However, the extra details from their testimonies have also not gone unnoticed. One of them happens to be when Ellison mentioned on the stand that SBF had mentioned his ambition of one day becoming the President of the United States. While they may be unrelated, it could also explain why Bankman-Fried was cozying up to several political figures.
The defendant’s curls were always seen to be one of his standout features, and he thought so, too, according to Ellison’s testimony. She mentioned on the stand that Bankman-Fried had once told her that his hair was “essential to his image” and very valuable, as he believed that the hair had earned him more money in his past jobs.
How Co-Conspirators Felt After The FTX Collapsed
While admitting to her role as a co-conspirator, Ellison seemed to be remorseful (or so it seemed) about her actions. During her testimony, she mentioned how she felt a sense of relief after FTX’s collapse as she didn’t have to lie anymore. According to her, the vent provided an opportunity for her to take responsibility and be honest about what she had done.
Ellison wasn’t the only one who felt certain emotions in the weeks following FTX’s collapse, as Singh mentioned that he was suicidal for days. He mentioned how, in spite of it all, he was optimistic that they could salvage the whole situation rather than playing the blame game.
Meanwhile, during that period, it would seem that all Wang was concerned about was not going to jail, as he flew into the US six days after FTX filed for bankruptcy. According to him, he believed that he was likely to be charged and decided to be one step ahead by agreeing to cooperate with the prosecutors in order to get a shorter prison sentence.
Sam Bankman-Fried’s trial will resume on October 26, with the prosecution concluding its case, after which the defense will move to open its case. The defendant is set to testify in what seems to be a last-ditch effort by SBF’s lawyers to salvage his case.
FTX and its sister platform, Alameda Research, have recently transferred $10 million worth of crypto assets to Coinbase, Binance and Wintermute.
These transfers came from three addresses associated with FTX and Alameda, with the funds consolidated into one central address. The movements have triggered speculation of an impending selloff amid FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried’s criminal trial in a United States court.
Notably, an FTX-affiliated address sent 2,904 Ether (ETH) worth $5.14 million to the central address, according to security firm PeckShield. On-chain data confirms that this transaction occurred yesterday at 08:16 PM UTC.
A few minutes after receiving the 2,904 ETH tokens, the address sent 1,000 ETH to a Coinbase address and 1,904 ETH tokens to a Binance deposit address on Wintermute. This represented the first batch of transactions.
Moreover, the second batch occurred hours later and saw an FTX cold wallet move 1,341 Maker (MKR) worth $2.09 million to the same address. Afterward, an Alameda consolidation address transferred 198,807 Chainlink (LINK) and 11,974 Aave (AAVE) to the address. These tokens were worth $3.16 million.
Shortly after this second tranche of inflows, the address moved the tokens out, sending them to the same Wintermute-hosted Binance deposit address. The wallet now holds only $69 worth of ETH and other altcoins.
Recent FTX transactions
Since the company filed for bankruptcy, the recent slew of transfers is the latest in a long line of fund movements carried out by FTX wallets. Last week, the FTX bankruptcy estate staked these assets, including $122 million worth of Solana (SOL) and $5 million worth of ETH.
The transactions coincide with the 12th trial day of Sam Bankman-Fried, who is facing charges bordering on fraud in a Manhattan federal court. The trial has exposed several revelations through testimonies from Bankman-Fried’s former associates, including Caroline Ellison, former CEO of Alameda.
BlockFi has announced its emergence from bankruptcy and is initiating plans to repay creditors, marking a significant turnaround after last year’s challenging halt of withdrawals following the FTX exchange collapse.
The Oct. 24 announcement by BlockFi, a crypto lending firm, about its emergence from bankruptcy and the commencement of creditor repayments signifies a pivotal moment in the company’s history.
BlockFi is pleased to announce that its bankruptcy plan (the “Plan”) is effective and the company has emerged from bankruptcy as of October 24, 2023 (the “Effective Date”).
Last year, the collapse of the FTX exchange compelled BlockFi to halt withdrawals, leading to a tumultuous period for the company and its stakeholders. In its blog post, the company’s management and advisors take pride in achieving this critical milestone swiftly and efficiently compared to other retail crypto companies.
The company’s ability to navigate through bankruptcy and plan for a strategic wind-down does bring a sigh of relief to creditors and customers. Yet, the turbulent nature of the crypto industry, coupled with the aftermath of the FTX collapse, raises questions about the stability and long-term viability of BlockFi’s operations.
The company assures users that digital assets will be distributed back to clients, with withdrawals available to nearly all wallet customers. Additionally, users with interest-yielding accounts are being prompted to withdraw available funds.
This marks the commencement of what the company describes as the first wave of distributions, with subsequent distributions being subject to various factors, primarily BlockFi’s treatment in the FTX bankruptcy cases.
The statement introduces an element of uncertainty, as the amount and frequency of subsequent distributions are not guaranteed. The dependency on the outcomes of the FTX bankruptcy cases further complicates the scenario, given the unpredictable nature of legal proceedings and the volatile crypto market.
Grayscale files for new spot Bitcoin ETF on NYSE Arca
Major cryptocurrency investment firm Grayscale Investments has filed a new application with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for a new spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF). The new filing aligns with Grayscale’s ongoing effort to convert its Grayscale Bitcoin Trust into a spot Bitcoin ETF, according to a statement from the firm. The news comes weeks after Grayscale won an SEC lawsuit for its spot Bitcoin ETF review, with a court of appeals ordering the SEC to explain why it rejected Grayscale’s application in June 2023. The company also filed with the SEC to list an Ether futures ETF in September.
New York Attorney General sues Gemini, Genesis, DGC for allegedly defrauding investors
New York’s attorney general has filed a lawsuit against cryptocurrency firms Gemini, Genesis and Digital Currency Group (DCG) for allegedly defrauding more than 23,000 investors through the Gemini Earn investment program. The suit claims that Gemini assured investors that the program was a low-risk investment, while investigations carried out by the office of New York State Attorney General Letitia James found that Genesis’ financials “were risky.” The lawsuit also charges Genesis’ former CEO, Soichiro Moro, and its parent company’s CEO, Barry Silbert, with defrauding investors by attempting to conceal more than $1.1 billion in losses. In addition, the court case looks to ban Gemini, Genesis and DCG from operating in the financial investment industry in New York.
Former FTX engineering director faces up to 75 years in prison following guilty plea
Nishad Singh, the former engineering director at now-defunct crypto exchange FTX, faces up to 75 years in prison for charges related to defrauding users of the crypto exchange. He pleaded guilty to fraud charges as part of his cooperation agreement with the U.S. prosecutors. During his testimony this week, Singh said that when liquidity issues at FTX began in November 2022, he felt “suicidal for some days” while dealing with alleged inconsistencies between the exchange’s public statements and its activities behind the scenes. Singh also claimed that Bankman-Fried had the habit of deciding on purchases through Alameda Research by himself.
Binance shutting down European Visa debit card in December
Elon Musk, Mark Cuban team up to contest SEC trial strategies
Elon Musk, Mark Cuban and others have collaboratively submitted a shared amicus brief to the Supreme Court of the United States to raise concerns about the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) approach to conducting internal proceedings without the inclusion of juries. The context of this legal challenge centers around the SEC vs. Jarkesy case. George Jarkesy argues that the SEC’s internal adjudication process, which lacks a jury and is overseen by an administrative law judge appointed by the commission, contradicts his Seventh Amendment rights. Effectively resulting in a single entity fulfilling the roles of judge, jury and enforcer.
Winners and Losers
At the end of the week, Bitcoin (BTC) is at $29,590, Ether (ETH) at $1,607 and XRP at $0.52. The total market cap is at $1.12 trillion, according to CoinMarketCap.
Among the biggest 100 cryptocurrencies, the top three altcoin gainers of the week are Bitcoin SV (BSV) at 59.00%, Stacks (STX) at 25.91% and MX TOKEN (MX) at 25.26%.
The top three altcoin losers of the week are Conflux (CFX) at -8.03%, Frax Share (FXS) and Sui (SUI) at -6.35%.
“Using publicly available information to learn is not stealing. Nor is it an invasion of privacy, conversion, negligence, unfair competition, or copyright infringement.”
“After extensive DAO forum discussion followed by community vote, the sunsetting of the Lido on Solana protocol was approved by Lido token holders and the process will begin shortly.”
BTC price hits 2-month high amid bet Bitcoin will break $32K ‘soon’
On Oct. 20, data from Cointelegraph Markets Pro and TradingView captured new two-month Bitcoin highs of $30,233 on Bitstamp. BTC price showed continued strength during the Asia trading session on the same day, with a slight comedown taking the spot price back below $29,500.
With volatility still evident, market participants argued that a weekly candle close was needed in order to establish the rally’s true staying power. For Keith Alan, co-founder of monitoring resource Material Indicators, the 100-week moving average (MA) at $28,627 was of particular importance.
“This move is one to watch, but what I’m watching for right now is to see if this Weekly candle closes above the 100-Week MA and if next week’s candle can stay above it with no wicks below,” Alan wrote in part of an X post on the day. “Some might consider that a confirmation of a bull breakout, but this market is known for squeezes and fake outs so I’m looking for more confirmations. For me BTC will also need to take out prior resistance at $30.5k, $31.5k and ultimately $33k to call a bull breakout confirmed and validated.”
FUD of the Week
Fantom Foundation hot wallet hacked for $550K
The Fantom Foundation, the developer of the Fantom network, has been hacked for over $550,000 worth of cryptocurrency. The foundation confirmed the attack on X, claiming that most of the funds stolen belonged to other users and that 99% of the foundation’s funds remain safe. Blockchain security researchers initially reported that the attacker stole approximately $7 million in crypto. The Fantom Foundation later released an official statement saying that some of the wallets labeled “Fantom: Foundation wallet” were mislabeled by block explorers and that not all the stolen funds were from the foundation.
TrueCoin’s third-party vendor breach potentially leaks TUSD user data
TrueUSD (TUSD) announced a potential leak of certain Know Your Customer (KYC) and transaction history data after one of TrueCoin’s third-party vendors was compromised. The company was the operator of the TUSD stablecoin until July 13, 2023. The impact of the attack and the resultant data leak is yet to be identified, as the total number of users’ data was not revealed during the announcement. Data collected from such breaches — names, email addresses and phone numbers, among others — are typically used for phishing attacks. Attackers reach out to unwary investors by mimicking various crypto services, often promising high profits in short amounts of time.
Web3 game project allegedly hired actors to pose as executives in $1.6M exit scam
The development team for gaming project FinSoul carried out an alleged exit scam, siphoning away $1.6 million from investors through market manipulation, according to a recent report from blockchain security platform CertiK shared with Cointelegraph. The FinSoul team allegedly hired paid actors to pretend to be its executives, then raised funds for the sole purpose of developing a gaming platform. However, instead of actually creating the platform, the FinSoul team allegedly transferred $1.6 million in bridged Tether from investors to itself. Blockchain data indicates developers then laundered the funds through cryptocurrency mixer Tornado Cash.
Big Questions: What did Satoshi Nakamoto think about ZK-proofs?
What was once a passing interest of Bitcoin inventor Satoshi Nakamoto, zero-knowledge-proof technology is now a major part of the crypto world.
Ethereum restaking: Blockchain innovation or dangerous house of cards?
“Restaking” involves reusing staked Ether to earn fees and rewards. The restaked tokens can then help secure and validate other protocols. But many fear restaking could disrupt Ethereum’s chain itself.
Bitmain’s revenge, Hong Kong’s crypto rollercoaster: Asia Express
Bitmain allegedly fires staff for speaking out against salary cuts, Hong Kong investors lose faith in crypto after JPEX scandal, Bitget gets a new crypto credit card and more.
Subscribe
The most engaging reads in blockchain. Delivered once a
week.
Editorial Staff
Cointelegraph Magazine writers and reporters contributed to this article.
FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried Fresh continued to live an extravagant life while his trading firm, Alameda Research, was facing severe financial challenges, court documents reveal.
FTX’s intricate web of spending and suspicion
Bankman-Fried was living the high life thanks to billions of dollars worth of customer funds from FTX, prosecutors allege in a fresh set of court documents.
The disgraced FTX founder and his associates indulged in extravagant spending on investments, donations, and real estate — even in the months leading up to the collapse of the crypto exchange.
Among the events Bankman-Fried enjoyed:
Meeting with President Bill Clinton in midtown Manhattan.
A dinner with the head of Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund.
An invitation from Anthony Scaramucci to attend a Steelers game.
A private dinner hosted by K5 Global co-founder Michael Kives, in which Hillary Clinton, singer Katy Perry, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, actor Leonardo DiCaprio, and reality star Kendall Jenner also attended.
Bankman-Fried’s social status skyrocketed at a time when his trading firm, Alameda Research, was running out of funds.
In the trial’s third week, prosecutors provided evidence, such as emails, bank statements, wire transfers and Bankman-Fried’s own notes to outline how FTX funds were purportedly used without customer permission or knowledge.
These records depicted Bankman-Fried’s attempts to expand his influence among elite circles through investments, political contributions, and donations.
To bolster their case, prosecutors enlisted forensic accountants, including an FBI agent and University of Notre Dame professor Peter Easton, who testified about tracing the expenses back to FTX customer funds.
The defense countered these claims, citing inconsistencies in whether the expenses were truly covered by customer funds and raising doubts about the accuracy of expert analyses and accounting methods.
Big spender
During the trial, prosecutors argued that FTX customer funds were utilized for investments. They presented an excerpt from the September 2022 investment agreement between Alameda and SkyBridge Capital, the firm founded by Scaramucci — the 10-day White House communications director for former President Donald Trump.
The deal preceded FTX’s bankruptcy filing by two months.
This agreement served as additional evidence that investment spending continued despite Alameda’s negative balance at that time, prosecutors claimed.
In court, details also emerged from an investment agreement revealing that Bankman-Fried had committed to investing in Knives’ K5.
The agreement was characterized as a fraudulent scheme aimed at enriching executives.
FTX’s bankruptcy lawyers took legal action against K5 to reclaim the money Bankman-Fried had invested.
This $700 million investment marked one of the largest amounts contributed by the FTX founder to any group, undertaken to enhance his political and social influence.
Moreover, prosecutors emphasized Bankman-Fried’s political contributions funded by Alameda.
The chart revealed donations to Protect Our Future, a Democratic political action committee primarily backed by the former FTX billionaire, and One Nation, a nonprofit group associated with Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell.
Bankman-Fried faced accusations of utilizing customer funds for political donations, allegedly aiming to influence crypto-friendly regulations in Washington, DC.
Bankman-Fried trial continues
During day 12 of the trial, prosecutors claimed that Bankman-Fried misled in-house lawyers and funneled FTX customer funds to Alameda, while also lending $2.2 billion to himself and other executives.
The former top lawyer of FTX, Can Sun, testified that Bankman-Fried asked him to come up with legal justifications for why $7 billion in customer funds were missing four days before the company declared bankruptcy. Sun said that he told Bankman-Fried that he could not identify any legal justifications.
Caroline Ellison, Bankman-Fried’s ex-girlfriend and former CEO of Alameda, testified that Bankman-Fried arranged for executives to divert funds from FTX customers to other purposes, including paying back billions of dollars in loans to Alameda.
Ellison said that Bankman-Fried ultimately called the shots. The defense attorneys maintain that Bankman-Fried did not intend to defraud anyone and acted in good faith in trying to build and run FTX.
The trial is ongoing, and it remains to be seen what the outcome will be.
The bankruptcy of FTX has left many investors with frozen funds, and the situation is still unfolding. It is unclear whether investors will be able to recoup any of their losses, and the tax implications of the bankruptcy are also uncertain.
Day four of Sam Bankman-Fried’s trial on federal fraud and money-laundering charges featured testimony from FTX co-founder Gary Wang, who relayed how he and the defendant engaged in financial crimes and lied about it.
Hammering home the government’s case, Wang, 30, the first of three of the prosecution’s star witnesses, told a New York jury on Thursday that he and Bankman-Fried illegally diverted billions from the accounts of FTX customers and investors and “lied to the public” ahead of the cryptocurrency trading platform’s collapse last November.
Acknowledging his alleged role in committing wire, securities and commodities fraud while serving as FTX’s former chief technology officer and part-owner of hedge fund Alameda Research, Wang said that he and Bankman-Fried in 2017 began illegally shifting FTX funds to Alameda and eventually withdrew $8 billion.
Wang said Bankman-Fried directed him to grant “special privileges on their FTX website” to Alameda by altering the computer code controlling its operations to grant a credit line of as much as $65 billion — a number so enormous it prompted Judge Lewis A. Kaplan to make sure Wang meant “billion” instead of “million.” He did.
“It can have negative balances and withdraw unlimited amounts of funds,” Wang testified of Bankman-Fried’s instructions. Asked whose funds he was referencing, Wang said, “customers of FTX.”
The damning testimony by Wang, once Bankman-Fried’s friend and college roommate, continued Friday as prosecutors laid out their case against the former cryptocurrency superstar, alleging he masterminded a “massive fraud” involving billions of dollars.
Wang is the first of three former top FTX executives slated to testify against Bankman-Fried after they pleaded guilty to fraud in cooperation deals with the government that may win them leniency at sentencing. The other former execs include Carolyn Ellison, Alameda’s former CEO and Bankman-Fried’s ex-girlfriend, and Nishad Singh, FTX’s former engineering director.
Locked up in a Brooklyn jail since August, Bankman-Fried has maintained his innocence since his arrest in the Bahamas last December. The 31-year-old faces a potential prison term of more than a century if convicted of the seven charges against him.
Damaging testimony from former friends
Wang did not make eye contact with Bankman-Fried as he entered a Manhattan courtroom to testify for the prosecution, Bloomberg News recounted. Bankman-Fried swiped at least $10 billion from thousands of customers and investors to finance outside ventures such as political donations and purchases of luxury real estate, Assistant U.S. Attorney Nathan Rehn declared in his opening statement on Wednesday.
Wang’s testimony aligned with that of Adam Yedidia, another of Bankman-Fried’s former friends and classmates. Yedidia testified that Bankman-Fried privately expressed concern about a potential $8 billion shortfall at FTX from loans to Alameda five months before both companies collapsed.
Under questioning by Assistant U.S. Attorney Danielle Sassoon, Yedidia said he brought up the issue with Bankman-Fried, asking him if things were alright.
“In response, Sam said said something like, ‘We were bulletproof last year. We’re not bulletproof this year,’” Yedidia testified, describing Bankman-Fried as having appeared atypically nervous.
Yedidia’s testimony potentially undercuts Bankman-Fried’s contention that he was not closely involved in running Alameda and relied instead on Ellison.
Testifying under immunity from prosecution, Yedidia said he became “longtime friends” with Bankman-Fried while both were students at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. They later worked and lived together at Bankman-Fried’s $30 million apartment in the Bahamas.
Yedidia said he quit his job as an FTX developer and stopped speaking to Bankman-Fried after learning early last November that Bankman-Fried had allegedly diverted FTX customer deposits to cover expenditures of Alameda.
Defense has “very different story” to tell
Defense attorneys contend their client had nothing criminal in mind while building his crypto empire. Bankman-Fried has “a very different story” to relay than the one told by prosecutors, his attorney, Mark Cohen, said in his opening statement.
Describing Bankman-Fried as a “math nerd who didn’t drink or party,” Cohen told the courtroom that “Sam didn’t defraud anyone, didn’t intend to defraud anyone.”
The proceedings are expected to last six weeks.
Before FTX failed and filed for bankruptcy, Bankman-Fried had a net worth on paper of $32 billion. Known for socializing with politicians, when smaller crypto firms began blowing up in early 2022, Bankman-Friedman publicly said he would help rescue the market.
Prosecutors were correct to focus on Bankman-Fried’s use of customer money without their consent, rather than delving too deeply into the world of cryptocurrencies, according to one former federal prosecutor.
“This case is less about complicated investments and all about garden-variety fraud,” said Michael Zweiback, co-founder of the law firm Zweiback, Fiset & Zalduendo.
A son of Stanford University law school professors, Bankman-Fried studied at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the 2010s before landing at a Wall Street investment firm in 2014. He quit in 2017 to move to San Francisco, where he helped start FTX in 2019.
—CBS News’ Cassandra Gauthier and the Associated Press contributed to this report.
Lawyers for Sam Bankman-Fried delivered opening statements in his criminal trial Wednesday. Prosecutors have accused the former FTX CEO of misusing billions of dollars in customer funds. Author Michael Lewis joins CBS News to discuss his new book, “Going Infinite: The Rise and Fall of a New Tycoon,” which takes an in-depth look at the rise and fall of Bankman-Fried.
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
Author Michael Lewis met with FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried more than 100 times. Lewis breaks down the crypto superstar’s rise and fall in his new book, “Going Infinite.”
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
Michael Lewis has made a literary career finding jump-off-the-page characters, and using them to help tell complicated stories. And what could be more complicated than explaining cryptocurrency? Lewis gained all-hours access to Sam Bankman-Fried, known for a time, as the J.P. Morgan of crypto. His sector as ungoverned as his hair, Bankman-Fried was worth more than $20 billion before he turned 30…an unlikely celebrity, his life braided finance, politics, sports and pop culture. Then the empire crumbled and today, Bankman-Fried sits in jail on various federal charges and faces potential sentences of more than 100 years. Lewis, though, didn’t panic-sell. He simply went where the story took him. His latest book, “Going Infinite” comes out Tuesday…. which is also the opening day in the trial of Sam Bankman-Fried.
Jon Wertheim: You had so much access to Sam Bankman-Fried writing this book. What ultimately is– is the purpose here?
Michael Lewis: I realized I had an ambition for the book. I saw it as kind of letter to the jury. I mean there’s gonna be this trial. And the lawyers are gonna tell two stories. And so– there’s a story war going on in the courtroom. And I think neither one of those stories is as good as the story I have.
Michael Lewis didn’t set out to write this book. Two autumns ago, he was at home in the Bay Area when he got a call from a friend, interested in investing with a young billionaire. Could Lewis meet with this wunderkind and size him up ….So it was, Lewis brought Sam Bankman-Fried here, in the Berkeley Hills, for a hike in the park.
Michael Lewis and Jon Wertheim in Berkeley Hills, the same place where Lewis first met with Sam Bankman-Fried.
60 Minutes
Michael Lewis: You gotta remember, I knew nothing about him. I– all I knew was I was supposed to evaluate his character. And that 18 months earlier, he had nothing, now he had $22.5 billion dollars and was the richest person in the world under 30.
He didn’t care much about like, spending it all on yachts, he was gonna spend it to save humanity from extinction kind of thing. So the whole walk was, like, my jaw was on the floor about here, after I heard all that.
Jon Wertheim: As an author, whose stock in trade is finding interesting characters, is your– your story meter startin’ to beep about now?
Michael Lewis: Oh, I was on red alert. And I said this to him, I said, s– “I don’t know what’s gonna happen to you. Something’s gonna happen to you. Can I just come and, you know, ride shotgun.
Michael Lewis: Now, riding shotgun ended up being, like, hanging on for dear life to– you know, an automobile that’s goin’ 270 miles an hour, and taking every hairpin turn.
Sam Bankman-Fried and Lewis would end up meeting more than a hundred times over two years, speaking for countless hours.
As our camera rolled in July, note how Bankman-Fried shuffled cards and jackhammered his legs and avoided eye contact. Lewis considers Bankman-Fried the most challenging —and fascinating —character he’s ever encountered. this from an author who’s been writing non-fiction since the eighties.
Michael Lewis: The story of Sam’s life is people not understanding him. Misreading him. He’s so different, he’s so unusual. I mean, I think in a funny way that the reason I have such a compelling story is I have a character that I do come to know, and that the reader comes to know, that the world still doesn’t know.
A graduate of MIT, Bankman-Fried saw the world in numbers, framing everything in his life as a probability exercise, including philanthropy. He committed to making as much money as possible… so he could give it away as efficiently as possible…guided by a social movement, effective altruism.
Sam Bankman-Fried
60 Minutes
Michael Lewis: What it means in Sam’s instance is you can go out and have a career where you do good. You can go be a doctor in Africa. Or you can go out and make as much money as possible and pay people to be doctors in Africa. If you’re a doctor in Africa, you get– you end up saving a certain number of lives, but you’re only one doctor. But if you can pay 40 people to become doctors in Africa, you’re gonna s– you’re gonna save 40 m– 40 times the number of lives.
Jon Wertheim: This is like a strategy game.
Michael Lewis: Well, you don’t understand Sam Bankman-Fried unless you understand that he turns everything into a game. Everything is gamified.
Bankman-Fried worked as a Wall Street trader before moving to Berkeley at age 25 to start his own trading firm, Alameda Research. Instead of buying and selling stocks or bonds, he would traffic in crypto, a digital form of currency not tied to a centralized system.
Michael Lewis: The basic idea was to be the smartest person in the crypto markets, to be the one who did the kind of trading in crypto that the smartest Wall Street traders did in stocks.
Jon Wertheim: So these quant skills he had as a trader on regular stocks and equities markets, he was gonna bring to this new ascending crypto world.
Michael Lewis: Correct.
Jon Wertheim: What’s the difference between crypto finance and traditional finance?
Michael Lewis: Well, the promise of crypto finance is the promise of an absence of intermediaries. If I want to wire you $10,000, a bank has to do it. A bank records the transaction. A bank takes some little slice of it. If I want to wire you $10,000 worth of Bitcoin, I could just hit a button and you get it. So you remove the institutions.
Coming out of the 2008 financial crisis, crypto took hold as an anti-establishment, punk rock version of afinancial system… which Lewis finds ironic….
Michael Lewis: In the beginning, especially, it’s a crowd of people who are incredibly mistrustful of institutions. What attracts them to it is they hate the government. They hate banks. But then they somehow– this pool of incredibly mistrustful people proceed to trust each other in ways that I wouldn’t trust you.
Jon Wertheim: They’re parking their money in a sector that’s unregulated. There are no physical properties.
Michael Lewis: Provably–
Jon Wertheim: You don’t go in there.
Michael Lewis: –squirrelly and unreliable–
Jon Wertheim: Right–
Michael Lewis: –over and over.
Jon Wertheim: But it’s predicated on trust.
Michael Lewis: It’s like they are Charlie Brown kicking the football, that they’re sure that this time Lucy’s gonna hold it.
Still, Bankman-Fried made a fortune at Alameda Research. And then he really got rich. Instead of simply trading, Bankman-Fried seized on the idea of opening his own cryptocurrency exchange.
Sam Bankman-Fried and Michel Lewis
60 Minutes
Michael Lewis: One of the things he notices is that all the crypto exchanges are screwed up in one way or another. There are dozens of these places where you can trade crypto, but they are– they’re not structured for a professional trader. The technology is bad. They’ll lose their customers’ money. It’s the wild west. He realizes that if you built a better exchange– he wanted to build an exchange he could trade on. So he creates FTX. And once he created it, it went boom. And when it went boom, he realized that, “Well, that’s– ya know– that’s the goldmine.” It actually isn’t trading the crypto.
Jon Wertheim: This is owning the casino.
Michael Lewis: It’s owning–
Jon Wertheim: Right?
Michael Lewis: –the casino. He started as a gambler and he realized that, you know, building the better casino was actually gonna be more valuable.
Soon, roughly $15 billion a day in trades—were executed on his new exchange, FTX.
Michael Lewis: If you’re sitting in the middle of those transactions and you’re taking out even a tiny fraction of a percentage point, there’s a lot of money to be made.
Jon Wertheim: Indifferent to the outcome of the trade, he’s just–
Michael Lewis: You’re taking no risk, you’re taking no risk at all. It didn’t matter to him, whether crypto went up or crypto went down; as long as people were trading crypto, it made money. It’s the best business. I had one venture capitalist tell me that several of the venture capitalists thought that Sam might be the world’s first trillionaire.
Jon Wertheim: Trillionaire?
Michael Lewis: Yeah. They’re looking for the next Google. They’re looking for the next Apple. They thought FTX had that kind of possibility, that it had a chance to be the single most important financial institution in the world.
As he began accumulating billions as if they were Pokemon cards, Bankman-Fried began attracting something else he wasn’t accustomed to: attention.
Michael Lewis: He changed not at all. You know, he’d never been on TV. He goes on TV in his cargo shorts and his messy hair and he’s playing video games while he’s on the air.
Jon Wertheim: Wait. Wait. He’s played video games on the air?
Michael Lewis: You would think your first television appearance, you might be a little– (laughs) a lit– a little uptight, a little nervous. And if you watch the clip you can see his eyes going back and forth, back (laughs) and forth. It’s because he’s trying to win his video game at the same time he’s on the air.
Whether it was his smarts, his fierce indifference to appearance or simply his vast wealth…the beautiful people suddenly found him irresistible…
Jon Wertheim: As his net worth goes up, so does his social capital. (laughs) You write about a– Zoom meeting you walked in on.
Michael Lewis
60 Minutes
Michael Lewis: He says, “I gotta go do a Zoom.” I said, “What is it?” And he says, “There’s this person named Anna Wintour. And– and I–” he didn’t know who she was.
Jon Wertheim: He had no idea who she was?
Michael Lewis: No. So I sat off to one side where she couldn’t see me. And I watched this Zoom.
Jon Wertheim: Now, you’re thinking, “What does Anna Wintour want to do with a schlub like Sam?”
Michael Lewis: Well—exactly. He is the worst-dressed person in America. He is the worst-dressed billionaire in the history of billionaires. And what she wants him to do is to sponsor the Met Gala, (laughs) her great ball that she throws every year, which is, like, you know, all about dress, and appearances. Sam was a social experiment. He is person who has nothing, all of a sudden has a seemingly infinite dollars, will give it away, is unbelievably open-handed about it, and doesn’t ask a whole lot of questions. What that attracts, who shows up when that– when this person exists? Everybody.
Jon Wertheim: Everyone comes with a trough to–
Michael Lewis: Everybody comes to the trough. Everybody is– (laughs) wants to be his best friend.
Bankman-Fried wanted it known that FTX was the go-to player in crypto.
He turned to the sports world to bring his exchange both legitimacy and edge. Lewis saw the FTX internal marketing documents…
Michael Lewis: He paid Tom Brady $55 million for 20 hours a year for three years. He paid Steph Curry $35 million for– same thing for three years.
Jon Wertheim: Pretty good hourly wage.
Michael Lewis: He spent 100 and something million dollars, buying the naming rights for the Miami Heat arena.
Michael Lewis: (laughs) For which he then paid Larry David another $10 million, you know. It’s breathtaking, what’s on that list.
Jon Wertheim: Did any of the people surrounding him, these celebrities, do it ’cause they found him interesting or was it all because he’s worth $20 some billion dollars?
Michael Lewis: It’s probably not fair for me to speak for them, but I will speak for them. Tom Brady, I think, adored him.
Jon Wertheim: Really?
Michael Lewis: I think Tom Brady thought he was just a really interesting person. I think he liked to hear what he had to say.
Michael Lewis: And he really liked Tom Brady. And Sam wasn’t, like, a big sports person. So it was funny to watch that interaction. It was like, “These two people actually get along.” It’s like the class nerd and the quarterback–
Jon Wertheim: The two high school tribes–
Michael Lewis: Yeah. Yeah. No. The nerd of all nerds. (laughs) Like, even the nerds don’t hang out with this nerd, he’s such a nerd. (laughs) The quarterback somehow likes him. And he somehow likes the quarterback.
Lewis writes in his book that Bankman-Bried’s philanthropic ambitions kept pace with his wealth. Never mind doctors in Africa, he set out to confront what he saw as existential threats to all of humanity.
Michael Lewis: Sam Bankman-Fried ends up with a portfolio heavily concentrated in two things. Pandemic prevention, because there really are things the government should be doing. And the other thing that made his list that was so interesting was Donald Trump. He took the view that all the big existential problems are gonna require the United States government to be involved to solve ’em. And if the democracy is undermined, it– like, we don’t have our democracy anymore, all these problems are less likely to be solved. And he saw Trump trying to undermine the democracy, and he thought, “Trump is– belongs on the list of existential risks.”
To that end, Lewis writes that in 2022 Bankman-Fried met with the most unlikely of allies, Republican Senate Minority Leader, Mitch McConnell …
Jon Wertheim: You’re flying with Sam and he tells you about a meeting he’s gonna have with Mitch McConnell.
Michael Lewis: Well, the interesting thing starts before we even get on the plane. I meet him at the airport, and he comes tumbling out of a car. And he’s in his cargo shorts and his T-shirt. And he’s got, balled up in his hand– it takes me a while to see what it is, but it’s a blue suit. It’s got more wrinkles than any blue suit ever had. It’s been just jammed into this little ball. (laughs) And a shoe, like, falls out of the pile that he’s got in his arms. And I said, like, “What– why you have the suit?” And he says– (laughs) he says, “Mi– Mitch McConnell really cares what you wear when you– (laughs) when you meet with him.” And he’s having dinner in six hours with Mitch McConnell. And I– I said, “Well, you got the suit. Is there– you got a belt?” He goes, “No. I don’t have a belt.” I said, “You got– you have a shirt?” He goes, “No. No shirt,” “and the suit, you really can’t really wear– (laughs) wear that suit.” And he goes, “Yeah. But they told me to bring a suit.”
According to Lewis, Bankman-Fried wanted to help McConnell fund Republican candidates at odds with Donald Trump…
Michael Lewis: What is the subtext of this dinner, is Sam is gonna write tens of millions of dollars of checks to a super PAC that Mitch McConnell is then gonna use to get elected people who are not hostile to democracy.
Sam Bankman-Fried
60 Minutes
Jon Wertheim: Wait. So, Mitch McConnell has a list of Republican candidates who are, sort of, on the playing field for democracy versus what he deemed outside?
Michael Lewis: He and his people had done work to distinguish between actual deep Trumpers and people who were just seeming to, to approve of Donald Trump, but were actually willing to govern.
Bankman-Fried ended up giving multi-millions in support of Republican candidates. Back in 2020, Bankman-Fried had ranked among Joe Biden’s biggest donors. As 2024 approached, he planned on spending more, albeit in the most unconventional way…
Jon Wertheim: One of the most shocking passages in this book, I thought, came with this revelation that Sam had looked into paying Donald Trump not to run.
Michael Lewis: That only shocks you if you don’t know Sam. (laughs) Sam’s thinking, “We could pay Donald Trump not to run for president. Like, how much would it take?”
Jon Wertheim: Did he get an answer?
Michael Lewis: So he did get an answer. He was floated– there was a number that was kicking around. And the number that was kicking around when I was talking to Sam about this was $5 billion, Sam was not sure that number came directly from Trump.
Jon Wertheim: Wait. Wait. So– so Sam’s looking into paying Trump not to run. And he actually gets– might not have come from Trump himself, but he actually got a price?
Michael Lewis: He got one answer, yes. The question Sam had was not just, “Is $5 billion enough to pay Trump not to run,” but “Was it legal?”
Jon Wertheim: Why didn’t this happen? Why didn’t he follow through?
Michael Lewis: Well, they were still having these conversations when FTX blew up. So why didn’t it happen? He didn’t have $5 billion anymore.
Approached for comment by 60 Minutes, neither former President Trump nor Sen. McConnell responded…last November, in a matter of days, megabillionaire Sam Bankman-Fried lost virtually everything, and he soon faced an onslaught of federal fraud charges…
Meteoric as the rise of Sam Bankman-Fried was, the fall came faster still. In a span of days, a celebrity multi-billionaire became a pariah, his wealth largely evaporated, as federal prosecutors mounted a case against him. In his new book, out this week, Michael Lewis details the crash, and leaves it to readers to decide if Sam Bankman-Fried was a cryptocurrency conman in cargo shorts….or a really smart guy, singularly ill-equipped to run and manage a business.
By spring of 2022, Sam Bankman-Fried had planted his flag in the Bahamas. He decided to move his high-flying cryptocurrency exchange, FTX, to the islands, not for the beaches, but for the friendly regulatory climate. With the prime minister on hand, they put shovels in the ground for a new headquarters. Bankman-Fried openly discussed paying off the country’s $9 billion national debt. By this point, Michael Lewis and Bankman-Fried had a dynamic that went beyond author-subject.
FTX purchased a penthouse in the Bahamas.
60 Minutes
Michael Lewis: And he started using me as a sounding board.
Jon Wertheim: For what?
Michael Lewis: For just, like, decisions he was making. Should I join Elon Musk in buying Twitter? You know? Should we do this? Should we do that?
Jon Wertheim: What’d you tell him?
Michael Lewis: Mostly, my answers were no, no, (laughs) and no. And he would look at me and say (laughs), “You’re a boring grownup.”
And Bankman-Fried, now 31, told Lewis, now 62, that anyone older than 45 was useless… but Lewis noted that if ever there were a corporate leader in need of adult input to manage 400 employees, it was Sam Bankman-Fried….
Jon Wertheim: What kind of a manager was he?
Michael Lewis: Horrible. I mean, even his best friends– inside the company said, “Sam is just not built to manage people.”
Jon Wertheim: Had Sam managed anything before?
Michael Lewis: His sole experience of leadership was running puzzle hunts for math nerds out of high school. And actually thought deep down, if ya asked him, people shouldn’t need to be managed. So he proceeded to act on that and basically didn’t manage them.
Jon Wertheim: Is there any checks and balances happening in this environment then?
Michael Lewis: Well, what checks and balances would you imagine there might be in a corporation?
Jon Wertheim: Chief financial officer?
Michael Lewis: No. There’s no chief financial officer.
Jon Wertheim: HR department?
Michael Lewis: No, there was no HR department.
Jon Wertheim: Compliance office?
Michael Lewis: N– oh no. There– no. There was no board of directors. Or, rather, I asked Sam, I said, (laughs) “Who’s your board of directors?” And he said, “We don’t really have one.” I said, “What do you mean, you don’t have one? Everyone has one.” He says, “There are two other people on something called a board of directors, but it’s changed and I don’t even know their names. And their job is just to DocuSign whatever–“
Jon Wertheim: He didn’t know the names of the board of directors?
Michael Lewis: (laughs) No, he didn’t know who was on it.
Jon Wertheim: So he’s running this like a lemonade stand, and he’s doing enough volume of business this– this could be a public traded company if he wanted to.
Michael Lewis: Oh, no. If it was a publicly traded company, it’d be a publicly traded company worth $40 billion. No, it was all Sam’s world. And there was nobody (laughs) there to say, like, “Don’t– don’t do that.”
FTX purchased a $30 million executive penthouse in a Bahamas resort—flush with an exclusive marina. It was lost on Sam, who worked feverishly in the office, and slept on a beanbag chair. But there was another reason he avoided the luxe penthouse: his girlfriend Caroline Ellison, a former Wall Street trader herself, had kicked him out. Compounding matters, he had put her in charge of running Alameda Research, Bankman-Fried’s privately held trading firm.
Jon Wertheim: So the romance between Sam and Caroline goes sideways. How does that impact what happens to FTX and Alameda Research?
Michael Lewis: Coincidentally, the romance more than goes sideways. They have a falling out where they’re basically not speaking to each other. She’s not speaking to him– at precisely the time crypto collapses.
Jon Wertheim: Explain why that’s a problem.
Michael Lewis: It’s a problem because Alameda Research is one of the traders on FTX.
Translation: though Bankman-Fried owned the FTX exchange, he was also trading crypto on FTX through his other business, Alameda Research.
Michael Lewis: And he was gambling in his own casino. And it, it created conflicts of interest.
Jon Wertheim: So he owns the casino, but he’s still gambling?
Michael Lewis: Yes. He didn’t stop gambling.
Sam Bankman-Fried and Michel Lewis
60 Minutes
The value of crypto had been eroding throughout the summer of 2022. Then came a one-two punch: a leak of Alameda’s unflattering balance sheet in early november … .and days later, Changpeng Shao, head of a rival exchange took to Twitter to question FTX’s viability… this triggered a classic panic run—digital style— on FTX
Jon Wertheim: How fast was money flowing out of FTX?
Michael Lewis: In the run, you know, $1 billion a day was leaving, and–
Jon Wertheim: $1 billion a day this thing’s gushing.
Michael Lewis: Yes. It unravels because the depositors at FTX want their money back. And it’s not all there.
It wasn’t all there in large part because the investors’ money intended for FTX had wound up in Bankman-Fried’s privately held fund, Alameda Research…. more than $8 billion…
Jon Wertheim: Do you think he knowingly stole customers’ money, Sam?
Michael Lewis: Put that way, no. So there’s another side of this. In the very beginning, if you were a crypto trader who wanted to trade on FTX and wanted to send dollars or yen or euros onto the exchange so you could buy crypto, y– FTX couldn’t get bank accounts. So Alameda Research, which could get bank accounts, created bank accounts for people to send money into so that it would go to FTX. But it was held in Alameda Research, Alameda Research bank accounts. And $8 billion-something piles up inside of Ala– Alameda Research that belongs to FTX customers that never gets moved–
Jon Wertheim: It never gets transferred over?
Michael Lewis: Never gets transferred.
Jon Wertheim: That sounds like a problem.
Michael Lewis: It’s a huge problem.
Jon Wertheim: What’s the toughest question you think Sam’s gonna have to answer?
Michael Lewis: How do you not know that $8 billion that’s not yours is in your private fund? I mean, really, how do you not know? Explain. $8 billion is in your private fund, that belongs to other people, and you’re saying you didn’t know. Please explain how that’s possible.
Jon Wertheim: Did you do that?
Michael Lewis: Yeah. I did.
Jon Wertheim: What’d he say?
Michael Lewis: He said, “You have to understand that when it went in there, it was a rounding error, that it felt like we had infinity dollars in there, that I wasn’t even thinking about it.”
Jon Wertheim: I can see people watching this saying, like, ‘Come on guys. This is like Elizabeth Holmes in cargo shorts. And this is all a ruse. Don’t fall for the shtick. This is a bad actor.’
Michael Lewis: It’s a little different supplying, you know, phony medical information to people that might kill them. And in this case, what you’re doing is possibly losing some money that belonged to crypto speculators in the Bahamas. On the other hand, this is not to excuse. He shouldn’t have done that.
Early in the morning of November 11th, Sam Bankman-Fried reluctantly docu-signed FTX into bankruptcy…it had taken five days for FTX to implode…
Jon Wertheim: You go back to the Bahamas as Pompeii is falling. What’d you see when you landed?
Michael Lewis: I got back the day, on the Friday of the collapse. It was the afternoon that Sam had signed the bankruptcy papers. And by then there’d been a mass exodus. Most of the employees had fled. And fled in such a way that– kind of in a ridiculous way. They’d taken the comp–company cars and ditched them at the airport with the keys inside. Or they were–
Jon Wertheim: Just get the hell out.
Michael Lewis: Nobody knew what had happened. But they were just scared that they were gonna be detained by the local authorities. We drove into the lot, and Sam Bankman-Fried is walking loops around the parking lot. He had been brought over there earlier to be interviewed by Bahamas authorities. And nobody had given him a ride home. And he was just sitting there all alone.
Jon Wertheim: How do you divorce Michael Lewis, the empathetic human being, from Michael Lewis, the journalist and author, who recognizes what a third act this is? Pretty dramatic, right?
Michael Lewis: If I were a better person, I would have been deeply distressed by all of this. It took about a nanosecond before I thought, “Oh my God. This is an incredible story.”
A month later, Bankman-Fried was arrested in the Bahamas and extradited to New York to face federal charges that he had fraudulently used customer deposits to finance billions of dollars of venture capital investments, real estate purchases, and political donations…
Jon Wertheim: What’s your response to someone who hears this and says– “It’s– it’s a fun story, and it’s crypto in the Bahamas, but this is the oldest architecture of a financial collapse that’s been going on for centuries.”
Michael Lewis: This isn’t a Ponzi scheme. Like, when you think of a Ponzi scheme, I don’t know, Bernie Madoff, the problem is– there’s no real business there. The dollar coming in is being used to pay the dollar going out. And in this case, they actually had– a great real business. If no one had ever cast aspersions on the business, if there hadn’t been a run on customer deposits, they’d still be sitting there making tons of money.
Inside the Beltway, in the Hollywood Hills and in sports arenas, suddenly (if predictably), it was: Sam Bankman who?….
Michael Lewis and Jon Wertheim talk about Sam Bankman-Fried
60 Minutes
Michael Lewis: He becomes toxic. Like, nobody wants to talk to him. He has no friends. You wa–watch everybody who rushed in rush out.
Jon Wertheim: How’d Tom Brady react to this?
Michael Lewis: The first reaction was very s– it was sadness. He clearly really liked him. And he really liked the hope that he brought. I mean, a lot of people wanted there to be a Sam, you know? There is still a Sam-Bankman-Fried-shaped hole in the world that now needs filling. Like that character would be very useful to have–
Jon Wertheim: What he represented.
Michael Lewis: What he wanted to do with the resources. And Brady was I think crushed. And I think as time has gone by, and he’s ceased to get a really good explanation about what’s happened– I think he’s just like, “He tricked me. I’m angry. I don’t wanna have anything to do with it anymore.”
Starting in December, Lewis began driving the 45 miles from Berkeley to Stanford, where Bankman-Fried was living with his parents, who have also been ensnared in legal proceedings tied to FTX…. out on bail but wearing an ankle monitor, he left the door open for Lewis, so they could continue their conversations. We anticipated speaking with Bankman-Fried in August, but the judge in his case instituted a gag order, and then put him in a Brooklyn jail for violating terms of his release. Bankman-fried has pled not guilty…
Michael Lewis: He genuinely thinks he’s innocent. I can tell you his state of mind four or five months ago. It’s like, “If you offered me plead guilty and do six months of house arrest, I’d still say no.”
Jon Wertheim: What do you suspect his biggest fear is if he has to go to prison?
Michael Lewis: Not having the internet. Now that sounds crazy, but I do think that if he had the internet, he could survive jail forever. Without having a constant stream of information to react to– I think he may go mad. If you gave Sam Bankman-Fried a choice (this is quite serious) of living in a $39 million penthouse in the Bahamas without the internet, or the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn with the internet, there’s no question in my mind he’d take the jail.
Michael Lewis has never before written something that dovetails so dramatically with a sensationalized news event. Lewis’ book, “Going Infinite,” comes out Tuesday, the same day Sam Bankman-Fried’s trial begins.
Jon Wertheim: He made a mockery of crypto in the eyes of many. He’s sort of taken away the credibility of effective altruism. How do you see him?
Michael Lewis: Everything you say is just true. And it–and it’s more interesting than that. Every cause he sought to serve, he damaged. Every cause he sought to fight, he helped. He was a person who set out in life to maximize the consequences of his actions– never mind the intent. And he had exactly the opposite effects of the ones he set out to have. So it looks to me like his life is a cruel joke.
Produced by Draggan Mihailovich. Associate producer, Emily Cameron. Broadcast associate, Elizabeth Germino. Edited by Warren Lustig.
FTX has filed a lawsuit against the parents of its founder, Sam Bankman-Fried, with the aim of recovering millions of dollars that the company alleges were fraudulently transferred and “misappropriated,” according to a court filing made late on Monday, The Wall Street Journal reported.
The lawsuit, filed in a Delaware bankruptcy court, represents the latest effort by FTX’s CEO, John J. Ray III, to recover some of the funds that Bankman-Fried allegedly distributed to family members and associates prior to the cryptocurrency exchange’s collapse in November of the previous year. Joseph Bankman and Barbara Fried are accused of taking advantage of their connections and influence within the FTX enterprise to enrich themselves.
Bankman-Fried’s parents, both professors at Stanford Law School, had been serving as his legal advisors during FTX’s collapse.
Bankman-Fried is set to face trial on October 3rd. Yuki Iwamura/Bloomberg | Getty Images.
According to the complaint, Bankman played a significant role in FTX’s operations, managing tax matters, advising on personnel hires, actively participating in high-level discussions, and referring to FTX as a family business. It also alleges that Bankman received substantial rewards for his work at FTX, including a $10 million gift from Bankman-Fried in early 2022, funded by Bankman-Fried’s trading firm, Alameda Research.
Although Fried did not hold a formal position at FTX, management claimed she was the primary advisor to her son regarding his political contributions, which totaled approximately $40 million ahead of the 2022 midterm elections.
The lawsuit also asserted that Bankman and Fried advocated for substantial political and charitable contributions, including over $5.5 million to Stanford University. Stanford confirmed to the WSJ that it had received gifts from the FTX Foundation and related entities but that the university would return the funds in full.
Attorneys for Bankman and Fried denied the accusations, calling them “completely false” and suggesting that Ray’s legal team was accumulating fees without benefiting FTX clients, adding that the lawsuit appeared to be an effort to exert pressure on the parents and hinder their child’s impending trial.
“This is a dangerous attempt to intimidate Joe and Barbara and undermine the jury process just days before their child’s trial begins,” Bankman and Fried’s lawyers wrote in a statement, per The WSJ.
Federal prosecutors have charged Bankman-Fried with defrauding billions of dollars from customers to finance his expansive business ventures through FTX. He denies the allegations and is set to face trial on October 3rd.
The fallen crypto king has been holed up at his parents’ home in Palo Alto since pleading not guilty to fraud charges stemming from FTX‘s collapse. But this afternoon in a Manhattan courtroom, a judge revoked Bankman-Fried’s bail, ordering him to go directly to jail before his trial scheduled to begin on October 2.
“My conclusion is there is probable cause to believe the defendant tried to tamper with witnesses at least twice,” said Judge Lewis A. Kaplan during his ruling.
According to CNBC, court marshals took Bankman-Fried into custody after the hearing. He removed his jacket, tie, and shoes and emptied his pockets. A reporter for CNBC, who was in the courtroom, said that Bankman Fried’s mother had her face buried in her hands during the ruling.
Prosecutors alleged that Bankman-Fried shared emails from his former girlfriend, Caroline Ellison, with The New York Times to intimidate her before his trial in October. They also said that Bankman-Fried leaked information to other journalists, including Michael Lewis, who is writing a book about FTX.
Last January, prosecutors argued that Bankman-Fried was sending messages to a former FTX executive who was a potential witness in the case, according to the Times. They also said Bankman-Fried was using VPN to access the internet and sending encrypted messages on Signal.
Judge Lewis responded by banning Bankman-Fried from contacting current or former employees. But, the order was not obeyed, and Bankman-Friend will now have to prep for his trial from a jail cell.
At press time, it was not clear where Bankman-Friend would be held. Prosecutors requested a jail in Putnam, New York, so he could access a laptop with internet. But the nearest jail to the courthouse is the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, which has limited internet access for prisoners.
Prosecutors are asking a judge to detain former FTX cryptocurrency exchange boss Sam Bankman-Fried after he allegedly leaked his former business partner’s personal information to the press in an attempt to discredit her as a witness.
Bitcoin rose sharply Wednesday and surpassed $30,000 for the first time in months, continuing a days-long increase in the cryptocurrency’s price, despite economic uncertainty and a regulatory crackdown on some crypto exchanges.
After months of evasion, basketball star Shaquille O’Neal has been served in a case involving collapsed cryptocurrency exchange FTX. The legal documents, served Tuesday, were delivered to the former athlete and current “Inside the NBA” analyst during the broadcast of a Miami Heat-Boston Celtics playoff game in Miami, plaintiffs’ attorney Adam Moskowitz said.
The complaint is part of a class-action lawsuit alleging O’Neal and other celebrities defrauded FTX investors by appearing in advertisements for the crypto-trading platform. O’Neal “hid” from process servers for months before being tracked down at the Kaseya Center, formerly called the FTX Arena, Moskowitz told CBS MoneyWatch.
A process server filmed the event to make sure there wouldn’t be “any problem” moving the case forward, Moskowitz said. Shaq ordered the process server to be ejected from the arena after the service, he added.
“They gave video of most of the service —not all, so we would be shocked if they raise any problems,” Moskowitz said. “We also now served a copy on his lawyer Bobby Martinez, so there can be no doubt he is served!”
Shaquille O’Neal looks on during the third quarter in game four of the Eastern Conference Finals between the Boston Celtics and the Miami Heat at Kaseya Center on May 23, 2023 in Miami, Florida.
Megan Briggs / Getty Images
Process servers thought they had successfully served the Hall of Famer in April. However, O’Neal earlier this month filed a request to dismiss the lawsuit, alleging that he had never actually received the legal papers.
“This purported ‘service’ is inadequate,” O’Neal’s attorneys said in a court filing. “It should be quashed, and the claims against Mr. O’Neal dismissed.”
According to federal law, a complaint must be served in person or through mail. If the individual being served does not receive the papers, the case can be delayed or dismissed.
In March, Forbes reported that Moskowitz’s firm had enlisted four different companies to hand O’Neal the complaint after months of failed attempts to serve the former athlete.
During the Tuesday night game, O’Neal was also served a second complaint alleging he and his son promoted an NFT project called ASTRALS before abandoning it, according to Moskowitz.
O’Neal’s lawyer, Roberto Martinez, did not immediately reply to CBS MoneyWatch’s request for comment.
“The irony here is that Shaq claimed no experience in crypto but this new class case for the NFT Astrals proves the opposition — he, his son and his business partner, all planned to make many millions odd dollars based solely on his involvement,” Moskowitz said.
FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried asked a New York federal judge on Monday night to dismiss most criminal charges brought against him by federal prosecutors following the sudden collapse of his cryptocurrency exchange last year.
Fallen FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried, aka SBF, thinks the court was too heavy-handed with the charges levied against him in December.
On Monday SBF’s legal team asked Manhattan federal court to dismiss 10 of the 13 criminal charges against him, including the foreign bribery charge, campaign finance charge, and a bank fraud charge, according to the New York Times.
Bankman-Fried was accused of misappropriating billions of dollars in customer funds in a fraud scheme between his FTX cryptocurrency exchange and his Alameda Research crypto trading firm. FTX filed for bankruptcy in November 2022 after a bank run exposed an $8 billion hole in the company’s accounts. SBF was arrested in the Bahamas and extradited to the United States in December. He is currently free on a $250 million bond as he awaits his trial, which is scheduled to start on October 2.
SBF has pleaded not guilty to the 13 fraud and conspiracy charges against him. In the court filing, his legal team argues that 10 of the charges violate the extradition process or are too vague, stating that the prosecution has an “eagerness to run up charges against Mr. Bankman-Fried,” per NYT.
Additionally, his lawyers claim that prosecutors “rushed to judgment” in the wake of the broad market crypto crash in 2022.
“Rather than wait for traditional civil and regulatory processes following their ordinary course to address the situation, the government jumped in with both feet, improperly seeking to turn these civil and regulatory issues into federal crimes,” his lawyers wrote in a court filing, according to Reuters.
Prosecutors must respond to SBF’s dismissal request by May 29. U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan is scheduled to hear arguments on June 15.
Basketball legend and businessman Shaquille O’Neal was served legal documents on Sunday in the FTX lawsuit, after allegedly dodging the paperwork for months. The lawsuit is targeting FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried and the company’s celebrity endorsers for defrauding investors.
Adam Moskowitz, co-counselfor investors on the FTX class action suit and partner at Moskowitz Law Firm, said that Shaq was “hiding and driving away from our process servers for the past three months,” per Coindesk.
“Plaintiffs in the billion $ FTX class action case just served @SHAQ outside his house,” the Moskowitz Law Firm tweeted. “His home video cameras recorded our service and we made it very clear that he is not to destroy or erase any of these security tapes, because they must be preserved for our lawsuit.”
Prior to the update on Sunday evening, Moskowitz Law Firm tweeted at Shaq on April 13th saying that “all other FTX celebrities have agreed to receive their complaints,” and called on the NBA Hall of Famer to have “courtesy and honor” in allowing the lawyers to deliver the papers.
You have been running from us for months & all other FTX celebrities have agreed to receive their complaints. Please have the courtesy & honor to simply allow our process servers tomorrow to deliver our legal complaint on your behalf, so you can defend your actions in this matter
The FTX class action lawsuit claims Bankman-Fried and other public figures defrauded investors by promoting the cryptocurrency in what ultimately was a “Ponzi scheme,” per court documents. Other celebrities implicated in the lawsuit are Tom Brady, Gisele Bündchen, Stephen Curry, and Kevin O’Leary.
“I wanted you to know the good news that we just served personally Shaquille O’Neal outside his house in Atlanta,” Adam M. Moskowitz, the attorney leading the lawsuit, said in a statement. “The good news is his home video cameras recorded our service and we have made it very clear, he is not to destroy and/or erase any of these security tapes, because they must be preserved for our lawsuit.”
Moskowitz and his law firm had been given a deadline of Monday to serve O’Neal, who Moskowitz said had “been hiding and driving away from our process servers for the past 3 months.”
O’Neal, who currently serves as an analyst for “Inside the NBA,” was the final defendant in the lawsuit to be served, according to the motion asking to serve him electronically.
The motion claimed that a process server had attempted to serve O’Neal dozens of times at his Texas and Georgia residences, and via mail to both the residences and his offices in Atlanta, where “Inside the NBA” is broadcast from.
Attorneys alleged in the motion that after an attempt to serve O’Neal in Texas, the process server “was sent an ominous and threatening text message by O’Neal or someone acting on his behalf.” The text message also claimed O’Neal lives in the Bahamas, which the law firm then determined to be untrue, the motion states.
The lawsuit accuses Bankman-Fried, O’Neal and other celebrity spokespeople, including Tom Brady and Larry David, of defrauding FTX investors.
“Mr. O’Neal will now be required to appear in federal court and explain to his millions of followers his ‘FTX: I Am All In’ false advertising campaign,” Moskowitz said Sunday night.
The four-time NBA champion has denied being involved in FTX beyond his sponsorship deal.
“A lot of people think I’m involved, but I was just a paid spokesperson for a commercial,” he said in an interview on CNBC after the lawsuit was filed.
FTX, which collapsed late last year, shuffled customer money between affiliated entities, using new investor funds and loans to pay interest on old ones in an attempt “to maintain the appearance of liquidity,” Moskowitz told CBS News in an email.
“FTX were geniuses at public relations and marketing, and knew that such a massive Ponzi scheme — larger than the Madoff scheme — could only be successful with the help and promotion of the most famous, respected, and beloved celebrities and influencers in the world,” he said.