ReportWire

Tag: Fraud

  • Ex-Theranos exec ‘Sunny’ Balwani sentenced to nearly 13 years in prison

    Ex-Theranos exec ‘Sunny’ Balwani sentenced to nearly 13 years in prison

    [ad_1]

    SAN JOSE, Calif. — A judge on Wednesday sentenced former Theranos executive Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani to nearly 13 years in prison for his role in the company’s blood-testing hoax — a sentence slightly longer than that given to the CEO, who was his lover and accomplice in one of Silicon Valley’s biggest scandals.

    Balwani was convicted in July of fraud and conspiracy connected to the company’s bogus medical technology that duped investors and endangered patients. His sentencing came less than three weeks after Elizabeth Holmes, the company’s founder and CEO, received more than 11 years in prison for her part in the scheme.

    The scandal revolved around the company’s false claims to have developed a device that could scan for hundreds of diseases and other potential problems with just a few drops of blood taken with a finger prick.

    The case threw a bright light on Silicon Valley’s dark side, exposing how its culture of hype and boundless ambition could veer into lies.

    Holmes, 38, could have gotten up to 20 years in prison — a penalty that U.S. District Judge Edward Davila could have imposed on Balwani, who spent six years as Theranos’ chief operating officer while remaining romantically involved with Holmes until a bitter split in 2016.

    While on the witness stand in her trial, Holmes accused Balwani, 57, of manipulating her through years of emotional and sexual abuse. Balwani’s attorney has denied the allegations.

    The two trials had somewhat different outcomes. Unlike Balwani, Holmes was acquitted on several charges of defrauding and conspiring against people who paid for Theranos blood tests that produced misleading results and could have pointed patients toward the wrong treatment. The jury in Holmes’ trial also deadlocked on three charges.

    Balwani was convicted on all 12 felony counts, and his lawyers sought a far more lenient sentence of just four to 10 months in prison. Prosecutors for the Justice Department asked for 15 years. A probation report recommended nine years.

    Duncan Levin, a former federal prosecutor who is now a defense attorney, described Balwani’s bid for a light sentence as “utterly unrealistic.” Levin suspects the judge may give greater weight to the Justice Department and the probation office recommendations, which mirror the sentences those agencies sought for Holmes.

    The judge ultimately gave her 11 1/4 years in prison and recommended that the sentence be served in a low-security facility in Byran, Texas.

    Federal prosecutors also want the judge to order Balwani to pay $804 million in restitution to defrauded investors — the same amount sought from Holmes. Davila deferred a decision on restitution during Holmes’ Nov. 18 sentencing until an unspecified future date.

    In court documents, Balwani’s lawyers painted him as a hardworking immigrant who moved from India to the U.S. during the 1980s to become the first member of his family to attend college. He graduated from the University of Texas in 1990 with a degree in information systems.

    He later moved to Silicon Valley, where he first worked as a computer programmer for Microsoft before founding an online startup that he sold for millions of dollars during the dot-com boom of the 1990s.

    Balwani and Holmes met around the same time she dropped out of Stanford University to start Theranos in 2003. He became enthralled with her and her quest to revolutionize health care.

    Balwani’s lawyers said he eventually invested about $5 million in a stake in Theranos that eventually became worth about $500 million on paper — a fraction of Holmes’ one-time fortune of of $4.5 billion.

    That wealth evaporated after Theranos began to unravel in 2015 amid revelations that its blood-testing technology never worked as Holmes had boasted in glowing magazine articles that likened her to Silicon Valley visionaries such as Apple co-founder Steve Jobs.

    Before Theranos’ downfall, Holmes teamed up with Balwani to raise nearly $1 billion from deep-pocketed investors that included software mogul Larry Ellison and media magnate Rupert Murdoch.

    “Mr. Balwani is not the same as Elizabeth Holmes,” his lawyers wrote in a memo to the judge. “”He actually invested millions of dollars of his own money; he never sought fame or recognition; and he has a long history of quietly giving to those less fortunate.” Balwani’s lawyers also asserted that Holmes “was dramatically more culpable” for the Theranos fraud.

    Echoing similar claims made by Holmes’s lawyers before her sentencing, Balwani’s attorneys also argued that he has been adequately punished by the intense media coverage of Theranos, which has been the subject of a book, documentary and award-winning TV series.

    Balwani “has lost his career, his reputation and his ability to meaningfully work again,” his lawyers wrote.

    Federal prosecutors cast Balwani as a ruthless, power-hungry accomplice in crimes that ripped off investors and imperiled people who received flawed results. The blood tests were to be available in a partnership with Walgreen’s that Balwani helped engineer.

    “Balwani presented a fake story about Theranos’ technology and financial stability day after day in meeting after meeting,” the prosecutors wrote in their memo to the judge. “Balwani maintained this façade of accomplishments, after making the calculated decision that honesty would destroy Theranos.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Former Manhattan district attorney discusses guilty verdict against Trump Organization

    Former Manhattan district attorney discusses guilty verdict against Trump Organization

    [ad_1]

    Former Manhattan district attorney discusses guilty verdict against Trump Organization – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Cy Vance, the former Manhattan district attorney who launched the criminal investigation into the Trump Organization, joined CBS News to discuss the guilty verdict against the company on charges of criminal tax fraud and falsifying business records.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Clean energy grant fraud results in 7 year prison sentence

    Clean energy grant fraud results in 7 year prison sentence

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — A Massachusetts man who participated in a scheme to defraud the U.S. government out of about $50 million in tax-free grants intended to fund clean energy projects has been sentenced to seven years in prison, federal prosecutors said Wednesday.

    Christopher N. Condron, 50, was also sentenced Tuesday in U.S. District Court in Boston to three years of probation and ordered to pay $8.7 million, the amount he actually made in the scheme that ran from 2009 until 2013, according to a statement from the U.S. attorney’s office.

    Condron and others submitted fraudulent grant applications to the U.S. Treasury Department on behalf of four different companies, purportedly involved in either biofuel gasificaton or wind farm projects, prosecutors said.

    The grants were from a program under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, meant to stimulate the U.S. economy after the 2008 recession.

    Condron claimed the companies had either acquired, placed into service, or started construction of the projects at a total cost of more than $170 million, prosecutors said. Condron and others then sought to be reimbursed for more than $50 million based on those inflated costs, authorities said.

    Condron submitted fraudulent documentation to an attorney who, in turn, submitted the applications to the Treasury Department, according to prosecutors.

    Condron, of Acton, was indicted in 2017 and in September 2021 was convicted by a federal jury of conspiracy to defraud the United States and wire fraud. An email seeking comment was sent to his attorneys.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Jury found Trump Organization

    Jury found Trump Organization

    [ad_1]

    Jury found Trump Organization “was running a scam,” legal expert says – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    The Trump Organization has been found guilty of fraud and other charges by a jury in New York. Harry Litman, a former U.S. attorney and deputy assistant attorney general, joins John Dickerson to discuss the verdict, what we’ve learned form the trial, and the potential ramifications for former President Donald Trump.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Put This on a Red Hat: Trump’s Family Business Found Guilty of a Whopping 17 Different Crimes

    Put This on a Red Hat: Trump’s Family Business Found Guilty of a Whopping 17 Different Crimes

    [ad_1]

    It’s never a good thing, especially when you’re running for president of the United States, to have to say: “My company has been convicted of more than one dozen crimes that prosecutors say I explicitly sanctioned.” It’s just not a great look! Unfortunately for Donald Trump, that’s exactly the look he’ll be sporting on the 2024 trail from here on out, thanks to the verdict just returned by a jury in New York’s state Supreme Court.

    On Tuesday, the Trump Organization, which was started by Trump’s father and which the ex-president has owned for many decades, was found guilty of 17 different crimes, including tax fraud, conspiracy, and falsifying business records. The business had been indicted back in July 2021 alongside its longtime CFO, Allen Weisselberg, but unlike Weisselberg, who pleaded guilty to the long-running tax fraud scheme this past August, had maintained its innocence. Prosecutors had accused the company of compensating the CFO (and other executives) with off-the-books perks in an effort to reduce their taxable income; in the case of Weisselberg, those perks included things like a free apartment on the Upper West Side, a pair of leased Mercedes-Benzes, private school tuition for his grandchildren, and cash at Christmas so Weisselberg could pass out “personal holiday gratuities,” among other things. The scheme benefitted not only Weisselberg, who owed less money in income taxes, but also the Trump Organization itself, which avoided payroll taxes on benefits. According to the indictment, the company maintained literal spreadsheets of its crimes.

    Twitter content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    While Donald Trump was not personally charged, his name was cited throughout the trial, with prosecutors accusing him of “explicitly sanctioning tax fraud.” Hours before the ex-president announced he was running for office for a third time, Weisselberg, whose plea deal required him to tell the truth, told the jury that Trump was not only aware of the untaxed benefits at the heart of the government’s criminal case—he was the guy who authorized them. Asked if the private school tuition was personally paid for by Trump, Weisselberg answered: “Correct.” Of the apartment he lived in rent-free, assistant district attorney Susan Hoffinger asked Weisselberg, “It’s your understanding that was authorized by Mr. Trump?” to which Weisselberg responded, “That was my understanding, yes.” Weisselberg definitively confirmed that the scheme saved the Trump Organization money, which the notoriously cheap Trump would have undoubtedly been very happy about.

    Though the maximum financial penalty the Trump Organization will have to pay (less than $2 million) is a relative pittance for a company of its size, as The New York Times notes, it’s the ripple effect for Trump, who is reportedly running in the hopes of halting various investigations into his conduct, that may hurt the most.

    The company’s conviction…could now reverberate through the 2024 presidential race, providing early fodder for opponents and their attack ads.

    It also might lay the groundwork for the district attorney’s office to intensify its broader criminal investigation into Mr. Trump’s business practices—and hush money paid to a porn star who said she had an affair with him—an inquiry that gained momentum in recent months, according to people with knowledge of the matter.

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Trump Organization found guilty in executive tax-fraud scheme

    Trump Organization found guilty in executive tax-fraud scheme

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — Donald Trump’s company was convicted of tax fraud on Tuesday in a case brought by the Manhattan District Attorney, a significant repudiation of financial practices at the former president’s business.

    A jury found two corporate entities at the Trump Organization guilty on all 17 counts, including conspiracy charges and falsifying business records.

    The verdict came on the second day of deliberations following a trial in which the Trump Organization was accused of being complicit in a scheme by top executives to avoid paying personal income taxes on job perks such as rent-free apartments and luxury cars.

    The conviction is a validation for New York prosecutors, who have spent three years investigating the former president and his businesses, though the penalties aren’t expected to be severe enough to jeopardize the future of Trump’s company.

    As punishment, the Trump Organization could be fined up to $1.6 million — a relatively small amount for a company of its size, though the conviction might make some of its future deals more complicated.

    Trump, who recently announced he was running for president again, has said the case against his company was part of a politically motivated “witch hunt” waged against him by vindictive Democrats.

    Trump himself was not on trial but prosecutors alleged he “knew exactly what was going on” with the scheme, though he and the company’s lawyers have denied that.

    The case against the company was built largely around testimony from the Trump Organization’s former finance chief, Allen Weisselberg, who previously pleaded guilty to charges that he manipulated the company’s books and his own compensation package to illegally reduce his taxes.

    Weisselberg testified in exchange for a promised five-month jail sentence.

    To convict the Trump Organization, prosecutors had to convince jurors that Weisselberg or his subordinate, Senior Vice President and Controller Jeffrey McConney, were “high managerial” agents acting on the company’s behalf and that the company also benefited from his scheme.

    Trump Organization lawyers repeated the mantra “Weisselberg did it for Weisselberg” throughout the monthlong trial. They contended the executive had gone rogue and betrayed the company’s trust. No one in the Trump family or the company was to blame, they argued.

    Though he testified as a prosecution witness, Weisselberg also attempted to take responsibility on the witness stand, saying nobody in the Trump family knew what he was doing.

    “It was my own personal greed that led to this,” an emotional Weisselberg testified.

    Weisselberg, who pleaded guilty to dodging taxes on $1.7 million in fringe benefits, testified that he and McConney conspired to hide that extra compensation from his income by deducting their cost from his pre-tax salary and issuing falsified W-2 forms.

    During his closing argument, prosecutor Joshua Steinglass attempted to refute the claim that Trump knew nothing about the scheme. He showed jurors a lease Trump signed for Weisselberg’s company-paid apartment and a memo Trump initialed authorizing a pay cut for another executive who got perks.

    “Mr. Trump is explicitly sanctioning tax fraud,” Steinglass argued.

    The verdict doesn’t end Trump’s battle with Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, a Democrat who took office in January.

    Bragg has said that a related investigation of Trump that began under his predecessor, District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr., is “active and ongoing.”

    In that wide-ranging probe, investigators have examined whether Trump misled banks and others about the value of his real estate holdings, golf courses and other assets — allegations at the heart of New York Attorney General Letitia James’ pending lawsuit against the former president and his company.

    The district attorney’s office has also investigated whether any state laws were broken when Trump’s allies made payments to two women who claimed to have had sexual affairs with the Republican years ago.

    Near the end of his tenure last year, Vance directed deputies to present evidence to a grand jury for a possible indictment of Trump. After taking office, though, Bragg let that grand jury disband so he could give the case a fresh look.

    On Monday, he confirmed that a new lead prosecutor had been brought on to handle that investigation, signaling again that it was still active.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Sam Bankman-Fried’s ‘I screwed up’ messaging is about lawsuits and penalties vs. jail, says U.S. securities lawyer

    Sam Bankman-Fried’s ‘I screwed up’ messaging is about lawsuits and penalties vs. jail, says U.S. securities lawyer

    [ad_1]

    FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried went on an “I screwed up” media blitz this week, highlighted by his video appearance at the New York Times DealBook summit on Wednesday and continuing into the Sunday talk shows.

    U.S. securities lawyer James Murphy, speaking to CNN’s Quest Means Business on Thursday, said Bankman-Fried “did a very good job of sticking to his talking points.” 

    Murphy said: “His talking points were, ‘I didn’t do anything wrong intentionally. I may have been negligent. I may have breached fiduciary obligations.’ But those two things get you sued, get you penalized. They don’t get you to jail. And so he steered clear of anything that sounded like intentional misconduct.”

    FTX imploded in spectacular fashion last month, spurring calls for tighter regulation and shaking confidence in the crypto sector. The $32 billion cryptocurrency exchange had established itself as a leader in the field, enlisting star athletes like Stephen Curry and other celebrities to bolster its image. 

    A key accusation leveled against Bankman-Fried is that he used customer funds from his crypto exchange to fund risky bets at affiliate trading arm Alameda Research. 

    ‘Did not ever try to commit fraud’

    In the DealBook interview, Bankman-Fried peppered his statements with legalese, stating that he “did not ever try to commit fraud on anyone,” didn’t “know of times when I lied,” and “didn’t knowingly comingle funds.” 

    Said Murphy of Bankman-Fried sticking to the script: “He’s a very, very bright man and managed to do that for an hour.”

    In a Financial Times interview published Sunday, Bankman-Fried stuck with the theme, saying, “I f****d up big and people got hurt.”

    On ABC’s This Week on Sunday, Bankman-Fried said, “Look, I screwed up. Like I was CEO, I had a responsibility here and a responsibility to be on top of what was going on the exchange. I wish I had done much better at that.” 

    ABC legal analyst Dan Abrams said afterwards, “His basic defense, it sounds like, is, ‘I didn’t have the intent. I wasn’t trying to do it.’ That’s not enough in a lot of cases. That’s not going to protect him necessarily from getting indicted. But it is something we hear from CEOs who get tried, and it almost never works.”

    ‘People will go to jail, and should go to jail’

    Abrams added that Bankman-Fried could be facing a long time in jail. 

    “We’re talking about, by the way, the possibility of up to life in prison,” he said. “When you’re talking about this much money, in the federal sentencing guidelines, you’re talking about the possibility of enhancement after enhancement after enhancement based on the dollar amounts that could lead to something up to life.”

    Earlier this week Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong said of Bankman-Fried, “It’s “baffling to me why he’s not in custody already.”

    Mark Cuban, billionaire owner of the Dallas Mavericks and a prominent crypto investor, recently told TMZ that Bankman-Fried should be worried about prison time.

    Mike Novogratz, CEO of crypto firm Galaxy Digital Holdings, told Bloomberg TV on Thursday, “Sam and his cohorts perpetuated a fraud…He took our money. And so he needs to get prosecuted. People will go to jail, and should go to jail.”

    Securities lawyer Murphy added that prosecutors don’t have to prove that there was securities fraud. “They can go with mail and wire fraud,” he said. “If the money of customers was misappropriated and given to this affiliated company Alameda, that is a fraud and should qualify under the statues. I sincerely hope our Department of Justice is looking at it very hard.” 

    Fortune reached out to Bankman-Fried for comments but did not receive an immediate reply. 

    Our new weekly Impact Report newsletter will examine how ESG news and trends are shaping the roles and responsibilities of today’s executives—and how they can best navigate those challenges. Subscribe here.

    [ad_2]

    Steve Mollman

    Source link

  • 2 arrested for attempting to scam Starbucks in 3 states with stolen credit card

    2 arrested for attempting to scam Starbucks in 3 states with stolen credit card

    [ad_1]

    NIANTIC, CT (WFSB) – Two men are accused of trying to purchase and fraudulently return items to Starbucks locations in three states, including in Connecticut.

    Antwone Washington, 30, of Far Rockaway , NY, and Dante Shirfield Isaac, 31, of Hartford, face a list of charges, according to East Lyme police.

    Police were called to a Starbucks on Flanders Road in Niantic on Thursday just before 8 p.m.

    A woman from Delaware reported that someone made unauthorized purchases on her credit card at a Starbucks in East Lyme.

    Police found that suspects were also trying to return merchandise from other Starbucks stores. They learned that two suspects had been pulling the same scam at other Starbucks locations in southeastern Connecticut.

    Washington and Isaac were taken into custody without incident.

    Police said they had a rental vehicle, which contained about $1,800 worth of Starbucks merchandise, along with receipts from stores in Pennsylvania, New York and Connecticut.

    Washington was charged with fourth-degree larceny, criminal attempt at sixth-degree larceny, illegal use of a credit card, third-degree identity theft, and other charges.

    Isaac was charged with criminal attempt at sixth-degree larceny, illegal use of a credit card, third-degree identity theft, second-degree breach of peace and other charges.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Fraud and scam problems with Zelle payments? Here’s what to know.

    Fraud and scam problems with Zelle payments? Here’s what to know.

    [ad_1]

    Zelle has been criticized for rampant fraud and scams that can leave some bank customers on the hook for financial losses.

    Zelle has been criticized for rampant fraud and scams that can leave some bank customers on the hook for financial losses.

    Over the past several months, banks in Charlotte and beyond have faced sharpened scrutiny of Zelle, a digital payment network created and marketed by the country’s seven largest banks.

    And many customers have fallen victim to scams that are growing more common on the service.

    Lawmakers have pushed banks to crack down on Zelle fraud and pay back a greater number of customers when they get tricked into losing money. Banks say they reimburse all unauthorized transactions already, and that fraudulent claims account for a minuscule fraction of the money sent back and forth on the network.

    Here’s a breakdown of why the payment service has come under fire — and what you can watch for on Zelle to protect your own cash.

    What is Zelle?

    Zelle is a peer-to-peer payment network similar to PayPal or Venmo. It allows users to digitally send money from their accounts to users at different banks.

    The service, created in 2017, is operated by Early Warning Services LLC, a company co-owned by seven banks: Bank of America, Wells Fargo JP Morgan Chase, Truist, U.S. Bank, PNC and Capital One. But many other banks use Zelle — a total of more than 1,700.

    Zelle is now the country’s most widely used transfer service, with more than double Venmo’s payment volumes, MarketWatch reported in October.

    But unlike Venmo, CashApp or other similar services, Zelle transfers money instantaneously from bank account to bank account with no entity in between.

    Why is Zelle being criticized?

    Lawmakers and regulators have pointed to growing complaints of fraud from bank customers, suggesting that Zelle users may have become a target for scammers.

    Fraudsters are likely drawn to Zelle for its ubiquity and ability to instantly transfer cash directly from a bank customer’s account, said Teresa Murray, a consumer watchdog for U.S. Public Interest Research Group.

    A report from Sen. Elizabeth Warren found that four of the country’s largest banks, including Bank of America and Truist, are on track to report more than half a million claims of fraud on Zelle for the past three years.

    Critics also argue the banks don’t do enough to repay customers that get scammed on Zelle.

    By law, banks are required to cover customers’ losses for unauthorized transactions, like a third party hacking into a customer’s account. From the banks’ point of view, those rules don’t apply to authorized transactions — ones that a customer initiated — even if they were tricked into doing so.

    That means that customers are often left on the hook for losses.

    Zelle and the banks behind it have pointed to the growing number of users as an explanation for increased claims, and the fact that the vast majority of transactions on the service — more than 99.9% — occur without incident of frauds or scams.

    What do Zelle scams typically look like?

    One common con on Zelle is known as a “me to me” scam.

    This is how Bank of America described it in one email to customers: Customers get a text that looks like a fraud alert from their bank, asking about a suspicious transaction from their bank account. After sending a text back saying they weren’t the one to make the charge, customers get a phone call.

    The caller identifies themselves as a bank employee, and offers to help stop the fraud by asking Zelle users to digitally send money to themselves.

    Scammers often don’t even need a password, Murray said. They can use customer’s usernames and two-factor verification code to access your bank account, and steal thousands of dollars within minutes.

    In other scams, bank customers get an email, text or call from what looks like a person or business they know, urging them to send funds through Zelle.

    “It’s frighteningly easy,” said Murray. “You combine robo calls and texts, with this easy, virtually untraceable way to rip people off, it’s like a horror movie.”

    What happens next for Zelle?

    At least three of the banks behind Zelle — JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America and Wells Fargo — are discussing a possible new reimbursement plan for customers that get scammed using the service, the Wall Street Journal reported.

    The conversation has centered on standardizing refund procedures, the Journal reported, in the hopes of building trust in the service and helping more customers get their money back.

    Barring a new plan from the banks, Murray said, regulators may step in to create guidelines for reimbursing customers.

    The best protection against fraud

    The best way to protect yourself is to watch for signs of a scam.

    “Never respond to unexpected phone calls or texts or emails,” Murray said. And never ever, ever share the two-factor authentication code whether it’s for your bank account or your email.”

    “If you abide by those two things, you will have fended off a lot of fraud.”

    This story was originally published December 2, 2022 5:50 AM.

    Related stories from Charlotte Observer

    Hannah Lang covers banking, finance and economic equity for The Charlotte Observer. Her work has appeared in The Wall Street Journal, the Triangle Business Journal and the Greensboro News & Record. She studied business journalism at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and grew up in the same town as her alma mater.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The FTX Ponzi: Uncovering The Largest Fraud In Crypto History

    The FTX Ponzi: Uncovering The Largest Fraud In Crypto History

    [ad_1]

    The below is an excerpt from the Bitcoin Magazine Pro report on the rise and fall of FTX. To read and download the entire 30-page report, follow this link.

    The Beginnings

    Where did it all start for Sam Bankman-Fried? As the story goes, Bankman-Fried, a former international ETF trader at Jane Street Capital, stumbled upon the nascent bitcoin/cryptocurrency markets in 2017 and was shocked at the amount of “risk-free” arbitrage opportunity that existed.

    [ad_2]

    Dylan LeClair And Sam Rule

    Source link

  • Here’s How Your Business Can Stop Fraud in Its Tracks

    Here’s How Your Business Can Stop Fraud in Its Tracks

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    For some businesses, fraud is nothing more than an accepted expense casually factored into the company’s bottom line. But for those who understand the true threat, fraud is a risk that must be prevented and stopped at all costs. We’ve become so accustomed to fraud’s existence that it now, unfortunately, seems like a fact of life. It doesn’t have to be this way, but preventing fraud requires a paradigm shift. It requires knowing your customer (KYC) and adopting practices that many companies have shied away from for years. Fraud will keep increasing until the business world embraces prevention from the first stages of customer interaction.

    Fraud is a business problem

    The internet has made fraud easy. Covid-19 made it even easier, with more businesses moving their workflows to digital platforms. Unfortunately, without a subsequent improvement in security practices, this digitalization exponentially increased the attack surface area for fraudsters worldwide who won’t hesitate to seize the advantage. According to LexisNexis, there was a 19.8% increase in fraud costs from 2019 to 2022.

    Fraud costs are a real problem for businesses. Of course, individuals bear the cost of fraud as well, but companies see a significant impact on their bottom line. Each $1 of fraud, according to the same LexisNexis study, costs eCommerce merchants in America an actual $3.75 once the response is all said and done. All told, fraudsters were able to steal about $28 billion in 2021 alone through identity fraud. Our current economic downturn means fraudsters will be more, not less, bold in their attacks.

    Clearly, fraud is more than a pesky issue. Not only does it cost both businesses and customers vast amounts of money, but it can also lead to significant damage to a brand. Businesses risk losing customers’ trust if they don’t appear to be tackling the issue and keeping their customers safe. This problem is incumbent upon companies to solve. However, it’s not as hard as we might think.

    Related: Why Verifying User Identities Is a Good Thing For Your Customers and Your Business

    Most fraud starts (and ends) with identity

    Most scams start at account creation, where a fraudster impersonates a real person or creates a fake persona to carry out fraudulent activity. KYC has historically consisted of methods like human-based document verification, SSN, knowledge-based authentication (KBA), as well as other database information to identify a person is who they are claiming to be by what they know about the individual. This might have worked 20 years ago, but the traditional methods we have been accustomed to are not cutting it anymore. Too much personal information is available online, and fraudsters can usually find the answers to security questions through data dumps or trolling a victim’s social media. Luckily, the solution already exists, using widely-accepted tools and stopping identity fraud at the source — account creation.

    Strong KYC practices at onboarding have often been avoided because of the misconception that they create too much friction for users. Truthfully, the tools are in place to make this a frictionless transaction. All the customer needs to do at the onset is capture their government-issued ID and then take a selfie. Such a small step can significantly reduce problems later on by creating an environment where fraud is prevented from the outset. It also sets the stage for frictionless continued fraud prevention using the selfie biometric for ongoing re-authentication.

    The secret behind strong, ongoing KYC

    Strong onboarding practices create a highly effective and streamlined re-authentication process for subsequent transactions with a customer. As the customer continues to interact with a business, it can use advanced analytics to build a baseline of behavior to assess risk levels dynamically. All the customer sees is the occasional request for a selfie, which then is compared with multiple other data points to verify a person’s identity.

    Another term for this practice is multi-factor authentication (MFA). That’s lazily been construed as “security measures” like SMS-based one-time passcodes. Unfortunately, while such added security measures are standard in business, they’re among the easiest MFA methods to break — a thief can intercept an SMS-based code for as little as $16.

    That doesn’t mean MFA needs to be completely thrown out. The concept is based in fact: The most secure identity verification consists of a combination of something you are, something you know and something you have. The hardest to spoof is something you are: biometrics. These include fingerprints, facial scans, voice recognition and retina scans (among many others). Today’s modern biometrics proofing is quickly approaching 100% accuracy.

    Incorporating these security measures also creates much stronger assurances for the company, since friendly fraud is a big problem. With facial recognition integrated into the account management process, companies now have time-stamped, verified proof that a person did make that purchase. With some simple tweaks to identity verification, businesses could save over $48 billion per year in fraudulent chargebacks.

    Related: The Technologies Consumers Can Use to Combat Fraud

    Active monitoring — the key to continued success

    The journey doesn’t stop at biometrics, though. A robust orchestration layer is needed to organize the tiny pieces of data spread across the internet into a comprehensive picture of each unique customer. This behind-the-scenes work can help monitor the KYC fundamentals to vet for fraud continuously.

    Orchestration and active monitoring also help keep the good customers while weeding out (or even preventing from the start) the customers you’d rather not do business with. Using a trusted vendor to execute these third-party identity verification actions, on top of the original and ongoing verification methods maintained in-house, helps businesses with underwriting. You can also assess risk in real-time; if a customer is usually in California but trying to sign in from Russia, you’re better able to catch the fraud and stop it in its tracks.

    Related: The Solution to Preventing Identity Theft in an Increasingly Digital World

    Simple KBA methods alone can’t keep up with advanced identity fraud techniques. Unfortunately, many companies equate better identity proofing with a worsened customer experience, but in reality, fraud prevention can enhance interactions and even streamline workflows for businesses and customers alike. Businesses can have their cake and eat it, too, by incorporating better identity verification from the start of the customer’s journey, along with biometric-based MFA and continuous, active monitoring. Our customers deserve it, and it will take a big bite out of the global identity fraud game.

    [ad_2]

    Clayton Roth

    Source link

  • How Businesses Can Combat Fraud and Increase Efficiency

    How Businesses Can Combat Fraud and Increase Efficiency

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    “There is no kind of dishonesty into which otherwise good people more easily and frequently fall than that of defrauding the government.”

    These words of wisdom from Benjamin Franklin have, unfortunately, proven timeless. People have been defrauding the government for centuries, but last month, the US hit an estimated $45 billion in COVID-19-related unemployment fraud. Now the government starts the long, costly and inefficient process of recouping the money, conducting investigations and punishing those responsible. This process is often called the “pay and chase” model.

    With all that fraud, it can be challenging for government agencies and private companies to separate the wheat from the chaff (or, in this case, the fraud from the noise). For example, is a person calling your call center with a device you haven’t seen before actually an existing customer with a new phone or someone attempting to take over an account?

    These issues create room for inefficiencies and cost companies huge operational sums when they cannot tell the difference. But, going too heavy with stricter verification that may dampen the customer experience is also something you have to avoid. The good news is it’s possible to identify fraudulent activity with modern technology better and thus increase efficiency.

    Related: The Government Is Not Immune to Account-Takeover Fraud, and That Could Be Trouble for You and Me

    Modern fraud and its noisy neighbor

    At its core, the focus of fraudsters has remained on tricking people into giving access to as much money or data as possible. It’s nothing new; the term “con man” was likely coined in the 1800s. Whether it’s Bill Starbuck’s “The Rain Song” from the musical 110 in the Shade, where the charismatic con man convinces townspeople to give him money to make it rain and end a drought, or someone calling your grandmother and pretending to be a government agency, fraud has always been, and always will be.

    Our ability to close fraud loopholes is improving. Still, fraudsters are constantly creating new schemes, and technology continues to enable them to get better at fooling us and covering their tracks. This requires businesses and the government to react to new trends quickly; the best defense against fraud is to be aware of the techniques, remain on guard and educate consumers to do the same. All the while, businesses and governments must walk a tightrope between restricting freedoms too much and being purely reactive to crime.

    The public and private sectors utilize call centers for customer account issues and require telephonic calls for some account actions. Unfortunately, these call centers are very susceptible to fraud. The time customer service reps spend trying to distinguish between fraud and noise (i.e., the legitimate calls that get flagged as fraud) distracts from more critical business and carries high costs.

    For example, in the financial services industry, the cost of fraud to businesses is $4 for every $1 of actual fraud. That means, on average, if a person defrauds $1,000 from a company, that business’s related costs will be $4,000. And this figure doesn’t include additional costs incurred if a fraudster secures enough information on their first attempt to follow up with more attempts on the same business or its clients, nor the cost of reputational damage post-attack.

    One of the big problems, though, is that fraud and noise can often seem similar. For instance, imagine you broke your cell phone and got a new one. When you try to access your bank account from your new phone, your account gets flagged because it doesn’t recognize the device. Now, you have to call to unlock your account, and your bank needs to spend resources confirming your identity. This protects the consumer and the bank but introduces inefficiency for both parties.

    Related: How to Identity Proof in an Increasingly Virtualized World

    So, what’s an agency to do?

    Is there a solution? Modern identity proofing continues to progress in leaps and bounds. The technology exists now to implement much better identity proofing that’s device-agnostic and uses powerful, behind-the-scenes algorithms to prove a customer’s identity — often without them even realizing what’s going on. Artificial intelligence (AI) helps us use data points across the web to calculate the risk associated with a person or caller and create a dynamic risk profile. Then, based on their risk level, they may be required to complete additional automated steps to log in to their account or conduct business.

    There are more straightforward steps, as well. For example, impersonating the dead has long been a lucrative tactic for fraudsters. Years ago, criminals even got hold of the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) Death Master File, a restricted record with millions of people to impersonate. One of the first steps a company can take during the account creation process is to check the Death Master File. Every time a person initiates a request for money with an agency, a quick screening can be done to ensure the person requesting a payment from the government is not a dead person. That would be a sure sign something’s amiss.

    Of course, there’s no end to the trickery. Recently, I watched in real-time as a phone-based scam targeted my stepmother. She received a text that appeared to be from a friend saying her email had been the target of a scam, and my stepmom should call a particular number to make sure hers hadn’t also been compromised. I had to explain that it wasn’t her friend texting but someone using her friend’s number.

    Older people are especially susceptible to fraud like this, but scammers have discovered impersonating a government agency or some entity with authority is a winner. If we get a call saying we’re in trouble with a government entity, will we ignore it? Probably not — many of us will do exactly what they say.

    Related: How Technology Can Improve CX for Government Services

    A continuous process

    We aren’t going to be able to screen out fraud completely. But we can get better at thwarting it, saving operational dollars and resources and providing good customer experiences. The greatest vulnerability in any system is usually the humans using it, so implementing more automated identity-proofing and anti-scam tools can help bridge the gap. We can build efficiency into our systems by keeping up with the latest scam trends and implementing adequate technical controls to stop them.

    [ad_2]

    Scott Straub

    Source link

  • Todd and Julie Chrisley sentenced for bank fraud, tax evasion

    Todd and Julie Chrisley sentenced for bank fraud, tax evasion

    [ad_1]

    Reality TV stars Todd and Julie Chrisley were sentenced Monday to lengthy prison terms after being convicted earlier this year on charges including bank fraud and tax evasion.

    U.S. District Judge Eleanor Ross in Atlanta gave Todd Chrisley 12 years in prison, while Julie Chrisley got seven years behind bars, according to the U.S. attorney’s office in Atlanta. Each is to serve three years supervised release afterward, and Ross also ordered them to pay restitution in an amount to be determined later.

    “The Chrisleys have built an empire based on the lie that their wealth came from dedication and hard work,” prosecutors wrote. “The jury’s unanimous verdict sets the record straight: Todd and Julie Chrisley are career swindlers who have made a living by jumping from one fraud scheme to another, lying to banks, stiffing vendors, and evading taxes at every corner.”  

    Federal prosecutors had previously said that the couple should each be sentenced to more than ten years in prison. 

    “A message must be sent to the Chrisleys and others that tax evasion is a serious offense, and that wealthy tax cheats who use personal companies to avoid paying taxes will face a substantial prison sentence,” the prosecutors said. “Finally, Todd and Julie Chrisley’s arrogance merits special consideration.”

    GettyImages-1228144545.jpg
     Pictured in this screengrab: (l-r) Julie Chrisley, Todd Chrisley

    USA Network/NBCU Photo Bank via Getty Images  


    The Chrisleys gained fame with their show “Chrisley Knows Best,” which follows their tight-knit, boisterous family. Federal prosecutors said the couple engaged in an extensive bank fraud scheme and then hid their wealth from tax authorities while flaunting their lavish lifestyle. 

    Todd Chrisley’s attorneys had argued in a court filing that he should not face more than nine years in prison. Julie Chrisley’s lawyers said a reasonable sentence for her would be probation with special conditions and no prison time.

    The Chrisleys were convicted in June on charges of bank fraud, tax evasion and conspiring to defraud the IRS. Julie Chrisley was also convicted of wire fraud and obstruction of justice. In a podcast episode released shortly after their convictions, Todd Chrisley said the it was a “heartbreaking time” for his family. 

    U.S. Attorney Ryan K. Buchanan said in a June 2022 press release that Todd and Julie Chrisley conspired to defraud community banks in the Atlanta area to obtain more than $30 million in personal loans prior to the launch of their first television show in 2014. The Chrisleys and their former business partner submitted false documents to obtain the loans, and then spent the money on cars, clothes, real estate and travel. They used new loans to pay back the old ones, Buchanan said.

    Todd Chrisley filed for bankruptcy and was able to walk away from more than $20 million of the loans. While he claimed he was bankrupt, he and his family were earning millions of dollars from their TV show, according to Buchanan. The Chrisleys were operating a loan-out company, which are usually used by entertainment professionals, and earned money from their show and other entertainment ventures. 

    When the IRS asked for information about their bank accounts, they transferred their loan-out company’s corporate account to Todd Chrisley’s mother in an effort to hide from the IRS. However, Todd Chrisley was still operating the loan-out company behind the scenes, Buchanan said.

    “The Chrisleys are unique given the varied and wide-ranging scope of their fraudulent conduct and the extent to which they engaged in fraud and obstructive behavior for a prolonged period of time,” prosecutors said.

    Chrisley Knows Best - Season 8
    Pictured: (l-r) Faye Chrisley, Chase Chrisley, Todd Chrisley, Savannah Chrisley, Chloe Chrisley, Julie Chrisley and Grayson Chrisley during Season Eight of “Chrisley Knows Best.”

    Tommy Garcia/USA Network/NBCU Photo Bank via Getty Images


    The couple’s accountant, Peter Tarantino, was also found guilty of conspiring to defraud the IRS and filing two false corporate tax returns on behalf of the Chrisleys’ company. 

    The prosecutors argued that while “most tax cheaters try to keep a low profile while avoiding detection from the IRS,” the Chrisleys did the opposite. 

    “In 2013, while Todd was in the midst of bankruptcy proceedings, the Chrisleys filmed a promotional video for their new reality show about their extravagant lifestyle. In the video, Todd boasted that he ‘make[s] millions of dollars a year,’ and in another shot where he is standing in his walk-in closet in his expansive house, he bragged that ‘in a year, we probably spend over $300,000, sometimes more, just on clothing.’”

    The Chrisleys have three children together and full custody of the 10-year-old daughter of Todd Chrisley’s son from a prior marriage. One of the couple’s children, Grayson Chrisley, 16, was hospitalized earlier this month after a car accident on Nov. 12.  

    According to a report from Metropolitan Nashville Police Department that was obtained by CBS News, Grayson Chrisley rear-ended another vehicle on Interstate 65. The driver of the other vehicle suffered injuries but refused to be transported by ambulance at the time of the accident. Chrisley was “unable to recall anything from the accident, possibly due to a head injury,” according to the department. He was transported to the hospital by ambulance. 

    Although the crash happened more than a week ago, the accident did not make headlines until this week, when TMZ first reported on it.   

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Former Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes sentenced to 11 years in prison

    Former Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes sentenced to 11 years in prison

    [ad_1]

    Former Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes sentenced to 11 years in prison – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    The disgraced founder of the failed blood testing company Theranos was sentenced Friday to more than 11 years in federal prison. Elizabeth Holmes was convicted of fraud and conspiracy earlier this year for misleading investors and endangering patients with a bogus blood-testing technology.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Elizabeth Holmes sentenced to more than 11 years for Theranos fraud

    Elizabeth Holmes sentenced to more than 11 years for Theranos fraud

    [ad_1]

    Deposed Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes was sentenced to 11 years and three months behind bars on Friday, capping a years-long saga that captivated the technology world and closing a chapter on one of the most spectacular corporate flameouts in U.S. history.

    Federal Judge Edward Davila imposed the sentence after an unusual hearing that stretched over four hours in which prosecutors argued with Holmes’ lawyers about her motives, investor losses and her degree of remorse.

    “Failure is normal. But failure by fraud is not OK,” Davila said before handing down the sentence, calling the case “troubling on so many levels.” He ruled that Holmes never accepted responsibility for her actions.

    “I am devastated”

    Holmes, 38, tearfully addressed the court before Davila handed down his sentence. “I regret my failings with every cell of my body,” she said.

    “I am devastated by my failings,” she told the court. “I have felt deep pain for what people went through, because I failed them.”

    Holmes’ prison term is set to begin April 27. She is also required to serve three years of probation after her release.

    The sentence is likely to send a message to other high-flying technology startups about the risks of deceiving customers and investors. It fell short of the 15 years prosecutors asked for, but was far longer than Holmes’ legal team had sought for the mother of a one-year-old son who has another child on the way. 

    Davila also said he will determine at a later date how much money Holmes must repay to defrauded investors, if any. Prosecutors had sought $804 million in repayment to investors who they said lost “everything.”

    In January, a jury convicted Holmes of four counts of fraud and conspiracy for her claims about Theranos, the blood-testing startup she launched in 2003. 

    At its peak, Theranos was valued at $10 billion and boasted luminaries including Larry Ellison and Rupert Murdoch as investors. However, a series of exposes by the Wall Street Journal, followed by multiple investigations by federal and state officials, revealed that Holmes had vastly overstated her technology’s capabilities.

    Former Theranos Chief Operating Officer Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani was convicted of 12 counts of fraud and is set to be sentenced Dec. 7.

    The Associated Press contributed reporting.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • What Happened to Elizabeth Holmes? Sentencing, Net Worth and More

    What Happened to Elizabeth Holmes? Sentencing, Net Worth and More

    [ad_1]

    Elizabeth Holmes, the founder of the not-so-revolutionary blood-testing company Theranos, has been gripping the headlines for nearly a decade.

    Although she was once seen as an impressive young entrepreneur, a shocking Wall Street Journal expose in 2015 revealed that her blood-testing technology didn’t produce accurate results, giving thousands of people faulty reports.

    Holmes stepped down as Theranos CEO in 2018 and was convicted of four fraud-related counts in January 2022.

    The saga was fictionalized by streamer Hulu in March 2022’s “The Dropout” with Amanda Seyfried, who won an Emmy for her portrayal of Holmes.

    Image credit: GLENN CHAPMAN/AFP via Getty Images

    What Is Elizabeth Holmes’ Sentence?

    Elizabeth Holmes was sentenced to 11.25 years in prison followed by 3 years supervised release after over three hours of testimony on Friday, November 18, per NBC Bay Area’s live coverage. She’ll be required to surrender at a later date. She was seen walking into court, appearing to be pregnant with her second child, according to a video obtained by The Wall Street Journal.

    The amount Holmes will need to pay back to investors will be determined at a later date, NBC’s Scott Budman tweeted from the courtroom.

    Holmes spoke at the sentencing, stating, “I regret my failings with every cell of my body.”

    Who Is Elizabeth Holmes?

    Elizabeth Holmes’ journey began at Stanford University in 2002, where she had planned to study medicine until she realized she had a fear of needles and blood. Inspired by her own skittishness, she filed a patent for a wearable medical device that could monitor a patient’s blood and administer medication as needed, per Business Insider.

    Just two years later, Holmes dropped out of Stanford and started her company, Theranos, from her basement.

    Holmes told investors she had proprietary technology that could detect medical conditions like cancer with only a single drop of blood. Additionally, she led investors to believe Theranos offered more than 200 diagnostic tests, although the company was found to be using third-party machines, per BBC.

    Based on these promises, she was able to reel in more than $700 million in investments from big names, including Oracle founder Larry Ellison. By stressing the importance of secrecy, she was able to get investors’ money without revealing how the technology worked.

    Along with COO Sunny Sunny Balwani — it was later revealed that Holmes and Balwani secretly dated throughout their work together — the duo ran the company under the false notion that the technology worked, introducing their blood testing machine, the Edison.

    They continued to rack in millions in funding including several partnerships with major healthcare brands such as Walgreens, where they planned to have Theranos Wellness Centers in locations nationwide, per CNN, and a $350 million deal with Safeway.

    Through it all, Holmes branded herself as a “Girl Boss” and even graced the covers of Forbes and Fortune.

    Image credit: Photo by Michael Kovac/Getty Images for Vanity Fair source

    However, Theranos’ chief scientist Ian Gibbons warned Holmes that there had been inaccuracies in the technology and it wasn’t ready for public consumption.

    In August 2015, the FDA began investigating Theranos after finding “major inaccuracies” in its testing, and just two months later, the WSJ revealed the company was testing blood samples on traditional blood testing machines after getting inaccurate results from their own Edison machine.

    In 2016, the company was investigated by the FDA, the SEC, and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the latter of which said Theranos’ lab was not meeting compliance standards, per CNN and that it determined “deficient practices of the laboratory pose immediate jeopardy to patient health and safety,” per a letter sent to Theranos from the agency.

    Because of these findings, Theranos voided two years of blood tests and corrected thousands of reports, per CNN, and the agency banned Holmes from operating a blood-testing lab for two years. Walgreens closed its 40 Theranos Wellness Centers.

    What Happened to Theranos?

    After Theranos’ lab was shut down, Holmes tried to make a comeback with another product called the “MiniLab,” which would allow her to bypass the CMS’s sanctions by selling the device instead of operating it in its own labs, per CNN.

    While Theranos tried to focus on the MiniLab and battle numerous lawsuits from investors, the company laid off 155 employees.

    Then in March 2018, the SEC charged Holmes and Balwani, who left the company in 2016, with “massive fraud,” per Business Insider. They were indicted in June with nine counts of wire fraud and two counts of conspiracy to commit wire fraud.

    Since Theranos was a private company, Holmes was allowed to stay on as CEO but had to give up financial and voting control of the company, in addition to paying a $500,000 fine and returning $18.9 million in Theranos stock. The same day Holmes was indicted, Theranos announced she would be stepping down as CEO.

    In September 2018 the company announced it would be shutting down after 15 years of business.

    Image credit: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

    Where Is Elizabeth Holmes Now?

    Despite Holmes’ impending legal troubles, her trial was delayed due to the birth of her first child in July 2021.

    During her trial, Holmes accused Sunny Balwani of abuse, which he has denied, according to The Guardian.

    She was found guilty on four of 11 federal charges in January 2022, including one count of conspiracy to defraud investors and three wire fraud counts, per CNN.

    Although Holmes is currently free on a $500,000 bond, she could face up to 20 years in prison, a $250,000 fine, and restitution for each count.

    Prosecutors have requested a 15-year sentence and $800 million in restitution, per The Guardian, stating it would “reflect the seriousness of the offenses, provide for just punishment for the offenses, and deter Holmes and others.”

    Meanwhile, Holmes’ lawyers requested 18 months of home confinement and no jail time. She was sentenced on November 18.

    As for Sunny Balwani, he was found guilty of ten counts of federal wire fraud and two counts of conspiracy to commit wire fraud in July 2022.

    What Is Elizabeth Holmes’ Net Worth?

    When Holmes was 30 years old, Forbes named her the world’s youngest self-made woman billionaire with a net worth of $4.5 billion. However, the outlet reevaluated the figure in 2016 when various allegations against Holmes came to light.

    At that time, experts determined that $800 million was a more realistic figure, but since she only owned half of Theranos’ stock and with a bevy of investors to pay back, the outlet determined her net worth to be zero.

    In 2019, Holmes married William “Billy” Evans, who is heir to the Evans Hotel Group, which manages three properties in San Diego and was started by his grandparents in 1953, per Business Insider.

    It’s unclear exactly how much Evans or his family are worth, but during her trial, CNBC learned the couple had been living in a 74-acre estate in Woodside, California, worth $135 million.

    [ad_2]

    Sam Silverman

    Source link

  • Elizabeth Holmes sentenced to over 11 years in prison for Theranos crimes

    Elizabeth Holmes sentenced to over 11 years in prison for Theranos crimes

    [ad_1]

    Theranos founder and former chief executive Elizabeth Holmes was sentenced to 135 months, or over 11 years, in prison, putting an endpoint on the unraveling of a onetime vigorously hyped Silicon Valley startup that collapsed under allegations of fraud.

    The sentence, handed down from U.S. District Judge Edward Davila, came after Holmes was convicted in January of defrauding investors in the blood-testing company, which purported to have technology that could identify diseases from a pinprick of blood from the tip of a finger.

    Prior to the sentencing, Holmes had sought more lenient treatment, while prosecutors aimed for more. Holmes had requested up to 18 months in prison, along with home confinement and community service, according to The Wall Street Journal. Prosecutors sought 15 years in prison, a three-year supervised release and restitution of $800 million, the Journal said.

    Holmes had until April 27 to surrender, and 14 days to appeal the conviction, according to the Journal. Her lawyers said they would seek permission to keep her out of prison on bail, pending appeal, the Journal said.

    Founded in 2003, Theranos’ value over the years ballooned to $9 billion. But the company’s pitch of simple-to-use blood-testing technology — which attracted the likes of the Walton and Murdoch families, along with former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger — began to fall apart in 2015, after reporting from the Wall Street Journal raised questions about the claims’ veracity.

    The Securities and Exchange Commission in 2018 charged Holmes and former president Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani with what the agency called “massive fraud,” leading Holmes to give up control of the company. Criminal charges, and the company’s dissolution, followed later that year.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Former Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes set to be sentenced

    Former Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes set to be sentenced

    [ad_1]

    Former Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes awaits sentencing Friday, 10 months after a jury found her guilty of defrauding investors in the failed blood-testing company.

    The sentencing hearing in San Jose, California, began shortly after 10 a.m. Pacific Time and stretched out for nearly four hours — an unusually long time for what is typically a procedural hearing.

    The amount of money Holmes must repay will be set at a later date, Judge Edward Davila of the Northern District of California ruled. Prosecutors had claimed that Holmes must repay $804 million to defrauded investors, but Davila ruled that true losses were likely closer to $121 million.

    Holmes, 38, founded Theranos in 2003, and it quickly grew to become of one of the best-known startups in the world, with a peak valuation of $10 billion. But a series of exposes by the Wall Street Journal raised questions about the effectiveness of the company’s technology and business practices, triggering multiple investigations by federal and state officials. 

    The sentence will be seen as a signal for how seriously wrongdoers in the high-flying world of tech startups can expect to be punished when they misrepresent a company’s capabilities.

    “Especially in a very highly publicized case, you want the public to know that if you defraud investors or anyone else, you’re looking at serious jail time,” said Carrie Cohen, global co-chair of the Investigations and white-collar defense practice group at law firm Morrison Foerster.

    “Given the facts that all came out at trial, I would suspect she’s looking at a significant amount of prison time, probably closer to what the government asked for,” Cohen said.

    In January, Holmes was convicted of four counts of investor fraud and conspiracy. A jury acquitted her of four other counts of harming patients who used Theranos’ blood-testing device, and couldn’t agree on other charges. Investors in Theranos, a group that included media magnate Rupert Murdoch and software billionaire Larry Ellison, lost $144 million when the startup faltered.

    Federal prosecutors have asked for a sentence of 15 years and payment of $800 million, painting Holmes’ crimes as “among the most substantial white collar offenses Silicon Valley or any other District has seen,” according to court filings this week. 

    Theranos Founder Elizabeth Holmes Attends Court Hearing
    Elizabeth Holmes, founder of Theranos, right, leaves from federal court in San Jose, California, on Thursday, Sept. 1, 2022. 

    Bloomberg


    Holmes’ lawyers have requested that she receive no prison time, arguing she poses no danger to society, has debt she likely can’t repay and has already suffered from the “dehumanizingly cruel” media coverage of Theranos’ downfall. They presented testimonials from 130 people, including friends, family and even Sen. Cory Booker, attesting to Holmes’ good attentions.

    Holmes has a 1-year-old son and appeared to be pregnant at her most recent court hearing. Both are factors that could prompt the judge to be lenient in sentencing, Cohen said.

    Holmes has testified that she was psychologically traumatized after being raped in college, and that she suffered sexual and emotional abuse at the hands of former Theranos Chief Operating Officer Sunny Balwani, who is 19 years her senior. While the duo were running Theranos, Holmes maintained that Balwani controlled her schedule, diet and presentation to others, and frequently belittled and castigated her.

    Balwani’s lawyers have denied the claims. He was found guilty of 12 counts of fraud in July and is scheduled to be sentenced on Dec. 7. 

    Holmes has said she plans to appeal her conviction. If she is sentenced to prison time, one point of contention could be when she begins the sentence. The judge could delay the start of her term until after Holmes gives birth. She could also post bail to stay out of prison while she appeals her sentence, Cohen said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Amid surge in food-stamp theft, low-income victims are left on the hook, lawsuit claims

    Amid surge in food-stamp theft, low-income victims are left on the hook, lawsuit claims

    [ad_1]

    Natahlie Rahmsay visited her neighborhood grocery in Boston in July to buy food with her electronic benefit transfer card for herself and her disabled adult son. Just days before, the card had been loaded with $460 in monthly food-stamp benefits. But the 71-year-old got a nasty shock at the register when the cashier told her she didn’t have enough money on the card to buy $91 worth of food. 

    Rahmsay soon learned that a scammer had used her EBT card to spend about $400 of her food-stamp benefits at a Sam’s Club in Cicero, Illinois — a city she hadn’t visited. She also doesn’t have a Sam’s Club membership. The scammer, it turns out, had “skimmed” her number through a device inserted into a card reader, stealing her card number and PIN. 

    Worse, Rahmsay soon discovered that the Massachusetts Transitional Assistance (DTA), the agency that oversees the food-stamp program in her state, wouldn’t reimburse her for the stolen benefits, according to a new class-action lawsuit.

    Months later, Rahmsay “still feels like she is crawling out of a financial hole,” said Betsy Gwin, senior economic justice attorney at the Massachusetts Law Reform Institute, which filed the lawsuit on behalf of Rahmsay and other skimming victims. “We want to make sure people who get SNAP benefits aren’t left holding bag” when their benefits are stolen.

    At issue is the question of who should bear the responsibility for stolen food-stamp benefits — taxpayers or the victims of theft? EBT cards act like debit cards, but lack the same protections against theft that credit and debit cards have. As a result, food-stamp theft victims are currently taking the financial hit when their benefits are stolen, according to the lawsuit, which is seeking to compel the DTA to restore stolen benefits to Rahmsay and other skimming victims.

    The cases in Massachusetts may represent just a fraction of Americans who lose their benefits to theft, with the U.S. Department of Agriculture last month flagging it as a growing problem. About 41 million Americans currently rely on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP —the formal name of the food-stamp program — for food assistance. 

    Skimming “is an extensive issue that extends across the country,” Gwin added. “The difference we see is the lack of federal protections for EBT users.”

    EBT cards are designed to resemble debit cards — complete with magnetic stripes and PIN numbers — partly as a way to reduce the stigma of purchasing groceries with foods stamps at the checkout line. But that means the cards are also susceptible to thieves who use skimmers — small card readers inserted into point-of-sale devices that steal both the card and PIN numbers and allow the scammers to use the card info to make unauthorized purchases. 

    Similar to debit cards, but no protection

    To be sure, skimming can occur with any type of card, including debit and credit cards. But major credit card companies like MasterCard and Visa have zero liability policies, which means they will reimburse card holders for unauthorized purchases. No such protections exist for EBT cards.

    That compounds the financial stress on food-stamp recipients when their funds are stolen because they have no way to recover their lost benefits. The lawsuit claims that the DTA has declined to reimburse victims of skimming theft because the USDA, which provides funding for SNAP, won’t cover the costs of restoring the nutritional aid.

    The DTA declined to comment, citing pending litigation, and the USDA didn’t immediately return requests for comment. 

    “The state and federal government weren’t stepping up to replace the stolen benefits even when there was no dispute that they were stolen,” Gwin said.

    Vanished: $740 in food stamp benefits

    Another food-stamp recipient who was left in a financial hole due to skimming is Christina Santiago, a mom of two. She was at Walmart on October 14 to buy her weekly family groceries with her $740 in monthly benefits, which had been deposited into her EBT account the previous day. When she arrived at the checkout, however, the cashier told her that her card had no funds. 

    Santiago had to leave without buying the groceries, according to the lawsuit. When she asked DTA about the missing funds, she was told that her funds had been used at a Sam’s Club in Plano, Texas — a state she has never visited. Santiago had never shared her card or PIN number with anyone else, which suggests a skimmer stole the data. 

    The DTA didn’t reimburse her for the stolen money, and the impact of the theft has “left a big hole in her finances,” the suit states. 

    Lawsuit seeks reimbursement

    One reason that EBT cards lack the same protection as credit and debit cards is because they aren’t covered by the Electronic Funds Transfer Act’s Regulation E, which outlines consumer protections and bank responsibilities with electronic fund transfers. 

    Congress in 1996 removed EBT cards from the regulation’s oversight, which means the cards don’t have the same consumer protections as other cards, according to the suit.

    Agencies are warning food-stamp recipients about the rise in skimming thefts and are advising them to keep their PINs secret, check their accounts regularly for unauthorized transactions and examine card-reading machines for skimming devices. 

    But that doesn’t go far enough, Gwin said. The lawsuit is asking that the DTA reimburse victims of skimming theft.

    “In our view, the harm and the burden associated with the loss of benefits following skimming-related thefts should not be on the SNAP beneficiaries themselves,” she said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Former Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes set to be sentenced

    Former Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes set to be sentenced

    [ad_1]

    Former Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes is set to be sentenced on Friday, 10 months after a jury found her guilty of defrauding investors in the failed blood-testing company. 

    Holmes, 38, founded Theranos in 2003, and it quickly grew to become of one of the best-known startups in the world, with a peak valuation of $10 billion. But a series of exposes by the Wall Street Journal raised questions about the effectiveness of the company’s technology and business practices, triggering multiple investigations by federal and state officials. 

    The sentence, to be imposed by Judge Edward Davila of the Northern District of California, will be seen as a signal for how seriously wrongdoers in the high-flying world of tech startups can expect to be punished when they misrepresent a company’s capabilities.

    “Especially in a very highly publicized case, you want the public to know that if you defraud investors or anyone else, you’re looking at serious jail time,” said Carrie Cohen, global co-chair of the Investigations and white-collar defense practice group at law firm Morrison Foerster.

    “Given the facts that all came out at trial, I would suspect she’s looking at a significant amount of prison time, probably closer to what the government asked for,” Cohen said.

    In January, Holmes was convicted of four counts of investor fraud and conspiracy. A jury acquitted her of four other counts of harming patients who used Theranos’ blood-testing device, and couldn’t agree on other charges. Investors in Theranos, a group that included media magnate Rupert Murdoch and software billionaire Larry Ellison, lost $144 million when the startup faltered.

    Federal prosecutors have asked for a sentence of 15 years and payment of $800 million, painting Holmes’ crimes as “among the most substantial white collar offenses Silicon Valley or any other District has seen,” according to court filings this week. 

    Theranos Founder Elizabeth Holmes Attends Court Hearing
    Elizabeth Holmes, founder of Theranos, right, leaves from federal court in San Jose, California, on Thursday, Sept. 1, 2022. 

    Bloomberg


    Holmes’ lawyers have requested that she receive no prison time, arguing she poses no danger to society, has debt she likely can’t repay and has already suffered from the “dehumanizingly cruel” media coverage of Theranos’ downfall. They presented testimonials from 130 people, including friends, family and even Sen. Cory Booker, attesting to Holmes’ good attentions.

    Holmes has a 1-year-old son and appeared to be pregnant at her most recent court hearing. Both are factors that could prompt the judge to be lenient in sentencing, Cohen said.

    Holmes has testified that she was psychologically traumatized after being raped in college, and that she suffered sexual and emotional abuse at the hands of former Theranos Chief Operating Officer Sunny Balwani, who is 19 years her senior. While the duo were running Theranos, Holmes maintained that Balwani controlled her schedule, diet and presentation to others, and frequently belittled and castigated her.

    Balwani’s lawyers have denied the claims. He was found guilty of 12 counts of fraud in July and is scheduled to be sentenced on Dec. 7. 

    Holmes has said she plans to appeal her conviction. If she is sentenced to prison time, one point of contention could be when she begins the sentence. The judge could delay the start of her term until after Holmes gives birth. She could also post bail to stay out of prison while she appeals her sentence, Cohen said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link