ReportWire

Tag: Finance

  • I Started Side Hustles to Pay Off $40k Debt and Build Wealth | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    This as-told-to story is based on a conversation with Marissa Cazem Potts, a Bay Area-based Intuit financial advocate* and financial literacy professional. The piece has been edited for length and clarity.

    Image Credit: Courtesy of Intuit. Marissa Cazem Potts.

    Want to read more stories like this? Subscribe to Money Makers, our free newsletter packed with creative side hustle ideas and successful strategies. Sign up here.

    Growing up, I experienced the pitfalls of my parents not understanding how to manage money.

    My father is second-generation American-Filipino, and my mom is half Black and half white and has enslaved person ancestry. Both of them wanted to make money and create a better life for themselves, but they didn’t know how to invest or even save their money. We spent a lot and would find ourselves in jeopardy. There’d be a year where I couldn’t get the new shoes I wanted for school because my parents didn’t manage their money well, but thankfully, we always had a home and all the things we needed.

    I wanted to be the generation that stops the cycle of being financially irresponsible.

    Related: The Shopping Strategy I Used to Pay Off $22,000 Debt and Save $36,000 Might Sound Extreme — But It Worked. Here’s How.

    I knew I had to go to college. My mother finished college; my grandmother had her master’s degree in education. I felt I had to at least get my undergraduate degree, coming from a legacy of women who considered education the way to financial freedom. My parents said they could help with my rent during college, but that was about it. I got a part-time job at Nordstrom and actually made a lot of money doing that.

    But when it came to tuition, there was no game plan. My parents dropped me off at the financial office at the University of California, Santa Barbara. The office told me that I could take loans out and wouldn’t have to pay them back until I graduated. I just wanted to make sure I got my education. So I signed the documents. I had a series of different loans, but I didn’t read the fine print. I didn’t understand the concept of interest, and I let the loans sit.

    I graduated in 2010 with that debt over my head and didn’t have a plan for paying it back. The first thing on my mind after graduating was getting a good job, making sure it paid well and thinking about what career I wanted to have. I’d always had a passion for writing, communicating and speaking, so I got an internship at E! News. That was unpaid, but it was a great opportunity.

    Related: I’m a Millennial Who Quit My Job Last Year to Do What I Love. Here’s How I’ve Made More Than $300,000 So Far.

    While I worked that unpaid internship, I had to make money on the side. So I started side hustles. I worked as a receptionist at a dance studio. I sold my old clothes. I was building income, but then I was spending it — on gas, food, something nice. At that point, I wasn’t thinking about paying the student loans or saving money.

    I was in Los Angeles for a while, then slowly navigated back home to the Bay Area for a career in technology. In the back of my mind, though, I always wanted to do something for myself, too.

    “I needed to start saving and investing, building a 401(k).”

     Eventually, I landed a job at Intuit and was introduced to financial education. There were tools like TurboTax, and at the time, Mint, Credit Karma. I realized I needed to get my finances in order. I needed to start saving and investing, building a 401(k).

    Then I took a job at LinkedIn and had a daughter, and I really didn’t want this $40,000 debt, increasing year over year, on my back. I’d learned a lot in my professional communications career — and realized I could spin that skill set into another side hustle, helping coach and advocate for executive women. So I started that executive coaching business on the side; I took on a few clients in the early morning, after hours or on weekends.

    Related: This Couple’s ‘Scrappy’ Side Hustle Sold Out in 1 Weekend — It Hit $1 Million in 3 Years and Now Makes Millions Annually: ‘Lean But Powerful’

    The side hustle kept me busy, and I had to sacrifice time with my young daughter and husband, so I made it a little spicier and reminded myself of my ultimate goal by funneling the money into an account called “Marissa’s Freedom Fund.” Any time I had a check from an executive coaching job or another side gig, it went straight into that account, and anything left over, whether $10 or $100, went into an emergency fund.

    I began paying off my six loans in 2022 and finished paying them off in 2023. I got that email from Navient, my loan processor at the time, saying, “Congratulations, your loans are paid off,” and I felt totally free.

    “Financial wellness means utilizing the tools that are available to you.”

    It’s important to treat financial wellness as self-care. The first step is looking at your debts and your accounts: I didn’t want to look at my student loan debt or credit card debt, but I had to see the big picture and figure out where to start. Financial wellness means utilizing the tools that are available to you, tapping into your network and practicing consistency — that’s the hardest part. You are your own worst enemy. You have to ensure you’re sticking to a routine when you’re working toward a financial goal.

    It can be intimidating, especially if you grew up in a home where you didn’t talk about money, but you should start your financial wellness journey as soon as you can. I try to talk openly with my daughter about finances so that she understands the power of a dollar. You can start small: $10 a month can grow into $100 a month, then $500 a month. Create savings and investment accounts. Also, be a conscious consumer — if you regret a purchase, return it.

    Related: ‘It Was Taboo’: Parents Shape Their Children’s Relationship With Money. Here’s How to Set Kids Up for Long-Term Success Instead of Struggle.

    Don’t feel defeated if you have debt. You have the agency to attack it by setting up different income streams. I still have that entrepreneurial drive today. I channel it both into my role as a financial advocate at Intuit, where I empower Gen Z (like my younger sister) and Gen Alpha with financial education and confidence, and as an intrapreneur, pursuing stretch projects and impact within my day-to-day work.

    It’s so important for younger generations to see that you can take the time to build skills, grow a network and test a business idea on the side while working in a traditional corporate role. A recent Intuit survey found that 26% of Gen Z already have a side hustle, and 37% want to start a side hustle.

    Related: Gen Z Is Turning to Side Hustles to Purchase ‘the Normal Stuff’ in ‘Suburban Middle-Class America

    By using your agency and leveraging free tools like Intuit for Education and other resources, you can prepare to launch a business full-time — if and when that path feels right for you.

    *Potts is not an official financial advisor; her tips are for “general informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. It is not a substitute for professional guidance.”

    [ad_2]

    Amanda Breen

    Source link

  • Expanding Your Small Business? You Need to Prepare For This Money Challenge | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    In our increasingly digitally borderless world, the dream of international expansion is more accessible than ever for American entrepreneurs. The reach of social media and a strategic web presence has the power to make your brand visible to a global audience in seconds. Yet, as U.S. small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) increasingly venture beyond borders, a significant yet often underestimated challenge emerges: currency volatility.

    From selling goods in Europe to sourcing materials from Asia, or managing a remote team spread across continents, operating internationally inherently means SMBs are engaging with different currencies. This involves added layers of complexity, not only because it entails managing Profit and Loss (P&L) statements in multiple currencies, but because the value of one currency against another is not static. A currency’s value can shift due to geopolitical events, economic news and market sentiment, often quickly and without warning. For small businesses, this can directly impact their bottom line in ways they might not be prepared for.

    Consider this scenario: You’re a small business owner and the U.S. dollar strengthens significantly against the currency in which you’ve priced an export contract. This means that your expected profit in dollars could sharply diminish upon conversion. Conversely, a weaker dollar could drastically increase the cost of imported goods, squeezing your profit margins or even making your products less competitive in the market. Beyond profitability, currency swings can make it difficult to accurately forecast spending or build a predictable budget. What you forecast to pay one month could significantly vary more or less the next, leading to instability that can derail your financial planning.

    For any U.S. small business looking to succeed in multiple markets, it’s essential to mitigate these risks by adopting a proactive currency management strategy. Here are three simple steps SMBs can take to hedge against currency volatility.

    Related: How to Solve the $800 Million Problem That’s Stopping Small Businesses From Expanding Overseas

    1. Assess exposure

    Small business owners should start by assessing how currency movements could affect their business. Consider which countries the business operates in and investigate the stability of local currency values over time. This provides an up-front indication of the level of risk you are taking on.

    From there, the next step is to establish the best way to manage a cross-border cash flow. For example, if you know you’re sourcing goods and materials from local vendors in a country with a volatile currency, you may want to keep most of the funds siphoned for those payments in USD until the time comes for you to actually make the payment. Alternatively, if you’re working with a foreign currency that is considered stable, it might be more cost-effective for your business to hold funds in that local currency consistently using a multi-currency account. By keeping those funds readily available, you can reduce the number of times you pay conversion fees and manage that revenue stream just like you would in dollars.

    It’s also worth noting that some businesses and individuals living and working in countries with volatile currencies may request to be paid in a non-native currency themselves, including USD. So it’s worth checking with suppliers and employees what their preference is before setting up payments.

    Related: How a Strong vs. Weak Dollar Impacts U.S. Businesses

    2. Rethink your supply chain

    Once SMBs have established their currency exposure, it’s time to start thinking strategically about how they’re spreading risk across the business. Especially this year, as new tariffs — taxes on imported goods — have created additional complexities for many small businesses, it’s more important than ever to mitigate the risk of unforeseen costs.

    A good place for SMBs to start is to take inventory of their suppliers. If they are all concentrated in one region with a volatile currency, it might be worth exploring alternatives. Similarly, if retail-based businesses shipping goods abroad are consistently paying cargo fees that they can’t readily predict, they might look for local suppliers of those same goods to avoid paying import charges on every order.

    Diversifying where the business buys and sells goods and services can significantly smooth out both currency risk and the impact of sudden tariff changes. In other words, rebalancing purchasing zones is a smart way to distribute and lessen overall financial exposure.

    Related: ‘Uniquely Positioned’: How Small Business Owners Can Successfully Navigate the Tariffs

    3. Embrace multi-currency financial platforms

    Regardless of a businesses’ chosen international structure, it’s crucial to choose financial tools that make managing a global cash flow simple. As I’ve already alluded to, multi-currency accounts can be a game-changer for SMBs operating across borders, allowing them to hold funds in multiple currencies and send money like a local to foreign accounts.

    Some multi-currency account offerings even allow businesses to set thresholds for automatic currency conversions, which means their account will automatically convert funds when a currency hits a designated rate. This seamlessly allows SMBs to capture gains and avoid losses without adding to their mental load.

    It’s also important to choose fast, affordable and transparent financial services providers. Faster international payments mean funds arrive quicker, reducing the window of exchange rate exposure. Some providers also offer a fixed exchange rate within a certain time frame, so businesses know that even if funds arrive the next day, it will be the exact amount they expected — no more, no less. For SMBs, having clarity on how much they’re paying in fees, when their money will arrive and how much their recipient will receive can be an enormous relief.

    Ultimately, managing exchange rate risk isn’t just about protection; it’s about creating opportunity. When currency volatility is well-managed, it can become a lever for competitiveness. Businesses that have the right tools can leverage these variations to optimize their purchases or strengthen their positions in critical markets.

    For U.S. entrepreneurs venturing into the global marketplace, understanding and proactively managing currency risk is no longer optional. By embracing transparency, demanding speed and prioritizing control over your international finances, SMBs can protect their margins, empower their growth and unlock the vast potential of the international economy.

    In our increasingly digitally borderless world, the dream of international expansion is more accessible than ever for American entrepreneurs. The reach of social media and a strategic web presence has the power to make your brand visible to a global audience in seconds. Yet, as U.S. small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) increasingly venture beyond borders, a significant yet often underestimated challenge emerges: currency volatility.

    From selling goods in Europe to sourcing materials from Asia, or managing a remote team spread across continents, operating internationally inherently means SMBs are engaging with different currencies. This involves added layers of complexity, not only because it entails managing Profit and Loss (P&L) statements in multiple currencies, but because the value of one currency against another is not static. A currency’s value can shift due to geopolitical events, economic news and market sentiment, often quickly and without warning. For small businesses, this can directly impact their bottom line in ways they might not be prepared for.

    Consider this scenario: You’re a small business owner and the U.S. dollar strengthens significantly against the currency in which you’ve priced an export contract. This means that your expected profit in dollars could sharply diminish upon conversion. Conversely, a weaker dollar could drastically increase the cost of imported goods, squeezing your profit margins or even making your products less competitive in the market. Beyond profitability, currency swings can make it difficult to accurately forecast spending or build a predictable budget. What you forecast to pay one month could significantly vary more or less the next, leading to instability that can derail your financial planning.

    The rest of this article is locked.

    Join Entrepreneur+ today for access.

    [ad_2]

    June Yuan

    Source link

  • Research Reports & Trade Ideas – Yahoo Finance

    [ad_1]

    Analyst Report: International Business Machine

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Property Taxes By State: What You’ll Pay Based on Where You Live

    [ad_1]

    Buying a home isn’t just about the purchase price; you’ll also need to budget for ongoing costs like property taxes. These taxes can vary widely depending on where you live. Homebuyers in Boston will pay more than those buying homes in Los Angeles, even if the houses have the same value. So read on as we break down property taxes by state so you’ll know what states charge the highest rates and where you might be able to save some cash.

    What are property taxes, and what do they do?

    Property taxes are charged to homeowners based on the assessed value of your property. They help local governments pay for things like schools, public transportation, fire departments, and other necessary public services and government expenses.

    Your local tax assessor calculates your property tax based on methods defined by state and local laws. If you itemize deductions, property taxes may be deductible on your federal tax return.

    Property taxes by state

    Keep in mind that property tax rates can vary significantly within the same state. What you ultimately pay depends on your county or city’s specific rate and your home’s assessed value. The figures below show statewide averages based on the most recent data available; your actual tax bill may differ. Effective property tax rates are from 2023, while median sale prices reflect July 2025 Redfin data.

    State

    Effective Property Tax Rate (2023, %)

    Median Sale Price (July 2025)

    Estimated Annual Property Tax

    Alabama 0.36 $300,100 $1,080
    Alaska 0.91 $422,900 $3,848
    Arizona 0.44 $439,000 $3,995
    Arkansas 0.53 $273,100 $1,447
    California 0.70 $830,400 $5,812
    Colorado 0.50 $598,400 $2,992
    Connecticut 1.48 $491,700 $7,277
    Delaware 0.50 $385,000 $1,925
    District of Columbia 0.61 $675,000 $4,118
    Florida 0.74 $404,100 $2,990
    Georgia 0.77 $382,000 $2,941
    Hawaii 0.32 $733,800 $2,348
    Idaho 0.48 $491,200 $2,358
    Illinois 1.83 $320,800 $5,871
    Indiana 0.77 $281,400 $2,167
    Iowa 1.23 $252,200 $3,102
    Kansas 1.19 $314,000 $3,737
    Kentucky 0.73 $280,300 $2,046
    Louisiana 0.55 $252,700 $1,390
    Maine 0.94 $416,600 $3,916
    Maryland 0.9 $461,100 $4,150
    Massachusetts 0.97 $686,700 $6,661
    Michigan 1.15 $291,500 $3,352
    Minnesota 0.99 $371,300 $3,676
    Mississippi 0.58 $265,700 $1,541
    Missouri 0.88 $288,700 $2,541
    Montana 0.60 $541,200 $3,247
    Nebraska 1.43 $305,400 $4,367
    Nevada 0.49 $465,500 $2,281
    New Hampshire 1.41 $513,100 $7,235
    New Jersey 1.77 $579,000 $10,248
    New Mexico 0.61 $364,800 $2,225
    New York 1.26 $597,000 $7,522
    North Carolina 0.62 $388,400 $2,408
    North Dakota 0.94 n/a n/a
    Ohio 1.31 $275,600 $3,610
    Oklahoma 0.77 $258,900 $1,994
    Oregon 0.78 $516,600 $4,029
    Pennsylvania 1.19 $325,800 $3,877
    Rhode Island 1.05 $518,800 $5,447
    South Carolina 0.47 $387,900 $1,823
    South Dakota 0.99 $332,400 $3,291
    Tennessee 0.49 $394,800 $1,935
    Texas 1.36 $351,700 $4,783
    Utah 0.47 $560,600 $2,635
    Vermont 1.42 $430,500 $6,113
    Virginia 0.77 $474,700 $3,655
    Washington 0.75 $648,900 $4,867
    West Virginia 0.48 $249,400 $1,197
    Wisconsin 1.25 $342,600 $4,283
    Wyoming 0.55 $487,900 $2,683

    Note: Data may not be available for every state; in these cases, figures are marked as “n/a.”

    Property taxes by state FAQ

    Which states have the highest property tax rates?

    The following states have the highest effective property tax rates:

    1. Illinois (1.83%)
    2. New Jersey (1.77%)
    3. Connecticut (1.48%)
    4. Nebraska (1.43%)
    5. Vermont (1.42%)

    Which states have the highest property tax payments?

    Here are the states where you can expect to pay the most in property taxes:

    1. New Hampshire ($9,133)
    2. Connecticut ($8,408)
    3. New York ($8,119)
    4. Massachusetts ($7,348)
    5. Rhode Island ($7,159)

    How are property taxes calculated?

    Your annual property tax payments are determined by your home’s assessed value, not the purchase price of the home. Assessors may use market value, recent sales, or state-specific formulas to determine assessed value. Once that number is set, your local property tax rate is applied to calculate your annual bill.

    Do property tax exemptions exist?

    There are property tax exemptions for certain groups. Veterans, elderly homeowners, low-income homeowners, and those with disabilities are eligible for exemptions that can lower or eliminate their tax bill.

    [ad_2]

    Chibuzo Ezeokeke

    Source link

  • Research Reports & Trade Ideas – Yahoo Finance

    [ad_1]

    Analyst Report: United Airlines Holdings Inc

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Research Reports & Trade Ideas – Yahoo Finance

    [ad_1]

    Analyst Report: Consolidated Edison, Inc.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump wants to abolish quarterly earnings reports in favor of biannual. Here’s what that would mean.

    [ad_1]

    President Trump says he wants to ditch a staple of U.S. financial markets: quarterly earnings reports.

    If Mr. Trump’s push is successful, the change would eliminate a requirement that’s been in place for 55 years, with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, mandating quarterly reports since 1970.

    Instead, the president said he wants to replace quarterly reporting with a new SEC rule requiring that companies disclose their financial data every six months. Providing companies with a longer ramp for issuing their reports would “save money, and allow managers to focus on properly running their companies,” Mr. Trump wrote on Monday in his social media post. 

    “Did you ever hear the statement that, ‘China has a 50 to 100 year view on management of a company, whereas we run our companies on a quarterly basis???’ Not good!!!” he added. 

    The idea is far from new, with academic and business experts suggesting such a change in years past, for similar reasons as those cited by Mr. Trump. During his first term, Mr. Trump had asked the SEC to examine the three- versus six-month reporting requirement, although no change was made.

    But Mr. Trump’s renewed push could make such a corporate overhaul more likely today, TD Cowen analyst Jaret Seiberg said in a Monday research report.

    “We start with a 60% probability that the SEC switches to semi-annual from quarterly reporting, though the fact that this is an easy win for [SEC Chairman Paul] Atkins to deliver to Trump causes our bias to be that the prospects for action are more likely to rise than to fall,” Seiberg noted. 

    Here’s what to know about the idea.

    Why is Mr. Trump proposing this now? 

    There are some new pushes from the corporate sector. 

    The Long Term Stock Exchange — a national securities exchange — said last week that it plans to petition the SEC to do away with the quarterly requirement. The San Francisco-based exchange lists companies focused on long-term goals, with its founder Eric Ries criticizing the financial markets for pushing businesses to prioritize short-term wins.

    The proposed change also aligns with the Trump administration’s goal to ease regulatory burdens on companies, which it has said would help unlock economic growth by reducing businesses’ costs. 

    What’s the benefit? 

    Supporters of the change say quarterly reporting is too costly and time-consuming and discourages companies from wanting to go public. They also say company executives focus too much on hitting quarterly earnings targets and not enough on long-term planning.

    Is there a downside? 

    Those who favor quarterly earnings say the reports provide investors with valuable financial updates and make them aware of any new risks the company is facing. Six-month reviews would deprive investors of those important insights, they argue.

    “This might be great for long-term company builders, but terrible for public market investors who need timely data,” noted one executive, Sam Kampner, the founder of analysis firm SalesCraft AI, on social media on Monday. “[H]aving less information means you’d be making less-informed investment decisions.”

    What does the data show?

    A 2018 study published in the Harvard Business Review looked at a similar change in the U.K., which stopped requiring quarterly reporting in 2014. The results were “nuanced and falls somewhere between the two extreme narratives,” Shivaram Rajgopal, a professor at Columbia Business School, wrote in the Harvard report.

    “Moving away from quarterly reporting did not end corporate short-termism and earnings management, but nor did it destroy all transparency, leaving investors in the dark,” he added.

    What’s the timeframe for making a change? 

    At least half a year, with TD Cowen’s Seiberg noting that he believes it will take the SEC six months to create a proposal based on economic data. 

    “Key indicators of the issue gaining momentum will be if Atkins discusses the issue in his public speeches in the coming months and if it ends up on the agenda for the SEC’s Investor Advisory Committee,” he said.

    contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • First Hawaiian Bank Has $493,000 Stock Position in Truist Financial Corporation $TFC

    [ad_1]

    First Hawaiian Bank boosted its holdings in shares of Truist Financial Corporation (NYSE:TFCFree Report) by 8.6% during the 1st quarter, according to its most recent disclosure with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm owned 11,991 shares of the insurance provider’s stock after buying an additional 948 shares during the period. First Hawaiian Bank’s holdings in Truist Financial were worth $493,000 as of its most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    Several other large investors have also recently bought and sold shares of TFC. Brighton Jones LLC raised its position in Truist Financial by 148.5% during the fourth quarter. Brighton Jones LLC now owns 23,581 shares of the insurance provider’s stock valued at $1,023,000 after buying an additional 14,093 shares during the period. Janus Henderson Group PLC increased its position in Truist Financial by 1.7% in the 4th quarter. Janus Henderson Group PLC now owns 179,859 shares of the insurance provider’s stock worth $7,805,000 after purchasing an additional 3,042 shares during the last quarter. Lazard Asset Management LLC increased its position in Truist Financial by 101.1% in the 4th quarter. Lazard Asset Management LLC now owns 14,316 shares of the insurance provider’s stock worth $620,000 after purchasing an additional 7,197 shares during the last quarter. Quantinno Capital Management LP increased its position in Truist Financial by 34.9% in the 4th quarter. Quantinno Capital Management LP now owns 98,013 shares of the insurance provider’s stock worth $4,252,000 after purchasing an additional 25,366 shares during the last quarter. Finally, Raiffeisen Bank International AG acquired a new position in Truist Financial in the 4th quarter worth about $594,000. 71.28% of the stock is owned by institutional investors and hedge funds.

    Insiders Place Their Bets

    In related news, insider Bradley D. Bender sold 12,540 shares of the stock in a transaction that occurred on Tuesday, July 22nd. The stock was sold at an average price of $45.19, for a total transaction of $566,682.60. Following the completion of the sale, the insider owned 500 shares in the company, valued at $22,595. This represents a 96.17% decrease in their position. The sale was disclosed in a document filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is available through this link. 0.14% of the stock is currently owned by insiders.

    Wall Street Analysts Forecast Growth

    Several brokerages have weighed in on TFC. Morgan Stanley reaffirmed a “mixed” rating on shares of Truist Financial in a research report on Monday, July 21st. Raymond James Financial raised Truist Financial from a “market perform” rating to an “outperform” rating and set a $50.00 target price on the stock in a research report on Tuesday, July 8th. Wells Fargo & Company reaffirmed an “equal weight” rating and issued a $47.00 target price on shares of Truist Financial in a research report on Thursday, August 21st. Citigroup raised Truist Financial from a “neutral” rating to a “buy” rating and upped their target price for the stock from $44.00 to $55.00 in a research report on Thursday, June 26th. Finally, Keefe, Bruyette & Woods lowered Truist Financial from an “outperform” rating to a “market perform” rating and set a $48.00 target price on the stock. in a research report on Wednesday, July 9th. Two analysts have rated the stock with a Strong Buy rating, nine have issued a Buy rating and six have issued a Hold rating to the company. Based on data from MarketBeat, the stock currently has an average rating of “Moderate Buy” and a consensus price target of $48.47.

    Read Our Latest Analysis on TFC

    Truist Financial Stock Performance

    TFC opened at $45.22 on Monday. The company has a market cap of $58.30 billion, a PE ratio of 12.32, a price-to-earnings-growth ratio of 1.69 and a beta of 0.88. The stock has a 50-day moving average of $45.02 and a 200-day moving average of $41.69. Truist Financial Corporation has a 52-week low of $33.56 and a 52-week high of $49.06. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.75, a quick ratio of 0.86 and a current ratio of 0.86.

    Truist Financial (NYSE:TFCGet Free Report) last released its quarterly earnings results on Friday, July 18th. The insurance provider reported $0.91 earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter, missing the consensus estimate of $0.93 by ($0.02). Truist Financial had a return on equity of 8.69% and a net margin of 16.82%.The company had revenue of $5.04 billion for the quarter, compared to the consensus estimate of $5.04 billion. During the same quarter last year, the company posted $0.91 EPS. The business’s revenue was down 406.0% compared to the same quarter last year. As a group, equities research analysts forecast that Truist Financial Corporation will post 4 earnings per share for the current fiscal year.

    Truist Financial Announces Dividend

    The firm also recently announced a quarterly dividend, which was paid on Tuesday, September 2nd. Investors of record on Friday, August 8th were paid a dividend of $0.52 per share. The ex-dividend date was Friday, August 8th. This represents a $2.08 annualized dividend and a yield of 4.6%. Truist Financial’s dividend payout ratio is presently 56.68%.

    Truist Financial Profile

    (Free Report)

    Truist Financial Corporation, a financial services company, provides banking and trust services in the Southeastern and Mid-Atlantic United States. The company operates through three segments: Consumer Banking and Wealth, Corporate and Commercial Banking, and Insurance Holdings.Its deposit products include noninterest-bearing checking, interest-bearing checking, savings, and money market deposit accounts, as well as certificates of deposit and individual retirement accounts.

    Featured Articles

    Want to see what other hedge funds are holding TFC? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for Truist Financial Corporation (NYSE:TFCFree Report).

    Institutional Ownership by Quarter for Truist Financial (NYSE:TFC)



    Receive News & Ratings for Truist Financial Daily – Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts’ ratings for Truist Financial and related companies with MarketBeat.com’s FREE daily email newsletter.

    [ad_2]

    ABMN Staff

    Source link

  • Citizens JMP Maintains a Buy Rating on BeOne Medicines (ONC)

    [ad_1]

    BeOne Medicines Ltd. (NASDAQ:ONC) is one of the top high growth international stocks to buy right now. On September 9, Citizens JMP analyst Reni Benjamin reiterated a Buy rating on BeOne Medicines Ltd. (NASDAQ:ONC) and set a price target of $348.00.

    On August 29, BeOne Medicines Ltd. (NASDAQ:ONC) announced positive topline results for Sonrotoclax in Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL), stating that the study met its primary endpoint of overall response rate (ORR) and exhibited clinically meaningful responses in rare B-cell lymphoma with considerable unmet need.

    Management added that BeOne Medicines Ltd. (NASDAQ:ONC) would submit the data to global regulatory authorities for their review and potential approval.

    Domiciled in Switzerland, BeOne Medicines Ltd. (NASDAQ:ONC) is a global oncology company that discovers and develops affordable, accessible, and innovative treatments for cancer patients.

    While we acknowledge the potential of ONC as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you’re looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock.

    READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now.

    Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Inflation fears drive falling consumer sentiment in September

    [ad_1]

    New data shows Americans are feeling increasingly concerned about the state of the economy. A survey reveals that consumer sentiment fell in September for the second consecutive month. CBS News senior business and technology correspondent Jo Ling Kent has more.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Research Reports & Trade Ideas – Yahoo Finance

    [ad_1]

    Analyst Report: Dominion Energy Inc

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How to Spot a Real Day Trading Mentor (and Avoid Pretenders) | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    There is no shortage of people who talk a really impressive game about how they’re rich, have the whole “day trading” thing dialed in, and are willing to teach you how easy it can be to follow in their footsteps to become the next great day trader.

    I’m not one of them.

    Yes, I day trade for a living, and I’ve done OK. But I’m first in line to tell you that day trading is not easy. It takes dedicated effort over time to start becoming solid at day trading. Then it takes even more time and work to turn it into a profession.

    You have two main choices when it comes to learning day trading: You can learn by doing, or get a teacher. Teaching yourself — in other words, making all the mistakes yourself — is a really costly way to do it, in time, money, and stress. I recommend that you stand on someone else’s shoulders and at least avoid many of the mistakes they made.

    Because this is not a sales pitch to stand on my shoulders, I will describe five things to look for in a day trading teacher. You can then apply those tests to whichever teachers you find.

    Related: Before You Start Day Trading, Know These Stages

    1. You want someone who’s seen it all

    How long ago did they begin to day trade? You don’t want someone who claims to have done great in the last few months or maybe a year, and now feels bulletproof. The strongest teachers will have traded and survived through great markets, but also sideways markets and downright terrible ones.

    You also don’t want someone who claims to be “a natural” at day trading; in fact, you should hope they have lots of figurative scars, which often accompany lessons thoroughly learned.

    2. They need to be currently in the game

    Michael Phelps may have hung up his competitive swimsuit years ago, but he could be a great swimming coach for decades to come. Not too much changes in competitive swimming, other than younger people regularly breaking records.

    Not so with day trading. The markets constantly change in terms of which stocks are listed, regulations being updated and technology continually improving.

    Your teacher should be trading every week and preferably every day. Day trading is difficult enough; you shouldn’t make it even more difficult by working with someone who’s been a spectator for too long.

    3. They must be able to explain and remember

    We’ve all known some people who are great at what they do, but terrible at explaining it to others. Maybe they’re not very articulate, or they speak so fast you can’t follow them.

    When I say “able to remember,” I mean that experts can easily forget what it was like to be a beginner. After making literally 25,000 trades in my career, I can glance at four monitors filled with hundreds of bits of data, and it all seems so clear to me. But I do remember the feeling of confusion and even despair while looking at just a fraction of this firehose for the first time.

    Look for someone who’s clear, patient and willing to explain — sometimes again and again — until the topic makes sense to you. Day trading is all about near-instantaneous judgments, but your questioning and learning zone should be judgment-free.

    Related: Want to Be a Stronger Mentor? Start With These 4 Questions

    4. Seek a specialist

    If you have a heart condition and need surgery, do you want to go to a surgeon who’s worked on a few hearts, done some tennis elbows and is a fairly good plastic surgeon, too?

    You want the person with deep experience. The kind who could write a 500-page book that’s an “Introduction to…” instead of the 50-page pamphlet that’s “The complete guide” to something. Although many day trading principles indeed apply to commodities, cryptocurrency and other investments, I have yet to meet someone who’s equally expert at all those types of investments. I certainly am not.

    It may be true that you don’t yet know what specific investments you want to focus on. That’s cool; shop around! But at some point, when you decide the investment type you want to bear down on, look for a teacher who’s done the same thing.

    5. Insist on a truth teller

    Of course, you want a teacher to make it as easy as possible, but day trading is not easy. It’s not even easy for me at my stage, because every day I must earn any reward, and am quickly punished for forgetting key principles. Stay well away from anyone who gives you the impression that day trading can be picked up without much difficulty.

    Also, it’s incredibly important that you find a teacher who shows you ALL of their trades — the fabulous ones, the okay ones, and the “what were you thinking” terrible trades. I can’t say much about day trading with absolute certainty, but I’m certain about this: Every trader on the planet continues to have green days and red days. Every trader loses occasionally.

    The only difference is how much they’ve lost, and what they do about it. The smart, surviving traders check themselves into what I call “trader rehab.” This allows them to return to the basics, rebuild their confidence, and get back in the game. Anyone who’s not showing you these scars is not being straight with you, and they should not have your trust.

    Social media is full of people who say they took up day trading and scored. More power to them; I do believe in beginner’s luck and once had it myself. You don’t need a teacher at all to have beginner’s luck. But if you want to continue in this profession — not if but when that beginner’s luck runs out — that truth-telling teacher will be the best trade you take.

    There is no shortage of people who talk a really impressive game about how they’re rich, have the whole “day trading” thing dialed in, and are willing to teach you how easy it can be to follow in their footsteps to become the next great day trader.

    I’m not one of them.

    Yes, I day trade for a living, and I’ve done OK. But I’m first in line to tell you that day trading is not easy. It takes dedicated effort over time to start becoming solid at day trading. Then it takes even more time and work to turn it into a profession.

    The rest of this article is locked.

    Join Entrepreneur+ today for access.

    [ad_2]

    Ross Cameron

    Source link

  • Want to Retire One Day? Avoid 3 Common Retirement Mistakes | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Retirement remains a far-off — and in some cases, unattainable — goal for many Americans.

    About one in four adults over age 50 said they expect to never retire, according to an AARP survey. That’s perhaps not surprising given that Americans believe they’ll need $1.26 million to retire comfortably, per Northwestern Mutual.

    Related: Are You on Track for Your Age? Here’s When You Should Save for Retirement, Make 6 Figures and Buy a Home, According to a New Survey.

    In a new report from Bank of America, 68% of employees said that saving for retirement is their No. 1 financial goal, though working toward it often comes with significant challenges.

    The research, which surveyed nearly 1,000 full-time employees who participate in 401(k) plans and 800 employers who offer a 401(k) plan, revealed that the average employee doesn’t start saving for retirement until age 30 and wishes they had more retirement education (33%).

    Employees’ top expected sources of retirement income were as follows, per the survey: 401(k) or 403(b) (85%), Social Security (75%), checking or savings account 53%), IRA (38%), taxable brokerage or investment account (24%).

    Related: How Much Money Do You Need to Retire Comfortably in Your State? Here’s the Breakdown.

    Baby Boomers are retiring at a rapid rate, setting a record number of retirees in 2024 that allowed Gen X to outnumber them in the workforce for the first time, GOBankingRates reported.

    On average, Boomers began saving for retirement at age 34; now in their 60s and 70s, one in four of them don’t feel on track to retire, according to the Bank of America survey. Additionally, only two in 10 Boomers said they completely understand their Social Security benefits.

    Rising healthcare costs in retirement present another hurdle, as only 34% of employees said they’re saving and investing for future healthcare expenses, despite current research showing that a 65-year-old couple could need as much as $428,000 in savings to cover their retirement healthcare expenses.

    Related: How to Start Thinking About Retirement Before You Plan to Retire

    Respondents said the main reason they don’t save for health care is that they can’t afford it, but many who have access to an HSA through their employer also don’t understand the tax advantages and rollover process.

    When employees across generations were asked to reflect on what they would have done differently to prepare for retirement, they cited three common mistakes: not starting to save at a younger age (49%), not taking full advantage of their employer’s 401(k) match (35%) and not paying off debt sooner (36%).

    Image Credit: Courtesy of Bank of America

    “The modern employee wants help with their broader financial goals,” Lorna Sabbia, head of workplace benefits at Bank of America, said. “Employers should consider additional resources to support their workforce in ways that bolster their long-term goals while also helping them tackle short-term challenges.”

    [ad_2]

    Amanda Breen

    Source link

  • How a Warner Bros.-Paramount Merger Could Make or Break Hollywood

    [ad_1]

    David Ellison is positioning himself as Hollywood’s newest power broker, with his family preparing a bid that could put Paramount and Warner Bros. under one roof. Jason Mendez/Getty Images for Paramount Pictures

    For years, whispers have percolated around a potential merger or acquisition between Warner Bros. and Paramount (now under Warner Bros. Discovery and Paramount Skydance, respectively). The tenor of these conversations just rose an octave thanks to reports of the Ellison family preparing for a formal bid. Will this be legacy studios’ best and last chance of creating a real rival to Netflix and YouTube? Or is it simply another experiment that stock-conscious executives hatched? Either way, such a deal would face enormous financial and creative challenges while also holding the potential to transform Hollywood. 

    Growing a content library for the sake of volume without any consideration for audience fit is like trying to explain the third act of Tenet to your grandmother—it’s just not going to make sense. But on paper, a combined entity would be armed to the teeth with top-notch brands and talents.

    A WBD-Paramount merger would trigger an intellectual property field day with DC, Harry Potter, Game of Thrones, Dune, Lord of the Rings, The Conjuring, Top Gun, Mission: Impossible, Transformers, Sonic, A Quiet Place and Star Trek under the same corporate parent. Cartoon Network, which the current WBD leadership downsized, might live once more alongside Nickelodeon as an irresistible one-two punch in kids media (or get sold off). Imagine no longer fretting about your overall TV slate because proven hitmakers Chuck Lorre, Taylor Sheridan and Bill Lawrence all work in-house on existing deals. 

    “The real test would be creative and product-market fit,” Steve Morris, founder and CEO of digital marketing agency New Media, told Observer.

    Theatrical stakes

    As of this writing, Warner Bros. accounts for 28 percent of the domestic box office market share while Paramount sits at 6.6 percent. This varies year-to-year, though. Since 2021, Paramount has enjoyed fewer tentpole peaks (Top Gun: Maverick notwithstanding) but delivered steadier conversion of awareness to theatrical intent on a film-by-film basis by opening week, according to Greenlight Analytics, where I work as Director of Insights & Content Strategy. WB’s slate has proven streakier in pre-release tracking, but its impressive highs in awareness, interest and theatrical intent tend to best Paramount’s. 

    Warner Bros. targets 12 to 14 theatrical releases annually, while Paramount wants to ramp up to 15 to 20 per year. A merger will almost assuredly reduce total output. 20th Century Fox released an average of 14 annual movies theatrically between 2015 and 2019. That number has dropped to around four under The Walt Disney Company’s ownership. Reducing the number of legacy movie studios again at a time when Big Tech grows stronger in entertainment by the day might cause a full-blown panic throughout the industry. 

    Consolidation of this magnitude usually leads to greater franchise dependency, squeezing out mid-budget and indie fare in the process. In turn, this results in less consistent volume for movie theaters (already a problem), less leverage for talent at the negotiating table, and a race toward the middle in terms of creative programming. Not fun. 

    Small-screen realities

    WBD and Paramount collectively accounted for just over 13 percent of total U.S. TV usage (broadcast, cable, streaming) in July, trailing only YouTube, according to Nielsen’s Media Distributor Gauge. If we examine combined streaming catalog demand shares, which account for all original and licensed films/TV series on-platform, in the U.S. across 2024, we get a No. 1 ranking at 23.4 percent, according to Parrot Analytics. Even accounting for overlap across both services, the combined customers of WBD (122.3 million worldwide streaming subscribers between HBO Max and Discovery+) and Paramount+ (79 million) would pack a punch.

    But WBD thought volume alone would close the gap with Netflix when it smushed together Max and Discovery+. Look at how that turned out. And while select content across Warners and Paramount commands high demand, a potential combo platter wouldn’t necessarily move the engagement needle immediately. 

    Unlocking the full value of the combined content catalog would require a complete overhaul of the streaming user interface and experience, an endeavor that’s as costly as it is timely. In the 2020s, with subscription fatigue already gnawing at quarterly earnings and FAST growing faster than SVOD, would both leadership and shareholders really have the patience for such an undertaking? 

    Talent and brand tensions

    As kid-in-a-candy-store exciting as it would be for content executives to have so much franchise power and top-tier talent at their disposal, the logistical nightmare of balancing so many high-profile spinning plates boggles the mind. The Ellisons may have deep pockets, but funding always remains finite in Hollywood. Leadership would need to decide how to split the pie between, say, competing talent deals such as Tom Cruise and Timothee Chalamet (WBD) versus Will Smith and the Duffer Brothers (Paramount). How would you like to be the executive tasked with explaining to the talent why one slice is smaller than the other? 

    No matter which way you cut it, certain talents and brands would inevitably feel shortchanged compared to others. In a town built on egos, you might as well strike a match next to a powder keg. It’s a good problem to have, but the abundance of choice doesn’t guarantee strong strategy and execution. 

    Speaking generally about media mergers, Comscore Senior Media Analyst Paul Dergarabedian zeroed in on the brand issue. “Do they get diluted, spun off, marginalized, or are they exploited well to get the best results? That’s got to be part of the equation,” he told Observer. 

    Regulatory and financial hurdles

    The list of reasons why any such deal can’t or won’t happen runs equally long as why it will. The DOJ and FTC emphasize even greater scrutiny on major M&A these days. Governing bodies would almost assuredly require divestitures, especially if a deal happened before WBD officially split off its cable assets. Some percentage of linear networks on both sides would have to go. It’s hard to see CNN existing alongside CBS News, for example. Even after jettisoning TV channels, both companies would still suffer from over-exposure to the rapidly declining linear TV business. Good luck trying to explain those numbers to angry shareholders. 

    WBD’s streaming division profits in part because it includes linear HBO revenues. Meanwhile, Paramount’s streaming business still wasn’t consistently profitable at the time of the sale to Skydance. On top of all that, both companies are saddled with considerable debt at the moment. It’s highly possible that any potential deal is more trouble than it’s worth. 

    Any combination of Paramount and Warner Bros. would yield a content slate exploding with blockbuster firepower. The new company (I’m going to start saying WarnerMount from now on) would snatch the franchise crown straight from Mickey Mouse’s head as it fed its streaming and theatrical furnace a steady diet of dynamite. But creative, regulatory, technological and financial challenges rightfully threaten to cloud the starry eyes of ambitious CEOs. (I’d love to see what the Skydance team can do with Paramount on its own). 

    Mergers and acquisitions have not proven to be the silver bullet Hollywood hoped they would be over the last 20 years. Would Warners and Paramount be any different? Perhaps. But more often than not, this tactic has been more exposing than helpful.

    How a Warner Bros.-Paramount Merger Could Make or Break Hollywood

    [ad_2]

    Brandon Katz

    Source link

  • The Cost of Limiting Shareholder Voice: How New Restrictions Threaten Economic Growth

    [ad_1]

    Restricting shareholder proposals undermines the checks and balances that protect markets, innovation and social responsibility. Unsplash+

    Illegal child marriages. Coerced sterilization. Debt bondage. Until recently, shareholders had the right to raise such human rights concerns through formal proposals to corporate boards, a right protected by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for nearly a century. Recent regulatory and interpretive changes, however, are creating new challenges for this fundamental avenue for accountability.

    The sugar cane industry, for example, has become emblematic of harmful supply chain practices, involving some of the most visible and widely reported examples of concerning business practices. Companies including Pepsi, Coca-Cola and Mondelez have faced investigations into alleged labor abuses, including debt bondage. At Pepsi’s 2025 annual meeting, shareholders sought to submit a proposal requesting a report on the company’s efforts to address human rights violations in its supply chain. The company excluded the proposal, citing SEC staff’s revised interpretation of Rule 14a-8, outlined in Staff Legal Bulletin 14M (SLB14M). 

    SLB14M provides guidance on the application of Rule 14a-8, which allows eligible shareholders to submit proposals for inclusion in a company’s proxy statement. The bulletin also specifies circumstances under which companies may exclude these proposals. Citing that revised interpretation, Pepsi argued that the reported abuses occurred in franchise operations (which are “expected” to follow a code of conduct), not in Pepsi’s direct supply chain, and that the franchise sales were not “significantly related” to Pepsi’s business. Essentially, Pepsi claimed that the source of the ingredients sold under its brand did not materially affect its own business because the company itself did not purchase them. The SEC agreed with Pepsi, preventing shareholders from voting on the proposal. 

    Pepsi did not dispute reports that its products sold in India were allegedly made with sugar obtained through a supply chain linked to debt bondage and coerced hysterectomies. Instead, the company contended that these issues were unlikely to materially impact its operations. According to the SEC’s interpretation, shareholders may only make proposals with significant financial implications for the company itself, no matter the broader social or environmental consequences.

    While SEC rules often shift with administrations, this case reflects a larger trend: a narrowing of shareholder voice. Several recent developments illustrate the pattern:

    Collectively, these developments constrain shareholders’ capacity to influence corporate behavior towards more sustainable or ethical practices. Critics of shareholder engagement argue that investors should focus solely on financial returns, treating social and environmental considerations as irrelevant. This is a false dichotomy on two levels. First, environmental and human rights issues often carry real financial risks. Second, systemic harm—from environmental degradation to inequality—affects the broader economy and threatens the diversified portfolios and returns of investors.

    The economic opportunity in sustainable business practices

    The sugar supply chain demonstrates both the risks and opportunities for companies and investors. Brands derive tremendous value from reputation. The perception that Pepsi products are linked to labor abuses can erode consumer trust and is a significant concern for the company. Addressing these issues presents an opportunity to safeguard brand equity and strengthen customer loyalty. For shareholders, engagement extends beyond a single company’s prospects. Human rights and sustainability issues influence global economic conditions, which in turn impact the returns of diversified investors. By encouraging companies to adopt responsible practices, shareholders can help stabilize markets, support GDP growth and mitigate systemic risk. 

    The path forward: strengthening market-based solutions

    Notably, this regulatory shift is occurring under a Republican-controlled administration and Congress, which has historically advocated for private property rights. Policymakers should ensure that proposal mechanisms remain consistent with free-market principles, enabling investors to allocate capital efficiently and hold companies accountable. If financial market rules are being revised, it should not be forgotten that the strength of our economy is based on a free capital market, which allows investors to fund a broad array of enterprises that create authentic value over the long term. 

    Limiting shareholder voice affects far more than greenhouse gas emissions and DEI. It alters the balance of power in capital markets, shifting decision-making from investors to executives and politicians. Investors are losing the power to push back when corporate executives risk the future of the company or the economy to boost profits. And this doesn’t just harm investors. This means our markets will become less effective allocators of capital, as decisions are made by unrestrained executives driven by short-term incentives or politicians swayed by political maneuvering, rather than by a commitment to the integrity of capital markets. 

    The innovation opportunity

    Recent SEC actions show the practical consequences. In March, SEC staff allowed Wells Fargo to exclude a proposal on workers’ rights and collective bargaining, a proposal that observers note likely would have been allowed a few months prior. Limiting shareholder engagement reduces opportunities for market-driven innovation in workforce development, climate solutions and sustainable growth strategies. Climate issues illustrate the stakes vividly. Analysts project that unchecked greenhouse gas emissions could reduce global GDP by 50 percent between 2070 and 2090. Economic modeling suggests that decisive global climate action could lead to a $43 trillion gain in net present value to the global economy by 2070. Investor engagement can accelerate the transition to cleaner energy and sustainable business models, creating economic opportunities while mitigating systemic risks. Ignoring investors’ voices on these matters rejects the role that capital has played in creating the economic engine of the U.S. economy.

    Workers depending on 401(k) plans, such as those in the American Airlines plan, could face real financial consequences if investor oversight is curtailed. Estimates suggest that the current trajectory of emissions could depress the entire equities market by up to 40 percent. The fossil fuel industry’s shortsightedness and the current administration’s policies are exacerbating the environmental crisis and creating economic and retirement instabilities. 

    Limiting shareholder voice threatens far more than individual investors. It weakens the very mechanisms that keep U.S. markets dynamic, resilient and capable of driving long-term growth. The muzzling of investors is part of a larger story: environmental data is being scrubbed from federal websites, critical scientific inquiry is being stalled and dissenters are being penalized. Historically, U.S. markets and democracy alike have relied on open debate and the free flow of information. Undermining shareholder oversight is part of a broader erosion of transparency that threatens both markets and the very norms that underpin a free society. Shareholder input is not a political preference but a market stabilizer, an innovation driver and a critical check on corporate governance. Preserving this function is essential to sustaining the economy, the integrity of capital markets and the broader social and environmental systems on which long-term prosperity depends. 

    The Cost of Limiting Shareholder Voice: How New Restrictions Threaten Economic Growth

    [ad_2]

    Rick Alexander

    Source link

  • State unveils grant programs to rope in fed funding

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Cities and towns will have access to a new pool of state money to rope in federal infrastructure funds for fixing crumbling roads and bridges and redeveloping downtowns.

    A pair of new grant programs rolled out this week by the Healey administration will provide funding and technical assistance for local governments to go after federal infrastructure dollars, with nearly $5 million in competitive and formula funding available over the next two fiscal years.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm“|@C6 E649?:42= 2DD:DE2?46 >62?D C6G:E2=:K65 5@H?E@H?D[ D276C C@25D[ ?6H 9@>6D 2?5 >@C6 ;@3D 😕 @FC 4@>>F?:E:6D[” v@G] |2FC2 w62=6J D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E] “%96D6 ?6H E@@=D H:== AC@G:56 4C:E:42= DFAA@CE E@ @FC =@42= 8@G6C?>6?E =6256CD 2?5 H:== 36 2? :>A@CE2?E A2CE @7 @FC 4@?E:?F65 H@C< E@ >2<6 |2DD249FD6EED E96 36DE A=246 E@ =:G6[ H@C< 2?5 5@ 3FD:?6DD]”k^Am

    kAm%96 ?6H |F?:4:A2= 2?5 %C:32= pDD:DE2?46 vC2?E !C@8C2> H:== 36 2G2:=23=6 E@ =@42= 8@G6C?>6?ED 2?5 7656C2==JC64@8?:K65 EC:36D E@ D66< 8C2?ED 7@C :?7C2DECF4EFC6[ 4=:>2E6 2?5 64@?@>:4 56G6=@A>6?E AC@;64ED] p3@FE Sa]d >:==:@? H:== 36 2G2:=23=6 @G6C E96 ?6IE EH@ 7:D42= J62CD[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 w62=6J 25>:?:DEC2E:@?]k^Am

    kAm%96 >@?6J 42? 36 FD65 7@C 8C2?E HC:E:?8[ AC@;64E D4@A:?8[ 7:D42= 2?2=JD:D 2?5 A=2??:?8 2?5 762D:3:=:EJ DEF5:6D[ 2>@?8 @E96C FD6D]k^Am

    kAm%96 %649?:42= pDD:DE2?46 vC2?ED 7@C #68:@?2= !=2??:?8 p86?4:6D AC@8C2> 😀 7@C>F=232D65 8C2?E AC@8C2> 7@C C68:@?2= A=2??:?8 286?4:6D E@ AC@G:56 5:C64E E649?:42= 2DD:DE2?46 E@ 4:E:6D 2?5 E@H?D[ A2CE:4F=2C=J 7@C :?7C2DECF4EFC6[ 4=:>2E6[ 2?5 64@?@>:4 56G6=@A>6?E AC@;64ED] p3@FE Sa >:==:@? H:== 36 2G2:=23=6 @G6C E96 ?6IE EH@ J62CD[ @77:4:2=D D2:5]k^Am

    kAm%96 8C2?E AC@8C2>D H6C6 2FE9@C:K65 F?56C 2 7656C2= 7F?5:?8 3:== D:8?65 3J w62=6J =2DE $6AE6>36C E92E 5:G6CED :?E6C6DE 7C@> E96 DE2E6’D C6D6CG6 7F?5D E@ 4C62E6 2 “A2J2DJ@F8@” 42A:E2= 7F?5 E@ AFCDF6 2 >F49 =2C86C A@@= @7 7656C2= 7F?5D 7@C :?7C2DECF4EFC6 AC@;64ED]k^Am

    kAmw62=6J @77:4:2=D D2J E96 D@42==65 C2:?J 52J 7F?5[ H9:49 😀 2AAC@249:?8 Sh 3:==:@?[ 86?6C2E6D 2? 6DE:>2E65 Sad_ >:==:@? 😕 :?E6C6DE 2 J62C]k^Am

    kAm%96 =2H C6BF:C6D E96 DE2E6 r@>AEC@==6C E@ EC2?D76C :?E6C6DE 7C@> DE2E6 C6D6CG6D E@ E96 r@>>@?H62=E9 u656C2= |2E49:?8 2?5 s63E #65F4E:@? uF?5 H96? 2>@F?ED 6I4665 `_T @7 3F586E65 C6G6?F6D @7 E96 AC6G:@FD 7:D42= J62C[ AC@G:565 E92E E96 32=2?46 @7 E96 7F?5 92D?’E 564C62D65 😕 E96 AC6G:@FD J62C]k^Am

    kAmq24<6CD @7 E96 A=2? D2:5 :E H:== AF>A FA E@ Sg__ >:==:@? :?E@ E96 42A:E2= 7F?5 @G6C E96 ?6IE E9C66 J62CD]k^Am

    kAmw62=6J’D 7656C2= :?7C2DECF4EFC6 4K2C[ “F6?E:? !2=7C6J[ 92D A@:?E65 E@ >@C6 E92? S`f]d 3:==:@? 2G2:=23=6 7C@> 7656C2= 8C2?E AC@8C2>D[ H9:49 96 D2JD AC@G:56D 2? “F?AC64656?E65 @AA@CEF?:EJ” E@ E2A :?E@ 7656C2= 7F?5D E@ 255C6DD D@>6 @7 E96 DE2E6’D >@DE AC6DD:?8 :?7C2DECF4EFC6 ?665D]k^Am

    kAm%96 >@?6J H@F=5 4@>6 7C@> E96 x?7C2DECF4EFC6 x?G6DE>6?E 2?5 y@3D p4E[ 2 S`]aEC:==:@? DA6?5:?8 3:== D:8?65 3J E96? !C6D:56?E y@6 q:56? 😕 a_a`] u656C2= :?7C2DECF4EFC6 >@?6J 😀 2=D@ 2G2:=23=6 E9C@F89 E96 rwx!$ 2?5 $4:6?46 p4E 2?5 E96 x?7=2E:@? #65F4E:@? p4E]k^Am

    kAm~G6C2==[ |2DD249FD6EED DE2?5D E@ 86E Sh]b 3:==:@? 7C@> E96 :?7C2DECF4EFC6 =2H @G6C E96 ?6IE 7:G6 J62CD[ :?4=F5:?8 2E =62DE Sc]a 3:==:@? 7@C C@25H2J FA8C256D 2?5 S`]` 3:==:@? 7@C 3C:586 C6A2:CD]k^Am

    kAmqFE E96 DE2E6 😀 2=D@ 492D:?8 27E6C >@C6 E92? S`f]d 3:==:@? 😕 4@>A6E:E:G6 8C2?ED >256 2G2:=23=6 E9C@F89 E96 :?7C2DECF4EFC6 =2H 7@C =@42= 8@G6C?>6?ED E@ 7:I A@E9@=6D 2?5 4CF>3=:?8 3C:586D[ FA8C256 H2E6C 2?5 D6H6C DJDE6>D 2?5 @E96C ?665D]k^Am

    kAmv2C5?6C |2J@C |:4926= }:49@=D@?[ H9@ 9625D E96 |2DD249FD6EED |2J@CD pDD@4:2E:@?[ D2:5 ?2G:82E:?8 2AA=:42E:@?D 7@C 7656C2= AC@8C2>D “42? @7E6? 36 4@>A=6I 2?5 E:>64@?DF>:?8[ 6DA64:2==J 7@C D>2==6C @C F?56CD6CG65 4@>>F?:E:6D]”k^Am

    kAmw6 D2:5 E96 ?6H 8C2?ED 8:G6 4:E:6D 2?5 E@H?D “E96 E@@=D E96J ?665 E@ 2446DD C6D@FC46D[ >@G6 AC@;64ED 7@CH2C5[ 2?5 DEC6?8E96? =@42= :?7C2DECF4EFC6]”k^Am

    kAm“%9:D 😀 23@FE 3F:=5:?8 2 DEC@?86C r@>>@?H62=E9 7C@> E96 DEC66E =6G6= FA—96=A:?8 4@>>F?:E:6D @7 6G6CJ D:K6 F?=@4< @AA@CEF?:E:6D E92E H:== >2<6 |2DD249FD6EED D276C[ 962=E9:6C[ 2?5 >@C6 C6D:=:6?E 7@C E96 7FEFC6[” }:49@=D@? D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E]k^Am

    kAmr9C:DE:2? |] (256 4@G6CD E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E69@FD6 7@C }@CE9 @7 q@DE@? |65:2 vC@FAUCDBF@jD ?6HDA2A6CD 2?5 H63D:E6D] t>2:= 9:> 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>Qm4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>k^2m]k^Am

    kAmr9C:DE:2? |] (256 4@G6CD E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E69@FD6 7@C }@CE9 @7 q@DE@? |65:2 vC@FAUCDBF@jD ?6HDA2A6CD 2?5 H63D:E6D] t>2:= 9:> 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>Qm4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>k^2m]k^Am

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Prenups can be an uncomfortable topic, but a big help in the event of heartbreak – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    There’s a certain stigma that can come with a prenuptial or cohabitation agreement, which outlines the fate of a couple’s assets if their marriage or common-law relationship were to end. Some might argue it signals a lack of trust or endurance of the relationship. But the conversation doesn’t have to turn sour, experts say.

    Most professionals will recommend a prenup for couples with a wealth disparity, or if one of them is bound to inherit money from family, and even in situations of second marriages, to make clear the division of assets.

    From assets to expectations, prenups set the ground rules

    But with more people getting together later in life, many already own assets such as a home, vehicle, or have larger investments and savings. Prenups could preserve those assets and keep a record of what each spouse brought into the marriage or cohabitation, said Aimee Schalles, a lawyer and co-founder of Jointly Solutions Ltd., an online prenuptial and cohabitation agreement platform.

    “We’re of the view that prenups are for everybody,” Schalles said. “We think even people who don’t have much can benefit from having some clarity in documenting what their arrangements are, and at least what they’re bringing into the relationship.”

    Usually, a divorce follows the default provincial family law in the absence of a legal prenuptial agreement. 

    Holly LeValliant, estate and trust consultant at Scotiatrust, said while she doesn’t always recommend a prenup to all her clients, splits can be hard without a preset agreement. “You don’t marry the same person you divorce,” she said. “You can end up in a situation where you may regret later not having those conversations.”

    LeValliant said prenuptials require both partners to disclose their complete financial picture. Hiding assets and debt could make the agreement invalid. The partners also need to each seek independent legal advice, she added.

    Have a personal finance question? Submit it here.

    Prenups protect assets and offer financial peace of mind

    While prenups are primarily made to protect each person’s assets, it can also help avoid having to take on your partner’s debt. In most provinces, what people bring into their marriage remains theirs, including debt, Schalles said. “If you came into a relationship with a lot of student debt, in most provinces, that would be yours to keep and your responsibility to pay,” she said.

    Article Continues Below Advertisement


    But like assets, debt can accumulate interest—which the partners may have to share. That can be avoided with a prenuptial agreement.

    The timing of these agreements is also really important, experts say. For example, a prenuptial agreement can’t be drawn up a day before the wedding, which could lead to one person feeling pressured to sign the papers without a choice or time to find a lawyer.

    “The courts look at issues like: When was the wedding planned? Had people travelled into the wedding? Have invitations been sent out?” said LeValliant. “If you’re putting too much pressure on that party where they feel like they have no choice but to sign, it may be a void agreement.”

    A flexible prenup grows with your relationship and circumstances

    How the conversation about a prenuptial agreement goes might depend on how the subject is brought up. 

    Talking about a prenuptial is essentially an extension of financial planning, said Blair Evans, assistant vice-president of tax and estate planning at IG Wealth Management. “Sometimes, having a financial discussion is daunting, but the more financial discussions that you do have with your partner, generally, they become less daunting,” he said.

    Schalles said the storytelling method could help get through the hard part of bringing it up. “Unfortunately, almost everybody knows someone who’s been through a bad split,” she said.

    One way to bring up the word “prenup” without conflict could be sliding it in during financial check-ins. “It could be to say to your partner: ‘Hey, you know, do you remember our friend Jonathan and that horrible split that he had a few years ago and how much stress it caused him and his ex-wife? I don’t want that for either of us,’” Schalles said. 

    She added: “If we are to find ourselves in this situation, I would prefer for us to have a plan in advance so we don’t find ourselves going through what they went through, because everybody agrees that that’s ugly.”

    [ad_2]

    The Canadian Press

    Source link