ReportWire

Tag: friends TV show

  • With Just One Scene, Platonic’s Season 2 Finale Emphasizes That “Men and Women Can’t Be Friends” in the Most Cliché Way

    For those who had been anticipating some grand denouement based on the buildup to the finale of Platonic’s second season, they were likely disappointed by the somewhat lackluster delivery/“wrapping up in a neat bow” of things. Because, for all that “slow-burn tension” with regard to Sylvia (Rose Byrne) and her husband, Charlie (Luke Macfarlane), it landed with all the rushedness of a premature ejaculator.

    The tease of some inevitable separation or divorce between Sylvia and Charlie all started when Will Zysman (Seth Rogen), Sylvia’s long-time bestie (hence, the name of the show), encouraged Charlie to quit his job in episode five, “Jeopardy.” Titled as such not only because Charlie fulfills a lifelong dream of appearing on said show, but because, all of the sudden his reputation is in jeopardy as a result of how disastrous his ability to “be” in front of a live audience is (not to mention his entire sense of sanity also being in jeopardy).

    Soon after the taping, Charlie goes out with Will for a drink, during which the latter ruminates on how he wishes he could be solid like Charlie. To this, Charlie replies, “I’m ‘solid’ because I have to be. I have a wife and three kids to support. I, I don’t have a choice… And you know what? I think I thought that after I was on Jeopardy!, everything would be different in my life.” He then adds, “[My life] has been exactly the same for a very, very long time. Sometimes I feel…boxed in. I guess I just wish I could blow shit up.” Will then gives him a pep talk that includes the advice, “So fucking quit dude. Blow it all up, start a new chapter.”

    Charlie, surprisingly, takes the advice to heart. His sudden attack of “brashness” also hitting when he leads Will unknowingly to the house of the Head of Business Affairs at King World Media in an unhinged bid to plead with him not to air the episode of Jeopardy! that he was on so as to spare him the embarrassment. Determined to break in with no ostensible plan other than that, Charlie realizes the huge mistake he’s made after already crossing the threshold of entering (ergo, breaking). Injuring his foot in the process of then making his escape (while a gaggle of teenage youths look on with mild, slack-jawed interest) before something truly terrible happens, it’s now completely apparent that he’s having some kind of crack-up. A midlife crisis would be too easy of a phrase to use for it. No, for Charlie, it’s the realization that he’s been suffocated by a blanket of sameness all these years.

    While Sylvia, in contrast, has been given the luxury of being much more “loose” and “la-di-da.” Or so she herself would also like to believe. But it’s in the episode following “Jeopardy,” “Road Trip,” that Sylvia is forced to reckon with her own “basicness” with regard to the shackles of her domestic life. It all starts when Will forces his way on the so-called road trip Sylvia is taking, which starts out as driving her daughter, Frances (Sophie Leonard), to Palm Desert for a debate tournament. But when Will secures a seat, followed by Sylvia’s other best friend, Katie Fields (Carla Gallo), when she calls Sylvia in tears over finding out that her first ex-husband’s new wife is pregnant, it does turn into a “whole thing” with road trip cachet. Much to Frances’ irritation more than Sylvia’s.

    And, at first, Will and Katie don’t exactly gel, until he starts warming to the rather generic tenets of her Breaking the Glass Ceiling podcast (as poorly made as it is)—“part of the Boss Mama Industries Network.” Then, by the time they all stop at a tavern (namely, Red’s Tavern) that Will insists on going to along the way (after already dropping off Frances), it starts to become clear that Sylvia is turning into the third wheel. Especially after she tells them, “My life is a little bit different to both of yours.”

    When they express offense and outrage over her comment, she doubles down, “My life is stable and predictable.” Will balks, “Are you kidding me right now? You fucking think you’re better than us?” Katie chimes in, “You’re just as fucked up as we are.” Sylvia continues to claim no, and that everything about her life and Charlie—recent “light breakdown” and all—is fine. Katie then counters, “Also, we are the two most interesting people in your life.” Apparently, as the two most interesting people, they feel it’s their responsibility to fully “team up” by the end of the episode, insisting that Sylvia goes home to Charlie during his overt emotional time of need (having just hallucinated someone was humming the Jeopardy! theme song in the bathroom at work and then leaving early as a result).

    Reluctantly, Sylvia agrees, already afraid of what’s coming with Charlie after she talked to him on the phone to try and get his help with some shysters at a mechanic shop. Realizing the full weight of his existential crisis, she laments to Will and Katie, “He’s always been the rock” and “I need him to be the rock.”

    But for those who thought the tension was actually meant to be between Sylvia and Charlie this season, the truth is, as usual, it’s between Sylvia and Will, whose fraught dynamic anchors the series. And it’s because Sylvia blames Will for “breaking” Charlie (as she puts in the finale), in addition to his sudden pivot toward spending more time with Katie (who evidently “just gets it” because she’s divorced and freaky too), that they start to experience another rift as the season draws to a close. This prompting Will to lean more and more on Katie, especially after Sylvia kicks him out of her guest house/would-be office in the penultimate episode of season two, “Boundaries.” He then starts to “crash” at Katie’s, promising her it’s only “temporary” (as he promised Sylvia).

    But by the next episode (the finale), she’s already grown sick of his presence in her house, telling Sylvia outside their kids’ school, “He’s been living with me for weeks. I don’t know how this guy became my problem. I barely know him… [oh, now she barely knows him, even though they’ve been acting like besties for a minute]. I get why you dumped him on me. The only trouble is, now I don’t know how to get rid of him.” Sylvia confirms, “He is impossible to get rid of.” Even though that certainly wasn’t the case in season one, when it started out with the two of them having not spoken for years because Sylvia didn’t much care for Will’s now ex-wife. Katie gets a devious look on her face all of the sudden and says, “Well, there is one thing I don’t think you tried.” There’s then an immediate cut to Katie and Will together in bed after having had sex. Once again proving what Vickie Miner in Reality Bites declared: “Sex is the quickest way to ruin a friendship.” Or at least the quickest way to make everything too awkward to continue living with that person anymore. So it is that Katie gets him to leave with the power of a few thrusts.

    Consequently, Will gets sent back to his “one true north,” Sylvia—only she isn’t so willing to “take him back,” as it were. In fact, her giving in to helping him move all the beer equipment he left in her backyard leads to a big argument that prompts the old Friends chestnut, “We need to take a break.” Interestingly enough, Friends, too, proved that platonic relationships between men and women were always either 1) prone to giving way to the romantic or 2) more trouble than they were worth—especially if one friend had romantic feelings for another that weren’t reciprocated (ultimately, Joey and Rachel).

    Naturally, the “break” between them doesn’t hold, with Sylvia giving in to overhearing Will’s pained reaction to a noncompete letter he gets from his former fiancée Jenna’s (Rachel Rosenbloom) company, Johnny 66, informing him he can’t open up Shitty Little Bar, even though he’s just weeks away from doing it—from at last opening his own place. And yes, Jenna is one of many people in the series who end up being vexed by Sylvia and Will’s closeness, this having been an early part of what was going to doom the relationship in season two.

    In the meantime, Charlie continues to “find himself” through the book he’s writing about Brett Coyote (though he only ends up finding himself right back in the corporate sector after self-publishing it). In point of fact, calling the episode, “Brett Coyote’s Last Stand” made it seem as though this finale would be about Charlie finally losing all patience for Sylvia and her general disinterest in him or his life, instead constantly mired in Will’s latest dramas and issues. Making most of Sylvia’s energy go into helping and catering to him, rather than her own husband.

    So while Harry Burns said in When Harry Met Sally, “Men and women can’t be friends because the sex part always gets in the way,” for Will and Sylvia, just as it was in season one, that still hasn’t technically become a factor. And yet, there’s no doubt that, with their plans to become even more intertwined by going into business together, their friendship will only wreak more havoc on everyone around them, Charlie and Katie included. So yes, maybe Sylvia actually should take a page from Katie’s book and sleep with Will if she really wants to “get rid of him” for good. After all, such a method is a cliché for a reason: it usually works.

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • A Chasm in the TV Space-Time Continuum, Or: Rachel Green Fucks Don Draper

    A Chasm in the TV Space-Time Continuum, Or: Rachel Green Fucks Don Draper

    Just when you thought scenes of Rachel Green Alex Levy boning Don Draper Paul Marks (not the other way around, as some might sexistly presume) would stop at last week’s episode of The Morning Show, “The Stanford Student,” the latest installment of the third season, “Strict Scrutiny,” chose to pick up where the banging session motif left off. This time commencing a new one that viewers are made privy to after a few requisite “romantic foreplay” shots of a pizza box on the counter with two half-drunk glasses of wine next to it. 

    The tracking shot then passes by the sleeping dog (because dogs aren’t as perverse about watching as cats) and into the living room with the multimillion dollar view of the city—that looks like any megalopolis—before finally showing us Alex and Paul continuing to delight in their forbidden tryst from the previous week. But it’s not really Alex and Paul, is it? Or even Jennifer Aniston and Jon Hamm. No, no. All one can truly see is the unlikely fan fiction melding of Friends and Mad Men come to life. 

    And while it might seem that Green and Draper are worlds (and decades apart), when one stops to think about it, the two really have quite a bit in common. Or maybe, more accurately, Rachel has quite a bit in common with Don’s usual type: Betty Draper (January Jones). For instance, like Rachel, Betty is overly spoiled and a little too into spending money on clothes and other “look at me” frivolities. But, at least in Betty’s defense, she has little else to occupy her time (certainly not the raising of her kids). Even though Rachel could have landed herself a similar trophy wife lifestyle had she not left Barry Farber (Mitchell Whitfield) at the altar.

    Another key similarity between the two “TV queens” are that both Betty and Rachel serve as the quintessential representation of the spoiled daughter/Daddy’s princess. Who no man will ever be good enough for (and this is how Electra complexes happen). Except that Rachel would like to believe getting a job has changed her nature. Alas, the true essence of a person (and the effects of their upbringing) never really goes away. 

    And while Rachel is more like Betty and less like Alex, Paul Marks, though seemingly modeled after a less socially inept Elon Musk, instead has many Don Draper characteristics. Starting with an arrogance and self-assurance that mimics the creative director who was able to make Sterling Cooper change to Sterling Cooper Draper Pryce by season four. Because while the Kennedy Camelot era had just ended in America, Don’s own Camelot era in advertising was just getting started. And so is Paul Marks’ proverbial Camelot era, as he extends his many business endeavors into the world of “legacy media,” cajoled back into a deal he was initially going to back out of thanks to Alex’s batting eyelashes. Granted, he had initially backed out in the first place largely as a result of her actions, so it’s only fair that she should be the one to reel him back in. 

    Indeed, the development of their attraction since the beginning of The Morning Show’s third season has almost felt as simultaneously prolonged and inevitable as the one between Ross (David Schwimmer) and Rachel (with Rachel taking a little more time to get on Ross’ pining bandwagon). Except, in this case, there are far more risks involved beyond merely “weirding Monica out” or making things awkward for a tight-knit friend group after the unavoidable breakup. At the forefront of those risks is sabotaging the deal that would arrange for Paul to buy UBA. A deal that still hasn’t been locked down, despite Cory’s (Billy Crudup) best efforts to push it through without any more scrutiny from the government.

    And yes, the board would surely blanch over the knowledge of Alex and Paul banging, because what would that do for the optics of this deal? For the public would then be keenly aware of a huge conflict of interest. It is this type of high-risk behavior that Don was always known for engaging in throughout Mad Men, and Hamm appears to be attracted to characters with this sense of self-destructive bravado. Aniston, on the other hand, has a flavor for the “goody two-shoes” ilk. And Alex being America’s sweetheart (no matter what dirt on her comes out) plays into her usual typecasting ever since taking on the role of Rachel Green. 

    What’s more, this isn’t the first time The Morning Show has had TV worlds involving Friends collide, with Reese Witherspoon a.k.a. Big Little Lies’ Madeline Mackenzie having once cameo’d as Rachel’s sister, Jill Green, for a two-episode arc (though “arc” is a strong word for a character who doesn’t change) in season six. However, in contrast to Ross falling for Jill’s coquettish charms, Paul has zero interest in Bradley Jackson (lesbian or not), who shows up after Alex backs out of her agreement to partake in a suborbital rocket launch (yes, it’s all very Bezos meets Musk) with Paul on live TV. The power play on Alex’s part (designed to indicate to Cory how much clout she really has) ends up putting Bradley in the rocket launch seat next to Paul and Cory, and, ultimately, titillates Paul. Because, after all, what other woman would have “the balls” to flake out on him in such a public and humiliating way? And, in cliche fashion, powerful men are turned on by “things” they can’t have, seeing those “things” as a challenge. A new “terrain to conquer.” And oh, how Paul conquers Alex’s by episode six, “The Stanford Student.”

    After a brief pause on their “unwittingly” romantic day date, of sorts, in episode four, “The Green Light,” their story comes back into sharp focus. Namely, with regard to their clearly, um, mounting attraction. With Alex playing the Rachel card of delaying gratification for as long as possible before finally giving in after interviewing Paul at his Hamptons house for an episode of Alex Unfiltered. And yes, she was the one who suggested the interview, as though to confirm Paul had feels for her too…by seeing if he would agree to do it. Because Paul never agrees to do interviews with anyone. 

    Watching how “good” the two seem for one another (that is, in this portion of the program, before the invariable crash and burn that TV drama requires), it’s enough to make one contemplate how Rachel Green existing in the 60s, or Don Draper existing in the 90s, might have made things better, relationship-wise, for the two. Because we all know ending up with Ross Geller or, in Don’s case, at an Esalen-like retreat center, isn’t exactly a happy ending. Maybe Don wouldn’t have felt the need to suppress his more narcissistic, work-obsessed qualities, as Rachel possessed them as well. Maybe their mutual narcissism could have tamped down the other’s in some fashion, or they would have simply felt more free to be who they truly were.

    But since this pair of unlikely lovers could never exist in each other’s world due to the limitations of being hemmed in by their respective TV series and decade, The Morning Show offers an unexpected glimpse into a fan fiction narrative that perhaps no one ever thought to concoct before. So yes, they might tell us this is “Alex Levy” and “Paul Marks,” but na. The only way these two can be looked at with each other is: Rachel Green and Don Draper.

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Jennifer Aniston says ‘Friends’ offensive to ‘a whole generation of kids’ – National | Globalnews.ca

    Jennifer Aniston says ‘Friends’ offensive to ‘a whole generation of kids’ – National | Globalnews.ca

    It’s The One With the Brutally Honest Actor: Friends star Jennifer Aniston is the latest celebrity to discuss the difficulties of working in comedy and making modern, apparently more sensitive audiences laugh.

    Aniston, who has been working in film and comedy for nearly three decades, told the French news agency AFP that it’s become “a little tricky” to produce comedies because you have to be “very careful.” She said this is especially troubling because “the beauty of comedy is that we make fun of ourselves, make fun of life.”

    Read more:

    Gwyneth Paltrow ‘shaken up’ after ski crash, says daughter Apple Martin

    Aniston, 54, lamented the past when she said: “You could joke about a bigot and have a laugh — that was hysterical. And it was about educating people on how ridiculous people were.”

    Story continues below advertisement

    She used her role as Rachel Green in the 1990s sitcom Friends as an example of how audiences have evolved over the years.

    “There’s a whole generation of people, kids, who are now going back to episodes of Friends and find them offensive,” she said.

    Aniston blamed the offensiveness on a combination of “things that were never intentional” and elements of the program that just lacked thought.

    Friends, a comedy about six young people in New York, has long since been criticized for a lack of diversity. All of the show’s main characters are white. While actors of colour appeared sparsely in short cameo roles, the most prominent, non-white actor on the show, Aisha Tyler (who played Charlie Wheeler), appeared in only nine episodes.

    Read more:

    Lolita the orca to be freed to ‘home waters’ after 50+ years in captivity

    Some of the jokes in friends have also been labelled transphobic or homophobic.

    Co-creator of the sitcom, Marta Kauffman, said last year she was “embarrassed” and felt “guilt” over the lack of diversity in Friends.

    “It’s painful looking at yourself in the mirror. I’m embarrassed that I didn’t know better 25 years ago,” Kauffman told the Los Angeles Times.

    Story continues below advertisement

    Friends ran from 1994 to 2004. It is one of the most profitable sitcoms ever created, bringing in reportedly US$1.4 billion since its initial debut.

    As a result of increased sensitivity, Aniston said less comedies are being made today than in decades prior. Not having comedies, she said, is a tragedy.

    “Everybody needs funny! The world needs humour!” she said. “We can’t take ourselves too seriously. Especially in the United States. Everyone is far too divided.”

    Read more:

    Jeremy Renner shares haunting 911 call of snowplow accident in emotional 1st TV interview

    Numerous popular comedians have already complained about producing comedy in the post-woke age. In particular, Dave Chappelle and Chris Rock have been especially outspoken about cancel culture and comedy.


    Click to play video: 'Comedian Dave Chappelle tackled on stage during Los Angeles show'


    Comedian Dave Chappelle tackled on stage during Los Angeles show


    Still, Aniston charges on. In her latest comedy, Murder Mystery 2, Aniston plays Audrey Spitz, a detective solving the case of a kidnapped billionaire alongside her partner Nick (played by Adam Sandler). Murder Mystery 2 is available to stream on Netflix on Friday.

    &copy 2023 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

    Sarah Do Couto

    Source link