ReportWire

Tag: Fraud

  • California men sent to prison for stolen mail scheme that netted nearly $250,000

    California men sent to prison for stolen mail scheme that netted nearly $250,000

    [ad_1]

    (FOX40.COM) — The United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of California recently announced the sentencing of two men from Sacramento who were found responsible for nearly $250,000 worth of check fraud.

    According to U.S. Attorney Phillip Talbert, Carlos Aranda, 41, and Daniel Hunt, 38, were sentenced to 66 and 57 months in prison for conspiracy, bank fraud, and aggravated identity theft connected to postal thefts.

    The attorney’s office said that Aranda and Hunt worked together to steal postal locks, create keys, and steal mail to obtain checks of various amounts.

    “The conspirators periodically gathered together at motel rooms and elsewhere to alter or ‘wash’ [the] stolen checks,” the attorney’s office said. The two men would take the stolen checks and attempt to deposit, cash, or even use them in negotiations.

    In total, the two men from Sacramento were able to commit nearly $250,000 worth of check fraud, according to the attorney’s office, however, it was not made clear how long the men were conducting the scheme.

    [ad_2]

    Aydian Ahmad

    Source link

  • The ‘heart’ of Alvin Bragg’s case against Trump is misdirection

    The ‘heart’ of Alvin Bragg’s case against Trump is misdirection

    [ad_1]

    Porn star Stormy Daniels says she had sex with Donald Trump at a Lake Tahoe hotel in July 2006. To keep her from telling that story, former Trump fixer Michael Cohen says, “the boss” instructed him to pay Daniels $130,000 shortly before the 2016 presidential election.

    Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg says that nondisclosure agreement was a serious crime that undermined democracy by concealing information from voters. Of these three accounts, Bragg’s is the least credible.

    “This was a planned, coordinated, long-running conspiracy to influence the 2016 election, to help Donald Trump get elected through illegal expenditures, to silence people who had something bad to say about his behavior,” lead prosecutor Matthew Colangelo said at the beginning of Trump’s trial last month. “It was election fraud, pure and simple.”

    Contrary to Colangelo’s spin, there is nothing “pure and simple” about the case against Trump. To begin with, Trump is not charged with “conspiracy” or “election fraud.” He is charged with violating a New York law against “falsifying business records” with “intent to defraud.”

    Trump allegedly did that 34 times by disguising his 2017 reimbursement of Cohen’s payment to Daniels as compensation for legal services. The counts include 11 invoices from Cohen, 11 corresponding checks, and 12 ledger entries.

    Falsifying business records, ordinarily a misdemeanor, becomes a felony when the defendant’s “intent to defraud” includes an intent to conceal “another crime.” Bragg says Trump had such an intent.

    What crime did Trump allegedly try to conceal? Prosecutors say it was a violation of an obscure New York law that makes it a misdemeanor for “two or more persons” to “conspire to promote or prevent the election of any person to a public office by unlawful means.”

    Why was the Daniels payment “unlawful”? By fronting the money, federal prosecutors argued in 2018, Cohen made an excessive campaign contribution.

    Cohen accepted that characterization in a 2018 plea agreement that also resolved several other, unrelated charges against him. But Trump was never prosecuted for soliciting that “contribution,” and there are good reasons for that.

    Such a case would have hinged on the assumption that Trump, in paying off Daniels, was trying to promote his election rather than trying to avoid embarrassment. While the first interpretation is plausible, proving it beyond a reasonable doubt would have been difficult, as illustrated by the unsuccessful 2012 prosecution of Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards, which was based on similar but seemingly stronger facts.

    Federal prosecutors would have had to prove that Trump “knowingly and willfully” violated the Federal Election Campaign Act. But given the fuzziness of the distinction between personal and campaign expenditures, it is plausible that Trump did not think paying Daniels for her silence was illegal.

    In any event, the Justice Department did not pursue that case, the statute of limitations bars pursuing it now, and Bragg has no authority to enforce federal campaign finance regulations. Instead, he is relying on a moribund New York election law that experts say has never been enforced before.

    That attempt to convert a federal campaign finance violation into state felonies is so legally dubious that Bragg’s predecessor, Cyrus R. Vance Jr., rejected the idea after long consideration. It reeks of political desperation and validates Trump’s complaint that Democrats are attempting “election interference” by undermining his current presidential campaign.

    As Bragg tells it, Trump is the one who committed “election interference,” which the D.A. describes as “the heart of the case.” Bragg says his prosecutors “allege falsification of business records to the end of keeping information away from the electorate.”

    Cohen, whom the defense team accurately describes as a convicted felon and admitted liar with a grudge against his former boss, is the only witness who has tied Trump to the production of those records. And since they were produced after the election, Bragg’s narrative is nonsensical as well as irrelevant—a point that should not be obscured by the salacious details of Daniels’ story.

    © Copyright 2024 by Creators Syndicate Inc.

    [ad_2]

    Jacob Sullum

    Source link

  • Jury selection to begin in the corruption trial of Sen. Bob Menendez

    Jury selection to begin in the corruption trial of Sen. Bob Menendez

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — Jury selection was scheduled to start Monday in the trial of Sen. Bob Menendez, a Democrat charged with accepting bribes of gold and cash to use his influence to deliver favors that would aid three New Jersey businessmen.

    Menendez, 70, will stand trial in Manhattan federal court along with two of the businessmen — real estate developer Fred Daibes and Wael Hana. All three have pleaded not guilty. A third businessman has pleaded guilty and agreed to testify against the other defendants. The senator’s wife is also charged, but her trial is delayed until at least July.

    Opening statements were possible, but unlikely, before Tuesday for a trial that has already sent the senator’s political stature tumbling. After charges were announced in September, he was forced out of his powerful post as chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

    The three-term senator has announced he will not be seeking reelection on the Democratic ticket this fall, although he has not ruled out running as an independent.

    It will be the second corruption trial for Menendez this decade. The previous prosecution on unrelated charges ended with a deadlocked jury in 2017.

    In the new case, prosecutors say the senator’s efforts on behalf of the businessmen led him to take actions benefitting the governments of Egypt and Qatar. Menendez has vigorously denied doing anything unusual in his dealings with foreign officials.

    Besides charges including bribery, extortion, fraud and obstruction of justice, Menendez also is charged with acting as a foreign agent of Egypt.

    Among evidence his lawyers will have to explain are gold bars worth over $100,000 and more than $486,000 in cash found in a raid two years ago on his New Jersey home, including money stuffed in the pockets of clothing in closets.

    The Democrat’s wife, Nadine Menendez, was also charged in the case, but her trial has been postponed for health reasons. She is still expected to be a major figure. Prosecutors say that Nadine Menendez often served as a conduit between the men paying the bribes and Menendez.

    The senator’s lawyers in court papers have said they plan to explain that Menendez had no knowledge of some of what occurred because she kept him in the dark.

    According to an indictment, Daibes delivered gold bars and cash to Menendez and his wife to get the senator’s help with a multimillion-dollar deal with a Qatari investment fund, prompting Menendez to act in ways favorable to Qatar’s government.

    The indictment also said Menendez did things benefitting Egyptian officials in exchange for bribes from Hana as the businessman secured a valuable deal with the Egyptian government to certify that imported meat met Islamic dietary requirements.

    In pleading guilty several weeks ago, businessman Jose Uribe admitted buying Menendez’s wife a Mercedes-Benz to get the senator’s help to influence criminal investigations involving his business associates.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • On the hot seat: A banker testifies at Trump’s criminal trial

    On the hot seat: A banker testifies at Trump’s criminal trial

    [ad_1]

    Michael Cohen (top left) used a First Republic Bank account that he established in October 2016 to send $130,000 to the adult film star Stormy Daniels. Prosecutors allege that former President Donald Trump subsequently made payments to Cohen that were reimbursement for a scheme to cover up a Trump sexual affair.

    Bloomberg

    If you’re a private banker, you’ve probably dealt with fast-talking clients who treat every transaction as an urgent matter. Maybe you’ve even had clients who paint a false or misleading picture of their financial activities.

    Gary Farro, a former senior managing director at First Republic Bank, recently found himself under a spotlight because of one such challenging client. On Tuesday, he finished testifying at the first criminal trial of a former president in U.S. history.

    Farro’s problematic client was Michael Cohen, the former Trump Organization lawyer who paid $130,000 to adult film actress Stormy Daniels in the waning days of the 2016 presidential campaign.

    Manhattan prosecutors have charged former President Donald Trump with falsifying business records in connection with payments that he later made to Cohen, allegedly to reimburse the attorney for his effort to cover up a Trump sexual affair.

    Cohen, who pleaded guilty in 2018 to various criminal charges, including campaign finance violations and making false statements to a federally insured bank, has morphed into a prominent nemesis of the former president. He is expected to testify later in the trial.

    But first, the jury heard from Farro, a New Jersey resident who last year joined Flagstar Bank, a subsidiary of New York Community Bancorp, after First Republic collapsed. He was called as a prosecution witness, and he said that he was testifying voluntarily. 

    Farro’s testimony was both mundane and extraordinary. It focused on the kind of back-office work that banks do all the time in an effort to know who their customers are, but It also came in the midst of a presidential campaign in which the defendant is the presumptive Republican nominee.

    From the witness stand, Farro recalled being assigned Cohen as a client in 2015.

    “I can only tell you what I was told,” he explained. “I was selected because of my knowledge and my ability to handle, um, individuals that may be a little challenging.”

    “Every time Michael Cohen spoke to me, he gave a sense of urgency,” Farro said, according to official transcripts of his testimony, which occurred over parts of two days. “He was a challenging client because of his desire to get things done so quickly.”

    The events that landed Farro in the witness seat started with a phone call from Cohen on Oct. 26, 2016. That was 19 days after the emergence of the infamous “Access Hollywood” tape, in which then-candidate Trump bragged in vulgar terms about kissing and groping women, and 13 days before the election.

    Cohen wanted to set up a bank account for a limited liability company — Essential Consultants LLC — that he had established nine days earlier. And he wanted to do so quickly.

    “When Mr. Cohen called me, I was on a golf course, I know that’s very cliche for a banker,” Farro testified. “But I was on a golf course on a day off.”

    Of course, Cohen had to provide various pieces of information so that the bank could do its due diligence before the account could be opened.

    The bank’s know-your-customer form stated the following, based on the information that Cohen provided to First Republic: “Michael Cohen is opening Essential Consultants as a real estate consulting company to collect fees for investment consulting work he does in real estate deals.”

    That assertion turned out to be false. The paperwork did not say anything about the true purpose of the bank account.

    If Cohen had given any indication of the adult entertainment angle, “Well, we would certainly ask additional questions,” Farro said. “It’s not our money to determine where it goes. However, it is an industry that we do not work with.”

    The paperwork also did not include any suggestion that the account would be used to help a political candidate. If there had been such a disclosure, Farro said, “There would be additional scrutiny.”

    It took only five or six hours to get the Essential Consultants account approved and ready to fund. “Moving in and opening an account in a singular day is considered very quick,” Farro said.

    Just four minutes before the 3 p.m. cutoff for wire transfers, Cohen moved $131,000 from a home equity line of credit that he already had at First Republic to the newly established Essential Consultants account.

    The next morning, on Oct, 27, 2016, Cohen authorized a $130,000 wire transfer from the Essential Consultants account to an account for clients of Daniels’ attorney, Keith Davidson. The purpose of the payment was characterized in paperwork as a “retainer.”

    During Farro’s testimony on Tuesday, Assistant District Attorney Rebecca Mangold asked: “Would the bank’s process for approving the wire be different if Mr. Cohen had indicated that the wire transfer was a payment to an adult film star?”

    “Yes,” Farro responded. “There would definitely be enhanced due diligence on that.”

    Farro also testified that it’s not atypical for a real estate transaction to be completed in a compressed period of time. Between Cohen’s initial call to Farro on the golf course and the wire transfer to Daniels’ attorney, only about 24 hours elapsed.

    When it was Trump attorney Todd Blanche’s turn to question Farro, he asked whether First Republic may have failed to do appropriate due diligence. “I don’t know if that’s a fair statement,” Farro replied.

    In January 2018, The Wall Street Journal reported that Cohen used Essential Consultants to pay $130,000 to Daniels.

    First Republic ultimately decided to close certain accounts controlled by Cohen, Farro testified. “We chose not to be attached to what we consider to be negative press,” he said.

    He also testified that media coverage was what alerted the San Francisco-based bank to the true nature of the transactions Cohen had made back in October 2016.

    “Well, once the client does not be completely honest with us, we choose not to do business with them going forward,” he said.

    [ad_2]

    Kevin Wack

    Source link

  • Shangri-La Files Chapter 11 on Four Motel-Home Conversions

    Shangri-La Files Chapter 11 on Four Motel-Home Conversions

    [ad_1]

    Shangri-La Industries, the troubled developer of motel-to-housing conversions for homeless residents, has declared Chapter 11 bankruptcy on four projects in California.

    The Los Angeles-based firm, accused of fraud by the state in connection to its state-funded conversions, filed for bankruptcy protection on former motel projects in Redlands, Thousand Oaks, Salinas and San Ysidro, the Los Angeles Daily News reported.

    The court filing affects the former Good Nite Inn in Redlands, the former Quality Inn & Suites in Thousand Oaks and the former Sanborn Inn in Salinas, each funded by the state’s Project Homekey program.

    It also affects a former Travelodge in San Ysidro, which was funded under the state Community Care Expansion program, according to Brian Sun, the attorney representing Shangri-La. 

    City officials couldn’t say how it might impact their respective Homekey projects.

    Gov. Gavin Newsom launched Project Homekey in June 2020 to provide shelter for homeless residents during the pandemic. The state has allocated more than $3 billion to cities and counties to buy motels, hotels and vacant apartment buildings for permanent homeless housing.

    Since 2020, the state Department of Housing and Community Development has provided Shangri-La Industries more than $121 million in Homekey funds to convert motels up and down the state into permanent supportive housing for the homeless.

    Then the developer defaulted on loans tied to seven properties, and owed about $41 million in delinquent debt as of Dec. 1, The Real Deal reported. In separate court cases, lenders had sued Shangri-La and asked the court for receiverships, an alternative to bankruptcy. 

    In January, Shangri-La Industries lost control of six out of seven former motels for Project Homekey sites to court-appointed receivers in Salinas, King City, San Bernardino and Redlands.

    After TRD reported on the defaults, the state opened an investigation into Shangri-La and found the firm had violated its operating agreements tied to six of the properties. In January, state Attorney General Rob Bonta filed a lawsuit against the firm, claiming the developer breached state contracts and alleging fraud. 

    A Southern California News Group investigation last year also found that lenders and contractors doing business with Shangri-Li said they weren’t paid for completed work at the former Good Nite Inn in Redlands, now Step Up in Redlands, and the former All Star Lodge in San Bernardino, now Step Up in San Bernardino.

    Dozens of mechanic’s liens totaling millions of dollars have been filed over the past year at recorders’ offices in San Bernardino, Ventura and Monterey counties, the sites of Shangri-La projects for Homekey. The firm’s failure to pay resulted in more than a dozen lawsuits.

    Last month, the Redlands City Council terminated its Homekey agreement with Shangri-La as the state housing regulators accused the developer of misappropriating $114 million in Homekey funds.

    Sun, the attorney for the developer, said the bankruptcy filings are part of the developer’s plan to restructure and finish its commitments on the various Homekey projects.

    In a lawsuit in March, Shangri-La Industries accused its former chief financial officer, Cody Holmes, of embezzling millions of dollars in company money so he and his former girlfriend could live high on the hog, placing the developer’s state-funded projects in jeopardy, including those listed in its Chapter 11 filing.

    Andy Meyers, CEO of the embattled company he co-founded with the late Hollywood producer Steve Bing, has blamed the state for the firm’s delinquencies, saying that lenders triggered defaults because government officials failed to sign regulatory agreements for the various conversion deals.

    — Dana Bartholomew

    Read more

    [ad_2]

    TRD Staff

    Source link

  • Mastercard, Visa tap AI for fraud solutions | Bank Automation News

    Mastercard, Visa tap AI for fraud solutions | Bank Automation News

    [ad_1]

    Card giants Mastercard and Visa leaned into AI and generative AI for fraud detection in the first quarter.   “We continue to enhance our solutions with generative AI to deliver even more value,” Chief Executive Michael Miebach said during Mastercard’s May 1 earnings call.   During the quarter, the card giant added generative AI to its Decision […]

    [ad_2]

    Whitney McDonald

    Source link

  • How We Can Win the AI Arms Race Against Fraud | Entrepreneur

    How We Can Win the AI Arms Race Against Fraud | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more sophisticated, it’s not just businesses and consumers who benefit. Fraudsters also exploit AI to outmaneuver programmatic advertising platforms and siphon significant advertising spending. This manipulation drains financial resources and undermines the integrity of digital advertising ecosystems.

    The rise of programmatic platforms has revolutionized how ads are bought, placed, and optimized. However, this innovation also presents new challenges, notably the threat of ad fraud perpetrated through sophisticated means such as clickbots and automated scripts. To counter these challenges, artificial intelligence is becoming an invaluable ally, ensuring that advertisers pay only for legitimate engagements and safeguard their investments against fraud.

    Programmatic advertising, designed to automate the buying and placing of ads using sophisticated algorithms, is particularly vulnerable to AI-powered fraud as it relies on highly automated processes. Bad actors use AI to create more intelligent clickbots that can mimic human browsing patterns, tricking algorithms into believing that a person is interacting with an ad when it’s a bot. These bots can generate fake clicks and ad impressions, simulating engagement metrics that advertisers rely on to gauge the effectiveness of their campaigns.

    AI-driven ad fraud extends to manipulating the bidding process within programmatic platforms. By artificially inflating traffic or manipulating auction dynamics, fraudsters can drive up costs for legitimate advertisers or ensure that their illegitimate ads are served to a larger audience, maximizing their ill-gotten gains.

    The financial implications are staggering. According to industry reports, ad fraud costs the global digital advertising industry billions of dollars annually, with a significant portion attributed to sophisticated AI-driven schemes. This financial drain depletes resources that could be spent on genuine engagement and growth opportunities.

    Related: 5 Ways to Spot and Avoid Deepfake Phone Scams

    The path forward

    AI’s role in enhancing the integrity of programmatic advertising is multifaceted. First and foremost, AI algorithms can analyze patterns and behaviors in traffic at a granular level — and in real-time, at a massive scale.

    Unlike traditional methods that may struggle to differentiate between human users and bots, AI systems such as my company’s Presspool.ai platform leverage advanced machine learning to identify subtle anomalies that indicate fraudulent activity. This includes detecting irregularity in click-through rates, unusual patterns in user engagement times, and the geographic origins of traffic that might suggest attacks from click farms or automated scripts.

    Moreover, AI-driven systems can automate the vetting process for ad placements, ensuring that advertisements only appear on reputable sites. This protects brand reputation and minimizes the risk of ads being displayed in environments where fraud is prevalent.

    The integration of AI into programmatic advertising also provides transparency and detailed reporting for advertisers. By offering insights into exactly where ads are being displayed and how they are interacted with, businesses can make more informed decisions about their advertising strategies.

    This level of transparency is vital for building trust between advertisers and programmatic platforms, ensuring a transparent ecosystem where companies are assured of security in their advertising investments.

    Related: How AI and Machine Learning Are Improving Fraud Detection in Fintech

    Winning the arms race

    Combating AI-powered fraud requires a multifaceted approach. Ad tech firms are built specifically for optimized programmatic advertising in the burgeoning newsletter space and are increasingly investing in advanced AI systems capable of detecting and countering fraudulent AI tactics. These systems analyze vast amounts of data in real-time, looking for patterns that deviate from expected human behavior, no matter how subtle.

    AI enhances programmatic platforms by constantly updating its awareness of what constitutes legitimate user behavior. Through continuous learning processes, AI models adapt to new tactics employed by fraudsters, staying ahead in the constant arms race against ad fraud. This adaptability is crucial in an environment where fraudulent techniques rapidly evolve.

    The application of AI also extends to improving the overall quality of engagement metrics. By analyzing vast amounts of data, AI can help advertisers identify the most effective ad placements, optimize bidding strategies in real time, and tailor ads to user preferences and behaviors—increasing the likelihood of genuine engagement. This targeted approach reduces the likelihood of fraud and enhances the ROI of ad campaigns by focusing on the most receptive audiences possible.

    While AI presents significant opportunities for efficiency and targeting in programmatic advertising, its potential for abuse cannot be overlooked. As AI technology evolves, so must the strategies to protect against its misuse. Advertisers, platform providers, and regulators must work hand in hand to safeguard the integrity of digital advertising environments from the rising tide of AI-powered fraud.

    Collaboration across the industry today, including sharing intelligence on emerging threats and fraud techniques, is crucial for staying ahead of fraudsters. Regulations and industry standards also play a critical role in mitigating risk. By establishing clear guidelines and protocols for identifying and reporting fraud and enforcing stringent penalties for violations, the industry can create a more secure and trustworthy advertising ecosystem.

    [ad_2]

    Jaxon Parrott

    Source link

  • Criminal schemes targeting U.S. seniors account for $3.4 billion in reported losses, FBI says

    Criminal schemes targeting U.S. seniors account for $3.4 billion in reported losses, FBI says

    [ad_1]

    Washington — Americans over 60 years of age fell victim to so-called elder fraud crimes more frequently last year than during any other year and accounted for an estimated $3.4 billion in total reported losses, according to a newly released FBI report. 

    Reports of criminal schemes targeting seniors in the U.S. increased by 14% between 2022 and 2023, federal investigators said, warning that investment scams in which victims are enticed into transferring money to fraudulent financial institutions are the costliest to the elderly. In all, over 101,000 complaints of fraud perpetrated against  individuals over 60 years of age were filed to federal law enforcement last year, the most of any age group throughout the country. 

    FBI officials said Tuesday the new numbers were “astonishing” and warned that as Americans witness one of the “greatest transfers of generational wealth,” the nation’s senior citizens are the most vulnerable.  

    There were 5,920 individuals over 60 who lost more than $100,000 as a result of criminal fraud and federal trends last year, demonstrating that seniors are increasingly being targeted and falling victim, the report said. In many cases, victims are coerced into authorizing payments to the criminal scammers, draining their bank accounts under false pretenses. 

    Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, FBI officials urged American financial institutions to do more to help elderly victims from following through on those money transfers. 

    “We need financial institutions to step up and put in precautions…to help their customers to stop being victims of crime,” the officials said. 

    The officials said Tuesday they hoped the new report will both shine a light on fraud schemes and prevent future victims from falling prey to illegal scammers. Education and “tough conversations” with America’s senior populations will be key to these prevention efforts, they said, highlighting that the earlier fraud crimes are reported, the better chance law enforcement has at preventing money transfers and stopping criminals before they complete their schemes. 

    A majority of elder fraud scams go unreported to law enforcement by the victims, which officials have said makes it difficult to quantify the total impact of the crimes nationwide. AARP estimated in a 2023 study that $28.3 billion is lost to elder fraud scams each year, 72% of which is taken by individuals who are known to the victims. 

    On Friday, a California man was arrested after investigators said he was allegedly trying to pick up $35,000 from two seniors who had previously fallen victim to his elder fraud scheme, which involved phishing attacks and two individuals who pretended to be federal agents. 

    Investigators said Tai Su was just one component of a large criminal enterprise that disguised itself as a Microsoft support system and a financial institution. The hackers would first gain access to the victims’ computers through phishing scams and then would convince the seniors to withdraw tens of thousands of dollars from their bank accounts. 

    Su now faces federal charges and made an initial appearance in court on Monday.. 

    According to the FBI’s report released on Tuesday, tech support scams remain the most common form of elder fraud crime. But victims are not just being targeted via technical avenues. According to the FBI, romance scams and those involving individuals posing as family members are also on the rise. 

    In 2023, law enforcement received over 6,700 reports of romance scams targeting individuals over the age of 60, costing victims nearly $357 million. 

    A federal indictment unsealed Monday in New Jersey charged 16 individuals tied to a so-called “grandparent scam” in which the alleged fraudsters operated call centers in the Dominican Republic to victimize hundreds of Americans by posing as grandchildren asking for money. 

    Investigators said Tuesday they’ve seen a shift in volume from scammers operating inside the U.S. to international criminal organizations, including those located in India, Laos and Cambodia. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • “Can I get scammed through an e-transfer?”—and other questions about protecting yourself from fraud – MoneySense

    “Can I get scammed through an e-transfer?”—and other questions about protecting yourself from fraud – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    Sometimes the fraud is sneakier—although who can be blamed for wanting to pay a bill? For Daria, she and six friends paid Bailey, a “travel hacker” for a trip to Thailand in January 2024. A had a Clubhouse group (remember the conversation app?) and Daria and the other members had got great tips from A and other co-mods in the space. (Names have been changed as the case has yet to be resolved.)

    The seven women paid Bailey for hotel rooms and flew the 20-hour trip from North America to Thailand, only to find out that Bailey wasn’t joining them until a few days later. Then to their horror, Bailey never showed up, canceled her trip two days before it ended and had never paid the hotel for their rooms with the money she was paid by the seven women. Just one received a refund. The others have issued credit card chargebacks and have even contacted the FBI. 

    It seems like scams and phishing attacks are everywhere. If they’re not calling or texting, they are messaging you. On every. Single. Platform. Just as writing this, I had two calls threatening me with the police and a text message asking me to verify my address. 

    It’s irritating at best and financially devastating at worst. According to the RCMP, the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre (CAFC) received reports totalling $531 million in victim losses in 2022. That’s a 40% increase from 2021. In 2023, Canadians lost $554 million. Think those numbers are big? Know that the CAFC estimates that just five to 10% of people report fraud.

    Why do scams and phishing work on Canadians?

    Why do we fall for frauds, scams and phishing? Maggie Cheung, a spokesperson from the Canadian Bankers Association, says it’s because of deception, manipulation and pressure tactics.

    “Cyber criminals often use human psychology and the art of manipulation to scare, confuse or rush you into opening a malicious link or attachment or into providing personal information through a process known as social engineering,” she says.

    These social engineering tactics force us to respond quickly, through the use of fear (like, you owe the Canada Revenue Agency money that needs to be paid stat) and leveraging our urges to respond to authority. (The CEO really needs you to send that bank transfer now, and the email looks real). These pressure tactics are so sophisticated, they’re believable. That’s why the finance writer of The Cut found herself putting USD$50,000 in a cardboard box into the back of a car.

    The common types of scams

    Anyone can be a victim of a scam, says Cheung. That’s because the techniques to convince you are complex, and cyber criminals are adept at telling a believable story. Some of the more popular scams are:

    [ad_2]

    Renée Sylvestre-Williams

    Source link

  • Supreme Court will hear case claiming CBD product got trucker fired

    Supreme Court will hear case claiming CBD product got trucker fired

    [ad_1]

    The Supreme Court will hear an appeal from a Vista, California, CBD hemp oil company fighting a lawsuit from a truck driver who says he got fired after using a product falsely advertised as being free from the active ingredient in marijuana

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court agreed Monday to hear an appeal from a CBD hemp oil maker fighting a lawsuit from a truck driver who says he got fired after using a product falsely advertised as being free from marijuana‘s active ingredient.

    Douglas Horn says he took the product to help with chronic shoulder and back pain he had after a serious accident. The company said it contained CBD, a generally legal compound that is widely sold as a dietary supplement and included in personal-care products, but not THC, which gives marijuana its high, Horn said in court documents.

    After a failed routine drug test got him fired, Horn says he confirmed with a lab that the product did have THC. He sued the Vista, California, company under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, among other claims, alleging the THC-free marketing amounted to fraud.

    The law known as RICO was crafted as a tool to prosecute organized crime, but people can also file civil suits under it against alleged schemes and collect triple the damages if they win. An appeals court found Horn’s claim should be allowed to go forward.

    Medical Marijuana, Inc. appealed that decision to the Supreme Court. The company disputes Horn’s claims and argues that he can’t sue under RICO because he’s claiming a personal injury. Other appeals courts have dismissed RICO suits in similar circumstances, the company said, making this case a good one to decide on a nationwide rule.

    Horn, for his part, says his firing was a business injury and he’s been financially ruined.

    The case will be heard in the fall.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 7 Minnesotans accused in massive scheme to defraud pandemic food program to stand trial

    7 Minnesotans accused in massive scheme to defraud pandemic food program to stand trial

    [ad_1]

    Opening statements are expected Monday in the fraud trial of seven people charged in what federal prosecutors have called a massive scheme to exploit lax rules during the COVID-19 pandemic and steal from a program meant to provide meals to children in Minnesota.

    The seven will be the first of 70 defendants to go on trial in the alleged scam. Eighteen others have already pleaded guilty.

    Prosecutors have said the seven collectively stole over $40 million in a conspiracy that cost taxpayers $250 million — one of the largest pandemic-related fraud cases in the country. Federal authorities say they have recovered about $50 million.

    Prosecutors say just a fraction of the money went to feed low-income kids, and that the rest was spent on luxury cars, jewelry, travel and property.

    The food aid came from the U.S. Department of Agriculture and was administered by the state Department of Education. Nonprofits and other partners under the program were supposed to serve meals to kids.

    Two of the groups involved, Feeding Our Future and Partners in Nutrition, were small nonprofits before the pandemic, but in 2021 they disbursed around $200 million each. Prosecutors allege they produced invoices for meals that were never served, ran shell companies, laundered money, indulged in passport fraud, and accepted kickbacks.

    An Associated Press analysis published last June documented how thieves across the country plundered billions in federal COVID-19 relief dollars in the greatest grift in U.S. history. The money was meant to fight the worst pandemic in a century and stabilize an economy in freefall.

    But the AP found that fraudsters potentially stole more than $280 billion, while another $123 billion was wasted or misspent. Combined, the loss represented 10% of the $4.3 trillion the government disbursed in COVID relief by last fall. Nearly 3,200 defendants have been charged, according to the U.S. Justice Department. About $1.4 billion in stolen pandemic aid has been seized.

    The defendants going on trial Monday before U.S. District Judge Nancy Brasel in Minneapolis are Abdiaziz Shafii Farah; Mohamed Jama Ismail; Abdimajid Mohamed Nur; Said Shafii Farah; Abdiwahab Maalim Aftin; Mukhtar Mohamed Shariff; and Hayat Mohamed Nur. They have all pleaded not guilty. Their trial is expected to last around six weeks.

    “The defendants’ fraud, like an aggressive cancer, spread and grew,” prosecutors wrote in a summary of their case.

    Prosecutors say many of the purported feeding sites were nothing more than parking lots and derelict commercial spaces. Others turned out to be city parks, apartment complexes and community centers.

    “By the time the defendants’ scheme was exposed in early 2022, they collectively claimed to have served over 18 million meals from 50 unique locations for which they fraudulently sought reimbursement of $49 million from the Federal Child Nutrition Program,” prosecutors wrote.

    Among the defendants awaiting trial is Aimee Bock, the founder of Feeding our Future. She’s one of 14 defendants expected to face trial together at a later date. Bock has maintained her innocence, saying she never stole and saw no evidence of fraud among her subcontractors.

    The scandal stirred up the 2022 legislative session and campaign in Minnesota.

    Republicans attacked Gov. Tim Walz, saying he should have stopped the fraud earlier. But Walz pushed back, saying the state’s hands were tied by a court order in a lawsuit by Feeding Our Future to resume payments despite its concerns. He said the FBI asked the state to continue the payments while the investigation continued.

    The Minnesota Department of Education now has an independent inspector general who is better empowered to investigate fraud and waste.

    [ad_2]

    CBS Minnesota

    Source link

  • Are dating apps making it easier for romance scammers?

    Are dating apps making it easier for romance scammers?

    [ad_1]

    Are dating apps making it easier for romance scammers? – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    All this week, CBS News has been investigating online romance scams. In this final installment, Jim Axelrod looks at what law enforcement and lawmakers can do — but also why it’s important for the online dating industry to police itself.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How online romance scams turn victims into accomplices

    How online romance scams turn victims into accomplices

    [ad_1]

    How online romance scams turn victims into accomplices – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    CBS News is investigating a growing number of fraud cases known as romance scams. Chief investigative correspondent Jim Axelrod explains how victims can unknowingly become perpetrators in the very scams they fall prey to.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Writer Leonardo Padura chronicles life in Cuba as his detective ‘alter ego’ solves gripping crimes

    Writer Leonardo Padura chronicles life in Cuba as his detective ‘alter ego’ solves gripping crimes

    [ad_1]

    HAVANA — His novels recount gruesome murders, thefts, scams, bribes and humiliating secrets. But those are not even the most important themes in the stories told by award-winning Cuban writer Leonardo Padura.

    For the last four decades, Padura, 68, has managed to turn his series of detective thrillers into a social and political chronicle of Cuba, especially Havana, where he has lived all his life.

    The island he depicts in his books — which have been translated to dozens of languages — is a mix of economic deprivation, Afro-descendant syncretism, corruption, mischief, uplifting music and growing inequality — all seasoned by a revolution that marked the 20th century.

    “I write about the problems of individuals in Cuban society. And often, in my books, more than dramatic conflicts between the characters, you will find a social conflict between the characters and their historical time,” Padura told The Associated Press in a recent interview at his home in Mantilla, the populous Havana neighborhood where he was born, raised and married.

    The scent of freshly brewed coffee is in the air, as well as the chirping sound of the birds that inhabit the patio where his dogs are buried. In a nearby studio, his wife, screenwriter Lucía López Coll, works on a computer.

    It’s also in this house where Mario Conde, the principal character of Padura’s work, was born. The downtrodden, nostalgic, chain-smoking detective has accompanied Padura since 1991, when “Past Perfect” — the first of the “Havana Quartet” series featuring Conde as the main protagonist — was published.

    Keeping track of Detective Conde is almost like taking the pulse of Cuba in the last few years.

    His last appearance was in the 2020 novel “Personas Decentes” (“Decent People”) in which, now over 60 years old, Conde gets involved in the investigation of a homicide — and corruption case — against the backdrop of the 2016 historic visit of former U.S. President Barack Obama and the Rolling Stones to the island.

    “This character comes from a neighborhood similar to mine,” Padura says of Conde. “He is a man of my generation. … His view of reality has evolved because I have evolved, and his feeling of disenchantment has a lot to do with the way we have been living all these years.”

    Reflecting on Cuba’s situation after the tightening of U.S. sanctions during the administration of President Donald Trump and the impact of the coronavirus pandemic, Padura says the island has barely crawled out of the crisis and has not yet been able to get back on its feet.

    He points at the lack of food and medications, rising prices and deteriorating health and education systems, while Cubans grapple with fuel shortages and constant blackouts.

    “There is a historical fatigue,” he says. “People are tired, they have no alternatives and they look for one by emigrating.”

    The soft-spoken chronicler highlights yet another impact of Cuba’s ongoing economic crisis: A wave of popular protests and demonstrations that had not been seen in decades.

    “The main cry was for food and electricity,” Padura recalls about the protests in 2021 and, more recently, in March. “But people also screamed ‘Freedom!’ The lack of food and electricity might have been solved by fixing some thermoelectric plants and with a little rice and sugar … but the other thing has not been talked about — and I think it’s something that should be discussed in depth.”

    Born in 1955, Leonardo de la Caridad Padura Fuentes studied literature at the University of Havana and worked as a journalist for state-owned media in the 1980s.

    He has won a number of important prizes, including the Hammett Prize, awarded by the International Association of Crime Writers, on two occasions (1998 and 2006); Cuba’s National Prize for Literature In 2012, and the Princess of Asturias Award for literature in Spain in 2015.

    In 2016, Netflix released “Four Seasons in Havana,” a miniseries featuring detective Conde.

    Despite the international recognition, only a few of Padura’s books have been published in Cuba, and when they do, only a few copies are printed. Also, because of his critical, sometimes dark view of the island, his work is barely promoted or mentioned in the official media.

    Unlike many writers and intellectuals who in recent years decided to leave Cuba, Padura — who travels extensively — is determined to stay.

    “I have many reasons for living outside of Cuba but I think the ones that keep me here weigh more heavily. One of them is my sense of belonging,” he says. “I have a strong sense of belonging to a reality, to a culture, to a way of seeing life, to a way of expressing myself.”

    ___

    Follow AP’s coverage of Latin America and the Caribbean at https://apnews.com/hub/latin-america

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • First trial in Feeding Our Future fraud case underway

    First trial in Feeding Our Future fraud case underway

    [ad_1]

    1st trial in Feeding Our Future fraud case underway


    1st trial in Feeding Our Future fraud case underway

    01:01

    MINNEAPOLIS — The trial of the first seven defendants in what federal prosecutors call the largest pandemic-era fraud case in the country is underway.

    Seventy people in total have been charged in this case, accused of stealing $250 million in federal aid meant to help feed needy children.

    With seven people on trial, there could be dozens if not hundreds of witnesses, along with hundreds if not thousands of pieces of evidence.

    Prosecutors say the defendants lied about the number of meals they distributed and used the nonprofit Feeding Our Future to help submit false claims for meal reimbursements from the federal government. They then allegedly collected millions to buy luxury vehicles, homes and exotic vacations, among other things. 

    The defense argues the seven didn’t knowingly defraud the government. 

    A number of people have already pleaded guilty. There could be more depending on the outcome of this trial. 

    [ad_2]

    Pauleen Le

    Source link

  • Mahindra Finance detects fraud in its retail vehicle loans portfolio amounting to ₹150 crore

    Mahindra Finance detects fraud in its retail vehicle loans portfolio amounting to ₹150 crore

    [ad_1]

    Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Limited (MMFSL) on Tuesday said it has detected a fraud in its retail vehicle loans portfolio in the fourth quarter (Q4) of FY24 amounting to ₹150 crore involving forgery of KYC (know your customer) documents at one of its branches in the North East.

    “In respect of retail vehicle loans disbursed by the company, the fraud involved forgery of KYC documents leading to embezzlement of company funds,” MMFSL said in a regulatory filing.

    “The investigations in the matter are at an advanced stage. The company estimates that the financial impact of this fraud is unlikely to exceed ₹150 crores,” the company added.

    The non-banking finance company said investigations are underway, and necessary corrective actions have been identified and are at various stages of implementation, including arrest of few persons involved.

    In view of this development, the agenda matters pertaining to approval of the audited standalone and consolidated financial results of the company for Q4 and financial year ended March 31, 2024, recommendation of dividend, AGM and related matters, which were to be considered at the board meeting scheduled to be held on April 23, 2024, are being deferred to a later date, which shall be intimated in due course, per the filing.

    The Audit Committee and the board Meeting scheduled on April 23, 2024, will consider all other matters scheduled to be discussed at the respective meetings, including increase in aggregate borrowing limits and fund raise via issue of non-convertible debentures.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Americans lose millions of dollars each year to wire transfer fraud scams. Could banks do more to stop it?

    Americans lose millions of dollars each year to wire transfer fraud scams. Could banks do more to stop it?

    [ad_1]

    Americans are losing millions of dollars every year to criminals who steal money from their bank accounts through fraudulent wire transfers. Some U.S. senators are now pressing major banks for answers about what they are doing to stop the scammers.  

    In a letter to JP Morgan Chase, Citibank, Bank of America and Wells Fargo, first reported by CBS News, the Senate Banking Committee wrote, “Banks should make consumers whole for unauthorized transactions,” including “fraudulently induced transactions” like wire transfers, where “a consumer was deceived or manipulated into initiating a transfer.”  

    That’s what several Chase bank customers interviewed by CBS News said happened to them. New York City resident Jennifer Davis said she lost $25,000 to a wire fraud scam.

    “I was horrified,” Davis said. “I was horrified. I was devastated. This was stolen from me and this is a crime.”

    Andrew Semesjuk of Connecticut said he lost $15,000.

    “Their job is to protect our investments,” Semesjuk said. “Otherwise, what’s the point of putting it with a bank?”

    Florida resident Nikki Kelly said she lost $48,000 from a business account.

    “My life has just basically been destroyed,” said Kelly.

    The story of Karen Roe, another Florida resident, is typical. She was in the hospital for a medical procedure last year when her phone rang. The caller ID said Chase Bank, she said, and when she answered, a man identified himself as working for the bank.   

    “‘We need to verify a transaction that’s been processed on your account,’” Roe quotes him as saying.

    Roe says he told her it was a $71 transaction at a Walmart in New Mexico. She told him it wasn’t her. “I said, ‘absolutely not.’ I said, ‘I’m in Orlando. I’m not in New Mexico. I haven’t been to New Mexico,’” Roe recalled.

    Next, she says, the man claimed someone was trying to wire-transfer money out of her account and told her he could stop the transaction, but first he needed to verify her identity over the phone.

    “He said that he was going to send an authentication code to make sure that it’s me on the other end of the phone,” Roe said.

    She read him back the code, but later discovered it had not been a step taken to verify her identity. Instead, the scammers used that code to authorize a wire transfer out of her account to their own. 

    Roe said they stole $27,000 she’d earned from running her countertop installation business. It was gone in a matter of seconds. The theft left her stunned.

    “It totally rocked my world,” Roe said.

    On top of that, the crooks also stole an additional $19,000 from an account she managed for a nonprofit industry group, leaving her facing questions from members of the group as to how the theft had happened.

    “That wasn’t even my money. That was the members’ money,” Roe said. “And I just was sick, was sick to my stomach.”

    Chase investigated the theft and in a letter to Roe acknowledged she was “the victim of a scam.”  But the bank contended the wire transfers were “authorized” and said Chase had “received calls verifying the wires as valid” with someone “providing (her) debit card number and pin,” and further said, “we processed it as you instructed.”

    Roe told CBS News she feels unfairly blamed.

    “They’re not taking responsibility for what is happening to their customers,” she said.

    Chase told CBS News it does reimburse customers “for unauthorized transactions” if it decides a customer had no part to play in the transaction.

    But in Roe’s case, and those of the other victims CBS News interviewed, Chase said it would not reimburse their money because Chase had determined their transactions were “authorized” — despite the victims reporting to law enforcement they were conned.

    “They just left me high and dry,” said Davis. “I don’t understand.”

    Consumer experts say the problem is the federal law that protects consumers in other banking transactions, the Electronic Funds Transfer Act, or EFTA,  generally exempts wire transfers, meaning banks don’t have to reimburse those losses.

    The National Consumer Law Center argues that loophole in regulations should be closed to encourage banks to tighten their security procedures.

    “If they knew that they were going to be on the hook and that they were going to have to reimburse consumers, I think they would have stronger security procedures,” said NCLC senior attorney Carla Sanchez-Adams.

    In a previous hearing on the subject, Senator Sherrod Brown, the chairman of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, said consumers need better protection.

    “It’s on the companies. People should be able to have an expectation their money is safe,” said Brown, a Democrat from Ohio.

    The committee is asking the four banks to provide five years’ worth of information, including how many people reported being victims and just how much money was lost.

    A CBS News analysis of consumer complaints reported to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau shows complaints about domestic wire fraud to JP Morgan Chase were more than four times higher in 2023 as compared to 2020, going from 88 complaints to 355.

    All four banks declined to comment on the Senate Banking Committee’s letter. 

    Chase told us it continues to “make significant investments to protect customers from fraud and scams” and help them spot tactics used by criminals.

    But in testimony before the Senate last year, Chase CEO Jamie Dimon said that it was “unreasonable” to ask banks to “subsidize” criminal activity and that the government and police should do more to stop and prosecute criminals who run wire transfer fraud scams.

    Chase provided CBS News with the following statement and tips for consumers:

    “Consumers should always be suspicious of people asking them for passcodes, access to their device, or money to prevent fraud. Banks won’t make these requests or ask that you send money to yourself, but scammers will.” – Chase spokesperson

    Scam prevention tips:

    Scammers can “spoof” phone numbers. The caller ID can say the call or text is from your bank even though it’s not. They do this to trick people into providing their personal or financial information or to get them to send money

    Remember, even if your caller ID says a call or text is from Chase, it could be a scam. When in doubt hang up and call us directly

    If you want to be sure you are talking to a legitimate representative of your bank, call the number on the back of your card or visit a branch

    Consumers should protect their personal account information, passwords and one-time passcodes

    Banks will never call, text or email asking for you to send money to yourself or anyone else to prevent fraud

    Always double check who you are sending money to – once you send money, you might not get it back.

    To learn more about common scams and ways to protect yourself, visit: www.chase.com/security.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Europe may have an answer to U.S. wire transfer fraud questions

    Europe may have an answer to U.S. wire transfer fraud questions

    [ad_1]

    A move by Citigroup to dismiss what it called a “misguided” and “imaginative” wire-fraud lawsuit by the New York attorney general has gotten a mixed reception among bankers, many of whom sympathize with Citi’s pushback while others say banks can do more to protect their customers.

    The move also highlights ongoing debates in the U.S. and abroad about who should be liable when a consumer loses money to a bank spoofing scam. While Europe is moving toward holding banks liable, the U.S. has not seen any such proposals.

    Letitia James, the state’s attorney general, sued Citibank in January for inadequate responses to “obvious red flags of identity theft and account takeover” cases, allowing fraud to take place, including against one customer who had $40,000 stolen from her via wire transfer after she clicked on a fraudulent link she received in a text message. Citi denied her case, according to the lawsuit.

    According to James’ office, the customer “did not provide any information” after clicking on the fraudulent link she received. Yet, after clicking the link, an unauthorized user changed her online banking password, enrolled her account in online wire transfer services, tried and failed to make a wire transfer of $39,999, then successfully executed a $40,000 transfer, which constituted most of her savings after a recent retirement.

    This month, Citigroup filed a motion to dismiss the case, acknowledging a recent rise in online wire fraud but arguing that banks are not liable for reimbursing customers who got scammed through wire fraud schemes.

    “There is no denying that the problem is real,” the bank wrote, but the New York state AG’s lawsuit “defies longstanding, settled understandings” of banks’ liability in cases of fraud.

    In reaction to the motion to dismiss the case, bankers on LinkedIn largely responded in defense of their institutions.

    “In this case, it seems the victim clicked a link that appeared to be from Citi,” said Ana Campaneria-Villarini, director of corporate fraud for BankUnited. “Well, the victim fell for it! It’s sad but shouldn’t be the fault of the bank. Why should the banks be liable?”

    Many responders sympathized to varying degrees. One commenter, Elena Michaeli, a fraud and cybersecurity consultant, pointed out that while banks have little recourse when a victim provides their banking credentials to a fraudster, banks have much more data and tools at their disposal than consumers.

    In Europe, lawmakers have proposed changes that could entitle consumers to refunds in cases of bank spoofing, where a fraudster pretends to be the consumer’s bank and tricks them into parting with their money. Only in cases of “gross negligence” — for example, if the victim falls for the same scheme more than once, or if the spoof is not convincing — would the payment service provider escape refund liability, according to the proposed regulation.

    The proposals also create a legal basis for payment service providers to voluntarily exchange personal data of their users, subject to information sharing arrangements, for the purposes of reducing fraud. The legislation would require such information sharing to happen in compliance with Europe’s General Data Protection Regulation.

    The proposals are under review by the European Parliament and Council, and while exact timelines are not yet known, any changes to fraud loss liability and data sharing arrangements could take 18 to 24 months to enter into force once agreed upon by member states of the European Union.

    “It is currently anticipated that the legislative proposals will enter into force in 2026,” wrote global law firm DLA Piper in a blog post about the proposals.

    In the U.S., the Department of the Treasury recently alluded to the lack of a legal basis for sharing fraud data between banks voluntarily in a recent report on artificial intelligence. “Most financial institutions” interviewed expressed the need for better collaboration in the domain of fraud prevention, according to the report.

    “Sharing of fraud data would support the development of sophisticated fraud detection tools and better identification of emerging trends or risks,” the report said, which likened such data sharing to similar arrangements banks have for sharing cybersecurity threat and anti-money-laundering data.

    As for who is liable in cases where a consumer falls victim to fraud and shares their banking credentials to someone impersonating their bank, neither U.S. lawmakers nor regulators have put forward proposals to change the current standard in which customers are generally liable for wire transfer fraud tactics they fall for.

    In a parallel case, consumers are sometimes liable when they fall for scams and mistakenly send payments through person-to-person payment networks like Zelle. The closest a regulator has come to changing the fraud liability standard for P2P payments was guidance that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was expected to issue in response to increasing fraud on Zelle in 2022. However, such guidance has not reached the agency’s rulemaking agenda; rather, the agency has proposed that it should examine payment markets run by the likes of Apple, Google and PayPal to ensure they comply with existing consumer protection laws.

    [ad_2]

    Carter Pape

    Source link

  • Prosecutors: South Carolina prison supervisor took $219,000 in bribes; got 173 cellphones to inmates

    Prosecutors: South Carolina prison supervisor took $219,000 in bribes; got 173 cellphones to inmates

    [ad_1]

    COLUMBIA, S.C. — A supervisor who managed security at a South Carolina prison accepted more than $219,000 in bribes over three years and got 173 contraband cellphones for inmates, according to federal prosecutors.

    Christine Mary Livingston, 46, was indicted earlier this month on 15 charges including bribery, conspiracy, wire fraud and money laundering.

    Livingston worked for the South Carolina Department of Corrections for 16 years. She was promoted to captain at Broad River Correctional Institution in 2016, which put her in charge of security at the medium-security Columbia prison, investigators said.

    Livingston worked with an inmate, 33-year-old Jerell Reaves, to accept bribes for cellphones and other contraband accessories. They would take $1,000 to $7,000 over the smart phone Cash App money transfer program for a phone, according to the federal indictment unsealed Thursday.

    Reaves was known as Hell Rell and Livingston was known as Hell Rell’s Queen, federal prosecutors said.

    Both face up to 20 years in prison, a $250,000 fine and an order to pay back the money they earned illegally if convicted.

    Reaves is serving a 15-year sentence for voluntary manslaughter in the shooting of a man at a Marion County convenience store in 2015.

    Lawyers for Livingston and Reaves did not respond to emails Friday.

    Contraband cellphones in South Carolina prisons have been a long-running problem. Corrections Director Bryan Stirling said inmates have run drug rings, fraud schemes and have even ordered killings from behind bars.

    A 2018 riot that killed seven inmates at Lee Correctional Intuition was fueled by cellphones.

    “This woman broke the public trust in South Carolina, making our prisons less safe for inmates, staff and the community. We will absolutely not tolerate officers and employees bringing contraband into our prisons, and I’m glad she is being held accountable,” Stirling said in a statement.

    The South Carolina prison system has implored federal officials to let them jam cellphone signals in prisons but haven’t gotten permission.

    Recently, they have had success with a device that identifies all cellphones on prison grounds, allowing employees to request mobile phone carriers block the unauthorized numbers, although Stirling’s agency hasn’t been given enough money to expand it beyond a one-prison pilot program.

    In January, Stirling posted a video from a frustrated inmate calling a tech support hotline when his phone no longer worked asking the worker “what can I do to get it turned back on?” and being told he needed to call a Corrections Department hotline.

    From July 2022 to June 2023, state prison officials issued 2,179 violations for inmates possessing banned communication devices, and since 2015, more than 35,000 cellphones have been found. The prison system has about 16,000 inmates.

    Stirling has pushed for the General Assembly to pass a bill specifying cellphones are illegal in prisons instead of being included in a broad category of contraband and allowing up to an extra year to be tacked on a sentence for having an illegal phone, with up to five years for a second offense.

    That bill has not made it out of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Instagram begins blurring nudity in messages to protect teens and fight sexual extortion

    Instagram begins blurring nudity in messages to protect teens and fight sexual extortion

    [ad_1]

    LONDON — Instagram says it’s deploying new tools to protect young people and combat sexual extortion, including a feature that will automatically blur nudity in direct messages.

    The social media platform said in a blog post Thursday that it’s testing out the features as part of its campaign to fight sexual scams and other forms of “image abuse,” and to make it tougher for criminals to contact teens.

    Sexual extortion, or sextortion, involves persuading a person to send explicit photos online and then threatening to make the images public unless the victim pays money or engages in sexual favors. Recent high-profile cases include two Nigerian brothers who pleaded guilty to sexually extorting teen boys and young men in Michigan, including one who took his own life, and a Virginia sheriff’s deputy who sexually extorted and kidnapped a 15-year-old girl.

    Instagram and other social media companies have faced growing criticism for not doing enough to protect young people. Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Instagram’s owner Meta Platforms, apologized to the parents of victims of such abuse during a Senate hearing earlier this year.

    Meta, which is based in Menlo Park, California, also owns Facebook and WhatsApp but the nudity blur feature won’t be added to messages sent on those platforms.

    Instagram said scammers often use direct messages to ask for “intimate images.” To counter this, it will soon start testing out a nudity-protection feature for direct messages that blurs any images with nudity “and encourages people to think twice before sending nude images.”

    “The feature is designed not only to protect people from seeing unwanted nudity in their DMs, but also to protect them from scammers who may send nude images to trick people into sending their own images in return,” Instagram said.

    The feature will be turned on by default globally for teens under 18. Adult users will get a notification encouraging them to activate it.

    Images with nudity will be blurred with a warning, giving users the option to view it. They’ll also get an option to block the sender and report the chat.

    For people sending direct messages with nudity, they will get a message reminding them to be cautious when sending “sensitive photos.” They’ll also be informed that they can unsend the photos if they change their mind, but that there’s a chance others may have already seen them.

    Instagram said it’s working on technology to help identify accounts that could be potentially be engaging in sexual extortion scams, “based on a range of signals that could indicate sextortion behavior.”

    To stop criminals from connecting with young people, it’s also taking measures including not showing the “message” button on a teen’s profile to potential sextortion accounts, even if they already follow each other, and testing new ways to hide teens from these accounts.

    In January, the FBI warned of a “huge increase” in sextortion cases targeting children — including financial sextortion, where someone threatens to release compromising images unless the victim pays. The targeted victims are often boys between the ages of 14 to 17, but the FBI said any child can become a victim. In the six-month period from October 2022 to March 2023, the FBI saw a more than 20% increase in reporting of financially motivated sextortion cases involving minor victims compared to the same period in the previous year.

    [ad_2]

    Source link