ReportWire

Tag: Frankenstein

  • Paul Thomas Anderson Wins Top DGA Film Prize For ‘One Battle After Another’, Pays Tribute To Producer & AD Adam Somner: “He Would Love This”

    [ad_1]

    One Battle After Another director Paul Thomas Anderson has won the DGA Awards‘ top prize — Outstanding Directorial Achievement in Theatrical Feature Film — which marks a highly significant Oscar predictor.

    “It’s an honor, President Nolan,” he told DGA president Christopher Nolan, to loud laughter from the audience Saturday at the Beverly Hilton.

    This was Anderson’s third DGA nomination. Most recently, he was nominated for Licorice Pizza in 2021 and, before that, for There Will Be Blood in 2007.

    Ever since the first DGA Awards ceremony in 1948, the winner of its Theatrical Feature Award has predicted the Best Director Oscar winner in all but eight instances. This makes the DGA Awards a major bellwether for Oscar. Add to that, the DGA Theatrical Feature win and Oscars Best Director has matched every year for the past five.

    Anderson referenced Spielberg’s Close Encounters of the Third Kind, saying, “It’s like we’re all here for a reason, some cosmic thing brought us to this room, and it was that call to the mountain. It’s that feeling that we all love making sh*t and we need to do it. We need to do it or it’s an addiction, I’m not quite sure.”

    Paul Thomas Anderson and team accept the Outstanding Directorial Achievement in Theatrical Feature Film for ‘One Battle After Another’ on Saturday at the DGA Awards

    Kevin Winter/Getty Images for DGA

    On a more somber note, Anderson paid tribute to his close friend, producer and longtime first AD Adam Somner, who died in 2024 from thyroid cancer.

    “Obviously we are up here, minus one,” Anderson said. “A lot of people in this room know our hero, our man, Adam Somner. Steven [Spielberg] knows him. His wife Carmen [Ruiz de Huidobro] is here.”

    Anderson continued, “He took this work so seriously, and did not take himself seriously at all. And that was a great gift… He made us feel safe. Think about this work that we do, how dangerous it can be, really dangerous. And to be to get through a film and no one get hurt, be safe, have an amazing experience is because of a great AD, and he was the best.”

    Choking up a little, Anderson went on, “I wish everyone in this room the love that I had with him, may you be blessed with a relationship that I had with him, and if you have one already, hold them close, remind them that you love them. He would love this. He’d be so f*cking happy.”

    Adam Somner

    Adam Somner

    Getty Images

    Last year, the big DGA win went to Anora’s Sean Baker, who went on to win the Directing Oscar and the film took Best Picture. Two years ago, Christopher Nolan won at the DGAs ahead of picking up Best Director and Best Picture Oscars for Oppenheimer.

    Other nominees in this same DGA category tonight Ryan Coogler for Sinners, Chloé Zhao for Hamnet, Guillermo del Toro for Frankenstein and Josh Safdie for Marty Supreme.

    Coogler is only the fifth Black director ever to be recognized in this DGA Awards category. The last was Spike Lee for BlacKkKlansman in 2018. But no Black filmmaker has ever won this top DGA prize.

    Zhao won this DGA top honor in 2021 for Nomadland (which also earned Best Picture and Best Director at Oscar) and now, with this Hamnet nomination, she joins Kathryn Bigelow, Jane Campion and Greta Gerwig as the only women to earn multiple DGA nominations.

    In 2018, Del Toro won the DGA top film prize for The Shape of Water, while this was Safdie’s first DGA nomination.

    [ad_2]

    Antonia Blyth

    Source link

  • Golden Globes 2026: The complete winners list

    [ad_1]

    Globes never say die!

    Five years after a Times investigation dulled the shine of the glitzy Hollywood affair, the 83rd Golden Globe Awards, airing Sunday, will cap off a multi-day series of events and tributes now dubbed “Golden Week.” It appears neither controversy nor potential conflicts of interest have been enough to keep this party down.

    Comedian Nikki Glaser, who delivered a good time as the emcee of the 2025 awards, has once again been tapped to host the star-studded ceremony. Paul Thomas Anderson’s “One Battle After Another” and Joachim Trier’s “Sentimental Value” are among the top film nominees, notching nine and eight nods each, respectively. On the television side, “The White Lotus” and “Adolescence” earned the most nominations with six and five nods apiece, respectively.

    Actors Helen Mirren and Sarah Jessica Parker were already honored during Thursday’s “Golden Eve” special. Mirren, whose prolific career has included portraying a number of British monarchs, was presented the Cecil B. DeMille Award, while Parker, of “Sex and the City” fame, received the Carol Burnett Award.

    The live 2026 Golden Globes telecast kicks off at 5 p.m. on CBS and Paramount+.

    (This story will be updated.)

    Film

    Motion picture — drama
    “Sinners”
    “It Was Just an Accident”
    “Sentimental Value”
    “Frankenstein”
    “Hamnet”
    “The Secret Agent”

    Motion picture — musical or comedy
    “One Battle After Another”
    “No Other Choice”
    “Marty Supreme”
    “Blue Moon”
    “Bugonia”
    “Nouvelle Vague”

    Motion picture — animated
    “Arco”
    “Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba Infinity Castle”
    “Elio”
    “KPop Demon Hunters”
    “Little Amélie or the Character of Rain”
    “Zootopia 2”

    Cinematic and box office achievement
    “Avatar: Fire and Ash”
    “F1”
    “KPop Demon Hunters”
    “Sinners”
    “Weapons”
    “Wicked: For Good”
    “Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning”
    “Zootopia 2”

    Motion picture — non-English language
    “It Was Just an Accident”
    “No Other Choice”
    “The Secret Agent”
    “Sentimental Value”
    “Sirât”
    “The Voice of Hind Rajab”

    Performance by a female actor in a motion picture — drama
    Jessie Buckley, “Hamnet”
    Jennifer Lawrence, “Die My Love”
    Renate Reinsve, “Sentimental Value”
    Tessa Thompson, “Hedda”
    Julia Roberts, “After the Hunt”
    Eva Victor, “Sorry, Baby”

    Performance by a male actor in a motion picture — drama
    Joel Edgerton, “Train Dreams”
    Oscar Isaac, “Frankenstein”
    Dwayne Johnson, “The Smashing Machine”
    Michael B. Jordan, “Sinners”
    Wagner Moura, “The Secret Agent”
    Jeremy Allen White, “Springsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere”

    Performance by a female actor in a motion picture — musical or comedy
    Rose Byrne, “If I Had Legs I’d Kick You”
    Cynthia Erivo, “Wicked: For Good”
    Kate Hudson, “Song Sung Blue”
    Chase Infiniti, “One Battle After Another”
    Amanda Seyfried, “The Testament of Ann Lee”
    Emma Stone, “Bugonia”

    Performance by a male actor in a motion picture — musical or comedy
    Timothée Chalamet, “Marty Supreme”
    George Clooney, “Jay Kelly”
    Leonardo DiCaprio, “One Battle After Another”
    Ethan Hawke, “Blue Moon”
    Lee Byung-hun, “No Other Choice”
    Jesse Plemons, “Bugonia”

    Performance by a female actor in a supporting role in any motion picture
    Emily Blunt, “The Smashing Machine”
    Elle Fanning, “Sentimental Value”
    Ariana Grande, “Wicked: For Good”
    Inga Ibsdotter Lilleaas, “Sentimental Value”
    Amy Madigan, “Weapons”
    Teyana Taylor, “One Battle After Another”

    Performance by a male actor in a supporting role in any motion picture
    Benicio Del Toro, “One Battle After Another”
    Jacob Elordi, “Frankenstein”
    Paul Mescal, “Hamnet”
    Sean Penn, “One Battle After Another”
    Adam Sandler, “Jay Kelly”
    Stellan Skarsgård, “Sentimental Value”

    Director
    Paul Thomas Anderson, “One Battle After Another”
    Ryan Coogler, “Sinners”
    Guillermo del Toro, “Frankenstein”
    Jafar Panahi, “It Was Just an Accident”
    Joachim Trier, “Sentimental Value”
    Chloé Zhao, “Hamnet”

    Screenplay
    Paul Thomas Anderson, “One Battle After Another”
    Ronald Bronstein and Josh Safdie, “Marty Supreme”
    Ryan Coogler, “Sinners”
    Jafar Panahi, “It Was Just an Accident”
    Joachim Trier and Eskil Vogt, “Sentimental Value”
    Maggie O’Farrell and Chloé Zhao, “Hamnet”

    Original score
    Alexandre Desplat, “Frankenstein”
    Ludwig Göransson, “Sinners”
    Jonny Greenwood, “One Battle After Another”
    Kangding Ray, “Sirât”
    Max Richter, “Hamnet”
    Hans Zimmer, “F1”

    Original song
    “Dream as One” (“Avatar: Fire and Ash”)
    Music and lyrics by Miley Cyrus, Andrew Wyatt, Mark Ronson, Simon Franglen

    “Golden” (“KPop Demon Hunters”)
    Music by Joong Gyu Kwak, Yu Han Lee, Hee Dong Nam, Jeong Hoon Seo, Park Hong Jun
    Lyrics by Kim Eun-jae (EJAE), Mark Sonnenblick

    “I Lied to You” (“Sinners”)
    Music and lyrics by Raphael Saadiq, Ludwig Göransson

    “No Place Like Home” (“Wicked: For Good”)
    Music and lyrics by Stephen Schwartz

    “The Girl in the Bubble” (“Wicked: For Good”)
    Music and lyrics by Stephen Schwartz

    “Train Dreams” (“Train Dreams”)
    Music by Nick Cave, Bryce Dessner
    Lyrics by Nick Cave

    Television

    Television series — drama
    “The Pitt”
    “Severance”
    “The Diplomat”
    “Pluribus”
    “Slow Horses”
    “The White Lotus”

    Television series — musical or comedy
    “Abbott Elementary”
    “Hacks”
    “Nobody Wants This”
    “The Studio”
    “The Bear”
    “Only Murders in the Building”

    Television limited series, anthology series or motion picture made for television
    “Adolescence”
    “All Her Fault”
    “The Beast in Me”
    “Black Mirror”
    “Dying for Sex”
    “The Girlfriend”

    Performance by a female actor in a television series — drama
    Kathy Bates, “Matlock”
    Britt Lower, “Severance”
    Helen Mirren, “MobLand”
    Bella Ramsey, “The Last of Us”
    Keri Russell, “The Diplomat”
    Rhea Seehorn, “Pluribus”

    Performance by a male actor in a television series — drama
    Sterling K. Brown, “Paradise”
    Diego Luna, “Andor”
    Gary Oldman, “Slow Horses”
    Mark Ruffalo, “Task”
    Adam Scott, “Severance”
    Noah Wyle, “The Pitt”

    Performance by a female actor in a television series — musical or comedy
    Kristen Bell, “Nobody Wants This”
    Ayo Edebiri, “The Bear”
    Selena Gomez, “Only Murders in the Building”
    Natasha Lyonne, “Poker Face”
    Jenna Ortega, “Wednesday”
    Jean Smart, “Hacks”

    Performance by a male actor in a television series — musical or comedy
    Adam Brody, “Nobody Wants This”
    Steve Martin, “Only Murders in the Building”
    Glen Powell, “Chad Powers”
    Seth Rogen, “The Studio”
    Martin Short, “Only Murders in the Building”
    Jeremy Allen White, “The Bear”

    Performance by a female actor in a limited series, anthology series, or a motion picture made for television
    Claire Danes, “The Beast in Me”
    Rashida Jones, “Black Mirror”
    Amanda Seyfried, “Long Bright River”
    Sarah Snook, “All Her Fault”
    Michelle Williams, “Dying for Sex”
    Robin Wright, “The Girlfriend”

    Performance by a male actor in a limited series, anthology series, or a motion picture made for television
    Jacob Elordi, “The Narrow Road to the Deep North”
    Paul Giamatti, “Black Mirror”
    Stephen Graham, “Adolescence”
    Charlie Hunnam, “Monster: The Ed Gein Story”
    Jude Law, “Black Rabbit”
    Matthew Rhys, “The Beast in Me”

    Performance by a female actor in a supporting role on television
    Carrie Coon, “The White Lotus”
    Erin Doherty, “Adolescence”
    Hannah Einbinder, “Hacks”
    Catherine O’Hara, “The Studio”
    Parker Posey, “The White Lotus”
    Aimee Lou Wood, “The White Lotus”

    Performance by a male actor in a supporting role on television
    Owen Cooper, “Adolescence”
    Billy Crudup, “The Morning Show”
    Walton Goggins, “The White Lotus”
    Jason Isaacs, “The White Lotus”
    Tramell Tillman, “Severance”
    Ashley Walters, “Adolescence”

    Performance in stand-up comedy on television
    “Bill Maher: Is Anyone Else Seeing This?”
    “Brett Goldstein: The Second Best Night of Your Life”
    “Kevin Hart: Acting My Age”
    “Sarah Silverman: PostMortem”
    “Kumail Nanjiani: Night Thoughts”
    “Ricky Gervais: Mortality”

    Podcasts

    Podcast
    “Call Her Daddy”
    “Good Hang With Amy Poehler”
    “SmartLess”
    “Up First”
    “Armchair Expert With Dax Shepard”
    “The Mel Robbins Podcast”

    [ad_2]

    Tracy Brown

    Source link

  • Guillermo del Toro Reveals Recent Death of His Brother at Palm Springs Film Awards

    [ad_1]

    Guillermo del Toro emotionally announced the passing of his brother while being honored at the Palm Springs Film Awards on Saturday.

    The director, on hand to receive the Visionary Award at the annual star-studded event, was joined on stage by his Frankenstein stars Oscar Isaac, Jacob Elordi and Mia Goth, as he spoke about how, at 61 years old, “I’ve come to believe that everybody’s born with one or two songs to sing. That’s it, and we keep repeating them and repeating them until we get them sort of right. And Frankenstein was the song I was born to sing.”

    Del Toro told the crowd at the Palm Springs Convention Center how he approached the iconic tale by “making it about fatherhood and forgiveness, because I believe that we want to be forgiven and forgive. And now, very recently, something has became very clear to me. Three days ago, I lost my older brother but I’m here, and I’m here because the film speaks about a condition that is purely human; that is proved by the final phase in the film, which says the heart may break and the broken live on. Even a broken heart pumps the blood and keeps you going.”

    “My brother and I played Victor and the creature on many moments in our lives,” he said in reference to Frankenstein‘s two main characters, and “many years ago, we granted each other love and granted each other peace. So I’m here for family.”

    The filmmaker — who skipped the event’s red carpet — didn’t reveal his brother’s name or any details about his death, but announced “I may be absent at a few functions this [awards] season, but not this one. I’m here because this is family,” as he gestured to his stars. “Life gives you a family on the way.”

    [ad_2]

    Kirsten Chuba

    Source link

  • The Best Horror Movies of 2025

    [ad_1]

    We all want to belong to someone or something. Or, to have someone or something that belongs to us. Though of course, like anything, there are levels to it. Desire can all too quickly turn to obsession, companionship to possession, and communal progression to cultural regression. Ownership defined much of 2025. From found families and clans to theft and entrapment, this year in horror circled the notion that survival or ruination isn’t entirely in our hands, and that the individual can only do so much to survive the monsters in our midst. We are either placed in the hands of others, or others are placed in ours. Both can be terrifying experiences that test the boundaries of control.

    What we saw on the screen in horror this year also existed in the atmosphere beyond the screen. With ownership came a real need for us to feel a part of something, even if it came down to simply not being a part of something else. Yes, there was tribalism and labels, which we all felt with even greater intensity this year, but there was also community, a necessary and occasionally desperate attempt for us to be claimed, to find others like us with shared experiences, interests, and desires for the future.  But ownership also comes with a desire for some measure of control and acquisition. Be it cult-like tactics of extremist movements, colonialism in its many forms, or corporate acquisitions, ownership comes in the form of a boot as often as it comes as a handshake.

    We saw explorations of ownership from the positive, but let’s be honest, to the mostly negative, across numerous horror movies this year, both critically acclaimed and not. Companion, Bring Her Back, Weapons, Opus, Frankenstein, I Know What You Did Last Summer, Queens of the Dead, The Monkey, Clown in a Cornfield, Good Boy, Control Freak, The Man in My Basement, and The Home, to name just a few, all dealt with ownership on some level.

    And then of course, there was Sinners, which you can be certain I’ll get further into later on. But what an encapsulation of this year’s trends on and off the screen! Not only does the narrative and thematics of Sinners come down to ownership, but so does much of the film’s production from Ryan Coogler working with long-time friends and collaborators, to his historic rights deal with Warner Bros.

    Another way of looking at ownership this year also came by way of accountability. Whether it was countries, collectives, or individuals, the patience for excuses ran short and our tolerance, much like that Jacob Elordi’s Creature in Frankenstein, wore thin. While our grievances fell short of inciting revolution, there was a palpable distaste both onscreen and off for false martyrs, shrines built on lies, corruption and evil, and fascistic sycophants. From the endings of The Long Walk and HIM to the blood-soaked slaughter of Neo-Nazis in Silent Night, Deadly Night, numerous filmmakers sent out a clear message: own up or get owned.

    As for surprises this year, Warner Bros. had an exceptionally great year for horror releases with the success of Sinners, Final Destination: Bloodlines, Weapons and The Conjuring: Last Rites. The fourth mainline Conjuring film, directed by Michael Chaves, and bringing Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga’s iconic turns as Ed and Lorraine Warren to a close, was the biggest horror hit at the global box office with $494.6 million. A Conjuring prequel focused on younger iterations of Ed and Lorraine is already in the works.

    Domestically, Sinners was the biggest horror release of the year with $279.6 million, making it a both a huge win for original horror and Black artists.

    Streaming service Shudder continued to highlight and distribute independent horror from new and fan-favorite directors with films like Grafted, The Rule of Jenny Pen, Night of the Reaper, Good Boy, and plenty more, some found on the list below. But not all surprises were success stories, such as Blumhouse’s M3GAN 2.0. It was oddly positioned as a summer blockbuster and bombed with $39.1 million globally, versus the original film’s $181.8 million globally. It was an ugly end to what seemed primed to be Blumhouse’s newest franchise, and has left the spin-off film Soulm8te in limbo. For what it’s worth, M3GAN 2.0 is fun on the whole, but it’s missing the horror element that made the first film resonate with younger audiences. Horror fans and industry heads will have their eyes on Blumhouse to make a comeback in 2026 after a rough 2025. I’m still of the opinion that they got off to a howling good start with Wolf Man back in January. There’s a thematic ownership link in that film too, but I digress.

    After some internal discussion there is a pair of films that didn’t make this list, for the sole reason of leaning further into the science fiction and action genres than horror but are deeply deserving of a shoutout: Dan Trachtenberg’s Predator: Killer of Killers and Predator: Badlands. Both of these films, one an animated Hulu exclusive, and the other, a live action theatrical release, push the Predator franchise in new directions. While the original two films, and Prey, which made this list in 2022, lean further into horror, Killer of Killers and Badlands showcase the versatility of the franchise in terms of genre, medium, and rating. I continue to be impressed by the scope Trachtenberg has brought to these films and the new character additions like Ursa, Kenji, Torres, Dek and Thia. Trachtenberg’s level of commitment and understanding of the lore is the kind of creator-driven director fans wish they could see applied to their favorite franchises.

    As always, this best horror films of the year list has been distributed between a wide release list and a limited and streaming release list to celebrate as many horror films as possible. Though truth be told, even with 20 total entries, it becomes a challenging task to cut these down to size, no matter how sharp I get my knives. After watching a total of 65 new horror releases this year, here’s what’s been brought to life.

    BEST WIDE RELEASES

    [ad_2]

    Aaron Couch

    Source link

  • How Hollywood Fell For Guillermo del Toro’s ‘Frankenstein’: “I’ve Never in 30 Years Had This Reaction”

    [ad_1]

    As the clock crossed midnight on Labor Day, the tide at this year’s Telluride Film Festival started to turn against Frankenstein. After Guillermo del Toro’s lavish adaptation of the Mary Shelley novel had launched in Venice days earlier to strong if not effusive reviews, star Oscar Isaac hopped on a plane to introduce the film’s secret, ultimately unfortunate North American debut at a late-night screening in the Colorado Rockies. I’ve been to screenings in Telluride like this before, where you can hear the restlessness in the room, feel the sense that it’s not playing as the filmmakers surely hope. My colleague Scott Feinberg wrote that the U.S. premiere “engendered a more muted response,” questioning its viability as an awards contender. Most coming out of that screening felt the same way. 

    Three months later, Frankenstein has re-emerged as a heavyweight, consistently racking up nominations totals in the same league as front-runners One Battle After Another, Sinners and Hamnet. (It’s up for best picture, directing, and acting at the Golden Globes and Critics Choice Awards.) A best picture nomination suddenly seems assured, and Jacob Elordi is a strong supporting actor contender. While Kathryn Bigelow’s A House of Dynamite played better in Venice, and Noah Baumbach’s Jay Kelly surged in Telluride, there’s no denying that del Toro’s film has secured the top spot among Netflix’s typically busy slate.

    The robust response from audiences continues to fuel the momentum. Immediately after Telluride, Frankenstein was the runner-up for the Toronto International Film Festival’s crucial People’s Choice Award; it now has a 94 percent verified audience score on Rotten Tomatoes, among the best of any player in the field. Del Toro has been reposting fan art and testimonials of folks who’ve seen the movie over and over. “Because I’m Mexican, I have what I call the immigration test. When I go through immigration, if they say, ‘What are you working on?’ I say, ‘Oh, the movie’s not going to land,’” del Toro tells me. “But if they say, ‘Oh, I can’t wait to see Frankenstein’ — which is what started to happen — I go, ‘Oh, it’s happening!’” 

    Guillermo del Toro and Oscar Isaac on the set of ‘Frankenstein’

    Ken Woroner/Netflix

    The film ranks within the Netflix platform’s top five most-viewed films of the year (within their first five weeks of release) and has been a quiet theatrical success. That latter point is key, since Netflix’s contenders rarely drum up much box-office noise in their qualifying runs — a point that’s been magnified in the conversation around Warner Bros.’ potential sale to the company (which is pending regulatory approval and the fending off of Paramount’s hostile-takeover bid). Indeed, while Netflix does not release box-office data — hence the “quiet” descriptor — Frankenstein has sold out just under 1,000 theaters globally, per sources familiar. 

    Two months out from its October release, it continues to play in theaters in Los Angeles, New York, Miami, Philadelphia, and more cities around the country. “What is insane for me is the way the audience has reacted. I’ve never in 30 years had this reaction. It’s a massive tidal wave of affection,” del Toro says. “I’ve been getting public and private communications from filmmakers I absolutely adore and worship, that talk about the movie with admiration or with great pride.”

    In conversations with voters and peers, speaking anecdotally, few filmmakers are brought up as often as del Toro. They’ve felt his support for their own careers. His chants of “fuck AI” at major industry screenings elicit regular cheers, and have become a refrain for like-minded filmmakers such as Rian Johnson. And it’s widely known that Frankenstein is the film that del Toro has long been working towards.

    “Since I’ve known you — and that has been awhile — you’ve always talked about, at some point, doing a Frankenstein,” del Toro’s longtime buddy Alfonso Cuarón told him at a recent industry screening. “Your awareness of Frankenstein and cinema go hand in hand.” Meanwhile, Margot Robbie said at a separate event, “I feel like, Guillermo, this is your magnum opus — this is the movie you were born to make.”

    Celebrity moderators of post-screening panels for guilds and Academy members are now a staple of any all-out Oscar campaign, but this season, there’s no equivalent for who’s come out for del Toro. Among them, in addition to Robbie and Cuarón: Bill Hader, Jon Favreau, Jason Reitman, Ava DuVernay, Bradley Cooper, Celine Song, Emerald Fennell and Hideo Kojima. Above, you can watch Martin Scorsese emceeing a larger discussion for the film. “It’s a remarkable work, and it stays with you,” he said to the audience. “I dreamed of it.”

    Del Toro has already won an Oscar for a Netflix film, with his dark stop-motion take on Pinocchio from 2022 taking home the best animated feature trophy. He’s also a recent best picture and best director winner for 2017’s The Shape of Water. But the Academy’s growing affection for the Guadalajara native arguably became most obvious a few years back, when his divisive and less-seen noir remake Nightmare Alley still eked out a best-picture nod. 

    Just how far del Toro can run with Frankenstein remains to be seen — the film remains on the bubble for both writing and directing nominations — but his genuine enthusiasm for simply promoting and speaking about it continues to work wonders for the campaign. Even if it’s simply del Toro’s way of coping with having completed his life’s work. “In the middle of the shoot, and then in releasing the movie, I realized that I was entering the most massive postpartum depression,” del Toro admits. “It feels overwhelming, and it leaves you without a horizon.” Fortunately, this creature isn’t just alive, but growing by the day.

    [ad_2]

    David Canfield

    Source link

  • 11 Fantastic Movies From 2025 to Catch Up on This Holiday Season

    [ad_1]

    You’re at home with your friends or family. The turkey is gone. The football game is over. The conversation is slowing. What can everyone do to keep the holiday spirit alive? Well, 2025 has been a pretty fantastic year for movies, and many of the best ones released this year are streaming right now in your home. Maybe you should watch one of those.

    But which one? Below, we’ve got 11 suggestions of sci-fi, horror, or fantasy films released this year that we love and maybe you missed. Some you probably didn’t miss. But we’re going under the assumption not everyone has seen everything, so even if you’ve seen something, maybe your brother or sister hasn’t. Here they are, in alphabetical order.

    Bugonia (for rent or purchase)

    Emma Stone and Jesse Plemons star in the latest film from director Yorgos Lanthimos about two men who kidnap a CEO they believe to be an alien. It’s super timely, very mysterious, and incredibly hilarious. Read our review here.

    Elio (on Disney+)

    It was kind of a box office bomb, but Pixar’s latest film, about a young boy who becomes the voice of the entire planet, is wildly exciting and heartwarming. It 100% lives up to its Pixar pedigree. Read our review here.

    Final Destination Bloodlines (on HBO Max)

    Maybe don’t show this one to Grandma and Grandpa, but the latest film in the tense, funny, gory horror series about the inevitability of death is easily the best film in the franchise. A total riot. Read our review here.

    Frankenstein (on Netflix)

    Frankenstein isn’t Guillermo del Toro’s best movie, but it’s the one he’s been building towards his whole life. It’s a sumptuous, emotional, and unforgettable retelling of the classic tale with wonderful performances across the board. Read our review here.

    How to Train Your Dragon (on Peacock)

    The original animated How to Train Your Dragon is one of the best animated films ever. So, that its live-action remake is also very good is no surprise. It’s the exact same movie, just with a whole new look. Read our review here.

    The Life of Chuck (for rent or purchase)

    We adore this movie. It’s not for everyone, and it gets very weird very quickly, but once it clicks and that lightbulb goes off over your head, you’ll never forget it. Mike Flanagan has become the master of Stephen King adaptations, and this wonderful, joyous King adaptation is so different from the rest. Read our review here, and learn more about some spoilers here.

    The Long Walk (for rent or purchase)

    A group of young men compete in a life-changing event where they have to march until only one remains. Based on the Stephen King novel, the film adaptation is shockingly brutal but well worth the trip for the harrowing performances. Read our review here.

    Predator: Killer of Killers (on Hulu)

    Did you see or hear about that awesome Predator movie, Predator: Badlands, that’s now in theaters? Well, its director, Dan Trachtenberg, released another Predator movie earlier this year, and it might be even better. It’s an animated anthology showing Predators fighting humans from across history. It’s phenomenal. Read our review here.

    Sinners (on HBO Max)

    Part music-driven masterpiece, part terrifying horror story, Sinners is unlike anything you’ve ever seen. But, we’ve come to expect that kind of quality and originality from the team of director Ryan Coogler and star Michael B. Jordan. Read our review here.

    Superman (on HBO Max)

    There have been so many iterations of Superman over the years, you could’ve assumed James Gunn’s new film was more of the same. But that’s not the case. Gunn’s film has a palpable joy about it. An optimism and excitement that so many superhero films these days are lacking. This is one you’ll want to watch again and again. Read our review here.

    Weapons (on HBO Max)

    Again, maybe this one isn’t for the more easily scared or grossed-out members of your family, but for others, Weapons is a can’t-miss. A horror mystery about a town that loses a whole classroom of kids is wholly entertaining and unforgettable. And messed up. And scary. And awesome. Read our review here.

    Also…

    If you want to go to theaters, there are also plenty of good movies to see. Yes, everyone might be seeing Wicked: For Good, and you could do that, but we’d suggest Predator: Badlands, Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery, The Running Man, or Zootopia 2 instead.

    Finally, we didn’t want this list to be too long, so if nothing on there interests you, here are a few others that didn’t quite make the cut: Pee Wee as Himself (on HBO Max), Jaws @ 50 (on Hulu or Disney+), 28 Years Later (on Netflix), or Black Phone 2 (for rent or purchase).

    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

    [ad_2]

    Germain Lussier

    Source link

  • Jacob Elordi’s Creature is special to me | The Mary Sue

    [ad_1]

    creature bent over with a head

    Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein has been a story told time and time again. But there is something special about Guillermo del Toro’s adaptation of the novel. The creation of science-fiction itself has left many of us connecting more with his take on the Creature more than other adaptations. And rightfully so!

    Jacob Elordi’s take on Frankenstein’s “monster” is one of the most caring and sweet portrayals of the Creature I have seen in cinema. Often, Frankenstein’s monster is the villain of the story. He’s terrifying, violent, and meant to be a…well, monster. What del Toro and Elordi did was make the Creature the victim in Victor’s (Oscar Isaac) world.

    The Creature gets to tell his side of the story and it is filled with wonder, compassion, and a desire to be loved and wanted. It is beautiful to see play out and it makes it clear that Victor’s quest for knowledge and playing God is what makes him out to be the villain instead of the Creature taking that title.

    To me, that has always been the case. This being was created by a man who thought science could provide life and didn’t stop think what that would mean for the being he created. Guillermo del Toro’s adaptation forces the audience to look at what Victor did and see how his drive was his downfall and turned him into the monster of the story.

    A beautiful portrayal by Jacob Elordi

    jacob elordi
    (Ken Woroner/Netflix)

    There is an earnest energy to Elordi’s Creature. He is curious and sweet and it is contrasted beautifully by Elordi’s height. The Creature may loom over many of the people that he meets but he really is just a man that wants to know more about the world and have justice after Victor left him for dead.

    All of that meant a lot to me as I was watching Frankenstein. The Creature wasn’t forced into some villainous turn and when the film does make it seem like the Creature will hurt anyone in his path, he makes it clear that he’s just protecting himself and trying to get to Victor for answers. Well, he probably would hurt Victor but maybe it is justified given how Victor treats him.

    There is just something magical in the way that Elordi plays the Creature. His loneliness is beautiful and upsetting all at once and getting to see how Elordi uses that to drive the Creature make this adaptation of Frankenstein something special.

    (featured image: Netflix)

    Have a tip we should know? [email protected]

    Image of Rachel Leishman

    Rachel Leishman

    Editor in Chief

    Rachel Leishman (She/Her) is the Editor in Chief of the Mary Sue. She’s been a writer professionally since 2016 but was always obsessed with movies and television and writing about them growing up. A lover of Spider-Man and Wanda Maximoff’s biggest defender, she has interests in all things nerdy and a cat named Benjamin Wyatt the cat. If you want to talk classic rock music or all things Harrison Ford, she’s your girl but her interests span far and wide. Yes, she knows she looks like Florence Pugh. She has multiple podcasts, normally has opinions on any bit of pop culture, and can tell you can actors entire filmography off the top of her head. Her current obsession is Glen Powell’s dog, Brisket.

    Her work at the Mary Sue often includes Star Wars, Marvel, DC, movie reviews, and interviews.

    [ad_2]

    Rachel Leishman

    Source link

  • ‘Frankenstein’, ‘Nosferatu’, and the Antidote to Hollywood’s Franchise Obsession

    [ad_1]

    As is tradition, whenever a hot new genre film hits the scene, fans can’t help but pit the two cinematic marvels against each other and debate which one is better. Those two films of the moment, at least as far as horror is concerned, are Robert Eggers’ Nosferatu and Guillermo del Toro’s Frankenstein.

    Instead of giving in to that cinephile debate-bro impulse, fans should take a “holy shit, two cakes” approach to the phenomenon of getting two remarkable remakes of classic horror cinema practically back-to-back. After all, why should two icons be compared when they are, in fact, the best organic outcome of that lofty shared dark universe properties initiative that never got off the ground? To scope out where this is going, the secret to their success was that they emanated self-respect, treating themselves as art rather than a play for established intellectual property (even though they are, at the end of the day, both distant franchise “cousins”). They stood ten toes down on creative vision, uncompromising freedom, and a tight script—things that feel old hat nowadays and should be celebrated for it.

    So let’s do that. I’ll start.

    The Problem With How Contemporary Pop Culture Films Are Made

    The film industry, as we know it, has gone pop culture crazy, mimicking the decades-long release calendar rollercoaster of box-office success that Marvel and the DC Universe had every studio exec fiending to jerry-rig with whatever intellectual properties they had in the cut. But the problem with that, as many comic book fans who cry superhero fatigue have reckoned with, is how artless the whole rigmarole has come to feel. Like a Fortnite-ification of cinema, properties have been treated like toys in a grander toy box, where the exercise of mashing them together would be bound to pack theaters and stuff pockets. Space Jam 2 did it and was a giant airball. The Monsterverse Godzilla and King Kong movies (while a fun exception) are doing it.

    Margot Robbie in Barbie © Warner Bros.

    And now, in the wake of ever-expanding, interconnected comic book universes, everything is turning into studios champing at the bit to weaponize nostalgia into films that are films in name only: They’re feature-length advertisements. Take the lineup of films Mattel, hot off Barbie, is planning to make, including:

    • American Girl Dolls
    • Bob the Builder
    • Hot Wheels
    • Magic 8 Ball
    • Masters of the Universe
    • Matchbox Cars
    • Monopoly
    • Polly Pocket
    • Rock ‘Em Sock ‘Em Robots
    • Uno
    • View-Master

    Suppose it’s not making toys into feature-length movies that punch above their weight at a poignant theme without ever actually saying anything. In that case, it’s legacy sequels that ultimately wind up doing the same thing—jingling referential keys in fans’ faces—to justify their existence. And yes, all those bargain bin horror reimaginings of childhood characters no one asked for, like Winnie the Pooh and Steamboat Willie, are a short walk from the same artless trough of movies I’m griping about.

    Somewhere along the way, in chasing the dragon of Marvel and DC success, product placement—whether literal or the symbol of a broader brand—became film fodder. And it sucks that the same, now-dated commodification impulse to appease audiences is still in effect today—despite repeated failed attempts along the way. To bring things back to Nosferatu and Frankenstein, take the “Dark Universe,” for example. This cinematic universe combusted before it even got off the runway. A would-be film universe that would’ve combined the canceled Bill Condon’s Bride of Frankenstein, Tom Cruise’s The Mummy, and a Johnny Depp-led The Invisible Man. Now, whenever the phrase “Dark Universe” is uttered, it’s immediately followed by jokes about what went wrong in blogs and YouTube videos. The answer is pretty obvious: they were a backward way of making films as products rather than art, and, hoisted by their own petard, they failed before seeing the light of day.

    Whether it’s the Dark Universe or the endless stream of movie announcements that will flood the internet long after this blog is posted—leaving readers scratching their heads about why it’s being made into a film before the inevitable dollar sign pops into view—all of these contemporary films end up following the same track. Too often, movies don’t feel like they’re allowed to simply be movies anymore.

    Joe Russo, Robert Downey Jr., and Anthony Russo speak onstage during the Marvel Studios Panel in Hall H at SDCC in San Diego, California on July 27, 2024
    Joe Russo, Robert Downey Jr., and Anthony Russo speak onstage during the Marvel Studios Panel in Hall H at SDCC in San Diego, California, on July 27, 2024. © Jesse Grant/Getty Images for Disney

    Of course, the success stories in this regard are still chugging along. Marvel films are announced like Moses descending from Mount Sinai at comic conventions, with a slate of logos and concept art (but no script). They cart out hot actors or directors riding the momentum of a newly released genre film during award season, assume notoriety will guarantee greatness, and then staple them onto projects—gesturing to the past as an assurance of future success under their banner.

    Sometimes, they never even materialize. Other times, their creation-by-committee approach to art just doesn’t hit for layman audiences. But rather than blame the studios for their helicopter-parent planning and meddling, the same actors’ and directors’ faces are plastered across thumbnails as patsies for their Sisyphean failures.

    Frankenstein and Nosferatu‘s Successes Should Be the Blueprint

    Nosferatu and Frankenstein, despite being remakes and adaptations themselves, feel so novel because they weren’t made as content meant to linger in the catalogue of a streamer. They were made as films. You can see the craft patched into every frame. Be it the use of miniatures, insistence on period piece accuracy, or its creator’s disdain for the buzzword du jour of Hollywood: AI. Decisions, both big and small, are night-and-day evidence to audiences that Nosferatu and Frankenstein are films cut from a different cloth—hence the ongoing online debate over which is the best—because their status as films that prioritize craft over commodity is undeniable.

    Sure, their late-fall/Christmas releases lend credence to points of comparison. Their shared promoting of the film in a way that doesn’t give the whole game away from frame one of its trailers is another shared quality they have—a vibe that most other films can’t seem to shake, being unsure of themselves by giving the whole game away, spoilers or no, to get butts in seats. Instead, both films teased the familiar monster characters without leaning too hard into their mythic tropes. But what’s got everyone so gung-ho on these films is that they feel like something to chew and stew on as pieces of art, to rewatch and arrive at new meaning, rather than something meant to be passively watched by as many people as possible, made with signals that are so homogenized and samey that they feel more like laminated cinematic experiences in comparison to the visual and thematic tactility of Frankenstein and Nosferatu.

    And who can blame fans for turning these films into their personalities? Eggers’ Nosferatu thrives in the macabre, combining gothic atmosphere with sexual repression, turning the story into a meditation on acceptance, reconciliation, and redemption. On the flip side, del Toro’s Frankenstein distills horror into something deeply relatable: generational trauma and the burden of ending cycles of abuse. Those are incredible feats for both films to achieve, elevating them from mere remakes to statement pieces in their own rights, with messages that are still on the audience’s minds to this day.

    Because of these reasons, Nosferatu and Frankenstein shouldn’t be pitted against each other in some gladiatorial “pick one” scenario. They should be celebrated together. Both works went for it. Both embody freedom, creation, and artistry as films. They should be the blueprint for how pop culture films should be made. By that same token, we shouldn’t look to these directors to helm new film adaptations. They should inspire Hollywood to take a chance on hungry creatives to make future horror film adaptations of their ilk—a Carmilla, The Picture of Dorian Gray, or a Phantom of the Opera—that embrace that same boldness Eggers and del Toro were allowed to display—not off their tenure as creatives, but as a means of making films that strive to be resonant rather than commercial. Horror films often get shafted in the court of “serious” film discussion and awards circles, dismissed as disposable, but these prove they can be beacons for new voices. We can have it all.

    The Bride Jessie Buckley Warner Bros.
    Jessie Buckley in The Bride! © Warner Bros.

    Nosferatu and Frankenstein should be cold water to the face of Hollywood—a reminder that creatives must be allowed to create, not forced into monotonous cycles of rehash and reheat in a desperate attempt to capture lightning twice. These films prove that remakes of classic horror, when freed from rights-holding obligations and the keep-the-car-warm navel-gazing of blockbuster logic, can feel inspired and moving rather than exhausted.

    Upcoming works like Maggie Gyllenhaal’s The Bride! and Eggers’ own Werwulf promise to carry that momentum forward, treating monster movies as art instead of content. That’s the lesson here: celebrate them not as rivals, but as reminders that films should be allowed to be films. Not just numbers ticking upward, not just filler for a streaming catalogue, but works that feel tapped in—works that let the freak flag fly, unapologetically, and remind us why even pop culture films matter.

    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

    [ad_2]

    Isaiah Colbert

    Source link

  • Video: ‘Frankenstein’ | Anatomy of a Scene

    [ad_1]

    “Hi, I am Guillermo del Toro, director of “Frankenstein.” “Life!” We are at a disciplinary hearing for Victor at the Royal College of Medicine in Edinburgh. And watch that little ball. I shot this as Victor narrating his past. So it’s idealized the way he remembers it. He remembers himself to be the hero, and he remembers himself to capture the attention of everyone. The red ball is a symbol of his mother’s death and his quest for immortality. The color red in the movie does. We introduce Harlander through these golden shoes and the rudeness of his manner. This is played by Christoph Waltz and he will finance Victor. This scene was meant to be shot, always roaming, looking for Victor. “Now there lies the challenge.” “That should be our concern.” “It should be.” I free the camera. I make it follow things. I make it zoop in a crane like this one. It’s like he’s giving a little concert. We’ve dressed him very much like a rock star with a flared shirt and the red of the cravat. That is again the quest for immortality. And his mother. The batteries. We introduced them here. These red batteries that will become key to the resurrection of the body of the creature and his experiment. And the idea was to make it very much like a tribunal. The symbol of the movie constantly around Victor is a circle. So the theater is in the shape of a circle. There are circular windows, et cetera because this has circular narrative that opens and ends in the frozen North. Now, this, I thought, was a really good way to demonstrate not only the technique of stitching, but also a little bit of a preview of what the creature may look like. We do that through this anatomical assembly and some of the anatomical waxes in Victor’s apartment. This is completely done analog. There is no C.G. creature. This moment I love. I call it the Spielberg pause, which Steven Spielberg does by cutting three times to people expecting to see something. This is a really nice little shock when the creature comes to life. And as I said, this is entirely a puppet. There are blue screen puppeteers behind it, and there’s a radio control and cable control. And now, Victor, the way Oscar Isaac plays it, And the way we dressed him, was meant to evoke like a bohemian in the ‘60s. A little by little we will introduce a broad brim hat, flared pants, little heeled boots that remind you of the anti-establishment that he is meant to represent, the progress in his mind. “Are you sure?” This catch, by the way, is completely real. It was caught by the puppeteers and one puppeteer was puppeteering the head; another one, the hand, and the way they interact is beautiful. Victor, and the way I set up the scene, is moving around, but is moving around a completely immobile tribunal. So for a while he manages them to be still and judging him in a severe way. And then the battle comes in into the arena. “Why not quantify it?” “This is unholy!” And Victor uses the ball again. He’s used it to send the points back and forth to the judges. And when they invoke God, he loses his patience and throws the ball. And there’s a beautiful shot where Harlander catches it. And that is the change of perspective. Harlander will have the ball with him when he goes and visits him into his lab. And I think what is great about this scene is that it establishes all at once Victor’s quest, Victor’s intentions, his temperament, and the absolute lack of uncertainty, which every tyrant, every villain really has. And he thinks himself to be a victim.

    [ad_2]

    Mekado Murphy

    Source link

  • Guillermo del Toro delivers a Frankenstein for the tech bro era

    [ad_1]

    There’s a reason the story of Frankenstein endures. Its examination of mankind’s hubris and inhumane scientific progress has only become more relevant since Mary Shelley’s time. The pursuit of “innovation at all costs” has led to new monsters, born from people who failed (or refused) to consider the consequences of their actions. So it’s no wonder that Victor Frankenstein in Guillermo del Toro’s Netflix adaptation feels so much like a modern day tech bro. He is practically their template.

    Squint a bit, and you can see Frankenstein’s recklessness in Mark Zuckerberg ignoring Facebook’s role in promoting the genocide in Myanmar, with Elon Musk lying about Tesla’s real self-driving capabilities (potentially leading to several crashes), or Sam Altman’s OpenAI building a hallucinating AI search engine trained on stolen content. Screw the consequences, they just want to shout “it’s alive!” as their products go viral (and as their investors lap up the engagement).

    Del Toro’s Frankenstein is a remix of the major elements of the novel — there’s the doomed love story, the mad scientist driven by his ego and the sympathetic monster who demonstrates far more humanity than his creator — refashioned in the director’s opulent style. But it’s also clear from the film’s explosive opening, where an Arctic ship encounters Victor Frankenstein (Oscar Isaac) being chased by a seemingly unkillable Creature (Jacob Elordi), that del Toro isn’t shying away from his campier horror roots. Arms are torn off, gallons of blood are spilled. This Frankenstein contains multitudes.

    Why did Victor Frankenstein go through hell to reanimate the dead? Because he could. In the novel and this film, the whole ordeal was always about bragging rights and demonstrating his greatness as a scientist. He didn’t consider what he owed to the new life form, or the cruelty of bringing a being into the world with no companion. It didn’t matter who he hurt. Sound familiar?

    Mia Goth and Jacob Elordi in Frankenstein (Netflix)

    What truly makes del Toro’s Frankenstein work is his understanding of the characters. As Victor Frankenstein, Oscar Isaac embodies the punk rock charm of a rebel scientist who thinks he alone can invent a way to reanimate life. But he also lives with the memory of an abusive father who likely killed his beloved mother. Elizabeth fascinates and intrigues Victor, but she’s also disgusted by his apathy for the natural world. It’s not hard to see why she feels immediate sympathy for the Creature, who is portrayed by Jacob Elordi as a sort of child-like super human. He’s an immediate disappointment to Frankenstein, who can’t help but repeat the cycle of abuse he experienced with his father.

    Looking back at his career, it’s as if del Toro has been trying to adapt Shelley’s novel through all of his films. You can see elements of the story in his debut feature Cronos, which centers on a device that makes people immortal (but also curses them with a thirst for blood). The tragic father and son relationship between Frankenstein and the Creature is mapped directly onto the evil vampires in Blade 2. The Gothic romance between Frankenstein and his sister-in-law Elizabeth (who also has eyes for the Creature) echoes Crimson Peak. And the desire for a seemingly “evil” being to fit into normal human life is front and center in del Toro’s Hellboy films.

    Jacob Elordi in Frankenstein

    Jacob Elordi in Frankenstein (Netflix)

    In an interview with NPR, del Toro mentioned that, as a child, seeing the monster appear for the first time in the 1931 Frankenstein film was “an epiphany.” It was an experience that helped him understand his own faith, and seemingly his entire view of life and art. His Frankenstein is the work of someone who has been living with the story for decades. It comes to life with lavish sets, his love of voluptuous colors (there’s a scene of a red scarf floating in the air that haunts me) and his fascination with the macabre.

    There’s a lesson in Frankenstein for today’s tech elite, but given their current obsession with AI despite its potentially massive societal and environmental impacts, I have little hope they’ll learn anything from it. But when Guillermo del Toro was asked about using generative AI by NPR, he spoke as someone who truly understood Shelley’s novel. “I’d rather die,” he said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Guillermo del Toro and Oscar Isaac Want ‘Frankenstein’ to Speak to Latin American Culture

    [ad_1]

    In a conversation with Guillermo del Toro and Oscar Isaac, dropped online by GQ to promote the long-awaited collaboration between the cinema faves, the duo talked about how their Latin culture informed their take on Frankenstein.

    Guillermo del Toro revealed he and Isaac were on the same page from day one: “I think that one of the things we connected over that dinner was our Latinness. Because obviously the shadow of the father looms differently in the Latin family, I believe.”

    Isaac supplied, “[The] patriarchal thing, it’s so strong.”

    The director nodded at his actor’s assessment of the way patriarchy comes into play in his film in a different tone due to their upbringing: “[And] the melodrama, and the drama of being blind to those flaws, you know, it’s very Mexican.” The filmmaker shared that he showed Isaac 1949’s La Oveja Negra (The Black Sheep) by Mexican filmmaker Ismael Rodríguez, which stars Pedro Infante, the iconic figurehead of machismo masculinity of a bygone old cinematic era—think Clark Gable en español.

    Isaac shared how he sprinkled some of the star’s on-screen presence as he made his Victor’s masculine energy inspired by the Infante’s sweeping movements when he played key scenes, “We used that one moment when Jacob [Elordi] comes back to ask for a bride,” and described how the creator responded to his creature’s request, “and I just kind of walked by him and pushed him away. That was a little nod.”

    From a filmmaking standpoint, del Toro elaborated on his intentionality: “Those moments for me are things that you determine only from a Latin culture. The swarthy Catholicism of the film. But I think the sort of pageantry of Catholicism, which verges on the operatic, you know, the intensity of emotions,”

    Isaac agreed, “That’s why we talk about it being a story of outsiders. I talked to you a lot about that first meeting, which was like feeling like an outsider from the moment that [I] came from Guatemala to this country and constantly moving around and always feeling like a bit of an other.”

    Isaac explained how this was something he experienced in trying to prove himself over the course of his career to play outside of the stereotypical Latino roles as his career evolved. “That kind of fed into this kind of myopic view of, like, excellence. The only way I can succeed is by being excellent and better than everyone else at this thing. And no matter what it costs, you know, that was something that definitely, I think, fed into Victor.”

    To del Toro, this made Isaac the right choice for his leading man in his lifelong dream project: “The Victor that I really believe would be a fresh Victor is a Victor that had swagger and sensuality and flair.” The filmmaker came to that conclusion from his experiences as a Latino, which ended up mirroring how he would see Victor’s final form in the eventual film as it came into fruition as “reclaiming that for not a British actor, not an Anglo actor,” as it related to his connection to Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. “We talked on the set and I said, ‘it’s not an accident that our Victor is played by, you know, Oscar Isaac Hernandez.’ And we reclaimed some of that energy.”

    Isaac added how he tapped into that wavelength. “Yeah, exactly. At one point, you’re like, ‘A European would never make a movie like this’—the way that you were shooting it with these huge sets and also the way you direct; sometimes you’d be like, ‘I need the Maria Cristina,’” he said in reference to the classic telenovela move where an actor walks away to process an emotion before doing a dramatic physical reaction, whether it’s a full-body turn or gaping wide-eyed brows up in the high heavens look.

    In Frankenstein it’s used with great gothic aplomb on purpose. Isaac shared the note del Toro gave him in a big moment opposite Mia Goth. “‘It was like you have to walk from his left shoulder past him and then you stop and you turn back,’” he recalled.

    “It’s like a telenovela,” del Toro interjected.

    Isaac reminisced, “You have to make this Mexican boy very happy,” he said in reference to the boy who grew up worshipping Frankenstein, who would at an older age approach him to play the complex anti-hero of Shelley’s text.

    Affirming, del Toro added, “When people say, ‘What’s Mexican about your movies?’ I say, ‘Me. Yeah,” he laughed, celebrating how his culture permeates his creations. “What else do you want? I think you cannot deny what you are, who you are. And what moves you in any act of artistic expression ever, you know?”

    Watch the rest of the interview below:

    Correction: A previous version of this article cited Netflix as the source. In fact, it was originally shared by GQ.

    Frankenstein is now in theaters and will be released on Netflix November 7.

    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

    [ad_2]

    Sabina Graves

    Source link

  • How ‘Frankenstein’ pays tribute to a beloved comics creator | The Mary Sue

    [ad_1]

    The season of Guillermo del Toro’s Frankenstein is officially upon us, with the movie playing in select theaters before a global debut on Netflix on November 7th.

    As the film’s trailers and early reviews have illustrated, the project just might be a masterpiece… one that tells its own sweeping tale while being incredibly reverential to both Mary Shelley’s source material and the larger cultural mythos of Frankenstein’s monster. For eagle-eyed fans, one particular name proves this in spades, giving a beloved comic creator their flowers.

    Towards the end of Frankenstein‘s credits, the following phrase is displayed: “Frankenstein character design inspired in part by Bernie Wrightson’s Frankenstein Monster. Early concept development and early concept sculptures by Spectral Motion and Bernie Wrightson.”

    For those who might be unfamiliar, Wrightson was a prolific part of the Silver and Bronze Ages of comics, especially in the ever-evolving horror subgenre on anthology titles like House of Mystery, Chamber of Darkness, and Tower of Shadows. In 1971, he and writer Len Wein co-created DC’s Swamp Thing, who has since gone on to inspire movies, shows, and crossovers few could have imagined. Wrightson’s distinct art style has made its way into countless comics, album covers, and even concept art for movies like Spider-Man, Ghostbusters, and Galaxy Quest.

    In and amongst all of that, Wrightson devoted seven years of unpaid work, which he later called a “labor of love”, to illustrating Shelley’s Frankenstein. The art aimed to capture Shelley’s descriptions of the characters and settings, as opposed to any film adaptations that had existed at the time. The edition featuring Wrightson’s art was ultimately released in 1983, and has since gotten reprinted in multiple editions.

    For Frankenstein fans, and just horror comic fans in general, Wrightson’s illustrations of the book have become the stuff of legend, to the point of his original cover art selling for $1.2 million in a 2019 auction. In 2016, del Toro revealed that he owned nine of Wrightson’s original illustrations, regarding them to be among his prized possessions.

    A monster years in the making…

    That brings us to del Toro’s Frankenstein… and actually, all the way back to 2008. At the time, the director had signed a first-look deal with Universal Pictures, during which he planned to bring his adaptation of Frankenstein to life. He cited Wrightson’s art as a major source of aesthetic inspiration, and had hopes of the creator designing the monster for the film.

    A year later, makeup tests seemingly began with Spectral Motion, del Toro, and his frequent collaborator Doug Jones, who called the design “hauntingly beautiful” and reverential to Wrightson’s illustrations. In a recent interview with Fresh Air, del Toro did confirm that Wrightson “collaborated with [him] earlier on,” although the exact extent of that is unknown at this time.

    Still, for those who have seen Frankenstein (or at very least, the viral behind-the-scenes photo of Jacob Elordi as the monster), Wrightson’s impact is undeniable. The character’s long hair, gaunt frame, and patchwork of flesh are undeniable… and when combined with Elordi’s acting, they craft something that is genuinely beautiful.

    Part of me does wish that Wrightson’s credit in Frankenstein was even more promient, just given the way that most of the moviegoing audience is going to engage with the movie. By the time it arrived in our theatrical showing, the house lights were on, nearly everyone else had already left, and the servers were whizzing around us picking up trash and empty popcorn bowls. And I’m sure that once the movie is on Netflix, pop-ups autoplaying another title or asking to rate the movie will pull most people away from the credits entirely.

    But at the same time, I’m still incredibly thankful that Wrightson is getting his flowers through this movie… and that he was able to be involved with the project directly in some way. When Wrightson passed away in 2017, it sent shockwaves through the comic community, with del Toro himself taking a 24-hour-long vow of silence in his honor. Now, with Frankenstein, his work is able to live forever in a whole new way.

    (featured image: Netflix)

    Have a tip we should know? [email protected]

    Image of Jenna Anderson

    Jenna Anderson

    Jenna Anderson is the host of the Go Read Some Comics YouTube channel, as well as one of the hosts of the Phase Hero podcast. She has been writing professionally since 2017, but has been loving pop culture (and especially superhero comics) for her entire life. You can usually find her drinking a large iced coffee from Dunkin and talking about comics, female characters, and Taylor Swift at any given opportunity.

    [ad_2]

    Jenna Anderson

    Source link

  • Guillermo del Toro’s ‘Frankenstein’ Screenplay is Becoming a Book

    [ad_1]

    Guillermo del Toro’s Frankenstein is in theaters this weekend before its hits Netflix on November 7—and a full month from now, you’ll be able to read it, too.

    Book publisher Insight Editions is releasing a 240-page hardcover of the film’s screenplay penned by del Toro that also includes a foreword by him, concept art, film stills, and behind-the-scenes photography. “From the tormented Victor Frankenstein to his tragic monster, del Toro’s unique artistic voice shines through every page,” reads the description, “offering an immersive experience for fans of both the original novel and del Toro’s cinematic genius.”

    via Amazon

    Previously, Netflix went and gave del Toro and Mark Gustafson’s Pinocchio movie from 2022 a similar treatment by releasing that film’s an art book and screenplay online for free. That went on to become an awards darling, racking up several wins including Best Animated Feature at the Golden Globes and Academy Awards. Already, Frankenstein has racked up wins during its run on the festival circuit, including the Gotham Awards’ Vanguard Tribute and the Graffetta d’Oro for Best Film at the Venice International Film Festival.

    Netflix would really like to repeat del Toro’s awards success and with Frankenstein, hence the limited theatrical release, and putting out its screenplay for fans of his work and the original 1818 novel by Mary Shelley further expands its reach. If you fall into either of those camps, the hardcover releases Tuesday, November 25 for $30.

    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

    [ad_2]

    Justin Carter

    Source link

  • For Your ‘Hear Me Out’ Consideration: Jacob Elordi’s Full ‘Frankenstein’ Monster

    [ad_1]

    Almost a year ago to the day, the promotional lead-up to 2024’s buzziest horror film, Robert Eggers’ Nosferatu, was still playing it close to the chest, abstaining from revealing Bill Skarsgård’s mustachioed Count and urging folks to flock to the theaters to see him on the big screen for themselves. In 2025, the promotional team behind Guillermo del Toro‘s Frankenstein has dropped all pretenses, giving prospective moviegoers an eyeful of Jacob Elordi’s Creature in advance.

    In a series of posts on the official Frankenstein X/Twitter account, fans were met with character portraits of the ensemble, all following in the wake of Elordi’s Creature. Before today’s thread of posts, the only shots fans got of Elordi’s enigmatic character were stray trailer glimpses (as well as the odd DiscussingFilm post of Elordi hugging his dog), obscured by a heavy cloak, as he smoldered at the camera, à la Alexandre Cabanel’s “The Fallen Angel.”

    Unlike Nosferatu, commenters under the post were more than willing to air out their thirst for the 6′ 5″ undead creature.

    Diverting from the train of thought on folks’ downbadness for Elordi’s character onto more artistic appreciations for his heavy makeup job, Variety reports Frankenstein’s production crew used 42 prosthetics to transform the Euphoria actor into del Toro’s monster. More specifically: 14 pieces for his head and neck. The Variety piece went on to detail that it took eight people 10 hours to apply Elordi’s full-body prosthetics. Furthermore, his prosthetics needed to be applied 50 times. In layman’s terms, that’s a lot of time spent in a makeup chair.

    As mentioned up top, Elordi wasn’t the only actor to receive character poster social media treatment in the lead-up to Frankenstein‘s limited theatrical release. Joining him were castmates Oscar Isaac as Victor Frankenstein, Mia Goth as Elizabeth Harlander, Christoph Waltz as Heinrich Harlander, and Felix Kammerer as William Frankenstein.

    In io9’s Frankenstein review, we praised del Toro’s film, writing, “It truly feels like a movie he was meant to make. A filmmaker at the height of his powers. And he’s given us a film that, even with a few little issues here and there, we’re likely to enjoy from now until forever.”

    Frankenstein is playing in select theaters, with plans to expand over the next few weeks. It’ll then premiere on Netflix on November 7.

    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

    [ad_2]

    Isaiah Colbert

    Source link

  • A Giant-Size ‘Frankenstein’ Poster Highlights Stellar New Universal Monsters Art

    [ad_1]

    In the world of alternate movie posters, the name Tyler Stout always stands out. Stout’s work has been a gateway to so many young poster fans, so anytime his name shows up on a list of people contributing to a show, we take special notice. When that list is of artists doing work of the iconic Universal Monsters, it’s an extra level of special. And when that list is split across simultaneous events happening in both Austin, Texas, and Los Angeles, California, as a kind of mega exhibition, it’s monstrous.

    io9 is excited to exclusively debut Tyler Stout’s incredible and unique new poster for 1931’s Frankenstein, which will first be available at a special Universal Monsters show, presented by Coda and Sideshow, at Canopy Gallery in Austin, Texas, on Friday. (There’s also an event at Celebrity Authentics at Universal Citywalk in Los Angeles, but more on that below.) Unlike a traditional poster-sized image, though, Stout and the team decided to go big with this one. It’s a 24 x 72-inch print, meant to approximate the giant size of the iconic monster. Here’s the full image.

    Tyler Stout’s ‘Frankenstein’ – Coda/Sideshow/Universal

    This two-sheet screenprint costs $120 in an edition of 300. There are also two other versions, one only available to attendees of the Austin show (they’ll have to sign up in person), and a third one will be at an upcoming convention, to be announced.

    “The work of Tyler Stout undoubtedly popularized the notion of alternate film posters more than other artists in the field. His work spoke to people with active relationships to cinema,” Coda co-founder Rob Jones told io9 over email. “His dense servings of characters, their relationships, and the pressures that act upon them remain unlike any other artist’s approach in the medium’s history.”

    “While it’s always a joyous jolt to work with him, the primary pleasures come from watching his brain fly while it figures out where to land on the page,” Jones continued. “In this instance, it lands on two pages, or sheets rather. Tyler hoped to evoke a pop culture icon that beckoned from the back pages of his childhood comic books: the Jack Davis ‘Life Size Frankenstein’ poster. To make that happen feasibly as a screenprint, he divided the image across two 24 x 36-inch sheets. Results are unlike any AMP made for Frankenstein and all expertly printed by DL Screenprinting in Seattle.”

    “I adore these results and perhaps overly identify with Henry Frankenstein, so consumed with personal pursuit that Tyler shows him living within the confines of his own work, i.e., the monster,” Jones concluded.

    Now, if the show were just the Stout Frankenstein alone, it would be awesome enough, but there’s so much more. Coda and Sideshow have recruited an incredible number of artists to do original art and screen-printed posters themed to Universal Monsters and here’s just a small sample of the other work in the shows.

    In Los Angeles, the show takes place at Celebrity Authentics at Universal Citywalk starting today, October 23, from 11 a.m. to 9 p.m. and will remain on display through November 2. In Austin, the show takes place at the Canopy Gallery from 6 to 10 p.m. on October 24. It remains on display there only through the weekend, October 26.

    Each location has a wholly unique show so each poster seen above will only be available, at least at the start, at those galleries (which we’ve noted in specific instances above). Leftovers will go online sometime in November and will be split into multiple waves. Keep an eye on codacurates.com for more information or head to Sideshow for more specifics.

    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

    [ad_2]

    Germain Lussier

    Source link

  • Good Luck Trying To See Guillermo del Toro’s ‘Frankenstein’ in Theaters This Weekend

    [ad_1]

    The fact that Frankenstein is hitting theaters before it arrives on Netflix is no doubt due to Guillermo del Toro’s strong desire for his dream project to have a theatrical experience. It also helps that movies must have a theatrical run to qualify for award season.

    The latter is one reason Netflix’s surprise hit KPop Demon Hunters had those limited movie theater screenings in August, with a return coming this Halloween due to popular demand.

    But while KPop Demon Hunters hit screens across multiple theater chains, if you were hoping to see Oscar Isaac (Moon Knight) and Jacob Elordi (Euphoria) in Frankenstein on the big screen, the opportunity is seemingly just as elusive as the monster himself.

    While Netflix struck a deal with AMC theaters to show KPop Demon Hunters, Frankenstein will not be screening at any of the chain’s cineplexes. So if you’re like me, a paying member of AMC A-List, you won’t be able to slot it into your weekly movie plan. Many families budget in the flat A-List fee to see movies monthly; for Frankenstein, you’ll have to shell out full price to see it elsewhere and then—if you have kids too young to enjoy del Toro’s passion project—you’ll have to book a sitter on top of that.

    But if you have an unlimited entertainment budget, you can find your closest venue on Guillermo del Toro and Netflix’s Frankenstein ticket site here. Just know that your nearest theater might not be so near, especially during opening weekend; it will expand next week.

    Your chances are better if you live in a major city. To use Los Angeles as an example—a city with many, many movie theaters—you can only watch it at the Egyptian Theater (operated by Netflix) in Hollywood or make the drive to Santa Monica, where the Nuart Theater is playing it in 35mm.

    New York City, meanwhile, only has three theaters playing it, including the Angelika Film Center, which has it in 35mm as well. The rest of the presentations are on digital unless you’re lucky enough to nab IMAX screening tickets (as of publishing, IMAX does not have a listing page for the film). Your best bet if you’re dead-set on seeing Frankenstein in IMAX is to call your local theater or check its website rather than simply going by the Netflix ticketing site.

    It appears that at least Hollywood’s TCL Chinese Theater is getting it in the large format on October 27 with del Toro hosting his film at the legendary shrine to cinema at a screening on October 31.

    Will you be seeing Frankenstein in theaters this weekend, waiting until its expansion next week, or holding out for Netflix in November?

    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

    [ad_2]

    Sabina Graves

    Source link

  • You Have to Watch David Harbour’s Weird ‘Frankenstein’ Mockumentary

    [ad_1]

    You might be surprised by this unexpected crossover between Stranger Things and Frankenstein that you never realized you needed. One of Netflix’s hidden gems is a half-hour mockumentary released in 2019 that’s part PBS Masterpiece Theater and part Orson Welles vanity show parody starring David Harbour (Thunderbolts*).

    Frankenstein’s Monster’s Monster, Frankenstein hits that nostalgia for watching public broadcasting with your grandma while sitting on plastic-wrapped couches and eating hard candy. Truly, while watching it, it felt like I got drop-kicked into that core childhood memory.  David Harbour plays himself as David Harbour the third, who unearths his father David Harbour Jr.’s (who he also plays) Frankenstein-inspired project. Experiencing daddy issues, Harbour III grapples with an existential crisis brought on by his mad genius dad’s love for the theater over, perhaps, his own son. I cannot stress how unseriously serious everyone is in this, especially Harbour, who relishes the larger-than-life movie star that was his fake-real father.

    Complete with a dramatic made-for-TV music score, the mockumentary (directed by Daniel Gray Longino and written by John Levenstein) follows David Harbour’s journey in unpacking his dad’s life work and love for the stage. The TV play within the special chronicles the Welles-esque capitulation into selling oneself out while grasping for one more artistic success.

    The play we watch throughout the mockumentary has that PBS TV station filter lighting and the weirdest plot. Frankenstein, the doctor (Harbour), invites over an alluring potential investor, Miss Macbeth (Kate Berlant), to fund building another monster. His assistant Sal (Alex Ozero as ’80s heartthrob Joey Vallejo) poses as the doctor while the real doctor poses as the monster (or does he), which hen suddenly it cuts to an ad for a steak restaurant Harbour Jr. is endorsing while eating his feelings of jealousy toward Vallejo—a feud that may have led to Harbour Jr. cutting the brakes of his competition’s car.

    Yeah, it’s definitely convoluted in that Adult Swim style of surreal humor but on Netflix, much like the Kristen Bell murder mystery farce The Woman in the House Across the Street From the Girl in the Window.

    © Netflix

    It’s so meta, and for that reason we think it’s a must-watch this season leading into the release of Guillermo Del Toro’s authentic Frankenstein feature for the streamer and Stranger Things season five. Harbour is definitely having fun as a lumbering star of the stage that a mere televised special cannot contain. There are even interstitials of him proclaiming, “That’s how I got into Juilliard!” on his mentor’s Inside the Actor’s Studio-style school of acting program.

    The kicker? His mentor is played by Alfred Molina, who is relegated to being a sea captain of few words on Frankenstein’s Monster’s Monster, Frankenstein.  It’s so unhinged to see the great actor just show up for kicks.

    The random nature of the special within the show leaves you with so many more questions than answers. Take, for instance, Harbour attempting to rationalize an irrational man who is completely made up and then being that very man who played two other men. I threw my hands up in the air so many times because it was just so ridiculous. Was he playing Frankenstein, the doctor pretending to be Frankenstein the creature? Or was he Frankenstein, the creature pretending to be his creator to get the investment to make a mate?  The galaxy brain that went into this is astounding. 

    David Harbour Julliard
    © Netflix

    After watching it, it became the most quoted thing around my house or when watching movies. The “Chekhov’s Gun” gun, called out upon introduction in the first act (“It has to go off in the last!”), became something I think of when I watch movies to review. But the most inside joke that lives on has to be “And that’s how I got into Juilliard!”

    We chatted with Harbour about it in 2023, which was before the release of his portrayal of Frankenstein for James Gunn’s Creature Commandos for DC Studios; he regaled us with his best Harbour Jr. and discussed why he was drawn to Mary Shelley’s creation: “The most interesting thing to me about Frankenstein’s monster in general is that he was created to be this sort of erudite, intellectual, romantic, brilliant person, and he winds up being a monster. I mean, that complexity can make for some pretty ripe comedy and also pathos—that a guy who considers himself one thing is viewed by others as something very different.”

    Contemplate his take on the monster, the man behind the monster, and his own father behind the man that David Harbour would go on to become before Hopper’s return on Stranger Things season 5 in the clip below for a taste.

    Frankenstein’s Monster’s Monster, Frankenstein is streaming on Netflix.

     

    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

    [ad_2]

    Sabina Graves

    Source link

  • ‘Frankenstein’ (the Book) Gets a Special Edition Ahead of ‘Frankenstein’ (the Movie)

    [ad_1]

    As excitement builds for Guillermo del Toro‘s stylish Frankenstein movie, Penguin Books would like you to remember where the story began. Mary Shelley’s 1818 novel, a pioneering work of sci-fi, is getting a special tie-in release with Jacob Elordi‘s hulking, weirdly glamorous monster gracing the cover.

    Frankenstein has, of course, been adapted many times over the years, with Boris Karloff’s Universal Pictures run as the monster providing the most indelible visual. Frankenstein’s monster (or “Frankenstein” if you don’t mind the inaccuracy) has long since become an established part of the creature pantheon, adorning Halloween decorations and popping up at Universal’s theme parks.

    A tie-in edition pairing an old book with a new adaptation—which is not a new idea by any means; other recent examples have seen Wicked and The Long Walk get shiny new covers inspired by their respective movies—might make novel fans cringe, but it makes sense. And if Elordi’s (heavily made-up) face gets a casual consumer to read a literary classic, isn’t that the best outcome possible?

    It also comes with an introduction by del Toro, offering further incentive.

    Here’s the full cover, which reproduces the film’s new poster revealed earlier today.

    © Penguin Books

    Guillermo del Toro’s Frankenstein, starring Jacob Elordi, Oscar Isaac, and Mia Goth, hits theaters for a limited release October 17; it arrives on Netflix November 7.

    The tie-in edition of the book releases October 28; you can pre-order here. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus was first published January 1, 1818.

    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

    [ad_2]

    Cheryl Eddy

    Source link

  • Channing Tatum Says Rejecting Guillermo del Toro’s Unmade ‘Beauty and the Beast’ Remake Is ‘One of the Biggest Mistakes of My Career’

    [ad_1]

    Channing Tatum was almost the star of a Guillermo del Toro fairy tale.

    In a recent interview with Vanity Fair, Tatum said he was offered the role of the Beast in del Toro’s retelling of “The Beauty and the Beast.” However, because the “Roofman” star “just had a baby” at the time and the film’s script wasn’t “totally there yet,” he turned the role down. Tatum looks back on the decision as “one of the biggest mistakes” of his career.

    “One of the biggest mistakes of my career: Guillermo del Toro wanted to do ‘Beauty and the Beast,’ his version of the Beast,” Tatum recalled. “And I’d just had a baby, I was on a movie that was absolutely killing me, and the script wasn’t totally there yet. I was just in a place in my head that I was like, ‘I don’t think I can do this right now.’ It was the biggest mistake, because I’m the biggest Guillermo fan ever. And I think Guillermo doing ‘Beauty and the Beast’ would’ve been the sickest movie ever.”

    Tatum didn’t actually miss out on anything since the film was never made. He hopes eventually he’ll be able to right his wrong and work with the three-time Oscar winner.

    “He’s got a billion other things that he wants to do,” Tatum added. “He’s such a creator. I’ll probably never forgive myself on that one, but I hope we get to work together one day.”

    Del Toro is currently making the rounds with his latest fantasy epic “Frankenstein,” which invoked a ecstatic 13-minute standing ovation at its Venice Film Festival debut. The film stars Oscar Isaac as the titular mad scientist and Jacob Elordi as his grotesque creation.

    While Venice was keen on del Toro’s latest, Variety film critic Peter Debruge was lukewarm. He wrote in his review, “[Del Toro’s] empathetic approach feels less revolutionary in ‘Frankenstein,’ since most versions of Shelley’s story feel for the brute, as opposed to his creator (played less like a scientist than a tortured artist by a long-haired Oscar Isaac). Boris Karloff embodied him as a tragic figure, crouched by the lake with the little girl, naive to the danger he poses for others. Now we get Jacob Elordi, looking like an emo jock or a wounded soldier, which is partly true, as he’s been reconstructed from the corpses of several.”

    [ad_2]

    Jack Dunn

    Source link

  • Jacob Elordi’s ‘Frankenstein’ Body, as Described by Guillermo del Toro

    [ad_1]

    When Guillermo del Toro’s Frankenstein hits theaters and Netflix later this year, people will watch for all kinds of reasons. Fans of the genre will be excited to see del Toro’s take on the classic tale. Fans of del Toro’s will want to see what he’s brought to this story he’s dreamed of making his entire life. And some, yes, will watch just to see Jacob Elordi as an animated corpse.

    Trailers and clips released publicly for the film have yet to reveal in detail what Elordi looks like as the creation of Dr. Frankenstein (Oscar Isaac) but, speaking to Entertainment Weekly, del Toro pulled the metaphorical robe off his monster. When asked to describe the look of the character, the Oscar-winning director said he’s “staggeringly beautiful, in an otherworldly way.”

    “It looks like a newborn, alabaster creature,” he continued. “The scars are beautiful and almost aerodynamic.” And, because the creature was created from the corpses of multiple people, del Toro explained that the skin is multiple colors. “The hues are pale but almost translucent. It feels like a newborn soul,” he said.

    Del Toro doesn’t think people who watch the film will be scared of the look of the creature because the character of Dr. Frankenstein didn’t design him that way. “Victor is as much an artist as he is a surgeon, and if he’s been dreaming about this creature for all his life, he’s going to nail it,” del Toro said. Both Frankenstein and del Toro are similar in that way. What they “didn’t want was the feeling that you were seeing an accident victim that has been patched [together].”

    Unfortunately, the quotes don’t come with a reveal of this “beautiful,” “alabaster” work of art. We guess you’ll just have to wait until October 17 in theaters, or November 7 on Netflix, to see it. And once that happens, we’re sure the internet will be totally normal about it.

    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

    [ad_2]

    Germain Lussier

    Source link