ReportWire

Tag: Genna Rivieccio

  • The Most Thorough Breakup Album in the History of Breakup Albums: Lily Allen’s West End Girl

    In what is arguably the Pet Shop Boys’ most signature song, “West End Girls,” Neil Tennant commences with the verse, “Sometimes you’re better off dead/There’s a gun in your hand it’s pointing at your head.” Released in 1985 (at least the version most have come to know), the year Lily Allen was born, it applies only too well to the relationship scenario presented on Allen’s fifth album (and her first in seven years), called, what else, West End Girl. The title works on manifold levels. For a start, it is Allen defiantly declaring her return to London, even if only “emotionally,” after years spent in New York. A move that, as the title and intro track explains, was largely due to accommodating her ex-husband, David Harbour. As it would turn out, a move to the U.S. wasn’t to be the only way in which she would do her best to “accommodate.” For, as the album unfolds, Allen effectively confirms all the rumors about Harbour’s infidelity. Worse still, a kind of infidelity that was made to seem “legitimate” by way of him telling Allen, after their marriage, that he wanted an open relationship.

    The signs of Allen’s dissatisfaction throughout the marriage were peppered throughout her podcast with Miquita Oliver, Miss Me? (on which Harbour served as a stand-in for Allen on two episodes while she went on a solo trip [also telling] in August of 2024). It was in little details, like mentioning that she was reading More: A Memoir of Open Marriage by Molly Roden Winter. Or that Harbour was off living in Atlanta, with their time spent mostly apart, or that she couldn’t meet some of Harbour’s more incongruous bedroom requests. The kind of requests, apparently, that he took to other women to fulfill. Even if, at the outset of the marriage, Harbour seemed determined to make it all as “fairy tale” as possible. This included, believe it or not their Las Vegas wedding on September 7, 2020, at a still-height of the pandemic (hence, Allen being pictured wearing a mask in certain photos). “Catered” by In-N-Out and officiated by an Elvis impersonator, Allen’s two daughters, Ethel and Marnie, were also in attendance, signaling how Harbour would be fully embracing his role as “stepdad.”

    Alas, as “West End Girl” describes, in its ominous, slow-burn kind of way, that wouldn’t really turn out to be the case. Starting out with a sunny, la-di-da sound (courtesy of co-production from Allen, Alessandro Buccellati, Blue Ma, Kito, Seb Chew, Hayley Gene Penner, Leon Vynehall and Leroy Clampitt), Allen, in her usual “telling a story” manner, paints the picture, “And now we’re all here/We’ve moved to New York/We found a nice little rental/Near a sweet little school/Now I’m looking at houses/With four or five floors/And you found us a brownstone/Said, ‘You want it? It’s yours’/So we went ahead and we bought it.” Soon, however, the tone gets darker as Allen describes the underlying jealousy and lack of support from Harbour after she announced that she got the lead in a West End play. That would’ve been back in 2021 for her theater debut, 2:22 A Ghost Story.

    The work offer seemed to come at an opportune moment for Allen, who makes it clear that her and Harbour’s wage disparity was just one of the many things that would make her uncomfortable, as elucidated by the lines, “I said, ‘I got some good news/I got the lead in a play’/That’s when your demeanor started to change/You said I’d have to audition/I said, ‘You’re deranged’ [a word that gets used a lot on this record]/And I thought/I thought that was quite strange.”

    In other words, a very unsettling feeling started to descend upon Allen. One that perhaps made her wonder if she should have dated Harbour for longer than a year before marrying him. But, naturally, she tried to push her sense of unease aside, admitting, “So very strange/But I ignored it/Went ahead and I bought it [“buying it” referring to both “the image” Harbour was selling and their brownstone in Carroll Gardens].” She also went ahead and accepted the part in the play (later getting nominated for a Laurence Olivier Award for Best Actress and winning Best Actress at the WhatsOnStage Awards), telling it half in the present and past tense when she says, “Got a flight and I boarded/I’m on my way/Now I’m in London/I’m on my own/I’m in a hotel room/I’m on my own/And now I’m in London/And I’m all alone.” Thus, while the “high” of being a “West End Girl” should feel nice, the lingering low of it all is, ultimately, the similarity to her first marriage, which she discusses in her memoir, My Thoughts Exactly. And while the specifics are different, it still results in Allen being alone (and feeling lonely) in a hotel room by herself. Back in 2014, that translated to calling up female escorts to “keep her company”—yes, that means having sex with them.

    Of course, the cuntier ilk might posit that perhaps Harbour is Allen’s “karma” for being the cheating cad in her first marriage to Sam Cooper (whose last name she keeps for all the writing credits on this album; so she’s “Lily Cooper” instead of Lily Allen, perhaps another subtle dig at Harbour). He being a modest “everyman” (that’s right, Allen married a “normal” before Lana Del Rey) who served as the one with the wage disparity in their marriage. Ergo, inspiring such No Shame lyrics (via “Apples”) as, “I felt like I was only good for writing the checks” and (via “Family Man”) “It’s not always easy/Being a family man [she being the ‘man’ in this iteration]/Baby, don’t leave me/I’m just doing what I can/To get by” and “I’ve come to the land of the free/I’ve let loose, I’m faithless/I am lost and shameless.” During her second marriage, Harbour would embody the traits conveyed in these lyrics.

    Being that West End Girl unfurls like chapters in a book about a dissolving marriage, the title track concludes with a one-sided conversation (in that we can only hear Allen’s part of the dialogue) as Allen reenacts a FaceTime chat from when she was away working on 2:22. It goes, “Hi! How are you? I miss you. Yeah. Huh? Yeah.” Her tone grows increasingly distressed as she continues to reply, “Alright. Um… Okay. Well, I mean it doesn’t make me feel great. If that’s what you need to do, then… I guess. How will it work? Right. I mean it makes me really sad, but… Mhmm. Mhmm. No, I’m fine, I’m fine. I just, I want you to be happy. Okay. Okay, I’ll speak to you later. I love you. Bye.”

    This leads seamlessly into the more up-tempo “Ruminating,” which finds Allen dissecting the nature of that call—the one in which Harbour sprung his true nature upon her, for it was no secret to anyone else that he was the type who “needed” to have sex with lots of different women. The more she thinks about it, the less okay she is with what went down, realizing that she only so readily agreed because of the initial shock of what he told her. But now that she’s “ruminating, ruminating, ruminating, ruminating,” as she repeats throughout the song, none of this is “gelling” for her. This much she makes even clearer when she sings, “Ruminating, ruminating/All the things you said/Why can’t you wait for me to come home?/This convеrsation’s too big for a phone call/Ruminating, ruminating/I’ve been up all night/Did you kiss her on thе lips and look into her eyes?/Did you have fun/Now that it’s done?/Baby, won’t you tell me that I’m still your number one?” But the most tragic addition to this question is Allen admitting that, even after everything, she wants to be his “number one” “‘cause you’re my number one.”

    Sadness gives way to numbness on “Sleepwalking.” Though, of course, that numbness is infused with anger and depression, as she’s sure to mention in the verse, “Course I’m angry/Course I’m hurt/Looking back, it’s so absurd/Course I trusted you/And took you at your worst/Who said romance isn’t dead?/Been no romance since we wed/‘Why aren’t we fucking baby?’/Yeah, that’s what you said/But you let me think it was me in my head/And nothing to do with them girls in your bed.” This retelling is what lays out the conditions during which Harbour was able to “master manipulate” her, all leading Allen to realize, “You don’t stop talking and I’m just sleepwalking/See your thoughts forming/Baby, stop it, it’s three in the morning [in ‘Ruminating,’ it’s “four in the morning”—the point being that Allen can never again say ‘five o’clock in the morning’]/And I don’t know if you do it intentionally/Somehow you make it my fault.”

    It’s during the bridge of “Sleepwalking” that Allen has her Charlotte York moment by telling him, “I know you’ve made me your Madonna/I wanna be your whore/Baby, it would be my honor/Please, sir, can I have some morе?/I could preserve all of your fantasies/If only you could act them all out with me.” Alas, Harbour simply would not do that, landing the marriage in a stalemate for, as Allen says, “You won’t love me/You won’t leave me.”

    The melancholic tone of “Sleepwalking” then breaks into Allen’s signature sunny voice and musical timbre on “Tennis.” Possessing a sound that belies the rage beneath it, or as Allen described it to British Vogue, she makes “music [that] sounds really pretty and it’s not.” No, indeed. It instead shows all the ugliness just beneath the veneer of “civility.” And “Tennis” does an “everything’s just wonderful” job of conveying that as Allen recounts how “Daddy’s home/For the first time in weeks.” While she might be calling him that from the perspective of telling her kids about his return, there’s no denying Allen married him, in part, to once again try to fill the void where her own father failed her, later bringing it up on “Fruityloop” with the line, “I’m just a little girl/Looking for a daddy.”

    Instead, she found the same kind of toxic father figure she was trying to substitute with a better, more wholesome one. The sort of man for whom she would want to make dinners and wait for by the door. Something she describes doing with, “Got the dinner on the table/Tell the kids it’s time to eat/And I made my baby’s favorite/But he didn’t seem to care/I just tell myself he’s jet-lagged/And I’m glad to have him here.” In many regards, the song echoes Taylor Swift’s “tolerate it,” during which she laments, “I wait by the door like I’m just a kid/Use my best colors for your portrait/Lay the table with the fancy shit/And watch you tolerate it/If it’s all in my head, tell me now/Tell me I’ve got it wrong somehow/I know my love should be celebrated/But you tolerate it.” Allen definitely seems to be experiencing the same phenomenon as she tries to welcome her ever-more (no Swift pun intended) distant husband back.

    On a side note, Allen has repeatedly made her respect and “fanship” of Swift known on Miss Me?, and yet, Swift could never come up with the kind of truly unvarnished lines about a breakup that Allen does, particularly on this record. In point of fact, Swift ought to take some lessons from Allen on that front, especially after the atrocious lyrical offerings on The Life of a Showgirl. But then, in Swift’s “defense,” she should have known better to release an album when she was happy (for, as Allen herself told Perfect magazine, “I’m not really interested in listening to an album of somebody telling me how happy they are”).

    In any case, things start to crumble quickly on “Tennis” (in the same devolving fashion that they do on “West End Girl”), with Allen continuing, “Then you showed me a photo/On Instagram/It was how you grabbed your phone back/Right out of my hands/So I read your texts/And now I regret it/I can’t get my head ‘round/How you’ve been playing tennis/If it was just sex/I wouldn’t be jealous/You won’t play with me/And who’s Madeline?” This being a question that Allen won’t rest on as the track continues. But before she keeps demanding to know who that is, Allen points out the injustice, “But you moved the goalposts/You’ve broken the rules/I tried to accommodate.”

    Having mentioned “Madeline” more than a few times in “Tennis,” it’s only natural that the following song should be called, well, “Madeline.” The proverbial “Becky with the good hair” in Allen’s world—an ironic reference considering all the drama that surrounded Allen after she commented on Beyoncé’s Cowboy Carter album on Miss Me? back in 2024. And, funnily enough, “Madeline” does have a certain country vibe to it, with a musical backing that channels a sweeping Western, with the hero(ine) blowing into town to save it from the nefarious harlot in question: Madeline. At one point, there’s ever a gunslingin’ shot fired in the background as Allen warns, “Lie to me, babe, and I’ll end you.”

    Except, unlike Beyoncé, Allen confronts her Becky with a text of her own, commencing with, “I know this is none of your fault/Messaging you feels kind of assault-ive/Saw your texts, that’s how I found out/Tell me the truth and his motives/I can’t trust anything that/Comes out of his mouth.” And yet, talking to Madeline does little to soothe her either, especially not with that Valley Girl lilt of hers (something Allen is deft at imitating) as she assures, “I hate that you’re in so much pain right now I really don’t wanna be the cause of any upset. He told me you were aware this was going on and that he had your full consent. If he’s lying about that, then please let me know. Because I have my own feelings about dishonesty. Lies are not something that I want to get caught up in. You can reach out to me any time, by the way. If you need any more details or you just need to vent or anything. Love and light, Madeline.”

    But there is no “love and light” for Allen, whose spiral about the many ways in which her husband broke their accords—accords she was strong-armed into in the first place—is at its most crystallized when she says, “We had an arrangement/Be discreet and don’t be blatant/And there had to be payment/It had to be with strangers/But you’re not a stranger, Madeline.” All these revelations hitting her at once is enough to make her want to “Relapse,” a track that serves as the next logical progression in this love tragedy.

    Anyone who is aware of Allen’s history with drugs and alcohol is, of course, also aware of the herculean effort it took for her to get sober. And the perilousness of such sobriety when an emotional nadir arrives. Something Allen acknowledged to British Vogue when she remarked, “The feelings of despair that I was experiencing were so strong. The last time that I felt anything like that, drugs and alcohol were my way out, so it was excruciating to sit with those [feelings] and not use them.” Thus, yet another reason that “making art” seemed perhaps more important than ever. But before arriving to that conclusion, Allen instead thought, “The ground is gone beneath me/You pulled the safety net/I moved across an ocean/Fom my family, from my friends/The foundation is shattered/You’ve made such a fucking mess/I tried to be your modern wife/But the child in me protests.” As for mentioning trying to be a “modern wife,” Allen is of course referring to her openness to, well, having an open marriage. Even though she wasn’t informed of Harbour’s desires to have one prior to being led down the primrose path of not so holy matrimony.

    So is it any wonder that the inner addict waiting to burst forth inside of Allen declares, “I need a drink/I need a Valium/You pushed me this far, and I just need to be numb/If I relapse/I know I stand to lose it all/Can you bring me back/When I’m climbing up the walls?” The saddest part of that question being that she’s still looking to her duplicitous husband to be her “rock,” even though he’s the one that caused her to disintegrate. A disintegration that reaches a new level on “Pussy Palace”—and no, Sabrina Carpenter’s “House Tour” has nothing on this: a tour of her husband’s second abode in the West Village. And one that finds her trying to drop off some of his things there (because she’s too pissed to allow him back into “their” bed), only to realize, “Something don’t feel right/I didn’t know it was your pussy palace/Pussy palace/Pussy palace/Pussy palace/I always thought it was a dojo/Dojo/Dojo/So am I looking at a sex addict?/Sex addict?/Sex addict?/Sex addict?” Made to feel like even more of a fool than she did before, the, er, blows keep coming when she notices the “Duane Reade bag with the handles tied/Sex toys, butt plugs, lube inside/Hundreds of Trojans, you’re so fucking broken/How’d I get caught up in your double life?”

    Naturally, Allen is quick to assert that this isn’t “her” or “Harbour,” per se, on the album. That it can be read as a kind of “autofiction.” One that she created “in December 2024 and it was a way for me to process what was happening in my life.” She’s also certain to emphasize, “There are things that are on the record that I experienced within my marriage, but that’s not to say that it’s all gospel.” Even so, there are plenty who will take “4chan Stan,” this album’s edition of “URL Badman,” as just that. Throughout the song, Allen alludes to Harbour’s philandering ways continuing to escalate and, in accordance with that, so, too does her escalation of snooping—only to wish she hadn’t tried pulling back the curtain at all to see the truth. Or, in this case, opening the drawer to do it. For that’s how the song begins, with Allen once again telling a story when she recounts, “I went through your bedside drawer/You know I’ve never been inclined to do that before.” This echoing how her suspicions also prompted her to do something she never would have done before on “Tennis” when she talks about how it was the way he “grabbed [his] phone back” from her that made her read his texts.

    The “kitchen sink drama” sort of backing track (in the style of something that both Pet Shop Boys and Soft Cell [RIP Dave Ball] would approve of) on “4chan Stan” only adds to the melodrama (on a related note, Allen reposted someone’s assessment of her record as Lorde’s Melodrama for divorced women). In addition to being yet another example of how Whitney Houston’s “It’s Not Right, But It’s Okay” is sort of a thematic through-line on this album. But particularly with “4stan Chan” and the revelations, “Never been Bergdorf’s/But you took someone shopping there in May ‘24/You bought her a handbag/It wasn’t cheap.” A verse that recalls Houston’s own appraisal of a receipt, “If six of y’all went out, ah/Then four of you were really cheap, yeah/‘Cause only two of you had dinner/I found your credit card receipt.”

    To further complicate her husband’s infidelity, Allen speculates that the reason he won’t tell her the woman’s name is because she’s famous (“Why won’t you tell me what her name is?/This is outrageous/What, is she famous?”). And also because he hasn’t been honest with the other woman either, in terms of telling her that Allen was not “open” to this when she agreed to an open marriage (“I think you’re sinking/You’re protecting a lie/We don’t want her thinking/That you cheat on your wife”). So it is that Allen must finally appraise his cowardice as follows: “What a sad, sad man/It’s giving 4chan stan.” Of course, Allen would have probably preferred if Harbour did have difficulty finding women to fuck him (which is what Reddit’s 4chan heavily attacts: incels…and white supremacists). Even though she brands him as “not even cute” when she says, “You love all the power/But you’re not even cute.”

    Alas, just look at someone like Kevin Federline, able to “snag” Britney Spears at the height of her own powers (and still haunting her as a result of that to this day). But then, it’s no secret that a man doesn’t need to be cute, just charming. Federline and Harbour have both proven that—and maybe it’s no coincidence that there was a time circa the It’s Not Me, It’s You Tour that Allen would cover Spears’ “Womanizer”—a track inspired by Federline’s own philandering behavior after Spears married him (though, in recent years, fans have speculated that the track is really about her father, Jamie, even though no songwriting credit is attributed to Britney).

    Whoever it’s really about, Allen seemed to foreshadow her own second marriage by singing such lyrics as, “Superstar, where you from?/How’s it goin’?/I know you, got a clue what you’re doin’/You can play brand new to all the other chicks out here/But I know what you are, what you are, baby/Look at you, gettin’ more than just a re-up/Baby, you got all the puppets with their strings up/Fakin’ like a good one, but I call ‘em like I see ‘em/I know what you are, what you are, baby/Womanizer, woman-womanizer, you’re a womanizer/Oh, womanizer, oh, you’re a womanizer, baby.” And that is something Allen would now like everyone to know about Harbour, regardless of her calling it “autofiction” or not.

    That much also shines through on the scathing “Nonmonogamummy” featuring Specialist Moss. It’s the latter’s presence on the track that helps Allen return to her ska/reggae/drum ‘n’ bass “roots,” the ones that were so prominent on Alright, Still. Coming right out the gate with, “I don’t want to fuck with anyone else/I know that’s all you wanna do/I’m so committed that I’d lose myself/‘Cause I don’t wanna lose you,” she establishes that a large reason behind why she put up with the behavior for so long was because she wanted the marriage to work out so badly. Almost at any cost.

    Allen then delivers several coups de grâce aimed at Harbour when she hurls such casual “how could you?” instances as, “I changed my immigration status/For you to treat me like a stranger” and “A life with you looked good on paper/I’ve been trying to be open/I just want to meet your needs/And for some reason/I revert to people pleasing/I’ll be your nonmonogamummy.” Of course, everyone saw how Allen’s attempt at “people pleasing” turned out here. Though, obviously, if one wants to “see the silver lining,” that wreckage prompted lyrical spun gold for what would become West End Girl.

    The upbeat sound and rhythm of “Nonmonogamummy” shifts to a downbeat “ballad,” of sorts, called “Just Enough.” A track that finds Allen exploring, among other things, her low self-esteem as it relates to her appearance. Which correlates to what happened in her marriage in that, as she mentioned to Perfect, “I don’t think that my previous relationship has helped me with [self-worth].” On “Just Enough,” it isn’t the first time Allen has alluded to feeling “old” on the record. On “Madeline,” she also pronounces, “I’ve gotten old, gotten ugly.” The same sentiment is parroted on “Just Enough” when she concedes, “Look at my reflection/I feel so drawn, so old/I booked myself a facelift/Wondering how long it might hold.” Indeed, Allen has talked about being more than okay with getting a facelift on Miss Me? and, yes, going as far as the consultation to see what it’s all about. This in addition to recently going “all the way” on paying good money for a tit job (which Allen has no shame—to use one of her album title’s phrases—discussing freely). And perhaps it can be assumed that Allen might have retained the services of a good lawyer after retaining the services of a good surgeon. You know, just in case Harbour is as nasty as he’s made to sound on the record and tries to come for Allen as a result of his own gaping insecurities. Ones that are paraded in such “Just Enough” lines as, “Why are we talking about vasectomies?/Did you get someone pregnant?” Despite these horrifying exchanges, Allen maintains, “You give me just enough/Hope to hold on to” before then adding, “Nothing.”

    But a woman can hold on to hope no matter how nonexistent it is. Which is why she’ll resort to creating an alter ego on dating apps named “Dallas Major” in order to “comply” with her husband’s “need” for an open marriage. As track eleven on West End Girl, it ups the ante on Allen’s emotional journey (or rollercoaster), going from totally bereft and heartbroken to sardonic and “whatever” as she quips, “I’m almost nearly forty/I’m just shy of five-foot-two/I’m a mum to teenage children/Does that sound like fun to you?” Continuing to repeat, “I hate it here”—as in “on the apps” she’s been forced to resort to for the sake of playing along with “openness”—Allen further explains that’s why she goes by “Dallas Major/But that’s not really my name/You know I used to be quite famous/That was way back in the day/Yes, I’m here for validation/And I probably should explain/How my marriage has been opened/Since my husband went astray.” With her litany of self-deprecations, Allen switches to the third person at the end of the track, as if to indicate that she no longer “identifies with herself,” having dissociated, floated up above her body and decided to observe the shitshow from afar.

    As for the line about being “here for validation,” she can admit such a craving applies to broadcasting the nitty-gritty details of her divorce (in a way that even Ariana Grande couldn’t on Eternal Sunshine) on what is now an immortal album. For British Vogue, Allen explained, “I want to feel validated. I want to feel like it’s okay to feel the things that I’m feeling and to be angry about the things that I’m angry about. I want someone to go, ‘Yeah, that is fucking confusing!’” For Perfect, she went into even more depth about how needing validation plays into making her personal life quite public in her music, stating, “I am excited about the possibility of [this album] helping me to move on. And I’m trying not to feel shame around that, because there is a part of me that feels guilt and shame that I have to be able to share things on such a grand scale in order to process them. Like there’s a grandiosity or almost a sociopathic element to that. But that’s what I do! I do it on my podcasts, I did it in my book. I had a childhood where I felt completely invisible and in my adult life, for whatever reason, I’ve decided to be incredibly visible. And I guess I am a ‘character’ in lots of ways. And I feel like the character can’t move on until everyone knows the story. Can’t move on to the next chapter.”

    The next chapter after “Just Enough” is “Beg For Me” (in contrast to Charli XCX’s “Beg For You”), which details Allen’s insatiable desire to be loved in a way that Carrie Bradshaw would deem to be “ridiculous, inconvenient, consuming, can’t-live-without-each-other love.” Allen takes Bradshaw’s declaration to Aleksandr Petrovsky one step further by announcing, “I want to feel held/I want to be told I’m special and I’m unusual/I want your desire/I want to be spoiled/I want to be told I’m beautiful/Why won’t you beg, beg, beg for me?” Elsewhere in the song, a warped sample of Lumidee’s 2003 hit “Never Leave You (Uh Oooh, Uh Oooh)” takes hold (though, musically, there’s more than a slight hint of Juvenile’s “Back That Azz Up”): “If you want me to stay, love endlessly/If you want me to stay, I’ll never leave.” The earnestness of this technically “simple” desire—even if it’s one that a girl, let a lone a grown woman, is never supposed to admit—layers on the tristesse of the relationship failing so spectacularly.

    But Allen is done being sad (or defeated) on “Let You W/In,” which features a sonic opening that recalls No Shame’s “Higher.” A song that, incidentally, also bears the mark of a scorned woman in such lyrics as, “Do me right/You’re lying/It’s in your eyes, don’t try it/No you can’t hide, have your lost your mind?/Did I cross your mind?” On “Let You W/In,” it seems Harbour’s answer to the latter question would be, “Not really,” with Allen accusing, “What is your sacrifice?/I’m protecting you from your secrets/Don’t tell the children, the truth would be brutal/Your reputation’s unstained.” Allen, needless to say, couldn’t let that lack of “staining” stand. And for Harbour to have believed that she wouldn’t write an album about what happened just goes to further show that he really didn’t know who he was tangoing with. And trifling with.

    Moreover, when she kicks off the track with the line, “I’ve become invisible,” it automatically signals her worst fear realized, that abovementioned one about feeling as invisible as she did when she was a child. Hence, this ever-bubbling need to seek the spotlight again as a means of garnering more visibility instead of being “stuck here in my palace [not her ‘pussy palace,’ mind you]/I’m so fucking miserable/In my rabbit hole, yeah, I’m Alice/And I’m expected to be nice/Picking up the pieces.” Evidently, part of picking them up meant acknowledging that, in spite of her best efforts to put pop stardom to bed, the desire is still very much alive and well within her. In fact, her interviewer for Perfect, Alex Bilmes, got straight to that question at the very start of the feature, asking, “You haven’t released any new music in seven years. Was there a period where you thought you might permanently retire from pop stardom?” Allen replied, “Yeah, there was a lot of time where I felt like that.”

    Concurring with Allen’s admission was none other than Miquita Oliver, who has continued to soldier on with Miss Me?, now with Jordan Stephens as her co-host. It was Stephens that she told on the October 23rd episode of the show, “[Lily] did not write music in her marriage… I didn’t think she’d ever make music again.” Both Stephens and Oliver then posited that, in this way, sometimes pain is the only motivator to make art. In point of fact, Allen exorcised the record from herself in a matter of sixteen days (as she told British Vogue, though Perfect was told ten; either way, it was fucking quick)—this after years spent saying she was working on new material. Evidently, all it took was an emotional evisceration to give her the final push she needed. To this end, she also stated to British Vogue that it’s true that all of her albums “have been informed by big traumatic experiences. My first album really was the break-up of my first love. And my second one was—this is going to sound so stupid—but the ‘Trauma of Fame.’”

    Then there was the little-loved (on Allen’s part) Sheezus, which she characterizes as “a mess, because I was a pop star who suddenly had two children and didn’t fit into this world. So actually it’s kind of exactly what it should have been. Then my last album was emerging from the detritus of my first marriage… And we’ll see what happens with these songs!”

    For Allen’s sake, hopefully what will happen is that she’ll get the validation she seeks from releasing them. Even if some, like the grand finale, “Fruityloop,” offer the kind of “parlance” that not “just any old” (or rather “any young”) listener can understand. Though everyone with even a cursory “Psych 101” knowledge can appreciate, “You’re just a little boy/Looking for his mummy/Things have gotten complicated/What with all the fame and money/Playing with his toys/He just wants attention/He can’t really do attachment/Scared he’s gonna be abandoned.” A fear that, ironically enough, also mirrors Allen’s. So it was that, while their wounds might have matched, their attachment styles certainly didn’t. And though Allen can also cop to being “just a little girl/Looking for a daddy, she still maintains (while self-referencing her own sophomore album title), “It’s not me, it’s you.”

    In another moment, she channels her stark revelation from No Shame’s “Apples,” “Now I’m exactly where I didn’t want to be/I’m just like my mommy and daddy.” That is to say: divorced. On “Fruityloop,” she rephrases the “Apples” motif as, “Thought that we could break the cycle/Thought that I could keep you happy.” With the second divorce, however, she’s less inclined to shoulder the bulk of the blame, instead informing Harbour, “You’re stuck inside your fruity loop.” Further shrugging, “It is what is/You’re a mess/I’m a bitch/Wish I could fix all your shit/But all your shit’s yours to fix.” Or, as Tate McRae puts it on “Tit For Tat,” “Fix your fucking self.”

    Even Allen is still trying to do that after years of talk therapy, now veering into EMDR as she keeps trying to “figure it all out” (hence, all the dabbling). Because, at a certain point during Miss Me?, Allen had stated that part of the reason she hesitated about releasing new music again was because 1) not enough people, for her, seemed to care about/react to the majesty of No Shame and 2) she needs and wants lots and lots of people to care (to fill the void of being cared for when it mattered most: during her childhood). One can only hope that, after punishing listeners with her absence for so long, they’ll finally start listening in droves. That maybe she’ll get the same kind of appreciation that Charli XCX suddenly did after Brat. And yes, XCX is just one of the many Allen acolytes, having cited her as a key influence on her own work (in turn, Allen has been an XCX fan to the point of incorporating some of the “brat’s” hallmarks—sped-up sound, vocoder, etc.—onto a track like “Relapse”).  

    But fans and casual listeners alike shouldn’t automatically assume that Allen is back back with this record. Or that she would have the emotional wherewithal to tour it. Though she did make that assurance to Perfect, adding that she’s got some bills to pay, thus, some money to make. “And this is what I do to earn money.” In short, gets her heart broken/generally traumatized and then paid to write about it. So yeah, move over Taylor Swift. Because The Life of Slighted Girl is more compelling than that of a showgirl.

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Selena Gomez Releases Codependent Anthem “In the Dark” for Nobody Wants This Season 2

    As the first song that Selena Gomez has released after being fresh from her marriage to Benny Blanco—with whom she recently made the joint album, I Said I Love You First—“In the Dark” does little to assuage the notion that monogamy of this variety doesn’t ultimately lead to codependency. Intended as a single in support of the second season of Nobody Wants This (which isn’t the best title for a show that one is contributing a song to), Gomez makes such “tailored” (read: rather generic) declarations as, “And I’ll be there when you lose yourself/To remind you of who you are/And I’ll be there like nobody else/You’re so beautiful in the dark.”

    While that latter assurance might be intended as a double meaning in that Gomez is trying to say that, even in her lover’s darkest hour, she still finds them beautiful, endearing, etc., the “compliment” is somewhat backhanded in that it kind of prompts the response, “But not in the light?” Because being told you look beautiful in the dark isn’t very “romantic,” since anyone can look “decent enough” in a dimly-lit room (ergo the sleazy expression, “All cats look the same in the dark” or “All cats are gray in the dark”—though it’s the former version of the “platitude” that Samantha Jones quotes to Carrie Bradshaw in “The Man, the Myth, the Viagra” while defending her contemplation of sleeping with a much older man).

    To this point, Lady Gaga’s 2009 hit, “Dance in the Dark,” is partly about women who feel too self-conscious to have sex with the lights on, with the word “dance” being wielded as a metaphor for, well, the dance of two bodies in a bed (evidenced by such lyrics as, “Baby loves to dance in the dark/‘Cause when he’s lookin’, she falls apart). If Gomez is turning that concept on its ear by painting the male in the relationship as the insecure one, then one supposes that’s the only “avant-garde” thing about it. Because the accompanying video certainly has little in the way of “groundbreaking” content to offer either. Directed by Luke Orlando (who has also worked on Charli XCX’s “New Shapes” and “Baby” videos and, more recently, Reneé Rapp’s “Mad”), it’s basically a showcase for Gomez to parade some “The Matrix-chic” fashions while occasionally standing against a black backdrop as dry ice works its magic to create a smoky effect around her and the floor. Not exactly something that could be described as “high in production value” and, shit, they could have at least interwoven some clips from the show in the spirit of songs that are made specifically for a movie or TV series. Except that, in truth, “In the Dark” wasn’t made for Nobody Wants This.

    In fact, some version of “In the Dark” has been percolating since 2018, when Gomez was working on the first iteration of what would become Rare (branded before that point as Seven Heavens). Though surely, in spite of the final version of the song taking years to emerge, it couldn’t have required too much time to come up with such lines as, “All my life’s lying where you are” and “Giving you love/Keep giving you love/Never giving you up.” And yes, that latter part channels some major Rick Astley energy—not to mention how it also exudes a creepy, overly-possessive aura. But, of course, that’s not what one is supposed to think when hearing it. It’s meant, instead, to sound endlessly and hopelessly romantic. The quality that’s been missing from most songs (and movies, for that matter) for a while now. And yet, when the attempt is made to infuse that characteristic into an “impassioned” single like this, the overall effect is that of disingenuousness. Because, let’s put it this way, “It’s All Coming Back to Me Now” this is not.

    Nor is the statement, “I’ll be there when you lose yourself/To remind you of who you are” “comforting” or “sweet,” so much as ominous and cult-like. What’s more, it’s an interesting avowal to make, considering the only person (when “having a sense of self” is done right) that can really “remind you of who you are” is yourself. Not some outside presence—regardless of them being your “true love” or not. But, of course, that’s not a “romantic” message to convey in a danceable love song designed for Top 40 radio. And to be in a show designed for the Top 10 of Netflix. In other words, so much for the mantra, “I needed to lose you to love me.”

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Madison Beer’s “Bittersweet” Video Consoles the Broken-Hearted With a Parade for Breaking Up

    When it comes to capturing the sadness that lurks just beneath an idyllic suburban setting in a music video, Madison Beer continues to have most others beat (even, perhaps, Lana Del Rey). And the video for her latest single, “Bittersweet,” is no exception. Co-directed by Beer and Iris Kim, the stage is immediately set at the end of a cul-de-sac as the camera, panning forward at a fairly rapid pace, lets the viewer know, almost right away, just where we are. Indeed, “Bittersweet” instantly connects itself to the video for “Spinnin,” during which Beer is in a much more concretely depressed state after a breakup while chillin’ in suburbia. In said video, Beer awakens in her already “sleepy” suburban neighborhood to find that everyone else has seemingly disappeared (hence the question, “Has the world stopped spinnin?”). Needless to say, such a concept has some very Twilight Zone-esque vibes.

    As does, in its own way, the video for “Bittersweet.” But before the surreal aspects of the video take hold, the viewer is made privy to the fairly average scene of Beer knocking on the door of her now ex-boyfriend (played by The Summer I Turned Pretty’s Sean Kaufman, doing his best impression of a douchebag here). When he answers, wearing a shirt that reads “Button Your Fly,” he regards Beer with eye-rolling annoyance. Even so, there are a few moments there where Beer looks at him almost hopefully, like she wishes he would call off their already established breakup. Instead, he coldly tells her, “Yo, we’re done” (rivaling Britney’s acting in the “Stronger” video when she says, “Whatever”) as he thrusts a box of her shit at her. The opening notes to “Bittersweet” then begin to play as he slams the door in her face.

    Turning around to face the street—and the world—Beer chokes back tears as she starts walking to her own house. However, the initial “sadness” of her mood is interrupted when she turns around to see that there are fireworks going off over her ex’s house. This being the first indication of the universe’s unyielding support of her relationship’s demise. Then there’s the sight of confetti on the ground, prompting Beer to drop her box of personal belongings before the camera cuts to a marching band and various “revelers” holding up a sign that reads, “It’ll be okay!” in giant block letters. But that’s just the tip of the iceberg for reassuring signs.

    Soon after, Beer also notices such encouragements as, “An angel gained its wings,” “Newly Single,” “Congrats on your breakup,” “Just the beginning” and, the coup de grâce, “Mom I am a rich man” (the famous Cher quote that’s gained increasing traction over the years, to the point where it also appeared in Taylor Swift’s “You Need to Calm Down” video).

    So it is that Beer’s frown is turned upside down as the parade effectively “goes through” her. And yet, that happiness seems to disappear just as quickly as it came while she sings, “Right now, I’m bittersweet.” That mixture of emotions still inferring that, at any given moment, she can become just as overpowered by her sadness as she is by her “sense of liberation.” Thus, in the midst of that melancholic emotional overtaking at the parade, she scurries back over to her house to seek refuge. Slamming the door behind her, a quick change of light indicates that some time has passed before she reemerges to the sight of various paparazzi and news representatives snapping photos and getting her “hot take” on the breakup (with the caption “Hear How She’s Really Been Doing” when the footage suddenly turns all “90s news-y”). Beer’s response? “One day, I’ll wake up sad/But go to bed so glad/Knowing you know what you could’ve had/Now I’m choosing me/It wasn’t so easy/God forbid forever on my knees.”

    Beer then takes the microphone from the reporter to sing into it, “Know you won’t make it right/Can’t look me in the еyes/Good for you/I always think I knew.” In the wake of this statement, a flash of images of Beer and her ex in various moments of heated tension occur before she’s “headlining” the very parade she walked into at the beginning of the video. But, once again, it’s not all embracing “being free” as, in the next scene, Beer is shown lying in her bedroom clutching the heart-shaped locket she’s wearing as its mirrored interior shines a bright light outward that ends up projecting scenes of her past with this ex onto her ceiling (in a scenario that is very reminiscent of Ariana Grande’s Brighter Days Ahead short film—which only adds to the overall “Grande-ness” of this song anyway, in terms of sound and lyrical motifs). Which would, of course, make it even harder for anyone to get over the person they once (thought they) loved.

    However, at the end of the video, just to lighten the mood—the bittersweetness of it all—Beer is shown in the same scene with Kaufman as the viewer saw at the beginning. Except, this time, Beer sweetly says, “Hi,” to which Kaufman answers rudely, “What do you mean ‘hi’?” He then breaks character to start laughing along with Beer who then imitates his line to make fun of him. It’s a “tag” to the video that adds more levity, rather than just concluding with the scene of Beer heartbrokenly lying in her bed (a “finale” that would have only mimicked the ending of the “Spinnin” video), reflecting back on these better times with her ex. The kind of times that make her wish it wasn’t over instead of realizing it’s for the best. As the parade goers reminded her with no subtlety.

    And yet, sometimes a person (and, let’s face it, especially a woman) who has just endured a breakup needs to be “hit over the head,” so to speak, with that kind of reminder in order to wake up from the sadness that’s enveloping them. This to shed the bitter in “bittersweet.”

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • MTV Makes Its Lack of Music Official

    Although MTV’s “content” focus has been reality TV and other adjacent schlock for many years now, those who remember it as the place to go for new music and groundbreaking videos by artists who once invested the time, effort and money into making them have been saddened to learn of the official loss of the “M” in MTV (formerly Music Television, but now, one supposes, just “Television”). That is to say, the music has been booted in an authoritative capacity, with Paramount, MTV’s parent company (and itself presently “A Skydance Corporation”), opting to jettison five of MTV’s “offshoot” channels—the ones that actually play videos—in the UK: MTV Music, MTV 80s, MTV 90s, Club MTV and MTV Live. While this doesn’t include the “plain” version of the channel in the US, where MTV was birthed, it still signals a larger indication of just how far the channel has fallen from its proverbial heyday.

    When it hit the airwaves for the first time on August 1, 1981 (at 12:01 a.m.), the inaugural video was The Buggles’ “Video Killed the Radio Star.” A pointed statement to make as the world was on the brink of an entirely new kind of “modernism” when it came to pop culture. The music video was beyond radio, TV and film—mixing all of those elements to form an entirely new—and ultimately far more powerful and influential—entity. An entity that would shape the next few generations. Not just their style and taste, but the way in which they “absorbed” media. Because if parents thought attention spans of the youth were “short” then, they could never have imagined what was coming with the likes of TikTok, ultimate mind flayer. But before that total bastardization of what it would mean to “consume content,” MTV laid the groundwork. Seeing a void to be filled for a generation that was clearly hankering for something like this (but didn’t yet know how to put it into words), there were already one hundred and sixteen music videos to be broadcast in the first day of the channel’s airing.

    And that was just the beginning. Because two years later, in 1983, a veritable dam had opened, unleashing the music video prowess that seemed innate to both Madonna and Michael Jackson. For both 1958-born pop music icons (still billed, to this day, as the Queen and King of Pop) would have some dominating videos on MTV in ‘83. Of course, it was Jackson’s year for churning out the “blockbuster” videos of the Thriller album: “Billie Jean,” “Beat It” and, the biggest of all, “Thriller.”

    Even so, Madonna’s output in ‘83 was not to be discounted, with “Everybody” (filmed in December of ‘82) and “Burning Up” in rotation frequently enough to dispel the average listener’s initial belief that Madonna was a Black artist. A misconception that was probably a compliment to her, but, at the same time, M was aware that being white would better serve her money-making/commercial possibilities. By 1984, Madonna’s self-titled debut, released the year prior, was really starting to gain traction thanks to the next duo of music videos from Madonna released that year: “Lucky Star” and “Borderline.”

    However, it was during the final months of 1984 that Madonna would truly become a household name thanks to the part MTV played in promoting the eponymous lead single from her sophomore record, Like A Virgin. Even before the video was out or the song was an official single release, Madonna decided to debut “Like A Virgin” in a big way during the First Annual MTV Video Music Awards. It was on that night of September 14, 1984 that the long-bubbling symbiosis between Madonna and MTV was crystallized. And forever etched into the public consciousness thanks to Madonna descending from the top of a giant, three-tiered wedding cake all dressed in white as she ironically sang about how she was made to feel “shiny and new” and “like a virgin, touched for the very first time” thanks to her new love. And her new love, ultimately, was MTV. Though it wasn’t always a love that cut both ways. Something Madonna addressed in honor of the network’s tenth anniversary in 1991, when she made a special tribute video during which she said the following (while dressed in her Greta Garbo-chic hair, makeup and attire and filmed in black and white), shot in a manner that makes abrupt cuts to her next “non sequitur” (but ultimately all related) train of thought:

    “I’m here because I wanted to talk to you about…us. And all that we’ve been through. I wanted to talk about me and you. I remember when we first met. You didn’t know who you were yet. I didn’t know who I was. We grew up together. So ten years, what’s the big deal, huh? I’m not one of those people that wears clothes just because somebody gave it to me for free. Although I do like this diamond. Are diamonds really a ten-year anniversary present? You think you can make me forget everything just by giving me this? You expect me to come running back to you every time you give me a present? When will you understand that I am a person and not a thing? That I deserve to be treated like a person and not a thing! I turn my back—for one minute—and you find somebody else. You’ve been hanging out with tramps with cheap clothes and bad songs to sing. I’ve got a tattoo on my behind too, you think you’re gonna see it? I know why you spend time with her: because she’s not threatening… She doesn’t make you laugh, she doesn’t make you cry… I won’t even go into the men you’ve been hanging around with… You’ve never had more fun with anyone else—and you know it.”

    That was and is still the truth when it comes to MTV and its most iconic moments. For even the Britney Spears ones are rooted in “Madonna-ness” (most especially the 2003 VMAs). But, more than that, the speech would touch on a number of apropos and foreshadowing points regarding the direction MTV had taken in its then still germinal period. It was like a harbinger of how the network would continue to mutate as the 90s went on. For, only a year after Madonna’s immortalized “love letter,” the network would premiere its first reality show (for some, arguably, the first “proper” reality show), The Real World, in 1992. Granted, before that, House of Style was one of MTV’s earliest deviations from focusing on music as it decided that taking to “the streets” to give the hoi polloi a snapshot of the latest fashion trends, as well as the lives of supermodels (still an ever-burgeoning concept that OG House of Style host Cindy Crawford helped solidify), was just as important as playing music videos.

    Of course, by the time the late 90s rolled around, the original “premise” of MTV was all but gone, with “content” taking over instead (though that isn’t to say some of said programming wasn’t actually brilliant [see: Daria]). Which is why Say What? started airing in 1998—because it was a show designed to do what MTV had originally been “all about”: playing music videos. The fact that the network had to make such a concerted effort to “block out time” (usually no more than an hour) to do what their unofficial mission statement had originally been was, well, not a good sign…to say the least. And then came a slew of other shows in the spirit of Say What?: 12 Angry Viewers, MTV Live, Artist’s Cut, and Total Request. It was the latter, in its Total Request Live format, that would signal the third phase of MTV and its influence on a new generation. To be sure, many tween and teenage millennials would spend their after-school hours watching TRL while “doing homework.” And yes, it was during this era when Britney Spears became the reigning queen of the network, serving as the twenty-first century edition of Madonna with her own indelible visuals, including “…Baby One More Time,” “Oops!…I Did It Again” and “Toxic.”

    Reality-type shows centered on the “hottest” musicians of the day also extended into programming like Punk’d and Making the Video (Britney was a staple on both). And even the VMAs continued to offer up a steady stream of “iconic” moments up to a certain year (the Taylor and Kanye incident of 2009 being of particular note)—but probably the last major “moment” was Beyoncé doing her baby bump reveal after singing “Love On Top” at the 2011 VMAs. The lack of “memorable MTV” instances wasn’t necessarily because the network stagnated. No, instead, it just kept getting worse. But, perhaps even more than that, it had lost its core audience. Generations that no longer cared about such things (e.g., music, style, what’s “relevant” in pop culture) as they once did, having grown into the very kind of person Avril Lavigne had warned about in “Sk8r Boi” (“She sits at home/Feeding the baby, she’s all alone”). More damaging still, those generations had joined the likes of Gen Z in getting their music and pop culture fix from other internet and app-centric outlets. Even for all of MTV’s best efforts to pivot itself toward being just as available via the internet, it didn’t have the same clout.

    Then came the first truly gut-punching portent of full-tilt doom: the deletion of the entire online archive of MTV News. That meant years and years of music journalism flushed into the proverbial abyss in the wake of layoffs and the shuttering of MTV News altogether. Ever since, the descent into total oblivion for MTV has been all but guaranteed. And sure, maybe it will keep the lights on, so to speak, with some of its “tentpole” offerings (like the VMAs and, in Britain, Geordie Shore), but there’s no denying that MTV will never again be the vibrant, cutting-edge network that molded culture and public taste as it once did. Yet that isn’t entirely its own fault. Indeed, perhaps it’s best to quote Madonna paraphrasing Sunset Boulevard’s Norma Desmond when she said in the abovementioned speech, “I am big. It’s the videos that got small.” And oh, how they have—whittled down to barely thirty seconds of “content” on a petite smartphone (that oxymoron of a word).  

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Almost As If in Direct Defiance of Her Body Positivity Message of Yore, Missy Elliott Performs at the Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show

    Perhaps the definition of irony can now be summed up by Missy Elliott, in her present state of thinness, performing at the Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show while singing, “I got a cute face, chubby waist/Thick legs, in shape/Rump shakin’, both ways/Make you do a double take.” As Elliott sang the caveat about still being “in shape” (despite the thick legs), the camera cut to a bevy of skinny models singing along with that specific part, almost as if the director wanted to make especially certain that no one at home should get it twisted just because some of Elliott’s lyrics hinted at something like “body positivity.” And this done at a time when that was hardly on anyone’s radar—for the “Lose Control” single originally came out in 2005. Indeed, tapping Elliott to not only perform, but to close out the show was an interesting choice when taking into account that Elliott has never been someone deemed “emblematic” of the brand.

    As for the other performers selected to soundtrack the show, Madison Beer, Karol G and Twice, well, let’s just say they have the kind of “aesthetic” that VS has been much more notoriously aligned with in the past. But, of course, it’s apparent that this “revamped” version of the fashion show is intended to be more “inclusive.” After all, a major part of the reason that the show was cancelled back in 2019 stemmed from critiques about its predictable lack of inclusivity. Not just in terms of the models selected to showcase the lingerie, but also, of course, with regard to the sizes paraded. Funnily enough, the VS Fashion Show probably could have kept going in the face of this criticism (especially since, at present, the pendulum has swung back toward favoritism for the “skinny bitch” body size that reached an apex in the 90s and 00s). But what really did the show in was the brand’s association with Les Wexner (it’s always men named Les, isn’t it?), the CEO of L Brands, Victoria’s Secret erstwhile parent company before it became its own publicly traded and independent business in 2021. Due to his very well-known and extremely close relationship with Jeffrey Epstein (in fact, one of Epstein’s lines for preying on women was to claim he was a recruiter for Victoria’s Secret models), the backlash against Wexner reached a peak in 2019, with one of the side effects being the so-called cancellation of the runway show. Only for it to reanimate in 2024.

    At the time of the cancellation, however, the reaction was one of the “serves them right” and “it’s about time” variety, with many women being fed up with the antiquated portrayal of women from the blatant perspective of a hetero male fantasy. Perhaps there was a time, pre-2008 (the year Elliott’s major weight loss due to Graves’ disease began), when Elliott might have been of the same mind. But it appears as though she, too, has drunk the “skinny bitch Kool-Aid”—along with her one-time collaborator, Lizzo. Indeed, when Elliott jumped on Lizzo’s 2019 single, “Tempo,” she was still promoting a message from the era when she was single-handedly advocating for body positivity, especially in rap. To be sure, her “Tempo” verse, “All the thick girls down on the flrrr/Ice on my neck like brrr/I’m big-boned with nice curves/Look at me, I know I look grrrd,” could have easily been pulled from one of her late 90s/early 00s tracks. As a matter of fact, Elliott was doing the unthinkable during this period: acting like a woman with confidence “despite” how she looked. To the point where she had the “audacity” to translate that confidence into sexual prowess in a song like “One Minute Man.” The track she tongue-in-cheekly chose to open her performance with at the Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show. After all, what woman who invested this much effort (and money) into her boudoir appearance would possibly want a “minute man” in the bedroom?

    As the third single from one of her most seminal albums, Miss E… So Addictive, Elliott performed elements of “One Minute Man” during the 2001 MTV Video Music Awards, along with the album’s lead single, “Get Ur Freak On.” A signature single she also chose to showcase at the VS Fashion Show (and with a not totally dissimilar backdrop that features a giant effigy of her face at one point; granted, to “mix up” the VS performance, Elliott also incorporated some green lasers à la Jennifer Lopez’s “Waiting For Tonight” video). Because, yes, once again, Elliott tailored the music selection to the notion of boudoir confidence—something that apparently isn’t a challenge for her to do when realizing that a large portion of her oeuvre is sexually charged. Including “Work It” (“Call me before you come/I need to shave my cho-cha” being just one of many bedroom-oriented lyrics in that particular hit), which Elliott dived into after “Get Ur Freak On.” And, unquestionably, the music all sounds just as fresh as ever. Which is part of why it’s rather a pity that it was paraded with such fanfare at this particular spectacle of the stick figures.

    In any case, Elliott took the audience right back to the 2000s in more ways than one during the fashion show. Not only with the onstage visuals and “soundtrack,” but the sanctioning of a body type and image that was once most at home in that decade. Alas, it has since bled out into the 2020s (in no small part thanks to Ozempic). For it is with Elliott’s presence alone—her agreement to promote her music at such an event—that she has sanctioned it. Not to mention shamelessly hollering, “Say what?! Victoria’s Secret!” at the end of her final song, “Lose Control” (a command that is actually the last thing America needs to be told right now).

    Interestingly enough, Elliott revamped the original phrase at the beginning of “Get Ur Freak On” from “Give me some new shit” to “We on some new shit.” But based on what was seen at the reanimated Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show this year, society isn’t on any new shit whatsoever. Still touting not only the same impossible body standards from decades ago, but also the same music. Talk about hauntology.

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Britney Spears Not So Coincidentally Releases “Scary” to Streaming Platforms Ahead of Kevin Federline’s “Tell-All”

    While Britney Spears may not have released an album since 2016 (which means she’s going mano a mano with Rihanna in terms of retreating from music for almost a decade now), it doesn’t mean she’s lacking for material to keep unleashing onto the masses. Which is why, every now and again, her “team” will put out some proverbial “from the vault” tracks. As they did on October 16th with an official streaming platform release of “Scary,” which originally only appeared on the Japanese deluxe edition of Femme Fatale. And, despite the eyebrow-raising about Spears’ overall “withdrawal” from participating in the songwriting or music production process of that record, it does bear noting that she actually did write the lyrics to “Scary” (along with Fraser T Smith and Kasia Livingston).

    In truth, the lyrics have Spears’ stamp all over it. Not just in terms of the “parlance” at play, but because it could also be said that Spears, at one point in her life, might have applied the following verse to Kevin Federline: “Baby, I don’t know/How I’m gonna survive/This fatal attraction/It’s gonna eat me alive/I’m not supposed to want ya/But I do like I die/It’s turned me into a monster/Like I’m Jekyll and Hyde.”

    To be sure, it was a “fatal attraction” for Spears, whose more than somewhat impetuous decision to marry Federline after roughly five months of dating (the two had been together for three months prior to announcing their engagement in July of 2004, then got married in September of that year) has resulted in a lifetime of hell in exchange for just under three years of marriage. A marriage that, according to Spears, Federline spent most of abandoning her in favor of late nights out on the town while she stayed home tending to their newborns, with Sean and Jayden born just one year apart (the former in September 2005 and the latter in September 2006).

    So, in truth, the only “monster”/“Jekyll and Hyde” behavior was coming from Federline, who seemed to turn on Spears just when she needed a trustworthy and reliable companion the most. Instead, Federline has proven that he will bite the hand that feeds him over and over again, having opted to release a “tell-all” memoir called, cringily enough, You Thought You Knew. The implication being that the public thought they knew the full extent of Spears’ “shenanigans,” both back when they were married and in subsequent years when it came to her being around their children.

    Naturally, the release of such a book has probably been a long time coming, yet only took this long because Federline is finally off Spears’ payroll (indeed, the timing of its release is no coincidence at all on that front). Besides, this is the same person who released videos that were taken unbeknownst to Spears by her own sons when they were each eleven and twelve. Videos meant to imply she’s a “crazy” and “unhinged” mother. And no, they don’t make her look very “flattering,” but it’s certainly not out of the realm of “parenting behavior” to scold one’s children for things like going into a store without shoes on (yes, ironic when considering that Spears herself had a “no shoes on at the gas station” phase). Even so, the media took the bait, reporting on the videos just after Spears had gotten out of her conservatorship (at the end of 2021; Federline posted the videos in August of 2022). And also just after she had married Sam Asghari.

    The callous action prompted Nicki Minaj to state on her Queen Radio podcast, “Do you understand what kind of a clown you have to be to be a whole grown fucking man, and as soon as you see somebody happy and getting married and moving on and being free and feeling good in their own skin, to do the very thing that you know is going to attempt to ‘break them down,’ going to the media… You know, only cowards use the media against a famous person who they once loved, they procreated with, um, they’re being taken care of by. Using the person’s fame as this constant ‘gotcha’ moment… How dare you?” Minaj then added of Jayden and Sean’s involvement, “They’re kids, they don’t know how detrimental this is. But you know, cocksucker. Leave her the fuck alone” (a sentiment she has since repeated in the wake of Federline releasing his book of lies).

    Alas, Federline cannot seem to do that. Not only releasing his “tell-all,” which includes accounts of Spears taking cocaine while breastfeeding (as if) and having an affair with a woman (okay, sure), but also going on any and every outlet that will take him to do interviews about it. Yes, it’s all very “scary” indeed. With Spears having no recourse but to actually comment on the whole thing, posting a statement on her Instagram that read, “What’s scary [that’s right, scary] is he’s convincing. It literally blows my mind the moments he stops before he cries. Are you fucking serious?” Unfortunately, yes, Federline seems to think he is. And while Spears might have been overexaggerating when she added, “I know his book will sell loads more than mine” (for there’s no way Federline would be capable of selling over two million copies of his schlock), it’s natural for her to fear that. Because both Federline and her own family have conditioned her to feel such fear for decades. And maybe, at the time when “Scary” was written, this fear was part of what she was tapping into—in addition to tapping into being scared by her own amorous feelings for another (once upon a time, K-Fed).

    As she repeats “so scary” around the one-minute, twenty-three-second mark, use of the theremin instrument is designed to play up the “spook” factor (and yes, theremins are also used in the background of movies or TV shows to denote the cliché sound associated with aliens [side note: Spears also has a song called “Alien”—wherein a version of the theremin sound is employed at the beginning]). It’s the same sound also used in Megan Thee Stallion’s own song called “Scary” (released on her 2022 album, Traumazine). And, to be sure, there ought to be a mashup of these two tracks.

    In another moment of eeriness, Spears sings, “You’re taking over my mind.” Although intended to speak from the perspective of someone who can’t stop thinking about the object of their affection, it instead reminds the listener of the effective “mind control” those behind Spears’ conservatorship had over her. Constantly manipulating her with the threat of limiting access to her children. So no wonder she also adds the following verses to “Scary”: “I wanna take over your body like like like it’s freaky Friday” (amazingly, Lindsay Lohan didn’t glom onto that phrase by posting it somewhere, desperate as she is to call out her “enduring relevance” in pop culture) and “I wanna take you to a dark place/Make you, make you, make you do it my way.” Again, these lyrics might be meant as “sexual” within the context of the song, but when taken out of it, they seem to be echoing Spears’ not-so-subconscious urge to engage in some payback at that time. Wanting to take possession of others the way they had taken possession of her, all in a bid to break free.

    So, sure, some can try to say that the release of “Scary” to streaming is timed for Halloween/“spooky season.” But the only thing that’s really spooky for Britney this season is the constant reanimation of what should have remained a spectral part of her past: Kevin Federline.

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Tame Impala Experiences a Coastal Bifurcation in “My Old Ways” Video

    “I thrive on [isolation] because it’s extremely recharging for me.” This is what Kevin Parker explains to Zane Lowe when speaking on his “anathema” need to be alone. To work and to think in total isolation. This “phenomenon” being the type of shit the absolutely terrifies most people. Mainly because most people are too afraid to “be alone with themselves” and dare to find out “what’s inside” if left without the proverbial noise of others for too long. But what Parker is saying is a common motif among artists, and especially solo musicians. Case in point, Marina Diamandis and Lorde, who have both spoken on their need to retreat from the world for a long period of time (for Lorde, that period usually amounts to four years) after enduring the promo and touring aspect of putting out a record.

    As for Parker, the need for isolation isn’t just about recharging, but having enough silence (ergo, enough peace) to ruminate and “catch” an idea. This is why Parker is constantly searching for and renting out Airbnbs wherever he can find them along the coastline, telling Lowe, “I find where there are places as close to the water as you can get. I want to be fucking right there.” This not only to pick up on the “white noise” of nature, but also because, as he puts it, “Staring out at the abyss, especially at nighttime or, like, at the end of the day, staring at the ocean, for me, is just, um, it helps me get lost and it just, there’s a tranquility that comes along with it, and an inspiration.” In other words, it puts one’s own insignificance into perspective. As it does, by the same token, to be milling around aimlessly in New York City.

    This being one of the primary (and symbolic) locations that Parker is featured in for the latest single and video from Deadbeat, “My Old Ways” (which just so happens to be the album’s “kickoff” track). Teaming again with Sam Kristofski (who also directed the “Loser” video), the video starts out in the studio, where Parker is, once more, in isolation mode. The studio setting is also a factor at the beginning of the video because, for the first minute of the song, there is a “made in the bedroom,” “analogue” quality to the intro: “So here I am once again, feel no good/I must be out of excuses, I knew I would/Feels like it came out of nowhere this time/Wish I had someone else to blame/I tell myself I’m only human/I know I, I said never again/Temptation feels like it never ends/I’m sliding, powerless as I descend.” This being the portion that Parker left “unvarnished” in its original iPhone recording incarnation before presenting the “polished” side of it once the beat drops just after the one-minute mark.

    Throughout this buildup, gradually intercut images of the cityscape begin to appear. And then, at another point, a flash to a sticky note in the studio that reads, “Am I still on?” The question, of course, has a double meaning within the context, and there’s no doubt that some part of Parker is wondering if he himself is still “on” in the sense of maintaining his “gift” for making music of the same caliber as Currents and The Slow Rush. With Deadbeat, and especially “My Old Ways,” Tame Impala proves that he certainly has maintained it, even if that gift comes with its fair share of torture. Not least of which is having to be around any large amount of people for more than, say, thirty minutes. For the artistic, introverted soul, that’s nothing short of torture. Which is why, in many regards, it’s quite ironic that so many artists flock to New York, world capital of getting caught in a clusterfuck. Just as Parker does while walking amongst the crowds near 54th Street in what can best be described as his “Brooklyn attire.” Indeed, Parker stands out less for being “famous” in this Manhattan environment than he does for being dressed either for North Brooklyn circa 2012 or somewhere in New Mexico.

    Walking the streets as though in a fugue state, Tame Impala sings, “Thought I would never go back, but just this once/A little present for holding out so long/I could not bear the thought of it two days ago/Don’t think I would forgive myself/I tell myself I’m only human/I know I, I said never again/Temptation feels like it never ends.” Such lyrics, of course, allow for a literal interpretation to “My Old Ways” in that it can clearly serve as an addict’s anthem. Whether the addiction is alcohol, especially “illicit” drugs, sex (think: Madonna’s auditory and visual rendering of Looking for Mr. Goodbar in the form of “Bad Girl”) or anything “taboo” in between. But it also works in the sense of a person who returns to behavior that they know is more insidiously—rather than overtly—bad for them. Sort of like Carrie Bradshaw (Sarah Jessica Parker, no relation to Kevin) musing at the end of Sex and the City’s “The Fuck Buddy” episode, “And just like that, I was thrown right back into my old pattern: greasy Chinese, sleeping till noon and feeling…restless.” This would be the perfect moment to cue “My Old Ways” as the credits roll. Particularly since Parker saw fit to set some of the video in Bradshaw’s beloved NYC.

    However, at around the two-minute, twenty-six-second mark, Tame Impala essentially enters a “portal” (it’s just a door, but still) to another, sunnier coast. More specifically, the Margaret River area in Parker’s native Australia. Even though one would have liked to believe the location was California, seeing as how there would be a poetry to it. What with Parker having “officially” started the Deadbeat album while staying at one of his near-the-ocean Airbnbs in Montecito (that’s Santa Barbara, for the unversed). This tying back to what he told Lowe about being proper “obsessed” with the ocean. And also to the fact that, ultimately, his “old ways” are retreating into isolation when he’s spent far too much time in a place like New York. Oversaturated—sodden—with people as it is. And no ocean to speak of unless you’re really willing to schlep.

    So it is that this sunnier coastal environment, as per the video’s delineation, is working out for him and his creative process far better than it seemed to be in such a heavily populated area without a readily available body of water (and no, “the Lake” of Central Park doesn’t really count). Kristofski’s subsequent rapidly intercut scenes of Parker sitting in contemplation inside his rather posh-looking “glass house,” or standing in front of the ocean with his arms outstretched as though summoning something (maybe the muse?), or a swoon-worthy sunset, or his painted phonograph all serve to create a kind of sensory overload. Thus, a kind of glimpse not only into Parker’s mind as he creates, but also into the mind of someone about to surrender to the temptation of returning to their “old ways.”

    For Parker, the best kind of “old ways” for him to retreat into are those that find him in total isolation. Hence, ending the video with him sitting inside a cave-like rock with nothing but his musical accoutrements. While some might call such a way of life “unhealthy,” for Parker (and all those who have been affected by his music), it’s the only way to live. That is, when he’s not promoting an album with interviews and tours…

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Tame Impala Proves Himself to Be An Overachieving Perfectionist With Deadbeat

    While some musicians take pride in their prolificness, Tame Impala is the kind who prefers, well, the slow rush. This being the title of the last album Kevin Parker released under the Tame Impala moniker in 2020. In the five years since, he hasn’t exactly been a “deadbeat” just lounging around. Instead, he’s been working mostly on other people’s projects, not least of which was Dua Lipa’s 2024 album, Radical Optimism. To be sure, her lead single from it, “Houdini,” has Tame Impala’s sonic stamp all over it. And that’s exactly how Lipa wanted it, commenting of her long-standing admiration for Parker’s music, “In terms of things that I’m obsessed with, Currents has been the soundtrack to my life. It’s one of my favorite albums ever ever ever. It was kind of like the gateway drug for me into Tame Impala.”

    Lipa isn’t wrong as, for many, that remains the album, even to this day (ten years since it was released). She further added of “snagging” him for Radical Optimism, “I’ve always looked up to him as someone that I’m really inspired by and he has always been on my dream board of people to work with.” And perhaps in Lipa, Parker found the final push he needed to fully embrace being as simultaneously pop and techno as possible. Two genres he’s circled for years now, but never wholly surrendered to. With his fifth record, Deadbeat, Tame Impala offers the best of both worlds, starting with the kickoff song, “My Old Ways.” Commencing with the “crude” iPhone recording of the track, Tame Impala spends one minute of the song building the listener up with his gentle, piano note-filled tale of woe, “So here I am once again, feel no good/I must be out of excuses, knew I would/Feels like it came out of nowhere this time/Wish I had someone else to blame/I tell myself I’m only human/I know I, I said never again/Temptation, feels like it never ends/I’m sliding, powerless as I descend…”

    At the one minute and one-second mark, the sonic tone shifts into a “high-gloss” recording as the beat finally drops and Tame Impala repeats, “Back into my old ways again.” With its 90s house influence, the addiction theme fits in perfectly in terms of evoking an era when taking drugs felt far more tempting. This in the sense that, there used to be a greater number of social scenarios (especially at nighttime, “in da clerb”) in which one would actually feel enticed to do so. Hell, even in Tame Impala’s earlier days, with his debut, Innerspeaker, having come out in 2010, there were more occasions for socially-motivated drug-taking. At present, it feels increasingly more like a way to numb the pain of reality. Or perhaps just the boringness of it. And yes, in a sense, that has always been the case, but “back then,” the communal element of “getting fucked up” was much more of a factor. And it’s one that comes across in “My Old Ways.” This further enhanced by Parker setting the stage for the Sam Kristofski-directed video partially in New York City, the ultimate milieu to incite a person to say, “I know what’s comin’, ain’t so shockin’, always fuckin’ up to somethin’/Story swappin’, downhill sloping, barely coping” and “I know it’s always déjà vu.”

    With a final rueful-sounding repetition of “back to my old ways again,” Tame Impala then leads into the slightly more “chipper” “No Reply.” Though “chipper,” of course, is a relative word for the perennially insecure Parker. And it is that insecurity which contributes to his self-styling as a “deadbeat.” Someone who can’t quite “comply” with what society deems to be a “useful” person. So it is that, amidst the up-tempo rhythm, Parker bemoans, “I apologize for the no reply/Wish I could describe what goes on inside/Get these butterflies/Man, they make me tired/I was so uptight and preoccupied/That I did not ask you about your life/And the things you like/How you spend your nights/And your 9 to 5/Are you that surprised?” That latter question alluding to the fact that everyone should know by now just what an “awkward lug” he is, and how, in trying to come across as at least “sort of” a person, he only ends up causing himself further anxiety as he wonders, “Was I impolite?/Was that joke alright?/I just want to seem like a normal guy.”

    But it’s already long been apparent that Parker wasn’t built to be “normal,” nor live the “normal” life, even as he settles into his “family man” role, having also welcomed a second child while recording Deadbeat. Though it’s his first child, Peach, who appears on the album’s cover with him, this capturing a spontaneous moment when the photographer was snapping away on the set and Peach made a beeline for her father. When asked by Triple J’s Lucy Smith why Parker at last chose to actually include an image of himself on the cover this time around, Parker replied, “I wanted it to be, um, an album that is noticeably more, like, exposed. Of me. I just wanted to put my own self into it and out there… I just saw an opportunity to make an album that was noticeably more human.”

    Perhaps it’s no coincidence that Parker has chosen to do just that at the very moment when society is doing its best to veer as much away from “humanity” as possible (yes, that’s shade at AI). For humans are becoming, evidently, far too “messy” to deal with. Particularly those pesky “night people.” The ones that Parker refers to on “Dracula,” his third single from the record, and one that marked his first entry into the Billboard Hot 100. This perhaps due to working with another songwriter, Sarah Aarons, for the first time since Lonerism. That Aarons has a “pedigree” in “hit-making” (having previously worked with such chart-topping artists as Rosé, Tate McRae, Miley Cyrus and Zara Larsson) surely couldn’t have hurt. Perhaps gave Parker the final push he needed to go all in on creating a “spooky” dance banger. One that does share a certain sonic DNA with The Slow Rush’s “Borderline.” Except with the instruction “but make it Halloween and also a bit of an existential rumination on finding and losing and maybe finding again someone you have amorous feelings for at a rave.” Indeed, it’s generous of Tame Impala to offer up a new “Halloween-ready” anthem apart from “Thriller,” which is in desperate need of being retired.

    In any case, all of Parker’s drug and alcohol-fueled bravura from the rave disappears with “Loser.” And, if there is one “defining” track on Deadbeat to encapsulate the theme, it’s this particular song—which, yes, of course takes its inspiration from Beck’s signature 1993 track of the same name. So much that Parker even has him cameo in the Joe Keery-starring video. In it, Keery is the “younger version” of Parker, a decision that echoes the fact that many of the songs on Deadbeat (including “No Reply”) draw their inspiration from Parker’s younger, even more insecurity-laden years. Thus, where Beck once said, “I’m a loser, baby/So why don’t you kill me?,” Tame Impala repurposes it to, “I’m a loser, babe/Do you wanna tear my heart out?” The self-deprecation continues with, “I’m a tragedy/Tryin’ to figure this whole mess out/I’m out of favor, my worst behavior.”

    Like many songs on Deadbeat, “Loser” is also one that comes across as though it’s two songs in one, meandering in different sonic directions by the second half. At about the two-minute, twenty-six-second mark on “Loser,” this is exactly what happens, with Parker dreamily crooning, “I leave alone and/Dark streets I roam in/Night air, I breathe in/The stars I believe in.” Indeed, there was a time when Parker believed in the stars so much he was willing to major in astronomy while in college (having started out in engineering—though he only attended university at all because his father told him music was, in essence, a deadbeat’s pursuit). Parker’s affinity for the cosmos, however, remains omnipresent in his music. As is also apparent in “Oblivion” (not to be confused with Grimes’ 2012 song of the same name). Once again experimenting with sound to make it mirror the lyrics themselves, Parker commences with faraway-sounding vocals before leading into saying, you guessed it, “You’re so far away/Endlessly, I try to reach you.”

    With “Oblivion,” whoever Parker is trying to reach (though one assumes it’s his wife), he must surely be getting through to, with such romantic, heart-on-his-sleeve lyrics as, “When I saw your face/I was hypnotized completely/I could see my future/Never yearned for life so deeply.” That word also having a certain drug-related connotation since, in order to achieve such a state of being unaware or unconscious of what’s happening around you, it typically requires some “mind-altering” aid. The dreamy tone of the song (even if one of its beats occasionally recalls Drake’s “One Dance”) is as key to making it sound romantic as the lyrics, “If I don’t get to you my love/Then I choose oblivion” and “If I never get to you/I’m going to oblivion.” It almost smacks of something Romeo would tell Juliet—and something he would actually do, considering he was willing to drink poison when he thought Juliet was dead. For both men, it seems that the declaration is that it’s “Not My World” if their respective lovers can’t be in it. And it is with “Not My World” that Parker continues to cultivate an ethereal soundscape. As a matter of fact, Parker was sure to call this song out to Triple J as being “kind of, like, the signature sound of Deadbeat.”

    This not just in terms of gut-punching lyrics that speak to him feeling out of step with the rest of society, but also in the stripped-back nature of the instruments—at least to start out. This done with a drum machine filtered through a guitar as Tame Impala paints the picture, “Waking just in time to catch the last hours of sunlight [more “Dracula” vibes]/People going home, they walk by/Must be nice/Must be nice/Makes me realize/It’s not my world/It’s not my world.” Although simple and to the point, this small description cuts to the core of how it feels to be a “deadbeat.” In other words, an artist who really can’t keep the same hours as those 9 to 5ers (or what’s left of them, anyway).

    After Tame Impala comes to this rather bittersweet conclusion, there’s still quite a bit of the song left, but he chooses to make it entirely instrumental as he plays with an array of musical intertwinements that help to get across the emotions he’s seeking to convey. Indeed, he also told Triple J, “The rhythms in my music will always be, you know, almost the most important thing. It just, for me, carries the, like, the groove carries the emotion.” And oh how it does so much carrying for the majority of “Not My World” until Tame Impala once more repeats “it’s not my world” twice at the very end.

    He then leads into the jauntier-sounding “Piece of Heaven,” which almost has an INXS feel to it (think: “Never Tear Us Apart”). And then comes a dash of Enya as the musical layers start to build on one another. And, in contrast to “Not My World,” this is a song that finds Tame Impala totally at ease with not being a part of the outside world, going so far as to pronounce, “Now there is a whole world/Going on out there/Whatever I’m missing out on/In here I don’t care.” The reason? “‘Cause I’m in your bedroom/Now I’m your possession.”

    But prior to finding this person who makes him feel like slightly less of an “anomaly,” Tame Impala speaks on “deadbeat qualities” again, starting the song out with, “This room is a shambles/But I think it’s fine/To you it’s untidy, maybe/To me it’s divine.” Establishing once again that he isn’t “normal” (granted, in previous tracks, he expressed wanting to be—though that has become increasingly less the case as the album goes on), Parker then speaks on finding another person whose bedroom is a “shambles,” too—therefore, just as “divine” to him as his own room. A “piece of heaven,” in fact. A world apart from the “real,” and oh so banal one outside.

    At the three-minute, forty-three-second mark, Tame Impala pulls that “two songs in one” maneuver again, with the track becoming all piano as he muses in a chanting kind of way, “It won’t make a difference/You can lie all your life/It won’t make a difference/You can try all your life.” Not exactly encouraging words after such a romantic, uplifting few minutes. But, then again, maybe what Parker is trying to say is that, you can lie to yourself all your life that you don’t want love, and you can try (“secretly”) all your life to find it. But, in the end, it’s as Parker himself once said on Currents: you just have to “let it happen.”

    With “Obsolete,” however, there’s another “comedown” from the high of love (or any general state of euphoria), with Tame Impala getting right to the point as announces, “Talk is cheap, but the words cut deep/Promises get old, they get hard to keep/Tell me, please, ‘cause I’m losing sleep/Do you want my love? Is it obsolete?” Here, too, it bears noting that, once again, Tame Impala is tapping into the general through the specific. Almost as though he’s asking if love overall is obsolete in the face of the current climate. Not just his own for this particular person he’s addressing. A person he also feels obliged to tell, “Always was so easy hanging out/But it sure doesn’t feel like that now/I know that you have been feeling rough/Or are you falling out of love?”

    The more this person seems to ignore him, however, the more he starts to spiral, adding ‘Cause I’m already talkin’ like it’s done/Saying things like, ‘At least we had some fun’/And things like, ‘I guess we met too young.’” The spiral only continues to augment as the song progresses, with Tame Impala growing almost full-tilt hostile when he says, “Just tell me what is/Tell me what is up/I’ve almost had enough/You’re playing with my love/Just tell me what is up/Yes, really what the fuck?”

    The R&B influence on Tame Impala’s musical style is also most prominent on “Obsolete,” particularly as it goes on the now standard “two songs in one” path at about the three-minute, twenty-one-second mark, segueing listeners out of this universe and into the one of “Ethereal Connection,” which goes all-out techno. A big deal for the person who once, per Triple J, used to describe techno music as a “guilty pleasure” (not unlike Madonna deriding it entirely before she made an electronic album in the form of Ray of Light). With “Ethereal Connection” (which fittingly served as the B-side to the almost as techno-y “End of Summer”), Tame Impala makes up for all that last time by taking listeners on what amounts to an odyssey through the club (sort of like what Charli XCX does with “365” on Brat), with all its various sounds and emotional highs and lows.

    Like “Not My World,” it is also far more reliant on music than it is lyrics, with Tame Impala saying one verse just twice during the seven minutes and forty-two seconds that the song runs for (and yes, it’s also got a certain LCD Soundsystem feel to it, and not just in terms of length). That verse being: “Don’t believe in magic/All the harder that I try/But you and I have something/That I can never describe/Take a ride/Say goodbye/I don’t say it too often/Isn’t usually my style/I’m here whatever happens/Don’t you know that I’ll stand by?/By your side/Until the end of time.” Or, as Lana Del Rey would put it, “I will love you till the end of time/I would wait a million years.”

    At another moment during the Triple J interview, Parker remarked, “I’m always talking about songs as though they’re, like, people that have their own personalities.” And if “See You On Monday (You’re Lost)” could be attributed with one, it would be “Eeyore.” This not just in terms of the musical pitch and tempo, but also the palpable resignation and ennui in the lyrics, “And it happens at every turn I’m at/Somewhat steady, but please don’t call me that/And it happens at every turn I’m at/Something beckoning me and I turn back.” As the song goes on, the repetition of “you’re lost” once more taps into the struggle of a deadbeat, perennially searching for a way to feel, well, not so lost compared to everyone else around them, all of whom appear to have it “together.” To be “found.”

    Such observations from a deadbeat can inevitably lead him to feel like an “Afterthought.” This track (also co-written with Sarah Aarons) being another sonic pendulum swing from one emotional extreme to another. For where “See You On Monday (You’re Lost)” was downtrodden and “Eeyore”-like, the personality of this track is frenetic and unrelenting (almost serving as Tame Impala’s version of Rick James’ “Give It To Me Baby,” musical backing-wise). And, in it, he derides the object of his affection for, well, effectively deriding him by treating him like an “afterthought.” Almost like it was tailor-made for “friend guys” everywhere (like Brian Krakow in My So-Called Life)—the ones who keep hoping against hope that their friend who’s a girl that they’ve been obsessed with for ages will finally notice them. You know, in that way.

    Parker comes across as exactly such a type as he paints the picture, “I might be crazy/Senses betray me/Are you parading all your lovers to bait me?/You only call me/To drive you to safety/But you never stay, must be so easy to play me/I can be emotional/If you need me to/Tell me, what do I say to turn this around?” Alas, for a man so firmly relegated into the “friend zone” (or, worse still, the “to be taken advantage of” zone), there is nothing to be said to “turn this around.” Regardless, Tame Impala still has the sense of shamelessness to say, “I beg you, don’t make me say it out loud/No matter what I do/I’m an afterthought to you.”

    Continuing to play into that bereft “friend zoned” motif, Tame Impala opts to round out the album with, “End of Summer,” which was the first single from Deadbeat, and the one to give listeners a glimpse into the techno-oriented direction the album was going to take. And it, too, speaks to one person in a friendship wanting to take it to the next level as Parker sings, “Everybody knows how I feel about you/So you can act surprised if you need to/And I am still your friend if you think it’s worth it.” In a sense, too, it’s almost as if Tame Impala is speaking directly to his listener in regard to how long it’s taken him to “return” with an album.

    And, as for the amount of time it took for Parker to finally “push” Deadbeat out of himself, he said it best when Zane Lowe mentioned how, the last time they talked, he was saying how lost he had gotten in making The Slow Rush. To this, Parker returned, “I think you have to. You have to get lost in it. If I’m not completely consumed by it and, like, just sort of felt like I’ve dropped off the face of the Earth in doing it, then I haven’t gone deep enough, you know? I honestly thought this album was gonna be the album that didn’t take years off my life. Like, mentally.” But what Tame Impala has lost mentally, he more than gives back to the minds of others with this record. Particularly in terms of its “concept,” which taps into so many people’s insecurities about themselves—namely, those who had the “audacity” to pursue art over a “career.”

    In characterizing why he chose to put the neon sign “Deadbeat” above himself, as it were, Parker told Triple J, “All the feelings that I’ve had in my life of, like, being a dropout, being a deadbeat, being hopeless, being a space cadet—that’s still how I feel. You know, I still feel, um, like I’m sort of constantly ‘therapying myself’ against these feelings.” And, in turn, the fellow “deadbeats” can “therapy themselves” with Deadbeat.

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Mariah Carey Is Here For It All—But Mainly Shade-Throwing and Throwing It Back

    Though it goes without saying, Mariah Carey has no “need” to ever release another album of new music again if she doesn’t feel like it. Her entire mint now coming from the Christmas cash that rolls in for her every year like clockwork. Maybe that’s, in part, why it’s taken her so long to release another studio album after 2019’s surprisingly good Caution. But perhaps even more than waiting so long because she has such a fat sack of passive income is Carey’s undeniable need to still be deemed “the best” in her class of music. Which, of course, means charting at a certain level, ergo her carefulness about what she chooses to release.

    What’s more, over the past few decades, Carey has scarcely acknowledged even the mere existence of “other chanteuses” in her category, save for Ariana Grande, who she actually collaborated with three times in song form: “Oh Santa! (Remix),” “yes, and? (remix)” and “One Heart, One Voice” (on which they’re both “featured artists” of Barbra Streisand’s). With Here For It All, however, Carey seems keen to remind people why she still ought to maintain her crown for being Queen of the Octave Range. However, when it comes to being Queen of Lyrics About Non-Superficial Things, Carey can’t exactly claim the crown. In fact, there are a few instances where Mariah’s vocals, diva “self-parody” and icon status combine as the only “superpowers” to mitigate the reality that there are some real The Life of a Showgirl moments on the album in terms of fluff and speaking from the insulated perspective of being a rich bitch.

    Yet Mariah manages to “sneakily” pass it off as being tongue-in-cheek…but you know damn well she’s serious as cancer when she says shit like, “I don’t care about much if it ain’t about Mi/Let the money talk first, conversations ain’t free/I’m the D-I-V-A, that’s MC/I’m the hot toddy, hottie body, yeah, that’s tea.” This being the opening verse of track one on the album, called, what else, “Mi.” With Mariah further shortening her nickname, “Mimi” (as in, The Emancipation of…) to create a double meaning that turns the track into an anthem for being selfish and vain. This made further apparent in such verses as, “I don’t acknowledge time, I do whatever I please/Diamonds in my hair, yeah, that’s pure luxury/I’m a bad bitch, but I’m good company [conversely, Swift announces the opposite on “Eldest Daughter”: “I’m not a bad bitch”]/You would know that if you really knew me/In another class from those ladies/Welcome to my house, pink sand on my feet/Harry Winston diamonds and some Louis XIII/I ain’t checked the price since Emancipation Mi.” Though, of course, Mariah probably hasn’t been checking the price for a lot longer than that. Even if her “diva” persona wasn’t fully cultivated until 2005’s The Emancipation of Mimi. That was the year “MC” turned thirty-six (indeed, The Emancipation of Mimi was released on March 30th, just three days after said birthday).

    On “Mi,” however, she’s offering up some lyrics that make her sound much younger/less mature than that as she flexes, “I like my ice cold, I like my wrist froze/I wear my high heels walking on my tiptoes/Yes, I like my back rubbed in my hot tub” and “I stay on your mind, in your head rent-free/I don’t check the price, can’t nobody check me.” Despite all the braggadocio about having so much money, the trashy side of Mariah flickers in when she starts mentioning Cool Whip amidst Hermès and Veuve Clicquot. In another The Life of a Showgirl-y moment, Carey boasts, “I’m an empire, baby” (Swift instead sings, as a “mafioso type,” “The empire belongs to me”). While this might be said as a play on being “from the N-Y-C” (which exists in the “Empire State”)—even if Carey is actually from Long Island (a totally different animal)—it still sounds datedly capitalistic. Yet, for as ultimately banal as the lyrics are, it took Carey and six other songwriters (Ray Romulus, Jonathan Yip, Luke Milano, Jeremy Reeves, Jeff Baranowski and Felisha King) to come up with them. Surely something Beyoncé could understand.

    On the next track, “Play This Song,” it took about as many people to land on something like, “At the drive-in eating with your little friend/I used to buy you steaks and scrimps/Don’t act like you don’t miss me.” This part sung largely by Anderson .Paak, who Carey is now purported to be dating. For she’s not one to stay single for very long, nor one to date someone who isn’t at least a couple decades younger. At any rate, the sound they’ve come up with is one that seems designed to serve as their own answer to Bruno Mars and Lady Gaga’s only slightly more cornball “Die With a Smile,” which is accompanied by a very 70s-inspired video. In point of fact, Mariah noted of her Anderson collaboration, “…when we got into the studio, we decided we wanted to do something that was kind of 70s, and we did give you that kind of vibe. So we started working on ‘Play This Song,’ and it was just one of those ones that I really loved. Working with him in the studio, he’s a great companion in terms of making music.” And clearly, a great companion in other ways for her as well.

    To lend a somewhat more modern feel for at least one occasion on this record, the track that follows is “Type Dangerous,” which served as the lead single that launched Carey back to a number one position on the Billboard charts, even if the more niche “Adult R&B Airplay” category. Throughout the track, Carey conveys the same “full of myself and feelin’ myself” aura that she started with on “Mi,” particularly when painting the picture, “I came in the door, dripped in Balenci/Cropped leather coat and some nine-inch Fendis/The crowd opened up and I started to strut/I need my space, but I’m signing autographs and such.” Mariah’s penchant for telling off other would-be competitors who would dare to either 1) steal her spotlight or 2) claim to be on the same level as her also comes to light again when she sings, “Hit the little girls’ room to powder my nose/Then came in three hatin’ ass hoes/They don’t know the meaning of water nor soap/I don’t have time for the rigamarole.”

    But, in truth, Mariah very much has time for it. Especially when it comes to ensuring the proper amount of shade is thrown. Something that occurs in a more general form on “Sugar Sweet” featuring Shenseea and Kehlani. As the second single from Here For It All, it offers a mid-tempo pace that finds Mariah playing a long game when it comes to “securing the ring,” as it were. For this is, evidently, a renewed interest for formerly independent women, if RAYE’s “Where Is My Husband!” is anything to go by (which it definitely is). Thus, Mariah shruggingly sings of her ability to not go off on a man she’s trying to “lure in” for the long haul, “Hate it when you have to leave/But I don’t say a thing/‘Cause I will absolutely get the ring/No hurry, no worries/Oh baby, baby, baby, baby, I’m/Gonna use my expertise [a sexual innuendo if ever there was one]/I’ma keep it nice, I’ma keep it neat/I’ma keep it sugar, I’ma keep it sweet.” Though, of course, anyone who has seen Mariah at her shadiest knows that isn’t exactly true.

    Nor does she keep it “sugar” or “sweet” on “In Your Feelings” (whereas Lana Del Rey and Drake preferred to name their songs “In My Feelings”), during which she gets rather accusatory with the lyrics, “I thought I was yours/Then again, you pretend, so I didn’t know for sure/I thought we could fly/Guess you’re probably scared of heights, I’ll let you go.” Of course, she won’t let whoever this person is go without throwing some major shade, while also throwing it back. For the sound of “In Your Feelings” (co-produced by Carey, Anderson .Paak, Rogét Chahayed, Alissia Benveniste) has an extremely throwback feel to the Mariah ballad heyday of the 90s, particularly on albums like Emotions and Music Box. At the same time, there’s a hint of Whitney Houston’s “I Have Nothing” to the sound and intonation of Carey’s voice. Which wouldn’t be out of the realm of her intentions, considering she’s been more keen of late to pay homage to her erstwhile “nemesis.” Whatever her “aim” with it, however, “In Your Feelings” does start to feel rather redundant, therefore, much longer than its three minutes and twenty-two seconds.

    “Nothing Is Impossible” runs a second longer than that, but somehow comes across as being less belabored. Yet, as far as “empowering anthems” go, it’s fairly generic. With Carey essentially confirming the “one size fits all” nature of the track with her comment, “I think it’s something, if anything, it would help somebody get through something.” And sure, it’s “something” all right, awash in the vocal range she’s known for and expected to deliver. Yet somehow, it just doesn’t land on the “authenticity” front and, in a way, it’s almost like it wants to serve “Beautiful” by Christina Aguilera, but doesn’t quite land it. This even if the themes of each song are quite different, as Mariah discusses resilience in the face of incredible struggle (so wait, maybe it is pretty similar to “Beautiful”—not “#Beautiful”—in that sense). While she might be talking about any number of the personal struggles she’s endured, including the death of her mother and sister on the same day in 2024, nothing specific at all comes through, as though Carey is trying too deliberately to make the lyrics as “catch-all” as possible. Apart from referring back to her “Butterfly” lyrics, “Spread your wings and prepare to fly,” with, “I knew deep down inside that I could fly.” A sentiment that, to be honest, conjures far too close of an association with R. Kelly declaring, “I believe I can fly.”

    Switching from the maudlin and ballad-y back to her other spectrum, cunty and R&B-tinged, “Confetti & Champagne” is the next offering. And arguably the shadiest track of Here For It All. Directed at an ex she wants to goad in her distinctly Mariah way, she once again brags about her status and wealth with such verses as, “Find me in the crowd/With diamonds all around” and “I stay surrounded by/Confetti and champagne/Bright lights like a big game.” In a certain sense, it mirrors Madonna’s “fuck you” to an ex (and yes, also a much younger one) on 2015’s “Unapologetic Bitch,” during which she gloats, “I’m poppin’ bottles that you can’t even afford/I’m throwin’ parties and you won’t get in the door/Said it, get it, love it, hate it, I don’t care no more/Tell me how it feels to be ignored.”

    There are other elements in the song that evoke certain comparisons as well. For instance, a backbeat that channels major Janet Jackson energy (think: The Velvet Rope era), or the fact that Carey repeats, “Look at me now/Yeah, look at me now” in such a way as to remind one of Chris Brown’s 2011 song of the same name. However, when Mariah sings the post-chorus, “Cheers, cheers, cheers, cheers, cheers/To me, not you, just me/That confetti and champagne/Clink, clink, clink, pow/Look at me now,” it is uniquely her.

    Having clearly hit her stride with the shade-throwing, she continues down that path for “I Won’t Allow It,” which, has a certain sound to it that makes it almost deserving of being called “Type Dangerous (Part II).” Once again radiating the sonic touch of Anderson .Paak, there’s more than a slight tinge of 70s-ness to it as Carey repeats the phrase, “I won’t allow it.” And what she won’t allow is being made to feel like shit by someone so clearly “lesser than” her. In this way, too, there’s echoes of Madonna’s “Unapologetic Bitch,” which also offers such lyrics as, “You know, you never really knew how much you loved me till you lost me/Did you?/You know, you never really knew how much your selfish bullshit cost me/Well, fuck you.”

    Carey has some choice words for her own ungrateful, “fame fucker” (an Olivia Rodrigo nod) of an ex when she asks, “Whatcha gonna say when we go our separate ways/And you see me outside with my billion dollar bae?/Please enjoy your Chick-fil-A.” An insult that has the same “kapow” effect as Regina George telling Jason in Mean Girls, “You can go shave your back now.” Mariah then continues the “Unapologetic Bitch”-meets-“vampire” motif by adding, “Wanted the fame, used my name/Bet you thought you could do that/I won’t entertain all your narcissistic ways.” Because, to be sure, the only “narcissistic ways” Carey will entertain are her own.

    Slowing it down yet again for “My Love,” Carey provides her listener another “90s signature” of her albums: the cover song (hear also: “Without You,” “I’ll Be There” and “Against All Odds.” As far as choices of songs to cover go, it does align with Carey’s usual love of “reinterpreting” ballads with her own vocals. But, in this case, as Mariah tells it, “It’s more an homage to my childhood, because I remember being a little girl and riding on the back of a motorcycle with my mother’s friend’s daughter and her boyfriend. This was their song, and they were in love.” As far as lyrics to love songs go, however, this one is pretty sparse, mostly repeating, “It’s in the hands of my love/And my love doеs it good.”

    As for a “real” reason Carey might have covered the song, there’s no denying it’s something worth checking off her “I’m a true legend” list to be able to get Paul McCartney to collaborate on the track in some way. For she herself remarked, “I’m still hoping that Paul McCartney might play something on it, which would be amazing. He is one of the greatest of all time, ever, and I just asked before I recorded the song, would he mind if I recorded it? I had a conversation with him, and he was like, ‘No, give it a shot, send it to me.’ And I’m like, ‘How do I do this?’ Because I really want him to be on this song doing background vocals, something.” Ah, such a testament to Mariah’s diva-ness to think that Paul McCartney ought to provide her with background vocals.

    By way of explanation for him not doing any such thing, she added, “I don’t think that’s where he’s at right now, but he might lay something [down] for the deluxe version. I would be thrilled out of my mind. But yeah, if you talk about the emotion when I’m singing it, it’s definitely about finding someone that you really revere and care for.” Someone of which you would say, “Don’t ever ask me why/I’ll never say goodbye to my love/It’s understood.”

    Perhaps for the time being, Carey has found that with Anderson .Paak. Or perhaps she’ll have to settle for finding it with Jesus. As she seems to indicate on the penultimate track of Here For It All, “Jesus I Do” featuring the Clark Sisters. And while it’s not a secret that Carey has no issue releasing gospel-y, Jesus-lovin’ fare, with “Jesus I Do,” she’s perhaps gone too far this time (in other words, one will take “Thank God I Found You” featuring 98 Degrees over this any day of the week). An upbeat, 70s-sounding (yet again) number, Carey does her best to fill her listener’s soul with the spirit of the good lord, Jesus Christ. But, like Taylor Swift failing to read the room in terms of releasing certain material in a climate like this, it just doesn’t work. For Swift, it was opting to put out a record about being rich and in love at a time when the world is at a nadir; for Mariah, it’s releasing a song that’s ultra-Christian at a time when the U.S.’ so-called Christianity is exactly what has it in the fucked-up state that it’s in.

    Even so, Mariah and the Clark Sisters act like they’re nuns married to Jesus when they say shit like, “I, I thought I would never find/A true love like You/Now I can never turn You loose, loose, loose.” The cringily romantic fetishizing also shows up in such verses as, “When I am down in misery/I call Your name [“Like A Prayer” much?] and I receive/The joy I need to set me free/From all of life’s atrocities/Jesus, I do, ooh/I do, Jesus, I do.” The “I do” loosely alluding to these women believing they’re married to Jesus (just like most nuns do). And while it’s a technically “good” song, it doesn’t really have a place on the album, sticking out like a sore thumb and begging to be put on its own separate Mariah record, perhaps a gospel-themed one.

    Even so, Mariah seems to want to make it “gel” by then leading into the title track, which is also gospel-tinged at a certain point. Placed as the last song on the album (this done, Mariah insists, so that everyone would have to listen instead of skipping over it—as if that’s really controllable), “Here For It All” takes up the most “space” on the record, clocking in at six minutes and thirty-eight seconds. Deemed by Mariah to be the song she’s most proud of on the album, it’s clear she wants to conclude by showing her octave range (complete with piano notes that have shades of “Hero” to it). In addition to her range when it comes to being simultaneously “humble” and braggadocious (case in point, “And baby, I’m here for it all/Red carpets in Cannes and applause/Bugattis, whatever they’re called/Yeah, baby, I’m here for it all/Our virtual sleepover nights/That kept me from losing my mind/Through things I don’t care to recall/Still baby, I’m here for it all”).

    At about the four-minute mark, the song starts to shift and morph into something else, with a new musical opening that briefly recalls the sound of “We Belong Together.” Carey then proceeds to go off on the kind of musical tangent she perfected on Caution’s “Giving Me Life,” which also enters the six-minute range. A track that, incidentally, suggests, “So, then maybe if the stars align/We’ll fix our minds on another tangent.” With Here For It All, though, the only tangent Mariah has fixed her mind on is one focused on throwing shade and throwing it back. In other words, reliable fare. But nothing “earth-shattering” (or, in Mariah’s vocal case, “glass-shattering”).

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Tate McRae’s “Tit For Tat” Is an Unvarnished Clapback at An Ex Trying to Paint a Self-Victimizing Narrative

    Although many have questioned if Taylor Swift has any taste left after releasing The Life of a Showgirl, she did at least have the good sense to mention to Jimmy Fallon on The Tonight Show that the song she keeps listening to lately is Tate McRae’s “Tit For Tat.” Indeed, it’s the kind of single that Swift might have written at the height of anger during one of her own breakups. Alas, Swift has gotten on the engagement and marriage track, which leaves McRae as the current jilted lover of choice for coming up with post-breakup diss tracks. And the person she’s likely dissing is The Kid Laroi, who she dated for a little over a year—which translates to practically a decade in “young, hot celebrity” dating time.

    And certainly long enough to impact The Kid Laroi to the point where he might serve as the G-Eazy to McRae’s Halsey in terms of writing a song with some shade thrown at her. Except, in that case, Halsey was the one to preempt G-Eazy with her hit, “Without Me” (after which he came up with some “disses” of his own that paled in comparison—namely, his feature on “WORK Pt. 4”). McRae, instead, developed the Ryan Tedder and Grant-produced “Tit For Tat” soon after the release of The Kid Laroi’s “A Cold Play.” A single that, although it might come across as “sweet” (e.g., “Around my house, I still got up all of our pictures, baby/‘Cause I still love you, that’s how I feel at my core/Flew different states to come see you in between tour/I gave you everything I had and even more”), is extremely toxic in terms of painting McRae into the villain. This done as The Kid Laroi self-victimizes with such passive aggressive lyrics as, “It’ll always be easy to blamе you/But it’s my fault for thinking I could/Fix you, fix you, fix you, fix you.”

    In many ways, it echoes the sentiments of his other breakup anthem, “Without You” (which became even more well-known when Miley Cyrus jumped on a revamped version of it in 2021), during which he “laments” that he “can’t make a wife out of a ho.” And, incidentally, Laroi did join McRae onstage during the Madison Square Garden date of her Think Later World Tour to sing this track with her. How…foreshadowing.

    Not just because it retroactively sounds as though “Without You” could have been written for her, but because, evidently, McRae now qualifies as “ho” material for him as he spends most of “A Cold Play” accusing her of being the one at fault for their breakup. This also apparent when he mentions, “You said to me, baby, you was all in/I think we just probably should’ve stayed friends/I think that we probably could’ve saved tears (and saved years).” McRae, in response to being painted as the monster who caused things to fall apart, sets the record a bit straighter from the outset of “Tit For Tat,” tellingly titled as such to show The Kid Laroi that, as Cardi B puts it on “Outside,” “Let’s go wrong for wrong, let’s go lick for lick/If I can handle that, let me see you handle this/Do you how you do me, bet you we won’t speak again.”

    Opening with a cheerleader-y kind of chant (think: the sound of Toni Basil on “Mickey”), McRae sets the stage for recounting The Kid Laroi’s own crimes with, “Thought I might love you again, I’ll see how I feel/Now that you’re acting like that, boy, I never will/Last night, she answered my call, it sealed the deal.” The self-assured, even cocky sound of that leads into McRae casually musing, “Right now, I’m not even about you.” However, it clearly seems that it isn’t just “right now,” but forever that McRae isn’t going to be “about” The Kid Laroi. Especially not after he foolishly chose to gas her up with “A Cold Play,” which she addresses him doing directly in the “Tit For Tat” chorus, “Let’s go song for song, let’s go back to back/Let’s go tit for tat, boy, you asked for that/That’s the best you got, where’s the good one at?/I was never as far away as you thought.”

    McRae even goes “so far” as to acknowledge that specific “fix you” lyric (itself a meta nod to the band Coldplay) by jibing, “Fix your fuckin’ self, kiss my ass for that.” Along with reminding those on the outside looking in that what Laroi attempted to do with “A Cold Play,” complete with its cloying video that shows the singer in tears (with a close-up, no less), is “changing up the narrative to write” without revealing the deeper complexities of the story. Trying to make it black and white, with McRae firmly in the “bitch” category. Fortunately, McRae isn’t one for taking such a false depiction while lying down.

    And surely, these frank, unvarnished expressions of hers must have The Kid Laroi blanching or blushing with shame and embarrassment. The sting of being publicly humiliated (just as he tried to do to her, by the way). Hence, McRae’s additional dig, “That looks like it really hurts/That bruise on your ego/I know that it makes it worse/It had to be me though.” Because, if not McRae, then who else would have been the one to put him in his place? Probably not whoever she caught answering his phone (this in itself echoing the part of the “Say My Name” tale that recounts, “It’s hard to believe that you are at home by yourself/When I just heard the voice, heard the voice of someone else”).

    With “Tit For Tat” slated to appear on the deluxe edition of So Close to What, it’s not only a welcome addition to an album that’s further placed McRae amongst the ranks of some of pop’s current crop of heavy hitters, but also cementing of the overarching theme of that record—which is that McRae will not suffer fools. Though, for a moment there, she was willing to, particularly if another song from So Close to What, “I Know Love” featuring The Kid Laroi, was something to go by. Obviously, it no longer is.

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • With “Bittersweet,” Madison Beer Is No Longer Saying “Yes Baby”

    On the heels of releasing a sexed-up, ultra workout-friendly (especially when taking into account the accompanying video) single called “Yes Baby,” Madison Beer has now offered a sharp contrast to that vibe in the form “Bittersweet.” With such a title, it should come as no shock that it’s a post-breakup track, and one that finds Beer at her most “Ariana Grande-esque,” lyrically speaking. Indeed, “Bittersweet” smacks of the sort of song one might find on Eternal Sunshine (or Eternal Sunshine Deluxe: Brighter Days Ahead) as Beer reflects on being both angry at the person who let her go (or perhaps forced her to let him go) as well as sad over losing the relationship—such a conundrum being well-trodden by Grande on songs like “eternal sunshine” and “twilight zone.”

    In the lyric video that goes with the single (shot by Fio Karpenko), a dreamy and dissociated-looking Beer continues to either stare off into the distance or run her hands through her hair as the lyrics to the song appear on either side of the center where she stands (though the viewer is only able to see her from a chest-up perspective). Printed in cursive, the effect lends an “old-timey” quality (especially since most Gen Zers weren’t taught cursive) that almost gives the effect that the words are meant to read like a bona fide breakup letter (a “Dear John” one, if you will). The go-to option at a certain point (mainly, WWII) in the twentieth century before that gave way not only to a breakup Post-It (à la Jack Berger’s [Ron Livingston] infamous “I’m Sorry I Can’t Don’t Hate Me—” kiss-off), but, maybe even worse still, flat-out ghosting without even the thought of writing any form of “apology” at all.

    However Beer’s breakup might have happened within the universe of this song, it’s apparent she’s still in shock over the loss, opening with the, that’s right, bittersweet verse, “Can’t believe it ends this way/Thought you’d always stay/Now I gotta wonder what I’ve changed/Think I have to go/Walking all alone/Hate to see it all go down the drain/Wanted to be with you/Wanted to make it through/But did you?/I swear I knew.” And what she knew, in her heart of hearts, was that it was over. Even if trying to “soldier on” for the sake of, who knows, something like “sentimentality.” Not only that, but having invested so much time and effort into something that ultimately won’t yield a “return.” Such a result prompting the likes of Taylor Swift to seethe, “And I’m pissed off you let me give you all that youth for free.”

    Beer, still just twenty-six, is slightly less bitter about the failed relationship. Even if she says she’s “bittersweet”—with one definition of that term being, “arousing pleasure tinged with sadness or pain.” The “pleasure” arising from letting go of a dynamic that she knows isn’t good for her. As Beer put it to Rolling Stone, “‘Bittersweet’ is about the end of a chapter and the difficulty of coming to terms with it, while also recognizing that deep down you know it’s for the best—and finding peace in that along the journey.”

    The song starts out “airily,” with minimal instrumentation until the beat, co-produced by One Love and Beer, drops around the thirty-nine-second mark, prompting Beer to delicately deliver the simultaneously vexed and depressed chorus, “Now that it’s over, you’ll blame it all on me/I know I should be bitter, but, baby/Right now I’m bittersweet/I’m getting over what you put me through/And I’d say I’m done crying, but, baby/I don’t lie like you do.” Here, too, the Grande of Eternal Sunshine flickers in, particularly on the title track when she sings, “I don’t care what people say/We both know I couldn’t change you/I guess you could say the same/Can’t rearrange truth/I’ve never seen someone lie like you do/So much, even you start to think it’s true.”

    That “Ariana-ness” of it all is then further compounded by Beer layering on some “oooh’s” and “hmmm’s” into it after the first recitation of the chorus. She then proceeds to give greater insight into the definition of “bittersweet” by adding, “One day I’ll wake up sad/But go to bed so glad/Knowing you know what you could have had.” So it is that Beer’s bittersweetness (a phrase that makes it seem like one is talking about beer the drink, but no) is tinged with more than a slight desire for revenge—or rather, “Miss Karma just doing her thing.”

    In the meantime, Beer will have to take comfort in the revelation, “Now I’m choosing me/It wasn’t so easy/God forbid forever on my knees” (which, yes, also feels like a blow job reference more than it does speaking on how “reverential” and “obsequious” Beer has been up until now). Beer can also take comfort in reconciling with her enduring conflicting emotions about the relationship and its end. Something that has led her to paint the picture, “I lay awake thinking, ‘How did I let you go?’/Getting away unscathed for so damn long/I got away, took my time/I’m okay alone/And you’ll stay knowing/You’ll forever know how hard I tried/With you.” But, in truth, whoever her ex may be, it’s more than likely he has no idea how hard she tried, nor does he probably care. This being just part of why it’s never been chicer to not have a boyfriend.

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • There Would Be No “Bad Girl” Video Without Diane Keaton

    Of all Madonna’s many videos, perhaps one of the most standout (while still being simultaneously underrated) for its cinematic qualities is 1993’s “Bad Girl.” And yes, of course, its cinematic nature is due, in part, to David Fincher serving as the director—though Madonna did originally ask Tim Burton to do it. Perhaps because this was fresh off Burton directing Batman Returns, which had just the kind of “dark,” “gritty” aura that Madonna was seeking in order to capture a concept based on something as unflinching as 1977’s Looking for Mr. Goodbar (with a key plot device from Wings of Desire thrown in for good measure).

    In many ways designed to be a cautionary tale against the pratfalls of being a “wayward” woman that dares to sleep with whomever she pleases (and as often as she likes), Looking for Mr. Goodbar was also meant to tap into the stigmas that remain, to this day, lobbed at any woman with the audacity to be so “free.” That is to say, sexually free. And to “punish” her for that freeness, Looking for Mr. Goodbar holds up Theresa Dunn (Diane Keaton) as the perfect example of what “can and will” happen to such a salope. At the time, this messaging resonated immensely with Madonna (even more so than usual), who was being torn limb from limb by the media for her “diabolical” trifecta of sexually-charged releases (no ejaculation pun intended): Sex, Erotica and Body of Evidence. All three projects seemed to prove to the masses that Madonna had not only run out of/overused her material, but that she was crossing an unspoken line of “good taste” that was not meant to be crossed.

    A line crossed in much the same way as Theresa in Looking for Mr. Goodbar, with her story based on the real-life murder of Roseann Quinn. A murder that ultimately compelled Judith Rossner to write a book inspired by it. Released in 1975, it became a bestseller that quickly led to its adaptation into a film by Richard Brooks. In the lead-up to the film’s release, Keaton took an “oath of secrecy,” as it were, about the finer points of the film’s content, commenting to The New York Times, “Richard Brooks, the director wants it that way. I still don’t know why he chose me for the part. He saw some footage of me in Harry and Walter Go to New York, which didn’t exactly get good reviews. Anyway, it’s done now.” And when it was done, oh how it shocked audiences. Particularly the pearl-clutchers. Even if many of those types would have liked to interpret the film as a “morality plea.” Not just that, but a warning to all women of what “free love” a.k.a. sexual pleasure will result in. Of course, for the viewers, like Madonna, that really understood the core of the film’s message, it isn’t saying that at all.

    No, instead Looking for Mr. Goodbar aims to remind people that, for women, true equality isn’t really possible. Is perhaps as much of a fantasy as any far-fetched sexual one. This because men, beasts that they are, can’t seem to tolerate a woman being free in any way, least of all sexually. It drives them insane, to the point of murder. And hearing a woman mock or berate him in the same way that a man freely does to a woman? Fucking forget it. For that’s what apparently set off John Wayne Wilson, the real murderer of Roseann Quinn, whose account of the events leading up to her murder state that when he couldn’t get hard, she insulted him. Something that, to use understatement, clearly set him off. In the film version of events, it plays out mostly the same way, with Gary Cooper White (Tom Berenger)—yes, the nod to John Wayne Wilson is apparent—also failing to “deliver” as they start fooling around in Theresa’s apartment. Except that, in the movie, they make it so that Gary’s sexuality is homo-leaning to add to his sense of “needing” to overcompensate for that “masculine lack” by being hyper-toxic. Ergo, his over-the-top reaction to Theresa telling him it’s fine that he can’t perform. This “condescending” (from his skewed perspective) comment is what sends him on a tirade that includes the rebuke, “Goddamn women. All you gotta do is lay there. Guy’s gotta do all the work.”

    Theresa quickly loses patience for his “hot takes” about women and sex, telling him to leave. Instead, his rage continues to escalate and he proceeds to overpower her, leading her back onto the bed, stripping her of her clothes and choking her with her own bra (this aspect appearing in the “Bad Girl” video by way of “Louise Oriole” [Madonna] being strangled by a pair of her own stockings). All of this is what ends up arousing him enough to get an erection—violence, evidently the go-to aphrodisiac for men of all sexual orientations.

    As he proceeds to rape her, he asks, “This is what you wanted, right bitch?” Because that’s what it is, to the toxic male, for a woman to want hard dick. It’s for her to be a bitch or a slut who deserves to be treated roughly and cruelly because she wants sex in the same way that men have always been able to get it. And, more than women being “allowed” to make not only their own money, but also more money than men (rare as it is), the idea of a woman being “allowed” to have sex like a man is even more appalling to the quintessential toxic male.

    For Madonna, in 1993, there could have been no such message more appropriate to interweave into one of her videos. Because no one on Earth at that moment in time was being as maligned for their sexual freeness and candor than Ms. Ciccone. So while Madonna may have never formed a direct relationship with Keaton—apart from the direct relationship of Warren Beatty’s “special appendage” slipping into each of them at separate times (Keaton in the late 70s and early 80s, and Madonna in the early 90s)—the actress’ work clearly informed one of her best videos. And though, sure, Looking for Mr. Goodbar could have existed without Diane Keaton, it’s plain to see the movie wouldn’t have had the same impact on someone like Madonna without the subtlety and nuance she brought to the part. Able to convey the underlying missive—that women and men are never going to be “equals” so long as violence informs everything that men do and every reaction that they have—in a manner that obviously spoke to Madonna. In short, there would be no “Bad Girl” video without Diane Keaton.

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • For Better or Worse, Diane Keaton Is Perennially Tied to Woody Allen

    In her later years, some of the best work of Diane Keaton’s career came under fire/grew somewhat tainted for its inextricable association with Woody Allen. And through his declining reputation as Dylan Farrow began reminding the masses yet again (first via an open letter published in The New York Times in 2014, three years before #MeToo popped off) that she was abused by him in 1992, Keaton consistently remained loyal to her longtime friend, collaborator and former boyfriend. This done at a time when even the staunchest defenders of Allen (including Scarlett Johansson) were forced by public opinion to back down on their cries of “he’s innocent.”

    Keaton perhaps felt she had less to lose in continuing to support Allen. After all, unlike Johansson, it’s not as though she was at the mercy of all the studio manipulation and control that comes with playing a Marvel character. For Johansson had made her comments about supporting Allen (“I love Woody. I believe him, and I would work with him anytime”) too close to the moment when promotion for Black Widow was about to ramp up.

    As for Keaton, she would always insist that none of the allegations against Allen could tarnish their collaborations together, the most iconic one of all being, without a doubt, Annie Hall. Considered a landmark moment in film, and one that paved the way for the modern rom-com, Keaton’s portrayal as the titular character was her true breakout role—though, of course, most will say it was as Kay Adams-Corleone in The Godfather and The Godfather Part II. But, in truth, Annie Hall was what made her fixed in the public consciousness. Although she had starred in previous Allen films, including Play It Again, Sam (first a stage play by Allen that debuted in 1969 before it became a movie, in which Keaton also played the same part), Sleeper and Love and Death, Annie Hall allowed her to truly carve out her own sense of acting brilliance. This due, in large part, to intermixing so much of the truth of her own life in with Annie’s (e.g., putting together the famed androgynous look featuring a men’s vest, fedora and tie via pieces from her own closet [for, lest anyone forget, Katharine Hepburn was a key source of inspiration to Keaton, not just for her own “butch” style, but also her tendency to play strong, independent characters]).

    In point of fact, Allen wrote the part with her specifically in mind, right down to her musical aspirations (shown during an affecting scene where she sings in a nightclub), her real last name, her neurotic, “kooky” personality and the fact that Allen and Keaton had emerged from a romantic relationship around that time. And drawing from the on-again, off-again nature of it was a key part of getting across the heart-wrenching authenticity of the dynamic, one that many a couple could relate to (and still do—or at least, those who purport themselves to be capable of “separating the artist from the art”). Without Keaton, the film wouldn’t have been what it was. Yet, without Allen as her unwavering champion, in addition to letting her “find the character” without too much help from him, Keaton wouldn’t have given such a tour de force performance. In effect, there is no Keaton without Allen. And it’s not one of those things where a person “ought to” say that he, like, “invented” her, but rather, it was more that he was the one capable of drawing her out of a kind of chrysalis that she was still caught inside of, half in and half out. But once she was fully out, her acting potential seemed to know no bounds as the late 70s bled into the early 80s.

    Perhaps that’s why she felt emboldened enough to star in 1977’s Looking for Mr. Goodbar right after Annie Hall. Yet another incredible performance that continued to show the depth of her range. A versatility that would also shine through in one of Allen’s (many) less well-received films, Interiors. After that movie’s release in 1979, it would be another fourteen years before Keaton would reteam with Allen again in a “full-on” starring role (though she did make a cameo in 1987’s Radio Days) as Carol Lipton in Manhattan Murder Mystery. Once again given a chance to showcase her prowess as a comedienne, the part seemed to be a launching-off point into what would become her “shtick” for most of the rest of her career. Playing the daffy, “well what’s wrong with that?” wife and/or mother that would crystallize more fully in films like Father of the Bride, The First Wives Club, Something’s Gotta Give, The Family Stone and Because I Said So. And yet, for all the work she did outside of the “Allen universe,” it remains his movies that are most indelible when it comes to conjuring up an image of Keaton. In other words, there is no Keaton without Allen, and vice versa. For there’s no denying that she was what made his career as mainstream (relatively speaking) as it got. Perhaps that’s why she could never believe he would do something as egregious as molesting a child, commenting, “I have nothing to say about that. Except: I believe my friend.”

    It was this ardent belief in Allen and his innocence that perhaps accounted for some of her erstwhile unknown bad taste. The sort of taste that came to light during the final movies of her filmography, during which she mostly appeared to be selecting projects on the basis of needing a paycheck. At the minimum, however, and despite her declarations of support for Allen, she never did agree to star in one of his late-career clunkers (A Rainy Day in New York and Rifkin’s Festival are some prime examples). This being perhaps her shrewdest move of all as an actress. While she might be right to a certain extent that the accusation against Allen can never besmirch their work together, it does loom large, especially in a film like Manhattan (you know, the one where Allen “plays a character” dating a seventeen-year-old). And that’s more of a disservice done to Keaton’s legacy than it is to Allen’s.

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Comparing Madonna’s “Right On Time” to the Nature of Some of Taylor Swift’s Recent Lyrical Offerings

    At a time when Taylor Swift’s lyrics have never been so glaringly cringe, Madonna, funnily enough, chose to release one of her own “From the Vault” tracks (though, of course, that’s not what she calls them) from 1994’s Bedtime Stories. This in honor of the forthcoming EP celebrating the album’s thirtieth anniversary, Bedtime Stories: The Untold Chapter. And, of “all” the songs (though the word “all” makes it sound as if the album is far more robust than its mere eight tracks) Madonna might have chosen to release from it as a single, she opted for the hyper-mushy “Right On Time.” This being more than likely because the other songs on it have been released/heard before by the die-hard fans in some way or another, including the supposed fellow “rarities” on it: “Freedom,” “Let Down Your Guard” and “Love Won’t Wait.” And what all of these previously unreleased tracks have in common with the ones that actually made the cut for Bedtime Stories is that the overarching motif is one of love, amorousness. Which was very much aligned with the fact that she met Carlos Leon in September of ‘94, a month before the album would come out.

    So, although, logically speaking, Leon might not have been a direct influence on the lyrics of the songs seeing as how Madonna had been working on them prior to meeting him, it was almost as though she “conjured” him with such lyrics as, “Who needs the sun/When the rain’s so full of life?/Who needs the sky?/It’s here in your arms/I want to be buried/You are/My sanctuary.” Quoting Walt Whitman (for she was also doing that long before Lana Del Rey), Madonna speaks an intro to the track from “Leaves of Grass”: “Surely, whoever speaks to me in the right voice, him or her I shall follow.” Evidently, it was Leon who spoke to her in the right voice that September day in Central Park. As the lore goes, he was on his bike and she was running. He had noticed her a few times prior to this day before deciding to approach her. Ah, the glory days of when a person could get cruised, with no apps to make it “easy” (though actually much harder) to meet someone.

    And perhaps in that instant, Madonna really did think to herself, “It seems like I’ve been waiting/All my life for you to rescue me [a blatant nod to her 1990 track of the same name]/And there ain’t no hesitating/This is right/Boy, I was meant to be/With you.” Which does somewhat beg the question of when “Right On Time” was actually written—perhaps not “tacked on” to the album because it was too rushed. Then again, the generic sentiments of the lyrics don’t necessarily mean Leon was the catalyst for them at all. Not like Swift being oh so specific about Travis Kelce’s supposed “redwood” of a wang on The Life of a Showgirl’s “Wood” (arguably the most challenging track to endure). Or just about any other over-the-top-in-its-corniness song that’s aimed at him.

    Even though, in truth, Kelce is ultimately a blurred-out shape to Swift, who can use just about any of the men from her past as a composite for describing “love,” whether in its “positive” state (e.g., “Lover”) or its heart-wrenching, post-breakup one (e.g., “All Too Well”). But with the content (and that is the word to describe it, for every song on the album sounds decidedly “churned out”) on The Life of a Showgirl, Swift is worse off for trying to be “specific in her generalness.” For example, the unfortunate part during “The Fate of Ophelia” during which she sings, “Pledge allegiance to your hands, your team, your vibes.” The only thing “specific” about that might be alluding to, as usual, how Kelce plays football, but it’s certainly enough to amplify the ick factor.

    In (very slight) contrast, Madonna decides to keep her mawkishness more “catch-all” when she sings something like, “With you, you’re like a lucky charm that I just found/You, you’re like a ray of sunshine [so close to ‘ray of light’] on a cloudy/Day, you always make the darkness lighter/You, you’re right on time.” And yes, there’s no denying that if someone saw those lyrics without being aware that Madonna had penned them, they could easily attribute it to Swift. While some M fans might take that as an insult, perhaps it’s actually more of a testament to how underrated the Queen of Pop has been when it comes to writing “romantic” songs. Indeed, for the most part, she’s flown under the radar as a romantic because the majority of love songs by her that have been her biggest hits are more about unrequitedness and/or tragic loss (hear: “Live to Tell,” “Take A Bow” and “The Power of Goodbye”). It’s been very rare for Madonna to ever go totally “all in” on the saccharine front. Unless, of course, one is talking about her early 80s-era work, when she was more willing to play the “slighted ingenue” (case in point, “Burning Up,” “Think of Me” and “Pretender”).

    Yet such a “persona” never really “fit” Madonna to a tee the way that it has for Swift (and served her so well, too). Because Madonna’s message was always one that fundamentally traced back to empowerment. And for most women (who aren’t lying to themselves), a sense of true empowerment usually means being single. Or “going through men” the way that Madonna does now with her rotating crop of boy toys. This in itself being so much different that Swift’s “serial monogamy” style. And then, of course, when one thinks of Madonna’s most well-known hits, none of them are pining and whining anthems in the Swift vein. “Like A Virgin,” “Express Yourself,” “Vogue,” “Ray of Light,” and “Music” are just a few of the non-woe-is-me instances of Madonna’s typical form of chart success.

    And this is, in large part, what made (and makes) Bedtime Stories such a departure from most of the other work in her catalogue. One that is, inarguably, much more varied (both musically and lyrically) than what Swift’s usual themes have to offer. Yet with the release of “Right On Time,” it’s difficult not to feel as though this is one song that’s perhaps better left in “the vault.” For it doesn’t show off Madonna’s standard deviation from what pop stars like Swift tend to come up with when it comes to describing newfound love. In other words, listeners aren’t getting a track that innovatively compares this “tingly feeling,” as it were, to being “like a virgin.” Instead, the lyrics sound as though they were made to complement the possibility of Madonna synergistically promoting a watch brand. Which would also be very Swift-ish in nature.

    But, again, this is where it bears reminding that Madonna was doing “Swift shit” long before it all seemed to become attributed solely to said “Boring Barbie,” with M not only perfecting the art of marketing and PR, but also self-branding when it was still in its infancy for musicians (and celebrities in general). And, of course, commodifying something “underground” and making it mainstream (as Swift is trying to do with this whole showgirl shtick; granted, such a shtick is far less “underground” than vogueing was at the time when Madonna released the signature song paying homage to it).

    Perhaps by unleashing “Right On Time” just after The Life of a Showgirl, Madonna also wants to remind the masses that she was writing these types of mushy, “so in love” lyrics before her as well. Except, unlike Swift, Madonna had the good sense not to release the track until now. As a kind of afterthought. A “postscript” on her varied, typically overlooked range. But even Madonna wouldn’t have the audacity to put out the voice memos that Swift has for certain The Life of a Showgirl variants (oh so many variants) and sell them to an increasingly skeptical fanbase.

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • MARINA May Be the First Female Pop Star to Freely Let Go of “Girlhood”

    For the past few years, MARINA has been living out the lyrics of her lead single from Princess of Power, “Butterfly.” Slowly changing shape inside a shroom-saturated chrysalis that has transformed her into a fundamentally “happier, more ‘up’” person. Not only that, but tripping on mushrooms also seemed to make her understand the wisdom of embracing one’s “fate”: that is to say, aging. Not necessarily in a “let me go gray (though MARINA already did do that for a period of time, starting during the lockdowns of 2020) and lose all sense of pride in my appearance” kind of way, but rather, in a way that acknowledges the passage of time. This done, first and foremost, with her inspiration behind “Cuntissimo,” which stemmed from MARINA looking specifically toward older women as her “totems.” Not just in the lyrical content (e.g., “Push-up bra, in my diamonds/Gift from my ex-husband”), but in terms of “how to be” in general as she was made keenly aware of “leaving girlhood behind” this year.

    So it is that she wanted to stop “idolizing” or “glamorizing” youth and putting the especial pressure on herself about “staying young.” Not only as a woman (the gender that always experiences the most stress when it comes to “being hot,” which remains synonymous with being young), but as a pop star. Thus, in order to help her on her journey toward this form of “aging acceptance,” MARINA created a mood board (both literally and figuratively) consisting of such icons as Salma Hayek (name-checked in “Cuntissimo”), Thelma and Louise (also name-checked in “Cuntissimo”), Sophia Loren, Eartha Kitt, Jamie Lee Curtis and Madonna (specifically during her The Immaculate Collection photoshoot).

    And while Madonna is the undisputed pioneer of breaking down barriers for female pop stars to even be “allowed” to keep making music/remain “relevant” past a certain age (i.e., twenty-five), MARINA appears to be the first one to not bother trying to seem younger than she really is (because, yes, it’s no secret that Madonna has made her fair share of bids, particularly on the surgical front, to remain as fresh as possible). An effort that has been concerted in the years leading up to her fortieth birthday on October 10, 2025. In fact, the day before her big “decade shift,” MARINA shared the image of a letter she had written to herself a year ago about where she wanted to be at this juncture. A peak example of her “manifesting” capabilities. Of the sort she also displayed when she wrote Love + Fear’s “Enjoy Your Life,” a track that was, despite the positivity oozing from it, written at a time when MARINA was quite depressed. To pull herself out of this state, it was as though she had to trick her mind into believing she was this exuberant, this “chill” about everything (e.g., “Sit back and enjoy your problems/You don’t always have to solve them/‘Cause your worst days, they are over/So enjoy your life”).

    This was before mushrooms entered her life and “positivity” became so much easier to unlock. And, of all the songs on Princess of Power, “Rollercoaster” most clearly embodies the way in which she “altered her mind” to tap into an entirely new way of thinking. Not just about the present, but her future. One in which she realizes, “I wanna go where the free ones live now/Never going back to the place I lived, no.” And the place she once lived was in the petty concerns and fears wrought by youth (more accurately, trying to cling to it), the very thing that society tells women is the most/best they’ll ever have to offer. To this point, MARINA stated during The Zach Sang Show, “The trick of the patriarchy is to make you think that your value disappears after you’re, like, not deemed ‘attractive.’ But you look at these older women and you’re like, ‘Oh, that’s when they actually step into their power.’ So, like, that’s what’s waiting for you on the other side. And it’s just such a shame that that’s kind of, like, covered with this superficial thing. This idea that we think wrinkles equals ‘not beautiful.’”

    Of course, MARINA still struggles with “fully letting go” of the indoctrination that comes not just with being a regular “adult girl,” but one who has worked in “the industry” for years. So it is that she admitted during her Eat the World Q&A in London that she wouldn’t necessarily rule out Botox, etc., what with even the steeliest force not being immune to the pressures of Hollywood. But even so, turning forty this year forced her to ask the question (also on The Zach Sang Show), “How do I wanna feel as I get older?” Answering herself with, “I don’t wanna feel ashamed about it, I don’t wanna feel like I have to hang on to youth. I want to have the same space that men are given to age. And I also wanna accrue all the positive things that men do, which is wisdom, knowledge, respect, power. And I think we’re in such a perfect place for that to be in motion.”

    Alas, she seems to be more than slightly overlooking the fact that it’s not in motion at all, but rather, at a simultaneous standstill/in a time machine going backward. This much made evident by the current U.S. administration, as well as Taylor Swift’s tradwife-touting The Life of a Showgirl (which, yes, is ironic, considering the life of a showgirl should come across as being way more freeing and salacious).

     And one supposes that this is what makes a pop star like MARINA so important at this particular moment in time. A woman who is in total control of herself (without using horrifying terms like “girlboss”), freely pronounces that she’s fine being perennially single and conscientiously child-free. She is a woman who insists, “Spread me like a picnic on the floor in the forest/‘Cause I don’t wanna live if I can’t be honest.”

    Right now, the honest truth for MARINA is this: “I don’t think older women get celebrated enough. And now that I’m… ‘ta-ta-ing’ to youth and, like, waving goodbye to it, I was, like, what is my future?” If 2024’s Eat the World and this year’s Princess of Power are to be consistent benchmarks that foretell what it might be (at least creatively speaking), MARINA’s looks very promising/embracing of her age and whatever comes with it—physically and emotionally. Which means that she’s establishing a healthy example for those pop stars coming up in the present, arguably being the first truly modern woman to do so.

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Madonna Chooses the Right Time to Release “Right On Time”—Because It Would Have Been a Disservice for Her to Include It on Bedtime Stories in 1994

    On the same day as announcing that her Bedtime Stories: The Final Chapter EP is actually real, and not just another tease (like, thus far, her much-talked about biopic, in all its various iterations), Madonna opted to casually drop one of the “rarities” from the record (of which there are actually none apart from this), “Right On Time.” A title that, in many ways, is only too appropriate for someone like her, who not only “burst onto the scene” just as the world needed/was ready for the first modern female pop star, but whose entire career has generally been guided by a “right place, right time” kind of luck. 

    “Right On Time,” however, seems to indicate that Madonna was aware it wasn’t the right time at all to release a track like this, awash as it is in the kind of syrupy lyrics that she might have been sooner caught singing in the early and mid-80s (e.g., the unbridled saccharineness of 1984’s “Shoo-Bee-Doo,” during which she sings, “Why don’t you dry your eyes, try and realize?/Love can open any door, and maybe/If you trust in me I can make you see/Shoo-bee-doo-bee-doo, ooh la la, come to me, baby/Shoo-bee-doo-bee-doo, ooh la la, don’t say maybe”). And although her intent with Bedtime Stories was to veer away from the oversexed aura that pulsated from Erotica’s very core, she probably didn’t really want to go this far on the other side of the spectrum. Hence, waiting only until now to show the extent of what she was willing to do in order to win back the favor of John Q. Public (namely, the type of people that could be classified as her own Midwestern brethren). Or rather, prove to the critics and the masses at large that, as she once pointed out, they couldn’t handle dealing with their own sexual fantasies, let alone talking frankly about sex at all. And so, as it was once said on VH1, Madonna, to paraphrase, simply picked up her clothes and put them back on. 

    And she did so, you guessed it, right on time. Because it just so happened that she wanted to embody a certain “softer” look and persona in order to throw her hat into the ring for the part of Eva Perón, writing an eight-page letter to Alan Parker in 1994 to express her ardent interest in portraying the simultaneously loved and hated Argentine political icon. To even more succinctly convey her acting abilities on that specific front, the concept behind the “Take A Bow” video would prove to be extremely instrumental. In it, Madonna goes for a 1940s-styled look (from the top [her hat with face veil] to bottom [her Christian Louboutin—then an unknown designer—heels]) meant to channel her inner Evita. A woman who could be both vulnerable, vixen-y and a little wrathful.

    That woman is nowhere to be found at any point during “Right On Time,” wherein Madonna is more unnecessarily worshipful than “vulnerable.” For example, “This is it, I know there’s so much more/With you, you’re like a dream that came true/Oh you, you’re like a fantasy that came into my life/And every day is so much brighter/You, you’re right on time.” And then, of course, there are the very “Till There Was You”-reminiscent lyrics, “Birds are singing just because they’re next to you/Bells are ringing, maybe you’re my dream come true/This groove keeps swinging, all the little things you do/The joy you’re bringing, maybe I’m in love with you.”

    Needless to say, a song like “Right On Time” does not possess the same subtlety or intelligence as some of the other love songs on the record (of which there are many), including “Inside of Me” (produced by Nellee Hooper), “Sanctuary” (produced by Madonna, Hooper and Dallas Austin) and, of course, “Take A Bow” (produced by Babyface, and who many said should have gotten a full-on “featuring” credit). In truth, it has all the lyrical subtlety of an anvil, which is out of character for the Madonna songwriting style of the post-early to mid-80s. And this is part of why “Right On Time” makes it more glaringly apparent than ever before that Bedtime Stories was M’s willful clawing back into the good graces of the public. This while, at the same time, proving her depth of range in musical styles. Glomming onto the R&B sound at a time when most (white people) remained focused on grunge, Madonna was also then still showcasing her ability to have her finger on the pulse of the next trend (meanwhile, Mariah was still either recording cheesy ballads or secret grunge albums). 

    To achieve that sound, Madonna turned to the likes of Dallas Austin to infuse the record with the, let’s call it, “flavor” she wanted (no doubt in part thanks to the influence of “canoodling” with 2Pac during that period). With the previously unreleased tracks from Bedtime Stories that have come out in the years since, it seems that Austin wasn’t in a musical variation kind of mood when it came to producing for M. At least if the backing track similarities between “Your Honesty” (which was unveiled on 2003’s Remixed & Revisited) and “Right On Time” are anything to go by.

    While Austin might have worked with her on this particular track, an official press release announcing the EP was sure to mention, “Madonna collaborated with Stuart Price to shape this EP, editing and mixing previously unreleased versions into a cohesive new chapter.” Price, a fan favorite producer, also worked with Madonna on Confessions on a Dance Floor, and now, for its “sequel,” slated for a 2026 release. And this is a reassuring piece of news, as one can’t help but get afraid when Madonna, who had once always stated that she hated looking back and only wanted to move forward, is in a “revisiting” mood like never before, having also released Veronica Electronica earlier this year. And, looking back on the record that came before Ray of Light, a track like “Right On Time” makes it abundantly clear that Madonna was still finding the “voice” for the next phase in her career. 

    Bedtime Stories was a through line to the recording of the Evita Soundtrack, the recording of which required Madonna to take some rigorous voice lessons in order to project in a certain way (hear: “Don’t Cry For Me Argentina”). Ergo, the noticeable and permanent shift that happened in the sound of her voice when Ray of Light came out. Marking the then longest period of time—four years—that she went without releasing a studio album (though she’s well surpassed that precedent as of 2025, with her last album, Madame X, being released in 2019). 

    That wait, too, was a matter of perfect and right timing on Madonna’s part, who tapped into the electronic music zeitgeist after already doing so with R&B in ‘94. Releasing an “untold chapter” of Bedtime Stories in honor of its thirtieth anniversary also feels like it could be “right on time” in terms of reminding listeners that songs by pop stars not only used to be musically layered and dense, but that they could actually go on for longer than three minutes. Though, fittingly, Madonna’s “Right On Time” is only two minutes and thirty-seven seconds. Perhaps a testament, once again, to how she has her finger on the pulse, knowing full well that nobody, even “older audiences,” has the attention span for a “long” song anymore. Though she doesn’t seem to quite grasp that no one has the wherewithal for a schmaltzy love song either. 

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Allie X’s “Reunite”: A Plea for Reconciliation—And Also Thematically Aligned With Lily Allen’s “Back to the Start”

    On the heels of releasing the solipsistic anthem, “Is Anybody Out There?,” Allie X has already unleashed the second single from HIGGY a.k.a. Happiness Is Going to Get You. Titled “Reunite,” it is, in its way an appropriate thematic companion to “Is Anybody Out There?” in that after wondering, “Is anybody listening ‘cause I’m not hearing anything/I think I might be in this world alone/Is anybody out there?/I don’t know,” Allie X starts to also question if perhaps she threw away a certain past relationship too prematurely. And, maybe if she hadn’t, she wouldn’t feel quite so lonely.

    A loneliness that comes across in the wistful, “ultra-throwback” musical intro to the track, which is all harpsichord for the first seventeen seconds. This followed by about a two-second pause before leading into the stabbing electro sound that Allie X is known for, achieved in this instance with co-production help from Bastian Langebæk (who also worked with her on “Is Anybody Out There?”). In the accompanying “visualizer,” Allie X is not only once again in her “Infant Marie” guise, but is also “just kind of existing” inside of a giant, transparent cube as she plays the harpsichord for a taxidermied hooded crow (which Allie has nicknamed, what else, “Higgy”).

    Upon completing her “introductory flourish,” however, X ceases to play the instrument (after all, that isn’t the sound of the song anymore—though she will go back to pretending to play the keys later on) in favor of singing along to the beat as she recounts, “Trauma’s complicated/When you went and changed, I disassociated/It was you that I hated, the simple one to blame/When you’re a child in pain, and I/I didn’t mean to hurt you [this recalling John Lennon saying the same on “Jealous Guy”]/I’ve been a maniac/But now I want you back.”

    With this narrative established within the first minute of the song, it instantly recalls one of the strongest lyrical comparisons to “Reunite”: an “obscure” track from Lily Allen’s 2009 album, It’s Not Me, It’s You, called “Back to the Start” (which also features an “esoteric” musical instrument in the form of a glockenspiel). Written for Allen’s half-sister, Sarah Owen, it’s an apology for being, as Allie X, would call it, a bit of a “maniac” toward her, especially during her teenage years. As Allen would describe, “We had a rocky relationship for years and years and years and it was just getting to the point where we just couldn’t argue like teenagers anymore, so I played it to her a long time ago and it’s kinda worked, we’ve sorted a lot of things out.” Perhaps the same can and will happen for Allie X, with whoever she may have written “Reunite” for.

    And while Allie X’s track may or may not be directed at an ex-lover (though it also functions as a “catch-all” kind of an apology track, applicable to a friend or family member), it bears the same general sense of regret over having acted “shit” toward someone you were once close to. Having pushed them away with your deliberately volatile behavior. Something that comes across in earnest via Allie X’s chorus, “And I’m not mad anymore/In fact now I’m doing fine/I’ve gotten wiser with age/Will you let me back into your life?/I know, it wasn’t your fault/And though it might have been mine/We were just doing our best/Maybe you and me can reunite.”

    The hopeful suggestion behind that “maybe” correlates to Allen’s own proposition in her chorus for “Back to the Start,” “I don’t know why I felt the need to keep it up for oh so long/It’s all my fault, I’m sorry, you did absolutely nothing wrong/I don’t know why I felt the need to drag it out for all these years/All the pain I’ve caused you, the constant flowing of your tears/Believe me when I say that I cannot apologize enough/When all you ever wanted from me was a token of my love/And if it’s not too late, could you please find it deep within your heart/To try and go back, go back to the start?”

    Allie X seems to feel a similar way, adding to her spiel/plea for forgiveness and reconciliation, “So many years/I wasted my time/Disconnecting from the simple truth, ooh/I separated myself, body and mind/I should have listened/Should have listened/I should have listened to you.”

    And so it is that within each of these apologies that each respective chanteuse admits not only to their own wrongdoing, but also to the fact that they were actually largely responsible for the rift in question—no small feat when it comes to delivering a meaningful kind of “sorry.” One that even Nancy Downs in The Craft might have trouble (Fairuza) balking at. In Allen’s case, she goes so far as get slightly meta with the assurance, “This is not just a song, I intend to put these words into action/I hope that it sums up the way that I feel to your satisfaction.”

    In the visualizer for “Reunite,” the allure of such a heartfelt apology is further conveyed by the sudden appearance of someone else outside the glass box, dressed in similar “Victorian attire” to Allie X. Someone who was clearly moved enough to materialize out of nowhere and listen to X’s sincere entreaty. However, the fact that the person outside the box (played by X’s “body double,” Rosie Carney), obfuscated and, therefore, “unknowable,” is dressed to look like Allie X also infers that maybe the person she’s asking forgiveness of could even be herself. The younger version that likely didn’t treat her with as much kindness and understanding as the current one does. That there are also moments in the visualizer (which is directed by Cal McIntyre, just like “Is Anybody Out There?”) when Allie X is reflected in the glass further adds to the validity of this theory. One that suggests she would like to reunite/reconnect with a past and inner self that she once acted so cruelly toward.

    Whoever the song is “truly” aimed at, however, is irrelevant. For, just like Allen’s “Back to the Start,” the theme of pleading for someone you did wrong to not only forgive you, but also “reunite” with you is one that many will find resonant. In addition to possibly not getting that desired forgiveness and reignited closeness after asking for it. Because, sadly, the biblical adage, “Ask and you shall receive” is rarely true.

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Britney Spears’ “Circus” Has More Clout and Showgirl Resonance Than the Entire The Life of a Showgirl Album

    In 2008, Taylor Swift was not only coming up in the world of music with her sophomore album, Fearless, but, more importantly, Britney Spears was making an unexpected and unprecedented “return” after, just months prior, being written off by the media as “never going to come back from” her much publicized mental breakdown. The one most closely associated with the illustrious images of her shaving her own head at a Tarzana hair salon on February 16, 2007. Although her performance at the VMAs later that year was meant to be her much-too-rushed “comeback,” Spears famously “bombed” (by the previous standards she had set for herself) while freely lip-syncing “Gimme More,” the lead single from Blackout. The performance was panned, unjustly so, and Spears went on a continuing emotional spiral for the rest of the year that led to her infamously and tragically being strapped to a gurney on January 3, 2008. A horrendous start to the new year.

    As was being placed in a conservatorship soon after on February 1, 2008. Meanwhile, Swift was building up toward releasing Fearless, which would come out in mid-November of that year. The same month that Spears released Circus, her sixth album. In celebration of its release, the title track and second single was put out on December 2nd, Spears’ twenty-seventh birthday (and, to be sure, there were many people who, earlier that year, probably thought Spears was at risk of joining the “27 Club”). The accompanying video, directed by Francis Lawrence (who had previously directed Spears’ perhaps more iconic “I’m a Slave 4 U”), not only centers on various product placements (chief among them, Bvlgari and Spears’ own fragrance), but also Spears as the ringleader of a circus. Yet, despite this theme, there is an undeniable element of “showgirl-ness” to the costumes she wears, in addition to appearing in a dressing room with a brightly-lit vanity mirror before taking her place at the center of the ring.

    And with just the opening verse alone, Spears says more about what it means to be a “showgirl” (a.k.a. born performer) than the entirety of Taylor Swift’s The Life of a Showgirl album: “There’s only two types of people in the world: the ones that entertain and the ones that observe/Well, baby, I’m a put-on-a-show kind of girl/Don’t like the back seat/Gotta be first.”

    By this time in the video, the viewer has already caught a glimpse of her wearing a see-through number while standing in front of a signature red curtain—the kind that only hangs in front of a stage, used in many an “old-timey” theater. Soon after, she’s walking through the fairgrounds, interacting with her fellow performers by dancing with them. After all, the song is also primarily about her love for this form of expression, and the ways in which dancing in certain environments can create the same kind of chaotic atmosphere as a circus ring. That atmosphere further compounded by the presence of all manner of performers, including a contortionist, ribbon twirler and stiltwalker.

    Spears joins in with her fellow showpeople in the center of the ring for a high-octane dance number that proves her assertion, “I’m like a firecracker, I make it hot/When I put on a show/I feel the adrenaline movin’ through my veins/Spotlight on me and I’m ready to break/I’m like a performer, the dance floor is my stage/Better be ready, hope that you feel the same.”

    For it is the essence of a showgirl (an inherent people-pleaser) to want the audience to respond to the enthusiastic energy they’re giving off. Spears, even despite being forced to be a “workhorse” for her family throughout every tour starting from 2009’s The Circus Starring Britney Spears, always wanted that positive reaction from those taking in her spectacle. Yet, even though Spears initially boasts of being the one to watch in “Circus,” unlike Swift, she proves herself a more legitimate showgirl in that she actually wants “the common folk” to be a part of her show, urging, “Don’t stand there watching me, follow me/Show me what you can do/Everybody let go, we can make a dance floor/Just like a circus.”

    The showgirl element of the “Circus” video begins to really ramp up once she starts to do her “whip and chair choreography” (timed for the moment when she sings, “I run a tight ship, so beware”), soon followed by one of the most visually stunning moments, when Spears is shown in profile as sparks fly above her, raining down behind her, in fact. Something she’s unfazed by, as any seasoned showgirl would be. This is but a preamble to dancing inside a ring that’s now on fire (a.k.a. a ring of fire). And no one knew/knows that metaphor better than Spears, who endured far more flak and scrutiny during the span of 2006-2008 alone than Swift has gotten in her entire career.

    Regardless, it’s apparent that Swift is but one of many millennial girls who very much wanted to be Spears (or at least be as adored as her). This being a key reason why “The Life of a Showgirl” featuring Sabrina Carpenter (a fellow Brit enthusiast and frequent homage-payer), the final track on said album, almost comes across as though it was inspired, in some sense, by Britney—the ultimate millennial showgirl. The one who, in Swift’s mind, would have warned/cautioned her against becoming a pop star (the modern equivalent of a showgirl). Thus, Swift painting the picture of visiting a star backstage after seeing her perform. This includes the verses, “I said, ‘You’re living my drеam’/Then she said to me/‘Hеy, thank you for the lovely bouquet/You’re sweeter than a peach/But you don’t know the life of a showgirl, babe/And you’re never, ever gonna/Wait, the more you play, the more that you pay/You’re softer than a kitten, so/You don’t know the life of a showgirl, babe/And you’re never gonna wanna.”

    Although Spears posted side-by-side images of the two known photographs of her and Swift together with the caption that the first time they met was during the Oops!… I Did It Again Tour “in 2003,” that doesn’t really track considering that said tour ended in 2001. More plausibly, Swift would have met Spears while she was on 2004’s The Onyx Hotel Tour, at which time Swift would have been fourteen (turning fifteen after that tour ended in mid-2004).  Whatever the specifics of the meeting, it happened, and it undeniably influenced Swift. A much as Spears’ music and various indelible performances, whether live or in the music video format. For Swift, that Spears influence was revealed in a very blatant manner just three years after Spears debuted her ringleader costume at The Circus Starring Britney Spears.

    While performing “We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together” at the 2012 MTV Europe Music Awards, Swift essentially re-created not only the entire “Circus” video, but also donned a ringleader ensemble that was very similar to the kind that Spears wore for her The Circus tour. Undoubtedly, Spears’ showmanship for the Circus era played a part in this specific rendition. And, funnily enough, Swift would have met Spears for the second time after becoming famous in September of 2008 at the MTV VMAs, when Swift was nominated for the lone, measly award of “Best New Artist.” An image that reveals the stark contrast between before and after fame, as Swift looks far less, shall we say, “rough-hewn” in it.

    Alas, for all that Britney might have “taught” Taylor about the life of a showgirl, it still never seemed to sink in that having “grit” (like Brit) is what really makes such a performer. And while Swift might insist she has that combination of chutzpah and tenacity with a song like “I Can Do It With a Broken Heart,” there’s no denying that Spears not only earned her stripes in a way that “softer than a kitten” Taylor never had to, but also the fact that she smiled through her pain in a way that Swift could never possibly fathom. In this regard alone, Spears has more to say about the life of a showgirl than Swift, with “Circus” itself (in spite of being produced and co-written by, unfortunately, Dr. Luke) having more bona fide showgirl dazzle in its three minutes and twelve seconds than the entire forty-one minutes and forty seconds of The Life of a Showgirl.

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Just Like the Song, “The Fate of Ophelia” Video Has Little to Do With Shakespeare’s Character in Hamlet

    Because Taylor Swift has increasingly decided to cast herself in the role of “English teacher” to the masses, maybe it should come as no surprise that she opted to not only write a song called “The Fate of Ophelia” for The Life of a Showgirl, but to make it the first track on the album and the lead single. Even though, to be quite honest, of all the schlock on this record, the title track featuring Sabrina Carpenter probably would have been her best bet for “first single” material. But it’s obvious that Swift wants to style herself as some kind of literary authority with this track, even if, for the most part, what comes across is the fact that Swift kind of just likes all the imagery surrounding Ophelia, including plenty of water-related scenes, as well as the famed painting of her by Sir John Everett Millais. Finding it “actually romantic,” Swift delivers her own “Pre-Raphaelite” take on the image by opening the video on a scene of a rather generic-looking rich person’s house (think: the “Blank Space” video) before panning over to a painting off to the side that features Swift in a white dress in “Ophelia pose.”

    Naturally, the painting “comes to life,” with Swift rising up as though now on a set. And oh, turns out she is, with the backdrops behind her suddenly lifting as she walks along the sound stage and sings, “I heard you calling on the megaphone” as the presumed director of the “production” does just that (though, needless to say, “megaphone,” within the context of the lyrics, is all about the cheerleader connotation as it relates to football). Swift continues the literalism of the lyrics by taking an oversized matchstick from someone else on the set, miraculously igniting it against her chest and then tossing it casually toward someone else (conveniently, a fire breather) while singing, “As legend has it, you are quite the pyro/You light the match to watch it blow.”

    From there, Swift does another costume change into something decidedly more “showgirl”: a sequined red leotard, rounded out by platinum blonde hair. This as she joins her fellow “Eras Tour family” in the dressing room. Commenting on the reunion with her dancers (who appear in various other scenes as well), Swift gushed, “Writing, rehearsing, directing and shooting the music video for ‘The Fate of Ophelia’ was the thrill of a lifetime because I got to be reunited with my Eras Tour family!! I wanted each one-take scene to feel like a live performance and remind us all of how it felt to be at those shows together. Making every moment count. It’s a journey through the chaotic world of show business.” Though, if that was the intent, it certainly doesn’t come across—at least not even one iota as effectively as the chaotic world of show business displayed in, what else, Showgirls. Nor does it have much to do with Ophelia in Hamlet.

    Then again, nothing Swift yammers on about in this song really does, least of all the shudder-inducing chorus (which is the part of the song that sounds most like Demi Lovato’s 2011 hit, “Give Your Heart a Break”), “All that time I sat alone in my tower/You were just honing your powers/Now I can see it all/Late one night/You dug me out of my grave and/Saved my heart from the fate of Ophelia.” Never mind that likening Travis Kelce to Hamlet is in extremely inaccurate taste (for intelligence level alone), but, lest anyone forget, he was no Prince Charming positioned in any way to “save” Ophelia from her “fate”: death. What’s more, even if Kelce isn’t the Hamlet to her Ophelia, per se, that Swift likens a fairy-tale romance to being saved (while repurposing Shakespeare in the process) isn’t exactly a “cute look” for 2025. Though it does certainly fortify the long-standing speculation that she’s fundamentally Republican, ergo right at home with the MAGA crowd despite her “bad blood” with the Orange Creature.

    In any case, to heighten the cornball factor of it all, Swift gets into the weeds as usual with her special breed of arithmomania by having chosen to release the video on Kelce’s birthday, October 5th. Worse still, she urges, “Keep it one hundred on the land, thе sea, the sky.” This being a reference to his jersey number, eighty-seven, and her favorite/lucky number in general, thirteen, adding up to one hundred.

    The video isn’t always quite so precise, coming off like a, that’s right, kaleidoscope of random scenes as one of the showgirls backstage pulls back the curtain to reveal yet another iteration of Swift, who is now dancing onstage (this time with a brunette wig) in something more akin to a 1960s-era getup. Here, too, the intent appears less about promoting an awareness of Shakespearean plays, and more about announcing all the ways in which no one works harder than Swift. During a portion of this performance, Swift and her backup dancers (wearing the same wigs and dresses as her) are presented as though through a kaleidoscope—this tying into how her visualizers for each song on The Life of a Showgirl are also presented in a kaleidoscopic way.

    From there, Swift (who obviously directed) cuts to another stage backdrop that features her on a ship as she strums a mark tree (you know, that wind chime-looking instrument) and remembers that this song is supposed to be, at least somewhat, about Ophelia, singing, “The eldest daughter of a nobleman/Ophelia lived in fantasy/But love was a cold bed full of scorpions/The venom stole her sanity.” Naturally, there are some listeners who won’t bother to read that “scorpions” line as a metaphor, and take it to mean that there was, in fact, a scene of Ophelia lying in bed and suddenly getting stung by scorpions. But no, there is no mention of scorpions at any point in Hamlet, with that “symbol” being more prominent in Macbeth (specifically, when Macbeth says, “O full of scorpions is my mind”). Nor did “venom” steal her sanity, men did. Most especially Hamlet, who killed her father, Polonius. Thus, for Swift to liken her Prince Charming to being the proverbial Hamlet to her Ophelia is a bit…ill-advised.

    As the camera pans out to show that the ship is part of a more theatrical kind of production than a film one (perhaps another attempt at “paying homage” to Shakespeare), Swift continues to prattle on about how Kelce “saved her” from, for all intents and purposes, suicide. Or rather, emotional suicide. She thus persists in thanking him for “rescuing” her, praising, “And if you’d never come for me/I might’ve lingered in purgatory/You wrap around me like a chain, a crown, a vine/Pulling me into the fire.” And yes, Swift clearly thinks she’s endlessly clever for referencing fire instead of water here, seeing as how Ophelia drowned. But what she’s really indicating is that Kelce is pulling her into the depths of hell. If for no other reason than to co-sign some Faustian pact with the NFL.

    Funnily enough, Swift then kind of does “commit suicide” by jumping into the fake water that then transitions into her starring in some kind of 1930s/1940s Busby Berkeley-inspired production (and, by the way, Jennifer Lopez already tread that ground pretty thoroughly with the “Medicine” video) called Sequins Are Forever (they definitely aren’t, but one supposes that was the best “riff” that Taylor could come up with for Elizabeth Taylor’s famed documentary/general philosophy, Diamonds Are Forever). The camera then pans out to once again reveal that this is just a big-budget film production, with the clapperboard informing viewers that the “film” is “featuring” Kitty Finlay (a nod to the “character” that “The Life of a Showgirl” mentions in the first verse, as well as to her grandmother’s last name) and that it is “Take 100” (because Swift splooges every time she self-references, here reminding that she says, “Keep it one hundred on the land, thе sea, the sky”).

    The “spectacle” keeps going in the next scene as Swift, now in a brown-haired wig again, sports a “rope dress” to match with the piles of ropes around her as she’s then lifted into the air. This followed by a cut to her doing her Las Vegas showgirl cosplay because she remembered she didn’t play up the showgirl aesthetic enough.

    By the final scene, Swift seems to have lost the plot completely with what whatever “meaning” this video was supposed to have by showing Swift being pushed on a cart in a getup that harkens back to her “Lavender Haze” look as she again sings, oh so “eloquently,” “Pledge allegiance to your hands, your team, your vibes.” However, this time when it’s said, Swift ramps up the cringe factor by having someone offscreen pass a football to her to catch. As if the viewer/listener wasn’t already well-aware that the track is all about Travis being a hero/“knight in shining armor” (or rather, in a shining football uniform).

    The cart leads Swift through some 1920s-looking hotel, complete with the aesthetic of the bellhops (maybe she had recently rewatched AHS: Hotel and took notes). And, evidently, these bellhops are having a party (one that looks decidedly New Year’s Eve-y, which would make sense considering Swift’s song, “New Year’s Day”). While Swift feigns getting down with “the help” for a minute, she soon steals away to the bathroom where the final shot is of her lying in the bathtub (from the same photoshoot featured on the standard edition of her album cover). Driving home the point that she’s been spared from the fate of Ophelia in that she’s just taking a bath in her showgirl-wear, not drowning. All because some big, strong meathead saved her! Shakespeare would be so proud.

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • The Poetic Sartorial Moment of Addison Rae Wearing Gypsy Rose Lee’s Dress

    Four years ago, Addison Rae was “just” a TikTok phenomenon with a brand-new single called “Obsessed” and the hope that it might parlay her way into being a pop star. And while she might have been invited to perform on The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon even “back then,” it didn’t do much to change the mostly negative reviews of her first musical effort, both critically and at the “average listener” level. Such eviscerating comments also extended to her appearance on Jimmy Fallon in 2021. This included such YouTube replies to the performance as, “The worst part about this ‘influencer’ thing is that they’re [spelled in the original comment as ‘their’] handed EVERYTHING but they all act like it’s the hardest job in the world, literally sit down, like please,” “The fact she isn’t trained and isn’t out of breath and isn’t even wearing an earpiece or A MIC PACK IS SO INSANE TO ME!!! Lip syncing shouldn’t be this obvious!” and “The dancers saved this. lmao imagine if it was just her on the stage.”

    As of now, during her post-Addison release era, there’s no need to imagine it. For, almost as if seeing that specific comment, Addison did appear alone onstage for her October 2, 2025 performance on The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon. More to the point, she chose to appear in one of Gypsy Rose Lee’s original dresses. And yes, that’s a pop culture reference that few in her typical audience would know “offhand.” But since Addison Rae is lately all about reminding people (namely, Zane Lowe) that her “taste” is primo (which is part of what’s helped her hone her craft and aesthetic for a pop music pivot), she chose this highly specific piece to sing (not lip sync) “Diet Pepsi” for the first time on TV. And while she’s had other singles come out since this one (namely, “Aquamarine,” “High Fashion,” “Headphones On,” “Fame Is a Gun” and “Times Like These”), which was released back in August of 2024, “Diet Pepsi” remains something of her “signature.” Not only that, but it’s also her most “accessible” song on Addison, readily “appealable” to what Jay Leno would call (at least in Pam & Tommy) “Uncle Jim and Aunt Susie in Duluth.” Such a demographic might even appreciate her “modest” look while on the show. Having no awareness that Lee was entirely responsible for it—since strippers a.k.a. burlesque dancers during her “heyday” (though she performed her act from the 1930s to the 1950s) dressed much more conservatively.

    While some subpar celebrities with no talent other than “influencer” cachet have worn iconic dresses before (*cough cough* Kim Kardashian pillaging Marilyn Monroe’s Jean Louis gown), there generally hasn’t been a “poetic” or “full circle” kind of angle to it. More often than not, the famous ilk wear such pieces solely because it’s “iconic,” de facto, they think they’re also going to soak up some that iconicness by wearing the garment. And not because it correlates in any real way to what they’re “about” (and even Sabrina Carpenter was kind of pushing it by wearing a replica of Madonna’s 1991 Oscars dress). Instead, it’s done as an attempt at seeming “knowledgeable” or “with it” vis-à-vis the past and all the women who paved the way for the current crop to have it slightly less shitty than they did. Particularly with regard to being able to expose their flesh so freely.

    Incidentally, it was Lee who said of her act, “Bare flesh bores men.” Hence, wearing the type of fare that the audience saw Addison Rae sporting while singing “Diet Pepsi” on Fallon. That Rae is more known for her flesh-baring tendencies than her covering up ones also added to the “intention” behind the frock. Something she reiterated when, after the show, she posted a quote from Lee’s memoir, Gypsy (which would go on to birth the famed musical of the same name), to her Instagram. The one that goes, “I could be a star without any talent at all!” (in the musical, that’s paraphrased as, “I’ll get famous with no talent”). An extremely prescient statement for a woman who made her stage debut in 1929. Long before Kim Kardashian would goadingly pronounce of her financial success, “Not bad for a girl with no talent.” But Addison Rae actually did start out with a specific talent: dancing. It’s only because of the medium that she became a “star” on—TikTok—that said talent has often been called into question, with her influencer status still frequently outshining her potential clout as a pop star.

    To that point, this “Diet Pepsi” performance was all about putting such tongue-wagging to rest. In addition to learning from the mistakes she made the first time she appeared on the show. Indeed, during the singing portion of her performance, AR was much less “choreo-heavy” than she was the first time around, instead devoting the first part of the song to actually singing, and the second part, around the two-minute, twenty-six-second mark, to bursting into the kind of choreography that Lee herself would most definitely commend (obviously, Addison Rae must have studied some of her moves). And as lights strobe around her, elements of the first track on her album, “New York,” play as she does everything in her power to channel the burlesque stylings of Lee.

    This is in no small part thanks to the dress, bedecked in all those tassels and shimmering sequins, beads and rhinestones, which helped her easily “do the trick.” Courtesy of every celebrity’s favorite place to roundaboutly unearth such a piece: The Way We Wore. In fact, AR’s stylist, Dara (that’s right, just Dara), pointed out to Vogue that she and Addison have been in possession of the dress for almost a full year, having reached out to The Way We Wore founder Doris Raymond before the making of the “High Fashion” video, during which AR appears in the dress for the first few scenes (eating a powdery confection in it, no less). Dara had requested a gold beaded dress for the scene, and Raymond came up with this kismet offer, which she herself had bought thirty-five years ago at auction.

    Upon passing it along to AR, Dara immediately realized that “it felt like it was made for her” (though Dita Von Teese, who owns another “sister” dress in the trio, might beg to differ). And also made for this particular show-stopping performance, which just so happened to coincide with Taylor Swift releasing The Life of a Showgirl the day after. Which was probably a good thing since Addison had more to reveal in the way of being a showgirl than that album does.

    What’s more, the connection between AR and Gypsy is clear. Lee was often called an “intelligent stripper”—like this combination couldn’t possibly go hand in hand. By the same token, so, too, could AR be called an “intelligent influencer”—and now, an “intelligent pop star.” Wielding her taste and penchant for carefully-curated references to her semiotic advantage at every turn.

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link