ReportWire

Tag: Finance

  • You Can Be A Chipotle Bag For Halloween This Year If You’re Perpetually Stuck In 2022

    You Can Be A Chipotle Bag For Halloween This Year If You’re Perpetually Stuck In 2022

    [ad_1]

    This Halloween, Chipotle wants to spice things up and do more than just feed customers; it wants to dress them, too.

    The burrito maker has joined forces with Spirit Halloween, North America’s largest Halloween retailer, to launch its first-ever costume collection, it said in statement on Wednesday. The publicity stunt takes inspiration from the viral costume memes that both brands have tapped into in recent years.

    Starting on September 6, customers can snag a costume that pays tribute to some of Chipotle’s iconic (and less-than-iconic) items, including: napkin, fork, water cup, burrito, and to-go bag. Each unitard is priced at $40 and will be available in sizes from adult small to XL.

    The unitards, or full-body suits, will be up for grabs on Spirit Halloween’s website and at select locations across the U.S., including Chicago, Denver, Los Angeles, New York, and Egg Harbor Township, New Jersey. Customers in Canada can buy a costume online, while supplies last.

    Through the collaboration, the companies are trying to monetize the somewhat-dated quirky costume memes inspired by Spirit Halloween’s bags. Two years ago, Chipotle jumped on the bandwagon with a fictional “Chipotle Fork” and a “Chipotle Napkin” unitard, which collectively garnered over 700,000 engagements online, the company said.

    But that’s not all – Chipotle says it is brewing up another “scarily great offer” for customers next month, with those details still under wraps. The company once gave away free food to customers who dressed in tin foil — like a burrito — on October 31, however the company has since watered down that promotion into a partial discount.

    Let’s take a look at the five unitards Chipotle is offering this Halloween:

    [ad_2]

    Francisco Velasquez

    Source link

  • Sun Life Financial (NYSE:SLF) Receives New Coverage from Analysts at Barclays

    Sun Life Financial (NYSE:SLF) Receives New Coverage from Analysts at Barclays

    [ad_1]

    Barclays initiated coverage on shares of Sun Life Financial (NYSE:SLFFree Report) (TSE:SLF) in a research note published on Thursday, Marketbeat Ratings reports. The brokerage issued an equal weight rating on the financial services provider’s stock.

    Separately, Argus raised shares of Sun Life Financial to a strong-buy rating in a report on Monday, June 3rd.

    Get Our Latest Stock Analysis on Sun Life Financial

    Sun Life Financial Trading Down 0.5 %

    Shares of SLF opened at $55.13 on Thursday. Sun Life Financial has a 12-month low of $44.57 and a 12-month high of $55.65. The firm has a 50-day moving average price of $50.74 and a 200 day moving average price of $51.50. The firm has a market capitalization of $31.84 billion, a P/E ratio of 14.10, a P/E/G ratio of 1.40 and a beta of 1.00.

    Sun Life Financial (NYSE:SLFGet Free Report) (TSE:SLF) last announced its quarterly earnings data on Monday, August 12th. The financial services provider reported $1.25 earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter, beating analysts’ consensus estimates of $1.18 by $0.07. Sun Life Financial had a net margin of 8.60% and a return on equity of 17.47%. The firm had revenue of $6.52 billion during the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $6.72 billion. Equities research analysts predict that Sun Life Financial will post 4.87 earnings per share for the current fiscal year.

    Sun Life Financial Cuts Dividend

    The business also recently announced a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Friday, September 27th. Shareholders of record on Wednesday, August 28th will be paid a dividend of $0.587 per share. This represents a $2.35 annualized dividend and a yield of 4.26%. The ex-dividend date of this dividend is Wednesday, August 28th. Sun Life Financial’s dividend payout ratio (DPR) is presently 60.10%.

    Institutional Inflows and Outflows

    Hedge funds have recently bought and sold shares of the stock. CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE Co boosted its stake in Sun Life Financial by 3.8% during the first quarter. CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE Co now owns 630,708 shares of the financial services provider’s stock worth $34,474,000 after buying an additional 23,235 shares during the period. Prudential PLC boosted its stake in Sun Life Financial by 15.9% during the fourth quarter. Prudential PLC now owns 349,027 shares of the financial services provider’s stock worth $18,102,000 after buying an additional 47,755 shares during the period. UBS Group AG lifted its position in shares of Sun Life Financial by 36.8% during the fourth quarter. UBS Group AG now owns 696,047 shares of the financial services provider’s stock worth $36,097,000 after purchasing an additional 187,064 shares in the last quarter. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. lifted its position in shares of Sun Life Financial by 20.5% during the fourth quarter. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. now owns 1,620,801 shares of the financial services provider’s stock worth $84,055,000 after purchasing an additional 275,334 shares in the last quarter. Finally, Cetera Investment Advisers lifted its position in shares of Sun Life Financial by 108.3% during the first quarter. Cetera Investment Advisers now owns 64,240 shares of the financial services provider’s stock worth $3,506,000 after purchasing an additional 33,401 shares in the last quarter. Hedge funds and other institutional investors own 52.26% of the company’s stock.

    About Sun Life Financial

    (Get Free Report)

    Sun Life Financial Inc, a financial services company, provides savings, retirement, and pension products worldwide. The company operates in five segments: Asset Management, Canada, U.S., Asia, and Corporate. It offers various insurance products, such as term and permanent life; personal health, which includes prescription drugs, dental, and vision care; critical illness; long-term care; and disability, as well as reinsurance.

    Featured Articles

    Receive News & Ratings for Sun Life Financial Daily – Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts’ ratings for Sun Life Financial and related companies with MarketBeat.com’s FREE daily email newsletter.

    [ad_2]

    ABMN Staff

    Source link

  • Nvidia’s Billion-Dollar A.I. Pitch: How the Chip Giant Ramps Up Startup Bets

    Nvidia’s Billion-Dollar A.I. Pitch: How the Chip Giant Ramps Up Startup Bets

    [ad_1]

    Jensen Huang prepares to throw out the ceremonial first pitch before the game between the San Francisco Giants and the Arizona Diamondbacks at Oracle Park on Sept. 03, 2024 in San Francisco. Lachlan Cunningham/Getty Images

    There’s no question that Nvidia (NVDA) is one of the biggest winners of the A.I. boom so far. Funneled by an insatiable demand for its graphics processing units (GPUs), the chipmaker’s stock has skyrocketed by more than 450 percent since early 2023. As Nvidia’s market cap and revenue soar, so does the pace of its investing in A.I. startups. More than half of the company’s startup investments since 2005 took place in the past two years.

    The value of the company’s startup investments reportedly totaled more than $1.5 billion at the beginning of 2024, a significant jump from the $300 million a year prior. The chipmaker has participated in more than ten $100 million-plus funding rounds for A.I. startups in 2024 alone, according to data from Crunchbase, and has backed more than 50 startups since 2023. That’s not to mention a flurry of activity from the company’s venture capital arm NVentures, which separately made 26 investments in 2023 and 2024.

    Nvidia’s seemingly unflappable upward trajectory took a hit yesterday (Sept. 3) after reports surfaced that it had received a subpoena from the U.S. Department of Justice as part of an antitrust probe. The company’s stock dropped nearly 10 percent, shaving $279 billion off its market cap, which currently stands at $2.6 trillion.

    But its falling stock price doesn’t mean the company is slowing down in its startup department. In addition to eyeing an investment in an upcoming funding round in ChatGPT-maker OpenAI, Nvidia yesterday unveiled its participation in a more than $100 million funding round for the Tokyo-based Sakana AI, a company that specializes in accessible A.I. models trained on small datasets.

    We invest in these companies because they’re incredible at what they do,” Nvidia founder and CEO Jensen Huang told Wired earlier this year. “These are some of the best minds in the world.”

    From companies specializing in humanoid robots to autonomous vehicles, here’s a look at some of Nvidia’s most significant startup investments:

    Perplexity AI

    Huang hasn’t been shy about his love for Perplexity AI, the A.I.-powered search engine positioned as a competitor to the likes of Google. The Nvidia CEO uses the startup’s tool nearly every day for research, according to Huang’s interview with Wired.

    He has also put his money where his mouth is, with Nvidia partaking in a $62.7 million funding round for Perplexity AI in April that valued the startup at $1 billion. Led by investor Daniel Gross, the round included participants like Amazon (AMZN)’s Jeff Bezos. It wasn’t the first time Nvidia has backed the company—the chipmaker also invested in Perplexity AI during another funding round in January that valued the startup at $73.6 million.

    Hugging Face

    Hugging Face, a startup providing open-source A.I. developer platforms, has long had close ties to Nvidia. The chipmaker participated in a $235 million funding round in Hugging Face in August 2023 that valued the company at $4.5 billion. Other corporate investors participating in the round included Google, Amazon, Intel, AMD and Salesforce.

    Hugging Face has previously included Nvidia hardware among its shared resources. In May, it launched a new program that donated $10 million worth of free, shared Nvidia GPUs to be used by A.I. developers.

    Adept AI

    Unlike more well-known A.I. assistants from companies such as OpenAI and Anthropic, Adept AI’s primary product doesn’t center around text or image generation. Instead, the startup is focused on building an assistant that can complete tasks on a computer, such as generating a report or navigating the web, and is able to use software tools. Nvidia is on board, having participated in a $350 million funding round in March 2023.

    Databricks

    After receiving a giant valuation of $43 billion last fall, Databricks became one of the world’s most valuable A.I. companies. The data analytics software provider unsurprisingly uses Nvidia’s GPUs and has been backed by the chipmaker alongside other investors like Andreessen Horowitz and Capital One Ventures, all of whom participated in a $500 million funding round in September 2023. “Databricks is doing incredible work with Nvidia technology to accelerate data processing and generative A.I. models,” said Huang in a statement at the time.

    Cohere

    A formidable opponent to OpenAI and Anthropic, the Canadian startup Cohere specializes in A.I. models for enterprises. The company’s growth over the past five years has attracted backers such as Nvidia, Salesforce and Cisco, which funded Cohere during a round held in July. Nvidia also took part in a May 2023 funding round that brought in some $270 million for the startup.

    Mistral AI

    Mistral AI is a French startup focusing on developing open-source A.I. models. It was founded by former Google DeepMind and Meta employees in April 2023. Nvidia has participated in two of the startup’s fundraising rounds, a $518 million round in June and a $426 million round in December 2023. The collaboration between the two companies doesn’t end there—in July, Nvidia and Mistral AI jointly released a small and accessible language model for developers.

    Figure

    Huang has long reiterated his belief that A.I.-powered robots able to work among humans will constitute the next wave of technology. It is, therefore, no surprise that Nvidia is a backer of Figure, a startup developing humanoid robots for use in warehouses, transportation and retail. Nvidia reportedly funneled $50 million towards the company during a February funding round that raised a total of $675 million and included participants like Bezos and Microsoft.

    Scale AI

    To properly train A.I. tools like OpenAI’s ChatGPT, tech companies need vast amounts of data. This is where A.I. startups like Scale AI, which provides troves of accurately labeled data and is headed by billionaire Alexandr Wang, come in. Nvidia participated in a $1 billion funding round for the company in May alongside Big Tech players like Amazon and Meta.

    Wayve

    Autonomous driving is another area of interest for A.I. leaders across the tech world. Huang himself said that “every single car, someday, will have to have autonomous capability” in a recent interview with Yahoo Finance. One of the startups at the forefront of this wave is the U.K.-based Wayve. Nvidia participated in a $1 billion funding round in the startup in May.

    Inflection AI

    Out of the 92 startups Nvidia has backed throughout the decades, Huang’s company has only been a lead investor in 20 rounds. One of these occurred in June 2023, when Nvidia led a staggering $1.3 billion round for Inflection AI. The chipmaker co-led the round alongside Microsoft, Bill Gates and former Google CEO Eric Schmidt.

    The A.I. startup, which was co-founded by LinkedIn (LNKD) co-founder Reid Hoffman and Google DeepMind co-founder Mustafa Suleyman and most recently valued at $4 billion, produces a chatbot known as Pi. Much of the round’s funding went towards bolstering Inflection A.I.’s computing cluster of 22,000 Nvidia H100 GPUs.

    Nvidia’s Billion-Dollar A.I. Pitch: How the Chip Giant Ramps Up Startup Bets

    [ad_2]

    Alexandra Tremayne-Pengelly

    Source link

  • Objections filed as Steward pushes for sale of hospitals

    Objections filed as Steward pushes for sale of hospitals

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — As Steward Health Care prepares to make the case in federal court Wednesday that the deals it reached to sell four Massachusetts hospital facilities should be quickly approved, a number of others would like to have a word — including key lenders for the bankrupt company, the Archdiocese of Boston, and the Internal Revenue Service.

    The blur of activity includes ongoing negotiations between Steward and Massachusetts state government over a second, and larger, infusion of public funding that the company says is required to keep its hospitals here open until the sales close, possibly on Sept. 30.

    Massachusetts aided Steward with $30 million to stay afloat in August and now is poised to provide the company another $42 million in payments and advances by the end of this week, according to a court filing late Monday.

    An array of objections have been lodged in U.S. Bankruptcy Court since Steward announced the hospital sales. A sale hearing is scheduled for 11 a.m. Wednesday, when Judge Christopher Lopez will weigh whether the deals are the best possible way for the company to wind down operations and maximize the value the assets return for its lenders and creditors. Steward says they are and should be approved.

    The court is likely to consider an objection filed by the “first in, last out” or FILO lenders that have pumped hundreds of millions of dollars into Steward as the company headed for bankruptcy. Those lenders said they “cannot possibly consent to the proposed sales of the Massachusetts Hospitals in their current form, and they do not.”

    “The Debtors’ sale process has resulted in bids for the Massachusetts Hospitals for an aggregate purchase price of $343 million, subject to certain adjustments … However, this figure is misleading as the entirety of the Purchase Price will be allocated towards the real property and therefore flow to benefit the purported landlord (MPT and Macquarie) and more specifically will flow to the purported landlord’s secured lender,” the FILO lenders wrote in the objection.

    The objection from the IRS relates to a section of each asset purchase agreement that says Steward has filed all of its tax returns. The federal government says that isn’t actually the case, echoing the way state government was repeatedly frustrated by Steward’s failure to file financial disclosures.

    “The United States states that either the terms of the respective Asset Purchase Agreements should be revised to correctly reflect that certain required federal tax returns for certain of the Seller Debtors have not been filed with the IRS and that the applicable Seller Debtor has a legal obligation to file such tax return,” or the court should require Steward to file the returns in question before the transactions close, the U.S. Department of Justice wrote on behalf of the IRS.

    The limited objection from the Archdiocese of Boston stems back to the history of many Steward hospitals as part of the Caritas Christi network. The church said its sale of the hospitals to Steward in 2010 was the best option “that would allow the Hospitals to continue to operate as Catholic health care facilities.”

    An agreement between the archdiocese and Steward requires the company to return any and all religious items and remove “all symbols of Catholic identity (e.g. interior signage, trade and service marks associated with Catholic identity in both paper and electronic form) and cease using a list of Catholic-related names.

    The church said it would object to the hospital sales “to the extent that the Debtors seek to transfer the Restricted Names or the Religious Items or authorize the buyers to continue to use symbols of Catholic identity,” but added that it appears no such transfer is contemplated. That suggests that there will be new names for St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center, the Holy Family hospitals, St. Anne’s Hospital and Good Samaritan Medical Center, since the church says Steward “acknowledged and agreed that the … names were ‘integrally related’ to the Hospitals’ Catholic identity.”

    [ad_2]

    By Colin A. Young | State House News Service

    Source link

  • Harris and Trump have competing tax plans. Here’s how your paycheck would change under both.

    Harris and Trump have competing tax plans. Here’s how your paycheck would change under both.

    [ad_1]

    Presidential candidates commonly trot out new tax proposals as part of their campaign platforms, often pledging to help ease the financial burden on taxpayers. This year, the plans emerging from rivals Kamala Harris and Donald Trump could affect voters’ paychecks in very different ways. 

    Former President Donald Trump would seek to extend the tax cuts enacted through the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, his signature 2017 legislation that reduced taxes for most Americans, although research has shown the top earners received the biggest benefits. He’s also proposing to eliminate taxes on tips and on Social Security income, while also lowering the corporate tax rate.

    Vice President Harris has proposed introducing more generous tax benefits for families, as well as hiking the corporate tax rate to help offset spending from bigger tax credits. 

    The two proposals reflect different views of how best to support U.S. families and fuel economic growth. On the one hand, Trump’s plan would provide tax cuts for all income groups, but the biggest winners would be higher-income Americans. The greatest benefits under Harris’ plan would go to the lowest-income Americans, while she would up the taxes of the top-earning households. 

    “It’s true that Trump looks like he’s winner for everybody, but he’ll provide much bigger giveaways to the top 1% and top 0.1%, whereas Harris will be negative for these people,” said Kent Smetters, faculty director of the Penn Wharton Budget Model, a group within the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School that analyzes the budgetary impact of government policies. 

    Ultimately, both plans would come with significant price tags, although the combination of Trump’s tax cuts for corporations and individuals would prove more expensive, Penn Wharton forecast. It estimates that his proposal would add $5.8 trillion to the federal deficit over the next decade, compared with $2 trillion for Harris’ plan. 

    In an email, Republican National Committee spokesperson Anna Kelly said that Trump’s tax policies will “shrink deficits” as well as “lower long-term debt levels” through cuts in federal spending, increasing energy production and deregulation.

    The Harris-Walz campaign, meanwhile, is pointing to the Penn Wharton Budget Model’s analysis as evidence that Trump would create a “deficit bomb agenda.” 

    “Donald Trump’s campaign may want to mute Donald Trump on the debate stage, but they can’t mute our strong economy and Trump’s disastrous agenda that will explode the deficit, increase costs on the middle class by nearly $4,000 a year, and send our economy hurtling into a recession by mid-next year,” Harris-Walz spokesman James Singer said in an email.

    “Explosive” deficit?

    Although Harris’ tax proposal would potentially have a smaller impact on the nation’s deficit than Trump, Smetters noted that both parties would ultimately add to the nation’s growing fiscal burden. 

    The federal budget deficit in fiscal year 2024 is projected to hit $1.9 trillion, the Congressional Budget Office forecast in June. That represents a 27% increase from its prior February forecast, due partly to new funding provided to Ukraine, Israel and other countries. 

    Deficits may seem abstract to many taxpayers, but at the simplest level they show the country is spending more than it’s taking in through tax revenue. That, in turn, increases the national debt to finance the deficit. Many economists warn that comes with a cost, such as higher interest payments to service that growing debt. 

    “Essentially we’re on this explosive path right now,” Smetters said. 

    At some point, soaring U.S. debt could sow doubt in capital markets about the federal government’s ability to either raise taxes or cut spending enough to avoid defaulting on that debt, he added.

    “Neither candidate is being serious about addressing the big issue —the house is burning down and the candidates are arguing over the furniture,” Smetters said. “They are just making things worse and harming the economy.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • BlueBet Plans US Market Withdrawal to Focus on Growth in Australia

    BlueBet Plans US Market Withdrawal to Focus on Growth in Australia

    [ad_1]

    This spring, BlueBet, the emerging Australian betting giant, announced a strategic deal with Betr, a recognizable gaming and betting operator. After the announcement of this strategic collaboration, the company confirmed its plans to review its operations in the United States.

    Now, BlueBet confirmed its intention to exit the US market and focus on its growth in Australia, which represents its core market. Supporting its decision to exit the lucrative US market, the company confirmed that the gambling regulation was “slower than expected.” This development ultimately hindered the company’s growth plans.

    Moreover, the slower-than-expected regulation impacted the interest in BlueBet’s business-to-business SaaS platform. This was rather disappointing, especially considering that the company relied on that asset for its market expansion.

    The company further explained that the industry “dynamics in the US B2C market are such that scale players are currently dominant with smaller operators unable to achieve the necessary unit economics – driving a recent wave of consolidation and exits, which is likely to continue into FY25.”

    BlueBet Holdings Limited today announces its decision to exit the US market to focus its capital and operational efforts on its core Australian market,

    reads a statement released by BlueBet

    Despite its intention to exit the US market, BlueBet will retain the ownership of its highly scalable international sportsbook technology. Leveraging this asset, the company will continue to pursue monetization options across the US and around the world. “BlueBet will collaborate with relevant partners and regulators to wind down the US operations and ensure the return of customer funds and anticipates incurring one-off separation costs related to the closure of its US operations,” added the company.

    The Betting Giant Aims at 10%+ Market Share in Australia

    In light of BlueBet’s “capital-lite” US strategy that effectively reduced its investment for market entry, as noted, the company plans to focus on growing its footprint in Australia. The halt of BlueBet’s US operations is expected to bring between $6 million and $8 million per year.

    These vital funds will be used to propel the company’s operations in the Land Down Under. There, BlueBet anticipates capturing more than 10% market share rather quickly.

    Ultimately, the gaming company expects to achieve this expansion through a “combination of organic and inorganic growth.” Unlike the US market, BlueBet remains confident in its ability to grow in Australia, leveraging its assets and benefitting from the strategic collaboration with Betr.

    [ad_2]

    Jerome García

    Source link

  • Home sales on track to match 2023’s sluggish pace

    Home sales on track to match 2023’s sluggish pace

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — As state lawmakers were putting the final touches on legislation they hope will ease some of the state’s housing problems, home sales ticked up more than 8% in July and put 2024 sales just ahead of last year’s sluggish pace.

    The Warren Group last week reported 4,427 single-family home sales in Massachusetts last month, representing an 8.2% increase over July 2023 sales.

    The median sale price of $650,000 — a new record high for the month of July — was up 6.6% over July 2023’s $610,000 median price. But Warren Group Associate Publisher Cassidy Norton found a slight silver lining for prospective homebuyers.

    “Yes, a median sale price of $650,000 was a new all-time high for the month of July, and month after month prices are setting new records, but price gains are smaller than they could be,” she said.

    “Interest rates are more than double where they were two years ago, and I’m certain prices would be even higher without those changes. That does lead to a lack of inventory that may have abated price gains somewhat.”

    That lack of inventory, a longstanding problem that makes it more expensive and more difficult to live in Massachusetts, “will continue to be the biggest factor driving prices for the foreseeable future,” Norton added.

    Through seven months of 2024, single-family home sales are up just a hair over the same checkpoint in 2023, a year that ended with the lowest volume of sales in 12 years.

    The 22,879 sales so far this year represent a 0.8 percent increase over the first seven months of 2023. The year-to-date single-family home sale price is up 9.5 percent to $618,500.

    The story was similar for the condominium market in July. The month’s 1,947 condo sales were up 3.2 percent over last July’s 1,886 sales.

    The median sale price climbed 1.8% over July 2023 to $565,000, also a new record for July. Year-to-date, there have been 10,901 condo sales — a 3.2 percent decrease compared to the first seven months of 2023 while the median sale price of $545,000 is up 4.8 percent over the same time.

    “The median condo price also reached a new high for July, but prices were down moderately from the previous month,” Norton said. “This could be an early indicator that condo prices are starting to plateau.”

    Gov. Maura Healey this month signed into law a policy-filled $5.16 billion housing bond package that lawmakers sent to her desk the morning of Aug. 1.

    The law authorizes $5.16 billion in bonding, and implements 49 new housing policies, though advocates said its omissions made for an “underwhelming” final product.

    [ad_2]

    By Colin A. Young | State House News Service

    Source link

  • ‘Time Has Come’ To Cut Interest Rates, Jerome Powell Says at Jackson Hole

    ‘Time Has Come’ To Cut Interest Rates, Jerome Powell Says at Jackson Hole

    [ad_1]

    “Time has come for policy to adjust. The direction of travel is clear,” Jerome Powell said. Bonnie Cash/Getty Images

    At the 2024 Jackson Hole Economic Symposium in Wyoming this morning (Aug. 23), Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell signaled that the central bank is ready to cut interest rates from their 23-year high next month as inflation continues to cool while the jobs market shows signs of strain.

    “Time has come for policy to adjust. The direction of travel is clear,” Powell said during a highly anticipated speech today. Pointing to consumer prices rising only 2.5 percent over the last year, Powell affirmed that inflation is on track to return to the Fed’s 2 percent target. “While the task is not complete, we’ve made a good deal of progress towards that outcome,” he said.

    Powell pointed to the weakening in the labor market as providing a sense of urgency for rate cuts. “We do not seek or welcome further cooling in labor market conditions,” he said. The unemployment rate rose to 4.3 percent in July, the highest level in two years.

    The U.S. economy has added jobs more slowly than anticipated this year, especially after the Bureau of Labor Statistics yesterday (Aug. 22) announced a data revision showing that it had over-reported the number of new jobs created by 818,000 in March. While data revisions are common, and the figure is a fraction of the 160 million Americans who currently have jobs, the news worried many that employment growth was weaker than many had thought.

    Powell projected confidence that inflation will continue to decline. He painted a picture of fluctuating price growth driven largely by supply-side limitations, citing strained supply chains and a highly tight U.S. labor market in 2022. At its peak tightness, the U.S. labor market saw twice as many job openings as the number of unemployed people available to fill them. While this supply-demand imbalance increased wages, it also put upward pressure on consumer prices.

    “High rates of inflation were a global phenomenon, reflecting common experiences: rapid increases in the demand for goods, strained supply chains, tight labor markets and sharp hikes in commodity prices,” Powell summarized.

    By highlighting how supply-side economic factors have contributed to easing inflation, Powell positions monetary policy as a tool that can now be wielded toward addressing rising unemployment.

    Markets responded positively to Powell’s latest remarks: The S&P 500 jumped 1 percent during his speech.

    ‘Time Has Come’ To Cut Interest Rates, Jerome Powell Says at Jackson Hole

    [ad_2]

    Shreyas Sinha

    Source link

  • Winner Joins evoke plc’s Portfolio in Romania After €10M Cash Injection

    Winner Joins evoke plc’s Portfolio in Romania After €10M Cash Injection

    [ad_1]

    evoke plc, one of the world’s leading betting and gaming groups that owns and operates globally renowned brands including William Hill, 888, and Mr Green has acquired a 51% stake in Romania’s Winner.ro owner New Gambling Solutions (NGS) SRL

    Consequently, the group has now turned into the fourth largest Business-to-Consumer operator in the country which is now considered its fifth core market. 

    NGS, which is the seventh largest operator in Romania, was acquired for €10 million ($11 million). As explained by evoke’s chief executive officer, Per Widerström, the transaction is expected to add significant value to the company’s previous plan.

    888.ro Brought Under NGS’s Umbrella

    evoke’s 888.ro brand will be added to NGS and the two entities will generate a combined entity that will feature a 7% Romanian market share.

    CEO Widerström expressed excitement regarding the addition of Winner to their portfolio, describing the acquisition as one that was “consistent” with their strategy “to build sustainable market-leading profitable positions in the most attractive markets.”

    In March, the company announced it would divide its operations into “core” markets in the UK, Spain, Denmark, and Italy while considering other active jurisdictions as “optimize” markets.

    As for Romania, 888 is determined to considerably grow its market by implementing a multi-brand strategy and using local expertise in parallel with its complementary 888 casino brand. 

    By 2026, evoke will own anywhere between 51% and 57% of the business, based on its performance markers.

    Starting with the third year post-acquisition, evoke will also be given the choice to unilaterally increase its ownership to 100%.

    “Romania Is a High-Growth Market”

    Given the country’s €1.1 billion ($1.22 billion) in gross gaming revenue (GGR) in 2023 and Regulus Partners’ forecast speaking of a 13% compound annual growth rate up to 2026, evoke is thrilled about the attractiveness of the market dynamics. 

    Winner.ro’s “Romania is a high-growth market, also took the opportunity to speak about the “an incredibly exciting transaction” that will reunite their “local-hero brand, with one of the world’s strongest international casino brands.”

    Zajdel also praised Romania as a “high-growth market” explaining the successful combo should prepare them for a “sustainable, profitable, market-leading position.”

    Winner, which launched in Romania in 2019, and delivered €19 million ($21 million) in GGR in the first half of the current year, is led by a strong team that knows how to build on their success via a “highly localized approach,” and a selection of “competitive advantages” including their product platform, enhanced customization rate, and wide expanded network of deposit points.

    evoke believes the transaction, which is still pending legal clearance, will not have any impact on the 2024 leverage. 

    However, starting next year, the acquisition expected to close in the third quarter of 2024, is projected to boost earnings and further cut the group’s leverage.

    [ad_2]

    Melanie Porter

    Source link

  • 7 Mistakes That Sabotage Your Startup Fundraising (And What To Do Instead) | Entrepreneur

    7 Mistakes That Sabotage Your Startup Fundraising (And What To Do Instead) | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    With U.S. venture capital fundraising at a 6-year low, raising investor capital for your startup has become more challenging than ever. Potential investors are tightening their budgets and adopting a “wait and see” approach before putting their capital at risk. Yet, some of the best startups — like Airbnb, Uber and Square — were born during market downturns. So, if you’re an entrepreneur seeking capital in this environment, you might wonder about your chances of success.

    As a serial entrepreneur and now CEO of Builderall, I’ve heard over 3,000 pitches and helped founders raise millions. From my experience, seven common mistakes often derail attempts to raise investment capital. If you’re looking to raise money for your startup in this uncertain economic environment, be sure to avoid the following:

    Mistake #1: Rushing the pitch

    Many founders rush through their pitch, but speed isn’t always your friend in the venture capital world. Your goal is to establish key points and let them resonate, not finish your presentation as quickly as possible.

    Think of it like telling a good joke at a party — you wouldn’t rush to the punchline before everyone has had a chance to grasp the setup, right? The same principle applies when pitching. You want your investors to hang on to every word. But that’s impossible if you rush or gloss over crucial information.

    One effective technique is to use strategic pauses. In between slides or after making a key point, pause for about three seconds to let it sink in and observe your audience’s reactions. Don’t be afraid of silence. Patience in delivery can be a powerful strategy.

    Related: What Every Entrepreneur Needs to Know About Raising Capital

    Mistake #2: Skipping trust indicators and key differentiators

    Balancing detail with brevity is tricky, but it’s essential. There are some critical signals you should share to help build trust and differentiate your business. While most founders want to focus on how great their product is, there are two questions that are arguably more important:

    • Why is your team uniquely qualified to lead this business?
    • How does your company stand out in the market?

    As far as team qualifications, don’t be shy about including specifics on years of experience, prestigious university degrees, previous exits, existing patents and/or impressive startup or corporate experiences.

    I once coached a founder who was struggling to raise capital. After reviewing his pitch deck, I said, “The problem is that you have no real startup experience.” He then proceeded to tell me that he and his co-founder sold their last company for $80 million, but he thought it wasn’t relevant since it was in a different industry. Let me tell you, your previous accomplishments are 100% relevant to whether or not investors will trust you with their money.

    Next, I can almost guarantee that whatever amazing idea you are pitching — we have probably already seen it. This begs the question, how are you going to execute differently when you get to market? This is where your current traction becomes crucial: existing user base, early subscribers, accepted patents and strategic partnerships all come into play. These elements demonstrate that you’re not just another idea but a viable business that is already making waves.

    Mistake #3: Talking too much and for too long

    I know — this sounds like a contradiction based on the first point, but hear me out. Blathering on is another fatal mistake. You should plan for a nine-minute pitch, but you don’t want to “rush through” your nine minutes. Instead, be relentless about what to include – and what to cut – so the pacing feels natural and you’re still covering the key data points that make your business compelling.

    I often ask new founders to introduce their startup in just two sentences: What do you do, and why should I care? After that, you have under 10 minutes to explain the market problem, the market size, your business model, your solution, your traction, your team, and your ask. That means you need to be very specific about what details will tell your story most effectively.

    I’ve seen many founders get nervous and overcompensate by filling the conversation with unnecessary details and fillers. This often has the opposite effect of what they intend. If you talk too much or too quickly, investors might think you’re not being straightforward, or they may get bored and lose interest.

    Related: 5 Innovative Ways for Entrepreneurs to Raise Capital in Today’s Market

    Mistake #4: Forgetting who you’re pitching to

    Remember, you’re pitching to investors, not potential clients. Investors are not interested in how great your product is; they want to know about your market, margins, and differentiation.

    I once sat through a pitch for a young women’s jewelry startup where the founder spent the entire time trying to sell me on the jewelry. As an investor, I wasn’t the target audience and the pitch fell flat. Rather than sell me on the business, she was selling me on the product. When talking to investors, they want to hear about the business opportunity, not the product.

    Mistake #5: Undermining your credibility with weak language

    This might seem like needless semantics, but words like “hope” subtly signal uncertainty, and investors are not fond of taking chances on “hope.” They want clear-cut projections backed by data and logic.

    Instead of saying “we hope,” use phrases like “we will” or “we project.” This shift instantly ramps up your pitch’s credibility. Be definitive; your words should exude confidence, not wishful thinking.

    Here are a few more examples:

    • Instead of saying, “We think our product will be successful,” assert your confidence by stating, “Our product is positioned to be successful.” This subtle shift conveys certainty and strengthens your pitch.
    • Replace “We believe our revenue will grow” with “Our projections show our revenue will grow.” This not only sounds more authoritative but also indicates that your assumptions are based on concrete data.
    • Don’t say, “We aim to capture 10% of the market;” instead, say, “We are on track to capture 10% of the market.” This adjustment demonstrates that you are actively working toward a clear, achievable target.
    • Change statements like “We expect to launch by Q2” to “We will launch by Q2.” This minor change projects certainty and reliability, which are crucial to building investor trust.

    These subtle language changes replace hesitation and probability with assertiveness. It emphasizes that your pitch is built on credibility and supported by a solid, well-thought-out plan.

    Mistake #6: Using broad claims instead of precise data points

    When pitching to investors, generalized claims can raise red flags, making investors wonder if you’re trying to obscure the truth or lack the necessary detail.

    For example, instead of saying, “We have a huge subscriber list,” focus on concrete details like, “We have over 20,000 subscribers.” Specifics not only clarify your claims but also significantly boost your credibility and trustworthiness.

    Here are a few more examples:

    • Don’t say, “Our team has a lot of experience.” Say, “Our team has eight years of experience in this industry.”
    • Replace “Our product is very sticky, and our customers rarely leave” with “Our product has an 89% customer retention rate.”
    • Instead of “We anticipate rapid growth,” say, “Our projections show 30% month-over-month growth in the fourth quarter.”
    • Swap “We dominate the market” with “We currently hold 45% of the market share in our region.”

    These changes in phrasing turn vague assertions into solid, data-backed statements, which help to build investor confidence and convey that your pitch is grounded in reality.

    Mistake #7: Telling instead of showing

    Our final lesson: show, don’t tell. Depicting something visually instead of through words will have a greater impact and be more likely to be remembered. Instead of telling investors, “We have a great interface,” show the interface screens and let them make the determination themselves about whether it’s great or not. Instead of saying, “We’ve grown exponentially over the years,” show a line or bar chart illustrating your impressive growth.

    One more example: telling investors how much your customers love you is far less impactful than showing screenshots of social media posts where your customers are raving about you in their own words. Keep this mantra in mind: less talk, more visuals.

    Bottom line

    Mastering the art of pitching involves more than just avoiding pitfalls — it’s about crafting a narrative that resonates with investors and builds trust. However, by avoiding these seven mistakes, you significantly increase your chances of securing the capital needed to take your startup to the next level.

    In today’s challenging economic climate, precise communication, showing rather than telling, and delivering data-backed arguments will set you apart. Investors want to back entrepreneurs who can navigate adversity and drive their ventures to success. Keep refining your pitch, build strong relationships, and show investors why your startup is the one to bet on.

    [ad_2]

    Pedro Sostre

    Source link

  • ATM fees reach 26-year high with charges topping $5 in some cities

    ATM fees reach 26-year high with charges topping $5 in some cities

    [ad_1]

    Banks are charging record amounts for noncustomers getting cash at ATMs, according to a new survey released this week by personal finance website Bankrate.

    The average out-of-network fee climbed to $4.77 this year, a 4-cent increase from 2023. It’s the highest average total fee since Bankrate started tracking fees in 1998. 

    “If you make an out-of-network ATM withdrawal, expect to pay, and pay more than ever before,” Bankrate chief financial analyst Greg McBride said in a statement. “Fees have increased again and you’ll typically pay two fees — one to the ATM owner and another to your own bank.”

    On average, your bank will charge $1.58 for using an out-of-network ATM. The owner of the out-of-network ATM will charge, on average, an additional $3.19, for a combined average fee of $4.77.

    Bankrate advises only using ATMs in your bank’s network for withdrawals to avoid fees when getting cash. Consumers can also ask for cash back when using a debit card for a purchase. Bankrate says that while there’s usually no fee for doing this, the maximum withdrawal limits are often lower than those imposed by ATMs.

    The average out-of-network ATM fee in some American cities can come in much higher than the fee in others. Depending on where you live, you may be spending more than $5 to access cash. The average ATM fee is highest in Atlanta, where people can pay $5.33 to withdraw cash at an out-of-network machine, according to Bankrate’s survey. The average withdrawal fee also topped $5 in San Diego, Phoenix, Detroit and Cleveland.

    Boston has the most inexpensive withdrawal fee of the 25 metropolitan areas Bankrate surveyed, with an average out-of-network fee of $4.16.

    To make matters even worse, consumers are also getting socked with higher overdraft fees, which climbed to an average of $27.08 in 2024 after declining for two straight years, Bankrate found.

    The Bankrate survey examined 10 banks and thrifts in 25 large markets. 

    ATM fees may be on the rise, in part, because fewer Americans are withdrawing cash. Americans made 6 billion ATM cash withdrawals in 2009, but that had dropped to 5.8 billion by 2015 and 3.7 billion in 2021, according to the Federal Reserve. 

    McBride in 2018 told MoneyWatch that fees go up each year because “no one is worried about alienating noncustomers.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • What To Do When Your Job Won’t Pay You More | Entrepreneur

    What To Do When Your Job Won’t Pay You More | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Feeling underpaid and undervalued at work? Gabrielle Judge, the creator of the Lazy Girl Jobs movement, is here to fix that. She’ll share her best strategies for accelerating your earnings and getting the raise or promotion you deserve.

    Register now for our upcoming livestream to gain insights on topics including:

    • How to maximize your time and money in the workplace

    • Leveraging pay transparency to get more money

    • What to do if you feel undervalued and underpaid

    • Strategies for getting a raise through job hopping

    About the Speaker:

    Gabrielle, as the visionary CEO and content creator behind Anti Work Girlboss, leads a social revolution reshaping the future workplace landscape. Her pioneering concept of the “lazy girl job” has captivated millions monthly, offering both relatable content and career inspiration. Her areas of expertise extend across work-life balance, branding for Gen Z employees, and forward-thinking perspectives on the future of work. Esteemed platforms like NPR, BBC, and TEDx have recognized her innovative contributions, inviting her to speak on her insights. Gabrielle’s groundbreaking ideas have also been spotlighted in over 10,000 global publications, including the Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg, Al Jazeera, and 60 Minutes Australia, underscoring her influential role in redefining career norms.

    [ad_2]

    Entrepreneur Staff

    Source link

  • Why Are Airlines Introducing Unlimited ‘All You Can Fly’ Deals?

    Why Are Airlines Introducing Unlimited ‘All You Can Fly’ Deals?

    [ad_1]

    Wizz Air is launching an unlimited flight model. Nicolas Economou/NurPhoto via Getty Images

    Wizz Air, a Hungarian-based budget airline, hopes to attract more customers with a new “All You Can Fly” deal for travelers interested in taking unlimited flights across Europe. The subscription is currently available at a discounted annual fee of 499 euros ($547) that will rise to 599 euros ($657) on Aug. 16. If the deal sounds too good to be true, that’s because there are some hidden caveats. Subscribers must book flights up to three days before departure and will have to pay an additional flat fee of 10 euros ($11) per booking. The deal also only covers one personal item, meaning customers will have to shell out for carry-on or checked baggage.

    The airline’s “All You Can Fly” deal, which will allow a total of 10,000 members to catch flights across European cities like Paris, Madrid and Vienna, shares parallels with a similar deal launched by Frontier Airlines last year for North American consumers. Members of Frontier’s GoWild! subscription also need to pay extra for luggage and additional add-ons like snacks, drinks and reserved seats and must reserve international flights 10 days in advance.

    Wizz Air is hoping the initiative will entice new clients amid financial and reputational struggles. The company earlier this month reported 45 million euros ($49 million) in operating profits from April to June, a 44 percent drop year over year that was largely influenced by grounding of nearly one-fifth of the airline’s fleet due to engine inspections. And in February, the consumer group Which? found the carrier ranked the worst short-haul airline by U.K. passengers.

    How are airlines faring amid inflation?

    Airfare overall has managed to avoid any sharp increases despite inflationary pressures. While core inflation in July was up 3.2 percent from last year, airline fares in the U.S. were down by 2.8 percent, according to data from the Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Airline fares decreased by 1.6 percent month over month, making July the fifth month in a row it has dropped.

    This decline can be partially attributed to a decline in jet fuel prices, Stephen Brown, the deputy chief North America economist at Capital Economics, told CNBC. Average aviation jet fuel prices for August are down by 17 percent year over year, according to data from the International Air Transport Association.

    Those interested in saving even more money on air travel through Wizz’s new deal should take advantage while they can, as unlimited flight subscriptions have been historically short experiments for airlines. In 2009, JetBlue debuted an unlimited $599 “All You Can Jet” offer that proved too popular, with the airline running out of supply and suspending sales of the pass mere hours after releasing it.

    American Airlines (AAL), too, rolled out unlimited lifetime tickets in the 1990s that were acquired by a few dozen travelers for $250,000 each, with the option to pay another $150,000 to add a companion feature. In the late 2000s, the airline terminated the program after realizing how much the lucky ticketholders, some of whom accumulated more than 30 million miles, were costing them in lost revenue.

    Why Are Airlines Introducing Unlimited ‘All You Can Fly’ Deals?

    [ad_2]

    Alexandra Tremayne-Pengelly

    Source link

  • Enterprise Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:EBTC) to Issue $0.24 Quarterly Dividend

    Enterprise Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:EBTC) to Issue $0.24 Quarterly Dividend

    [ad_1]

    Enterprise Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:EBTCGet Free Report) announced a quarterly dividend on Tuesday, July 16th, Zacks reports. Stockholders of record on Tuesday, August 13th will be given a dividend of 0.24 per share by the savings and loans company on Tuesday, September 3rd. This represents a $0.96 annualized dividend and a dividend yield of 3.54%. The ex-dividend date is Tuesday, August 13th.

    Enterprise Bancorp has increased its dividend by an average of 9.5% per year over the last three years and has raised its dividend every year for the last 6 years.

    Enterprise Bancorp Price Performance

    NASDAQ EBTC opened at $27.14 on Monday. The company has a market cap of $335.86 million, a PE ratio of 9.33 and a beta of 0.54. Enterprise Bancorp has a 52-week low of $22.60 and a 52-week high of $34.10. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.37, a quick ratio of 0.91 and a current ratio of 0.91. The firm’s 50 day moving average price is $25.44 and its 200-day moving average price is $25.73.

    About Enterprise Bancorp

    (Get Free Report)

    Enterprise Bancorp, Inc operates as the holding company for Enterprise Bank and Trust Company that engages in the provision of commercial banking products and services. It offers commercial and retail deposit products, including checking accounts, limited-transactional savings and money market accounts, commercial sweep products, and term certificates of deposit.

    Recommended Stories

    Dividend History for Enterprise Bancorp (NASDAQ:EBTC)

    Receive News & Ratings for Enterprise Bancorp Daily – Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts’ ratings for Enterprise Bancorp and related companies with MarketBeat.com’s FREE daily email newsletter.

    [ad_2]

    ABMN Staff

    Source link

  • Tidal Investments LLC Increases Position in Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ:VRTS)

    Tidal Investments LLC Increases Position in Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ:VRTS)

    [ad_1]

    Tidal Investments LLC raised its holdings in Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ:VRTSFree Report) by 9.4% during the first quarter, Holdings Channel reports. The institutional investor owned 1,048 shares of the closed-end fund’s stock after buying an additional 90 shares during the period. Tidal Investments LLC’s holdings in Virtus Investment Partners were worth $260,000 as of its most recent SEC filing.

    A number of other hedge funds have also made changes to their positions in the business. Signaturefd LLC grew its position in shares of Virtus Investment Partners by 29.2% in the 4th quarter. Signaturefd LLC now owns 221 shares of the closed-end fund’s stock valued at $53,000 after buying an additional 50 shares during the last quarter. Texas Permanent School Fund Corp lifted its holdings in shares of Virtus Investment Partners by 1.3% in the 1st quarter. Texas Permanent School Fund Corp now owns 5,911 shares of the closed-end fund’s stock valued at $1,466,000 after purchasing an additional 76 shares during the last quarter. ProShare Advisors LLC boosted its position in shares of Virtus Investment Partners by 6.3% in the 1st quarter. ProShare Advisors LLC now owns 1,377 shares of the closed-end fund’s stock valued at $341,000 after purchasing an additional 81 shares during the period. Bessemer Group Inc. purchased a new position in Virtus Investment Partners during the 1st quarter worth approximately $57,000. Finally, EntryPoint Capital LLC increased its position in Virtus Investment Partners by 625.6% during the first quarter. EntryPoint Capital LLC now owns 312 shares of the closed-end fund’s stock worth $77,000 after buying an additional 269 shares during the period. Hedge funds and other institutional investors own 80.52% of the company’s stock.

    Wall Street Analysts Forecast Growth

    A number of equities analysts have recently issued reports on the stock. Morgan Stanley lowered their target price on shares of Virtus Investment Partners from $213.00 to $208.00 and set an “underweight” rating on the stock in a research report on Monday, July 29th. TD Cowen dropped their price objective on shares of Virtus Investment Partners from $250.00 to $247.00 and set a “hold” rating on the stock in a research note on Monday, July 8th. Finally, Piper Sandler decreased their target price on shares of Virtus Investment Partners from $267.00 to $264.00 and set an “overweight” rating for the company in a research note on Wednesday, July 10th.

    View Our Latest Stock Analysis on VRTS

    Insider Transactions at Virtus Investment Partners

    In other Virtus Investment Partners news, EVP Barry M. Mandinach sold 7,886 shares of Virtus Investment Partners stock in a transaction that occurred on Monday, May 20th. The stock was sold at an average price of $234.00, for a total value of $1,845,324.00. Following the sale, the executive vice president now owns 12,418 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $2,905,812. The sale was disclosed in a filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is available through the SEC website. Company insiders own 6.10% of the company’s stock.

    Virtus Investment Partners Price Performance

    Shares of NASDAQ VRTS opened at $197.49 on Friday. The company has a market cap of $1.41 billion, a PE ratio of 11.90 and a beta of 1.46. The stock has a fifty day moving average price of $223.19 and a 200 day moving average price of $230.35. Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. has a 1-year low of $168.78 and a 1-year high of $263.39.

    Virtus Investment Partners Announces Dividend

    The company also recently announced a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Thursday, August 15th. Stockholders of record on Wednesday, July 31st will be issued a $1.90 dividend. This represents a $7.60 annualized dividend and a dividend yield of 3.85%. The ex-dividend date of this dividend is Wednesday, July 31st. Virtus Investment Partners’s payout ratio is 45.78%.

    Virtus Investment Partners Company Profile

    (Free Report)

    Virtus Investment Partners, Inc is a publicly owned investment manager. The firm primarily provides its services to individual and institutional clients. It launches separate client focused equity and fixed income portfolios. The firm launches equity, fixed income, and balanced mutual funds for its clients.

    Read More

    Want to see what other hedge funds are holding VRTS? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ:VRTSFree Report).

    Institutional Ownership by Quarter for Virtus Investment Partners (NASDAQ:VRTS)

    Receive News & Ratings for Virtus Investment Partners Daily – Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts’ ratings for Virtus Investment Partners and related companies with MarketBeat.com’s FREE daily email newsletter.

    [ad_2]

    ABMN Staff

    Source link

  • Super Group Posts Record Q2 Results Following US Exit

    Super Group Posts Record Q2 Results Following US Exit

    [ad_1]

    Super Group has published its financials for Q2 2024, outlining record-breaking revenues in the wake of its exit from the US market.

    Super Group Excels Following Its US Exit

    For Q2, the company reported revenue of €414.7 million ($453.2 million) marking an increase of 9% from €380.8 million in Q2 2023. The significant increase was attributed to growth from the company’s businesses in Africa and Canada, which offset declines in the Middle East and Asia-Pacific markets.

    Loss for Q2 2024 stood at €0.8 million ($0.87 million) and includes non-cash charges of €36.8 relating to the impairment of DGC-related assets.

    Adjusted EBITDA, meanwhile, was up 8% year-on-year to €81.9 million ($89.5 million) for the second quarter of 2024.

    At the end of the quarter, Super Group had cash and cash equivalents of €306.8 million ($335.3 million), up from €241.9 million in the prior-year period. This increase was attributed to inflows from operating activities of €104.5 million ($114.2 million) and outflows from investing and financing activities of €42.9 million and €3.7 million, respectively. The figure also takes a gain of €7 million as a result of currency fluctuations into mind.

    Super Group reported a vast increase in the number of monthly active consumers. Whereas the company recorded 3.7 million active consumers in Q2 2023, it now reported an increase in active players of 21% to 4.5 million.

    CEO Menashe Wants to Make 2024 a “Super Year for Super Group”

    Company representatives commented on the results, expressing excitement about the company’s financial position and FY2024 outlook. According to CEO Neal Menashe, the record-breaking Q2 results demonstrate the company’s exceptional business progress.

    Menashe reflected on the exit from the US market, saying that he was glad to have optimized the company’s activity. He vowed to continue improving the company’s global footprint both in terms of geography and product.

    On an additional note, CEO Menashe added that he glad to welcome Manchester City and South Africa’s Premier Soccer League to the company’s brand sponsorship portfolio.

    Our outlook for the remainder of the year is strong, and we look forward to making 2024 a super year for Super Group.

    Neal Menashe, CEO, Super Group

    Alinda van Wyk, Super Group’s chief financial officer, added that the company’s sharpened focus on key markets continues to be a winning strategy. She provided an insight into the company’s expectations for FY 2024:

    Given the strength we have seen in the first half of the year, we are confident in raising our ex-US Adjusted EBITDA guidance for the full year 2024 to greater than €300m. Finally, our debt-free balance sheet continues to show strength, and we were pleased to return capital to shareholders through the announcement of our first ever dividend.

    Alinda van Wyk, CFO, Super Group

    In other news, Super Group appointed a new chief marketing officer earlier this year. The one up to the task was Elen Barber, a former Kindred executive.

    [ad_2]

    Angel Hristov

    Source link

  • Healey signs $5.1B housing bond bill

    Healey signs $5.1B housing bond bill

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Gov. Maura Healey signed a $5.1 billion bond bill Tuesday aimed at boosting the state’s dwindling housing stock, but critics say the plan will do little to help struggling renters and people now at risk of losing their homes.

    The measure, approved on the final day of formal legislative sessions, includes a mix of bonding, policy changes, tax breaks and other incentives to help spur the much-needed development of new homes.

    Healey, a first-term Democrat who has made housing a key part of her legislative agenda, described the measure as the “most ambitious” in state history to address what she called the state’s “toughest” challenge.

    “The Affordable Homes Act creates homes for every kind of household, at every stage of life, and unlocks the potential in our neighborhoods,” Healey said in a statement. “Today we are taking an unprecedented step forward in building a stronger Massachusetts where everyone can afford to live.”

    Under the plan, at least $2 billion will be devoted to the rehabilitation of more than 43,000 public housing units, with 25% of the money dedicated to preserving housing for those with low incomes.

    The bill also calls for diverting $800 million to the state’s Affordable Housing Trust Fund to create and preserve affordable housing for households whose incomes are not more than 110% of area median income.

    Among the policy initiatives in the bill is a proposal to authorize accessory dwelling units equal to or less than 900 square feet to be built by-right in single-family zoning districts in all communities.

    The plan expands funding for the state’s Community Investment Tax Credit Program, which funds community development corporations that partner with nonprofits to build affordable housing across the state.

    Under the tax credit program, donations to community development corporations that qualify are eligible to receive a 50% refundable tax credit.

    The Senate approved the $5.4 billion housing bond bill in May and the House followed in June with a $6.5 billion bill. Differences between the two bills were worked out by a six-member committee, which announced a compromise on the final day of formal sessions.

    Lawmakers rejected Healey’s controversial proposal to give communities the authority to add transfer fees from 2% to 5% onto property tax bills to fund affordable housing, which faced opposition from the real estate industry.

    Lawmakers also rejected a plan to spend $1 billion to allow the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority’s water system to be expanded to the Ipswich River Basin, which includes Beverly, Danvers, Ipswich, Middleton, Peabody, Salem and other communities north of Boston.

    And some housing advocates say the changes in the new law will do little to help people who are now struggling to pay the rent or facing foreclosure.

    “The housing bond bill includes meaningful funding to support public housing and build new affordable housing, but legislators failed to include any tools to help renters who are facing enormous rent hikes and eviction today,” said Carolyn Chou, executive director of the group Homes for All Mass.

    Homes for All Mass was pushing for inclusion of a proposal that would allow cities and towns to stabilize rents by pegging increases to the rate of inflation with a cap at 5% and protect tenants by banning no-fault evictions.

    “We need strong rent stabilization now to protect people during the decades it will take to make housing more affordable in Massachusetts,” Chou said.

    The housing bill was a top priority for Healey and other Beacon Hill leaders, who are trying to spur more home building amid a shrinking inventory that is edging first-time buyers out of the market.

    The prolonged housing crunch is affecting the state’s economic growth, making it much harder to attract new families and companies, they say.

    Massachusetts has some of the highest housing costs and rents in the country. The median price of a single-family home hit a record $609,000 in June, according to real estate industry reports. Meanwhile, single-family home sales were down in June versus the same month last year.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Maryland Casino Sector Records Slowdown as July Revenue Declines

    Maryland Casino Sector Records Slowdown as July Revenue Declines

    [ad_1]

    Maryland’s six casinos have generated almost $170 million in revenue in July 2024, marking a slight year-on-year decline. By extension, this led to a slight decline in the industry’s contributions to the state.

    Maryland’s Six Casinos Recorded Slightly Lower Revenue

    Maryland has six legal commercial casinos that offer both table games and video lottery terminals (VLTs). The properties include MGM National Harbor, Live! Casino Hotel, Horseshoe Casino Baltimore, Ocean Downs Casino, Hollywood Casino Perryville, and Rocky Gap Casino Resort.

    In July, the six casinos generated $169,821,301 in revenue from slots and table games.  This marks a slight 2.6% decline from July 2023 and represents $116,461,385 in VLT revenue and $53,359,924 in table game revenue.

    The commercial casino industry’s contributions to the state also experienced a slight decline to $72,163,554. This figure marks a decrease of 1.4% from July 2023. Likewise, the industry’s contributions to the Education Trust Fund were down 1.4% year-on-year. The fund, for reference, provides support to the casinos’ local communities, the racing industry and smaller businesses.

    How the Six Casinos Performed

    MGM National Harbor, a property boasting some 2,300 slot machines and 212 table games, recorded $71,983,723 in revenue in July. This result was more or less in line with the July 2023 figure, representing only a slight decrease of 0.2%. The property recorded $43,937,330 in VLT revenue and $28,046,382 in table gaming revenue.

    Live! Casino & Hotel, meanwhile, posted a total revenue of $62,562,895, which encompasses $18,411,276 in table gaming revenue and 44,151,618 in VLT revenue. The total figure marked a YOY decrease of 0.3%. For context, the casino has 3,861 slots and 179 gaming tables.

    Horseshoe Casino, which fields some 1,347 slot machines and 115 table games, on the other hand, reported revenue of $13,317,234 in July 2024. The property struggled a bit as its revenue declined by 16.9% year-on-year. The total revenue consisted of $8,839,531 in VLT revenue and $4,477,702 in table game revenue.

    Ocean Downs Casino, a casino sporting 876 VLTs and 19 table games, saw its total revenue decrease by 4.6% YOY to $9,621,082. This figure included $8,853,569 in VLT revenue and $767,512 in table game revenue.

    In addition, Hollywood Casino, which has 735 VLTs and 23 table games, posted revenue of $7,297,270, down 2.8% from July 2023. The property reported $6,089,220 in VLT revenue and $1,208,049 in table game revenue.

    Finally, Rocky Gap Casino, which has 636 VLTs and 16 table games, reported $5,039,106 in revenue for July, down 13.4% YOY.  VLT revenue stood at $4,590,114, while table game revenue reached $448,991.

    [ad_2]

    Angel Hristov

    Source link

  • MIT economist: Markets have overestimated AI-driven productivity gains

    MIT economist: Markets have overestimated AI-driven productivity gains

    [ad_1]

    The problem with the AI bubble isn’t that it is bursting and bringing the market down—it’s that the hype will likely go on for a while and do much more damage in the process than experts are anticipating.

    Economic analysts, consultants, and business leaders are desperate for anything that will lift productivity growth in the industrialized world. It has been disappointing in the information age, despite all of the glimmer and talk of revolutionary technologies. Total Factor Productivity (TFP)—economists’ favorite measure of macroeconomic productivity which estimates how much aggregate output is growing due to improvements in efficiency and technology—used to grow about 2% a year throughout the 1950s, 60s, and early 70s. Since the 1980s, its growth has been hovering around 0.5%. The promise of an AI-driven productivity boom is music to everyone’s ears.

    It isn’t just wishful thinking on the part of businesses. The hype machine of the tech world is powerful. We are told every day in newspapers and social media about the transformative effects of new tools, sparkling with superhuman intelligence.

    And of course, the prospect of artificial general intelligence (AGI) appeals to us after decades of Hollywood movies where machines become so capable that they battle it out with humans.

    Alas, it seems unlikely that anything of the scale promised by the tech world—such as rapid advances towards singularity where machines can do everything humans can—is even remotely possible. Even more grounded predictions such as those from Goldman Sachs that generative AI will boost global GDP by 7% over the next decade and from the McKinsey Global Institute that the annual GDP growth rate could increase by 3-4 percentage points between now and 2040, may be far too optimistic.

    What should we expect from AI?

    My own research shows that the effect of the suite of AI technologies is more likely to be in the range of about 0.5%-0.6% increase in U.S. TFP and about 1% increase in US GDP within 10 years. This is nothing to sneer at. Given the state of the economy in the United States and other industrialized countries, we should welcome such a contribution with open arms and do our best so that this potential is realized. Yet, it isn’t transformative.

    Where this number comes from is useful to understand, not just to increase our confidence in it but also to know why we could even squander that potential if we give in to the hype.

    On its current trajectory and with current capabilities, AI’s biggest impact will come from automating some tasks and making workers a little more productive in some occupations. For now, this can only happen in occupations that do not involve much interaction with the real world (construction, custodial services, and all sorts of blue-collar and craft work are out) and in occupations that do not have a central social element (psychiatry, much of entertainment and academia are out). Even in occupations that fall outside of these categories, getting much productivity growth from AI will be difficult. Physicians could benefit from AI in diagnosis and calibrating their treatment and prescription decisions. But this requires much more reliable AI models—not gimmicks such as large language models that can write Shakespearean sonnets.

    Based on the available evidence and these considerations, I estimate that only about 4.6% of tasks in the U.S. economy can be meaningfully impacted by AI within the next decade.

    Combine this with existing estimates of how much of a productivity gain businesses can get from the use of generative AI tools, which is on average about 14%, and you come up with a TFP boost of only 0.66% over ten years, or by 0.06% annually.

    I readily admit that there is a huge degree of uncertainty. It may well be that generative AI models will make tremendous progress within the next few years and suddenly they can do much more than the 4.6% I currently estimate. Or they could revolutionize the process of science, leading to myriad new materials and products that we could not dream of today and completely change the production process for the better.

    But I, for one, don’t think this is the likely outcome. A very tiny percentage of U.S. companies are currently using AI, and it will be a slow process until AI is productively used throughout the economy.

    Hype is the enemy

    Worse, the hype may be the biggest enemy of getting productivity increases from AI, and the misallocation of resources that it causes could make us lose the modest gains that we can get from AI.

    This is for at least three reasons. First, with the hype, there will be a lot of overinvestment in AI. Most business executives, at least until last week’s market correction and soul-searching, were under pressure to jump on the AI bandwagon. If you are not investing in AI massively, you are lagging behind your peers, they were told by journalists, consultants, and tech experts. This leads to efficiency losses not to efficiency gains. In a rush to automate everything, even the processes that shouldn’t be automated, businesses will waste time and energy and will not get any of the productivity benefits that are promised. The hard truth is that getting productivity gains from any technology requires organizational adjustment, a range of complementary investments, and improvements in worker skills, via training and on-the-job learning. The miraculous, revolutionary returns from AI are very likely to remain a chimera.

    Second, there will be a lot of wasted resources, investment, and energy, as tech companies and their backers go after bigger and bigger generative AI models. The current market correction will not stop tech leaders from asking for trillions of dollars to buy even more GPU capacity and strive to build bigger models. They may pass on some of these costs by selling their services and technologies to businesses that are not ready to undertake this transition, but as a society, we surely bear the consequences of this overinvestment.

    Third and most fundamentally, boosting productivity requires workers to become more productive, gain greater expertise, and use better information in their decision-making and problem-solving. This applies not just to journalists, academics, and office workers—most of what electricians, plumbers, blue-collar workers, educators, and healthcare workers do is tackle a series of problems. The better the information they use, the better they will be at their jobs and the more able they will become to take on more sophisticated tasks. The real promise of AI is as an informational tool: to collect, process, and present reliable, context-dependent, and easy-to-use information to human decision-makers.

    But this is not the direction in which the tech industry, mesmerized by human-like chatbots and dreams of AGI and misled by self-appointed AI prophets, is heading.

    More must-read commentary published by Fortune:

    The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.

    Recommended Newsletter: CEO Daily provides key context for the news leaders need to know from across the world of business. Every weekday morning, more than 125,000 readers trust CEO Daily for insights about–and from inside–the C-suite. Subscribe Now.

    [ad_2]

    Daron Acemoglu

    Source link

  • Steward’s creditors accused of ‘brinkmanship’

    Steward’s creditors accused of ‘brinkmanship’

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — The Healey administration is lashing out at Steward Health Care System’s creditors for seeking to block $30 million in state funding to help transition the bankrupt company’s hospitals to new owners.

    In a new filing in U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Assistant Attorney General Andrew Troop accuses a group representing creditors seeking to collect $9 billion in debt from Steward of engaging in “brinksmanship” in an effort “to wring out more value from qualified bidders or the commonwealth to salvage their own bad financial, investment or lending decisions.”

    “Many of these creditors seem to have lost sight of the importance of providing safe healthcare over the long term, and instead seem intent on saddling bidders with potentially critical levels of debt or obligations, which will only make this crisis a recurring one,” Troop wrote in the seven-page statement.

    While the state is “unable” to stop Steward from closing the two hospitals, Troop said it still has “significant police powers” to intervene in the federal bankruptcy process if it “does not result in a clear path to the sale of the hospitals.”

    The fiery statement comes as a federal judge in Texas weighs a request from a group representing Steward’s myriad creditors to reject Gov. Maura Healey’s plan to devote $30 million in repurposed Medicaid funding to help transition the sale of six of Steward’s hospitals as part of the company’s bankruptcy proceedings.

    Steward plans to put its 31 U.S. hospitals – including Holy Family’s locations in Methuen and Haverhill – up for sale to pay down $9 billion in outstanding liabilities owed to creditors. The company filed for federal bankruptcy protections in May.

    Steward said it was not able to find buyers for Carney Hospital in Dorchester and Nashoba Valley Medical Center in Ayer and announced plans to shut down the facilities in the next 30 days.

    U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Lopez, who is overseeing the case, approved the request to close the hospitals following a hearing Wednesday in a Texas courtroom.

    Bids on Steward’s Massachusetts hospitals and other states were due last week, but the company has not disclosed prospective buyers. A hearing on the sales was scheduled for Thursday, but the company asked the federal judge presiding over the case to postpone the proceedings until Aug. 13, without citing a reason.

    Last week, Healey officials announced plans to provide $30 million in Medicaid funding to help ensure a “smooth transition” to new ownership for the company’s six remaining hospitals. Healey told reporters earlier this week that “not a dime” of the money will go to Steward or its management team.

    But in a court filing this week, a committee representing Steward’s creditors asked Lopez to block the move, arguing that the transition funding would come “at the expense of the rest of debtors, their estates and their creditors.”

    On Wednesday, Lopez approved a request by Steward and others to reject a master lease for all the hospital properties, saying the move “is in the best interests of the Debtors, their respective estates, creditors, and all parties in interest.”

    The Attorney General’s Office sided with Steward on the lease issue and has accused the hospitals’ landlords – Medical Properties Trust and Macquarie Asset Management – of trying to block the move “to extract concessions from the Steward estate and their mortgagee.

    “These hospitals – while each in name a lessee – have been forced to pay the costs typically associated with property ownership, including real estate taxes, maintenance, and insurance,” Troop said in the latest court filing.

    Steward’s landlords objected to the request to reject the master lease, arguing in court filings that federal law prohibits the company from stopping rent payments “when their express intention is to continue conducting business in the landlords’ property pending a proposed sale.”

    “If a debtor were permitted to reject a lease and stop paying rent, while continuing to conduct business in the landlord’s property, every debtor would do that,” lawyers for the two property owners wrote in a legal filing. “But of course that is not allowed.”

    During the hearing Wednesday, Lopez also heard arguments for approving the Healey administration’s request to use the $30 million for transition costs, but it was not clear when he would issue his ruling on the funding.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link