ReportWire

Tag: fda

  • Beware of Dove, Tresemmé ! Unilever recalls products, says contaminated by cancer-causing chemical

    Beware of Dove, Tresemmé ! Unilever recalls products, says contaminated by cancer-causing chemical

    [ad_1]

    Unilever has said that dry shampoo brands including Dove are contaminated with a cancerous chemical called benzene, a Bloomberg report stated. The list of brands recalled by the consumer goods company also included names like Nexxus, Suave, Tresemmé and Rockaholic and Bed Head dry shampoo maker Tigi, an official notice posted on the Food and Drug Administration’s website Friday read. According to media reports, the recall pertains to products made before October 2021.  

    The problem with aerosols has largely appeared to be from the propellants that are used to spray the products from the cans. As per Unilever, this was the case with its dry shampoo recall. The company has not released the amount of benzene content that was found in the products, and has said that it recalled them out of caution.

    According to the report, this isn’t the first time that dry shampoos have been pointed out as a problem. P&G had recalled its Pantene and Herbal Essences dry shampoos in December last year, citing benzene contamination.

    Valisure Chief Executive Officer David Light said that it unfortunately makes sense that other consumer-product categories, like aerosol dry shampoos, could be heavily affected by benzene contamination. The officer added that they are actively investigating this area.

    The Food and Drug Administration has said that daily exposure to benzene in the recalled products is expected to cause adverse health consequences. “Exposure to benzene can result in leukemia and other blood cancers”, Bloomberg quoted the agency.

    Also read: Hindustan Unilever shares jump 2% ahead of Q2 results. Here’s what analysts say

    Also read: Why Hindustan Unilever’s Q2 earnings failed to excite the market today  

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Weird Facts

    Weird Facts

    [ad_1]

    A donut shop in Portland, Oregon, was told by the FDA to stop adding medicines to food because it included Nyquil and Pepto Bismol in its donuts.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • A Simple Rule for Planning Your Fall Booster Shot

    A Simple Rule for Planning Your Fall Booster Shot

    [ad_1]

    In less than two weeks, you could walk out of a pharmacy with a next-generation COVID booster in your arm. Just a few days ago, the Biden administration indicated that the first updated COVID-19 vaccines would be available shortly after Labor Day to Americans 12 and older who have already had their primary series. Unlike the shots the U.S. has now, the new doses from Pfizer and Moderna will be bivalent, which means they’ll contain genetic material based both on the ancestral strain of the coronavirus and on two newer Omicron subvariants that are circulating in the U.S.

    These shots’ new formulation promises some level of protection that simply hasn’t been possible with the original vaccines. “A bivalent vaccine will have some benefit for almost everybody who gets it,” Rishi Goel, an immunologist at the University of Pennsylvania, told me. “How much benefit that is, we’re still not exactly sure.” People who aren’t at high risk could end up only marginally more protected against severe outcomes, and no one thinks the shots will banish COVID infections for good. There is, however, a simple rule of thumb that nearly everyone can follow to maximize the uncertain gains from a shot: Wait three to six months from your last COVID infection or vaccination.

    Put that rule into action, and it plays out a little differently, depending on your circumstances.

    If you haven’t had an Omicron infection:

    If you haven’t had COVID since about November 2021, the advantage of a bivalent booster over the original formula is obvious, and as long as you haven’t gotten boosted recently, there’s every reason to get the new one right away. (If you have been boosted in the past few months, your antibody levels are probably still too high for a new shot to do much for you.) Marion Pepper, an immunologist at the University of Washington, told me that Americans who have already gotten three or more doses “have probably maxed out the protective capacity” of the original shots. By contrast, the bivalent vaccines offer something new to those who have so far escaped Omicron: a lesson on the spike proteins of the BA.4 and BA.5 subvariants, which will help the immune system fight the real thing should it get into your body. “I’m just super excited to get the bivalent vaccine,” says Jenna Guthmiller, an immunologist at the University of Colorado who has not yet had COVID. “I think it’ll be really nice and ease my mind a little bit.”

    If you have had an Omicron infection:

    Veterans of Omicron infections might still have something to gain from seeing the BA.4 and BA.5 spike proteins—especially if your goal is to avoid getting sick with COVID at all. Past a certain number of shots, boosters’ impact on your long-term protection against severe disease is unclear, Goel told me. Paul Offit, the director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, told me he doesn’t plan on getting a booster at all this fall because, after three vaccine doses and an infection, “I think I’m protected against serious illness.” But if you want to stave off infection, Goel said, “the bivalent vaccines, or really any variant-containing vaccines, have real value.” That’s because formulas based on a given variant have been shown to temporarily increase your stock of antibodies that target that variant.

    How long that extra-protective state lasts, or whether it’s sufficient to prevent any infection whatsoever, is still a scientific puzzle. The original boosters were shown to increase antibody levels to a peak about two weeks after the shot, then decay steadily over the following three months. We don’t know yet whether a bivalent formula will change that timeline, Goel said.

    But you can still use it to estimate approximately when your protection will be at its highest. You might, for example, choose to err on the early side of that three-to-six-month timeline if you have a particularly high-risk event coming up in the next few weeks. “If all we had was the original booster and I was going to an indoor wedding or something, I think it would be reasonable to get that booster,” Pepper said.

    If you had an Omicron infection this summer:

    “You’re still riding the wave of antibodies that you generated as a result of that infection,” Guthmiller told me, so a shot won’t do much for you yet. That’s true regardless of which Omicron subvariant you might have been infected with, she said, because BA.2 infections have been shown to protect fairly well against today’s dominant strains, BA.4 and BA.5. (BA.2 became dominant in the United States back in March.) The severity of your illness doesn’t really matter either, Goel said. A higher fever and more intense cough might indicate that your immune system got extra revved up, he said, but they could just as easily mean that your body needs more help responding to the coronavirus. In either case, once a little more time has passed, getting the bivalent vaccine could help extend your body’s memory of its last COVID encounter, and keep infection at bay.

    If you’re at high risk:

    Certain groups of people should get any booster as soon as it’s available to them, the experts I spoke with emphasized to me: immunocompromised people, people over the age of 50 or so, and people with medical conditions that put them at high risk of severe disease. If you fall in one of these categories and haven’t received all the boosters you’re eligible for, “I wouldn’t wait for the bivalent,” Offit said. For people in these high-risk categories who have already gotten the recommended number of boosters, you should get the new one as soon as it’s available to you. (The FDA and CDC have not yet indicated whether they will recommend a waiting period between your most recent shot and the bivalent booster.) Goel recommended waiting at least a month after your most recent infection or shot, but if you’re very worried about your risk, you don’t need to stretch the delay to three months. Your body might still have extra antibodies floating around, but with no practical way to check at scale, “I’m honestly in favor of recommending boosting as a way to maximize individual benefit,” he said.

    If you want to wait and see:

    Waiting is always an option if you want to know more about how the bivalent vaccines perform. The FDA and CDC are set to green-light the shots based on human data from the existing boosters and other experimental bivalent boosters that didn’t make it to market in the U.S.—plus trials on the new formula in mice. Pfizer and Moderna simply haven’t progressed very far in their human trials. While there’s no reason to suspect that the new shots won’t be safe, Offit recommended opting for the original boosters until more safety and efficacy data are available, which could be as soon as a couple of months after the rollout—as long as the vaccine makers or the government collects that information and makes it public. But Guthmiller and Goel said they weren’t concerned about the lack of human data, and the bivalent shot is almost certainly the better bet.

    There is one significant reason to avoid waiting too long for the bivalent shot: It offers the greatest protection against infection from the subvariants it’s actually designed around. BA.4 and BA.5 might be with us through the fall and winter—or they might give way to a different branch of Omicron, or even a variant that’s entirely unlike Omicron. You’d certainly be better off against this new variant with a bivalent booster than no booster at all. But if you want to maximize your anti-infection shield while you have it, consider putting it up against the enemy you know.

    [ad_2]

    Rachel Gutman-Wei

    Source link

  • CME Activity Targets Opioid Epidemic Through Adaptive Learning

    CME Activity Targets Opioid Epidemic Through Adaptive Learning

    [ad_1]

    Press Release



    updated: Sep 23, 2019

    On each day in 2017, 91 deaths were attributed to opioid overdose; in fact, the number of overdose deaths involving opioids has increased six-fold since 1999. The numbers are clear: clinicians are failing to alleviate the nation’s growing opioid crisis. Through an adaptive-learning continuing medical education (CME) program, a collaboration of several organizations (Rockpointe, University of North Texas, CogBooks, and O’Donnell Learn) and available through the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) CE Certification Directory, is offering a new approach to help clinicians turn the tide against an epidemic that has had catastrophic consequences.

    To help address the opioid crisis, the FDA developed a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) for the use of outpatient opioid analgesics and, in 2012, issued an educational blueprint to provide guidance on prescribing opioid analgesics for pain management. In September 2018, the FDA updated the blueprint to include additional information on pain management, such as components of an effective treatment plan, non-pharmacologic treatments for pain, pharmacologic treatments for pain (non-opioid and opioid analgesics), and a primer on addiction medicine. It also widened the scope of the blueprint to apply not only to prescribers, but to all healthcare providers involved in the management of patients with pain.

    Rockpointe’s new adaptive-learning CME activity, “Opioid Analgesics: Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) and the New FDA Blueprint,” presents participating clinicians with a thorough review of the FDA’s updated educational blueprint to facilitate the evidence-based management of pain in their patients on a daily basis. The education provides tools to help clinicians mitigate issues associated with opioid therapies, such as misuse and addiction. The program aims to educate 10,000 clinicians using adaptive-learning technologies, with the results to be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

    Physicians across many specialties manage acute and chronic pain in their patients on a daily basis. With 58 opioid prescriptions written for every 100 people in the United States in 2017, it is imperative that clinicians integrate non-pharmacologic and non-opioid analgesics into pain treatment plans in an evidence-based manner, appropriately identify patients who are candidates for opioid therapy, and recognize how to effectively monitor these patients during treatment periods. This activity is intended for those involved in direct patient care, including clinicians registered with the DEA who are eligible to prescribe all opioid analgesics. In addition, because of the broader scope of the revised FDA educational blueprint, the intended audience may include members of the healthcare team who are not authorized to prescribe.

    After completing the activity, participants should be able to:

    ·         Define the components of an effective treatment plan, such as treatment goals, patient engagement, and collaboration within the healthcare team;

    ·         Assess the risks and benefits of non-pharmacologic therapies prior to initiating long-term pharmacologic therapy;

    ·         Identify patients who are candidates for treatment with non-opioid pharmacologic analgesics;

    ·         Evaluate criteria for initiating opioid analgesics; and

    ·         Identify risk factors for addiction to opioid analgesics.

    Adaptive Learning

    The program’s adaptive-learning instructional design allows for a tailored educational experience that addresses the unique needs of each learner. The activity incorporates text, interactive questions, and audio recordings of faculty experts synced with a slide presentation. Depending on each participant’s response to the questions in the activity, an algorithm creates a unique educational pathway. Those with a good grasp of a concept move closer to completion, while others with less knowledge are provided additional content/questions to assist in gaining an adequate understanding of a topic. Post-activity content-based questions are used to assess learning, along with measures of clinicians’ perceptions of the content and their confidence in managing patients with pain.

    This CME program is available online at www.CElink.Rockpointe.com. Clinicians will be able to claim CME credit upon successful completion of the program.

    This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the accreditation requirements and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint providership of the University of North Texas Health Science Center (UNTHSC) and Rockpointe. UNTHSC is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians. UNTHSC designates this enduring material for a maximum of 3.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™.

    Through the American Board of Medical Specialties (“ABMS”) ongoing commitment to increase access to practice relevant Continuing Certification Activities through the ABMS Continuing Certification Directory, “Opioid Analgesics: Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) and the New FDA Blueprint” has met the requirements as a MOC Part II Self-Assessment or MOC Part II CME Activity (apply toward general CME requirement) for the following ABMS Member Boards:

    MOC Part II Self-Assessment Activity
    Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

    MOC Part II CME Activity
    Allergy and Immunology
    Anesthesiology
    Family Medicine
    Internal Medicine
    Medical Genetics and Genomics
    Nuclear Medicine
    Pediatrics
    Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
    Preventive Medicine
    Psychiatry and Neurology
    Radiology
    Thoracic Surgery
    Urology

    This CME webcourse is available through Aug. 30, 2020, and the on-demand format allows participants to view the presentation at their own convenience from the comfort of their home or office.

    This activity is supported by an independent educational grant from the Opioid Analgesic REMS Program Companies. For a list of REMS Program Companies, see: https://ce.opioidanalgesicrems.com/RpcCEUI/
    rems/pdf/resources/List_of_RPC_Companies.pdf.

    Through effective continuing medical education, Rockpointe strives to improve and advance the quality of patient care. Its educational programs have been at the forefront of new issues in healthcare, including implementing MIPS, combating the nation’s opioid crisis, and utilizing technical advances that improve care. As part of its commitment to quality, Rockpointe works to inform the continuing-education community of significant quality-improvement issues through news and analysis on Policy and Medicine. In addition, its popular Medical Education Exchange (MEDX) CME regional meetings include sessions on the basics of quality improvement and alternative payment models, as well as relevant and scientifically accurate sessions on numerous disease states. All sessions include links back to associated National Quality Priorities to reinforce the bigger picture and the triple aim of: 1) improving health and 2) lowering cost to 3) better the patient experience. At Rockpointe, education equals quality.

    Source: Rockpointe Corp

    [ad_2]

    Source link