ReportWire

Tag: Freedom of information

  • Aide to Lloyd Austin asked ambulance to arrive quietly to defense secretary's home, 911 call shows

    Aide to Lloyd Austin asked ambulance to arrive quietly to defense secretary's home, 911 call shows

    An aide to Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin asked first responders to avoid using lights and sirens in requesting an ambulance be sent to Austin’s northern Virginia home after he had complications from surgery for prostate cancer that he had kept secret from senior Biden administration leaders and staff.

    Austin was hospitalized Jan. 1 and admitted to intensive care after developing an infection a week after undergoing surgery. He was released from Walter Reed National Military Medical Center on Monday.

    On the Jan. 1 call to the Fairfax County Department of Public Safety, a man who identified himself as a government employee described Austin as alert. The identity of Austin and the caller were redacted from a copy of the 911 audio, which was obtained by The Associated Press under the Freedom of Information Act. The caller named the street on which Austin lives.

    In the four-minute call, the reason for needing the ambulance also was redacted. The caller said Austin was not having chest pains.

    “Can I ask, like, can the ambulance not show up with lights and sirens? Um, we’re trying to remain a little subtle,” the aide said, according to the recording.

    A dispatcher responded that the ambulance would comply once it got near the home.

    “Usually when they turn into a residential neighborhood, they’ll turn them off,” the dispatcher said, adding that emergency sirens and lights are required by law on major roads when ambulances are responding to a call.

    Austin was located on the ground floor of the residence, said the aide, who indicated he would be waiting outside for the ambulance.

    The caller asked how long it would take to get to the home. The dispatcher said it depended on traffic and road conditions and said first responders would be arriving from the closest available station.

    Details of the 911 audio file from the Fairfax County Public Safety Department were first reported by The Daily Beast.

    As he recovers, Austin will be working from home. His doctors said he “progressed well throughout his stay and his strength is rebounding.” They said in a statement the cancer was treated early and his prognosis is “excellent.”

    Austin, 70, was admitted to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center on Dec. 22 and underwent surgery to treat the cancer, which was detected earlier in the month during a routine screening.

    Dr. John Maddox, the trauma medical director, and Dr. Gregory Chesnut, the director of the Center for Prostate Disease Research at Walter Reed, said that during Austin’s hospitalization he underwent medical tests and was treated for lingering leg pain. They said he has physical therapy to do but there are no plans for further cancer treatment other than regular checks.

    President Joe Biden and senior administration officials were not told about Austin’s hospitalization until Jan. 4, and Austin kept the cancer diagnosis secret until Jan. 9. Biden has said Austin’s failure to tell him about the hospitalization was a lapse in judgment, but the Democratic president insists he still has confidence in his Pentagon chief.

    During Austin’s time at Walter Reed, the U.S. launched a series of military strikes late last week on the Iranian-backed Houthis in Yemen, targeting dozens of locations linked to their campaign of assaults on commercial shipping in the Red Sea. Working from his hospital bed, Austin juggled calls with senior military leaders, including Gen. Erik Kurilla, head of U.S. Central Command, and White House meetings to review, order and ultimately watch the strikes unfold over secure video.

    The lack of transparency about Austin’s hospitalization, however, has triggered administration and Defense Department reviews on the procedures for notifying the White House and others if a Cabinet member must transfer decision-making authorities to a deputy, as Austin did during his initial surgery and a portion of his latest hospital stay. And the White House chief of staff ordered Cabinet members to notify his office if they ever can’t perform their duties.

    Austin’s secrecy also drew criticism from Congress members on both sides of the political aisle, and Rep. Mike Rogers, an Alabama Republican who is chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, said he has opened a formal inquiry into the matter. Others openly called for Austin to resign, but the White House has said the Pentagon chief’s job is safe.

    It is still unclear when Austin will return to his office in the Pentagon or how his cancer treatment will affect his job, travel and other public engagements going forward. Deputy Defense Secretary Kathleen Hicks has been taking on some of his day-to-day duties as he recovers.

    ___

    Follow the AP’s coverage of Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin at https://apnews.com/hub/lloyd-austin.

    Source link

  • Arkansas governor’s $19,000 lectern remains out of sight, but not out of mind with audit underway

    Arkansas governor’s $19,000 lectern remains out of sight, but not out of mind with audit underway

    LITTLE ROCK, Ark. — From targeting Chinese-owned farmland to banning gender-neutral terms like “pregnant people” from state documents, Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders has rolled out announcements in recent weeks in quick succession, cheered on by her Republican base.

    The former White House press secretary — known for scaling back regular press briefings in Washington — has also fielded questions from behind a lectern at the state Capitol. But it’s the lectern she’s not using — a $19,000 purchase that’s led to an audit and claims her office illegally altered public records — that remains a problem for the first-term governor.

    That lectern hasn’t been seen at Sanders’ public events, and the governor’s office won’t say where it is. But questions about its cost and how its purchase was handled haven’t gone away so easily.

    Sanders has dismissed such questions as a “manufactured controversy” and even chided reporters for chasing what she called “tabloid gossip.” But whether it’s that or a legitimate matter of public accountability, the lectern purchase has drawn the attention of everyone from late-night comic Jimmy Kimmel to The New York Times and could hamper the governor’s efforts to emerge in the vanguard of next-generation Republican leaders nationally.

    Sanders appears eager to move on, and has invoked a strategy familiar to followers of the Trump administration: change the subject and blame the media. But she has helped sustain the story in part by refusing to answer basic questions about the purchase.

    Where is the lectern now? Who told a governor’s employee to add the words “to be reimbursed” to an invoice after the state Republican Party paid for the lectern, which was originally purchased months earlier with a state-issued credit card? And why isn’t she using it now when she makes new announcements?

    She made a stab at that last question when asked directly why she wasn’t using the pricey lectern at a recent news conference.

    “Because I figure if I do, then you would talk about nothing else, instead of the important actions that we’re actually taking today,” Sanders said.

    An audit approved by an all-Republican legislative panel is underway into the 39-inch-tall, wood-paneled, blue lectern. The Republican Party of Arkansas reimbursed the state for the purchase on Sept. 14, and Sanders’ office has called the use of a state credit card for the lectern an accounting error.

    And even as she’s dismissed questions about the purchase, Sanders has also said she welcomed the audit and urged that it be completed quickly.

    The optics of an expensive lectern purchased for someone who preaches fiscal responsibility are tough to shake. Political observers liken it to criticism the Pentagon received in past years for pricey hammers and toilet seats.

    “It’s a small thing that becomes emblematic of a larger thing that most Americans are suspicious of anyway, regardless of party orientation,” said Janine Parry, political science professor at the University of Arkansas.

    A photo the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette ran on the front page after Sanders’ office allowed the paper to view it has been widely circulated. When The Associated Press asked to see the lectern, Sanders’ office sent an official photo of it instead. A state GOP spokeswoman said the lectern was “available for use.”

    The lectern’s purchase emerged just as Sanders was urging lawmakers to broadly limit the public’s access to records about her administration. Sanders ultimately signed a measure blocking release of her travel and security records after the broader exemptions faced backlash from media groups and some conservatives.

    The purchase was initially flagged by Matt Campbell, a lawyer and blogger who has a long history of freedom-of-information requests that have uncovered questionable spending and other misdeeds by elected officials. Days before Sanders proposed the FOI changes, Campbell filed a lawsuit over the state blocking release of the governor’s travel and security records.

    “Anybody who tries to brush this off as ‘who cares about a lectern?’ is missing the entire point of all of it,” Campbell said. “If the GOP had just bought the lectern in the first place, it’s not an issue, but it’s the questions that remain.”

    The questions also focus on the decision to purchase the lectern from Beckett Events LLC, a Virginia-based company run by political consultant and lobbyist Virginia Beckett. The company has not responded to requests for comment.

    Similar lectern models are listed online for $7,500 or less. Sanders has said the one purchased by the state had additional features that contributed to its cost, including a custom height and sound components. The cost also included a road case, shipping, handling and a credit card fee.

    State Democrats have gleefully pointed out that they bought their party’s lectern for $5 from state surplus.

    More broadly, the purchase has spurred questions about how records were handled. Tom Mars, an attorney who served as head of State Police under Sanders’ father, former Gov. Mike Huckabee, has offered lawmakers the testimony of a client he says has firsthand knowledge of the governor’s office interfering with public records requests.

    That includes a governor’s office employee in September adding the undated “to be reimbursed” note to the original June invoice. Sanders’ office has said the note was added to reflect that the state had been reimbursed.

    Campbell has also filed a new Freedom of Information Act lawsuit seeking additional records about the lectern and challenging the governor’s office claims that Sanders’ husband Bryan’s state emails are exempt from public release.

    The week after the audit request was approved, Sanders announced that the state was ordering the subsidiary of a Chinese company to divest itself of 160 acres of farmland. She also signed an executive order banning agencies from using a list of gender-neutral terms.

    An outside group appears to be aiding Sanders’ attempts to change the subject, running a TV ad praising the governor. An attorney identified on filings as the treasurer for the group behind the ad did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    “The Biden presidency is a disaster, but in Arkansas, Gov. Sanders and Republican legislators are fighting for you,” the narrator in the ad by New Generation PAC says.

    Sanders’ most vocal defenders in the Legislature have been mostly silent on the lectern issue. Senate President Bart Hester played down the controversy, saying he doubted the audit would uncover wrongdoing.

    “I think the audit is much ado about nothing,” Hester said. “People who trust the governor will say victory and people who want a story will say there’s something more to it.”

    Source link

  • Government should pay compensation for secretive Cold War-era testing, St. Louis victims say

    Government should pay compensation for secretive Cold War-era testing, St. Louis victims say

    ST. LOUIS — Ben Phillips’ childhood memories include basketball games with friends, and neighbors gathering in the summer shade at their St. Louis housing complex. He also remembers watching men in hazmat suits scurry on the roofs of high-rise buildings as a dense material poured into the air.

    “I remember the mist,” Phillips, now 73, said. “I remember what we thought was smoke rising out of the chimneys. Then there were machines on top of the buildings that were spewing this mist.”

    As Congress considers payments to victims of Cold War-era nuclear contamination in the St. Louis region, people who were targeted for secret government testing from that same time period believe they’re due compensation, too.

    In the 1950s and 1960s, the Army used blowers on top of buildings and in the backs of station wagons to spray a potential carcinogen into the air surrounding a St. Louis housing project where most residents were Black. The government contends the zinc cadmium sulfide sprayed to simulate what would happen in a biological weapons attack was harmless.

    Phillips and Chester Deanes disagree. The men who grew up at the Pruitt-Igoe housing complex are now leading the charge seeking compensation and further health studies that could determine whether the secretive testing contributed to various illnesses or premature deaths that some Pruitt-Igoe residents later suffered.

    “We were experimented on,” Phillips said. “That was a plan. And it wasn’t an accident.”

    The new push comes as federal lawmakers are weighing compensation for people claiming harm from other government actions — and inactions — during the Cold War.

    The Associated Press reported in July that the government and companies responsible for nuclear bomb production and atomic waste storage sites in and near St. Louis were aware of health risks, spills and other problems, but often ignored them. Many believe the nuclear waste was responsible for the deaths of loved ones and ongoing health problems.

    The AP report, part of a collaboration with The Missouri Independent and the nonprofit newsroom MuckRock, examined documents obtained by outside researchers through the Freedom of Information Act.

    Republican U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley introduced legislation soon after the news reports calling for expansion of an existing compensation program for exposure victims. The Senate endorsed the amendment. While the House has yet to vote, Democratic President Joe Biden said last month that he was “prepared to help in terms of making sure that those folks are taken care of.”

    Former residents of Pruitt-Igoe say they should be taken care of, too.

    Phillips and Deanes, 75, are co-founders of PHACTS, which stands for Pruitt-Igoe Historical Accounting, Compensation, and Truth Seeking. Their attorney, Elkin Kistner, said it would be “appropriate and necessary” for Hawley’s proposal to be widened to include former Pruitt-Igoe residents.

    The government released documents in 1994 revealing details about the spraying. And St. Louis wasn’t alone in being subjected to secretive Cold War-era testing. Similar spraying occurred at nearly three dozen other locations.

    There were other types of secret testing. In a 2017 book, St. Louis sociologist Lisa Martino-Taylor cited documents obtained through a FOIA request to detail how pregnant women in several cities were given doses of radioactive iron during prenatal visits to determine how much was absorbed into the blood of the mothers and babies. The government also created radiation fields inside buildings, including a California high school.

    The area of the testing in St. Louis was described in Army documents as “a densely populated slum district.” About three-quarters of the residents were Black.

    “We were living in so-called poverty,” Deanes said. “That’s why they did it. They have been experimenting on those living on the edge since I’ve known America. And of course they could get away with it because they didn’t tell anyone.”

    Pruitt-Igoe was built in the 1950s with the promise of a new and better life for lower income residents. The project failed and was demolished in the 1970s.

    Despite the ultimate demise, Deanes and Phillips said that through their youth, Pruitt-Igoe was a welcoming place. Yet over the years, both men cited countless premature deaths and unusual illnesses among relatives and friends who once lived at Pruitt-Igoe.

    Phillips’ mother died of cancer and a sister suffered from convulsions that puzzled her doctors, he said. Phillips himself lost hearing in one ear due to a benign tumor. Deanes’ brother battled health problems for years and died of heart failure.

    Both men wonder if the spraying was responsible.

    A government study found that in a worst-case scenario, “repeated exposures to zinc cadmium sulfide could cause kidney and bone toxicity and lung cancer.” Yet the Army contends there is no evidence anyone in St. Louis was harmed.

    A spokesperson for the Army said in a statement to the AP that health assessments performed by the Army “concluded that exposure would not pose a health risk,” and follow-up independent studies also found no cause for alarm.

    Phillips and Deane believe the previous health studies were half-hearted. In addition to a new health study, they’d like to see soil tested to see if any radioactive material was part of the spraying.

    It’s unclear if Hawley’s bill might be expanded. Messages left with his office were not returned.

    Democratic U.S. Rep. Cori Bush of St. Louis said in a statement that she and her staff “are currently looking into alternative pathways that the federal government can take to ensure those impacted by the spraying of radioactive compounds and biochemicals in Pruitt-Igoe are also addressed.”

    Deanes and Phillips say that in addition to compensation and more detailed studies, they want an apology.

    “This shouldn’t go on,” Deanes said. “How are we supposed to be the leader of the free world and this is the way we conduct ourselves with our own citizens?”

    Source link