the attorney, Sigrid McCawley, told NBC News hours after the first tranche of 40 case files was unsealed in Manhattan federal court Wednesday night.

    The documents contained the names of Epstein associates such as Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew of Britain, billionaire Glenn Dubin, Michael Jackson, magician David Copperfield and more people.

    “There’s a lot more to come,” McCawley said. “There’s a significant amount left for sure.”

    “And as we’ve seen, in this case, truth is stranger than fiction. So we learn more each time about how the sophisticated trafficking operation happened for so many decades and how many people were involved,” said McCawley, who represents Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre and other victims.

    “It was vast, it was significant. And it harmed literally hundreds of young women. So you’re going to start seeing more of how that happened, who knew about it and what was going on,” McCawley said.

    The court documents being unsealed are part of a case file for a lawsuit that Giuffre filed years ago against Ghislaine Maxwell, the British socialite who acted as a procurer of young women for Epstein, her one-time boyfriend.

    Epstein killed himself in a New York jail in August 2019, a month after being arrested on federal charges of sex trafficking underage girls.

    Maxwell is serving a 20-year federal prison sentence on charges related to facilitating Epstein’s rampant sexual abuse of women.

    Read more CNBC coverage of Jeffrey Epstein cases

    Many of the names disclosed in the first set of court documents being released were previously known to have some kind of connection to Epstein and Maxwell.

    The mere presence of their names in the files does not mean they were necessarily accused of abusing women or facilitating that abuse.

    Epstein was known for years for socializing with rich and powerful businessmen, celebrities, and other high-profile people.

    Prince Andrew, nearly two years ago, reached an out-of-court settlement with Giuffre, who had sued him for allegedly sexually assaulting her when she was under the control of Epstein and Maxwell. Andrew has denied her claim.

    In a deposition unsealed Wednesday in Giuffre’s lawsuit against Maxwell, another Epstein victim, Johanna Sjoberg, testified that during a visit to Epstein’s house in New York, Andrew put his hand on her breast, and Maxwell or Epstein put the hands of a puppet that looked like Andrew on “Virginia’s breast.”

    Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell attend de Grisogono Sponsors The 2005 Wall Street Concert Series Benefiting Wall Street Rising, with a Performance by Rod Stewart, at Cipriani Wall Street in New York City on March 15, 2005.

    Joe Schildhorn | Patrick McMullan | Getty Images

    Sjoberg elsewhere in that deposition was asked about Clinton by Giuffre’s lawyer McCawley.

    “Did Jeffrey ever talk to you about Bill Clinton?” McCawley asked.

    Sjoberg responded: “He said one time that Clinton likes them young, referring to girls.”

    Clinton has never been accused of sexual misconduct with women or girls connected to Epstein.

    McCawley, in her interview Wednesday night, lauded Giuffre for her court fight with Maxwell, which led to the disclosure of the documents, and charges against Epstein and Maxwell.

    “Virginia is an incredibly strong human being she has been through so much through this journey,” McCawley said.

    “When I started with her almost 10 years ago. She was she was resilient in wanting to have truth and justice,” the lawyer said. “And I think that this is really a shining moment bringing light to this issue. And having people recognize what not only she went through, but so many other young individuals and having that justice and people acknowledge what happened is really powerful for her.”

    Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • New Court Documents Unsealed in the Jeffrey Epstein Case | Entrepreneur

    New Court Documents Unsealed in the Jeffrey Epstein Case | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    The first batch of a series of much-anticipated court documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking case were released late tonight, revealing mentions of notable figures, including former Presidents Bill Clinton and Donald Trump and Prince Andrew.

    While their names were referred to, no allegations of any criminal activity have been made against them.

    What the documents reveal so far

    Clinton’s name was frequently brought up due to debates over the credibility of a witness who reported seeing the former president on Epstein’s property. Prince Andrew is mentioned in an email by convicted sex offender and Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell, making an apparent reference to both him and Clinton.

    Writing to her lawyers, she asks what to say regarding her relationships with the two notable figures.

    “I have already suffered such a terrible and painful loss over the last few days that I can’t even see what life after press he’ll even looks like – statements that don’t address all just lead to more questions .. what is my relationship to clinton ? Andrew on and on. Let’s rest till monday. I need head space.”

    Ghislaine asks them to contact Epstein’s lawyer. “See what you can understand from him and pehaps craft something in conjunction with him?”

    Deposition documents also detail how the alleged victim, Johanna Sjoberg, was asked if she knew Bill Clinton was a friend of Epstein.

    “I knew he had dealings with Bill Clinton,” she said. “I did not know they were friends until I read the 15 Vanity Fair article about them going to Africa together.”

    When asked if Epstein had ever mentioned Clinton, Ms Sjoberg said: “He said one time that Clinton likes them young, referring to girls.”

    Donald Trump’s name appeared in accounts where Epstein bragged about his ability to call the former president.

    Sjoberg said a pilot on a private plane once told her to tell Epstein they would have to land in Atlantic City instead of New York.

    ‘Jeffrey said, ‘Great, we’ll call up Trump, and we’ll go to — I don’t recall the name of the casino, but — we’ll go to the casino,’ she said.

    Despite these mentions, Clinton, Trump, and Andrew remain unaccused of any direct involvement in Epstein’s illegal activities.

    Related: ‘The Firm Deeply Regrets Any Association With This Man:’ JPMorgan Agrees to Pay $75 Million to Settle U.S. Virgin Island Suit Over Jeffrey Epstein

    Why are the documents being released now?

    The court papers were submitted for a lawsuit in Manhattan federal court, in which Virginia Giuffre, an Epstein victim, sued Maxwell.

    In December, New York district judge Loretta Preska ruled that the documents should no longer remain secret —and that her court will begin to publish the documents.

    The controversy surrounding Epstein has escalated following his 2019 jailhouse suicide, leaving many questions unanswered. His partner, Ghislaine Maxwell, is currently serving a 20-year sentence following her conviction for assisting Epstein in his crimes.

    As these documents come to light, the hope among legal experts and the public is that they will contribute to the broader fight against sex trafficking while also providing some measure of closure to the victims of these heinous crimes.

    Related: Ghislaine Maxwell Is Called ‘Prison Karen’ for Filing 400 Complaints Behind Bars

    [ad_2]

    Jonathan Small

    Source link

  • Why the Epstein Document Release Probably Won’t Provide All the Answers

    Why the Epstein Document Release Probably Won’t Provide All the Answers

    [ad_1]

    In 2015, Virginia Giuffre, a prominent victim of Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse, sued Ghislaine Maxwell for defamation. The British socialite had accused Giuffre of lying when she claimed that Epstein and Maxwell abused her. It was a few years before Epstein’s extensive history of predation would become the subject of persistent international news, and his name a byword for the misdeeds of the wealthy and well-connected.

    Giuffre’s suit was eventually settled; Epstein died in a federal prison in 2019 while awaiting trial; and Maxwell was convicted in 2021 for facilitating her ex-boyfriend’s abuse and sentenced to 20 years in prison. (She has appealed the conviction.) But because of the enduring interest in the broader Epstein saga, reaching as it often does into conspiratorial territory, the scheduled release of previously sealed court documents related to Giuffre’s suit has been touted in recent weeks as a potential reckoning for the powerful men in Epstein’s orbit–the Epstein “list,” as it’s generally referred to on social media.

    The unsealed documents, the first batch of which was released on Wednesday, provided little new information about the case and didn’t draw up any such list. They included transcripts of several depositions of Maxwell in which she denies that she committed any abuse or witnessed any of Epstein’s, as well as interviews with Epstein’s accusers who describe his pattern of sexual assault during massages. The documents also offer a small window into Maxwell’s psyche as the legal proceedings that would overtake her life in the years to come began to materialize.

    “I am out of my depth to understanding defamation and other legal hazards and don’t want to end up in a law suit aimed at me from anyone if I can help it,” Maxwell wrote in a 2015 email that was unsealed. “Apparently even saying Virginia is a lier has hazard!”

    In another unsealed email from that year, Epstein wrote to Maxwell suggesting that she “issue a reward to any of virginias  friends acquaionts  family” who will “come forward  and help prove her allegations are false.”

    Another unsealed document offers more context around Epstein’s relationships with Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, and Donald Trump–connections that have been dissected at length in recent years. One of Epstein’s alleged victims, Johanna Sjoberg, said in a 2016 deposition that “he said one time that Clinton likes them young, referring to girls.” She recounted that “Andrew put his hand on my breast.” (Andrew has denied this.) She recalled that on one occasion, when Epstein’s plane couldn’t land in New York and instead touched down in Atlantic City, “Jeffrey said, Great, we’ll call up Trump and we’ll go to–I don’t recall the name of the casino, but–we’ll go to the casino.”

    None of the three men objected to the unsealing of this document. Clinton and Trump have not been accused of any crimes related to Epstein. A spokesperson for Clinton said in 2019 that “President Clinton knows nothing about the terrible crimes Jeffrey Epstein pleaded guilty to in Florida some years ago, or those with which he has been recently charged in New York” and that he had “not spoken to Epstein in well over a decade, and has never been to Little St. James Island, Epstein’s ranch in New Mexico, or his residence in Florida.” Andrew and Giuffre settled her lawsuit last year claiming that he sexually abused her when she was 17.

    More documents related to Giuffre’s suit against Maxwell are scheduled to be released in the coming days. Maxwell’s attorney, Arthur Aidala, told NewsNation on Tuesday that she has “nothing to say” about Epstein or the supposed list of names that would be released.

    [ad_2]

    Dan Adler

    Source link

  • Ghislaine says Andrew DID visit Epstein's 'paedo island' in unsealed docs

    Ghislaine says Andrew DID visit Epstein's 'paedo island' in unsealed docs

    [ad_1]

    GHISLAINE Maxwell said Prince Andrew DID visit Jeffrey Epstein’s “paedo island” – and moaned “questions about the Prince go on and on”.

    Prince Andrew is among 170 people whose redacted names are in unsealed court documents about Epstein.

    4

    Prince Andrew did visit Epstein’s island, according to Ghislaine MaxwellCredit: Getty
    Andrew was photographed with Virginia Giuffre and Ghislaine Maxwell

    4

    Andrew was photographed with Virginia Giuffre and Ghislaine MaxwellCredit: AFP
    Andrew and Epstein walking through New York's Central Park

    4

    Andrew and Epstein walking through New York’s Central ParkCredit: Jae Donnelly
    Melania Trump, Prince Andrew, Gwendolyn Beck and Jeffrey Epstein at Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Florida

    4

    Melania Trump, Prince Andrew, Gwendolyn Beck and Jeffrey Epstein at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, FloridaCredit: Getty

    Andrew has always denied any wrongdoing and told the BBC in 2019 that he had never met Ms Giuffre.

    The order for the files to be released was given by New York judge Loretta Preska in relation to the 2015 defamation case brought by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell.

    In her deposition, Maxwell said she could only remember one time when she was present on the island during a visit by Andrew.

    She told investigators: “There were no girls on the island at all. No girls, no women, other than the staff who work at the house.

    “Girls meaning, I assume you are asking if they were underage. But there was nobody female outside of the cooks and the cleaners.”

    The first documents to emerge include an email sent by Maxwell whinging that questions about her relationship with Andrew go “on and on”.

    In the email, Maxwell writes: “I can’t even see what life after press hell even looks like.

    “Statements that don’t address all just lead to more questions. What is my relationship to Clinton? Andrew? On and on.”

    Maxwell also said under oath that she ‘did not recall’ being in London with Virginia Giuffre and Andrew – despite photographs showing the three together.

    In another round of her deposition, Maxwell also denied that Bill Clinton ever visited Epstein’s island.

    But she said Clinton did have a meal on Epstein’s plane – and that she knew the former US President’s longtime personal aide Doug Band, who claims Clinton visited the island.

    Asked if she had a relationship with Band, Maxwell said: “We are talking about adult consensual relationships, it’s off the record.”

    One of Epstein’s alleged victims claimed that he told that “Clinton likes them young” while talking about girls.

    Names of Epstein and Maxwell’s victims, associates and alleged co-conspirators will continue to be made public as part of the document dump, according to Preska’s order.


    It comes as…


    The list is expected to include names of people with close ties to Epstein such as Microsoft founder Bill Gates and former Israeli PM Ehud Barak.

    There is no suggestion that any of those named are accused of any wrongdoing.

    The new files will include emails, legal documents, depositions and more relating to Epstein and Maxwell.

    Only Epstein and Maxwell have been charged over the alleged sexual abuse of dozens of young girls in his Upper East Side townhouse and his waterfront mansion in Palm Beach, Florida, between 2002 and 2005.

    Prince Andrew’s accuser Ms Giuffre launched a legal battle against him in 2021 – accusing him of sexually abusing her at Jeffrey Epstein’s mansion and raping her when she was 17.

    She also alleged in court documents she was recruited by Maxwell, 61, as a teenage “sex slave” for Epstein.

    Ms Giuffre filed a defamation lawsuit in 2015 which was settled – but some of those involved in the trial were identified in the ruling through links to interviews they had previously given.

    Judge Preska cited this as a reason for why their identities should not remain sealed.

    She ruled there was no legal justification for continuing to conceal the names of more than 150 “John and Jane Does” mentioned in the court filings relating to Epstein.

    Media sued to have the documents made public and they have been released on a rolling basis since 2019.

    Today’s unsealing is the eighth and likely final release from the 2015 defamation case.

    Of the dozens of documents being released, 67 concern Johanna Sjoberg and relate to the defamation case brought by Ms Giuffre – who claims Andrew had sex with her when she was 17.

    Ms Sjoberg also claims that in March 2001, when she was 21, Andrew groped her breast at Epstein’s New York mansion while playing with a Spitting Image puppet of himself.

    Ms Giuffre sued Prince Andrew in 2021 for battery and infliction of emotional distress.

    They settled in February 2022 for a reported £10million, though he has always denied the allegations against him and claimed he could not recall ever meeting Ms Giuffre.

    Epstein killed himself in 2019 while he awaited trial.

    Maxwell, 62, is serving 20 years for sex trafficking.

    [ad_2]

    Harry Goodwin

    Source link