ReportWire

Tag: film-reviews-tag/features

  • The Exorcist: Believer review: ‘A cheesy rip-off’

    The Exorcist: Believer review: ‘A cheesy rip-off’

    [ad_1]

    Even if you aren’t a fan of Friedkin’s film, there is no denying the power of its iconic sequences: the arrival of Father Merrin (Max von Sydow) at Chris’s house on a foggy night; Regan’s head twisting around; the aforementioned swearing, vomiting, and crucifix misuse. Green’s film offers nothing to compare with these. There are no images you might put on a poster or a T-shirt, no scenes you might lampoon in a parody. I don’t know whether a new film could ever be as upsetting and transgressive as The Exorcist was, but it would have been nice if Green had had a crack at it, instead of serving up imitations of what Friedkin created all those years ago. It was startling to see Blair encased in pale, puffy, scar-streaked prosthetic make-up in the 1973 film. Sticking the same make-up on two young actresses today is about as startling as a trip to a high-street fancy-dress shop.

    The rushed, unscary and frankly silly climax has Victor putting together a squad of multi-faith demon-busters, as if he is assembling the Avengers or picking a team for an action-packed heist movie. “Anyone else wanna leave, better leave now,” he says, looking and sounding far too badass to be an anxious dad in a horror drama. “Once we start, we’re not stopping.” And so it is that a film that was shaping up to be an intelligent and respectful homage to The Exorcist descends to the depths of a cheesy, straight-to-streaming rip-off. Viewers should do what Victor advises, and leave.

    ★★☆☆☆

    The Exorcist: Believer is released on 6 October.

    If you liked this story, sign up for the weekly bbc.com features newsletter, called The Essential List. A handpicked selection of stories from BBC Future, Culture, Worklife and Travel, delivered to your inbox every Friday.

    If you would like to comment on this story or anything else you have seen on BBC Culture, head over to our Facebook page or message us on Twitter.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Creator film review: A ‘jaw-droppingly distinctive’ sci-fi

    The Creator film review: A ‘jaw-droppingly distinctive’ sci-fi

    [ad_1]

    The balance between the Star Wars side of things and the war drama side is exemplified by the location shooting. Much of the film was shot among the verdant mountains, fields and towering, dagger-like islands of Thailand, which means that it’s spectacular, but also that the combat seems to be happening in real places, with plenty of troubling imagery that recalls the Vietnam War via Apocalypse Now. The futuristic CGI is incorporated so seamlessly that the spell is never broken. Even when robots, simulants and armoured hovercraft are on screen, you can’t see the joins between the physical and the digital.

    Still, it would have been close to impossible for Edwards to get the balance between tones exactly right. The escapades in the rushed last act are harder to believe than those earlier on, and the initial ethical questions are soon forgotten. Some of the technology in the film’s 2070 seems less advanced and less frightening than the technology that is being used today, too. One jarring plot point is that everyone is amazed that a child-like simulant has been manufactured, whereas the boffins in M3GAN cracked that problem a year ago.

    But there is no denying that The Creator is a major new sci-fi adventure. If you’re partial to such things, Edwards’ ambitious, immersive film should prompt the intoxicating awe that you might have got from The Matrix and Avatar – the feeling that you’re seeing a rich vision of the future unlike any that has been on the big screen before.

    ★★★★★

    The Creator is released in the UK on 28 September and the US on 29 September.

    If you liked this story, sign up for the weekly bbc.com features newsletter, called The Essential List. A handpicked selection of stories from BBC Future, Culture, Worklife and Travel, delivered to your inbox every Friday.

    If you would like to comment on this story or anything else you have seen on BBC Culture, head over to our Facebook page or message us on Twitter.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Strays review: Three stars for foul-mouthed, R-rated dog comedy

    Strays review: Three stars for foul-mouthed, R-rated dog comedy

    [ad_1]

    The live-action film uses trained dogs enhanced with special effects, with the occasional human on screen. Will Forte plays Doug, Reggie’s owner, a loser stoner who kept the dog out of spite when his girlfriend left him. Doug keeps trying to lose Reggie, dropping him off far away, but Reggie believes it’s a game they’re playing, which he wins by coming back. Ferrell is perfect for the role, bringing the same sweet, guileless enthusiasm he showed in Elf, and he’s so shrewd an actor that he’s actually touching when Reggie says, “I really just want to be home.”

    When Doug finally drops Reggie in a mean alley, he meets the scrappy Bug, who insists that being a stray is the only way to live. You’re free of pesky humans, and can have sex with anything you want, including a random couch left on the street. Foxx sounds a lot as though he’s channelling Samuel L Jackson here, which isn’t a bad thing. Between the crude language and the streetwise delivery, it’s almost as if Quentin Tarantino had made a dog movie. In fact, the director is Josh Greenbaum, who did Barb and Star Go to Vista Del Mar and who keeps the action moving swiftly. 

    When Bug finally convinces Reggie that Doug does not love him, Reggie decides to make his way back and bite off the one thing Doug loves the most, his penis. It’s funnier when Ferrell says it. And technically, that means Strays qualifies as a revenge movie.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • New DC superhero film Blue Beetle is ‘stale and derivative’

    New DC superhero film Blue Beetle is ‘stale and derivative’

    [ad_1]

    Over the past year, Warner Bros’ DC superhero films seem to have suffered a severe case of Kryptonite poisoning. Black Adam, Shazam! Fury of the Gods and The Flash all crashed and burned at the box office, and it’s not likely that their new offering, Blue Beetle, is going to save the day. It was always a long shot, mind you. Compared to Superman, Batman and Wonder Woman, Blue Beetle is a lesser known, fuzzily defined character: his main claim to fame is that he inspired Nite Owl in Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons’ classic graphic novel, Watchmen. But if the Blue Beetle film had had enough fresh ideas, its protagonist’s obscurity might not have been an issue. Unfortunately, the average beetle has more fresh ideas than this one.

    More like this:

    –       ‘Like it was written by ChatGPT’

    –       Meg 2: The Trench is ‘plain awful’

    –       The 1961 film that was eerily prescient

    The story begins as Jaime Reyes (Xolo Maridueña) returns to his hometown, the futuristic, fictional, and horribly fake-looking Palmera City, having studied for a pre-law degree in Gotham. He doesn’t say whether he met Bruce Wayne while he was at university, but things didn’t go well for his family in the meantime. His dad (Damián Alcázar) is recovering from a heart attack, and the family is about to be kicked out of its cosy barrio house by developers from the evil Kord corporation. Nonetheless, Jaime apparently has no qualms about getting a job as a cleaner for the corporation’s villainous CEO, Victoria (Susan Sarandon), or about flirting with Victoria’s non-villainous niece, Jenny (Bruna Marquezine). For reasons that aren’t clear, Victoria is obsessed with creating cyborg Robocops with the help of a small extra-terrestrial device called The Scarab. But, much to her annoyance, this shiny metal bug chooses Jaime as its host. After it attaches itself to his spine, he is wrapped in an ugly exoskeleton that allows him to fly, blast people with energy beams, and do various other generic super things.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Red, White & Royal Blue is ‘a royal disappointment’

    Red, White & Royal Blue is ‘a royal disappointment’

    [ad_1]

    (Image credit: Amazon Prime Video)

    Amazon Prime video’s adaptation of Casey McQuiston’s hit 2019 LGBTQ+ romance novel is disappointingly predictable and clichéd, writes Louis Staples.

    T

    The best romantic comedies have a specific skill: they can make us surrender our most basic ideas about what we consider to be realistic or plausible, even if they are grounded in a world we mostly recognise. That’s exactly what we’re asked to do in the opening minutes of Red, White & Royal Blue. The film – an adaptation of the 2019 romance novel by Casey McQuiston – stars a fictional British royal family. The US has its first female president, Ellen Claremont (Uma Thurman), whose son Alex (Taylor Zakhar Perez) is a handsome, energetic trouble-maker searching for his purpose in life.

    More like this:
    –       10 of the best films to watch in August
    –       Meg 2: The Trench is ‘plain awful’
    –       The film too hot for the US censors

    On a diplomatic trip to the UK for a royal wedding, America’s “first son” Alex reignites his long-time rivalry with prince Henry (Nicholas Galitzine), brother of the heir to the British throne. After causing a scene during the wedding, the duelling pair are forced to embark on some PR damage control to soothe transatlantic relations. Soon, they end up seeing a different side to each other. One thing leads to another and, well, you can probably imagine what happens next.

    From the start, the film’s aesthetic and tone feel akin to a big-budget Hallmark movie. It has all the predictable stereotypes: British people are uptight. And Americans? They’re loud and obnoxious! Groundbreaking. It also features all of the genre’s staple montages: the “getting to know each other” montage, the sex montage and, of course, the “it’s all fallen apart” montage just before the end. Even for a romcom – a genre that is often pretty up-front about being formulaic – there is very little that feels unexpected.

    The romcom genre’s recent embrace of LGBTQ+ relationships has prompted debate about the type of representation queer audiences want, versus the stories that are getting made into films. There is a lingering scepticism that mainstream films featuring LGBTQ+ people are primarily made for straight audiences, while some queer romcoms, like Billy Eichner’s 2022 film Bros, have been seen as a missed opportunity to be more inventive with the genre’s tropes. From the outset, it’s certainly clear that Red, White & Royal Blue is not trying to revolutionise queer storytelling. And although both characters deal with the shared experience of coming out, they are navigating such specific and privileged circumstances that it would seem ridiculous to expect them to be representative of the wider queer community.

    The film loses its sense of fun when it veers away from being a relatively silly love story and gets too detailed about the fictionalised specifics of Anglo-American relations. Even prestige TV shows like Succession and House of Cards have struggled to make audiences fully buy into a political landscape without big real-life players, like Donald Trump. Things get even worse when the film attempts to portray fictional royalty. Although McQuiston’s novel was written before Prince Harry and Meghan Markle stepped down as working royals in 2020, the script leans heavily into the story of the real-life “spare” and his American wife. It’s unfortunate that there is a noticeable dip in the quality of dialogue between the film’s British characters, who are largely reduced to wooden and humourless caricatures. Not even Stephen Fry, the UK’s fictional king, could make the creaky script sing.

    Despite being at least 30 minutes too long, with a script that often sounds like it was written by ChatGPT, there are moments where Red, White & Royal Blue is strangely entertaining. The film is at its best when it stops being so earnest and leans into the more eccentric moments that probably would arise in such unusual circumstances. There are small exchanges that take you by surprise, like when Alex comes out to his mother – in the Oval Office, of course – and she launches into an unexpectedly educated and supportive monologue about anal sex and the various sexual health precautions Alex should consider. “You’re ridiculous!”, he responds. “I can’t believe they gave you the nuclear codes!”.

    There are also subplots that should have been explored more, like that focusing on a jealous gay journalist who outs the couple in the media. The opening scenes – where the prince and first son loathe each other – are the most fun, but their rivalry ends too soon. Perhaps there might have been interesting (and even humorous) ways to further explore the differences between Alex defining as bisexual and Henry as gay, and how that manifested in their relationship.

    There are distinct tiers of romcom, and on paper, Red, White & Royal Blue sounded like it might be akin to 2001’s The Princess Diaries, except with more sex scenes and jokes about Lana Del Rey and Lady Gaga. But while the pop-culture references and intimacy are there – no one could argue that the film is de-sexualised or sanitised – it’s doubtful that it will have anywhere near the cultural impact of Anne Hathaway’s film debut. Red, White & Royal Blue sits in an awkward space: it isn’t quite “so bad it’s good” enough to fully feel like a Hallmark movie, or Netflix’s cheap and cheerful festive films like Single All the Way (2021) and The Knight Before Christmas (2019). But it’s also not good enough to be remembered as a classic romcom, or to become the subject of cultural conversation, like Andrew Ahn’s Fire Island or Eichner’s intensely discoursed Bros (both 2022).

    Aside from the vaguest progressive platitudes, Red, White & Royal Blue doesn’t make any astute observations about romance, privilege or being LGBTQ+. Whether or not you’ll enjoy it probably depends on your expectations. If you’re looking for a film about beautiful men with perfect hair and sculpted abs, which doesn’t demand too much from you, then it might be for you. But if you’re expecting it to be in the grade of romcoms that are laugh-out-loud hilarious and actually say something interesting about relationships – or anything beyond lazy clichés – then you’ll be royally disappointed.

    ★★☆☆☆

    Red, White & Royal Blue is released on Amazon Prime Video on 11 August

    If you liked this story, sign up for the weekly bbc.com features newsletter, called The Essential List. A handpicked selection of stories from BBC Future, Culture, Worklife and Travel, delivered to your inbox every Friday.

    If you would like to comment on this story or anything else you have seen on BBC Culture, head over to our Facebook page or message us on Twitter.

    ;

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Meg 2: The Trench review: Ben Wheatley’s sequel is ‘plain awful’

    Meg 2: The Trench review: Ben Wheatley’s sequel is ‘plain awful’

    [ad_1]

    The end of The Meg teased Jonas’s romance with the oceanographer Suyin, who had a young daughter, Meiying (Sophia Cai). In the sequel, we learn that Suyin has died, and Jonas seems to be 14-year-old Meiying’s stepfather. It’s all murky, but relationships were never The Meg’s strength. Suyin’s brother, Jiuming, has also joined the institute. He is played by Wu Jing, a Chinese superstar. His presence speaks to the film’s global box-office aspirations, but he fits in smoothly in a bland, unexciting role. Cliff Curtis returns as the level-headed manager, Mac, and Page Kennedy sits behind a computer as DJ. He is the film’s meta voice, the “Don’t go in the house” guy.  

    Jonas takes a crew that includes Jiuming and even little Meiying (don’t ask how; it’s ridiculous) 25,000ft below the ocean floor to explore a trench that these megalodons seem to be escaping from. When things inevitably go wrong and every major character is in danger and soaking wet, the gang end up in a raft. “This feels unpleasantly familiar,” DJ says, and another veteran of The Meg says, “I just hope it goes better than last time.” Ha. That rare moment, with the audience meant to laugh knowingly, stands out. DJ seems to be in a different movie, especially when he takes out a gun to defend them from the supersharks and says, “I even made poison-tipped bullets, just like Jaws 2”. No other character is that aware that they live in an echo of other movies.

    The director, Ben Wheatley, is the latest indie filmmaker to take on a big commercial project, as Taika Waititi did spectacularly with Thor: Ragnarok and Chloé Zhao less so with Eternals. Wheatley’s films are quirky and different from each other, ranging from black comedy Sightseers, to the eco-thriller In the Earth. But each has a single distinctive tone, something the floundering Meg 2 lacks.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Greta Gerwig’s ‘bold, inventive’ Barbie breaks the mould

    Greta Gerwig’s ‘bold, inventive’ Barbie breaks the mould

    [ad_1]

     

    The zany, joke-packed fish-out-of-water farce keeps a grin stuck on your face, almost as if you were a classic Barbie or Ken yourself. Gosling’s clowning is especially enjoyable. As in The Nice Guys, and the Saturday Night Live sketch about Avatar’s logo, he is energetically committed to making a fool of himself. Still, the scenario does seem familiar at first. Essentially, you’ve got the sentient playthings from Toy Story, the relentlessly upbeat figurines from The Lego Movie (Will Ferrell appears as a villainous businessman, just as he did in The Lego Movie) and you’ve got the magical innocent abroad from Enchanted and Elf (yes, Ferrell was in that, too).

    What’s so pleasing about Barbie, though, is that Gerwig and Baumbach waste no time in racing through the scenes you might anticipate and on to scenes you wouldn’t. Their exuberantly eccentric fairy tale has some of the dark, angst-ridden surrealism of Charlie Kaufman (Mattel’s offices are reminiscent of Being John Malkovich) and the meticulous eeriness of Stanley Kubrick. It has a sequence from an epic rock opera, and a dream ballet from a Gene Kelly musical. It’s a subversive history of Mattel’s often questionable product development, and an unbridled satire of sexism and patriarchal oppression. Some younger viewers – ie, those who are still at prime Barbie-buying age – may be puzzled, but Gerwig, with her usual sincerity, ensures that it is always a joyous comedy.

    In fact, she and Baumbach may have tried to cram in too much: most obviously, there are three or four endings too many. But it’s easy to forgive these excesses, because Barbie is one of the few recent Hollywood films to have more to them than is given away in the trailer, and one of the few that come across as complete, self-contained stories, rather than attempts to set up a long-running series of sequels. It may be a comedy about a mass-produced plastic doll, but Barbie breaks the mould.

    ★★★★★

    Barbie is on general release from 21 July.

    Love film? Join BBC Culture Film Club on Facebook, a community for film fanatics all over the world.

    If you would like to comment on this story or anything else you have seen on BBC Culture, head over to our Facebook page or message us on Twitter.

    And if you liked this story, sign up for the weekly bbc.com features newsletter, called The Essential List. A handpicked selection of stories from BBC Future, Culture, WorkLife and Travel, delivered to your inbox every Friday.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning is ideal escapism

    Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning is ideal escapism

    [ad_1]

    Another nagging problem is that so much of the film is so familiar. Like the previous two Mission: Impossible episodes, both directed by McQuarrie, this one uses stunts and locations we’ve already seen in recent Bond movies (including a conveniently deserted Venice). What’s worse is that it uses stunts and locations we’ve already seen in other movies, too. Maybe there are just too many globe-trotting thriller franchises these days, but when Ethan chases some bad guys through the desert on horseback, it’s like a scene in John Wick Chapter 4, which came out in March. And when his car goes bumping down the Spanish Steps in Rome, it’s like a scene in Fast X, which came out in May.

    Bearing in mind the films which inspired Cruise and McQuarrie, it might have been more appropriate if Ethan and Grace had been swanning around the French Riviera instead. But maybe McQuarrie is saving that for Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part Two, which is due to be released in a year’s time.

    ★★★★☆

    Mission: Impossibe – Dead Reckoning Part Two is released on 10 July.

    Love film and TV? Join BBC Culture Film and TV Club on Facebook, a community for cinephiles all over the world.

    If you would like to comment on this story or anything else you have seen on BBC Culture, head over to our Facebook page or message us on Twitter.

    And if you liked this story, sign up for the weekly bbc.com features newsletter, called The Essential List. A handpicked selection of stories from BBC Future, Culture, Worklife and Travel, delivered to your inbox every Friday.

    [ad_2]

    Source link