[ad_1]
Fifth Third Buys Comerica for $10.9B in Year’s Biggest Bank Deal. Which Firms Might Be Next.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
Fifth Third Buys Comerica for $10.9B in Year’s Biggest Bank Deal. Which Firms Might Be Next.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
QRG Capital Management Inc. increased its position in Fifth Third Bancorp (NASDAQ:FITB – Free Report) by 15.1% in the 3rd quarter, according to its most recent 13F filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The institutional investor owned 71,858 shares of the financial services provider’s stock after acquiring an additional 9,444 shares during the quarter. QRG Capital Management Inc.’s holdings in Fifth Third Bancorp were worth $3,078,000 at the end of the most recent quarter.
A number of other institutional investors and hedge funds also recently added to or reduced their stakes in FITB. Park National Corp OH increased its stake in shares of Fifth Third Bancorp by 15.0% in the second quarter. Park National Corp OH now owns 41,503 shares of the financial services provider’s stock worth $1,514,000 after purchasing an additional 5,411 shares in the last quarter. M&G Plc purchased a new stake in Fifth Third Bancorp in the 2nd quarter worth $1,254,000. Plato Investment Management Ltd bought a new stake in Fifth Third Bancorp during the first quarter valued at about $639,000. Russell Investments Group Ltd. lifted its position in shares of Fifth Third Bancorp by 9.1% in the first quarter. Russell Investments Group Ltd. now owns 313,324 shares of the financial services provider’s stock valued at $11,657,000 after acquiring an additional 26,194 shares in the last quarter. Finally, State Board of Administration of Florida Retirement System grew its holdings in Fifth Third Bancorp by 2.2% during the 1st quarter. State Board of Administration of Florida Retirement System now owns 827,625 shares of the financial services provider’s stock valued at $30,796,000 after buying an additional 18,208 shares in the last quarter. Institutional investors own 83.79% of the company’s stock.
Several equities analysts have recently commented on FITB shares. StockNews.com downgraded shares of Fifth Third Bancorp from a “hold” rating to a “sell” rating in a report on Wednesday. Argus increased their price objective on shares of Fifth Third Bancorp from $42.00 to $46.00 and gave the company a “buy” rating in a report on Monday, July 22nd. Royal Bank of Canada lifted their target price on Fifth Third Bancorp from $38.00 to $43.00 and gave the stock an “outperform” rating in a report on Monday, July 22nd. Baird R W lowered Fifth Third Bancorp from a “strong-buy” rating to a “hold” rating in a research note on Monday, October 21st. Finally, Morgan Stanley lifted their price objective on Fifth Third Bancorp from $47.00 to $51.00 and gave the stock an “equal weight” rating in a research note on Monday, September 30th. One equities research analyst has rated the stock with a sell rating, eight have issued a hold rating and nine have given a buy rating to the stock. According to MarketBeat.com, the stock presently has an average rating of “Hold” and a consensus target price of $42.28.
Check Out Our Latest Stock Analysis on Fifth Third Bancorp
Shares of Fifth Third Bancorp stock opened at $46.87 on Thursday. Fifth Third Bancorp has a 52 week low of $24.64 and a 52 week high of $46.90. The company has a market capitalization of $31.72 billion, a PE ratio of 15.57, a price-to-earnings-growth ratio of 2.07 and a beta of 1.21. The stock’s fifty day moving average is $42.95 and its two-hundred day moving average is $39.89. The company has a quick ratio of 0.82, a current ratio of 0.82 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.92.
Fifth Third Bancorp (NASDAQ:FITB – Get Free Report) last posted its quarterly earnings results on Friday, October 18th. The financial services provider reported $0.78 EPS for the quarter, missing the consensus estimate of $0.83 by ($0.05). The company had revenue of $2.19 billion during the quarter, compared to analysts’ expectations of $2.16 billion. Fifth Third Bancorp had a return on equity of 14.58% and a net margin of 16.58%. The company’s quarterly revenue was up 1.2% on a year-over-year basis. During the same period in the prior year, the business earned $0.92 EPS. As a group, analysts expect that Fifth Third Bancorp will post 3.33 earnings per share for the current year.
The company also recently disclosed a quarterly dividend, which was paid on Tuesday, October 15th. Shareholders of record on Monday, September 30th were issued a dividend of $0.37 per share. This is an increase from Fifth Third Bancorp’s previous quarterly dividend of $0.35. This represents a $1.48 annualized dividend and a yield of 3.16%. The ex-dividend date was Monday, September 30th. Fifth Third Bancorp’s dividend payout ratio (DPR) is presently 49.17%.
In other news, EVP Jude Schramm sold 20,000 shares of the stock in a transaction on Monday, August 26th. The stock was sold at an average price of $42.00, for a total transaction of $840,000.00. Following the transaction, the executive vice president now owns 114,422 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $4,805,724. This represents a 0.00 % decrease in their position. The transaction was disclosed in a filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which can be accessed through this link. In other news, EVP Kristine R. Garrett sold 7,500 shares of the stock in a transaction that occurred on Monday, October 28th. The shares were sold at an average price of $43.67, for a total transaction of $327,525.00. Following the transaction, the executive vice president now directly owns 55,913 shares in the company, valued at approximately $2,441,720.71. This trade represents a 0.00 % decrease in their ownership of the stock. The transaction was disclosed in a document filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is accessible through this link. Also, EVP Jude Schramm sold 20,000 shares of the business’s stock in a transaction that occurred on Monday, August 26th. The stock was sold at an average price of $42.00, for a total transaction of $840,000.00. Following the completion of the transaction, the executive vice president now directly owns 114,422 shares of the company’s stock, valued at $4,805,724. This trade represents a 0.00 % decrease in their position. The disclosure for this sale can be found here. 0.50% of the stock is currently owned by corporate insiders.
Fifth Third Bancorp operates as the bank holding company for Fifth Third Bank, National Association that engages in the provision of a range of financial products and services in the United States. It operates through three segments: Commercial Banking, Consumer and Small Business Banking, and Wealth and Asset Management.
Receive News & Ratings for Fifth Third Bancorp Daily – Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts’ ratings for Fifth Third Bancorp and related companies with MarketBeat.com’s FREE daily email newsletter.
[ad_2]
ABMN Staff
Source link

[ad_1]
David Chiaverini, Wedbush Security equity research analyst, joins ‘Closing Bell’ to discuss regional banks ahead of earnings.
03:09
3 minutes ago
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Nicolette Nelson was running late for her return flight to Fairbanks as she sprinted towards her gate at Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport (CVG). Overcome by a medical issue, she didn’t make it to her gate and wound up spending the night in a Cincinnati hospital. By the next day, she had recovered and awaited her flight home, but it was repeatedly delayed.
So Nelson spent hours of her delay in a quiet cubicle in an unlikely place — a bank — waiting for her flight and wiling away the time on electronic devices.
“It’s been really, it’s quiet and that is what I need,” Nelson said.
Fifth Third Bank was trying to appeal to this type of traveler when it rechristened its 40-year-old CVG branch last month as a combination lounge and lending center. Weary travelers and constantly working entrepreneurs stake out prime spots in the bank away from the airport hubbub, while corporate travelers use the center to squeeze out more business.
“One woman wanted to rent my office to work,” remembers Lisa Slocum, the airport Fifth Third Bank branch manager. Slocum directed the woman to other options in the branch.
Other customers use the bank on a purely transactional basis. On a recent day, Hannah Thelen and her mother, Ashley Thelen, were passing through on their way to Spain and stopped in to convert currency.
“I love the central location,” Ashley Thelen said as she converted dollars to euros.
It’s a central location for a flyer, but a maze of trams, moving sidewalks, and concourses need to be navigated to get to it in Terminal B, and it is past the TSA checkpoint, so the branch doesn’t get customers off the street.
Fifth-Third Bank isn’t the first financial institution to create an airport lounge vibe. Capital One closed its branch at Washington, D.C.’s Dulles International Airport in 2020, instead creating “airport lounges” for cardholders in Dulles, along with similar spots at airports in Denver and Dallas. The lounges offer amenities on par with an airline rewards club but are only for Capital One card holders, and banking services are not a part of the experience like they are at Fifth-Third’s CVG branch.
Capital One Lounge inside Dulles International Airport in Washington, D.C.
Capital One
If CVG were a city, it’d be the fourth or fifth largest in Kentucky on most days, with 16,000 workers employed on the airport campus daily, according to Mindy Kershner, CVG’s senior manager of communications, plus the nine million passengers going through the gates yearly. That’s a lot of potential banking customers. Yet full-service airport bank branches are a relative rarity, surprising in a retail landscape that often resembles an upscale mall more than a terminal.
Wings Credit Union has a small full-service branch at the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, and Wings Vice President of Marketing Brent Andersen said the branch is also more about serving the large number of airport employees who are members than the traveling public. He adds, however, that in terms of visibility and advertising, even with the higher airport rent, the branch is a no-brainer.
“We’d have to spend a lot more in other advertising to get that kind of visibility,” Andersen said, crediting the branch with also landing new members.
For Fifth Third Bank, and a handful of other retail banking players, the airport branches are more than just expensive advertising for the brand (though that’s certainly part of the appeal). They are also functional financial centers, and in a digital era when bank branches are under existential scrutiny, some financial companies are betting on airports as a viable and visible place to keep their shingle hung.
The banks and credit unions adding airport branches are just another indicator that the long-predicted demise of in-person banking at the hands of digital isn’t happening exactly as expected. The long-term trend is still less retail footprint, but branches have been staging a bit of a comeback. In fact, FDIC data shows that 2023 saw the first annual gain in branch count nationwide, to nearly 70,000, in a decade. This rebound comes as banking giants JPMorgan Chase and PNC have announced plans to open more branches — Chase up to 500, plus 1,700 renovations, while PNC is adding 100 new branches and renovating another 1,000 at a cost of $1 billion over the next three to five years.
When Fifth Third Bank, the nation’s tenth-largest bank by deposits, rechristened its 40-year-old CVG location last month, it did so with plenty of local media coverage, cementing its commitment to airport banking.
“There are very few full-service branches in airports, and this is one of a kind,” said John Sieg, regional retail executive for Fifth Third Bank. The bank is trying to create something like Delta’s Sky Club, except with on-site banking — cashing checks, checking balances, and converting currency — and open to all. And you won’t get dinged with an overdraft fee for lounging on their sofas.
“Our objective is for travelers to have a place to do their full-service banking and hang out with us. They could hang out with us all day if they have a delayed flight. We have had customers that have done it,” Sieg said.
Wells Fargo operates a full-service branch in Las Vegas’s Harry Reid International Airport, and according to a bank spokeswomen, has a multi-year relationship with the airport that involves both the branch and multiple ATMs throughout terminals. Although Wells Fargo had little to say about the branch, it’s not difficult to imagine why it might be popular in Vegas, where slots are as much a part of the landscape as espresso machines.
Truist Bank, formerly SunTrust, operates a full-service bank branch at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport, where serving customers remains a top priority, but Brian Davis, director of consumer and small business banking communications, also noted that being at the airport provides the bank with “a high level of brand visibility for the millions of passengers who pass through.”
Still, not everyone in the industry is sold on mixing anxiety about getting through security and to the gate on time with personal finance.
“I think it’s a bad idea,” says Paul McAdam, senior director of banking and payments intelligence at analytics firm J.D. Power. McAdam says ATMs and advanced-function kiosks are one thing, but a full-service branch, except maybe in the largest markets, is overkill. JFK Airport in New York City has three credit unions in its terminals.
“I sense that bank branches in airports would handle a lot of transaction volume but very little value-added volume of customers looking to open accounts or receive advice. Who wants to open a new account in an airport?” McAdam said.
Financial giants are testing the concept of bank-branded destinations more widely. Capital One has opened some cafes in New York that cater to the remote worker, offering a financial vibe without vaults of money and tellers watching your every move.
With most travelers focused on traveling, Fifth Third conceded that banking isn’t top of mind for many airport customers. Sieg says the CVG branch does about 1,700 transactions a month.
“That is probably on the smaller side of what a transaction count would be at a traditional bank mart or office,” he said, but the visibility of the branch makes up for lower volume.
The branch offers an array of spaces, including a service bar where travelers can tap away at their tablets while watching coffee-clutching, harried travelers racing for their gates. The bank also includes a fully private office with phones, a hydration station, sofas, and overstuffed chairs, an enticement for remote workers.
“Regardless of whether you are a customer or a non-customer, we wanted to put out the best welcome sign we could have. Everybody is invited and can use this space,” Sieg said.
However, if someone feels a need to apply for a mortgage during their layover or open a savings account, the branch has that functionality.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Bloomberg
Higher-for-longer interest rates are dampening commercial loan demand at regional banks, but Texas expansions are helping two midsize lenders,
The Ohio-based banks are seeing more stability from business clients in the Lone Star State than in some other parts of their footprints,
While the Southeast, including the Carolinas and Florida, has been core to both banks’ growth plans, lending in the land where everything’s bigger has been helping them offset the negative impacts of economic uncertainty at a time when the near-term interest rate outlook remains unknown.
Texas, Florida and North Carolina have all consistently seen a rise in gross domestic product, population and company relocations in the last five years, priming them for financial institutions’ expansion plans.
“Texas has been a really nice story for us,”
The $214.5-billion
“I really like our new colleagues,” who are led by market president Clint Bryant, Steinour said Friday in an interview. He added that the Texas economy is “booming.”
Texas is the most recent initiative, but
To date, the new markets and verticals have produced a loan pipeline “approaching $2 billion,” as well as a sizable deposit portfolio, Chief Financial Officer Zach Wasserman said on the conference call. “The early traction has been really positive,” he said.
Huntington reports loan growth, higher funding costs
The bank reiterated previously stated guidance calling for full-year 2024 deposit growth in the 2% to 4% range, with Wasserman suggesting the end result would be nearer the top end.
In a similar vein, Steinour labeled
Approximately 40% of the first-quarter loan and deposit growth that
Investors appeared to view
Fifth Third beats estimates
While
Overall, the bank brought in $480 million of net income in the first quarter, down 2% sequentially. The bank beat analysts’ estimates on net interest income, expenses and fees. Its stock price was up 6% Friday, to $36.25.
Piper Sandler analysts wrote in a note that most investors expected
Spence added that any loan growth will likely be driven by taking market share.
“The places where we are expecting to see growth in the second half of the year are the places where we made investments to be able to do it,” Spence said.
In 2023,
[ad_2]
Catherine Leffert
Source link

[ad_1]
Tim Spence, Fifth Third Bank CEO, joins ‘Closing Bell Overtime’ to talk the state of regional banks one year after the collapse of SIlicon Valley Bank.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Timothy Spence, Fifth Third Bank CEO, joins ‘Squawk on the Street’ to discuss how Spence is considering the range of outcomes for rates and inflation next year, Fifth Third’s customer behavior, and how Silicon Valley Bank’s collapse altered the playbook for regional banks.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
A customer enters Comerica Inc. Bank headquarters in Dallas, Texas.
Cooper Neill | Bloomberg | Getty Images
A trio of regional banks face increasing pressure on returns and profitability that makes them potential targets for acquisition by a larger rival, according to KBW analysts.
Banks with between $80 billion and $120 billion in assets are in a tough spot, says Christopher McGratty of KBW. That’s because this group has the lowest structural returns among banks with at least $10 billion in assets, putting them in the position of needing to grow larger to help pay for coming regulations — or struggling for years.
Of eight banks in that zone, Comerica, Zions and First Horizon might ultimately be acquired by more profitable competitors, McGratty said in a Nov. 19 research note.
Zions and First Horizon declined comment. Comerica didn’t immediately have a response to this article.
While two others in the cohort, Western Alliance and Webster Financial, have “earned the right to remain independent” with above-peer returns, they could also consider selling themselves, the analyst said.
The remaining lenders, including East West Bank, Popular Bank and New York Community Bank each have higher returns and could end up as acquirers rather than targets. KBW estimated banks’ long-term returns including the impact of coming regulations.
“Our analysis leads us to these conclusions,” McGratty said in an interview last week. “Not every bank is as profitable as others and there are scale demands you have to keep in mind.”
Banking regulators have proposed a sweeping set of changes after higher interest rates and deposit runs triggered the collapse of three midsized banks this year. The moves broadly take measures that applied to the biggest global banks down to the level of institutions with at least $100 billion in assets, increasing their compliance and funding costs.
Invesco KBW Regional Bank ETF
While shares of regional banks have dropped 21% this year, per the KBW Regional Banking Index, they have climbed in recent weeks as concerns around inflation have abated. The sector is still weighed down by concerns over the impact of new rules and the risk of a recession on loan losses, particularly in commercial real estate.
Given the new rules, banks will eventually cluster in three groups to optimize their profitability, according to the KBW analysis: above $120 billion in assets, $50 to $80 billion in assets, and $20 to $50 billion in assets. Banks smaller than $10 billion in assets have advantages tied to debit card revenue, meaning that smaller institutions should grow to at least $20 billion in assets to offset their loss.
The problem for banks with $80 billion to $90 billion in assets like Zions and Comerica is that the market assumes they will soon face the burdens of being $100 billion-asset banks, compressing their valuations, McGratty said.
On the other hand, larger banks with strong returns including Huntington, Fifth Third, M&T and Regions Financial are positioned to grow through acquiring smaller lenders, McGratty said.
While others were more bullish, KBW analysts downgraded the U.S. banking industry in late 2022, months before the regional banking crisis. KBW is also known for helping determine the composition of indexes that track the banking industry.
Banks are waiting for clarity on regulations and interest rates before they will pursue deals, but consolidation has been a consistent theme for the industry, McGratty said.
“We’ve seen it throughout banking history; when there’s lines in the sand around certain sizes of assets, banks figure out the rules,” he said. “There’s still too many banks and they can be more successful if they build scale.”

[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Jamie Dimon, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of JPMorgan Chase & Co., gestures as he speaks during an interview with Reuters in Miami, Florida, U.S., February 8, 2023.
Marco Bello | Reuters
American banks are closing out another quarter in which interest rates surged, reviving concerns about shrinking margins and rising loan losses — though some analysts see a silver lining to the industry’s woes.
Just as they did during the March regional banking crisis, higher rates are expected to lead to a jump in losses on banks’ bond portfolios and contribute to funding pressures as institutions are forced to pay higher rates for deposits.
KBW analysts Christopher McGratty and David Konrad estimate banks’ per-share earnings fell 18% in the third quarter as lending margins compressed and loan demand sank on higher borrowing costs.
“The fundamental outlook is hard near term; revenues are declining, margins are declining, growth is slowing,” McGratty said in a phone interview.
Earnings season kicks off Friday with reports from JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup and Wells Fargo.
Bank stocks have been intertwined closely with the path of borrowing costs this year. The S&P 500 Banks index sank 9.3% in September on concerns sparked by a surprising surge in longer-term interest rates, especially the 10-year yield, which jumped 74 basis points in the quarter.
Rising yields mean the bonds owned by banks fall in value, creating unrealized losses that pressure capital levels. The dynamic caught midsized institutions including Silicon Valley Bank and First Republic off guard earlier this year, which — combined with deposit runs — led to government seizure of those banks.
Big banks have largely dodged concerns tied to underwater bonds, with the notable exception of Bank of America. The bank piled into low-yielding securities during the pandemic and had more than $100 billion in paper losses on bonds at midyear. The issue constrains the bank’s interest revenue and has made the lender the worst stock performer this year among the top six U.S. institutions.
Expectations on the impact of higher rates on banks’ balance sheets varied. Morgan Stanley analysts led by Betsy Graseck said in an October 2 note that the “estimated impact from the bond rout in 3Q is more than double” losses in the second quarter.
Bond losses will have the deepest impact on regional lenders including Comerica, Fifth Third Bank and KeyBank, the Morgan Stanley analysts said.
Still, others including KBW and UBS analysts said that other factors could soften the capital hit from higher rates for most of the industry.
“A lot will depend on the duration of their books,” Konrad said in an interview, referring to whether banks owned shorter or longer-term bonds. “I think the bond marks will look similar to last quarter, which is still a capital headwind, but that there’ll be a smaller group of banks that are hit more because of what they own.”
There’s also concern that higher interest rates will result in ballooning losses in commercial real estate and industrial loans.
“We expect loan loss provisions to increase materially compared to the third quarter of 2022 as we expect banks to build up loan loss reserves,” RBC analyst Gerard Cassidy wrote in a Oct. 2 note.
Still, bank stocks are primed for a short squeeze during earnings season because hedge funds placed bets on a return of the chaos from March, when regional banks saw an exodus of deposits, UBS analyst Erika Najarian wrote in an Oct. 9 note.
“The combination of short interest above March 2023 levels and a short thesis from macro investors that higher rates will drive another liquidity crisis makes us think the sector is set up for a potentially volatile short squeeze,” Najarian wrote.
Banks will probably show stability in deposit levels in the quarter, according to Goldman Sachs analysts led by Richard Ramsden. That, and guidance on net interest income in the fourth quarter and beyond, could support some banks, said the analysts, who are bullish on JPMorgan and Wells Fargo.
Perhaps because bank stocks have been so beaten down and expectations are low, the industry is due for a relief rally, said McGratty.
“People are looking ahead to, where is the trough in revenue?” McGratty said. “If you think about the last nine months, the first quarter was really hard. The second quarter was challenging, but not as bad, and the third will be still tough, but again, not getting worse.”
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Martin Gruenberg, acting chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC), speaks during an Urban Institute panel discussion in Washington, D.C., on Friday, June 3, 2022.
Ting Shen | Bloomberg | Getty Images
U.S. regulators on Tuesday unveiled plans to force regional banks to issue debt and bolster their so-called living wills, steps meant to protect the public in the event of more failures.
American banks with at least $100 billion in assets would be subject to the new requirements, which makes them hold a layer of long-term debt to absorb losses in the event of a government seizure, according to a joint notice from the Treasury Department, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Federal Reserve and Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
The steps are part of regulators’ response to the regional banking crisis that flared up in March, ultimately claiming three institutions and damaging the earnings power of many others. In July, the agencies released the first salvo of expected changes, a sweeping set of proposals meant to heighten capital requirements and standardize risk models for the industry.
In their latest proposal, impacted lenders will have to maintain long-term debt levels equal to 3.5% of average total assets or 6% of risk-weighted assets, whichever is higher, according to a fact sheet released Tuesday by the FDIC. Banks will be discouraged from holding the debt of other lenders to reduce contagion risk, the regulator said.
The requirements will create “moderately higher funding costs” for regional banks, the agencies acknowledged. That could add to the industry’s earnings pressure after all three major ratings agencies have downgraded the credit ratings of some lenders this year.
Still, the industry will have three years to conform to the new rule once enacted, and many banks already hold acceptable forms of debt, according to the regulators. They estimated that regional banks already have roughly 75% of the debt they will ultimately need to hold.
The KBW Regional Banking Index, which has suffered deep losses this year, rose less than 1%.
Indeed, industry observers had expected these latest changes: FDIC Chairman Martin Gruenberg telegraphed his intentions earlier this month in a speech at the Brookings Institution.
Broadly, the proposal takes measures that apply to the biggest institutions — known in the industry as global systemically important banks, or GSIBs — down to the level of banks with at least $100 billion in assets. The moves were widely expected after the sudden collapse of Silicon Valley Bank in March jolted customers, regulators and executives, alerting them to emerging risks in the banking system.
That includes steps to raise levels of long-term debt held by banks, removing a loophole that allowed midsized banks to avoid the recognition of declines in bond holdings, and forcing banks to come up with more robust living wills, or resolution plans that would take effect in the event of a failure, Gruenberg said this month.
Regulators would also look at updating their own guidance on monitoring risks including high levels of uninsured deposits, as well as changes to deposit insurance pricing to discourage risky behavior, Gruenberg said in the Aug. 14 speech. The three banks seized by authorities this year all had relatively large amounts of uninsured deposits, which were a key factor in their failures.
Analysts have focused on the debt requirements because that is the most impactful change for bank shareholders. The point of raising debt levels is so that if regulators need to seize a midsized bank, there is a layer of capital ready to absorb losses before uninsured depositors are threatened, according to Gruenberg.
The move will force some lenders to either issue more corporate bonds or replace existing funding sources with more expensive forms of long-term debt, Morgan Stanley analysts led by Manan Gosalia wrote in a research note Monday.
That will further squeeze margins for midsized banks, which are already under pressure because of rising funding costs. The group could see an annual hit to earnings of as much as 3.5%, according to Gosalia.
There are five banks in particular that may need to raise a total of roughly $12 billion in fresh debt, according to the analysts: Regions, M&T Bank, Citizens Financial, Northern Trust and Fifth Third Bancorp. The banks didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.
Having long-term debt on hand should calm depositors during times of distress and reduces costs to the FDIC’s own Deposit Insurance Fund, Gruenberg said this month. It also improves the chances that a weekend auction of a bank could be done without using extraordinary powers reserved for systemic risks, and gives regulators more options in that scenario, like replacing ownership or breaking up banks to sell them in pieces, he said.
“While many regional banks have some outstanding long-term debt, the new proposal will likely require issuance of new debt,” Gruenberg said. “Since this debt is long-term, it will not be a source of liquidity pressure when problems become apparent. Unlike uninsured depositors, investors in this debt know that they will not be able to run when problems arise.”
Investors in long-term bank debt will have “greater incentive” to monitor risk at lenders, and the publicly traded instruments will “serve as a signal” of the market’s view of risk in these banks, he said.
Regulators are accepting comments on these proposals through the end of November. Trade groups raised howls of protest when regulators released part of their plans in July.
Correction: FDIC Chairman Martin Gruenberg gave a speech in August at the Brookings Institution. An earlier version misstated the month.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
The Moody’s ratings downgrades and outlook warnings on a swath of U.S. banks this week show that the industry still faces pressure after the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank.
Concern over the sector had waned after second-quarter results showed most banks stabilized deposit levels following steeper losses during the March regional banking crisis. But a new issue may cast a pall over small and midsized banks: They’ve been forced to pay customers more for deposits at a pace that outstrips growth in what they earn from loans.
“Banks kept their deposits, but they did so at a cost,” said Ana Arsov, global co-head of banking for Moody’s Investors Service and a co-author of the downgrade report. “They’ve had to replace it with funding that’s more expensive. It’s a profitability concern as deposits continue to leave the system.”
Banks are usually expected to thrive when interest rates rise. While they immediately charge higher rates for credit-card loans and other products, they typically move more slowly in increasing how much they pay depositors. That boosts their lending margins, making their core activity more profitable.
This time around, the boost from higher rates was especially fleeting. It evaporated in the first quarter of this year, when bank failures jolted depositors out of their complacency and growth in net interest margin turned negative.
“Bank profitability has peaked for the time being,” Arsov said. “One of the strongest factors for U.S. banks, which is above-average profitability to other systems, won’t be there because of weak loan growth and less of an ability to make the spread.”
Shrinking profit margins, along with relatively lower capital levels compared to peers at some regional banks and concern about commercial real estate defaults, were key reasons Moody’s reassessed its ratings on banks after earlier actions.
In March, Moody’s placed six banks, including First Republic, under review for downgrades and cut its outlook for the industry to negative from stable.
Falling margins affected several banks’ credit considerations. In company-specific reports this week, Moody’s said it had placed U.S. Bank under review for a downgrade for reasons including its “rising deposit costs and increased use of wholesale funding.”
It also lowered its outlook on Fifth Third to negative from stable for similar reasons, citing higher deposit costs.
The analyst stressed that the U.S. banking system was still strong overall and that even the banks it cut were rated investment grade, indicating a low risk of default.
“We aren’t warning that the banking system is broken, we are saying that in the next 12 months to 2 years, profitability is under pressure, regulation is rising, credit costs are rising,” Arsov said.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
A general view of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on Wall Street in New York City on May 12, 2023.
Angela Weiss | AFP | Getty Images
Moody’s cut the credit ratings of a host of small and mid-sized U.S. banks late Monday and placed several big Wall Street names on negative review.
The firm lowered the ratings of 10 banks by one rung, while major lenders Bank of New York Mellon, U.S. Bancorp, State Street, Truist Financial, Cullen/Frost Bankers and Northern Trust are now under review for a potential downgrade.
Moody’s also changed its outlook to negative for 11 banks, including Capital One, Citizens Financial and Fifth Third Bancorp.
Among the smaller lenders receiving an official ratings downgrade were M&T Bank, Pinnacle Financial, BOK Financial and Webster Financial.
“U.S. banks continue to contend with interest rate and asset-liability management (ALM) risks with implications for liquidity and capital, as the wind-down of unconventional monetary policy drains systemwide deposits and higher interest rates depress the value of fixed-rate assets,” Moody’s analysts Jill Cetina and Ana Arsov said in the accompanying research note.
“Meanwhile, many banks’ Q2 results showed growing profitability pressures that will reduce their ability to generate internal capital. This comes as a mild U.S. recession is on the horizon for early 2024 and asset quality looks set to decline from solid but unsustainable levels, with particular risks in some banks’ commercial real estate (CRE) portfolios.”
Regional U.S. banks were thrust into the spotlight earlier this year after the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank triggered a run on deposits across the sector. The panic eventually spread to Europe and resulted in the emergency rescue of Swiss giant Credit Suisse by domestic rival UBS.
Though authorities went to great lengths to restore confidence, Moody’s warned that banks with substantial unrealized losses that are not captured by their regulatory capital ratios may still be susceptible to sudden losses of market or consumer confidence in a high interest rate environment.
The Federal Reserve in July lifted its benchmark borrowing rate to a 5.25%-5.5% range, having tightened monetary policy aggressively over the past year and a half in a bid to rein in sky-high inflation.
“We expect banks’ ALM risks to be exacerbated by the significant increase in the Federal Reserve’s policy rate as well as the ongoing reduction in banking system reserves at the Fed and, relatedly, deposits because of ongoing QT,” Moody’s said in the report.
“Interest rates are likely to remain higher for longer until inflation returns to within the Fed’s target range and, as noted earlier, longer-term U.S. interest rates also are moving higher because of multiple factors, which will put further pressure on banks’ fixed-rate assets.”
Regional banks are at a greater risk since they have comparatively low regulatory capital, Moody’s noted, adding that institutions with a higher share of fixed-rate assets on the balance sheet are more constrained in terms of profitability and ability to grow capital and continue lending.
“Risks may be more pronounced if the U.S. enters a recession – which we expect will happen in early 2024 – because asset quality will worsen and increase the potential for capital erosion,” the analysts added.
Though the stress on U.S. banks has mostly been concentrated in funding and interest rate risk resulting from monetary policy tightening, Moody’s warned that a worsening in asset quality is on the horizon.
“We continue to expect a mild recession in early 2024, and given the funding strains on the U.S. banking sector, there will likely be a tightening of credit conditions and rising loan losses for U.S. banks,” the agency said.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Signs explaining Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and other banking policies on the counter of a bank in Westminster, Colorado November 3, 2009.
Rick Wilking | Reuters
If there wasn’t enough banking jargon to blind you, it’s time to learn a new piece of it: Welcome to the industry’s era of the “criticized loan.”
It’s a loan that’s not gone bust, or even missed a payment. But in a time when Wall Street is vibrating to any sign of recession risk, especially from banks, it’s gaining new currency. Criticized loans are those that show preliminary signs of higher risk, such as a developer who’s making payments but is otherwise having financial trouble, or an office building that recently lost a big tenant and needs to replace it.
And they’re rising, which sets off the kind of bells that have sent bank stocks down roughly 20% since early March, even as earnings from the sector are coming in healthier than expected. Wall Street is watching stats on commercial real estate loans almost as closely as for signs that depositors are fleeing for higher interest rates paid by money-market funds (the No. 1 question on recent earnings calls).
Banks are being asked more about criticized loans partly because other credit quality metrics look so good, despite the failures of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank last month, according to David George, a banking analyst with Robert W. Baird & Co. Watching these loans is a way to gain at least limited insight into a real estate downturn many analysts expect to get worse before it gets better, as a combination of recession fears and the slow return of workers to post-Covid offices drives expectations of rising office vacancy rates.
“It’s more subjective, but there are regulators at every bank,” he said. “Criticized loans could be paying or performing but a loan could be singled out because of its collateral.”
Not all banks disclose criticized loan growth in earnings reports, and the definition of a criticized asset is more fluid than classifications of whether a loan has missed payments or is otherwise “non-performing,” meaning it has missed payments or violated some other term of the loan deal. A bank’s quarter-end list of criticized assets is developed by a bank itself, under the supervision of bank examiners, according to David Fanger, senior vice president at the bond-rating agency Moody’s Investor Service.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.’s guidelines for such loans say they should be singled out if “well-defined weaknesses are present which jeopardize the orderly liquidation of the debt, [including] a project’s lack of marketability, inadequate cash flow or … the project’s failure to fulfill economic expectations. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.”
So far, reports for the first quarter show only slight growth in criticized loans, even as they move into the spotlight at regional banks and national-level commercial banks like Bank of America and Wells Fargo.
At Bank of America, criticized loans to office building projects rose to $3.7 billion out of $19 billion in office loans. But office buildings represent only a quarter of the bank’s commercial real estate loans, and all CRE is just 7% of the bank’s total loans and leases. So even that ominous-sounding number — 20% of office loans look at least potentially shaky — works out to less than 1% of the bank’s total loans and leases. Bank of America set aside $900 million for potential loan losses in all categories, a truer indication of short-term vulnerability.
“They’re over-reserved,” George said. “It’s almost impossible for us to see office [losses] more than 4 or 5 percent of office loans. They already have reserves for that.”
Wells Fargo, the nation’s biggest commercial real estate lender, according to American Banker, did not disclose its level of criticized loans in its earnings report. A spokeswoman said in an e-mail that the number will be in the bank’s quarterly Securities and Exchange Commission filing. Wells Fargo previously said its criticized loan levels in commercial real estate fell during 2022, but ticked upward in the fourth quarter to $12.4 billion out of $155.8 billion in loans.
Among the most detailed disclosures are those from Huntington Bancshares, a Columbus, Ohio-based regional with $169 billion in assets. Its criticized loans, which include all commercial lending and not just real estate, rose 5% to $3.89 billion. That included upgrades of $323 million in loans to a higher risk rating, and paydowns of $483 million, offset by $893 million in loans newly placed in the “criticized” category. Criticized loans are only 3.5% of Huntington’s total loans and 13 times more than the total of commercial loans that are 30 days past due.
Of Huntington’s $16 billion-plus in commercial real estate loans, none are 90 days past due and only 0.25% of balances are 30 days past due or more. But the 30-days-late category is up from close to zero in late 2022. How big a problem is this? If all of the 30-days-late loans went unpaid and had to be written off, Huntington’s quarterly earnings of $602 million would have dropped by about 7%, or $41 million. The total of all criticized loans compares to 2022 net income of $2.13 billion.
“Our credit quality remains top-tier,” Huntington CEO Stephen Steinour told analysts on its recent earnings call. “Huntington is built to thrive during times like this.”
The story is similar among regional banks generally. PNC, the second-largest regional bank, said criticized real estate loans are now 20% of office loans, because multi-tenant buildings it has lent to are about 25% empty, and 60% of the loans are up for refinancing or repayment by the end of 2024. But only 0.2% of office loans are actually delinquent. “In the near term, this (multi-tenant office) is our primary concern area,” CFO Robert Reilly told analysts. PNC has loan loss reserves of 9.4% of total multi-tenant office loans.
At Cincinnati-based Fifth Third Bancorp, 8.2% of office loans are now criticized, but that represents about 0.1% of the bank’s total loans. Cleveland-based Keycorp said its criticized loans were about 2.8% of its total, up from 2.5% late last year, but that only 0.2% of loans aren’t being paid on time.
“Credit quality remains strong,” Keycorp CEO Christopher Gorman said after its earnings, adding that the company has reduced risk for a decade, including by eliminating most construction loans to office building developers. “We have limited exposure to high-risk areas, such as office, lodging and retail,” he told analysts on the quarterly earnings call.
There is an estimated $1.5 trillion in the commercial real estate refinancing pipeline over the next three years, but Moody’s research shows the portfolios to be well diversified across bank types, and according to a recent analysis from CNBC Pro using Deutsche Bank data, the concentration of CRE risk is smallest at the largest banks, where office loans make up less than 5% of total loans, and are less than 2% on average.
For investors, the key is to look at all the metrics together to manage their own risk, Fanger said. Many, even most, criticized loans will never go bad, he said, since they can be restructured or refinanced, or the office building collateral can be sold to repay some loans. But the newly prominent metric, which he said has been around for years, is the place to look for one version of what could happen down the road.
“There’s a qualitative aspect to any rating,” Fanger said. “We find it a useful measure for the likely direction of risk.”
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
During a period of high interest rates, it might be more difficult to impress investors with dividend stocks. But the stocks can have an important advantage over the long term. The dividend payouts can increase over the years, helping to push share prices higher over time.
When considering stocks for dividend income, yield shouldn’t be the only thing you consider. If a stock’s price has tumbled because investors are worried about the company’s business prospects, the dividend yield might be very high. A double-digit yield might mean investors expect to see a cut to the dividend soon.
There are many ways to look at companies’ expected ability to maintain or raise their dividend payouts. But one can also take a simple approach to begin researching stock choices.
At the moment, you can get a bank CD with a yield of close to 5% pretty easily. Here’s a look at current yields for CDs and U.S. Treasury securities and an approach for laddering them not only to protect your cash but to hedge against interest-rate risk.
For investors who would rather aim for long-term growth to go along with dividend income, or take a relatively conservative approach to growth while reinvesting dividends, a screen of stocks in the S&P 500
SPX,
produces only 10 stocks with dividend yields of 4.5% or higher with majority “buy” or equivalent ratings among analysts polled by FactSet. Here they are, sorted by dividend yield:
| Company | Ticker | Dividend Yield | Expected payout increase through 2025 | Share “buy” ratings | April 16 price | Consensus price target | implied 12-month upside potential |
| Comerica Inc. |
CMA, |
6.56% | 10% | 58% | $43.30 | $60.53 | 40% |
| Citizens Financial Group Inc. |
CFG, |
5.77% | 12% | 74% | $29.10 | $39.29 | 35% |
| Healthpeak Properties Inc. |
PEAK, |
5.71% | 9% | 60% | $21.01 | $27.69 | 32% |
| Hasbro Inc. |
HAS, |
5.34% | 8% | 69% | $52.40 | $69.27 | 32% |
| Philip Morris International Inc. |
PM, |
5.11% | 11% | 67% | $99.48 | $113.56 | 14% |
| Realty Income Corp. |
O, |
5.04% | 7% | 56% | $60.77 | $70.00 | 15% |
| Fifth Third Bancorp |
FITB, |
4.99% | 3% | 72% | $26.44 | $34.55 | 31% |
| VICI Properties Inc. |
VICI, |
4.82% | 12% | 95% | $32.35 | $37.73 | 17% |
| Organon & Co. |
OGN, |
4.71% | 5% | 55% | $23.80 | $31.89 | 34% |
| Iron Mountain Inc. |
IRM, |
4.69% | 15% | 78% | $52.76 | $56.00 | 6% |
| Source: FactSet | |||||||
Click on the ticker for more about each company.
Click here for Tomi Kilgore’s detailed guide to the wealth of information available for free on the MarketWatch quote page.
The dividend yields for this group of 10 companies are based on current annual regular payout rates, with all paying quarterly except for Realty Income Corp.
O,
which pays monthly.
These two oil and natural gas producers would have passed the above screen based on their most recent dividend payments and analysts’ sentiment, however, they pay a combined fixed-plus-variable dividend every quarter, with the fixed portion relatively low:
[ad_2]