ReportWire

Tag: Firearm

  • ‘No resting until this guy is found’: Family dog killed after shots fired into Truckee home

    A dog was killed after someone fired a gun into a Truckee home last week, according to the police department. Officers are now searching for the suspect. “It’s just heartbreaking. I’ve never dealt with murder, you know, and it’s not a person; it really affects you when one of your family members gets murdered, cold-blooded,” said Kade Krautstrunk.Kade Krautstrunk spoke to KCRA on Wednesday night about the incident. He says he and his family are devastated after their beloved dog, Bandit, was shot and killed.”It’s the hardest thing any of us has ever had to deal with,” he said.Bandit, described as the heart of Krautstrunk’s parents’ household, was shot as the family was preparing to celebrate the dog’s birthday just days before Christmas.”He was kind of the heart of my mom and dad’s household. And was kind of like their staple,” Krautstrunk said. “My parents were hiding the Christmas presents, and like going through all the motions, and sure enough, it’s supposed to be his birthday, days before Christmas.”Officials said the shooting occurred on Dec. 9 along Deerfield Drive, when someone discharged a firearm into the home. Truckee police shared a photo of a man wanted in connection with the incident. He’s described as a Hispanic man appearing to be between the ages of 18 and 20, around 5 feet, 7 inches tall and around 170 pounds with a light complexion, short black hair and a mustache. Truckee police are actively searching for the suspect, releasing a photo of the man seen in the neighborhood on Deerfield Drive multiple times before the shooting. Krautstrunk described the suspect as appearing unashamed and possibly planning to return.”He looks proud. You know, he doesn’t look too ashamed of what he did. And that’s what’s so scary about it. It doesn’t look like he’s not coming back, you know,” Krautstrunk said. The suspect was seen in the neighborhood on multiple occasions, carrying a box believed to contain a gun, as shown in home surveillance video shared with KCRA.”There’s no resting until this guy is found,” Krautstrunk said, pleading for the community’s help. “I’m begging, you know, whoever can help find this guy… It’s hard having to just be on guard all the time, you know? It’s like I never feel safe.”Anyone with information about the shooting or the suspect is urged to contact the Truckee Police Department at 530-317-1112 or by emailing crimetips@townoftruckee.gov. See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    TRUCKEE, Calif. —

    A dog was killed after someone fired a gun into a Truckee home last week, according to the police department. Officers are now searching for the suspect.

    “It’s just heartbreaking. I’ve never dealt with murder, you know, and it’s not a person; it really affects you when one of your family members gets murdered, cold-blooded,” said Kade Krautstrunk.

    Kade Krautstrunk spoke to KCRA on Wednesday night about the incident. He says he and his family are devastated after their beloved dog, Bandit, was shot and killed.

    “It’s the hardest thing any of us has ever had to deal with,” he said.

    Bandit, described as the heart of Krautstrunk’s parents’ household, was shot as the family was preparing to celebrate the dog’s birthday just days before Christmas.

    “He was kind of the heart of my mom and dad’s household. And was kind of like their staple,” Krautstrunk said. “My parents were hiding the Christmas presents, and like going through all the motions, and sure enough, it’s supposed to be his birthday, days before Christmas.”

    Officials said the shooting occurred on Dec. 9 along Deerfield Drive, when someone discharged a firearm into the home.

    Truckee police shared a photo of a man wanted in connection with the incident. He’s described as a Hispanic man appearing to be between the ages of 18 and 20, around 5 feet, 7 inches tall and around 170 pounds with a light complexion, short black hair and a mustache.

    Truckee police are actively searching for the suspect, releasing a photo of the man seen in the neighborhood on Deerfield Drive multiple times before the shooting.

    Krautstrunk described the suspect as appearing unashamed and possibly planning to return.

    “He looks proud. You know, he doesn’t look too ashamed of what he did. And that’s what’s so scary about it. It doesn’t look like he’s not coming back, you know,” Krautstrunk said.

    The suspect was seen in the neighborhood on multiple occasions, carrying a box believed to contain a gun, as shown in home surveillance video shared with KCRA.

    “There’s no resting until this guy is found,” Krautstrunk said, pleading for the community’s help. “I’m begging, you know, whoever can help find this guy… It’s hard having to just be on guard all the time, you know? It’s like I never feel safe.”

    Anyone with information about the shooting or the suspect is urged to contact the Truckee Police Department at 530-317-1112 or by emailing .

    See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    Source link

  • Quincy man arraigned in Route 128 rest stop shooting

    SALEM — A Quincy man was arraigned Thursday in Salem District Court on seven charges related to a shooting that took place on Route 128 North about 11:30 p.m. on Monday, according to the Office of Essex County District Attorney Paul F. Tucker.

    Thomas D. Perkins, 26, is charged with two counts of armed assault with intent to murder with a firearm, two counts of assault with a dangerous weapon, carrying a firearm without a license (second offense), possessing ammunition without a firearm ID car (subsequent offense), discharging a firearm near a highway, and defacing property.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm!6C<:?D A=62565 ?@E 8F:=EJ E@ 2== @7 E96 492C86D] %96 q6G6C=J !@=:46 s6A2CE>6?E 2?5 E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E6 !@=:46 C6DA@?565 E@ E96 :?4:56?E]k^Am

    kAm!6C<:?D 2==6865=J 3642>6 :?G@=G65 😕 2 G6C32= 2=E6C42E:@? H:E9 2?@E96C >2=6 😕 E96 A2C<:?8 =@E @7 E96 q6G6C=J $6CG:46 !=2K2 C6DE DE@A @? #@FE6 `ag }@CE9]k^Am

    kAm&A@? C6EFC?:?8 E@ E96:C C6DA64E:G6 G69:4=6D[ E96 4@>>@?H62=E9 2==686D E92E !6C<:?D AFCDF65 E96 @E96C 5C:G6C @?E@ E96 9:89H2J 2?5 7:C65 2E 9:D G69:4=6[ H9:49 2=D@ 42CC:65 2?@E96C A6CD@?]k^Am

    kAm%96 sp’D ~77:46 2D<65 E92E E96 5676?52?E 36 96=5 H:E9@FE 32:= A6?5:?8 2 52?86C@FD?6DD 962C:?8] yF586 {:D2 r@C6 8C2?E65 E96 C6BF6DE 2?5 DE:AF=2E65 E92E !6C<:?D 92G6 ?@ 4@?E24E H:E9 2?5 DE2J 2H2J 7C@> E96 EH@ :?5:G:5F2=D 😕 E96 @E96C G69:4=6]k^Am

    kAmpDD:DE2?E s:DEC:4E pEE@C?6J !2EC:4< r@==:?D C6AC6D6?E65 E96 4@>>@?H62=E9 2E E96 2CC2:8?>6?E] !6C<:?D H2D C6AC6D6?E65 3J 2EE@C?6J |6892? %2J=@C]k^Am

    kAm!6C<:?D 😀 D4965F=65 E@ C6EFC? E@ $2=6> s:DEC:4E r@FCE 7@C E96 52?86C@FD?6DD 962C:?8 @? %9FCD52J[ s64] `g]k^Am

    By Buck Anderson | Staff Writer

    Source link

  • Federal judge asked to strike down firearm age restrictions

    BOSTON — A coalition of gun rights groups are asking a federal judge to strike down Massachusetts’ ban on the sale of handguns to anyone age 18 to 20 in response to a federal appeals court ruling that overturned a federal ban.

    In a filing in U.S. District Court, the Las Vegas-based Firearms Policy Coalition and other groups ask the judge to grant an injunction blocking the state’s age-based prohibitions from being enforced. The groups argue that the 18 to 20 age group is protected by the Second Amendment and that there is “historical tradition” supporting the states restrictions.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm“x? DF>[ `gE@a_J62C@=5D 2C6 A2CE @7 ‘E96 A6@A=6’ H:E9 $64@?5 p>6?5>6?E C:89ED[ 2?5 E96C6 😀 ?@ H6==6DE23=:D965 2?5 C6AC6D6?E2E:G6 7@F?5:?86C2 9:DE@C:42= EC25:E:@? E92E E96 DE2E6 4@F=5 A@DD:3=J A@:?E E@ E92E H@F=5 ;FDE:7J AC@9:3:E:?8 E96> A@DD6DD:?8 2?5 42CCJ:?8 7:C62C>D @? 2? 6BF2= 7@@E:?8 H:E9 @E96C 25F=E 4:E:K6?D[” =2HJ6CD 7@C E96 A=2:?E:77D HC@E6 😕 E96 acA286 4@FCE 7:=:?8]k^Am

    kAm%96 8C@FA’D >@E:@? 7@C 2 DF>>2CJ ;F58>6?E 😀 E96 =2E6DE =682= G@==6J 😕 2 =2HDF:E 7:=65 😕 u63CF2CJ @? 3692=7 @7 2? `gJ62C@=5 qC6HDE6C >2? H9@ 92D 2 DE2E6 7:C62C> :56?E:7:42E:@? 42C5] qFE 3642FD6 @7 9:D 286[ 96 42??@E 3FJ 2?5 42CCJ 2 92?58F? 7@C A6CD@?2= 5676?D6[ @C 2 D6>:2FE@>2E:4 C:7=6 7@C 9F?E:?8 2?5 E2C86E D9@@E:?8]k^Am

    kAm|2DD249FD6EED AC@9:3:ED 2?J@?6 `g @C J@F?86C 7C@> AFC492D:?8 2 7:C62C> @C 2>>F?:E:@? H9:=6 C6D:56?ED F?56C a` 42??@E 3FJ 2 92?58F?[ D6>:2FE@>2E:4 C:7=6 @C D9@E8F?[ @C =2C8642A24:EJ H62A@?]k^Am

    kAm|:?@CD 286D `d E@ `f 42? 86E 2 =:>:E65 7:C62C> xs 7@C C:7=6D 2?5 D9@E8F?D 7@C 9F?E:?8 2?5 E2C86E D9@@E:?8 H:E9 E96 A6C>:DD:@? @7 2 A2C6?E @C 8F2C5:2?]k^Am

    kAm%96 DE2E6 C6DEC:4E:@?D 92G6 =@?8 366? E2C86E65 3J 8F? C:89ED 8C@FAD H9@ 2C8F6 E92E :7 `gJ62C@=5D 42? 6?=:DE 😕 E96 >:=:E2CJ 2?5 36 D6?E @77 E@ 7:89E[ E96J D9@F=5 36 23=6 E@ 6I6C4:D6 E96:C $64@?5 p>6?5>6?E C:89ED 2D 4:G:=:2?D]k^Am

    kAmx? y2?F2CJ[ E96 u:7E9 r:C4F:E &]$] r@FCE @7 pAA62=D DECF4< 5@H? 2 =@?8DE2?5:?8 7656C2= 32? E92E AC6G6?E65 E96 D2=6 @7 92?58F?D E@ p>6C:42?D 36EH66? E96 286D @7 `g 2?5 a_[ CF=:?8 E92E E96 7656C2= =2H 32??:?8 92?58F? D2=6D E@ E66?D 😀 :?4@?D:DE6?E H:E9 E96 ?2E:@?’D 9:DE@C:42= EC25:E:@? 2?5 G:@=2E6D E96 $64@?5 p>6?5>6?E]k^Am

    kAm%96 ;F586D 2=D@ 4:E65 E96 &]$] $FAC6>6 r@FCE’D =2?5>2C< a_aa CF=:?8 😕 }6H *@C< $E2E6 #:7=6 2?5 !:DE@= pDD@4:2E:@? G] qCF6?[ H9:49 96=5 E96C6 😀 2 4@?DE:EFE:@?2= C:89E E@ 42CCJ 2 92?58F? @FED:56 E96 9@>6 7@C D6=75676?D6]k^Am

    kAm“%9:D 42D6 😀 23@FE 6?5:?8 |2DD249FD6EED’ 2FE9@C:E2C:2?[ 28632D65 2EE24< @? A624623=6 25F=ED[” qC2?5@? r@>3D[ E96 8C@FA’D AC6D:56?E[ D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E] “%96 DE2E6’D 32? :D?’E ;FDE F?4@?DE:EFE:@?2= – :E’D 2? :?DF=E E@ E96 G6CJ AC:?4:A=6D E9:D ?2E:@? H2D 3F:=E @?]”k^Am

    kAm~? q624@? w:==[ #6AF3=:42? =2H>2<6CD 92G6 7:=65 =68:D=2E:@? E92E H@F=5 C6A62= E96 DE2E6’D `g E@ a_J62C@=5 C6DEC:4E:@?D] qFE E96 AC@A@D2= 7246D =@?8 @55D 😕 E96 s6>@4C2E:44@?EC@==65 DE2E6 {68:D=2EFC6[ H96C6 =2H>2<6CD 92G6 D@F89E E@ E:89E6? 8F? =2HD 😕 C646?E J62CD]k^Am

    kAmvF? 4@?EC@= 25G@42E6D 92G6 =@?8 2C8F65 E92E 6IA2?5:?8 2446DD E@ 7:C62C>D 7@C J@F?8 25F=ED H@F=5 @?=J :?4C62D6 8F? G:@=6?46[ ?@E:?8 E92E 92?58F?D 2C6 E96 >@DE 4@>>@?=J FD65 H62A@?D 😕 >FC56CD 2?5 >2DD D9@@E:?8D]k^Am

    kAm%96J 2=D@ ?@E6 E92E E96 >2;@C:EJ @7 >2DD D9@@E:?8D 2C6 42CC:65 @FE 3J J@F?8 25F=ED 2?5 4:E6 D4:6?E:7:4 C6D62C49 D9@H:?8 E92E 3C2:? 56G6=@A>6?E 😀 ?@E 7F==J 4@>A=6E6 2E `g J62CD @=5 E@ 2C8F6 E96J 42??@E 36 ECFDE65 E@ FD6 8F?D D276=J]k^Am

    kAmr9C:DE:2? |] (256 4@G6CD E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E69@FD6 7@C }@CE9 @7 q@DE@? |65:2 vC@FAUCDBF@jD ?6HDA2A6CD 2?5 H63D:E6D] t>2:= 9:> 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>Qm4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>k^2m]k^Am

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Three dead, one wounded in South Gate domestic violence case

    Two women are dead and a third woman wounded in South Gate after being shot by a male relative who then killed himself, according to the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department.

    The shooting appears to be a case of domestic violence, officials said.

    According to the Sheriff’s Department, South Gate Police Department officers pulled up to the 8400 block of San Luis Avenue early Saturday after a 911 caller said a man was shooting a firearm in her residence.

    The suspect was leaving the residence when he fired at police, who returned fire, striking the man, according to the Sheriff’s Department. The man went back inside and the officers heard more gunshots.

    Once inside, the officers found a woman in her 70s with gunshot wounds. The woman was taken to a hospital and is in stable condition, according to police.

    The two women who were killed, a 25-year-old and a woman in her early 50s, had also been shot. The man was found dead after with the Sheriff’s Department described as a “self-inflicted gunshot wound.”

    The weapon the man used to shoot at the South Gate officers was found at the scene, according to the Sheriff’s Department.

    The Sheriff’s Department said it is investigating the incident, including the officer-involved shooting.

    Those with information are encouraged to contact the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department’s Homicide Bureau at (323) 890-5500 or Crime Stoppers at (800) 222-TIPS (8477).

    Dakota Smith

    Source link

  • Trump pardons Jan. 6 rioter for gun offense and woman convicted of threatening to shoot FBI agents

    President Donald Trump has issued two pardons related to the investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, riot, including for a woman convicted of threatening to shoot FBI agents who were investigating a tip that she may have been at the Capitol, officials said Saturday.Related video above: BBC leaders resign amid scandal over misleading edit of Trump’s Jan. 6 speechIn a separate case, Trump issued a second pardon for a Jan. 6 defendant who had remained behind bars despite the sweeping grant of clemency for Capitol rioters because of a separate conviction for illegally possessing firearms.It’s the latest example of Trump’s willingness to use his constitutional authority to help supporters who were scrutinized as part of the Biden administration’s massive Jan. 6 investigation that led to charges against more than 1,500 defendants.Suzanne Ellen Kaye was released last year after serving an 18-month sentence in her threats case. After the FBI contacted her in 2021 about a tip indicating she may have been at the Capitol on Jan. 6, she posted a video on social media citing her Second Amendment right to carry a gun, and she threatened to shoot agents if they came to her house. In court papers, prosecutors said her words “were part of the ubiquity of violent political rhetoric that causes serious harm to our communities.”An email seeking comment was sent to a lawyer for Kaye on Saturday. Kaye testified at trial that she didn’t own any guns and didn’t intend to threaten the FBI, according to court papers. She told authorities she was not at the Capitol on Jan. 6 and wasn’t charged with any Capitol riot-related crimes.A White House official said Kaye suffers from “stress-induced seizures” and experienced one when the jury read its verdict. The White House said this is “clearly a case of disfavored First Amendment political speech being prosecuted and an excessive sentence.” The official requested anonymity because they weren’t authorized to publicly discuss the case.In a separate case, Trump pardoned Daniel Edwin Wilson, of Louisville, Kentucky, who was under investigation for his role in the riot when authorities found six guns and roughly 4,800 rounds of ammunition in his home. Because of prior felony convictions, it was illegal for him to possess firearms.Wilson’s case became part of a legal debate over whether Trump’s sweeping pardons for Jan. 6 rioters in January applied to other crimes discovered during the sprawling federal dragnet that began after the attack on the Capitol. The Trump-appointed federal judge who oversaw Wilson’s case criticized the Justice Department earlier this year for arguing that the president’s Jan. 6 pardons applied to Wilson’s gun offense.Wilson, who had been scheduled to remain in prison until 2028, was released Friday evening following the pardon, his lawyer said on Saturday.”We are grateful that President Trump has recognized the injustice in my client’s case and granted him this pardon,” attorney George Pallas said in an email. “Mr. Wilson can now reunite with his family and begin rebuilding his life.”The White House official said Saturday that “because the search of Mr. Wilson’s home was due to the events of January 6, and they should have never been there in the first place, President Trump is pardoning Mr. Wilson for the firearm issues.”Wilson had been sentenced in 2024 to five years in prison after pleading guilty to conspiring to impede or injure police officers and illegally possessing firearms at his home.Prosecutors had accused him of planning for the Jan. 6 riot for weeks and coming to Washington with the goal of stopping the peaceful transfer of power. Authorities said he communicated with members of the far-right Oath Keepers extremist group and adherents of the antigovernment Three Percenters movement as he marched to the Capitol.Prosecutors cited messages they argued showed that Wilson’s “plans were for a broader American civil war.” In one message on Nov. 9, 2020, he wrote: “I’m willing to do whatever. Done made up my mind. I understand the tip of the spear will not be easy. I’m willing to sacrifice myself if necessary. Whether it means prison or death.”Wilson said at his sentencing that he regretted entering the Capitol that day but “got involved with good intentions.”The Justice Department had initially argued in February that Trump’s pardons of the Jan. 6 rioters on his first day back in the White House didn’t extend to Wilson’s gun crime. The department later changed its position, saying it had received “further clarity on the intent of the Presidential Pardon.”U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich, who was nominated to the bench by Trump, criticized the department’s evolving position and said it was “extraordinary” that prosecutors were seeking to argue that Trump’s Jan. 6 pardons extended to illegal “contraband” found by investigators during searches related to the Jan. 6 cases.Politico first reported Wilson’s pardon on Saturday.Megerian reported from West Palm Beach, Fla.

    WASHINGTON (AP) —

    President Donald Trump has issued two pardons related to the investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, riot, including for a woman convicted of threatening to shoot FBI agents who were investigating a tip that she may have been at the Capitol, officials said Saturday.

    Related video above: BBC leaders resign amid scandal over misleading edit of Trump’s Jan. 6 speech

    In a separate case, Trump issued a second pardon for a Jan. 6 defendant who had remained behind bars despite the sweeping grant of clemency for Capitol rioters because of a separate conviction for illegally possessing firearms.

    It’s the latest example of Trump’s willingness to use his constitutional authority to help supporters who were scrutinized as part of the Biden administration’s massive Jan. 6 investigation that led to charges against more than 1,500 defendants.

    Suzanne Ellen Kaye was released last year after serving an 18-month sentence in her threats case. After the FBI contacted her in 2021 about a tip indicating she may have been at the Capitol on Jan. 6, she posted a video on social media citing her Second Amendment right to carry a gun, and she threatened to shoot agents if they came to her house. In court papers, prosecutors said her words “were part of the ubiquity of violent political rhetoric that causes serious harm to our communities.”

    An email seeking comment was sent to a lawyer for Kaye on Saturday. Kaye testified at trial that she didn’t own any guns and didn’t intend to threaten the FBI, according to court papers. She told authorities she was not at the Capitol on Jan. 6 and wasn’t charged with any Capitol riot-related crimes.

    A White House official said Kaye suffers from “stress-induced seizures” and experienced one when the jury read its verdict. The White House said this is “clearly a case of disfavored First Amendment political speech being prosecuted and an excessive sentence.” The official requested anonymity because they weren’t authorized to publicly discuss the case.

    In a separate case, Trump pardoned Daniel Edwin Wilson, of Louisville, Kentucky, who was under investigation for his role in the riot when authorities found six guns and roughly 4,800 rounds of ammunition in his home. Because of prior felony convictions, it was illegal for him to possess firearms.

    Wilson’s case became part of a legal debate over whether Trump’s sweeping pardons for Jan. 6 rioters in January applied to other crimes discovered during the sprawling federal dragnet that began after the attack on the Capitol. The Trump-appointed federal judge who oversaw Wilson’s case criticized the Justice Department earlier this year for arguing that the president’s Jan. 6 pardons applied to Wilson’s gun offense.

    Wilson, who had been scheduled to remain in prison until 2028, was released Friday evening following the pardon, his lawyer said on Saturday.

    “We are grateful that President Trump has recognized the injustice in my client’s case and granted him this pardon,” attorney George Pallas said in an email. “Mr. Wilson can now reunite with his family and begin rebuilding his life.”

    The White House official said Saturday that “because the search of Mr. Wilson’s home was due to the events of January 6, and they should have never been there in the first place, President Trump is pardoning Mr. Wilson for the firearm issues.”

    Wilson had been sentenced in 2024 to five years in prison after pleading guilty to conspiring to impede or injure police officers and illegally possessing firearms at his home.

    Prosecutors had accused him of planning for the Jan. 6 riot for weeks and coming to Washington with the goal of stopping the peaceful transfer of power. Authorities said he communicated with members of the far-right Oath Keepers extremist group and adherents of the antigovernment Three Percenters movement as he marched to the Capitol.

    Prosecutors cited messages they argued showed that Wilson’s “plans were for a broader American civil war.” In one message on Nov. 9, 2020, he wrote: “I’m willing to do whatever. Done made up my mind. I understand the tip of the spear will not be easy. I’m willing to sacrifice myself if necessary. Whether it means prison or death.”

    Wilson said at his sentencing that he regretted entering the Capitol that day but “got involved with good intentions.”

    The Justice Department had initially argued in February that Trump’s pardons of the Jan. 6 rioters on his first day back in the White House didn’t extend to Wilson’s gun crime. The department later changed its position, saying it had received “further clarity on the intent of the Presidential Pardon.”

    U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich, who was nominated to the bench by Trump, criticized the department’s evolving position and said it was “extraordinary” that prosecutors were seeking to argue that Trump’s Jan. 6 pardons extended to illegal “contraband” found by investigators during searches related to the Jan. 6 cases.

    Politico first reported Wilson’s pardon on Saturday.

    Megerian reported from West Palm Beach, Fla.

    Source link

  • Trump pardons Jan. 6 rioter for gun offense and woman convicted of threatening to shoot FBI agents

    President Donald Trump has issued two pardons related to the investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, riot, including for a woman convicted of threatening to shoot FBI agents who were investigating a tip that she may have been at the Capitol, officials said Saturday.Related video above: BBC leaders resign amid scandal over misleading edit of Trump’s Jan. 6 speechIn a separate case, Trump issued a second pardon for a Jan. 6 defendant who had remained behind bars despite the sweeping grant of clemency for Capitol rioters because of a separate conviction for illegally possessing firearms.It’s the latest example of Trump’s willingness to use his constitutional authority to help supporters who were scrutinized as part of the Biden administration’s massive Jan. 6 investigation that led to charges against more than 1,500 defendants.Suzanne Ellen Kaye was released last year after serving an 18-month sentence in her threats case. After the FBI contacted her in 2021 about a tip indicating she may have been at the Capitol on Jan. 6, she posted a video on social media citing her Second Amendment right to carry a gun, and she threatened to shoot agents if they came to her house. In court papers, prosecutors said her words “were part of the ubiquity of violent political rhetoric that causes serious harm to our communities.”An email seeking comment was sent to a lawyer for Kaye on Saturday. Kaye testified at trial that she didn’t own any guns and didn’t intend to threaten the FBI, according to court papers. She told authorities she was not at the Capitol on Jan. 6 and wasn’t charged with any Capitol riot-related crimes.A White House official said Kaye suffers from “stress-induced seizures” and experienced one when the jury read its verdict. The White House said this is “clearly a case of disfavored First Amendment political speech being prosecuted and an excessive sentence.” The official requested anonymity because they weren’t authorized to publicly discuss the case.In a separate case, Trump pardoned Daniel Edwin Wilson, of Louisville, Kentucky, who was under investigation for his role in the riot when authorities found six guns and roughly 4,800 rounds of ammunition in his home. Because of prior felony convictions, it was illegal for him to possess firearms.Wilson’s case became part of a legal debate over whether Trump’s sweeping pardons for Jan. 6 rioters in January applied to other crimes discovered during the sprawling federal dragnet that began after the attack on the Capitol. The Trump-appointed federal judge who oversaw Wilson’s case criticized the Justice Department earlier this year for arguing that the president’s Jan. 6 pardons applied to Wilson’s gun offense.Wilson, who had been scheduled to remain in prison until 2028, was released Friday evening following the pardon, his lawyer said on Saturday.”We are grateful that President Trump has recognized the injustice in my client’s case and granted him this pardon,” attorney George Pallas said in an email. “Mr. Wilson can now reunite with his family and begin rebuilding his life.”The White House official said Saturday that “because the search of Mr. Wilson’s home was due to the events of January 6, and they should have never been there in the first place, President Trump is pardoning Mr. Wilson for the firearm issues.”Wilson had been sentenced in 2024 to five years in prison after pleading guilty to conspiring to impede or injure police officers and illegally possessing firearms at his home.Prosecutors had accused him of planning for the Jan. 6 riot for weeks and coming to Washington with the goal of stopping the peaceful transfer of power. Authorities said he communicated with members of the far-right Oath Keepers extremist group and adherents of the antigovernment Three Percenters movement as he marched to the Capitol.Prosecutors cited messages they argued showed that Wilson’s “plans were for a broader American civil war.” In one message on Nov. 9, 2020, he wrote: “I’m willing to do whatever. Done made up my mind. I understand the tip of the spear will not be easy. I’m willing to sacrifice myself if necessary. Whether it means prison or death.”Wilson said at his sentencing that he regretted entering the Capitol that day but “got involved with good intentions.”The Justice Department had initially argued in February that Trump’s pardons of the Jan. 6 rioters on his first day back in the White House didn’t extend to Wilson’s gun crime. The department later changed its position, saying it had received “further clarity on the intent of the Presidential Pardon.”U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich, who was nominated to the bench by Trump, criticized the department’s evolving position and said it was “extraordinary” that prosecutors were seeking to argue that Trump’s Jan. 6 pardons extended to illegal “contraband” found by investigators during searches related to the Jan. 6 cases.Politico first reported Wilson’s pardon on Saturday.Megerian reported from West Palm Beach, Fla.

    WASHINGTON (AP) —

    President Donald Trump has issued two pardons related to the investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, riot, including for a woman convicted of threatening to shoot FBI agents who were investigating a tip that she may have been at the Capitol, officials said Saturday.

    Related video above: BBC leaders resign amid scandal over misleading edit of Trump’s Jan. 6 speech

    In a separate case, Trump issued a second pardon for a Jan. 6 defendant who had remained behind bars despite the sweeping grant of clemency for Capitol rioters because of a separate conviction for illegally possessing firearms.

    It’s the latest example of Trump’s willingness to use his constitutional authority to help supporters who were scrutinized as part of the Biden administration’s massive Jan. 6 investigation that led to charges against more than 1,500 defendants.

    Suzanne Ellen Kaye was released last year after serving an 18-month sentence in her threats case. After the FBI contacted her in 2021 about a tip indicating she may have been at the Capitol on Jan. 6, she posted a video on social media citing her Second Amendment right to carry a gun, and she threatened to shoot agents if they came to her house. In court papers, prosecutors said her words “were part of the ubiquity of violent political rhetoric that causes serious harm to our communities.”

    An email seeking comment was sent to a lawyer for Kaye on Saturday. Kaye testified at trial that she didn’t own any guns and didn’t intend to threaten the FBI, according to court papers. She told authorities she was not at the Capitol on Jan. 6 and wasn’t charged with any Capitol riot-related crimes.

    A White House official said Kaye suffers from “stress-induced seizures” and experienced one when the jury read its verdict. The White House said this is “clearly a case of disfavored First Amendment political speech being prosecuted and an excessive sentence.” The official requested anonymity because they weren’t authorized to publicly discuss the case.

    In a separate case, Trump pardoned Daniel Edwin Wilson, of Louisville, Kentucky, who was under investigation for his role in the riot when authorities found six guns and roughly 4,800 rounds of ammunition in his home. Because of prior felony convictions, it was illegal for him to possess firearms.

    Wilson’s case became part of a legal debate over whether Trump’s sweeping pardons for Jan. 6 rioters in January applied to other crimes discovered during the sprawling federal dragnet that began after the attack on the Capitol. The Trump-appointed federal judge who oversaw Wilson’s case criticized the Justice Department earlier this year for arguing that the president’s Jan. 6 pardons applied to Wilson’s gun offense.

    Wilson, who had been scheduled to remain in prison until 2028, was released Friday evening following the pardon, his lawyer said on Saturday.

    “We are grateful that President Trump has recognized the injustice in my client’s case and granted him this pardon,” attorney George Pallas said in an email. “Mr. Wilson can now reunite with his family and begin rebuilding his life.”

    The White House official said Saturday that “because the search of Mr. Wilson’s home was due to the events of January 6, and they should have never been there in the first place, President Trump is pardoning Mr. Wilson for the firearm issues.”

    Wilson had been sentenced in 2024 to five years in prison after pleading guilty to conspiring to impede or injure police officers and illegally possessing firearms at his home.

    Prosecutors had accused him of planning for the Jan. 6 riot for weeks and coming to Washington with the goal of stopping the peaceful transfer of power. Authorities said he communicated with members of the far-right Oath Keepers extremist group and adherents of the antigovernment Three Percenters movement as he marched to the Capitol.

    Prosecutors cited messages they argued showed that Wilson’s “plans were for a broader American civil war.” In one message on Nov. 9, 2020, he wrote: “I’m willing to do whatever. Done made up my mind. I understand the tip of the spear will not be easy. I’m willing to sacrifice myself if necessary. Whether it means prison or death.”

    Wilson said at his sentencing that he regretted entering the Capitol that day but “got involved with good intentions.”

    The Justice Department had initially argued in February that Trump’s pardons of the Jan. 6 rioters on his first day back in the White House didn’t extend to Wilson’s gun crime. The department later changed its position, saying it had received “further clarity on the intent of the Presidential Pardon.”

    U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich, who was nominated to the bench by Trump, criticized the department’s evolving position and said it was “extraordinary” that prosecutors were seeking to argue that Trump’s Jan. 6 pardons extended to illegal “contraband” found by investigators during searches related to the Jan. 6 cases.

    Politico first reported Wilson’s pardon on Saturday.

    Megerian reported from West Palm Beach, Fla.

    Source link

  • Elderly woman tells bank employees she was kidnapped, ordered to withdraw large sum of cash

    Two people were arrested after an older woman told bank employees in Ceres, California, that she had been kidnapped and was ordered to withdraw a large amount of money, according to police. Wells Fargo employees reported the incident to police on Thursday. Police responded and immediately arrested a woman who police later learned identified herself with a false name. Police said that 33-year-old Nicholas Payton, who is a felon on probation, was also involved in the kidnapping. He fled the area before police arrived but was arrested a block away.Officers said they found a loaded rifle without a serial number in Payton’s backpack. Both suspects were booked on kidnapping, elder abuse charges and conspiracy to commit a crime charges. Payton was also booked for being a prohibited person in possession of a firearm, a prohibited person in possession of ammunition, carrying a loaded firearm in public, carrying a firearm while in possession of a controlled substance, and possession of an unserialized firearm.The victim was reunited with her family.Police said Saturday that they later learned with the help of the Stanislaus County Sheriff’s Office and fingerprint analysis that one of the suspect’s real names was Stephanie Maghoney. She had an active felony warrant for her arrest in Tracy, California, for burglary. Maghoney was re-arrested for that outstanding warrant and now also faces a felony charge for false impersonation.

    CERES, Calif. —

    Two people were arrested after an older woman told bank employees in Ceres, California, that she had been kidnapped and was ordered to withdraw a large amount of money, according to police.

    Wells Fargo employees reported the incident to police on Thursday. Police responded and immediately arrested a woman who police later learned identified herself with a false name.

    Police said that 33-year-old Nicholas Payton, who is a felon on probation, was also involved in the kidnapping. He fled the area before police arrived but was arrested a block away.

    Officers said they found a loaded rifle without a serial number in Payton’s backpack. Both suspects were booked on kidnapping, elder abuse charges and conspiracy to commit a crime charges.

    Payton was also booked for being a prohibited person in possession of a firearm, a prohibited person in possession of ammunition, carrying a loaded firearm in public, carrying a firearm while in possession of a controlled substance, and possession of an unserialized firearm.

    The victim was reunited with her family.

    Police said Saturday that they later learned with the help of the Stanislaus County Sheriff’s Office and fingerprint analysis that one of the suspect’s real names was Stephanie Maghoney.

    She had an active felony warrant for her arrest in Tracy, California, for burglary.

    Maghoney was re-arrested for that outstanding warrant and now also faces a felony charge for false impersonation.

    Source link

  • After two arrests at Folsom schools, Curt Taras makes first federal court appearance

    A retired Air Force engineer and former youth soccer coach accused of making threats at Folsom High School and later violating a court order at a local elementary school is back in custody and now faces a federal charge of allegedly possessing a firearm in a school zone.Curt Taras made his initial appearance in federal court at 2 p.m. Thursday, where the court went over his federal charge.Authorities say the FBI took Taras into custody Wednesday morning in coordination with the U.S. Attorney’s Office and the Folsom Police Department. The federal case stems from a September incident at Folsom High School in which officials say Taras allegedly made threats on campus while carrying a knife; a firearm and ammunition were later found in his vehicle parked nearby. He was arrested again this week after allegedly violating a court order by entering Gallardo Elementary School. He posted bail in both local cases before the federal arrest.“There are statutes that prohibit a person from having a firearm within a thousand feet of a school. Curt never had a firearm on Folsom High School, but his vehicle was parked nearby in walking distance at a strip mall,” said Matthew Taylor, Taras’s attorney. Taras is slated to appear in Sacramento County court on Friday on related local matters. In a statement, the DA’s office said it would again seek detention and ask him to stay away from all district school sites pending resolution of the cases.Taras will appear in federal court again on Friday afternoon, where a judge will review his detention details. He will be detained until then. The federal public defender asked the judge if Taras could not be shackled on both his ankles and hands moving forward. The judge granted this and said future proceedings could be leg shackles.A hearing in Sacramento County court was also set for Friday morning. Taras’ defense attorney said that the hearing will still proceed, but Taras will not be present.The Sacramento County District Attorney’s Office had said it would ask a judge to deny bond in his local cases.See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    SACRAMENTO, Calif. —

    A retired Air Force engineer and former youth soccer coach accused of making threats at Folsom High School and later violating a court order at a local elementary school is back in custody and now faces a federal charge of allegedly possessing a firearm in a school zone.

    Curt Taras made his initial appearance in federal court at 2 p.m. Thursday, where the court went over his federal charge.

    Authorities say the FBI took Taras into custody Wednesday morning in coordination with the U.S. Attorney’s Office and the Folsom Police Department.

    The federal case stems from a September incident at Folsom High School in which officials say Taras allegedly made threats on campus while carrying a knife; a firearm and ammunition were later found in his vehicle parked nearby.

    He was arrested again this week after allegedly violating a court order by entering Gallardo Elementary School. He posted bail in both local cases before the federal arrest.

    “There are statutes that prohibit a person from having a firearm within a thousand feet of a school. Curt never had a firearm on Folsom High School, but his vehicle was parked nearby in walking distance at a strip mall,” said Matthew Taylor, Taras’s attorney.

    Taras is slated to appear in Sacramento County court on Friday on related local matters. In a statement, the DA’s office said it would again seek detention and ask him to stay away from all district school sites pending resolution of the cases.

    Taras will appear in federal court again on Friday afternoon, where a judge will review his detention details. He will be detained until then.

    The federal public defender asked the judge if Taras could not be shackled on both his ankles and hands moving forward. The judge granted this and said future proceedings could be leg shackles.

    A hearing in Sacramento County court was also set for Friday morning. Taras’ defense attorney said that the hearing will still proceed, but Taras will not be present.

    The Sacramento County District Attorney’s Office had said it would ask a judge to deny bond in his local cases.

    See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    Source link

  • Deltona man arrested after gas station shooting Friday night

    An 18-year-old Deltona man has been arrested and is facing several charges following a Friday night shooting outside a gas station.The Volusia Sheriff’s Office said Yeiriel Andres Tirado Diaz is facing charges of shooting into an occupied vehicle, discharging a firearm from a vehicle, and three counts of aggravated assault with a firearm. According to the sheriff’s office, Tirado Diaz pulled into the parking lot of the Circle K at 1380 Howland Boulevard in Deltona around 6:25 p.m. and shot at the victim who was pumping gas.The victim got into his car and fled the area along with two passengers as Tirado Diaz allegedly fired several more shots. Nobody was injured in the incident.The victim told the sheriff’s office that Tirado Diaz had been their best friend for several years, that the two were arrested together in 2024 and that Tirado Diaz was upset because the victim’s charges were dropped but not his own.Tirado Diaz remains in the Volusia County jail and is being held without bond.

    DELTONA, Fla. —

    An 18-year-old Deltona man has been arrested and is facing several charges following a Friday night shooting outside a gas station.

    The Volusia Sheriff’s Office said Yeiriel Andres Tirado Diaz is facing charges of shooting into an occupied vehicle, discharging a firearm from a vehicle, and three counts of aggravated assault with a firearm.

    According to the sheriff’s office, Tirado Diaz pulled into the parking lot of the Circle K at 1380 Howland Boulevard in Deltona around 6:25 p.m. and shot at the victim who was pumping gas.

    The victim got into his car and fled the area along with two passengers as Tirado Diaz allegedly fired several more shots. Nobody was injured in the incident.

    The victim told the sheriff’s office that Tirado Diaz had been their best friend for several years, that the two were arrested together in 2024 and that Tirado Diaz was upset because the victim’s charges were dropped but not his own.

    Tirado Diaz remains in the Volusia County jail and is being held without bond.

    Source link

  • Student arrested on suspicion of bringing gun to Brentwood campus

    BRENTWOOD – A student was arrested on suspicion of bringing a gun to school Tuesday in Brentwood, police said.

    Jason Green

    Source link

  • ‘They’re next’: ABC10 shooting suspect faces new federal charges; ominous note found in car

    Federal prosecutors have added new charges against the man accused of shooting into the lobby of ABC10 Sacramento and said a note was found in his car that used the phrase “they’re next” in referring to Trump administration officials.Anibal Hernandez Santana, a 64-year-old California lawyer and retired lobbyist, has now been charged with possession of a firearm within a school zone and discharge of a firearm within a school zone, in addition to interference with a radio communication station, according to an amended criminal complaint filed Monday in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California. (Video above: Suspect’s lawyer speaks out.)The complaint sheds new light on why investigators believe Hernandez Santana is responsible for Friday’s shooting at ABC10 and reveals that a note referencing members of the Trump administration was found in his car after his initial release on bail on Saturday. | RELATED | Read the amended criminal complaint hereAccording to the court documents, Sacramento police who executed the search warrant found a handwritten note that read, “For hiding Epstein & ignoring red flags. Do not support Patel, Bongino, & AG Pam Bondie. They’re next. – C.K. from above.”The court documents outline a timeline of the shooting and investigation that followed. Before opening fire on the ABC10 station Friday at 1:34 p.m., he allegedly fired a single round in the air two minutes earlier while standing on the sidewalk in front of 2555 3rd Street. The court documents describe the area as located adjacent to the rear parking lot and about 300 feet to the southwest corner of ABC10. That location was within a school zone, according to prosecutors. He then drove to the front of ABC10 at 400 Broadway and fired three shots into the building’s lobby, prosecutors said. The criminal complaint says that video surveillance showed the suspect wearing a “gray t-shirt, dark colored pants, gray and white shoes, and a dark colored satchel worn around his torso.”The complaint alleges that the shooting interfered with ABC10’s radio communications because employees sheltered in place and the shooting led to the cancellation of a planned news conference. A witness at the shooting scene showed officers a spent 9mm casing and another witness provided a description of the suspect’s vehicle. Crime scene investigators found a spent projectile from a doorway in the building’s lobby. After DMV records linked the suspect’s Nissan vehicle to a residence on Carlson Drive in River Park, Hernandez-Santana was taken into custody as he exited his apartment. (See neighbors speak out about that initial arrest in the video below.)Detectives who executed a search warrant in his apartment “located a dark colored satchel that appeared consistent with the satchel that was worn by the suspect as previously observed on video surveillance,” the court documents said. Inside the satchel, they found a Sub Compact 9mm handgun with the same caliber as the bullet and casing found at the shooting scene. The handgun was inside a holster with an empty magazine, according to the court documents. Hernandez Santana’s hands also tested presumptive positive for gunshot residue, according to the complaint. The court documents say detectives also found a whiteboard planner on Santana Hernandez’s refrigerator with a handwritten note under “Friday” that said, “Do the Next Scary Thing.” He was booked based on that information, according to the complaint. The court documents go on to say that after Hernandez-Santana was released on bail Saturday at 1:50 p.m., law enforcement executed a search warrant on his vehicle. That’s where they found the note that referenced FBI Director Kash Patel, Deputy Director Dan Bongino and Attorney General Pam Bondi. Sacramento County District Attorney Thien Ho said he believes “C.K. from above” in the note was a reference to the slain conservative activist Charlie Kirk. Hernandez Santana was arrested later that evening.The first two federal charges related to firearms in a school zone face a maximum penalty of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine. The interference with a radio communications station charge carries a maximum of one year imprisonment and a fine of up to $10,000. In addition to the federal charges, the Sacramento County District Attorney’s Office said it will be filing charges related to discharging a firearm into an inhabited building and assault with a semi-automatic firearm, along with personal use of a firearm allegation.If convicted of those charges, he would face a maximum sentence of 17 years in state prison.Ho, the Sacramento County district attorney, said his office will be requesting no bail. He is due to appear on those charges Monday at 3 p.m., an hour after his federal court appearance. Defense attorney Mark Reichel confirmed to KCRA 3 that he is representing Hernandez Santana in both cases and said Sunday that his client was arrested by the FBI after he took a break from conferring with the attorney and going outside his apartment. KCRA 3 spoke to Reichel on Sunday, before the FBI released new details in the case and outlined the investigation. At the time, Reichel questioned the motives behind the federal arrest and what he described as a minor charge related to radio communications interference. He said he believed investigators were scrutinizing his client’s social media activity, which was critical of the Trump administration.”If you look at his social media, they’re going to say, ‘Boy, it sure shows that he’s liberal and left wing.’ So you think they’re going to overlook something like that? I don’t think so,” he said.KCRA 3 has reviewed what appears to be Hernandez Santana’s public social media account on X, which includes many posts critical of President Donald Trump and members of his administration, and some that referenced Kirk’s killing.In the past week, the account posted or replied to posts 18 times on political themes.According to Reichel, Hernandez Santana is an Army veteran who went on to become a lawyer and successful lobbyist and legislative advocate in Sacramento before retiring a year ago. See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    Federal prosecutors have added new charges against the man accused of shooting into the lobby of ABC10 Sacramento and said a note was found in his car that used the phrase “they’re next” in referring to Trump administration officials.

    Anibal Hernandez Santana, a 64-year-old California lawyer and retired lobbyist, has now been charged with possession of a firearm within a school zone and discharge of a firearm within a school zone, in addition to interference with a radio communication station, according to an amended criminal complaint filed Monday in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California.

    (Video above: Suspect’s lawyer speaks out.)

    The complaint sheds new light on why investigators believe Hernandez Santana is responsible for Friday’s shooting at ABC10 and reveals that a note referencing members of the Trump administration was found in his car after his initial release on bail on Saturday.

    | RELATED | Read the amended criminal complaint here

    According to the court documents, Sacramento police who executed the search warrant found a handwritten note that read, “For hiding Epstein & ignoring red flags. Do not support Patel, Bongino, & AG Pam Bondie. They’re next. – C.K. from above.”

    The court documents outline a timeline of the shooting and investigation that followed. Before opening fire on the ABC10 station Friday at 1:34 p.m., he allegedly fired a single round in the air two minutes earlier while standing on the sidewalk in front of 2555 3rd Street. The court documents describe the area as located adjacent to the rear parking lot and about 300 feet to the southwest corner of ABC10. That location was within a school zone, according to prosecutors.

    He then drove to the front of ABC10 at 400 Broadway and fired three shots into the building’s lobby, prosecutors said.

    The criminal complaint says that video surveillance showed the suspect wearing a “gray t-shirt, dark colored pants, gray and white shoes, and a dark colored satchel worn around his torso.”

    The complaint alleges that the shooting interfered with ABC10’s radio communications because employees sheltered in place and the shooting led to the cancellation of a planned news conference.

    A witness at the shooting scene showed officers a spent 9mm casing and another witness provided a description of the suspect’s vehicle. Crime scene investigators found a spent projectile from a doorway in the building’s lobby.

    After DMV records linked the suspect’s Nissan vehicle to a residence on Carlson Drive in River Park, Hernandez-Santana was taken into custody as he exited his apartment.

    (See neighbors speak out about that initial arrest in the video below.)

    Detectives who executed a search warrant in his apartment “located a dark colored satchel that appeared consistent with the satchel that was worn by the suspect as previously observed on video surveillance,” the court documents said.

    Inside the satchel, they found a Sub Compact 9mm handgun with the same caliber as the bullet and casing found at the shooting scene.

    The handgun was inside a holster with an empty magazine, according to the court documents.

    Hernandez Santana’s hands also tested presumptive positive for gunshot residue, according to the complaint.

    The court documents say detectives also found a whiteboard planner on Santana Hernandez’s refrigerator with a handwritten note under “Friday” that said, “Do the Next Scary Thing.”

    He was booked based on that information, according to the complaint.

    The court documents go on to say that after Hernandez-Santana was released on bail Saturday at 1:50 p.m., law enforcement executed a search warrant on his vehicle.

    That’s where they found the note that referenced FBI Director Kash Patel, Deputy Director Dan Bongino and Attorney General Pam Bondi.

    Sacramento County District Attorney Thien Ho said he believes “C.K. from above” in the note was a reference to the slain conservative activist Charlie Kirk.

    Hernandez Santana was arrested later that evening.

    The first two federal charges related to firearms in a school zone face a maximum penalty of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine. The interference with a radio communications station charge carries a maximum of one year imprisonment and a fine of up to $10,000.

    In addition to the federal charges, the Sacramento County District Attorney’s Office said it will be filing charges related to discharging a firearm into an inhabited building and assault with a semi-automatic firearm, along with personal use of a firearm allegation.

    If convicted of those charges, he would face a maximum sentence of 17 years in state prison.

    Ho, the Sacramento County district attorney, said his office will be requesting no bail.

    He is due to appear on those charges Monday at 3 p.m., an hour after his federal court appearance.

    Defense attorney Mark Reichel confirmed to KCRA 3 that he is representing Hernandez Santana in both cases and said Sunday that his client was arrested by the FBI after he took a break from conferring with the attorney and going outside his apartment.

    KCRA 3 spoke to Reichel on Sunday, before the FBI released new details in the case and outlined the investigation. At the time, Reichel questioned the motives behind the federal arrest and what he described as a minor charge related to radio communications interference.

    He said he believed investigators were scrutinizing his client’s social media activity, which was critical of the Trump administration.

    “If you look at his social media, they’re going to say, ‘Boy, it sure shows that he’s liberal and left wing.’ So you think they’re going to overlook something like that? I don’t think so,” he said.

    KCRA 3 has reviewed what appears to be Hernandez Santana’s public social media account on X, which includes many posts critical of President Donald Trump and members of his administration, and some that referenced Kirk’s killing.

    In the past week, the account posted or replied to posts 18 times on political themes.

    According to Reichel, Hernandez Santana is an Army veteran who went on to become a lawyer and successful lobbyist and legislative advocate in Sacramento before retiring a year ago.

    See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    Source link

  • Federal judge rejects challenge to handgun restrictions

    BOSTON — A federal judge has upheld the state’s ban on the sale of certain types of handguns following a legal challenge by gun rights groups that vow to repeal the ruling.

    In a decision issued Friday, U.S. District Court Judge Denise Casper rejected claims in a lawsuit filed by the owners of Gunrunners LLC and the Delaware-based Firearms Policy Coalition alleging that the restrictions violate the Second Amendment and are “inconsistent” with the nation’s history of firearm regulation.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm{2HJ6CD 7@C E96 A=2:?E:77D E@@< 2:> 2E E96 DE2E6’D 32? @? 46CE2:? EJA6D @7 92?58F?D[ 2C8F:?8 :E 😀 F?4@?DE:EFE:@?2= 32D65 @? E96 &]$] $FAC6>6 r@FCE’D =2?5>2C< a_aa CF=:?8 😕 }6H *@C< $E2E6 #:7=6 2?5 !:DE@= pDD@4:2E:@? G] qCF6?[ H9:49 96=5 E96C6 😀 2 4@?DE:EFE:@?2= C:89E E@ 42CCJ 2 92?58F? @FED:56 E96 9@>6 7@C D6=75676?D6]k^Am

    kAm“x? 5:C64E 567:2?46 @7 E9:D AC64656?E[ |2DD249FD6EED 92D 4=@D65 :ED 3@C56CD E@ =2C86 A@CE:@?D @7 E96 >@56C? 92?58F? >2C<6E[ 32??:?8 2D “F?D276” >2?J @7 E96 7:C62C>D E92E 2C6 >@DE ECFDE65 3J E96 p>6C:42? A6@A=6 24C@DD E96 4@F?ECJ[ DF3DE:EFE:?8 :ED ;F58>6?E 7@C E96:CD[” E96 A=2:?E:77D HC@E6 😕 4@FCE 7:=:?8D]k^Am

    kAmqFE r2DA6C C6;64E65 E9@D6 2C8F>6?ED[ 2C8F:?8 E92E E96 DE2E6’D C68F=2E:@?D C6BF:C6 92?58F?D D@=5 3J C6E2:=6CD E@ 92G6 2 “>6492?:D> H9:49 67764E:G6=J AC64=F56D 2? 2G6C286 7:G6 J62C @=5 49:=5 7C@> @A6C2E:?8 E96 92?58F? H96? :E 😀 C625J E@ 7:C6]”k^Am

    kAm“%96 AFCA@D6 7@C E96 C68F=2E:@?D 😀 “C6=2E:G6=J D:>:=2C” E@ E92E @7 E96 9:DE@C:42= 6G:56?46[ H9:49 H2D E@ AC6G6?E 49:=5C6? 7C@> 244:56?E2==J 5:D492C8:?8 2 7:C62C> 8:G6? E96:C 23:=:EJ E@ 92?5=6 2?5 @A6C2E6 E96 7:C62C>[” r2DA6C HC@E6]k^Am

    kAm|2DD249FD6EED 92D D@>6 @7 E96 E@F896DE 7:C62C> C68F=2E:@?D 😕 E96 ?2E:@? 2?5 AC@9:3:ED 2?J@?6 `g J62CD @=5 @C J@F?86C 7C@> AFC492D:?8 2 7:C62C> @C 2>>F?:E:@?[ H9:=6 C6D:56?ED F?56C a` 42??@E 3FJ 2 92?58F?[ D6>:2FE@>2E:4 C:7=6 @C D9@E8F?[ @C =2C8642A24:EJ H62A@?]k^Am

    kAm&?56C DE2E6 C68F=2E:@?D[ 92?58F?D D@=5 3J 562=6CD >FDE A2DD 2 >2<6 2?5 >@56= A6C7@C>2?46 E6DE AC@G:?8 E96J 2C6 ?@E AC@?6 E@ C6A62E65 7:C:?8 7C@> 2 D:?8=6 EC:886C AF==[ 6IA=@D:@? FA@? 7:C:?8 H:E9 DE2?52C5 2>>F?:E:@?[ @C 244:56?E2= 5:D492C86] %96 DE2E6 92D 2 C@DE6C @7 92?58F?D 2AAC@G65 7@C D2=6]k^Am

    kAmvF? 4@?EC@= 25G@42E6D 2C8F6 E96 DE2E6’D DEC:4E C6BF:C6>6?ED – :?4=F5:?8 C62=E:>6 =:46?D6 4964D]k^Am

    kAmqFE $64@?5 p>6?5>6?E 8C@FAD 92G6 =@?8 2C8F65 E92E E96 E@F896C 8F? 4@?EC@= =2HD 2C6 F??646DD2CJ 2?5 AF?:D9 =2H23:5:?8 8F? @H?6CD H9:=6 D:56DE6AA:?8 E96 :DDF6 @7 :==682= 7:C62C>D] %96 DE2E6’D 7:C62C> =:46?D:?8 AC@46DD 92D =@?8 366? 2 E2C86E 7@C 8F? C:89ED 8C@FAD]k^Am

    kAmpEE@C?6J v6?6C2= p?5C62 r2>A36==[ H9@ H2D ?2>65 2D 2 5676?52?E 😕 E96 =2HDF:E[ D2:5 E96 CF=:?8 4@?7:C>D E92E “|2DD249FD6EED 92D E96 DEC@?86DE 8F? D276EJ =2HD 😕 E96 4@F?ECJ E92E 2C6 6?7@C465 4@?D:DE6?E H:E9 AF3=:4 D276EJ 2?5 E96 $64@?5 p>6?5>6?E]”k^Am

    kAm“%9:D 564:D:@? E@ FA9@=5 |2DD249FD6EED 92?58F? D276EJ C68F=2E:@?D 😀 2 D:8?:7:42?E H:? E92E H:== AC@E64E E96 AF3=:4 2?5 4@?E:?F6 |2DD249FD6EED’ =6256CD9:A @? 8F? G:@=6?46 AC6G6?E:@?[” E96 s6>@4C2E D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E]k^Am

    kAmqFE qC2?5@? r@>3D[ u!r’D AC6D:56?E[ 4C:E:4:K65 r2DA6C’D CF=:?8 2D “3:K2CC6 2?5 566A=J 7=2H65” 2?5 D2:5 E96 A=2:?E:77D H:== 2AA62= E96 564:D:@?]k^Am

    kAm“%9:D 564:D:@? 😀 23DFC5[ =2H=6DD[ 2?5 :>A@DD:3=6 E@ C64@?4:=6 H:E9 3:?5:?8 $FAC6>6 r@FCE AC64656?E @C E96 E6IE 2?5 9:DE@CJ @7 E96 r@?DE:EFE:@?[” 96 D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E] “|2<6 ?@ >:DE2<6i u!r H:== 2AA62= E9:D :?D2?6 CF=:?8 2?5 H6 H:== 7:89E F?E:= E9:D F?4@?DE:EFE:@?2= 32? 😀 DECF4< 5@H? – H92E6G6C :E E2<6D[ 7@C 2D =@?8 2D :E E2<6D]”k^Am

    kAmk6>mr9C:DE:2? |] (256 4@G6CD E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E69@FD6 7@C }@CE9 @7 q@DE@? |65:2 vC@FAUCDBF@jD ?6HDA2A6CD 2?5 H63D:E6D] t>2:= 9:> 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>Qm4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>k^2m]k^6>mk^Am

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Former NFL quarterback Jay Cutler pleads guilty to DUI incident

    Former NFL quarterback Jay Cutler was sentenced to four days in jail as part of a plea deal on Tuesday, according to CNN affiliate WSMV 4, after being charged with driving under the influence and possession of a firearm in 2024.Cutler was arrested in October last year after police said the car he was driving rear-ended another vehicle in Franklin, Tennessee.A police statement at the time said that officers responded to the accident and detected the smell of alcohol on Cutler, who also had bloodshot eyes and was slurring words.According to police, the former QB refused a field sobriety test at the scene and was later taken to a hospital, where a blood sample was taken after authorities got a search warrant.The police investigation also found two firearms in Cutler’s vehicle, including a loaded pistol.According to the police report, Cutler attempted to flee the scene after offering the other driver $2,000 not to call the police.According to WSMV 4, Cutler pled guilty to driving under the influence on Tuesday. As part of the plea bargain, the firearm possession charge was dropped.Cutler has not commented publicly on the incident.The 42-year-old is reportedly required to pay a $350 fine and serve four days at the Williamson County Jail, starting on Sept. 29. WSMV 4 also reported that Cutler will be on unsupervised probation for a year and will be required to attend a DUI safety class.Cutler will also have his Tennessee driver’s license revoked and agreed to “forfeit” his pistol, WSMV 4 added. Cutler was a highly touted QB prospect out of Vanderbilt University in the mid-2000s. He was selected in the first round, 11th overall, in the 2006 NFL draft by the Denver Broncos.He played just three seasons in Denver before being traded to the Chicago Bears where he made a name for himself.In his eight seasons with the Bears, he became the franchise’s all-time leading passer with 23,443 yards and 154 touchdowns.He would play 12 seasons in the league for the Broncos, Bears and Miami Dolphins, passing for 35,133 yards and 227 touchdowns. His last season in the NFL was 2017.

    FRANKLIN, Tenn. —

    Former NFL quarterback Jay Cutler was sentenced to four days in jail as part of a plea deal on Tuesday, according to CNN affiliate WSMV 4, after being charged with driving under the influence and possession of a firearm in 2024.

    Cutler was arrested in October last year after police said the car he was driving rear-ended another vehicle in Franklin, Tennessee.

    A police statement at the time said that officers responded to the accident and detected the smell of alcohol on Cutler, who also had bloodshot eyes and was slurring words.

    According to police, the former QB refused a field sobriety test at the scene and was later taken to a hospital, where a blood sample was taken after authorities got a search warrant.

    The police investigation also found two firearms in Cutler’s vehicle, including a loaded pistol.

    According to the police report, Cutler attempted to flee the scene after offering the other driver $2,000 not to call the police.

    The Franklin Police Department via CNN Newsource

    Jay Cutler mugshot: Arrested and charged in 2024

    According to WSMV 4, Cutler pled guilty to driving under the influence on Tuesday. As part of the plea bargain, the firearm possession charge was dropped.

    Cutler has not commented publicly on the incident.

    The 42-year-old is reportedly required to pay a $350 fine and serve four days at the Williamson County Jail, starting on Sept. 29. WSMV 4 also reported that Cutler will be on unsupervised probation for a year and will be required to attend a DUI safety class.

    Cutler will also have his Tennessee driver’s license revoked and agreed to “forfeit” his pistol, WSMV 4 added.

    Cutler was a highly touted QB prospect out of Vanderbilt University in the mid-2000s. He was selected in the first round, 11th overall, in the 2006 NFL draft by the Denver Broncos.

    He played just three seasons in Denver before being traded to the Chicago Bears where he made a name for himself.

    In his eight seasons with the Bears, he became the franchise’s all-time leading passer with 23,443 yards and 154 touchdowns.

    He would play 12 seasons in the league for the Broncos, Bears and Miami Dolphins, passing for 35,133 yards and 227 touchdowns. His last season in the NFL was 2017.

    Source link

  • Panel urges state to offer tax breaks for ‘personalized’ firearms

    BOSTON — A state panel is recommending that lawmakers carve out a sales tax break for “personalized” firearms as part of broader efforts to reduce gun deaths.

    In a report, the Special Legislative Commission on Emerging Firearm Technology calls for passage of legislation that would authorize a sales tax break for purchases of firearms equipped with the new technology and set penalties for firearms sellers and gun owners who violate the proposed regulations.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm“%96 4@>>:DD:@? 7:?5D E92E A6CD@?2=:K65 7:C62C>D @776C 2 D:8?:7:42?E A@DD:3:=:EJ @7 C65F4:?8 7:C62C> 244:56?ED 2?5 562E9D[” E96 C6A@CE’D 2FE9@CD HC@E6] “v:G6? E96 9:896C AC:46 @7 E96D6 7:C62C>D[ E96 4@>>:DD:@? C64@>>6?5D E92E E96 |2DD249FD6EED v6?6C2= r@FCE AFCDF6 D2=6D E2I 6I6>AE:@?D E@ 6?4@FC286 E96:C AFC492D6]”k^Am

    kAm%96 4@>>:DD:@?[ H9:49 :?4=F565 DE2E6 =2H>2<6CD[ =2H 6?7@C46>6?E @77:4:2=D 2?5 w62=6J 25>:?:DEC2E:@? @77:4:2=D[ C64@>>6?565 E92E E96 {68:D=2EFC6 A2DD 2 =2H 5:C64E:?8 E96 DE2E6 tI64FE:G6 ~77:46 @7 !F3=:4 $276EJ 2?5 $64FC:EJ E@ “56E6C>:?6 E96 762D:3:=:EJ 2?5 G:23:=:EJ” @7 >:4C@DE2>A:?8 E649?@=@8J 2?5 DEF5J :ED 67764E:G6?6DD 😕 7@C6?D:4 :?G6DE:82E:@?D]k^Am

    kAm~E96C C64@>>6?52E:@?D :?4=F565 C6BF:C:?8 2== D6>:2FE@>2E:4 92?58F?D ?6H=J C68:DE6C65 😕 E96 DE2E6 36 6BF:AA65 H:E9 >:4C@DE2>A:?8 E649?@=@8J 2?5 D6E A6?2=E:6D 7@C 92?58F? >2?F724EFC6CD[ 5:DEC:3FE@CD 2?5 >6C492?ED H9@ 5@ ?@E 4@>A=J]k^Am

    kAm%96 D2=6D E2I 3C62< AC@A@D2= H@? E96 DFAA@CE @7 E96 8F? :?5FDECJ C6AC6D6?E2E:G6 @? E96 4@>>:DD:@? – y2<6 |4vF:82? @7 E96 }2E:@?2= $9@@E:?8 $A@CED u@F?52E:@? x?4][ H9@ G@E65 E@ DFAA@CE E96 E2I 3C62<]k^Am

    kAm%96 A2?6=[ 9@H6G6C[ H2D =2C86=J 5:G:565 @G6C 2 AC@A@D2= E@ 4C62E6 2 D2=6D E2I 6I6>AE:@? 7@C E96 AFC492D6 @7 2 A6CD@?2=:K65 7:C62C> H:E9 E96 “EC256:?” @7 2 ?@?A6CD@?2=:K65 7:C62C>] |4vF:82? 2?5 E96 EH@ #6AF3=:42?D @? E96 4@>>:DD:@? – $6?] !6E6C sFC2?E 2?5 #6A] s@?2=5 q6CE9:2F>6[ yC] – G@E65 282:?DE E92E @AE:@?[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 4@>>:DD:@?’D C6A@CE]k^Am

    kAmp >:4C@DE2>A:?86?23=65 7:C62C> 92D 2 F?:BF6 4@56 :>AC:?E65 @? :ED 7:C:?8 A:?[ DE2>A65 @?E@ 3F==6E 42CEC:586 42D:?8D 6249 E:>6 :E 😀 5:D492C865]k^Am

    kAm%9@D6 F?:BF6 :>AC:?ED :56?E:7J E96 7:C62C>’D >2<6[ >@56= 2?5 D6C:2= ?F>36C[ 2==@H:?8 =2H 6?7@C46>6?E E@ >2E49 DA6?E 42CEC:586 42D:?8D 7@F?5 2E 2 4C:>6 D46?6 E@ E96 DA64:7:4 7:C62C>D]k^Am

    kAm“%9:D :56?E:7:42E:@? >6E9@5 >2J D6CG6 2D 2?@E96C E@@= 2?5 @AA@CEF?:EJ 7@C =2H 6?7@C46>6?E E@ :?G6DE:82E6[ D@=G6[ 2?5 AC@D64FE6 8F? 4C:>6D[” E96 C6A@CE’D 2FE9@CD HC@E6] “(:E9 2 A@D:E:G6 :56?E:7:42E:@? @7 2? xu| 4@56[ :?G6DE:82E:@?D >2J =625 5:C64E=J E@ E96 7:C62C> :?G@=G65 😕 2 4C:>6 2?5 7FCE96C 6>A@H6C =2H 6?7@C46>6?E E@ =:?< D6A2C2E6 4C:>6D]”k^Am

    kAmqFE E96 E649?@=@8J 😀 ?6H=J 6>6C8:?8[ 2?5 D@ 72C @?=J EH@ &]$] >2?F724EFC6CD 2C6 😕 E96 AC@46DD @7 >2<:?8 A6CD@?2=:K65 H62A@?D[ @?=J @?6 @7 H9:49 92D 366? 2AAC@G65 7@C E96 >2C<6E[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 4@>>:DD:@?’D 7:?5:?8D] %96 A6CD@?2=:K65 H62A@?D 2=D@ 4@DE >F49 >@C6 E92? EC25:E:@?2= 7:C62C>D[ E96 C6A@CE’D 2FE9@CD ?@E65]k^Am

    kAm%@ 52E6[ @?=J 2 92?57F= @7 DE2E6D – :?4=F5:?8 }6H y6CD6J[ }6H *@C< 2?5 r2=:7@C?:2 – 92G6 2AAC@G65 =2HD >2?52E:?8 E92E 8F? C6E2:=6CD D6== 7:C62C>D H:E9 >:4C@DE2>A:?8 E649?@=@8J]k^Am

    kAm%96 }2E:@?2= #:7=6 pDD@4:2E:@? D2JD >:4C@DE2>A:?8 😀 2? “:?4@?D:DE6?E E649?@=@8J” E92E E6DED 92G6 D9@H? “42? 36 56762E65 H:E9 4@>>@? 92?5 E@@=D 😕 F?56C 2 >:?FE6]”k^Am

    kAm“$:?46 >:4C@DE2>A:?8 E649?@=@8J 42? 36 56762E65 😕 F?56C 2 >:?FE6 2?5 4C:>:?2=D 24BF:C6 8F?D 😕 2 >2??6C :?4@?D:DE6?E H:E9 E96 E96@CJ 369:?5 E96 E649?@=@8J[ E9:D 8F? 4@?EC@= >62DFC6 @?=J D6CG6D E@ 3FC56? =2H23:5:?8 8F? @H?6CD[” E96 8C@FA D2:5 😕 2 C646?E A@DE]k^Am

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Police/Fire

    In news taken from the logs of Cape Ann’s police and fire departments:

    Rockport Tuesday, July 1


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAmkDEC@?8maibg 2]>]ik^DEC@?8m p 3F:=5:?8 @? qC@25H2J H2D 4964<65 2?5 D64FC65]k^Am

    k9bm|@?52J yF?6 b_k^9bm

    kAmkDEC@?8mp?:>2= 42==Dik^DEC@?8m #6A@CED H6C6 >256 7C@> vC2?:E6 $EC66E 2E e 2?5 f A]>]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8mbicc A]>]ik^DEC@?8m p?:>2= r@?EC@= H2D ?@E:7:65 @7 2 C6A@CE >256 23@FE 2? 2?:>2= @? $@FE9 $EC66E]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8maic` A]>]ik^DEC@?8m p G6C32= H2C?:?8 H2D :DDF65 27E6C E@H? 3J=2H G:@=2E:@? H2D C6A@CE65 @? “F2CCJ #@25]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8m`icf A]>]ik^DEC@?8m $FDA:4:@FD 24E:G:EJ H2D C6A@CE65 @? w:89 $EC66E]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8m`ibe A]>]ik^DEC@?8m p C6A@CE H2D >256 23@FE 2??@J:?8 42==D 😕 |2:? $EC66E]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8m`_ibd 2]>]ik^DEC@?8m p A6CD@? H2D DA@<6? E@ 2kDEC@?8m7k^DEC@?8mE6C 2 >65:42= 2=2C> H2D C6A@CE65 @? |2:? $EC66E]k^Am

    k9bm|2?496DE6C3JE96$62 |@?52J[ yF?6 b_k^9bm

    kAmkDEC@?8m{@DE 2?5 7@F?5 AC@A6CEJk^DEC@?8m H2D C6A@CE65 @? q6249 $EC66E 2E `ai_` A]>] 2?5 $F>>6C $EC66E 2E diaf A]>]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8mx?5:G:5F2=D H6C6 2DD:DE65k^DEC@?8m @? uC:6?5 $EC66E 2E hice 2]>] 2?5 r6?EC2= $EC66E 2E cide A]>]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8mgi_f 2]>]ik^DEC@?8m p C6A@CE H2D >256 23@FE AC@A6CEJ 52>286 2?5 2==6865 G2?52=:D> @? q6249 $EC66E]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8mai_a 2]>]ik^DEC@?8m pDD:DE2?46 H2D AC@G:565 E@ 2?@E96C 286?4J @? E96 ?@CE93@F?5 =2?6D @7 #@FE6 `ag ?62C >:=6 >2C<6C dc]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8m`ibh 2]>]ik^DEC@?8m %96 6CC2E:4 @A6C2E:@? @7 2 >@E@C G69:4=6 @? E96 D@FE93@F?5 =2?6D @7 #@FE6 `ag ?62C !:?6 $EC66E H2D C6A@CE65]k^Am

    k9bmtDD6I |@?52J[ yF?6 b_k^9bm

    kAmkDEC@?8m{@DE 2?5 7@F?5 AC@A6CEJk^DEC@?8m H2D C6A@CE65 2E E96 tDD6I #:G6C 2E “ 2]>] 2?5 @? y@9? (:D6 pG6?F6 2E fidg A]>]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8mdi`e A]>]ik^DEC@?8m p >65:42= EC2?DA@CE H2D C67FD65 @? t2DE6C? pG6?F6]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8mx?5:G:5F2=D H6C6 2DD:DE65k^DEC@?8m @? y@9? (:D6 pG6?F6 2E `_ib_ 2]>] 2?5 cibf A]>]k^Am

    k9bmv=@F46DE6C $F?52J[ yF?6 aak^9bm

    kAmkDEC@?8mgi`h A]>k^DEC@?8m]i }@ 24E:@? H2D C6BF:C65 7@C 2 5:DEFC32?46 2E E96 w2=J2C5 pA2CE>6?ED @? $49@@= w@FD6 #@25]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8mdicb A]>]k^DEC@?8mi p 4C2D9 H:E9 :?;FC:6D H2D C6A@CE65 2E ~C492C5 2?5 $F>>6C DEC66ED] %96 4C2D9 H2D 36EH66? 2 3:4J4=:DE 2?5 2 G69:4=6]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8mbi_g A]>]k^DEC@?8mi $6CG:46D H6C6 C6?56C65 E@ 2DD:DE E96 u:C6 s6A2CE>6?E 2E |2C<6E q2D<6E @? v=@F46DE6C rC@DD:?8 #@25]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8maiab A]>]k^DEC@?8mi !@=:46 2E E96 DE2E:@? E@@< 2 C6A@CE @7 92C2DD>6?E]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8m`i_d A]>]k^DEC@?8mi $6CG:46D H6C6 C6?56C65 7@C 2 4C2D9 H:E9 AC@A6CEJ 52>286 @?=J @? t2DE |2:? $EC66E]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8m“ida 2]>k^DEC@?8m]i p 5:DEFC32?46 C6A@CE65 @? #6D6CG@:C #@25 4@F=5 ?@E 36 =@42E65]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8meich 2]>]k^DEC@?8mi !@=:46 A=2??65 E@ 7:=6 2 4C:>:?2= 4@>A=2:?E 282:?DE 2 eeJ62C@=5 v=@F46DE6C >2? H:E9 2 492C86 @7 6G25:?8 2 E2I: 72C6 @7 S`_ @? (2D9:?8E@? $EC66E]k^Am

    k9bm$2EFC52J[ yF?6 a`k^9bm

    kAmkDEC@?8mhic_ A]>]ik^DEC@?8m $6CG:46D H6C6 C6?56C65 7@C 2 7:C6 2=2C> @? pE=2?E:4 #@25]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8mfi`a A]>]k^DEC@?8mi p b`J62C@=5 v=@F46DE6C >2? H2D 2CC6DE65 @? 492C86D @7 5C:G:?8 H9:=6 5CF?< 2?5 =62G:?8 E96 D46?6 @7 AC@A6CEJ 52>286 27E6C G2?52=:D> @? $@FE96C 2?5 %C2823:8K2?52 C@25D H2D C6A@CE65] p44@C5:?8 E@ E96 C6A@CE[ A@=:46 H6C6 5:DA2E4965 E@ E96 q2DD #@42?286C 23@FE A2DE AC@A6CEJ 52>286] (9:=6 9625:?8 E96C6[ A@=:46 D2H 2 3=24< q|( $&’ 5:D23=65 2E E96 :?E6CD64E:@? @7 t2DE6C? pG6?F6 2?5 E96 #@FE6 `ag tIE6?D:@?] %96 G69:4=6 925 =67E 2 EC2:= @7 7=F:5 5@H? E@ q2DD pG6?F6 2?5 A2CED @7 E96 7C@?E 6?5 2?5 F?56C 42CC:286 D9:6=5:?8 H6C6 @? E96 8C@F?5 36?62E9 E96 G69:4=6] %96 5C:G6C E@=5 A@=:46 E96 42C 925 @G6C962E65 2?5 96 H2D 255:?8 >@C6 7=F:5 E@ E96 4@@=2?E DJDE6>] !@=:46 ?@E:465 E96 42C H2D >:DD:?8 2 7C@?E C68:DEC2E:@? A=2E6[ 925 7C6D9 7C@?E6?5 52>286 2?5 H2D =62<:?8 2?E:7C66K6] (9:=6 DA62<:?8 H:E9 E96 5C:G6C[ A@=:46 ?@E:465 96 2AA62C65 :?E@I:42E65[ 2?5 A@=:46 2D<65 9:> :7 96 925 925 2?JE9:?8 E@ 5C:?<] !@=:46 E96? 2D<65 E96 >2? E@ E2<6 D6G6C2= 7:6=5 D@3C:6EJ E6DED] pE E9:D A@:?E[ E96 8@=74=F3 >2?286C 2CC:G65[ 2?5 96 92?565 E96 @77:46C E96 52>2865 7C@?E C68:DEC2E:@? A=2E6 E@ E96 5C:G6C’D $&’] w6 E@=5 A@=:46 E92E :E H2D 7@F?5 😕 563C:D @7 2 C@4< H2==] !@=:46 2CC6DE65 E96 5C:G6C H:E9@FE :?4:56?E 2?5 925 E96 G69:4=6 E@H65 2H2J] !@=:46 H6?E E@ E96 :?E6CD64E:@? @7 $@FE96C 2?5 %C2823:8K2?52 2?5 D2H 52>286 E@ E96 C@4< H2== 2?5 2 EC2:= @7 A=2DE:4 G69:4=6 563C:D[ 2?E:7C66K6 7=F:5 2?5 A2CED @7 E96 F?56C42CC:286 D9:6=5:?8 DEC6H? @? E96 8@=7 42CE EC24<] p ?6:893@C E@=5 A@=:46 D96 925 962C5 2 =@F5 32?8 2?5 H6?E E@ E96 H:?5@H 2?5 D2H 2 52C<4@=@C65 $&’ C:5:?8 5@H? E96 42CE EC2:= 367@C6 :E DA65 @77 5@H? $@FE96C #@25 =62<:?8 7=F:5] %96 ?6:893@C 42==65 E96 8@=7 4=F3 >2?286C] !@=:46 7@==@H65 E96 7=F:5 EC2:= 324< E@ H96C6 E96 $&’ 925 366? 5:D23=65 2E E96 :?E6CD64E:@?] pE E96 DE2E:@?[ E96 5C:G6C C67FD65 E@ DF3>:E E@ 2 496>:42= 3C62E9 E6DE E@ >62DFC6 9:D 3=@@5 2=4@9@= 4@?E6?E D@ 9:D =:46?D6 H2D C6A@CE65=J DFDA6?565]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8mrC2D96D H:E9 AC@A6CEJ 52>286 @?=Jk^DEC@?8mi $6CG:46D H6C6 AC@G:565 2E bi`_ A]>] @? vC2?E r:C4=6[ 2E cicd A]>] @? (6DE6C? pG6?F6[ 2?5 2E didf A]>] @? (6DE6C? pG6?F6]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8m`aid` A]>]k^DEC@?8mi !@=:46 2E E96 DE2E:@? E@@< 2 C6A@CE @7 7:C62C>D]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8m“i_e 2]>]k^DEC@?8mi %96 u:C6 s6A2CE>6?E H2D ?@E:7:65 27E6C A@=:46 C646:G65 2 42== 7@C 2 >65:42= 2=2C> @? r92A6= $EC66E]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8m`_id` 2]>]k^DEC@?8mi p DFDA:4:@FD A6CD@? H2D C6A@CE65 @? !62C= $EC66E]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8mgiaf 2]>]k^DEC@?8mi !6246 H2D C6DE@C65 27E6C 2 5:DEFC32?46 @? uC:6?5 $EC66E]k^Am

    k9bmuC:52J[ yF?6 a_k^9bm

    kAmkDEC@?8m`_i_c A]>]k^DEC@?8mi !6246 H2D C6DE@C65 27E6C 2 C6A@CE @7 92C2DD>6?E 2E }:=6D q6249]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8mhi_` A]>]ik^DEC@?8m p7E6C 2 C6A@CE @7 2 5@>6DE:4 5:DAFE6[ A@=:46 A=2??65 E@ 7:=6 2 4C:>:?2= 4@>A=2:?E 282:?DE 2 ddJ62C@=5 v=@F46DE6C H@>2?[ H9@D6 255C6DD 😀 =:DE65 2D 9@>6=6DD[ @? 2 492C86 @7 2DD2F=E @? 2 72>:=J >6>36C @? |2A=6H@@5 pG6?F6 2?5 $96A96C5 $EC66E] p chJ62C@=5 v=@F46DE6C >2?[ 2=D@ D2:5 E@ 36 2D 9@>6=6DD[ H2D 2CC6DE65 2?5 492C865 H:E9 2DD2F=E 2?5 32EE6CJ W:?E:>2E6 A2CE?6CDX]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8meid_ A]>]k^DEC@?8mi !@=:46 2DD:DE65 2?@E96C 286?4J 😕 4@??64E:@? H:E9 2 H2?E65 A6CD@? C6A@CE65 2E 2 |2:? $EC66E 2A2CE>6?E 3F:=5:?8] !@=:46 H6?E E@ 2? 255C6DD 2?5 2CC6DE65 2 afJ62C@=5 #6G6C6 >2? @? 2 492C86 @7 2EE6>AE65 2C>65 9@>6 :?G2D:@? 😕 #6G6C6] %96 >2? H2D E2<6? :?E@ 4FDE@5J 7@C E96 #6G6C6 !@=:46 s6A2CE>6?E] !@=:46 D62C4965 E96 >2? 2?5 7@F?5 2 3=24< 7:C62C> 😕 2 9@=DE6C @? 9:D 9:A] xE =2E6C EFC?65 @FE E@ 36 2 qq 8F? A@H6C65 3J 2 42C3@? 5:@I:56 42CEC:586]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8meic_ A]>]k^DEC@?8mi p DE@=6? 46== A9@?6 H2D C6A@CE65 @? #2:=C@25 pG6?F6]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8mdicd A]>]k^DEC@?8mi $6CG:46D H6C6 C6?56C65 7@C 2 h“ 42== @? r2FD6H2J $EC66E 7@C 2 G69:4=6 :?E@ 2 76?46]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8mdiah A]>]k^DEC@?8mi }@ 24E:@? H2D C6BF:C65 7@C 2 C6A@CE @7 G2?52=:D> @? qC:89ED:56 pG6?F6]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8mrC2D96D H:E9 AC@A6CEJ 52>286 @?=Jk^DEC@?8mi pE dia` A]>][ 2 9:E2?5CF? @? $F>>:E 2?5 |:==6EE DEC66EDj 2E ciaf A]>] 2E $E286 u@CE !2C< @? w@F89 pG6?F6j 2?5 2E ci_g A]>] @? (2D9:?8E@? $EC66E H:E9 D6CG:46D C6?56C65]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8maibd A]>]k^DEC@?8mi }@ 24E:@? H2D C6BF:C65 7@C 2 C6A@CE @7 E9C62ED @? |2CD9 $EC66E]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8m`aicc A]>]k^DEC@?8mi $6CG:46D H6C6 C6?56C65 7@C 2 423=6 =:?6 😕 E96 C@25H2J @? #@FE6 `ag D@FE93@F?5]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8mhid_ 2]>]k^DEC@?8mi $6CG:46D H6C6 C6?56C65 7@C 2 =@H92?8:?8 H:C6 @? #@86CD $EC66E]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8mfi_b 2]>k^DEC@?8m]i p 4:EJ @C5:?2?46 G:@=2E:@? H2D C6A@CE65 2E E96 u:EK w6?CJ {2?6 w@FD6 @? w2C3@C {@@A] p >2? H9@ H2D C6A@CE65 E@ 36 9@>6=6DD H2D C6A@CE65 E96C6 H:E9 2 E6?E] %96 E6?E H2D C6>@G65 2?5 E96 :?5:G:5F2= H6?E @? 9:D H2J]k^Am

    Source link

  • 15-Year-Old Jones High Student Charged for Bringing Gun to Orlando School

    15-Year-Old Jones High Student Charged for Bringing Gun to Orlando School

    A 15-year-old Jones High student was charged for bringing a gun to an Orlando school.

    The Orlando Police Department said it will not hesitate to protect the students and teachers they serve and take all threats seriously.

    After a social media post was shared about a student with a gun at Jones High School, a 15-year-old was swiftly located by the School Resource Officers on campus.

    The student was found with an unloaded BB gun. However, it did not have any markings to distinguish it from a real firearm, according to local law enforcement.

    While there was no threat associated with his social media post, the actions of this student caused unnecessary fear among his peers, their parents and teachers.

    The student was charged with a city ordinance violation: Carrying a Simulated Firearm.

    In light of the recent school shooting in Georgia, the Orlando Police Department expressed its unwavering commitment to vigilance in local schools and to stop any individuals who could be considered a danger to public safety.

    Recently, a 16-year-old Central Florida student was also arrested for threatening a mass shooting at another local school; a 15-year-old Central Florida student was also arrested for making an online school shooting threat at another school; and a 13-year-old student was also arrested for threatening a school shooting in Central Florida.

    Source link

  • Gun control foes push to repeal restrictions

    Gun control foes push to repeal restrictions

    BOSTON — Opponents of Massachusetts’ new gun control law are gearing up to repeal the tough restrictions, which they say will hurt businesses, cost jobs and deprive people of their constitutional rights.

    A law signed by Democratic Gov. Maura Healey in July expanded the state’s bans on “assault” weapons and high-capacity magazines, outlawed so-called “ghost” guns and set new restrictions on the open carry of firearms, among other provisions.

    The move was in response to concerns about mass shootings and gun violence.

    But critics of the new restrictions say they are unconstitutional and argue the changes will do little to reduce gun violence. They’ve started gathering signatures on petitions to put a repeal of the law before voters in the 2026 elections.

    The chief organizer of the repeal effort, Cape Cod Gun Works owner Toby Leary, said on Thursday that the petition-gathering effort is well underway and he is seeing strong support for putting the question on the ballot.

    “A lot of businesses and jobs are at stake,” Leary said during a livestreamed briefing sponsored by the state’s Republican Party. “The effects of this law on businesses will be catastrophic. Jobs will be lost. Businesses and livelihoods will be lost.”

    Leary said among the many concerns gun shop owners have about the new restrictions is that the expansion of banned firearms will reduce the kinds of rifles and other weapons that can be sold in the state, which will hurt bottom lines. He estimates about 50% of his business will be “put on hold” if the law isn’t repealed.

    “But this is also about freedom,” Leary said. “This law is so unconstitutional on every level. A lot of ordinary people are going to run afoul of this law.”

    Massachusetts already has some of the toughest gun control laws in the country, including real-time license checks for private gun sales and stiff penalties for gun-based crimes.

    Gun control advocates argue the strict requirements have given the largely urban state one of the lowest gun-death rates in the nation, while not infringing on the right to bear arms.

    Despite those trends, Democrats who pushed the gun control bill thorough the Legislature argued that gun violence is still impacting communities across the state whether by suicide, domestic violence or drive-by shootings.

    Second Amendment groups have long argued that the tougher gun control laws are unnecessary, and punish law-abiding gun owners while sidestepping the issue of illegal firearms.

    The new law, which passed despite objections from the Legislature’s Republican minority, added dozens of long rifles to a list of prohibited guns under the assault weapons ban, and outlawed the open carry of firearms in government buildings, polling places and schools, with exemptions for law enforcement officials.

    It sets strict penalties for possession of modification devices such as Glock switches that convert semi-automatic firearms into fully automatic, military-style weapons. The state’s red flag law, which allows a judge to suspend the gun license of someone deemed at risk to themselves or others, was also expanded under the law.

    The repeal effort is one of several seeking to block the law. The Massachusetts Gun Owners’ Action League, which is affiliated with the National Rifle Association, plans to file a federal lawsuit seeking to overturn the new law’s training and licensing requirements. Other legal challenges are expected.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • 9th Circuit upholds California gun bans in some ‘sensitive’ places, but not others

    9th Circuit upholds California gun bans in some ‘sensitive’ places, but not others

    California may enforce its recent ban on guns in “sensitive places” when it comes to parks and playgrounds, bars and restaurants that serve alcohol, casinos, stadiums, amusement parks, zoos, libraries, museums, athletic facilities and the parking areas associated with them, a federal appellate court ruled Friday.

    However, the state may not enforce similar restrictions in hospitals or other medical facilities, on public transit, at places of worship or financial institutions, or in the parking areas associated with or shared by those places, the three-judge panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals determined.

    It also may not enforce its ban on guns at all events requiring a permit, or on visitors carrying guns onto any private property where the owner has not posted signs explicitly allowing them, the panel ruled.

    The appellate panel — which simultaneously issued similar findings relating to laws in Hawaii — issued its ruling in response to broad injunctions by lower courts that had blocked the bans from taking effect amid ongoing litigation over the laws.

    The panel noted that some locations where it rejected statewide bans, such as banks and churches, could still bar visitors from carrying guns based on existing property laws, but the state governments could not unilaterally and universally do so for them. It said owners of private property are similarly free to ban firearms on their property.

    “For the places where we hold that the states likely may not prohibit the carry of firearms, the practical effect of our ruling is merely that private-property owners may choose to allow the carry of firearms,” Circuit Judge Susan P. Graber wrote for the panel. “Owners of hospitals, banks and churches, for example, remain free to ban firearms at those locations.”

    Gov. Gavin Newsom claimed partial victory — and said the state would continue fighting to drive down gun violence.

    “We refuse to accept shootings at schools, parks and concerts as a normal fact of life. While we fought for the court to go further, today’s ruling affirms our state’s authority to limit guns in many public places,” Newsom said in a statement. “California will continue to take action to protect our residents, and defend our nation-leading, life-saving gun laws from an extreme gun lobby and politicians in their pockets.”

    Gun advocates characterized the ruling as a partial win, as well.

    “This partially favorable decision from the Ninth Circuit shows how far we’ve come over the past decade. But this case, and our work to restore the right to bear arms, is far from over,” said Brandon Combs, president of the Firearms Policy Coalition, which helped bring the challenge against the laws. “FPC will continue to fight forward until all peaceable people can fully exercise their right to carry in California and throughout the United States.”

    Graber, an appointee of President Clinton, was joined in the decision by Circuit Judge Mary M. Schroeder, an appointee of President Carter; and Circuit Judge Jennifer Sung, an appointee of President Biden.

    The ruling was the latest to apply the historical test for gun laws set out in 2022 by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn. vs. Bruen. There, the high court said that gun laws are legitimate only if they are rooted in the nation’s history and tradition or sufficiently analogous to some historical law.

    Graber’s opinion parsed through an array of historical laws to determine whether lower court injunctions blocking many of the states’ bans on guns in sensitive places should stand, or if they should be reversed based on historical precedent.

    In doing so, the ruling divided public places into those where guns may be banned, such as parks; and those where they may not be based on a lack of similar restrictions in the past, such as places of worship.

    That partition highlighted a reality under Bruen’s “history and tradition” test that gun control advocates have denounced as preposterous: that it precludes leaders from crafting modern gun laws to address modern realities of gun violence, such as mass shootings at places of worship.

    Billy Clark, senior litigation attorney at the gun control advocacy group Giffords Law Center, said the decision “further illustrates that it is constitutional to keep guns out of sensitive places” — but also more evidence of the “chaos” in 2nd Amendment law caused by the Bruen decision.

    Janet Carter, senior director of issues and appeals at the gun control group Everytown Law, said her group didn’t agree with all aspects of the decision, but still found it “heartening.”

    “Keeping guns out of sensitive places is common sense and these laws are crucial to keeping our communities safe from gun violence,” Carter said.

    Adam Kraut, executive director of the gun rights advocacy group Second Amendment Foundation, said California’s expansion of “sensitive places” where guns are banned “goes beyond what the Supreme Court contemplated when it mentioned them in Bruen,” and said his group will continue to fight such bans in court.

    Kevin Rector

    Source link

  • Teen charged in shooting of 49ers’ Ricky Pearsall is ‘very sorry,’ attorney says

    Teen charged in shooting of 49ers’ Ricky Pearsall is ‘very sorry,’ attorney says

    SAN FRANCISCO — 

    The 17-year-old accused of shooting San Francisco 49ers wide receiver Ricky Pearsall during a botched armed robbery attempt last weekend was arraigned in juvenile court Wednesday, a day after he was charged with multiple felonies, including attempted murder.

    Judge Roger C. Chan read the charges against the teenager, who because he is a minor was referred to only by his initials. The allegations include personal use and intentional discharge of a firearm, assault with a semiautomatic firearm and attempted second-degree robbery,

    The young man, whom police have said lives in Tracy, about 70 miles east of San Francisco, sat facing forward through the short proceeding, next to his court-appointed public defender, Bob Dunlap. His parents sat in the front row of benches reserved for the public, a few feet from their son. His mother required a Spanish-speaking translator.

    Assistant Dist. Atty. David Mitchell said members of Pearsall’s family also attended the hearing, though he did not specify which relatives or whether they joined online or attended in person.

    Neither the suspect nor his family made any public comments. While taking questions from the media after the hearing, Dunlap said the teenager — whom he described as a high school senior — and his parents were “very sorry” about the shooting.

    “This is very, very hard on them,” Dunlap said. “They assured me, and from what little I know, that this is completely out of character for him.”

    Pearsall, 23, was walking back to his car alone after shopping in one of the luxury stores in San Francisco’s Union Square district on Saturday afternoon when, according to police, a gunman confronted Pearsall and tried to rob him, targeting his Rolex watch. A struggle ensued, and the attacker’s gun fired multiple times, San Francisco Police Chief Bill Scott said during a Saturday evening news conference. Both Pearsall and the assailant were shot.

    A bullet struck Pearsall in the chest and exited through his back, missing his vital organs, according to a social media post by his mother. He was treated at San Francisco General Hospital and released Sunday.

    The suspect was shot in his left arm and treated at the same hospital, according to police. Dunlap said his client is bandaged but recovering well.

    Dunlap said it was too early to address questions about why the teenager was in San Francisco, or his motives. Dunlap said he has read a police report on the incident, but has not yet been able to review video of the shooting that investigators are gathering from area surveillance cameras, which he believed would shed more light on what happened.

    He added that there were “extenuating circumstances” that he believed could factor into the case, but provided no details. He also said he wasn’t convinced the attempted murder charge would “hold water at the end of the day.”

    A probation official revealed during the hearing that the suspect has a pending juvenile court matter in San Joaquin County. Officials provided no details on that case, though Dunlap said his client would probably be transferred back to San Joaquin County after the San Francisco proceedings conclude.

    San Francisco Dist. Atty. Brooke Jenkins has not yet said whether she would seek to try the teenager in adult court. That would require a ruling by a judge that “essentially means that the juvenile system would not be equipped to rehabilitate that minor,” Jenkins said.

    Dunlap said it would be inappropriate for the case to be transferred out of juvenile court.

    “I think that my client certainly should be treated as a juvenile. He is a juvenile,” Dunlap said.

    Pearsall, who played for Arizona State and the University of Florida, was drafted by the 49ers in the first round of the 2024 NFL draft. He was sidelined with a shoulder injury during much of the NFL preseason.

    The 49ers have put Pearsall on the non-football injury list, meaning he will miss at least the first four regular-season games. Team officials have said they expect him to make a full recovery.

    Hannah Wiley

    Source link

  • 21-Year-Old Indicted for Murder of Florida Mother

    21-Year-Old Indicted for Murder of Florida Mother

    A 21-year-old man was indicted for murder in connection to a shooting that resulted in the death of 53-year-old Florida mother.

    State Attorney Bill Gladson announced the grand jury indictment of 21-year-old Donald Donell Jamison, in connection with the July 30, 2024 shooting that resulted in the death of 53-year-old Claudia Barbosa and the injury of another individual.

    Jamison has been indicted for one count of Premeditated First-Degree Murder with a Firearm, one count of Attempted Felony Murder, two counts of Robbery with a Firearm, and one count of Escape from a Law Enforcement Officer.

    The day of the incident, the Hernando County Sheriff’s Office (HCSO) received a call for service, indicating two individuals were shot while at a Brooksville restaurant. The caller stated the suspect had fled the scene in a vehicle. When first responders arrived, they located Claudia and the second victim with apparent gunshot wounds.

    Claudia Barbosa was pronounced deceased on scene, while the other victim suffered non-life-threatening injuries.

    Hernando County Sheriff Al Nienhuis and his law enforcement officers worked diligently to investigate the incident and apprehend the suspect responsible. HCSO officials were able to obtain surveillance footage and confirm the information given by multiple witnesses on scene.

    According to law enforcement, a statewide broadcast was issued for the suspect vehicle. Shortly after, the Florida Highway Patrol observed a vehicle matching the description and conducted a traffic stop.

    When troopers made contact with the driver, later identified as Jamison, he matched the description of the suspect given by witnesses.

    Jamison was detained and transported back to Hernando County to be interviewed by HCSO investigators. While in custody, Jamison attempted to escape but was immediately detained and arrested.

    The State Attorney’s office said it acknowledges the gravity of this matter and its profound impact on the victim’s family and the community. As these legal proceedings develop, the State Attorney’s office pledged to remain committed to ensuring justice and accountability for all.

    Source link