ReportWire

Tag: gavin newsom

  • Watch: Memorial service honors Rep. Doug LaMalfa in Chico; House speaker, Gov. Newsom are attending

    [ad_1]

    A public memorial service to honor the late Congressman Doug LaMalfa is being held at the Silver Dollar Fairgrounds in Chico on Saturday.Watch the video leading this story for a livestream of the service beginning at noon.House Speaker Mike Johnson and a delegation of members of Congress are among the attendees honoring their Republican colleague. The gathering is also bipartisan with Gov. Gavin Newsom and U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff in attendance.LaMalfa died on Jan. 5 while in surgery at Enloe Hospital following a medical emergency at his home.Memorial Service Updates The memorial began with a color presentation by the Unified Northstate Honor Guard and the singing of the National Anthem by Alexandria Jones.Mark Lavy, a second cousin of LaMalfa, was the first speaker at the service. He recalled LaMalfa’s life story, including how he met his wife Jill, the moment he knew he would be a Republican and key moments in his political career.Other speakers at the memorial include: Speaker Johnson; Ray Sehorn, LaMalfa’s sixth grade teacher; former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy; LaMalfa’s congressional chief of staff Mark Spannagel; Paradise Mayor Mark Spannagel; David Reade, LaMalfa’s former chief of staff in the Assembly; and Assemblymember James Gallagher.LaMalfa’s wife and his children were also set to deliver a family tribute.LaMalfa represented California’s District 1 in Washington for more than a decade and was the chairman of the Congressional Western Caucus. The district includes a large portion of California’s northernmost area, including Oroville, Yuba City, Chico, Redding and the California-Oregon state boundary.As a fourth-generation rice farmer, LaMalfa heavily advocated for his agricultural constituents. The congressman also worked to provide wildfire victims and survivors in his district with relief and recovery efforts and to bolster the state’s water resources.Before being elected to the U.S. House in 2012, LaMalfa served in the California State Assembly and State Senate. Earlier this month, a bill previously championed by LaMalfa advanced in the California Assembly. AB 1091 would allow Californians to purchase eight-character license plates.LaMalfa is survived by Jill, his four children, one grandchild, two sisters and a host of cousins.See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    A public memorial service to honor the late Congressman Doug LaMalfa is being held at the Silver Dollar Fairgrounds in Chico on Saturday.

    Watch the video leading this story for a livestream of the service beginning at noon.

    House Speaker Mike Johnson and a delegation of members of Congress are among the attendees honoring their Republican colleague. The gathering is also bipartisan with Gov. Gavin Newsom and U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff in attendance.

    This content is imported from Twitter.
    You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

    LaMalfa died on Jan. 5 while in surgery at Enloe Hospital following a medical emergency at his home.

    Memorial Service Updates

    The memorial began with a color presentation by the Unified Northstate Honor Guard and the singing of the National Anthem by Alexandria Jones.

    Mark Lavy, a second cousin of LaMalfa, was the first speaker at the service. He recalled LaMalfa’s life story, including how he met his wife Jill, the moment he knew he would be a Republican and key moments in his political career.

    Other speakers at the memorial include: Speaker Johnson; Ray Sehorn, LaMalfa’s sixth grade teacher; former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy; LaMalfa’s congressional chief of staff Mark Spannagel; Paradise Mayor Mark Spannagel; David Reade, LaMalfa’s former chief of staff in the Assembly; and Assemblymember James Gallagher.

    LaMalfa’s wife and his children were also set to deliver a family tribute.

    LaMalfa represented California’s District 1 in Washington for more than a decade and was the chairman of the Congressional Western Caucus. The district includes a large portion of California’s northernmost area, including Oroville, Yuba City, Chico, Redding and the California-Oregon state boundary.

    As a fourth-generation rice farmer, LaMalfa heavily advocated for his agricultural constituents. The congressman also worked to provide wildfire victims and survivors in his district with relief and recovery efforts and to bolster the state’s water resources.

    Before being elected to the U.S. House in 2012, LaMalfa served in the California State Assembly and State Senate.

    Earlier this month, a bill previously championed by LaMalfa advanced in the California Assembly. AB 1091 would allow Californians to purchase eight-character license plates.

    LaMalfa is survived by Jill, his four children, one grandchild, two sisters and a host of cousins.

    See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Stephen A Smith shreds Newsom for violating ‘America First’ with disparagement of Trump in a foreign country

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Commentator Stephen A. Smith tore into California Gov. Gavin Newsom for disparaging President Donald Trump at the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland, this week.

    On Wednesday’s episode of Smith’s “Straight Shooter” podcast, the host asserted that while he has no problem with Newsom criticizing Trump while on American soil, slamming the president in a foreign country is a completely different story.

    “I have no problem with Gavin Newsom being candid and open about his feelings about our president on United States soil. To go over to another country, Switzerland, to go over there and to be in the presence of other European leaders, speaking against the President of the United States — I’m not down with that,” Smith asserted. 

    ‘BOND VILLAIN’: NEWSOM ROASTED AS PHOTO OF HIM POSING WITH ‘SUGAR DADDY’ ALEX SOROS GOES VIRAL

    Stephen A. Smith slammed Gov. Gavin Newsom for disparaging President Donald Trump at the World Economic Forum in Switzerland this week. (Paras Griffin/Getty Images; Tayfun Coskun/Anadolu)

    Smith questioned why Newsom was in Switzerland “speaking negatively about the President of the United States” before playing a clip of the governor criticizing Trump.

    The “Straight Shooter” host reiterated that he felt it was unacceptable for an elected U.S. official to come out in opposition to the president while speaking to foreign leaders outside the country.

    “Say whatever you want here, as a governor from the opposite side of the aisle of a state in the United States, on American soil — fine. But I’m one of those people: when we go somewhere else, it’s America first,” Smith said.  

    While acknowledging that his argument may sound “very simplistic” to some, he argued that “some things are worthy of being simple.”

    “I understand you trolling Trump. I understand that you’re aiming to run for the presidency in 2028, but we got problems here in the United States,” he contended. “And don’t tell me they don’t exist in California.”

    Smith then pointed to issues impacting California like sanctuary status and affordability.

    BESSENT MOCKS NEWSOM AT DAVOS AS ‘PATRICK BATEMAN MEETS SPARKLE BEACH KEN’

    Newsom speaking at Davos

    California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks to reporters at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, on Jan. 20, 2026. (Fabrice Coffrini / AFP via Getty Images)

    “I’ll be damned if affordability ain’t at the top of the list in the state of California! It’s expensive as hell! And a lot of it has happened on Gavin Newsom’s watch,” he railed.

    Although critical of Newsom, Smith conceded that he likes the governor “as a person” and believes that the “number one impediment to his governing ability is his heart because he truly cares, and he wants to do right by everybody.”

    He added that while he won’t call Newsom out of his name like others do, his decision to disparage Trump in front of the rest of the world was unacceptable.

    “You going overseas to do that — that don’t cut the mustard. Can’t do that. I mean, you can, but it’s not good,” he argued. “I got a lot of problems with Donald Trump and a lot of problems with the decisions that he made. I’m not going on foreign soil to do it. I’m not going on a world stage to do it about him.”

    NEWSOM TOUTS CALIFORNIA’S NUMEROUS LEGAL FIGHTS WITH TRUMP ADMINISTRATION IN FINAL STATE OF THE STATE

    Stephen A. Smith speaks

    Host Stephen A. Smith in conversation with Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, at a SiriusXM town hall event at SiriusXM Studio on Nov. 19, 2025, in Washington, D.C. (Paul Morigi/Getty Images for SiriusXM)

    Smith also pointed out that Newsom had been invited onto the show on “numerous occasions” but never accepted the invitation, calling out the governor for declining to do so.

    “What the hell you running from me for? I just want to ask questions. I want to give you an opportunity to answer to the people of California and to the American people if you’re going to be a presidential candidate in 2028. Gavin Newsom not appearing on this show doesn’t stop me from talking about him and his record,” he said. “I don’t know all about his record. He does. And he has the platform here anytime he wants to make sure that the record is set straight.”

    Fox News Digital has reached out to Newsom for comment, but did not immediately hear back.

    NEWSOM LASHES OUT AT TRUMP OVER ‘CARNIVAL OF CHAOS’ AMID MINNESOTA ICE SHOOTING FUROR

    President Donald Trump

    U.S. President Donald Trump delivers remarks at the World Economic Forum (WEF) on January 21, 2026 in Davos, Switzerland.  (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

    On Tuesday, Newsom slammed foreign world leaders for “rolling over” when confronted by Trump, declaring he should have brought “kneepads” for foreign dignitaries attending the WEF.

    “People are rolling over. I should have brought a bunch of kneepads for all the world leaders,” Newsom told reporters at the event. “It’s just pathetic.”

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Fox News Digital’s Emma Colton contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Swalwell governor bid hit with residency questions after court filing alleges he doesn’t live in California

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Longtime political foe of President Donald Trump Democratic California Rep. Eric Swalwell is facing a legal campaign challenge after a conservative activist filed a petition claiming the lawmaker is allegedly prohibited from running for California governor because he doesn’t actually live in the Golden State.

    “Public records searches reveal no current ownership or leasehold interest held by Eric Swalwell in California, nor any history of any ownership of leasehold interest based on available public records,” a petition filed Jan. 8 by filmmaker and activist Joel Gilbert states, the New York Post reported.

    “Swalwell’s congressional financial disclosers from 2011 to 2024 list no California real estate ownership,” the petition added. 

    The left-wing lawmaker’s gubernatorial campaign, however, has hit back at the petition as a “nonsense claim” that the team looks forward to “beating” in court. 

    SWALWELL CAMPAIGN IN THE HOT SEAT AFTER ACCEPTING ALMOST $15K FROM CCP-TIED LAW FIRM: ‘STOP PLAYING FOOTSIE’

    Representative Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., is suing a Trump official after he was criminally referred to the Department of Justice. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

    Swalwell has served as a California congressman since 2013, and announced his candidacy to succeed Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom when his second term ends in January 2027. The gubernatorial race already is crowded with at least 10 candidates slated to be on the ballot in the nonpartisan primary in June. 

    Swalwell is viewed as a front-runner as the race gets underway. 

    The court filing claims that the congressman listed the address for the office of his attorney on campaign filings and not a residential California address. The address listed in the court filing shows an office building in downtown Sacramento. 

    State law requires the California governor be a resident of the state five years prior to his or her election. 

    “The governor shall be an elector who has been a citizen of the United States and a resident of this state for 5 years immediately preceding the governor’s election,” the filing states, outlining the California Constitution’s residential requirements of governors.  

    Trump holds up a fist

    President Donald Trump pumps his fist at Christmas Eve dinner at his Mar-a-Lago club, Wednesday, Dec. 24, 2025, in Palm Beach, Fla.  (Alex Brandon/AP Photo)

    When approached for comment on the matter, a campaign general consultant for Swalwell said the lawmaker has always resided in California across his political career and that his attorney’s address was listed on the campaign filing due to death threats he has received. 

    SWALWELL THREATENS TO REVOKE DRIVER’S LICENSES OF MASKED ICE AGENTS OPERATING IN CALIFORNIA

    “Since joining Congress, Eric Swalwell has always had a residence in the Bay Area. He has always had a California driver’s license, paid California taxes, and starts his California mornings with Johnny’s Donuts maple bars in Dublin. This nonsense claim comes from a MAGA blogger who made a film claiming Elvis is alive. We look forward to beating him in court,” Kate Maeder, Swalwell campaign consultant, told Fox News Digital in an emailed statement Monday morning. 

    “Because of the thousands of death threats the Congressman has received, it is perfectly legal to list a campaign office as the address for his legal filings,” she added. 

    Gilbert’s petition calls on the California secretary of state to “fulfill her constitutional duty” and disqualify Swalwell from the race. 

    “The criteria for running for governor of California according to the California Constitution is a candidate must be resident of the state for 5 years prior to the election,” Gilbert told Fox Digital in additional comment on Monday afternoon. “Swalwell’s response that he has a California driver’s license or pays California taxes or went to a Donut shop in Dubin is irrelevant and a smoke screen. He’s a lawyer and should know better.”

    The director added in response to Swalwell’s campaign: “My film about Elvis is a comedy! Swalwell is clueless every time he Tweets or opens his mouth or files a document!”

    The director added that the campaign’s response was “absurd” as it related to “beating” Gilber in court, as Swalwell is not being sued, and instead the filing calls on the California secretary of state to respond. 

    “He clearly doesn’t understand the law at all despite being an attorney,” Gilbert said, before doubling down that candidates must prove residency on the state’s candidate intention statement. 

    In November 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) opened a probe into Swalwell’s past mortgages, specifically investigating if allegations of millions of dollars in loans and refinancing were based on Swalwell declaring that his primary residence was in Washington, D.C.

    CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR HOPEFUL ERIC SWALWELL EMBRACES ROLE AS TRUMP’S LOUDEST CRITIC AMID NEW DOJ PROBE

    Swalwell, Democratic California Sen. Adam Schiff and New York Attorney General Letitita James all have been referred to the DOJ over allegations of mortgage fraud since President Donald Trump‘s return to the Oval Office.

    Following the DOJ opening a probe into his mortgages, Swalwell filed a lawsuit against Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Bill Pulte, who referred Swalwell to the DOJ for criminal review, alleging that he abused his position to obtain the mortgage records of numerous Democrats. 

    Eric Swalwell

    Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) speaks at a press conference on committee assignments. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

    “Either he’s guilty of mortgage fraud in Washington, DC, or he’s ineligible to run for governor of California,” Gilbert told the Daily Mail. “He can’t have it both ways.”

    Fox News Digital attempted to reach out to Gilbert by email for additional comment on the court filing Monday afternoon. 

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    The feud between Swalwell and Trump dates to Trump’s first term, when Swalwell emerged as one of the former president’s most vocal congressional critics and served as a House impeachment manager, cementing a long-running political rivalry. 

    Fox News Digital’s Leo Briceno and Greg Wehner contributed to this report. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Why Silicon Valley is really talking about fleeing California (it’s not the 5%) | TechCrunch

    [ad_1]

    If you’ve been following the billionaire exodus from California with some confusion, here’s what’s actually driving the nervousness: it’s not the 5% rate. As highlighted Friday in the New York Post, the proposed wealth tax would hit founders on their voting shares rather than the actual equity they own.

    Take Larry Page, who about 3% of Google but controls roughly 30% of its voting power through dual-class stock. Under this proposal, he’d owe taxes on that 30%. For a company valued in the hundreds of billions, that’s a lot more than a rounding error. The Post reports that one SpaceX alumni founder building grid technology would face a tax bill at the Series B stage of the company that would wipe out his entire holdings.

    David Gamage, the University of Missouri law professor who helped craft the proposal, thinks Silicon Valley is overreacting. “I don’t understand why the billionaires just aren’t calling good tax lawyers,” he told The San Francisco Standard this week. Gamage insists founders wouldn’t be forced to sell. Those with most of their wealth in private stock could open a deferral account for assets they don’t want taxed immediately — California would instead take 5% whenever those shares are eventually sold. “If your startup fails, you pay nothing,” he explained. “But if your startup is the next Google, you’re giving California a share of your gamble.” He also said founders could submit alternative valuations from certified appraisers reflecting what shares could actually sell for, rather than being stuck with the default voting-control formula.

    But that’s pretty small consolation. For startups that aren’t publicly traded, calculating valuations is “inherently difficult,” tax expert Jared Walczak told the Post. “These are not clear cut—you could come to a very different conclusion not because of dishonesty.” And if the state disagrees with your appraisal, it’s not just the company on the hook; the state can also penalize the person who calculated the valuation. Even with alternative appraisals, founders would still face enormous tax bills on control they hold but wealth they haven’t realized.

    Now, if you’ve been under a rock: California’s health care union is pushing a ballot initiative for a one-time 5% tax on anyone worth over $1 billion. The union argues it’s necessary to offset the deep cuts to health care that President Trump signed into law last year, including slashes to Medicaid and ACA subsidies. As originally envisioned, they expect to raise about $100 billion from roughly 200 individuals and the tax would apply retroactively to anyone living in California as of January 1, 2026.

    But the resistance is fierce and bipartisan. As reported last weekend by the WSJ, Silicon Valley elite have formed a Signal chat called “Save California” that includes everyone from Trump’s crypto czar David Sacks to Kamala Harris mega-donor Chris Larsen. They’ve called the proposal “Communism” and “poorly defined.” Some are taking just-in-case measures, too, with Larry Page reportedly dropping $173.4 million on two Miami waterfront properties across last month and the first week of the new year, and Peter Thiel’s firm leasing Miami office space last month. (Thiel has had ties to Miami for years — including a home — but an uncharacteristic press release about the move was seemingly meant to send a message.)

    Even Governor Gavin Newsom is fighting it. “This will be defeated, there’s no question in my mind,” he told the New York Times this week, adding that he’d been “relentlessly working behind the scenes” against the proposal. “I’ll do what I have to do to protect the state.”

    Techcrunch event

    San Francisco
    |
    October 13-15, 2026

    For now, the union isn’t backing down. “We’re simply trying to keep emergency rooms open and save patient lives,” said executive committee member Debru Carthan to the Journal last weekend. “The few who left have shown the world just how outrageously greedy they truly are.”

    The proposal needs 875,000 signatures to make November’s ballot, where it would need a simple majority to pass.

    [ad_2]

    Connie Loizos

    Source link

  • Democrats Should Run a Governor for President in 2028

    [ad_1]

    The very electable Andy Beshear.
    Photo: Jon Cherry/Bloomberg/Getty Images

    In a long profile of potential presidential candidate Andy Beshear at Politico, Jonathan Martin elicited one absolutely firm comment from the Kentucky governor about 2028: “The Democratic Party needs to nominate a Democratic governor.” He wasn’t just talking about himself, though he’s nearing the end of two terms as chief executive of a very red state. California’s Gavin Newsom and Illinois’ J.B. Pritzker are likely 2028 candidates perceived as very different in temperament and even ideology from the model moderate Beshear. Pennsylvania’s Josh Shapiro is perceived as being in the same “lane” as the Kentuckian, but doesn’t have the same laid-back personality. Maryland’s Wes Moore is an up-and-comer who hasn’t chosen sides in national party factional battles. Michigan’s Gretchen Whitmer’s star has faded a bit, but she’s still a major party figure who could take the presidential plunge.

    Putting aside all these individuals and their specific strengths and weaknesses, is Beshear right about governors being not just a better bet for Democrats right now but essential for victory?

    Traditionally, big-state governorships were thought of as the best platform for a presidential candidacy. Though only 17 of the 47 presidents were governors, only four men (James Garfield, Warren Harding, John F. Kennedy and Barack Obama) have gone directly from Congress to the White House. Among Democrats, however, the last sitting or former governor to win a presidential nomination was Bill Clinton. Indeed, the last governor to run a viable Democratic nomination contest was Howard Dean in 2004, and his signature issue was foreign policy (his opposition to the Iraq War). In the crowded 2020 Democratic presidential field, four governors or former governors ran, but three dropped out before Iowa and the other (Deval Patrick) had zero impact on the race. So the prospective bumper crop of Democratic governors in 2028 is rather remarkable.

    What governors have that senators simply don’t is a record of executive accomplishment and practical management experience. Only the top tier of members of Congress get anything like the media coverage virtually every governor commands. As state civic leaders, governors are presumed to represent people of both parties even if they are the bitterest of partisans. And in this era of chronic anti-Washington sentiment, governors can treat the federal government with the disdain most voters feel.

    A governor might also provide a positive contrast to the very likely GOP presidential nominee in 2028, J.D. Vance, who has never run much of anything other than his mouth. When he heads out on the 2028 campaign trail right after the midterms, Vance will have had two years experience as Donald Trump’s very subordinate attack dog, and two years as an obscure Senate backbencher who barely got his seat warm. And most of all, Vance will be the candidate of the incumbent presidential party in 2028, with any “outsider” claims looking ludicrous.

    Looking at Trump-era Democratic politics more generally, senators make noise while governors at least have a chance to make laws, build things, and do things. This is one reason members of Congress posture so much about “fighting” Trump. Words are all they have. And in 2028, as Beshear makes clear to Martin, Democrats will likely be in a mood to stop fighting and start winning. All other things being equal, governors have an advantage in electability, if only because their identities transcend party and many of them have a record of winning Republican votes. If Democrats enter the 2028 election cycle feeling very confident of victory, maybe an AOC, who has never run a campaign outside New York City, or a Pete Buttigieg, whose top elected post was in a small Indiana city, will suffice. But if, as is more likely, prospects for victory look iffy, Democrats are very likely to look for a champion who’s not mostly known for long speeches in Congress (sorry, Cory Booker!)

    Among the governors who may run in 2028, of course, Beshear is distinctive for his enormous political success in a state where Republicans have super-majorities in both legislative chambers and hold seven of eight spots in the congressional delegation. He would enter the nomination contest as presumptively electable. If he can just figure out how to excite people who have been “fighting Trump” so long that they sometimes mistake words for action and moral victories for actual victories, Beshear could go all the way to the White House.

    [ad_2]

    Ed Kilgore

    Source link

  • California’s governor plans to set aside $200 million for state EV tax credits

    [ad_1]

    The loss of the federal EV tax credits may have been a huge blow to prospective buyers, but California wants to fill that gap for its residents. Governor Gavin Newsom’s proposed budget for 2026-2027, which was released on Friday, includes a “light-duty zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) incentive program” that details a one-time infusion of $200 million.

    According to the budget summary, this incentive program is “a critical part of the Administration’s strategy to keep ZEVs affordable and accessible for all.” The proposed budget still has to make it through the state’s legislature later this year, but if passed, the new incentive would help continue the momentum of EV adoption across California. In the third quarter of 2025, the state saw almost 30 percent of auto sales being EVs, according to the California Energy Commission.

    There are no details in the budget summary outlining how exactly the $200 million would break down on a per-vehicle basis, but USA Today reported that the rebate would be an “on the hood” instant discount for EVs. Previously, buyers would get up to $7,500 back in federal tax rebates on new EV purchases and up to $4,000 on used EVs. For California’s proposed incentives, the chairwoman of the California Air Resources Board, Lauren Sanchez, told USA Today that the state is still trying to figure out if it will offer tax credits for those who buy used EVs.

    [ad_2]

    Jackson Chen

    Source link

  • Newsom to deliver final State of the State address live at California Capitol

    [ad_1]

    After several years of providing legislators with a pre-recorded video link for his annual State of the State address, Gov. Gavin Newsom will deliver his final address live and in-person inside the California State Capitol on Thursday.

    The governor’s State of the State has been required in writing since California became a state in 1850. All those years of speeches are housed in one place, across the street from the Capitol, in the State Library and court building.

    The very first State of the State address in 1850 shows the status of California’s statehood then, written by Gov. Peter Burnett, with the first sentence reading: “Gentlemen of the Senate and Assembly, the circumstances under which you have assembled are most new interesting and extraordinary.”

    Alex Vassar, spokesperson for the California State Library, said that 176 years later, the annual address offers a snapshot of California’s triumphs and tragedies and everyday troubles.

    “The requirement has always been that it’s important for the governor as the first person who oversees the operation of the state, the head of the executive branch, that he notified the legislature of what his concerns are, how things are running,” Vassar said. 

    Newsom seemed to be carrying on the traditional speech when he took office in 2019. However, since the COVID-19 pandemic, he has not delivered his State of the State speech in the Capitol building. Instead, he delivered his 2021 remarks from an empty Dodger Stadium and resorted to pre-recorded video in the final week of the legislative session in 2025.

    State Senator Tony Strickland (R-Huntington Beach) said he is looking for the governor to address the state’s $18 billion budget deficit, unemployment, and affordability problems. 

    “We’ve got serious problems in California. We need serious leadership,” Strickland said. “His record is abysmal in California.”

    Assemblymember Alex Lee (D-Milpitas) is calling for a crackdown on tax breaks.

    “I’m looking for the governor, hopefully, closing tax loopholes on corporations and billionaires,” Lee said. “And I hope he paints a strong picture that yes, we have problems, but here’s how we get to the next stage of California.”

    Gov. Earl Warren began delivering the State of the State in the form of a speech to the legislature in the 1960s.

    Now, in his final year in office, Newsom is expected to return to that tradition.

    How to watch

    Newsom will deliver his final State of the State address inside the California State Capitol on Thursday.

    The address is expected to begin at 10:30 a.m. PT and will stream live on CBS News Sacramento.

    [ad_2]

    Steve Large

    Source link

  • State of the State: Gavin Newsom to deliver final address as California governor

    [ad_1]

    Gov. Gavin Newsom is set to deliver his final State of the State address as the state’s governor this Thursday.Newsom will host the address at the state Capitol in front of a joint session of the Legislature, the first time he has done so since 2020. In recent years, he has opted for writing letters to the Legislature, releasing pre-recorded messages or touring across the state to issue new policies and initiatives.Ahead of the address, the governor’s office offered brief outlines of themes Newsom is expected to touch upon. One topic includes homelessness and California’s efforts to resolve the state’s mental health crisis.Housing affordability, education and investment in public schools are other topics outlined. The governor also plans on addressing public safety, violent crime, and theft across the state, and the various levels of law enforcement working to handle those issues.Another major topic Newsom is expected to address is climate initiatives and how California’s policies have implications both nationally and globally.Newsom’s office also shared that Newsom will convey that California is a stable democracy, an economic engine with conscience, and a “functioning alternative to Donald Trump’s federal dysfunction.” The State of the State address begins at 10:30 a.m. Thursday.Because there is a two-term limit on holding the office of California governor, Newsom will not be able to run for a third term.See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    Gov. Gavin Newsom is set to deliver his final State of the State address as the state’s governor this Thursday.

    Newsom will host the address at the state Capitol in front of a joint session of the Legislature, the first time he has done so since 2020. In recent years, he has opted for writing letters to the Legislature, releasing pre-recorded messages or touring across the state to issue new policies and initiatives.

    Ahead of the address, the governor’s office offered brief outlines of themes Newsom is expected to touch upon. One topic includes homelessness and California’s efforts to resolve the state’s mental health crisis.

    Housing affordability, education and investment in public schools are other topics outlined. The governor also plans on addressing public safety, violent crime, and theft across the state, and the various levels of law enforcement working to handle those issues.

    Another major topic Newsom is expected to address is climate initiatives and how California’s policies have implications both nationally and globally.

    Newsom’s office also shared that Newsom will convey that California is a stable democracy, an economic engine with conscience, and a “functioning alternative to Donald Trump’s federal dysfunction.”

    The State of the State address begins at 10:30 a.m. Thursday.

    Because there is a two-term limit on holding the office of California governor, Newsom will not be able to run for a third term.

    See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Valero will import fuel into the Bay Area after it idles Benicia Refinery in April

    [ad_1]

    Valero on Tuesday said it will continue to provide the Bay Area with gasoline even after it completely idles its Benicia Refinery later this year.

    It will begin to idle its processing units in February as part of a phased approach and expects to have most of its refining processing units idled by April 2026. 

    Valero is Benicia’s largest employer as well as the city’s single largest source of tax revenue, and in its announcement, the company said it is preparing to submit a Worker Readjustment and Retraining Notification, as required by law. WARNS are required when a company with 75 or more employees lays off 50 or more employees in a 30-day period.

    As for the impact on Bay Area drivers, Valero announced the company will import fuel into the region and use existing inventory to keep drivers supplied.

    “Valero remains committed to fulfilling its contractual supply obligations in the California market and anticipates importing additional gasoline volumes to the Bay Area in the near term,” the company said.

    Gov. Gavin Newsom’s office touted the plan as one that will “help maintain steady supply and stable prices as discussions continue on a path forward for the refinery.”

    “We’re in ongoing discussions with Valero to evaluate options for continued operations at the Benicia refinery and I appreciate the company planning responsibly, including planning for imports of refined products to supply the market in the meantime,” Newsom said.

    How long Valero will import fuel into the region was not stated, and California and the California Energy Commission are still working on the refinery’s future.

    “We want to express our appreciation to Valero for continuing to work with us collaboratively to evaluate options for the Valero Benicia refinery and for maintaining fuel supply to Northern California,” said Siva Gunda, CEC Vice Chair.

    Ashwini Rao has lived in Benicia for about a year. During that time, the future of the refinery has been a big question. Now that they know the answers, they say a lot of people will feel the impact, good and bad.

    “It does affect people, the local jobs, so definitely it’s a loss for people here,” said Rao. “But I do see a lot of pollution here happening, so that’s kind of better.”

    Severin Borenstein is a professor at UC Berkeley and the faculty director of their energy institute. He said he saw the move coming.

    “The demand for Californian gasoline is declining, and refineries have been talking for a long time about their financial viability as California uses less and less gasoline,” Borenstein said.

    [ad_2]

    Jose Fabian

    Source link

  • California’s ban on open carry in more populated counties is unconstitutional, appeals panel says

    [ad_1]

    A federal appeals panel has ruled that a California law prohibiting open carry of firearms in heavily populated counties is unconstitutional.

    The ruling was issued Friday by two judges on a three-judge panel for the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The judges found that the state’s policy of limiting open carry to counties with a population of less than 200,000 is inconsistent with the Second Amendment.

    “California’s legal regime is a complete ban on open carry in urban areas — the areas of the state where 95% of the people live,” they said in the decision.

    The dissenting judge disagreed and said California could limit open carry in more populated areas because it allows for concealed carry throughout the state.

    The ruling comes in a long-running debate over gun laws in the United States and in California, which has passed a series of restrictions.

    It came after Mark Baird, a Siskiyou County resident, filed a lawsuit asking the courts to restore the historical practice of open carry being allowed.

    Chuck Michel, president of the California Rifle & Pistol Association, said he expected state officials will seek a review of the ruling by the full appeals court.

    “It’s a very significant opinion,” Michel said, adding that a key question in the case is how a 2022 Supreme Court decision expanding gun rights should be applied.

    The press office for Gov. Gavin Newsom said in a statement on social media that the state’s law was carefully crafted to comply with the Second Amendment.

    “California just got military troops with weapons of war off of the streets of our cities, but now Republican activists on the Ninth Circuit want to replace them with gunslingers and return to the days of the Wild West,” the statement said.

    In a statement to CBS Sacramento, Attorney General Rob Bonta’s office said it’s reviewing the opinion.

    “We are committed to defending California’s commonsense gun laws,” Bonta’s office said. “We are reviewing the opinion and considering all options.”

    Craig DeLuz is a California concealed carry permit holder and publisher of A2 News, who says allowing open carry permits in would change perceptions about gun rights.

    “It will remove a stigma which many on the left and many quite sadly in law enforcement want, which is if you’re a person carrying a gun and not wearing a badge you are a ‘bad guy,’ and so I think this addresses that,” DeLuz said. 

    California State Senator Catherine Blakespear (D-Encinitas) says the federal court ruling is bad for public safety.

    “I was truly alarmed by the decision,” Blakespear said. “I mean, this is not the ‘Wild West’ where everybody walks around with a gun on their waist. I mean, we see in other countries when there is a mass shooting, they tighten down on their gun laws.”

    [ad_2]

    CBS Bay Area

    Source link

  • On the Frantic Front Lines of the Los Angeles Fires With Governor Gavin Newsom

    [ad_1]

    At the intersection of Midwick Drive and Sinaloa Avenue in Altadena, neighbors had mobilized to stop a situation almost exactly the same as I had seen playing out across the street from my brother’s home in the Palisades. Flames from a house, fully engulfed, were pouring up and over the fence toward the home of Eric Fiedler and his son Christopher, which had survived the fire that night. With two garden hoses and a ladder, they climbed to the roof to attempt to beat back the flames by wetting the roof and the hedges. It was 9:25 a.m.

    One resident who was wearing a cutoff black T-shirt and sunglasses used the shirt to cover his mouth to prevent smoke from asphyxiating him. A fire truck from Riverside County Cal Fire pulled up, resulting in the exalted screams of even the KNBC reporter on the scene, Michelle Valles.

    “Thank you so much! Oh, my goodness. Praise the Lord.”

    Around the same time the Riverside County firefighters battled the flames on Sinaloa, Ashley, the daughter of Herb and Loyda Wilson, was heading back toward their house two miles away after evacuating for the night to see if McNally Avenue had survived. By the time she and her boyfriend got close, she knew it wasn’t good. She called her parents, in Hawaii, inconsolable.

    “It’s gone, Dad! Everything is gone!”

    “Relax,” Herb told his daughter in the Hawaiian darkness. “It’s going to be OK.”

    Cate Heneghan had been receiving reports from her neighbors, too. One of them, who grew up in the home she still lived in on McNally Avenue, had tried to get close around six in the morning. But she told Cate that when she drove past Fairoaks Burger, less than a tenth of a mile away and just around the corner, all she saw was flames.

    Cate attempted to get back to the block as well, but when she was within a half mile, she thought better of it.

    I don’t want to be part of the problem. I know it’s gone. It’s gone, Cate. Just let it go.

    Even though she saw homes just a few blocks away that were still standing, her gut told her to turn around, so she did.

    Nick Schuler of Cal Fire, the state fire agency, had a thought run through his head he had never experienced in all of his years of fighting fires.

    God, I hope I don’t die of cancer. This is not a good place to be. Thousands of homes have burned.

    He was in the smoldering heart of the Palisades. He and Governor Newsom were driving through the area after a morning fire briefing, trying to find a cell signal for Newsom to reach President Biden. My damn cell phone, the governor thought. He had initiated the call because he was going to elevate the asks about resources, personnel, equipment, and federal reimbursements for what people were already saying could potentially be the costliest natural disaster in American history.

    ‘Firestorm’ by Jacob Soboroff

    As the fire continued to rage both in the neighborhoods and on the ridges of the Santa Monica Mountains, the governor directed his security detail to pull over.

    “Guys, turn left. Just stop. Stop.”

    He checked the bars on his cell phone.

    “No. Jesus Christ.”

    He couldn’t get a signal.

    “You know, get near the gas station—it worked there last night.”

    At 9:41 a.m. we came across Governor Newsom and Schuler outside that gas station. Newsom had declared a state of emergency on Tuesday after the Palisades Fire broke out, and with it deployed hundreds of members of the California National Guard to Los Angeles. Once the Eaton Fire ignited, he knew that a major disaster declaration was needed—and had to be requested of President Biden, who was still in town—in order to mobilize federal resources for the Palisades, Eaton, Hurst, and Woodley Fires, now burning. The Hurst Fire had broken out Tuesday night and was growing in size in the north San Fernando Valley, surpassing five hundred acres Wednesday morning. Smoke plumes were rising from all corners of Los Angeles County. The Woodley fire started early Wednesday, a few dozen acre blaze in the Sepulveda Basin.

    [ad_2]

    Jacob Soboroff

    Source link

  • $50K reward offered for tips in fatal 2018 shooting of barber Arthur Jordan

    [ad_1]

    Arthur Jordan. (File photo courtesy of GoFundMe)

    A $50,000 reward is being offered for information leading to an arrest and conviction in the killing of a man in Logan Heights, Gov. Gavin Newsom’s office announced Monday.

    Arthur Jordan, 28, was shot July 19, 2018, while sitting in a car in the 3000 block of Martin Avenue. At the time of his death, Jordan was a barber working in his family’s shop.

    San Diego Police Department investigators have interviewed witnesses and potential suspects, but have exhausted all leads.

    “We are very thankful for the governor’s support in our efforts to find justice for Jordan and his family,” said SDPD detective Chris Murray.

    The governor’s office also announced a $50,000 reward for information in the 2009 fatal shooting of a teen in Oakland and the payment of a reward in the 1982 killing of a young girl in Vacaville. An arrest was made in 2017.

    Under California law, law enforcement agencies may ask the governor to issue rewards in specific unsolved cases where they have exhausted all investigative leads.

    SDPD has requested that the reward be offered in Jordan’s case. Those with information may contact Sgt. Joel Tien at 619-531- 2323. Anonymous tips can also be submitted to San Diego Crime Stoppers at 888- 580-8477.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Authenticity Under Fire: Gavin Newsom, Jimmy Kimmel and Adam Carolla Stay Real in the Crucible of 2025  – LAmag

    [ad_1]

    Jimmy Kimmel, Gavin Newsom and Adam Carolla each represent a distinctly California way of seeing the world. But two events this year, the Los Angeles Wildfires in January and Kirk’s assassination in Utah in September, pushed those perspectives into sharper focus — and weaved their voices into a single discordant harmony of authenticity. 

    Fire Season 

    In most places, fire is a tragic accident. In Los Angeles, it’s a season tucked between “awards” and “pilot.” It arrives like a harsh winter, expected but never welcome, and familiar enough that locals know to dress for it. We keep masks and go-bags the way others keep umbrellas and snowshoes. We measure years by which canyons burned and which celebrity couple fled with their pets. Year after year, the hills ignite, the power goes out, the ash falls like black snow and the city pretends to be surprised all over again. 

    In January, the Palisades and Eaton fires weren’t just blazes, they were nightmare scenarios, erupting simultaneously on opposite flanks of Los Angeles County. The Palisades fire surged through the Santa Monica mountains toward Pacific Palisades and Malibu. Meanwhile, the Eaton fire ignited northeast of Altadena in the San Gabriel mountains, then roared into foothill communities under blistering winds, swallowing entire blocks of midcentury homes in neighborhoods that once thought themselves too ordinary to glow. On screens across the country, the burning hillsides mimicked the timeless Hollywood magic of looking beautiful while dying. 

    The Empath 

    On Jan. 13, late-night host Jimmy Kimmel returned to his Hollywood stage after a week dealing with evacuation and disruption. He opened with a trembling confession: that it had been “a very scary, very stressful, very strange week here in L.A.” His gratitude poured out toward firefighters “who carried the skyline on their shoulders,” and he joked about singed studio lighting before pausing, visibly shaken. 

    The man who’d built a second career out of skewering Donald Trump put his knives away for the night. It was vintage Kimmel but stripped of armor. In a city that worships poise and cool, his willingness to experience all feelings became its own kind of heroism. The laugh lines had always been there, but through the smoke they felt like lifelines. 

    The Optimist 

    While Kimmel was comforting viewers, Gov. Gavin Newsom was getting ready for his close-up. On Jan. 7, as winds tore through the Palisades, he stood before reporters at the fresh fire line, ash catching alarmingly in his perfectly coiffed hair, and declared a state of emergency. Five days later, on Jan. 12, he signed Executive Order N-4-25, which tweaks requirements under the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Coastal Act, streamlining permitting for rebuilding, and ensures protections against rental price-gouging. “Victims who have lost their homes and businesses must be able to rebuild quickly and without roadblocks,” was his decree. To him, the blaze wasn’t just destruction; it was a test of the state’s image — an opportunity to prove that even in ashes, California still sells the future. 

    The Cynic 

    Enter Adam Carolla. On the morning of Jan. 13, displaced by evacuation, he released his podcast episode “L.A. Fire Dept. Needs Less Equity and More Water.” From a Burbank hotel room not far from his signature garage, his voice carried the familiar gravel of disbelief. He railed against “environmental lunatics” running the state, mocked the city’s “woke disaster response” and sighed that Los Angeles “turns its ashes into headlines faster than it clears the brush.” It was a sermon from the Church of Fed-Up. If Kimmel gave the fires meaning and Newsom gave them management, Carolla gave them context: proof that the same city that burns every year still refuses to learn why. 

    Three voices, three archetypes: the empath, the optimist, the cynic. Each speaking their truth through the sunniest days and the darkest smoke. Each bringing a version of that signature L.A. style. 

    The Man Show Generation 

    The nation was introduced to Jimmy Kimmel and Adam Carolla as two friends riffing on masculinity at the turn of the millennium. The Man Show premiered on Comedy Central in 1999, at the tail end of the grunge era, when deadpan, sarcasm and cynicism were L.A.’s holy trinity. Kimmel and Carolla sat in leather chairs chugging beers while bikini-clad models on trampolines bookended commercial breaks. They closed each episode with a toast to “our forefathers and their magnificent sons.” 

    The joke, they insisted, was on toxic masculinity itself. It was an ode to a vanishing breed of guy — beer in one hand, remote in the other, a world-weary, Al Bundy-esque shrug about everything else. It was bawdy, politically incorrect and, depending on whom you asked, either a parody of sexism or an enthusiastic participant in it. What’s often forgotten is that the show was a time capsule of a world before every joke would be archived and litigated. For Carolla, the blue-collar philosopher trying to reason with a world gone soft, the format was liberation. His “everyman” act wasn’t an invention; it was authentic. He truly is the curmudgeon who sees through everything and enjoys telling you so while yelling at the clouds. 

    Kimmel, by contrast, evolved. On The Man Show, he shared the same reverence for a cold beer and a cheap laugh. But as the show faded and the world changed, Kimmel did something rare for an adult in Hollywood: He grew up, publicly. When Donald Trump entered politics, Kimmel found his antagonist. The dude bro who once co-hosted girls on trampolines became the country’s late-night conscience, skewering Trump with a blend of sarcasm and moral outrage. His monologues were part stand-up, part sermon —a reinvention no one saw coming. (More on that later.) 

    In a strange way, both men have stayed loyal to the same impulse. Kimmel’s authenticity comes from vulnerability in a culture that mistakes emotion for weakness. Carolla’s comes from defiance, refusing to feel at all. They’re mirror images of the same Los Angeles archetype: the alpha-male leading man who exudes machismo yet flirts with emotion while his ego screams at him to quash it. And so, when the 2025 fires came, Kimmel reached for compassion; Carolla reached for complaint. 

    And yet, after all these years, they still call each other friends, which might be the most surprising punch line either of them has delivered. In an age when friendship is filtered through politics, theirs endures like an old photograph. They’re relics of pre-cancellation toxic masculinity with heart — and proof that affection can survive ideology 

    Gavin Newsom: The San Frangeleno 

    If Adam Carolla is the guy yelling at traffic on the 405 and Jimmy Kimmel is the guy making fun of it from behind a desk, Gavin Newsom is the man promising to fix it. 

    Newsom has never been from Los Angeles, but he’s always looked like he should be. San Francisco’s golden boy. The wine merchant’s son who dined with the Gettys was born of fog and privilege, not smog and palm trees. He built his fortune through PlumpJack, the winery, café and brand that made Napa feel sexy again. He built his legend by marrying same-sex couples in San Francisco City Hall, defying federal law and defining his city’s liberal conscience. 

    In West Hollywood, he became the straight-boy savior of gay marriage. He was the rare politician whose courage came with natural lighting. Drag queens toasted him at The Abbey and activists wore his name like merch. To a city that worships the performative act done sincerely, he was an instant archetype: the Optimist. The man who believes in progress and knows how it can be branded, filmed and broadcast without making it any less real. 

    Los Angeles is full of people who moved here to become themselves, and it feels like Newsom would be that kind of Angeleno. He’s the political equivalent of an actor from the Midwest who saw the skyline once and knew that grit and determination could make his dreams come true. And in a town where everyone is selling their version of the future, he’s often sold the one we vote for.  

    In 2013, then-Lt. Gov. Newsom walked into Carolla’s Glendale studio for an interview. It was the early age of “long-form” podcasting, and Newsom, still very much San Francisco’s polished prince, sat across from Carolla, the Valley’s reigning curmudgeon. What followed survives as a sort of Golden State odd-couple bit: the fog meets the smog. 

    Carolla came out swinging, asking why “the streets are still covered in tents.” 

    Newsom, as composed then as now, countered with stats about behavioral health and compassion initiatives, each syllable dripping with civic optimism. When he mentioned “multitiered responses to homelessness,” Carolla cut him off with a laugh: “You sound like you’re reading off a yoga mat.” The room cracked up. Newsom grinned and didn’t flinch. 

    For 40 minutes, they sparred. Carolla played the blue-collar foreman, Newsom the Silicon Valley optimist. Somewhere between punch lines and policy, they found a rhythm. They were the contractor who builds decks and the aristocrat who builds narratives, circling the same dream with different tools. 

    By the end, they were laughing, even friendly. They shone as two sides of the same Gold Coast coin, talking over each other yet ending in applause. 

    By 2024, Newsom realized the value of L.A.’s favorite side gig and teamed up with NFL legend Marshawn Lynch and sports agent Doug Hendrickson on Politickin’. The weekly podcast is a collision of politics, pop culture and personal stories. It was Newsom’s first real immersion into the kind of conversation Carolla had long claimed as his domain. 

    In March, he launched his solo podcast, This Is Gavin Newsom. Playing like a confessional, it turns California’s crises into a serialized audio diary. 

    Today, as Newsom spars with Trump on social media, trading barbs with the timing of a late-night comic, the San Franciscan has embraced the Angeleno archetype in full. He’s now a man who understands that, in California, governance is its own genre of entertainment. Where other politicians stumble online, he lands his lines. Every post is framed like a punch line, every rebuttal like a well-rehearsed callback. 

    Jimmy Kimmel’s Conversion 

    Jimmy Kimmel used to make fun of sincerity for a living with his best friend. Now he makes a living presenting it. 

    Somewhere between The Man Show’s altar of beer-chugging and his first tearful monologue about gun violence, Kimmel became Los Angeles’ late-night moral weather vane. He’s the man who turns personal heartbreak into a national teachable moment — part confessor, part comedian, part suburban dad with a platform. 

    When Kimmel stood before his studio audience in 2017, his voice shaking as he described his newborn son’s open-heart surgery, the moment shattered every late-night rule. Hosts were supposed to joke, not cry. But Kimmel did both. He laughed through the tremor, turned pain into persuasion and redefined what counted as a punch line. “It’s not partisan to care about people,” he said. The clip went viral, of course: Raw sincerity in the land of fake tans is a sight to behold. 

    Jimmy Kimmel Live banners
    OCTOBER 16 2017 – HOLLYWOOD CALIFORNIA: Banners for the Jimmy Kimmel Live television show on Hollywood Boulevard in Los Angeles
    Credit: Adobe Stock

    Most recently, Kimmel found himself squarely inside the cancel culture he and Carolla once mocked, after a monologue about Charlie Kirk’s assassination ignited backlash. On Sept. 15, Kimmel opened his show by accusing the “MAGA gang” of trying to recharacterize the shooter to avoid accountability, saying they were “desperately trying to score political points.” In a media climate where every syllable can be weaponized, that line drew the ire of FCC chair Brendan Carr, who publicly warned of potential regulatory consequences for ABC. 

    Within hours, Nexstar and Sinclair, two of ABC’s largest affiliate operators, announced they would pull Jimmy Kimmel Live! from their stations indefinitely. Disney formally suspended the show on Sept. 17. For six days, Kimmel’s voice, usually a calming nightly constant, went silent on national TV. Many viewed the incident as a crucible for free speech in late-night comedy; others saw it as a wake-up call about boundaries in political satire. 

    When Kimmel returned on Sept. 23, he did so theatrically, emotionally and deliberately, wearing the weight of both criticism and support. He defended his remarks, saying he had been “intentionally and maliciously mischaracterized,” and acknowledged that he can be reactionary — that sometimes his instincts overtake his filter. 

    In Los Angeles, where emotion is part of the vernacular, Kimmel’s return felt less like a comeback and more like an affirmation. The moment was especially poignant in a town where every comedian, actor or politician knows the danger of a viral misstep. 

    If Newsom’s authenticity is managerial and Carolla’s is defiant, Kimmel’s is sentimental. He’s the kind of guy who believes the world can be fixed if we just feel it hard enough. 

    Adam Carolla’s Rebellion 

    It’s 2025, and Adam Carolla still records in his garage. The space doubles as a studio, workshop and shrine to the forgotten art of self-sufficiency, littered with socket wrenches, microphones and a few vintage Lamborghinis. He likes the hum of engines. He hates the sound of self-pity. 

    It’s been his theme for decades, first on Loveline, every Gen X teen’s favorite late-night radio show, where Carolla offered unsolicited life advice alongside Dr. Drew Pinsky from 1995 to 2005. On the show, Carolla landed somewhere in the vicinity of a big brother, a stand-up comic and an awkward shop teacher. He repeated his disdain on The Man Show and confirms it today on every episode of The Adam Carolla Show, which holds the Guinness World Record as the most downloaded podcast of all time. 

    For 30 years, he’s been waking up and doing what every dude bro dreams of: turning on the mic and saying exactly what he thinks, consequences be damned. 

    Carolla’s biography reads like blue-collar scripture. Raised in North Hollywood, football, carpentry and comedy were his trade schools. He quite literally built the set of his own life — first as a carpenter, then as a radio personality and finally as a pioneer in digital broadcasting when he launched The Adam Carolla Podcast in 2009, mere days after CBS canceled his now quaint-seeming radio show. While most comedians were still chasing sitcom pilots, Carolla quietly, yet masterfully, reinvented the talk show from his garage. 

    His 2011 book In Fifty Years We’ll All Be Chicks lays out his worldview like a manual for the end of common sense. He rants about goat cheese, hybrid cars and “diversity seminars.” On the surface, it’s comedy about condiments and kumbaya; underneath it’s commentary from someone allergic to artifice. He warns that America has become “self-entitled, thin-skinned, hyperallergic, gender-neutral,” a place where toughness goes to die. His audience is millions of mostly male listeners, and to them he’s the patron saint of unfiltered grievance. He’s the guy keeping sarcasm alive in a world obsessed with emotional safety, all Clark Gable and no Harry Styles. 

    If Newsom’s authenticity is strategic and Kimmel’s is sentimental, Carolla’s is oppositional. His humor is the last vestige of the workshop, the locker room, the barstool confessional. He’s the voice of the holdouts, the mechanics, the skeptics, the men who still keep a socket set in the trunk just in case the city breaks down. And that’s why his friendship with Kimmel, and his willingness to spar civilly with Newsom, matter. They remind everyone watching that appreciating authenticity in Los Angeles doesn’t equal agreement. 

    The Provocateur 

    If Carolla is California’s cynic, Kimmel its conscience and Newsom its optimist, then conservative wunderkind Charlie Kirk was an outside antagonist who helped sharpen them. Brash, media-savvy and raised on rhetoric instead of irony, he turned outrage into a brand. His assassination on Sept. 10 cut through the noise and left the nation — and the state — in turmoil. 

    Adam Carolla opened his podcast the next morning with a sigh. He called Kirk “a  guy who said what he thought, and you can’t say that about many people anymore,” before pivoting into a rant about the violence of rhetoric and the stupidity of extremists. For the cynic, Kirk’s death was confirmation that the country had become a place where arguments end in police tape — and common sense, like civility, had left the building. 

    Jimmy Kimmel couldn’t hide his emotion. On Sept. 23, he returned to the air with a voice still raw. “We disagree about everything,” he said, “but disagreement isn’t supposed to end like this.” His monologue was part mourning, part mea culpa, an acknowledgment of a culture that feeds on mockery until it bites back. For a few minutes, the laughter stopped entirely. In a city that runs on reinvention, Kimmel’s apology doubled as catharsis: the comic learning, once again, how to feel in public. 

    Gavin Newsom handled it like a statesman who knows the cameras are live. 

    In the opening episode of his podcast This Is Gavin Newsom, recorded just weeks before the shooting, Kirk had been his first guest. After the assassination, Newsom released a statement calling it “a failure of the discourse we all claim to defend” and dedicated his next episode to “the space between argument and empathy.” For the optimist, the loss became a tragic metaphor: proof that raw, honest conversation itself has become an endangered species. 

    Together, the responses of Carolla, Kimmel and Newsom formed a strange harmony. The cynic mourned the loss of reason, the empath mourned the loss of life and the optimist mourned the loss of dialogue. Kirk, in death, became what he could never be in life: a point of agreement. In a city that turns tragedy into script notes, the three men reacted exactly as Los Angeles would expect them to —one with frustration, one with tears, one with hope. And when the cameras pulled back, the skyline flickered like a vigil.  

    [ad_2]

    Alexandra Kazarian

    Source link

  • Trump administration moves to set up militarized zone on California-Mexico border

    [ad_1]

    The Trump administration announced plans Wednesday to add another militarized zone to the southern border — this time in California — as part of a major shift that has thrust troops into border enforcement with Mexico like never before.

    The Department of Interior said it would transfer jurisdiction along most of California’s border with Mexico to the Navy to reinforce “the historic role public lands have played in safeguarding national sovereignty.”

    The Interior Department described the newest national defense area in California as a high-traffic zone for unlawful crossings by immigrants. But Border Patrol arrests along the southern U.S. border this year have dropped to the slowest pace since the 1960s amid President Trump’s push for mass deportations.

    The move places long stretches of the border under the supervision of nearby military bases, empowering U.S. troops to detain people who enter the country illegally and sidestep a law prohibiting military involvement in civilian law enforcement. It is done under the authority of the national emergency on the border declared by Mr. Trump on his first day in office.

    The military strategy was pioneered in April along a 170-mile stretch of the border in New Mexico and later expanded to portions of the border in Texas and Arizona.

    The newly designated militarized zone extends nearly from the Arizona state line to the Otay Mountain Wilderness, traversing the Imperial Valley and border communities including the unincorporated community of Tecate, California, across the border from the Mexican city with the same name.

    More than 7,000 troops have been deployed to the border, along with an assortment of helicopters, drones and surveillance equipment.

    The zones allow U.S. troops to apprehend immigrants and others who are accused of trespassing on Army, Air Force or Navy bases. Those apprehended also could face additional criminal charges that can mean prison time.

    U.S. authorities say the zones are needed to close gaps in border enforcement and help in the wider fight against human smuggling networks and brutal drug cartels.

    “By working with the Navy to close long-standing security gaps, we are strengthening national defense, protecting our public lands from unlawful use, and advancing the President’s agenda,” Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said in a news release.

    The new militarized zone was announced the same day a federal judge ordered the Trump administration to end the deployment of California National Guard troops in Los Angeles and return control of those troops to the state.

    The state sued after Mr. Trump called up more than 4,000 California National Guard troops in June without Gov. Gavin Newsom’s approval to further the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement efforts.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • What a federal ban on THC-infused drinks and snacks could mean for the hemp industry

    [ad_1]

    MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — The production lines at Indeed Brewing moved quickly, the cans filling not with beer, but with THC-infused seltzer. The product, which features the compound that gets cannabis users high, has been a lifeline at Indeed and other craft breweries as alcohol sales have fallen in recent years.

    But that boom looks set to come to a crashing halt. Buried in the bill that ended the federal government shutdown this month was a provision to ban those drinks, along with other impairing beverages and snacks made from hemp, which have proliferated across the country in recent years. Now the $24 billion hemp industry is scrambling to save itself before the provision takes effect in November 2026.

    “It’s a big deal,” said Ryan Bandy, Indeed’s chief business officer. “It would be a mess for our breweries, for our industry, and obviously for a lot of people who like these things.”

    Here’s what to know about the looming ban on impairing products derived from hemp.

    Congress opened the door in 2018

    Marijuana and hemp are the same species. Marijuana is cultivated for high levels of THC in its flowers. Low-THC hemp is grown for its sturdy fibers, food or wellness products. “Rope, not dope” was long the motto of farmers who supported legalizing hemp.

    After states began legalizing marijuana for adult use over a decade ago, hemp advocates saw an opening at the federal level. As part of the 2018 farm bill, Congress legalized the cultivation of industrial hemp to give farmers, including in Republican Sen. Mitch McConnell’s home state of Kentucky, a new cash crop.

    But the way that law defined hemp — as having less than 0.3% of a specific type of THC, called delta-9 — opened a huge loophole. Beverages or bags of snacks could meet that threshold and still contain more than enough THC to get people high. Businesses could further exploit the law by extracting a non-impairing compound, called CBD, and chemically changing it into other types of impairing THC, such as delta-8 or delta-10.

    The result? Vape oil, gummy candies, chips, cookies, sodas and other unregulated, untested products laden with hemp-derived THC spread around the country. In many places, they have been available at gas stations or convenience stores, even to teens. In legal marijuana states, they undercut heavily taxed and regulated products. In others, they evaded the prohibition on recreational use of weed.

    Some states, including Indiana, have reported spikes in calls to poison-control centers for pediatric exposure to THC.

    A patchwork of state regulations

    Dozens of states have since taken steps to regulate or ban impairing hemp products. In October, Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a bill banning the sale of intoxicating hemp products outside the state’s legal marijuana system.

    Texas, which has a massive hemp market, is moving to regulate sales of impairing hemp, such as by restricting them to those over 21. In Nebraska, lawmakers have instead considered a bill to criminalize the sale and possession of products containing hemp-based THC.

    Washington state adopted a program to regulate hemp growing. But the number of licensed growers has cratered since the state banned intoxicating hemp products outside of the regulated cannabis market in 2023. Five years ago, there were 220, said Trecia Ehrlich, cannabis program manager with the state agriculture department. This year, there were 42, and with a federal ban looming, she expects that number to drop by about half next year.

    Minnesota made infused beverages and foods legal in 2022 for people 21 and older. The products, which must be derived from legally certified hemp, have become so popular that Target is now offering THC drinks at some of its stores in the state.

    They’ve also been a boon to liquor stores and to small Minneapolis brewers like Indeed, where THC drinks make up close to one-quarter of the business, Bandy said. At Bauhaus Brew Labs, a few blocks away, THC drinks account for 26% of their revenues from distributed products and 11% of revenues at the brewery’s taproom.

    A powerful senator moves to close the loophole

    None of that was what McConnell intended when he helped craft the 2018 farm bill. He finally closed the loophole by inserting a federal hemp THC ban in the measure to end the 43-day federal government shutdown, approved by the Senate on Nov. 10.

    “It will keep these dangerous products out of the hands of children, while preserving the hemp industry for farmers,” McConnell said. “Industrial hemp and CBD will remain legal for industrial applications.”

    Some in the legal marijuana industry celebrated, as the ban would end what they consider unfair competition.

    They were joined by prohibitionists. “There’s really no good argument for allowing these dangerous products to be sold in our country,” said Kevin Sabet, president and CEO of Smart Approaches to Marijuana.

    But the ban doesn’t take effect for a year. That has given the industry hope that there is still time to pass regulations that will improve the hemp THC industry — such as by banning synthetically derived THC, requiring age restrictions on sales, and prohibiting marketing to children — rather than eradicate it.

    “We are very hopeful that cooler heads will prevail,” said Jonathan Miller, general counsel of the industry group U.S. Hemp Roundtable. “If they really thought there was a health emergency, there would be no year-long period.”

    The federal ban would jeopardize more than 300,000 jobs while costing states $1.5 billion in lost tax money, the group says.

    Drew Hurst, president and chief operating officer at Bauhaus Brew Labs, has no doubt his company would be among the casualties.

    “If this goes through as written currently, I don’t see a way at all that Bauhaus could stay in business,” Hurst said.

    What comes next?

    A number of lawmakers say they will push for regulation of the hemp THC industry. Kentucky’s second senator, Republican Rand Paul, introduced an amendment to strip McConnell’s hemp language from the crucial government-funding bill, but it failed on a lopsided 76-24 vote.

    Minnesota’s Democratic U.S. senators, Amy Klobuchar and Tina Smith, are among those strategizing to save the industry. Klobuchar noted at a recent news conference that the ban was inserted into the unrelated shutdown bill without a hearing. She suggested the federal government could allow states to develop their own regulatory frameworks, or that Minnesota’s strict regulations could be used as a national model.

    Kevin Hilliard, co-founder of Insight Brewing in Minneapolis, said the hemp industry needs a solution before planting time next spring.

    “If a farmer has uncertainty, they’re not going to plant,” Hilliard said.

    ___

    Johnson reported from Seattle. AP congressional reporter Kevin Freking contributed from Washington, D.C.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ex-UFC fighter Dan Henderson endorses Chad Bianco for California governor, rips Newsom for state’s issues

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    EXCLUSIVE: Former UFC fighter Dan Henderson officially endorsed Sheriff Chad Bianco for California governor in 2026, he told Fox News Digital. 

    Bianco, the current police sheriff of Riverside County, is running as a Republican and led the field in an October poll by the University of California, Berkeley over Republican challenger Steve Hilton and Democratic frontrunner Katie Porter. 

    Henderson said Bianco earned his support in 2020, when the sheriff famously refused to enforce the state’s COVID-19 stay-at-home orders and mask mandates. 

    CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM 

    “It was kind of a blessing that he didn’t shut everything down as long as we were being responsible with everything. I kind of admired how he handled that whole situation,” Henderson said. 

    “A lot of business owners would have went out of business, and maybe even worse, as far as losing a lot of the things that they had, had he shut all the business down like the governor wanted… It was more common sense, he didn’t panic and think the world was going to end.”

    As a lifelong California resident, Henderson has dealt with certain difficulties in his home state in recent years under the leadership of Gov. Gavin Newsom and Democrats. Henderson said that while he plans to remain in California, he’s seen many of his closest friends flee to Texas, Tennessee and Florida.

    Henderson shared his biggest grievances.

    Gas prices

    Henderson drives a Grenadier, and said it takes about $100 to fill up his tank with current California gas prices. He wants to see the next governor take advantage of the natural oil off California’s shores to increase the state’s access to gasoline, and bring prices down, instead of relying on foreign suppliers.

    “We have the highest prices in the country,” Henderson said. “We have a lot of oil under the ground that we’re not even using, but we buy everything, and we have a big deficit every year, because we’re not utilizing our resources.”

    The migrant crisis and ICE agent targeting

    “I think everybody should have to come into our country legally, just like if we wanted to go into others country, we have to legally do that,” Henderson said. “I have friends who are legal [immigrants], and they would like to see everyone else come in the way they did, legally.” 

    Residents surround federal and Border Patrol agents who plan their escape after an immigrant raid in Bell, California, June 19, 2025. (Genaro Molina/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)

    ICE agents in California have been frequent targets of protesters in 2025. In June during an anti-ICE protest in downtown Los Angeles, demonstrators allegedly threw rocks and bottles at officers, resulting in injuries. In July 2025, agents conducting a raid in Camarillo and Oxnard were reportedly attacked with rocks, and one of their vehicles was blocked and hit. 

    Newsom has signed multiple laws that affect ICE agents, including a measure that prohibits federal and local law enforcement from wearing masks that conceal their identities while on duty. The laws also ban ICE from entering schools and hospitals without a warrant. 

    “[ICE] is trying to protect everybody by getting criminals, not just immigrants, but more of the worst of the worst immigrants, not even immigrants but illegals, and for them to not be able to do their job and make our state safer… I think it’s ridiculous that they’re having to deal with, some of their biggest problems are coming from our citizens, from some on the left.”

    INSIDE GAVIN NEWSOM’S TRANSGENDER VOLLEYBALL CRISIS

    Trans athletes in girls’ sports

    California education policy currently allows biological males to compete in girls’ high sports. 

    “It’s just not fair to women that train hard to beat other women and, you know, for their gender, they’re the top of the world, but then they are forced to compete against the men… in most sports, the girls don’t have a chance,” Henderson said. 

    Newsom himself has said, multiple times, that he believes males competing in girls’ sports is “unfair.” Yet, he has not taken any action to address the issue. 

    “He doesn’t really care much about fixing it,” Henderson added.

    The Los Angeles wildfires

    Newsom was the subject of immense criticism when wildfires ravaged the city in January. 

    “[Newsom] just didn’t make sure everything was handled properly. And there wasn’t enough water reserve and that’s it. A lot of people didn’t know that that was an issue, but I’m sure he did,” Henderson told Fox News Digital. 

    Newsom ordered an independent investigation of the Los Angeles Department of Water Pressure on Jan. 10 regarding the loss of water pressure and deliberate shutdown of the reservoir, calling it “deeply troubling,” according to court records. 

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 

    Newsom along with the wildfires

    Gov. Gavin Newsom and LA wildfires (Getty)

    Newsom added that the loss of water pressure “likely impaired” the ability of firefighters to protect homes and evacuation zones in the Pacific Palisades.  

    Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Letters: Alameda County should stop coddling criminals

    [ad_1]

    Submit your letter to the editor via this form. Read more Letters to the Editor.

    Alameda County should
    stop coddling criminals

    Re: “Accused killer appears in court” (Page A1, Nov. 19).

    In your report on the horrific killing of coach John Beam, Alameda County Chief Public Defender Brendon Woods argued that “Instead of more jail and prison, we should invest in more effective solutions, such as diversion, mentorship and violence interruption.”

    [ad_2]

    Letters To The Editor

    Source link

  • No signs California won’t move forward with redistricting despite a court blocking similar plan in Texas

    [ad_1]

    After a panel of federal judges in Texas this week struck down that state’s recently redrawn congressional maps, voters in California might be wondering if that means the Golden State will halt its own mid-decade redistricting plan.

    After all, when Gov. Gavin Newsom and other California Democrats began talking about redistricting early on, they framed it as a counter to the gerrymandering in Texas that was meant to benefit Republicans there. In selling the idea to voters that California should adopt new maps that benefit Democrats, Newsom said, just before he signed a bill to call the special election, “We’re responding (to) what occurred in Texas; we’re neutralizing what occurred.”

    However, now that Texas may not be able to move forward with its redistricting plan — the recent decision could still be overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court — some voters may wonder if California ought to proceed with its new maps.

    Newsom’s office confirmed that California can still go forward with its plan because it is not contingent on what happens in any other state.

    That’s because on the day the California Legislature passed bills to call for a special election and put new maps before voters, language that said California’s new maps would be implemented “only if Texas, Florida, or another state adopts a new congressional district map” was removed. At the time, a spokesperson for Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas said that wording was removed because Texas had, by then, voted to redistrict.

    “Because Texas Republicans have voted,” spokesperson Nick Miller said in an August email, “the original trigger language in our measure is no longer necessary.”

    “To make sure the measure is clear to California voters when they have the final say, it has been removed,” he added.

    Some voters may still be surprised, though, thinking California would only move forward with redistricting if Texas does. The title of the ballot measure had stated that Proposition 50 “authorizes temporary changes to congressional district maps in response to Texas’ partisan redistricting.”

    “There is more than one reason that Californians may feel misled, including the reason for (our) lawsuit,” Mike Columbo, the lead attorney in a case challenging the state’s new congressional maps, said in an email.

    That lawsuit — brought by California Republicans, and which the U.S. Department of Justice later joined — alleged California’s maps are unconstitutional because districts were racially gerrymandered. A spokesperson for Newsom previously expressed confidence that the state will prevail in court.

    Asked if California still plans to redistrict in light of this week’s ruling on the Texas maps, Newsom’s office responded with a statement from the governor: President Donald Trump and Texas Gov. Greg Abbott “played with fire, got burned — and democracy won. This ruling is a win for Texas, and for every American who fights for free and fair elections.”

    To be clear: Texas has filed an appeal with the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn the 2-1 decision by the federal district court judges. Should the nation’s highest court ultimately side with Texas, the maps that Abbott is pushing for could be implemented after all.

    Meanwhile, irrespective of the Texas case, there’s still the matter of the Republicans’ lawsuit challenging California’s maps.

    With that case still pending, voters and candidates alike may be asking what this means for California and the 2026 midterm elections. When will they know what the districts look like?

    After all, a key date for candidates is coming up: Starting Dec. 19, candidates who don’t want to pay the filing fee to run for a House seat can begin gathering voter signatures to have the fee waived.

    Knowing by then what the boundaries are for the district they’re running in is important, said Columbo.

    “It will create a problem for voters and those candidates if the districts change after that date,” he said.

    His team is seeking a preliminary injunction and requesting that California’s current congressional maps — used in the 2024 elections — remain in place until a final decision is rendered about the legality of those established by Proposition 50.

    A three-judge panel will hear the matter on Dec. 3, and attorneys for the plaintiffs have asked for a decision on the preliminary injunction by Dec. 5 so that if the losing side appeals, the U.S. Supreme Court would have two weeks to weigh in before Dec. 19, Columbo said.

    “The reason we are asking for such a quick decision is to avoid the confusion and disruption that would occur if we don’t have a decision by Dec. 19 and then later, the court determines that the maps are unconstitutional,” he said.

    Once it’s established which maps candidates will run on, the lawsuit challenging the Proposition 50 maps would proceed as normal through the court process, Columbo said.

    Such a plan is not unheard of.

    Jessica Levinson, a professor at Loyola Law School who has taught courses on constitutional law and election law, said in these types of cases, a court generally will indicate which map shall be used for the next election while a case is still being heard.

    That happened, she said, with an ongoing U.S. Supreme Court case that centers around Louisiana’s congressional maps.

    “People need to know which lines are in place before they have to declare their candidacy,” Levinson said. “Judges will have to give some indication about whether or not the new lines can be used. That will obviously have huge implications for who runs, in which district and what the contest looks like.”

    “We just need to know which lines to use,” she added. “But the case doesn’t need to have a final resolution” yet.

    In the meantime, candidates have already started announcing their plans to run in districts based on the Proposition 50 maps. With California’s June 2 primary election just over six months away, a number of candidates have started fundraising and seeking endorsements.

    [ad_2]

    Linh Tat

    Source link

  • Exclusive: Gov. Gavin Newsom reacts to ex-aide’s arrest — ‘real surprise and shock’

    [ad_1]

    California Gov. Gavin Newsom, right, is seen with his then-chief of staff Dana Williamson in an undated photo released by the Governor’s Office. Williamson served as Newsom’s top aide during key moments of his first term, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2021 recall election.

    California Gov. Gavin Newsom, right, is seen with his then-chief of staff Dana Williamson in an undated photo released by the Governor’s Office. Williamson served as Newsom’s top aide during key moments of his first term, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2021 recall election.

    Governor’s Office via Politico

    The recent arrest of Capitol powerbroker Dana Williamson took Gov. Gavin Newsom completely by surprise, he said Wednesday in his first remarks since the U.S. Attorney’s Office indicted his former chief of staff on 23 counts of conspiracy to commit bank and wire fraud, lying to the FBI, falsifying tax returns and obstruction.

    FBI agents arrested Williamson, who served as Newsom’s chief of staff from December 2022 to November 2024, last Wednesday at her Carmichael home. Prosecutors accused her, lobbyist Greg Campbell and former Deputy State Attorney General Sean McCluskie of orchestrating a scheme to pad McCluskie’s salary by stealing $225,000 from dormant campaign accounts belonging to former Attorney General Xavier Becerra, who is now running for governor in 2026.

    In an exclusive interview with The Sacramento Bee, Newsom said his first reaction was “real surprise and shock,” as well as concern for Williamson’s four children when he learned about her arrest while in Brazil at a United Nations climate summit. Prosecutors also charged Williamson with claiming $1 million worth of private jet travel, furniture and luxury clothing as business deductions, in addition to the 18 bank and wire fraud counts. She pleaded not guilty, was released on bond and is awaiting a court appearance next month.

    Newsom said the office was first made aware of the FBI investigation a year ago, after agents first approached Williamson. His office then placed her on leave and she left the following month, in December 2024.

    “As soon as we found out about it (the FBI investigation), my legal folks came over and we moved to place her on leave,” the governor said. “My hope was, over the course (of) last year, that whatever this was, I wasn’t privy to the details, it would be worked out.”

    A spokesperson for the governor previously told The Bee that the office had also been informed that Williamson was working to resolve a civil matter related to a Paycheck Protection Program loan for her political consulting firm.

    Since Williamson’s arrest, lobbyists, consultants and current and former members of Newsom’s administration have received letters from the FBI informing them that their phones were intercepted as part of its investigation.

    Newsom said he did not receive any such letter, nor has the FBI interviewed him as part of its ongoing investigation. He said he does not believe he is the intended target of the FBI probe, as Williamson’s lawyer has alleged.

    “I don’t know anything about that..and whatever that assertion is,” he said. “That was certainly not reflected in the indictment itself. There’s nothing specific in that respect, or at least connects me.”

    Newsom’s office insinuated last week that the investigation may be political, as the DOJ has targeted Democratic politicians and opponents of Trump in recent months, including New York Attorney General Leticia James and former FBI Director James Comey.

    “There’s not an objective observer of this (federal) administration that can’t be concerned about that,” Newsom told The Bee. “I mean, just look at their actions on a consistent basis. Look at, you know, their actions over the course the last few months. So, I mean, I think that that’s the table stakes as it relates to the moment we’re living in.”

    The FBI investigation into Williamson appears to also be linked to a previous state sexual harassment lawsuit against gaming company Activision Blizzard, which Williamson, Campbell and lobbyist Alexis Podesta, an unindicted co-conspirator, all represented at one time. The Department of Fair Employment and Housing, now known as the Civil Rights Department, sued Activision Blizzard in 2021 for fomenting a “frat boy” culture that allowed unfettered sexual harassment and discrimination against female employees.

    Two state attorneys on the case were fired and resigned in protest in spring 2022, accusing the Governor’s Office of “interfering” in the case. Prosecutors said Williamson passed on information about the case to Podesta in January 2023 while she was chief of staff and the case was ongoing, claiming she could get another attorney on the case fired.

    “To the extent that there’s some allegations around her (Williamson’s) relationship with Activision, from my vantage point, from the vantage point of everyone around me, I’m not aware of anything,” Newsom said. “So that would, that would be of concern in that respect. But, look, no one’s naive about the moment we’re living in. And, as I say, this was really surprising to me in the first place.”

    Activision Blizzard, which is now part of Microsoft, eventually agreed to pay $54 million in a December 2023 settlement, but did not admit wrongdoing. Casey Wasserman, a member of its board of directors at the time, donated $100,000 to Newsom’s recall defense campaign in 2021.

    Newsom said Wasserman, whom he tapped in January to lead the philanthropic effort overseeing wildfire recovery in Los Angeles County, is a longtime friend of 30 years, from before he first entered politics in San Francisco in 1995. Wasserman, a sports executive, is also chair of the nonprofit LA28, which is overseeing the 2028 Olympics in Los Angeles. His company also employs sports agent Doug Hendrickson, Newsom’s longtime friend and co-host of the “Politickin’” podcast.

    Newsom pointed out that Bobby Kotick, Activision Blizzard’s chief executive, donated to efforts opposing Proposition 50, the governor’s successful bid to redistrict congressional districts: “He’s hardly been shy as an advocate for causes we’re not necessarily aligned with.”

    Wasserman, who is no longer on the Activision Blizzard board, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    Newsom, who has said he’s considering a presidential run after he’s termed out of office next year, has not taken a position in the governor’s race, which may now be shaken up by the scandal surrounding Becerra’s former aide. Newsom suggested Wednesday he would not issue any endorsements.

    “I try to avoid that topic, just on the basis of its uncomfortable … when you have a sell-by date,” Newsom said. “I used to be frustrated with Jerry Brown when he wasn’t returning my calls at this stage. Now, I’m deeply empathetic to Jerry, and actually want to apologize to him for being a pest … I think it’s more interesting who’s not running, you know, with Kamala (Harris) and (Alex) Padilla, than who is (running).”

    Before joining Newsom’s administration, Williamson was known as a sharp-elbowed political operative who brokered some of the governor’s most ambitious legislative deals. She is accused of helping McCluskie, a longtime Becerra aide, funnel money from Becerra’s accounts by disguising them as payments to his wife for a no-show job with Williamson’s consulting firm.

    McGregor Scott, Williamson’s attorney, last week accused the FBI of arresting his client as retaliation for not cooperating with an investigation into Newsom. Williamson initially retained Scott two years ago for help with a “discrete matter,” he said.

    Scott, the former U.S. Attorney in Sacramento, said federal prosecutors ignored his requests to meet and allow his client to voluntarily surrender herself. Instead, FBI agents stormed her home and temporarily handcuffed one of her adult children during her arrest last week.

    “We appreciate the governor’s concern for my client’s children,” Scott said Wednesday.

    This story was originally published November 19, 2025 at 8:57 PM.

    Related Stories from Miami Herald

    Lia Russell

    The Sacramento Bee

    Lia Russell covers California’s governor for The Sacramento Bee’s Capitol Bureau. Originally from San Francisco, Lia previously worked for The Baltimore Sun and the Bangor Daily News in Maine.

    [ad_2]

    Lia Russell

    Source link

  • Why Trump’s plan to help GOP keep control of the House could backfire

    [ad_1]

    As President Donald Trump laid it out to reporters this summer, the plan was simple.

    Republicans, the president said, were “entitled” to five more conservative-leaning U.S. House seats in Texas and additional ones in other red states. The president broke with more than a century of political tradition in directing the GOP to redraw those maps in the middle of the decade to avoid losing control of Congress in next year’s midterms.

    Four months later, Trump’s audacious ask looks anything but simple. After a federal court panel struck down Republicans’ new map in Texas on Tuesday, the entire exercise holds the potential to net Democrats more winnable seats in the House instead.

    “Trump may have let the genie out of the bottle,” said UCLA law professor Rick Hasen, “but he may not get the wish he’d hoped for.”

    Trump’s plan is to bolster his party’s narrow House margin to protect Republicans from losing control of the chamber in next year’s elections. Normally, the president’s party loses seats in the midterms. But his involvement in redistricting is instead becoming an illustration of the limits of presidential power.

    Playing with fire

    To hold Republicans’ grip on power in Washington, Trump is relying on a complex political process.

    Redrawing maps is a decentralized effort that involves navigating a tangle of legal rules. It also involves a tricky political calculus because the legislators who hold the power to draw maps often want to protect themselves, business interests or local communities more than ruthlessly help their party.

    And when one party moves aggressively to draw lines to help itself win elections — also known as gerrymandering — it runs the risk of pushing its rival party to do the same.

    That’s what Trump ended up doing, spurring California voters to replace their map drawn by a nonpartisan commission with one drawn by Democrats to gain five seats. If successful, the move would cancel out the action taken by Texas Republicans. California voters approved that map earlier this month, and if a Republican lawsuit fails to block it, that map giving Democrats more winnable seats will remain in effect even if Texas’ remains stalled.

    “Donald Trump and Greg Abbott played with fire, got burned — and democracy won,” California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, posted on X after the Texas ruling, mentioning his Republican counterpart in Texas along with the president.

    Rep. Kevin Kiley, a Republican whose northern California district would be redrawn under the state’s new map, agreed.

    “It could very well come out as a net loss for Republicans, honestly when you look at the map, or at the very least, it could end up being a wash,” Kiley said. “But it’s something that never should have happened. It was ill-conceived from the start.”

    For Trump, a mix of wins and losses

    There’s no guarantee that Tuesday’s ruling on the Texas map will stand. Many lower courts have blocked Trump’s initiatives, only for the conservative majority on the U.S. Supreme Court to put those rulings on hold. Texas Republicans immediately appealed Tuesday’s decision to the high court, too.

    Republicans hope the nation’s highest court also weakens or eliminates the last major component of the Voting Rights Act next year, which could open the door to further redraws in their favor.

    Even before Tuesday, Trump’s push for mid-decade redistricting was not playing out as neatly as he had hoped, though he had scored some apparent wins. North Carolina Republicans potentially created another conservative-leaning seat in that battleground state, while Missouri Republicans redrew their congressional map at Trump’s urging to eliminate one Democratic seat. The Missouri plan faces lawsuits and a possible referendum that would force a statewide vote on the matter.

    Trump’s push has faltered elsewhere. Republicans in Kansas balked at trying to eliminate the state’s lone swing seat, held by a Democratic congresswoman. Indiana Republicans also refused to redraw their map to eliminate their two Democratic-leaning congressional seats.

    After Trump attacked the main Indiana holdout, state Sen. Greg Goode, on social media, he was the victim of a swatting call over the weekend that led to sheriff’s deputies coming to his house.

    Trump’s push could have a boomerang effect on Republicans

    The bulk of redistricting normally happens once every 10 years, following the release of new population estimates from the U.S. Census. That requires state lawmakers to adjust their legislative lines to make sure every district has roughly the same population. It also opens the door to gerrymandering maps to make it harder for the party out of power to win legislative seats.

    Inevitably, redistricting leads to litigation, which can drag on for years and spur mid-decade, court-mandated revisions.

    Republicans stood to benefit from these after the last cycle in 2021 because they won state supreme court elections in North Carolina and Ohio in 2022. But some litigation hasn’t gone the GOP’s way. A judge in Utah earlier this month required the state to make one of its four congressional seats Democratic-leaning.

    Trump broke with modern political practice by urging a wholesale, mid-decade redraw in red states.

    Democrats were in a bad position to respond to Trump’s gambit because more states they control have lines drawn by independent commissions rather than by partisan lawmakers, the legacy of government reform efforts.

    But with Newsom’s push to let Democrats draw California’s lines successful, the party is looking to replicate it elsewhere.

    Next up may be Virginia, where Democrats recaptured the governor’s office this month and expanded their margins in the Legislature. A Democratic candidate for governor in Colorado has called for a similar measure there. Republicans currently hold 9 of the 19 House seats in those two states.

    Overall, Republicans have more to lose if redistricting becomes a purely partisan activity nationally and voters in blue states ditch their nonpartisan commissions to let their preferred party maximize its margins. In the last complete redistricting cycle in 2021, commissions drew 95 House seats that Democrats would have otherwise drawn, and only 13 that Republicans would have drawn.

    Gerrymandering’s unintended consequences

    On Tuesday, Republicans were reappraising Trump’s championing of redistricting hardball.

    “I think if you look at the basis of this, there was no member of the delegation that was asked our opinion,” Republican Rep. Pete Sessions of Texas told reporters.

    Incumbents usually don’t like the idea of radically redrawing districts. It can lead to what political experts call a “dummymander” — spreading the opposing party’s voters so broadly that they end up endangering your own incumbents in a year, like 2026, that is expected to be bad for the party in power.

    Incumbents also don’t like losing voters who have supported them or getting wholly new communities drawn into their districts, said Jonathan Cervas, who teaches redistricting at Carnegie Mellon University and has drawn new maps for courts. Democratic lawmakers in Illinois and Maryland have so far resisted mid-decade redraws to pad their majorities in their states, joining their GOP counterparts in Indiana and Kansas.

    Cervas said that’s why it was striking to watch Trump push Republicans to dive into mid-decade redistricting.

    “The idea they’d go along to get along is basically crazy,” he said.

    ___

    Associated Press writers Joey Cappelletti and Kevin Freking in Washington contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link