ReportWire

Tag: Finance

  • JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM) Position Reduced by Kozak & Associates Inc.

    JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM) Position Reduced by Kozak & Associates Inc.

    [ad_1]

    Kozak & Associates Inc. decreased its position in shares of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM) by 10.8% during the 4th quarter, Holdings Channel.com reports. The firm owned 8,242 shares of the financial services provider’s stock after selling 994 shares during the quarter. JPMorgan Chase & Co. accounts for 0.4% of Kozak & Associates Inc.’s investment portfolio, making the stock its 16th biggest holding. Kozak & Associates Inc.’s holdings in JPMorgan Chase & Co. were worth $1,385,000 as of its most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

    Other hedge funds have also recently added to or reduced their stakes in the company. Curbstone Financial Management Corp boosted its stake in JPMorgan Chase & Co. by 0.3% in the fourth quarter. Curbstone Financial Management Corp now owns 23,930 shares of the financial services provider’s stock valued at $4,070,000 after acquiring an additional 60 shares during the last quarter. Grey Street Capital LLC boosted its stake in JPMorgan Chase & Co. by 0.9% in the fourth quarter. Grey Street Capital LLC now owns 6,994 shares of the financial services provider’s stock valued at $1,190,000 after acquiring an additional 60 shares during the last quarter. Sendero Wealth Management LLC boosted its stake in JPMorgan Chase & Co. by 1.1% in the fourth quarter. Sendero Wealth Management LLC now owns 5,811 shares of the financial services provider’s stock valued at $988,000 after acquiring an additional 62 shares during the last quarter. Raleigh Capital Management Inc. boosted its stake in JPMorgan Chase & Co. by 0.8% in the third quarter. Raleigh Capital Management Inc. now owns 8,151 shares of the financial services provider’s stock valued at $1,182,000 after acquiring an additional 64 shares during the last quarter. Finally, Affinity Wealth Management LLC boosted its stake in JPMorgan Chase & Co. by 0.4% in the second quarter. Affinity Wealth Management LLC now owns 19,082 shares of the financial services provider’s stock valued at $2,775,000 after acquiring an additional 68 shares during the last quarter. Institutional investors and hedge funds own 71.55% of the company’s stock.

    Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades

    JPM has been the topic of a number of recent research reports. Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft raised shares of JPMorgan Chase & Co. from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating and raised their price objective for the company from $140.00 to $190.00 in a research note on Tuesday, January 9th. Royal Bank of Canada reissued an “outperform” rating and set a $185.00 price target on shares of JPMorgan Chase & Co. in a research report on Wednesday, March 20th. The Goldman Sachs Group reissued a “buy” rating on shares of JPMorgan Chase & Co. in a research report on Thursday, February 1st. Barclays lifted their price target on shares of JPMorgan Chase & Co. from $186.00 to $212.00 and gave the stock an “overweight” rating in a research report on Tuesday, January 2nd. Finally, BMO Capital Markets lifted their price target on shares of JPMorgan Chase & Co. from $192.00 to $194.00 and gave the stock a “market perform” rating in a research report on Tuesday, January 16th. Eight analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating and twelve have assigned a buy rating to the company. According to MarketBeat, the stock presently has an average rating of “Moderate Buy” and an average target price of $181.63.

    View Our Latest Research Report on JPM

    Insider Transactions at JPMorgan Chase & Co.

    In related news, Vice Chairman Peter Scher sold 1,812 shares of JPMorgan Chase & Co. stock in a transaction dated Tuesday, January 16th. The shares were sold at an average price of $166.65, for a total transaction of $301,969.80. Following the completion of the sale, the insider now owns 46,766 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $7,793,553.90. The sale was disclosed in a legal filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is accessible through this link. In other JPMorgan Chase & Co. news, Vice Chairman Peter Scher sold 1,812 shares of the business’s stock in a transaction dated Tuesday, January 16th. The shares were sold at an average price of $166.65, for a total value of $301,969.80. Following the completion of the sale, the insider now owns 46,766 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $7,793,553.90. The transaction was disclosed in a legal filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is accessible through the SEC website. Also, CEO Jennifer Piepszak sold 1,648 shares of the business’s stock in a transaction that occurred on Friday, February 16th. The shares were sold at an average price of $178.96, for a total transaction of $294,926.08. Following the completion of the transaction, the chief executive officer now owns 32,819 shares of the company’s stock, valued at $5,873,288.24. The disclosure for this sale can be found here. Insiders have sold 849,303 shares of company stock worth $155,107,447 in the last ninety days. Insiders own 0.79% of the company’s stock.

    JPMorgan Chase & Co. Trading Up 0.4 %

    Shares of NYSE:JPM opened at $200.29 on Friday. The company has a quick ratio of 0.91, a current ratio of 0.91 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.30. JPMorgan Chase & Co. has a 12 month low of $126.22 and a 12 month high of $200.72. The company’s fifty day simple moving average is $182.22 and its 200 day simple moving average is $163.62. The firm has a market cap of $576.91 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 12.35, a PEG ratio of 2.49 and a beta of 1.14.

    JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPMGet Free Report) last issued its quarterly earnings results on Friday, January 12th. The financial services provider reported $3.04 earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter, missing the consensus estimate of $3.73 by ($0.69). JPMorgan Chase & Co. had a net margin of 20.70% and a return on equity of 17.80%. The business had revenue of $38.57 billion during the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $39.73 billion. During the same quarter in the previous year, the firm posted $3.57 earnings per share. The firm’s quarterly revenue was up 11.7% on a year-over-year basis. As a group, research analysts forecast that JPMorgan Chase & Co. will post 15.75 EPS for the current fiscal year.

    JPMorgan Chase & Co. Increases Dividend

    The company also recently disclosed a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Tuesday, April 30th. Stockholders of record on Friday, April 5th will be paid a dividend of $1.15 per share. The ex-dividend date is Thursday, April 4th. This is a positive change from JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s previous quarterly dividend of $1.05. This represents a $4.60 annualized dividend and a dividend yield of 2.30%. JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s payout ratio is currently 25.89%.

    JPMorgan Chase & Co. Profile

    (Free Report)

    JPMorgan Chase & Co operates as a financial services company worldwide. It operates through four segments: Consumer & Community Banking (CCB), Corporate & Investment Bank (CIB), Commercial Banking (CB), and Asset & Wealth Management (AWM). The CCB segment offers deposit, investment and lending products, cash management, and payments and services; mortgage origination and servicing activities; residential mortgages and home equity loans; and credit cards, auto loans, leases, and travel services to consumers and small businesses through bank branches, ATMs, and digital and telephone banking.

    Further Reading

    Want to see what other hedge funds are holding JPM? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPMFree Report).

    Institutional Ownership by Quarter for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM)

    Receive News & Ratings for JPMorgan Chase & Co. Daily – Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts’ ratings for JPMorgan Chase & Co. and related companies with MarketBeat.com’s FREE daily email newsletter.

    [ad_2]

    ABMN Staff

    Source link

  • City halfway there when it comes to school budget request

    City halfway there when it comes to school budget request

    [ad_1]

    Even with the city planning to kick in $3 million of a proposed $6.1 million increase to keep Gloucester schools level funded in the new school year, Superintendent Ben Lummis cited possible cuts to balance the fiscal 2025 budget.

    He outlined a proposed $55.85 million level-services budget for the School Committee on Wednesday night. That is a 12.3% increase, or $6.1 million, more than this year’s spending, given a jump in costs for out-of-district special education and transportation, health care and contractual salary increases, among other things.

    Lummis said the city plans to meet the schools halfway.

    In doing so, the schools would have to cut $3.1 million worth of services, costs and staffing to balance its budget.

    “At this point, the city has let us know they can fund $3 million of the $6.1 million the schools require for a level-funded budget,” Lummis said.

    “But to be clear,” said School Committee Vice Chair Bill Melvin, “that’s not … It’s a reduction in services.”

    Lummis said coming to a balanced budget — not the level-services one — would depend on several factors, including:

    A $1.3 million supplemental appropriation prior to the end of the fiscal year in June to make pay prepaid tuition and special education costs. This would require a City Council vote.

    Another $200,000 for one-time costs for information technology and buses this fiscal year.

    A proposed $1.5 million annual increase in the schools’ operating budget from the city.

    Another $3.1 million in reductions in costs and staffing.

    “It is very unlikely that we’re going to be able to staff levels that we’ve had for recent years because of the increase in operating expenses, and also just to wage pressures as well,” Lummis said.

    What might the reductions look like?

    The administration wants to protect Tier 1 (core) instruction and curriculum and support vulnerable learners.

    In the elementary schools, the priority would be to protect social emotional learning and mental health. At the middle school this would mean maintaining the house structure, and at the high school, the priority would be preparation for post-secondary success, Lummis said.

    However, salaries and benefits make up 86% of the Gloucester schools’ operating costs, so reducing the operating budget means reducing staffing.

    A $500,000 cut in the operating budget equals about seven full-time equivalent positions, Lummis said.

    Reduction options

    Lummis referred to two different levels of cuts. The first would mean reductions of $1 million to $1.75 million.

    At the elementary level, this would include Tier II intervention and support, special education staff based on students’ Individualized Education Plan services, a move of some services to grants, and instructional support and curriculum initiatives.

    At the grade six through 12, the administration would look to trim Tier II intervention support, pause the planned medical assisting exploratory launch as a new career and vocational program at Gloucester High until September 2025, reduce special education staff based on IEP services, move related services onto grants, reduce staff in one or more academic areas which Lummis said would increase class size; and reduce increases in student support services for mental health and social emotional learning.

    At the district office, Lummis would trim IT infrastructure and delay upgrades, seek one-time funding for a one-to-one Chromebook initiative, and reduce administration and transportation costs.

    Lummis said the reductions would still mean smaller class sizes in the elementary schools and a range of class sizes at the middle and high schools. This level of reductions would allow for diverse academic offerings and a broad range of programming at Gloucester High, improvements at O’Maley Innovation Middle School and high-qualify art, music, and performing arts programs.

    However, those areas would be in jeopardy with reductions of $2 million to $3 million.

    The schools’ operating budget is not benefiting fully from the state funding increases that have come since fiscal 2023 as a result of the state Student Opportunity Act, Lummis said.

    For instance, in fiscal 2023, state Chapter 70 education aid to the city increased by $2.77 million and by $1.67 million last year, with the governor proposing $318,000 on top of that for this coming school year.

    Lummis said the state has determined the cost of educating students has increased $2.3 million for the upcoming school year, and that the local contribution should increase by $1.9 million, plus another $318,000 for Chapter 70 aid.

    Cumulative state aid for education increases since fiscal 2022 has totaled nearly $12 million.

    However, during that time, the city has increased the schools’ operating budget by a total of $1.85 million above the typical baseline increase to the schools each year which is typically $1.25 million, he said.

    Increased funding applied to the schools outside the operating budget since fiscal 2022 includes $2 million for DPW school facilities, $3.3 million for borrowing for school capital projects, and $4.2 million for one-time projects such as the Annisquam River flood barrier, demolition of East Gloucester Elementary School, grease traps, Gloucester High lockers, and American Rescue Plan Act funding for new playgrounds.

    Finding dollars

    There are opportunities to increase school funding, including the city funding the operating budget with the $2.3 million increase determined by the state, Lummis said.

    The city could put American Rescue Plan Act funding it received toward special education tuition, transportation and wage stabilization, which Lummis said are all eligible to be funded this way. The city could also reduce the facilities budget for such things as flooring projects and allocate those dollars to the schools, he said.

    Mayor Greg Verga, a member of the School Committee, said the city administration would continue to work with the school administration “to see what kind of rabbits we can pull out of our hats.”

    Verga said he shared with Lummis a spreadsheet showing the city spends $22.1 million outside the schools’ operating budget on the schools, an increase of $6 million from 2022 to 2024.

    “The kicker” is the city’s increase this year in new growth under Proposition 2 1/2 is 2.6% or $3.5 million. With a $130 million budget, total school spending represents about $72 million, he said.

    With another $1 million going toward the city’s pension liability, and the proposed increase to the schools of $1.5 million, Verga said he has $1 million in new growth funding to spread around to the rest of the city’s budget.

    One solution may be to lobby state lawmakers to pass the governor’s Municipal Empowerment Act to provide more opportunities for local option tax increases, he said.

    The School Committee’s Budget and Finance Subcommittee plans to take up the fiscal 2025 school budget April 8.

    [ad_2]

    By Ethan Forman | Staff Writer

    Source link

  • SENIOR LOOKOUT: Tips for reducing risk of a taking spill

    SENIOR LOOKOUT: Tips for reducing risk of a taking spill

    [ad_1]

    The fear of falling as we age is a very real concern. Most of us can tell a story of a friend or loved one who fell and experienced a life-changing injury. The National Institute on Aging reports that more than one in three people age 65 years or older falls each year. For an older person, a fall can be the start of serious problems, such as injury, a hospital stay, or even disability.

    Concern about falling can lead an older person to avoid activities such as walking, shopping, or taking part in social activities — even if they haven’t fallen previously. The irony is that the likelihood of falling increases if a person doesn’t stay active. If they allow fear to keep them inactive at home, they are more likely to fall.

    There are several factors that help explain why older people are at higher risk for falling. Poor eyesight can make it difficult to see a step, a throw rug, or a toy on the floor. Certain medical conditions or medications can cause dizziness.

    A person can lower their chances of falling. Some falls don’t “just happen.” Here are a few tips to help you avoid falls:

    Stay physically active. Talk to your doctor about what you can do safely to stay active.

    Have your eyes and hearing tested. When you get new eyeglasses or contact lenses, take time to get used to them.

    Find out about the side effects of medicines you take. If a drug makes you sleepy or dizzy, tell your doctor or pharmacist.

    Get enough sleep.

    Limit the amount of alcohol you drink.

    Stand up slowly.

    Use a cane or walker if you need help feeling steady when you walk. Again, you should speak with your doctor to learn which might be best for you.

    Be very careful when walking on wet or icy surfaces.

    Wear non-skid, rubber-soled, low-heeled shoes, or lace-up shoes with non-skid soles that fully support your feet.

    Don’t walk on stairs or floors in socks or in shoes or slippers with smooth soles.

    Be careful about long dresses, slacks, or pajamas that could trip you.

    There are many ways you can make your home safer. Just a few include:

    Keep cords away from areas where you walk.

    Remove loose carpets and rugs or tack down the carpets and only use rugs with non-skid backing.

    Add lights in dimly lit areas and at the top and bottom of stairs.

    Use nightlights in bedrooms, halls, and bathrooms.

    Clean up clutter – especially near staircases.

    Put handrails on both sides of any steps or stairs in or outside of your home.

    Add grab bars near the toilet and bathtub, and no-slip decals or a rubber mat in the tub or shower.

    If you are concerned about falling, you can register for an emergency response system. If you fall or need emergency help, you push a button on a special necklace or bracelet to alert 911. There is a fee for this service and it is not always covered by insurance. You can call SeniorCare’s Information & Referral Department at 978-281-1750 for a list of services available in our area.

    Always tell your doctor if you have fallen since your last checkup, even if you weren’t hurt. A fall can alert your doctor to a new medical problem or problems with your medications or eyesight that can be corrected. Your doctor may suggest physical therapy, a walking aid, or other steps to help prevent future falls.

    SeniorCare offers the free evidence-based workshop “A Matter of Balance” several times each year. The next session is scheduled for Wednesdays from April 24 to June 13, 11 a.m. to 1 p.m., at the Ipswich YMCA,110 County Road in Ipswich. A Matter of Balance educates and supports aging adults around falling and the fear of falling. Topics such as viewing falls as controllable, setting realistic goals for increasing physical activity and modifying our environments help participants create a personal plan to lessen the risk of falling.

    There is no charge to attend A Matter of Balance, but advance registration is required. For information about or to register for A Matter of Balance, please contact Abby Considine at SeniorCare at 978-281-1750.

    Tracy Arabian is the communications officer at SeniorCare Inc., a local agency on aging that serves Gloucester, Beverly, Essex, Hamilton, Ipswich, Manchester-by-the-Sea, Rockport, Topsfield and Wenham.

    Tracy Arabian is the communications officer at SeniorCare Inc., a local agency on aging that serves Gloucester, Beverly, Essex, Hamilton, Ipswich, Manchester-by-the-Sea, Rockport, Topsfield and Wenham.

    [ad_2]

    Senior Lookout | Tracy Arabian

    Source link

  • B & T Capital Management DBA Alpha Capital Management Has $8.18 Million Holdings in JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM)

    B & T Capital Management DBA Alpha Capital Management Has $8.18 Million Holdings in JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM)

    [ad_1]

    B & T Capital Management DBA Alpha Capital Management cut its position in JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM) by 0.8% during the fourth quarter, according to the company in its most recent disclosure with the Securities & Exchange Commission. The institutional investor owned 48,060 shares of the financial services provider’s stock after selling 367 shares during the period. JPMorgan Chase & Co. accounts for about 1.7% of B & T Capital Management DBA Alpha Capital Management’s investment portfolio, making the stock its 16th biggest position. B & T Capital Management DBA Alpha Capital Management’s holdings in JPMorgan Chase & Co. were worth $8,175,000 at the end of the most recent reporting period.

    A number of other institutional investors and hedge funds have also recently added to or reduced their stakes in the company. Moneta Group Investment Advisors LLC lifted its position in shares of JPMorgan Chase & Co. by 105,652.2% during the fourth quarter. Moneta Group Investment Advisors LLC now owns 98,000,567 shares of the financial services provider’s stock worth $13,141,876,000 after purchasing an additional 97,907,897 shares in the last quarter. Norges Bank acquired a new position in shares of JPMorgan Chase & Co. during the fourth quarter worth approximately $3,894,646,000. Morgan Stanley raised its stake in shares of JPMorgan Chase & Co. by 15.9% during the fourth quarter. Morgan Stanley now owns 59,049,256 shares of the financial services provider’s stock worth $7,918,506,000 after buying an additional 8,088,433 shares during the last quarter. Wellington Management Group LLP raised its stake in shares of JPMorgan Chase & Co. by 12.2% during the third quarter. Wellington Management Group LLP now owns 42,421,711 shares of the financial services provider’s stock worth $6,151,997,000 after buying an additional 4,603,090 shares during the last quarter. Finally, Barclays PLC raised its stake in shares of JPMorgan Chase & Co. by 51.6% during the second quarter. Barclays PLC now owns 8,422,975 shares of the financial services provider’s stock worth $1,225,037,000 after buying an additional 2,868,091 shares during the last quarter. 71.55% of the stock is currently owned by institutional investors and hedge funds.

    Insider Buying and Selling at JPMorgan Chase & Co.

    In other news, insider Ashley Bacon sold 3,368 shares of the firm’s stock in a transaction dated Tuesday, January 16th. The shares were sold at an average price of $166.73, for a total transaction of $561,546.64. Following the completion of the sale, the insider now owns 205,461 shares in the company, valued at approximately $34,256,512.53. The transaction was disclosed in a filing with the SEC, which is accessible through this link. In other news, insider Ashley Bacon sold 3,368 shares of the firm’s stock in a transaction dated Tuesday, January 16th. The shares were sold at an average price of $166.73, for a total transaction of $561,546.64. Following the completion of the sale, the insider now owns 205,461 shares in the company, valued at approximately $34,256,512.53. The transaction was disclosed in a filing with the SEC, which is accessible through this link. Also, insider Lori A. Beer sold 3,920 shares of the firm’s stock in a transaction dated Thursday, February 22nd. The stock was sold at an average price of $182.74, for a total transaction of $716,340.80. Following the sale, the insider now owns 44,996 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $8,222,569.04. The disclosure for this sale can be found here. Insiders sold a total of 845,383 shares of company stock worth $154,341,636 over the last quarter. 0.79% of the stock is currently owned by insiders.

    Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades

    JPM has been the subject of a number of recent research reports. Bank of America boosted their price target on shares of JPMorgan Chase & Co. from $177.00 to $188.00 and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a research note on Thursday, January 4th. Morgan Stanley boosted their price target on shares of JPMorgan Chase & Co. from $191.00 to $221.00 and gave the stock an “overweight” rating in a research note on Tuesday, January 30th. Barclays boosted their price target on shares of JPMorgan Chase & Co. from $186.00 to $212.00 and gave the stock an “overweight” rating in a research note on Tuesday, January 2nd. Oppenheimer dropped their price target on shares of JPMorgan Chase & Co. from $238.00 to $219.00 and set an “outperform” rating for the company in a research note on Tuesday, March 19th. Finally, Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft raised shares of JPMorgan Chase & Co. from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating and boosted their price target for the stock from $140.00 to $190.00 in a research note on Tuesday, January 9th. Eight investment analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating and twelve have given a buy rating to the company’s stock. According to data from MarketBeat.com, JPMorgan Chase & Co. presently has an average rating of “Moderate Buy” and a consensus target price of $181.63.

    Get Our Latest Analysis on JPMorgan Chase & Co.

    JPMorgan Chase & Co. Stock Performance

    Shares of JPM opened at $195.83 on Wednesday. JPMorgan Chase & Co. has a 12 month low of $126.22 and a 12 month high of $200.48. The firm has a fifty day simple moving average of $181.02 and a 200 day simple moving average of $163.00. The stock has a market capitalization of $564.06 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 12.07, a PEG ratio of 2.48 and a beta of 1.14. The company has a current ratio of 0.91, a quick ratio of 0.91 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.30.

    JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPMGet Free Report) last announced its earnings results on Friday, January 12th. The financial services provider reported $3.04 EPS for the quarter, missing the consensus estimate of $3.73 by ($0.69). JPMorgan Chase & Co. had a return on equity of 17.80% and a net margin of 20.70%. The business had revenue of $38.57 billion for the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $39.73 billion. During the same quarter in the previous year, the company posted $3.57 EPS. The business’s revenue for the quarter was up 11.7% compared to the same quarter last year. Research analysts forecast that JPMorgan Chase & Co. will post 15.84 EPS for the current fiscal year.

    JPMorgan Chase & Co. Increases Dividend

    The company also recently declared a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Tuesday, April 30th. Shareholders of record on Friday, April 5th will be paid a $1.15 dividend. The ex-dividend date of this dividend is Thursday, April 4th. This represents a $4.60 dividend on an annualized basis and a yield of 2.35%. This is a boost from JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s previous quarterly dividend of $1.05. JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s dividend payout ratio (DPR) is currently 25.89%.

    About JPMorgan Chase & Co.

    (Free Report)

    JPMorgan Chase & Co operates as a financial services company worldwide. It operates through four segments: Consumer & Community Banking (CCB), Corporate & Investment Bank (CIB), Commercial Banking (CB), and Asset & Wealth Management (AWM). The CCB segment offers deposit, investment and lending products, cash management, and payments and services; mortgage origination and servicing activities; residential mortgages and home equity loans; and credit cards, auto loans, leases, and travel services to consumers and small businesses through bank branches, ATMs, and digital and telephone banking.

    Featured Stories

    Want to see what other hedge funds are holding JPM? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPMFree Report).

    Institutional Ownership by Quarter for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM)

    Receive News & Ratings for JPMorgan Chase & Co. Daily – Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts’ ratings for JPMorgan Chase & Co. and related companies with MarketBeat.com’s FREE daily email newsletter.

    [ad_2]

    ABMN Staff

    Source link

  • The Science of Crypto Forensics Survives a Court Battle—for Now

    The Science of Crypto Forensics Survives a Court Battle—for Now

    [ad_1]

    On March 12, Russian-Swedish national Roman Sterlingov was found guilty of money laundering conspiracy and other violations by a federal jury in Washington, DC, for having operated Bitcoin Fog, a service criminals used to launder what authorities claim was hundreds of millions of dollars in ill-gotten gains.

    The conviction was heralded by the US Department of Justice as a victory over crypto-enabled criminality, but Sterlingov’s lawyers maintain the case against him was flawed and plan to appeal. They allege that the nascent science used to collect evidence against him is not fit for the purpose.

    The DOJ investigation used blockchain forensics, a technique whereby investigators scrutinize the public trail of crypto transactions to map the flow of funds. In a statement, Lisa Monaco, deputy attorney general for the US, described the DOJ as “painstakingly tracing bitcoin through the blockchain” to identify Sterlingov as the pseudonymous administrator behind Bitcoin Fog.

    Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have acquired an undeserved reputation for being less traceable than conventional money, but evidence collected this way has brought down many criminals over the past decade. Blockchain forensics was crucial to the trial of Ross Ulbricht, founder of the infamous Silk Road marketplace. But in the Bitcoin Fog case, the defense has pulled this investigative technique into the spotlight, effectively putting crypto tracing on trial in place of their client. The case is a “first-of-its-kind,” says Tor Ekeland, legal counsel to Sterlingov. “Nobody has challenged blockchain forensics before, because it’s brand-new.”

    Before Sterlingov’s trial, his attorneys asked the presiding judge to determine the admissibility of evidence from blockchain forensics experts that had used software from a firm called Chainalysis, which expedites the otherwise tedious process of sifting through the blockchain. He ruled the evidence was admissible.

    That decision has been characterized by Michael Gronager, Chainalysis CEO, as an endorsement of his firm and its methods. “We are now the only company in the world with a stamp of approval for our ability to look at a blockchain and create evidence,” he says. But Ekeland says he will work with Sterlingov to appeal both the guilty verdict and the judge’s ruling on the validity of blockchain forensics. The conviction of Sterlingov is the latest example of the unhappy phenomenon, claims Ekeland, whereby “newly emergent junk science leads to unjust verdicts.”

    Beth Bisbee of Chainalysis, formerly the company’s head of US investigations, disputes that characterization. “The evidence that the government presented to the jury demonstrated the exact opposite,” says Bisbee, who testified as an expert witness at the trial. “Our methods are transparent, tested, reviewed, and reliable.”

    Natsec Threat

    Until it was shut down by US law enforcement in 2021, Bitcoin Fog supplied what’s known as a crypto mixing or crypto tumbling service. Funds belonging to many parties are pooled, jumbled up, and spat out into brand-new wallets, masking the origin of the coins held in each. Mixers were originally promoted as a way to improve the level of privacy cryptocurrency could afford consumers, but they have been readily co-opted for the purpose of money laundering. Bitcoin Fog was among the first mixers to emerge, in 2011, making it “the longest-running bitcoin money laundering service on the darknet,” the DOJ says.

    In the past few years, the US government has cracked down on crypto mixers, which it considers a threat to national security. After taking down Bitcoin Fog, the US Treasury sanctioned Tornado Cash, another mixer, in 2022. The year after, it took down another, ChipMixer, and charged the founder with money laundering. To identify the individuals behind these operations, investigators had to follow the crypto money.

    [ad_2]

    Joel Khalili

    Source link

  • Bragg Gaming Releases Strong 2023 Results, Updates Guidance

    Bragg Gaming Releases Strong 2023 Results, Updates Guidance

    [ad_1]

    Bragg Gaming Group, a global provider of iGaming tech, has published its Q4 and FY 2023 results, reporting very favorable figures. The company subsequently updated its growth targets for 2024.

    In Q4 2023, revenue decreased by 1.4% to $25.2 million, reflecting the revised commercial terms with a key strategic partner. Betting handle, on the other hand, reached a whopping $6.6 billion, marking a significant increase.

    Quarterly adjusted EBITDA declined by 23.7% to $3 million. In the meantime, adjusted EBITDA margins decreased by 350bps to 11.9%, a change attributed to a decline in the gross profit offset by an improvement in cost optimization.

    Gross profit decreased by 7.3% to $12.9 million, while operational loss decreased from $0.6 million in Q4 2022 to $0.4 million in Q4 2023.

    As for Bragg’s full-year results, the company reported revenue of $100.5 million, representing an increase of 10.4% year-on-year. Betting handle stood at $24.1 billion. The group also reported a gross profit increase of 10.8% to $53.7 million, representing a gross profit margin of 53.4%.

    Adjusted EBITDA, on the other hand, stood at EUR 15.2 million for FY 2023, marking an increase of 26.3% year-on-year. This translated into an adjusted EBITDA margin of 16.3%. Cash flow from operations reached $12.6 million.

    The company ended 2023 with $9.5 million in cash and cash equivalents and $5.5 million of net working capital, excluding deferred consideration and convertible debt.

    Bragg added that it expects FY 2024 revenue in the range of $109.7-117.2 million and adjusted EBITDA range between $16.3 million and 19.9 million.

    The Company Will Explore Strategic Alternatives

    In 2023, Bragg Gaming Group signed several Tier-1 content distribution deals with companies such as Betsson, 888 and PokerStars. In addition, it launched content in new regulated markets, such as Belgium, Italy and Caliente.

    The company rolled out new games and continues to supply operators in international markets with proprietary and exclusive content.

    In the meantime, Bragg’s board formed an ad hoc special committee, chaired by independent board member Don Robertson, to undertake a review of the company’s strategic alternatives. Such alternatives include a potential sale, merger, financing, acquisitions or other moves.

    Matevž Mazij, Bragg’s chief executive officer, released a statement on the results, saying that his team will continue its efforts to establish the business as a premier content-focused iGaming B2B provider.

    He praised the expansion of Bragg’s global distribution, saying that his team anticipates a further surge in the global adoption of his company’s games in 2024. Mazij added that his company is in a good spot for long-term growth in top-line revenue, gross profit and adjusted EBITDA, along with improved operating margins.

    With confidence, we affirm our readiness with the appropriate strategies, financial strength, and infrastructure to maintain our business momentum while executing initiatives that foster cash flow growth and generate added value for our shareholders.

    Matevž Mazij, CEO, Bragg Gaming Group

    In other news, Bragg recently agreed to provide Golden Nugget Michigan with content.

    [ad_2]

    Angel Hristov

    Source link

  • BuzzFeed Revenue Fell Sharply in 2023 as CEO Jonah Peretti Figures Out Turnaround Plan

    BuzzFeed Revenue Fell Sharply in 2023 as CEO Jonah Peretti Figures Out Turnaround Plan

    [ad_1]

    BuzzFeed co-founder and CEO Jonah Peretti.  Bennett Raglin/Getty Images for BuzzFeed Inc.

    BuzzFeed (BZFD)’s content and advertising revenue fell sharply in the last three months of 2023 but managed to turn a slim profit of $3.5 million, the company said in its 2023 fourth-quarter and full-year earnings report today (March 25). Quarterly revenue came at $75.7 million, down 26 percent from the year prior. Full-year revenue fell just as much to $252.7 million. 

    One bright spot is that time spent by BuzzFeed’s audience on its media products grew 3 percent in 2023 to 306 million hours. However, time spent on BuzzFeed content on its third-party platforms declined by 32 percent last year. All the earnings numbers exclude the pop culture media brand Complex, which BuzzFeed sold in February and was classified as “held for sale” in the December report.

    Almost a year ago, BuzzFeed shuttered its newsroom, BuzzFeed News, and let go all 180 employees as a result. The media company’s co-founder and CEO Jonah Peretti said he’d over-invested in BuzzFeed’s news brand trying to keep it afloat to no success. Since the decision, Peretti has spoken about shifting the company’s focus to content creators and artificial intelligence (A.I.) instead.  During the earnings call, he said A.I. will first impact the programmatic and affiliate lines of revenue for the company, but also shared some of his vision for future uses of the technology in content creation.  

    “Our teams are starting to create content that feels more alive that has intelligence embedded in it that can interact with people that can personalize the experience for different people,” Peretti said on a call with analysts today.” And all of that is the very beginnings of what I think is the new medium and for content companies, particularly digital media content companies like BuzzFeed that is going to be a huge driver of future growth as that new medium starts to emerge.”

    At the end of 2023, the struggling digital media company had $36 million in cash and $128 million in debt, partly stemming from its $300 million acquisition of Complex 2021. At the time of the acquisition, BuzzFeed took out a $150 million loan from several hedge funds that’s due this year. On the earnings call, CFO Matt Omer said $31 million of that loan is still outstanding. “The unsecured lenders do have an option to call the debt in December this year,” Omer said. “However we expect that we’ll be able to work with them in advance of the date of the call option.”

    BuzzFeed sold Complex for $109 million in February. Peretti said that the offload would help BuzzFeed invest more into its remaining brands, including HuffPost, which is now the company’s only news offering. He also said the sale would aid BuzzFeed’s A.I. innovation goals.

    BuzzFeed has also gone through some leadership changes in the last few months. The company’s chief financial officer Felicia DellaFortuna left in November to take on the same role at Enthusiast Gaming. Two months later, in January, its president Marcela Martin resigned to pursue other opportunities. DellaFortuna’s role was filled immediately by Omer, who was formerly finance and treasurer chief, while Martin’s was absorbed by other executives in the company.  

    BuzzFeed Revenue Fell Sharply in 2023 as CEO Jonah Peretti Figures Out Turnaround Plan

    [ad_2]

    Nhari Djan

    Source link

  • BevCam to open studio in downtown Beverly

    BevCam to open studio in downtown Beverly

    [ad_1]

    BEVERLY — The city’s local cable television station is heading to downtown Beverly.

    BevCam is scheduled to open a new media center next month at 261 Cabot St., the storefront formerly occupied by A New Leaf. The space will be called BevCam Downtown and will have two studios, including a podcast studio in the front window.

    “We’re very excited about this,” said Paul Earl, president of BevCam’s board of directors. “I think it’s a great move.”

    BevCam, which stands for Beverly Community Access Media, will keep its studio in Beverly High School. But officials are hoping the visibility of a downtown location will increase awareness of the organization.

    BevCam, which began in 2006, is known mostly for its coverage of local government meetings and high school sports. Earl said the organization does that very well, but acknowledged that the demographic of its viewers is “very old.”

    The station’s social media accounts have seen an uptick in recent months under new staff hired by Executive Director Rob Chapman. The opening of a studio on Cabot Street should expose BevCam to Montserrat College of Art students and other young people who visit the downtown’s coffee shops and shops. The studio will be open later hours in the evenings and on weekends, Earl said.

    “Once we get down there and we’re open for business it could help us a lot,” he said.

    In addition to a main studio and the podcast studio, the new location will have a common area that can hold up to 50 people for events and meetings; two edit suites; and an office for Chapman.

    BevCam launched a fundraising campaign to help pay for the new space. As of Friday, it had raised $5,355 toward its goal of $10,000. The fundraiser is scheduled to run through April 5.

    Chapman, who became BevCam’s executive director in 2022, said local access stations in other communities have opened locations in or near their downtowns. Salem, Danvers and Gloucester all have downtown-area studios.

    “There is sort of a move in the industry to be more accessible,” he said.

    Noting that organizations like BevCam are known as “PEG” channels, for public, education and government, Chapman said BevCam has traditionally done well on the government and education portions.

    “It’s building up that ‘P’, getting the public involved,” he said.

    Staff Writer Paul Leighton can be reached at 978-338-2535, by email at pleighton@salemnews.com, or on Twitter at @heardinbeverly.

    Staff Writer Paul Leighton can be reached at 978-338-2535, by email at pleighton@salemnews.com, or on Twitter at @heardinbeverly.

    [ad_2]

    By Paul Leighton | Staff Writer

    Source link

  • Bank of America Co. (NYSE:BAC) Shares Sold by CX Institutional

    Bank of America Co. (NYSE:BAC) Shares Sold by CX Institutional

    [ad_1]

    CX Institutional lessened its stake in Bank of America Co. (NYSE:BAC) by 48.9% during the fourth quarter, according to the company in its most recent 13F filing with the SEC. The institutional investor owned 18,925 shares of the financial services provider’s stock after selling 18,101 shares during the quarter. CX Institutional’s holdings in Bank of America were worth $637,000 as of its most recent filing with the SEC.

    Several other institutional investors and hedge funds have also recently bought and sold shares of the company. Adams Asset Advisors LLC raised its position in shares of Bank of America by 3.1% during the 4th quarter. Adams Asset Advisors LLC now owns 354,987 shares of the financial services provider’s stock valued at $11,952,000 after acquiring an additional 10,799 shares in the last quarter. First Bank & Trust raised its holdings in shares of Bank of America by 10.6% during the fourth quarter. First Bank & Trust now owns 8,474 shares of the financial services provider’s stock worth $285,000 after purchasing an additional 809 shares during the period. Redhawk Wealth Advisors Inc. acquired a new stake in Bank of America during the fourth quarter worth about $464,000. Sterling Group Wealth Management LLC acquired a new stake in Bank of America during the fourth quarter worth about $210,000. Finally, Advisor Resource Council raised its stake in Bank of America by 87.3% during the fourth quarter. Advisor Resource Council now owns 21,804 shares of the financial services provider’s stock worth $734,000 after acquiring an additional 10,164 shares during the period. Institutional investors and hedge funds own 68.06% of the company’s stock.

    Insider Buying and Selling at Bank of America

    In other Bank of America news, major shareholder Of America Corp /De/ Bank acquired 5,398 shares of Bank of America stock in a transaction that occurred on Wednesday, December 27th. The stock was acquired at an average price of $10.56 per share, with a total value of $57,002.88. Following the purchase, the insider now owns 5,398 shares in the company, valued at $57,002.88. The transaction was disclosed in a filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is available through this hyperlink. Corporate insiders own 0.27% of the company’s stock.

    Bank of America Trading Down 1.2 %

    Bank of America stock opened at $37.05 on Friday. The company has a 50 day moving average price of $34.17 and a 200 day moving average price of $31.10. Bank of America Co. has a 52 week low of $24.96 and a 52 week high of $37.61. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.15, a quick ratio of 0.80 and a current ratio of 0.80. The firm has a market capitalization of $292.35 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 12.07, a P/E/G ratio of 1.69 and a beta of 1.38.

    Bank of America (NYSE:BACGet Free Report) last announced its quarterly earnings data on Friday, January 12th. The financial services provider reported $0.70 EPS for the quarter, topping analysts’ consensus estimates of $0.69 by $0.01. The firm had revenue of $22 billion during the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $23.70 billion. Bank of America had a return on equity of 11.38% and a net margin of 15.42%. The business’s quarterly revenue was down 10.2% compared to the same quarter last year. During the same period last year, the company posted $0.85 EPS. Research analysts forecast that Bank of America Co. will post 3.12 EPS for the current year.

    Bank of America Announces Dividend

    The firm also recently announced a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Friday, March 29th. Shareholders of record on Friday, March 1st will be paid a $0.24 dividend. This represents a $0.96 dividend on an annualized basis and a yield of 2.59%. The ex-dividend date of this dividend is Thursday, February 29th. Bank of America’s dividend payout ratio (DPR) is presently 31.27%.

    Wall Street Analysts Forecast Growth

    A number of brokerages have recently weighed in on BAC. Odeon Capital Group cut Bank of America from a “buy” rating to a “hold” rating and set a $33.90 price target on the stock. in a research report on Tuesday, January 16th. Morgan Stanley raised Bank of America from an “equal weight” rating to an “overweight” rating and increased their target price for the stock from $32.00 to $41.00 in a research report on Tuesday, January 30th. Barclays increased their price objective on shares of Bank of America from $39.00 to $43.00 and gave the stock an “overweight” rating in a report on Tuesday, January 2nd. Citigroup increased their price objective on shares of Bank of America from $37.00 to $39.00 and gave the stock a “neutral” rating in a report on Wednesday. Finally, BMO Capital Markets dropped their price target on shares of Bank of America from $37.00 to $36.00 and set a “market perform” rating on the stock in a research note on Tuesday, January 16th. One equities research analyst has rated the stock with a sell rating, five have given a hold rating and ten have given a buy rating to the company. According to data from MarketBeat.com, Bank of America presently has an average rating of “Moderate Buy” and an average price target of $35.65.

    Check Out Our Latest Research Report on Bank of America

    Bank of America Company Profile

    (Free Report)

    Bank of America Corporation, through its subsidiaries, provides banking and financial products and services for individual consumers, small and middle-market businesses, institutional investors, large corporations, and governments worldwide. It operates in four segments: Consumer Banking, Global Wealth & Investment Management (GWIM), Global Banking, and Global Markets.

    Recommended Stories

    Want to see what other hedge funds are holding BAC? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for Bank of America Co. (NYSE:BACFree Report).

    Institutional Ownership by Quarter for Bank of America (NYSE:BAC)

    Receive News & Ratings for Bank of America Daily – Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts’ ratings for Bank of America and related companies with MarketBeat.com’s FREE daily email newsletter.

    [ad_2]

    ABMN Staff

    Source link

  • Do You Need Credit Even After You Retire? | Entrepreneur

    Do You Need Credit Even After You Retire? | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    After decades of work, you may be ready to put your credit profile to rest. Who needs credit after they retire?

    You do—you need credit even after you retire. There are multiple reasons, and we will discuss them right here.

    Why Credit is Important, Ever

    For starters, let us go back a couple of years (not much more than that, right?) to your teenage years. Ideally, you were just starting to build credit upon your 18th birthday.

    Back then, you built your credit in anticipation of applying for credit cards, buying a home, leasing a car, taking out loans, etc. Without a good credit score and excellent credit history, you would not be able to achieve all of that.

    Hopefully, you kept at it to build and maintain a great credit score.

    If you are approaching retirement or have already reached it, you may think you can let go of your credit. You made it up until now and no longer need to maintain good credit.

    That thought is false. Here is why you do need good credit even after you retire.

    1. To Help your Offspring Buy a Home

    Parents want nothing more than to be able to provide for their children. A healthy dynamic between parent and child is strong in affection, emotional support, and trust.

    Financial support is also very prevalent, especially when the kids are young.

    As children grow older and become independent individuals, financial support may lessen or cease.

    Not all parents have the financial means to support their children forever, but that does not mean they don’t continue caring and worrying for them.

    Can you relate to wanting to be there for your adult child but feeling strapped by your limited budget?

    If your children want to buy a house, you can do something huge for them without opening your wallet. That is to cosign their loan. And to cosign their loan, you must have good credit.

    Cosign a Loan

    Many potential home buyers cannot close on their loans because their income falls short. In that case, they can bring in a co-signer to sign on their loan and supplement their income to get approved for a mortgage.

    Co-signing a loan is a great act of kindness, especially when you do it for a loved one.

    All the co-signer needs to qualify is income plus a good credit profile.

    So you got it right there. The first reason you may need credit after you retire is if you ever want to co-sign on your child’s loan.

    Once we are on the topic of co-signing, we need to touch upon the risks of cosigning.

    Technically, a co-signer should not have to lay out any money. The co-signer is there to assure the lender that in case the primary borrower fails to make payments on the loan, the cosigner will step forward and make payments. However, since you may be limited financially, you don’t want to get to the point of having to step in to make payments instead of the primary borrower.

    Here is how to avoid that and other risks of cosigning.

    How to Co-sign Responsibly

    Affordability

    The first risk is the primary borrower not making payments on their loan.

    Before you co-sign, sit down with the primary borrower, who may be your own children, and check their finances.

    Check if they have a plan for paying their mortgage. Do they seem able to afford the loan? Do they have extra finances in case an emergency crops up?

    It may seem like you are letting them into your personal affairs, but once you co-sign, you are legally just as responsible for the loan. Don’t go into this blindly to keep peace in the family. Instead, be cautious so you don’t find yourself in hot water with your children later when they fail to pay their mortgage.

    The banks all check finances before they approve a loan. You are entitled to do so as well.

    Ask for Loan Statements

    Take it one step further. Usually, only the primary borrower receives their mortgage statements.

    When you co-sign a loan, request from the bank to receive monthly statements. This will allow you to hover like a hawk over the account to make sure they are making timely payments.

    Request Escrow

    Ask the primary borrower to give you three months’ mortgage payments. If they ever miss a payment, use this money as escrow to make it yourself. If you have escrow, you don’t have to shell out your money.

    Get a Refinance Commitment

    Lastly, you need to cosign their loan because the primary borrower is not eligible for a mortgage.

    However, they may become eligible over time due to increased income, more intelligent savings, etc.

    Get a commitment from the primary borrower that as soon as they become eligible for their mortgage, they will refinance the loan and remove you from being a co-signer.

    Yes, co-signing on your child’s loan is nice, but it must not be forever.

    As soon as they can get you off, they should.

    2. To Downsize your Home

    Enough talk about helping your child own their home. Now, let’s focus on the house you live in.

    As the years pass and you slowly ship your kids out of your home and into their humble abode, you may feel very humble. Humbled by your huge living property occupied by only you and your spouse.

    The desire to downsize homes stems from needs that are now obsolete.

    Space? Previously occupied bedrooms are now empty. At least empty of human beings because your children may have upped and left, but assuming they are like many others, their STUFF is still there. The stuff they did not take along with them but would pass out if you dared throw any of it out.

    In any case, you no longer need so many rooms. (In the worst case, remove most of their STUFF to clear up more space. Rest assured, they will never know).

    Steps? Gone are the days when your legs swiftly carried you up those steps to the second floor of your home and had you prancing back down. New aches and pains may have you seeing red at the sight of those steps.

    You can easily make do without the upstairs floor.

    Location? When your children were going to school, clubs, friends’ houses, and whatnot, you wanted to be situated in the location with the shortest carpool route.

    Now that your children are busy carpooling their own brood, you might be more than ready to move out of the bustling area to quieter pastures.

    We’ve established enough chances that you may move out of your current home and into a smaller dwelling.

    Buying a house

    Once you move out, you may decide to buy a new house. If you sold your prior home, you can buy a smaller apartment to retire in.

    That requires taking out a mortgage. The bank must approve you for a mortgage, and good credit is crucial. They will not approve you without a decent credit score.

    Furthermore, strong credit can help you obtain a lower interest rate on your mortgage. The higher your credit score, the better your interest rate will be. Fico estimates that you can get a 1.5% lower interest rate with an average 800 score than a 680 score.

    In that case, good credit is very important even after you retire. Without it, no lender will approve you for a mortgage. And even if they do, your interest rates will likely be higher than they could have been.

    Renting

    Have you lived in a rental all these years? Do you want to give up your current home for a smaller rental? If you are interested in a new rental contract, you must have good credit, just like you would with a mortgage.

    Potential landlords often request to see your credit report. It is their way of being cautious before accepting you as a new tenant. Landlords review your credit report for bankruptcies, charged-off accounts, and any red flags that may indicate financial issues. The landlord can easily deny your tenancy if any of those marks are present. And if they don’t deny you and are ready to accept you as a tenant, they may still ask you for a larger deposit or demand a cosigner to protect themselves from possible shortcomings in your rent payments.

    A delinquent credit report is not a good indicator of a responsible tenant.

    But if you can show a beautiful credit report clean of delinquencies, you come across as a responsible person. A landlord would be happy to take you in as a tenant. After all, you present yourself as the person who makes timely payments.

    That brings us to this conclusion: If you do not want to stay stuck forever in the home you purchased or rented way back then, make sure you have good credit. When it comes time to downsize, you will have all your options open.

    3. To Apply for Home Utilities

    Let us move on to another explanation for credit after retirement.

    Whether you buy a new house, move into a new apartment rental, or stay where you are, it makes no difference. Electricity, plumbing, water, and gas will always remain necessities.

    Your blood pressure may rise when the bills from the utility companies arrive in the mail, but you can’t live without ‘em.

    So, where do utilities come into the picture now?

    As we mentioned earlier, if you downsize and move into another house, you will need to set up utilities for your new place.

    How else would you have water to boil for your coffee the morning after the move? And to be able to use your kettle or coffee machine, you need electricity. And electricity to keep your appliances humming, gas to keep things going, internet if you want, and a Tylenol to stop your head from spinning.

    Once you get your bearings, you must apply for home utilities with each home utility provider. The clincher is that the utility providers will check your credit report before they agree to take you on as a customer.

    The idea is that the provider is lending you electricity one month at a time. They want to assure that you are a trustworthy borrower and will pay what you owe them when the last day of the month hits. The provider may get that assurance if they find you have a good credit history with track record payments. Why else would they want to lend you electricity for a month?

    They wouldn’t. So, to have your name honored at the top of a utility bill, you will need to have good credit!

    4. To Apply for New Credit Cards

    Those who know, know.

    There is a thrill and exhilaration when you know how to manage your credit cards perfectly.

    Firstly, you know precisely which of your cards to use for every swipe you make. Secondly, you know how and where to transfer your rewards for maximum cashback. You also have an exact timeline of when your annual fees are due, when a benefit needs re-enrollment, and when a credit is about to expire.

    Keeping track of credit cards is a game of strategy for the savvy.

    Now, here is what I am getting to. Perhaps you are playing the game of managing your credit cards perfectly. If that is the case, I can easily assume you will still apply for more credit cards after retirement. After all, one who knows how to keep track of their credit cards can handle many, many cards. And strategizing credit cards is just too satisfying to give up so quickly.

    This brings us to a couple of situations in which you might just decide to apply for a new credit card.

    Cash in on Rewards at the Drugstore

    As you advance to older age, you might find yourself more often than not at the drugstore. To fill a prescription, to find another super vitamin, or to refill your stash of reading glasses. There are plenty of credit cards that earn great rewards on drugstore purchases. It is worth your while to get one to maximize the rewards on the money you spend at drugstores.

    Get a New Welcome Offer

    Banks never cease to offer exciting welcome offers on credit cards, which often entice consumers to get the card. You might apply for the card if you come across a welcome offer you desire.

    Fly with Airline Points

    Perhaps now more than ever, you can find the time to travel. You’re home, have no job to run to, and life is calm.

    Thankfully, there is a wide range of airline credit cards. Whether you ever flew or not, there may be an airline card you could never use that would complement your trip amazingly now.

    Hence, a new credit card.

    Consequently, everyone knows that a bank must consider your application if you have good credit. Some credit cards even require excellent credit.

    Be wise and keep your credit in good standing so you can apply for a credit card whenever you like.

    5. To get an Auto Lease

    Let’s hit the road. Another reason you may need credit after retirement is for an auto lease.

    Even if you already own a car, you may decide to get a new lease, either for a new car or in addition to your current one. Or, you may want to upgrade your current vehicle.

    Whatever the reason, when you apply for a new auto lease, the bank will pull your credit. You will only get approved if they find your credit in good standing.

    Moreover, if you want to get the best lease rate, you need a score of approximately 720.

    6. To get Auto Insurance

    Once we are on cars, let us mention auto insurance.

    If you drive a four-wheeled vehicle, you want auto insurance. Though I never wish it upon you, if you, G-d forbid, are ever involved in a car accident, auto insurance will help cover the mess.

    Auto insurance companies will check your credit before they approve you for insurance. The company will trust someone who comes across as responsible through their credit report as someone who will drive a car responsibly.

    It is a bit of a far-fetched connection, but if the insurance companies are looking for clean credit, you should present clean credit.

    How to Maintain Your Credit

    Finally, we set the facts straight. Credit is essential even after you retire.

    But how do you maintain your credit after you retire? Do you close most of your credit cards to avoid messing up any of them? First of all, no, that is not the way to go.

    Here are some tips to guide you in maintaining your credit.

    Keep Two Cards Open

    There is no reason to close all your credit cards. That would simply squash your credit history and plunge your credit down under.

    On the contrary, you should keep at least two credit cards open. This will safeguard your credit history that you have built up with those cards.

    However, this brings us to our second tip: to make sure you use those cards responsibly.

    Don’t Max Out your Cards

    When using your credit cards, be very careful not to max out your cards so as not to elevate credit utilization.

    Credit utilization is the percent of each card’s credit limit used. High credit utilization is bad for your credit. Therefore, keep your card balances low rather than high.

    Make On-Time Payments

    Of course, when it comes time to pay your bill, be extra vigilant to make on-time payments. Late payments are a no-no for good credit.

    Pay your credit card bill after the statement prints but before the due date.

    Conclusion

    You may have started reading this post, and you were sure it would say that you are right and do not need credit after you retire. After all, why did you work all of your life? Was it not to sit and relax after retirement? Things may change, but this is the best advice concerning your good credit. Always check out the newest information, especially relating to credit and taxes.

    Yes, but no. You can retire, take it easy, and let go. But if you ever want to get a new car, house, or credit card, you will need good credit to get approved.

    Hopefully, you have kept up your credit for decades now. If so, keeping your credit in good shape should not be too difficult. It is well worth the effort so that you are not stuck in place when you want to add another cherry to your life. Be it in the form of a lovely little house or a fancy, compact car.

    Featured Image Credit: Photo by Anna Shvets; Pexels

    The post Do You Need Credit Even After You Retire? appeared first on Due.

    [ad_2]

    Chaim Geller

    Source link

  • Warren renews push for U.S. wealth tax

    Warren renews push for U.S. wealth tax

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren is leading a renewed effort in Congress to impose a wealth tax on the nation’s top earners.

    The proposed Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act, filed by Warren and other Democrats, would set a new 2% annual surtax on the net worth of households and trusts between $50 million and $1 billion and a 1% annual surtax on the net worth of households and trusts above $1 billion, adding up to an overall 3% tax.

    The plan also includes anti-tax evasion and avoidance provisions that seek to prevent wealthy families from squirreling away money in trusts to avoid taxation.

    The lawmakers say the new wealth tax would drum up an estimated $3 trillion over 10 years by requiring the nation’s top earners to “pay their fair share” of taxes.

    “No one thinks it’s fair that Jeff Bezos gets enough tax loopholes that he pays at a lower rate than a public school teacher,” Warren, a Cambridge Democrat, said in a statement.

    “All my bill is asking is that when you make it big, bigger than $50 million dollars, then on that next dollar, you pitch in 2 cents, so everyone else can have a chance.”

    Warren and other backers of the plan say the gap in wealth between the richest and the poorest in the U.S. is expanding.

    They cite Federal Reserve data showing the average wealth of the top 10% of the nation was $7.73 million, up 17% in 2022 from 2019. Despite that growth, families in the bottom 50% owned only 2% of the total wealth distributed across the country, according to the data.

    The proposal, backed by Massachusetts Sen. Ed Markey and Reps. Ayanna Pressley and Jim McGovern, would affect about 100,000 families nationwide, according to Warren’s office.

    Warren filed a similar bill in 2019 when she was running for president, but it failed to gain momentum.

    Even if her proposal is approved by the Democratic-led Senate, it faces long odds in the Republican-controlled House of Representatives, where lawmakers have resisted calls from Democrats to take up a wealth tax.

    President Joe Biden, a Democrat who is seeking reelection this fall, is also pushing for higher taxes on the nation’s top earners.

    Earlier this month, Biden unveiled a federal budget proposal that calls for $5 trillion in additional taxes on corporations and high earners over the next decade.

    The plan, which is subject to congressional approval, includes raising the corporate tax rate to 28% from 21%, which is the level that was set by the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act under then-President Donald Trump.

    Biden wants to raise the tax rate on capital gains such as stock sales for people who earn more than $400,000 to 39.6% and impose a 25% “billionaire tax” on those with assets of more than $100 million.

    Massachusetts has a tax – set by a voter-approved law that went into effect last year – which charges a 4% surtax on incomes above $1 million in addition to the state’s flat 5% personal income tax. The money is earmarked for education and transportation.

    A 2023 report by the nonpartisan Tax Foundation, a Washington D.C-based think tank, ranked Massachusetts 46th in the nation for its business tax climate, ahead of only neighboring Connecticut, California, New York and New Jersey, citing the negative impacts of the “millionaires tax”.

    The foundation cautioned states against taxing the rich to drum up money, saying it undercuts investment and drives entrepreneurs and innovators away.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • State eyes simplification of college aid process

    State eyes simplification of college aid process

    [ad_1]

    With an array of more than 50 state financial aid programs available to college students, public higher education officials are embarking on an effort to simplify those offerings by 2026.

    The Department of Higher Education plans to evaluate gaps in financial support as officials consider redesigning the mix of tuition reimbursement, grant, loan forgiveness and tax programs. The overhaul is meant to expand education access, improve affordability, and ensure that aid delivery is reliable and predictable, Deputy Commissioner of Policy Michael Dannenberg said.

    “So part of our analysis will look at the ultimate unmet need or need of students, whether they are in state or out of state, whether they’re receiving financial aid programs from the state or not from the state,” he said during a virtual Board of Higher Education meeting Tuesday. ”We’ll try and simplify, and highlight, (and) prioritize those for needy families and socioeconomic mobility.”

    Developing a “more coherent financial aid system” would also focus on ensuring students complete their degrees and certificates, Dannenberg said.

    Earlier this year, DHE launched its Massachusetts Application for State Financial Aid (MASFA), a portal that’s meant to mimic the federal FAFSA form and allow undocumented students to unlock the millions of dollars available in state aid programs.

    Nearly 400 MASFA applications have been submitted or are in progress for the 2023-2024 academic year, with another 230 applications in the pipeline so far for the next academic year, a DHE spokesperson said Monday.

    At least 34 state financial aid programs serve less than 10,000 students, and more than 20 programs reach less than 2,000 recipients. At least two dozen state financial aid programs are not based on economic need, and at least 16 programs have a median award value under $200, Dannenberg said.

    Officials do not want to harm current financial aid recipients, and some programs may need to be adjusted with a grandfather clause to protect them, he said.

    The deputy commissioner showed board members a list of the programs, with some serving categories of students, including athletes, children of Sept. 11 victims, foster and adopted children, and aspiring educators, paraprofessionals and nurses. Also on the list were recent major expansions of financial aid, including making community college free for adults ages 25 and older and covering tuition costs and fees for Pell-Grant eligible students.

    “So we’ve got a lot of programs, a lot of very small small programs, and a lot of programs that are not linked to economic need,” he said.

    As the redesign continues, the plan is to conduct analyses this spring and summer, and review redesign options with the board in the fall. Officials would then seek input from advocates, experts and others at the start of 2025, share recommendations by spring 2025, and prepare to implement the changes for the fall 2026, Dannenberg said.

    Beyond the state’s financial aid portfolio, higher education officials are grappling with the ripple effects of the severely delayed launch of the updated Free Application for Federal Student Aid.

    The form only became available in January, compared to its typical fall rollout, after the system experienced multiple glitches with new funding formulas. During Tuesday’s board meeting, state officials urged students, including those frustrated by the FAFSA’s challenges this year, to still complete the form.

    Students need to submit the FASFA by May 1 for “priority consideration,” though officials are considering extending that deadline due to the form’s delay, said Clantha McCurdy, senior deputy commissioner of access and student financial assistance.

    The DHE is spending $1 million on “strategies” to boost FAFSA completion rates, said Robert Dais, director of GEAR UP, or Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness for Undergraduate Programs. Dais did not offer examples, and said the department has partnered with the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education on ideas to “excite and incentivize students.” The funding, outlined in the fiscal 2024 budget, can be used on public awareness campaigns and FAFSA “completion clinics.”

    “We are targeting Gateway Cities and students from historically underserved populations,” Dais said. “There’s more to come soon, but essentially we just wanted folks to know know that the Department of Higher Education is clearly focused on improving FAFSA and MASFA completion rates, and doing everything that we can to ensure that the neediest students are doing so.”

    [ad_2]

    By Alison Kuznitz | State House News Service

    Source link

  • Advocacy groups plea for scrutiny in Capital One-Discover deal | Entrepreneur

    Advocacy groups plea for scrutiny in Capital One-Discover deal | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Pressures on major mergers and acquisitions could collapse blockbuster Capital One-Discover deal.

    Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are an integral part of investment banking infrastructure, but pressure on major moves could cost prospective business ventures at the highest level.

    Capital One and Discover’s blockbuster banking deal is one such merger that faces intense pressure from advocacy groups to scrutinize the fine print.

    The $35.3B deal would allow the banking giant Capital One to absorb one of the credit world’s best-known assets in Discover, after a turbulent 2023. However, 30 advocacy groups have spoken out and urged the Justice Department to step in to kick the tires.

    A letter from the advocacy groups, postmarked March 21, starkly reads; “Dear Chair Powell, Acting Comptroller Hsu, and Assistant Attorney General Kanter:

    We urge the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve), Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), and the Department of Justice to move quickly to commence a full and transparent review of the proposed Capital One Financial Corporation acquisition of Discover Financial Services that provides ample opportunity for the public to engage and comment on the proposed merger.”

    Capital One keeps confidence

    Capital One remains buoyant, expecting the deal to close by the end of 2024, but the letter’s thirty authors have asked for certain items to be adhered to publicly:

    • The Federal Reserve and the OCC should prohibit streamlined application or expedited review for the proposed merger.
    • The Federal Reserve and the OCC should extend the public comment period to at least sixty day.
    • The Federal Reserve and the OCC should hold a public hearing on the proposed merger.
    • The Federal Reserve and the OCC should disclose any pre-filing discussions with the merging parties.
    • The Department of Justice should fully evaluate the proposed merger under the 2023 merger guideline.
    • The Department of Justice should make the competitive factors report available to the public.

    If the deal does go through then Capital One’s owner, McClean would be bigger than JPMorgan Chase and would snap up one of the biggest credit card distributors in the United States. Capital One would quadruple their number of existing customers after swallowing up the 305 million additional cardholders according to the New York Times.

    Discover released a February statement about the acquisition, with new CEO and President of Discover, Michael Rhodes stating that the “transaction with Capital One brings together two strong brands with enhanced ability to accelerate growth and maximizes value for our shareholders, enabling them to participate in the tremendous upside of the combined company,”

    “This agreement underscores the strength of our business and is a testament to the hard work of Discover employees. We look forward to a bright future as part of the Capital One family and to providing expanded opportunities for our loyal customers.”

    It remains to be seen if the move will be stalled or sail through, but Captial One believes it will with its dedicated approach to the formal application process that was made to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency on the same day as the letter from the advocacy groups reached the Federal Reserve Chair Powell, Acting Comptroller of the Currency Hsu and DOJ’s Antitrust Division Assistant Attorney General Kanter.

    Image: Pexels.

    The post Advocacy groups plea for scrutiny in Capital One-Discover deal appeared first on Due.

    [ad_2]

    Brian-Damien Morgan

    Source link

  • Taking the Financial Angle to World Poetry Day! | BankBazaar – The Definitive Word on Personal Finance

    Taking the Financial Angle to World Poetry Day! | BankBazaar – The Definitive Word on Personal Finance

    [ad_1]

    There is no one way to gain knowledge. Anyone can tell you that. But are you a believer in it? Or have you made up your mind on ‘things’ being learnt a ‘certain way’? We’re talking about those very things, a little differently, today!

    Are you a poet and don’t know it? Get it? Get what we did there? 😀 This World Poetry Day, let’s awaken the poet in us and learn something we could use – through rhyme! We must admit, a hard-hitting phrase, a funny one-liner or song lyrics stay in our heads way better because we file it under the ‘fun information’, category! We retain this info flawlessly and bring it to the front when needed!

    So, we’re going to do this – we’re going to pair up an unauthentic two to drive our point – Poetry and Finance! The poem is called:

    Are you ever glum when you hear the word ‘ finance’?

    Does it make your heart heavy and weaken your stance?

    Don’t worry, don’t worry – you’re not alone,

    We’re here to address it and not postpone.

    Honest, it’s as easy as grabbing a tissue,

    See here, you’ll soon be over this ‘finance’ issue!

    No more will you be left with a question mark,

    You will be as wise as Noah when he built that ark!

    How do I do it, such a task?

    One moment please, it is no tough ask.

    All you need to know is on our site,

    Look around, get answers without a fight.

    Whether it’s advice, your next move, or Personal Loan

    You’ll get the support you need, a one that’s shown.

    So don’t fret and wonder the next time around,

    Perfect Credit Cards exist here! Let the trumpet sound!

    So, say ‘yes’, say ‘yes’ to finance broken down,

    Targeting what you need to turn the frown around

    There it is…now, we do hope you feel better,

    No more sad faces anymore or being under the financial weather!

     

    Looking for something more?

    All information including news articles and blogs published on this website are strictly for general information purpose only. BankBazaar does not provide any warranty about the authenticity and accuracy of such information. BankBazaar will not be held responsible for any loss and/or damage that arises or is incurred by use of such information. Rates and offers as may be applicable at the time of applying for a product may vary from that mentioned above. Please visit www.bankbazaar.com for the latest rates/offers.

    Copyright reserved © 2024 A & A Dukaan Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

    [ad_2]

    Ruth Singh

    Source link

  • British banks scramble after a Big Lebowski-inspired ‘Dudeist priest’ in Northern Ireland filed hundreds of false documents

    British banks scramble after a Big Lebowski-inspired ‘Dudeist priest’ in Northern Ireland filed hundreds of false documents

    [ad_1]

    Bosses at some of the U.K.’s largest banks faced confusion and chaos after discovering hundreds of fake documents relating to their financial assets, filed by an ordained “Dudeist priest” in Northern Ireland.

    The alarm was raised by banking trade association UK Finance, which wrote to its members earlier this year warning that over 800 false loan documents relating to 190 of the country’s largest companies, including The Bank of Scotland, estate agent Knight Frank and private equity giant Macquarie, had been filed with Companies House.

    According to The Times of London, the falsified documents marked each company’s loans as being repaid or “fully satisfied” despite all the charges still being outstanding.

    While the mass filings at the start of the year could easily have been part of a complex state-sponsored cyberattack or fraud on an industrial scale, they were, in fact, the actions of just one man. 

    The individual in question is an unnamed meditation and acupuncture practitioner from Northern Ireland who identifies as a so-called Dudeist priest. Dudeism is a religious movement inspired by the Coen brothers’ 1998 movie The Big Lebowski, which advocates the practices followed by the film’s main character, Jeffrey “the Dude” Lebowski. The movement likens itself to Chinese Taoism with its “take it easy manifesto.” 

    The movie’s plot centers around the laid-back Lebowski who gets ensnared in a kidnapping conspiracy involving a millionaire who shares Lebowski’s name. 

    In an interview with The Times, the man, whose identity the outlet didn’t reveal, stated that he had made the filings as he believed the businesses concerned owed him money.

    Fortune reviewed the list of companies shared by UK Finance that were impacted by the false dismissal of charges. Some of the banks tied to the unsatisfied charges include HSBC, NatWest, CBRE and Royal Bank of Canada. 

    The incident places further scrutiny on Companies House, an agency of the UK government that maintains the register of companies.

    Companies House has been heavily criticized in recent years as the publisher of often incorrect or misleading data about U.K. companies, a powerful tool used by bogus companies, fake directorships and money launderers to hide their true intentions.

    Things are starting to change, with new powers granted to the agency last year under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act, which allows Companies House to finally start scrutinizing the data submitted to it. However, a surge in demand for its services means concerns surrounding its operations impact many companies and individuals—and therefore, are essential to address.

    “We have taken steps to block the account that is linked with these transactions and, using new powers available to us, have removed all the related filings,” a Companies House spokesperson told Fortune in a statement. “We are contacting the companies concerned and have launched an urgent review of our processes. We continue to work with law enforcement partners where appropriate.”

    Northern Ireland’s Dudeist priest

    The issues surrounding false filings have largely been resolved now—but ironically, the person behind it didn’t have a clear rationale for pursuing the companies that he did. 

    Speaking to The Times, the man said: “I didn’t know anything about it [the filings] until I was reading it and then I was sending things away all at once.

    “When I found something new I’d sink into it a bit too much and then I would get a bit scattered. I think if I spread it out and read it slowly and took my time maybe things would have been different, but that’s not what happened, unfortunately.”

    All the false filings have now been removed from the Companies House website, with a “rectified” statement prefixed. For instance, Companies House’s record on Nero Coffee Roasting Limited said: “Rectified The material was formerly considered to form part of the register but is no longer considered by the registrar to do so.”

    Subscribe to the new Fortune CEO Weekly Europe newsletter to get corner office insights on the biggest business stories in Europe. Sign up for free.

    [ad_2]

    Prarthana Prakash

    Source link

  • Decoding the TikTok ownership controversy | Entrepreneur

    Decoding the TikTok ownership controversy | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    In the ever-evolving landscape of digital technology, a new controversy has emerged that has the potential to reshape the dynamics of social media ownership and usage. The center of this controversy is the popular video-sharing app TikTok, owned by the Chinese company ByteDance. The app, which has gained immense popularity worldwide, is now facing a potential ban in the United States unless sold to U.S. owners. This move, initiated by U.S. politicians, has sparked a heated debate about data privacy, political misinformation, and the power dynamics between the U.S. and China in the digital world.

    The key figure in this drama is Steve Mnuchin, the former Treasury Secretary under the Trump administration. Mnuchin and a group of his affluent political associates have expressed interest in purchasing TikTok’s U.S. operations. The proposed price tag? A few billion dollars. This might seem like a hefty sum, but when compared to the value of other social media giants, it’s a bargain. For instance, Meta, the parent company of Instagram, is valued at $1.25 trillion.

    Why the ban?

    The popularity of TikTok is undeniable. Its usage is nearly double that of Instagram, making it a highly lucrative platform. Why would U.S. politicians want to ban such a profitable app unless it’s sold to U.S. owners? The answer lies in two primary concerns: data privacy and the spread of political misinformation.

    The first concern concerns the fear of China accessing U.S. users’ data. This apprehension is not unfounded, given the increasing importance of data in today’s digital age. However, it’s worth noting that U.S. politicians have assured the public that all U.S. TikTok data is stored on servers in Texas without Chinese access. This raises questions about the validity of the data privacy argument and whether it’s being used as a smokescreen for other motives.

    Political misinformation and tit-for-tat

    The second concern is about the potential spread of political misinformation through TikTok. This is a valid concern, considering the role social media platforms have played in recent years in shaping public opinion and influencing political outcomes. However, it’s worth questioning whether the information on TikTok significantly differs from that on other social media platforms.

    The move to ban TikTok unless it’s sold to U.S. owners can also be seen as a tit-for-tat response to China’s ban on using U.S. social media in China. However, the proposed ban on TikTok is not an outright ban. Instead, it’s a strategic move to redirect the profits from TikTok to U.S. owners, specifically to Steve Mnuchin and his associates.

    Unraveling the motives

    This situation raises several questions about the motives behind this move. Is it a legitimate concern for national security and the prevention of misinformation, or is it a power play to control a highly profitable social media platform? Is it an attempt to level the playing field with China, or is it a strategic move to benefit a select group of individuals?

    The TikTok controversy is a complex issue that goes beyond social media. It reflects the power dynamics in the digital age, where data is the new currency and control over popular platforms can translate into significant political and economic power. As this situation unfolds, it’s crucial to critically examine the motives behind such moves and their implications for the future of digital technology and global power dynamics.

    Conclusion

    In conclusion, the TikTok controversy is a testament to the intricate interplay between technology, politics, and power. It’s a reminder that in the digital age, the battle for control is fought on the physical battlefield and in the virtual world of social media. Whether this move is seen as a legitimate concern or the ultimate gangster move, it’s clear that the stakes are high, and the outcome will have far-reaching implications.


    Frequently Asked Questions

    Q. What is the controversy surrounding TikTok?

    The controversy revolves around the potential ban of the popular video-sharing app, TikTok in the United States unless it is sold to U.S. owners. This move has sparked a heated debate about data privacy, political misinformation, and the power dynamics between the U.S. and China in the digital world.

    Q. Who is the key figure in this unfolding drama?

    The key figure in this drama is Steve Mnuchin, the former Treasury Secretary under the Trump administration. Mnuchin and a group of his affluent political associates have expressed interest in purchasing TikTok’s U.S. operations.

    Q. Why is there a potential ban on TikTok?

    The potential ban on TikTok arises from two primary concerns: data privacy and the spread of political misinformation. There is a fear of China accessing U.S. users’ data and the potential spread of political misinformation through TikTok.

    Q. What is the role of political misinformation in this controversy?

    The concern about the potential spread of political misinformation through TikTok is significant, considering the role social media platforms have played in recent years in shaping public opinion and influencing political outcomes.

    Q. What are the motives behind the move to ban TikTok?

    The motives behind this move are complex and could range from a legitimate concern for national security and the prevention of misinformation to a power play to control a highly profitable social media platform or a strategic move to benefit a select group of individuals.

    Q. What are the implications of the TikTok controversy?

    The TikTok controversy reflects the power dynamics in the digital age, where data is the new currency and control over popular platforms can translate into significant political and economic power. The outcome of this situation will have far-reaching implications for the future of digital technology and global power dynamics.

    The post Decoding the TikTok ownership controversy appeared first on Due.

    [ad_2]

    Taylor Sohns MBA, CIMA®, CFP®

    Source link

  • Goldman Sachs’s Top Woman Banker Stephanie Cohen Is Leaving After 25 Years

    Goldman Sachs’s Top Woman Banker Stephanie Cohen Is Leaving After 25 Years

    [ad_1]

    Stephanie Cohen speaks during the 2018 New York Times Dealbook Summit. Michael Cohen/Getty Images for The New York Times

    Stephanie Cohen, one of the few female top executives at Goldman Sachs (GS), is leaving the investment bank after a 25-year career in banking, The Wall Street Journal first reported today (March 18). She will join Cloudflare, a cloud service provider which Goldman Sachs took public in 2019, as its first chief strategy officer.

    Cohen, who leads Goldman Sachs’s Platform Solutions unit, which includes many of the bank’s consumer-lending businesses, has been on personal leave since June 2023, the Journal previously reported.

    Cohen, 46, joined Goldman Sachs in 1999 as an analyst after graduating from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. She worked her way up in Goldman’s investment banking division to managing director in 2008 and was named partner in 2014. During that time period, Cohen worked on historic corporate deals, including Chrysler’s repayment of a U.S. government loan in the aftermath of the 2008 Financial Crisis. 

    Cohen was named Goldman’s chief strategy officer in 2017. And the next year, she was picked by CEO David Solomon as a member of Goldman’s 33-person management committee. She was one of seven women on the top decision-making team and was 10 years younger than the average man in the group. That committee has been downsized to 25 people. 

    “There weren’t a lot of investment bankers that looked like me. When I walked into a board room, they’d expect a very tall man, but instead they’d get a relatively short woman,” Cohen said at a 2018 event in New York reported by Observer. “You can use that as something that bothers you, or you can use that as a point of differentiation. For example, one of the things I learned early on was that when I was on big conference calls with lots of people, everyone would know when I spoke because I was the only woman.”

    In late 2020, Cohen was tapped to co-head Goldman’s consumer and wealth management division, which was merged into Platform Solutions in 2022 after a reorganization. Products under her unit include Goldman’s credit card partnerships with Apple and General Motors.

    Cohen is the latest in a string of female senior bankers who have left Goldman in recent years for better opportunities elsewhere. According to a Wall Street Journal analysis published last week, two-thirds of the women who were partners at the bank at the end of 2018 have left the firm or no longer have the title.

    Goldman Sachs’s Top Woman Banker Stephanie Cohen Is Leaving After 25 Years

    [ad_2]

    Sissi Cao

    Source link

  • Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) Stock Forecasts

    Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) Stock Forecasts

    [ad_1]

    Analyst Report: Williams-Sonoma, Inc.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Retiree’s Guide to Building a Diverse Investment Portfolio | Entrepreneur

    Retiree’s Guide to Building a Diverse Investment Portfolio | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    A well-diversified investment portfolio is the gold standard for retirement. To construct one, investors need a solid understanding of a couple of key concepts, which we’ll cover today.

    But first, we have to remember one crucial thing—constructing a diverse portfolio is only half the battle. Maintaining a diversified portfolio is the other half. With that in mind, we’ll discuss how to build a diverse investment portfolio, and we hope to bring you advice that is applicable both if you are a retiree or a younger investor.

    Diversification is the name of the game here—this isn’t just a strategy but a crucial defense against the market’s unpredictable and volatile nature. If the proper safeguards aren’t put in place, this nature can quickly and easily erode years of hard work, savings, and investing.

    By spreading your investments across a variety of asset classes, sectors, and even geographic regions, you can attain a good balance of growth and security. Once you’ve decided to call it a day regarding the workforce, you can enjoy yourself without constantly worrying.

    Understanding Your Investment Goals

    Before constructing a properly diversified portfolio, we must take a step back. Setting clear, well-defined, and realistic goals is essential to a financially secure retirement.

    Once you have a clear rundown of what you hope to achieve and accomplish during your retirement years, you can start constructing a strategy that aligns with those objectives.

    Defining Retirement Objectives

    First, you have to have a clear end goal in sight. Retirement objectives or goals vary quite widely among individuals, but everyone needs a clear retirement plan for structure. While some would like nothing more than to retire to a quiet place and catch up on their reading, others eagerly await their retirement years to travel the world.

    For some, the goal is to maintain a particular lifestyle or quality of life—while others want to kick their feet up and luxuriate at a far greater level than when they were working.

    One major factor to consider is your family situation. Depending on whether or not you have children (and their ages), expenses like college or helping out for a downpayment can significantly affect how much money you’ll need.

    Another consideration is debt. Data show that three key generations—Baby Boomers, Gen X, and Millenials have an average outstanding student loan debt of more than $30,000. While everything we’ll suggest in this guide still applies, paying off debt is always a priority when it comes to achieving and maintaining financial resilience.

    Setting clear, measurable goals is the first step in tailoring your investment strategy to meet your needs. Consider factors such as your desired retirement age, expected lifestyle, and any and all financial obligations you might have, such as supporting family members or contributing to charitable causes.

    As a rule of thumb, plenty of retirement experts recommend one of two approaches—either having ten times your salary saved up, or a portfolio allowing you to live on 80% of your pre-retirement income annually.

    Assessing Your Risk Tolerance

    Investing your money is an integral part of successfully navigating retirement—but risk will always be a factor.

    Several factors come into play here. In general, younger investors have a higher risk tolerance, as they have more than enough time to recoup any losses (or wait for the markets to bounce back).

    To assess your risk tolerance, consider your financial situation, investment time horizon, and emotional capacity to handle market fluctuations. Once that assessment is done (and you can enlist the help of professionals here as well), you’ll have a much clearer picture of the asset classes and investment strategies that are a good fit for you.

    In general, those with low risk tolerance will favor fixed-income securities, investing in ETFs or low-risk stocks with a buy-and-hold approach. In contrast, those with higher risk tolerance can opt for growth stocks, options trading, and short-term trading in general.

    If you’re already retired, you generally have a lower risk tolerance due to the limited timeframe for recovering from significant market downturns, so more conservative strategies are in order.

    Asset Allocation Basics

    Asset allocation determines how you spread your investments across various different asset classes. The goal is to find a distribution that provides the best returns for your desired level of risk.

    Equities vs. Fixed Income

    Equities (more commonly referred to as stocks) represent a unit of ownership in a public company. Stocks hold a lot of growth potential as an asset class, but they’re also quite risky and volatile. If you’re out for growth, then stocks will be a significant part of your portfolio—and the same holds true if you have a high risk tolerance.

    Stocks have historically outperformed other asset classes in the long run, so if you’ve gotten an early start at retirement planning, they’re also likely a good fit for you.

    Fixed-income investments, on the other hand, like bonds, treasury bills, and treasury notes are in essence loans you make to institutions (private or public) which then provide a steady stream of interest payments.

    They tend to be less volatile than equities and provide a measure of safety for investment capital. However, the trade-off for this stability is lower potential returns. In many cases, fixed-income securities are ideal for retirees seeking to preserve capital and generate steady income.

    The Role of Stocks in Retirement

    Let’s get one thing out of the way—traditionally, retirement portfolios have leaned more heavily toward fixed-income securities because of their stability. However, the world’s recent misadventures with inflation have quickly demonstrated that age-old wisdom might no longer hold water.

    To keep up with inflation and the rising cost of living, stocks have perhaps become more important than ever for the aspiring retiree. Let’s take a closer look at the how and the why.

    Growth Opportunities

    Stocks present investors with a huge growth opportunity through two channels: capital appreciation and dividends. Capital appreciation is an increase in stock price, allowing investors to profit when they sell the stock, while dividends are regular payments paid out to shareholders.

    By utilizing the tenets of fundamental analysis and identifying companies that can consistently increase their earnings and revenues, investors can capture some of that growth for themselves. On the other hand, dividend payments can serve as a handy source of passive income.

    It’s important to note that stocks are incredibly diverse, whether you look at them through the lens of market cap, geography, or industry.

    Investing in stocks is a must in order to accrue savings that will outlive you—there simply isn’t an asset class that can match them in terms of returns. On top of that, being as diverse as they are, stocks are a great tool for diversifying, allowing you to invest in speculative, high-risk/high-reward companies and established businesses across a variety of industries and countries.

    Assessing Stock Market Risks

    As we’ve mentioned, there is no reward with risk, and while the growth potential inherent to stocks is enticing, it is accompanied by higher risks and greater volatility compared to fixed-income investments.

    This poses a particular challenge for retirees—market fluctuations can bring down (and keep down) the value of an otherwise good stock for years on end, which isn’t ideal for someone who relies on their investments for income. In a few minutes, we’ll tackle strategies for ameliorating this issue, such as diversification and hedging.

    With a good idea of your own risk tolerance, you can adjust how much of your portfolio will be dedicated to stocks. As a general rule, the closer you are to retirement age, the less you should invest in stocks, rerouting those funds to purchase bonds in their stead.

    No matter how much you invest in stocks, regularly reviewing and adjusting your stock holdings and rebalancing your portfolio is a must for risk management. Another strategy to consider is dollar-cost averaging, which reduces risk and is easy to implement.

    On top of this, consider investing in value stocks, defensive stocks, large-cap or blue chip stocks, or dividend-paying stocks—each category has at least one quality that makes them (in general) more recession-proof and stable.

    Bonds and Fixed Income Investments

    Fixed-income securities—bonds, treasury notes, and treasury bills, are a staple of stability in the world of finance. Unlike stocks, which are subject to the ebbs and flows of the market, fixed-income securities are generally a safe bet, making them more and more appealing as you close in on retirement age.

    Whether you’re close to retirement age or a young investor thinking about the future, bonds will play a big role in your journey to financial independence—so let’s take a closer look at this type of investment.

    Types of Bonds and Their Benefits

    Bonds are loans made to an institution for which you receive a steady stream of interest rate payments as compensation. They come in several different forms, with the chief difference being who the issuer is.

    Government bonds are issued by federal, state, and even municipal authorities. Owing to the government’s ability to print money and collect taxes, these bonds are considered some of the most secure investments in the world. However, they typically have lower yields than some alternatives.

    Companies issue corporate bonds, which have higher yields. However, since these are businesses (private or public), the risk is higher. When considering corporate bonds as an option, make sure to examine the issuing company’s creditworthiness.

    When it comes to retirement planning, municipal bonds are of great interest—as they’re often exempt from federal and sometimes even state and local taxes. The US treasury’s TIPS (Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities), which are indexed to inflation, are another interesting choice, as they can go a long way in protecting your money from being eroded away by inflation.

    Each type of bond offers a different balance of risk and return, allowing retirees to choose investments that align with their income needs and risk tolerance.

    Alternative Investments and Diversification

    Beyond stocks and bonds, other types of investments can serve to diversify your holdings further, potentially leading to lower risks and higher returns. Let’s take a look at a few possible choices.

    Real estate is a logical first choice. By owning a property (either directly, as a landlord) or indirectly (via a real estate investment trust or REIT), you can accrue passive (well, relatively passive in the former case) income while also benefiting from increasing property values. REITs are more “user friendly”, as they trade just like stocks, while also paying out huge dividends required by law.

    Precious metals, such as silver, gold, and platinum, have generally been used as hedges against inflation. Buying physical gold is doable, but storage is typically an issue—investing in mining stocks is another possibility.

    Since we’ve mentioned gold, we also have to mention commodities. Trading commodities, such as gold, oil, steel, soybeans, coffee, or other agricultural products, is another way to diversify—although the commodities market is quite specific and would usually require at least a year’s worth of paper trading experience to reduce risks.

    Last but not least, those among us who meet the criteria to be considered accredited investors (avg. yearly income of $200,000 or $300,000 if filing jointly with a spouse OR $1 million in net worth excluding your primary residence OR a series 7, series 65, or series 82 FINRA license) also have access to investments such as private equity, hedge funds, and VC firms.

    Managing Risk and Volatility

    Risk and volatility are everpresent elements in financial markets, and successfully navigating these factors is a challenge that requires comprehensive, strategic planning. An investor’s goal is to strike a delicate balance between two goals that are often at odds—growth and security.

    While there are plenty of ways to manage risk and volatility, broadly speaking, all of those methods fall into one of two categories—diversification and hedging.

    Diversification Strategies

    Diversification can be explained simply by quoting a common saying—don’t put all your eggs in one basket. If you spread your investments across a multitude of asset classes, industries, sectors, investment strategies, and even geographic locations, a single downturn won’t be nearly as damaging to your retirement plans as it would otherwise be.

    This approach is based on the fact that different investments react differently to the exact same market conditions—to use the most basic examples, the macroeconomic factors that are good for bonds aren’t good for stocks.

    There are many ways to diversify—some are simple and straightforward, while others require a bit more elbow grease. On the simple end of the spectrum, you can invest in broad-market ETFs to gain exposure to the entire US stock market or perhaps supplement that with an emerging markets ETF to gain exposure to developing economies.

    If you prefer a more granular, hands-on approach, the 60/40 portfolio, consisting of 60% stocks and 40% bonds, is a perennial favorite for retirement planning. This portfolio is usually adjusted as the investor ages, shifting the balance toward more bonds and fewer stocks.

    Hedging Techniques and Their Limitations

    If you’ve ever heard of the expression “hedging your bets,” you probably already understand the gist of hedging as an investment strategy. In essence, it consists of placing an investment that is expected to perform inversely when compared to another investment, in an attempt to offset any potential losses.

    If you’ve diversified your portfolio, you’re already doing one version of hedging, but there are plenty of additional ways to safeguard yourself from losses. However, they will most likely appeal more to the younger and less risk-averse investor audience.

    First things first–avoid using Googling or any other manual research techniques. Many companies use link prospecting and SEO-related shenanigans to emerge as ideal hedge candidates. Trust the data, not publicity or PR tricks.

    If you want to hedge your investments even further, trading options and futures, short selling, and diversifying further into non-correlated or defensive assets are some options at your disposal.

    For options, buying puts allows you to protect yourself from declining stock prices, for example—while short selling even allows you to profit off of declining stock prices. In terms of defensive hedging, many investors like to allocate a portion of their portfolio to gold, as it is a proven hedge against inflation.

    However, hedging isn’t for everyone, and it comes with its own difficulties. It can be quite costly, and the financial instruments you purchase to hedge may expire worthless. Remember that there is always a tradeoff with hedging—you receive protection from downside risk, but the upside potential is reduced as a result.

    As we’ve said before, apart from diversification, most of these hedging strategies are for young investors or those with a high-risk tolerance. Young investors have an additional benefit: While options trading and short selling are more complex than traditional investing, young investors have plenty of time to learn the ropes.

    In any case, hedging is complex and multifaceted—our most sincere advice is not to try it without consulting a financial advisor first.

    Tax Considerations and Retirement Planning

    Taxes are an unfortunate inevitability—but you’re not without recourse. With a couple of key pointers and a carefully constructed plan, you can minimize your tax bill in retirement, which ultimately leads to an increase in the longevity of your savings.

    Let’s examine the two main points regarding taxes and retirement planning: tax-efficient withdrawal strategies and Roth conversions.

    Tax-Efficient Withdrawal Strategies

    Taxation can take a significant (and unnecessary) chunk out of your retirement funds if you don’t have a well-thought-out, tax-efficient withdrawal strategy. This consists of carefully determining what accounts you will withdraw from and when.

    Once you get to retirement age, you should ideally maintain separate accounts for tax-deferred and tax-advantaged purposes, such as traditional IRAs, Roth IRAs, and 401k plans, in addition to regular taxable accounts.

    One common approach is to begin by withdrawing from taxable accounts, taking advantage of the lower capital gains tax rates associated with them, and then moving on to tax-deferred accounts, which are taxed at the higher ordinary income tax rates.

    Withdrawals from tax-free accounts come last, optimally in years when additional income could push investors into the next tax bracket. This allows retirees to manage their marginal tax rate more efficiently.

    Furthermore, strategically timing withdrawals can reduce tax liabilities. For example, delaying Social Security benefits while drawing down retirement accounts can lead to lower taxes overall. Social Security benefits are subject to their own tax rules depending on your income bracket.

    Understanding Roth Conversions

    A Roth conversion is a technique that could potentially be beneficial for tax-efficient withdrawal. This approach consists of transferring funds in a tax-advantaged account like an IRA into a Roth IRA. The amount you “convert” will be taxed as ordinary income in the year you complete the conversion. However, on the flip side, all the growth in that account will be tax-free, and so will the withdrawals—just like other Roth IRA growth and withdrawals.

    A key element of a beneficial Roth conversion is finding the right timing. If your income varies from year to year, converting in a year when you earn less than you usually do can go a long way in minimizing the immediate tax impact of this strategy.

    Roth conversions also have benefits in terms of estate planning, as they don’t require minimum distributions for the original account holder. They also have the potential for longer tax-free growth and tax-free inheritance for beneficiaries.

    Conclusion

    While securing a safe, worry-free retirement is a universal goal, the strategies required are pretty specific. Thankfully, they’re relatively easy to apply with some planning and consistency.

    By understanding foundational strategies such as diversification and the roles that different asset classes play in constructing a resilient portfolio, investors can be confident that their decisions result in a fair mix of profit and security.

    Remember—investing should be an almost lifelong journey. While there’s always something new to learn, we hope that we’ve given you a good foundation for solving one of the most common problems faced by Americans today.

    Featured Image Credit: Photo by Markus Winkler; Pexels

    The post Retiree’s Guide to Building a Diverse Investment Portfolio appeared first on Due.

    [ad_2]

    Shane Neagle

    Source link

  • Hertz’s electric vehicle and CEO about-face is the latest twist after a COVID bankruptcy filing and a deep relationship with Carl Icahn

    Hertz’s electric vehicle and CEO about-face is the latest twist after a COVID bankruptcy filing and a deep relationship with Carl Icahn

    [ad_1]

    It seemed like a good idea at the time. Now we know better.

    Hertz, reeling from a bankruptcy and the pandemic, announced plans to buy 100,000 Teslas in late 2021. The splashy move certainly helped Elon Musk’s electric-vehicle maker, which saw its market cap surge past $1 trillion for the first time. 

    Hertz enjoyed a bump in its market value as well, and the car-rental giant hired NFL star Tom Brady to show off its new fleet of Teslas.

    “How do we democratize access to electric vehicles? That’s a very important part of our strategy,” interim CEO Mark Fields said at the time. “Tesla is the only manufacturer that can produce EVs at scale.”

    But Hertz paid close to list prices for the Teslas, rather than demanding a large discount as car-rental giants often do. That decision would come back to bite it.

    Last year, Musk’s EV maker cut prices across its lineup to boost sales. That not only angered individual customers who’d recently bought a Tesla at a higher price, but it also crushed the resale value of Hertz’s used EVs. 

    ‘Elevated costs’ of EVs

    This January, the rental giant revealed that it was selling off 20,000 electric vehicles, noting the costly depreciation, weak demand, and pricey repairs. It took a $245 million hit and suffered its steepest quarterly loss since the pandemic.

    “The elevated costs associated with EVs persisted,” Hertz CEO Stephen Scherr said at the time. “Efforts to wrestle it down proved to be more challenging.”

    This week, Hertz announced that Scherr would be replaced by Gil West, the former COO of General Motors’ Cruise robotaxi unit. While Scherr took over after the Tesla deal, under his leadership Hertz continued its focus on EVs, placing big orders for them with GM and Polestar.

    The ill-fated EV push followed a difficult stretch for Hertz that culminated in billionaire activist investor Carl Icahn unloading his substantial stake in the car-rental company in 2020 days after its bankruptcy. In 2014, Icahn had begun acquiring his stake in Hertz, which was struggling. He called Hertz “a great brand” that he hoped would “return to its former glory,” and three of his allies soon had board seats, while the hunt for a new CEO began.

    After selling selling his stake, Icahn said, “Yesterday I sold my equity position at a significant loss, but this does not mean that I don’t continue to have faith in the future of Hertz.”

    The following year, the company announced the decision to buy Teslas. Now it’s about to welcome yet another new CEO, again tasked with turning things around. 

    Subscribe to the Eye on AI newsletter to stay abreast of how AI is shaping the future of business. Sign up for free.

    [ad_2]

    Steve Mollman

    Source link