ReportWire

Tag: gaby hoffmann

  • Screening at NYFF: Scott Cooper’s ‘Springsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere’

    Jeremy Allen White as Bruce Springsteen. Photo courtesy of 20th Century Studios. © 2025 20th Century Studios. All Rights Reserved.

    The first and final scenes of any film are vital, and contained within these bookends you can find the entire story of Springsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere. Unfortunately, nearly everything in between is standard biopic filler and reinforces filmmaker Scott Cooper’s unique position in the Hollywood landscape: he’s a tremendous director of actors and quite unremarkable at most other parts of the job.

    Based on Warren ZanesBruce Springsteen biography of the same name, the film (which Cooper both directed and wrote) tells the story of how the famed heartland rocker created Nebraska—perhaps his most time-tested album—but it seldom has anything to say beyond observing his emotional troubles during this period, often at great dramatic distance. Despite this contained focus on a one-year period, Deliver Me From Nowhere is very much a decades-spanning saga in the tale of most by-the-numbers “true stories” about revered figures and begins with a monochrome depiction of a young Springsteen (Matthew Pellicano Jr.) listening to his father (Stephen Graham) abuse his mother (Gaby Hoffmann) in the next room. A hard cut from his haunted expression to the adult Springsteen (Jeremy Allen White) delivering a full-throated, thoroughly embodied performance of “Born to Run” in 1981 creates a strange but appropriate thematic link between these childhood events and Springsteen’s ’70s mega-hit. Regardless of what the song was actually about (in short: a girl), its lyrics become an obvious cipher here for a man escaping his past at lightspeed. If only the rest of the film had maintained this momentum.

    As mentioned, Deliver Me From Nowhere does in fact conclude with a touching gesture toward catharsis, so in theory one could string these brief opening and closing acts together to create a much more impactful short film without losing very much by way of story. However, viewers then wouldn’t be treated to the real delights of a Scott Cooper joint: broad caricatures who become imbued with beating humanity in a way so few American filmmakers tend to manage. As Springsteen begins work on his next album, he sees the process as a long-overdue exorcism of personal demons, while his record executives et al. want more hits for the radio. The Boss, however, is largely shielded from these demands, leaving his manager and producer Jon Landau (Jeremy Strong) to advocate on his behalf.

    This side of things—the logistics of creating the next big hit or cultural phenomenon—features little by way of discernible drama despite the many arguments that play out in the confines of various offices. And yet it can be intriguing to watch in its own way, as Landau becomes the de facto point-of-view character for lengthy stretches, talking up Springsteen’s genius to anyone who’ll listen (including and especially David Krumholtz’s Columbia record exec) while barely giving any pushback to the artist himself. There’s a sense of inevitability to Nebraska coming into being (and the iconic Born in the U.S.A. after it, which used many of his original concepts for the former). On one hand, this rarely affords the movie any meaningful stakes. On the other, it allows Strong to create a cautiously eager version of Landau who practically bleeds adoration for Springsteen. Similarly, Paul Walter Hauser plays an eager recording engineer who goes along with Springsteen’s intentionally lo-fi plans for Nebraska, while Marc Maron plays a mostly silent studio mixer who, despite a few incredulous reactions, largely goes along with things. After all, who is he, and who are any of them, to question the Boss?

    A man with curly hair and a sweat-soaked shirt sings passionately into a microphone on stage, one arm raised in the air under bright concert lights.A man with curly hair and a sweat-soaked shirt sings passionately into a microphone on stage, one arm raised in the air under bright concert lights.
    White’s conception of Springsteen is joyful to witness. Photo courtesy of 20th Century Studios. © 2025 20th Century Studios. All Rights Reserved.

    This kind of idolatry is usually the raison d’être for jukebox “IP” biopics like Deliver Me From Nowhere, and there’s a refreshing honesty to the hagiography refracted in Strong’s doting gaze. Granted, the film is prevented from veering into full-on Boss propaganda by the personal half of the story, in which he enters a romance with radiant single mother Faye Romano (Odessa Young), a relationship that feels doomed by the very same inevitability that colors the movie’s making-of-Nebraska half. He offers her, up front, a premonition of what will inevitably happen—that he won’t be able to commit himself to loving her so long as this album and its ghosts hang around his neck—but with the movie’s parameters all clearly established, in the studio and behind closed doors, there remains little reason to watch it beyond its performances. Springsteen will prioritize his work, people will laud his musical talent and he will eventually confront the wounds of his past, but none of these are framed as part of a story where Springsteen’s or anyone’s human impulses threaten to derail the inevitable for even a moment.

    White’s conception of Springsteen is joyful to witness, not just for the way he impersonates the Boss’s gravelly voice and vein-popping performances but for the way he conjures Springsteen’s spirit through exaggeration. He crafts a sense of mood (and moodiness) where the film might not otherwise contain it, brooding to the extreme and sitting in Jersey and New York diner booths hunched over to the side, leaning so far that he threatens to keel over. He doesn’t so much play Springsteen as he does an imaginary, effortlessly cool, deeply tormented version that James Dean might have portrayed, and Deliver Me From Nowhere is slightly better for it. In tandem with Masanobu Takayanagi’s cinematography, which subtly silhouettes the superstar and turns him into an icon even in mundane settings, the film has tremendous physical architecture even if its emotional architecture is practically null.


    SPRINGSTEEN: DELIVER ME FROM NOWHERE ★★ (2/4 stars)
    Directed by: Scott Cooper
    Written by: Scott Cooper
    Starring: Jeremy Allen White, Jeremy Strong, Paul Walter Hauser, Stephen Graham, Odessa Young, David Krumholtz, Gaby Hoffmann, Harrison Sloan Gilbertson, Grace Gummer, Marc Maron, Matthew Pellicano Jr.
    Running time: 114 mins.


    Clichés abound in the form of flowery dialogue, but the kind that, when imbued with enough cinematic gusto—Springsteen speaks of “finding silence amongst the noise”—can transcend their trappings and become jubilant. Unfortunately, here they end up as overwritten pablum that struggles to convey meaning.

    There are movie references aplenty, from Springsteen discovering dark subject matter through a Terrence Malick film and flashbacks of him enjoying Charles Laughton’s sumptuous The Night of the Hunter with his father. But these only serve as mood boards, presented as-is when Springsteen watches them, rather than becoming stylistic or thematic influences for the artist or for the film at large. They become reminders of how comparatively little by way of style or philosophy Cooper puts into his work, even if his protagonist can be seen watching them, enjoying them and being influenced by them in a way that makes his wheels silently turn. But what that influence leads to, and the synapses it fires, remain something of a mystery.

    At the end of the day, Deliver Me From Nowhere is a film worth looking at and observing from the same distance that Cooper frames his impenetrable version of Springsteen, whose troubles hover over his creative process like a gloomy cloud. But the camera seldom looks past the pristine surfaces it creates in order to explore those problems or Springsteen’s connection to the many lyrics we see him jotting down throughout the runtime. “Double album??” he scrawls at one point, underlining it twice in a gesture that hilariously ends up with about as much weight and meaning as any of Springsteen’s actual lyrics—in a film nominally about the lifelong pain that fuels them. Sure. Double album. Why the hell not?

    Screening at NYFF: Scott Cooper’s ‘Springsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere’

    Siddhant Adlakha

    Source link

  • Eric: Change Comes From Within (Even If You’re Without A Puppet-y Shell)

    Eric: Change Comes From Within (Even If You’re Without A Puppet-y Shell)

    Set during the time and place everyone loves to romanticize—New York City in the 1980s—Abi Morgan’s Eric isn’t your typical kidnapping story. But then, nor is Morgan your typical screenwriter, having showcased a wide range of genres and styles over the years, something that is best elucidated by the fact that she is the writer of both The Iron Lady starring Meryl Streep and Shame starring Michael Fassbender. Eric probably falls more in the same column as the latter, even if not as overtly “seedy.” Still, it does explore a certain underworld (often literally) of New York, one that, in this case, involves a network of homeless people intertwined with the proverbial “hustle” aboveground. 

    The hustle in question is centered around a nightclub called The Lux, which just so happens to be right near the Andersons’ apartment. A place where Vincent (Benedict Cumberbatch) and Cassie (Gaby Hoffman, coming out of her intermittent retirement to remind us of her aphorism, “I really love my job, but I don’t want to do it that often”) live in the antithesis of wedded bliss. Their nine-year-old son, Edgar (Ivan Morris Howe), to his dismay, lives with them, too, and is daily subjected to their toxic fighting. 

    This constant exposure to the kinds of “adult fare” he shouldn’t be hearing is just one of the many reasons for Edgar’s obvious precociousness. In addition to his father quizzing him on who said quotes like, “Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself.” A chestnut penned by none other than Leo Tolstoy. And it also serves as the crux of the series’ message, which is why use of the Tolstoyism is established in the first episode. Even if, in many moments, there are other themes that shine through. Like, for example, the racism inherent in police handlings of missing children reports. Or a white boy being so taken with a Black man and his graffiti that he would rather descend into the depths of hell than spend another second in his cush abode. And it is cush. After all, rent was much more affordable for a two-income household in 1985, regardless of neighborhood. Even if it’s hard to tell what neighborhood the Andersons live in. For the entire aesthetic of Eric is intended to make the environs as vague as possible, a mere “sketch” of what New York is “supposed to” look like. On the one hand, there are Times Square-ish sensibilities to it, while on the other, there are Brooklyn-ish qualities as well. 

    The seemingly deliberate genericness of what constitutes “80s New York” is, in part, a result of filming the majority of the show in Budapest. As director Lucy Forbes said, “There was never going to be an option to shoot the whole thing in New York because it’s so expensive.” A statement that seems ripe with bittersweet irony considering how many films of the 80s were made guerilla-style and on the cheap (e.g., Susan Seidelman’s Smithereens).” She then added, “So it was about choosing the right place to go, and Budapest has lots of very good studio space that is cost effective and has an amazing crew.” Granted, not so amazing that they could turn back the clock and make New York look like New York again, but hey, you can’t have everything.

    Instead, you have to search for little fragments of what used to make the city itself by going to other milieus, including none other than New Jersey. On seeking a bit of 80s New York in the Garden State, executive producer Lucy Dyke noted, “It’s hard because you’re searching for a 1980s New York that just doesn’t exist anymore. New York is such a completely different place now, so we went all over the world searching for that.” The aesthetic result is, accordingly, something that feels decidedly Eastern Europe meets Montreal (where, on a side note, Scream VI filmed for its “New York” premise). This in addition to sharing an overall aesthetic similarity to Stranger Things—also a Netflix series, and also set in the 80s. And, perhaps most similar of all, involving the disappearance of a preteen boy. 

    Except that in Edgar’s situation, the disappearance is voluntary. Because, after reaching a threshold for the discord he can tolerate between his parents, he decides to follow one of the many homeless people in the area down into the bowels of the subway (in this regard, there is a certain Beauty and the Beast [the 1987 TV series] vibe to Eric). That’s how desperate he is to escape the toxicity. Of course, his parents won’t realize that until the end of the series, when it hits them that their constant bickering was what drove him away, preferring to brave the mean streets of New York rather than continue to sit inside listening to his father spew bilious rhetoric. For example, telling Cassie, “Don’t smother the boy” when she simply gives her son a hug. He then continues to spout his toxic masculinity by complaining that maybe he wouldn’t be so “grumpy” if it hadn’t been “weeks” since he got “laid.” 

    To make matters worse, Vincent fuels his already choleric temperament with a steady stream of alcohol to help fortify his inherent belligerence. A rage that has long been deep-seated, largely thanks to the cold environment he grew up in, courtesy of his rich real estate “development” father, Robert Anderson (John Doman), who matches the same level of emotional coldness as Vincent’s mother, Anne (Phoebe Nicholls). With Robert representing the rash of Trumpian-type “developers” reigning over 80s New York (and determining its future of homogeneity), it’s no wonder Vincent wants to go in the totally opposite direction, career-wise. Hence, starting his own Sesame Street-esque kids’ show called Good Day Sunshine Although the show has been an “institution” on TV for the past ten years, Vincent’s partner and collaborator, Lennie Wilson (Dan Fogler), insists they need to make changes to the show in order to make up for the recent dip in viewership. The suggestion from the suits is to “broaden appeal,” to “bridge the gap” between preschoolers and elementary school kids. All of this is polite white speak for: let’s get a more ethnic puppet. 

    It is Edgar, however, who already has a bright idea for the show’s newest cast member. A blue and white furry creature (channeling Sully from Monsters, Inc.) that has a markedly curmudgeonly personality. His name? Why, Eric, of course. Alas, Vincent isn’t really paying attention to Edgar’s “pitch” until it’s too late. Taking for granted, as so many parents do, that their children will always keep trying to be heard by them. But there’s only so many times and ways a child can shout from the mountaintops to actually be listened to by their parents. And Edgar is done trying. 

    Thus, Detective Michael Ledroit (McKinley Belcher III) is given his entrée into the narrative. His own storyline designed to reflect that specific era in New York. To that end, it is here that Eric starts to verge slightly into AHS: NYC territory (mainly with its closeted-gay-cop-dealing-with-the-gradual-death-of-a-lover-who-has-AIDS element)—except actually watchable. Mainly because, more than a “nostalgia trip” (with shades of Twin Peaks in addition to Stranger Things), Eric, through all its bleakness, manages to stick to its core point: “Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself.” Least of all Vincent, who grows increasingly surly and unreachable as he drives the few people who were once close to him away in the aftermath of Edgar’s disappearance. 

    In both Vincent and Edgar’s—father and son’s—situations, one is a product of their environment. Eric posits, then, that the only way to really change is to remove yourself from the environment that’s turning you rotten on the inside. Even if the real problem lies within the environment itself (a.k.a. the person supposedly “in charge” that’s, er, puppeteering all that negativity).

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • ‘Sleepless in Seattle’ Wanted to Screw With Our Expectations About Love

    ‘Sleepless in Seattle’ Wanted to Screw With Our Expectations About Love

    “Shall we?” Tom Hanks’s Sam asks Meg Ryan’s Annie, lifting his hand toward hers as a slight breeze blows and the music swells. The Seattle widower and Baltimore journalist finally meet—where else—atop the observation deck of the Empire State Building on Valentine’s Day, as Sam’s son, Jonah (Ross Malinger), looks on adoringly. This is only the start of their romance, but it’s the end of Sleepless in Seattle, released 30 years ago and now remembered as one of the best romantic comedies of all time.

    Unfolding during the typically dreary period between Christmas and Valentine’s Day, Annie and Sam’s cross-country meet-cute begins with a Delilah-style radio show, which Jonah calls into with one request: find a new wife for his father. At one point, Sam gets roped into joining the call. Once on the line, he heartbreakingly describes the moment he fell in love with Jonah’s mother. “I knew it the very first time I touched her,” he says. “It was like coming home, only to no home I’d ever known.” Thousands of miles away, Annie is one of many listeners entranced by the story, maybe by the mere sound of Sam’s voice. A journey to meet him ensues.

    “You don’t want to be in love. You want to be in love in a movie,” Annie’s best friend, Becky (Rosie O’Donnell), says—both a warning to the character and summary of why Sleepless in Seattle, directed by Nora Ephron from a screenplay by Ephron, David S. Ward, and Jeff Arch, endures three decades later.

    Nominated for two Academy Awards and one of the highest-grossing films of 1993, Sleepless is the kind of movie that both comforts and confounds. “What if someone you never met, someone you never saw, someone you never knew was the only someone for you?” its tagline reads, a premise as fitting of a horror film as a romance. Repeat viewings lay bare the movie’s small pleasures—a kid-aged Gaby Hoffmann booking Jonah’s flight to New York, Rob Reiner explaining new-fangled ’90s dating to a stupified Sam—but can also leave the viewer stupified. As Roger Ebert wrote in his review,Sleepless in Seattle is as ephemeral as a talk show, as contrived as the late show, and yet so warm and gentle I smiled the whole way through.”

    Writer-director Nora Ephron, who sandwiched Sleepless in between 1989’s When Harry Met Sally and 1998’s You’ve Got Mail, understood the mix of sour and sweet required to get one love-drunk. According to film producer Gary Foster, Ephron was hired as “a slightly cynical New Yorker who was looking to put a little edge in the fairy tale.” As Ephron told Rolling Stone in 1993, she was merely “looking for a cash infusion.” But she had her directive in mind, once declaring of the film: “Our dream was to make a movie about how movies screw up your brain about love, and then if we did a good job, we would become one of the movies that would screw up people’s brains about love forever.”

    In Ephron’s hands, the script was infused with her biting East Coast wit, including a pre-Seinfeld “Soup Nazi” reference. (At one point, Annie enters her office at The Baltimore Sun to hear the tail-end of a coworker’s pitch: “he’s the meanest guy in the world, but he makes the best soup you’ve ever eaten.”) There’s also the following interoffice exchange:

    Coworker: It’s easier to be killed by a terrorist than it is to find a husband over the age of 40.

    Annie: That’s not true.

    Becky: But it feels true.

    (Sidenote: there’s a very similar riff on this joke in 2006’s The Holiday, made by Nancy Meyers, the Pepsi to Ephron’s Coke.)

    But it also retained the genre’s unabashedly romantic DNA. By the time Ephron, the film’s fourth attached writer, got to the script, 1957’s An Affair to Remember had already become a character in the movie, much to Ephron’s chagrin. When she first watched the Cary Grant and Deborah Kerr–led romance, “I was a hopeless teenage girl awash in salt water,” Ephron told Rolling Stone. As an adult, she continued, “I now look at this movie and say, ‘What was I thinking?’” She got downright disdainful about it in another interview, calling Affair a “weepy” film that appeals to “one’s deepest masochistic core…. It’s really kind of hooking into those pathetic female fantasies.”

    Savannah Walsh

    Source link