ReportWire

Tag: Finance

  • SK Wealth Management LLC Acquires Shares of 1,316 Invesco QQQ $QQQ

    [ad_1]

    SK Wealth Management LLC acquired a new position in Invesco QQQ (NASDAQ:QQQ – Free Report) during the third quarter, Holdings Channel.com reports. The firm acquired 1,316 shares of the exchange traded fund’s stock, valued at approximately $803,000.

    A number of other institutional investors and hedge funds also recently added to or reduced their stakes in the business. Kingstone Capital Partners Texas LLC raised its stake in shares of Invesco QQQ by 704,593.7% during the 2nd quarter. Kingstone Capital Partners Texas LLC now owns 67,615,365 shares of the exchange traded fund’s stock valued at $37,299,340,000 after buying an additional 67,605,770 shares during the last quarter. 1832 Asset Management L.P. raised its position in Invesco QQQ by 100.0% during the second quarter. 1832 Asset Management L.P. now owns 2,115 shares of the exchange traded fund’s stock valued at $1,167,000 after acquiring an additional 40,999,982 shares in the last quarter. Symphony Financial Ltd. Co. acquired a new position in Invesco QQQ in the second quarter valued at approximately $1,236,482,000. HRT Financial LP lifted its holdings in Invesco QQQ by 118.3% in the second quarter. HRT Financial LP now owns 3,145,578 shares of the exchange traded fund’s stock valued at $1,735,226,000 after acquiring an additional 1,704,600 shares during the period. Finally, JPMorgan Chase & Co. boosted its position in Invesco QQQ by 42.4% in the 2nd quarter. JPMorgan Chase & Co. now owns 4,895,265 shares of the exchange traded fund’s stock worth $2,700,424,000 after purchasing an additional 1,457,109 shares in the last quarter. 44.58% of the stock is currently owned by institutional investors and hedge funds.

    Invesco QQQ Stock Up 1.3%

    Shares of NASDAQ QQQ opened at $617.05 on Monday. The firm’s 50 day simple moving average is $614.14 and its 200-day simple moving average is $584.06. Invesco QQQ has a 12 month low of $402.39 and a 12 month high of $637.01.

    Invesco QQQ Increases Dividend

    The company also recently declared a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Wednesday, December 31st. Investors of record on Monday, December 22nd will be given a dividend of $0.7941 per share. This is a boost from Invesco QQQ’s previous quarterly dividend of $0.69. This represents a $3.18 annualized dividend and a yield of 0.5%. The ex-dividend date is Monday, December 22nd.

    Invesco QQQ News Roundup

    Here are the key news stories impacting Invesco QQQ this week:

    • Positive Sentiment: Shareholders approved converting QQQ to an open‑ended ETF and Invesco immediately cut QQQ’s expense ratio by about 10%, lowering ongoing costs for holders and improving QQQ’s competitiveness — a likely catalyst for inflows. Invesco cuts QQQ expense ratio by 10% after shareholders approve open-ended ETF conversion
    • Positive Sentiment: Invesco’s broader “modernization” of QQQ (approved by investors) enables operational flexibility and a more standard ETF structure, which should make the fund more attractive to large institutional and retail buyers over time. Invesco QQQ Gets Green Light For Modernization
    • Positive Sentiment: Softer-than-expected November inflation helped lift growth names and ETFs tied to the Nasdaq‑100 by increasing the odds of Fed rate cuts next year — a key macro driver behind the recent bounce in QQQ. QQQ ETF News, 12-19-2025
    • Neutral Sentiment: QQQ remains above its 50‑day and 200‑day moving averages and close to its 52‑week high, indicating positive momentum, but that also raises the bar for additional upside without a fresh catalyst. (Context: recent market commentary and CPI reads.)
    • Negative Sentiment: A technical bearish signal on the Nasdaq‑100 chart was flagged today, suggesting a possible short‑term pullback or consolidation risk for QQQ after this rally; traders should watch support levels and volume for clues. The Nasdaq-100 ETF just flashed a bearish chart signal. Here’s what happens next.

    Invesco QQQ Company Profile

    (Free Report)

    PowerShares QQQ Trust, Series 1 is a unit investment trust that issues securities called Nasdaq-100 Index Tracking Stock. The Trust’s investment objective is to provide investment results that generally correspond to the price and yield performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. The Trust provides investors with the opportunity to purchase units of beneficial interest in the Trust representing proportionate undivided interests in the portfolio of securities held by the Trust, which consists of substantially all of the securities, in substantially the same weighting, as the component securities of the Nasdaq-100 Index.

    See Also

    Want to see what other hedge funds are holding QQQ? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for Invesco QQQ (NASDAQ:QQQ – Free Report).

    Institutional Ownership by Quarter for Invesco QQQ (NASDAQ:QQQ)



    Receive News & Ratings for Invesco QQQ Daily – Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts’ ratings for Invesco QQQ and related companies with MarketBeat.com’s FREE daily email newsletter.

    [ad_2]

    ABMN Staff

    Source link

  • Research Reports & Trade Ideas – Yahoo Finance

    [ad_1]

    Daily Spotlight: Canada's GDP Rebounds in 3Q

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Nike CEO Elliot Hill’s Turnaround Plan Hits a Roadblock In China

    [ad_1]

    Elliot Hill took over as Nike’s CEO in October 2024. Photo by Tom Hauck/Getty Images

    Elliott Hill, a longtime Nike executive, came out of retirement last year to take the helm of the footwear giant. So far, his turnaround plan is showing progress—at least in most markets. Even as the company posts solid global results, its grip on China continues to weaken.

    Hill’s renewed focus on product innovation and a return to Nike’s sporting roots helped the company beat Wall Street expectations on both revenue and profit for the second quarter of fiscal 2026. Total sales reached $12.4 billion for the September-November period, up 1 percent year over year, though net income fell 32 percent to $800 million.

    Still, Nike’s stock sank more than 10 percent on Dec. 19 as investors zeroed in on persistent weakness in China. Sales in the region dropped 17 percent to $1.4 billion, marking the sixth consecutive quarter of declining revenue there.

    “We see China as a big opportunity,” said Hill during Nike’s earnings call yesterday (Dec. 18). “With that said, it’s clear that we need to reset our approach.”

    Nike’s once-dominant sneaker business has stumbled in recent years amid an overreliance on lifestyle franchises. The company needed new leadership to regain momentum in specialized sports categories such as running. Hill, who spent more than three decades at Nike before retiring in 2020, was tapped for the role last October.

    Nike’s ‘Win Now’ turnaround plan

    Under a reorganization Hill has dubbed “Win Now,” Nike has reshuffled leadership roles to streamline operations and reduce management layers. The strategy centers on reclaiming authority in sports performance by emphasizing products designed for running, basketball and football, while pulling back from oversaturated lifestyle staples such as the Air Force 1 and Dunk.

    The approach is already delivering gains, particularly in North America, where sales jumped 9 percent in the most recent quarter to $5.6 billion. “I’d say we’re in the middle innings of our comeback,” said Hill.

    China, however, remains a major obstacle. Efforts to roll out “Win Now” initiatives in key cities like Beijing and China—ranging from upgraded in-store presentations to stronger product storytelling—have struggled amid declining foot traffic and elevated levels of aging inventory. “What we’ve done is a start, but it’s not happening at the level or the pace we need to drive wider change,” said Hill.

    Looking ahead, Nike plans to tailor its strategy to China’s increasingly digital-first retail environment. As the company ramps up investment in the region, executives also stressed the need to improve store fleets within China’s “monobrand footprint,” where single-brand stores dominate over third-party retailers.

    At the same time, Nike is balancing market-specific challenges with the effects of tariffs. The company, which manufactures much of its footwear and apparel in Vietnam, Indonesia, Cambodia and China, has also been forced to absorb costs and raise prices due to levies on imports. Nike is facing a $1.5 billion tariff hit for the year in what Hill described as a “significant headwind.”

    Nike CEO Elliot Hill’s Turnaround Plan Hits a Roadblock In China

    [ad_2]

    Alexandra Tremayne-Pengelly

    Source link

  • DraftKings hopes to score big with new prediction markets app

    [ad_1]

    DraftKings is entering the red-hot prediction markets business, launching technology that lets users trade contracts linked to sporting and financial events. 

    DraftKings said event contracts will be available for trading in 38 states and that the company will eventually expand beyond sports and finance into other markets, such as entertainment and culture. The sports betting company announced Friday it is debuting DraftKings Predictions, a mobile app and web product that will be regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. 

    “Along with our operational footprint, marketing and analytics infrastructure and advanced in-house technology, we believe we are uniquely positioned to lead this space over the long term,” Corey Gottlieb, chief product officer of DraftKings, said in a statement.

    DraftKings said its app, which is expected to be available in major app stores within days, will connect with multiple exchanges, starting with the derivatives marketplace CME Group. 

    Once they have a DraftKings account, users can enter the DraftKings Predictions app and start trading by clicking on the yes/no questions associated with an event, such as an NFL game, and deciding how much money they want to wager. 

    More specifically, users originate the trades, while DraftKings acts as a broker, Jeanine Hightower-Sellitto, the general manager of DraftKings Predictions, told CBS News.

    “We’re handling that order and it’s getting sent to an exchange for it to be executed,” she explained. 

    DraftKings faces growing competition from prediction markets — including Kalshi and Polymarket, now valued at $9 billion and $11 billion, respectively — that enable users to speculate on the outcome of sports and other events. 

    In October, DraftKings announced the acquisition of Railbird Technologies, a federally regulated prediction market. At the time, DraftKings said the deal supports its “broader strategy to enter prediction markets.”

    Some prediction market platforms lacking a license for sports wagering have faced pushback from state regulators. Event contracts traded on markets are regulated differently from sports bets, which are illegal in certain states.

    Others have criticized the move by prediction markets to facilitate speculation on sports. Charlie Baker, the president of the NCAA, recently called out Kalshi on social media after the company filed forms to accept bets on the transfer decisions and status of student-athletes, saying it would threaten “competition integrity and recruiting processes.” 

    “We certify markets all the time that we do not end up listing,” Kalshi said on X on Dec. 18. “We have no immediate plans to list these contracts.”

    Headquartered in Boston, DraftKings was launched in 2012 as a sports entertainment and gaming company. Among its offerings are a fantasy sports product, which allows users to build virtual sports team lineups and compete against other users, and a mobile sports betting platform called DraftKings Sportsbook, where customers can place bets on sports, players, leagues and events.

    Edited by

    Alain Sherter

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • TikTok Reaches Deal With US Investors: Here’s Who Owns What

    [ad_1]

    An Oracle-backed investor group is set to take majority control of TikTok’s U.S. operations, pending regulatory approval. Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

    A yearslong saga over the future of TikTok in America is nearing its end. The U.S. division of the popular social media app, which is owned by Chinese tech giant ByteDance, will soon be majority-owned by a coalition of U.S. investors that includes Oracle.

    The agreement was detailed in an internal memo from TikTok CEO Shou Chew, first reported by Axios. Oracle, alongside private equity firm Silver Lake and the Abu Dhabi-based investment firm MGX, will own 45 percent of TikTok’s U.S. operations. ByteDance will retain a stake just below 20 percent, and affiliates of existing ByteDance investors will own the remaining roughly one-third.

    MGX did not respond to requests for comment from Observer. Oracle and Silver Lake declined to comment.

    The development follows years of concern over ByteDance’s access to data on U.S. citizens, an estimated 170 million of whom use TikTok. Efforts to either ban the app in the U.S. or force a sale to American owners began last year under the Biden administration, with deadlines later extended multiple times by President Donald Trump.

    The terms of TikTok’s new deal appear to closely mirror a framework laid out by the White House in September to place the company’s U.S. division in domestic hands. Under that proposal, Oracle would be responsible for recreating TikTok’s algorithm by retraining a new version for the U.S. market and protecting American user data in a secure cloud. At the time, Trump said Chinese President  Xi Jinping had expressed approval of the plans.

    Oracle will play a similar role in TikTok’s new agreement, which is expected to close on Jan. 22. The American owners of the division will oversee “retraining the content commendation algorithm on U.S. user data to ensure the content feed is freed from outside manipulation,” according to the Chew’s memo, which also notes that Oracle will serve as a “trusted security partner” upon the deal’s completion.

    Austin-based Oracle, co-founded by billionaire Larry Ellison, has emerged as the winner among a crowded group of U.S. players—including MrBeast and Perplexity AI—bidding for ownership of TikTok. The deal is set to further deepen ties between TikTok and the tech company, which already helps the platform store U.S. user data. Oracle’s shares are up by more than 7 percent today (Dec. 19).

    The new deal is expected to value TikTok at approximately $14 billion, according to Axios. After it closes, TikTok’s U.S. operations “will operate as an independent entity with authority over U.S. data protection, algorithm security, content moderation and software assurance,” the memo said, while “TikTok global’s U.S. entities will manage global product interoperability and certain commercial activities, including e-commerce, advertising and marketing.” The U.S. venture will be governed by a seven-member, majority-American board.

    The agreement, which is still pending approval from Chinese regulators, would resolve a longstanding point of contention between Washington and Beijing. Not all lawmakers, however, are convinced that it goes far enough to safeguard national security or protect the data of U.S. citizens.

    “This deal won’t do a thing to protect the privacy of American users,” said Senator Rob Wyden, a Democrat from Oregon, in a statement.”It’s unclear that it will even put TikTok’s algorithm in safer hands.”

    TikTok Reaches Deal With US Investors: Here’s Who Owns What

    [ad_2]

    Alexandra Tremayne-Pengelly

    Source link

  • Research Reports & Trade Ideas – Yahoo Finance

    [ad_1]

    The Argus Dividend Growth Model Portfolio

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • When Does the Seller Get Money After Closing? What to Expect and How Long It Takes

    [ad_1]

    Quick answer: Most sellers receive their money within 24–48 hours after closing, though timing can vary depending on:
    – The type of closing: Wet closings may allow same-day payment, while dry closings can take several business days.
    – How the seller is paid: Wire transfers are typically faster than cashier’s checks, though bank processing timelines apply.
    – Recording and banking requirements: Deed recording, cut-off times, weekends, and holidays can all affect when funds are released.

    Selling a home is a major financial milestone, and one of the first questions sellers ask is when does the seller get money after closing? In most cases, sellers receive their proceeds within 24 to 48 hours, though some transactions pay out the same day while others take several business days.

    Whether you’re selling a home in Kansas City, MO, Portland, OR, or Los Angeles, CA, understanding how and when you’ll receive your funds can help you plan your next move with confidence. In this Redfin guide, we’ll explain when sellers get paid after closing, how wire transfers work, what can delay payment, and what to expect along the way.

    What happens between accepting an offer and getting paid

    After accepting an offer, several required steps must be completed before a seller can receive their money. This process typically takes 30 to 60 days and explains why payment usually happens shortly after closing, not immediately.

    Before funds can be released:

    • The buyer completes inspections, appraisal, title work, and secures final loan approval.
    • The seller signs closing documents and ownership officially transfers once the deed is recorded.
    • The escrow or closing agent confirms the buyer’s funds have cleared.
    • The seller’s mortgage, commissions, and closing costs are paid.

    When sellers typically get paid after closing

    Once the transaction is finalized, sellers are usually paid shortly after closing. The exact timing depends on how the sale is completed and how funds are processed.

    The timeline below shows when sellers typically receive their proceeds across common closing scenarios.

    Closing scenario

    When seller typically gets paid

    Wet closing + wire transfer

    Same day or within 24 hours

    Wet closing + cashier’s check

    1–3 business days

    Dry closing

    2–5 business days

    Wire sent after bank cut-off time

    Next business day

    Weekend or holiday closing

    1–3 additional business days

    Because these steps can take time to process, sellers are generally paid after closing rather than at the signing table. It’s best to wait until funds are deposited before making major purchases or scheduling another home closing.

    How long does a wire transfer take after closing?

    A wire transfer after closing typically takes the same day to 48 hours, depending on bank processing times and when the transfer is initiated.

    In many transactions, funds move in two steps:

    • The buyer’s lender wires funds to the escrow account.
    • Escrow wires the seller’s proceeds to the seller’s bank.

    Several factors can affect wire transfer timing:

    • Bank cut-off times (often between 2–4 p.m.)
    • Whether the transfer is domestic or international.
    • Weekends and federal holidays.
    • Additional security verification by the bank.

    Wire transfer vs. cashier’s check: which is faster?

    Sellers are typically paid by either wire transfer or cashier’s check, and the method chosen can affect how quickly funds become available after closing.

    Wire transfer

    • Usually the fastest option.
    • Funds often available the same day or next business day.
    • Requires careful verification to avoid wire fraud.

    Cashier’s check

    • Must be deposited and cleared.
    • Banks may hold funds for up to seven business days.
    • Often considered safer due to fraud concerns.

    How wet and dry closings affect seller payment

    The terms “wet” and “dry” closing describe when funds are released relative to document signing, which can influence whether a seller is paid the same day or several days later.

    Wet closing

    • Funds are released immediately after documents are signed.
    • Sellers may get paid the same day.
    • Required in most states.

    Dry closing

    • Documents are signed first.
    • Funds are released days later.
    • Requires agreement from all parties.

    Dry closings are allowed in the following states, where payment typically takes 2–5 business days:

    While most sellers are paid shortly after closing, delays can occur in certain situations. These delays are typically administrative and temporary, and often relate to processing or verification requirements.

    Common reasons include:

    • Deed recording delays at the county level.
    • Buyer’s lender funding delays.
    • Outstanding liens or payoff verification.
    • Wire transfer initiated after a bank’s cut-off time.
    • Weekend or holiday closures.
    • Dry closing agreements.

    What if the buyer’s funds don’t clear?

    It’s rare for a buyer’s funds not to clear, but delays can occasionally occur due to financing, lender, or banking issues.

    When this happens:

    • The escrow officer notifies all parties.
    • Funds are not released until the issue is resolved.
    • Seller protections outlined in the contract typically apply.

    The bottom line: when does the seller get money after closing?

    Most sellers receive their money within 24 to 48 hours after closing, though the exact timing depends on the closing type, payment method, and bank processing rules. Understanding how wire transfers work and planning for possible delays can help ensure a smoother, more predictable payout. With the right preparation, you’ll know what to expect and be ready to move forward confidently after your home sale.

    FAQs: How long does a wire transfer take after closing?

    1. Do sellers get paid the same day as closing?

    In some cases, yes – especially with wet closings and early wire transfers. Most sellers, however, are paid within 24 to 48 hours.

    2. How long does a wire transfer take after closing?

    Wire transfers typically take the same day to 48 hours, depending on bank cut-off times and holidays.

    3. Can a seller get paid before the deed is recorded?

    Usually not. Most states require the deed to be recorded before funds are released.

    4. What’s the fastest way for a seller to get paid?

    A wire transfer initiated before the bank’s cut-off time in a wet closing state is usually the fastest.

    5. Do weekends and holidays delay payment?

    Yes. Banks and county offices are often closed, which can delay fund disbursement.

    [ad_2]

    Emily Pascale

    Source link

  • Research Reports & Trade Ideas – Yahoo Finance

    [ad_1]

    Analyst Report: Deere & Co.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Research Reports & Trade Ideas – Yahoo Finance

    [ad_1]

    Technical Assessment: Bullish in the Intermediate-Term

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Research Reports & Trade Ideas – Yahoo Finance

    [ad_1]

    Analyst Report: CMS Energy Corporation

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Research Reports & Trade Ideas – Yahoo Finance

    [ad_1]

    Weekly Stock List

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Future of Crypto Trading Is Hybrid: CeFi and DeFi Unite

    [ad_1]

    Hybrid trading ecosystems allow users to access traditional and crypto-native assets seamlessly, with deeper liquidity and fewer risks. Unsplash+

    Despite its rocky start, the crypto industry has firmly transitioned from niche communities to the core of global finance. In early December, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded nearly a full week of net inflows, totaling around $288 million, as BTC continues its recovery. At the same time, traditional asset managers are increasingly embracing digital assets: Vanguard, for example, recently began offering clients exposure to BTC, ETH, XRP and other crypto ETFs. What once was a fringe corner of finance is knowing seeing significant capital flows, and, naturally, traders’ expectations have evolved alongside it.

    Today’s users want simplicity above all else. They want a market structure that feels seamless and doesn’t force them to jump between five different platforms to engage with all the services they need. They don’t want to sacrifice liquidity for self-custody, transparency for better execution or choose between crypto-native assets and traditional financial instruments. 

    This is where hybrid CeFi-DeFi (centralized-decentralized finance) models enter the scene, designed to bridge these gaps. By merging centralized and decentralized rails, hybrid platforms aim to eliminate compromise and deliver better results for traders.  

    Establishing a new market backbone

    Historically, traders had to choose between two camps. CeFi offered deep liquidity, institutional-grade execution and predictable user experience. DeFi, meanwhile, provided open access, transparency and blockchain-native liquidity. Each side had its strengths and weaknesses, which users inevitably had to navigate.

    Now, these gaps are gradually closing. Tokenized real-world assets (RWA) have surged to $24 billion as of the late third quarter of this year, driven largely by tokenized U.S. treasuries, among the most liquid RWAs today. By 2028, the market could exceed $2 trillion, achieving an almost 82-fold increase. 

     On the DeFi side, decentralized perpetual-futures trading surpassed $1 trillion in monthly volume in October 2025, putting DeFi platforms on par with many centralized exchanges. In short, more traditional financial instruments are moving on-chain, while crypto-native assets demand deep liquidity. No single model—pure CeFi or pure DeFi—can meet all of these conditions simultaneously. Hybrid models, however, can.

     The world increasingly needs an environment that allows users to move between asset types without forcing them to move platforms as well. Or split their margins, for that matter. Hybrid architecture enables users to move freely between tokenized U.S. stock futures, high-leverage crypto derivatives and on-chain liquidity pools, all from a single account and interface. What used to take multiple logins is now made into a single workflow. 

    Why does this matter? CeFi rarely touches newly emerging DeFi assets; DeFi often lacks the institutional-level liquidity needed for serious capital; and traditional products remain on altogether different rails from crypto as a whole. By connecting historically siloed markets, hybrid systems unlock efficiency, scale and accessibility at unprecedented levels. 

    There is also the fact that hybrid models lower counterparty risk by reducing the number of hand-offs: fewer transfers between platforms, fewer intermediaries, fewer points of failure. And with shared liquidity pools, traders get better pricing and faster execution across multiple instrument types. This is the prime example of infrastructure finally catching up with user expectations.

    Why all-in-one ecosystems are winning

    The push toward unified trading platforms did not happen by accident. It is being driven by four key forces, all existing in tandem.

    1. User expectations. Users want simplicity when managing their finances. One account, seamless experience—this desire sets the standard for the industry to reach.
    2. Technological progress. Advances in asset tokenization, real-time settlements and blockchain rails all contribute to a market state where unified platforms can actually be built successfully. Just a couple of years ago, this wouldn’t have been very feasible.
    3. Institutional participation. As this class of investors grows more proactive about entering the crypto space, seamlessness becomes that much more necessary. Institutions need access to multiple asset classes without fragmented custody, inconsistent execution or operational gaps in order to feel confident.
    4. Regulatory maturity. Clearer frameworks support multi-asset ecosystems, which means that platforms in this sector can build with greater confidence and without fearing unexpected backlash. Europe’s MiCA and the GENIUNS Act in the U.S. are prime examples of this shift. The first created a legal base for cross-asset and cross-service platforms, while the latter introduced a comprehensive framework for stablecoins and the classification of digital asset payments. These steps lay the groundwork for platforms offering a wide range of hybrid services, and for unified CeFi-DeFi ecosystems; this legal clarity is an absolute must.

    With all of these factors aligning, consolidation stops looking like a simple “trend” and appears instead as what it truly is—the natural next stage in the development of this market.

    There are many tangible benefits that this transition brings to traders, but arguably the greatest one is the growth in user trust. Now market participants can see and understand the full lifecycle of their assets in one coherent system. This makes participation smoother, safer and aligned with how people actually want to trade.

    The hybrid future is already here

    The next market cycle will not be defined by any single asset class. Instead, it will be defined by interoperability: CeFi and DeFi instruments will mix seamlessly, traditional markets will connect with on-chain liquidity and A.I. will increasingly augment human decision-making.

    For traders, this means smoother workflows, deeper liquidity and fewer risks. For the industry, it means the next step in maturity and infrastructure that finally matches user expectations. The future of crypto trading is hybrid, and more importantly, it’s not a distant vision. That future is already here, developing around us in real time.

    The Future of Crypto Trading Is Hybrid: CeFi and DeFi Unite

    [ad_2]

    Ignacio Aguirre Franco

    Source link

  • Research Reports & Trade Ideas – Yahoo Finance

    [ad_1]

    Analyst Report: Best Buy Co. Inc.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Research Reports & Trade Ideas – Yahoo Finance

    [ad_1]

    Analyst Report: Oracle Corp.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • CIBC Asset Management Inc Has $18.83 Million Position in Capital One Financial Corporation $COF

    [ad_1]

    CIBC Asset Management Inc boosted its holdings in Capital One Financial Corporation (NYSE:COF – Free Report) by 53.9% during the second quarter, according to the company in its most recent Form 13F filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission. The firm owned 88,505 shares of the financial services provider’s stock after acquiring an additional 30,991 shares during the quarter. CIBC Asset Management Inc’s holdings in Capital One Financial were worth $18,830,000 at the end of the most recent quarter.

    A number of other hedge funds and other institutional investors have also recently added to or reduced their stakes in COF. WPG Advisers LLC bought a new stake in shares of Capital One Financial in the 1st quarter valued at approximately $25,000. Moisand Fitzgerald Tamayo LLC lifted its position in shares of Capital One Financial by 103.3% during the 2nd quarter. Moisand Fitzgerald Tamayo LLC now owns 122 shares of the financial services provider’s stock worth $26,000 after buying an additional 62 shares during the period. Olistico Wealth LLC boosted its stake in Capital One Financial by 439.1% in the 2nd quarter. Olistico Wealth LLC now owns 124 shares of the financial services provider’s stock valued at $26,000 after buying an additional 101 shares in the last quarter. Saudi Central Bank bought a new stake in Capital One Financial in the first quarter valued at $27,000. Finally, RMG Wealth Management LLC acquired a new position in Capital One Financial during the second quarter worth $27,000. Institutional investors own 89.84% of the company’s stock.

    Capital One Financial Trading Up 0.6%

    Shares of NYSE COF opened at $239.20 on Friday. Capital One Financial Corporation has a 1-year low of $143.22 and a 1-year high of $243.31. The company has a market cap of $152.07 billion, a PE ratio of 100.93, a P/E/G ratio of 0.57 and a beta of 1.16. The company has a current ratio of 1.03, a quick ratio of 1.03 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.45. The company has a 50-day moving average of $217.32 and a two-hundred day moving average of $214.56.

    Capital One Financial (NYSE:COF – Get Free Report) last released its quarterly earnings results on Monday, November 3rd. The financial services provider reported $5.95 EPS for the quarter. The business had revenue of $15.46 billion for the quarter. Capital One Financial had a net margin of 2.24% and a return on equity of 10.94%. As a group, equities analysts expect that Capital One Financial Corporation will post 15.65 earnings per share for the current fiscal year.

    Capital One Financial Increases Dividend

    The company also recently announced a quarterly dividend, which was paid on Monday, December 1st. Stockholders of record on Monday, November 17th were paid a $0.80 dividend. This is an increase from Capital One Financial’s previous quarterly dividend of $0.60. The ex-dividend date of this dividend was Monday, November 17th. This represents a $3.20 annualized dividend and a dividend yield of 1.3%. Capital One Financial’s payout ratio is 135.02%.

    Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades

    Several equities research analysts have recently commented on the stock. UBS Group reduced their target price on shares of Capital One Financial from $270.00 to $266.00 and set a “buy” rating on the stock in a research note on Tuesday, October 7th. The Goldman Sachs Group lifted their price target on shares of Capital One Financial from $266.00 to $276.00 and gave the company a “buy” rating in a report on Wednesday, October 22nd. TD Cowen upped their price objective on shares of Capital One Financial from $258.00 to $261.00 and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a research note on Monday, October 6th. Zacks Research lowered shares of Capital One Financial from a “strong-buy” rating to a “hold” rating in a report on Monday, November 24th. Finally, Wall Street Zen upgraded shares of Capital One Financial from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating in a research note on Friday, September 26th. Three analysts have rated the stock with a Strong Buy rating, seventeen have given a Buy rating and seven have issued a Hold rating to the stock. According to data from MarketBeat.com, the stock presently has an average rating of “Moderate Buy” and an average target price of $262.70.

    View Our Latest Research Report on Capital One Financial

    Insider Buying and Selling at Capital One Financial

    In related news, insider Neal Blinde sold 43,200 shares of the firm’s stock in a transaction dated Thursday, November 6th. The stock was sold at an average price of $221.83, for a total value of $9,583,056.00. Following the transaction, the insider owned 73,020 shares in the company, valued at $16,198,026.60. This trade represents a 37.17% decrease in their ownership of the stock. The transaction was disclosed in a legal filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is available at the SEC website. Also, CEO Richard D. Fairbank sold 103,487 shares of Capital One Financial stock in a transaction dated Tuesday, November 4th. The stock was sold at an average price of $220.68, for a total value of $22,837,511.16. Following the completion of the sale, the chief executive officer owned 4,001,228 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $882,990,995.04. The trade was a 2.52% decrease in their ownership of the stock. The disclosure for this sale is available in the SEC filing. Insiders have sold a total of 280,218 shares of company stock valued at $62,395,804 over the last ninety days. Company insiders own 1.26% of the company’s stock.

    Capital One Financial Profile

    (Free Report)

    Capital One Financial Corporation operates as the financial services holding company for the Capital One, National Association, which engages in the provision of various financial products and services in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. It operates through three segments: Credit Card, Consumer Banking, and Commercial Banking.

    Recommended Stories

    Institutional Ownership by Quarter for Capital One Financial (NYSE:COF)



    Receive News & Ratings for Capital One Financial Daily – Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts’ ratings for Capital One Financial and related companies with MarketBeat.com’s FREE daily email newsletter.

    [ad_2]

    ABMN Staff

    Source link

  • Gen Z more likely to return products than other age groups despite environmental harm, report finds

    [ad_1]

    A new report from the National Retail Federation shows that Gen Z shoppers make the most returns out of any generation, despite the environmental harm it can cause. Taylor Hoit, head of product and technology at the online marketplace Rebel, joins CBS News to discuss.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Sheryl Sandberg’s Lean In Finds Women Are Leaning Out in the Workplace

    [ad_1]

    Sandberg argues that standardized processes are essential to closing the widening ambition gap. John Lamparski/Getty Images

    Twelve years after Sheryl Sandberg’s best-seller Lean In sparked a workplace movement urging women to push for advancement, many are now leaning out. A new survey by LeanIn.org, the nonprofit Sandberg founded alongside the book’s release in 2013, conducted with McKinsey & Company shows a notable drop in women’s ambition.

    LeanIn.org’s annual “Women in the Workplace” report, released Tuesday (Dec. 9) and based on data from 124 companies in the U.S. and Canada, finds for the first time that women are less likely than men to say they want a promotion. In 2025, 80 percent of women sought a promotion compared to 86 percent of men. In prior years, ambition levels were aligned. Last year, for example, both were at 70 percent.

    “We do see that ambition gap, but only when women don’t get the opportunities and support they need,” Sandberg said in an interview with Bloomberg on Tuesday. 

    She said the gap stems from persistent barriers at every career stage. Two in 10 companies now say women’s advancement is a low or nonexistent priority—a figure that rises to three in 10 for women of color. About half of the companies that previously contributed to the report also no longer prioritize advancing women, Sandberg said.

    Day-to-day, these barriers are reflected in how ambition is perceived and rewarded. Women are 30 percent more likely than men to be labeled “aggressive” when they ask for raises or promotions, and men in senior roles are 70 percent more likely than their female peers to be selected for leadership training.

    Sandberg argues the solution is straightforward: “Standardize your processes. Establish criteria in advance that everyone agrees to that are universally applied.”

    The report also notes the impact of post-COVID return-to-office mandates. A quarter of surveyed companies now offer fewer remote and hybrid options—policies that disproportionately affect women, who make up about two-thirds of U.S. caregivers. Women who work mostly remotely face stigma for using flexibility benefits, whereas men generally do not.

    Gender diversity programs are also shrinking. Nearly one-sixth of companies have reduced formal leadership sponsorships and scaled back programs designed for women. These cuts come amid the Trump administration’s rollback of DEI efforts and the rise of natalist policies that encourage women to have more children.

    As rhetoric promoting stay-at-home motherhood gains traction, Sandberg said the data doesn’t support the idea that staying home is inherently better for families. These expectations, she added, “were never really gone.” Even now, she said, “Do I really think we ever fully encouraged leadership in…women as much as men?” The answer is no.

    “If you can afford to be a full-time spouse and a full-time parent as a man or a woman and you want to do that, I think that can be deeply fulfilling work,” said Sandberg. “Most women don’t have that option.”

    Ultimately, Sandberg said expanding leadership opportunities for women is an economic imperative. “It’s a question of economic productivity,” she said. “Do we want to get the best out of our workforce?”

    Sheryl Sandberg’s Lean In Finds Women Are Leaning Out in the Workplace

    [ad_2]

    Rachel Curry

    Source link

  • Research Reports & Trade Ideas – Yahoo Finance

    [ad_1]

    Analyst Report: Royal Bank of Canada

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Research Reports & Trade Ideas – Yahoo Finance

    [ad_1]

    December Optimism

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • UK Announces £30M Fund to Strengthen Gambling Harm Prevention Efforts

    [ad_1]

    The UK government has taken a decisive step toward addressing gambling harm, announcing a new GBP 30 million ($39.71 million) fund for voluntary and community groups. The initiative, spearheaded by the Department of Health and Social Care, marks the first phase of a two-year program that aims to bridge the gap between the existing funding framework and the upcoming statutory levy system.

    The Measure Seeks to Address Short-Term Deficiencies

    According to a recent Next.io report, officials outlined the plan during an information session on October 26, announcing that the expression of interest period is now open and will run until January 9. Applications will be accepted from January 12, with grant decisions expected in early spring. The first installments should be available starting in April.

    The fund will have three components. The first focuses on direct prevention work, primarily programs that reach out to people and communities before harm escalates. Another portion of the funds will go toward innovation, experimenting with new approaches, or adapting successful models from other sectors. The third will help bolster organizations with staffing, training, and systems, allowing them to scale up. Groups can apply for amounts ranging from GBP 5,000 ($6,600) to GBP 2 million ($2.65 million).

    The announcement seeks to address growing concerns in the sector. Numerous non-profit organizations have warned of rising financial distress as they await clarity on when the statutory levy money will begin flowing. Distribution also remains a contentious topic. Some charities claim that the competition for limited funds has led to friction and accusations within the field.

    New Tax Increases Could Lead to a Spike in Harm

    According to government officials, applicants must commit to achieving an “industry-free funding status” by 2030. Although the expectation has raised questions for organizations that still depend on industry donations to survive, officials noted they would adopt a pragmatic view for the next two years. Funds from the National Lottery will not count as industry money during this period, though that position may be reevaluated.

    Starting in April 2026, however, the rules will become stricter. Any organization that receives money from the fund must not accept contributions from gambling operators. The Government Grants Management Service will help facilitate the transition with the Find a Grant portal, introducing a new digital system to streamline monitoring and reporting after 2026.

    This development coincides with significant upheaval in the gambling sector due to the recently unveiled gambling tax rise from 21% to 40%. Experts are concerned that this tax increase may push more players to unlicensed sites, increasing the risk of harm and putting even more pressure on the already hard-pressed organizations. The new fund will thus be invaluable in bolstering the country’s harm prevention infrastructure before the statutory levy takes full effect.

    [ad_2]

    Deyan Dimitrov

    Source link