ReportWire

Tag: first amendment to the united states constitution

  • Federal judge overturns Trump’s Harvard funding freeze

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — A federal judge has ruled that the Trump administration’s move to freeze $2.2 billion in research funding for Harvard University was unconstitutional.

    The ruling issued Wednesday by U.S. District Judge Allison D. Burroughs in Boston said the funding freeze amounted to “retaliation, unconstitutional conditions, and unconstitutional coercion” against the Ivy League school for refusing to yield to the White House’s “ideologically motivated” policy demands.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm“p C6G:6H @7 E96 25>:?:DEC2E:G6 C64@C5 >2<6D :E 5:77:4F=E E@ 4@?4=F56 2?JE9:?8 @E96C E92? E92E E96 5676?52?ED WE96 7656C2= 8@G6C?>6?EX FD65 2?E:D6>:E:D> 2D 2 D>@<6D4C66? 7@C 2 E2C86E65[ :56@=@8:42==J>@E:G2E65 2DD2F=E @? E9:D 4@F?ECJ’D AC6>:6C F?:G6CD:E:6D[” qFCC@F89D HC@E6 😕 E96 CF=:?8]k^Am

    kAmqFCC@F89D’ CF=:?8 3=@4:?:DEC2E:@? 7C@> E6C>:?2E:?8 @C 7C66K:?8 >@C6 7656C2= 7F?5:?8 E@ w2CG2C5[ 3FE E96 (9:E6 w@FD6 92D G@H65 E@ 2AA62= E96 564:D:@?]k^Am

    kAm(9:E6 w@FD6 DA@<6DA6CD@? {:K wFDE@? D2:5 E96 %CF>A 25>:?:DEC2E:@? H:== 2AA62= E96 CF=:?8 2?5 3=2DE65 qFCC@F89D 2D 2? “24E:G:DE ~32>22AA@:?E65 ;F586]” $96 D2:5 w2CG2C5 “5@6D ?@E 92G6 2 4@?DE:EFE:@?2= C:89E E@ E2IA2J6C 5@==2CD 2?5 C6>2:?D :?6=:8:3=6 7@C 8C2?ED 😕 E96 7FEFC6]”k^Am

    kAmx? 2 DE2E6>6?E[ w2CG2C5 !C6D:56?E p=2? v2C36C D2:5 E96 ;F586’D CF=:?8 “277:C>D w2CG2C5’D u:CDE p>6?5>6?E 2?5 AC@465FC2= C:89ED[ 2?5 G2=:52E6D @FC 2C8F>6?ED 😕 5676?D6 @7 E96 &?:G6CD:EJ’D 24256>:4 7C665@>[ 4C:E:42= D4:6?E:7:4 C6D62C49[ 2?5 E96 4@C6 AC:?4:A=6D @7 p>6C:42? 9:896C 65F42E:@?]”k^Am

    kAm“tG6? 2D H6 24@H=6586 E96 :>A@CE2?E AC:?4:A=6D 277:C>65 😕 E@52J’D CF=:?8[ H6 H:== 4@?E:?F6 E@ 2DD6DD E96 :>A=:42E:@?D @7 E96 @A:?:@?[ >@?:E@C 7FCE96C =682= 56G6=@A>6?ED[ 2?5 36 >:?57F= @7 E96 492?8:?8 =2?5D42A6 😕 H9:49 H6 D66< E@ 7F=7:== @FC >:DD:@?[” v6C36C D2:5]k^Am

    kAm%96 %CF>A 25>:?:DEC2E:@? 925 2C8F65 E96 7F?5:?8 7C66K6 H2D ?646DD2CJ E@ 4@>A6= w2CG2C5 E@ 255C6DD 2?E:D6>:E:D> 2?5 “C25:42= =67E” :56@=@8:6D @? 42>AFD]k^Am

    kAmt2C=:6C E9:D J62C[ E96 (9:E6 w@FD6’D ;@:?E 2?E:D6>:E:D> E2D< 7@C46 — H9:49 :?4=F56D E96 &]$] s6A2CE>6?E @7 w62=E9 2?5 wF>2? $6CG:46D 2?5 s6A2CE>6?E @7 t5F42E:@? — D2:5 :E 92D 5:C64E65 7656C2= 286?4:6D E@ 7C66K6 >@C6 E92? Sa]a 3:==:@? 😕 5:C64E 7656C2= 7F?5D E@ E96 6=:E6 D49@@=]k^Am

    kAm%96 286?4:6D 4:E65 E96 &]$] $FAC6>6 r@FCE’D a_ab C63F<6 😕 $EF56?ED 7@C u2:C p5>:DD:@?D G] w2CG2C5[ F?:G6CD:EJ :?G6DE:82E:@?D 2?5 C6A@CED E92E 7@F?5 y6H:D9 DEF56?ED 2C6 DF3;64E65 E@ A6CG2D:G6 :?DF=ED[ A9JD:42= 2DD2F=E[ 2?5 :?E:>:52E:@? @? 42>AFD[ H:E9 “?@ >62?:?87F= C6DA@?D6” 7C@> w2CG2C5’D =6256CD9:A]k^Am

    kAm“w2CG2C5’D 42>AFD[ @?46 2 DJ>3@= @7 24256>:4 AC6DE:86[ 92D 364@>6 2 3C665:?8 8C@F?5 7@C G:CEF6 D:8?2=:?8 2?5 5:D4C:>:?2E:@?[” E96 E2D< 7@C46 D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E] “%96C6 😀 2 52C< AC@3=6> @? w2CG2C5’D 42>AFD[ 2?5 3J AC:@C:E:K:?8 2AA62D6>6?E @G6C 244@F?E23:=:EJ[ :?DE:EFE:@?2= =6256CD 92G6 7@C76:E65 E96 D49@@=’D 4=2:> E@ E2IA2J6C DFAA@CE]”k^Am

    kAmw2CG2C5 DF65 @G6C E96 >@G6[ 4=2:>:?8 :E H2D “2C3:EC2CJ 2?5 42AC:4:@FD” 2?5 G:@=2E65 :ED u:CDE p>6?5>6?E C:89ED 2?5 E96 DE2EFE@CJ AC@G:D:@?D @7 %:E=6 ‘x @7 E96 r:G:= #:89ED p4E]k^Am

    kAmw2CG2C5 92D >@C6 E92? Sh 3:==:@? 😕 4FCC6?E 2?5 A=65865 7656C2= 8C2?ED 2?5 4@?EC24ED[ >F49 @7 :E 56G@E65 E@ D4:6?E:7:4 2?5 >65:42= C6D62C49[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 F?:G6CD:EJ]k^Am

    kAm%96 =682= 7:89E 😀 A2CE @7 2 9:89DE2<6D 5:DAFE6 36EH66? E96 %CF>A 25>:?:DEC2E:@? 2?5 E96 xGJ {628F6 F?:G6CD:EJ[ H9:49 92D AFD965 324< 282:?DE E96 AC6D:56?E’D 677@CED E@ 7@C46 D49@@= =6256CD E@ 6=:>:?2E6 :ED 5:G6CD:EJ AC@8C2>>:?8 2?5 4FCE2:= DEF56?E 56>@?DEC2E:@?D @? 42>AFD]k^Am

    kAm%96 %CF>A 25>:?:DEC2E:@? 92D 2=D@ D@F89E E@ AC6G6?E w2CG2C5 7C@> 6?C@==:?8 :?E6C?2E:@?2= DEF56?ED 😕 2? 677@CE E@ AF?:D9 E96 D49@@= 7@C C67FD:?8 :ED 56>2?5D] qFE E9@D6 677@CED 92G6 D@ 72C 366? 3=@4<65 3J 7656C2= 4@FCED]k^Am

    kAm%CF>A 😀 2=D@ AFD9:?8 7@C w2CG2C5 E@ 36 DEC:AA65 @7 :ED 244C65:E2E:@? 2?5 E2I6I6>AE DE2EFD 2D 96 AC6DD6D 7@C C67@C>D 2E @E96C 6=:E6 F?:G6CD:E:6D 2?5 4@==686D 96 4=2:>D 2C6 “:?5@4EC:?2E:?8” DEF56?ED H:E9 “C25:42= =67E” :562D]k^Am

    kAmr9C:DE:2? |] (256 4@G6CD E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E69@FD6 7@C }@CE9 @7 q@DE@? |65:2 vC@FAUCDBF@jD ?6HDA2A6CD 2?5 H63D:E6D] t>2:= 9:> 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>Qm4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>k^2m]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • DiZoglio hits road to promote ballot question

    DiZoglio hits road to promote ballot question

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — State Auditor Diana DiZoglio is hitting the road to rally voter support for her ballot campaign to open up the state Legislature’s financial books.

    DiZoglio said she plans to begin a 141-mile trek across Massachusetts to raise awareness of Question 1, which asks voters in the election Nov. 5 to approve a performance and financial audit of the state Legislature.

    She argues that the audit would ensure the Legislature is operating in accordance with government rules and regulations.

    The Methuen Democrat’s “Walking for Sunshine” sojourn was to get underway Friday night in Great Barrington, where she was to meet supporters at a local bar before hitting the long road to Boston.

    DiZoglio said she will meet with voters at nightly events along the way and urge them to “demand greater transparency for the state Legislature” by approving the referendum.

    DiZoglio, a former state lawmaker, launched her review of the Legislature more than a year ago but said she has not been able to receive access to the people and records her office needs for a forensic investigation. She has framed the plan as part of a broader effort to improve transparency and accountability in state government.

    House Speaker Ron Mariano, D-Quincy, and Senate President Karen Spilka, D-Ashland, have so far blocked her efforts to conduct the investigation of the House and Senate’s inner workings, calling the proposed audit “unconstitutional” and claiming it would violate the separation of powers.

    The effort was dealt a blow last year when Attorney General Andrea Campbell’s office rejected DiZoglio’s request to file a lawsuit to force the audit, saying a review of state laws, judicial rulings and the historical record suggests she does not have standing to file the legal challenge.

    But DiZoglio and other supporters gathered enough signatures from voters to put the question on the November ballot.

    “We believe taxpayers deserve to know how their tax dollars are being spent, and they deserve transparency, accessibility and accountability from elected officials,” the Yes on 1 campaign said in a statement.

    “But instead of taking meaningful action that makes life better in the Commonwealth, they continue to be characterized as one of the least efficient, least productive legislatures in the country, plagued by late-night horse trading and closed-door discussions, with constituencies cut out of the process.”

    The state’s restrictive records law consistently earns Massachusetts failing grades from First Amendment groups.

    In 2016, the state overhauled its public records law for the first time in decades, limiting how much state and local governments and police departments may charge for public records and setting deadlines for agencies to respond to requests for information, among other changes.

    But lawmakers left in place many of the exemptions shielding the Legislature, courts and law enforcement agencies from disclosing certain records.

    Recent polls have shown voters strongly support for Question 1 – one of five referendums on the November ballot – which so far has not drawn any organized opposition.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • DiZoglio hits road to promote ballot question

    DiZoglio hits road to promote ballot question

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — State Auditor Diana DiZoglio is hitting the road to rally voter support for her ballot campaign to open up the state Legislature’s financial books.

    DiZoglio said she plans to begin a 141-mile trek across Massachusetts to raise awareness for Question 1, which asks voters in the Nov. 5 elections to approve a performance and financial audit of the state Legislature, which she argues will ensure that it is operating in accordance with government rules and regulations.

    The Methuen Democrat’s “Walking for Sunshine” sojourn gets underway Friday night in Great Barrington, where she will meet supporters at a local bar before hitting the long road to Boston.

    DiZoglio said she will meet with voters at nightly events along the way and urge them to “demand greater transparency for the state Legislature” by approving the referendum.

    A former state lawmaker, DiZoglio launched her review of the Legislature more than a year ago but said she hasn’t been able to get access to individuals and records her office needs for a forensic investigation. She has framed the plan as part of a broader effort to improve transparency and accountability in state government.

    House Speaker Ron Mariano, D-Quincy, and Senate President Karen Spilka, D-Ashland, have so far blocked her efforts to conduct the investigation into the House and Senate’s inner workings, calling the proposed audit “unconstitutional” and claiming it would violate the separation of powers.

    The effort was dealt a blow last year when Attorney General Andrea Campbell’s office rejected DiZoglio’s request to file a lawsuit to force the audit, saying a review of state laws, judicial rulings and the historical record, suggests she doesn’t have standing to file the legal challenge.

    But DiZoglio and other supporters gathered enough signatures from voters to put the question on the November ballot.

    “We believe taxpayers deserve to know how their tax dollars are being spent, and they deserve transparency, accessibility and accountability from elected officials,” the Yes on 1 campaign said in a statement. “But instead of taking meaningful action that makes life better in the Commonwealth, they continue to be characterized as one of the least efficient, least productive legislatures in the country, plagued by late-night horse trading and closed-door discussions, with constituencies cut out of the process.”

    The state’s restrictive records law consistently earns Massachusetts failing grades from First Amendment groups.

    In 2016, the state overhauled its public records law for the first time in decades, limiting how much state and local governments and police departments may charge for public records and setting deadlines for agencies to respond to requests for information, among other changes.

    But lawmakers left in place many of the exemptions shielding the Legislature, courts and law enforcement agencies from disclosing certain records.

    Recent polls have shown voters strongly support for Question 1 — one of five referendums on the November ballot — which so far hasn’t drawn any organized opposition.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link