ReportWire

Tag: finals

  • Team U.S.A. Won More Than Gold in Men’s Hockey

    [ad_1]

    Less than two minutes into overtime of the men’s gold-medal hockey game at the Milano Cortina Olympics, between the U.S.A. and Canada, the American Jack Hughes—a fresh gap in his teeth, his mouth still bloody from a high stick in the third period—lunged and poked the puck around a Canadian defender. The ice, which had seemed crowded with players colliding at incredible speeds during regulation, suddenly opened up—Olympic hockey uses a three-on-three format during overtime instead of the ordinary five-on-five. The Canadian Nathan MacKinnon had an angle on the puck, but there was an air of caution about him as he skated toward it. Perhaps fatigue was setting in. MacKinnon had been all over the rink all game, which was as fast, and as physical, and as highly skilled, surely, as any hockey competition in history. He’d had his own chances to score; halfway through the third period, he’d even missed an open net. So it had gone for Canada all day. Perhaps MacKinnon was haunted, seeing ghosts. Or perhaps it was the sight of three real, live Americans streaking into the attacking zone.

    MacKinnon glided toward the puck—and toward Zach Werenski, who’d beaten him there. Then the Canadian hesitated, ever so slightly. That was all it took. Werenski was able to fight him off, turn back, and get off a sharp pass across the ice to Hughes, who was flying up the left side. Hughes was ready for it. He shot and scored, a goal that gave the U.S. its first gold in men’s hockey since 1980, when a bunch of college kids beat the mighty Soviets on their way to the final.

    There is now, as there was then, a political context that seemed to inform every hard hit, every ringing chant for Canada or for the U.S.A. Donald Trump, after all, has made no secret of his contempt for Canadians or his disregard of their sovereignty. And the Canadians have made hockey, the country’s national sport, a kind of referendum on their strong identity. “You can’t take our country—and you can’t take our game,” wrote the Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau after the Canadians’ overtime win over the U.S. for the 4 Nations Face-Off trophy last year—one of the wildest, most highly charged sporting events I’ve ever seen. But the thrilling reality is that these U.S. and Canada teams were well matched in most measures, and together put on a display of unbelievable speed and skill. The competitive intensity between them had less to do with some narrative of freedom versus tyranny based on the two nations’ differences and more to do with their familiarity. The U.S. and Canadian players face each other all year long, crisscrossing the border. Some of them are teammates, and might even refer to one another as family. They know each other’s weaknesses and tendencies. They respect each other, sometimes grudgingly. But it was obvious from the determination on both sides that they understood friendships don’t define rivalries. “There’s hatred there,” the quick-to-brawl American forward Brady Tkachuk said before the game. “I mean, they’ve been the top dog. They’ve been the best for the last bunch of years, and, for us, we want to be in that position, be the best. So it’s going to be a game where I think a lot of guys could say, This is the biggest game that they’ve ever played in.”

    And after Hughes’s golden goal, that’s the way it seemed. Blue gloves and helmets flew into the air, and the players poured onto the ice in jubilation. “It was just euphoria,” Charlie McAvoy said. “I can’t even explain what I was feeling, just pure joy.” The Canadians, meanwhile, are left with silver medals and regrets over missed opportunities. Because for most of the game, right up until the moment that Hughes kicked the puck out of the corner to begin Team U.S.A.’s winning attack, Canada had the clear edge in every respect—except goaltending. The Canadians outshot the Americans 42–28. Hughes’s goal will be the single moment from this game that is long remembered, but it was Connor Hellebuyck’s performance that made it possible. Hellebuyck stood up in traffic, stuffed Connor McDavid (the best player in the world) on a breakaway, and somehow managed to reach back and use his paddle to deflect what should have been a tap-in by Devon Toews near the start of the third. Hellebuyck, with forty-one saves, is the game’s true hero.

    [ad_2]

    Louisa Thomas

    Source link

  • Watch: U.S. women’s curling will play for bronze after semifinal loss

    [ad_1]

    Watch: U.S. women’s curling will play for bronze after semifinal loss

    Updated: 12:55 PM PST Feb 20, 2026

    Editorial Standards

    Above video: Team USA falls to Switzerland in women’s curling semifinals. Can’t view the above video highlights? Click here. The U.S. women’s curling team will play for bronze at the 2026 Milan Cortina Winter Olympics.Switzerland’s Alina Patz shot 100 percent on draw shots, 98 percent on takeouts, and 99 percent on game shots. Her precision proved too much for Team USA to overcome.Patz led Switzerland to a 7-4 victory in the semifinals, sending the Swiss to the gold medal match and the Americans to the bronze medal game.It marked the first time since 2002 that the U.S. reached the women’s Olympic curling semifinals. The team is still seeking its first Olympic medal in the sport.In the other semifinal, Sweden defeated Canada, 6-3.The U.S. will face Canada for bronze on Saturday, while Sweden and Switzerland will meet in Sunday’s gold medal match.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

    Above video: Team USA falls to Switzerland in women’s curling semifinals. Can’t view the above video highlights? Click here.

    The U.S. women’s curling team will play for bronze at the 2026 Milan Cortina Winter Olympics.

    Switzerland’s Alina Patz shot 100 percent on draw shots, 98 percent on takeouts, and 99 percent on game shots. Her precision proved too much for Team USA to overcome.

    Patz led Switzerland to a 7-4 victory in the semifinals, sending the Swiss to the gold medal match and the Americans to the bronze medal game.

    It marked the first time since 2002 that the U.S. reached the women’s Olympic curling semifinals. The team is still seeking its first Olympic medal in the sport.

    In the other semifinal, Sweden defeated Canada, 6-3.

    The U.S. will face Canada for bronze on Saturday, while Sweden and Switzerland will meet in Sunday’s gold medal match.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Sorry Charles Barkley; the Mavericks needlessly are headed back to Minnesota

    Sorry Charles Barkley; the Mavericks needlessly are headed back to Minnesota

    [ad_1]

    Three minutes into the fourth quarter of Game 4 this entire column was justifiably nearly done, and a Pulitzer was in the bag, because the Dallas Mavericks were following a script they have mastered.

    They fall behind against the Minnesota Timberwolves here in the Western Conference Finals, and then go on some silly 27-1 run to come back and win it in the final minute. That’s what they did in the first three games, and why they had a 3-0 series lead.

    On Tuesday night, with the American Airlines Center jumping well before tip off, this series finale felt inevitable. The Mavericks were going to win Game 4, and advance to the NBA Finals for the first time since 2011.

    Should have happened.

    “It’s hard to close in this league,” Dallas Mavericks coach Jason Kidd said.

    If his players didn’t know that before Tuesday they do now.

    Even when the Mavericks trailed by eight points with less than two minutes remaining, they had their chances to tie it. Maybe take the lead, just like they did in the previous three games. Everyone in the building, but a small number, expected it.

    In the fourth game, neither happened.

    Minnesota’s Karl-Anthony Towns finally played to the Hall of Fame level Karl-Anthony Towns thinks he is, and the Wolves defeated the Mavs, 105-100.

    The series that should never have been a sweep now in reality is not, which will only depress TNT’s NBA color analyst Charles Barkley. Sir Charles has made it no secret he would prefer to eat nothing but fruits and vegetables rather than return to Minneapolis for a Game 5, which will be played on Thursday night.

    “That game is on me. I just didn’t give enough energy,” Mavericks guard Luka Doncic said after the game.

    Mavs center Daniel Gafford said the same thing; that he couldn’t find the energy.

    Starbucks, maybe?

    “This one hurts,” Gafford said. “We expected to be happy at the end of the game, and now we’re (upset).”

    Energy issues aside, with a 3-0 series lead they more than likely arrived to the arena knowing they would show up and win the game.

    Energy issues aside, the Mavs simply didn’t make shots, and Minnesota did.

    The Mavericks shot 15-of-40 from 3-point range. They took 81 shots in the game. Mavs guard Kyrie Irving never could get it going, and shot 6-of-18 from the floor.

    “We had good looks. Corner 3’s. Couldn’t ask for a better situation,” Kidd said.

    Despite the horrible shooting, even in the waning seconds it still felt like the Mavericks were going to do it again, win, and celebrate a trip to the Finals.

    When Doncic hit a 3-pointer and was fouled with 13 seconds remaining, he had the chance to make it a 2-point game. In the previous three games, he makes the free throw, the Mavs steal the inbound pass, and Doncic makes the game-winning shot with 0.2 seconds remaining.

    Consistent with how Game 4 went, he missed the free throw and that ended the Mavs’ plans of a sweep.

    “That’s where I thought the game could change,” Kidd said. “We couldn’t capitalize. … We’ve been knocking down 3’s. Wide open 3’s. We just didn’t make them.”

    The loss of center Derek Lively to a neck sprain suffered in Game 3 was noticeable, and not the reason the Mavs lost. They did welcome forward Maxi Kleber back to the lineup for the first time in more than a month, but he can’t be expected to do too much in his first game back.

    It’s impossible to see how Minnesota wins this series, but possible to see the Timberwolves winning another game. They’re talented, and if a few more shots drop in the first three games this series is tied.

    In Game 4, Towns and guard Anthony Edwards combined for 54 points.

    After playing like a dead ghost, and not a good one, in the first three games, in Game 4 KAT finally played like he cares about the game of basketball beyond making millions from it. In Game 4, he made 9 of 13 shots, including 4 of 5 from 3-point range. If he really ever decides to care all the time, he’s a top 10 player in the NBA.

    The Mavericks now head back to Minnesota in an effort to be done with this series on Thursday night.

    “Whether you win in four or seven,” Doncic said, “you just have to win four.”

    This should have been over in four.

    This story was originally published May 28, 2024, 10:58 PM.

    Related stories from Fort Worth Star-Telegram

    Mac Engel is an award-winning columnist who has covered sports since the dawn of man; Cowboys, TCU, Stars, Rangers, Mavericks, etc. Olympics. Movies. Concerts. Books. He combines dry wit with 1st-person reporting to complement an annoying personality.
    Support my work with a digital subscription

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The real reason why Dallas and Arlington lost their bid to host 2026 FIFA World Cup Final

    The real reason why Dallas and Arlington lost their bid to host 2026 FIFA World Cup Final

    [ad_1]

    The last time disappointment was this tangible at AT&T Stadium was three weeks ago, when the Dallas Cowboys blew it in the playoffs against the Green Bay Packers.

    FIFA’s announcement on Sunday that its 2026 World Cup Finals will not be played at AT&T Stadium in Arlington was the rare instance of the “big win” that still felt like a devastating defeat.

    AT&T Stadium was picked to host nine matches, the most of any site, including a semifinal, but Sunday’s announcement was still the playoff win for DFW that played out like just another Cowboys’ wildcard loss.

    “There is some disappointment here; I gotta speak my mind,” former Dallas Cowboys running back Emmitt Smith said in a press-only event at AT&T Stadium, shortly after the announcement was made.

    “I can’t believe we lost to New Jersey.”

    Amen, brother.

    For more than a year, all of the reports from overseas insisted that the biggest soccer match in the world was coming here. In the months, days and weeks leading up to Sunday’s announcement, none of the local leadership for this bid was sure if these reports were accurate.

    They were hopeful, but not entirely sure. They wanted to believe it, and by their reaction on Sunday it was apparent nearly all of them bought the reports.

    “I knew it was up in the air; FIFA has been good about keeping things close to the chest,” Arlington mayor Jim Ross said. “We knew that it was just a rumor. We had no proof of any of that. We all wanted that final game. Instead, we got nine of them. I’m happy with that.”

    The announcement of the entire schedule was made in a Miami production studio for an awkward made-for-TV event co-hosted by comedian Kevin Hart, rather than Katt Williams. One of America’s co-hosts for this TV event was “soccer star” Kim Kardashian.

    Anyone who has ever attended a sporting event at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey knows Emmitt Smith is correct.

    “It was a helluva battle,” said Cowboys owner Jerry Jones, who lobbied FIFA so hard to get the final match here. “We almost got there. We’re disappointed. We are. No question about that.”

    This wasn’t about New Jersey, or even the venue. This is about New York City beating out all of DFW, and every other city scheduled to host matches in the 2026 World Cup that will be played between Canada, Mexico and the U.S.

    New York is New York. Even the most loyal and ardent supporter of DFW would say, “OK, I get it.”

    Jerry said that DFW’s bid could not overcome the reality of a New York City. The perception of New York is hard to beat.

    AT&T Stadium may be 84 times the venue of a MetLife Stadium, and not many tourist destinations can compete with New York.

    “I know there were some disappointed faces down there, but I’m thrilled,” former Dallas Mavericks forward Dirk Nowitzki said at the event. “I’m excited for this region. The World Cup semifinal will be an incredible atmosphere. I’m not too disappointed. I’m thrilled.”

    That is the correct attitude.

    Event planners had not planned for any scenario where AT&T Stadium was picked to host nine matches. They had thought four or five.

    To host nine matches will be a financial earthquake. That’s nine matches where more than 90,000 fans from all over the world will attend.

    “This is like nine Super Bowls,” FC Dallas co-owner Dan Hunt said.

    Ross dismissed any idea that one of the reasons Arlington was not awarded the final had anything to do with public transportation.

    He’s right.

    In the end, this is about New York City. New York versus the rest of North America.

    That Arlington’s AT&T Stadium was even in the discussion to host the 2026 World Cup Finals speaks highly to the bid that was presented, and Jerry’s ability to persuade anyone.

    “This is the most significant sports event that has taken place in our region,” Jerry said. “We will take it to a level that they didn’t anticipate. I know what this area can do.”

    It can do a lot.

    It just can’t be New York City.

    This story was originally published February 4, 2024, 4:21 PM.

    Related stories from Fort Worth Star-Telegram

    Mac Engel is an award-winning columnist who has covered sports since the dawn of man; Cowboys, TCU, Stars, Rangers, Mavericks, etc. Olympics. Movies. Concerts. Books. He combines dry wit with 1st-person reporting to complement an annoying personality.
    Support my work with a digital subscription

    [ad_2]

    Mac Engel

    Source link

  • The Finals gets surprise release during the 2023 Game Awards

    The Finals gets surprise release during the 2023 Game Awards

    [ad_1]

    The Finals, one of the buzziest new shooters of 2023 despite only existing in beta, finally has a release date. It’s out… right now! Developer Embark Studios announced the news at the 2023 Game Awards.

    Created by ex-Battlefield devs, The Finals is a free-to-play first-person shooter in which various teams of three shoot each other a bunch to see which team is the best at shooting the other teams. Embark Studios ran a closed beta in the spring and an open beta spanning from late October through early November that racked up 7.5 million players.

    One of the huge draws of The Finals is that it’s not a battle royale. There’s no circle or storm or slowly encroaching safe zone. You also don’t really get punished when you get eliminated, save for a brief 20-second respawn timer. Matches last no longer than 15 minutes. It feels like a throwback to the deathmatch modes that dominated the mid-2000s, except it’s as gorgeous and technically impressive as any other modern shooter. Nostalgia for an earlier, arguably simpler era of gaming is no doubt a factor in The Finals’ popularity.

    The other huge draw is that every single building can explode.

    Last week, I got a chance to play The Finals during a closed media session meant to illustrate The Finals’ final state before its launch. I cannot express how frequently the thing I was standing on exploded.

    Image: Embark Studios

    For the most part, that tracks with Polygon’s more extensive preview of The Finals from earlier this year. The general concept is that you’re a contestant in some sort of shiny, violent, futuristic game show. Matches take place on maps like Monaco and Las Vegas. (Get it? Because gambling!) When you’re eliminated, you turn into a pile of coins. (Also because gambling.) Buildings, however, don’t suffer such a cartoonish fate. Shooting a wall or floor with an RPG causes it to collapse into a pile of rubble. When a building takes enough structural damage, the whole thing comes crashing down — even if you’re meticulously perched on the eaves, trying to get the drop on an opposing team.

    You can choose from three classes, simply named “light,” “medium,” and “heavy,” each replete with all the gear and movement speed (or lack thereof) you’d expect from those barebones classifications. For the session, Embark paired attendees off into squads of three. We played two different quick-play modes: Quick Cash and Bank It. Both modes tally your score not by how many eliminations you have but by how much cash you can steal from opponents and deliver to various drop points. But I’ll be honest: The shooting in The Finals is so distractingly solid — so emblematic of the golden age of Battlefield — I couldn’t help but spend my time prioritizing spraying and praying over learning “rules” and “objectives.” You’re welcome, teammates!

    A player of The Finals runs up stairs behind a teammate wearing bunny ears.

    Image: Embark Studios

    The Finals also features a tournament component with higher stakes than the quick-play modes. If your squad doesn’t finish in the top two for your existing round, you’re eliminated from the bracket. (I’m not sure what happens after the first round, because our squad finished last. Twice.)

    I’d be remiss not to mention our experience playing The Finals was marred by technical difficulties. Such things are generally excusable for a beta; that is, after all, the whole point of betas. Still, for roughly half the games we played, one or two players of our three-person squad would inexplicably fail to load in. When we’d successfully get into a match, for about half of those matches, one player would get dropped. Since The Finals does not have an option to rejoin an existing match, one party member getting kicked out meant we all had to quit. (Let the record reflect that we totally would’ve won all of those matches otherwise.)

    Aside from those hiccups, which may very well not be present at all in today’s full release, The Finals is an energetic and competent multiplayer shooter I could see myself dipping into for a few rounds when Halo Infinite gets too frustrating. Players have by and large moved on from the sort of arena-style gameplay on display here, so sure, like the contest that defines this game’s minimalist lore, The Finals is ultimately a gamble. But it’s one I hope pays off.

    The Finals is out now on PlayStation 5, Windows PC, and Xbox Series X.

    [ad_2]

    Ari Notis

    Source link