The Securities and Exchange Commission on Friday said that a social-media post on X falsely stating that it had approved spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds was created after an “unauthorized party” obtained control over the phone number connected with the agency’s account on the platform.
The markets regulator said its staff would “continue to assess whether additional remedial measures are warranted” in the wake of the breach, which occurred Tuesday and raised questions about cybersecurity at both the agency and the social-media platform, formerly known as Twitter.
The agency said it was coordinating with law enforcement on the matter, including with the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security.
“Commission staff are still assessing the impacts of this incident on the agency, investors, and the marketplace but recognize that those impacts include concerns about the security of the SEC’s social media accounts,” the SEC said in a statement.
The confusion began on Tuesday afternoon, when the hacked post appeared on the SEC’s X account.
“Today the SEC grants approval for #Bitcoin ETFs for listing on registered national securities exchanges,” the post read. “The approved Bitcoin ETFs will be subject to ongoing surveillance and compliance measures to ensure continued investor protection.”
A second post appeared two minutes later that simply read “$BTC,” the SEC noted in its statement. The unauthorized user soon deleted that second post, but also liked two other posts by non-SEC accounts, according to the agency. The price of bitcoin BTCUSD, -0.71%
rose sharply in the wake of the posts, before soon pulling back.
In response to the hack, SEC staff posted on the official X account of SEC Chair Gary Gensler announcing that the agency’s main account had been compromised, and that it had not yet approved any spot bitcoin exchange-traded products. Staff then deleted the initial unauthorized post, un-liked the liked posts and used the official SEC account to make a new post clarifying the situation, the agency said Friday.
The SEC also said that it had reached out to X for assistance Tuesday in the wake of the incident, and that agency staff believe the unauthorized access to the SEC’s account was “terminated” later in the day.
“While SEC staff is still assessing the scope of the incident, there is currently no evidence that the unauthorized party gained access to SEC systems, data, devices, or other social media accounts,” the agency said.
Wednesday’s move marked a breakthrough for the crypto industry, which for years has tried to get such ETFs off the ground in hopes of drawing more traditional investors to the digital-asset space.
Bitcoin was down 7.6% over a 24-period as of Friday evening.
After long-awaited spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds made their debut this week,investors are now weighing the prospects of eventual approval of similar ether ETFs.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Wednesday greenlighted 11 spot bitcoin BTCUSD, -1.58%
ETFs for the first time. The products, which made its debut trading on Thursday, logged a relatively strong first day.
However, bitcoin fell 6.8% on Friday, leaving it with a 3.2% gain over the past seven days, according to CoinDesk data. It underperformed ether ETHUSD, +1.82%,
which rose 17.6% over the past seven days while it declined 1.2% on Friday.
The news about bitcoin ETFs was mostly priced in, while investors are now looking past it to a potential approval of ether ETFs, analysts said.
“I see value in having an ETH ETF,” Larry Fink, chief executive at the world’s largest asset manager BlackRock, told CNBC’s Squawk Box on Friday. BlackRock, which just launched its iShares bitcoin Trust IBIT,
in November filed an application for a spot ether ETF.
“It’s hard to know exactly what the U.S. regulators would do” about ether ETF applications, said Alonso de Gortari, chief economist at Mysten Labs, an internet infrastructure company.
However, “I would expect that once you open the door, it becomes easier and I think the industry is very excited about it,” de Gortari said. If bitcoin ETFs see an impressive institutional inflow in the coming months, it could make such products more established and set a good precedent for other crypto ETF applications, he said.
The enormous competition and huge inflows into bitcoin ETFs will only boost investors’ interests in an ether ETF, according to Paul Brody, EY’s global blockchain leader. “There’s no doubt that ETH is the next big market and has immediately become a priority for financial services companies,” Brody said in emailed comments.
Compared with bitcoin, the Ethereum blockchain offers more utility and has unique advantages, noted Fadi Aboualfa, head of research at digital assets custodian Copper.
Sandy Kaul, head of digital asset and industry advisory services at Franklin Templeton, said she eventually expects the arrival of ETFs that track a basket of cryptocurrencies. Such products, instead of those based on single crypto, would dominate the space if they are approved, she said.
“Just like the S&P 500 has 500 stocks in it, right? You don’t have just one stock.” Kaul said in a phone interview. The arrival of a bitcoin ETF, is just a “baby step into really beginning to think about the future market structure of crypto,” Kaul added.
However, not everyone is that optimistic. Will McDonough, founder and chairman of Corestone Capital, said the approval of an Ethereum ETF has “a long way to go.”
SEC chairman Gary Gensler previously said bitcoin was the only cryptocurrency he was prepared to publicly label a commodity, rather than a security.
The agency also went after companies that offered crypto staking, which allows investors to earn yields by locking their coins to secure blockchains such as Ethereum. The SEC shut down crypto exchange Kraken’s staking business in the U.S. last year.
One possibility is that “companies will be able to offer an ETH ETF, but they will not be allowed to stake that ETH and earn yield,” noted EY’s Brody.
The traditional portfolio of stocks and bonds has been on a tear over the past two months as the S&P 500 nears a record high, but it’s the big gains in fixed income that stand out, according to Bespoke Investment Group.
Fixed-income assets are typically the “insurance” part of the classic 60-40 portfolio, usually holding up during market weakness even if that wasn’t the case in 2022, Bespoke said in a note emailed Thursday. Both stocks and bonds in the U.S. have rallied during the fourth quarter and are up so far in 2023.
“With just two trading days left in the year, the market is on the verge of history,” Bespoke said. “After being written off for dead in the last year, the traditional 60/40 portfolio of 60% stocks and 40% bonds is within a whisker of its best two-month rally since at least 1990.”
In 2022, bonds failed to provide a cushion in the 60-40 portfolio as the Federal Reserve aggressively raised interest rates to battle surging inflation. Stocks and bonds tanked last year, with the S&P 500 SPX
seeing its ugliest annual performance since 2008, when the global financial crisis was wreaking havoc in markets.
Over the past two months, the classic 60-40 mix has seen a gain of 12.16% based on the total returns of the S&P 500 and Bloomberg Aggregate Bond Index, according to Bespoke. The current rolling two-month performance is stronger than gains seen in the two-month rally after the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic through May 2020, the firm found.
BESPOKE INVESTMENT GROUP NOTE EMAILED DEC. 28, 2023
“The only other period that was better for the strategy was the two months ending in April 2009,” the firm said. “Back then, the strategy rallied 12.25%, so if the next two trading days even see marginal gains, the current rally will set the record.”
Bonds surge
The Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF BND
and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF AGG
have each seen a total return of slightly more than 7% this quarter through Wednesday, according to FactSet data.
That puts the Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF on track for its best quarterly performance on record, while the iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF is heading for its biggest total return since 2008, FactSet data show. The iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF gained a total 7.4% in the fourth quarter of 2008.
In April 2009, “the bond leg” of the 60-40 portfolio was up just 1.87% on a rolling two-month basis, while in May 2020 it gained 2.25%, the Bespoke note shows.
“During this current period, bonds have rallied an unprecedented 8.87%, which far exceeds any other two-month period since at least 1990,” the firm said. “While they still underperformed stocks in the last two months, they have never acted as a smaller drag on the strategy during a period of strength.”
Bespoke found that the S&P 500, a gauge of U.S. large-cap stocks, is up 14.35% over the last two months on a total-return basis, “which is certainly strong relative to history but not anywhere close to a record.”
The U.S. stock market was trading slightly higher on Thursday afternoon, with the S&P 500 up 0.2% at around 4,791, according to FactSet data, at last check. That’s within striking distance of the index’s closing peak of 4,796.56, reached Jan. 3, 2022, according to Dow Jones Market Data.
As stocks were inching higher Thursday afternoon, shares of both the Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF were trading down modestly, according to FactSet data, at last check.
The yield on the 10-year Treasury note BX:TMUBMUSD10Y
was rising about seven basis points on Thursday afternoon, at around 3.85%, but is down so far this quarter, FactSet data show. Bond yields and prices move in opposite directions.
Bond prices are rallying as many investors anticipate the Fed is done hiking rates — and may begin cutting them sometime next year — as inflation has fallen significantly from its 2022 peak.
As for year-to-date gains, the S&P 500 has surged 26.6% on a total-return basis through Wednesday, while the iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF has gained a total 6.1% over the same period, FactSet data show.
Yields on 3-month BX:TMUBMUSD03M
and 6-month BX:TMUBMUSD06M
Treasury bills have been seeing yields north of 5% since March when Silicon Valley Bank’s collapse ignited fears of a broader instability in the U.S. banking sector from rapid-fire Fed rate hikes.
Six months later, the Fed, in its final meeting of the year, opted to keep its policy rate unchanged at 5.25% to 5.5%, a 22-year high, but Powell also finally signaled that enough was likely enough, and that a policy pivot to interest rate cuts was likely next year.
Importantly, the central bank chair also said he doesn’t want to make the mistake of keeping borrowing costs too high for too long. Powell’s comments helped lift the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA
above 37,000 for the first time ever on Wednesday, while the blue-chip index on Friday scored a third record close in a row.
“People were really shocked by Powell’s comments,” said Robert Tipp, chief investment strategist, at PGIM Fixed Income. Rather than dampen rate-cut exuberance building in markets, Powell instead opened the door to rate cuts by midyear, he said.
“Eventually, you end up with a lower fed-funds rate,” Tipp said in an interview. The risk is that cuts come suddenly, and can erase 5% yields on T-bills, money-market funds and other “cash-like” investments in the blink of an eye.
Swift pace of Fed cuts
When the Fed cut rates in the past 30 years it has been swift about it, often bringing them down quickly.
Fed rate-cutting cycles since the ’90s trace the sharp pullback also seen in 3-month T-bill rates, as shown below. They fell to about 1% from 6.5% after the early 2000 dot-com stock bust. They also dropped to almost zero from 5% in the teeth of the global financial crisis in 2008, and raced back down to a bottom during the COVID crisis in 2020.
Rates on 3-month Treasury bills dropped suddenly in past Fed rate-cutting cycles
FRED data
“I don’t think we are moving, in any way, back to a zero interest-rate world,” said Tim Horan, chief investment officer fixed income at Chilton Trust. “We are going to still be in a world where real interest rates matter.”
Burt Horan also said the market has reacted to Powell’s pivot signal by “partying on,” pointing to stocks that were back to record territory and benchmark 10-year Treasury yield’s BX:TMUBMUSD10Y
that has dropped from a 5% peak in October to 3.927% Friday, the lowest yield in about five months.
“The question now, in my mind,” Horan said, is how does the Fed orchestrate a pivot to rate cuts if financial conditions continue to loosen meanwhile.
“When they begin, the are going to continue with rate cuts,” said Horan, a former Fed staffer. With that, he expects the Fed to remain very cautious before pulling the trigger on the first cut of the cycle.
“What we are witnessing,” he said, “is a repositioning for that.”
Pivoting on the pivot
The most recent data for money-market funds shows a shift, even if temporary, out of “cash-like” assets.
The rush into money-market funds, which continued to attract record levels of assets this year after the failure of Silicon Valley Bank, fell in the past week by about $11.6 billion to roughly $5.9 trillion through Dec. 13, according to the Investment Company Institute.
Investors also pulled about $2.6 billion out of short and intermediate government and Treasury fixed income exchange-traded funds in the past week, according to the latest LSEG Lipper data.
Tipp at PGIM Fixed Income said he expects to see another “ping pong” year in long-term yields, akin to the volatility of 2023, with the 10-year yield likely to hinge on economic data, and what it means for the Fed as it works on the last leg of getting inflation down to its 2% annual target.
“The big driver in bonds is going to be the yield,” Tipp said. “If you are extending duration in bonds, you have a lot more assurance of earning an income stream over people who stay in cash.”
Molly McGown, U.S. rates strategist at TD Securities, said that economic data will continue to be a driving force in signaling if the Fed’s first rate cut of this cycle happens sooner or later.
With that backdrop, she expects next Friday’s reading of the personal-consumption expenditures price index, or PCE, for November to be a focus for markets, especially with Wall Street likely to be more sparsely staffed in the final week before the Christmas holiday.
The PCE is the Fed’s preferred inflation gauge, and it eased to a 3% annual rate in October from 3.4% a month before, but still sits above the Fed’s 2% annual target.
“Our view is that the Fed will hold rates at these levels in first half of 2024, before starting cutting rates in second half and 2025,” said Sid Vaidya, U.S. Wealth Chief Investment Strategist at TD Wealth.
U.S. housing data due on Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday of next week also will be a focus for investors, particularly with 30-year fixed mortgage rate falling below 7% for the first time since August.
The major U.S. stock indexes logged a seventh straight week of gains. The Dow advanced 2.9% for the week, while the S&P 500 SPX
gained 2.5%, ending 1.6% away from its Jan. 3, 2022 record close, according to Dow Jones Market Data.
The Nasdaq Composite Index COMP
advanced 2.9% for the week and the small-cap Russell 2000 index RUT
outperformed, gaining 5.6% for the week.
The stocks of long-neglected small companies are finally showing signs of life as the market rally broadens. But these tiny companies still remain vastly undervalued. So, they are one of the best buys in the stock market right now.
Small- and medium-cap companies, or smidcaps, have not been this cheap since the Great Financial Crisis 15 years ago. “Smidcaps relative to large caps look very attractive,” says says portfolio manager Aram Green, at the ClearBridge Select Fund LBFIX, which specializes in this space. “Over the long term you will be rewarded.”
Green is worth listening to because he is one of the better fund managers in the smidcap arena. ClearBridge Select beats both its midcap growth category and Morningstar U.S. midcap growth index over the past five- and 10 years, says Morningstar Direct. This is no easy feat, in a mutual fund world where so many funds lag their benchmarks.
The timing for smidcap outperformance seems about right, since these stocks do well coming out of recessions. Technically, we have not recently had a recession. But there was an economic slowdown in the first half of the year, and the U.S. did have an earnings recession earlier this year. So that may count.
To get smidcap exposure, consider the funds of outperforming managers like Green, and if you want to throw in some individual stocks, Green is a great guide on how to find the best names in this space.
I recently caught up with him to see what we can learn about analyzing smidcaps. Below are four tactics that contribute to his fund’s outperformance, with nine company examples to consider.
1. Look for an entrepreneurial mindset: Green’s background gives him an edge in investing. He’s an entrepreneur who co-founded a software company called iCollege in 1997. It was bought out by BlackBoard in 2001. He knows how to understand innovative trends, identify a good idea, secure capital and quickly ramp up a business. This experience gives him a “private market mindset” that helps him pick stocks to this day.
“Founder-run companies regularly outperform.”
Green looks for managers with an entrepreneurial mindset. You can glean this from company calls and filings, but it helps a lot to meet management — something most individual investors cannot do. But Green offers a shortcut, one which I regularly use, as well. Look for companies that are run by founders. This will give you exposure to managers with entrepreneurial spirit.
Here, Green cites the marketing software company HubSpot HUBS, +0.79%,
a 1.9% fund position as of the end of the third quarter. It was founded by Massachusetts Institute of Technology college buddies Brian Halligan and Dharmesh Shah. They’re on the company’s board, and Shah is chief technology officer.
Academic studies confirm founder-run companies regularly outperform. My guess is this is because many founders never lose the entrepreneurial spirit, no matter how easy it would be to quit and sip Mai Tai’s on a beach after making a bundle.
In the private market, Green cites Databricks, a data management and analytics company with an AI angle. This competitor of Snowflake SNOW, -0.92%
is likely to go public in 2024. If you feel like an outsider because you lack access to private market investing, note that Green says he typically buys more exposure to private companies on the initial public offering (IPO), and then in the market. “We like to spend time with them when they are private so we can pounce when they are public,” Green says.
2. Look for organic growth: When companies make acquisitions their stocks often decline, and for good reason. Managers make mistakes in acquisitions because they overestimate “synergies.” Or they get wrapped up in ego-enhancing empire building.
“We favor entrepreneurial management teams that do not make a lot of acquisitions to grow, but use their resources to develop new products to keep extending the runway,” says Green.
Here, he cites ServiceNow NOW, +2.62%,
which has grown by “extending the runway” with new offerings developed internally. It started off supporting information technology service desks, and has expanded into operations management of servers and security, onboarding employees, data analytics, and software that powers 911 emergency call systems. Green obviously thinks there is a lot more upside to come, given that this is an overweight position, at 4.6% of the portfolio (the fund’s biggest holding).
Green also puts the “Amazon.com of Latin America” MercadoLibre MELI, +0.17%
in this category, because it continues to expand geographically and in areas such as logistics and payment systems. “They have really morphed into a fintech company,” Green says. He puts HubSpot and the marketing software company Klaviyo KVYO, -5.73%
in this category, too.
3. Look for differentiated business models: Green likes companies with offerings that are special and different. That means they’ll take market share, and face minimal competition. They’ll also enjoy pricing power. “This leads to high margins. You don’t have someone beating you up on price,” he says.
Green cites the decking company Trex TREX, +0.10%,
which offers composite decking and railing made from recycled materials. This gives it an eco-friendly allure. Compared to wood, composite material lasts longer and requires less maintenance. It costs more up front but less over the long term. Says Green: “The alternative decking market has taken about 20% of the market and that can get to 50%.”
Of course, entrepreneurs notice success, and try to imitate it. That’s a risk here. But Trex has an edge in its understanding of how to make the composite material. It has a strong brand. And it is building relationships with big-box retailers Home Depot and Lowe’s. These qualities may keep competitors at bay.
4. Put some ballast in your portfolio: Green likes to keep the fund’s portfolio balanced by sector, size, and business dynamic. So the portfolio includes the food distributor Performance Food Group PFGC, -1.69%.
The company is posting mid-single digit sale growth, expanding market share and paying down debt. Energy drinks company Monster MNST, -0.85%
also offers ballast. Monster’s popular product line up helps the company to take share and enjoy pricing power, Green says.
It’s admittedly unusual to see a food companies in a portfolio loaded with high-growth tech innovators. But for Green, it’s all part of the game plan. “Rapid growth, disrupting businesses are not going to work year in year out. There are times they fall out of favor, like 2022. So, having that balance is important because it keeps you invested in the equity market.”
In other words, keeping some ballast means you’re less likely to get shaken out by sharp declines in high-growth and high-beta tech innovators when trouble strikes the market.
Michael Brush is a columnist for MarketWatch. At the time of publication, he owned AMZN, TSLA and MELI. Brush has suggested AMZN, TSLA, NOW, MELI, HD and LOW in his stock newsletter, Brush Up on Stocks. Follow him on X @mbrushstocks
U.S. stocks closed higher on Friday, shaking off earlier weakness after a strong monthly jobs report, to clinch a sixth straight week in a row of gains. The Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA, +0.36%
advanced about 130 points, or 0.4%, to end near 36,247, according to preliminary FactSet data. The S&P 500 index gained 0.4% Friday and the Nasdaq Composite finished 0.5% higher. A string of weekly gains propelled the S&P 500 index SPX, +0.41%
to a fresh 2023 closing high and left the Dow about 1.4% away from its record close set nearly two years ago, according to Dow Jones Market Data. Equities have benefitted from a risk-on tone going into year end, which has been driven by falling 10-year Treasury yields TMUBMUSD10Y, 4.230%
and optimism around the Federal Reserve potentially cutting interest rates in the year ahead. That hinges on if inflation continues to ease. November’s robust jobs report served as a reminder Friday of the tough path of the “last mile” in getting inflation down to the Fed’s 2% annual target. As part of this, the 10-year Treasury yield jumped about 11.5 basis points Friday to 4.244%, but still was about 74 basis points lower than its October high. For the week, the Dow was only fractionally higher, the S&P 500 gained 0.2% and the Nasdaq climbed 0.7%.
U.S. stocks booked back-to-back gains on Monday, despite rising oil prices and a deadly weekend assault on Israeli by Hamas that left hundreds dead. The Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA, +0.59%
rose about 197 points, or 0.6%, ending near 33,604, shaking off earlier weakness, while the S&P 500 index SPX, +0.63%
advanced 0.6% and the Nasdaq Composite Index COMP, +0.39%
gained 0.4%, according to preliminary FactSet data. U.S. benchmark oil prices CL00, +4.34%
rose 4.3% to $86.38 a barrel as traders gauged potential implications of the Israel-Gaza war on crude supplies from the Middle East. Investors also flocked to haven assets, including gold GC00, +1.62%
and the U.S. dollar DXY, +0.03%,
while cash trading in the $25 trillion Treasury market was closed for the Columbus Day and Indigenous Peoples Day holiday. Israel on Monday seal off the Gaza Strip from food, fuel and other supplies as the conflict between Israel and Hamas intensified, according to the Associated Press.
U.S. stocks and bonds are both falling again, with the S&P 500 just wrapping up its worst quarterly performance in a year after another surge in Treasury yields.
“That creates a lot of anxiety,” as there’s still a fair amount of “investor PTSD” from last year, when markets were rocked by losses in both equities and bonds, said Phil Camporeale, a portfolio manager for J.P. Morgan Asset Management’s global allocation strategy, by phone.
But it’s not the same environment.
Last year was about the Federal Reserve rushing to tame runaway inflation with rapid interest-rate hikes after being “behind the curve,” he said. Now investors are grappling with a surge in Treasury yields after the Fed in September doubled its U.S. growth forecast this year to 2.1%, according to Camporeale, pointing to the central bank’s latest summary of economic projections.
“This is your kiss-your-recession-goodbye trade,” he said, with sharp market moves in September reflecting the notion that “the Fed is not easing anytime soon.”
The U.S. labor market has been strong despite the central bank’s aggressive tightening of monetary policy, with the unemployment rate at a historically low 3.8% in August. In September, the Fed projected the jobless rate could move up to 4.1% by the end of next year, below its previous forecast from June.
“Inflation is falling,” Camporeale said. “The most important metric right now is the labor market.”
As he sees it, investors are worried that the Fed will hold interest rates higher for longer should the unemployment rate remain low and the labor market “tight.” The Fed projected in September that it could raise rates once more this year before reaching the end of its hiking cycle, with fewer potential rate cuts penciled in for 2024 than previously forecast.
Investors expect to get a look at the U.S. employment report for September this coming week, with nonfarm payrolls data scheduled to be released on Oct. 6.
Meanwhile, the U.S. stock market ended mostly lower Friday, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA,
S&P 500 SPX
and Nasdaq Composite COMP
all closing out September with monthly losses as investors weighed fresh data on inflation.
A reading Friday of the Fed’s preferred inflation gauge showed that core prices, which exclude volatile food and energy categories, edged up 0.1% in August. That was slightly less than expected. Meanwhile, the core inflation rate slowed to 3.9% over the 12 months through August.
But headline inflation measured by the personal-consumption-expenditures price index rose more than the core reading on a month-over-month basis, as higher gas prices fueled its increase.
S&P 500’s worst month of 2023
Investors have been anxious that the Fed may keep rates high for longer to bring inflation down to its 2% target.
Friday’s close left the S&P 500 logging its worst month since December, dropping 4.9% in September for back-to-back monthly losses. The S&P 500 sank 3.6% in the third quarter, suffering its biggest quarterly loss since the three months through September in 2022, according to Dow Jones Market Data.
“The price to pay for a resilient economy is higher yields,” said Steven Wieting, chief economist and chief investment strategist at Citi Global Wealth, in an interview. “We’re probably near the peak in yields.”
The yield on the 10-year Treasury note BX:TMUBMUSD10Y
ended September at 4.572%, after rising just days earlier to its highest level since October 2007, according to Dow Jones Market Data. Yields and debt prices move opposite each other.
But for Camporeale, it’s still too early to venture out to the back end of the U.S. Treasury market’s yield curve to add duration to bondholdings. That’s because the yield curve is not yet “re-steepened” and he views the U.S. economy as currently on course for a soft landing with rates staying higher for longer.
“If you avoid recession, why should you have a lower yield as you go out in time?” said Camporeale. “You should be compensated for having more yield as you go out in time if you avoid recession, not less.”
The 2-year Treasury rate BX:TMUBMUSD02Y
finished September at 5.046%, continuing to yield more than 10-year Treasury notes.
The yield curve has been inverted for a while, with short-term Treasurys offering higher rates than longer-term ones. The situation is being monitored by investors because historically such inversion has preceded a recession.
“If we were nervous about growth we would be buying the 10-year part of the curve or the 30-year part of the curve,” said Camporeale. “But we are not doing that right now.”
As for asset allocation, he said he’s now neutral stocks and overweight U.S. high-yield credit, particularly bonds with shorter durations of one to three years.
Camporeale sees junk bonds as a “nice” trade as he is not expecting a recession in the next 12 months and they are providing “enticing” yields versus the U.S. equity market, which probably has most of its returns in “versus what we think you get through the rest of the year.”
The S&P 500 index was up 11.7% this year through September, FactSet data show.
While watching for any signs of deterioration in the labor market, Camporeale said he now anticipates the earliest the Fed may cut rates is in the second half of next year. To his thinking, the recent move higher in 10-year Treasury yields was appropriate “in a world where maybe the yield curve has to re-steepen.”
‘Pain trade’
Bond prices in the U.S. broadly dropped in September along with the stocks.
The iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF AGG
was down 2.6% last month on a total return basis, bringing its total loss for the third quarter to 3.2%, according to FactSet data. That was the fund’s worst quarterly performance since the third quarter of 2022.
The ETF, which tracks an index of investment-grade bonds in the U.S. such as Treasurys and corporate debt, has lost 1% on a total return basis so far this year through September, FactSet data show. Meanwhile, the iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF TLT
has seen a total loss of 9% over the same period.
“Few investors want to call the top for peak rates,” said George Catrambone, head of fixed income at DWS, in a phone interview. Some bond investors had started to extend into long-term Treasurys in July. “That’s been the pain trade, I think, ever since then,” said Catrambone.
As for the equity market, the speed of the move up in 10-year Treasury yields hurt stocks, with the rate climbing “well beyond what many assumed would be the upper end,” according to Liz Ann Sonders, chief investment strategist at Charles Schwab.
With higher rates pressuring equity valuations, “clearly what’s going to matter is third-quarter-earnings season, once that kicks in” during October, she said by phone. Company “earnings are going to have to start to do some more heavy lifting.”
Stocks closed mostly lower on Friday, with the S&P 500 cementing its biggest drop in a month since December, as a surge in bond yields knocked the wind out of this year’s rally in equities. The Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA, -0.47%
fell about 157 points, or 0.5%, ending near 33,508, according to preliminary FactSet data. The S&P 500 index SPX, -0.27%
shed 0.3% and the Nasdaq Composite index COMP, +0.14%
gained 0.1%. September was the worst month for the Dow since February, with its 3.5% loss, while the S&P 500 shed 4.9% and the Nasdaq lost 5.8%, marking their worst months since December 2022, according to Dow Jones Market Data. Yearly core inflation edged higher in August, according to Friday’s release of the latest PCE price index. The focus over the weekend will likely be a U.S. government shutdown. Given the negative backdrop for markets, the S&P 500, Dow and Nasdaq all booked declines in the third quarter.
The Federal Reserve’s inflation fight has been particularly brutal for anyone not already a U.S. homeowner before interest rates and mortgage rates rose to 15-year highs.
With mortgage rates around 7.2% to kick off the post–Labor Day period, the difference between the rates on a new 30-year home loan and on all outstanding U.S. mortgage debt (see chart) has not been so wide since the 1980s.
It’s the 1980s again in the U.S. housing market.
Glenmede, FactSet
“Generally, climbing interest rates curb demand and cause housing prices to fall,” Glenmede’s investment strategy team wrote, in a Tuesday client note, but not this time.
Instead, U.S. homes remain in critically low supply after more than a decade of underbuilding, and with most homeowners who already refinanced at low pre-pandemic rates being “reluctant to leave their homes,” wrote Jason Pride, chief of investment strategy and research, and his Glenmede team.
“Until the supply gap is filled by new construction, home prices and building activity are unlikely to decline as meaningfully as they normally would given the headwind from rising rates,” the Glenmede team said.
The Glenmede team, however, does expect more pressure on consumers in the coming months, particularly as student-loan payments resume in October and if the Fed keeps interest rates high for a while, as increasingly expected. The benchmark 10-year Treasury yield BX:TMUBMUSD10Y,
which underpins the U.S. economy, was back on the climb at 4.26% Tuesday.
Meanwhile, shares of home-vacation rental platform Airbnb Inc. ABNB, +7.23%
rose 7.2% on Tuesday, after the Labor Day weekend, and 66.4% higher on the year so far, according to FactSet.
Shares of Invitation Homes Inc. INVH, -0.91%,
which grew out of the last decade’s home-loan foreclosure crisis to become a single-family-rental giant, were up 14.3% on the year, according to FactSet.
Dallas Tanner, CEO of Invitation Homes, said he expected “the rising costs and the burden of homeownership” to continue to benefit his company, in a July earnings call. The company recently bought a portfolio of about 1,900 homes and has been snapping up newly constructed homes. Companies can borrow on Wall Street at much lower rates than individuals.
Stocks closed lower Tuesday, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA
off 0.5%, and the S&P 500 index SPX
0.4% lower and the Nasdaq Composite Index COMP
down 0.1%, according to FactSet.
The U.S. Labor Day holiday will mark another milestone in the marathon to bring workers back to the office, but it won’t be a quick fix for landlords, according to Thomas LaSalvia, head of commercial real estate economics at Moody’s Analytics.
“A lot of companies are saying that after Labor Day, ‘We expect more out of you,” LaSalvia said, referring to days in the office. Still, office attendance, he argues, likely only stages a fuller comeback if a job or promotion is on the line.
That could prove difficult, with Friday’s U.S. jobs report for August expected to show U.S. unemployment at a scant 3.5%, near the lowest levels since the late 1960s, even if hiring has been slowing. The labor market, so far, appears unfazed by the Federal Reserve’s benchmark rate reaching a 22-year high.
It has been a different story for landlords facing a roughly 19% vacancy rate nationally and piles of debt coming due, especially for owners of older Class B and C office buildings with a bleak outlook or properties in cities with wobbling business centers.
As with shopping malls, LaSalvia said it’s largely a problem of oversupply, with many office properties at risk of becoming obsolete as tenants flock to better buildings and locations staging a rebirth. The trend can be traced in leasing data since 2021, with Class A properties in central business districts (blue line) showing a big advantage over less desirable buildings in the heart of cities (orange line).
Return to office isn’t going to save the entire office property market
Moody’s Analytics
“Little by little, we are finding the office isn’t dead,” LaSalvia said, but he also sees more promise in neighborhoods with a new purpose, those catering to hybrid work and communities that bring people together.
Another way to look at the trend is through rents. Manhattan’s Penn Station submarket, with its estimated $13 billion overhaul and neighboring Hudson Yards development, has seen asking rents jump 32% to $74.87 a square foot in the second quarter since the fourth quarter of 2019, according to Moody’s Analytics. That compares with a 2% bump in asking rents in downtown New York City to $61.39 a square foot for the same period.
The push for a return to the office also doesn’t mean a repeat of prepandemic ways. Goldman Sachs analysts estimate that part-time remote work in the U.S. has stabilized around 20%-25%, in a late August report, but that’s still up from 2.6% before the 2020 lockdowns.
Furthermore, the persistence of remote work will likely add another 171 million square feet of vacant U.S. office space through 2029, a period that also will see tenants’ long-term leases expire and many companies opting for less space. The additional vacancies would roughly translate to 57% of Los Angeles roughly 300 million square feet of office space sitting empty.
“The fundamental reason why we had offices in the first place have not completely disintegrated,” LaSalvia said. “But for some of those Class B and C offices, the writing was on the wall before the pandemic.”
U.S. stocks were mixed Thursday, but headed for losses in a tough August for stocks, with the S&P 500 index SPX
off about 1.5% for the month, the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA
2.1% lower and the Nasdaq Composite COMP
down 2% in August, according to FactSet.
U.S. stocks posted back-to-back losses Wednesday after Federal Reserve minutes of its July meetings showed concerns about inflation revving back up. The Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA fell about 180 points, or 0.5%, ending near 34,765, according to preliminary FactSet data. The S&P 500 index SPX gave up 0.8% and the Nasdaq Composite Index COMP closed 1.2% lower. All three benchmarks booked back-to-back loses, while the S&P 500 ending at its lowest level in more than a month. Minutes of the Fed’s July 25-26 meeting said “most participants continue to see significant upside risks to inflation, which could require further…
Investors should think twice before picking an actively managed mutual fund according to its style category. By “style category,” I’m referring to the widely used method of grouping mutual funds according to the market-cap of the stocks they invest in and where those stocks stand on the spectrum of growth-to-value.
This matrix traces to groundbreaking research in 1992 by University of Chicago professor Eugene Fama and Dartmouth College professor Ken French, and has since been popularized by investment researcher Morningstar in the form of its well-known style box.
In urging you to think twice before picking a fund based on this matrix, I’m not questioning the existence of important distinctions between the various styles. Fama and French’s research convincingly showed that there are systematic differences between them. My point is that there also are huge differences within each style as well. You can pick a style that outperforms all others on Wall Street and still lose a lot of money, just as you can pick the worst-performing style and turn a huge profit.
This points to the two types of risk you face when picking an actively managed fund. You have the risk associated with the fund’s style (category risk) and you also have the risk associated with the particular stocks that the fund’s manager selects (so-called idiosyncratic risk). Idiosyncratic risk often overwhelms category risk, especially over shorter periods.
To illustrate, consider the midcap-growth style. As judged by the Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF VOT,
this style produced a 28.8% loss in 2022. Yet, according to Morningstar Direct, the best-performing actively managed midcap-growth fund last year produced a gain of 39.5%, while the worst performer lost 67.0%.
This best-versus-worst performance spread of over 100 percentage points is illustrated in the accompanying chart. Notice that the comparable spread was almost as wide for many of the other styles as well. Though I haven’t done the research to compare 2022’s spreads with those of other calendar years, I have no reason to expect that they on average were any lower.
“ The only way to eliminate idiosyncratic risk when investing in particular styles is to invest in an index fund.”
The only way to eliminate idiosyncratic risk when investing in particular styles is to invest in an index fund benchmarked to the style in question. If you are enamored of a particular fund manager and willing to bet he will significantly outperform the category average, just know that you also incur the not-significant idiosyncratic risk that the fund will lag by a large amount.
The bottom line? By investing in an actively managed fund in a style category, you will be incurring the risk not only of that category itself but also the not-insignificant idiosyncratic risk of that particular fund. Fasten your seatbelt if that’s the path you take.
Mark Hulbert is a regular contributor to MarketWatch. His Hulbert Ratings tracks investment newsletters that pay a flat fee to be audited. He can be reached at mark@hulbertratings.com
My colleagues JP Aubry and Yimeng Yin just released an update on state and local pension plans. Their analysis compared 2023 to 2019 – the year before all the craziness began. Think of the unusual events that have occurred in the last few years: 1) the onset of COVID; 2) the subsequent COVID stimulus; 3) declining interest rates; 4) rising inflation; and then 5) rising interest rates.
Despite the volatility of asset values over this period, the 2023 funded status of state and local pension plans is about 78%, which is 5 percentage points higher than in 2019 (see Figure 1). Of course, the numbers for 2023 are estimates based on plan-by-plan projections, but these projections have an excellent track record.
While the aggregate funded ratio provides a useful measure of the public pension landscape at large, it also can obscure variations in funding at the plan level. Figure 2 separates the plans into thirds based on their current actuarial funded status. The average 2023 funded ratio for each group was 57.6% for the bottom third, 79.5% for the middle third, and 91.1% for the top third.
The major reason for the improvement in plans’ funded status is that, despite the turbulence in the economy, total annualized returns, which include interest and dividends, have risen noticeably for almost all major asset class indexes over the 2019-2023 period (see Figure 3). The exception over this short and volatile period is fixed-income assets, which have declined in value.
The effect of fixed income’s decline on overall portfolio performance has been modest because, since 2019, fixed income has averaged only about 20% of pension fund assets (see Figure 4).
So, things are looking a little better for state and local pensions. Yes, the funded ratios are biased upward because plans use the assumed return on their portfolios – roughly 7% – to discount promised benefits. That said, trends are important, and the trend is good.
Moreover, annual state and local benefit payments as a share of the economy are approaching their peak for two reasons. First, most pension plans do not fully index retiree benefits for inflation, which lowers the real value of benefits over time. Second, the benefit reductions for new hires – introduced in the wake of the Great Recession – have started to have an impact.
With liabilities in check and solid asset performance, maybe we can all relax a bit about the future of the state and local pension system.
A worsening U.S. fiscal situation caught stock and bond investors off guard in the past week and now a round of approaching government auctions is about to provide a crucial test for Treasurys.
The question in the days ahead is whether risks to the demand for U.S. government debt are growing. If so, that could put upward pressure on Treasury yields, which would undermine the performance of stocks. However, if investors end up caring less about the fiscal situation than they do about the possibility of slowing economic growth and decelerating inflation, government debt’s safe-haven appeal could be reinforced, putting a limit on how high yields might go.
Concern about the deteriorating fiscal outlook was a factor behind the past week’s rise in long-term Treasury yields. Ten- BX:TMUBMUSD10Y
and 30-year yields BX:TMUBMUSD30Y
respectively jumped to 4.188% and 4.304% on Thursday, the highest levels since early November, as investors sold off long-term government debt — which took the shine off U.S. stocks. By Friday, though, a moderating pace of U.S. job creation for July sent yields into reverse, giving equities a temporary lift during the final trading session of the week.
At issue is the extent to which potential buyers of Treasurys may be deterred by Fitch Ratings’ Aug. 1 decision to cut the U.S. government’s top AAA rating, at a time when the government is about to unleash what Barclays rates strategists describe as a “tsunami” of supply. A total of $103 billion in 3-, 10-and 30-year Treasurys come up for sale between Tuesday and Thursday. In addition, a spate of Treasury bills are scheduled to be auctioned starting on Monday.
Gene Tannuzzo, global head of fixed income at Boston-based Columbia Threadneedle Investments, said that while he and his team still have room to add T-bills to the government money-market funds they oversee during the week ahead, they haven’t made up their minds about whether to buy more longer-dated maturities for their bond funds.
“While we are comfortable that the Fed is at or near the end of its rate hikes, there are a lot more questions about the durability of the economic recovery, the degree that inflation will remain low, and the risk premium that needs to be put in at the long end,” Tannuzzo said via phone.
Treasury’s $1 trillion third-quarter borrowing plans, along with some technical issues and the Bank of Japan’s decision to switch to a more flexible yield-curve control approach, might reduce demand for U.S. government debt, he said. Columbia Threadneedle managed $617 billion as of June.
“One can’t ignore the risk of an unruly rise in yields, but our view is that this is a low risk and what the Treasury auctions may produce instead is ‘indigestion,’ driven by poor technicals and low liquidity, Fitch’s downgrade, and the Bank of Japan action — and by the end of August, we should be past much of this,” he told MarketWatch.
Risks to the demand for Treasurys may become obvious soon, given Tuesday-Thursday’s $103 billion in total sales of 3-, 10- and 30-year securities, according to analyst John Canavan of U.K.-based Oxford Economics. The main “question mark” for the market’s ability to absorb the increased Treasury issuance will be whether or not domestic investment funds continue to show interest, Canavan wrote in a note distributed on Friday.
Source: Oxford Economics.
“ ‘My suspicion is that with higher rates comes equally solid demand’ at upcoming auctions.”
— John Flahive, head of fixed income at BNY Mellon Wealth Management
Market players have had little difficulty absorbing Treasury coupon issuances in recent years because of flight-to-safety trades made after the U.S. onset of the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020. Now, however, increased auction sizes are being accompanied by still-elevated inflation, better-than-expected economic growth, and the possibility of more rate hikes by the Federal Reserve — which is likely to complicate the market’s ability to absorb the increased supply “without hiccups,” Canavan said.
On the flip side of the debate is John Flahive, head of fixed income at BNY Mellon Wealth Management in Boston, which managed $286 billion in assets as of June. He said equity markets will continue to be much more focused on economic developments and earnings. And as long as the latter of the two remains robust, stocks “can grind higher in a low-volatility environment,” Flahive said via phone.
Saying he does not expect his team to be a major participant in the Treasury auctions, Flahive said that the bond market’s reaction in the past week was “a little overdone” and “we always felt that there was a limited to how much yields could go up to reflect more government debt.”
“My suspicion is that with higher rates comes equally solid demand” at upcoming auctions, he said. “I’m still optimistic about rates going back down over time as the result of a slowing economy and decelerating inflation. We continue to like the bond market and see a better-than-even chance that yields go down as the economy continues to weaken in the quarters ahead.”
Friday’s reaction to July’s official jobs report, which showed the U.S. added a modest 187,000 new jobs, provided a breather from the past week’s run-up in Treasury yields.
On Friday, the 30-year Treasury yield fell 9 basis points to 4.214%, yet still ended with its biggest weekly gain since early February. The 10-year rate, which dropped 12.8 basis points to 4.06%, finished with a third straight week of advances.
Stocks fell Friday, leaving major indexes with weekly declines. The Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA
posted a 1.1% weekly fall, while the S&P 500 SPX
shed 2.3% and the Nasdaq Composite COMP
retreated 2.9%. The soft start to August comes after a run of sharp gains for equities. The S&P 500 remains up 16.6% for the year to date.
The economic calendar for the week ahead includes U.S. inflation updates.
On Monday, June consumer-credit data is set to be released. Tuesday brings the NFIB’s small business optimism index, plus data on the U.S. trade balance and wholesale inventories. Then on Thursday, weekly initial jobless claims and the July consumer-price index are released. That’s followed on Friday by the producer-price index for last month and an August consumer-sentiment reading.
Meanwhile, portfolio manager and fixed-income analyst John Luke Tyner at Alabama-based Aptus Capital Advisors, which manages roughly $5 billion in assets, said he plans to follow the Treasury auctions, but doesn’t usually participate in them.
“One of the biggest trends we’ve seen is the continued increase in the issuance amounts from Treasury. Whatever we are budgeting for is never enough, which justifies the Fitch downgrade,” Tyner said via phone. “It’s tough to say people aren’t going to buy U.S. debt, but you’ve got to entice them to buy duration and take the risk.
“The U.S. is not an emerging market, but ultimately we are going to see the market rate that participants require be higher, with a notable uptick in term premia,” he said. “What we could see in the face of all this issuance is a grind up in yields on an auction-by-auction basis. If I look at the technicals, a 4.9%-5% yield on the 10-year note seems in the cards,” and “it will be difficult for stocks to hold or expand from full valuations as rates run up.”
Stocks fell on Wednesday, a day after Fitch Ratings lowered its U.S. debt ratings to AA+ from the top AAA category, pointing to its growing debt burden and “erosion of governance” over the past two decades. The S&P 500 SPX, -1.38%
fell about 63 points, or 1.4%, ending near 4,513, booking its biggest daily percentage decline since April 25, according to preliminary Dow Jones Market Data. The Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA, -0.98%
shed about 1%, while the Nasdaq Composite Index COMP, -2.17%
closed 2.2% lower. Stocks already had been taking a breather from their march toward record levels when Fitch on Tuesday evening made good on a threat to downgrade its U.S. debt rating a notch to AA+. Longer-dated Treasury yields rose Wednesday, with the 10-year Treasury rate TMUBMUSD10Y, 4.105%
touching 4.07%, according to FactSet. Treasurys and other haven assets are viewed as likely to benefit from a flight to safety in a scenario where investors get more jittery about the U.S. economic outlook.
U.S. stocks closed higher, with the Dow posting its longest win streak in over six years, according to Dow Jones Market Data. The Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA, +0.52%
gained about 184 points, or 0.5%, ending near 35,411, according to preliminary FactSet data. With 11 straight sessions of gains, it was the blue-chip gauge’s longest streak of win since Feb. 27, 2017, according to Dow Jones Market Data. The S&P 500 index SPX, +0.40%
advanced 0.4%, with the energy sector leading the way higher, and the Nasdaq Composite Index COMP, +0.19%
ended up 0.2%. Stocks have been charging higher in 2023 despite the dramatic pace of rate hikes from the Federal Reserve since last year. Focus is on Wednesday’s Fed rate decision, with U.S. central bankers expected to raise rates by another 25 basis points to a 5.25%-5.5% range, potentially marking the last in this cycle as its inflation fight appears to be pay off. Energy prices rose Monday, with U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude for September CL00, +0.13%
delivery ending at $78.74 a barrel, the highest for a front-month contract in three months, according to Dow Jones Market Data.
It hasn’t served a vital economic function since the government stopped treating it as money back in 1971. Actually, you could argue it stopped being necessary long before that.
Yes, some people prefer it in jewelry. It is used in some technological equipment, and sometimes, still, in dentistry. But so what? According to authoritative data from the World Gold Council, even all those uses only account for about half of the world’s supply each year. Logically, this should mean that there is a gigantic glut of gold and that its price would be in free fall.
But it isn’t. Gold is beating U.S. stocks and bonds this month. And this isn’t even a rarity. I’ve run some numbers and have found a couple of things that could be very important to retirees, and for all of us suckers saving for retirement.
Even though, according to traditional financial theory, they really make no sense at all.
The first thing is that over the past century including some gold in your portfolio alongside stocks and bonds has genuinely added value. It has produced higher average returns, less volatility and fewer of those disastrous “lost decades” where your portfolio ended up whistling Dixie.
The second thing is that this peculiarity has been showing no signs of letting up in recent years or decades — even though, if anything, gold makes even less sense today than it used to.
Let me explain.
As usual, I’ve tapped the excellent database maintained by the NYU Stern School of Business, which tracks asset values going back to 1928.
Over that period, a conventional so-called balanced portfolio invested 60% in the S&P 500 SPY, -0.06%
index of large-company stocks and 40% in U.S. 10-year Treasury bonds TMUBMUSD10Y, 3.832%
has generated an average return of 4.9% a year in “real” terms, meaning above inflation.
A portfolio that’s 60% invested in the S&P 500, 30% in the bonds and 10% in gold GC00, -0.26%
earned a slightly higher average, 5.1% a year in real terms. But the volatility was lower: The portfolio that included the gold had a lower standard deviation of returns, and a much higher “median” return, meaning the middlemost return if you ranked all the years from best to worst. The portfolio including gold beat the traditional one by five full percentage points in total over the typical 10-year period, and failed to keep up with inflation for 10 years on only five occasions — half as often as the portfolio consisting exclusively of stocks and bonds.
Nor is this just about olden times. The portfolio including 10% gold has beaten the traditional 60/40 by an average of 0.4 percentage point a year since President Richard Nixon finally killed the gold standard in 1971. And it has beaten the traditional portfolio by the same amount, an average of four-tenths of a percentage point, so far this millennium. (The 60/40 portfolio has done better if you start measuring only in 1980, as that ignores the golden 1970s but includes the long bear market for gold of the 1980s and 1990s.)
And gold has added value in five of the last seven years (while in the other two it was effectively a tie).
It’s not so much that gold is a great long-term investment on its own. It’s that gold has seemed to shine when others, specifically stocks and bonds, have failed. And it still does. It held up during the crash of 1929-32. But it also held up during the crash in 2002. And in 2008. And 2020.
A financial expert told me this was “hindsight bias.” But so is most financial analysis.
When your financial adviser tells you what you might reasonably expect from large stocks, small stocks, international stocks, real estate and so forth in the decades ahead, he or she is basing that on history. (In some cases this has been downright hilarious, as when advisers said you should still expect “average” historical returns of 5% a year from Treasurys, even when they had only a 2% yield.)
I’m danged if I know why. But so far this year, once again, you’ve been better off in a portfolio of 60% stocks, 30% bonds and 10% gold than in just 60% stocks and 40% bonds. Make of it what you will.
