ReportWire

Tag: FPV drones

  • In Ukraine, civilians donate their spare cash — and watch it turn into $40 million strikes against Russia

    [ad_1]

    • In Ukraine, crowdfunding foundations play an outsize role in keeping elite units supplied with FPV drones.

    • One renowned group, the Sternenko Foundation, delivers new, updated drones in days or weeks.

    • Drone pilots say it’s often the difference between life and death on the rapidly changing battlefield.

    Editor’s note: This story features several interviewees who requested to be identified only by their first name or call sign for their safety.

    Every few weeks, Ukrainian bridal shop owner Ilia scrapes together a donation — usually no more than $7.

    “If I had any doubts about how my money is being used, I wouldn’t give it,” said the grizzled 33-year-old, who is exempt from military service because he is blind in one eye.

    Much of that money goes to the Sternenko Foundation, a prominent volunteer group that uses civilian donations to equip Ukrainian defenders with thousands of attack drones. The foundation runs regular online fundraisers, spreading the word on Telegram to Ukrainians like Ilia.

    Ilia walks in this park almost every night with his wife, Tatyana, he said. The soldiers’ names are blurred out.Ilia/Business Insider

    He’s one of the hundreds of thousands contributing to Ukraine’s extraordinary crowdfunding of its embattled military, which has become a key pillar of the war effort. With Ukrainian forces strapped for resources, crowdfunders domestically and globally raise money for anything Kyiv’s Western allies don’t usually provide, from civilian trucks and defensive drone nets to tourniquets and electric generators.

    The Sternenko Foundation, run by Ukrainian activist Serhii Sternenko, specializes in fundraising for first-person-view drones, the most widely used weapon on Ukraine’s battlefield. The group has gained renown among soldiers for providing drones with rapidly updating software and designs. Some pilots say they vastly outperform the drones supplied by Ukraine’s government.

    Ilia, like thousands of other donors, sends his money through the foundation’s website — then watches the results on Telegram. Units receiving drones from Sternenko post videos of battlefield hits, mixing heavy metal soundtrack with footage of their drones blasting into infantry troops and artillery.

    Activist Serhii Sternenko during interview to Ukrainian media in November.

    Sternenko, trained as a lawyer, is a prominent internet personality in Ukraine.Global Images Ukraine/Global Images Ukraine via Getty Images

    For Ilia, the crowdfunding movement is turning his pocket change into real combat power that he can witness.

    It’s a remarkably cost-effective formula in the age of modern war. The Sternenko Foundation typically aims to raise $250,000 per day, and its recipients say they are inflicting damage to Russian military hardware that collectively reaches into the billions of dollars over the last three years. As is the norm, they back up most hits with videos.

    A famed beneficiary of the fund, the Ronin drone unit of the 65th Separate Mechanized Brigade in Zaporizhzhia, touts perhaps one of the war’s most audacious examples of asymmetric warfare.

    Ronin pilots said in January that they had used a 10-inch FPV drone, worth $500, to disable a Buk medium-range air defense system estimated to be worth about $40 million. An uploaded video showed a drone approaching a modern Buk-M3 launcher from on high, before slamming into its missiles.

    Over the next few months, Ronin FPV drones pushed deeper and deeper into Russian-held territory. In February, the pilots uploaded videos of attacks against six more Buk systems.

    Last year, the Ronin pilots said they had struck just one of the SAMs. By the end of summer in 2025, their videos showed that they’d hit at least 15 in eight months.

    The wrath of donated drones

    The recent Buk strikes only happened because of Sternenko’s drones, a pilot from the Ronin unit, named Andriy, told Business Insider.

    The Sternenko Foundation says it’s delivered over 210,000 drones since the war began, a small fraction of the 2.2 million total drones that Ukraine reported producing in 2024 alone.

    Pilots like Andriy, however, say Sternenko’s drones are different.

    Battlefield conditions shift fast, so the Sternenko team regularly asks pilots what upgrades are needed. Andriy said the volunteers swiftly relay that information to manufacturers, and then deliver drones with updated hardware and software in days or weeks.

    “Even at night, if we are on the attack, and any problems arise, we are in contact with the drone developer, and we can solve it on the spot,” the senior soldier said.

    That short feedback loop allowed for constant small tweaks to Sternenko’s drones, Andriy said, so the Ronin pilots gradually improved their 10-inch platforms. These are the workhorses of Ukraine’s FPV drones — radio-controlled, battery-powered quadcopters that use 7- to 12-inch propellers to fly.

    Originally designed as flying cameras, they’ve become one of the war’s primary weapons after soldiers started fitting the cheap platforms with small, explosive payloads like rocket-propelled grenades that typically weigh 10 pounds or less. Pilots fly them right into their targets — armored vehicles, fortified positions, and soldiers.

    Both sides are now locked in a perpetual race to develop new drone defenses, such as jammers that disrupt their radio signals, which drives the need for constant upgrades in the field.

    A Ukrainian man holds an FPV quadcopter.

    A volunteer holds a ready-made FPV drone in a drone workshop in April 2024 in Lviv.Global Images Ukraine/Global Images Ukraine via Getty Images

    Thanks to the updates on Sternenko’s funded drones, the Ronins eventually received FPV quadcopters that could fly reliably beyond 18 miles. Many of Russia’s Buks were positioned beyond that limit, Andriy said.

    “We started hitting Buks as fast and as efficiently as we could,” the drone pilot said. Sternenko’s volunteers also provided a new type of drone that acted as a signal repeater, he said, strengthening the wireless communications link between the drone and its operator in jammed areas.

    Andriy said the Ronin unit typically takes three to four FPV drones to finish off a Buk air defense system and estimates that it cost them 55 drones, or $27,500, to disable 15 systems collectively worth between $150 million and $600 million.

    A striking cost ratio

    That cost ratio means that for every $1 spent by donors through Sternenko, the Ronin pilots were inflicting at least roughly $5,450 worth of damage to Russia’s military.

    Independent analysts told Business Insider it’s difficult to determine the exact dollar value of these strikes, but that their cost efficiency is astronomically high.

    “A Buk-M3 battery is valued at around $100 million, but that would be the export price,” said Benjamin Blandin, a researcher with the Japanese nonprofit Yokosuka Council on Asia-Pacific Studies.

    Older batteries, such as the Buk-M1, might have cost foreign customers around $45 million. Still, Blandin cautioned that the Russian defense ministry is known to purchase homegrown assets, such as tanks like the T-72, at a far cheaper rate than the sale price for other nations.

    Many estimates say that, with such a deep discount, the Buk-M1 costs Moscow about $10 million per system.

    A Russian Buk-M2 missile launcher drives at the Red Square in Moscow.

    The Buk relies on launchers and radars that work in tandem to counter air threats.Alexander NEMENOV / AFP via Getty Images

    A Buk battery also consists of many parts, including multiple launchers, a command post, and a main radar.

    “Typically, the radar itself, and fire control computers are the most expensive part of the system,” said Robert Tollast, a researcher of land warfare for the UK-based Royal United Services Institute.

    When analyzing the Ronin videos of Buk hits, he said the unit clearly damaged radars in some clips.

    Siemon Wezeman, a senior researcher of arms transfers for the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, said that destroying one critical Buk component, such as the main radar, could put the rest out of action, prompting Ukrainians to say they destroyed the entire thing.

    “But no matter what price is taken or how out-of-action the system had been made, it’s still a very much higher USD value lost than that of a few drones used against it,” he added, referring to US dollars.

    Donated drones, a class above the rest

    Russia, realizing its Buks were being hunted, started pulling them further away from the frontline in Zaporizhzhia, Andriy said. Still, he said his unit was able to use donated drones to hit a Buk at a distance of 55 kilometers, or 34 miles — a staggering feat for today’s FPV technology.

    “When we mentioned the distance to other foundations, their eyes went wide with surprise,” Andriy said.

    Out of roughly 30 to 40 FPV drones he pilots in a two-day shift, Andriy estimated that 95% typically come from the foundation.

    A Ukrainian drone operator holds a controller with his thumbs and forefinger on both control sticks and his middle fingers on the edges of the controller.

    Ukrainian drone pilots receiving drones from Sternenko said they greatly prefer volunteer FPVs.Maks Muravsky/Global Images Ukraine via Getty Images

    Ukrainian soldiers also receive drones purchased by the Ministry of Defense. Andriy said these can be outdated, and he prefers the crowdfunded drones.

    The commander of the Dovbush Hornets, the drone unit of the 68th Jaeger Brigade in Pokrovsk, told Business Insider that state-funded drone deliveries suffer from a typical issue that plagues governments: It can take too long to turn immediate feedback into updated systems.

    In a war where techniques and jamming frequencies evolve in a matter of weeks, that delay can be the difference between victory and death.

    “With the Sternenko situation, their representatives call the unit and ask what specific technical characteristics of drones they need, and they just buy the one that suits the unit,” said the major, whose call sign is Fierce. “But for the Ministry of Defense, they already have the drones accumulated, so they just give them to the unit.”

    State-funded drones are needed, but often have to be sent to a manufacturer for retweaking.

    Two Ukrainian soldiers work on FPV drones together in a workshop.

    While Ukraine is filled with drone manufacturers, some military units also have their own drone workshops and specialists.Scott Peterson/Getty Images

    “These drones are sometimes impossible to use on certain sections of the front lines,” Fierce said. “So the fighters have to invest their own salaries in the drones, to modify them and change the control frequencies. It takes time and their personal money.”

    The issue was common enough for the Sternenko Foundation to launch a refitting project for Ministry of Defense drones, called reDrone, primarily to add hardware upgrades such as motor controllers.

    In a statement to Business Insider, Ukraine’s Defense Ministry said that its provided FPV drones are purchased from private manufacturers “to create a sustainable, large-scale, and predictable supply system” for its troops.

    “At the same time, in wartime conditions, certain units may have specific needs that can be promptly met through volunteer initiatives,” it wrote. “The flexibility of drone supplies from volunteers complements the large-scale state system of equipping the army.”

    Civilians at the heart of the fight

    In Konotop, just 60 miles from the northern front, Ilia is also a volunteer. He said he’s driven donated vehicles and equipment dozens of times to soldiers in the greater Sumy and wartorn Donbas regions.

    Ilia said he was nearly killed on four occasions on these supply runs near the frontlines.

    “God decided I am more useful here on this Earth,” he laughed.

    Ukraine, strained from years of war, has long relied on its civilians to support the front with battle supplies.

    “This war is a black hole that just keeps sucking up all of our resources,” said Oleksandr Skarlat, the Sternenko Foundation’s director.

    The overwhelming majority of donations received by the foundation come in small amounts from Ukrainian civilians, said Skarlat, a national finswimming athlete before the invasion.

    The foundation says it raises roughly 300 million hryvnia, or about $7.2 million, from over 450,000 individual contributions a month.

    The group operates like a hub, connecting manufacturers with drone units, then paying for and delivering drones to those troops, Skarlat explained to Business Insider.

    “The foundation’s advantage is speed and time,” he said. “An expensive drone is not always better. If new components are released, they must be purchased and transferred to the units immediately.”

    Soldiers with blurred faces hold up FPV drones received from Sternenko's foundation.

    Members of a drone unit record themselves thanking the Sternenko Foundation for a new delivery of FPV drones on August 20.Sternenko Foundation website/Business Insider

    That process is now a well-oiled machine, but it is limited by whatever resources Sternenko’s team can raise. They try to prioritize squads that produce better results, such as the Ronins and Dovbush Hornets, which operate in Pokrovsk.

    Sternenko, a popular internet personality, uses his following to promote fundraisers and repost strike footage uploaded by recipient units. In May, he was shot in the thigh during an assassination attempt that Ukraine’s security service said was orchestrated by Russia.

    As proof to donors, the foundation meticulously records its drone deliveries, their cost, and recipients in a public database. Sternenko’s team posts daily videos of drone squads receiving hundreds of FPVs, paid for by civilians.

    Over time, the foundation has become one of Ukraine’s premier crowdfunders, well-known among the military units flying the deadly FPVs filling the battlefield.

    A spreadsheet shows where the Sternenko Foundation is sending drones and how much it spends for each delivery.

    An example of the reports of drones sent to each Ukrainian unit, with payment documents linked to each entry.Business Insider

    “I don’t want to offend anyone,” said Fierce, the Dovbush Hornets commander. “But there are some organizations and people that try to help, and they don’t even understand the quality of their drones and how they can fit the tasks of our units. The Sternenko Foundation has a well-built base, and they have the quality.”

    A formula that works, oft-uncredited

    More recently, the foundation is asking civilians to donate to a new project, dubbed “Shahedoriz,” that raises funds for interceptor drone development. Ukraine, hard-pressed to stop Russia’s intensifying Shahed waves, is trying to develop more interceptors that can destroy enemy drones and missiles to shore up its struggling air defenses.

    One of the new drones is the Sting, a high-speed piloted FPV drone designed by Ukrainian manufacturer Wild Hornets to chase down the Shahed-136.

    Alex Roslin, a Canada-based foreign coordinator for Ukrainian drone manufacturer Wild Hornets, said the Sting has achieved more than 130 successful kills so far. All of the interceptors were purchased by Sternenko, he told Business Insider.

    Roslin believes local crowdfunders like the foundation play an outsize role in the war but are strangely overlooked in the West.

    “Without these volunteers and the donors who generously contribute, for Ukraine, it would be a catastrophe,” he said.

    A person holding the Sting interceptor drone.

    Ukraine has seen limited use of interceptor drones to down the Shahed, but has in recent months been driving hard at development to counter Russia’s growing drone waves.Wild Hornets/Telegram

    Skarlat put it in stronger terms. “If not for the support of the volunteers,” he said, “Ukraine would most likely already be in the hands of the occupation regime.”

    At night, Ilia looks up and watches Shaheds hurtle through the Konotop sky, Ukrainian tracer bullets and drones soaring up to meet them. “This is why we just keep donating, keep sending money,” Ilia said.

    Many of the Shaheds fly onward to Kyiv, but some strike at home in Konotop too, and the number of casualties in the city has grown steadily, he said.

    Ukrainian machine gunners open fire into the night sky.

    A Ukrainian mobile fire group tries to down a Russian Shahed. With the exploding drones increasing in number with time, Kyiv has been pushing hard for new solutions to guard its skies.Oleg Palchyk/Global Images Ukraine via Getty Images

    Ilia, grinning, said he doesn’t seek shelter during the air raid warnings. Three and a half years of war have driven the fear of bombs from him, he said. But when asked in a video call about his son in the third grade, and the boy’s future, the bridal apparel businessman’s smile fell.

    After a few moments of silence, he cleared his throat. “My main motivation is him,” he said. “It is my motivation to keep helping and donating.”

    “I don’t need the Russians to die. I won’t go to their home when this is over. I just want them to leave so I can protect my family,” he said. “We just want to live a normal life.”

    Translation by Sofiia Meleshko.

    Read the original article on Business Insider

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • NATO beware: Drones can’t replace tanks, experts warn

    [ad_1]

    As armies scramble to learn the lessons of the Russia-Ukraine war, one question looms above all: Have drones replaced traditional weapons such as tanks and artillery?

    For NATO, the implications are more than tactical. As the alliance struggles to rebuild its long-neglected armies, it faces tough decisions about allocating scarce money and industrial capacity. If robots are the future, then doesn’t it make sense to build $500 drones instead of $5 million tanks?

    Not so fast, warn some experts. Replacing old-fashioned firepower with a purely drone force would be a blunder.

    “There are several reasons why it would be a mistake for NATO forces to rely heavily on massed small UAS [unmanned aerial systems] and long range OWA [one-way attack] drones to replace traditional weapons systems in pursuit of improved lethality and thus deterrence against future Russian aggression,” argues Justin Bronk, a researcher at the British think tank Royal United Services Institute, in a recent essay.

    Europeans rush drone-based radar jammers in effort to supplant US tech

    Rather than exploiting Russia’s weaknesses, a drone-centric NATO could be playing to Russia’s strengths.

    “Russian forces currently field the most formidable” counter-UAS capabilities in the world, according to Bronk. In addition to jammers, modified infantry weapons and short-range air defense systems, Russian forces have become accustomed to using anti-drone measures such as netting to deflect unmanned aerial vehicles and armored cages to protect vehicles.

    “In most cases, only a small fraction of the huge volumes of drones launched by Ukrainian forces reach their targets, and a still smaller proportion achieve decisive damage when they do,” Bronk wrote.

    Indeed, one reason why Ukrainian drones have achieved success at all is the presence of legacy firepower that constrains Russia’s ability to maneuver and to concentrate counter-UAS assets.

    “This attrition from UAS has been occurring in the context of a Russian force that is still constrained by minefields and forced to disperse by Ukrainian artillery, GMLRS [Guided Multiple Launch Rocket Systems] and ATACMS [Army Tactical Missile Systems], Storm Shadow/SCALP cruise missiles and glide bombs, Bronk explained. “If NATO forces were to pursue massed UAS at the expense of rebuilding stocks of these traditional fires, Russian forces would find it significantly easier to mitigate UAS lethality than they have up to now in Ukraine.”

    Ukrainian soldiers from an air defense unit of the 59th Brigade fire at Russian strike drones in Dnipropetrovsk region, Ukraine, on Aug. 10. (Evgeniy Maloletka/AP)

    The impact of drones in Ukraine has been contradictory. On the one hand, they dominate the battlefield, with hordes of omnipresent attack and reconnaissance UAVs paralyzing maneuver and forcing troops and vehicles to remain within cover and fortification. Most recently, waves of unjammable Russian first-person view drones guided by fiber-optic cables have devastated Ukrainian supply lines.

    Yet despite enormous effort to innovate and manufacture drones, Ukraine has only been able to limit Russian advances — but not stop them. Advancing behind saturation bombardments by artillery, glide bombs and drones, Russian offensives are succeeding in capturing ground. The gains are meager and the cost is staggering. But the Kremlin doesn’t care about losses, and Ukraine simply lacks sufficient quantities of manpower and traditional weapons to defeat the attackers.

    “Ukraine has achieved very impressive defensive results against larger Russian forces, but has not managed to retain the strategic initiative or operational momentum despite deploying millions of UAS that are constantly iteratively developed by a system honed by multiple years of desperate fighting,” Bronk wrote.

    The best evidence is that Ukraine is clamoring for legacy weapons such as ATACMS and High Mobility Artillery Rocket System, or HIMARS, rocket launchers, guided artillery shells and anti-tank guided missiles.

    “When available, high-end ATGMs [Anti-Tank Guided Missiles], anti-tank BONUS artillery rounds and regular artillery are still prized by many Ukrainian commanders for countering Russian attempts to break through the frontlines, because they are far more responsive and more reliably able to knock out vehicles and suppress massing infantry than FPV drones,” wrote Bronk.

    While UAVs have inflicted significant casualties on Russian forces (as have Russian drones on Ukrainian troops), Bronk sees drones at their most valuable as enablers for traditional forms of firepower.

    For example, cheap decoy or kamikaze drones can saturate air defense radars and force the defender to expend interceptors that would otherwise target missiles and rockets.

    NATO testing Baltic Sea drones to track Russian warships, freighters

    Bronk favors a NATO focus on glide bombs. Though far more expensive than drones, they are far cheaper than guided missiles: A Joint Direct Attack Munition, or JDAM, costs around $25,000, compared to a million-dollar ATACMS rocket. Glide bombs “destroy armored vehicles, fighting positions, supply dumps, warehouses, factories and command posts. They are easy to manufacture at scale with existing factories and multiple bombs can be delivered by a single jet with a targeting pod on each sortie.”

    Beyond their battlefield value, Bronk sees glide bombs as a deterrent against Russian aggression. By threatening Russian air defenses, they present Moscow with the prospect of operating at the mercy of NATO airpower.

    Rather than playing catch-up with Russia and Ukraine in drone warfare, NATO should use drones to augment its existing strengths, Michael Kofman, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, told Defense News. These include superior precision strike capabilities, better-trained personnel and the ability to conduct joint operations.

    “Those are the advantages that are likely to prove much more significant than being second- or third-mover in the drone fight,” Kofman said.

    Ultimately, those nations that can integrate drones with conventional weapons will have the advantage over those that rely on masses of drones at the expense of traditional firepower.

    “Fundamentally, it is far technically and tactically easier to counter a force that primarily relies on massed, cheap FPV and OWA drones for its primary lethality than it is to counter well-employed airpower, long range fires, armor, artillery and mortars within a professional joint force,” Bronk concluded.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Pro-Kremlin supporters are fuming after footage appears to show Ukrainian drones decimating an entire Russian armored column

    Pro-Kremlin supporters are fuming after footage appears to show Ukrainian drones decimating an entire Russian armored column

    [ad_1]

    • Ukrainian forces decimated a Russian column of 11 tanks and armored vehicles.

    • Ukraine heavily relied on FPV attack drones to obliterate the Russian armor.

    • Russian military bloggers are increasingly frustrated by Russia’s perceived tactical blunders.

    Ukrainian forces deployed FPV attack drones to help obliterate an entire column of Russian armored vehicles, Metro reports.

    Video appears to show Ukraine exploding drones, finishing off 11 tanks and armored vehicles. It included three T-72 tanks, five tracked amphibious [MTLBS] armored fighting vehicles, and an infantry fighting vehicle, reduced to burning hulks scattered across the battlefield.

    Two tracked armored fighting vehicles were also destroyed, one by an anti-tank guided missile, Metro reported.

    The battle raged near the settlement of Novomykhailivka, in the Donetsk region of Ukraine, which Russia has been attempting to capture since October.

    The assault was captured by cameras mounted on the attacking drones and those flying overhead, showing the devastation caused to the Russian column.

    The convoy was maneuvering near the front lines along the east of Ukraine and became vulnerable to fire from artillery and swift and targeted strikes from the air by drones.

    Leveling Russia’s battlefield advantage

    Footage shows the FPV exploding drones accelerating toward the Russian tanks and armored vehicles, with the feed abruptly cutting off just before impact.

    Other footage gives a panoramic view, showing the dark shapes of tanks in motion, some bursting into flames as the exploding drones hit, followed by an aftermath of smoking, twisted wrecks abandoned in winter fields pockmarked with shell holes.

    The video was dated January 30. According to reports, the battle lasted nearly two and a half hours.

    Business Insider could not independently verify the video.

    The apparent victory against the armored column matters because Ukraine increasingly sees relatively inexpensive drone technology as a way of leveling Russia’s battlefield advantage.

    Commander-in-Chief of Ukraine’s armed forces, Valerii Zaluzhnyi, wrote on Thursday for CNN News that with accelerated technical innovations, the nature of war had changed.

    He highlighted the key role played by unmanned weapons systems, such as drones, which help Ukraine against Putin’s forces despite Russia’s significant superiority of manpower and weapons.

    FPV drones are an effective and low-cost weapon employed by both Russia and Ukraine since the start of the full-scale invasion.

    “Perhaps the number one priority here is mastery of an entire arsenal of (relatively) cheap, modern, and highly effective unmanned vehicles and other technological means.

    Already such assets allow commanders to monitor the situation on the battlefield in real time, day and night, and in all weather conditions,” wrote Ukraine’s top military leader.

    ‘Complete stupidity and incompetence’

    Drone-mounted cameras show a UAV hitting a Russian tank.

    Drone-mounted cameras show a UAV hitting a Russian tank, in a video showing a battle in in the Novomykhailivka area of the Donetsk region.Screengrab.

    While the number of casualties from the wrecked armored column remains unknown, the strikes triggered a backlash among pro-war ‘Z’ channels associated with Putin, expressing frustration over perceived military incompetence, Metro reports.

    Russian military bloggers have become increasingly frustrated by the Russian military’s tactics. Russian forces continue self-sabotage by gathering in large groups to attack Ukrainian positions, making them an easy target for Ukrainian drones.

    The Institute for the Study of War (ISW), a US think tank, said one Russian military blogger expressed dismay at Russian forces‘ tactics at “complete stupidity and incompetence.”

    Another Kremlin-affiliated milblogger argued that the Russian military command needs to stop attacking in mechanized columns due to repeated high equipment losses.

    The milblogger also criticized the military leadership for failing to account for Ukrainian drone operations and to equip Russian armored vehicles with electronic warfare systems, reported the ISW.

    Ukraine, after nearly two years of war, has called on the West to bolster its defenses. The increased use of drone attacks, that have reached targets as far afield as Moscow and Saint Petersburg, has become a strategic focus for Ukraine.

    “It’s a war of armor against projectiles. At the moment, projectiles are winning,” Gleb Molchanov, a Ukrainian drone operator, told The Guardian.

    Read the original article on Business Insider

    [ad_2]

    Source link